Arab Spring & Saddam_writing Sample

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 Arab Spring & Saddam_writing Sample

    1/2

    Saddams Removal and Arab Spring: we need to learn the right lessons

    By Farooq A. Kirmani

    Was Saddams ouster from power in Iraq responsible for Arab Spring? Recently, on two

    different BBC news programmes, Richard Perle and Colleen Graffy (on Question Time andAndrew Marr Show respectively), were seen advocating the correlation. The argument, more

    explicitly stated by Colleen on AM Show, holds that Arab masses, after seeing an apparently

    invincible brutal dictator, who had held the country in an iron-grip for decades, being

    deposed like a paper tiger, realised that they could as well repeat the same with others in the

    region?

    However, by the very basic rules of logic, this proposition is untenable. If this proposition is

    logically deconstructed, it reads: because Americans and its allies deposed Saddam easily,

    therefore, we can also topple other dictators in the region. But, without any association

    between Americans and Arab masses, by any stretch of imagination, how can it be so? The

    fundamental fact of the matter is that Saddam was removed by a highly organised and very

    powerful external force. Therefore, logically, it shall follow, that the dictators in the region

    can only be removed by similar forces, external or internal. In other words, removal of such

    rulers needs an organised (and not un-organised), military (and not public) and surgically-

    planned (and not extempore) intervention. Clearly, Arab Spring is none of it. So, the

    argument holding the regime change in Iraq, per se, as the fountainhead of Arab Spring is

    clearly misleading and fallacious.

    However, this is not to say that the war in Iraq has had no bearing on Arab Spring. Actually,

    the war in Iraq that took place after the regime change seems to have lead to Arab Spring. It

    is no secret that the bloody post-regime-change insurgency in Iraq inflicted highly

    unexpected damage on foreign forces: militarily, politically and morally. At a huge human

    cost, the insurgents mounted hell of a resistance to the occupying forces. The hitherto

    invincible military might of West seemed hopelessly helpless in front of an asymmetrical

    force that was nowhere to be seen before the regime change in the country. In fact, the tide

    could be turned only after some local militias switched sides.

    Now, in my opinion, herein lie the seeds of Arab Spring. The invincible foreign forces, that

    toppled the apparently invincible dictator in a matter of days, were made to retreat, reconsiderand return! If such a feat was possible, therefore, nothing could be impossible for Arabs. This

    new found confidence, as per my understanding, is the real fountainhead of the energy that

    lead to Arab Spring that went on to depose the despots in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya. It was

    the same confidence that showed itself in the unprecedented resistance by Hezbollah against

    the military might of Israel in 2006 Lebanon war. It was the same confidence that showed

    itself yet again in unprecedented resistance by Hamas against Israel in 2008.

    Given the fact that the current and future policies of West, especially those of America, are

    going to be predominantly influenced by the lessons from recent wars, especially the one in

    Iraq, it is vitally important that we learn them right.

  • 8/3/2019 Arab Spring & Saddam_writing Sample

    2/2

    ==================