Appoquinimink School Appoquinimink School DistrictDistrict

A Bright Horizon for MHSA Bright Horizon for MHS

Corrective Action PlanCorrective Action Plan

3 Year Plan3 Year Plan

December, 2007December, 2007

What is AYP – School What is AYP – School Accountability?Accountability?

•Percent proficient – each year’s target mustbe met or safe harbor met (ELA=68%; M=50%)

•Participation – target is 95%•Other Indicator -- maintain or show

progressfrom previous year

•Any cell not meeting target will not meet AYP

– Historically, MHS target cells have been in the area of students with disabilities.

5 Year Performance-Reading5 Year Performance-ReadingReadi

ng Numb

er

Reading

Average

Reading % Meets

or Excee

ds Stand

ard

Reading % Below Stand

ard

Reading % at PL

5

Reading % at PL

4

Reading % at PL

3

Reading % at PL

2

Reading % at PL

1

Reading

NCE Numb

er

Reading

NCE Avera

ge

Reading

StDev

Spring 2007 RMW

Grade 9

491529.62

81.67

18.33

6.7216.5

058.4

511.6

16.72 491 65.9

42.64

 Grade 10

512525.40

81.05

18.95

< 5.010.5

569.1

413.0

95.86 512 66.2

33.85

Spring 2006 RMW

Grade 9

584528.14

81.16

18.84

5.6515.4

160.1

013.3

65.48 584 67.0

37.97

 Grade 10

562518.36

69.75

30.25

< 5.0 6.9461.2

122.6

07.65 562 62.6

35.46

Spring 2005 RMW

Grade 10

394520.55

74.62

25.38

< 5.0 < 5.069.2

914.9

710.4

1394 65.5

36.04

Spring 2004 RMW

Grade 10

411515.92

71.29

28.71

< 5.0 < 5.068.1

316.3

012.4

1370 50.4

36.40

Spring 2003 RMW

Grade 10

360519.82

76.39

23.61

< 5.0 < 5.072.7

812.5

011.1

1324 51.9

34.93

5 Year Performance-Math5 Year Performance-Math

Math Number

Math Average

Math %

Meets or

Exceeds

Standard

Math %

Below Stand

ard

Math % at PL 5

Math % at PL 4

Math % at PL 3

Math % at PL 2

Math % at PL 1

Math NCE Number

Math NCE Average

Math

StDev

Spring 2007 RMW

Grade 9

497523.7

059.15 40.85

11.67

10.87

36.62

24.55

16.30

491 68.839.42

 Grade 10

518547.3

470.46 29.54

23.17

15.83

31.47

11.00

18.53

518 67.041.83

Spring 2006 RMW

Grade 9

595525.4

361.18 38.82

14.29

9.24

37.65

21.85

16.97

595 67.641.59

Spring 2005 RMW

Grade 10

396533.5

055.56 44.44

13.89

12.63

29.04

24.49

19.95

396 62.339.61

Spring 2004 RMW

Grade 10

411533.1

153.53 46.47

16.30

7.30

29.93

28.95

17.52

366 60.639.00

Spring 2003 RMW

Grade 10

356536.2

957.58 42.42

17.42

11.80

28.37

25.00

17.42

319 60.941.86

Consequences of not Consequences of not meeting AYP --meeting AYP --

DistrictsDistricts1 year = No consequences2 years = Under District Improvement (UDI) andimprovement plan required3 years = Remain Under District Improvement

andcontinue with improvement plan evaluation4 years = Corrective Action – select one or moreNCLB district corrective action options5 years = Corrective Action – corrective action

planevaluation and continues

Corrective Action-DOE Corrective Action-DOE ExpectationsExpectations

• Replace the school staff who are relevant to the failure to make adequate yearly progress

• Institute and fully implement new curriculum, including providing appropriate professional development for all relevant staff, that is based on scientifically based research

• Significantly decrease management authority at the school level

• Appoint an outside expert to advise the school on its progress toward making adequate yearly progress, based on its school plan described above

• Extend the school year or school day for the school• Restructure the internal organizational structure of

the school

Corrective Action ItemsCorrective Action ItemsWhat are we doing?What are we doing?

• Continue to use Accelerated Reader (AR) and STAR to increase reading scores for all students

• Provide additional support in reading for Special Education students using ABC Darian, Read Naturally, Fast Track, AR incentives

• Enhance Six Traits writing process across the curriculum to impact writing scores

What are we doing?What are we doing?• Mandatory Summer School/Extended

Time/Remediation Course for 9th grade students who score PL 1 or 2

• Design and implement Mentoring program for minority students

• Continue to offer Pre Calc Prep for minority students –Enhance the post secondary component

• Require all high school special education teachers to participate in a summer/fall instructional institute

What are we doing?What are we doing?• Spring Audit of Target Populations –

eschool data• Modified Schedule with Professional

Development Program for Instructional Practice

• Collaboration with Middle School Administration for alignment of programs and target populations

• Offer year-long, double math for small group students in math & ELA 9th & 10th Grade

What are we doing?What are we doing?• Offer professional development for whole

staff, focusing on instructional strategies• Utilize the SSP-Student Success Plans, as

a means of addressing individual student goals

• Increase administrative presence in the classrooms on a daily basis

• Utilize the DPAS II Evaluation System to provide timely and quality feedback for instructional practice

Supports NeededSupports Needed

• Staff for Double Period Courses• Policy for Mandatory Summer

School/Extended Time/Course Remediation• Mentoring Grant• Professional Development Program

– Outside Consultant(s)– Follow Up and On going

• Data Management and Accountability System