Upload
peter-ah
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/24/2019 Araullo vs Executive Secretary Paquito N
1/1
Araullo vs Executive Secretary
Facts:
On 25 September 2013, Senator Jinggoy Estrada delivered a privileged speech before the Senate,alleging that Senators had received an incentive !orth "50 million for voting in favor of the
impeachment of #hief J$stice %enato #& #orona& 'his sp$rred (epartment of )$dget
*anagement +()* Secretary -lorencio .bad /// to iss$e a statement that the f$nds released!ere part of the (isb$rsement .cceleration "rogram +(.", !hich !as designed by the ()* as
a stim$l$s pacage to increase government spending&
'he (." !as allegedly first evidenced by a memorand$m of Sec& .bad dated 12 October 2011,
asing for the "residents approval for the implementation of the (."& /t listed so$rces of f$nds
amo$nting to "2&11 billion, along !ith proposed priority proects to be f$nded& 'he billions of
pesos for (.", according to the ()*, !ere collected from the savings of the government and
its 4nprogrammed -$nds& 'he savings incl$ded+a 4nreleased appropriations for $nfilled positions !hich !ill lapse at the end of the
year6+b .vailable balances from completed or discontin$ed proects6
+c 4nreleased appropriations of slo! moving proects and discontin$ed proects6 and
+d 7ithdra!n $nobligated allotments !hich have earlier been released to 89.
.ll these events gave rise to :$estions on the legality of this move by the ()*& "etitions !ere
filed before the S$preme #o$rt challenging the constit$tionality of the (.", 8ational
)$dget #irc$lar +8)# 8o& 5;2, and related iss$ances of the (epartment of )$dget and*anagement +()* implementing the (."&
Issues:1& 7hether or not the (." violated the e:$al protection cla$se and the principle of separation
of po!ers2& 7hether or not the doctrine of operative fact sho$ld apply to proects f$nded by the (."
Held:1& 'he #o$rt r$led that the arg$ment that the (." !as $sed to discriminate against some
legislators lacs fact$al and legal basis& .lso, it pointed that it !as merely spec$lative to
concl$de that the (." effectively stayed the hands of legislators from cond$cting in:$ires onthe e