Upload
eshe
View
49
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Agenzia nazionale per le nuove tecnologie , l’energia e lo sviluppo economico sostenibile. Approach in the agroindustry water management: a case study. Roberto Farina [email protected] Unità Tecnica Modelli, Metodi e Tecnologie per le Valutazioni Ambientali - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Approach in the agroindustry water management:
a case study
Agenzia nazionale per le nuove tecnologie,l’energia e lo sviluppo economico sostenibile
Roberto [email protected]
Unità Tecnica Modelli, Metodi e Tecnologie per le Valutazioni AmbientaliLaboratorio Protezione della Risorsa Idrica, via Martiri di Monte Sole, 4 - 40129 Bologna
Water use in industry • Cleaning- washing• Transport
– Material– Heat
• Dilution• Cooking• Product component
Water use in industry:quality
• Legislation refer only at:– Discharge in the environment– Safety for the workers and products– Quality, just for the agroindustry
Water use in industry:quantity
• Legislation refer only at:– IPPC directive– Local legislation– Local agreements with public authorities
Industry considered
• Fruit industry with production of– Clear juice fruit– Concentrates juice fruits– Flavors– Desiccated fruit– Fourth range fruit
Industry considered
• Use of water– Washing of fruit– Cleaning of machinery– Steam production
• Quantity of water discharged 480mc/d
Wastewater cycle
Reflui
Effluente
Aria
Canale di scarico reflui
Riciclo Fanghi
Fanghi a digestione
BIOGAS
PRODUZIONE EQUALIZZATORE FILTRO ANAEROBICO
VASCHE A FANGHI ATTIVISEDIMENTATORE
AREA DI RINATURALIZZAZIONE
Acque di pioggia Toilette
Characteristics of the wastewater tested
Refluo 1 Refluo 2 Refluo liquido 3 Bucce refluo 3
COD totale mg/l 4970 3330 3550
COD disciolto mg/l 4020 2180 2230
Solidi Totali g/kg 4.5 3.45 3.93 250
Solidi Volatili g/kg 3.03 2.07 2.71 246
Soldi sospesi tot g/l 2.45 0.61 1.9
Solidi sospesi vol g/l 1.126 0.5 1.3
Azoto ammoniacale mg/l
13 25.6 14
Azoto totale mg/l 14 67.4 57 1600 g/kg
pH 4.2 4.8 4.6 3.7
Test BMP effluent 2
Produzione specifica refluo 2
00,05
0,10,15
0,20,25
0,30,35
0,4
L C
H4/
g C
OD
Specific Production : 0.34 l CH4/g COD
Test BMP peelings
Specific Production: 0.43 l CH4/g SV
Produzione specifica refluo 3
00,050,1
0,150,2
0,250,3
0,350,4
0,450,5
14/1
2/20
09
16/1
2/20
09
18/1
2/20
09
20/1
2/20
09
22/1
2/20
09
24/1
2/20
09
26/1
2/20
09
28/1
2/20
09
30/1
2/20
09
01/0
1/20
10
03/0
1/20
10
05/0
1/20
10
L CH
4 / g
SV
Lgas/gSV
17 days 23 days
Biomethanation test
Continues flow UASB reactor
SEPARATOR GLS
FEEDING POINT
RICIRCOLO
Effluent 2 after UASB treatment
PARAMETRO VALORE PARAMETRO
COD disciolto 240 mg/l
Solidi Totali 1,025 g/kg
Solidi Volatili 0,127 g/kg
Solidi Sospesi Totali 0,09 mg/l
Solidi Sospesi Volatili 0,05 mg/l
Azoto Ammoniacale 15,7 mg/l
Azoto Totale 16,8 mg/l
pH 7,3
Performances:Organic load removal : 92.8 %Total solids removal: 70 %Biogas quality: 89 % CH4
PARAMETRO VALORE PARAMETRO
COD 270 mg/l
Solidi Totali 2.1 g/kg
Solidi Volatili 1.3 g/kg
Solidi sospesi totali 0.09 g/l
Solidi sospesi volatili 0.07 g/l
Azoto ammoniacale 12.8 mg/l
Azoto totale 35 mg/l
Performances:Organic load removal: 96 %Total solids removal: 49 %Biogas quality: 77 %
Effluent 3 after UASB treatment feed batch
PARAMETRO VALORE PARAMETRO
COD 110 mg/l
Solidi Totali 1.89 g/kg
Solidi Volatili 0.84 g/kg
Solidi Sospesi Totali 0.09 g/l
Solidi sospesi Volatili 0.09 g/l
Azoto ammoniacale 26 mg/l
Azoto totale 30 mg/l
pH 7
Performances: Organic load removal: 98 %Total solids removal: 45 %Biogas Quality: 85 % CH4
Effluent 3 after mesophilic UASB treatment feed batch
New waste water cycle
Concentrated wastewaters
Effluente
Canale di scarico reflui
Fanghi a digestione
BIOGAS
PRODUZIONE EQUALIZZATORE FILTRO ANAEROBICO
AREA DI RINATURALIZZAZIONE
Acque di pioggia Toilette
alimentazione
influente
reazione
sedimentazionescarico
scaricofango
scaricoeffluente
attesa
Diluted wastewaters
peeling
Why and SBR reactor
SBR (Sequencing Batch Reactors) activated sludge discontinuous biological treatment systems.Possibility to have in one basin all the different phases of a biological process (organic matter and nitrogen removal, sludge sedimentation) in different moments, not in different basins.
alimentazione
influente
reazione
sedimentazionescarico
scaricofango
scaricoeffluente
attesa
The 4 different phases of an SBR are:FeedingReactionSedimentationDischargeall the different phases can variate according with the characteristics of the wastewater quality and quantity and according with the effluent characteristics.
Management flexibility according with the possibility to
change the duration of the different phases; Simplification of the plant engineering; Higher flexibility to organic and hidraulic loading changes; Improving the sedimentability characteristics of the sludge
according with the selection of the biomass; Possibility/necessity of a complete automation of the
process Possibility to reduce the aeration cost
Adavantages of the SBR technology
Conclusions
Not always it is necessary to apply new technologies to improve the wastewater treatment in an industry.
Segregation of effluents allow to reduce process volumes and provide better wastewater characteristics for each specific treatment.
Segregation of effluents allow the reuse of wastewaters even without treatment