1

Architecture for Coalition Cooperation

Navy Surface Warfare – Future Readiness

RDML James P. McManamon

24 January 2011Statement A: Approved for Public Release; Distribution is unlimited

2

Team Ships Organization

PMS 400D

DDG51

SHIPS ACQUISITION

MANAGEMENT OFFICE

DIRECTOR

DEPUTY

DIRECTOR

PMS 500

DDG 1000

DPM

PMS 501

LCS

PMS 377LHD8 / LCAC / LHAR / AADS

PMS 317LPD-1 7/ JCC(X)

PMS 325AUXILIARY SHIPS /

SMALL BOATS & CRAFTS

PEO STAFF

PROGRAM EXECUTIVE

OFFICER SHIPS

RDML DAVE LEWIS

SWE SUPPORT

DEPUTY COMMANDER FOR

SURFACE WARFARE

RDML JAMES McMANAMON

COMBATANTS

OFFICE

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

DPM

DPM

DPMPMS 502

CG(X)

PMS 385STRATEGIC AND THEATER

SEALIFT

DPM

DPM

DPM

DPM

AMPHIBIOUS & AUXILIARY

SEALIFT OFFICE

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

SURFACE WARFARE

DIRECTORATE

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

PMS 333INACTIVE SHIPS/

SHIP TRANSFERS

PMS 470AMPHIBIOUS /AUXILIARY/MINE

PMS 333/336INACTIVE SHIPS/

SHIP TRANSFERS

PMS 326INTERNATIONAL FLEET

SUPPORT

PMS 400F

CGs / FFGs / DDG51sDPM

COMMANDING OFFICER

SURFACE SHIP

ENGINEERING

PLANNING PROGRAM

(SURFMEPP)

DPM

DPM

INACTIVE SHIPS

DPM

SHIP TRANSFERS

DPM

DEPUTY

FLEET READINESS

SEA 21ADPM

3

PMS 326 Business Base

Ship Platform/FOTS

$107.4M

Combat Systems

Coastal Radar/

Other

$63.5M

PMS 326 Business Base

Total Case Value (TCV) $4.7B

Total Capital Avail (TCA) $296.9M

Follow on Technical

Support (FOTS) CasesTCV $2.778B / TCA $192.2M

Combat Systems Cases TCV $2.149B / TCA $76.89M

Other Miscellaneous CasesTCV $311.2M / TCA $27.8M

FUNCTIONS

• International TYCOM

• Engineering Tech Support

• Overall Program/Project Management

• DSRA / PMA Planning and Execution

• Maintenance Support

• Systems Upgrade and Integration

• Configuration Mgmt/Supply & Material

Support

• HM&E Support / Upgrades

• Software, Pubs, Manuals /Training

• Infrastructure

• Legacy Systems

PLATFORMS

• Current/ex-USN: FFG 7, MHC, FF1052,

LST, LSD, KIDD, LCAC

• Future: LPD, Ticonderoga

• Indigenous: DD, DE, DDH, PFG, PCG,

PGG, MEKO, DDG, SA’AR 5

• Other International:

Corvette/Frigate Class Ships

SHIPYARD

• Upgrades

• Industrial Training Program

• Port Engineer

OTHER FACILITIES

• FACDAR

• Land-based Radar Systems

• Land-based Test Sites

Actively supporting ~150 ships representing

23 countries:

» Several ex-USN ships plus foreign built with USN

combat systems

» Additional countries with stand alone systems

(Radar, CIWS, SLQ32, etc.)

• Legacy Support is provided on >25 different

combat systems in 16 countries

» Includes AAW, ASUW, ASW, and EW

» Includes ASROC, MK 92 FCS, CIWS Blk 0

• International FFG Working Group (IFWG)

Serving as TYCOM to the World’s Fleetby adapting USN processes to meet

FMS requirements

4

FUNCTIONS

• International TYCOM

• Engineering Tech Support

• Overall Program /Project Management

• DSRA / PMA Planning and Execution

• Maintenance Support

• Systems Upgrade and Integration

• Configuration Mgmt

• Material Support

• HM&E Support / Upgrades

• Software, Pubs, Manuals

• OJT and Country Tailored Training

• Infrastructure

• Legacy Systems

COMPETENCIES

• Program/Project

Management

• Financial

Management

• Operation and

Maintenance Tech

Services

• Ship Overhaul

Support Services

• Engineering and

Logistics

PLATFORMS

• Current/ex-USN: FFG 7, MHC,

FF1052, LST, LSD, KIDD, LCAC

• Indigenous: DD, DE, DDH, PFG,

PCG, PGG, MEKO, DDG, SA’AR

5

• Other International: Corvette/

Frigate Class Ships

SHIPYARD

• Upgrades

• Industrial Training Program

• Port Engineers

IMA/ISEA

• Development/Support

OTHER FACILITIES

• FACDAR

• Land-based Radar Systems

• Land-based Test Sites

Product LinesInternational Fleet Support

5

Non-USN Supported

Equipt/Systems

Engineering Services

Supportability Contract

FOTS Request from

Foreign Customer

USN Supported

Equipt/Systems

General /Special

Tech Support

Regional

Maintenance

Centers

Boiler / SSDG / HM&E / LST

LM2500 Tech Services

NSWCDD-SSES

Industrial Upgrade Equip /

ALT Kitting / Spares

Navy Inventory

Control Point

Industrial Upgrade

Tech Assist

Puget Sound

Naval Shipyard

Surveillance / C2 / ASW

NUWC

Keyport

Communications

NAWC-ADSt. Indigoes

NSDC Dam Neck

Electronic Warfare / MSO

NSWC

Crane

Configuration Data

Panama City

Coastal Defense

RAST / HRS / SGSI / VLA

NAWC

Lakehurst

Training Devices

NAWC-TSD

Orlando

Mk 75 Gun Systems

NSWC ORDSTA

Louisville

TARTAR, Mk 13, MK 92

NSWC-PHD

Operational and

Maintenance Training

• Sonar Dome X-Ray

• MTT/LOA

1200 PSI Propulsion Systems

• Routine Boiler Inspections

• Job Planning Spvsr

• Welding and NDT

• Boilermaker

HM&E - Auxiliary Systems

Mk 13 & Mk 26 GMLS

Mk 42 5’/54

Gun Systems

MK 74 & Mk 68 Gun Fire

Control Systems

AN/SQS-26 CX &

Other Sonar Systems

AN/SQS-26 Sonar Dome

Rubber Window

Replacements

HM&E / Combat Systems

OEMs

PARMs

Calibration

NWAD-PHD

Corona

AN/SQR-17 / AN-SQR-19

AN/SQS-56

PMS 411

Tech Doc

NSWC-PHD

NSDSA / ISEA

USN Fleet Support Activities

PMS 326

Follow On Technical Support ProgramRepresentative Process for Technical Support Services

FOTS Request for Technical Assistance

6

• Opportunities for shared International logistics• Procurement, Sharing, Asset Visibility

• Interim meeting to be hosted by NAVICP in October 2010

Established “SMART” Acquisition and Inventory Management Team

(Turkey & USN lead)

• Pre-approval by US State Dept for transfer of parts & data between IFWG countries• DoS coordinating USG interagency review

Third Party Transfer Process (USN lead)

• Explore practical implementation of FFG-7 Anti-Air Warfare modernization• Examine broader applicability of Turkish Navy ESSM and RAN SM-2 Blk IIIB programs

Future with and after SM-1 (USN lead)

• Address common concerns:• Cost and uncertainty of sustaining viable SM-1 DTRM• Explore affordable options

Standard Missile MK56 Dual Thrust Rocket Motor (DTRM) (RAN

& USN lead)

• Configuration and Modernization Data Base (Spain lead)• “Green Ship” Initiative (USN lead)

• Awareness of international responsibilities to operate and maintain our ships in an environmentally conscious manner

Other Initiatives

May 2009 – Inaugural IFWG

Meeting hosted and chaired by

USN

• Participation and leadership at the

flag level

• Several countries briefed major

modernization programs

• Identified opportunities for sharing

technology and significant cost

savings

May 2010 - Second IFWG

Meeting hosted and chaired by

Turkey

• Charter established, now nine

navies

• Stepped forward in shared

logistics

• Underway demo of Turkey’s

GENESIS combat management

system

• Limited industry participation

October 2010 – IFWG

“SMART” Logistics Team

Meeting

• NAVICP Mechanicsburg

• Key opportunity for modernizing

future material support

May 2011 –3rd IFWG Meeting

NAS North Island, San Diego CA

Initia

tive

sInternational Frigate Working Group (IFWG)

A First Step

7

FMS vs DCS

FMS - Management

• DoD Program management – “Leave the

driving to us”

• Experienced personnel familiar with the

equipment

• FMS charges for this management

service

– Administrative Surcharge & Non-Recurring costs

– Contract administration services (CAS)

– Defined Services Lines

DCS - Management

• U.S. Government only involved in

export license review

• Procurement contract between U.S.

industry & foreign government

– Contractor directly interfaces with customer

– No U.S. Government involvement

– Disputes resolved by foreign government

• Report to Congress if sale meets

36(c), AECA

FMS - Financial

• LOA estimated prices – What will the actual

cost be?

• Will LOA payment schedule match actual

execution performance profile?

• When will the case be closed?

• USG consolidates purchases for better

prices

• Prompt & reliable payments to contractor

DCS – Financial

• May represent more risk for seller

• Freedom from FAR & DFARS may reduce

cost

• Less than economic quantity purchase

• Commercial banking procedures

• Prompt incremental and final billing

• Prompt contract closure

8

Assessment Plan/Policy

SURFMEPP

Sustainment Program

IMA Capacity/Capability

Gaps Identified

Surface Ship End-to-End Process Map, Maintenance & Modernization Process Gaps

• Need for Integrated Assessment Program

• Need for Integrated Sustainment Program

• SSLCM scope limitations• No Maintenance Material Management

• Need for sufficiently “Engineered” Work Packages• Availability Schedule Milestones

• Maintenance and Modernization Integration

• Establish appropriate Avail Type, Schedule and Duration

• Insufficient IT support systems• Work Package Development, Logistics

• Lack of QA oversight

Avail Execution/Work Certification

• Reconstitution of IMA Capacity/Capability

• “I” Level

• No Existing Avail Completion/Work Certification Process

9

Assessments:• Skilled techs performing

documented procedures

• Utilize NMD & other tools

• Mission specific focus

Sustainment:• Maintenance Engineering

• Performance Monitoring

• Fleet Engineering Support

• Training & Tech. Docs

• Obsolescence

Surface Ship Readiness Initiative (SSRI)

Expected Service LifeFleet Intro

Decom

Assess ShipTSRA

Plan MaintenanceSURFMEPP

Execute Avail.

Avail Ex. & Work Cert

Maintain ReadinessSustainment

SURFMEPP:• Class Maint. Planning

• Availability Planning

• Maint. Planning Data Systems

• Cost Engineering

• Material Management

Avail Ex. & Work Cert:• Technical Adjudication of work

• Event Readiness

• Test & Certification of work

Continuous SustainmentProcess

10

SEA 21 READINESS TASK FORCES

Phase1: Issue Extrapolation

Phase 2: Needs / Requirements Assessment

Phase 3: Gap AnalysisPhase 4: Alternative Analysis and Solution Selection

Phase 5: Implementation and Control

• Scope ReadinessTask Force Mission

• Assess Impact andSeverity of SystemIssues

• Metrics Deep Dive• Evaluation of

Current System

Requirements• Needs Assessment

of non-existing requirements

• Issues identified inPhase 1 evaluatedagainst system

requirements • Preliminary RecommendationsFormulated

• Historical studyanalysis

• Alternative solution identification

• Integration of historical data withpreliminary recommendations

• Feasibility Assessment

•Develop concise Implementation Plan

•Monitor ExecutionTimeline

READINESS

Readiness is defined as the ability of forces, units, weapons systems, or equipments to deliver the outputs for which they are designed.

+

+

+

+

Optimal

Readiness

CORE ELEMENTS

HISTORICAL READINESS TRENDS

READINESS = f(P,E,S,T)

INSURV Scores

Past Studies

Metrics

Common Themes

Manning Reductions

Deferred Maintenance

Minimized on-the-job training

Increased Reliance on shore-support

Parts Obsolescence MaterialUnavailability

Task Force Mission: Perform a coordinated, comprehensive, holistic assessment of a system or Class of Ships and develop Actionable Readiness Recommendations.

5 -

PH

ASE

D A

PP

RO

AC

HM

AJO

R D

ELIV

ERA

BLE

S

Root Cause Issues

Requirements Analysis

Performance Evaluation

Readiness

Issue

Requirement Action Lead Preliminary

Solution

Issue A Requirement A Action Lead A Solution A

Issue B Requirement B Action Lead B Solution B

Issue C Requirement C Action Lead C Solution C

Issue D Requirement D Action Lead D Solution D

Issue E Requirement E Action Lead E Solution E

Recommendation Selection

Recommendation Execution

AWS-SPY - 48 Actionable Recommendations

- Phase: 5

MCM CLASS- 51 Actionable Recommendations

- Phase: 5

LPD 17 CLASS- 100+ Draft Recommendations

- Phase: 3

BMD MISSION- 50+ Draft Recommendations

- Phase: 3ON

GO

ING

TFs

COORDINATED

COMPREHENSIVE

Factors Examined

ObsoleteEquipment

Spare Parts Support

Departures from Specifications

Past systemalterations

Changes in system employment

System aging factors

Adequacy of Training

COSAL Effectiveness

APL / AEL Accuracy LLTM Management

2M Repair Ability ILS Documentation

HOLISTIC

RESULTS

“Our Goal: Not to be a reference in a future Readiness study.”J.P. McManamon

Participants include (but not limited to):-USFF-CNSF-NAVPERS-SEA04-SEA05-SEA21-PEO SHIPS-PEO IWS-NAMDC-NAVICP

-ISEAs-PYs-SUPSHIP-NAVMAC-CRMC-NSWCs-OPNAV-NAVSUP-CLASRONs-Others

The results of the TF effort will be referenced for years to come as the most comprehensive readiness study ever conducted.-VADM McCoy onAWS-SPY TF

Execute Mission Requirements

Self-sufficiently Sustain Operations

Enable Ships to Get Underway

FIGHT

SUSTAIN

MOBILIZE

11

AEGIS BMD Technology Evolution

12

PB11 DDGM & CGM Fielding Profiles

13

DDG ModernizationDescription

Provide a comprehensive Modernization strategy for the DDG 51 class ships to ensure a mission relevant service life of 35 years

Primary objective is to reduce workload and total ship class ownership costs via HM&E technology insertion and provide warfighting improvements

Provides Multi-Mission Signal Processor (MMSP) BMD capability

Supports a Force Structure requirement of 313 ships

Applies to DDG 51 Class (Flight I & II First, DDG 51-78)

14

DDG Modernization Requirements

Warfighting UpgradesAAW

CIC Display Upgrades

Open Architecture Computing Plant

VLS Modifications

AWS ACB 12 Computer Program

Multi-Mission SIGPRO

SPY-1D Transmitter Upgrades

Multi-Mission BMD

SM6/NIFC-CA (IOC FY14)

FCS STAMO Upgrades

C4I

*NAVSSI BLK 4

*IFF Mode 5

CEC

SHIP/FORCE PROTECTION

ESSM

*CIWS-1B

*NULKA

*SEWIP

*SSTD (ATT) – IOC FY13

MK 54 Torpedo/DFCI

SQQ-89A(V)15 w/MFTA

HM&E Modernization

Full IBNS Upgrade

MCS/DCS Upgrades

GEDMS

Wireless Communications

Digital Video Surveillance

Quality of Life Upgrades

Advanced Galley

Mission Life Extension Upgrades

GUN WEAPON SYSTEM

MK-160 Mod X Gun Computing System