April 3AA- Presentation UGM

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/28/2019 April 3AA- Presentation UGM

    1/18

    Did the IFRS Adoption have Effect on Acco

    Manipulation Practices in Emerging EconThe Case of Indonesian Listing Compa

    Theresia TrisantiSekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi YKPN, Yogyaka

  • 7/28/2019 April 3AA- Presentation UGM

    2/18

    General Overview

    Investors

    Listed Firms

    Government &Regulator

    Manipulate FR

    Acct. Standard

    Demand High

    Quality of FR

    Effic

    mark

    Invesconf

  • 7/28/2019 April 3AA- Presentation UGM

    3/18

    Issue of Interest (1)

    Investors

    ListedCompanies

    Government& Regulator

    Manipulate FR

    Regulate

    Review FR

    Accountin(IFRS)

    IS practice

    O

    in

    d

    f ( )

  • 7/28/2019 April 3AA- Presentation UGM

    4/18

    Research Focus

    Accounting ReformIncome

    SmoothingPractices

    Constrain ?

    Indonesian Context

    Issue of Interest (2)IFRS were from developed countries

    Developed countries (Aggressive

    shareholders activisms, active takeovermarkets, diverse corporate

    shareholdings).

    Developing countryInd

    concentrated ownership developing legal infrastr

    accounting & corporate X

  • 7/28/2019 April 3AA- Presentation UGM

    5/18

    Research Objectives

    Accounting

    Reforms

    2005 :

    Converged to

    IFRS

    Government

    & Regulator

    Pra

    ?

    Companys factors:

    - Company Size

    - Profitability

    - Debt Financing

    - Institutional Ownership

    IS Practi?

  • 7/28/2019 April 3AA- Presentation UGM

    6/18

    Literature ReviewIS practices occur when companys management take step

    reduce and store earnings during the good years and defe

    for use during the business-downturn years orvice versa2009; Lo, 2008).

    Authors/

    Variable

    Aussenegg,

    E.U,

    2008

    Latridis,

    U.K.

    2010

    Tondeloo ,

    Germany,

    2005

    Paglietti,

    Italy,

    2009

    Paananen,

    Sweden,

    2007

    IncreasedMarket

    Liquidity

    Yes No No No

    Reduce

    Trans Cost Yes Yes

    Increased Disclosure

    Yes Yes No

    Information

    Comparability Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Reduce

    EM practice Yes No Yes No

    LR: Research of the effects of IFRS adoption to

    (selected only)

  • 7/28/2019 April 3AA- Presentation UGM

    7/18

    esearc ypot eses

    Four variables related to companys factors will be tested to ascertain their effect i

    practices.

    H2 There is a significant relationship between the IS practice and the company siz

    H3 There is a significant relationship between the IS practice and the total debt of

    H4 There is a significant relationship between the IS practice and the institutional o

    company.

    H5 There is a significant relationship between the IS practice and the profitability o

    The main hypotheses to ascertain whether the convergence to IFRS have effec

    practices.

    H1 There is a significant differences on IS practices after the convergence to IFR

    the pre- period convergence.

    R h D i (1)

  • 7/28/2019 April 3AA- Presentation UGM

    8/18

    Research Design (1)

    Firms with complete data

    Initial Sample

    2000 2004

    Smoother Firms= 210

    Non Smoother Firms= 117(Average score of smoothing index

  • 7/28/2019 April 3AA- Presentation UGM

    9/18

    Research Design (2)

    Smoother = 1

    Non- Smoother = 0

    Independent Variable

    Company and CG factorpractices: Company size (H2) Debt financing (H3) Institutional ownersh Profitability (H5)

    DependentVariable(Status)

    Logistic regression model was used to test the com

    factors that affecting IS practices.

    Logit (pi) = ln [pi/1-pi] = + 1 SIZEi + 2 DEBTi + 3 INSTi + 4

    Fi di d Di i (1)

  • 7/28/2019 April 3AA- Presentation UGM

    10/18

    Finding and Discussion (1)

    Paired Differences Sample Test Before and After Convergence to IFRS

    Description MeanStd. Deviation Std. Error

    Mean T

    Pair 2000-2004 with

    2005-2009 0.066 0.302 0.026 2.546

    * Notes: The table indicated significance at 0.01 (***), 0.05(**) and 0.1(*) levels

    The Effect of Convergence of IFRS to IS Practices

    Firms with Complete Financial Data

    Description NumbListed firms from 2000 to 2009

    Bank and financial institution (-)

    Incomplete data (-)

    Listed firms with complete data from 2000 to 2009

    R h Fi di d Di i (3)

  • 7/28/2019 April 3AA- Presentation UGM

    11/18

    Research Finding and Discussion (3)

    Variables

    Before Convergence to IFRS

    (2005-2009)

    After Convergenc

    (2005-200

    SIZE 0.115 0.213

    DEBT 0.025** 0.013**

    INST 0.312 0.239

    PRT 0.018** 0.014**

    * Notes: The table indicated significance at 0.01 (***), 0.05(**) and 0.1(*) levels

    Logistic Regression Result

    Logit(pi) = 1.871 -0.881*SIZE + 2.480*DEBT -0.05

    +5.006*PRT

  • 7/28/2019 April 3AA- Presentation UGM

    12/18

    Limitations of the Research

    Suggestions for Future Research

    The convergence of accounting standards to IFRS was started

    year 2005 and continuing convergence until now. The samples

    research were collected from 2000 up to 2009 only.The study focused only on publicly listed companies in I

    Develop different IS model: different type of industry.

    Research Finding

    The IS practices get lesser after

    convergence to IFRS, but the

    occurrence still high.

    The big challenge is

    on releasing standard

    regulations but is on

    that they can be wellimplemented and mo

  • 7/28/2019 April 3AA- Presentation UGM

    13/18

  • 7/28/2019 April 3AA- Presentation UGM

    14/18

    The explanatory variables and measurem

    Variable Representedby

    Predicted Measured Company Size SIZE (+) Total assets (after taking logarit

    Debt Financing DEBT (+) Long term debt to total assets

    Institutional

    Ownership INST (+)

    % of institutional ownership

    Profitability PRT (+) Net income after tax to total ass

  • 7/28/2019 April 3AA- Presentation UGM

    15/18

    Artificial & Real SmoothingArtificial smoothing: changing in accounting

    procedures. Examples: inventory valuation,depreciation and changing in accounting estibad debts, capital assets lives, and pensionassumption.

    Real smoothing: examples: timing transactio

    capital assets acquisitions, spending the R&Dadvertising, delay (after shipment) or acceler(before shipment) the recognition of sales at year-end period.

    (Atik, 2009; Chong, 2004; Eckel, 1981)

    International Financial Report

  • 7/28/2019 April 3AA- Presentation UGM

    16/18

    International Financial ReportStandards (IFRS) IFRS is issued by the International Accounting

    Board (IASB). They purport to be a set of ruleswould apply equally to financial reporting by p

    companies worldwide.

    Information asymmetry should decrease:

    IFRS are more market-oriented IFRS disclosure requirements are larger

    Earnings management and IS practices should

    IFRS are more precise

    They admit a limited number of options

  • 7/28/2019 April 3AA- Presentation UGM

    17/18

    Income Smoothing Model

    Eckels indexIS index = (CVi/CVs)

    where

    i = one-period change in income

    S = one-period change in sales

    CVj = coefficient of variation for

    variable j (i.e., j's standard deviation

    divided by its expected value)(Ahmad & Mansor, 2009; Habib, 2005; Ashari et al., 1994)

    If the CVi (the c

    variation for inco

    than the CVs (th

    of variation for sa

    ratio less than on

    suggesting that t

    income smoothe

    A h t D t t IS P ti

  • 7/28/2019 April 3AA- Presentation UGM

    18/18

    Approaches to Detect IS Practices

    1. Studies uses income smoothing index (CVi / CVs)

    1981)

    2. Studies accepts accounting changes as income-sm

    instruments and examines the effects of accountin

    changes to the net incomes of firms (Moses, 1987

    3. Studies and examines classificatory smoothing. O

    income (income before extraordinary items) is a bepredictor of future cash flows than net income.

    4. Studies uses discretionary accruals to detect inco

    smoothing behavior. Accrual models were develop

    earnings management literature.