Upload
brij-mohan-singh
View
226
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/14/2019 Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Systems
1/13
9/21/13 Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Systems
file:///C:/Users/H P/Desktop/home group/BM SINGH/Monal/Biofertilizers/mycorrhizae/Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Syste
Search PMN
SymposiumHomepage
ImpactStatement
PDF versionfor printing
2004 Plant Management Network.Accepted fo r publication 14 January 2003. Published 1 March 2004.
Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to SupportSustainable Cropping Systems
Yolande Dalp,Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, ResearchBranch, 960 Carling Avenue Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0C6; and MarciaMonreal,Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Research Branch, P.O.Box 1000A, Brandon, Manitoba, R7A 5Y3
Corresponding author: Yo lande Dalp. [email protected]
Dalp, Y., and Monreal, M. 2004. Arbuscular mycorrhiza inoculum to supportsustainable cropping s ystems . Online. C rop Management do i:10.1094/CM-2004-0301-09-RV.
AbstractArbuscular mycorrhizae (AM) are symbiotic associations, formed between plantsand soil fungi that play an essential role in plant growth, plant protection, andsoil quality. The AM fungi expand their filaments in soil and plant roots. Thisfilamentous network promote bi-directional nutrient movement where soilnutrients and water move to the plant and plant photosynthates flow to thefungal network. AM fungi are ubiquitous in the soil and can form symbiosis withmost terrestrial plants including major crops, cereals, vegetables, andhorticultural plants. In agriculture, several factors, such as host cropdependency to mycorrhizal colonization, tillage system, fertilizer application,and mycorrhizal fungi inoculums potential can affect plant response and plantbenefits from mycorrhizae. Due to their obligate symbiotic status, AM fungineed to associate with plant for growth and proliferation. Consequently, thecultivation of AM fungal strains and the maintenance of reference collections
require methodologies and infrastructures quite different from those used withother microbial collections and inoculum production. Interest in AM fungipropagation for agriculture is increasing due to their role in the promotion ofplant health, in soil nutrition improvement, and soil aggregate stability. Thecomprehensive life cycle of AM fungi and methods currently used for thepropagation of inoculum and the maintenance of in vivo and in vitro sourcecollections are described. Methods and regulations of large-scale production ofcommercial inoculum that provide users with products of high quality andefficiency are discussed.
IntroductionArbusc ular my cor rhizae (AM) are sy mbiotic assoc iations formed
between p lants and soil fungi that benefit both partners. The phy tobio nt
cor respond to appro ximately 80% of plant species and the fungi are
classified in the phy lum Glomeromy co ta, including nine genera; Glomus,
Paraglo mus,Sclero cystis,Acaulospo ra,Entrophospo ra, Gigaspora,
Scutellospo ra,Diversispora, Geosiphon, andArch aeospo ra(41). A M fungi
(AMF) are ubiquitous in the soil with around 17 0 desc ribed species (46).
The symbiosis is called arbuscular because the fungi form specialized
tree-like struc tures (arbuscules = tree-like) inside root cells. Other
structures pro duced by fungi are intra- and extraradical spores (which are
germinating structures useful for long-term preserv ation of species,
propagation, and species identification purposes), intraradical hyphae,
extraradical hyphae, intracellular fungal storage structures called vesic les
(which are lipid co ntaining bodies) and, for some genera, auxiliary cells
branc hing from extraradic al hy phae. I ntraradical A M fungal my celium
mailto:[email protected]://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/cm/http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/cm/http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/cm/http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/cm/mailto:[email protected]://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/cm/about/impact.pdfhttp://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/sub/cm/review/2004/amfungi/Dalpe.pdfhttp://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/cm/about/impact.pdfhttp://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/pub/cm/review/2004/inoculant/http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/pub/cm/review/2004/inoculant/http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/search/pmnjournalshttp://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/cm/http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/8/14/2019 Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Systems
2/13
9/21/13 Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Systems
file:///C:/Users/H P/Desktop/home group/BM SINGH/Monal/Biofertilizers/mycorrhizae/Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Syste 2
form a network around and inside cortical ce lls of plant roots, ex traradical
AM my celium c an spread thro ughout the soil surrounding the r oo t sy stem
and increase the ability to explore soil areas, acce ssing water and
nutrients for plant roo ts. Benefits to plants are improv ed water and
nutrient uptake, enhanced P transport, and dro ught and disease
resistance. Benefits to fungi are the supply of photosy nthates to the fungal
network located in the cortical ce lls of the plant and the surrounding soil.
All water, nutrients, and photosy nthates ex changes occur v ia the fungal
filament network that bridged plant rhizosphere and plant roo ts.
AM Interaction with Soil and CropsThe increased capac ity o f plant roots for water and nutrients uptake
from the soil when colonized by AMF is the main mechanisms propo sed to
explain the effect of AM in plant performance. This behavior is
particularly ev ident with soil nutrients that are more immobile such as
phosphorus (P), zinc (Zn), and coppe r (Cu) . Improv ed phosphorus
nutrition when co lonized with AMF has been demo nstrated for hundreds
of cultivated plants. By ex tending past the P-depletion zone formed
around the ro ot sy stems, the fungal soil network is able to maintain P
transport to plant for longer periods (19,21 ,27 ). Under high P soil
conditions, AMF are almost of no use to the plants and the symbiosis is
temporarily inhibited. As suc h, a reduction in P applications isreco mmended in order to stimulate and maintain symbiosis efficiency .
Most agricultural cro ps such as flax, c orn, sorghum, wheat, barley ,
potatoes, and sunflower can benefit from myc orrhizal association. Some
other crop plants do not form AM symbiosis; those belong to the
Cruciferae, Brassicaceae, Chenopodiaceae , and Caryophy llaceae families
(3). Canola (Brassicaceae family), an important cro p in wester n Canada
does not form A M. Efficiencies and limitations o f registered my cor rhizal
inoculum, in terms of the cultivated cro ps, are clearly po sted on sale
products together with reco mmendation for use.
Interaction of AM and Agricultural PracticesAgricultural pr actic es such as fertilizer applic ations, c ro p ro tat ion,
tillage, and liming affect field AM potential and ro ot c olonization leve ls.
For ex ample, high lev els of P fertilization have been found to slow do wn or
inhibit mycor rhizal efficiency in soybean fields (12). Cropping of a soil
with cano la, a non-ho st plant spec ies, delay ed my cor rhiza dev elopment of
maize and of flax (1 5; Monreal et al., unpublished data). Higher so il
infectiv ity was observ ed under reduced or no tillage practices (31 ) and
liming increased mycor rhizal colo nization of barley ro ots and soil
infectiv ity (17 ). Plant spec ies differ in their fertilization requirements, and
consequently their dependency o n AMF vary considerably from one crop
to another (33). For ex ample, under field conditions, beans, corn, and leek
have a much higher mycor rhizal dependency than potato and wheat. Thisrange of plant response to A MF has to be taken into acc ount when
managing a cro pping system o r a cro p rotation. Data on the potential of
cro p plants to benefit from myc orrhizal symbiosis are available at the
mycor rhizal produc ers lev el. Table 1 , taken from Plenchette et al. (33) and
personal investigations, gives ex amples of Relative Field Mycorrhizal
Dependency (RFMD for some plants. Equation 1 gives the formula for
calc ulating RFMD.
Table 1. Relative Field Mycorrhizal Dependency (RFMD)for selected plants.
Plant name RFMD* (%)
8/14/2019 Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Systems
3/13
9/21/13 Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Systems
file:///C:/Users/H P/Desktop/home group/BM SINGH/Monal/Biofertilizers/mycorrhizae/Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Syste 3
Cabbage (Brassicaceae)* 0
Carrot 99.2
Chicory (witloof) 82.4
Faba bean 93.5
Garden beet (C henopodiaceae)* 0
Garden pea 96.7
Kentucky blue grass 72.4
Kidney bean 94.7
Leek 95.7
Pepper 66.1
Potato 41.9
Tomato (according cultivars) 59.2 - 78.0
Sweet corn 72.7
Wheat (according cultivars) 44.5 - 56.8
* Non-mycorrhizal plant.
RFMD =
DM of mycorrhizal plant - DM of non-mycorrhizal plant
100 [1]DM of mycorrhizal plant
Impact on Plant Protection and Microbial InteractionsAM fungi are recognized as high potential agents in plant protec tion
and pest management (34,43,48). In several cases direct bioc ontrol
potential has been demonstrated, especially for plant diseases caused by
Phytophtora, Rhizoctonia, andFusariumpathogens (1,49,5 2). Sev eral
studies have co nfirmed synergism between A MF and biocontro l agents
such asBurkho lde ria cepacia Palleroni & Holmes (37 ),Pseudomonas
fluo rescensMigula (11 ), Trichoderma harzianumRifai (7 ), and
Ve rticillium chlamydosporiumKamysc hko ex Barron & Onions (35).
These interactions suggest that A M might affect plant and soil micro bialactiv ity by stimulating the production of root exudates, phy toalex ins, and
phenolic co mpounds (30,32). A small increase of activity o f plant defence
genes, especially for the pro duction of chitinases, glucanases, flavo noid
bio sy sthesis, and phy toalexins, has been observed during my cor rhizal
growth; howev er these mycor rhizal defence induction mechanisms
remain transitory (18).
AMF Impact on C Sequestration and Soil-aggregate StabilityOver the years, a body o f research has acc umulated showing the effects
of AMF biomass accumulated in the roo ts of colonized plants and in the
surrounding soil. The A MF soil hyphae spread into the rhizosphere where
they dev elop a network of micro scopic filaments that make up to 80% ofthe total hyphae co ntent in soil (24). For ex ample, in 4- to 5-week-old
inoculated faba beans plants (Vic ia fava L.), myc orrhizal fungi biomass
varied from 0.5 to 5% assoc iated with low (16%) and high (62%) root
colonization levels, respectively (25). Also, AMF spore biomass,
measured in nine soil-field samples grown with cassava for six mo nths,
was e stimated between 89 to 93 lb/acre (44).
Soil-aggregates stability is an important soil physical property that can
be affec ted by AMF. Recently , a gly copro tein produc ed by AMF that
promotes soil aggregation, glomalin, has been discov ered. Furthermore,
higher than normal carbon diox ide conce ntrations help to promote soil
aggregation by increasing the produc tion of glomalin (38). These findings
8/14/2019 Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Systems
4/13
9/21/13 Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Systems
file:///C:/Users/H P/Desktop/home group/BM SINGH/Monal/Biofertilizers/mycorrhizae/Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Syste 4
could have important future implications in the use o f myco rrhizal fungi
to promote the pro duction of soil stable aggregates, improv e water
infiltration, and soil C sequestration in agricultural systems.
Propagation Cycle of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal FungiThe major biological characteristic of AMF is their obligate biotrophic
nature. This means that each of their life cycle steps requires the
association with a living plant. A s with most o f the filamentous fungi, AMF
propagation can occur either by spores differentiation and germination
(Figs. 1a, 1b) or by my celium ex tension through soil and roots (Figs. 1c ,1d). Spores are differentiated by budding intercalary or apically o n
hyphae. AMF species identification is based on spore characters, spore
wall architec ture, and the morphology of subtending hy phae. Some
molecular to ols to differentiate among AMF species and strains have been
dev eloped. However these new technologies remain to be tested for a
variety of A M fungal str ains and spec ies (26,29,42,53). Sex ual
reproduction has not yet been observ ed for these symbiotic fungi;
therefore they are considered asexual.
Fungal filaments grow through soil particles and come in c ontact with
young plant ro ots, the fungus threads its way thr ough roo t surfac e, and
then grow between and inside co rtical cells (Figs. 1e , 1f, 1 g). The wide
dispersal of the fungal network through its filaments gives the plant-rootmyc orrhizae access to a much larger volume of soil than the root sy stem
itself (Fig. 1d). The establishment of my co rrhizal networks in roots and so il
constitute a so il-root fungal continuum, which is required for beneficial
symbiotic ex changes between fungi and plant.
Fig. 1. Propagation cycle of AMF. a.Spores of (i) Gigaspora, (ii) Glomus, (iii)Entrophospora, and (iv) Acaulospora; b.germinating spore; c.hyphal networkand spores; d.hypha and spores around root; e.hyphal penetration insideroot; f.intracellular arbuscules; g.intraradical vesicles; h.colonized plant.
Inoculum PropagationThe main obstacle in the produc tion of efficient and reliable A M fungal
inoculum lies in their symbiotic behaviour, the fungi obligatory requiring
a host plant for growth. Traditionally, mycor rhizal fungi are propagated
through pot-culture. Starting fungal inoculum, usually made of spores and
8/14/2019 Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Systems
5/13
9/21/13 Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Systems
file:///C:/Users/H P/Desktop/home group/BM SINGH/Monal/Biofertilizers/mycorrhizae/Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Syste 5
colo nized root segments, are incorpor ated to a growing substrate for
seedling production (5 ). The fungi spread in the substrate and colonize
root seedlings. Both co lonized substrates and roots can then serv e as
mycor rhizal inoculum. Soilless similar culture sy stems such as aeroponic
cultures enable the produc tion of cleaner spores and facilitate uniform
nutrition of co lonized plants (20). The successful propagation of some A M
fungal strains on roo t-organ culture allowed the c ultivation of monox enic
strains that can be used either directly as inoculum or as starting
inoculum for large-scale production (13).
(i) Pot-cu lture propagation.Unlike sapro phytic fungi, the large-scale produc tion of AMF inoculum, due to their obligate symbiotic status,
requires c ontrol and o ptimization of both host gro wth and fungal
dev elopment. The micro scopic sizes of AMF, together with the complex
identification proc esses also c ontribute to the pitfalls of inoculum
propagation. The inoculum propagation pro cess e ntails the following
stages.
Isolation of AMF pure culture strain. Pure culture strains can be
obtained originally from a single spore that germinate and co lonize roots
of a host plant. AM fungal strains can also be generated from co lonized
root segments isolated directly from field plants. Monospec ific cultures
will then be obtained through subsequent pot-culture generatio n, using
isolated spores or fine roo t segments as starting inoculum. A technicalproblem usually enco untered with AMF is that spores c an easily fall into
dormancy and germination rates decrease dramatically (1 6). A cold-
temperature treatment can be used to break dormancy (23,39). Research
culture collection can prov ide users with reliable fungal cultures
appropriate to start AM fungus propagation, acco mpanied with detailed
information on spec ies origin, spore morphology , and sometimes strain
molecular biology and biochemistry.
Choice of a host plant. The most important criteria required for the
host plant is its high myco rrhizal potential (i.e., its capacity to be
colo nized by the AMF strain and to promote its growth and sporulation), a
tolerance to gro wth under growth chamber and greenhouse conditions,
and an extensive roo t system made o f solid but non-lignified roots. Leek(Allium po rrumL.), Sudan grass (Sorghum bicolor(L.) Moench), cor n
(Zea mays L.), and bahia grass (Paspalum notatum Flugge) are the most
frequently used plant host for inoculum propagation (50).
Optimum growing c onditions. Pasteurized, steamed, or irradiated
growing substrates are required in order to avoid culture co ntamination
whic h could affect the quality of the inoc ulum. A well-aerate d substrate is
recommended, such as co arse texture sandy soil (14) mixed with
vermic ulite or perlite or Turface (8). Inadequate mineral nutrient
compo sition may affect fungal developme nt. Optimum P levels vary with
the host plant and cultivated fungal strains and an exc ess of available
phosphorus c an inhibit A MF propagation. Potassium, nitrogen,
magnesium, and a selection of micro-element ratios may also affectinoculum dev elopment, espec ially when inert growing substrates are used
and plant fertilization is performed artificially (9,45). Other edaphic
factors such as pH, soil temperature (36), light intensity , relative
humidity , and environment aeration must also be controlled to o ptimize
AMF propagation.
(ii) In vitro propagation on root-organ c ulture(Fig. 2). Root-
organ cultures co nsist of exc ised roots that proliferate under axe nic
conditions on a synthetic nutrient media (Fig. 2d) supplemented with
v itamins, minerals, and carb ohydrates. Continuo us c ultures o f vigoro us
root-organ cultures hav e been obtained through transformation of roots
by the soil bacteriumAgrobacterium rhizogenesConn. (51). Since 1 988
8/14/2019 Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Systems
6/13
9/21/13 Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Systems
file:///C:/Users/H P/Desktop/home group/BM SINGH/Monal/Biofertilizers/mycorrhizae/Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Syste 6
(4), sev eral dozen species and strains have been successfully propagated
in vitro with various sy nthetic growth media and growth co nditions (13),
and tested with compartmentalized solid and liquid vessels. The mono-
specific strains available can be used direc tly as starting material for large-
scale inoculum production, a sole Petri dish culture being enough to
generate sev eral thousand of spores and meters of hyphae within 4
months.
Fig. 2. In vitro propagation. a.Isolated spores; b.germinating colonized rootsegment; c.carrot root in culture; d.AMF root-organ culture; e.closer view ofan AMF root-organ culture.
In v itro bulk production of AMF inoculum is promising, offering clean,
v iable, contaminat ion-free fungi (Glomeromy cota in v itro c ollection, o r
GINCO) (Fig. 2e). The co st of in vitro inoculum may appear prohibitive
compared to the co st of a greenhouse-propagated one, but its use as
starting inoculum is a warranty of purity.
Research Collections (In Vivo and In Vitro)Three major research collec tions (Table 2) manage inoculum
maintenance and distribution. Their respectiv e activ ities, serv ices, and
availability in AMF strains are posted on their respec tive websites.
Table 2. Major research collections of AMF inoculum.
Name andinternet address Propagation mode
Banque Europenne des Glomeromycota (BEG)www.kent.ac.uk/bio/beg
Pot-culture
Glomeromycota In Vitro Collection (GINCO)res2.agr.gc.ca/ecorc/ginco-can/index_e.htmwww.mbla.ucl.ac.be/ginco-bel
Root-organ culture
International Culture Collection ofVesicular-Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (INVAM)invam.caf.wvu.edu
Pot-culture
Their commo n purpose is mainly to pro vide research and industry
scientists with pure and r eliable material for starting inoculum pro duction
for both fundamental researches and applied technologies.
Several other laboratory and industry collections are distributed
http://invam.caf.wvu.edu/http://www.mbla.ucl.ac.be/ginco-belhttp://res2.agr.gc.ca/ecorc/ginco-can/index_e.htmhttp://www.kent.ac.uk/bio/beg8/14/2019 Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Systems
7/13
9/21/13 Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Systems
file:///C:/Users/H P/Desktop/home group/BM SINGH/Monal/Biofertilizers/mycorrhizae/Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Syste 7
throughout the world to support either fundamental and applied
researches or commercial activities.
Long-term Preservation of AMF InoculumLarge-scale production of mycorrhizal inoculum requires inventory of
product and the ability to prov ide clients with products o f high and
consistent quality. Although the detailed procedure for inoculum
preserv ation is proprietary , methodologies for its preserv ation remain
simple and inexpensive. Fungal v iability and mycor rhizal efficiency can be
maintained for several months at room temperature (68 to 7 7 F)especially when semi-dry inocula are kept in their plastic c ontainers or
packaging. The major inconv enience o f such a storage period is the
occ urrence of spore dormancy . Long-term storage (up to 1 to 2 y ears)
may be co nducted at 41 F cold temperature storage (Dalp et al.,
unpublished results). This method is efficient for both in v ivo and in vitro
propagated strains. As spore germination and myce lium potential may be
stimulated by c old treatment, strain vigour can usually be reco vered after
long-term storage at cold temperature. Liquid inoculums should react
similarly to the traditional dry o nes.
More sophisticated and expensive preservation techniques are
performed by research culture co llections. These include the maintenance
of inoculum on liv ing plant-host grown o n sterile growth substrate withregular check for mono -specificity of the cultivated strains, storage in
liquid nitrogen tanks (10), and freeze-drying under v acuum. The last two
techniques are the usual techniques used in repository culture co llections
(DAOM/CCFC; ATCC).
Commercial Inoculum ProductionSmall scale AMF inoculum pro duction began in the 1 980s followed by
large scale production in the 1990s. At present, sever al companies have
officially registered and c ommerc ialized AMF inoculum.
(i) Methodologies.The first generation of co mmercial inoculum
appeared in the early 1 980s. Since then, basic methodo logies used for in
v iv o inoc ulum propagation hav e evolv ed gradually . Pot-cultiv ation
remains the preferred propagation technique, as it prov ides a convenient
and relatively economic method to produc e my corrhizal inoculum on a
large scale (40). Generally , myco rrhizal fungi propagules, such as
colo nized roots, spores, and hyphae, are mixed with a growing substrate,
and the pots are seeded and incubated under c ontrolled co nditions (Fig.
3). The in vitro pro pagation on root-organ culture may not change
drastically the traditional procedures but will certainly facilitate the
quality co ntrol of strain purity and improv e the supply of massiv e
amounts of spores as starting inoculum.
8/14/2019 Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Systems
8/13
9/21/13 Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Systems
file:///C:/Users/H P/Desktop/home group/BM SINGH/Monal/Biofertilizers/mycorrhizae/Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Syste 8
Fig. 3. In vivo propagation. a.Seeding mycorrhizal substrates; b.mycorrhizalseedling production; c.growth chamber inoculum propagation; d.root growthand colonization; e.colonized seedlings; f.field inoculum propagation.
(ii) Obtaining m other inocu lum for large-scale production .
Both segments of colonized roots (0.0 8 to 0.1 6 inches long) containing
hypha and/or v esicles and fungal spores may be used as starting fungalpropagules for the production of mother inoculum. Research collections
can prov ide such material from either in viv o or in v itro propagated fungi.
Since roo t-organ culture technology has become av ailable, fungal
propagules may be extracted from in v itro cultures grown at large scales
on so lid or semi-liquid growing media.
(iii) Establishmen t of c ultures.The establishment of myc orrhizal
cultures may proceed in different ways (Fig. 3):
Mother inoculum added directly at seeding in large trays or po ts;
Mother inoculum incorporated at seedling transplantation of 4-
to-6-week old plantlets;
Mother inoculum added at transplantation of micro-propagatedplantlets;
Colonized seedlings produced in greenhouses and transplanted to
the field.
Composition of Commercial InoculumThe inoculum sold o n the market are provided as granular substrates
made from mixed materials such as peat, compost, v ermiculite, perlite,
sand, and/or expanded clay in which segments of colo nized roots, spores,
and filamentous networks are distributed. Most of the time these roots,
spores, and hyphal networks are not detectable bec ause of their
microscopic sizes. In terms of fungal content, the tendency is to introduc e
a mix of several AMF in co mmercial inoculum. The most frequently used
AMF spe cies for commerc ial inoc ulum is typic ally Glomus intraradices
Schenck & Smith. This species is well adapted to both in v ivo and in vitro
propagation, can colonize a large variety o f host plants, survive to long-
term storage, and is geographically distributed all over the wor ld. These
characteristics make the G. intraradicesspecies an exc ellent candidate for
commercial inoculum. Sev eral other AMF belonging mainly to Glomus
species, but also to Gigaspora,Scutellospo ra, andAcaulospo ragenera,
are gradually used for co mmercial inoculum produc tion. These AMF are
sometimes in a mixture with growth-promoting bacteria and with
ecto myco rrhizal fungi, making a potentially better inoculum for plant
8/14/2019 Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Systems
9/13
9/21/13 Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Systems
file:///C:/Users/H P/Desktop/home group/BM SINGH/Monal/Biofertilizers/mycorrhizae/Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Syste 9
protection and production.
Innovations and Future DevelopmentsOne innovativ e technique is the ready - and easy-to-use inoculum in
whic h fungal pro pagules are extracted fro m growing media, c oncentrated,
and mixed with carriers such as peat, sand, vermiculite, or ex panded clay .
Products are av ailable in powdered form containing a specified number of
active fungal propagules per v olume of inoculum. Liquid inoculum
dedicated to hor ticultural use and isolated spores are also av ailable.
Aeroponic inoculum produc tion at large scale has b een inv estigated bySouza et al. (47 ) but has not reached co mmercialization. Bioreac tor assays
with liquid AMF ro ot-organ culture pro pagation (22) may ev entually
become suitable for commerc ialization for research needs. Howev er , as
the fungi are produced in association withAgrobacterium-transformed
roots, it is unlikely that its used c an be allowed for field inoculation.
Knowing the performance variability b etween A M fungal strains, the
improvement of commercial inoculum quality will almost certainly co me
from the selection of higher performance my cor rhizal fungal strains better
adapted to the plant host or cro p to be c olonized and to specific
env ironmental growing conditions (2,28).
Constraints and Regulations(i) Cost of inoc ulu m v ersus fertilizers.A gain, the obligate
bio trophic nature of AMF which, unlike other fungi, implie s the
establishment of a plant propagation system, e ither under greenhouse
conditions or in vitro laboratory propagation. These techniques result in
high inoculum pro duction costs, which still remains a serious problem
since they are not compe titive with produc tion costs of phosphorus
fertilizer. Even if farmers understand the significance of sustainable
agricultural systems, the reduction of phosphorus inputs by using AM
fungal inocula alone cannot be justified ex cept, perhaps, in the case of high
value c rops. This c ould be the case of organic crop farmers, whic h can sell
their products at premium price.
(ii) Sanitary con trol.Another serious problem in commercializing
inoculum comes from the need to co ntrol the biological composition of
the product, espec ially from invading phytopathogenic micro organisms.
At present, the inoculum produced using the pot-culture v ariants, eithe r
in greenhouses, growth chambers, or fields, is never co mpletely free from
external microorganisms. This is a problem even though the producers
attempt to co ntrol pathogens with various agrochemicals. Farmers are
usually aware of the risk of pathogens, so they avo id using inoculum
containing host root residues. In most co mmercial inoculum, colonized
root segments are chopped into 0.08-to-0.1 2-inch-long pieces so
segments that remain are difficult to detect. When colo nized roots are
directly incorporated to carriers, their surface sterilization with a lightsolution of disinfecting product can be done without affecting the
effectiv eness of an inoculum. When roots and r hizosphere material are
used for inoculum preparation, handling with clean apparatus is advised.
(iii) Efficiency of inocu lum .In the field application of any
microbial inoculum, it is essential to v erify that the inoculated
microor ganisms possess the characteristics and the potential described by
the inoculum manufacturers. With AM inoculum, such ev aluations can be
done using several approaches such as morphological identification of AM
spores to c onfirm the fungus identity, and by estimating the myc orrhizal
root c olonization level of test plants (6). Tentative molec ular techniques
have been dev eloped for the detection of AMF inoculum strains and
8/14/2019 Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Systems
10/13
9/21/13 Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Systems
file:///C:/Users/H P/Desktop/home group/BM SINGH/Monal/Biofertilizers/mycorrhizae/Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Syst 10
discrimination from indigenous A MF strains naturally o cc urring in soils.
These techniques are not y et totally re liable due to the large genetic
heterogeneity in AMF and, as such, these techniques are not ro utinely
used for the detection o f AMF. Similar situations are observ ed with the
discrimination among strains when using internal transcribed spac er (ITS)
sequences of ribosomal DNA genes (rDNA). Reliable molec ular techniques
to trac e the inoculated strains using rep-PCR and specific primers
dev elopments are under study (42). Such a technological breakthrough
would greatly facilitate bo th fundamental and applied researc h on
mycor rhizae as well as improv e quality contro l of commercial inoculum.(iv) Official registration for com m ercial produc ts.The
commercialization of mycorrhizal inoculum is subjected to regional or
national registration at agriculture departments and usually falls under
the country s Fertilizer A ct. In Canada, myco rrhizal inoculum are
considered to be supplements: products, other than fertilizers,
manufactured, sold o r represented for use in the improvement of the
physical condition of the soil or to aid plant growth or crop y ields. In the
USA, registration o f an AM inoculum may fall either in the fertilizer or the
pesticide sectors, depending on the vocation of the proposed my cor rhizal
product.
Applicatio n for registration is required for such produc ts and
extensive information is attached to the registration request: (a) a list ofingredients and possible contaminants in the proposed inoculum; (b) the
minimum co ncentration of each ingredient including the active
mycor rhizal fungi and the purpose of each o f them; (c) official material
safety data sheets; (d) the product label, showing the name and address of
producer, the number of viable fungal propagules or the symbiotic
efficiency expressed as percentage of co lonization ex pected by the
inoculum, reco mmended plant host, soil conditions for effectiveness,
reco mmended application rate, storage co nditions, and expiration date;
(e) manufacturing proc ess; and (f) the testing proto co l. Such quality
contro l is important to exc lude poor quality micro bial inocula from the
market.
Attached with prev ious information, statistically significant efficacydata from field tests done under different so il and climatic co nditions are
usually required in order to support the claims being made regarding the
performance of the proposed inoculum. A detailed taxo nomic description
may also be requested to gether with strain history , geographic
distribution, and ex isting literature on the my co rrhizal potential of the
fungal strain. In most c ountries, myco rrhizal fungi are no longer
considered detrimental for human and animal health. As such, no
env ironmental infectivity o r tox icity tests are required. The creation of an
International Association of My cor rhizal Inoculum Producers was
discussed at the last International Conference o n Myco rrhizae held August
10 -15 , 200 3 in Montreal, in order to establish rules and regulations which
would stimulate industrial pro ductio n of high quality inoculum. Organiccro p farmers since they hav e already started using AMF inoculum in
larger-scale production, are po tentially a new clientele base. Howev er, at
this point, they are hav ing difficulties with inoculum application and with
a clear measureme nt of beneficial effect in their cro ps (personal
communication). For large-scale application of inoculum, future research
focusing on achieving good co ntact between seed an inoculum is needed.
Regardless of the method of inoculum application, new user s should
establish a portion of their crop without inoculum in order to assess the
benefits obtained in the c rop established with ino culum.
Acknowledgments
8/14/2019 Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Systems
11/13
9/21/13 Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Systems
file:///C:/Users/H P/Desktop/home group/BM SINGH/Monal/Biofertilizers/mycorrhizae/Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Syst 1
The authors wish to thank Dr. Mary Leggett (Philom Bios Inc.,
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada) who organized the Inoc ulum Forum
Conference; Mr. Clifford Hamilton for his technical assistance on image
preparation; and S. Sguin, J. Cayouette , and S. Redhead for c omments on
the manuscript.
Literature Cited1 . Abdel-Aziz, R. A., Radwan , S. M. A., Abdel-Kader, M. M., an d Baraka t, M. I.
A. 1 997 . Biocontr ol of faba bean root-rot using VA m y corrhizae and its
effect on biological nitrogen fixation. Egypt. J. Microbiol. 31:273-286.2. Adholey a, A. 2003 . Commercial production of AMF through industrial mode
and its large-scale application. 4t h Int. Conf. Mycorr hizae. Montr ealQuebec Canada, Aug ust 10-15 2 003, No. 240.
3. Barker, S. J., Tagu, D., and Delp, G. 1 99 8. Regulat ion of root and funga lmorphogenesis in my corrh izal sym biosis. Plant Phy siol. 1 1 6:1 201 -1 207 .
4. Bcard, G., and Fortin, J . A. 1 988. Early ev ents of v esicular-arbuscularmy corr hiza form ation on Ri T-DNA t ran sform ed roots. New Phy tol.108:211-218.
5. Brundrett, M., Bougher, N., Dell, B., Grov e, T., and Malajczuk, N. 1 99 6.Working with m y corrhizas in forestr y an d agr icult ure. ACIAR (Austr al.Cen. Int. Agr ic. Res.) Mono. 32 .
6. Dalp, Y. 19 91 , Vesicular-arbuscular my corrh izae. Pages 287 -301 in:
Manua l of Soil Sam pling a nd Methods of Ana ly sis. 3 rd Ed. Can. Soc. SoilSci., Lewis Pub. of CRC Press.
7 . Datnoff, L. E., Nem ec, S., and Pern ezny , K. 19 95. Biological contr ol offusarium crown a nd root r ot of tomat o in Florida u sing Trichodermaharzianumand Glomus intraradices. Biol. Control. 5:427 -43 1 .
8. Dehne, H. W., and Backhaus, G. F. 1 986 . The use of v esicular-arbuscularmycorrhizal fungi and plant production. I. Inoculum production. J. PlantDis. Prot. 93:4 1 5-42 4.
9. Dixon, S., Smith, S. E., and Smith, F. A. 1 99 9. Cha racterization of twoarbuscular m y corrh izal fungi in sy mbiosis with Allium porrum: Inflow andflux of phosphate across the sy mbiotic interface. New Phy tol. 14 4:1 7 3-18 1 .
1 0. Douds, D. D., and Schenck, N. C. 1 99 0. Cry opreserv ation of spores ofv esicula r-ar buscula r m y corrhizal fu ng i. New Phy tol. 1 1 5:667 -67 4.
1 1 . Edwar ds, S. G., Young, J. P. W., and Fitter, A. H. 19 98. Interactionsbetween Pseudo monas fluorescens biocontrol agent s and Glomus mosseae,an a rbuscular m y corrh izal fungu s, within the r hizosphere. FEMSMicrobiol. Lett. 1 66 :297 -303 .
1 2. Ezawa , T., Yam am oto, K., an d Yoshida, S. 2000. Species composition andspore density of indigenous vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi underdifferent conditions of P-fertilit y as rev ealed by soy bean tr ap cult ur e. SoilSci. Plant Nutr. 46 :291 -297 .
1 3. Fortin, J. A., Bcard, G., Declerck, S., Dalp, Y., St-Arna ud, M., Cough lan,A. P., and Pich , Y. 2002. Ar buscula r m y corrhiza on r oot-organ cu lt ures: Arev iew. Can. J. Bot. 80:1 -20.
1 4. Gaur , A., and Adholey a, A . 20 00. Effects of th e particle size of soil-less
substrat es upon AM fungus inoculum production. Mycorrhiza 1 0:43-48.1 5. Gav ito, M. E., and Miller, M. 1 99 8. Chang es in my corrh iza development inma ize induced by crop ma nagem ent practices. Plant Soil 1 98:1 85-19 2.
1 6. Gemma , J. N ., an d Koske, R. E. 1 988 . Seasonal v ariation in sporeabundance and dorm ancy of Gigaspora giganteaand in my corrh izalinoculum potential of dune soil. My cologia 8 0:21 1 -21 6.
1 7 . Hamel, C., Dalp, Y., Lapierre, C., Sima rd, R. R., and Smith , D. L. 1 99 6.Endomy corrh izae in a n ewly cultiv ated acidic meadow: Effects of thr eey ears of bar ley cr opping, tilla ge, l im e, an d ph osphorus on r oot coloniza tionand soil infectiv ity . Biol. Fertil. Soils 21 :16 0-1 65.
1 8. Harrison, M. J. 19 97 . The arbuscular m y corrh izal sym biosis. Pages 1 -34in: Plant-Microbe Inter actions, Vol. 3. G. Sta ncey , an d N.T. Keen, eds.Chapman and Hall, New York.
8/14/2019 Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Systems
12/13
9/21/13 Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Systems
file:///C:/Users/H P/Desktop/home group/BM SINGH/Monal/Biofertilizers/mycorrhizae/Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Syst 12
19. Hodge, A. 2000. Microbial ecology of the arbuscular mycorrhiza. FEMSMicrobiol. Ecol. 32:91-96.
20. Ja rstfer, A. G, and Sylv ia. D. M. 1 99 9. A eroponic cultur e of VAM fungi.Pages 427 -44 1 : Mycorrhiza: Structur e, Function, Molecular Biology andBiotechnology. 2nd edition. A. Varma, and B. Hock, eds. Springer-Verlag,Berlin.
21 . Jeffries, P., and Barr ea, J. M. 19 94 . Biogeochemical cy cling and arbuscularmy corrh izas in th e sustainability of plant-soil systemsp. Pages 10 1 -1 1 5:Impact of Arbuscular My corrh izas on Sustainable Agricultu re and Na tur alEcosystem s. S. Gian inazzi, and H. Schu epp, eds. Ba sel; Boston; Berlin;
Birkhauser.22 . Jolicoeur, M., Williams, R. D., Chav arie, C., Fortin, J. A., and
Ar ch am bault , J . 1 999. Pr oduction of Glomus intraradicespropagu les, anarbuscular my corrh izal fung us, in a n a irlift bioreactor. Biotechnol. Bioeng.63:224-232.
23 . Jug e, C., Samson, J., Bastien, C., Vierheilig, H., Cough lan, A. , and Pich, Y.2002 . Breaking dorm ancy in spores of the arbuscular m y corrh izal fungusGlomus intraradices: A critical cold-storage period. Mycorrhiza 1 2:3 7 -42 .
24 . Kabir, Z., OHalloran, I. P., and Hamel, C. 1 99 7 . Overw inter surv iv al ofarbuscular m y corrh izal hy phae is fav ored by atta chm ent to roots butdiminished by disturbance. My corrh iza 7 :19 7 -200.
25. Kucey , R. M. N., a nd Paul, E. A. 1 982 . Bioma ss of my corrh izal fungiassociated with bean root. Soil Biol. Biochem. 14:413-414.
26. Lanfranco, L., Wyss, P., Marzachi, C., and Bonfante, P. 1995. Generation ofRAPD-PCR prim ers for th e ident ificat ion of isolates of Glomus mosseae, anarbuscular m y corrh izal fungus. Mol. Ecol. 4:61 -68.
27 . Lange, N. R., and Vlek, P. L. G. 2 000. Mechanism of Calcium an dPhospha te Release from Hy droxy -Apatite by Myc orr hizal fung i. Soil Sci.Soc. Am. J. 64 :949 -955.
28. Masanori, S., and Takuy a. M. 2002. Inoculation with a rbuscularmy corr hizal fung i: The stat us quo in Japan and futu re prospects. Plant Soil244:273-279.
29 . Millner, P. D., Mulbry , W. W., and Rey nolds, S. L. 2001 . Taxon-specificoligonucleotide primers for detection of Glomus etunicatum. My corrh iza10:259-265.
30. Morandi, D. 1996. Occurrence of phytoalexins and phenolic compounds inendom y corrhizal int eract ions, and their potential r ole in biological contr ol.Plant Soil 1 85:241 -251 .
31 . Mozafar, A., A nken, T. Ruh, R., an d Frossard, E. 2 000. Tillage intensity ,my corrh izal and non my corrh izal fungi, an d nutrient concentr ations inmaize, wheat, and canola. Agron. J. 92:11 1 7 -1 1 24.
32 . Norm an, J . R., and Hooker, J. E. 2 000. Sporulat ion ofPhytophthorafragariaeshows great er stimula tion by exudates of non-my corrh izal t hanby m y corrhizal straw ber ry roots. My col. Res. 1 04 :1 06 9-1 07 3.
33 . Plenchette, C., Fortin, J. A., and Furlan, V . 1 983 . Growth r esponses ofsev eral pla nt species to my corrhizae in a soil of m oderate P-fertility . I.My corrh izal dependency under field conditions. Plant Soil 1 1 0:19 9-209.
34 . Quar les, W. 1 99 9. Plant disease biocontrol and VAM fungi. IPM Pract. 21 :1-
9.35 . Rao, M. S., Kerry , B. R., Gowen, S. R., Bourne, J. M., an d Par v ath a, R. P.
1 997 . Management ofMeloidogyne incognitain toma to nurseries byintegr ation of Glomus deserticolawith Verticillium chlamydosporium.Pflanzenkrank. Pflanzenschut z 104 :41 9-422 .
36 . Rao, A. V., and Tara fdar, J. C. 1 99 9. Soil solarization for ma ss scaleproduction of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal inoculum in Indian arid zone.Indian J. Ag ric. Sci. 69:27 1 -27 4.
37 . Rav nskov , S., Larsen, J., an d Jakobsen, I. 200 2. Phosphorus uptake of anarbuscular my corrh izal fung us is not a ffected by the biocontrol bacteriumBurkholderia cepacia. Soil Biol. Biochem. 3 4:1 87 5-1 881 .
38 . Rilling , M. C., Wright , S. F., Allen, M. F., an d Field, C. B. 1 99 9. Rise incarbon dioxide changes soil structu re. Na tur e 400:6 28.
8/14/2019 Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Systems
13/13
9/21/13 Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Systems
39 . Safir, G. R., Coley , S. C., Siqueira, J. O., and Carlson, P. S. 1 99 0.Improv ement a nd sy nchronization of VA m y corrh iza fung al sporegermina tion by short-term cold storage. Soil Biol. Biochem. 22 :109 -1 1 1 .
40. Sahay , N. S., Sudha, A. S., Varm a, A., and Singh, A. 1 998. Trends inendomy corrh izal research . Indian J. Exp. Biol. 3 6:1 069 -1 086.
41 . Schuessler, A., Schwar zott, D., and Walker, C. 2001 . A new fungal phy lum ,the Glomeromy cota: Phy logeny and ev olution. My col. Res. 10 5:14 1 3-14 21 .
42 . Sguin, S., Dsaulniers, N., Dalp, Y., and Lv esque, C. A. 2 003.Development of AMF strains specific pr imer s for detection in field-gr owncolonized roots. 4 th Int. Conf. My corrhizae. Montr eal Quebec Cana da,
Au gu st 1 0-1 5 2 003, No. 444.43 . Sharm a, S., and Dohroo, N. P. 19 96 . Vesicular-arbuscular m y corrh izae in
plant health and disease man agement. Int. J. Tr op. Plant Dis. 1 4:1 47 -1 55.44 . Siev erding, E., Toro, S., and Mosquera , O. 1 98 9. Biomass production and
nut rient concentra tions in spores of VA m y corrhizal fun gi. Soil Biol.Biochem. 21 :69-7 2.
45. Singh, C. S., an d Jha, D. 1 99 4. Mass inoculum production of v esiculararbuscular mycorrhizae (VAM): Effect of various bacteriological media andfertilizer solut ions. Microbiol. Res. 1 49 :27 -29.
46 . Smith , S. E., Read, D. J., an d Harley , J. L. 1 99 7 . Mycorrhizal Sym biosis.2nd Ed. Academic Press, London, Toronto.
47 . Souza, de, E. S., Burity , H. A., Espirit o-Sant o, A. C., a nd Silv a, da, M. L. R.B. 1996. Alternative for arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculumproduction in aeroponic cult ure. Pesqu. Ag ropecu. Bras. 3 1 :153 -1 58.
48. St. Ar naud, M., Hamel, C., Caron, M., and Fortin, J. A . 1 99 5.Endom y corhizes VA et sensibilit des plant es aux m ala dies: Sy nth se de lalittrature et mcanismes dinteraction potentiels. Pages 51-87 in: LaSy m biose My corhizienne. tat des Conna issances. J. A . Fort in, Y. Pich, C.Char est, eds. Editions Orbis Frelisghbur g Qubec.
49 . St. Arnau d, M., Hamel, C., Vimar d, B., Caron, M., and Fortin, J. A. 1 99 7 .Inh ibition ofFusarium oxysporumf.sp. dianthiin th e non-VAM speciesDianthus caryophyllusby co-cultur e with Tagetes patulacompanion plantscolonized by Glomus intraradices. Can. J. Bot. 7 5:998 -1 005.
50. Struble, J. E., and Skipper, H. D. 1 988 . Vesicular-arbuscular m y corrh izalfungal spore production as influenced by plant species. Plant Soil 109:1194-
1 1 9 6 .51 . Tepfer, D. 1 989 . Ri t-DNA from Agrobacterium rhizogenes : a sour ce of geneshav ing applicat ions in rhizospher e biology a nd plant dev elopment , ecologyand ev olut ion. Pages 294 -342 : Plant -Microbe Inter actions, Vol. 3. T.Kosuge, an d E. W. Nester, eds. McGraw -Hill Publishing, New York.
52. Vigo, C., Norm an, J. R., and Hooker, J. E. 200 0. Biocontrol of the path ogenPhytophthora parasiticaby arbuscular m y corrh izal fungi is a consequenceof effects on infection loci. Plant Path. 4 9:50 9-51 4.
53. Yokoy am a, K., Tateishi, T., Maru moto, T., a nd Saito, M. 2002 . A m olecularmarker diagnostic of a specific isolate of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungusGigaspora margarita. FEMS Microbiol. Let. 2 1 2:1 7 1 -1 7 5.