Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Supplementary data
Assessment of Indoor Volatile Organic Compounds in Head Start Child Care Facilities
Danh C. Vu1, Thi L. Ho2, Phuc H. Vo1, Mohamed Bayati3, Alexandra N. Davis4, Zehra Gulseven5, Gustavo Carlo5, Francisco Palermo5, Jane A. McElroy6, Susan C. Nagel7, Chung-Ho Lin1
1Center for Agroforestry, School of Natural Resources, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA2Center of Core Facilities, Cuu Long Delta Rice Research Institute, Vietnam3Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA4Department of Individual, Family, and Community Education, University of New Mexico, NM, USA5Center for Children and Families Across Cultures, Department of Human Development and Family Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA6Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA7Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, School of Medicine, University of Missouri, USA
Correspondence
Chung-Ho Lin
Email: [email protected]
Table S1. Building and classroom characteristics
Table S2. List of VOCs monitored in this study
Table S3. Evaluation of non-cancer and cancer risks via the inhalation pathway
Table S4. Spearman rank correlation coefficients for aromatic hydrocarbons
Table S5. Spearman rank correlation coefficients for aldehydes and ketones
Table S6. Eigenvalues
Table S7. Factor loadings of variables after Varimax rotation
S8. Description on indoor sources of VOCs
Figure S1. Locations of the four studied Head Start facilities (School A, School B, School C, and
School D)
Figure S2. Comparison of VOC concentrations among the four Head Start facilities
Table S1. Building and classroom characteristics
Characteristics School A School B School C School D
Locations urban urban urban urbanBuilding age (years) 56 18 23 96Building type commercial
buildingcommercial building
commercial building
church building
Building material brick/concrete brick/concrete brick brickRenovation/repainting work (within the last 2 years)
yes* annual yes no
Area (sq. ft) 10,000Building ventilation(electric/gas)
electric electric electric unknown
Heating system gas electric electric unknownWater damage yes no yes yesPaint peeling no no no yesMold no no no noKitchen/eating room yes (basement) yes yes yesProximity to highway/traffic signal/gas station
four-block across the street
one-block four-block
Nearby dry-cleaners no across the street
no no
Proximity to grove/woods
onsite two-block 200 ft onsite
Classrooms 13 8 4 14Classroom area(sq. ft.)
1000
Number of children(per classroom)
20 8 - 12 15 20
Floor material tile teraflex carpet and tile tileUse of pesticides yes once a month yes noUse of air fresheners no no no noFrequency of cleaning daily daily daily dailyUse of scented/unscented candles
yes no no daily
Use of bleach/cleaner yes yes yes daily sanitation
Use of board/markers yes yes yes yesUse of electronic devices (TV, PC, camera)
yes yes yes yes
*: minor maintenance (repainting work) outside the building during the sampling time.
Table S2. List of VOCs monitored in this study
No. Compounds Chemical classification Retention time (min)
Monitored primary* and secondary ions
LOD, g/m3
LOQ, g/m3
1 Benzene Aromatic hydrocarbon 3.11 78, 77 0.003 0.010
2 Trichloroethylene Chlorinated hydrocarbon 3.45 130, 132 0.015 0.050
3 Methyl methacrylate Ester 3.56 69, 100 0.026 0.086
4 Bromodichloromethane Chlorinated hydrocarbon 3.63 83, 85 0.020 0.065
5 4-Methyl-2-pentanone Ketone 3.88 58, 57 0.031 0.101
6 1,4-Dioxane Ether 3.88 88, 58 0.035 0.116
7 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Chlorinated hydrocarbon 3.97 75, 77 0.027 0.089
8 2-Hexanone Ketone 4.00 58, 57 0.030 0.098
9 Toluene Aromatic hydrocarbon 4.23 91, 92 0.001 0.003
10 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Chlorinated hydrocarbon 4.27 75, 77 0.021 0.069
11 1,2-Dichloroethene Chlorinated hydrocarbon 4.40 61, 96 0.002 0.007
12 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Chlorinated hydrocarbon 4.40 97, 99 0.018 0.061
13 Octane Aliphatic hydrocarbon 4.64 57, 85 0.036 0.120
14 Hexanal Aldehyde 4.76 56, 57 0.011 0.035
15 Tetrachloroethylene Chlorinated hydrocarbon 4.78 166, 164 0.002 0.005
16 Dibromochloromethane Chlorinated hydrocarbon 4.85 127, 129 0.007 0.022
17 1,2-Dibromoethane Brominated hydrocarbon 4.94 107, 109 0.006 0.020
18 Butyl acetate Ester 4.95 56, 73 0.008 0.026
19 Chlorobenzene Chlorinated hydrocarbon 5.45 112, 77 0.002 0.006
20 Ethylbenzene Aromatic hydrocarbon 5.65 91, 106 0.001 0.004
21 m-Xylene Aromatic hydrocarbon 5.80 91, 1060.001 0.004
22 p-Xylene Aromatic hydrocarbon 5.80 91, 106
23 n-Butyl ether Ether 5.95 57, 87 0.003 0.008
24 Styrene Aromatic hydrocarbon 6.12 104, 103 0.001 0.004
25 o-Xylene Aromatic hydrocarbon 6.12 91, 106 0.002 0.006
26 Bromoform Brominated hydrocarbon 6.15 173, 171 0.001 0.004
27 n-Nonane Aliphatic hydrocarbon 6.17 57, 85 0.002 0.006
28 Heptanal Aldehyde 6.26 55, 70 0.008 0.026
29 2-Butoxyethanol Glycol ether 6.33 57, 87 0.059 0.196
30 Cumene Aromatic hydrocarbon 6.56 105, 120 0.001 0.004
31 2,2-Methoxyethoxy ethanol Glycol ether 6.75 59, 58 0.123 0.406
32 -Pinene Cyclic terpene 6.74 93, 92 0.011 0.037
33 n-Propylbenzene Aromatic hydrocarbon 6.98 91, 120 0.001 0.003
34 3-Ethyltoluene Aromatic hydrocarbon 7.08 105, 120 0.001 0.002
35 4-Ethyltoluene Aromatic hydrocarbon 7.12 105, 120 0.001 0.002
36 Benzaldehyde Aldehyde 7.14 77, 105 0.001 0.005
37 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene Aromatic hydrocarbon 7.19 105, 120 0.001 0.003
38 2-Ethyltoluene Aromatic hydrocarbon 7.31 105, 120 0.001 0.003
39 α-Methylstyrene Aromatic hydrocarbon 7.35 118, 117 0.002 0.006
40 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene Aromatic hydrocarbon 7.52 105, 120 0.001 0.003
41 Decane Aliphatic hydrocarbon 7.54 57, 71 0.002 0.006
42 2,2-Ethoxyethoxy ethanol Glycol ether 7.61 59, 72 0.035 0.116
43 Octanal Aldehyde 7.62 57, 84 0.007 0.023
44 1,3-Dichlorobenzene Chlorinated hydrocarbon 7.69 146, 148 0.001 0.003
45 3-Carene Cyclic terpene 7.73 93, 91 0.002 0.008
46 Benzyl chloride Chlorinated hydrocarbon 7.81 91, 126 0.001 0.002
47 1,4-Dichlorobenzene Chlorinated hydrocarbon 7.81 146, 148 0.002 0.008
48 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene Aromatic hydrocarbon 7.86 105, 120 0.001 0.004
49 2-Ethylhexanol-1 Alcohol 7.94 57, 70 0.045 0.149
50 D-Limonene Cyclic terpene 7.96 68, 93 0.002 0.006
51 1,2-Dichlorobenzene Chlorinated hydrocarbon 8.04 146, 148 0.002 0.005
52 m-Diethylbenzene Aromatic hydrocarbon 8.17 119, 1050.003 0.009
53 o-Diethylbenzene Aromatic hydrocarbon 8.17 119, 105
54 p-Diethylbenzene Aromatic hydrocarbon 8.28 119, 105 0.002 0.008
55 n-Butylbenzene Aromatic hydrocarbon 8.28 91, 92 0.001 0.004
56 g-Terpinene Cyclic terpene 8.30 93, 91 0.002 0.005
57 Acetophenone Ketone 8.45 105, 77 0.003 0.010
58 Heptanoic acid Carboxylic acid 8.48 60, 73 0.104 0.343
59 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane Chlorinated hydrocarbon 8.72 157, 155 0.002 0.005
60 Undecane Aliphatic hydrocarbon 8.74 57, 71 0.001 0.002
61 Nonanal Aldehyde 8.82 57, 56 0.002 0.008
62 Decamethylcyclopentasiloxane Organosilicon 9.03 73, 267 0.001 0.002
63 Dodecane Aldehyde 9.82 57, 71 0.002 0.006
64 Naphthalene Aromatic hydrocarbon 9.82 128 0.002 0.005
65 Decanal Aldehyde 9.91 57, 55 0.003 0.009
66 Hexachlorobutadiene Chlorinated hydrocarbon 10.02 225, 190 0.001 0.002
67 Benzothiazole Heterocylic hydrocarbon 10.26 135, 108 0.007 0.022
68 Tridecane Aliphatic hydrocarbon 10.81 57, 71 0.001 0.004
69 Tetradecane Aliphatic hydrocarbon 11.74 57, 71 0.001 0.003
70 Pentadecane Aliphatic hydrocarbon 12.61 57, 71 0.001 0.003
71 Hexadecane Aliphatic hydrocarbon 13.43 57, 71 0.001 0.005
72 2-Ethylhexyl salicylate Ester 15.06 120, 138 0.001 0.003
73 Homosalate Ester 15.68 138, 109 0.001 0.003
Table S3. Evaluation of non-cancer and cancer risks via the inhalation pathway
The Exposure Concentration (EC) (g/m3) for non-cancer and cancer risks was calculated using
the following equation:
EC=CA× ET× EF×EDAT
in which, CA is the VOC concentration in indoor air (g/m3), ET is exposure time (hours/day),
EF is exposure frequency (days/year), ED is exposure duration (years), and AT is averaging time
(period over which the exposure is averaged, hours).
For the evaluation of non-cancer risk, Hazard Quotient (HQ) for the inhalation pathway was
calculated as follows:
HQ= ECToxicity Value×1000
in which HQ is dimensionless, and Toxicity Value (mg/m3) for chronic exposure is the inhalation
Reference Concentration (RfC) that is available in the EPA's online IRIS system (EPA, 2009).
An HQ higher than 1 represents a possible adverse non-cancer effect, and an HQ less than or
equal to 1 indicates that adverse non-cancer effects are not likely to occur.
The cancer risk for children exposed via the inhalation pathway was estimated using the linear low-dose represented by the following relationship:
Cancer risk=IUR×EC
in which IUR is Inhalation Unit Risk (probability of cancer for a 70-year exposure to 1 μg/m3)
(μg/m3)-1. IUR values were obtained from the IRIS system. A value higher than 1 × 10-6 indicates
a possible carcinogenic effect, and a value less than or equal to 1 × 10-6 represents no
carcinogenic effects are expected as a result of exposure. It is suggested that exposures to
carcinogenic VOCs in early-life may result in higher lifetime cancer risks than comparable
exposure durations later in life. Therefore, 10-fold and 3-fold adjustments were made for
exposures with respect to two age groups: < 2 years of age, and 2 to 6 years of age, respectively
(EPA, 2009).
Table S3A. Exposure parameter values
Parameters Unit School A School B School C School DET Exposure time hrs/day 8 8 8 8EF Exposure frequency days/year 232 235 235 239
EDExposure duration(Age 3 – 5) years 3 3 3 3
AT (non-cancer) Average time days 26280 26280 26280 26280AT (cancer) 25550 25550 25550 25550
Table S3B. Toxicity values
Compounds RfC, mg/m3IUR 10-6, (g/m3)-
1 References
1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene 0.06 EPA
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.06 EPA
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.06 EPA
Benzene 0.03 29 EPA, OEHHA
Cumene 0.4 EPA
Ethylbenzene 1 2.5 EPA, OEHHA
Xylenes 0.1 EPA
Naphthalene 0.003 34 EPA, OEHHA
Styrene 1 EPA
Toluene 5 EPA
2-Butoxyethanol 1.6 EPA
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.8 11 EPA, OEHHATetrachloroethylene (PERC) 0.04 6.1 EPA, OEHHA
Trichloroethylene (TCE) 0.002 2 EPA, OEHHA
References
EPA. 2009. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS): Part F. 2009.
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-09/documents/partf_200901_final.pdf
Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) Assessments. 2018.
https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/search/index.cfm. Assessed July 4th 2018
The Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA). Toxicity criteria on
chemicals evaluated by OEHHA. 2018. https://oehha.ca.gov/chemicals. Assessed July 4th 2018
Table S4. Spearman rank correlation coefficients for aromatic hydrocarbons
Variables 123T 124T 135T MeS BenzCumen
e DETB ETB ETT MPX NAP PRB OXY STY TOL123T 1 0.96 0.93 0.27 -0.15 0.23 0.94 0.43 0.86 0.83 0.41 0.61 0.81 0.14 0.42124T 1 0.92 0.16 -0.22 0.19 0.89 0.38 0.90 0.80 0.38 0.58 0.77 0.09 0.32135T 1 0.23 -0.07 0.32 0.85 0.46 0.87 0.78 0.43 0.68 0.74 0.26 0.37MES 1 -0.04 0.21 0.22 0.16 0.06 0.29 0.29 0.21 0.29 0.27 0.42
BENZ 1 0.23 -0.02 0.09 -0.27 -0.24 0.19 0.11 -0.25 0.22 -0.03CUME 1 0.36 0.92 0.36 0.30 0.28 0.84 0.33 0.95 0.27DETB 1 0.56 0.84 0.80 0.45 0.68 0.81 0.24 0.41ETB 1 0.53 0.53 0.39 0.87 0.56 0.84 0.34ETT 1 0.75 0.41 0.71 0.72 0.29 0.31MPX 1 0.35 0.59 0.98 0.23 0.61NAP 1 0.50 0.37 0.35 0.22PRB 1 0.57 0.79 0.30OXY 1 0.25 0.60STY 1 0.24TOL 1
Abbreviations: 123T = 1,2,3-trimethylbenzene; 124T = 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene; 135T = 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene; MeS = -methylstyrene; Benz = benzene; DETB = diethylbenzenes; EtB = ethylbenzene; EtT = ethyltoluenes; MPX = m/p-xylenes; NAP = naphthalene; PrB = propylbenzene; OXY = o-xylene; STY = styrene; TOL = toluene.
Values in bold are different from 0 with a significance level p < 0.005
Table S5. Spearman rank correlation coefficients for aldehydes and ketones
Variables Acetophenone Benzaldehyde Decanal Heptanal Nonanal OctanalAcetophenone 1 -0.02 -0.36 0.07 -0.09 -0.38Benzaldehyde 1 0.28 -0.18 0.11 0.16Decanal 1 0.38 0.67 0.73Heptanal 1 0.42 0.46Nonanal 1 0.60Octanal 1
Values in bold are different from 0 with a significance level p < 0.05
Table S6. Eigenvalues
F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8 F9Eigenvalue 8.103 6.097 3.565 3.496 2.971 2.228 1.537 1.276 1.188
Variability (%)21.90
1 16.479 9.635 9.449 8.029 6.022 4.155 3.449 3.211
Cumulative %21.90
1 38.380 48.015 57.464 65.492 71.515 75.670 79.119 82.330
Table S7. Factor loadings of variables after Varimax rotation
F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8 F9
1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene 0.9781,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.9781,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.952Benzene 0.790Cumene 0.938Diethylbenzenes 0.942Ethylbenzene 0.918Ethyltoluenes 0.841m/p-Xylenes 0.670Naphthalene 0.744o-Xylene 0.705Styrene 0.935Toluene 0.819Decane 0.872Docecane 0.919Hexadecane 0.728Nonane 0.862OctaneTetradecaneTridecane 0.842Undecane 0.590Pinene 0.898Limonene 0.7022-Butoxyethanol2-Ethylhexanol-1 0.80222EE 0.82522MEE 0.916Benzaldehyde 0.779Decanal 0.724Nonanal 0.505Octanal 0.8292-Ethylhexylsalicylate 0.809Butyl acetate 0.763Homosalate 0.7351,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.511PERC 0.830Trichloroethylene 0.518
% of data variance 17.3 8.9 11.0 8.6 10.9 6.0 7.6 4.5 7.4Cumulative (%) 17.3 26.2 37.2 45.8 56.7 62.7 70.4 74.9 82.3
Abbreviations: 22EE = 2-(2-Ethoxyethoxy)ethanol, 22MEE = 2-(2-Methoxyethoxy)ethanol
S8. Description on indoor sources of VOCs
- Factor 1 consisting of aromatic hydrocarbons (trimethylbenzenes, diethylbenzenes,
ethyltoluenes, and xylenes) likely represents vehicle-associated emissions and solvents emissions
(inks, paints, coatings).
- Factor 2 contains PERC (tetrarchloroethylene), TCE (trichloroethylene), nonane, and
decane which are indicative of emissions from dry-cleaning process.
- Factor 3 accounts for high loadings of cumene, ethylbenzene, styrene, and 2-
ethylhexanol-1, reflecting emissions from decorative materials, computers, and printers. Factor 4
is contributed mainly by 2-ethylhexylsalicylate, homosalate, toluene, and undecane. While the
former two compounds indicate use of sunscreen, toluene and undecane are likely linked to oil-
based paints and adhesives.
- Factor 5 is characterized mainly by 22EE, 22MEE, benzaldehyde, naphthalene, and
hexadecane which point out the presence of consumer cleaning products such as floor cleaners,
floor sealants, floor polish, paints, and paint removers. High factor loadings of -pinene, D-
limonene, and butyl acetate in Factor 6 reflect uses of fragrance products as well as scented
cleaning products.
- Factor 7 includes octanal, nonanal, and decanal which can be released from building
materials such as cabinetry materials (plywood subfloor and paneling), carpet, and paints.
Emissions of these aldehydes are also associated with uses of perfumes and odorants. Besides,
the VOCs in these two factors were reportedly related to air fresheners (Chin et al., 2014; Mishra
et al., 2015; Hoang et al., 2016). However, no use of air fresheners was documented at the
investigated Head Start facilities during the sampling period of time, therefore it is likely that
their emissions were not attributed to air fresheners.
- Benzene which was present in Factor 8 is indicative of vehicle-associated emissions.
- Factor 9 (dodecane, tridecane, and 1,4-dichlorobenzene) could reflect oils, lubricants,
degreasers, and paint removers. 1,4-dichlorobenzene is also used in mothballs.
References
EPA. 2009. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS): Part F.
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-09/documents/partf_200901_final.pdf.
Chin, J.Y., Godwin, C., Parker, E., Robins, T., Lewis, T., Harbin, P. and Batterman, S., 2014.
Levels and sources of volatile organic compounds in homes of children with asthma. Indoor Air
24(4), 403-415.
Mishra, N., Bartsch, J., Ayoko, G.A., Salthammer, T. and Morawska, L., 2015. Volatile organic
compounds: characteristics, distribution and sources in urban schools. Atmos. Environ. 106, 485-
491.
Hoang, T., Castorina, R., Gaspar, F., Maddalena, R., Jenkins, P.L., Zhang, Q., McKone, T.E.,
Benfenati, E., Shi, A.Y. and Bradman, A., 2016. VOC exposures in California early childhood
education environments. Indoor Air 27(3), 609-621.
Figure S1. Locations of the four studied Head Start facilities (School A, School B, School C, and
School D)
Figure S2. Comparison of VOC concentrations among the four Head Start facilities