AR69 Neutral

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/14/2019 AR69 Neutral

    1/4

    AUTOMATED TESTING OF

    ACCELEROMETER TRANSVERSE SENSITIVITY

    Jeffrey J. Dosch David M. LallyR&D Group Leader Engineering Vice President

    PCB PiezotronicsDepew NY 14043

    ABSTRACT

    A new system for automated testing of accelerometertransverse sensitivity has been designed and implementedat PCB Piezotronics. This paper describes the transversetest system theory, construction, and operation. Transversesensitivities obtained from the automated system andsensitivities obtained by the manual method described inISO 5347-11:1993 were found to agree to within the stateduncertainty of 0.3%.

    NOMENCLATURE

    ia linear acceleration [g]

    i rotational acceleration [radian/s2]

    iS linear sensitivity [mV/g]

    i rotational acceleration [mV/rad/ s2]

    SUT sensor under test

    ov SUT output [Volts]

    Interferometer phase [radian]

    S sensitivity [mV/g]g acceleration constant [9.80665 m/s

    2]

    c excitation frequency [radian/s]

    Re( ) real part of ( )Im( ) imaginary part of ( )( )* complex conjugate of ( )subscripts:

    x,y,z coordinate axes

    t transverse direction

    INTRODUCTION

    A number of final calibration tests are performed by anaccelerometer manufacturer to ensure the quality andaccuracy of the sensor used by the test engineer. Finalcalibration of an accelerometer for test and measurementapplications may include testing of sensor sensitivity,frequency response, time constant, resonant frequency,and transverse sensitivity.

    The trend in modal testing is for increasingly large channelcounts and the consequent demand for lower cost sensors.The challenge to the sensor manufacturer is to reduce thesensor cost without sacrificing quality and sensor accuracy.Because of the costs involved in final calibration, ratherthan testing on a 100% basis, some sensor manufacturershave addressed the cost challenge by statistical sampling ofsome of their final tests. Where feasible, PCB Piezotronicshas addressed the challenge in a different way and that isto automate the final calibration testing, and thus allow cost-effective final calibration of each sensor manufactured.

    This paper describes a new automated system for testing ofaccelerometer transverse sensitivity. The system uses a

    resonant beam to generate uniform motion in the transverseplane. The beam motion is controlled and data is acquiredvia computer-based acquisition and control. Compared tothe manual method used previously, the new approach hasbeen found to provide more accurate and consistentcalibration in the production environment.

    THEORY

    Ideally, an accelerometer will respond only to motion alongits sensing axis. In the non-ideal world an accelerometermay respond to axial acceleration in a directionperpendicular to the main sensing axis and to rotationalacceleration. Consider the accelerometer with the desiredsensing axis oriented in the z direction (Figure 1) and

    subject to both linear and rotational acceleration. Outputfrom the sensor will be equal to:

    [ ]

    =

    z

    y

    x

    z

    y

    x

    zyxzyxo

    a

    a

    a

    SSSv

    (1)

    Where ia and i are the linear and rotational acceleration

    componentsiS and i are the accelerometers sensitivity

    T E C H N I C A L I N F O R M A T I O N AR_69

    1

  • 8/14/2019 AR69 Neutral

    2/4

    to these accelerations. For most piezoelectric

    accelerometers the rotational sensitivity, i , is small andcan be ignored. In such instances, only linear accelerationcomponents contribute to sensor output:

    [ ]

    =

    z

    y

    x

    zyxo

    a

    a

    a

    SSSv

    (2)

    For the sensor with sensing oriented along the z-axis, the

    maximum transverse sensitivity has a magnitude equal to St(Figure 1):

    22

    yxt SSS += (3)

    The transverse sensitivity is usually expressed as apercentage of the main axis sensitivity:

    z

    t

    S

    STranverse =100(%) (4)

    Typical values of transverse sensitivity are: less than 2% forpiezoelectric quartz accelerometers and less than 5% forpiezoceramic accelerometers.

    The calibrator described in this paper generates rectilinear

    acceleration in the x-y plane at a frequency c . The

    motion is controlled such that acceleration componentsalong the x and y axis are in phase quadrature (shifted inphase by 90 degrees):

    )sin()( tXta cx = (5))cos()( tYta cy = (6)

    In the general case equations (5) and (6) describe ellipticalmotion in x-y plane; if X = Y, then a circle is described. In

    the automated test system, acceleration components xa

    and ya are measured with reference accelerometers.

    Acceleration magnitude and direction determined at any

    time tis:

    22)( yxt aata += (7)

    =

    x

    y

    a

    at 1tan)( (8)

    Maximum transverse sensitivity of the sensor under test

    (SUT) is then determined from the SUT output, )(tvo , and

    Eq (7):

    =

    )(

    )(max

    ta

    tvS

    t

    o

    t (9)

    Eq (9) describes a time domain method for calculating themaximum transverse sensitivity and assumes phase

    quadrature of the x and y reference accelerometers.

    Improved signal resolution can be obtained by using Fourierdomain signal processing. The improved resolution isespecially useful when testing accelerometers with lowsensitivity such as shock accelerometers that may havemain axis sensitivities as small as 0.05 mV/g.

    A digital Fourier transform is applied to the acquired signals.The spectral components of the SUT and x-y reference

    sensors evaluated at the excitation frequency c are the

    complex quantities:

    ( )c

    taFFTjA xcx == )()(

    (10)

    c

    taFFTjA ycy == )()( (11)

    ( )c

    tvFFTjV oco == )()( (12)

    The SUT output that is in-phase with the x and the yreference accelerometers is respectively:

    =

    x

    x

    oxA

    AVV Re (13)

    =

    y

    y

    oyA

    AVV Re (14)

    The cross sensitivities in the x and the y directions are:

    x

    x

    xA

    VS = (15)

    y

    y

    yA

    V

    S = (16)

    Given the above cross sensitivities in the x and y directions,the maximum transverse sensitivity magnitude and directionis calculated:

    22

    yxt SSS += (17)

    x

    y

    tS

    S1

    tan = (18)

    AUTOMATED TRANSVERSE TESTER

    The automated transverse test system consists of aresonant beam, x and y reference accelerometers,independent x and y exciters to generate acceleration in thex-y plane, and personal computer based acquisition andcontrol (Figures 2 and 3). The computer acquires the SUTand x and y reference signals. The computer also controlsthe motion in the x-y plane, generating near circular motion

    according to equations (5) and (6) with X =Y, whilemaintaining phase quadrature. Transverse sensitivity iscalculated from the acquired signals using Eqs. (10)through (18).

    The resonant beam was designed to provide rectilinear

    motion in the x-y plane, with negligible motion in the zdirection and minimal rotational acceleration. The

    T E C H N I C A L I N F O R M A T I O N AR_69

    2

  • 8/14/2019 AR69 Neutral

    3/4

  • 8/14/2019 AR69 Neutral

    4/4

    COMPUTER

    A/D AND D/A

    AMPLIFIER

    x

    y

    DIRECTION OF

    TRANSVERSE

    EXCITATION

    SIGNAL

    CONDITIONER

    SUT

    X ACCELEROMETER

    BEAM

    X EXCITER

    Y EXCITER

    BASE

    Y ACCELEROMETER

    TOP VIEW

    SIDE VIEW

    Figure 2: System for automated testing of accelerometertransverse sensitivity.

    Figure 3: Resonant beam with reference accelerometersandsensor undertest.

    z

    SUTFIXTURE

    SHAKER

    ARMATURE

    SHAKER

    MOTION Figure 4: Method for testing transverse sensitivity using avibration shaker.

    T E C H N I C A L I N F O R M A T I O N AR_69

    4