15
Applying Rigorous Analysis to General Education Reform Eric Ruckh, David Sill, and Michael Palmer

Applying Rigorous Analysis to General Education Reform Eric Ruckh, David Sill, and Michael Palmer

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Applying Rigorous Analysis to General Education Reform Eric Ruckh, David Sill, and Michael Palmer

Applying Rigorous Analysis to General Education Reform

Eric Ruckh, David Sill, and Michael Palmer

Page 2: Applying Rigorous Analysis to General Education Reform Eric Ruckh, David Sill, and Michael Palmer

• BRIDGE and AQIP are central to SIUE

• Simultaneous processes

• Culture of rigor in scholarship of teaching and learning

Page 3: Applying Rigorous Analysis to General Education Reform Eric Ruckh, David Sill, and Michael Palmer

AQIP

• Higher Learning Commission of North Central Association

• Alternative process for maintaining accreditation

Page 4: Applying Rigorous Analysis to General Education Reform Eric Ruckh, David Sill, and Michael Palmer

AQIP Process

Systems PortfolioSystems Appraisal

Strategy ForumAnnual Updates

Action Projects

Page 5: Applying Rigorous Analysis to General Education Reform Eric Ruckh, David Sill, and Michael Palmer

Systems Portfolio

• Regularly updated—100 pages

• Overview and nine categories, including:– Helping Students Learn– Understanding Students' & Stakeholders'

Needs– Valuing People– Leading and Communicating

• Systems appraisal every four years

Page 6: Applying Rigorous Analysis to General Education Reform Eric Ruckh, David Sill, and Michael Palmer

General Education Reform Started with the Objectives Project

• 2003—AAC&U’s Greater Expectations Institute

• 2004—AAC&U’s General Education Institute

• 2005—BRIDGE (Baccalaureate Reform through Integrated Design of General Education)

Page 7: Applying Rigorous Analysis to General Education Reform Eric Ruckh, David Sill, and Michael Palmer

BRIDGESecretarial

Support

Provost FacultySenate

InformationKnowledge

IntegrationLinkage

CommunicationWriting

Speaking

ApplicationCitizenship

Design Teams

FacultyConversations

Page 8: Applying Rigorous Analysis to General Education Reform Eric Ruckh, David Sill, and Michael Palmer

BRIDGE 2005-2007

• Phase I—Eleven design teams completed proposals by March 15, 2006

• Phase II—Three design teams (May 2006)– Distribution model– Core curriculum– Learning communities

• March 29, 2007--All faculty meeting

• Fall 2007—Faculty Senate action

Page 9: Applying Rigorous Analysis to General Education Reform Eric Ruckh, David Sill, and Michael Palmer

Comparison—Systems Portfolio and BRIDGE designs

• Do they reflect the same culture?

• What are the underlying assumptions and frameworks?

• What can we learn from a rigorous analysis?

• Can theory and research improve practice?

Page 10: Applying Rigorous Analysis to General Education Reform Eric Ruckh, David Sill, and Michael Palmer

Systems Portfolio

Page 11: Applying Rigorous Analysis to General Education Reform Eric Ruckh, David Sill, and Michael Palmer

Theoretical Frame

Loosely from Michel Foucault

Structure of a text:

• Aims/Purpose

• Order/Relation

• Field/‘Unsaid’

Assumptions

Page 12: Applying Rigorous Analysis to General Education Reform Eric Ruckh, David Sill, and Michael Palmer

Exercise

• Examine Page from Systems Portfolio– What are its aims? What relations does it

establish? What are its unsaid assumptions?

• Examine Page from a design proposal– What are its aims? What relations does it

establish? What are its unsaid assumptions?

• Comparison--Alignment– What is important or significant?

Page 13: Applying Rigorous Analysis to General Education Reform Eric Ruckh, David Sill, and Michael Palmer

Report out

• What did you find?

• Were there any surprises?

Page 14: Applying Rigorous Analysis to General Education Reform Eric Ruckh, David Sill, and Michael Palmer

Theoretical FrameIn Application

• Aims/Purpose

• Order/Relation

• Field/‘Unsaid’

Assumptions

Comparison of

the two texts

Page 15: Applying Rigorous Analysis to General Education Reform Eric Ruckh, David Sill, and Michael Palmer

Reflective Questions:• What are the underlying assumptions and

frameworks of your institutional culture?

• How do you know them?

• Do your institutional projects align with your university’s culture?