Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
AROC Impairment Specific Report Inpatient – Pathway 3
STROKE
Australasian Faculty
of Rehabilitation
Medicine
Anywhere Hospital
July 2016 – June 2017
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017Page 2
Table of contents
Stroke dashboard……………………………………………………………………………………………………………3
Introduction to impairment specific reports………………………………………………………………………..5
Stroke impairment codes……………………………………………………………………………………………..7
Stroke AN-SNAP classes……………………………………………………………………………………………….8
The BIG picture………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………9
Review of FIM item scoring by AN-SNAP class……………………………………………………………………..20
Outcomes analysis…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………31
Explanatory data…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….51
Appendix 1: Glossary……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..102
Appendix 2: AROC impairment codes……………………………………………………………………………………110
Appendix 3: AN-SNAP classes…………………………………………………………………………………………………112
Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….113
AROC contact details……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..114
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017Page 3
Stroke Dashboard (FY 2017)
Functional
Gain
Change in Accommodation
Your Facility:
Rehabilitation Outcomes by Facility Performance Against Benchmark
Length of
Stay
All Stroke episodes
(Total)
Facility Beds
(All wards)
Number of Episodes by Impairment
Performance against last year
Outlier facilities Red
are not show n on graph Status Trend
Your Facility Lower Functional Outcome
Higher Functional Outcome
Shorter
Length of Stay
Long
erLe
ngth
of S
tay
1.11(n=10)
1.12(n=11)
1.13(n=4)
1.14(n=2)
1.19(n=3)
1.21(n=26)
1.22(n=24)
1.23(n=4)
1.24(n=5)
1.29(n=2)
Same accommodation (88.6%)
Different accommodation (7.6%)
Unknown (3.8%)
YOUR FACILITY
AUSTRALIA
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017Page 4
* Mean value provided unless otherw ise specif ied *This includes all impairments from all w ards
Completed Episodes by Facility
AROC Suggested
Minimum Days between clinically
rehab ready & start date:
Days between clinically
rehab ready & start date:
(Mean)
AUSTRALIA
% with at least one
complication:
% with at least one
complication:
% episodes with start
delays:
% episodes with start
delays:
Days between onset
and rehab episode:
Days between onset
and rehab episode:
Average Age: Average Age:
Mortality Rate: Mortality Rate:
% with at least one
comorbidity:
% with at least one
comorbidity: Your Facility Your Facility
Key Indicators* Facility FIM Training*
YOUR FACILITY AUSTRALIAFIM Credentialed Staff
per 100 Episodes
FIM Credentialed
Facility Trainers
Stroke Dashboard (FY 2017)C
ompl
eted
epi
sode
s
Completion rate over timeAUSTRALIA
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017Page 5
Introducing the Impairment Specific Reports
This report compares YOUR FACILITY's data to YOUR NATIONAL data. Each impairment specific report is
structured as a series of chapters. Each report will present an overall big picture chapter on the impairment,
followed by a chapter looking at FIM item scoring at YOUR FACILITY as compared to YOUR NATIONAL
data by AN-SNAP class. An outcomes analysis chapter follows with an explanatory data chapter at the end.
Some facilities only have a small number of episodes. While YOUR NATIONAL data includes all facilities with
data on this impairment, facilities will only receive this report where they have a minimum of 20 completed
episodes within this impairment. An ANYWHERE HOSPITAL report is available for those facilities with too
few episodes on the AROC website.
AROC welcomes your feedback on this report.
NOTE: This report should be considered in conjunction with the All Impairments Report & Outcome
Benchmarks Report for your facility.
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017Page 6
Data used in this report
*Refer to Appendix 1 for more details about the process of data concatenation
All tables and graphs present financial year 2017 data unless otherwise indicated, and the
number of episodes from YOUR FACILITY in 2017 are provided. Where there are less than five
episodes within a subgroup, summary data are not provided.
Case-mix analysis uses version 4 AN-SNAP classes (Appendix 3), introduced July 2016.
Casemix adjustment is against YOUR NATIONAL data.
NOTE: Appendix 1 (Glossary) contains definitions of concepts referred to in this report. An
understanding of these will help with interpretation of the data.
This report summarises stroke episodes ending in financial year 2017 (1 July 2016 to 30 June
2017) collected in the V4 data set - Pathway 3 (inpatient direct care). Unit of counting is by
concatenated* episode, not by patient
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017Page 7
Stroke impairment codes Stroke episodes were identified as those with the following AROC impairment codes:
1.11 — Haemorrhagic — Left body involvement
1.12 — Haemorrhagic — Right body involvement
1.13 — Haemorrhagic — Bilateral involvement
1.14 — Haemorrhagic — No paresis
1.19 — Haemorrhagic — Other stroke
1.21 — Ischaemic — Left body involvement (right brain)
1.22 — Ischaemic — Right body involvement (left brain)
1.23 — Ischaemic — Bilateral involvement
1.24 — Ischaemic — No paresis
1.29 — Ischaemic — Other stroke
NOTE: A list of all impairment codes can be found in Appendix 2
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017Page 8
Stroke AN-SNAP classes
Levels of functioning for stroke are categorised by the following version 4 AN-SNAP classes:
4AA1 Stroke, weighted FIM motor 51-91, FIM cognition 29-35
4AA2 Stroke, weighted FIM motor 51-91, FIM cognition 19-28
4AA3 Stroke, weighted FIM motor 51-91, FIM cognition 5-18
4AA4 Stroke, weighted FIM motor 36-50, Age ≥ 68
4AA5 Stroke, weighted FIM motor 36-50, Age ≤ 67
4AA6 Stroke, weighted FIM motor 19-35, Age ≥ 68
4AA7 Stroke, weighted FIM motor 19-35, Age ≤ 67
4AZ3 Weighted FIM motor score 13-18, All other impairments, Age ≥ 65
4AZ4 Weighted FIM motor score 13-18, All other impairments, Age ≤ 64
NOTE: A list of all AN SNAP classes can be found in Appendix 3
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
The BIG picture
Page 9
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017Page 10
Volume of episodes by facilities
treating stroke
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Nu
mb
er o
f ep
iso
des
AUSTRALIA
NOTE: 245 facilities reported at least one stroke episode, with 142 facilities reporting between 20 and 305 episodes in this reporting period
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Proportion of episodes by
impairment and AN-SNAP class
Page 11
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
1.1 Haemorrhagic (n=30)
1.2 Ischaemic (n=61)
1.1 Haemorrhagic (n=3,081)
1.2 Ischaemic (n=6,332)
Proportion of episodes
4AA1 4AA2 4AA3 4AA4 4AA5 4AA6 4AA7 4AZ3 4AZ4
AU
ST
RA
LIA
YO
UR
FA
CIL
ITY
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Episodes by impairment and
AN-SNAP class
Page 12
AN-SNAP class V4
4AA1 (motor 51-91, cognition 29-35) 9 (30.0%) 13 (21.3%) 22 (24.2%)
4AA2 (motor 51-91, cognition 19-28) 4 (13.3%) 12 (19.7%) 16 (17.6%)
4AA3 (motor 51-91, cognition 5-18) 0 (0.0%) 4 (6.6%) 4 (4.4%)
4AA4 (motor 36-50, Age ≥ 68) 2 (6.7%) 8 (13.1%) 10 (11.0%)
4AA5 (motor 36-50, Age ≤ 67) 2 (6.7%) 0 (0.0%) 2 (2.2%)
4AA6 (motor 19-35, Age ≥ 68) 3 (10.0%) 12 (19.7%) 15 (16.5%)
4AA7 (motor 19-35, Age ≤ 67) 4 (13.3%) 3 (4.9%) 7 (7.7%)
4AZ3 (motor 13-18, Age ≥ 65) 5 (16.7%) 8 (13.1%) 13 (14.3%)
4AZ4 (motor 13-18, Age ≤ 64) 1 (3.3%) 1 (1.6%) 2 (2.2%)
All Stroke AN-SNAP Classes** 30 (100.0%) 61 (100.0%) 91 (100.0%)
AN-SNAP class V4
4AA1 (motor 51-91, cognition 29-35) 720 (23.3%) 1,600 (25.2%) 2,320 (24.6%)
4AA2 (motor 51-91, cognition 19-28) 567 (18.4%) 1,274 (20.1%) 1,841 (19.5%)
4AA3 (motor 51-91, cognition 5-18) 186 (6.0%) 378 (6.0%) 564 (6.0%)
4AA4 (motor 36-50, Age ≥ 68) 364 (11.8%) 799 (12.6%) 1,163 (12.3%)
4AA5 (motor 36-50, Age ≤ 67) 140 (4.5%) 247 (3.9%) 387 (4.1%)
4AA6 (motor 19-35, Age ≥ 68) 444 (14.4%) 900 (14.2%) 1,344 (14.2%)
4AA7 (motor 19-35, Age ≤ 67) 184 (6.0%) 335 (5.3%) 519 (5.5%)
4AZ3 (motor 13-18, Age ≥ 65) 352 (11.4%) 649 (10.2%) 1,001 (10.6%)
4AZ4 (motor 13-18, Age ≤ 64) 124 (4.0%) 150 (2.4%) 274 (2.9%)
All Stroke AN-SNAP Classes** 3,086 (100.0%) 6,349 (100.0%) 9,435 (100.0%)
**There were 0 episodes in YOUR FACILITY and 22 episodes in AUSTRALIA with AN-SNAP class 499A
1.1 Haemorrhagic
YOUR FACILITY — N (%)
1.2 Ischaemic All Stroke
AUSTRALIA — N (%)
1.1 Haemorrhagic
1.2 Ischaemic All Stroke
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Proportion of episodes by AN-SNAP class
Page 13
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
4AA1 (n=27) 4AA2 (n=19) 4AA3 (n=4) 4AA4 (n=13) 4AA5 (n=3) 4AA6 (n=16) 4AA7 (n=8) 4AZ3 (n=14) 4AZ4 (n=4)
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f ep
iso
des
AN-SNAP Class
YOUR FACILITY AUSTRALIA
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Proportion of episodes by impairment
Page 14
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1.1 Haemorrhagic (n=39) 1.2 Ischaemic (n=69)
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f ep
iso
des
Impairment
YOUR FACILITY AUSTRALIA
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Proportion of episodes by
AN-SNAP class over time
Page 15
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2013(n=101)
2014(n=115)
2015(n=103)
2016(n=104)
2017(n=108)
2013(n=7,583)
2014(n=8,481)
2015(n=8,845)
2016(n=9,162)
2017(n=9,435)
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f ep
iso
des
YOUR FACILITY AUSTRALIA
4AA1 (n=27)
4AA2 (n=19)
4AA3 (n=4)
4AA4 (n=13)
4AA5 (n=3)
4AA6 (n=16)
4AA7 (n=8)
4AZ3 (n=14)
4AZ4 (n=4)
499A (n=0)
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Episodes by AN-SNAP class over time
Page 16
AN-SNAP class V4 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
4AA1 (motor 51-91, cognition 29-35) 31 22 25 28 27 2,193 2,299 2,419 2,416 2,320
4AA2 (motor 51-91, cognition 19-28) 22 23 17 21 19 1,409 1,661 1,553 1,801 1,841
4AA3 (motor 51-91, cognition 5-18) 5 6 7 3 4 422 520 560 509 564
4AA4 (motor 36-50, Age ≥ 68) 8 16 10 10 13 895 1,032 1,066 1,149 1,163
4AA5 (motor 36-50, Age ≤ 67) 3 7 5 4 3 345 362 364 344 387
4AA6 (motor 19-35, Age ≥ 68) 11 18 14 18 16 1,032 1,145 1,208 1,299 1,344
4AA7 (motor 19-35, Age ≤ 67) 8 4 5 7 8 454 474 513 482 519
4AZ3 (motor 13-18, Age ≥ 65) 7 11 16 9 14 622 762 926 910 1,001
4AZ4 (motor 13-18, Age ≤ 64) 3 7 4 3 4 149 200 205 229 274
499A (Data error - ungroupable) 3 1 0 1 0 62 26 31 23 22
All Stroke AN-SNAP Classes 101 115 103 104 108 7,583 8,481 8,845 9,162 9,435
AN-SNAP class V4 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
4AA1 (motor 51-91, cognition 29-35) 30.7% 19.1% 24.3% 26.9% 25.0% 28.9% 27.1% 27.3% 26.4% 24.6%
4AA2 (motor 51-91, cognition 19-28) 21.8% 20.0% 16.5% 20.2% 17.6% 18.6% 19.6% 17.6% 19.7% 19.5%
4AA3 (motor 51-91, cognition 5-18) 5.0% 5.2% 6.8% 2.9% 3.7% 5.6% 6.1% 6.3% 5.6% 6.0%
4AA4 (motor 36-50, Age ≥ 68) 7.9% 13.9% 9.7% 9.6% 12.0% 11.8% 12.2% 12.1% 12.5% 12.3%
4AA5 (motor 36-50, Age ≤ 67) 3.0% 6.1% 4.9% 3.8% 2.8% 4.5% 4.3% 4.1% 3.8% 4.1%
4AA6 (motor 19-35, Age ≥ 68) 10.9% 15.7% 13.6% 17.3% 14.8% 13.6% 13.5% 13.7% 14.2% 14.2%
4AA7 (motor 19-35, Age ≤ 67) 7.9% 3.5% 4.9% 6.7% 7.4% 6.0% 5.6% 5.8% 5.3% 5.5%
4AZ3 (motor 13-18, Age ≥ 65) 6.9% 9.6% 15.5% 8.7% 13.0% 8.2% 9.0% 10.5% 9.9% 10.6%
4AZ4 (motor 13-18, Age ≤ 64) 3.0% 6.1% 3.9% 2.9% 3.7% 2.0% 2.4% 2.3% 2.5% 2.9%
499A (Data error - ungroupable) 3.0% 0.9% 0.0% 1.0% 0.0% 0.8% 0.3% 0.4% 0.3% 0.2%
All Stroke AN-SNAP Classes 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
YOUR FACILITY — N AUSTRALIA — N
YOUR FACILITY — % AUSTRALIA — %
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Proportion of episodes by
impairment over time
Page 17
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2013(n=101)
2014(n=115)
2015(n=103)
2016(n=104)
2017(n=108)
2013(n=7,583)
2014(n=8,481)
2015(n=8,845)
2016(n=9,162)
2017(n=9,435)
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f ep
iso
des
YOUR FACILITY AUSTRALIA
1.1 Haemorrhagic(n=39)
1.2 Ischaemic(n=69)
Ungroupable* (n=0)
*Ungroupable are the episodes captured using V3 data, which had no distinction for Haemorrhagic/Ischaemic
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Episodes by impairment over time
Page 18
Impairment 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
1.1 Haemorrhagic 28 39 44 33 39 2,042 3,529 3,185 3,091 3,086
1.2 Ischaemic 36 72 59 71 69 2,625 4,882 5,660 6,071 6,349
Ungroupable* 37 4 0 0 0 2,916 70 0 0 0
All Stroke 101 115 103 104 108 7,583 8,481 8,845 9,162 9,435
Impairment 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
1.1 Haemorrhagic 27.7% 33.9% 42.7% 31.7% 36.1% 26.9% 41.6% 36.0% 33.7% 32.7%
1.2 Ischaemic 35.6% 62.6% 57.3% 68.3% 63.9% 34.6% 57.6% 64.0% 66.3% 67.3%
Ungroupable* 36.6% 3.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 38.5% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Stroke 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
YOUR FACILITY — N AUSTRALIA — N
YOUR FACILITY — % AUSTRALIA — %
*Ungroupable are the episodes captured using V3 data, which had no distinction for Haemorrhagic/Ischaemic
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Summary of your incomplete episodes
Page 19
Total reporting episodes 108 9,435
Incomplete episodes 19 1,541
% incomplete 17.6% 16.3%
Reason for incomplete:
Discharged home with end FIM=18 0 (0.0%) 30 (1.9%)
Discharged home with no end FIM 0 (0.0%) 22 (1.4%)
Discharged to another hospital 5 (26.3%) 690 (44.8%)
Discharged back to acute 8 (42.1%) 560 (36.3%)
Discharged at own risk 0 (0.0%) 70 (4.5%)
Change of care type (LOS<1 week) 1 (5.3%) 20 (1.3%)
Died 2 (10.5%) 36 (2.3%)
Other/Unknown Discharge 3 (15.8%) 113 (7.3%)
Impairment Group:
1.1 Haemorrhagic 6 (31.6%) 33 (37.1%)
1.2 Ischaemic 13 (68.4%) 56 (62.9%)
AN-SNAP Class:
4AA1 (motor 51-91, cognition 29-35) 1 (5.3%) 26 (29.2%)
4AA2 (motor 51-91, cognition 19-28) 0 (0.0%) 19 (21.3%)
4AA3 (motor 51-91, cognition 5-18) 0 (0.0%) 4 (4.5%)
4AA4 (motor 36-50, Age ≥ 68) 2 (10.5%) 11 (12.4%)
4AA5 (motor 36-50, Age ≤ 67) 0 (0.0%) 3 (3.4%)
4AA6 (motor 19-35, Age ≥ 68) 5 (26.3%) 11 (12.4%)
4AA7 (motor 19-35, Age ≤ 67) 2 (10.5%) 6 (6.7%)
4AZ3 (motor 13-18, Age ≥ 65) 7 (36.8%) 7 (7.9%)
4AZ4 (motor 13-18, Age ≤ 64) 2 (10.5%) 2 (2.2%)
YOUR FACILITY AUSTRALIA
YOUR FACILITY
Incomplete Episodes Complete episodes
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Review of FIM item scoring by AN-SNAP class
Page 20
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017Page 21
Interpreting your comparative FIM scoring charts
The FIM splat provides a graphic presentation of functional status in a radar chart. The 18 FIM items are arranged in order as 'spokes' of a wheel and the scoring levels
from 1 (total dependence) to 7 (total independence) run from the centre outwards. The mean FIM item score for each item is indicated — a perfect score would be
demonstrated as a large circle. The two FIM splats compare FIM scoring on admission (Figure A) and discharge (Figure B) between YOUR FACILITY and NATIONAL
data — differences in the two shaded areas indicate differences in mean admission/discharge scoring. Graphs include completed episodes with valid FIM scoring.
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Comparative FIM item scoring
AN-SNAP class 4AA1
Page 22
1
2
3
4
5
6
7Eating
Grooming
Bathing
Dress upper
Dress lower
Toileting
Bladder
Bowel
Bed transfer
Toilet transfer
Bath transfer
Walking
Stairs
Comprehension
Expression
Social interaction
Problem solving
Memory
YOUR FACILITY (n=21)
AUSTRALIA (n=2,162)
Admission FIM scores
1
2
3
4
5
6
7Eating
Grooming
Bathing
Dress upper
Dress lower
Toileting
Bladder
Bowel
Bed transfer
Toilet transfer
Bath transfer
Walking
Stairs
Comprehension
Expression
Social interaction
Problem solving
Memory
YOUR FACILITY (n=21)
AUSTRALIA (n=2,162)
Discharge FIM scores
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017Page 23
Comparative FIM item scoring
AN-SNAP class 4AA2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7Eating
Grooming
Bathing
Dress upper
Dress lower
Toileting
Bladder
Bowel
Bed transfer
Toilet transfer
Bath transfer
Walking
Stairs
Comprehension
Expression
Social interaction
Problem solving
Memory
YOUR FACILITY (n=16)
AUSTRALIA (n=1,659)
Admission FIM scores
1
2
3
4
5
6
7Eating
Grooming
Bathing
Dress upper
Dress lower
Toileting
Bladder
Bowel
Bed transfer
Toilet transfer
Bath transfer
Walking
Stairs
Comprehension
Expression
Social interaction
Problem solving
Memory
YOUR FACILITY (n=16)
AUSTRALIA (n=1,659)
Discharge FIM scores
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017Page 24
Comparative FIM item scoring
AN-SNAP class 4AA3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7Eating
Grooming
Bathing
Dress upper
Dress lower
Toileting
Bladder
Bowel
Bed transfer
Toilet transfer
Bath transfer
Walking
Stairs
Comprehension
Expression
Social interaction
Problem solving
Memory
YOUR FACILITY (n<5)
AUSTRALIA (n=473)
Admission FIM scores
1
2
3
4
5
6
7Eating
Grooming
Bathing
Dress upper
Dress lower
Toileting
Bladder
Bowel
Bed transfer
Toilet transfer
Bath transfer
Walking
Stairs
Comprehension
Expression
Social interaction
Problem solving
Memory
YOUR FACILITY (n<5)
AUSTRALIA (n=473)
Discharge FIM scores
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017Page 25
Comparative FIM item scoring
AN-SNAP class 4AA4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7Eating
Grooming
Bathing
Dress upper
Dress lower
Toileting
Bladder
Bowel
Bed transfer
Toilet transfer
Bath transfer
Walking
Stairs
Comprehension
Expression
Social interaction
Problem solving
Memory
YOUR FACILITY (n=9)
AUSTRALIA (n=990)
Admission FIM scores
1
2
3
4
5
6
7Eating
Grooming
Bathing
Dress upper
Dress lower
Toileting
Bladder
Bowel
Bed transfer
Toilet transfer
Bath transfer
Walking
Stairs
Comprehension
Expression
Social interaction
Problem solving
Memory
YOUR FACILITY (n=9)
AUSTRALIA (n=990)
Discharge FIM scores
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017Page 26
Comparative FIM item scoring
AN-SNAP class 4AA5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7Eating
Grooming
Bathing
Dress upper
Dress lower
Toileting
Bladder
Bowel
Bed transfer
Toilet transfer
Bath transfer
Walking
Stairs
Comprehension
Expression
Social interaction
Problem solving
Memory
YOUR FACILITY (n<5)
AUSTRALIA (n=340)
Admission FIM scores
1
2
3
4
5
6
7Eating
Grooming
Bathing
Dress upper
Dress lower
Toileting
Bladder
Bowel
Bed transfer
Toilet transfer
Bath transfer
Walking
Stairs
Comprehension
Expression
Social interaction
Problem solving
Memory
YOUR FACILITY (n<5)
AUSTRALIA (n=340)
Discharge FIM scores
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017Page 27
Comparative FIM item scoring
AN-SNAP class 4AA6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7Eating
Grooming
Bathing
Dress upper
Dress lower
Toileting
Bladder
Bowel
Bed transfer
Toilet transfer
Bath transfer
Walking
Stairs
Comprehension
Expression
Social interaction
Problem solving
Memory
YOUR FACILITY (n=10)
AUSTRALIA (n=1,055)
Admission FIM scores
1
2
3
4
5
6
7Eating
Grooming
Bathing
Dress upper
Dress lower
Toileting
Bladder
Bowel
Bed transfer
Toilet transfer
Bath transfer
Walking
Stairs
Comprehension
Expression
Social interaction
Problem solving
Memory
YOUR FACILITY (n=10)
AUSTRALIA (n=1,055)
Discharge FIM scores
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017Page 28
Comparative FIM item scoring
AN-SNAP class 4AA7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7Eating
Grooming
Bathing
Dress upper
Dress lower
Toileting
Bladder
Bowel
Bed transfer
Toilet transfer
Bath transfer
Walking
Stairs
Comprehension
Expression
Social interaction
Problem solving
Memory
YOUR FACILITY (n=5)
AUSTRALIA (n=402)
Admission FIM scores
1
2
3
4
5
6
7Eating
Grooming
Bathing
Dress upper
Dress lower
Toileting
Bladder
Bowel
Bed transfer
Toilet transfer
Bath transfer
Walking
Stairs
Comprehension
Expression
Social interaction
Problem solving
Memory
YOUR FACILITY (n=5)
AUSTRALIA (n=402)
Discharge FIM scores
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017Page 29
Comparative FIM item scoring
AN-SNAP class 4AZ3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7Eating
Grooming
Bathing
Dress upper
Dress lower
Toileting
Bladder
Bowel
Bed transfer
Toilet transfer
Bath transfer
Walking
Stairs
Comprehension
Expression
Social interaction
Problem solving
Memory
YOUR FACILITY (n=7)
AUSTRALIA (n=639)
Admission FIM scores
1
2
3
4
5
6
7Eating
Grooming
Bathing
Dress upper
Dress lower
Toileting
Bladder
Bowel
Bed transfer
Toilet transfer
Bath transfer
Walking
Stairs
Comprehension
Expression
Social interaction
Problem solving
Memory
YOUR FACILITY (n=7)
AUSTRALIA (n=639)
Discharge FIM scores
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017Page 30
Comparative FIM item scoring
AN-SNAP class 4AZ4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7Eating
Grooming
Bathing
Dress upper
Dress lower
Toileting
Bladder
Bowel
Bed transfer
Toilet transfer
Bath transfer
Walking
Stairs
Comprehension
Expression
Social interaction
Problem solving
Memory
YOUR FACILITY (n<5)
AUSTRALIA (n=158)
Admission FIM scores
1
2
3
4
5
6
7Eating
Grooming
Bathing
Dress upper
Dress lower
Toileting
Bladder
Bowel
Bed transfer
Toilet transfer
Bath transfer
Walking
Stairs
Comprehension
Expression
Social interaction
Problem solving
Memory
YOUR FACILITY (n<5)
AUSTRALIA (n=158)
Discharge FIM scores
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Outcomes Analysis
Page 31
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Completed episodes by AN-SNAP class
and Impairment
Page 32
AN-SNAP class V4
4AA1 (motor 51-91, cognition 29-35) 27 21 77.8% 2,320 2,162 93.2%
4AA2 (motor 51-91, cognition 19-28) 19 16 84.2% 1,841 1,659 90.1%
4AA3 (motor 51-91, cognition 5-18) 4 4 100.0% 564 474 84.0%
4AA4 (motor 36-50, Age ≥ 68) 13 9 69.2% 1,163 991 85.2%
4AA5 (motor 36-50, Age ≤ 67) 3 2 66.7% 387 342 88.4%
4AA6 (motor 19-35, Age ≥ 68) 16 10 62.5% 1,344 1,055 78.5%
4AA7 (motor 19-35, Age ≤ 67) 8 5 62.5% 519 402 77.5%
4AZ3 (motor 13-18, Age ≥ 65) 14 7 50.0% 1,001 645 64.4%
4AZ4 (motor 13-18, Age ≤ 64) 4 1 25.0% 274 158 57.7%
All Stroke AN-SNAP Classes 108 75 69.4% 9,413 7,888 83.8%
Impairment
1.1 Haemorrhagic 39 25 64.1% 3,086 2,531 82.0%
1.2 Ischaemic 69 50 72.5% 6,349 5,363 84.5%
All Stroke 108 75 69.4% 9,435 7,894 83.7%
NOTE: All outcomes analysis are based on completed episodes. A definition of completed episodes can be found in Appendix 1 (Glossary).
All episodesCompleted
episodes% Complete All episodes
Completed
episodes% Complete
AUSTRALIAYOUR FACILITY
AUSTRALIA
All episodesCompleted
episodes% CompleteAll episodes
YOUR FACILITY
Completed
episodes% Complete
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Casemix-adjusted relative means
Page 33
AUSTRALIA
Outcome measures Casemix adjustment relative mean 95% CI IQR
Length of stay -0.5 -3.6 to 2.7 -8.8 to 6.8
FIM change -0.7 -4.6 to 4.2 -9.9 to 9.6
Note: Includes only completed episodes with valid FIM scores and LOS
YOUR FACILITY
-6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
Casemix-adjusted relative means with 95% confidence intervals
FIM change
Length of stay
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Casemix-adjusted relative means over time
Page 34
NOTE: Includes only completed episodes with valid FIM scores and LOS; where n<5 the casemix-adjusted relative mean will not be shown
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Cas
emix
ad
just
ed r
elat
ive
mea
n
Casemix adjusted relative mean length of stay Casemix adjusted relative mean FIM change
YOUR FACILITYNOTE: Casemix adjusted values are based on FY 2017
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Outcome measures – difference from National
Page 35 NOTE: Includes only completed episodes with valid FIM scores and LOS
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Age (years) (73.2)
Length of stay (days) (28.0)
FIM admission score (74.8)
FIM discharge score (97.9)
FIM change (adm to disch) (23.2)
FIM efficiency (per week) (5.8)
Disch private residence (%) (75.7)
Lower than AUSTRALIA Higher than AUSTRALIA
How YOUR FACILITY is different to AUSTRALIA
AUSTRALIA
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Outcome measures – difference from last year
Page 36 NOTE: Includes only completed episodes with valid FIM scores and LOS
-4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Age (years) (71.4)
Length of stay (days) (26.9)
FIM admission score (74.2)
FIM discharge score (96.8)
FIM change (adm to disch) (22.6)
FIM efficiency (per week) (5.9)
Disch private residence (%) (71.3)
Lower than 2016 Higher than 2016
How YOUR FACILITY has changed since 2016
2016
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Average LOS by AN-SNAP class over time
Page 37
NOTE: Includes only completed episodes with valid LOS; where n<5 ALOS will not be shown
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Ave
rag
e le
ng
th o
f sta
y (d
ays)
YOUR FACILITY AUSTRALIA
4AA1 4AA2 4AA3 4AA4 4AA5 4AA6 4AA7 4AZ3 4AZ4
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Average LOS by AN-SNAP class
Page 38 NOTE: Includes only completed episodes with valid LOS, where n<5 average LOS will not be shown
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
4AA1 (n=26) 4AA2 (n=19) 4AA3 (n<5) 4AA4 (n=11) 4AA5 (n<5) 4AA6 (n=11) 4AA7 (n=6) 4AZ3 (n=7) 4AZ4 (n<5) All stroke (n=75)
Ave
rag
e le
ng
th o
f sta
y (d
ays)
AN-SNAP Class
YOUR FACILITY AUSTRALIA
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Casemix-adjusted relative mean LOS
by AN-SNAP class
Page 39 NOTE: Includes only completed episodes with valid LOS; where n<5 CARMI LOS will not be shown
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
4AA1 (n=26) 4AA2 (n=19) 4AA3 (n<5) 4AA4 (n=11) 4AA5 (n<5) 4AA6 (n=11) 4AA7 (n=6) 4AZ3 (n=7) 4AZ4 (n<5) All stroke (n=75)
Cas
emix
ad
just
ed le
ng
th o
f sta
y (d
ays)
AN-SNAP Class
YOUR FACILITY
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Average LOS by impairment
Page 40 NOTE: Includes only completed episodes with valid LOS, where n<5 average LOS will not be shown
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
1.1 Haemorrhagic (n=33) 1.2 Ischaemic (n=56) All stroke (n=75)
Ave
rag
e le
ng
th o
f sta
y (d
ays)
Impairment
YOUR FACILITY AUSTRALIA
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Casemix-adjusted relative mean LOS
by impairment
Page 41 NOTE: Includes only completed episodes with valid LOS; where n<5 CARMI LOS will not be shown
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1.1 Haemorrhagic (n=33) 1.2 Ischaemic (n=56) All stroke (n=75)
Cas
emix
ad
just
ed le
ng
th o
f sta
y (d
ays
)
Impairment
YOUR FACILITY AUSTRALIA
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Average FIM change by
AN-SNAP class over time
Page 42
NOTE: Includes only completed episodes with valid FIM scores; where n<5 average FIM change will not be shown
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Ave
rag
e F
IM c
han
ge
(po
ints
)
YOUR FACILITY AUSTRALIA
4AA1 4AA2 4AA3 4AA4 4AA5 4AA6 4AA7 4AZ3 4AZ4
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Average FIM change by AN-SNAP class
Page 43
NOTE: Includes only completed episodes with valid FIM scores, where n<5 average FIM change will not be shown
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
4AA1 (n=26) 4AA2 (n=19) 4AA3 (n<5) 4AA4 (n=11) 4AA5 (n<5) 4AA6 (n=11) 4AA7 (n=6) 4AZ3 (n=7) 4AZ4 (n<5) All stroke (n=75)
Ave
rag
e F
IM c
han
ge
(po
ints
)
AN-SNAP Class
YOUR FACILITY AUSTRALIA
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Casemix-adjusted relative mean
FIM change by AN-SNAP class
Page 44 NOTE: Includes only completed episodes with valid FIM scores, where n<5 CARMI FIM change will not be shown
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
4AA1 (n=26) 4AA2 (n=19) 4AA3 (n<5) 4AA4 (n=11) 4AA5 (n<5) 4AA6 (n=11) 4AA7 (n=6) 4AZ3 (n=7) 4AZ4 (n<5) All stroke (n=75)
Cas
emix
ad
just
ed F
IM c
han
ge
(po
ints
)
AN-SNAP Class
YOUR FACILITY
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Average FIM change by impairment
Page 45
NOTE: Includes only completed episodes with valid FIM scores, where n<5 average FIM change will not be shown
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
1.1 Haemorrhagic (n=33) 1.2 Ischaemic (n=56) All stroke (n=75)
Ave
rag
e F
IM c
han
ge
(po
ints
)
Impairment
YOUR FACILITY AUSTRALIA
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Casemix-adjusted relative mean
FIM change by impairment
Page 46 NOTE: Includes only completed episodes with valid FIM scores, where n<5 CARMI FIM change will not be shown
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
1.1 Haemorrhagic (n=33) 1.2 Ischaemic (n=56) All stroke (n=75)
Cas
emix
ad
just
ed F
IM c
han
ge
(po
ints
)
Impairment
YOUR FACILITY AUSTRALIA
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Casemix-adjusted relative mean and average
length of stay and FIM change by AN-SNAP class
and impairment
Page 47
AN-SNAP class V4
4AA1 (motor 51-91, cognition 29-35) -0.7 (-4.0 — 2.6) -3.0 (-8.8 — 2.8) 14.2 (10.5 — 17.1) 12.2 (6.2 — 18.1) 14.8 (14.3 — 15.3) 15.4 (15.0 — 15.8)
4AA2 (motor 51-91, cognition 19-28) 0.3 (-5.0 — 5.6) -1.7 (-6.9 — 3.4) 18.4 (13.0 — 23.6) 17.4 (11.5 — 22.2) 18.2 (17.6 — 18.7) 18.9 (18.3 — 19.4)
4AA3 (motor 51-91, cognition 5-18) — — — — 23.5 (22.2 — 24.7) 21.4 (20.1 — 22.6)
4AA4 (motor 36-50, Age ≥ 68) -0.7 (-9.9 — 8.5) 10.3 (-0.2 — 20.9) 23.4 (17.3 — 35.6) 37.3 (27.2 — 48.3) 27.1 (26.0 — 28.2) 27.4 (26.5 — 28.4)
4AA5 (motor 36-50, Age ≤ 67) — — — — 36.2 (32.9 — 39.4) 35.7 (34.2 — 37.3)
4AA6 (motor 19-35, Age ≥ 68) 1.2 (-9.5 — 12.0) 0.0 (-15.1 — 15.1) 38.2 (26.0 — 49.0) 28.4 (13.3 — 43.5) 39.4 (38.1 — 40.8) 29.2 (28.0 — 30.5)
4AA7 (motor 19-35, Age ≤ 67) -11.7 (-34.2 — 10.7) -6.6 (-36.3 — 23.1) 51.8 (22.0 — 66.8) 31.3 (4.1 — 63.5) 56.2 (52.9 — 59.5) 40.4 (38.4 — 42.4)
4AZ3 (motor 13-18, Age ≥ 65) 8.1 (-6.5 — 22.8) 5.5 (-20.3 — 31.2) 43.7 (29.7 — 57.7) 27.9 (2.9 — 52.8) 48.2 (45.9 — 50.5) 23.6 (21.8 — 25.5)
4AZ4 (motor 13-18, Age ≤ 64) — — — — 82.3 (74.3 — 90.4) 40.8 (36.9 — 44.7)
All Stroke AN-SNAP Classes -0.5 (-3.6 — 2.7) -0.7 (-4.6 — 4.2) 25.4 (21.1 — 29.5) 21.9 (17.7 — 27.0) 28.0 (27.4 — 28.5) 23.2 (22.8 — 23.6)
AN-SNAP class V4
1.1 Haemorrhagic 3.7 (-2.8 — 10.2) 0.8 (-8.9 — 10.5) 28.2 (22.5 — 38.8) 24.1 (14.6 — 33.9) 29.9 (28.8 — 31.0) 23.6 (22.9 — 24.3)
1.2 Ischaemic -2.6 (-5.9 — 0.8) -0.7 (-5.3 — 3.8) 23.7 (18.0 — 27.3) 20.6 (16.2 — 26.5) 27.1 (26.5 — 27.7) 23.0 (22.5 — 23.4)
All Stroke -0.5 (-3.6 — 2.7) -0.7 (-4.6 — 4.2) 25.4 (21.1 — 29.5) 21.9 (17.7 — 27.0) 28.0 (27.4 — 28.5) 23.2 (22.8 — 23.6)
NOTE: Includes only completed episodes with valid FIM scores and LOS, where n<5 scores will not be shown
YOUR FACILITY AUSTRALIA
FIM changeLOSFIM changeLOSFIM changeLOS
CARMI (95%CI) Average (95%CI) Average (95%CI)
LOS FIM change LOS FIM change LOS FIM change
CARMI (95%CI) Average (95%CI) Average (95%CI)
AUSTRALIAYOUR FACILITY
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Casemix-adjusted relative mean LOS
by age group*
Page 48 * Approximately 20% national population per age group
NOTE: Includes only completed episodes with valid LOS and age, where n<5 CARMI LOS will not be shown
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
<60 (n=9) 60-69 (n=11) 70-79 (n=26) 80-84 (n=18) 85+ (n=11)
Cas
emix
ad
just
ed le
ng
th o
f sta
y (d
ays)
Age Group
YOUR FACILITY AUSTRALIA
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Casemix-adjusted relative mean
FIM change by age group*
Page 49 * Approximately 20% national population per age group
NOTE: Includes only completed episodes with valid FIM scores and age, where n<5 CARMI FIM change will not be shown
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
<60 (n=9) 60-69 (n=11) 70-79 (n=26) 80-84 (n=18) 85+ (n=11)
Cas
emix
ad
just
ed F
IM c
han
ge
(po
ints
)
Age Group
YOUR FACILITY AUSTRALIA
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Average and casemix-adjusted relative mean
length of stay and FIM change by age group*
Page 50
Age group
<60 21.3 (6.8 — 35.9) 25.9 (12.2 — 39.5) 34.0 (31.9 — 36.0) 26.2 (25.1 — 27.3)
60-69 30.2 (17.5 — 42.9) 15.6 (1.2 — 30.0) 29.5 (28.1 — 30.9) 25.1 (24.2 — 26.1)
70-79 26.2 (20.7 — 31.6) 25.7 (17.7 — 33.7) 27.2 (26.3 — 28.2) 23.7 (23.0 — 24.4)
80-84 29.8 (19.2 — 40.3) 26.9 (17.7 — 36.1) 26.2 (24.9 — 27.4) 21.8 (21.0 — 22.7)
85+ 14.3 (9.8 — 18.7) 10.7 (3.0 — 18.5) 24.9 (24.1 — 25.7) 19.7 (19.0 — 20.4)
Age group
<60 -1.4 (-9.3 — 6.5) 2.6 (-9.9 — 15.2) 3.3 (1.7 — 5.0) 0.7 (-0.1 — 1.6)
60-69 -5.4 (-15.5 — 4.7) -11.9 (-24.7 — 1.0) 1.0 (0.0 — 2.1) 0.9 (0.1 — 1.7)
70-79 3.6 (-0.9 — 8.1) 4.7 (-2.8 — 12.1) 2.2 (1.4 — 3.0) 2.0 (1.3 — 2.6)
80-84 2.8 (-4.3 — 9.9) 5.0 (-3.1 — 13.0) 1.0 (-0.1 — 2.1) -0.2 (-1.0 — 0.6)
85+ -9.8 (-15.3 — -4.2) -11.1 (-18.8 — -3.4) -0.6 (-1.3 — 0.0) -2.7 (-3.4 — -2.0)
NOTE: Includes only completed episodes with valid FIM scores and LOS and age, where n<5 scores will not be shown
*Approximately 20% national population per age group
CARMI LOS (95%CI) CARMI FIM change (95%CI)
FIM change (95%CI)LOS (95%CI) FIM change (95%CI)
AUSTRALIAYOUR FACILITY
CARMI LOS (95%CI) CARMI FIM change (95%CI)
YOUR FACILITY AUSTRALIA
LOS (95%CI)
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Explanatory data
Page 51
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017Page 52
Casemix-adjusted relative mean LOS and
FIM change by number of comorbidities
NOTE: Includes only completed episodes with valid FIM scores and LOS; where n<5 the casemix-adjusted relative mean will not be shown
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
None (n=40) One (n=17) Two (n=10) Three (n=6) Four or more (n<5)
Cas
emix
ad
just
ed r
elat
ive
mea
n
Number of comorbidities —YOUR FACILITY
Casemix adjusted relative mean length of stay Casemix adjusted relative mean FIM change
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017Page 53
Casemix-adjusted relative mean LOS and
FIM change by number of comorbidities
NOTE: Includes only completed episodes with valid FIM scores and LOS; where n<5 the casemix-adjusted relative mean will not be shown
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
None (n=3,361) One (n=1,774) Two (n=1,278) Three (n=785) Four or more (n=492)
Cas
emix
ad
just
ed r
elat
ive
mea
n
Number of comorbidities —AUSTRALIA
Casemix adjusted relative mean length of stay Casemix adjusted relative mean FIM change
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017Page 54
Casemix-adjusted relative mean LOS.
by type of comorbidity
NOTE: Includes only completed episodes with valid LOS * No data included where number of episodes <5
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1
(n=14)
(n=12)
(n=11)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
CARMI LOS —YOUR FACILITY
-6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5
Cardiac disease (n=1,863)
Other (n=1,453)
Stroke (n=1,041)
Diabetes mellitus (n=866)
Osteoarthritis (n=456)
Respiratory disease (n=442)
Mental health problem (n=375)
Cancer (n=320)
Visual impairment (n=264)
Dementia (n=258)
Chronic pain (n=177)
Renal failure NO dialysis (n=161)
Osteoporosis (n=156)
Drug and alcohol abuse (n=155)
Hearing impairment (n=138)
Morbid obesity (n=101)
Parkinsons disease (n=93)
Inflammatory arthritis (n=72)
Epilepsy (n=60)
Delirium, pre-existing (n=46)
Brain injury (n=43)
Renal failure with dialysis (n=38)
Spinal cord injury/disease (n=32)
Pressure ulcer, pre-existing (n=22)
Multiple sclerosis (n=10)
CARMI LOS — AUSTRALIA
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017Page 55
Casemix-adjusted relative mean
FIM change by type of comorbidity
NOTE: Includes only completed episodes with valid FIM scores
* No data included where number of episodes <5
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
(n=14)
(n=12)
(n=11)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
CARMI FIM change —YOUR FACILITY
-14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4
Cardiac disease (n=1,859)
Other (n=1,450)
Stroke (n=1,042)
Diabetes mellitus (n=865)
Osteoarthritis (n=456)
Respiratory disease (n=441)
Mental health problem (n=374)
Cancer (n=321)
Visual impairment (n=264)
Dementia (n=260)
Chronic pain (n=177)
Renal failure NO dialysis (n=161)
Drug and alcohol abuse (n=156)
Osteoporosis (n=156)
Hearing impairment (n=139)
Morbid obesity (n=101)
Parkinsons disease (n=93)
Inflammatory arthritis (n=72)
Epilepsy (n=60)
Delirium, pre-existing (n=46)
Brain injury (n=43)
Renal failure with dialysis (n=38)
Spinal cord injury/disease (n=32)
Pressure ulcer, pre-existing (n=22)
Multiple sclerosis (n=10)
CARMI FIM change —AUSTRALIA
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017Page 56
Casemix-adjusted relative mean LOS and
FIM change by number of complications
NOTE: Includes only completed episodes with valid FIM scores and LOS; where n<5 the casemix-adjusted relative mean will not be shown
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
None (n=62) One (n=10) Two (n<5) Three (n<5) Four or more (n<5)
Cas
emix
ad
just
ed r
elat
ive
mea
n
Number of complications —YOUR FACILITY
Casemix adjusted relative mean length of stay Casemix adjusted relative mean FIM change
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017Page 57
Casemix-adjusted relative mean LOS and
FIM change by number of complications
NOTE: Includes only completed episodes with valid FIM scores and LOS; where n<5 the casemix-adjusted relative mean will not be shown
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
None (n=5,841) One (n=1,209) Two (n=488) Three (n=208) Four or more (n=124)
Cas
emix
ad
just
ed r
elat
ive
mea
n
Number of complications —AUSTRALIA
Casemix adjusted relative mean length of stay Casemix adjusted relative mean FIM change
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017Page 58
Casemix-adjusted relative mean
length of stay by type of complication
NOTE: Includes only completed episodes with valid LOS * No data included where number of episodes <5
0 2 4 6 8
(n=8)
(n=5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
CARMI LOS —YOUR FACILITY
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Other (n=983)
UTI (n=480)
Incontinence urinary (n=463)
Fall (n=366)
Incontinence faecal (n=314)
Delirium (n=173)
Chest infection (n=164)
Significant electrolyte imbalance (n=110)
Faecal impaction (n=59)
DVT/PE (n=50)
Pressure ulcer (n=47)
Wound infection (n=45)
Fracture (n=39)
CARMI LOS —AUSTRALIA
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017Page 59
Casemix-adjusted relative mean
FIM change by type of complication
NOTE: Includes only completed episodes with valid FIM scores
* No data included where number of episodes <5
-20 -15 -10 -5 0
(n=8)
(n=5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
(n<5)
CARMI FIM change —YOUR FACILITY
-10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
Other (n=981)
UTI (n=479)
Incontinence urinary (n=461)
Fall (n=366)
Incontinence faecal (n=314)
Delirium (n=173)
Chest infection (n=163)
Significant electrolyte imbalance (n=111)
Faecal impaction (n=59)
DVT/PE (n=49)
Pressure ulcer (n=47)
Wound infection (n=45)
Fracture (n=39)
CARMI FIM change —AUSTRALIA
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Type of accommodation prior to impairment
Page 60
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
1.1 Haemorrhagic (n=29)
1.2 Ischaemic (n=60)
All Impairments (n=89)
1.1 Haemorrhagic (n=3,020)
1.2 Ischaemic (n=6,289)
All Impairments (n=9,309)
Proportion of episodes
AU
ST
RA
LIA
YO
UR
FA
CIL
ITY
n Private Residence n Residential Aged Care n Other n
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Type of accommodation prior to impairment
Page 61
Impairment
1.1 Haemorrhagic 28 (93.3%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (3.3%) 1 30 (100.0%)
1.2 Ischaemic 57 (93.4%) 2 (3.3%) 1 (1.6%) 1 61 (100.0%)
All Stroke 85 (93.4%) 2 (2.2%) 2 (2.2%) 2 91 (100.0%)
Impairment
1.1 Haemorrhagic 2,782 (90.1%) 167 (5.4%) 71 (2.3%) 66 3,086 (100.0%)
1.2 Ischaemic 5,871 (92.5%) 301 (4.7%) 117 (1.8%) 60 6,349 (100.0%)
All Stroke 8,653 (91.7%) 468 (5.0%) 188 (2.0%) 126 9,435 (100.0%)
AUSTRALIA — N (%)
Private residenceResidential Aged
CareOther Unknown All episodes
YOUR FACILITY — N (%)
Private residenceResidential Aged
CareOther Unknown All episodes
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Carer status prior to impairment
Page 62
NOTE: Includes only those episodes coming from private residence
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
YOUR FACILITY (n=85) AUSTRALIA (n=8,653)
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f ep
isod
es
CARER living in- codependent
CARER living in- NOT
codependent
CARER NOTliving in
NO CARERand NEEDS
one
NO CARERand DOES
NOT need one
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Any services received prior to impairment
by carer status
Page 63 NOTE: Includes only those episodes coming from private residence and with known carer status and known services status
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
NO
CA
RE
R a
nd D
OE
S N
OT
nee
d on
e (n
=59)
NO
CA
RE
R a
nd N
EE
DS
one
(n<
5)
CA
RE
R N
OT
livin
g in
(n=
6)
CA
RE
R li
ving
in -
NO
T c
odep
ende
nt (
n=11
)
CA
RE
R li
ving
in -
code
pend
ent (
n<5)
All
epis
odes
in p
rivat
e re
side
nce
(n=7
9)
NO
CA
RE
R a
nd D
OE
S N
OT
nee
d on
e (n
=5,3
29)
NO
CA
RE
R a
nd N
EE
DS
one
(n=
280)
CA
RE
R N
OT
livin
g in
(n=
556)
CA
RE
R li
ving
in -
NO
T c
odep
ende
nt (
n=1,
361)
CA
RE
R li
ving
in -
code
pend
ent (
n=51
4)
All
epis
odes
in p
rivat
e re
side
nce
(n=8
,040
)
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f ep
isod
es
Services received No servieces received
YOUR FACILITY (n=79) AUSTRALIA (n=8,040)
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Carer status and any services received
prior to impairment
Page 64
NOTE: Includes only those episodes coming from private residence and with known carer status
Carer status prior to this impairment No. % No. %
NO CARER and DOES NOT need one 61 75.3 5,496 66.3
NO CARER and NEEDS one 1 1.2 284 3.4
CARER NOT living in 6 7.4 567 6.8
CARER living in - NOT codependent 11 13.6 1,411 17.0
CARER living in - codependent 2 2.5 532 6.4
Missing 4 363
All episodes in private residence 85 100.0 8,653 100.0
Carer status prior to this impairment Yes (%) No (%) Yes (%) No (%)
NO CARER and DOES NOT need one 22.0 78.0 14.9 85.1
NO CARER and NEEDS one — — 27.1 72.9
CARER NOT living in 66.7 33.3 62.8 37.2
CARER living in - NOT codependent 45.5 54.5 33.7 66.3
CARER living in - codependent — — 32.7 67.3
All episodes in private residence 29.1 70.9 23.0 77.0
YOUR FACILITY AUSTRALIA
AUSTRALIA
Any services received prior to this impairment?
YOUR FACILITY
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Number of services received
prior to impairment by carer status
Page 65 NOTE: Includes only those episodes coming from private residence and with known carer status and known services status
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%N
O C
AR
ER
and
DO
ES
NO
T n
eed
one
(n=5
9)
NO
CA
RE
R a
nd N
EE
DS
one
(n<
5)
CA
RE
R N
OT
livin
g in
(n=
6)
CA
RE
R li
ving
in -
NO
T c
odep
ende
nt (
n=11
)
CA
RE
R li
ving
in -
code
pend
ent (
n<5)
NO
CA
RE
R a
nd D
OE
S N
OT
nee
d on
e (n
=5,3
29)
NO
CA
RE
R a
nd N
EE
DS
one
(n=
280)
CA
RE
R N
OT
livin
g in
(n=
556)
CA
RE
R li
ving
in -
NO
T c
odep
ende
nt (
n=1,
361)
CA
RE
R li
ving
in -
code
pend
ent (
n=51
4)
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f ep
isod
es
4+ servicetypes
3 servicetypes
2 servicetypes
1 servicetype
YOUR FACILITY (n=79) AUSTRALIA (n=8,040)
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Type of services received prior to impairment
Page 66 NOTE: Includes only those episodes coming from private residence and with known carer status and known services status
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
Domesticassistance (n=18)
Social support(n=4)
Nursing care(n=2)
Allied health care(n=1)
Personal care(n=5)
Meals (n=5) Provision of goods& equipment
(n=2)
Transport services(n=1)
Casemanagement
(n=1)
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f ep
isod
es
YOUR FACILITY (n=79) AUSTRALIA (n=8,040)
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Type of services received prior to impairment
by carer status
Page 67 NOTE: Includes only those episodes coming from private residence and with known carer status and known services status
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%N
O C
AR
ER
and
DO
ES
NO
T n
eed
one
(n=5
9)
NO
CA
RE
R a
nd N
EE
DS
one
(n<
5)
CA
RE
R N
OT
livin
g in
(n=
6)
CA
RE
R li
ving
in -
NO
T c
odep
ende
nt (
n=11
)
CA
RE
R li
ving
in -
code
pend
ent (
n<5)
All
epis
odes
in p
rivat
e re
side
nce
(n=7
9)
NO
CA
RE
R a
nd D
OE
S N
OT
nee
d on
e (n
=5,3
29)
NO
CA
RE
R a
nd N
EE
DS
one
(n=
280)
CA
RE
R N
OT
livin
g in
(n=
556)
CA
RE
R li
ving
in -
NO
T c
odep
ende
nt (
n=1,
361)
CA
RE
R li
ving
in -
code
pend
ent (
n=51
4)
All
epis
odes
in p
rivat
e re
side
nce
(n=8
,040
)
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f ep
isod
es
Case management
Transport services
Provision of goods& equipment
Meals
Personal care
Allied health care
Nursing care
Social support
Domesticassistance
YOUR FACILITY (n=79) AUSTRALIA (n=8,040)
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Number and type of services received
prior to impairment by carer status
Page 68
NOTE: Includes only those episodes coming from private residence and with known carer status and known services status
Number of episodes in private residence 59 1 6 11 2 79
Percent of episodes receiving:
No services 78.0 100.0 33.3 54.5 50.0 70.9
1 service type 16.9 0.0 33.3 9.1 50.0 17.7
2 service types 5.1 0.0 16.7 9.1 0.0 6.3
3 service types 0.0 0.0 16.7 18.2 0.0 3.8
4 or more service types 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.1 0.0 1.3
Service Type received
Domestic assistance 16.9 0.0 33.3 45.5 50.0 22.8
Social support 1.7 0.0 16.7 18.2 0.0 5.1
Nursing care 0.0 0.0 16.7 9.1 0.0 2.5
Allied health care 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3
Personal care 1.7 0.0 33.3 18.2 0.0 6.3
Meals 3.4 0.0 0.0 27.3 0.0 6.3
Provision of goods & equipment 1.7 0.0 16.7 0.0 0.0 2.5
Transport services 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.1 0.0 1.3
Case management 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.1 0.0 1.3
(NOTE: Accommodation prior is private
residence)
Services received prior to this
impairment
Carer status prior to discharge - YOUR FACILITY
NO CARER and
DOES NOT need
one
All episodes in
private residence
CARER living in -
codependent
NO CARER and
NEEDS one
CARER NOT living
in
CARER living in -
NOT
codependent
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Number and type of services received
prior to impairment by carer status
Page 69
NOTE: Includes only those episodes coming from private residence and with known carer status and known services status
Number of episodes in private residence 5,329 280 556 1,361 514 8,040
Percent of episodes receiving:
No services 85.1 72.9 37.2 66.3 67.3 77.0
1 service type 9.7 12.5 25.9 14.0 19.6 12.3
2 service types 3.2 8.2 14.6 7.8 6.2 5.1
3 service types 1.5 2.1 10.6 4.8 3.9 2.8
4 or more service types 0.5 3.9 11.5 7.1 2.9 2.7
Service Type received
Domestic assistance 12.8 23.2 54.3 26.2 28.2 19.3
Social support 1.5 5.4 13.1 7.1 3.9 3.5
Nursing care 0.5 2.9 5.4 3.3 2.7 1.6
Allied health care 0.8 1.4 3.1 2.0 2.9 1.3
Personal care 1.4 6.1 18.5 11.8 7.6 4.9
Meals 2.4 6.1 16.5 11.3 5.3 5.2
Provision of goods & equipment 1.1 2.5 8.3 5.1 2.1 2.4
Transport services 1.6 4.6 17.1 9.0 3.3 4.1
Case management 0.7 1.1 5.0 1.9 2.3 1.3
Services received prior to this
impairment
Carer status prior to discharge - AUSTRALIA
NO CARER and
DOES NOT need
one
NO CARER and
NEEDS one
CARER NOT living
in
CARER living in -
NOT
codependent
CARER living in -
codependent
All episodes in
private residence(NOTE: Accommodation prior is private
residence)
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Days from injury to episode start
with an acute admission by AN-SNAP class
Page 70 NOTE: Includes first admissions where all dates have been entered
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.2
0.5
0.2
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.8
0.3
10.8
11.3
0.0
16.0
0.0
7.1
0.0
16.3
0.0
11.4
8.9
9.7
11.5
10.6
13.4
12.7
18.2
16.1
23.1
11.9
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
4AA1 (n=17)
4AA2 (n=11)
4AA3 (n<5)
4AA4 (n=7)
4AA5 (n<5)
4AA6 (n=13)
4AA7 (n<5)
4AZ3 (n=8)
4AZ4 (n<5)
All stroke (n=67)
4AA1 (n=1,628)
4AA2 (n=1,340)
4AA3 (n=414)
4AA4 (n=850)
4AA5 (n=280)
4AA6 (n=972)
4AA7 (n=393)
4AZ3 (n=731)
4AZ4 (n=202)
All stroke (n=6,827)
Average number of days between dates*No data provided when less than 5 episodes have dates
Injury to acute admission Acute admission to rehabilitation episode start
YOUR FACILITY
AUSTRALIA
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Days from referral to rehabilitation
episode start
Page 71 NOTE: Includes first admissions where all dates have been entered
0.8
0.9
0.7
1.1
1.0
0.7
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
YOUR FACILITY(n=67)
AUSTRALIA(n=7,546)
Average number of days between dates *No data provided when less than 5 episodes have dates
Referral to assessment Assessment to clinically rehab ready Clinically rehab ready to rehab episode start
%Delayed in episode start
21.4%
% Delayed in episode start
16.7%
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Type of delay in episode start
Page 72
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Patient related issues (n=8) Service issues (n=10) External support issues(n=0)
Equipment issues (n=0) Behavioural issues (n=0) Reason(s) not specified(n=0)
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f ep
isod
es
YOUR FACILITY AUSTRALIA
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Delays in episode start
Page 73
No. % No. %
No delay 66 78.6 7,342 83.3
Delay in episode start 18 21.4 1,468 16.7
Missing 7 625
All episodes 91 100.0 9,435 100.0
No. % No. %
Patient related issues 8 44.4 342 23.3
Service issues 10 55.6 1,134 77.2
External support issues 0 0.0 24 1.6
Equipment issues 0 0.0 9 0.6
Behavioural issues 0 0.0 17 1.2
Reason(s) not specified 0 0.0 4 0.3
Reasons for delay in episode start
Delay in episode start
YOUR FACILITY AUSTRALIA
YOUR FACILITY AUSTRALIA
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Days from clinically ready to discharge
Page 74
NOTE: Includes completed episodes with a delay in discharge
10.0
9.4
9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 9.7 9.8 9.9 10 10.1
YOUR FACILITY (n=7)
AUSTRALIA (n=570)
Average number of days between dates *No data provided when less than 5 episodes have dates
Clinically ready for discharge to episode end (where a delay was reported)
%Delayed in episode end10.1%
%Delayed in episode end8.7%
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Type of delay in episode end
Page 75
NOTE: Includes completed episodes only
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Patient related issues (n=0) Service issues (n=4) External support issues(n=2)
Equipment issues (n=1) Behavioural issues (n=0) Reason(s) not specified(n=0)
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f ep
isod
es
YOUR FACILITY AUSTRALIA
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Delays in episode end
Page 76
No. % No. %
No delay 62 89.9 6,761 91.3
Delay in episode end 7 10.1 641 8.7
Missing 6 423
All episodes 75 100.0 7,825 100.0
No. % No. %
Patient related issues 0 0.0 98 15.3
Service issues 4 57.1 166 25.9
External support issues 2 28.6 239 37.3
Equipment issues 1 14.3 41 6.4
Behavioural issues 0 0.0 11 1.7
Reason(s) not specified 0 0.0 155 24.2
NOTE: Includes completed episodes only
Delay in episode endYOUR FACILITY AUSTRALIA
Reasons for delay in episode endYOUR FACILITY AUSTRALIA
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Mode of episode end by AN-SNAP class
Page 77
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
4AA1 (n=22)
4AA2 (n=16)
4AA3 (n<5)
4AA4 (n=10)
4AA5 (n<5)
4AA6 (n=15)
4AA7 (n=7)
4AZ3 (n=13)
4AZ4 (n<5)
All stroke (n=91)
4AA1 (n=2,320)
4AA2 (n=1,841)
4AA3 (n=564)
4AA4 (n=1,163)
4AA5 (n=387)
4AA6 (n=1,344)
4AA7 (n=519)
4AZ3 (n=1,001)
4AZ4 (n=274)
All stroke (n=9,413)
Proportion of episodes
Final Accommodation Interim Accommodation Remaining in Hospital Other Unknown
AU
ST
RA
LIA
Y
OU
R F
AC
ILIT
Y
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Mode of episode end by AN-SNAP class
Page 78
AN-SNAP class V4
4AA1 (motor 51-91, cognition 29-35) 21 0 0 1 0 2,088 57 152 18 5
4AA2 (motor 51-91, cognition 19-28) 12 3 1 0 0 1,529 92 191 26 3
4AA3 (motor 51-91, cognition 5-18) 4 0 0 0 0 415 41 93 11 4
4AA4 (motor 36-50, Age ≥ 68) 7 1 1 1 0 835 106 197 19 6
4AA5 (motor 36-50, Age ≤ 67) 1 1 0 0 0 312 21 40 12 2
4AA6 (motor 19-35, Age ≥ 68) 7 3 4 1 0 766 179 364 28 7
4AA7 (motor 19-35, Age ≤ 67) 4 0 3 0 0 317 55 134 10 3
4AZ3 (motor 13-18, Age ≥ 65) 5 0 7 1 0 421 165 365 50 0
4AZ4 (motor 13-18, Age ≤ 64) 1 0 1 0 0 109 31 123 8 3
All Stroke AN-SNAP Classes 62 8 17 4 0 6,792 747 1,659 182 33
AN-SNAP class V4
4AA1 (motor 51-91, cognition 29-35) 95.5 0.0 0.0 4.5 0.0 90.0 2.5 6.6 0.8 0.2
4AA2 (motor 51-91, cognition 19-28) 75.0 18.8 6.3 0.0 0.0 83.1 5.0 10.4 1.4 0.2
4AA3 (motor 51-91, cognition 5-18) 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 73.6 7.3 16.5 2.0 0.7
4AA4 (motor 36-50, Age ≥ 68) 70.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 0.0 71.8 9.1 16.9 1.6 0.5
4AA5 (motor 36-50, Age ≤ 67) 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 80.6 5.4 10.3 3.1 0.5
4AA6 (motor 19-35, Age ≥ 68) 46.7 20.0 26.7 6.7 0.0 57.0 13.3 27.1 2.1 0.5
4AA7 (motor 19-35, Age ≤ 67) 57.1 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.0 61.1 10.6 25.8 1.9 0.6
4AZ3 (motor 13-18, Age ≥ 65) 38.5 0.0 53.8 7.7 0.0 42.1 16.5 36.5 5.0 0.0
4AZ4 (motor 13-18, Age ≤ 64) 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 39.8 11.3 44.9 2.9 1.1
All Stroke AN-SNAP Classes 68.1 8.8 18.7 4.4 0.0 72.2 7.9 17.6 1.9 0.4
YOUR FACILITY — % AUSTRALIA — %
Interim
Accom
Remaining in
Hospital Other Unknown Final Accom
Interim
Accom
Remaining in
Hospital Other UnknownFinal Accom
YOUR FACILITY — N AUSTRALIA — N
Final Accom
Interim
Accom
Remaining in
Hospital Other Unknown Final Accom
Interim
Accom Unknown
Remaining in
Hospital Other
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Mode of episode end by impairment code
Page 79
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
1.1 Haemorrhagic (n=30)
1.2 Ischaemic (n=61)
All stroke (n=91)
1.1 Haemorrhagic (n=3,086)
1.2 Ischaemic (n=6,349)
All stroke (n=9,435)
Proportion of episodes
Final Accommodation Interim Accommodation Remaining in Hospital Other Unknown
AU
ST
RA
LIA
Y
OU
R F
AC
ILIT
Y
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Mode of episode end by impairment
Page 80
Impairment
1.1 Haemorrhagic 19 4 5 2 0 2,163 243 587 83 10
1.2 Ischaemic 43 4 12 2 0 4,642 505 1,076 102 24
All Stroke 62 8 17 4 0 6,805 748 1,663 185 34
Impairment
1.1 Haemorrhagic 63.3 13.3 16.7 6.7 0.0 70.1 7.9 19.0 2.7 0.3
1.2 Ischaemic 70.5 6.6 19.7 3.3 0.0 73.1 8.0 16.9 1.6 0.4
All Stroke 68.1 8.8 18.7 4.4 0.0 72.1 7.9 17.6 2.0 0.4
UnknownFinal Accom
Interim
Accom
Remaining in
Hospital Other Unknown Final Accom
Interim
Accom
Remaining in
Hospital Other
YOUR FACILITY — N AUSTRALIA — N
Final Accom
Interim
Accom
Remaining in
Hospital Other Unknown Final Accom
Interim
Accom
Remaining in
Hospital Other Unknown
YOUR FACILITY — % AUSTRALIA — %
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Mode of episode end
Page 81
Final AccomFinal Accom
Interim AccomInterim Accom
Back tocommunity
Back tocommunity
Remain inHospital
Remain inHospital
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f ep
isod
es
YOUR FACILITY (n=91) AUSTRALIA (n=9,435)
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Interim accommodation post discharge
by AN-SNAP class
Page 82 NOTE: Includes only those episodes with mode of episode end equal to interim accommodation
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
4AA1 (n<5)
4AA2 (n<5)
4AA3 (n<5)
4AA4 (n<5)
4AA5 (n<5)
4AA6 (n<5)
4AA7 (n<5)
4AZ3 (n<5)
4AZ4 (n<5)
All stroke (n=8)
4AA1 (n=57)
4AA2 (n=92)
4AA3 (n=41)
4AA4 (n=106)
4AA5 (n=21)
4AA6 (n=179)
4AA7 (n=55)
4AZ3 (n=165)
4AZ4 (n=31)
All stroke (n=747)
Proportion of episodes
AU
ST
RA
LIA
YO
UR
FA
CIL
ITY
n Private Residence n Residential Aged Care n Hospital n Other n
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Interim accommodation post discharge
by AN-SNAP class
Page 83
NOTE: Includes only those episodes with mode of episode end equal to interim accommodation
AN-SNAP class V4
4AA1 (motor 51-91, cognition 29-35) 0 — 0 — 0 — 0 — 0 —
4AA2 (motor 51-91, cognition 19-28) 1 (33.3%) 1 (33.3%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (33.3%) 3 (100.0%)
4AA3 (motor 51-91, cognition 5-18) 0 — 0 — 0 — 0 — 0 —
4AA4 (motor 36-50, Age ≥ 68) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (100.0%)
4AA5 (motor 36-50, Age ≤ 67) 1 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (100.0%)
4AA6 (motor 19-35, Age ≥ 68) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (33.3%) 2 (66.7%) 3 (100.0%)
4AA7 (motor 19-35, Age ≤ 67) 0 — 0 — 0 — 0 — 0 —
4AZ3 (motor 13-18, Age ≥ 65) 0 — 0 — 0 — 0 — 0 —
4AZ4 (motor 13-18, Age ≤ 64) 0 — 0 — 0 — 0 — 0 —
All Stroke AN-SNAP Classes 2 (25.0%) 1 (12.5%) 2 (25.0%) 3 (37.5%) 8 (100.0%)
AN-SNAP class V4
4AA1 (motor 51-91, cognition 29-35) 25 (43.9%) 9 (15.8%) 5 (8.8%) 15 (26.3%) 57 (100.0%)
4AA2 (motor 51-91, cognition 19-28) 21 (22.8%) 17 (18.5%) 13 (14.1%) 35 (38.0%) 92 (100.0%)
4AA3 (motor 51-91, cognition 5-18) 3 (7.3%) 12 (29.3%) 6 (14.6%) 15 (36.6%) 41 (100.0%)
4AA4 (motor 36-50, Age ≥ 68) 14 (13.2%) 13 (12.3%) 14 (13.2%) 61 (57.5%) 106 (100.0%)
4AA5 (motor 36-50, Age ≤ 67) 7 (33.3%) 0 (0.0%) 6 (28.6%) 8 (38.1%) 21 (100.0%)
4AA6 (motor 19-35, Age ≥ 68) 12 (6.7%) 42 (23.5%) 29 (16.2%) 84 (46.9%) 179 (100.0%)
4AA7 (motor 19-35, Age ≤ 67) 11 (20.0%) 8 (14.5%) 16 (29.1%) 16 (29.1%) 55 (100.0%)
4AZ3 (motor 13-18, Age ≥ 65) 0 (0.0%) 51 (30.9%) 26 (15.8%) 75 (45.5%) 165 (100.0%)
4AZ4 (motor 13-18, Age ≤ 64) 4 (12.9%) 8 (25.8%) 7 (22.6%) 9 (29.0%) 31 (100.0%)
All Stroke AN-SNAP Classes 97 (13.0%) 160 (21.4%) 122 (16.3%) 318 (42.6%) 747 (100.0%)
** There was 0 episode(s) in YOUR FACILITY and 50 episodes in AUSTRALIA with unknown interim accommodation
YOUR FACILITY
Private residenceResidential Aged
CareHospital Other All episodes**
Residential Aged
CareHospital Other All episodes**
AUSTRALIA
Private residence
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Interim accommodation post discharge
by impairment
Page 84 NOTE: Includes only those episodes with mode of episode end equal to interim accommodation
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
1.1 Haemorrhagic (n<5)
1.2 Ischaemic (n<5)
All stroke (n=8)
1.1 Haemorrhagic (n=243)
1.2 Ischaemic (n=505)
All stroke (n=748)
Proportion of episodes
AU
ST
RA
LIA
YO
UR
FA
CIL
ITY
n Private Residence n Residential Aged Care n Hospital n Other n
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Interim accommodation post discharge
by impairment
Page 85
NOTE: Includes only those episodes with mode of episode end equal to interim accommodation
Impairment
1.1 Haemorrhagic 1 (25.0%) 1 (25.0%) 1 (25.0%) 1 (25.0%) 4 (100.0%)
1.2 Ischaemic 1 (25.0%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (25.0%) 2 (50.0%) 4 (100.0%)
All Stroke 2 (25.0%) 1 (12.5%) 2 (25.0%) 3 (37.5%) 8 (100.0%)
Impairment
1.1 Haemorrhagic 27 (11.1%) 61 (25.1%) 30 (12.3%) 106 (43.6%) 243 (100.0%)
1.2 Ischaemic 70 (13.9%) 99 (19.6%) 92 (18.2%) 213 (42.2%) 505 (100.0%)
All Stroke 97 (13.0%) 160 (21.4%) 122 (16.3%) 319 (42.6%) 748 (100.0%)
** There was 0 episode(s) in YOUR FACILITY and 50 episodes in AUSTRALIA with unknown interim accommodation
Private residenceResidential Aged
CareHospital Other All episodes**
YOUR FACILITY
Other All episodes**
AUSTRALIA
Private residenceResidential Aged
CareHospital
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Final accommodation post discharge
by AN-SNAP class
Page 86 NOTE: Includes only those episodes with mode of episode end equal to either final or interim accommodation
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
4AA1 (n=21)
4AA2 (n=15)
4AA3 (n<5)
4AA4 (n=8)
4AA5 (n<5)
4AA6 (n=10)
4AA7 (n<5)
4AZ3 (n=5)
4AZ4 (n<5)
All stroke (n=70)
4AA1 (n=2,145)
4AA2 (n=1,621)
4AA3 (n=456)
4AA4 (n=941)
4AA5 (n=333)
4AA6 (n=945)
4AA7 (n=372)
4AZ3 (n=586)
4AZ4 (n=140)
All stroke (n=7,539)
Proportion of episodes
AU
ST
RA
LIA
YO
UR
FA
CIL
ITY
n Private Residence n Residential Aged Care n Other n
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Final accommodation post discharge
by AN-SNAP class
Page 87 NOTE: Includes only those episodes with mode of episode end equal to either final or interim accommodation
AN-SNAP class V4
4AA1 (motor 51-91, cognition 29-35) 20 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 1 20 (100.0%)
4AA2 (motor 51-91, cognition 19-28) 13 (86.7%) 2 (13.3%) 0 (0.0%) 0 15 (100.0%)
4AA3 (motor 51-91, cognition 5-18) 4 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 4 (100.0%)
4AA4 (motor 36-50, Age ≥ 68) 7 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 1 7 (100.0%)
4AA5 (motor 36-50, Age ≤ 67) 2 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 2 (100.0%)
4AA6 (motor 19-35, Age ≥ 68) 7 (77.8%) 0 (0.0%) 2 (22.2%) 1 9 (100.0%)
4AA7 (motor 19-35, Age ≤ 67) 4 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 4 (100.0%)
4AZ3 (motor 13-18, Age ≥ 65) 3 (75.0%) 1 (25.0%) 0 (0.0%) 1 4 (100.0%)
4AZ4 (motor 13-18, Age ≤ 64) 1 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 1 (100.0%)
All Stroke AN-SNAP Classes 61 (92.4%) 3 (4.5%) 2 (3.0%) 4 66 (100.0%)
AN-SNAP class V4
4AA1 (motor 51-91, cognition 29-35) 2,000 (93.2%) 33 (1.5%) 40 (1.9%) 72 2,145 (100.0%)
4AA2 (motor 51-91, cognition 19-28) 1,438 (88.7%) 82 (5.1%) 38 (2.3%) 63 1,621 (100.0%)
4AA3 (motor 51-91, cognition 5-18) 360 (78.9%) 43 (9.4%) 26 (5.7%) 27 456 (100.0%)
4AA4 (motor 36-50, Age ≥ 68) 706 (75.0%) 147 (15.6%) 36 (3.8%) 52 941 (100.0%)
4AA5 (motor 36-50, Age ≤ 67) 301 (90.4%) 8 (2.4%) 6 (1.8%) 18 333 (100.0%)
4AA6 (motor 19-35, Age ≥ 68) 574 (60.7%) 241 (25.5%) 71 (7.5%) 59 945 (100.0%)
4AA7 (motor 19-35, Age ≤ 67) 293 (78.8%) 26 (7.0%) 30 (8.1%) 23 372 (100.0%)
4AZ3 (motor 13-18, Age ≥ 65) 205 (35.0%) 252 (43.0%) 70 (11.9%) 59 586 (100.0%)
4AZ4 (motor 13-18, Age ≤ 64) 104 (74.3%) 22 (15.7%) 3 (2.1%) 11 140 (100.0%)
All Stroke AN-SNAP Classes 5,981 (79.3%) 854 (11.3%) 320 (4.2%) 384 7,539 (100.0%)
Private residence
YOUR FACILITY
Residential Aged
CareOther Missing All episodes
Private residenceResidential Aged
CareOther Missing All episodes
AUSTRALIA
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Final accommodation post discharge
by impairment
Page 88 NOTE: Includes only those episodes with mode of episode end equal to either final or interim accommodation
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
1.1 Haemorrhagic (n=23)
1.2 Ischaemic (n=47)
All stroke (n=70)
1.1 Haemorrhagic (n=2,406)
1.2 Ischaemic (n=5,147)
All stroke (n=7,553)
Proportion of episodes
AU
ST
RA
LIA
YO
UR
FA
CIL
ITY
n Private Residence n Residential Aged Care n Other n
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Final accommodation post discharge
by impairment
Page 89
NOTE: Includes only those episodes with mode of episode end equal to either final or interim accommodation
Impairment
1.1 Haemorrhagic 19 (90.5%) 1 (4.8%) 1 (4.8%) 2 21 (100.0%)
1.2 Ischaemic 42 (93.3%) 2 (4.4%) 1 (2.2%) 2 45 (100.0%)
All Stroke 61 (92.4%) 3 (4.5%) 2 (3.0%) 4 66 (100.0%)
Impairment
1.1 Haemorrhagic 1,886 (78.4%) 266 (11.1%) 110 (4.6%) 144 2,406 (100.0%)
1.2 Ischaemic 4,107 (79.8%) 589 (11.4%) 211 (4.1%) 240 5,147 (100.0%)
All Stroke 5,993 (79.3%) 855 (11.3%) 321 (4.2%) 384 7,553 (100.0%)
YOUR FACILITY
Private residenceResidential Aged
CareOther Missing All episodes
Private residenceResidential Aged
CareOther Missing All episodes
AUSTRALIA
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Interim and final accommodation
post discharge
Page 90 NOTE: Includes only those episodes with mode of episode end equal to either final or interim accommodation
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f ep
isod
es
YOUR FACILITY (n=91) AUSTRALIA (n=9,435)
Interim Final Interim Final
n
n Other (I=2, F=0)
n Hospital (I=2, F=n/a)
n
Transitional liv ing unit (I=1,
F=0)
n Boarding house (I=0, F=0)
n
Community group home (I=0,
F=0)
n
Residential Aged Care (I=1,
F=3)
n Private residence (I=2, F=61)
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Interim and final accommodation
post discharge
Page 91
NOTE: Includes only those episodes with mode of episode end equal to either final or interim accommodation
Accommodation Interim (%) Final (%) Interim (%) Final (%)
Private residence 2 (25.0%) 61 (95.3%) 97 (13.9%) 5,981 (85.9%)
Residential Aged Care 1 (12.5%) 3 (4.7%) 160 (23.0%) 854 (12.3%)
Community group home 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 4 (0.6%) 14 (0.2%)
Boarding house 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 24 (0.3%)
Transitional living unit 1 (12.5%) 0 (0.0%) 216 (31.0%) 29 (0.4%)
Hospital 2 (25.0%) n/a 122 (17.5%) n/a
Other 2 (25.0%) 0 (0.0%) 98 (14.1%) 63 (0.9%)
Missing/Unknown 0 6 50 574
All episodes 8 (100.0%) 70 (100.0%) 747 (100.0%) 7,539 (100.0%)
YOUR FACILITY AUSTRALIA
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Carer status post discharge
Page 92
NOTE: Includes only those episodes whose final accommodation is private residence
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
YOUR FACILITY (n=61) AUSTRALIA (n=6,063)
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f ep
isod
es
CARER living in- codependent
CARER living in- NOT
codependent
CARER NOTliving in
NO CARERand NEEDS
one
NO CARERand DOES
NOT need one
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Any services received post discharge
by carer status
Page 93 NOTE: Includes only those episodes whose final accommodation is private residence and with known carer status and known services status
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%N
O C
AR
ER
and
DO
ES
NO
T n
eed
one
(n=1
9)
NO
CA
RE
R a
nd N
EE
DS
one
(n<
5)
CA
RE
R N
OT
livin
g in
(n=
8)
CA
RE
R li
ving
in -
NO
T c
odep
ende
nt (
n=20
)
CA
RE
R li
ving
in -
code
pend
ent (
n=7)
All
epis
odes
in p
rivat
e re
side
nce
(n=5
6)
NO
CA
RE
R a
nd D
OE
S N
OT
nee
d on
e (n
=2,0
34)
NO
CA
RE
R a
nd N
EE
DS
one
(n=
133)
CA
RE
R N
OT
livin
g in
(n=
594)
CA
RE
R li
ving
in -
NO
T c
odep
ende
nt (
n=2,
248)
CA
RE
R li
ving
in -
code
pend
ent (
n=70
9)
All
epis
odes
in p
rivat
e re
side
nce
(n=5
,718
)
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f ep
isod
es
Services received No servieces received
YOUR FACILITY (n=56) AUSTRALIA (n=5,718)
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Carer status and any services received
post discharge
Page 94
NOTE: Includes only those episodes whose final accommodation is private residence and with known carer status and known services status
Carer status after this impairment No. % No. %
NO CARER and DOES NOT need one 19 33.9 2,041 35.6
NO CARER and NEEDS one 2 3.6 133 2.3
CARER NOT living in 8 14.3 599 10.4
CARER living in - NOT codependent 20 35.7 2,255 39.3
CARER living in - codependent 7 12.5 712 12.4
Missing 5 323
All episodes in private residence 61 100.0 6,063 100.0
Carer status after this impairment Yes (%) No (%) Yes (%) No (%)
NO CARER and DOES NOT need one 68.4 31.6 57.9 42.1
NO CARER and NEEDS one — — 66.9 33.1
CARER NOT living in 87.5 12.5 83.0 17.0
CARER living in - NOT codependent 80.0 20.0 74.9 25.1
CARER living in - codependent 71.4 28.6 73.3 26.7
All episodes in private residence 75.0 25.0 69.3 30.7
YOUR FACILITY
YOUR FACILITY
AUSTRALIA
AUSTRALIA
Any services received after this impairment?
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Change in prior accommodation post discharge
Page 95
NOTE: Includes only those episodes whose final accommodation is private residence and with known carer status and known services status
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Priv
res
- n
o ca
rer
req'
d(n
=51)
Priv
res
- c
arer
req
'd(n
=19)
Oth
er (
n=1
)
Res
i car
e -
Hos
tel/N
ursi
ng h
ome
(n=0
)
Priv
res
- n
o ca
rer
req'
d(n
=4,4
41)
Priv
res
- c
arer
req
'd(n
=2,5
32)
Oth
er (
n=1
19)
Res
i car
e -
Hos
tel/N
ursi
ng h
ome
(n=2
29)
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f ep
isod
es
Large improvement
Small improvement
Same
Small decline
Large decline
YOUR FACILITY AUSTRALIA
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Number of services received post discharge
by carer status
Page 96 NOTE: Includes only those episodes whose final accommodation is private residence and with known carer status and known services status
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%N
O C
AR
ER
and
DO
ES
NO
T n
eed
one
(n=1
9)
NO
CA
RE
R a
nd N
EE
DS
one
(n<
5)
CA
RE
R N
OT
livin
g in
(n=
8)
CA
RE
R li
ving
in -
NO
T c
odep
ende
nt (
n=20
)
CA
RE
R li
ving
in -
code
pend
ent (
n=7)
NO
CA
RE
R a
nd D
OE
S N
OT
nee
d on
e (n
=2,0
34)
NO
CA
RE
R a
nd N
EE
DS
one
(n=
133)
CA
RE
R N
OT
livin
g in
(n=
594)
CA
RE
R li
ving
in -
NO
T c
odep
ende
nt (
n=2,
248)
CA
RE
R li
ving
in -
code
pend
ent (
n=70
9)
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f ep
isod
es
4+ servicetypes
3 servicetypes
2 servicetypes
1 servicetype
YOUR FACILITY (n=56) AUSTRALIA (n=5,718)
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Type of services received post discharge
Page 97
NOTE: Includes only those episodes whose final accommodation is private residence and with known carer status and known services status
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Domesticassistance (n=18)
Social support(n=5)
Nursing care(n=2)
Allied health care(n=30)
Personal care(n=11)
Meals (n=8) Provision of goods& equipment
(n=6)
Transport services(n=10)
Casemanagement
(n=8)
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f ep
isod
es
YOUR FACILITY (n=56) AUSTRALIA (n=5,718)
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Type of services received pre and post rehab
Page 98
NOTE: Includes only those episodes whose final accommodation is private residence and with known carer status and received services both prior and post the episode
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Domesticassistance
Social support Nursing care Allied health care Personal care Meals Provision ofgoods &
equipment
Transportservices
Casemanagement
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f ep
isod
es
PRIOR POST
YOUR FACILITY (n=14)
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Type of services received post discharge
by carer status
Page 99 NOTE: Includes only those episodes whose final accommodation is private residence and with known carer status and known services status
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%N
O C
AR
ER
and
DO
ES
NO
T n
eed
one
(n=1
9)
NO
CA
RE
R a
nd N
EE
DS
one
(n<
5)
CA
RE
R N
OT
livin
g in
(n=
8)
CA
RE
R li
ving
in -
NO
T c
odep
ende
nt (
n=20
)
CA
RE
R li
ving
in -
code
pend
ent (
n=7)
All
epis
odes
in p
rivat
e re
side
nce
(n=5
6)
NO
CA
RE
R a
nd D
OE
S N
OT
nee
d on
e (n
=2,0
34)
NO
CA
RE
R a
nd N
EE
DS
one
(n=
133)
CA
RE
R N
OT
livin
g in
(n=
594)
CA
RE
R li
ving
in -
NO
T c
odep
ende
nt (
n=2,
248)
CA
RE
R li
ving
in -
code
pend
ent (
n=70
9)
All
epis
odes
in p
rivat
e re
side
nce
(n=5
,718
)
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f ep
isod
es
Case management
Transport services
Provision of goods& equipment
Meals
Personal care
Allied health care
Nursing care
Social support
Domesticassistance
YOUR FACILITY (n=56) AUSTRALIA (n=5,718)
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Number and type of services received
post discharge
Page 100
NOTE: Includes only those episodes whose final accommodation is private residence and with known carer status and known services status
Number of episodes in private residence 19 2 8 20 7 56
Percent of episodes receiving:
No services 31.6 50.0 12.5 20.0 28.6 25.0
1 service type 42.1 0.0 37.5 25.0 42.9 33.9
2 service types 21.1 50.0 12.5 15.0 0.0 16.1
3 service types 5.3 0.0 0.0 5.0 14.3 5.4
4 or more service types 0.0 0.0 37.5 35.0 14.3 19.6
Service Type received
Domestic assistance 21.1 50.0 37.5 45.0 14.3 32.1
Social support 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 8.9
Nursing care 0.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 3.6
Allied health care 52.6 0.0 37.5 65.0 57.1 53.6
Personal care 15.8 0.0 50.0 20.0 0.0 19.6
Meals 0.0 50.0 25.0 20.0 14.3 14.3
Provision of goods & equipment 5.3 0.0 12.5 15.0 14.3 10.7
Transport services 0.0 0.0 12.5 35.0 28.6 17.9
Case management 5.3 0.0 12.5 25.0 14.3 14.3
Services received after this impairmentCarer status post discharge - YOUR FACILITY
NO CARER and
DOES NOT need
one
NO CARER and
NEEDS one
CARER NOT living
in
CARER living in -
NOT
codependent
CARER living in -
codependent
All episodes in
private residence(NOTE: Accommodation post is private
residence)
AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3) | Anywhere Hospital | July 2016 – June 2017
Number and type of services received
post discharge
Page 101
NOTE: Includes only those episodes whose final accommodation is private residence and with known carer status and known services status
Number of episodes in private residence 2,034 133 594 2,248 709 5,718
Percent of episodes receiving:
No services 42.1 33.1 17.0 25.1 26.7 30.7
1 service type 32.3 15.8 18.4 28.6 32.2 29.0
2 service types 12.5 12.8 17.8 14.5 15.8 14.3
3 service types 6.5 11.3 17.7 12.1 12.1 10.7
4 or more service types 6.3 27.1 29.0 19.4 13.1 15.2
Service Type received
Domestic assistance 21.8 45.1 55.1 30.8 28.9 30.2
Social support 4.8 21.1 19.4 13.4 9.0 10.6
Nursing care 4.9 12.8 12.6 11.3 9.6 9.0
Allied health care 40.8 37.6 48.5 53.8 54.6 48.3
Personal care 7.5 27.1 30.6 23.7 19.5 18.2
Meals 4.6 19.5 21.7 11.7 5.9 9.7
Provision of goods & equipment 8.9 18.0 22.7 17.8 15.2 14.8
Transport services 8.4 23.3 27.3 17.9 8.5 14.4
Case management 5.6 18.0 15.5 12.2 13.4 10.5
Services received after this impairmentCarer status post discharge - AUSTRALIA
NO CARER and
DOES NOT need
one
NO CARER and
NEEDS one
CARER NOT living
in
CARER living in -
NOT
codependent
CARER living in -
codependent
All episodes in
private residence(NOTE: Accommodation post is private
residence)
Page 102
Appendix 1: Glossary
AN-SNAP class
The Australian National Sub-Acute and Non-Acute Patient Classification (AN-SNAP) is a casemix classification for sub-acute and non-acute care provided
in a variety of treatment settings. Version 4, introduced in July 2016 and used in these reports, uses the episode’s impairment, age, weighted FIM motor
admission score and FIM cognition score to determine which of 50 inpatient (admitted overnight adult) rehabilitation classes the episode should be
assigned to.
Between AN-SNAP V3 and V4 there have been some minor refinements to the positioning of age and FIM score splits, however the greatest change has
been the introduction of impairment‐specific weights to FIM item scores in the calculation of a motor score, the introduction of reconditioning only classes
and the removal of orthopaedic replacement classes (now grouped with all other orthopaedic conditions). Refer Appendix 3 for the full list of classes and
the section Impairment‐specific weighted FIM scores below for more detail about how the items are weighted. For more information about AN-SNAP class
V4 please refer to the AROC website.
AROC
The Australasian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre (AROC) was established in 2002 and current membership encompasses close to 100% of all Australian
and New Zealand rehabilitation facilities. Facilities routinely submit deidentified data to AROC for each rehabilitation episode, including information about
demographics, process indicators and functional status.
Benchmark group
In Calendar Year 2015 new benchmark groups were introduced. With the exception of brain injury and spinal cord dysfunction an episode’s benchmark
group is determined by the country of the submitting facility and can be either Australia or New Zealand. For episodes recorded as brain injury or spinal
cord dysfunction (or major multi trauma involving brain injury and/or spinal cord dysfunction) the benchmark group is determined by first admission
episodes reported by all specialist (brain/spinal) units in both Australia and New Zealand, calculated separately for traumatic and non-traumatic episodes.
The benchmark data set is all episodes during the reporting period in the AROC database.
Page 103
Casemix-adjusted relative mean
A comparison of some statistics such as length of stay and FIM change is only possible if the groups being compared comprise similar episodes. The
specific impairment, level of functional independence, age and other factors relating to the episode have an impact on these statistics. If, for example, your
average length of stay were different from the benchmark group, we could not tell if your episodes really were different or if the difference was merely due
to the unique casemix.
To overcome this difficulty, it is possible to statistically control for casemix. This is achieved by adjusting measures such as length of stay and FIM change
so that the comparison is only made between similar types of episodes.
In this report we have calculated casemix-adjusted relative mean length of stay and casemix-adjusted relative mean FIM change for completed episodes.
To do this, we needed to know the LOS (or FIM change) and AN-SNAP class for each episode as well as the mean LOS (or FIM change) for the
benchmark group for each AN-SNAP class. We then calculated the difference between each episode LOS (or FIM change) and the mean LOS (or FIM
change) of the appropriate AN-SNAP class. These differences were then averaged to produce the casemix-adjusted relative mean. This may be easier to
understand as a set of two equations illustrated below.
For each episode calculate:
LOSdiff = episode’s LOS – mean LOS appropriate AN-SNAP class.
Casemix-adjusted relative mean = Sum of LOSdiff for all episodes divided by Number of episodes
A casemix-adjusted relative mean length of stay of, say, -2 days would indicate that, on average, your facility has a LOS of 2 days less than similar
episodes in the benchmark group. A casemix-adjusted relative mean FIM change of, say, 4 would indicate that, on average, your facility improved 4 FIM
points more than similar episodes in the benchmark group. It is important to consider both of these statistics together. For example, your episodes may
have stayed longer than similar episodes in the benchmark group, but they may also have achieved a greater functional improvement.
Complete/incomplete episode
An episode is considered “complete” for the purpose of calculating outcome statistics in this report if (A) the mode of episode end was either 1 (discharged
to usual accommodation) or 2 (discharged to interim accommodation) AND total FIM score at episode end was greater than 18, or (B) the mode of episode
end was 7 (change of care type within sub-acute/non-acute care) AND length of stay greater than 6 days.
Glossary … continued
Page 104
Glossary … continued
Confidence interval for a mean
To decide if a difference between your facility’s mean score and the benchmark group’s mean is statistically significant, look at the two confidence intervals. If
they overlap, the difference is not likely to be statistically significant. For example your facility’s mean onset to first admission may be 16 days while the
benchmark group’s mean is 12 days. These values are certainly different, but the difference may not be statistically significant. If the 95% confidence interval
of your data were (13 – 19) (i.e. 13 days to 19 days) and that of the benchmark group data set were (10.5 – 13.5) (i.e. 10.5 days to 13.5 days), the difference
is not likely to be statistically significant as the two confidence intervals overlap. Note that this is a conservative comparison and is not as accurate as a
formal statistical test.
Data Concatenation
Increasingly some jurisdictions have introduced business rules around data collection that have resulted in episodes of rehabilitation being ended and then
re-commenced a few days later. AROC definitions would record these as one episode with the period in between defined as a suspension of rehabilitation.
Such business rules result in two (or more) episodes of rehabilitation being reported to AROC when only one full episode should be reported.
Whilst this happens much more frequently in some impairment groups (e.g. spinal cord injury & brain injury) it does impact all impairments to some degree.
Reporting of multiple episodes impacts outcomes analysis, resulting in shorter than real length of stays and reduced FIM change being reported.
Concatenated episodes will have a revised Length of stay and FIM change (start details will be taken from the identified primary episode; end details from
the identified final episode), and will also have a revised number of suspensions (being the sum across all concatenated ‘submitted episodes’ plus the
number of breaks between ‘submitted episodes’) and a revised number of suspension days (being the sum across all concatenated ‘submitted episodes’
plus the sum of all days between ‘submitted episodes’).
Submitted episodes to AROC are identified for concatenation based on the following rules:
• Subsequent episodes MUST have same impairment code and be from same reporting facility with same MRN and DOB
• Leading episode must be discharged into the hospital system with following episode being admitted from hospital system
• Number of days between episodes being 0-14 days for spinal and 0-7 days for all other impairments
To make it easier for AROC to identify episodes that should be concatenated in January 2014 the data item Mode of Episode Start had an additional code
set value added: 9 = recommenced rehabilitation episode following suspension
Page 105
Glossary … continued
Data quality score
The data quality score is the average percent reported for all AROC data items (including impairment specific items where relevant) with the exception of
those items that are optional. Path, facility code, facility name, MRN and episode end date are not included as these fields are used to extract the data for
reporting.
Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) is used as a tool to assess the functional independence of patients at episode start and end.
• The FIM motor score is the sum of the scores obtained for the first thirteen (13) items in the FIM instrument. A higher FIM motor score indicates a
greater level of functional independence in motor skills.
• The FIM cognition score is the sum of the scores obtained for the final five (5) items in the FIM instrument. A higher FIM cognition score indicates
better cognitive function.
FIM change
The change in functional status from the beginning to the end of the episode is measured by the change in FIM score. This is calculated as the FIM score at
the end of the episode minus the FIM score at the start of the episode. In some instances the change in total FIM score (the sum of items 1 to 18) is
calculated. In other cases either the change in FIM motor score (the sum of items 1 to 13) or the change in FIM cognition score (the sum of items 14 to 18) is
calculated.
A higher FIM score corresponds to higher level of function while a lower FIM score represents less functional independence. This means that a positive value
for the change in FIM score indicates functional improvement during the episode. A negative value for the change in FIM score indicates a decline in
functional independence during the episode.
FIM efficiency
The FIM efficiency indicates the average FIM improvement per day. This statistic is calculated as the mean FIM change divided by the mean length of stay
(LOS).
Page 106
Impairment‐specific weighted FIM motor scores
Impairment‐specific weighted FIM motor scores are new to the inpatient (admitted overnight adult) rehabilitation AN-SNAP V4 classes. Weights reflect the
relative impact of each item on the cost of caring for the rehabilitation patient. If an item has a weight of more than 1, it will have an impact on the cost of
care that is more than average – a weight less than 1 implies the impact will be less than average. Within each impairment type, the weights are scaled to
sum to 13 – thus both weighted and unweighted scores range from a minimum of 13 to a maximum of 91. Where impairments are grouped together in the
classification, a single set of weights for that group has been derived. The exception is Major Multiple Trauma (MMT) where there were too few episodes to
develop relative weights and so all weights were set to 1.
Interquartile range (IQR)
The middle 50% — between the 25% percentile and the 75% percentile.
Length of stay (LOS)
The length of stay (LOS) of an episode is the number of days on which care has been provided. It is calculated as the end date minus the start date, minus
the number of leave days during the episode.
Mean
The mean, or average, is a measure of the "centre" of your data. It is calculated by adding all data values and dividing by the number of values. The mean
can be used to calculate a total. For example, if the mean length of stay were 21 days for a group of 30 episodes, the total number of bed days could be
calculated as 21 multiplied by 30
Glossary … continued
Page 107
Glossary … continued
Mean or median - which to use?
The mean and the median are both measures of the "centre" of your data. For data that are symmetric about the mean (e.g. normally distributed data), the
mean and the median will be close to each other. However they may have very different values for some data sets.
As an example, consider length of stay. Typically, most episodes within a class will have roughly the same length of stay. However, there will be a few
episodes that are longer than the others and a smaller number that are very long. These longer lengths of stay have the effect of increasing the mean length
of stay, but have little or no effect on the median.
If you want to know how long episodes in this class "typically" stay, you will probably be interested in the median as this gives you the middle value - half the
episodes are longer and half the episodes are shorter. If, however, your interest is in allocation of resources and you want to know how long episodes stay
on average, or if you want to get an idea of the total number of days of care provided to episodes in this class, you will need to look at the mean. (The total
days can be calculated by multiplying the mean with the number in the class.)
Median
The median provides the middle value of your data – half the values lie above it and half the values lie below. For example, if your median length of stay
were 20 days, half of your episodes would have stayed for 20 days or less, while the other half would have stayed 20 days or longer. Note that the median,
unlike the mean, cannot be used to calculate the total number of bed days.
Page 108
Glossary … continued
Relative Functional Gain (RFG) and Relative Functional Efficiency (RFE)
FIM change measures the absolute difference between admission FIM and discharge FIM scores, i.e. client 1 had a 10 point improvement (admission 46 -
discharge 56) and client 2 also had a ten point improvement (admission 116 - discharge 126). FIM change does not take into account the proportion of FIM
change possible, i.e. client 1 improved 10 points out of possible 80 (126-46) and client 2 improved 10 points out of a possible 10 (126-116). So not all
patients that improve 10 FIM points are the same. This proportion of FIM change possible is known as the Relative Functional Gain (RFG) and tries to take
into account the amount of FIM gain possible. RFG is calculated as follows:
• If actual FIM change > 0 [improved]
– (Discharge FIM - Admission FIM)/(126 - Admission FIM)
• e.g. 90 – 50/(126-50) = 40/76 = 52.6%
• If actual FIM change < 0 [declined]
– (Discharge FIM - Admission FIM)/ (Admission FIM)
• e.g. 90 – 100/100 = -10/100 = -10%
• If actual FIM change = 0 [no change]
– 0%
FIM efficiency measures the absolute difference between admission FIM and discharge FIM scores per day, without taking into account the proportion of FIM
change possible. The Relative Functional Gain per day is known as the Relative Functional Efficiency (RFE), and is calculated as the RFG divided by the
length of stay (LOS).
Submitted versus reporting episodes
Submitted episodes are those submitted to AROC either via direct data entry or upload through AROC Online Services. These episodes have not been
concatenated.
The reporting data used by AROC in this report is made up of concatenated episodes. For most episodes there is no difference between the submitted
episode and the one used for reporting.
Page 109
Valid FIM
For an episode to have a Valid FIM flag it must be a complete episode and each of the 18 items on admission and discharge must have been answered with
a valid response of 1-7.
Valid LOS
For an episode to have a Valid LOS flag it must be a complete episode with a length of stay ranging between 1 and 500 days.
Version 4 data set
The version 4 (V4) AROC dataset was introduced on 1 July 2012. V4 is designed as a bank of data items, combinations of which are used to describe 6
possible pathways of care (see the AROC website for more information about the different pathways). NOTE: This report utilises only Pathway 3 data
(inpatient direct care).
Glossary … continued
Page 110
Appendix 2: AROC impairment codes STROKE
Haemorrhagic
1.11 Left body involvement
1.12 Right body involvement
1.13 Bilateral involvement
1.14 No paresis
1.19 Other Orthopaedic fractures
Ischaemic
1.21 Left body involvement (right brain)
1.22 Right body involvement (left brain)
1.23 Bilateral involvement
1.24 No paresis
1.29 Other Orthopaedic fractures
BRAIN DYSFUNCTION
Non-traumatic
2.11 Sub-arachnoid haemorrhage
2.12 Anoxic brain damage
2.13 Other non-traumatic brain dysfunction
Traumatic
2.21 Open injury
2.22 Closed injury
NEUROLOGICAL CONDITIONS
3.1 Multiple Sclerosis
3.2 Parkinsonism
3.3 Polyneuropathy
3.4 Guillian-Barre
3.5 Cerebral palsy
3.8 Neuromuscular disorders
3.9 Other neurological conditions
SPINAL CORD DYSFUNCTION
Non traumatic spinal cord dysfunction
4.111 Paraplegia, incomplete
4.112 Paraplegia, complete
4.1211 Quadriplegia, incomplete C1-4
4.1212 Quadriplegia, incomplete C5-8
4.1221 Quadriplegia, complete C1-4
4.1222 Quadriplegia, complete C5-8
4.13 Other non-traumatic spinal cord dysfunction
Traumatic spinal cord dysfunction
4.211 Paraplegia, incomplete
4.212 Paraplegia, complete
4.2211 Quadriplegia, incomplete C1-4
4.2212 Quadriplegia, incomplete C5-8
4.2221 Quadriplegia, complete C1-4
4.2222 Quadriplegia, complete C5-8
4.23 Other traumatic spinal cord dysfunction
AMPUTATION OF LIMB
Not resulting from trauma
5.11 Single upper above elbow
5.12 Single upper below elbow
5.13 Single lower above knee (includes through knee)
5.14 Single lower below knee
5.15 Double lower above knee (includes through knee)
5.16 Double lower above/below knee
5.17 Double lower below knee
5.18 Partial foot (single or double)
5.19 Other amputation not from trauma
AMPUTATION OF LIMB
Resulting from trauma
5.21 Single upper above elbow
5.22 Single upper below elbow
5.23 Single lower above knee (includes
through knee)
5.24 Single lower below knee
5.25 Double lower above knee (includes
through knee)
5.26 Double lower above/below knee
5.27 Double lower below knee
5.28 Partial foot (single or double)
5.29 Other amputation from trauma
ARTHRITIS
6.1 Rheumatoid arthritis
6.2 Osteoarthritis
6.9 Other arthritis
PAIN SYNDROMES
7.1 Neck pain
7.2 Back Pain
7.3 Extremity pain
7.4 Headache (includes migraine)
7.5 Multi-site pain
7.9 Other pain (includes abdo/chest wall)
Page 111
AROC impairment codes…continued ORTHOPAEDIC CONDITIONS
Fractures (includes dislocation)
8.111 Fracture of hip, unilateral (incl. #NOF)
8.112 Fracture of hip, bilateral (incl. #NOF)
8.12 Fracture of shaft of femur
8.13 Fracture of pelvis
8.141 Fracture of knee
8.142 Fracture of lower leg, ankle, foot
8.15 Fracture of upper limb
8.16 Fracture of spine
8.17 Fracture of multiple sites
8.19 Other orthopaedic fracture
Post Orthopaedic Surgery
8.211 Unilateral hip replacement
8.212 Bilateral hip replacement
8.221 Unilateral knee replacement
8.222 Bilateral knee replacement
8.231 Knee and hip replacement, same side
8.232 Knee and hip replacement, diff sides
8.24 Shoulder replacement
8.25 Post spinal surgery
8.26 Other orthopaedic surgery
Soft tissue injury
8.3 Soft tissue injury
CARDIAC 9.1 Following recent onset of new cardiac impairment
9.2 Chronic cardiac insufficiency
9.3 Heart and heart/lung transplant
PULMONARY
10.1 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
10.2 Lung transplant
10.9 Other pulmonary
BURNS
11 Burns
CONGENITAL DEFORMITIES
12.1 Spina bifida
12.9 Other congenital deformity
OTHER DISABLING IMPAIRMENTS
13.1 Lymphoedema
13.3 Conversion disorder
13.9 Other disabling impairments that cannot be classified into a specific group
MAJOR MULTIPLE TRAUMA
14.1 Brain + spinal cord injury
14.2 Brain + multiple fracture/amputation
14.3 Spinal cord + multi fracture/amputation
14.9 Other multiple trauma
DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES
15.1 Developmental disabilities (excludes cerebral palsy)
RE-CONDITIONING/RESTORATIVE
16.1 Re-conditioning following surgery
16.2 Reconditioning following medical illness
16.3 Cancer rehabilitation
Appendix 3: AN-SNAP V4
overnight rehabilitation classes
Page 112
Class Description of AN-SNAP class Class Description of AN-SNAP class
4AZ1 Weighted FIM motor score 13-18, Brain, Spine, MMT, Age ≥ 49 4AE1 Amputation of limb, Age ≥ 54, weighted FIM motor 68-91
4AZ2 Weighted FIM motor score 13-18, Brain, Spine, MMT, Age ≤ 48 4AE2 Amputation of limb, Age ≥ 54, weighted FIM motor 31-67
4AZ3 Weighted FIM motor score 13-18, All other impairments, Age ≥ 65 4AE3 Amputation of limb, Age ≥ 54, weighted FIM motor 19-30
4AZ4 Weighted FIM motor score 13-18, All other impairments, Age ≤ 64 4AE4 Amputation of limb, Age ≤ 53, weighted FIM motor 19-91
4AA1 Stroke, weighted FIM motor 51-91, FIM cognition 29-35 4AH1 Orthopaedic conditions, fractures, weighted FIM motor 49-91, FIM cognition 33-35
4AA2 Stroke, weighted FIM motor 51-91, FIM cognition 19-28 4AH2 Orthopaedic conditions, fractures, weighted FIM motor 49-91, FIM cognition 5-32
4AA3 Stroke, weighted FIM motor 51-91, FIM cognition 5-18 4AH3 Orthopaedic conditions, fractures, weighted FIM motor 38-48
4AA4 Stroke, weighted FIM motor 36-50, Age ≥ 68 4AH4 Orthopaedic conditions, fractures, weighted FIM motor 19-37
4AA5 Stroke, weighted FIM motor 36-50, Age ≤ 67 4A21 Orthopaedic conditions, all other, weighted FIM motor 68-91
4AA6 Stroke, weighted FIM motor 19-35, Age ≥ 68 4A22 Orthopaedic conditions, all other, weighted FIM motor 50-67
4AA7 Stroke, weighted FIM motor 19-35, Age ≤ 67 4A23 Orthopaedic conditions, all other, weighted FIM motor 19-49
4AB1 Brain dysfunction, weighted FIM motor 71-91, FIM cognition 26-35 4A31 Cardiac, Pain syndromes, Pulmonary, weighted FIM motor 72-91
4AB2 Brain dysfunction, weighted FIM motor 71-91, FIM cognition 5-25 4A32 Cardiac, Pain syndromes, Pulmonary, weighted FIM motor 55-71
4AB3 Brain dysfunction, weighted FIM motor 41-70, FIM cognition 26-35 4A33 Cardiac, Pain syndromes, Pulmonary, weighted FIM motor 34-54
4AB4 Brain dysfunction, weighted FIM motor 41-70, FIM cognition 17-25 4A34 Cardiac, Pain syndromes, Pulmonary, weighted FIM motor 19-33
4AB5 Brain dysfunction, weighted FIM motor 41-70, FIM cognition 5-16 4AP1 Major Multiple Trauma, weighted FIM motor 19-91
4AB6 Brain dysfunction, weighted FIM motor 29-40 4AR1 Reconditioning, weighted FIM motor 67-91
4AB7 Brain dysfunction, weighted FIM motor 19-28 4AR2 Reconditioning, weighted FIM motor 50-66, FIM cognition 26-35
4AC1 Neurological conditions, weighted FIM motor 62-91 4AR3 Reconditioning, weighted FIM motor 50-66, FIM cognition 5-25
4AC2 Neurological conditions, weighted FIM motor 43-61 4AR4 Reconditioning, weighted FIM motor 34-49, FIM cognition 31-35
4AC3 Neurological conditions, weighted FIM motor 19-42 4AR5 Reconditioning, weighted FIM motor 34-49, FIM cognition 5-30
4AD1 Spinal cord dysfunction, Age ≥ 50, weighted FIM motor 42-91 4AR6 Reconditioning, weighted FIM motor 19-33
4AD2 Spinal cord dysfunction, Age ≥ 50, weighted FIM motor 19-41 4A91 All other impairments, weighted FIM motor 55-91
4AD3 Spinal cord dysfunction, Age ≤ 49, weighted FIM motor 34-91 4A92 All other impairments, weighted FIM motor 33-54
4AD4 Spinal cord dysfunction, Age ≤ 49, weighted FIM motor 19-33 4A93 All other impairments, weighted FIM motor 19-32
499A Adult Overnight Rehabilitation - Ungroupable
Page 113
Acknowledgements • AROC wish to acknowledge the valuable contributions made by:
– Members of the Management Advisory Group of the Australasian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre
– Members of the Scientific and Clinical Advisory Committee of the Australasian Rehabilitation
Outcomes Centre
– The many staff from the rehabilitation facilities who have spent a great deal of time and care to
collect, collate and correct the data, without whose considerable effort these reports would not be
possible.
• Disclaimer
AROC has made every effort to ensure that the data used in these reports are accurate. Data submitted
to AROC are checked for anomalies and facilities are asked to re-submit data prior to the production of
AROC reports. We have provided general guidelines on the interpretation of the information reported but
would advise readers to use their professional judgement in considering all information contained in this
report.
• Copyright
This work is copyright. It may be produced in whole or in part for study or training purposes subject to the
inclusion of an acknowledgment of the source and no commercial usage or sale. Reproduction for
purposes other than those above requires the written permission of AROC.
• Suggested acknowledgement
Anywhere Hospital AROC Impairment Specific Report on Stroke (Inpatient - pathway 3), July 2016 – June 2017. Australasian
Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre (2017).
Page 114
AROC Contact Details
Australasian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre
Australian Health Services Research Institute
iC Enterprise 1, Innovation Campus
University of Wollongong NSW 2522
Phone: +61 2 4221 4411
Email: [email protected]
Web: aroc.org.au