Upload
hirokazu
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Argon gas pressure dependence of the properties of transparentconducting ZnO:Al ®lms deposited on glass substrates
Yasuhiro Igasaki*, Hirokazu KanmaResearch Institute of Electronics, Shizuoka University, Johoku 3-5-1, Hmamatsu 432-8011, Japan
Received 12 July 1999; accepted 8 November 1999
Abstract
Aluminium doped zinc oxide (ZnO:Al) ®lms were deposited on amorphous substrates heated up to 2008C with a radio
frequency (rf) power of 100 W by rf magnetron sputtering from a ZnO target mixed with Al2O3 of 2 wt.%. Argon gas pressure
during deposition was in the range 0.08±2.7 Pa. As argon gas pressure was increased, the deposition rate and the grain size
were decreased and the surface roughness was increased. Furthermore, the carrier concentration and the Hall mobility were
decreased and thus the electrical resistivity was increased. However, the optical transmittance of about 90% was maintained
over the argon pressure range. The resistivity of the ®lm deposited at argon gas pressure of 0.13 Pa was about
2:5� 10ÿ4 O cm, a value comparable to that for indium tin oxide ®lm presently used as a transparent electrode.
# 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Transparent conducting oxide ®lm; Transparent electrode; Zinc oxide ®lm; Aluminum-doped zinc oxide ®lm; Sputtering; rf
magnetron sputtering
1. Introduction
The increasing use of transparent electrodes for
solid state display devices, solar cells, and transmit-
tance-variable windows has promoted the develop-
ment of inexpensive materials such as zinc oxide
(ZnO), and Al-doped zinc oxide (ZnO:Al) ®lms have
been actively investigated as a transparent conducting
material [1±4]. The electrical properties of ZnO:Al
®lms are so heavily affected by adsorption of oxygen
on the surfaces of the crystallites [5] that values for
their electrical resistivity differ with morphological
structure of each ®lm. Therefore, in order to know the
attainable value for the electrical resistivity of ZnO:Al
®lm, we attempted to measure the electrical resistivity
of a single-crystal ®lm which can be considered to
have no effect of the morphological structure and
obtained the value comparable to that for ITO ®lms
[6,7].
From the viewpoint of practical use, however, the
®lms should be deposited on an amorphous substrate
such as glass substrates. Krikorian and Sneed have
established that the three most important parameters
which determine the ®lm properties in sputtering for a
given material and substrate are substrate temperature,
deposition rate, and background pressure [8]. In this
paper, we report the argon gas pressure dependence of
electrical properties, structural properties and optical
properties of the ZnO:Al ®lms deposited on glass
substrates.
2. Experimental
ZnO:Al ®lms were prepared by rf magnetron sput-
tering. The apparatus used was a NEVA type FP-45 rf
Applied Surface Science 169±170 (2001) 508±511
* Corresponding author. Tel/Fax: �81-53-478-1308.
0169-4332/01/$ ± see front matter # 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 1 6 9 - 4 3 3 2 ( 0 0 ) 0 0 7 4 8 - 0
sputtering system modi®ed for magnetron sputtering,
made up of a water-cooled stainless steel jar of inside
radius 300 mm connected with an oil diffusion pump
through a liquid nitrogen trap. Magnets stored in an
aluminum receptacle were installed on a water-cooled
cathode. A sintered disc of ZnO (purity, 99.99%)
mixed with 2 wt.% Al2O3 (purity, 99.99%), 125 mm
in diameter, was used as a target. A substrate heating
device was mounted on a water-cooled anode. The
distance between target and substrate was about 50 or
70 mm. A stainless steel mesh with 70% transmittance
maintained at earth potential was sometimes laid
between target and substrate. The residual gas and
the sputtering gas were monitored with a B-A type
ionization gauge and a capacitance manometer,
respectively. Quartz glass was used as a substrate.
The substrates were ultrasonically cleaned in a weak
alkaline cleaning solution provided by Furuuchi Che-
mical Laboratory, in acetone and ®nally in methyl
alcohol.
Prior to pre-sputtering, the jar and the substrates
were heated, respectively, at several ten degrees and at
about 4008C for degassing the equipment. After the jar
was evacuated to a pressure below 3� 10ÿ4 Pa, pre-
sputtering of 10 min was carried out at an argon gas
pressure between about 0.08 and 2.7 Pa with an rf
power of 150 W. A constant ¯ow of argon gas was
maintained at a value between 1.5 and 5.0 cm3/min
with a STEC type SEC-400 Mark 3 mass ¯ow con-
troller. After the pre-sputtering, the jar was re-evac-
uated to a pressure below 3� 10ÿ5 Pa.
ZnO:Al ®lms were deposited on the substrates
heated at 100 or 2008C with an rf power of 100 W
at same argon pressure as that during pre-sputtering.
However, the substrate temperature after deposition
was in a value between 150 and 2108C depending
on the deposition conditions. Deposition time was
10±90 min. A ®nal thickness and the deposition rate
were 250±900 nm and 4±21 nm/min, respectively.
Film thickness was determined with a surface rough-
ness detector DEKTAK.
The crystal structure was studied by X-ray diffrac-
tion using CuKa line with a RIGAKU type RAD-IIA.
A JEOL type JSM-T330A scanning microscope
equipped with a wavelength dispersive X-ray spectro-
scope (WDS) JXA-840AP was used for the observa-
tion of surface roughness and for the estimation of
aluminum content. The electrical resistivity r and the
Hall coef®cient RH were measured using the van der
Pauw method. An electric current I ranging from 0.1
to 1.0 mA at 0.1 mA intervals was applied through
electrodes and each potential difference V between the
electrodes was measured. The resistivity was calcu-
lated from the V versus I curve using the least-squares
method. The Hall voltage was measured under an
electric and a magnetic ®eld and then reversed ®elds;
the current and the magnetic ®eld used were, respec-
tively, 10 mA and 3100 G. The carrier concentration N
and the Hall mobility m were calculated from the
electrical resistivity and the Hall coef®cient using
the following relations:
N � 1
eRH
(1)
m � 1
Ner(2)
The optical transmittance and the absorption coef-
®cient for ZnO:Al ®lms deposited on quartz substrates
were measured by a double beam spectrophotometer
(Hitachi type-340) at room temperature with unpolar-
ized light in the spectral range 300±2600 nm.
3. Results and discussion
In the application of ZnO:Al ®lms to a transparent
conductor, especially in solid state display devices, the
electrical resistivity and the optical transmittance of
the ®lms must be most important factors. Therefore,
the emphasis of studies of transparent conducting
®lms has been concentrated mainly on how to prepare
transparent and low resistivity ®lms.
Fig. 1 presents the electrical resistivity r and the
optical transmittance T as a function of argon gas
pressure. T was the average transmittance in the
wavelength range 400±850 nm. Each of the marks
in Fig. 1, means the data obtained from ®lms prepared
under the following conditions;
1. (&): The ®lms were deposited on the substrates
heated at about 1008C for 60 min, substrate±target
distance was 50 mm and a stainless steel mesh
was laid at 3 cm under the target, ®lm thickness
was in the range 300±900 nm.
2. (&): The ®lms were deposited on the
substrates heated at about 1008C for 30±60 min,
Y. Igasaki, H. Kanma / Applied Surface Science 169±170 (2001) 508±511 509
substrate±target distance was 70 mm and a
stainless steel mesh was laid at 3 cm under the
target, ®lm thickness was in the range 270±
360 nm.
3. (*): The ®lms were deposited on the substrates
heated at about 1008C for 15±40 min, substrate±
target distance was 50 mm, ®lm thickness was in
the range 260±390 nm.
4. (*): The ®lms were deposited on the substrates
heated at about 2008C for 15±40 min, substrate±
target distance was 50 mm, ®lm thickness was in
the range 240±370 nm.
As shown in Fig. 1, the average transmittance T of
the ®lm is about 90% independent of argon gas
pressure during deposition, enough for a transparent
conducting ®lm. On the other hand, the resistivity r of
the ®lm increases with increase in argon gas pressure.
The resistivity r is proportional to the reciprocal of
the product of the carrier concentration N and the Hall
mobility m. Therefore, the change in resistivity with
argon gas pressure shown in Fig. 1, is ascribed to the
change in N and/or m which are characteristic para-
meters re¯ecting the ®lm structure and/or the impurity
contents. In order to explain the dependence of the
electrical resistivity on argon gas pressure, we inves-
tigated the change in structural characteristics such as
crystal structure and surface roughness, and the
change in the aluminum content.
Figs. 2 and 3 show the carrier concentration and the
aluminum content, and the Hall mobility and FWHM
Fig. 1. Optical transmittance T and electrical resistivity r as a
function of argon gas pressure during deposition. The meaning of
marks is presented in text.
Fig. 2. Carrier concentration N and aluminum content Al/
(Al� Zn) as a function of argon gas pressure during deposition.
Marks correspond to those in Fig. 1.
Fig. 3. The Hall mobility m and the half-width of X-ray diffraction
peak FWHM as a function of argon gas pressure during deposition.
Marks correspond to those in Fig. 1.
510 Y. Igasaki, H. Kanma / Applied Surface Science 169±170 (2001) 508±511
of X-ray diffraction from (0001) plane, respectively,
as a function of argon gas pressure.
As shown in Fig. 2, the carrier concentration N
decreases with increasing argon gas pressure in the
range 0.27±2.7 Pa, and the aluminum content is
almost constant in the argon pressure range 0.08±
1.0 Pa and then increases slightly above about
1.0 Pa. In the aluminum doped zinc oxide, an alumi-
num atom is generally considered to be substituted
for zinc atom and to act as donor. Therefore, the
decrement of N shown in ®gure is not ascribed to
the change in the aluminum content namely donor
concentration.
As shown in Fig. 3, the Hall mobility m is decreased
and FWHM is increased with increasing argon gas
pressure in the range 0.27±2.7 Pa. The change in
FWHM generally re¯ects the change in the grain size
of crystallites, that is, the increase in FWHM corre-
sponds to the decrease in grain size. Therefore, one of
the causes of decrement of m with increasing argon gas
pressure can be ascribed to the decrease in grain size,
namely the increase in the grain-boundary i.e. the
scattering centre for carriers. On the other hand, from
SEM observation, we found that the surface roughness
was increased with increase in argon pressure. The
increase in surface roughness of ®lm decreases the
effective thickness, not measured thickness by DEK-
TAK, of conducting path in ®lm for the carrier and
then increases the apparent electrical resistivity.
Furthermore, the increase in surface roughness
increases the effective surface area of ®lms.
In the ZnO ®lm, an oxygen adsorbed on the surface
of crystallites traps an electron and decreases the
carrier concentration and also decreases the Hall
mobility by increasing the potential height at the
surface of crystallites [9]. On the other hand, as
mentioned above, the decrease in the crystallite size
and the increase in the surface roughness increase the
effective surface area of ®lm and then cause the
increase in the number of adsorption site for oxygen.
Therefore, we can conclude that the increase of resis-
tivity of ZnO:Al ®lm with increasing argon gas pres-
sure can be ascribed to the decrease in the carrier
concentration and the Hall mobility caused by the
decrease in grain size and the increase in surface
roughness.
4. Conclusions
ZnO:Al ®lms were deposited on quartz substrates
heated to 100 or 2008C with an rf power of 100 W
under an argon gas pressure between 0.08 and 2.7 Pa
by rf magnetron sputtering from a ZnO target with
2 wt.% Al2O3, and their structural, optical and elec-
trical properties such as electrical resistivity r, carrier
concentration N and the Hall mobility m were studied
as a function of argon gas pressure from the viewpoint
of their application to the transparent electrodes. As a
result, it was found that the electrical properties were
closely related to the grain size and the surface rough-
ness of ®lm, and that as argon pressure during deposi-
tion was increased, the grain size was decreased and
the surface roughness was increased and thus the
electrical resistivity was increased. The minimum
resistivity of about 2:5� 10ÿ4 O cm obtained with
a ®lm grown on a quartz substrate heated at 1008Cwith an rf power of 100 W at argon pressure of 0.13 Pa
is comparable to one for ITO ®lm. Therefore, we can
claim that ZnO:Al ®lms deposited on glass substrates
at lower pressure can be used as transparent conduct-
ing ®lm.
Acknowledgements
One of the authors (Y.I.) wishes to express his
appreciation to the Takahashi Foundation for their
®nancial support.
References
[1] T. Minami, H. Nanto, S. Takata, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 23 (1984)
L280.
[2] Z.-C. Jin, I. Hamberg, C.G. Granqvist, Appl. Phys. Lett. 51
(1987) 149.
[3] Y. Igasaki, M. Ishikawa, G. Shimaoka, Appl. Surf. Sci. 33/34
(1988) 926.
[4] M. Ruth, I. Tuttle, J. Goral, R. Nou®, J. Crystal Growth 96
(1989) 363.
[5] P. Ponasewicz, R. Littbarski, M. Grunze, in: Current Topics in
Materials Science, E. Kaldis (Ed.), Vol. 7, North-Holland,
Amsterdam, 1981 p. 397.
[6] Y. Igasaki, H. Saito, J. Appl. Phys. 69 (1991) 2190.
[7] Y. Igasaki, H. Saito, J. Appl. Phys. 70 (1991) 3613.
[8] E. Krikorian, R.J. Sneed, J. Appl. Phys. 37 (1966) 3655.
[9] Y. Igasaki, H. Saito, Thin Solid Films 199 (1991) 223.
Y. Igasaki, H. Kanma / Applied Surface Science 169±170 (2001) 508±511 511