55
DNA methylation as a source of epigenetic regulation in the Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) Mackenzie Gavery & Steven Roberts University of Washington, School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences

Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

  • Upload
    mgavery

  • View
    2.112

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

DNA methylation as a source of epigenetic regulation in the Pacific

oyster (Crassostrea gigas)

Mackenzie Gavery & Steven Roberts

University of Washington, School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences

Page 2: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Background

Epigenetics

DNA methylation

Results

Characterization of DNA

methylation in Pacific oysters

Discussion & Future

Directions

Outline

Page 3: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

GENES (DNA)

TRAITS

color

growthdisease resistance

ENVIRONMENT

nutritionpathogens

temperature

Background

Page 4: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

GENES (DNA)

EPIGENOME(DNA methylation)

TRAITS

color

growthdisease resistance

ENVIRONMENT

nutritionpathogens

Background

temperature

Page 5: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

GENES (DNA)

EPIGENOME(DNA methylation)

TRAITS

color

growthdisease resistance

ENVIRONMENT

nutritionpathogens

Background

temperature

Page 6: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Me

C

GC

GGene A

TF X

Page 7: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Invertebrates?

DNA Methylation

Page 8: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Invertebrates?Model invertebrates lack DNA methylationDistribution & function unclear

DNA Methylation

Page 9: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Invertebrates?Model invertebrates lack DNA methylationDistribution & function unclear

DNA Methylation

Objectives:Characterize DNA methylation in C. gigasGain an understanding of the functional

role

Page 10: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Part 1

Page 11: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Part 1Approach

In silico analysis

Experimental analysis: MBD-Seq

Page 12: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

CpG O/E

Predicted degree of DNA methylation

Measu

red d

egre

e o

f D

NA

meth

yla

tion

En

rich

men

t le

vel in

MB

D lib

rary

(Gavery & Roberts, 2010)

(Rob

ert

s &

Gavery

, 2011

)

Part 1: Results

Page 13: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

CpG O/E

Predicted degree of DNA methylation

Measu

red d

egre

e o

f D

NA

meth

yla

tion

En

rich

men

t le

vel in

MB

D lib

rary

(Gavery & Roberts, 2010)

(Rob

ert

s &

Gavery

, 2011

)

Part 1: Results

Page 14: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

CpG O/E

Predicted degree of DNA methylation

Measu

red d

egre

e o

f D

NA

meth

yla

tion

En

rich

men

t le

vel in

MB

D lib

rary

(Gavery & Roberts, 2010)

(Rob

ert

s &

Gavery

, 2011

)

Part 1: Results

Page 15: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

CpG O/E

Predicted degree of DNA methylation

Measu

red d

egre

e o

f D

NA

meth

yla

tion

En

rich

men

t le

vel in

MB

D lib

rary

(Gavery & Roberts, 2010)

(Rob

ert

s &

Gavery

, 2011

)

Part 1: Results

Page 16: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Part 2

Page 17: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Part 2

genomic DNA

Approach

High-throughput bisulfite sequencing:

Gill tissue

Additional resources:

RNA-seq data: gill tissue (Zhang et al, 2012)

Page 18: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

genomic DNA

Part 2Approach

High-throughput bisulfite sequencing:

Gill tissue

Additional resources:

RNA-seq data: gill tissue (Zhang et al, 2012)

Page 19: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

>250,000 CG dinucleotides

Part 2: Results

Page 20: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

scaffold 86 (Galaxy Trackster)

Part 2: Results

ex

CG

genes

exons

%methylation

0bp 200,000bp

100%

0%

Page 21: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Part 2: Results

ex

CG

genes

exons

%methylation

0bp 200,000bp

100%

0%

scaffold 86 (Galaxy Trackster)

Page 22: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Part 2: Results

ex

CG

genes

exons

%methylation

0bp 200,000bp

100%

0%

scaffold 86 (Galaxy Trackster)

Page 23: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Part 2: Results

ex

CG

genes

exons

%methylation

0bp 200,000bp

100%

0%

scaffold 86 (Galaxy Trackster)

Page 24: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Distribution in genomic elements

Part 2: Results

Page 25: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Distribution in genomic elements

Part 2: Results

unan-notated

48%intron35%

exon17%

Page 26: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Part 2: ResultsRelationship with expression

Page 27: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

RNA-Seq data (Zhang et al., 2012)

Part 2: ResultsRelationship with expression

Gene expression (Deciles)

DN

A m

eth

yla

tion/g

ene

Page 28: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Part 3

Page 29: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Approach:

High-throughput bisulfite sequencing:

Gill tissue

Part 3

Page 30: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Approach:

High-throughput bisulfite sequencing:

Gill tissue

Male gamete (sperm) tissue

Part 3

Page 31: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Part 3: Results

genes

%methylation: gill

CG

%methylation: sperm

0bp 6,000bp

Page 32: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Part 3: Results

genes

%methylation: gill

CG

%methylation: sperm

0bp 6,000bp

Page 33: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Part 3: Results

genes

%methylation: gill

CG

%methylation: sperm

0bp 6,000bp

Page 34: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Part 3: ResultsIdentify differentially methylated regions

(DMR)

Page 35: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Part 3: ResultsIdentify differentially methylated regions

(DMR)

100bp windows

DMR >75% difference between tissues

Page 36: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Part 3: Results>200,000 regions were evaluated

Page 37: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Part 3: Results>200,000 regions were evaluated

DMR7%

methylation same across tissues

93%

Page 38: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Part 3: Results>200,000 regions were evaluated

DMR7%

methylation same across tissues

93%

half of DMR in gene bodies

genes with DMR had significantly less methylation

Page 39: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Summary

Page 40: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Summaryunmethylatedmethylated

Page 41: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Gene function:

Summaryunmethylatedmethylated

Page 42: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Gene function:

Summaryunmethylated

induciblehousekeeping

methylated

Page 43: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Gene function:

Expression:

Summaryunmethylated

induciblehousekeeping

methylated

Page 44: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Gene function:

Expression:

Summaryunmethylated

inducible

low

housekeeping

high

methylated

Page 45: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Gene function:

Expression:

Tissue specific

methylation:

Summaryunmethylated

inducible

low

housekeeping

high

methylated

Page 46: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Gene function:

Expression:

Summaryunmethylated

inducible

low

tissue specific

housekeeping

high

conserved across tissues

methylated

Tissue specific

methylation:

Page 47: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Gene function:

Expression:

Summaryunmethylated

inducible

low

tissue specific

housekeeping

high

conserved across tissues

methylated

Role of methylation in

introns:

Tissue specific

methylation:

Page 48: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Gene function:

Expression:

Summaryunmethylated

inducible

low

tissue specific

housekeeping

high

conserved across tissues

methylated

unknownRole of methylation in

introns:

Tissue specific

methylation:

Page 49: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Gene function:

Expression:

Summaryunmethylated

inducible

low

tissue specific

housekeeping

high

conserved across tissues

methylated

Role of methylation in inter-genic regions:

unknownRole of methylation in

introns:

Tissue specific

methylation:

Page 50: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Gene function:

Expression:

Summaryunmethylated

inducible

low

tissue specific

housekeeping

high

conserved across tissues

methylated

Role of methylation in inter-genic regions:

unknownRole of methylation in

introns:

unknown

Tissue specific

methylation:

Page 51: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Next Steps

Page 52: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

Explore relationships between DNA methylation and alternative splicing

Annotate intergenic regions of the C. gigas genome

Next Steps

GENES (DNA)

EPIGENOME(DNA methylation)

Page 53: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

GENES (DNA)

EPIGENOME(DNA methylation)

Conclusions

Page 54: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

EPIGENOME(DNA methylation)

TRAITS

color

growthdisease resistance

ENVIRONMENT

nutritionpathogens

temperature

GENES (DNA)

Conclusions

Page 55: Aquaculture 2013, Nashville TN

AcknowledgementsRoberts Lab:

Samuel White Caroline StorerEmma Timmins-SchiffmanClaire EllisLisa Crosson

Taylor Shellfish:Jonathan DavisMolly Jackson

email: [email protected]: students.washington.edu/mgavery