45
Application of State and Federal Law in 2011 K-12 Redistricting Paul Mitchell, Redistricting Partners

Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

  • Upload
    taariq

  • View
    27

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

K-12 Redistricting Paul Mitchell, Redistricting Partners. Application of State and Federal Law in 2011. What is Redistricting. definitions. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

K-12 RedistrictingPaul Mitchell, Redistricting Partners

Page 2: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

What is Redistrictingdefinitions

Redistricting is the process of drawing district lines. It is done every 10 years after the release of the US Census. The well known examples are Congress and the legislature.

K-12 districts with election areas must also do redistricting.

Page 3: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

What is Redistrictingdefinitions

Redistricting is the process of drawing district lines. It is done every 10 years after the release of the US Census. The well known examples are Congress and the legislature.

K-12 districts without election areas must review their vulnerability under the California Voting Rights Act.

Page 4: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

What is Redistrictingdefinitions

VRA is the Federal Voting Rights Act which oversees all election systems, including redistricting. Operative sections in redistricting are Section 2 and Section 5.

CVRA is the California Voting Rights Act – it pushes most at-large systems into districted elections based on an analysis of populations and voting patterns.

Page 5: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

What is Redistrictingthe Gerrymander

The term Gerrymander came from a cartoon depicting a rather serpentine looking district created by Governor Elbrige Gerry in Massachusetts.

Page 6: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

What is Redistrictingthe Gerrymander

There are still legislative linesthat look a lot likethe original Gerrymander!

Kevin DeLeon’s SD 22

Page 7: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

What is Redistrictingthe Gerrymander

The current “worst of the worst” is the new Henry Waxman Congressional Seat.

Not contiguous at high tide?

Page 8: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

What is RedistrictingWhy should anyone care?

Page 9: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

What is RedistrictingWhy should anyone care?

Page 10: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

What is RedistrictingWhy should anyone care?

Page 11: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

What is RedistrictingWhy should anyone care?

In K-12 this is unlikely to be about Partisanship as much as rural v. urban; ethnicities or other factors where winners and losers are found.

Page 12: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

Traditional Redistricting PrinciplesShould be followed by K-12 Districts

There are a number of criteria that have been used nationally and upheld by courts.

• Relatively equal size - people, not citizens• Contiguous – districts should not hop/jump• Maintain “communities of interest”• Follow city/county/local government lines• Keep districts compact – appearance/function• Preserving voter choices (incumbents)

Page 13: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

Traditional Redistricting PrinciplesShould be followed by K-12 Districts

There are a number of criteria that have been used nationally and upheld by courts.

• Relatively equal size - people, not citizens• Contiguous – districts should not hop/jump• Maintain “communities of interest”• Follow city/county/local government lines• Keep districts compact – appearance/function• Preserving voter choices (incumbents)

Page 14: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

Traditional Redistricting PrinciplesShould be followed by K-12 Districts

Pop. Deviation % Dev.

1 118,063 32,498 +38%2 86,695 1,130 +1%3 67,089 (18,476) -22%4 68,998 (16,567) -19%5 81,515 (4,050) -5%

Goal Population85,565

Page 15: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

Traditional Redistricting PrinciplesShould be followed by K-12 Districts

Pop. Deviation % Dev.

1 57,036 -620 -1.1%2 57,185 -471 -0.8%3 55,143 -2,513 -4.4%4 58,961 1,305 2.3%5 58,291 635 1.1%6 57,382 -274 -0.5%7 59,598 1,942 3.4%

Goal Population57,656

Page 16: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

Traditional Redistricting PrinciplesShould be followed by K-12 Districts

There are a number of criteria that have been used nationally and upheld by courts.

• Relatively equal size - people, not citizens• Contiguous – districts should not hop/jump• Maintain “communities of interest”• Follow city/county/local government lines• Keep districts compact – appearance/function• Preserving voter choices (incumbents)

Page 17: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

Current DistrictsEqual Size Districts

Page 18: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

Traditional Redistricting PrinciplesShould be followed by K-12 Districts

There are a number of criteria that have been used nationally and upheld by courts.

• Relatively equal size - people, not citizens• Contiguous – districts should not hop/jump• Maintain “communities of interest”• Follow city/county/local government lines• Keep districts compact – appearance/function• Preserving voter choices (incumbents)

Page 19: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

Communities of InterestBringing like people together for representation

What is a community of interest includes ethnic and language minorities and other groups.

• Communities covered by the VRA

• Latinos• Asians• African Americans

Page 20: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

African American COI

Page 21: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

Asian COI

Page 22: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

Latino COI

Page 23: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

Armenian COI

Page 24: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

VRA RequirementsProgressive federal and local laws protect minorities

Asian African American Latino1 13% 16% 21%2 10% 7% 19%3 9% 18% 53%4 30% 5% 22%5 45% 2% 15%6 49% 1% 37%7 58% 1% 12%

Sample District

Page 25: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

VRA RequirementsProgressive federal and local laws protect minorities

Asian African American Latino1 13% 16% 21%2 10% 7% 19%3 9% 18% 53%4 30% 5% 22%5 45% 2% 15%6 49% 1% 37%7 58% 1% 12%

Sample District

Page 26: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

Traditional Redistricting PrinciplesShould be followed by K-12 Districts

There are a number of criteria that have been used nationally and upheld by courts.

• Relatively equal size - people, not citizens• Contiguous – districts should not hop/jump• Maintain “communities of interest”• Follow city/county/local government lines• Keep districts compact – appearance/function• Preserving voter choices (incumbents)

Page 27: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

Traditional Redistricting PrinciplesShould be followed by K-12 Districts

Page 28: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

Traditional Redistricting PrinciplesShould be followed by K-12 Districts

There are a number of criteria that have been used nationally and upheld by courts.

• Relatively equal size - people, not citizens• Contiguous – districts should not hop/jump• Maintain “communities of interest”• Follow city/county/local government lines• Keep districts compact – appearance/function• Preserving voter choices (incumbents)

Page 29: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

Traditional Redistricting PrinciplesShould be followed by K-12 Districts

Compact Not Compact

Page 30: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

What is the CVRAdefinition

The California Voting Rights Act was signed in 2002 and ONLY impacts boards with at-large elections. These boards may need to transition to “by-area” elections if:

• The district has Racially Polarized Voting, and,

• The sub-group(s) in question can have better outcomes through the creation of districts.

• Having a diverse board can help with the narrative, but does not provide protection from a violation of CVRA.

Page 31: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

What is a CVRA Analysisdefinition

CVRA Analysis is the process of determining the requirements for districts under the California Voting Rights Act. This analysis includes:

• Review of past elections, board composition, overall ethnic makeup of the district.

• Analysis of key ballot measure and candidate races to determine the existence of and severity of RPV

• Drawing of potential district lines to see if districts can be created that are Majority-Minority (Federal VRA) or Influence (State CVRA)

Page 32: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

What is CVRA Analysisdefinition

CVRA Analysis is the process of determining the requirements for districts under the California Voting Rights Act. This analysis includes:

• Review of past elections, board composition, overall ethnic makeup of the district.

• Analysis of key ballot measure and candidate races to determine the existence of and severity of RPV.

• Drawing of potential district lines to see if districts can be created that are Majority-Minority (Federal VRA) or Influence (State CVRA)

Page 33: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

CVRA Review of DistrictEthnic, electoral, historic

A review of past election results and a review of the overall ethnic makeup could point to several things that make the district a target for CVRA lawsuit:

• Rate of turnover on the board – could point to election patterns where other groups do not have an opportunity to get elected.

• African American, Latino or Asian populations that are large and densely populated in specific regions.

• The district can create majority-minority or “influence” districts.

Page 34: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

What is CVRA Analysisdefinition

CVRA Analysis is the process of determining the requirements for districts under the California Voting Rights Act. This analysis includes:

• Review of past elections, board composition, overall ethnic makeup of the district.

• Analysis of key ballot measure and candidate races to determine the existence of and severity of RPV.

• Drawing of potential district lines to see if districts can be created that are Majority-Minority (Federal VRA) or Influence (State CVRA)

Page 35: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

Racially Polarized VotingHow it is analyzed

Review of election results for candidates and ballot measures. Federal case law has validated two key methods that can be used in addition to others:

• HPA – Extreme Case Analysis. Looks at precincts that are on average 90% of one race.

• Regression Analysis. Answers questions of how the votes change throughout a model, such as how the votes for Prop 187 drop the more Latino a precinct is.

• Today’s data can get much more precise than the 1986 case that validated these methods.

Page 36: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

Racially Polarized VotingHow it is analyzed

Review of election results for candidates and ballot measures. Federal case law has validated two key methods:

• HPA – Extreme Case Analysis. Looks at precincts that are on average 90% of one race.

• Regression Analysis. Answers questions of how the votes change throughout a model, such as how the votes for Prop 187 drop the more Latino a precinct is.

• Today’s data can get much more precise than the 1986 case that validated these methods.

Page 37: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

Racially Polarized VotingHow it is analyzed

HPA Analysis looks at Precincts or census blocks that are homogeneous – for this purpose we can consider anything 90% of one race to be all one race. For one client we found the following:

HPA Analysis – Overall Counts

Latino White Census Block Count 1382 3518 Total Pop 136,462 142,920 % Ethnic 93.38% 92.10%

Page 38: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

Racially Polarized VotingHow it is analyzed

HPA Analysis looks at Precincts or census blocks that are homogeneous – for this purpose we can consider anything 90% of one race to be all one race. And that kind of data allows us to determine:

CANDIDATE RACE Latino White

Non-Latino 45.45% 63.58% Latino 54.54% 36.41% -9.09% 27.17%

Page 39: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

Racially Polarized VotingHow it is analyzed

Review of election results for candidates and ballot measures. Federal case law has validated two key methods:

• HPA – Extreme Case Analysis. Looks at precincts that are on average 90% of one race.

• Regression Analysis. Answers questions of how the votes change throughout a model, such as how the votes for Prop 187 drop the more Latino a precinct is.

• Today’s data can get much more precise than the 1986 case that validated these methods.

Page 40: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

Racially Polarized VotingHow it is analyzed

A Simple regression analysis looks at how votes change as ethnic composition of a precinct changes. Multi-Variable regression analysis can look at how race impacts vs. other factors.

The results are formulas that can be confusing and scatterplot graphs that can be relatively intuitive.

Page 41: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

Racially Polarized VotingHow it is analyzed

A Simple regression analysis looks at how votes change as ethnic composition of a precinct changes. Multi-Variable regression analysis can look at how race impacts vs. other factors.

y = 0.4946x + 0.2944y = 0.4946(1) + 0.2944 = 0.78978.9% of Latinos voted for Latino

y = 0.4946(0) + 0.2944 = 0.2944 29.4% of Whites (Non-Latinos) voted Latino

Page 42: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011
Page 43: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

What is CVRA Analysisdefinition

CVRA Analysis is the process of determining the requirements for districts under the California Voting Rights Act. This analysis includes:

• Review of past elections, board composition, overall ethnic makeup of the district.

• Analysis of key ballot measure and candidate races to determine the existence of and severity of RPV.

• Drawing of potential district lines to see if districts can be created that are Majority-Minority (Federal VRA) or Influence (State CVRA)

Page 44: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011

What is CVRA AnalysisMajority-minority and Influence Districts

Page 45: Application of State and Federal Law in 2011