3 - 1 3. High-Cost Support The high-cost support mechanisms enable areas with very high costs to recover some of these costs from the federal universal service fund, leaving a smaller remainder of the costs to be recovered through end-user rates or state universal service support mechanisms. In this manner, the high-cost support mechanisms are intended to hold down rates and thereby further one of the most important goals of federal and state regulation -- the preservation and advancement of universal telephone service. This section of the report outlines the high-cost support mechanisms and provides data for these mechanisms. The high-cost support mechanisms include embedded high-cost loop support (HCLS),1 safety net additive support, safety valve support, forward-looking non-rural high-cost model support (HCMS), interstate common line support (ICLS)2 for rate-of-return carriers, interstate access support (IAS) for price-cap carriers, and local switching support (LSS). Table 3.1 summarizes the annual amounts for the high-cost support mechanisms for 1986 through 2006.3 It is based on information provided by the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) through 1997 and the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC) since 1998. Support amounts for 2006 are projected, based on USACs third quarter filing.4 Support amounts are subject to adjustment if data are corrected in future periods. Competitive carriers are eligible to receive support from the universal service support mechanisms provided that they provide service using their own facilities, either partially or completely. Thus, pure resellers are not eligible. To be eligible to receive support, a carrier must be designated as an eligible telecommunications carrier (ETC) by the state regulatory commission of the state in which it operates, or by the FCC where the state commission lacks 1 This was formerly referred to as the Universal Service Fund, and still bears that name in the Commission rules. It is now referred to as high-cost loop support to avoid confusion with the new, more comprehensive universal service support mechanisms that the Commission developed to implement the 1996 Act. See 47 C.F.R. 36.601. See also 47 C.F.R. Part 54. 2 Effective July 1, 2004, long term support (LTS) was merged into ICLS. 3 The 2006 numbers are based on the assumption that fourth quarter projections will be the same as those for the third quarter. The numbers for prior years reflect actual payments. Except for ICLS and LSS, for which final true-ups are available through 2004, the actual support amounts for a given year contain adjustments for prior years. USAC now makes these amounts available on their website on a monthly basis, beginning with 2003. Actual support amounts for earlier years were provided to us by special request. 4 Universal Service Administrative Company, Federal Universal Service Support Mechanism Fund Size Projections (USAC Filing) for the Third Quarter 2006 (May 2, 2006). 3 - 2 jurisdiction.5 A competitive carrier that is designated as an ETC will receive high-cost support that is determined by the number of lines it serves, the support per line received by the incumbent local exchange carrier (ILEC) against which it is competing, and the degree to which it uses its own facilities to provide its services.6 Table 3.2 compares the annual amounts of support received by ILECs and by competitive ETCs (CETCs) for each support mechanism since the first CETC started receiving support in 1999.7 Historically, HCLS was provided to all ILECs based on their embedded costs. Such support provides assistance for non-traffic sensitive (NTS) local loop costs -- a term that refers to the costs of outside telephone wires, poles, and other facilities that link each telephone customer's premises to the public switched telephone network. NTS costs are allocated between the state and interstate jurisdictions because all local loops can be used for making and receiving both intrastate and interstate telephone calls. Historically, the interstate allocation was made using the Subscriber Plant Factor (SPF).8 This factor is now 25% for all companies. Today, only rural carriers9 receive HCLS. Non-rural carriers receive HCMS instead of HCLS. If an ILEC is deemed a rural carrier, it continues to receive high-cost support based on embedded costs. The expense adjustment allows those study areas10 with an average unseparated cost per loop that exceeds 115% of the national average to allocate an additional portion of their NTS costs to the interstate jurisdiction and to have those costs recovered by HCLS.11 Table 3.3 shows the percentages of additional NTS costs recovered by HCLS.12 HCLS 5 47 C.F.R. 54.201. 6 47 C.F.R. 54.307. 7 The data for 2006 are projections. USACs quarterly filings include projections of support for competitive carriers that have applied for, but not yet received, ETC status. These support amounts have been removed from the 2006 data reported here if the carrier failed to attain ETC status by the time of the filing for the Third Quarter 2006. 8 The Subscriber Plant Factor is defined in section 36.154(e) of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. 36.154(e). It was frozen in 1981 and then transitioned to 25% between 1985 and 1993, subject to the limitations in section 36.154(f) of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. 36.154(f). 9 See 47 C.F.R. 51.5 for the definition of a rural carrier. Generally, they either have fewer than 100,000 lines or serve predominantly rural areas. 10 A study area is usually an operating company's operations in one state. Holding companies may own multiple operating companies and thus have multiple study areas in a state. Study area boundaries were frozen as of November 15, 1984. Any subsequent change requires a Commission waiver of this freeze. 11 In January 1988, high-cost assistance was retargeted to increase benefits to small and 3 - 3 was implemented during a period in which the basic interstate allocation of loop costs was shifted from a level based on the historical SPF to the present flat allocation factor of 25%. Both of these changes were phased in between 1985 and 1993, during which time the HCLS was increased by one-eighth of the formula amount each year. In December 1993, the Commission, at the recommendation of the Joint Board in CC Docket 80-286, imposed a cap on HCLS payments.13 The cap was indexed to the rate of growth in the national total of working exchange loops. It is implemented by adjusting the national average cost per loop used to calculate each study area's high-cost assistance (using the current formula from Table 3.3) from the average value to whatever base value is required to achieve the cap. For example, in 2003, the cap was achieved by adjusting the base value 2001 cost per loop from the national average of $240.00 to $267.15. In addition, when exchanges are sold or transferred to another company, the new owner is limited to the same support for those exchanges that they had under the old owner.14 The Commission modified the high-cost support mechanism to provide additional support to rural carriers on May 23, 2001.15 Implementation of the modified support mechanism medium sized LECs. The old and new high-cost formulas are compared in Table 3.1 of the Monitoring Reports in CC Docket No. 87-339. The last report in that docket was released May 30, 1997. 12 For example, suppose the national average cost per loop is $240 and a company with 10,000 loops has a cost per loop of $420, or 175% of the national average. Then for the portion of their costs between $276 (115% of the national average) and $360 (150% of the national average) they would receive 65% of those costs [.65 times ($360 - $276) = $54.60], plus they would receive 75% of their costs over $360 [.75 times ($420 - $360) = $45], resulting in HCLS totaling $99.60 per loop, or $996,000 total support. 13 Amendment of Part 36 of the Commissions Rules and Establishment of a Joint Board, CC Docket No. 80-286, Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd 303 (1993). 14 47 C.F.R. 54.305. This applies to sales and transfers initiated after May 7, 1997. In August 2000, the Common Carrier Bureau adopted an order removing similar older caps for individual study areas that were subject to them at that time, effective January 1, 2000. Petitions for Waiver Concerning the Definition of Study Area Contained in Part 36 Appendix-Glossary of the Commissions Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 15 FCC Rcd 23491 (2000). 15 See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Multi-Association Group (MAG) Plan for Regulation of Interstate Services of Non-Price Cap Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers and Interexchange Carriers, CC Docket Nos. 96-45, 00-256, Fourteenth Report and Order, Twenty-Second Order on Reconsideration, and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in CC Docket No. 96-45, and Report and Order in CC Docket No. 00-256, 16 FCC Rcd 11244 (2001) (Rural Task Force Order). 3 - 4 began July 1, 2001 and was recently extended beyond the originally anticipated five year period.16 The Commission rebased the HCLS fund for rural carriers, revised the corporate operations expense limitation formula, 17 and modified the indexed cap. Accordingly, beginning July 1, 2001, the caps for non-rural hold-harmless and rural HCLS are calculated separately.18 For rural carriers, the national average annual loop cost is now frozen at $240.00 and the cap is indexed to the rate of growth in working loops of rural carriers plus the rate of inflation as measured by the Gross Domestic Product Chained Price Index (GDP-CPI).19 The Commission adjusted the rural HCLS cap by changing the base year for the calculations to 2000 for purposes of recalculating the cap for 2002 and subsequent years.20 To encourage new investment in rural infrastructure, safety net additive support was made available for rural carriers whose telephone plant in service per loop increased by over 14% in one year.21 In such cases, this additional loop support equals the difference between what the rural carriers HCLS would have been uncapped and what it is capped in the qualifying year less the difference between the uncapped and capped amounts in the base year. For new sales or transfers of rural exchanges, the acquiring carrier is required to keep separate cost information for the acquired exchanges to determine the eligible support for those exchanges. Safety valve support is available for new investments in infrastructure made in the acquired exchanges.22 If a carrier is deemed to be a non-rural carrier, it now receives high-cost support based on forward-looking costs, as estimated by an FCC cost model. The Commission adopted a new 16 See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, WC Docket No. 05-337, Order, 21 FCC Rcd 5514 (2006), extending rules until the Commission adopts new high-cost support rules for rural carriers. 17 Previously, in 1997, the Commission had adopted limitations on the amount of allowed corporate operations expense. The limitations are specified in section 36.621(a)(4) of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. 36.621(a)(4). 18 47 C.F.R. 36.602 and 36.603. See page 36 below for a discussion of hold-harmless. 19 This replaces the indexing of the cap to the rate of growth of the national total of working exchange loops. 20 See Rural Task Force Order; Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Multi-Association Group (MAG) Plan for Regulation of Interstate Services of Non-Price Cap Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers and Interexchange Carriers, CC Docket Nos. 96-45, 00-256, Order on Reconsideration, 17 FCC Rcd 11472 (2002) (Rebasing Order). 21 See 47 C.F.R. 36.605. 22 See 47 C.F.R. 54.305(d)-(f). 3 - 5 high-cost support mechanism for non-rural carriers on October 21, 1999, based on recommendations from the Joint Board.23 This HCMS mechanism is based on the forward-looking costs of providing supported services24 as determined by the Commissions cost model.25 For each state, the cost model calculates the wire center forward-looking cost per line incurred by non-rural carriers to provide supported services. The statewide average cost per line is then compared to the national average cost per line to determine eligibility for support. The forward-looking support mechanism provides support to non-rural carriers in those states that have a statewide average forward-looking cost per line greater than the national benchmark, which initially was set at 135 percent of the national average forward-looking cost per line. Beginning in 2004, this benchmark is now two standard deviations above the national average.26 After determining the total amount of forward-looking support provided to non-rural carriers in a particular state, the support is then targeted to individual wire centers that have 23 See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Ninth Report and Order and Eighteenth Order on Reconsideration, 14 FCC Rcd 20432 (1999) (High-Cost Methodology Order), revd in part and remanded, Qwest Corp. v. FCC, 258 F.3d 1191 (10th Cir. 2001), Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order on Remand, Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, and Memorandum Opinion and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 22559 (2003) (Order on Remand), remanded, Qwest Corp. v. FCC, 398 F.3d 1222 (10th Cir. 2005). 24 The services eligible for federal universal service support are listed in section 54.101 of the Commissions rules. 47 C.F.R. 54.101. 25 The new cost model consists of: (1) a model platform, which contains a series of fixed assumptions about network design and engineering; and (2) input values for the model platform, such as the cost of network components, e.g., cables and switches, as well as various capital cost parameters. The Commission adopted the model platform in the Platform Order released in October 1998. Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Forward-Looking Mechanism for High-Cost Support for Non-Rural LECs, CC Docket Nos. 96-45, 97-160, Fifth Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 21323 (1998) (Platform Order). The Commission adopted input values in the Inputs Order released in November 1999. Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Forward-Looking Mechanism for High-Cost Support for Non-Rural LECs, CC Docket Nos. 96-45, 97-160, Tenth Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 20156 (1999) (Inputs Order). 26 High-Cost Methodology Order, 14 FCC Rcd 20432 at paras. 10 and 55. The forward-looking support mechanism provides support for all intrastate costs that exceed the benchmark. High-Cost Methodology Order, at paras. 60-63. In October 2003, the Commission adopted an order modifying the national benchmark. Order on Remand, at paras. 49-69. 3 - 6 forward-looking costs in excess of the benchmark.27 Under the targeting approach, the amount of support provided to a non-rural carrier serving a particular wire center depends on the relative costs in that wire center and the number of lines served by the carrier. By comparing the relative costs in various above-benchmark wire centers, the targeting approach enables the Commission to provide greater amounts of support to carriers serving lines in wire centers with costs further above the benchmark. Thus, unlike providing a uniform per line statewide support amount, the targeting approach provides support in an amount commensurate with the cost of service, thereby encouraging carriers to serve high-cost areas. The Commission also adopted a transitional hold-harmless measure to prevent rate shocks and disruptions in state rate designs when the new mechanism took effect. As adopted, no non-rural telephone company would receive less support than it received under the embedded HCLS mechanisms during the transition period. On December 8, 2000, the Commission adopted measures to phase down interim hold-harmless support, through $1.00 reductions in average monthly per-line embedded HCLS, beginning January 1, 2001, and every year thereafter until there is no more interim embedded hold-harmless HCLS.28 That point has now been reached. LTS was related to interstate non-traffic sensitive costs. LTS provided support to the members of the NECA common line pool, allowing them to charge a below-cost carrier common line (CCL) rate that was uniform for all companies in the pool. Prior to 1989, all ILECs were required to be part of the NECA common line (CL) pool, and CCL rates were uniform nationwide. On April 1, 1989, companies were permitted to withdraw from the NECA CL pool and provide jurisdictionally specific CCL access charges; however, carriers had to remain in the pool to receive LTS.29 Nationwide pool results provided by NECA for 2005 are shown in Tables 3.4 and 3.5. Table 3.4 summarizes the CL pool revenues and expenses for the year 2005, as well as a comparison with the corresponding figures for 2004. Table 3.5 has comparable figures for NECA's traffic sensitive pool. To reduce disparities in CCL rates among ILECs after companies were permitted to withdraw from the CL pool, LTS was set up. LTS originally consisted of payments to the NECA CL pool from companies that withdrew from the NECA CL pool. Companies remaining in the NECA pool charge CCL rates, pursuant to the NECA tariff, which were formerly equal to the average CCL rate of the price-cap companies. Effective January 1, 1998, the funds for LTS 27 High-Cost Methodology Order, at paras. 68-76. 28 Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Thirteenth Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 15 FCC Rcd 24422 (2000). 29 See previous Monitoring Reports for a detailed list of which companies are no longer in the NECA CL pool. 3 - 7 came from the federal universal service support mechanisms, and LTS was portable to CETCs. At the same time, the NECA pool rate no longer was made equal to the average price-cap rate. Rather, the amount of LTS that a NECA pool member was eligible to receive in 1998 was the 1997 level of LTS (the difference between 1997 CCL revenue requirements and the sum of 1997 CCL revenues using the NECA pool rate and 1997 subscriber line charge revenues) multiplied by the rate of growth of the national average NTS cost per loop. The 1999 level of LTS was similarly adjusted from the 1998 level by the national average loop cost growth rate. Beginning January 1, 2000, LTS was adjusted for inflation to reflect the annual percentage change in the GDP-CPI.30 After the implementation of ICLS (see below), the Commission determined that it was necessary to reduce LTS for some carriers to prevent over earning by those carriers whose ICLS would otherwise have fallen below zero.31 Effective July 1, 2004, LTS was merged into ICLS.32 In response to the 1996 Act, the Commission also has removed implicit support from interstate access charges. In November 2001, the Commission created the ICLS mechanism for rate-of-return carriers to convert implicit support in the access rate structure to explicit, portable support.33 ICLS recovers any shortfall between the allowed common line revenues of rate-of-return carriers and their subscriber line charge revenues and gradually replaces the carrier common line charge. Under the MAG Order, the ICLS mechanism was implemented beginning on July 1, 2002. On May 31, 2000, the Commission established an explicit interstate access support (IAS) mechanism for price-cap carriers to replace the implicit support previously collected through interstate access charges.34 Like LTS and ICLS, the purpose of this mechanism is to provide 30 See 47 C.F.R. 54.303. 31 See Multi-Association Group (MAG) Plan for Regulation of Interstate Services of Non-Price Cap Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers and Interexchange Carriers, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket Nos. 00-256, 96-45, Order and Second Order on Reconsideration, 17 FCC Rcd 11593 (2002) (MAG Reconsideration Order). 32 See Multi-Association Group (MAG) Plan for Regulation of Interstate Services of Non-Price Cap Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers and Interexchange Carriers, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket Nos. 00-256, 96-45, Report and Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 19 FCC Rcd 4122 (2004). 33 Multi-Association Group (MAG) Plan for Regulation of Interstate Services of Non-Price Cap Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers and Interexchange Carriers, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in CC Docket No. 00-256, Fifteenth Report and Order in CC Docket No. 96-45, 16 FCC Rcd 19613 (2001) (MAG Order). 34 Access Charge Reform, Price Cap Performance Review for Local Exchange Carriers, 3 - 8 explicit support to ensure reasonably affordable interstate rates. This is in contrast to the Commissions other high-cost support mechanisms, which provide support to enable states to ensure reasonably affordable and comparable intrastate rates. The IAS mechanism provides support to carriers serving lines in areas where they are unable to recover their permitted revenues from the subscriber line charges. The support total is an aggregate annual amount of approximately $650 million. Support is targeted to the density zones that have the greatest need for it, and is provided on a portable, per-line basis. It is available on a competitively neutral basis to any ETC serving a supported customer, regardless of the technology used by that carrier. LSS provides support for traffic sensitive local switching costs. LSS provides support to ILECs with study areas of 50,000 or fewer access lines, to help defray the higher switching costs of small ILECs. The LSS is recovered through the universal service support mechanisms, rather than through higher traffic-sensitive access charges. Until 1997, this support was implicitly included in those access charges, based on dial equipment minute (DEM) weighting.35 The portion of these costs that were normally allocated to interstate was determined by the ratio of interstate to total dial equipment minutes, known as the DEM factor. However, ILEC study areas with 50,000 access lines or fewer had that portion multiplied by a weighting factor, which was determined by the number of access lines in the study area.36 The resulting weighted DEM factor (which was not permitted to exceed .85) allowed these study areas to recover a greater portion of their local switching costs from interexchange carriers in the form of higher access charges.37 Low-Volume Long Distance Users, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Sixth Report and Order in CC Docket Nos. 96-262 and 94-1, Report and Order in CC Docket No. 99-249, Eleventh Report and Order in CC Docket No. 96-45, 15 FCC Rcd 12962 (2000) (CALLS Order), revd and remanded, Texas Office of Public Utility Counsel v. FCC, 265 F. 3d 313 (5th Cir. 2001), and Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, Price Cap Performance Review for LECs, CC Docket No. 94-1, Low-Volume Long Distance Users, CC Docket No. 99-249, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order on Remand, 18 FCC Rcd 14976 (2003). 35 Table 3.7 of the 2003 Universal Service Monitoring Report provides estimates of DEM weighting impacts from 1993 to 1997. 36 The weighting factors, which became effective in 1993, are shown in Table 3.6 of the December 1998 and June 1999 Monitoring Reports. 37 The weighted and unweighted DEM factors were shown in section 8 of this report in 2003 and prior years. The DEM factors were frozen in 2001 for a five year period, which has since been extended. See Jurisdictional Separations Reform and Referral to the Federal-State Joint Board, Report and Order, CC Docket No. 80-286, FCC 01-162, 16 FCC Rcd 11382 (2001). Because the factors are frozen, they are no longer being reported. 3 - 9 Since 1998, the LSS factor has been calculated as the difference between the 1996 weighted DEM factor and the 1996 unweighted DEM factor. It is subject to the limit that the sum of the DEM factor and the LSS factor shall not exceed .85. Also, if the number of lines has increased since 1996 across one of the limit values of 10,000 or 20,000 or 50,000 lines, the 1996 weighted DEM factor used for computing the LSS factor is adjusted to reflect the weighting factor appropriate for the new number of lines. The LSS is the product of a carriers annual unseparated local switching revenue requirement multiplied by its LSS factor. The Commissions rules require that the LSS be trued-up with actual costs no later than 15 months after the end of the calendar year for which historical data are submitted.38 All of the universal service support mechanisms are administered by USAC, an independent subsidiary of NECA. As part of its administration of these support mechanisms, USAC files quarterly reports with the Commission, at least 60 days prior to the start of each quarter. These reports include quarterly projections of the amounts to be paid for each program, along with true-ups (differences between actual payments and projections) for prior periods, administrative expenses and interest income. The report for the third quarter of 2006, filed on May 2, 2006, was the primary one used to compile the tables in this section, along with information on actual support payments since 2003 found on the USAC website39 and data provided to us by USAC on annual support payments between 1998 and 2002. Tables 3.6 through 3.14 provide a summary by state of the total amounts of these support payments. Each table summarizes the annual amounts for the high-cost programs for 1998 through 2006. The 2006 numbers are based on the assumption that fourth quarter projections will be the same as those for the third quarter. Table 3.6 summarizes HCLS payments, Table 3.7 summarizes safety net additive support payments, Table 3.8 summarizes safety valve support payments, Table 3.9 summarizes HCMS payments,40 Table 3.10 summarizes LTS payments, Table 3.11 summarizes ICLS payments, Table 3.12 summarizes IAS payments, and Table 3.13 summarizes LSS payments. Table 3.14 summarizes the total of these seven payments. Table 3.15 shows the amounts of these payments by state going to ILECs and CETCs for each year since 1999. Table 3.16 shows, by support mechanism by state, for 2005, the monthly support payments per loop to carriers.41 38 47 C.F.R. 54.301(e)(2)(iv). 39 The monthly payment information for each study area can be found at: http://form498.universalservice.org/hc/disbursements/default.aspx. 40 The payments for the forward-looking high-cost model support only include payments actually made based on the model. In cases where the HCL hold-harmless payment was made because it exceeded the model amount, the model amount was not counted and the hold-harmless payments were included in Table 3.6. 41 Loops or lines from USACs Fund Size Projection for the Fourth Quarter 2005 were used because USACs files showing actual payments do not include the number of loops or lines on which those payments are based. HCLS loops were used for ILECs. For CETCs, reported HCLS loops only reflect areas where they compete against rural ILECs. 3 - 10 Pursuant to Part 36 of the Commissions rules, NECA collects certain cost data from ILECs that provide service to approximately 98% of the nation's subscribers.42 Each year NECA collects NTS cost and loop data from the previous year, and files all such data with USAC and the Commission. USAC, as administrator of the high-cost support mechanism, uses that information to distribute high-cost assistance in the following year. On October 1, 2005, NECA reported new data for 2004, and revised data for the four previous years. State totals, based on that report, covering cost data for 2004, are presented in Table 3.17. This table shows unseparated NTS costs (revenue requirement), the number of loops, and costs per loop. It also shows the expected HCLS payments for 2006, based on 2004 data, using the high-cost formula and the cap discussed above. The costs shown are embedded costs for all companies.43 The final column shows the percentage of the total payments going to companies in the state. Table 3.18 shows the changes, from the revised data for 2003 to the newly reported data for 2004, for state totals, of the unseparated NTS revenue requirement, the number of loops, the revenue requirement per loop, and the HCLS payments. The phrase, "payments in later year" in the last column refers to the fact that these are projections of payments to be made two years after the costs are incurred; in this case, in the years 2005 and 2006. Tables 3.19 through 3.21 present state summaries of the revised historical information filed for 2000 through 2004 in the 2005 filing. Table 3.19 shows the unseparated NTS revenue requirements for each year. Table 3.20 shows the number of loops. Table 3.21 shows the unseparated NTS revenue requirement per loop. The next several tables in this section are data for individual study areas. Tables 3.22 through 3.30 are derived from the USAC data. In each table, only those study areas that are (or at some time were) eligible for payments from the support mechanism covered by the table, regardless of whether they received any support, are included in the table. Table 3.22 has HCLS Consequently, for CETCs, rural and non-rural loops or lines were computed separately and then added. For the rural portion, the maximum of HCLS loops or the sum of rural IAS plus ICLS access lines were used. For the non-rural portion, the maximum of HCMS supported loops or the sum of non-rural IAS plus ICLS access lines were used. Only those CETC loops or lines that were reported as eligible for support in the Fourth Quarter filing or received support payments in 2005 were included. 42 These are the carriers that settle on a cost basis. Costs for the remaining ILECs, which settle on an average schedule basis, are attributed by NECA on the basis of those carriers' average number of loops per exchange. 43 The data submitted by NECA include payments that would have been made to non-rural carriers if the forward-looking high cost model had not been implemented, which form the basis of the hold-harmless calculations. Consequently the amounts shown in Table 3.6 are a better indication of the actual HCLS payments. 3 - 11 payments. Table 3.23 has safety net additive support payments. Table 3.24 has safety valve support payments. Table 3.25 provides, by non-rural study area, the high cost support using the forward-looking high-cost model support mechanism.44 Table 3.26 has LTS payments. Table 3.27 has ICLS payments. Table 3.28 has IAS payments for price-cap companies. Table 3.29 has LSS payments. Table 3.30 has the total support payments for all seven programs. Each of these tables contains the annual amounts for only those years for which a support mechanism was in place. The 1998 amounts in Tables 3.22, 3.26, and 3.29 are the actual payments after processing the final true-ups for 1998.45 Table 3.27 has the final ICLS true-ups for 2002 through 2004.46 Table 3.29 has the final LSS true-ups for 1999 through 2004.47 The other numbers (except for 2006 data) are based on the actual payments, as reported by USAC, and include out-of year adjustments for prior years. In all cases the 2006 total is based on the assumption that the fourth quarter amount will be the same as the third quarter projection. CETC study areas listed in the USAC Filing for the Third Quarter of 2006 as being ineligible for support (because they applied for, but have not yet received, ETC status) have been excluded from these tables. Tables 3.31 through 3.35 are derived from NECAs 2005 filing.48 Table 3.31 contains individual study area data for 2004 for unseparated NTS costs (Revenue Requirement), the number of loops, and costs per loop. It also shows the expected HCLS payments for 2006, based on 2004 data, and the percentage of the national total HCLS that goes to the study area. For study areas that acquired exchanges from another study area and had to report the amounts for the acquired exchanges separately, the study area code is appended with an A for the data for the acquired exchanges. In the second column of Table 3.31, the types are cost (C) and average schedule (A), indicating the form of settlements used by that study area. The third column indicates whether the study area has been designated as rural (R) or non-rural (N). In addition to the name of the study area, the name of the holding company (if any) is also shown. The costs shown are embedded costs 44 Companies getting hold-harmless support have those amounts shown in Table 3.22. 45 These are from Universal Service Administrative Company, Federal Universal Service Support Mechanism Fund Size Projections (USAC Filing) for the First Quarter 2002 (November 2, 2001), Appendix HC7. 46 These are from the USAC Filing for the Third Quarter 2004 (May 13, 2004), Appendix HC23, the USAC Filing for the Third Quarter 2005 (May 2, 2005), Appendix HC23, and the USAC Filing for the Third Quarter 2006 (May 2, 2006), Appendix HC23. 47 These are from the USAC Filing for the Third Quarter 2001 (May 2, 2001), Appendix HC6; USAC Filing for the Fourth Quarter 2002 (August2, 2001), Appendix HC17; USAC Filing for the Third Quarter 2003 (May 2, 2003), Appendix HC18; USAC Filing for the Third Quarter 2004 (May 13, 2004), Appendix HC22; USAC Filing for the Third Quarter 2005 (May 2, 2005), Appendix HC22; and USAC Filing for the Third Quarter 2006 (May 2, 2006), Appendix HC22. 48 National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., Universal Service Fund 2005 Submission of 2004 Study Results (October 1, 2005). 3 - 12 for all companies, and the payments shown include potential payments to non-rural companies that form the basis of hold-harmless calculations.49 Table 3.32 shows the percentage changes from the previous year for each of these amounts for individual study areas. In the payments column in this table, the entry "INFINITE" indicates that the payment was zero in the first year and positive in the second year. Tables 3.33 through 3.35 present individual study area data for the historical information filed for 2000 through 2004 in the 2005 filing. Table 3.33 shows the unseparated NTS revenue requirements for each year. Table 3.34 shows the number of loops. Table 3.35 shows the unseparated NTS revenue requirement per loop. In compiling the historical data, it is necessary to account for changes that have occurred in the study areas over time. These changes are noted in Table 3.36.50 In cases where study areas have merged, the pre-merger data for all of the merged study areas have been combined and reported as the data for the surviving study area in Tables 3.33 through 3.35. In cases where there has been an ownership change resulting in a code number change, the pre-change data is reported under the new code number and name. In the case of newly created study areas, pre-creation data is reported as 0. In Table 3.32, percentage changes in the case of mergers are comparisons of the surviving study area data with the consolidated pre-merger data. In the case of sales of exchanges, for comparison purposes the data for the sold exchanges are consolidated with the data for the study area that divested them. Each year NECA submits detailed account data used to calculate the unseparated revenue requirement per loop for each study area that settles on a cost basis, and total attributed revenue requirements for study areas that settle on an average schedule basis. In its filings since 1993, in addition to submitting such information for the latest year, NECA also submitted revised information for the four preceding years. The detailed account data are not reported here, but the most recent revision of the data for each year since 1988 is available in electronic form on the Wireline Competition Bureau Statistical Reports web site . 49 The data submitted by NECA include payments that would have been made if the forward-looking high cost model had not been implemented. Consequently, Table 3.22 is a better indication of actual HCLS payments. 50 Because the study areas were matched between years by study area code number, changes in only the name of the company are not included in this list. However, for name changes between 2003 and 2004, Table 3.32 shows the old name in parentheses. YearHigh-Cost Loop SupportSafety Net Additive SupportSafety Valve SupportHigh-Cost Model SupportLong-Term SupportInterstate Common Line SupportInterstate Access SupportLocal Switching SupportTotal Support1986 $56 - - - - - - - $56 1987 126 - - - - - - - 126 1988 183 - - - - - - - 183 1989 265 - - - $236 - - - 500 1990 339 - - - 263 - - - 602 1991 485 - - - 272 - - - 757 1992 609 - - - 306 - - - 915 1993 705 - - - 323 - - - 1,028 1994 725 - - - 347 - - - 1,072 1995 750 - - - 382 - - - 1,132 1996 763 - - - 426 - - - 1,188 1997 794 - - - 470 - - - 1,263 1998 827 - - - 473 - - $390 1,690 1999 864 - - - 473 - - 380 1,718 2000 874 - - $219 478 - $279 385 2,235 2001 927 - - 206 492 - 577 390 2,592 2002 1,045 - - 233 493 $173 615 376 2,935 2003 1,085 $9 $0 234 504 409 622 396 3,259 2004 1,137 12 0 273 275 716 642 414 3,468 2005 1,219 15 4 292 0 1,178 691 425 3,824 2006 * 1,284 20 2 332 - 1,231 657 467 3,993 Note: Detail may not appear to add to totals due to rounding. - Support mechanism did not exist in that year.* Estimate for 2006 based on USAC projections.Sources: National Exchange Carrier Association (1986-1997), Universal Service Administrative Company (1998-2005). Federal Universal Service Support Mechanisms Fund Size Projections for the Third Quarter 2006 (2006).Total High-Cost Support Fund Payments(In Millions of Dollars)Table 3.1High-Cost Support Fund Payment HistoryChart 3.105001000150020002500300035004000Millions of DollarsTotal Support 126 183 500 602 757 915 1028 1072 1132 1188 1263 1690 1718 2235 2592 2935 3259 3468 3824 39931987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 20063 - 13Year CompaniesHigh-Cost Loop SupportSafety Net Additive SupportSafety Valve SupportHigh-Cost Model SupportLong-Term SupportInterstate Common Line SupportInterstate Access SupportLocal Switching SupportTotal SupportILECs 864.2 - - - 472.9 - - 380.3 1,717.41999 CETCs 0.1 - - - 0.4 - - 0.0 0.5Total 864.3 - - - 473.3 - - 380.3 1,718.0ILECs 873.8 - - 218.7 477.3 - 278.8 384.7 2,233.32000 CETCs 0.4 - - 0.0 1.1 - 0.0 0.0 1.5Total 874.1 - - 218.7 478.4 - 278.8 384.7 2,234.8ILECs 921.5 - - 205.4 484.2 - 575.7 387.9 2,574.72001 CETCs 5.7 - - 0.3 8.0 - 1.0 1.9 16.9Total 927.2 - - 205.7 492.1 - 576.7 389.9 2,591.6ILECs 1,039.1 - - 213.8 481.2 172.1 608.5 374.2 2,888.92002 CETCs 5.7 - - 19.0 11.8 0.8 7.0 1.7 46.1Total 1,044.9 - - 232.8 493.0 172.9 615.4 375.9 2,935.0ILECs 1,058.2 8.8 - 207.2 479.1 392.0 604.9 379.2 3,129.42003 CETCs 26.5 0.3 - 26.8 25.0 17.1 16.9 17.0 129.6Total 1,084.6 9.1 - 234.0 504.1 409.1 621.7 396.3 3,259.0ILECs 1,055.4 10.5 - 218.9 243.8 648.9 596.0 379.0 3,152.62004 CETCs 81.3 1.1 - 54.5 31.0 66.8 45.7 35.3 315.7Total 1,136.6 11.6 - 273.4 274.8 715.8 641.7 414.4 3,468.4ILECs 1,052.1 12.3 3.8 221.3 0.0 953.9 581.9 360.4 3,185.72005 CETCs 166.8 2.9 0.6 70.6 -0.2 224.4 109.1 64.4 638.5Total 1,218.9 15.2 4.4 291.8 -0.2 1,178.3 691.0 424.8 3,824.2ILECs 1,047.2 16.0 0.8 213.6 - 950.4 560.8 384.0 3,172.72006 * CETCs 237.2 4.2 1.0 118.8 - 280.3 96.4 82.7 820.4Total 1,284.3 20.2 1.8 332.4 - 1,230.6 657.2 466.7 3,993.2Note: Details may not appear to add to totals due to rounding. ILECs are incumbent local exchange carriers. CETCs are competitive eligible telecommunications carriers.- Support mechanism did not exist in that year.* Estimate for 2006 based on USAC projections.Source: Universal Service Administrative Company.Chart 3.2Total High-Cost Support Fund Payments - ILECs and CETCs(In Millions of Dollars)Table 3.2High-Cost Support Fund Payment History - ILECs and CETCs(In Millions of Dollars)0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006SupportILECsCETCs3 - 14 3 15 Table 3.3 Embedded High-Cost Loop Fund Formulas Cost Range as % of National Average % Expense Adjustment within Range Study Areas with Over 200,000 Loops 0% - 115% 0% 115% - 160% 10% 160% - 200% 30% 200% - 250% 60% 250% and above 75% Study Areas with 200,000 Loops or Fewer 0% - 115% 0% 115% - 150% 65% 150% and above 75% Notes: These values have been used since 1988. Beginning January 1, 2000, these are only applicable to rural companies and to hold-harmless support for non-rural companies. Pool Year (Note 2) PercentageChangeLine Item (Note 1) 2004 2005 (Note 3)Carrier Common Line (CCL) Earned RevenuesSpecial Access Surcharge $107,098,955 $133,061,599 24.24%CCL Net Realized Uncollectibles $4,976,184 $4,127,690 -17.05%CCL Net Earned Revenues $102,122,771 $128,933,909 26.25%End-User Net Earned Revenues (Note 4) $991,386,899 $962,608,490 -2.90%Total Common Line Net Earned Revenues $1,093,509,670 $1,091,542,399 -0.18%ICLS $652,817,276 $930,504,399 42.54%Long-Term Support $243,831,816 $0 -100.00%Total Common Line Revenues $1,990,158,762 $2,022,046,798 1.60%NECA Administrative Costs $26,324,892 $25,224,014 -4.18%Average Schedule Company Settlements $366,611,120 $374,219,230 2.08%Common Line Expenses and Other Taxes $1,252,839,400 $1,295,658,107 3.42%Common Line Adjusted Federal Income Tax $75,872,149 $76,501,261 0.83%Total Common Line Expenses $1,721,647,561 $1,771,602,612 2.90%Common Line Residue for Distribution (Note 5) $268,511,201 $250,444,186 -6.73%Common Line Average Net Investment $2,341,390,728 $2,192,652,715 -6.35%Common Line Residue Ratio (Note 6) 11.47% 11.42% -0.40%Note 1: All of the individual line items include some estimates and are subject to further adjustments undercurrent NECA procedures.Note 2: The pool year is the calendar year. The 2004 pool year data are reported as of February 28, 2005.The 2005 pool year data are reported as of February 28, 2006.Note 3: Year-to-year changes are affected by changes in the number of companies participating in NECAtariffs, sales and acquisitions of assets by participating companies, average schedule to costconversions, and mid-year tariff changes in rate levels.Note 4: Amount includes end-user SLC waiver revenues for NECA tariff participants.Note 5: Residue for distribution is total revenues less total expenses.Note 6: Residue ratio is calculated by dividing the amount of residue for distribution by the amount ofaverage net investment and multiplying by 100.Table 3.4National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc.Pool Results - Common Line Summary3 - 16National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc.Pool Results - Traffic Sensitive SummaryPool Year (Note 2) PercentageChangeLine Item (Note 1) 2004 2005 (Note 3)Traffic Sensitive Earned Revenues $809,882,656 $822,641,156 1.58%Local Switching Support $325,401,791 $310,949,327 -4.44%Traffic Sensitive Net Realized Uncollectibles $1,526,893 $1,615,890 5.83%Traffic Sensitive Net Earned Revenues $1,133,757,554 $1,131,974,593 -0.16%Total Traffic Sensitive Revenues $1,133,757,554 $1,131,974,593 -0.16%NECA Administrative Costs $15,726,968 $15,177,976 -3.49%Average Schedule Company Settlements $361,134,139 $354,776,670 -1.76%Traffic Sensitive Expenses & Other Taxes $532,091,027 $568,558,763 6.85%Traffic Sensitive Adjusted Federal Income Tax $49,647,326 $42,330,855 -14.74%Total Traffic Sensitive Expenses $958,599,460 $980,844,264 2.32%Traffic Sensitive Residue for Distribution (Note 4) $175,158,094 $151,130,329 -13.72%Traffic Sensitive Average Net Investment $1,152,196,094 $1,105,812,461 -4.03%Traffic Sensitive Residue Ratio (Note 5) 15.20% 13.67% -10.10% Note 1: All of the individual line items include some estimates and are subject to further adjustments undercurrent NECA procedures.Note 2: The pool year is the calendar year. The 2004 pool year data are reported as of February 28, 2005.The 2005 pool year data are reported as of February 28, 2006.Note 3: Year-to-year changes are affected by changes in the number of companies participating in NECAtariffs, sales and acquisitions of assets by participating companies, average schedule to costconversions, and mid-year tariff changes in rate levels.Note 4: Residue for distribution is total revenues less total expenses.Note 5: Residue ratio is calculated by dividing the amount of residue for distribution by the amount ofaverage net investment and multiplying by 100.Table 3.53 - 17State or Jurisdiction 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006ALABAMA 21,800,835 21,708,609 13,576,288 15,453,729 16,050,478 18,042,245 16,927,983 19,306,707 22,108,791ALASKA 32,000,263 36,858,696 38,592,012 43,763,238 44,675,073 42,820,132 48,040,754 53,747,618 61,508,019AMERICAN SAMOA 0 0 0 17,676 0 (1,650) 767,700 654,012 309,822ARIZONA 20,543,238 18,362,646 19,688,325 24,449,474 26,403,756 30,528,308 39,848,583 33,039,188 40,269,906ARKANSAS 45,888,519 50,973,342 45,564,663 45,664,170 62,532,024 60,858,997 65,480,010 70,408,890 67,262,784CALIFORNIA 32,452,556 29,726,451 28,187,757 30,031,809 32,376,201 33,316,344 37,448,856 36,639,006 41,714,100COLORADO 27,530,368 28,078,032 29,640,447 29,388,387 31,440,901 34,679,242 37,676,368 34,620,240 34,106,151CONNECTICUT 0 0 0 0 00000DELAWARE 0 0 0 0DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 0 0 0 0FLORIDA 9,503,863 9,837,420 10,381,512 12,863,073 13,222,008 11,950,548 10,687,942 12,463,645 12,112,974GEORGIA 43,839,125 40,959,225 42,548,087 47,726,328 56,375,955 53,118,466 42,423,112 41,321,439 37,189,299GUAM 0 394,548 1,223,460 343,446 0 1,437,902 4,775,865 9,530,541 7,543,101HAWAII 31,571 378,732 378,360 1,277,112 2,071,587 3,015,711 4,851,324 12,447,420 21,141,942IDAHO 19,909,914 19,628,691 18,877,584 18,650,055 20,685,816 20,741,823 21,358,204 22,917,042 20,226,810ILLINOIS 5,336,115 20,291,268 6,210,756 7,732,992 11,895,567 12,424,125 12,351,372 16,269,370 16,901,280INDIANA 2,867,566 3,220,683 4,757,712 4,348,545 6,794,010 8,028,121 8,684,095 9,641,041 11,747,376IOWA 3,470,888 3,927,414 4,675,446 5,358,582 8,653,826 14,554,062 16,888,461 21,688,830 27,408,276KANSAS 35,680,025 39,602,289 39,313,497 48,759,258 52,879,300 59,883,994 68,840,164 98,695,481 104,774,181KENTUCKY 13,688,167 9,409,629 9,367,208 9,515,893 21,294,954 19,863,491 18,061,623 23,657,922 27,506,538LOUISIANA 41,953,218 40,909,401 43,703,265 46,674,032 50,889,258 50,853,650 59,326,267 61,342,232 72,770,433MAINE 4,839,886 5,298,069 7,102,143 7,693,212 8,273,040 6,840,121 8,915,130 7,296,541 7,223,862MARYLAND 0 0 0 47,628 200,700 372,650 279,666 266,337 294,006MASSACHUSETTS 5,160 47,604 20,004 116,826 239,208 155,742 102,456 214,356 77,775MICHIGAN 14,147,961 16,816,689 21,469,743 22,691,736 25,251,390 22,830,789 23,439,214 24,585,676 26,015,022MINNESOTA 8,422,456 11,851,026 16,226,949 17,185,635 25,151,208 26,188,017 28,586,696 36,742,684 41,876,685MISSISSIPPI 18,238,298 18,266,196 14,565,069 16,585,404 19,146,684 19,390,101 19,422,040 27,268,657 29,700,891MISSOURI 29,261,897 32,497,104 40,818,762 40,300,608 44,811,722 42,284,551 42,032,820 36,668,044 39,409,995MONTANA 23,260,667 25,047,981 25,009,902 27,630,348 28,317,264 27,733,949 26,821,188 27,233,843 24,739,551NEBRASKA 5,993,161 6,657,618 8,547,087 9,936,034 11,248,935 13,838,283 13,919,052 16,691,067 17,156,127NEVADA 3,532,823 4,215,264 4,677,543 6,632,430 6,883,467 8,225,107 6,168,624 6,366,483 7,231,029NEW HAMPSHIRE 2,259,432 1,633,989 1,288,836 1,003,899 975,360 867,894 681,939 667,644 318,369NEW JERSEY 1,743,597 0 0 0 00000NEW MEXICO 18,979,208 20,875,452 18,293,091 18,106,968 20,003,238 19,550,715 20,624,985 23,661,127 26,434,719NEW YORK 11,146,052 12,819,186 14,685,669 12,531,138 12,078,444 9,844,646 9,006,500 8,026,914 8,165,976NORTH CAROLINA 20,992,234 14,151,897 10,324,953 8,919,450 11,524,905 11,975,314 15,712,617 11,895,918 12,591,591NORTH DAKOTA 4,618,626 5,072,256 9,025,489 11,113,527 13,017,948 18,473,275 16,048,576 21,313,335 26,567,472NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS 3,568,910 4,731,756 2,425,068 2,683,836 2,655,984 808,208 (69,682) 0 0OHIO 4,310,309 5,267,052 5,711,859 7,608,876 7,914,813 9,331,800 8,895,759 9,129,618 8,458,296OKLAHOMA 27,562,422 28,098,519 33,049,110 38,365,380 42,104,889 52,561,601 50,775,218 57,163,684 57,509,391OREGON 18,043,353 20,258,403 22,565,850 23,832,882 25,604,163 26,098,741 26,828,285 22,620,119 25,758,897PENNSYLVANIA 1,312,806 896,637 1,067,316 1,205,328 1,555,002 1,673,597 1,660,598 1,904,602 2,447,382PUERTO RICO 47,664,546 44,205,888 50,570,226 21,018,612 1,362,300 3,331,586 (1,102) 0 0RHODE ISLAND 0 0 0 0 00000SOUTH CAROLINA 22,635,875 20,855,634 19,341,595 19,226,232 29,466,579 27,890,743 24,380,825 25,966,713 26,347,839SOUTH DAKOTA 2,882,766 4,275,900 6,804,816 9,150,504 13,745,820 17,814,953 22,424,124 31,586,556 35,778,288TENNESSEE 8,383,365 10,578,075 11,571,882 13,837,946 17,116,157 17,887,232 17,627,624 14,693,948 13,738,260TEXAS 75,126,397 73,408,401 72,485,676 80,486,007 91,039,953 100,021,058 118,967,811 103,874,358 101,931,396UTAH 3,483,006 3,919,044 3,883,188 4,989,777 6,517,500 8,826,246 7,290,812 7,371,594 7,519,560VERMONT 4,465,536 4,246,788 3,465,117 3,897,540 5,820,054 5,266,379 5,802,432 7,675,470 7,258,953VIRGIN ISLANDS 11,214,702 15,839,880 16,580,460 17,939,550 18,471,948 14,370,630 13,998,480 14,409,661 10,782,063VIRGINIA 4,490,867 4,665,192 4,344,974 3,993,210 4,190,754 4,355,514 2,503,213 3,697,393 3,212,493WASHINGTON 22,999,149 24,193,620 23,202,165 30,567,945 31,400,460 28,338,470 28,001,141 27,103,945 25,256,283WEST VIRGINIA 20,018,869 18,391,848 17,303,676 21,725,004 24,940,026 21,773,507 20,032,209 15,461,524 16,533,441WISCONSIN 13,238,421 14,893,403 17,414,784 21,166,212 21,970,530 24,462,311 25,492,966 33,767,705 33,698,751WYOMING 11,952,520 16,082,514 13,609,407 12,984,456 13,639,758 15,150,551 15,827,639 15,166,600 13,678,506INDUSTRY TOTAL 827,291,508 864,325,961 874,138,788 927,191,939 1,044,880,917 1,084,649,792 1,136,638,538 1,218,882,740 1,284,314,652Source: Universal Service Administrative Company filings to the FCC.Note: Payments are actual disbursements made in each year and may include out-of-year adjustments to payments made for previous years. Payments for 2006 are projections based on the filing for the 3rd quarter of 2006.Table 3.6High-Cost Loop Support Payments By State or Jurisdiction(Dollars)3 - 18State or Jurisdiction 2003 2004 2005 2006ALABAMA 283,722 200,208 242,559 265,539ALASKA 201,264 253,680 295,296 325,092AMERICAN SAMOA 0000ARIZONA 0 118,896 146,748 225,078ARKANSAS 326,880 247,440 371,640 371,418CALIFORNIA 0 196,500 203,604 251,988COLORADO 11,514 71,145 49,830 49,470CONNECTICUT 0000DELAWAREDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 0000FLORIDAGEORGIA 296,532 388,078 263,343 469,149GUAM 0000HAWAII 9,744 (1,074) 23,802 12,912IDAHO 85,452 114,564 199,224 189,717ILLINOIS 262,608 208,116 251,508 316,932INDIANA 134,328 151,920 283,413 463,788IOWA 767,515 1,193,847 1,709,571 2,131,257KANSAS 283,601 638,355 642,209 936,327KENTUCKY 232,068 176,436 4,339 159,180LOUISIANA 75,888 139,501 171,520 232,194MAINE 0 0 0 64,659MARYLAND 106,584 74,328 90,456 90,456MASSACHUSETTS 0 0 38,088 12,696MICHIGAN 75,912 73,946 131,922 125,934MINNESOTA 1,525,104 954,603 2,645,968 2,356,764MISSISSIPPI 6,444 4,356 265,269 334,509MISSOURI 208,968 272,828 235,488 408,255MONTANA 24 169,704 206,736 218,388NEBRASKA 201,684 842,220 575,916 850,587NEVADA 226,579 153,111 200,919 255,180NEW HAMPSHIRE 0 0 0 32,310NEW JERSEY 0000NEW MEXICO 109,652 117,906 145,803 163,329NEW YORK 0 831,192 858,447 854,403NORTH CAROLINA 0000NORTH DAKOTA 82,741 99,363 114,840 318,216NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS 0000OHIO 541,740 347,772 444,756 486,741OKLAHOMA 221,136 248,988 334,518 434,898OREGON 23,904 165,069 172,566 194,796PENNSYLVANIA 29,344 21,104 25,233 40,323PUERTO RICO 0000RHODE ISLANDSOUTH CAROLINA 668,088 530,796 1,029,132 1,725,921SOUTH DAKOTA 57,508 440,843 601,170 1,129,986TENNESSEE 128,892 73,872 (25,716) 220,392TEXAS 458,676 391,145 488,910 510,408UTAH 39,180 47,712 34,896 35,268VERMONT 0 0 0 397,989VIRGIN ISLANDS 0000VIRGINIA 171,492 151,159 (219,831) 173,616WASHINGTON (4,509) 23,292 66,278 41,424WEST VIRGINIA 54,816 35,928 117,816 118,455WISCONSIN 1,148,605 1,337,861 1,558,180 2,050,344WYOMING 87,144 83,997 167,148 169,914INDUSTRY TOTAL 9,140,824 11,590,707 15,163,514 20,216,202Source: Universal Service Administrative Company filings to the FCC.Note: Payments are actual disbursements made in each year and may include out-of-year adjustments to payments made for previous years.Payments for 2006 are projections based on the filing for the 3rd quarter of 2006.Table 3.7Safety Net Additive Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction(Dollars)3 - 19State or Jurisdiction 2005 2006ALABAMA 0 0ALASKA 171,648 0AMERICAN SAMOA 0 0ARIZONA 43,740 3,507ARKANSAS 0 0CALIFORNIA 0 0COLORADO 0 0CONNECTICUT 0 0DELAWARE 0 0DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 0 0FLORIDA 0 0GEORGIA 0 0GUAM 0 0HAWAII 0 0IDAHO 0 0ILLINOIS 0 0INDIANA 0 0IOWA 9,360 22,293KANSAS 0 0KENTUCKY 0 0LOUISIANA 0 0MAINE 0 0MARYLAND 0 0MASSACHUSETTS 0 0MICHIGAN 0 0MINNESOTA 0 0MISSISSIPPI 0 0MISSOURI 0 0MONTANA 0 0NEBRASKA 0 0NEVADA 0 0NEW HAMPSHIRE 0 0NEW JERSEY 0 0NEW MEXICO 0 0NEW YORK 0 0NORTH CAROLINA 0 0NORTH DAKOTA 0 120,648NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS 0 0OHIO 0 0OKLAHOMA 0 0OREGON 0 0PENNSYLVANIA 0 0PUERTO RICO 0 0RHODE ISLAND 0 0SOUTH CAROLINA 0 0SOUTH DAKOTA 13,488 12,636TENNESSEE 0 0TEXAS 245,172 0UTAH 88,572 92,976VERMONT 0 0VIRGIN ISLANDS 0 0VIRGINIA 0 0WASHINGTON 0 0WEST VIRGINIA 0 0WISCONSIN 3,806,163 1,577,532WYOMING 0 0INDUSTRY TOTAL 4,378,143 1,829,592Source: Universal Service Administrative Company filings to the FCC.Note: Payments are actual disbursements made in each year and may include out-of-year adjustments to payments made for previous years.Payments for 2006 are projections based on the filing for the 3rd quarter of 2006.Table 3.8Safety Valve Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction(Dollars)3 - 20State or Jurisdiction 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006ALABAMA 51,743,652 46,445,571 42,927,069 42,116,427 42,621,753 45,789,693 49,426,830ALASKA 0000000AMERICAN SAMOAARIZONA 0000000ARKANSASCALIFORNIA 0000000COLORADOCONNECTICUT 0000000DELAWAREDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 0000000FLORIDAGEORGIA 0000000GUAMHAWAII 0000000IDAHOILLINOIS 0000000INDIANAIOWA 0000000KANSASKENTUCKY 1,165,656 0 3,262,920 3,189,189 16,315,065 16,997,301 19,025,169LOUISIANA 0000000MAINE 10,775,778 8,873,436 5,480,907 5,653,734 2,137,286 2,044,395 2,111,536MARYLAND 0000000MASSACHUSETTSMICHIGAN 0000000MINNESOTAMISSISSIPPI 103,707,456 103,996,830 120,595,569 120,967,993 136,773,388 146,626,579 178,823,661MISSOURI 0000000MONTANA 1,541,526 4,383,033 10,887,342 10,757,091 17,806,404 19,867,213 22,006,918NEBRASKA 00004,189,576 7,084,560 6,888,378NEVADA 0000000NEW HAMPSHIRENEW JERSEY 0000000NEW MEXICONEW YORK 0000000NORTH CAROLINANORTH DAKOTA 0000000NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDSOHIO 0000000OKLAHOMAOREGON 0000000PENNSYLVANIAPUERTO RICO 0000000RHODE ISLANDSOUTH CAROLINA 0000000SOUTH DAKOTA 00001,536,621 2,455,359 2,628,786TENNESSEE 0000000TEXASUTAH 0000000VERMONT 15,103,584 10,007,652 9,117,498 9,646,596 10,792,938 10,294,152 10,114,431VIRGIN ISLANDS 0000000VIRGINIAWASHINGTON 0000000WEST VIRGINIA 31,234,866 25,875,165 30,651,192 31,654,752 25,846,873 26,327,823 27,145,319WISCONSIN 0000000WYOMING 3,399,585 6,150,825 9,879,543 10,044,726 15,405,661 14,353,070 14,194,418INDUSTRY TOTAL 218,672,103 205,732,512 232,802,040 234,030,508 273,425,565 291,840,145 332,365,445Source: Universal Service Administrative Company filings to the FCC.Note: Payments are actual disbursements made in each year and may include out-of-year adjustments to payments made for previous years.Payments for 2006 are projections based on the filing for the 3rd quarter of 2006.Table 3.9High-Cost Model Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction(Dollars)3 - 21State or Jurisdiction 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005ALABAMA 7,166,124 7,260,720 7,334,976 7,444,164 7,596,475 7,571,025 3,837,982 (700)ALASKA 16,989,936 16,782,816 16,954,464 17,206,932 17,622,828 18,052,434 9,441,522 199AMERICAN SAMOA 0 0 258,360 262,212 268,176 274,524 137,262 0ARIZONA 3,031,056 3,079,740 3,111,216 3,171,553 3,285,558 3,453,125 1,759,437 0ARKANSAS 14,992,212 15,238,044 15,393,852 15,623,064 15,302,418 14,134,308 6,681,546 0CALIFORNIA 13,236,636 13,136,832 13,271,160 13,468,788 12,984,942 12,635,988 6,392,190 0COLORADO 12,580,056 11,989,644 12,112,248 12,292,620 12,643,747 13,237,232 7,715,859 (99)CONNECTICUT 177,480 161,316 162,960 165,396 169,152 173,160 87,558 0DELAWARE 00000000DISTRICT OF COLUMBIAFLORIDA 6,312,636 5,267,508 5,321,388 5,400,636 5,406,816 5,074,572 2,408,435 (23,219)GEORGIA 17,295,180 17,682,108 17,862,864 18,128,952 18,506,856 18,707,226 9,612,378 0GUAM 1,006,872 1,926,708 1,946,412 1,975,392 2,326,686 2,573,239 906,998 0HAWAII 215,547 253,188 158,700 0 82,368 84,312 84,350 0IDAHO 2,773,224 3,424,068 3,459,084 3,510,564 3,590,412 3,642,672 1,875,978 0ILLINOIS 5,254,932 6,149,376 6,212,292 6,304,812 6,363,432 6,431,490 3,283,092 0INDIANA 5,069,148 5,082,132 5,134,140 5,210,520 5,311,080 5,431,512 2,755,277 (1)IOWA 7,443,672 7,164,144 7,237,440 7,348,661 7,504,416 10,026,153 5,539,203 10,824KANSAS 9,196,188 11,335,920 11,451,864 11,622,384 11,839,008 12,293,675 6,198,366 14,691KENTUCKY 5,281,620 4,849,836 4,899,432 4,972,416 5,013,564 4,996,386 2,547,696 0LOUISIANA 16,804,272 16,559,940 16,729,284 16,978,404 17,095,236 16,889,904 9,678,077 0MAINE 5,620,956 5,947,728 6,008,532 6,098,040 6,128,058 6,300,581 3,352,960 20,544MARYLAND 95,628 90,408 91,332 92,700 94,812 97,056 49,074 0MASSACHUSETTS 100,956 101,184 102,228 103,752 106,104 107,976 55,176 0MICHIGAN 8,770,020 9,721,740 9,821,136 9,967,428 10,124,478 10,372,897 5,849,090 (71,245)MINNESOTA 11,512,875 12,031,404 12,154,464 12,337,665 12,595,827 13,210,959 8,240,168 16,916MISSISSIPPI 4,958,280 5,024,460 5,075,832 5,151,432 5,249,814 5,331,570 2,693,490 0MISSOURI 10,297,848 10,608,516 10,660,200 10,876,632 10,982,550 10,385,796 5,040,366 0MONTANA 9,871,788 9,907,968 10,009,296 10,158,348 10,389,300 10,630,326 5,376,420 0NEBRASKA 3,745,176 3,821,904 3,861,012 3,918,516 3,984,318 4,043,706 2,050,026 0NEVADA 1,114,488 907,116 916,380 930,024 965,097 1,047,916 539,184 0NEW HAMPSHIRE 1,529,400 1,496,724 1,512,012 1,534,536 1,524,972 1,562,118 812,382 0NEW JERSEY 00000000NEW MEXICO 6,171,888 6,097,620 6,159,972 6,251,736 6,419,120 6,806,409 3,388,194 10,954NEW YORK 6,895,260 6,737,412 6,806,316 6,907,692 6,792,648 6,402,138 3,076,368 0NORTH CAROLINA 13,687,176 11,931,264 12,053,268 12,232,788 12,110,298 12,179,982 6,276,930 0NORTH DAKOTA 5,652,804 5,921,508 5,982,072 6,071,148 6,210,909 8,092,932 4,466,998 1,811NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS 00000000OHIO 5,256,576 5,160,552 5,213,316 5,185,116 5,397,954 5,467,686 2,710,908 0OKLAHOMA 16,099,620 16,246,176 16,412,304 16,656,708 16,886,808 16,497,282 8,146,740 0OREGON 10,457,100 9,159,840 9,253,548 9,391,344 9,593,304 9,807,666 5,533,047 (569,885)PENNSYLVANIA 13,950,696 13,993,764 14,136,852 14,347,404 14,604,618 14,653,146 7,258,806 0PUERTO RICO 91,200,252 89,253,768 90,871,314 96,930,129 95,186,238 96,296,564 60,779,136 0RHODE ISLAND 00000000SOUTH CAROLINA 10,720,464 10,986,012 11,098,404 11,263,620 11,005,990 11,457,343 5,875,128 0SOUTH DAKOTA 4,389,072 4,989,084 5,040,072 5,115,180 5,274,207 6,417,324 3,453,158 527TENNESSEE 10,611,060 10,287,924 10,393,116 10,547,916 10,787,772 10,695,102 5,251,596 0TEXAS 31,326,576 29,350,572 29,650,692 30,092,220 29,298,066 28,928,034 15,215,244 (101,199)UTAH 1,585,764 1,472,940 1,488,012 1,510,188 1,544,508 1,581,084 799,488 0VERMONT 3,357,552 2,364,576 2,388,756 2,424,312 2,479,464 2,538,132 1,283,448 0VIRGIN ISLANDS 4,984,620 7,133,280 7,206,216 7,313,544 7,479,852 7,656,900 3,871,830 0VIRGINIA 3,268,404 3,308,460 3,342,300 3,392,076 3,464,832 3,490,458 1,764,364 0WASHINGTON 12,093,252 13,133,580 13,267,908 15,576,630 14,457,411 15,565,225 9,274,016 (23,511)WEST VIRGINIA 1,166,220 1,050,600 1,061,352 1,077,144 1,101,636 1,127,724 570,246 0WISCONSIN 13,786,572 13,294,332 12,832,080 13,023,234 13,219,584 14,342,192 7,926,280 496,745WYOMING 3,661,764 4,455,408 4,500,960 4,568,004 4,671,864 5,311,505 2,899,035 0INDUSTRY TOTAL 472,766,898 473,331,864 478,383,390 492,134,676 493,045,583 504,088,666 274,822,502 (216,648)Source: Universal Service Administrative Company filings to the FCC.Note: Payments are actual disbursements made in each year and may include out-of-year adjustments to payments made for previous years.Long Term Support was merged into Interstate Common Line Support effective July 2004. All payments and refunds shown for 2005 are out-of-year adjustments.Table 3.10Long-Term Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction(Dollars)3 - 22State or Jurisdiction 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006ALABAMA 2,997,286 6,706,895 12,311,706 17,912,850 19,699,011ALASKA 4,387,324 15,550,250 28,436,936 51,163,032 59,194,551AMERICAN SAMOA 144,933 547,316 602,696 1,371,487 786,390ARIZONA 2,395,184 5,884,058 8,430,613 11,891,383 12,430,080ARKANSAS 10,561,406 21,278,826 36,807,579 43,782,381 48,195,996CALIFORNIA 3,195,885 7,834,700 14,849,268 22,618,012 19,858,326COLORADO 2,348,337 4,846,640 12,105,251 19,089,078 20,078,976CONNECTICUT 145,251 466,003 778,550 1,015,519 781,842DELAWARE 00000DISTRICT OF COLUMBIAFLORIDA 1,843,719 4,798,794 6,769,810 10,613,805 10,713,207GEORGIA 7,985,127 9,888,884 25,194,781 31,804,674 32,099,994GUAM 0 1,944,590 3,895,152 9,634,823 7,691,271HAWAII 1,042,112 3,382,714 5,726,995 11,650,211 14,805,858IDAHO 2,118,685 4,783,780 6,703,398 9,136,360 9,150,768ILLINOIS 4,873,202 12,099,372 17,604,024 24,612,961 24,912,918INDIANA 2,732,462 5,593,217 9,550,887 13,294,018 15,048,516IOWA 6,392,962 17,673,953 27,784,532 37,039,059 37,824,888KANSAS 8,374,144 20,491,336 31,789,158 53,970,469 53,518,161KENTUCKY 3,842,169 8,828,617 12,846,173 19,386,580 24,793,428LOUISIANA 2,940,771 6,886,736 16,132,945 30,875,677 35,086,944MAINE 1,874,680 4,558,496 7,625,501 12,264,837 12,586,320MARYLAND 233,111 540,299 692,878 631,194 748,830MASSACHUSETTS 135,412 528,252 358,862 523,278 204,672MICHIGAN 2,097,739 4,106,032 10,308,057 19,139,688 21,709,398MINNESOTA 7,623,604 17,502,520 30,915,928 45,914,230 49,107,453MISSISSIPPI 1,767,876 3,848,737 6,937,730 12,347,306 15,335,364MISSOURI 8,083,575 16,439,859 21,866,809 27,612,764 29,462,838MONTANA 3,584,002 7,602,374 12,439,080 19,917,344 20,594,601NEBRASKA 2,720,092 9,660,618 12,295,804 14,907,643 15,398,970NEVADA 924,702 2,391,068 4,250,187 5,872,739 6,169,740NEW HAMPSHIRE 801,512 1,015,355 1,475,878 2,195,778 2,707,254NEW JERSEY 23,624 65,576 155,780 65,575 114,132NEW MEXICO 2,088,710 5,183,424 9,028,948 13,827,216 14,323,362NEW YORK 1,302,190 2,843,569 5,765,085 8,869,578 10,591,326NORTH CAROLINA 3,678,899 7,733,613 17,519,304 25,490,287 29,824,947NORTH DAKOTA 3,450,144 10,308,986 18,247,385 24,319,379 31,214,193NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS 00000OHIO 1,302,254 3,343,392 8,511,246 9,549,780 10,693,068OKLAHOMA 6,572,534 15,817,757 24,661,302 41,359,918 44,071,869OREGON 2,703,805 5,692,166 11,099,662 17,922,429 18,954,009PENNSYLVANIA 5,117,516 13,783,938 24,416,450 36,597,346 34,838,274PUERTO RICO 0 0 20,633,150 133,785,501 123,373,995RHODE ISLAND 00000SOUTH CAROLINA 8,449,503 18,335,121 26,936,830 31,291,743 35,320,044SOUTH DAKOTA 4,051,624 13,018,722 19,653,404 28,273,815 28,227,081TENNESSEE 3,171,610 7,695,735 14,099,702 22,704,787 22,664,238TEXAS 10,578,327 23,790,625 39,683,782 66,702,372 57,673,629UTAH 2,997,786 6,548,404 7,981,178 9,509,333 8,754,492VERMONT 1,798,600 4,121,057 5,621,540 9,459,851 6,716,670VIRGIN ISLANDS 1,573,244 4,841,481 8,102,288 8,208,247 14,403,048VIRGINIA 1,330,261 3,153,427 5,437,672 7,880,265 8,148,924WASHINGTON 1,890,078 4,067,291 13,772,747 24,311,453 27,089,154WEST VIRGINIA 525,724 1,021,869 1,699,050 2,213,373 2,308,908WISCONSIN 10,591,177 26,810,522 37,746,299 61,839,440 68,111,541WYOMING 1,529,326 3,277,385 7,493,687 11,971,746 12,493,506INDUSTRY TOTAL 172,894,199 409,134,351 715,753,659 1,178,342,614 1,230,606,975Source: Universal Service Administrative Company filings to the FCC.Note: Payments for 2002 to 2004 are final trueups that include adjustments made in subsequent years.Payments for 2005 are actual disbursements made in that year and may include out-of year adjustments to payments made for previous yePayments for 2006 are projections based on the filing for the 3rd quarter of 2006.Table 3.11Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction(Dollars)3 - 23State or Jurisdiction 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006ALABAMA 8,828,091 17,767,491 24,056,472 11,299,565 18,797,196 20,213,970 18,625,869ALASKA 0000000AMERICAN SAMOAARIZONA 2,140,941 12,768,167 20,376,165 18,700,551 19,449,051 19,352,556 19,276,449ARKANSAS 3,378,933 6,822,129 4,787,478 8,015,127 17,186,127 17,419,164 11,100,684CALIFORNIA 16,211,703 32,326,125 31,961,553 32,634,651 31,135,644 34,361,808 39,526,641COLORADO 8,099,265 16,016,586 15,852,048 19,092,198 20,910,102 20,807,553 20,484,033CONNECTICUT 0 340,266 544,332 822,528 809,772 509,337 582,861DELAWARE 199,512 385,947 373,665 320,397 266,283 259,146 254,508DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 0000000FLORIDA 30,507,915 62,063,139 61,218,594 54,381,078 59,856,746 64,278,167 57,554,229GEORGIA 5,957,415 11,891,154 13,484,496 14,168,910 15,808,323 24,340,592 20,935,623GUAM 0000000HAWAII 744,795 2,702,961 2,254,638 2,159,208 2,331,290 2,575,110 2,652,801IDAHO 6,935,610 14,488,992 14,985,027 15,481,290 15,995,493 16,100,781 16,061,787ILLINOIS 6,698,124 13,200,369 13,216,725 12,664,326 12,452,580 12,364,854 12,239,280INDIANA 11,687,559 23,902,872 24,211,953 25,112,991 25,104,358 23,839,515 23,576,010IOWA 3,745,074 7,056,894 6,895,944 6,716,220 6,691,367 5,937,684 4,918,953KANSAS 3,345,489 7,045,917 7,581,021 5,139,362 8,049,550 7,571,579 6,855,207KENTUCKY 9,056,898 16,185,444 19,290,270 17,609,436 16,827,594 18,294,115 19,231,011LOUISIANA 5,445,729 10,805,082 10,315,482 10,083,627 10,607,348 12,368,644 11,397,885MAINE 431,805 725,691 359,514 156,371 305,553 232,362 121,227MARYLAND 1,984,422 3,752,091 3,555,162 1,676,697 1,174,311 2,428,287 2,544,657MASSACHUSETTS 681,882 788,682 128,256 172,320 1,097,472 1,888,512 1,856,583MICHIGAN 99,879 145,413 238,794 356,853 396,309 558,415 589,266MINNESOTA 2,086,566 3,428,328 4,429,914 5,312,741 4,502,815 5,115,355 3,810,603MISSISSIPPI 5,952,876 11,797,332 20,357,364 17,219,518 17,958,436 18,536,502 20,884,755MISSOURI 7,711,950 15,880,248 13,954,164 15,419,076 14,500,926 13,303,611 12,121,308MONTANA 266,052 559,239 663,987 969,060 1,181,556 1,313,050 903,114NEBRASKA 603,621 1,325,355 2,629,749 5,571,516 4,974,468 5,680,736 5,388,786NEVADA 3,033,204 8,394,360 7,789,374 11,046,549 10,085,637 10,579,080 10,631,886NEW HAMPSHIRE 1,008,735 1,971,087 3,453,606 3,523,182 1,998,219 1,824,702 1,876,566NEW JERSEY 2,536,380 5,000,085 2,562,480 375,450 438,402 366,186 298,152NEW MEXICO 3,880,002 7,735,743 7,857,828 9,231,663 7,980,834 9,948,258 8,705,553NEW YORK 12,196,734 23,369,421 19,654,758 16,928,592 15,901,489 19,289,301 18,351,765NORTH CAROLINA 5,808,558 12,088,692 23,010,936 33,845,778 34,870,061 36,958,926 32,587,443NORTH DAKOTA 589,725 1,159,116 711,963 760,722 761,854 835,631 897,453NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS 126,321 250,371 248,817 272,676 286,995 346,284 387,909OHIO 3,902,088 11,584,665 15,038,265 15,200,220 15,632,610 14,791,125 14,318,337OKLAHOMA 3,429,762 6,931,635 5,057,199 6,330,615 4,784,511 5,169,266 2,024,646OREGON 7,787,661 19,583,346 21,956,826 21,784,824 18,852,033 20,141,792 20,906,295PENNSYLVANIA 6,535,158 13,375,383 16,013,835 18,902,013 19,181,096 21,141,788 23,329,323PUERTO RICO 0000000RHODE ISLAND 25,686 96,477 60,198 46,491 56,457 44,472 37,287SOUTH CAROLINA 8,337,342 16,797,183 15,749,205 14,701,164 14,089,749 13,275,792 12,721,401SOUTH DAKOTA 31,119 71,940 86,637 171,569 177,072 146,295 51,030TENNESSEE 4,499,133 8,638,695 7,768,041 8,773,317 9,955,481 10,141,752 9,763,371TEXAS 19,343,871 38,621,091 39,305,025 41,354,421 37,331,712 39,592,084 36,071,898UTAH 1,798,356 2,711,406 2,436,198 2,326,740 2,189,661 2,531,382 2,505,615VERMONT 191,970 1,194,909 1,970,931 2,145,891 2,421,292 2,417,928 2,393,391VIRGIN ISLANDS 0000000VIRGINIA 25,632,867 52,028,370 55,598,061 59,525,562 63,058,434 70,063,707 61,916,259WASHINGTON 11,103,702 22,905,042 23,674,848 25,561,148 28,958,896 34,445,643 38,016,540WEST VIRGINIA 9,946,782 19,314,279 19,824,648 19,580,352 16,479,853 19,680,115 19,350,108WISCONSIN 1,323,642 2,631,846 1,406,055 256,329 315,939 369,399 272,886WYOMING 2,966,646 6,072,090 6,478,326 7,840,214 7,566,871 7,247,830 6,268,140INDUSTRY TOTAL 278,837,550 576,699,146 615,436,827 621,741,099 641,745,828 691,000,143 657,177,384Source: Universal Service Administrative Company filings to the FCC.Note: Payments are actual disbursements made in each year and may include out-of-year adjustments to payments made for previous years.Payments for 2006 are projections based on the filing for the 3rd quarter of 2006.Table 3.12Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction(Dollars)3 - 24State or Jurisdiction 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006ALABAMA 9,863,334 7,349,622 6,731,295 6,771,888 6,234,524 6,261,958 6,142,285 5,877,598 6,772,341ALASKA 15,140,835 14,175,093 14,769,177 13,573,329 13,073,054 13,629,364 13,897,171 14,896,038 17,641,893AMERICAN SAMOA 0 124,410 214,791 179,040 462,129 410,532 353,285 292,404 400,404ARIZONA 9,271,179 9,732,288 10,637,322 9,516,402 8,930,867 9,515,657 10,592,939 10,076,843 12,172,665ARKANSAS 7,457,826 7,035,777 7,353,954 7,289,430 7,908,315 8,479,740 7,901,593 9,015,158 9,069,057CALIFORNIA 6,954,408 6,794,022 6,399,933 6,521,277 6,009,440 5,760,996 5,217,074 5,043,072 5,171,052COLORADO 3,818,154 3,721,788 3,909,582 4,305,947 4,546,744 4,661,294 4,819,943 4,710,194 4,786,704CONNECTICUT 1,035,240 797,637 789,657 686,412 647,701 780,972 769,737 723,888 667,692DELAWARE 000000000DISTRICT OF COLUMBIAFLORIDA 4,220,451 3,442,098 3,570,501 4,300,156 3,918,308 3,904,512 4,057,818 4,117,775 3,947,352GEORGIA 13,521,924 13,123,731 12,859,902 13,588,262 13,892,267 14,193,144 14,001,536 13,963,260 13,954,485GUAM 000000000HAWAII 39,648 840,993 1,121,160 1,368,760 1,559,675 1,315,884 1,145,671 2,828,103 2,572,149IDAHO 6,202,335 6,166,839 6,515,499 7,881,547 7,633,664 7,174,584 6,964,817 6,701,760 7,466,736ILLINOIS 11,998,443 12,457,695 12,221,301 11,899,200 12,135,972 11,200,944 11,580,138 10,007,740 11,294,574INDIANA 8,341,722 8,755,638 8,908,611 8,598,134 8,091,963 8,861,364 9,226,610 9,574,479 9,983,001IOWA 15,075,849 14,710,702 14,985,528 15,535,527 14,430,044 20,700,339 24,473,842 23,940,702 28,993,116KANSAS 14,131,281 13,664,862 12,942,879 13,598,238 13,743,190 13,385,756 14,050,257 17,789,839 19,321,353KENTUCKY 5,490,699 5,242,098 5,317,815 5,353,004 4,443,159 5,054,280 5,251,486 5,259,811 6,295,956LOUISIANA 6,574,767 6,179,073 6,589,386 6,291,088 6,342,269 6,239,388 6,367,294 6,482,711 7,284,246MAINE 7,714,515 7,722,324 7,780,815 7,537,371 7,380,662 7,048,839 7,684,590 6,953,210 8,101,932MARYLAND 473,400 506,382 504,963 765,011 620,696 658,416 666,642 910,308 684,840MASSACHUSETTS 383,571 493,053 480,966 648,664 731,992 1,155,972 879,906 969,828 555,768MICHIGAN 8,270,259 8,200,446 8,002,278 7,638,095 7,566,044 8,189,930 9,119,224 9,230,104 10,347,087MINNESOTA 17,503,701 17,560,428 17,662,626 16,841,415 16,092,328 16,899,638 21,131,238 22,916,871 23,644,611MISSISSIPPI 3,596,718 3,482,388 3,484,518 3,608,845 3,469,620 3,536,112 3,878,756 4,206,240 5,253,495MISSOURI 7,656,195 7,548,462 6,377,469 6,623,599 6,484,070 7,433,510 7,349,495 7,325,605 7,155,882MONTANA 8,932,746 8,390,469 8,428,140 8,963,262 8,990,569 8,621,580 8,358,861 8,192,520 8,491,761NEBRASKA 10,129,721 10,897,575 10,718,199 11,198,680 10,881,237 11,044,080 10,899,121 10,949,808 11,097,834NEVADA 5,815,119 5,871,945 6,439,410 6,890,199 6,700,770 7,195,129 6,555,624 6,619,642 7,788,609NEW HAMPSHIRE 4,699,155 5,375,313 4,679,721 4,924,103 5,143,237 4,415,472 4,404,418 4,043,544 4,738,170NEW JERSEY 1,232,427 993,234 1,151,775 1,020,055 905,089 1,092,276 848,615 900,252 877,356NEW MEXICO 8,400,984 7,554,042 8,767,137 9,326,957 10,062,728 9,664,846 9,625,004 10,917,854 11,230,143NEW YORK 17,322,360 17,838,462 17,843,838 17,133,941 16,354,539 15,814,788 15,233,251 14,788,388 15,702,738NORTH CAROLINA 6,082,674 5,636,580 5,810,920 5,703,355 5,417,894 5,826,960 5,890,570 5,834,124 6,346,770NORTH DAKOTA 10,830,486 10,709,298 9,840,591 10,240,836 8,353,188 13,297,296 14,191,822 16,133,342 20,684,073NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS 667,803 798,222 705,837 660,533 621,466 572,028 557,001 321,444 678,525OHIO 4,473,951 4,629,063 4,676,637 4,867,749 4,258,209 4,363,296 4,640,354 3,838,968 4,646,256OKLAHOMA 15,840,726 14,001,165 14,510,214 14,668,500 15,206,699 14,815,608 14,332,020 16,160,661 18,105,783OREGON 7,255,236 7,391,592 7,747,791 8,043,837 7,534,165 7,435,848 7,695,070 8,181,724 9,117,720PENNSYLVANIA 6,905,862 6,721,311 6,733,593 6,510,344 5,421,431 6,132,228 6,111,372 5,834,644 5,807,007PUERTO RICO 000000000RHODE ISLANDSOUTH CAROLINA 11,068,493 8,161,467 7,290,804 8,359,632 6,678,733 6,465,300 6,302,875 4,758,792 6,128,640SOUTH DAKOTA 9,652,416 10,213,983 10,349,034 9,575,970 9,192,674 11,085,063 14,076,313 14,710,586 15,941,523TENNESSEE 8,401,485 7,583,802 8,018,046 7,710,598 7,512,313 7,700,016 7,737,700 7,169,574 7,617,930TEXAS 16,636,698 15,841,335 16,620,900 18,510,072 18,962,362 19,027,244 18,743,342 19,215,306 19,987,878UTAH 4,860,150 4,786,446 5,365,695 4,898,082 4,583,074 4,590,864 4,366,211 4,043,628 5,052,012VERMONT 4,716,894 4,637,340 5,095,044 5,068,918 4,617,768 4,421,460 4,269,200 5,396,550 5,122,599VIRGIN ISLANDS 000000000VIRGINIA 4,681,620 4,863,735 5,156,877 5,075,806 5,325,061 5,933,277 5,761,405 5,890,835 5,827,470WASHINGTON 5,850,558 5,838,087 6,311,820 7,998,375 6,624,004 6,766,254 7,883,472 8,483,453 8,367,474WEST VIRGINIA 3,235,917 3,548,727 3,904,146 4,171,461 3,422,479 3,236,400 3,797,382 2,516,999 3,838,470WISCONSIN 22,644,561 22,794,588 23,021,091 22,007,452 21,361,341 23,927,316 25,601,631 28,387,399 31,768,938WYOMING 5,172,102 5,416,926 5,420,082 5,419,675 5,412,066 6,358,662 8,969,976 7,691,669 8,164,203INDUSTRY TOTAL 390,246,598 380,322,556 384,739,270 389,869,033 375,891,793 396,256,416 414,375,957 424,795,247 466,668,273Source: Universal Service Administrative Company filings to the FCC.Note: Payments for 1998 to 2004 are final trueups that include adjustments made in subsequent years.Payments for 2005 are actual disbursements made in that year and may include out-of year adjustments to payments made for previous years.Payments for 2006 are projections based on the filing for the 3rd quarter of 2006.Table 3.13Local Switching Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction(Dollars)3 - 25State or Jurisdiction 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006ALABAMA 38,830,293 36,318,951 88,214,302 93,882,843 99,862,304 92,281,837 100,839,113 109,342,677 116,898,381ALASKA 64,131,034 67,816,605 70,315,653 74,543,499 79,758,279 90,253,444 100,070,063 120,273,831 138,669,555AMERICAN SAMOA 0 124,410 473,151 458,928 875,238 1,230,722 1,860,943 2,317,903 1,496,616ARIZONA 32,845,473 31,174,674 35,577,804 49,905,596 61,391,530 68,081,699 80,199,519 74,550,458 84,377,685ARKANSAS 68,338,557 73,247,163 71,691,402 75,398,793 101,091,641 113,093,878 134,304,295 140,997,233 135,999,939CALIFORNIA 52,643,600 49,657,305 64,070,553 82,347,999 86,528,021 92,182,679 95,239,532 98,865,502 106,522,107COLORADO 43,928,578 43,789,464 53,761,542 62,003,540 66,831,777 76,528,120 83,298,668 79,276,796 79,505,334CONNECTICUT 1,212,720 958,953 952,617 1,192,074 1,506,436 2,242,663 2,445,617 2,248,744 2,032,395DELAWARE 0 0 199,512 385,947 373,665 320,397 266,283 259,146 254,508DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 000000000FLORIDA 20,036,950 18,547,026 49,781,316 84,627,004 85,609,445 80,109,504 83,780,751 91,450,173 84,327,762GEORGIA 74,656,229 71,765,064 79,228,268 91,334,696 110,244,701 110,373,162 107,428,208 111,693,308 104,648,550GUAM 1,006,872 2,321,256 3,169,872 2,318,838 2,326,686 5,955,731 9,578,015 19,165,364 15,234,372HAWAII 286,766 1,472,913 2,403,015 5,348,833 7,010,380 9,967,573 14,138,556 29,524,646 41,185,662IDAHO 28,885,473 29,219,598 35,787,777 44,531,158 49,013,604 51,909,601 53,012,454 55,055,167 53,095,818ILLINOIS 22,589,490 38,898,339 31,342,473 39,137,373 48,484,898 55,082,865 57,479,322 63,506,433 65,664,984INDIANA 16,278,436 17,058,453 30,488,022 42,060,071 47,141,468 53,161,533 55,473,147 56,632,465 60,818,691IOWA 25,990,409 25,802,260 30,643,488 35,299,664 43,877,192 70,438,242 82,571,252 90,336,030 101,298,783KANSAS 59,007,494 64,603,071 67,053,729 81,025,797 94,416,663 111,477,724 129,565,850 178,684,268 185,405,229KENTUCKY 24,460,486 19,501,563 29,807,009 36,026,757 57,147,036 59,773,467 72,026,073 83,600,068 97,011,282LOUISIANA 65,332,257 63,648,414 72,467,664 80,748,606 87,583,016 91,029,193 102,251,432 111,240,784 126,771,702MAINE 18,175,357 18,968,121 32,099,073 30,927,750 29,496,861 30,558,142 30,021,020 28,811,889 30,209,536MARYLAND 569,028 596,790 2,580,717 4,657,430 4,704,481 3,451,702 2,936,899 4,326,582 4,362,789MASSACHUSETTS 489,687 641,841 1,285,080 1,657,924 1,340,972 2,120,262 2,493,872 3,634,062 2,707,494MICHIGAN 31,188,240 34,738,875 39,393,036 40,442,672 45,278,445 45,932,413 49,185,840 53,574,560 58,786,707MINNESOTA 37,439,032 41,442,858 48,130,605 49,793,043 65,892,881 80,638,979 94,331,448 113,352,024 120,796,116MISSISSIPPI 26,793,296 26,773,044 132,785,751 141,139,843 170,586,927 170,300,475 187,668,196 209,250,553 250,332,675MISSOURI 47,215,940 50,654,082 65,568,381 73,681,087 84,316,081 92,171,760 91,063,244 85,145,512 88,558,278MONTANA 42,065,201 43,346,418 45,254,916 51,694,230 62,832,464 66,314,404 72,153,213 76,730,706 76,954,333NEBRASKA 19,868,058 21,377,097 23,729,919 26,378,585 31,464,331 44,359,887 49,170,267 55,889,730 56,780,682NEVADA 10,462,430 10,994,325 15,066,537 22,847,013 23,263,410 30,132,348 27,752,367 29,638,863 32,076,444NEW HAMPSHIRE 8,487,987 8,506,026 8,489,304 9,433,625 11,898,687 11,384,021 9,372,836 8,731,668 9,672,669NEW JERSEY 2,976,024 993,234 3,688,155 6,020,140 3,491,193 1,533,302 1,442,797 1,332,013 1,289,640NEW MEXICO 33,552,080 34,527,114 37,100,202 41,421,404 46,431,624 50,546,709 50,765,871 58,511,212 60,857,106NEW YORK 35,363,672 37,395,060 51,532,557 59,942,192 56,182,579 51,833,733 49,813,885 51,832,628 53,666,208NORTH CAROLINA 40,762,084 31,719,741 33,997,699 38,944,285 55,742,932 71,561,647 80,269,482 80,179,255 81,350,751NORTH DAKOTA 21,101,916 21,703,062 25,437,877 28,584,627 31,744,152 51,015,952 53,815,998 62,718,338 79,802,055NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS 4,236,713 5,529,978 3,257,226 3,594,740 3,526,267 1,652,912 774,314 667,728 1,066,434OHIO 14,040,836 15,056,667 19,503,900 29,246,406 33,911,495 38,248,134 40,738,649 37,754,247 38,602,698OKLAHOMA 59,502,768 58,345,860 67,401,390 76,622,223 85,828,129 106,243,999 102,948,779 120,188,047 122,146,587OREGON 35,755,689 36,809,835 47,354,850 60,851,409 67,392,263 70,843,149 70,173,166 68,468,745 74,931,717PENNSYLVANIA 22,169,364 21,611,712 28,472,919 35,438,459 42,712,402 55,174,266 58,649,426 65,503,613 66,462,309PUERTO RICO 138,864,798 133,459,656 141,441,540 117,948,741 96,548,538 99,628,150 81,411,184 133,785,501 123,373,995RHODE ISLAND 0 0 25,686 96,477 60,198 46,491 56,457 44,472 37,287SOUTH CAROLINA 44,424,832 40,003,113 46,068,145 55,646,667 71,350,010 79,517,759 78,116,203 76,322,172 82,243,845SOUTH DAKOTA 16,924,254 19,478,967 22,225,041 23,913,594 32,350,962 48,565,139 61,761,535 77,787,796 83,769,330TENNESSEE 27,395,910 28,449,801 34,482,177 40,735,155 46,355,893 52,880,294 54,745,975 54,684,345 54,004,191TEXAS 123,089,671 118,600,308 138,101,139 167,709,390 189,183,733 213,580,058 230,333,036 230,017,003 216,175,209UTAH 9,928,920 10,178,430 12,535,251 14,109,453 18,079,066 23,912,518 22,675,062 23,579,405 23,959,923VERMONT 12,539,982 11,248,704 26,244,471 22,593,331 25,804,315 28,139,515 30,190,850 35,243,951 32,004,033VIRGIN ISLANDS 16,199,322 22,973,160 23,786,676 25,253,094 27,525,044 26,869,011 25,972,598 22,617,908 25,185,111VIRGINIA 12,440,891 12,837,387 38,477,018 64,489,462 69,908,969 76,629,730 78,676,247 87,312,369 79,278,762WASHINGTON 40,942,959 43,165,287 53,885,595 77,047,992 78,046,801 80,293,879 87,913,564 94,387,261 98,770,875WEST VIRGINIA 24,421,006 22,991,175 63,450,822 72,163,053 80,465,705 78,449,420 68,461,541 66,317,650 69,294,701WISCONSIN 49,669,554 50,982,323 54,591,597 58,828,744 68,548,687 90,947,275 98,420,976 130,225,031 137,479,992WYOMING 20,786,386 25,954,848 29,896,680 35,195,050 41,610,883 48,070,187 58,246,866 56,598,063 54,968,687INDUSTRY TOTAL 1,690,305,004 1,717,980,381 2,234,771,101 2,591,627,306 2,934,951,359 3,259,041,656 3,468,352,756 3,824,185,898 3,993,178,523Source: Universal Service Administrative Company filings to the FCC.Note: Payments shown here are the sums of payments shown in Tables 3.6 through 3.13.Table 3.14Total High-Cost Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction(Dollars)3 - 26State or Jurisdiction ILECs CETCs ILECs CETCs ILECs CETCs ILECs CETCs ILECs CETCs ILECs CETCs ILECs CETCs ILECs CETCsAlabama 36,318,951 0 88,214,302 0 93,882,843 0 99,840,657 21,647 89,293,506 2,988,331 94,588,334 6,250,779 97,678,778 11,663,899 102,251,011 14,647,370Alaska 67,816,605 0 70,315,653 0 74,543,499 0 79,633,434 124,846 88,850,054 1,403,390 95,096,980 4,973,083 100,627,607 19,646,224 98,674,638 39,994,917American Samoa 124,410 0 473,151 0 458,928 0 875,238 0 1,230,722 0 1,860,943 0 2,317,903 0 1,496,616 0Arizona 31,174,674 0 35,577,804 0 48,845,290 1,060,306 56,758,691 4,632,839 62,265,191 5,816,508 66,572,006 13,627,513 61,804,813 12,745,645 68,565,687 15,811,998Arkansas 73,247,163 0 71,691,402 0 75,398,793 0 101,091,641 0 112,277,219 816,659 104,291,859 30,012,436 103,476,130 37,521,103 106,173,927 29,826,012California 49,657,305 0 64,070,553 0 82,347,999 0 86,503,022 24,999 92,059,403 123,276 95,186,762 52,770 98,674,387 191,115 106,390,695 131,412Colorado 43,789,464 0 53,761,542 0 62,003,540 0 66,143,448 688,329 73,651,142 2,876,978 74,987,264 8,311,404 72,049,895 7,226,901 71,123,691 8,381,643Connecticut 958,953 0 952,617 0 1,192,074 0 1,506,436 0 2,242,663 0 2,445,617 0 2,248,744 0 2,032,395 0Delaware 0 0 199,512 0 385,947 0 373,665 0 320,397 0 266,283 0 259,146 0 254,508 0District of Columbia 0000000000000000Florida 18,547,026 0 49,781,316 0 84,627,004 0 85,609,445 0 80,109,504 0 81,841,610 1,939,141 81,140,368 10,309,805 76,734,600 7,593,162Georgia 71,765,064 0 79,228,268 0 91,334,696 0 110,244,701 0 110,373,162 0 105,771,772 1,656,436 102,637,923 9,055,385 99,096,693 5,551,857Guam 2,321,256 0 3,169,872 0 2,318,838 0 1,969,968 356,718 4,572,924 1,382,807 7,434,786 2,143,229 11,427,375 7,737,989 7,884,885 7,349,487Hawaii 1,472,913 0 2,403,015 0 5,348,833 0 7,010,380 0 9,967,573 0 13,889,383 249,173 17,568,456 11,956,190 22,606,476 18,579,186Idaho 29,219,598 0 35,787,777 0 44,531,158 0 49,013,604 0 51,909,601 0 53,012,454 0 55,055,167 0 53,095,818 0Illinois 38,898,339 0 31,342,473 0 39,137,373 0 48,479,657 5,241 55,080,459 2,406 57,479,277 45 63,505,452 981 65,663,013 1,971Indiana 17,058,453 0 30,488,022 0 42,060,071 0 47,141,468 0 53,149,059 12,474 55,299,595 173,552 54,481,006 2,151,459 57,492,699 3,325,992Iowa 25,802,260 0 30,643,488 0 35,233,563 66,101 43,224,375 652,816 54,547,156 15,891,086 55,841,707 26,729,545 55,618,671 34,717,359 60,925,257 40,373,526Kansas 64,603,071 0 67,053,729 0 81,019,830 5,967 94,268,913 147,749 108,785,249 2,692,475 121,727,826 7,838,024 132,251,224 46,433,044 132,055,755 53,349,474Kentucky 19,501,563 0 29,807,009 0 36,026,757 0 57,147,036 0 59,757,468 15,999 71,749,739 276,334 75,144,011 8,456,057 75,210,951 21,800,331Louisiana 63,648,414 0 72,467,664 0 80,748,606 0 87,583,016 0 91,029,193 0 88,157,077 14,094,355 85,913,185 25,327,599 86,366,865 40,404,837Maine 18,968,121 0 32,099,073 0 30,927,750 0 29,496,861 0 29,725,830 832,312 27,779,495 2,241,525 24,533,155 4,278,734 25,349,043 4,860,493Maryland 596,790 0 2,580,717 0 4,657,430 0 4,704,481 0 3,451,702 0 2,936,899 0 4,326,582 0 4,361,691 1,098Massachusetts 641,841 0 1,285,080 0 1,657,924 0 1,340,972 0 2,120,262 0 2,493,872 0 3,634,062 0 2,707,494 0Michigan 34,738,875 0 39,393,036 0 40,431,984 10,688 44,477,695 800,750 44,379,093 1,553,320 43,022,294 6,163,546 43,744,197 9,830,363 44,631,927 14,154,780Minnesota 41,442,858 0 48,130,605 0 49,698,983 94,060 65,788,105 104,776 78,599,334 2,039,645 75,428,194 18,903,254 81,420,327 31,931,697 82,321,251 38,474,865Mississippi 26,773,044 0 132,785,751 0 141,139,843 0 149,589,072 20,997,855 145,961,305 24,339,170 146,413,078 41,255,118 147,106,117 62,144,436 140,588,648 109,744,027Missouri 50,654,082 0 65,568,381 0 73,621,807 59,280 84,225,880 90,201 92,095,987 75,773 90,894,928 168,316 85,025,623 119,889 88,435,827 122,451Montana 43,346,418 0 45,254,916 0 51,504,570 189,660 62,361,590 470,874 65,692,180 622,224 70,960,584 1,192,629 72,677,550 4,053,156 69,709,249 7,245,084Nebraska 21,377,097 0 23,729,919 0 26,378,585 0 31,464,331 0 44,359,887 0 49,107,561 62,706 54,422,214 1,467,516 54,668,200 2,112,482Nevada 10,994,325 0 15,066,537 0 22,846,950 63 22,973,633 289,777 26,224,437 3,907,911 24,211,672 3,540,695 24,451,060 5,187,803 25,630,626 6,445,818New Hampshire 8,506,026 0 8,489,304 0 9,433,625 0 11,898,687 0 11,384,021 0 9,372,836 0 8,731,668 0 9,568,887 103,782New Jersey 993,234 0 3,688,155 0 6,020,140 0 3,491,193 0 1,533,302 0 1,442,797 0 1,332,013 0 1,289,640 0New Mexico 34,527,114 0 37,100,202 0 41,421,404 0 46,221,145 210,478 46,776,559 3,770,150 47,227,016 3,538,855 49,491,285 9,019,927 48,698,361 12,158,745New York 37,395,060 0 51,532,557 0 59,460,149 482,043 55,659,061 523,518 51,104,130 729,603 49,633,569 180,316 47,160,351 4,672,277 49,473,066 4,193,142North Carolina 31,719,741 0 33,997,699 0 38,944,285 0 55,742,932 0 71,561,647 0 79,089,350 1,180,132 72,920,918 7,258,337 76,169,451 5,181,300North Dakota 21,703,062 0 25,437,877 0 28,584,627 0 31,654,811 89,341 39,959,801 11,056,151 38,869,743 14,946,255 36,413,361 26,304,977 42,433,701 37,368,354Northern Mariana Islands 5,529,978 0 3,257,226 0 3,594,740 0 3,526,267 0 1,652,912 0 709,640 64,674 436,572 231,156 810,480 255,954Ohio 15,056,667 0 19,503,900 0 29,246,406 0 33,911,495 0 38,248,134 0 40,738,649 0 37,754,247 0 38,602,698 0Oklahoma 58,345,860 0 67,401,390 0 76,622,223 0 85,800,208 27,921 106,262,224 (18,225) 102,410,238 538,541 108,602,175 11,585,872 107,356,983 14,789,604Oregon 36,809,835 0 47,354,850 0 60,851,409 0 67,392,263 0 70,843,149 0 66,199,436 3,973,730 64,914,449 3,554,296 64,870,959 10,060,758Pennsylvania 21,611,712 0 28,472,919 0 35,438,459 0 42,712,402 0 55,174,266 0 58,321,676 327,750 63,459,742 2,043,871 64,707,909 1,754,400Puerto Rico 132,925,644 534,012 139,946,898 1,494,642 111,508,014 6,440,727 86,185,212 10,363,326 85,955,805 13,672,345 58,567,786 22,843,398 66,047,054 67,738,447 47,407,680 75,966,315Rhode Island 0 0 25,686 0 96,477 0 60,198 0 46,491 0 56,457 0 44,472 0 37,287 0South Carolina 40,003,113 0 46,068,145 0 55,646,667 0 71,350,010 0 79,517,759 0 78,116,203 0 76,322,172 0 82,243,845 0South Dakota 19,478,967 0 22,225,041 0 23,913,594 0 32,003,665 347,297 40,952,744 7,612,395 47,824,157 13,937,378 54,108,387 23,679,409 55,972,318 27,797,012Tennessee 28,449,801 0 34,482,177 0 40,665,639 69,516 46,063,270 292,623 52,740,553 139,741 54,408,927 337,048 53,510,220 1,174,125 52,456,962 1,547,229Texas 118,600,308 0 138,101,139 0 167,610,051 99,339 188,031,058 1,152,675 211,301,637 2,278,421 229,221,439 1,111,597 226,230,724 3,786,279 205,497,036 10,678,173Utah 10,178,430 0 12,535,251 0 14,109,453 0 18,079,066 0 23,912,518 0 22,675,062 0 23,301,638 277,767 23,719,365 240,558Vermont 11,248,704 0 26,244,471 0 22,593,331 0 25,804,315 0 27,501,079 638,436 27,158,041 3,032,809 28,418,389 6,825,562 26,045,892 5,958,141Virgin Islands 22,973,160 0 23,786,676 0 25,253,094 0 27,525,044 0 26,869,011 0 25,972,598 0 22,617,908 0 25,185,111 0Virginia 12,837,387 0 38,477,018 0 64,489,462 0 69,908,969 0 76,629,469 261 75,789,178 2,887,069 72,048,998 15,263,371 67,111,638 12,167,124Washington 43,165,287 0 53,885,595 0 68,815,275 8