13
Approach to Informing the Design of an Adaptive Learning Support System Dejan Ljubojevic [email protected] Learning Technology Research Institute

Approach to Informing the Design of an Adaptive Learning Support System Dejan Ljubojevic [email protected] Learning Technology Research Institute

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Approach to Informing the Design of an Adaptive Learning Support System

Dejan Ljubojevic

[email protected]

Learning Technology Research Institute

Contents

My research - question and aimThe project overview (completed and planned)Pilot Study:

– purpose, – design & implementation,– outcome (tools, architectures and further research

ideas)The way ahead

Research Question and Aim

Question:– What is an 'appropriate' learning design (by which I mean the locus and the

balance of adaptive functionality) inside a system consisting of: 1) learning resources (based on the learning object technology), 2) learning history (learner profile/user information), and 3) an adaptive software agent?

Aim:– Framework for guidance in designing adaptive learning support inside Intelligent

Learning Environment ILE.

Project Overview - completed and planned

Pilot Study - purpose

illuminate the problem space, approximate architecture, set the dynamic in motion to

accumulate ideas through observation,

estimate feasibility given the constraints (time, resources, etc.) and, if necessary, redefine mission statement.

Design,Acquire &Organise

Runtime

Pilot Study - design and implementation

Staging the Dynamic:– 1 Student solving set problem with 1

Tutor’s help,– Java programming problem, ‘Aggregate,

Instantiate and Animate’, inside JCreator IDE,

– Around 25 Learning Aids at hand,

Observing the Dynamic:– Camera capturing the audio/video (face

expressions) data,– HyperCam capturing the screen states,

Analysis:– captured audio/video data analysed

using ‘Conversational Analysis’ (Fox, 1993),

– pre and post session interviews with the tutor subject.

Pilot study - outcomes I

System Architecture

Pilot study - outcomes II

Research communication tool - Problem Solving Universe (PSU) (Ljubojevic, Cook, Boyle, 2003) Learning Activity Description tool

Define problem task at the centre (???)

Decide on dimensions of support, each quadrant (?) a single dimension (tools, concept, procedure etc.)

Main problem solving angle ()

??????

??

?? ??

??

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! Populate the universe with

resources (!)

Pilot study - outcomes II continued

Problem: Aggregate two objects from a library and animate (motion) the aggregated object across the screen 3.2.1 – Anim. example of while loops; 3.2 – Repetition; Anim. explanation (decisions); 3.1 - Decisions; 2.3.1 Layout of

graphics screen; 2.3 – Graphics; 1.3.3 – Getting Started with J-Creator; 1.3 –Creating a program; 1.2.3 – Visualisation of library and classes; 1.2 – Introduction to OO; 1.1 – Applications of Computers

3.2.1

Pilot study - outcome III

Where does this research fit in the bigger (recognised) scheme of things?– Problem Solving Universe as a IMS Learning Design (IMS LDIM, 2003) - Learning Activity Description

Research ideas:– Observations of possible patterns in Tutor behaviour (too small corpus)

– Observations of Context-shifts as a possible way forward - building on intersubjectivity research ( Baker, Hansen, Joiner, and Traum, 1998)

– Validating the PSU tool through Activity Theory - Activity, Actions and Operations (Vygotsky, 1978)Distribution of the most common Tutor Strategies - Subject 1

0

5

10

15

20

25

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220

Utte rance

Oc

cu

ren

ce

Conceptual Guidance Direct Gudance Direct Questioning Interpretative Support

Distribution of the most common Tutor Strategies - Subject 2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170

Utterance

Oc

cu

re

nc

e

Interpretative Support Compare and Contrast Direct Questioning

The way ahead

Study1 Study1,2 Study2

Study2

Questions

[email protected]

References:

- Baker, M., Hansen, T., Joiner, R., And Traum, D. (1998). ‘Grounding’ for Intersubjectivity and Learning. 4th Congress of the International Society for Cultural Research and Activity Theory (ISCRAT 98),

University of Arhus, Denmark.

- Fox, B. (1993). Human Tutorial Dialogue. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

- IMS LDIM (2003). IMS Learning Design Information Model. Available At: [http://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign/ldv1p0/imsld_infov1p0.html]

(last visited - 06/10/03).

- Ljubojevic, D., Cook, J., & Boyle, T. (2003). Personalisation Versus the One Size Fits All Approach to Learning Design.

In Proceedings of 10th Annual Conference of

the Association for Learning Technology (ALT-C), Abstracts, p. 70.

- Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Souberman (Eds.).

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.