Upload
kevlyn
View
65
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
ArcelorMittal Design Project. Presented By: Braulio Escobar, Jim Beidleman , Dave Taucher , Joseph Kaminski . Table of Contents. Project Background Project Objectives Information Design Process Our Design Conclusion . Project Background . - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Presented By:
Braulio Escobar, Jim Beidleman, Dave Taucher, Joseph Kaminski
ArcelorMittal Design Project
Project BackgroundProject ObjectivesInformationDesign ProcessOur Design Conclusion
Table of Contents
Project Background Large Steel Company with Extensive client base Facing large problem with disorganized and mislabeled
scrap coming in Causing off heats and affecting quality of their product Creates dissatisfied clients Currently correcting the heats one batch at a time
Do so by adding in pure alloys Chromium cost $32 for every 100g Manganese cost $6.50 for every 100g Aluminum cost $15.72 for every 100g
Expensive Time consuming
Would like a system created to mitigate these issues
Would like for the material to be organized before entering their facilities
The problem requires us to look at the big picture Cooperation between large entities (i.e. auto manufacturers,
scrappers, etc.)
Gathering Information
The recycled steel is creating issues Unfeasible to exclude scrap metal from the solution Too costly to make steel solely from scratch Will be impossible eventually
Expanding countries of China and India Limited resources Inflation & exorbitant prices
Effectively use scrap to sustain steel making into the future “Cradle-to-Cradle”
Gathering Information
Identify ProblemFind The NeedsIdentify Effective SolutionAnalyze Effectiveness Of Solution
Objectives
Several Problems:Issue of OrganizationIssue of Effective StorageIssue of Multiple Entities Cooperating
Faced with a Problem
Efficient Cost Time Space
Within ArcelorMittal’s tolerances Appropriate Incentives Sustainable Organized
Attributes
Weighted Objective Tree
Steel Recycling Process 1/1
Efficiency .5/.5
Sustainable .5/.5
Cost .5/.25
Time .5/.25
Organized .33/.17
Appropriate Incentives .33/.17
Cost to Benefit Ratio .8/.2
Cheap .2/.05
Area of Operation .33/.17
Entities 1/.33
Metal Recognition ..5/.09
Beneficial for all entities .5/.09
Scrapyard
Transportation
Mutual Gains .5/.09
Storage .5/.09
Efficient ProcessSustainable
Incentives that propagate the process and can be maintained into the foreseeable future of all entities involved
Process that can be maintained without exorbitant operational costs
Space EfficientArcelorMittal does not separate the steel on
site
Specifications
Our designMeans/Functions 1 2 3
Organization Method
By Size By Composition By Density
Metal Recognition Coding Chemical Process
Magnetic Process
Transportation Train Trucks Barges
Primary Organizational Entity
Scrapyard Outside Contractor
ArcelorMittal
A: By size/ chemical process/ Barges/ ArcelorMittalB: By composition/ coding/ train/ scrapyardC: By density/ Magnetic process/ trucking/ scrapyard
Constraints/Objectives
Weight % A B C
C: Cost Effective X C: Time Effective C: Organized C: No ArcelorMittal Involvement
O: Efficiency 50 .8/5040%
.4/5020%
O: Sustainable 50 .7/5035%
.6/5030%
Totals 75% 50%
Produce manuals to be sold to scrap companies
These manuals identify types of metal used in productIdentify where metals are in
product Incentive
This would provide new income
Help with quality of steel arriving at their plants
Manufacturers
Would Purchase manuals from Manufactures More Specific in scrap process
Scrappers
Incentives Increased payment from ArcelorMittal for properly
separated steel
Pays higher fees for the recycled steel imported into their plants
Needs to establish better and more frequent communication between themselves, manufacturers, and the scrappers
Incentives Less need for raw materials like pure
carbon etc.Less expensive with more effective use
of recycled material
ArcelorMittal
Builds on ArcelorMittal’s already established specs Provides incentives for scrappers to meet their specs fully Utilizes the cradle-to-cradle concept better Less cost for raw materials Possibly reduced mining Help reach a shrinking state of new steel production
Benefits
Our Solution
Effectively implement appropriate incentivesCan be sustained into the foreseeable future Utilizes almost all of existing infrastructure
therefore efficient process
Conclusion
ArcelorMittal Schnitzer Scrapping Chemicool Steel.org Ted Frick PhD Chemistry (U.S. Steel)
Acknowledgements