Appendix F EXP3 - eprints.utas.edu.au F_EXP3.pdf · Appendix F STATISTICAL RESULTS FOR EXPERIMENT 3 Hakuei Fujiyama 1. Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1

3.1.1 Movement Frequency- Phasic hand activation2 x 2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x LIMB x LC x CM] ANOVA Coding Group: 1= older group, 2= younger groupLimb: 1= upper limb, 2 = lower limbLimb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateralCM: 1= isodirectional, 2= non-isodirectional

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (Frequency_No TMS in Part3Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectSS Degr. of

FreedomMS F p

InterceptgroupErrorLIMBLIMB*groupErrorCMCM*groupErrorLCLC*groupErrorLIMB*CMLIMB*CM*groupErrorLIMB*LCLIMB*LC*groupErrorCM*LCCM*LC*groupErrorLIMB*CM*LCLIMB*CM*LC*groupError

224.7223 1 224.7223 4934.847 0.0000000.2893 1 0.2893 6.352 0.0177031.2751 28 0.04550.0106 1 0.0106 10.445 0.0031400.0040 1 0.0040 3.937 0.0571230.0285 28 0.00100.3095 1 0.3095 7.582 0.0102340.2950 1 0.2950 7.227 0.0119541.1431 28 0.04080.0727 1 0.0727 7.343 0.0113630.0386 1 0.0386 3.892 0.0584650.2774 28 0.00990.0043 1 0.0043 7.162 0.0123040.0025 1 0.0025 4.202 0.0498550.0167 28 0.00060.0019 1 0.0019 5.588 0.0252610.0010 1 0.0010 3.086 0.0898850.0094 28 0.00030.0418 1 0.0418 5.330 0.0285530.0341 1 0.0341 4.341 0.0464630.2198 28 0.00780.0030 1 0.0030 5.705 0.0238970.0023 1 0.0023 4.367 0.0458530.0147 28 0.0005

Appendix F STATISTICAL RESULTS FOR EXPERIMENT 3 Hakuei Fujiyama

1

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (Frequency_No TMS in Part3)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. ofFreedom

F p H-FEpsilon

H-FAdj. df1

H-FAdj. df2

H-FAdj. p

Lowr.BndEpsilon

Lowr.BndAdj. df1

Lowr.BndAdj. df2

L

LIMBLIMB*groupErrorCMCM*groupErrorLCLC*groupErrorLIMB*CMLIMB*CM*groupErrorLIMB*LCLIMB*LC*groupErrorCM*LCCM*LC*groupErrorLIMB*CM*LCLIMB*CM*LC*groupError

1 10.44549 0.003140 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.003140 1.000000 1.000000 28.000001 3.93673 0.057123 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.057123 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

281 7.58243 0.010234 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.010234 1.000000 1.000000 28.000001 7.22723 0.011954 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.011954 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

281 7.34256 0.011363 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.011363 1.000000 1.000000 28.000001 3.89195 0.058465 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.058465 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

281 7.16192 0.012304 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.012304 1.000000 1.000000 28.000001 4.20168 0.049855 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.049855 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

281 5.58757 0.025261 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.025261 1.000000 1.000000 28.000001 3.08632 0.089885 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.089885 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

281 5.33042 0.028553 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.028553 1.000000 1.000000 28.000001 4.34055 0.046463 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.046463 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

281 5.70522 0.023897 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.023897 1.000000 1.000000 28.000001 4.36672 0.045853 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.045853 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

28

group; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 28)=6.3521, p=.01770

Effective hypothesis decompositionVertical bars denote 0.95 conf idence intervals

1 2

group

0.86

0.88

0.90

0.92

0.94

0.96

0.98

1.00

1.02

1.04

1.06

DV_

1Appendix F STATISTICAL RESULTS FOR EXPERIMENT 3 Hakuei Fujiyama

2

LIMB; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 28)=10.445, p=.00314


1 2

LIMB

0.88

0.90

0.92

0.94

0.96

0.98

1.00

1.02

1.04

1.06

DV_

1

CM; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 28)=7.5824, p=.01023


1 2

CM

0.80

0.85

0.90

0.95

1.00

1.05

1.10

DV_

1

CM*group; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 28)=7.2272, p=.01195


group 1 group 2

1 2

CM

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

1.1

1.2

DV_


3

LC; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 28)=7.3426, p=.01136


1 2

LC

0.86

0.88

0.90

0.92

0.94

0.96

0.98

1.00

1.02

1.04

1.06

DV_

1

LIMB*CM; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 28)=7.1619, p=.01230


CM 1 CM 2

1 2

LIMB

0.82

0.84

0.86

0.88

0.90

0.92

0.94

0.96

0.98

1.00

1.02

1.04

1.06

DV_

1

LIMB*CM*group; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 28)=4.2017, p=.04985


group 1 group 2

LIMB: 1

CM: 1 20.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

1.1

1.2

DV_

1

LIMB: 2

CM: 1 2


4

LIMB*LC; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 28)=5.5876, p=.02526

Effective hypothesis decompositionVertical bars denote 0.95 confidence intervals

LC 1 LC 2

1 2

LIMB

0.86

0.88

0.90

0.92

0.94

0.96

0.98

1.00

1.02

1.04

1.06

DV_

1

CM*LC; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 28)=5.3304, p=.02855


CM 1 CM 2

1 2

LC

0.75

0.80

0.85

0.90

0.95

1.00

1.05

1.10

DV_

1

CM*LC*group; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 28)=4.3405, p=.04646


group 1 group 2

LC: 1

CM: 1 20.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

1.1

1.2

DV_

1

LC: 2

CM: 1 2


5

LIMB*CM*LC; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 28)=5.7052, p=.02390


CM 1 CM 2

LIMB: 1

LC: 1 20.75

0.80

0.85

0.90

0.95

1.00

1.05

DV_

1

LIMB: 2

LC: 1 2

LIMB*CM*LC*group; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 28)=4.3667, p=.04585


group 1 group 2

LC: 1

CM: 1 20.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

1.1

1.2

DV_

1

LC: 2

CM: 1 2

Factors: LevelsLIMB: 1

LIMB*CM*LC*group; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 28)=4.3667, p=.04585


group 1 group 2

LC: 1

CM: 1 20.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

1.1

1.2

DV_

1

LC: 2

CM: 1 2

Factors: LevelsLIMB: 2


6

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (Frequency_No TMS in Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Between; Within; Pooled MS = .01080, df = 55.83

Cell No.group CM {1}

1.0039{2}

.86196{3}

1.0032{4}

1.00151234

1 1 0.003439 0.999998 0.9999201 2 0.003439 0.002625 0.0066882 1 0.999998 0.002625 0.9999682 2 0.999920 0.006688 0.999968

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (Frequency_No TMS in Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Within MS = .00060, df = 28.000

Cell No.LIMB CM {1}

1.0011{2}

.92086{3}

1.0060{4}

.942611234

1 1 0.000164 0.697604 0.0001641 2 0.000164 0.000164 0.0003562 1 0.697604 0.000164 0.0001642 2 0.000164 0.000356 0.000164

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (Frequency_No TMS in Part3)Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Between; Within; Pooled MS = .01153, df = 28.734

Cell No.group LIMB CM {1}

1.0006{2}

.84376{3}

1.0072{4}

.88015{5}

1.0016{6}

.99796{7}

1.0048{8}

1.005112345678

1 1 1 0.000142 0.963402 0.000142 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.0000001 1 2 0.000142 0.000142 0.000215 0.007987 0.135893 0.006512 0.0063981 2 1 0.963402 0.000142 0.000142 1.000000 0.999997 1.000000 1.0000001 2 2 0.000142 0.000215 0.000142 0.072369 0.088492 0.060634 0.3454562 1 1 1.000000 0.007987 1.000000 0.072369 0.998863 0.999580 0.9992802 1 2 1.000000 0.135893 0.999997 0.088492 0.998863 0.954931 0.9449572 2 1 1.000000 0.006512 1.000000 0.060634 0.999580 0.954931 1.0000002 2 2 1.000000 0.006398 1.000000 0.345456 0.999280 0.944957 1.000000


Cell No.group LIMB LC {1}

.88723{2}

.95715{3}

.91846{4}

.96889{5}

.99434{6}

1.0052{7}

1.0009{8}

1.009012345678

1 1 1 0.000142 0.000148 0.000142 0.534478 0.086300 0.108707 0.0704261 1 2 0.000142 0.000142 0.243245 0.977740 0.986266 0.947081 0.8817781 2 1 0.000148 0.000142 0.000142 0.536410 0.370616 0.802824 0.3208681 2 2 0.000142 0.243245 0.000142 0.997709 0.980393 0.990567 0.9953762 1 1 0.534478 0.977740 0.536410 0.997709 0.325326 0.853992 0.0744932 1 2 0.086300 0.986266 0.370616 0.980393 0.325326 0.981964 0.9927402 2 1 0.108707 0.947081 0.802824 0.990567 0.853992 0.981964 0.6877012 2 2 0.070426 0.881778 0.320868 0.995376 0.074493 0.992740 0.687701

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (Frequency_No TMS in Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Within MS = .00785, df = 28.000

Cell No.CM LC {1}

.99936{2}

1.0078{3}

.90112{4}

.962351234

1 1 0.953633 0.000170 0.1252511 2 0.953633 0.000165 0.0421892 1 0.000170 0.000165 0.0040232 2 0.125251 0.042189 0.004023


7


Cell No.group CM LC {1}

.99894{2}

1.0089{3}

.80675{4}

.91716{5}

.99977{6}

1.0067{7}

.99549{8}

1.007512345678

1 1 1 0.999838 0.000142 0.024753 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 0.9999991 1 2 0.999838 0.000142 0.008584 0.999999 1.000000 0.999982 1.0000001 2 1 0.000142 0.000142 0.001139 0.001316 0.000857 0.035166 0.0008141 2 2 0.024753 0.008584 0.001139 0.522016 0.420499 0.587371 0.7230162 1 1 1.000000 0.999999 0.001316 0.522016 0.999986 0.999999 0.9999692 1 2 1.000000 1.000000 0.000857 0.420499 0.999986 0.999647 1.0000002 2 1 1.000000 0.999982 0.035166 0.587371 0.999999 0.999647 0.9994222 2 2 0.999999 1.000000 0.000814 0.723016 0.999969 1.000000 0.999422

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (Frequency_No TMS in Part3)Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Within MS = .00052, df = 28.000

Cell No.LIMB CM LC {1}

.99766{2}

1.0046{3}

.88392{4}

.95779{5}

1.0011{6}

1.0109{7}

.91832{8}

.9669012345678

1 1 1 0.932520 0.000142 0.000146 0.998965 0.355805 0.000142 0.0004951 1 2 0.932520 0.000142 0.000142 0.998641 0.957420 0.000142 0.0001581 2 1 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000205 0.0001421 2 2 0.000146 0.000142 0.000142 0.000143 0.000142 0.000146 0.7790712 1 1 0.998965 0.998641 0.000142 0.000143 0.704062 0.000142 0.0002132 1 2 0.355805 0.957420 0.000142 0.000142 0.704062 0.000142 0.0001432 2 1 0.000142 0.000142 0.000205 0.000146 0.000142 0.000142 0.0001422 2 2 0.000495 0.000158 0.000142 0.779071 0.000213 0.000143 0.000142


Cell No.group LIMB CM LC {1}

.99740{2}

1.0038{3}

.77707{4}

.91045{5}

1.0005{6}

1.0139{7}

.83643{8}

.92387{9}

.99791{10

1.0012345678910111213141516

1 1 1 1 0.999980 0.000146 0.000146 1.000000 0.818897 0.000146 0.000146 1.000000 1.0001 1 1 2 0.999980 0.000146 0.000146 1.000000 0.996510 0.000146 0.000146 1.000000 1.0001 1 2 1 0.000146 0.000146 0.000146 0.000146 0.000146 0.000151 0.000146 0.028455 0.0201 1 2 2 0.000146 0.000146 0.000146 0.000146 0.000146 0.000146 0.953960 0.959983 0.9261 2 1 1 1.000000 1.000000 0.000146 0.000146 0.953879 0.000146 0.000146 1.000000 1.0001 2 1 2 0.818897 0.996510 0.000146 0.000146 0.953879 0.000146 0.000146 1.000000 1.0001 2 2 1 0.000146 0.000146 0.000151 0.000146 0.000146 0.000146 0.000146 0.267315 0.2101 2 2 2 0.000146 0.000146 0.000146 0.953960 0.000146 0.000146 0.000146 0.990470 0.9772 1 1 1 1.000000 1.000000 0.028455 0.959983 1.000000 1.000000 0.267315 0.990470 0.9992 1 1 2 1.000000 1.000000 0.020616 0.926525 1.000000 1.000000 0.210803 0.977576 0.9998812 1 2 1 1.000000 1.000000 0.354348 0.980174 1.000000 1.000000 0.330664 0.996470 0.999929 0.9152 1 2 2 1.000000 1.000000 0.020813 0.996182 1.000000 1.000000 0.212318 0.978080 0.999917 1.0002 2 1 1 1.000000 1.000000 0.024239 0.945014 1.000000 1.000000 0.237894 0.985096 1.000000 1.0002 2 1 2 1.000000 1.000000 0.018393 0.911384 1.000000 1.000000 0.193150 0.970806 0.996545 1.0002 2 2 1 1.000000 1.000000 0.025771 0.951134 1.000000 1.000000 0.749669 0.987375 1.000000 0.9992 2 2 2 1.000000 1.000000 0.016870 0.898772 1.000000 1.000000 0.180673 0.998598 0.981249 1.000


8


Cell No.group LIMB CM LC {9}

.99791{10}

1.0054{11}

.99077{12}

1.0051{13}

1.0016{14}

1.0080{15}

1.0002{16}

1.009912345678910111213141516

1 1 1 1 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.0000001 1 1 2 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.0000001 1 2 1 0.028455 0.020616 0.354348 0.020813 0.024239 0.018393 0.025771 0.0168701 1 2 2 0.959983 0.926525 0.980174 0.996182 0.945014 0.911384 0.951134 0.8987721 2 1 1 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.0000001 2 1 2 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.0000001 2 2 1 0.267315 0.210803 0.330664 0.212318 0.237894 0.193150 0.749669 0.1806731 2 2 2 0.990470 0.977576 0.996470 0.978080 0.985096 0.970806 0.987375 0.9985982 1 1 1 0.999881 0.999929 0.999917 1.000000 0.996545 1.000000 0.9812492 1 1 2 0.999881 0.915947 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 0.999999 1.0000002 1 2 1 0.999929 0.915947 0.924234 0.992632 0.774960 0.998230 0.6312632 1 2 2 0.999917 1.000000 0.924234 1.000000 1.000000 0.999999 1.0000002 2 1 1 1.000000 1.000000 0.992632 1.000000 0.999984 1.000000 0.9995682 2 1 2 0.996545 1.000000 0.774960 1.000000 0.999984 0.999804 1.0000002 2 2 1 1.000000 0.999999 0.998230 0.999999 1.000000 0.999804 0.9975472 2 2 2 0.981249 1.000000 0.631263 1.000000 0.999568 1.000000 0.997547

group; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3Current effect: F(1, 28)=6.3521, p=.01770Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 0.932931 0.019480 0.893028 0.972835 152 1.002365 0.019480 0.962461 1.042268 15

LIMB; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3Current effect: F(1, 28)=10.445, p=.00314Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LIMB DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 0.960992 0.013686 0.932958 0.989026 302 0.974304 0.014166 0.945287 1.003321 30

LIMB*group; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=3.9367, p=.05712Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group LIMB DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 0.922189 0.019355 0.882543 0.961836 151 2 0.943673 0.020033 0.902637 0.984709 152 1 0.999795 0.019355 0.960149 1.039441 152 2 1.004935 0.020033 0.963899 1.045971 15

CM; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=7.5824, p=.01023Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.CM DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 1.003561 0.005933 0.991408 1.015715 302 0.931735 0.026163 0.878143 0.985326 30


9

CM*group; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=7.2272, p=.01195Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group CM DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 1.003907 0.008391 0.986719 1.021094 151 2 0.861956 0.036999 0.786166 0.937746 152 1 1.003216 0.008391 0.986028 1.020404 152 2 1.001514 0.036999 0.925724 1.077303 15

LC; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=7.3426, p=.01136Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 0.950238 0.016791 0.915844 0.984633 302 0.985058 0.013420 0.957567 1.012549 30

LC*group; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=3.8919, p=.05847Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 0.902846 0.023746 0.854205 0.951487 151 2 0.963016 0.018979 0.924139 1.001894 152 1 0.997630 0.023746 0.948989 1.046271 152 2 1.007099 0.018979 0.968222 1.045977 15

LIMB*CM; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=7.1619, p=.01230Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LIMB CM DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 1.001127 0.005795 0.989256 1.012997 301 2 0.920858 0.026268 0.867051 0.974665 302 1 1.005996 0.006198 0.993301 1.018691 302 2 0.942612 0.026539 0.888250 0.996974 30

LIMB*CM*group; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=4.2017, p=.04985Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group LIMB CM DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 1.000619 0.008195 0.983832 1.017406 151 1 2 0.843760 0.037148 0.767666 0.919854 151 2 1 1.007194 0.008765 0.989241 1.025148 151 2 2 0.880152 0.037531 0.803273 0.957031 152 1 1 1.001634 0.008195 0.984847 1.018422 152 1 2 0.997956 0.037148 0.921862 1.074050 152 2 1 1.004798 0.008765 0.986844 1.022752 152 2 2 1.005071 0.037531 0.928192 1.081951 15


10

LIMB*LC; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in PaCurrent effect: F(1, 28)=5.5876, p=.02526Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LIMB LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 0.940788 0.016875 0.906221 0.975356 301 2 0.981196 0.013108 0.954347 1.008046 302 1 0.959688 0.017241 0.924372 0.995004 302 2 0.988920 0.013886 0.960476 1.017363 30

LIMB*LC*group; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=3.0863, p=.08989Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group LIMB LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 0.887234 0.023865 0.838348 0.936120 151 1 2 0.957145 0.018537 0.919174 0.995116 151 2 1 0.918459 0.024382 0.868515 0.968403 151 2 2 0.968887 0.019637 0.928662 1.009113 152 1 1 0.994343 0.023865 0.945457 1.043229 152 1 2 1.005247 0.018537 0.967276 1.043218 152 2 1 1.000917 0.024382 0.950973 1.050861 152 2 2 1.008952 0.019637 0.968726 1.049177 15

CM*LC; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in ParCurrent effect: F(1, 28)=5.3304, p=.02855Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.CM LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 0.999355 0.006883 0.985257 1.013454 301 2 1.007767 0.005990 0.995497 1.020038 302 1 0.901121 0.032470 0.834609 0.967633 302 2 0.962348 0.024449 0.912267 1.012430 30

CM*LC*group; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=4.3405, p=.04646Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group CM LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 0.998940 0.009734 0.979002 1.018879 151 1 2 1.008873 0.008471 0.991520 1.026226 151 2 1 0.806752 0.045920 0.712690 0.900814 151 2 2 0.917160 0.034576 0.846334 0.987985 152 1 1 0.999770 0.009734 0.979832 1.019709 152 1 2 1.006662 0.008471 0.989309 1.024014 152 2 1 0.995490 0.045920 0.901428 1.089552 152 2 2 1.007537 0.034576 0.936711 1.078363 15


11

LIMB*CM*LC; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=5.7052, p=.02390Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LIMB CM LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 0.997655 0.007016 0.983283 1.012027 301 1 2 1.004598 0.005557 0.993215 1.015982 301 2 1 0.883922 0.032936 0.816456 0.951387 301 2 2 0.957794 0.024156 0.908313 1.007275 302 1 1 1.001056 0.006852 0.987020 1.015091 302 1 2 1.010937 0.006761 0.997087 1.024786 302 2 1 0.918321 0.033065 0.850590 0.986052 302 2 2 0.966903 0.024875 0.915949 1.017856 30

LIMB*CM*LC*group; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=4.3667, p=.04585Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group LIMB CM LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

123456789101112

1 1 1 1 0.997398 0.009922 0.977073 1.017722 151 1 1 2 1.003841 0.007859 0.987742 1.019939 151 1 2 1 0.777070 0.046578 0.681659 0.872481 151 1 2 2 0.910450 0.034162 0.840473 0.980427 151 2 1 1 1.000483 0.009690 0.980634 1.020332 151 2 1 2 1.013906 0.009562 0.994319 1.033492 151 2 2 1 0.836435 0.046761 0.740649 0.932221 151 2 2 2 0.923869 0.035178 0.851811 0.995928 152 1 1 1 0.997913 0.009922 0.977588 1.018237 152 1 1 2 1.005356 0.007859 0.989257 1.021455 152 1 2 1 0.990773 0.046578 0.895362 1.086184 152 1 2 2 1.005138 0.034162 0.935161 1.075115 15

3.1.2 Movement Frequency- Tonic hand activation2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x LC x DIRECTION] ANOVA Caption Group: 1= older group, 2= younger groupLimb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateralDirection: 1= DF, 2= PF

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (Frequency_No TMS in Part3)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectSS Degr. of

FreedomMS F p

InterceptgroupErrorCMCM*groupErrorLCLC*groupErrorCM*LCCM*LC*groupError

126.3592 1 126.3592 5044.050 0.0000000.0185 1 0.0185 0.737 0.3978720.7014 28 0.02510.0231 1 0.0231 1.725 0.1996880.0103 1 0.0103 0.770 0.3877570.3742 28 0.01340.0000 1 0.0000 0.021 0.8858270.0017 1 0.0017 2.643 0.1152070.0178 28 0.00060.0003 1 0.0003 0.271 0.6070110.0010 1 0.0010 0.986 0.3293150.0282 28 0.0010


12

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (Frequency_No TMS in Part3)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectDegr. of

FreedomF p H-F

EpsilonH-F

Adj. df1H-F

Adj. df2H-F

Adj. pLowr.Bnd

EpsilonLowr.BndAdj. df1

Lowr.BndAdj. df2

Lowr.BnAdj. p

CMCM*groupErrorLCLC*groupErrorCM*LCCM*LC*groupError

1 1.725192 0.199688 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.199688 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.1991 0.769761 0.387757 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.387757 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.387

281 0.020996 0.885827 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.885827 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.8851 2.643058 0.115207 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.115207 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.115

281 0.270612 0.607011 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.607011 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.6071 0.985632 0.329315 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.329315 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.329

28

group; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3Current effect: F(1, 28)=.73713, p=.39787Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 1.038560 0.020433 0.996704 1.080415 152 1.013750 0.020433 0.971894 1.055605 15

CM; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=1.7252, p=.19969Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.CM DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 1.040016 0.024601 0.989624 1.090409 302 1.012293 0.005922 1.000163 1.024423 30

CM*group; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=.76976, p=.38776Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 1.061681 0.034791 0.990415 1.132946 151 2 1.015439 0.008375 0.998284 1.032594 152 1 1.018352 0.034791 0.947086 1.089618 152 2 1.009147 0.008375 0.991993 1.026302 15

LC; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=.02100, p=.88583Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 1.025821 0.015312 0.994455 1.057187 302 1.026489 0.013916 0.997982 1.054995 30


13

LC*group; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=2.6431, p=.11521Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 1.041971 0.021655 0.997613 1.086330 151 2 1.035148 0.019681 0.994834 1.075462 152 1 1.009671 0.021655 0.965312 1.054029 152 2 1.017829 0.019681 0.977515 1.058143 15

CM*LC; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in ParCurrent effect: F(1, 28)=.27061, p=.60701Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.CM LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 1.041189 0.027771 0.984302 1.098075 301 2 1.038844 0.022008 0.993762 1.083926 302 1 1.010453 0.005366 0.999462 1.021445 302 2 1.014133 0.007134 0.999519 1.028747 30

CM*LC*group; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=.98563, p=.32931Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 1.069472 0.039274 0.989022 1.149922 151 1 2 1.053889 0.031124 0.990133 1.117644 151 2 1 1.014470 0.007589 0.998926 1.030015 151 2 2 1.016408 0.010090 0.995740 1.037075 152 1 1 1.012905 0.039274 0.932455 1.093355 152 1 2 1.023799 0.031124 0.960044 1.087555 152 2 1 1.006436 0.007589 0.990892 1.021981 152 2 2 1.011858 0.010090 0.991191 1.032526 15

3.2.1 Variability of Movement Frequency- Phasic hand activation2 x 2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x LIMB x LC x CM] ANOVA Caption Group: 1= older group, 2= younger groupLimb: 1= upper limb, 2 = lower limbLimb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateralCM: 1= isodirectional, 2= non-isodirectional


14

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectSS Degr. of

FreedomMS F p


2.374518 1 2.374518 521.5053 0.0000000.002810 1 0.002810 0.6171 0.4387090.127490 28 0.0045530.016394 1 0.016394 10.2126 0.0034420.005855 1 0.005855 3.6476 0.0664430.044947 28 0.0016050.004268 1 0.004268 2.0188 0.1664050.001332 1 0.001332 0.6302 0.4339560.059194 28 0.0021140.009325 1 0.009325 4.4347 0.0443090.000760 1 0.000760 0.3614 0.5525780.058873 28 0.0021030.005568 1 0.005568 5.2894 0.0291200.000325 1 0.000325 0.3086 0.5829780.029475 28 0.0010530.014155 1 0.014155 19.0892 0.0001550.001716 1 0.001716 2.3136 0.1394570.020763 28 0.0007420.017690 1 0.017690 9.7870 0.0040780.002756 1 0.002756 1.5247 0.2271680.050610 28 0.0018070.010650 1 0.010650 8.8939 0.0058690.000841 1 0.000841 0.7024 0.4090700.033529 28 0.001197

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectDegr. of

FreedomF p H-F

EpsilonH-F

Adj. df1H-F

Adj. df2H-F

Adj. pLowr.Bnd


Lowr.BndAdj. df2

L

LIMBLIMB*groupErrorCMCM*groupErrorLCLC*groupErrorLIMB*CMLIMB*CM*groupError

1 10.21258 0.003442 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.003442 1.000000 1.000000 28.000001 3.64761 0.066443 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.066443 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

281 2.01879 0.166405 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.166405 1.000000 1.000000 28.000001 0.63021 0.433956 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.433956 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

281 4.43471 0.044309 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.044309 1.000000 1.000000 28.000001 0.36138 0.552578 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.552578 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

281 5.28943 0.029120 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.029120 1.000000 1.000000 28.000001 0.30856 0.582978 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.582978 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

28


15



1 2

LIMB

0.07

0.08

0.09

0.10

0.11

0.12

0.13

0.14

DV_

1



1 2

LC

0.06

0.07

0.08

0.09

0.10

0.11

0.12

0.13

0.14

DV_

1



CM 1 CM 2

1 2

LIMB

0.07

0.08

0.09

0.10

0.11

0.12

0.13

0.14

0.15

0.16

DV_


16



LC 1 LC 2

1 2

LIMB

0.07

0.08

0.09

0.10

0.11

0.12

0.13

0.14

0.15

0.16

DV_

1



CM 1 CM 2

1 2

LC

0.06

0.07

0.08

0.09

0.10

0.11

0.12

0.13

0.14

0.15

0.16

DV_

1



CM 1 CM 2

LIMB: 1

LC: 1 20.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

0.16

0.18

0.20

DV_

1

LIMB: 2

LC: 1 2


17

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (FrequencySD_No TMSApproximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Within MS = .00105, df = 28.000

Cell No.LIMB CM {1}

.09180{2}

.09060{3}

.09870{4}

.116771234

1 1 0.997061 0.653858 0.0013931 2 0.997061 0.529985 0.0008712 1 0.653858 0.529985 0.0242342 2 0.001393 0.000871 0.024234


Cell No.LIMB LC {1}

.08976{2}

.09265{3}

.12165{4}

.093821234

1 1 0.936755 0.000166 0.8458601 2 0.936755 0.000175 0.9953742 1 0.000166 0.000175 0.0001872 2 0.845860 0.995374 0.000187


Cell No.CM LC {1}

.09290{2}

.09760{3}

.11850{4}

.088871234

1 1 0.929372 0.013398 0.9537701 2 0.929372 0.054419 0.6772282 1 0.013398 0.054419 0.0037052 2 0.953770 0.677228 0.003705

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3)Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Within MS = .00120, df = 28.000


.08843{2}

.09517{3}

.09108{4}

.09013{5}

.09736{6}

.10003{7}

.14593{8}

.0876112345678

1 1 1 0.994215 0.999988 0.999999 0.970708 0.891917 0.000157 1.0000001 1 2 0.994215 0.999769 0.999090 0.999997 0.999287 0.000235 0.9884931 2 1 0.999988 0.999769 1.000000 0.996246 0.970357 0.000170 0.9999231 2 2 0.999999 0.999090 1.000000 0.991132 0.949504 0.000164 0.9999912 1 1 0.970708 0.999997 0.996246 0.991132 0.999987 0.000326 0.9532492 1 2 0.891917 0.999287 0.970357 0.949504 0.999987 0.000566 0.8538662 2 1 0.000157 0.000235 0.000170 0.000164 0.000326 0.000566 0.0001542 2 2 1.000000 0.988493 0.999923 0.999991 0.953249 0.853866 0.000154

group; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in PaCurrent effect: F(1, 28)=.61714, p=.43871Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 0.102889 0.006160 0.090272 0.115507 152 0.096046 0.006160 0.083428 0.108664 15


18

LIMB; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in PaCurrent effect: F(1, 28)=10.213, p=.00344Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LIMB DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 0.091203 0.002981 0.085097 0.097308 302 0.107733 0.006514 0.094389 0.121077 30

LIMB*group; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=3.6476, p=.06644Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 0.089685 0.004215 0.081051 0.098320 151 2 0.116094 0.009213 0.097222 0.134965 152 1 0.092721 0.004215 0.084086 0.101355 152 2 0.099371 0.009213 0.080500 0.118243 15

CM; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in PartCurrent effect: F(1, 28)=2.0188, p=.16640Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.CM DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 0.095251 0.003415 0.088256 0.102246 302 0.103685 0.006626 0.090112 0.117257 30

CM*group; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=.63021, p=.43396Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 0.096316 0.004829 0.086424 0.106208 151 2 0.109463 0.009370 0.090269 0.128656 152 1 0.094185 0.004829 0.084293 0.104077 152 2 0.097907 0.009370 0.078713 0.117101 15

LC; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3Current effect: F(1, 28)=4.4347, p=.04431Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 0.105701 0.005910 0.093594 0.117807 302 0.093235 0.004531 0.083952 0.102517 30

LC*group; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=.36138, p=.55258Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 0.110902 0.008358 0.093781 0.128023 151 2 0.094877 0.006408 0.081750 0.108004 152 1 0.100500 0.008358 0.083379 0.117621 152 2 0.091592 0.006408 0.078465 0.104719 15


19

LIMB*CM; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=5.2894, p=.02912Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 0.091803 0.003102 0.085448 0.098157 301 2 0.090603 0.004067 0.082272 0.098934 302 1 0.098699 0.004543 0.089393 0.108005 302 2 0.116766 0.010422 0.095418 0.138114 30

LIMB*CM*group; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=.30856, p=.58298Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 0.089092 0.004387 0.080106 0.098079 151 1 2 0.090278 0.005752 0.078496 0.102061 151 2 1 0.103540 0.006425 0.090380 0.116701 151 2 2 0.128647 0.014739 0.098456 0.158838 152 1 1 0.094513 0.004387 0.085526 0.103500 152 1 2 0.090928 0.005752 0.079146 0.102710 152 2 1 0.093857 0.006425 0.080696 0.107018 152 2 2 0.104886 0.014739 0.074695 0.135076 15

LIMB*LC; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3Current effect: F(1, 28)=19.089, p=.00016Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 0.089756 0.004022 0.081517 0.097995 301 2 0.092650 0.003753 0.084961 0.100338 302 1 0.121645 0.009329 0.102536 0.140755 302 2 0.093820 0.005722 0.082098 0.105541 30

LIMB*LC*group; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3Current effect: F(1, 28)=2.3136, p=.13946Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 0.087344 0.005688 0.075693 0.098996 151 1 2 0.092026 0.005308 0.081154 0.102899 151 2 1 0.134460 0.013193 0.107434 0.161485 151 2 2 0.097728 0.008093 0.081150 0.114305 152 1 1 0.092168 0.005688 0.080516 0.103820 152 1 2 0.093273 0.005308 0.082400 0.104146 152 2 1 0.108831 0.013193 0.081806 0.135857 152 2 2 0.089911 0.008093 0.073334 0.106489 15

CM*LC; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Current effect: F(1, 28)=9.7870, p=.00408Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.CM LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 0.092899 0.003753 0.085211 0.100586 301 2 0.097603 0.004341 0.088711 0.106495 302 1 0.118503 0.010265 0.097475 0.139531 302 2 0.088866 0.006163 0.076242 0.101491 30


20

CM*LC*group; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=1.5247, p=.22717Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 0.092355 0.005307 0.081484 0.103226 151 1 2 0.100278 0.006139 0.087703 0.112853 151 2 1 0.129449 0.014517 0.099711 0.159187 151 2 2 0.089476 0.008716 0.071622 0.107330 152 1 1 0.093442 0.005307 0.082571 0.104314 152 1 2 0.094928 0.006139 0.082353 0.107503 152 2 1 0.107557 0.014517 0.077820 0.137295 152 2 2 0.088256 0.008716 0.070403 0.106110 15

LIMB*CM*LC; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=8.8939, p=.00587Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 0.088432 0.003305 0.081662 0.095202 301 1 2 0.095173 0.004279 0.086409 0.103937 301 2 1 0.091080 0.006608 0.077545 0.104616 301 2 2 0.090126 0.005487 0.078887 0.101365 302 1 1 0.097365 0.005008 0.087106 0.107624 302 1 2 0.100033 0.005650 0.088460 0.111606 302 2 1 0.145926 0.017051 0.111000 0.180852 302 2 2 0.087606 0.007422 0.072402 0.102810 30

LIMB*CM*LC*group; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=.70242, p=.40907Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

123456789101112

1 1 1 1 0.083311 0.004674 0.073737 0.092885 151 1 1 2 0.094874 0.006051 0.082479 0.107268 151 1 2 1 0.091378 0.009345 0.072236 0.110520 151 1 2 2 0.089179 0.007759 0.073285 0.105073 151 2 1 1 0.101399 0.007083 0.086890 0.115908 151 2 1 2 0.105682 0.007990 0.089316 0.122049 151 2 2 1 0.167520 0.024113 0.118127 0.216914 151 2 2 2 0.089773 0.010497 0.068272 0.111275 152 1 1 1 0.093553 0.004674 0.083979 0.103127 152 1 1 2 0.095473 0.006051 0.083078 0.107867 152 1 2 1 0.090783 0.009345 0.071641 0.109925 152 1 2 2 0.091073 0.007759 0.075179 0.106967 15

3.2.2 Variability of Movement Frequency- Tonic hand activation2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x LC x DIRECTION] ANOVA Caption Group: 1= older group, 2= younger groupLimb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateralDirection: 1= DF, 2= PF


21

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectSS Degr. of

FreedomMS F p

InterceptgroupErrorDIRECTIODIRECTIO*groupErrorLCLC*groupErrorDIRECTIO*LCDIRECTIO*LC*groupError

1.320912 1 1.320912 844.8767 0.0000000.000733 1 0.000733 0.4687 0.4992310.043776 28 0.0015630.007501 1 0.007501 5.5468 0.0257550.000183 1 0.000183 0.1352 0.7158530.037864 28 0.0013520.000052 1 0.000052 0.0362 0.8504540.000188 1 0.000188 0.1302 0.7209020.040436 28 0.0014440.000322 1 0.000322 0.3088 0.5828430.000444 1 0.000444 0.4258 0.5193840.029225 28 0.001044

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectDegr. of

FreedomF p H-F

EpsilonH-F

Adj. df1H-F

Adj. df2H-F

Adj. pLowr.Bnd


Lowr.BndAdj. df2

L

DIRECTIODIRECTIO*groupErrorLCLC*groupErrorDIRECTIO*LCDIRECTIO*LC*groupError

1 5.546761 0.025755 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.025755 1.000000 1.000000 28.000001 0.135212 0.715853 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.715853 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

281 0.036211 0.850454 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.850454 1.000000 1.000000 28.000001 0.130230 0.720902 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.720902 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

281 0.308780 0.582843 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.582843 1.000000 1.000000 28.000001 0.425789 0.519384 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.519384 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

28

DIRECTIO; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 28)=5.5468, p=.02575


1 2

DIRECTIO

0.08

0.09

0.10

0.11

0.12

0.13

0.14

DV_


22

group; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in PaCurrent effect: F(1, 28)=.46866, p=.49923Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 0.102446 0.005105 0.091990 0.112902 152 0.107388 0.005105 0.096932 0.117845 15

DIRECTIO; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in PaCurrent effect: F(1, 28)=5.5468, p=.02575Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.DIRECTIO DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 0.112823 0.005643 0.101265 0.124382 302 0.097011 0.004093 0.088626 0.105396 30

DIRECTIO*group; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in PaCurrent effect: F(1, 28)=.13521, p=.71585Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group DIRECTIO DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 0.111587 0.007980 0.095240 0.127933 151 2 0.093306 0.005789 0.081448 0.105164 152 1 0.114060 0.007980 0.097714 0.130406 152 2 0.100716 0.005789 0.088858 0.112574 15

LC; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3Current effect: F(1, 28)=.03621, p=.85045Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 0.104257 0.004723 0.094583 0.113931 302 0.105577 0.005275 0.094772 0.116382 30

LC*group; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=.13023, p=.72090Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 0.103038 0.006679 0.089357 0.116719 151 2 0.101854 0.007460 0.086574 0.117135 152 1 0.105476 0.006679 0.091795 0.119157 152 2 0.109300 0.007460 0.094020 0.124581 15

DIRECTIO*LC; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=.30878, p=.58284Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.DIRECTIO LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 0.113802 0.007608 0.098218 0.129385 301 2 0.111844 0.008207 0.095033 0.128656 302 1 0.094712 0.004706 0.085073 0.104351 302 2 0.099310 0.005722 0.087589 0.111031 30


23

DIRECTIO*LC*group; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3Current effect: F(1, 28)=.42579, p=.51938Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group DIRECTIO LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 0.115742 0.010759 0.093703 0.137780 151 1 2 0.107431 0.011607 0.083656 0.131207 151 2 1 0.090334 0.006655 0.076702 0.103966 151 2 2 0.096277 0.008092 0.079701 0.112854 152 1 1 0.111862 0.010759 0.089824 0.133901 152 1 2 0.116257 0.011607 0.092482 0.140033 152 2 1 0.099090 0.006655 0.085458 0.112722 152 2 2 0.102343 0.008092 0.085766 0.118919 15

3.3.1 Movement Amplitude- Phasic hand activation2 x 2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x LIMB x LC x CM] ANOVA Caption Group: 1= older group, 2= younger groupLimb: 1= upper limb, 2 = lower limbLimb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateralCM: 1= isodirectional, 2= non-isodirectional

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (Amplitude_No TMS in Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectSS Degr. of

FreedomMS F p


1317678 1 1317678 1189.085 0.0000005777 1 5777 5.213 0.030204

31028 28 1108128525 1 128525 225.039 0.000000

5602 1 5602 9.809 0.00404215991 28 5717504 1 7504 40.748 0.000001265 1 265 1.442 0.239927

5156 28 184922 1 922 20.491 0.00010139 1 39 0.872 0.358491

1260 28 453127 1 3127 34.792 0.000002177 1 177 1.969 0.171498

2516 28 90258 1 258 9.503 0.004573

2 1 2 0.064 0.802300760 28 27

7 1 7 0.159 0.69312949 1 49 1.052 0.313903

1310 28 47258 1 258 8.363 0.007327

2 1 2 0.077 0.783252865 28 31


24

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectDegr. of

FreedomF p H-F

EpsilonH-F

Adj. df1H-F

Adj. df2H-F

Adj. pLowr.Bnd


Lowr.BndAdj. df2

L


1 225.0389 0.000000 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.000000 1.000000 1.000000 28.000001 9.8094 0.004042 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.004042 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

281 40.7484 0.000001 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.000001 1.000000 1.000000 28.000001 1.4417 0.239927 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.239927 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

281 20.4911 0.000101 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.000101 1.000000 1.000000 28.000001 0.8716 0.358491 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.358491 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

281 34.7916 0.000002 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.000002 1.000000 1.000000 28.000001 1.9695 0.171498 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.171498 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

28



1 2

group

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

DV_

1



1 2

LIMB

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

DV_


25

LIMB*group; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 28)=9.8094, p=.00404


group 1 group 2

1 2

LIMB

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

DV_

1



1 2

CM

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

DV_

1



1 2

LC

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

DV_


26



CM 1 CM 2

1 2

LIMB

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

DV_

1



LC 1 LC 2

1 2

LIMB

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

DV_

1



CM 1 CM 2

LIMB: 1

LC: 1 230

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

DV_

1

LIMB: 2

LC: 1 2


27

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (Amplitude_No TMS in PApproximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Between; Within; Pooled MS = 209.91, df = 50.80

Cell No.group LIMB {1}

106.98{2}

51.030{3}

87.500{4}

50.8811234

1 1 0.000164 0.016816 0.0001641 2 0.000164 0.000164 0.9999952 1 0.016816 0.000164 0.0001642 2 0.000164 0.999995 0.000164

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (Amplitude_No TMS in PApproximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Within MS = 89.873, df = 28.000

Cell No.LIMB CM {1}

88.037{2}

106.44{3}

48.973{4}

52.9371234

1 1 0.000164 0.000164 0.0001641 2 0.000164 0.000164 0.0001642 1 0.000164 0.000164 0.1246542 2 0.000164 0.000164 0.124654

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (Amplitude_No TMS in PApproximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Within MS = 27.130, df = 28.000

Cell No.LIMB LC {1}

100.23{2}

94.241{3}

51.879{4}

50.0311234

1 1 0.000167 0.000164 0.0001641 2 0.000167 0.000164 0.0001642 1 0.000164 0.000164 0.2336822 2 0.000164 0.000164 0.233682

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3)Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Within MS = 30.904, df = 28.000


89.820{2}

86.254{3}

110.65{4}

102.23{5}

50.759{6}

47.188{7}

53.000{8}

52.87512345678

1 1 1 0.242768 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.0001421 1 2 0.242768 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.0001421 2 1 0.000142 0.000142 0.000198 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.0001421 2 2 0.000142 0.000142 0.000198 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.0001422 1 1 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.241309 0.768296 0.8141822 1 2 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.241309 0.007772 0.0096402 2 1 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.768296 0.007772 1.0000002 2 2 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.814182 0.009640 1.000000

group; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3Current effect: F(1, 28)=5.2135, p=.03020Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 79.00305 3.038838 72.77827 85.22783 152 69.19041 3.038838 62.96563 75.41519 15


28

LIMB; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=225.04, p=.00000Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LIMB DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 97.23804 3.513967 90.04000 104.4361 302 50.95542 1.282938 48.32744 53.5834 30

LIMB*group; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=9.8094, p=.00404Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 106.9758 4.969500 96.79628 117.1554 151 2 51.0303 1.814348 47.31373 54.7468 152 1 87.5002 4.969500 77.32067 97.6798 152 2 50.8806 1.814348 47.16407 54.5971 15

CM; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=40.748, p=.00000Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.CM DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 68.50520 2.438521 63.51011 73.50028 302 79.68826 2.196065 75.18983 84.18670 30

CM*group; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=1.4417, p=.23993Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 72.35977 3.448590 65.29565 79.42389 151 2 85.64633 3.105705 79.28458 92.00807 152 1 64.65062 3.448590 57.58650 71.71474 152 2 73.73020 3.105705 67.36845 80.09195 15

LC; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=20.491, p=.00010Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 76.05718 2.129812 71.69446 80.41990 302 72.13628 2.252457 67.52233 76.75023 30

LC*group; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=.87161, p=.35849Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 80.55917 3.012010 74.38935 86.72899 151 2 77.44693 3.185455 70.92182 83.97204 152 1 71.55519 3.012010 65.38537 77.72501 152 2 66.82563 3.185455 60.30052 73.35074 15


29

LIMB*CM; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=34.792, p=.00000Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 88.0370 4.125917 79.58546 96.4886 301 2 106.4391 3.401082 99.47226 113.4059 302 1 48.9734 1.295695 46.31927 51.6275 302 2 52.9375 1.511752 49.84079 56.0342 30

LIMB*CM*group; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=1.9695, p=.17150Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 95.8643 5.834927 83.9120 107.8166 151 1 2 118.0874 4.809856 108.2348 127.9399 151 2 1 48.8552 1.832389 45.1018 52.6087 151 2 2 53.2053 2.137940 48.8259 57.5846 152 1 1 80.2097 5.834927 68.2574 92.1620 152 1 2 94.7907 4.809856 84.9382 104.6433 152 2 1 49.0915 1.832389 45.3380 52.8450 152 2 2 52.6697 2.137940 48.2903 57.0490 15

LIMB*LC; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in PaCurrent effect: F(1, 28)=9.5031, p=.00457Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 100.2350 3.556614 92.94956 107.5203 301 2 94.2411 3.595765 86.87553 101.6067 302 1 51.8794 1.279261 49.25896 54.4999 302 2 50.0314 1.405229 47.15296 52.9099 30

LIMB*LC*group; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=.06389, p=.80230Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 109.4834 5.029811 99.18034 119.7865 151 1 2 104.4682 5.085180 94.05172 114.8848 151 2 1 51.6349 1.809148 47.92902 55.3408 151 2 2 50.4256 1.987294 46.35483 54.4964 152 1 1 90.9865 5.029811 80.68336 101.2896 152 1 2 84.0140 5.085180 73.59748 94.4305 152 2 1 52.1239 1.809148 48.41805 55.8298 152 2 2 49.6373 1.987294 45.56648 53.7081 15

CM*LC; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in PartCurrent effect: F(1, 28)=.15897, p=.69313Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.CM LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 70.28961 2.496635 65.17549 75.40374 301 2 66.72078 2.496003 61.60795 71.83361 302 1 81.82475 2.144594 77.43175 86.21775 302 2 77.55178 2.450639 72.53187 82.57169 30


30

CM*LC*group; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=1.0517, p=.31390Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 74.19263 3.530776 66.96016 81.42509 151 1 2 70.52692 3.529881 63.29628 77.75755 151 2 1 86.92571 3.032914 80.71307 93.13836 151 2 2 84.36694 3.465727 77.26772 91.46616 152 1 1 66.38660 3.530776 59.15413 73.61906 152 1 2 62.91464 3.529881 55.68401 70.14528 152 2 1 76.72378 3.032914 70.51114 82.93642 152 2 2 70.73662 3.465727 63.63740 77.83584 15

LIMB*CM*LC; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=8.3630, p=.00733Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 89.8202 4.231221 81.1529 98.4874 301 1 2 86.2539 4.152371 77.7481 94.7596 301 2 1 110.6497 3.498713 103.4829 117.8165 301 2 2 102.2284 3.660786 94.7296 109.7272 302 1 1 50.7591 1.315877 48.0636 53.4545 302 1 2 47.1877 1.498140 44.1189 50.2565 302 2 1 52.9998 1.578705 49.7659 56.2336 302 2 2 52.8752 1.687570 49.4183 56.3320 30

LIMB*CM*LC*group; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=.07714, p=.78325Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

123456789101112

1 1 1 1 97.5112 5.983850 85.2539 109.7686 151 1 1 2 94.2173 5.872340 82.1884 106.2463 151 1 2 1 121.4556 4.947928 111.3203 131.5910 151 1 2 2 114.7191 5.177133 104.1143 125.3240 151 2 1 1 50.8740 1.860931 47.0621 54.6859 151 2 1 2 46.8365 2.118689 42.4965 51.1764 151 2 2 1 52.3958 2.232627 47.8225 56.9691 151 2 2 2 54.0147 2.386585 49.1261 58.9034 152 1 1 1 82.1291 5.983850 69.8717 94.3865 152 1 1 2 78.2904 5.872340 66.2614 90.3193 152 1 2 1 99.8438 4.947928 89.7084 109.9792 152 1 2 2 89.7376 5.177133 79.1328 100.3425 15

3.3.2 Variability of Movement Amplitude- Tonic hand activation2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x LC x DIRECTION] ANOVA Caption Group: 1= older group, 2= younger groupLimb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateralDirection: 1= DF, 2= PF


31

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectSS Degr. of

FreedomMS F p


278476.6 1 278476.6 934.0819 0.00000022.9 1 22.9 0.0770 0.783479

8347.6 28 298.138.7 1 38.7 0.6085 0.44190715.1 1 15.1 0.2369 0.630210

1782.4 28 63.7195.1 1 195.1 3.7135 0.06417683.5 1 83.5 1.5889 0.217891

1471.1 28 52.534.3 1 34.3 0.6995 0.4100296.4 1 6.4 0.1305 0.720581

1372.4 28 49.0

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectDegr. of

FreedomF p H-F

EpsilonH-F

Adj. df1H-F

Adj. df2H-F

Adj. pLowr.Bnd


Lowr.BndAdj. df2

L

DIRECTIODIRECTIO*groupErrorLCLC*groupErrorDIRECTIO*LCDIRECTIO*LC*groupError

1 0.608476 0.441907 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.441907 1.000000 1.000000 28.000001 0.236946 0.630210 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.630210 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

281 3.713530 0.064176 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.064176 1.000000 1.000000 28.000001 1.588874 0.217891 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.217891 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

281 0.699512 0.410029 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.410029 1.000000 1.000000 28.000001 0.130544 0.720581 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.720581 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

28

group; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3Current effect: F(1, 28)=.07697, p=.78348Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 48.61031 2.229083 44.04424 53.17638 152 47.73570 2.229083 43.16963 52.30177 15

DIRECTIO; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=.60848, p=.44191Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 47.60487 1.400124 44.73684 50.47289 302 48.74115 2.017282 44.60893 52.87337 30


32

DIRECTIO*group; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=.23695, p=.63021Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 47.68764 1.980075 43.63164 51.74363 151 2 49.53299 2.852868 43.68915 55.37682 152 1 47.52210 1.980075 43.46610 51.57810 152 2 47.94931 2.852868 42.10548 53.79315 15

LC; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=3.7135, p=.06418Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 49.44809 1.965080 45.42281 53.47338 302 46.89792 1.408157 44.01344 49.78240 30

LC*group; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=1.5889, p=.21789Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 49.05135 2.779042 43.35874 54.74396 151 2 48.16927 1.991435 44.09000 52.24854 152 1 49.84484 2.779042 44.15223 55.53745 152 2 45.62657 1.991435 41.54730 49.70584 15

DIRECTIO*LC; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=.69951, p=.41003Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 48.34544 1.435997 45.40393 51.28694 301 2 46.86430 1.490157 43.81185 49.91674 302 1 50.55075 2.925833 44.55745 56.54405 302 2 46.93155 1.612890 43.62769 50.23540 30

DIRECTIO*LC*group; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=.13054, p=.72058Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 47.36325 2.030807 43.20333 51.52317 151 1 2 48.01202 2.107400 43.69521 52.32884 151 2 1 50.73945 4.137753 42.26365 59.21526 151 2 2 48.32652 2.280971 43.65417 52.99888 152 1 1 49.32762 2.030807 45.16770 53.48754 152 1 2 45.71657 2.107400 41.39976 50.03338 152 2 1 50.36205 4.137753 41.88625 58.83786 152 2 2 45.53657 2.280971 40.86421 50.20893 15

3.4.1 Variability of Movement Amplitude- Phasic hand activation2 x 2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x LIMB x LC x CM] ANOVA Caption Group: 1= older group, 2= younger groupLimb: 1= upper limb, 2 = lower limb


33

Limb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateralCM: 1= isodirectional, 2= non-isodirectional

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (AmplitudeSD_No TMS in PartSigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectSS Degr. of

FreedomMS F p


10397.23 1 10397.23 134.8731 0.000000377.77 1 377.77 4.9004 0.035167

2158.49 28 77.091547.90 1 1547.90 54.9505 0.000000123.65 1 123.65 4.3897 0.045323788.73 28 28.17300.06 1 300.06 6.2537 0.01851948.07 1 48.07 1.0019 0.325421

1343.47 28 47.98281.45 1 281.45 5.5825 0.02532353.83 1 53.83 1.0677 0.310300

1411.68 28 50.4241.05 1 41.05 1.9817 0.17021581.84 1 81.84 3.9506 0.056714

580.05 28 20.7238.64 1 38.64 2.2081 0.14845929.27 1 29.27 1.6729 0.206437

489.91 28 17.5088.94 1 88.94 2.6131 0.1171950.00 1 0.00 0.0000 0.999252

953.02 28 34.047.95 1 7.95 0.6869 0.414243

19.72 1 19.72 1.7033 0.202483324.10 28 11.57

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (AmplitudeSD_No TMS in Part3)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectDegr. of

FreedomF p H-F

EpsilonH-F

Adj. df1H-F

Adj. df2H-F

Adj. pLowr.Bnd


Lowr.BndAdj. df2

L


1 54.95053 0.000000 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.000000 1.000000 1.000000 28.000001 4.38974 0.045323 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.045323 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

281 6.25374 0.018519 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.018519 1.000000 1.000000 28.000001 1.00191 0.325421 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.325421 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

281 5.58245 0.025323 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.025323 1.000000 1.000000 28.000001 1.06774 0.310300 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.310300 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

281 1.98173 0.170215 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.170215 1.000000 1.000000 28.000001 3.95062 0.056714 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.056714 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

28


34



1 2

group

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

DV_

1



1 2

LIMB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

DV_

1

LIMB*group; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 28)=4.3897, p=.04532


group 1 group 2

1 2

LIMB

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

DV_


35



1 2

CM

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

DV_

1



1 2

LC

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

DV_

1

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (AmplitudeSD_No TMS Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Between; Within; Pooled MS = 13.157, df = 46.05

Cell No.group LIMB {1}

7.1491{2}

3.5055{3}

11.094{4}

4.57911234

1 1 0.004286 0.088755 0.2258501 2 0.004286 0.000173 0.9076662 1 0.088755 0.000173 0.0001652 2 0.225850 0.907666 0.000165

group; Unweighted Means (AmplitudeSD_No TMS in PaCurrent effect: F(1, 28)=4.9004, p=.03517Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 5.327324 0.801504 3.685518 6.969130 152 7.836534 0.801504 6.194728 9.478340 15


36

LIMB; Unweighted Means (AmplitudeSD_No TMS in PaCurrent effect: F(1, 28)=54.951, p=.00000Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LIMB DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 9.121532 0.882809 7.313179 10.92988 302 4.042326 0.312725 3.401737 4.68291 30

LIMB*group; Unweighted Means (AmplitudeSD_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=4.3897, p=.04532Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 7.14913 1.248481 4.591736 9.70653 151 2 3.50551 0.442261 2.599584 4.41144 152 1 11.09393 1.248481 8.536532 13.65133 152 2 4.57914 0.442261 3.673208 5.48507 15

CM; Unweighted Means (AmplitudeSD_No TMS in Part3Current effect: F(1, 28)=6.2537, p=.01852Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.CM DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 5.463783 0.383198 4.678837 6.248729 302 7.700075 0.946260 5.761749 9.638401 30

CM*group; Unweighted Means (AmplitudeSD_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=1.0019, p=.32542Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 4.656730 0.541924 3.546649 5.76681 151 2 5.997918 1.338214 3.256711 8.73913 152 1 6.270835 0.541924 5.160754 7.38092 152 2 9.402232 1.338214 6.661025 12.14344 15

LC; Unweighted Means (AmplitudeSD_No TMS in Part3Current effect: F(1, 28)=5.5825, p=.02532Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 7.664848 0.952631 5.713472 9.616224 302 5.499010 0.393758 4.692432 6.305587 30

LC*group; Unweighted Means (AmplitudeSD_No TMS in ParCurrent effect: F(1, 28)=1.0677, p=.31030Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 5.936638 1.347224 3.176976 8.69630 151 2 4.718010 0.556858 3.577337 5.85868 152 1 9.393057 1.347224 6.633395 12.15272 152 2 6.280010 0.556858 5.139337 7.42068 15


37

LIMB*CM; Unweighted Means (AmplitudeSD_No TMS in Part3Current effect: F(1, 28)=1.9817, p=.17021Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 7.58980 0.521700 6.521141 8.65845 301 2 10.65327 1.517772 7.544253 13.76228 302 1 3.33777 0.296664 2.730082 3.94546 302 2 4.74688 0.485220 3.752955 5.74081 30

LIMB*CM*group; Unweighted Means (AmplitudeSD_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=3.9506, p=.05671Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 6.64891 0.737795 5.137601 8.16021 151 1 2 7.64936 2.146453 3.252551 12.04617 151 2 1 2.66455 0.419546 1.805152 3.52395 151 2 2 4.34647 0.686204 2.940850 5.75210 152 1 1 8.53068 0.737795 7.019379 10.04199 152 1 2 13.65717 2.146453 9.260364 18.05399 152 2 1 4.01099 0.419546 3.151586 4.87039 152 2 2 5.14729 0.686204 3.741663 6.55291 15

LIMB*LC; Unweighted Means (AmplitudeSD_No TMS in PaCurrent effect: F(1, 28)=2.2081, p=.14846Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 10.60567 1.480555 7.572896 13.63845 301 2 7.63739 0.592563 6.423579 8.85120 302 1 4.72402 0.528865 3.640690 5.80735 302 2 3.36063 0.251650 2.845148 3.87611 30

LIMB*LC*group; Unweighted Means (AmplitudeSD_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=1.6729, p=.20644Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 7.81044 2.093820 3.521444 12.09944 151 1 2 6.48783 0.838011 4.771239 8.20441 151 2 1 4.06284 0.747928 2.530774 5.59490 151 2 2 2.94819 0.355887 2.219191 3.67719 152 1 1 13.40091 2.093820 9.111911 17.68990 152 1 2 8.78695 0.838011 7.070364 10.50354 152 2 1 5.38521 0.747928 3.853146 6.91727 152 2 2 3.77307 0.355887 3.044066 4.50207 15

CM*LC; Unweighted Means (AmplitudeSD_No TMS in PCurrent effect: F(1, 28)=2.6131, p=.11720Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.CM LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 5.937942 0.551231 4.808797 7.06709 301 2 4.989623 0.391563 4.187543 5.79170 302 1 9.391754 1.651213 6.009398 12.77411 302 2 6.008396 0.555316 4.870884 7.14591 30


38

CM*LC*group; Unweighted Means (AmplitudeSD_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=.00000, p=.99925Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 4.65693 0.779558 3.060076 6.25378 151 1 2 4.65653 0.553754 3.522218 5.79085 151 2 1 7.21635 2.335168 2.432974 11.99972 151 2 2 4.77949 0.785335 3.170802 6.38817 152 1 1 7.21896 0.779558 5.622103 8.81581 152 1 2 5.32272 0.553754 4.188402 6.45703 152 2 1 11.56716 2.335168 6.783785 16.35053 152 2 2 7.23730 0.785335 5.628619 8.84599 15

LIMB*CM*LC; Unweighted Means (AmplitudeSD_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=.68686, p=.41424Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 8.28317 0.740245 6.766849 9.79949 301 1 2 6.89642 0.548897 5.772055 8.02078 301 2 1 12.92818 2.598265 7.605872 18.25048 301 2 2 8.37836 0.882602 6.570431 10.18629 302 1 1 3.59271 0.452207 2.666409 4.51902 302 1 2 3.08283 0.276232 2.516992 3.64866 302 2 1 5.85533 0.894303 4.023434 7.68723 302 2 2 3.63843 0.350545 2.920373 4.35649 30

LIMB*CM*LC*group; Unweighted Means (AmplitudeSD_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=1.7033, p=.20248Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678910111213141516

1 1 1 1 6.80570 1.046864 4.661300 8.95011 151 1 1 2 6.49211 0.776257 4.902019 8.08220 151 1 2 1 8.81518 3.674501 1.288303 16.34205 151 1 2 2 6.48354 1.248188 3.926748 9.04034 151 2 1 1 2.50815 0.639517 1.198162 3.81814 151 2 1 2 2.82095 0.390651 2.020741 3.62117 151 2 2 1 5.61752 1.264735 3.026825 8.20821 151 2 2 2 3.07543 0.495746 2.059942 4.09092 152 1 1 1 9.76064 1.046864 7.616235 11.90504 152 1 1 2 7.30073 0.776257 5.710639 8.89082 152 1 2 1 17.04118 3.674501 9.514300 24.56805 152 1 2 2 10.27317 1.248188 7.716378 12.82997 152 2 1 1 4.67727 0.639517 3.367282 5.98726 152 2 1 2 3.34470 0.390651 2.544489 4.14491 152 2 2 1 6.09314 1.264735 3.502450 8.68384 152 2 2 2 4.20143 0.495746 3.185945 5.21692 15

3.4.2 Variability of Movement Amplitude- Tonic hand activation2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x LC x DIRECTION] ANOVA Caption Group: 1= older group, 2= younger groupLimb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateral


39

Direction: 1= DF, 2= PF

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (AmplitudeSD_No TMS in Part3)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectSS Degr. of

FreedomMS F p


1922.998 1 1922.998 69.51181 0.000000146.380 1 146.380 5.29129 0.029094774.601 28 27.66420.887 1 20.887 1.83122 0.18680836.268 1 36.268 3.17969 0.085404

319.368 28 11.40620.718 1 20.718 2.68080 0.11275611.694 1 11.694 1.51312 0.228899

216.391 28 7.7280.495 1 0.495 0.11733 0.7345070.651 1 0.651 0.15449 0.697262

118.039 28 4.216

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (AmplitudeSD_No TMS in Part3)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. ofFreedom

F p H-FEpsilon

H-FAdj. df1

H-FAdj. df2

H-FAdj. p

Lowr.BndEpsilon

Lowr.BndAdj. df1

Lowr.BndAdj. df2

DIRECTIODIRECTIO*groupErrorLCLC*groupErrorDIRECTIO*LCDIRECTIO*LC*group

1 1.831223 0.186808 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.186808 1.000000 1.000000 28.000001 3.179693 0.085404 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.085404 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

281 2.680799 0.112756 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.112756 1.000000 1.000000 28.000001 1.513118 0.228899 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.228899 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

281 0.117330 0.734507 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.734507 1.000000 1.000000 28.000001 0.154485 0.697262 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.697262 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000



1 2

group

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

5.5

6.0

6.5

7.0

DV_


40

group; Unweighted Means (AmplitudeSD_No TMS in PaCurrent effect: F(1, 28)=5.2913, p=.02909Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 2.898660 0.679023 1.507745 4.289576 152 5.107582 0.679023 3.716667 6.498498 15

DIRECTIO; Unweighted Means (AmplitudeSD_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=1.8312, p=.18681Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 3.585919 0.300727 2.969908 4.201931 302 4.420324 0.748823 2.886430 5.954217 30

DIRECTIO*group; Unweighted Means (AmplitudeSD_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=3.1797, p=.08540Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 3.031212 0.425292 2.160041 3.902384 151 2 2.766108 1.058995 0.596855 4.935362 152 1 4.140626 0.425292 3.269455 5.011798 152 2 6.074539 1.058995 3.905285 8.243792 15

LC; Unweighted Means (AmplitudeSD_No TMS in Part3Current effect: F(1, 28)=2.6808, p=.11276Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 4.418632 0.657903 3.070979 5.766285 302 3.587611 0.396283 2.775862 4.399360 30

LC*group; Unweighted Means (AmplitudeSD_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=1.5131, p=.22890Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 3.002004 0.930415 1.096135 4.907873 151 2 2.795316 0.560429 1.647330 3.943303 152 1 5.835260 0.930415 3.929391 7.741129 152 2 4.379905 0.560429 3.231919 5.527892 15

DIRECTIO*LC; Unweighted Means (AmplitudeSD_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=.11733, p=.73451Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 3.937228 0.382182 3.154363 4.720093 301 2 3.234611 0.334613 2.549186 3.920035 302 1 4.900036 1.067420 2.713524 7.086548 302 2 3.940611 0.550508 2.812946 5.068276 30


41

DIRECTIO*LC*group; Unweighted Means (AmplitudeSD_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=.15449, p=.69726Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 3.144024 0.540487 2.036886 4.25116 151 1 2 2.918401 0.473215 1.949064 3.88774 151 2 1 2.859985 1.509560 -0.232209 5.95218 151 2 2 2.672232 0.778536 1.077472 4.26699 152 1 1 4.730432 0.540487 3.623295 5.83757 152 1 2 3.550820 0.473215 2.581483 4.52016 152 2 1 6.940087 1.509560 3.847893 10.03228 152 2 2 5.208990 0.778536 3.614230 6.80375 15

3.5 Absolute Error (AE) of Relative Phase2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x LC x CM] ANOVA Caption Group: 1= older group, 2= younger groupLimb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateralCM: 1= isodirectional, 2= non-isodirectional

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (AE of RP_No TMS in Part3)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectSS Degr. of

FreedomMS F p


37305.97 1 37305.97 102.2409 0.000000532.20 1 532.20 1.4586 0.237263

10216.72 28 364.88174.83 1 174.83 2.3197 0.13896414.59 1 14.59 0.1936 0.663304

2110.32 28 75.3751.01 1 51.01 0.9927 0.32761866.89 1 66.89 1.3017 0.263569

1438.88 28 51.3923.55 1 23.55 0.5841 0.4511050.28 1 0.28 0.0069 0.934439

1128.79 28 40.31

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (AE of RP_No TMS in Part3)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. ofFreedom

F p H-FEpsilon

H-FAdj. df1

H-FAdj. df2

H-FAdj. p

Lowr.BndEpsilon

Lowr.BndAdj. df1

Lowr.BndAdj. df2

Lowr.BAdj.

CMCM*groupErrorLCLC*groupErrorCM*LCCM*LC*group

1 2.319658 0.138964 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.138964 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.1381 0.193614 0.663304 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.663304 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.663

281 0.992694 0.327618 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.327618 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.3271 1.301692 0.263569 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.263569 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.263

281 0.584095 0.451105 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.451105 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.4511 0.006890 0.934439 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.934439 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.934


42

group; Unweighted Means (AE of RP_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=1.4586, p=.23726Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 19.73782 2.466046 14.68636 24.78929 152 15.52593 2.466046 10.47446 20.57740 15

CM; Unweighted Means (AE of RP_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=2.3197, p=.13896Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.CM DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 18.83890 1.771930 15.20927 22.46854 302 16.42485 2.048850 12.22797 20.62173 30

CM*group; Unweighted Means (AE of RP_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=.19361, p=.66330Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 21.29356 2.505888 16.16048 26.42664 151 2 18.18208 2.897512 12.24680 24.11736 152 1 16.38424 2.505888 11.25116 21.51732 152 2 14.66762 2.897512 8.73234 20.60291 15

LC; Unweighted Means (AE of RP_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=.99269, p=.32762Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 18.28388 1.824587 14.54638 22.02138 302 16.97987 1.899669 13.08858 20.87117 30

LC*group; Unweighted Means (AE of RP_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=1.3017, p=.26357Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 19.64321 2.580356 14.35759 24.92883 151 2 19.83243 2.686537 14.32931 25.33556 152 1 16.92455 2.580356 11.63893 22.21017 152 2 14.12731 2.686537 8.62419 19.63043 15

CM*LC; Unweighted Means (AE of RP_No TMS in Part3Current effect: F(1, 28)=.58409, p=.45110Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.CM LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 19.93388 2.009815 15.81696 24.05080 301 2 17.74392 1.938738 13.77260 21.71525 302 1 16.63388 2.378137 11.76249 21.50527 302 2 16.21582 2.068384 11.97893 20.45271 30


43

CM*LC*group; Unweighted Means (AE of RP_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=.00689, p=.93444Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 21.69004 2.842307 15.86783 27.51224 151 1 2 20.89709 2.741789 15.28079 26.51339 151 2 1 17.59638 3.363193 10.70720 24.48557 151 2 2 18.76778 2.925136 12.77591 24.75965 152 1 1 18.17772 2.842307 12.35552 23.99992 152 1 2 14.59075 2.741789 8.97445 20.20705 152 2 1 15.67138 3.363193 8.78219 22.56057 152 2 2 13.66387 2.925136 7.67200 19.65574 15

3.6 Standard Deviation (SD) of Relative Phase2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x LC x CM] ANOVA Caption Group: 1= older group, 2= younger groupLimb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateralCM: 1= isodirectional, 2= non-isodirectional

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (SD of RP_No TMS in Part3)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectSS Degr. of

FreedomMS F p


85891.95 1 85891.95 570.9494 0.0000001639.83 1 1639.83 10.9004 0.0026304212.24 28 150.441729.70 1 1729.70 20.9702 0.000088642.53 1 642.53 7.7898 0.009355

2309.54 28 82.48511.62 1 511.62 13.4078 0.001033111.07 1 111.07 2.9109 0.099055

1068.44 28 38.16831.34 1 831.34 20.3255 0.00010685.58 1 85.58 2.0924 0.159139

1145.23 28 40.90

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (SD of RP_No TMS in Part3)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. ofFreedom

F p H-FEpsilon

H-FAdj. df1

H-FAdj. df2

H-FAdj. p

Lowr.BndEpsilon

Lowr.BndAdj. df1

Lowr.BndAdj. df2

Lowr.BAdj.

CMCM*groupErrorLCLC*groupErrorCM*LCCM*LC*group

1 20.97023 0.000088 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.000088 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.0001 7.78980 0.009355 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.009355 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.009

281 13.40777 0.001033 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.001033 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.0011 2.91085 0.099055 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.099055 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.099

281 20.32546 0.000106 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.000106 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.0001 2.09237 0.159139 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.159139 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.159


44



1 2

group

18

20

22

24

26

28

30

32

34

36

DV_

1



1 2

CM

18

20

22

24

26

28

30

32

34

36

38

DV_

1

CM*group; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 28)=7.7898, p=.00936


group 1 group 2

1 2

CM

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

DV_


45



1 2

LC

18

20

22

24

26

28

30

32

34

DV_

1

LC*group; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 28)=2.9109, p=.09906


group 1 group 2

1 2

LC

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

DV_

1



CM 1 CM 2

1 2

LC

18

20

22

24

26

28

30

32

34

36

38

40

42

DV_


46

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (SD of RP_No TMS in PApproximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Between; Within; Pooled MS = 58.230, df = 51.60

Cell No.group CM {1}

24.340{2}

36.561{3}

21.575{4}

24.5401234

1 1 0.000236 0.818634 0.9998821 2 0.000236 0.000171 0.0039162 1 0.818634 0.000171 0.5924232 2 0.999882 0.003916 0.592423

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (SD of RP_No TMS in PApproximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Between; Within; Pooled MS = 47.149, df = 41.34

Cell No.group LC {1}

33.477{2}

27.424{3}

24.160{4}

21.9541234

1 1 0.003920 0.031115 0.0003731 2 0.003920 0.567202 0.3292722 1 0.031115 0.567202 0.5202542 2 0.000373 0.329272 0.520254

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (SD of RP_No TMS in PApproximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Within MS = 40.901, df = 28.000

Cell No.CM LC {1}

22.390{2}

23.524{3}

35.247{4}

25.8541234

1 1 0.901247 0.000164 0.1787391 2 0.901247 0.000165 0.5036322 1 0.000164 0.000165 0.0001812 2 0.178739 0.503632 0.000181

group; Unweighted Means (SD of RP_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=10.900, p=.00263Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 30.45046 1.583441 27.20693 33.69399 152 23.05715 1.583441 19.81362 26.30069 15

CM; Unweighted Means (SD of RP_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=20.970, p=.00009Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.CM DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 22.95720 0.753299 21.41414 24.50027 302 30.55041 1.820592 26.82110 34.27972 30

CM*group; Unweighted Means (SD of RP_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=7.7898, p=.00936Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 24.33989 1.065325 22.15767 26.52211 151 2 36.56103 2.574705 31.28698 41.83507 152 1 21.57452 1.065325 19.39230 23.75674 152 2 24.53979 2.574705 19.26575 29.81384 15


47

LC; Unweighted Means (SD of RP_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=13.408, p=.00103Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 28.81864 1.197875 26.36490 31.27237 302 24.68898 1.307041 22.01163 27.36633 30

LC*group; Unweighted Means (SD of RP_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=2.9109, p=.09906Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 33.47738 1.694051 30.00727 36.94748 151 2 27.42354 1.848435 23.63720 31.20989 152 1 24.15989 1.694051 20.68979 27.63000 152 2 21.95442 1.848435 18.16807 25.74076 15

CM*LC; Unweighted Means (SD of RP_No TMS in Part3Current effect: F(1, 28)=20.325, p=.00011Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.CM LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 22.38996 0.738001 20.87823 23.90169 301 2 23.52445 1.011447 21.45259 25.59630 302 1 35.24731 2.135498 30.87294 39.62168 302 2 25.85351 2.066719 21.62003 30.08699 30

CM*LC*group; Unweighted Means (SD of RP_No TMS in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=2.0924, p=.15914Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 23.89025 1.043691 21.75234 26.02815 151 1 2 24.78954 1.430402 21.85949 27.71959 151 2 1 43.06451 3.020051 36.87822 49.25080 151 2 2 30.05755 2.922782 24.07050 36.04459 152 1 1 20.88968 1.043691 18.75177 23.02758 152 1 2 22.25936 1.430402 19.32931 25.18940 152 2 1 27.43011 3.020051 21.24381 33.61640 152 2 2 21.64948 2.922782 15.66243 27.63652 15

3.7 Pre Stimulus EMG2 x 2 x 5 [GROUP x HA x CONDITION] ANOVA Caption Group: 1= older group, 2= younger groupHand Activation (HA): 1= phasic, 2= tonicCondition: 1= hand only, 2= contralateral isodirectional/DF, 3= ipsilateral isodirectional/DF, 4= contralateral non-isodirectional/ PF, 5= ipsilateral non-isodirectional/PF


48

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (PreStmulus EMG in Part3)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectSS Degr. of

FreedomMS F p

InterceptgroupErrorHAHA*groupErrorCONDITIOCONDITIO*groupErrorHA*CONDITIOHA*CONDITIO*groupError

2.300765 1 2.300765 171.7464 0.0000000.001545 1 0.001545 0.1153 0.7367130.375096 28 0.0133960.624970 1 0.624970 118.5442 0.0000000.000141 1 0.000141 0.0267 0.8713730.147617 28 0.0052720.059201 4 0.014800 11.0812 0.0000000.004039 4 0.001010 0.7559 0.5561370.149589 112 0.0013360.047850 4 0.011963 9.4118 0.0000010.005353 4 0.001338 1.0529 0.3833820.142354 112 0.001271

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (PreStmulus EMG in Part3)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. ofFreedom

F p -i-df

-df

-dp

H-FEpsilon

H-FAdj. df1

H-FAdj. df2

H-FAdj. p

Lowr.BndEpsilon

Lowr.BndAdj. df1

Lowr.BndAdj. df2

HAHA*groupErrorCONDITIOCONDITIO*groupErrorHA*CONDITIOHA*CONDITIO*group

1 118.5442 0.000000 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.000000 1.000000 1.000000 28.000001 0.0267 0.871373 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.871373 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

284 11.0812 0.000000 0.684045 2.736182 76.61309 0.000008 0.250000 1.000000 28.000004 0.7559 0.556137 0.684045 2.736182 76.61309 0.511139 0.250000 1.000000 28.00000

1124 9.4118 0.000001 0.803186 3.212743 89.95681 0.000011 0.250000 1.000000 28.000004 1.0529 0.383382 0.803186 3.212743 89.95681 0.376185 0.250000 1.000000 28.00000

HA; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 28)=118.54, p=.00000


1 2

HA

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

0.16

0.18

0.20

DV_


49

CONDITIO; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(4, 112)=11.081, p=.00000


1 2 3 4 5

CONDITIO

0.04

0.05

0.06

0.07

0.08

0.09

0.10

0.11

0.12

0.13

0.14

0.15

DV_

1

HA*CONDITIO; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(4, 112)=9.4118, p=.00000


HA 1 HA 2

1 2 3 4 5

CONDITIO

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

0.16

0.18

0.20

0.22

0.24

DV_

1

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (PreStmulus EMG in PaApproximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Within MS = .00134, df = 112.00

Cell No.CONDITIO {1}

.09040{2}

.07171{3}

.07241{4}

.1087312345

1 0.046443 0.060886 0.053646 02 0.046443 0.999975 0.000116 03 0.060886 0.999975 0.000117 04 0.053646 0.000116 0.000117 05 0.969624 0.007422 0.010291 0.221408


50

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (PreStmulus EMG in Part3)Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Within MS = .00127, df = 112.00

Cell No.HA CONDITIO {1}

.14368{2}

.10367{3}

.10361{4}

.17279{5}

.14233{6}

.03713{7}

.03975{8}

.04121{9}

.04467{10}

.0469112345678910

1 1 0.001341 0.001313 0.060078 1.000000 0.000156 0.000156 0.000156 0.000156 0.0001561 2 0.001341 1.000000 0.000156 0.002216 0.000156 0.000156 0.000156 0.000156 0.0001561 3 0.001313 1.000000 0.000156 0.002169 0.000156 0.000156 0.000156 0.000156 0.0001561 4 0.060078 0.000156 0.000156 0.039944 0.000156 0.000156 0.000156 0.000156 0.0001561 5 1.000000 0.002216 0.002169 0.039944 0.000156 0.000156 0.000156 0.000156 0.0001562 1 0.000156 0.000156 0.000156 0.000156 0.000156 1.000000 0.999989 0.998187 0.9873382 2 0.000156 0.000156 0.000156 0.000156 0.000156 1.000000 1.000000 0.999947 0.9988222 3 0.000156 0.000156 0.000156 0.000156 0.000156 0.999989 1.000000 0.999997 0.9998212 4 0.000156 0.000156 0.000156 0.000156 0.000156 0.998187 0.999947 0.999997 1.0000002 5 0.000156 0.000156 0.000156 0.000156 0.000156 0.987338 0.998822 0.999821 1.000000

group; Unweighted Means (PreStmulus EMG in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=.11531, p=.73671Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 0.089843 0.009450 0.070485 0.109201 152 0.085305 0.009450 0.065947 0.104663 15

HA; Unweighted Means (PreStmulus EMG in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=118.54, p=.00000Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.HA DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 0.133217 0.010468 0.111773 0.154660 302 0.041932 0.003856 0.034033 0.049830 30

HA*group; Unweighted Means (PreStmulus EMG in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=.02670, p=.87137Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group HA DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 0.134801 0.014805 0.104475 0.165127 151 2 0.044886 0.005453 0.033716 0.056056 152 1 0.131632 0.014805 0.101307 0.161958 152 2 0.038977 0.005453 0.027808 0.050147 15

CONDITIO; Unweighted Means (PreStmulus EMG in Part3)Current effect: F(4, 112)=11.081, p=.00000Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.CONDITIO DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345

1 0.090403 0.007363 0.075322 0.105485 302 0.071709 0.006123 0.059167 0.084252 303 0.072412 0.006573 0.058947 0.085876 304 0.108727 0.010876 0.086447 0.131006 305 0.094620 0.007688 0.078871 0.110369 30


51

CONDITIO*group; Unweighted Means (PreStmulus EMG in Part3)Current effect: F(4, 112)=.75593, p=.55614Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group CONDITIO DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678910

1 1 0.093139 0.010412 0.071811 0.114468 151 2 0.073883 0.008659 0.056146 0.091621 151 3 0.076985 0.009296 0.057943 0.096026 151 4 0.104264 0.015382 0.072756 0.135772 151 5 0.100945 0.010873 0.078673 0.123217 152 1 0.087667 0.010412 0.066339 0.108996 152 2 0.069535 0.008659 0.051797 0.087273 152 3 0.067839 0.009296 0.048797 0.086880 152 4 0.113190 0.015382 0.081682 0.144697 152 5 0.088294 0.010873 0.066022 0.110567 15

HA*CONDITIO; Unweighted Means (PreStmulus EMG in Part3)Current effect: F(4, 112)=9.4118, p=.00000Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.HA CONDITIO DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678910

1 1 0.143678 0.012723 0.117615 0.169741 301 2 0.103670 0.009467 0.084279 0.123062 301 3 0.103613 0.009923 0.083287 0.123939 301 4 0.172788 0.019058 0.133749 0.211826 301 5 0.142334 0.012766 0.116183 0.168485 302 1 0.037129 0.003333 0.030301 0.043956 302 2 0.039748 0.003790 0.031984 0.047512 302 3 0.041210 0.004475 0.032044 0.050377 302 4 0.044666 0.004634 0.035173 0.054159 302 5 0.046905 0.005167 0.036320 0.057490 30


52

HA*CONDITIO*group; Unweighted Means (PreStmulus EMG in Part3)Current effect: F(4, 112)=1.0529, p=.38338Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group HA CONDITIO DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234567891011121314151617181920

1 1 1 0.148688 0.017994 0.111829 0.185546 151 1 2 0.106534 0.013388 0.079111 0.133958 151 1 3 0.108509 0.014033 0.079764 0.137255 151 1 4 0.159343 0.026952 0.104135 0.214552 151 1 5 0.150929 0.018054 0.113946 0.187911 151 2 1 0.037591 0.004714 0.027936 0.047247 151 2 2 0.041232 0.005360 0.030252 0.052213 151 2 3 0.045460 0.006328 0.032497 0.058423 151 2 4 0.049184 0.006554 0.035759 0.062609 151 2 5 0.050962 0.007308 0.035992 0.065931 152 1 1 0.138668 0.017994 0.101809 0.175526 152 1 2 0.100806 0.013388 0.073382 0.128230 152 1 3 0.098717 0.014033 0.069971 0.127462 152 1 4 0.186232 0.026952 0.131023 0.241440 152 1 5 0.133740 0.018054 0.096757 0.170723 152 2 1 0.036666 0.004714 0.027011 0.046322 152 2 2 0.038264 0.005360 0.027283 0.049244 152 2 3 0.036961 0.006328 0.023998 0.049924 152 2 4 0.040148 0.006554 0.026722 0.053573 152 2 5 0.042849 0.007308 0.027880 0.057818 15

3.9 Resting Motor Threshold (rMT)Independent t-testCaption Group: 1= older group, 2= younger group

T-tests; Grouping: group (MEP amplitude in Part3)Group 1: 2Group 2: 1

VariableMean

2Mean

1t-value df p Valid N

2Valid N

1Std.Dev.

2Std.Dev.

1F-ratio

Variancesp

VariancesrMT 39.73333 41.33333 -1.12833 28 0.268756 15 15 4.096456 3.657998 1.254093 0.677664

3.10.1 Relative hand position at the time of TMS delivery2 x 5 [GROUP x CONDITION] ANOVA Caption Group: 1= older group, 2= younger groupCondition: 1= hand only, 2= contralateral isodirectional, 3= ipsilateral isodirectional, 4= contralateral non-isodirectional, 5= ipsilateral non-isodirectional


53

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (hndPos_Max_TMS_Min in Part3_new)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectSS Degr. of

FreedomMS F p

InterceptgroupErrorCONDITIOCONDITIO*groupError

16272.54 1 16272.54 31.29047 0.0000051570.08 1 1570.08 3.01912 0.093278

14561.33 28 520.056458.08 4 1614.52 12.07160 0.000000303.22 4 75.80 0.56678 0.687258

14979.47 112 133.75

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (hndPos_Max_TMS_Min in Part3_new)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. ofFreedom

F p H-FEpsilon

H-FAdj. df1

H-FAdj. df2

H-FAdj. p

Lowr.BndEpsilon

Lowr.BndAdj. df1

CONDITIOCONDITIO*group

4 12.07160 0.000000 0.669307 2.677228 74.96239 0.000004 0.250000 1.0000004 0.56678 0.687258 0.669307 2.677228 74.96239 0.619242 0.250000 1.000000



1 2

group

-22

-20

-18

-16

-14

-12

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

DV_

1



TMS_HandonlyTMS_ISO_CNT

TMS_ISO_IPSTMS_N-ISO_CNT

TMS_N-ISO_IPS

CONDITIO

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

DV_


54

CONDITIO*group; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(4, 112)=.56678, p=.68726


group 1 group 2

TMS_HandonlyTMS_ISO_CNT

TMS_ISO_IPSTMS_N-ISO_CNT

TMS_N-ISO_IPS

CONDITIO

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

DV_

1

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (hndPos_Max_TMS_Min in Part3_new)Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Within MS = 133.75, df = 112.00


-8.039{2}

-18.19{3}

-17.90{4}

-6.236{5}

-1.71412345

TMS_Handonly 0.008267 0.011153 0.974283 0.219782TMS_ISO_CNT 0.008267 0.999982 0.001147 0.000116TMS_ISO_IPS 0.011153 0.999982 0.001610 0.000117

TMS_N-ISO_CNT 0.974283 0.001147 0.001610 0.555517TMS_N-ISO_IPS 0.219782 0.000116 0.000117 0.555517

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (hndPos_Max_TMS_Min in Part3_new)Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Between; Within; Pooled MS = 211.01, df = 91.130

Cegroup CONDITIO {1}

-7.378{2}

-14.57{3}

-13.14{4}

-2.036{5}

1.2254{6}

-8.700{7}

-21.81{8}

-22.66{9}

-10.44{10}

-4.65412345678910

1_Handonly 0.791 0.935 0.959 0.575 1.000 0.181 0.126 1.000 1.0001_ISO_CNT 0.791 1.000 0.100 0.011 0.983 0.996 0.879 0.999 0.6891 _ISO_IPS 0.935 1.000 0.217 0.030 0.998 0.828 0.975 1.000 0.8451 -ISO_CNT 0.959 0.100 0.217 0.999 0.961 0.012 0.007 0.989 1.0001 -ISO_IPS 0.575 0.011 0.030 0.999 0.688 0.002 0.001 0.466 0.9992_Handonly 1.000 0.983 0.998 0.961 0.688 0.070 0.040 1.000 0.9942_ISO_CNT 0.181 0.996 0.828 0.012 0.002 0.070 1.000 0.189 0.0042 _ISO_IPS 0.126 0.879 0.975 0.007 0.001 0.040 1.000 0.120 0.0022 -ISO_CNT 1.000 0.999 1.000 0.989 0.466 1.000 0.189 0.120 0.9342 -ISO_IPS 1.000 0.689 0.845 1.000 0.999 0.994 0.004 0.002 0.934

group; Unweighted Means (hndPos_Max_TMS_Min in PCurrent effect: F(1, 28)=3.0191, p=.09328Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 -7.1802 2.633243 -12.5742 -1.78628 152 -13.6509 2.633243 -19.0448 -8.25690 15


55

CONDITIO; Unweighted Means (hndPos_Max_TMS_Min in Part3_new)Current effect: F(4, 112)=12.072, p=.00000Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345

TMS_Handonly -8.0390 0.705960 -9.4851 -6.5929 30TMS_ISO_CNT -18.1890 3.251395 -24.8492 -11.5288 30TMS_ISO_IPS -17.8997 3.660357 -25.3976 -10.4018 30

TMS_N-ISO_CNT -6.2359 2.314867 -10.9777 -1.4941 30TMS_N-ISO_IPS -1.7142 2.311029 -6.4481 3.0197 30

CONDITIO*group; Unweighted Means (hndPos_Max_TMS_Min in Part3_new)Current effect: F(4, 112)=.56678, p=.68726Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678910

1 TMS_Handonly -7.3777 0.998379 -9.4227 -5.3326 151 TMS_ISO_CNT -14.5708 4.598167 -23.9897 -5.1518 151 TMS_ISO_IPS -13.1418 5.176526 -23.7455 -2.5382 151 TMS_N-ISO_CNT -2.0363 3.273716 -8.7422 4.6696 151 TMS_N-ISO_IPS 1.2254 3.268289 -5.4694 7.9201 152 TMS_Handonly -8.7004 0.998379 -10.7455 -6.6553 152 TMS_ISO_CNT -21.8072 4.598167 -31.2261 -12.3883 152 TMS_ISO_IPS -22.6575 5.176526 -33.2611 -12.0539 152 TMS_N-ISO_CNT -10.4355 3.273716 -17.1414 -3.7296 152 TMS_N-ISO_IPS -4.6538 3.268289 -11.3485 2.0410 15

3.10.2 SD of hand position at the time of TMS delivery2 x 5 [GROUP x CONDITION] ANOVA Caption Group: 1= older group, 2= younger groupCondition: 1= hand only, 2= contralateral isodirectional, 3= ipsilateral isodirectional, 4= contralateral non-isodirectional, 5= ipsilateral non-isodirectional

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (hndSD in Part3_new)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectSS Degr. of

FreedomMS F p


6994.490 1 6994.490 491.9669 0.00000051.265 1 51.265 3.6058 0.067927

398.087 28 14.2171800.178 4 450.044 21.9790 0.000000

60.100 4 15.025 0.7338 0.5707862293.320 112 20.476

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (hndSD in Part3_new)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. ofFreedom

F p H-FEpsilon

H-FAdj. df1

H-FAdj. df2

H-FAdj. p

Lowr.BndEpsilon

Lowr.BndAdj. df1

Lowr.Adj.


4 21.97904 0.000000 0.630774 2.523097 70.64672 0.000000 0.250000 1.000000 28.04 0.73379 0.570786 0.630774 2.523097 70.64672 0.513296 0.250000 1.000000 28.0


56



1 2

group

5.0

5.5

6.0

6.5

7.0

7.5

8.0

8.5

9.0

DV_

1



Handonly ISO_CNT ISO_IPS N-ISO_CNT N-ISO_IPS

CONDITIO

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

DV_

1

CONDITIO*group; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(4, 112)=.73379, p=.57079


group 1 group 2

Handonly ISO_CNT ISO_IPS N-ISO_CNT N-ISO_IPS

CONDITIO

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

DV_


57

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (hndSD in Part3_new)Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Within MS = 20.476, df = 112.00


1.0546{2}

5.7137{3}

6.7875{4}

9.4539{5}

11.13312345

Handonly 0.001240 0.000140 0.000114 0.000114ISO_CNT 0.001240 0.889087 0.015128 0.000197ISO_IPS 0.000140 0.889087 0.158490 0.002954

N-ISO_CNT 0.000114 0.015128 0.158490 0.605009N-ISO_IPS 0.000114 0.000197 0.002954 0.605009

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (hndSD in Part3_new)Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Between; Within; Pooled MS = 19.224, df = 137.67

Cellgroup CONDITIO {1}

.91417{2}

6.1580{3}

6.8361{4}

10.432{5}

12.726{6}

1.1951{7}

5.2695{8}

6.7389{9}

8.4756{10}

9.541012345678910

1 Handonly 0.058 0.017 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.165 0.010 0.000 0.0001 ISO_CNT 0.058 1.000 0.236 0.005 0.060 1.000 1.000 0.912 0.5181 ISO_IPS 0.017 1.000 0.479 0.019 0.016 0.993 1.000 0.991 0.8021 N-ISO_CNT 0.000 0.236 0.479 0.929 0.000 0.042 0.384 0.910 1.0001 N-ISO_IPS 0.000 0.005 0.019 0.929 0.000 0.000 0.007 0.193 0.4122 Handonly 1.000 0.060 0.016 0.000 0.000 0.299 0.035 0.001 0.0002 ISO_CNT 0.165 1.000 0.993 0.042 0.000 0.299 0.997 0.642 0.2372 ISO_IPS 0.010 1.000 1.000 0.384 0.007 0.035 0.997 0.988 0.7962 N-ISO_CNT 0.000 0.912 0.991 0.910 0.193 0.001 0.642 0.988 1.0002 N-ISO_IPS 0.000 0.518 0.802 1.000 0.412 0.000 0.237 0.796 1.000

group; Unweighted Means (hndSD in Part3_new)Current effect: F(1, 28)=3.6058, p=.06793Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 7.413222 0.435391 6.521364 8.305080 152 6.244001 0.435391 5.352143 7.135859 15

CONDITIO; Unweighted Means (hndSD in Part3_new)Current effect: F(4, 112)=21.979, p=.00000Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345

Handonly 1.05464 0.129259 0.789865 1.31942 30ISO_CNT 5.71374 0.700082 4.279683 7.14779 30ISO_IPS 6.78749 0.769541 5.211159 8.36382 30

N-ISO_CNT 9.45385 0.857705 7.696925 11.21078 30N-ISO_IPS 11.13334 1.170207 8.736276 13.53040 30


58

CONDITIO*group; Unweighted Means (hndSD in Part3_new)Current effect: F(4, 112)=.73379, p=.57079Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678910

1 Handonly 0.91417 0.182800 0.539716 1.28861 151 ISO_CNT 6.15802 0.990065 4.129962 8.18607 151 ISO_IPS 6.83607 1.088295 4.606802 9.06534 151 N-ISO_CNT 10.43214 1.212978 7.947470 12.91681 151 N-ISO_IPS 12.72571 1.654922 9.335755 16.11567 152 Handonly 1.19512 0.182800 0.820668 1.56957 152 ISO_CNT 5.26945 0.990065 3.241396 7.29751 152 ISO_IPS 6.73891 1.088295 4.509639 8.96818 152 N-ISO_CNT 8.47557 1.212978 5.990893 10.96024 152 N-ISO_IPS 9.54096 1.654922 6.151007 12.93092 15

3.10.3 MEP Amplitude- comparison between mean MEP amplitude of phasic and tonic hand activation)Dependent t-testCaption condition: 1= phasic 2= tonic

T-test for Dependent Samples (MEP amplitude in Part3)Marked differences are significant at p < .05000

VariableMean Std.Dv. N Diff. Std.Dv.

Diff.t df p

total phasictotal tonic

1.496186 0.4820681.262817 0.513880 30 0.233368 0.377096 3.389614 29 0.002035

3.10.4 MEP Amplitude- comparison within phasic hand activation2 x 5 [GROUP x CONDITION] ANOVA Caption Group: 1= older group, 2= younger groupCondition: 1= hand only, 2= contralateral isodirectional, 3= ipsilateral isodirectional, 4= contralateral non-isodirectional, 5= ipsilateral non-isodirectional

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (MEP Amplitude in Part3Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectSS Degr. of

FreedomMS F p


335.7858 1 335.7858 345.8873 0.0000006.5142 1 6.5142 6.7102 0.015049

27.1823 28 0.97080.2477 4 0.0619 1.1047 0.3579730.3083 4 0.0771 1.3751 0.2470996.2783 112 0.0561

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (MEP Amplitude in Part3)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. ofFreedom

F p -i-df

-df

-dp

H-FEpsilon

H-FAdj. df1

H-FAdj. df2

H-FAdj. p

Lowr.BndEpsilon

Lowr.BndAdj. df1

Lowr.BndAdj. df2

Lo


4 1.104682 0.357973#### 0.902448 3.609794 101.0742 0.356138 0.250000 1.000000 28.000004 1.375130 0.247099#### 0.902448 3.609794 101.0742 0.250771 0.250000 1.000000 28.00000


59



1 2

group

0.9

1.0

1.1

1.2

1.3

1.4

1.5

1.6

1.7

1.8

1.9

2.0

2.1

DV_

1

group; Unweighted Means (MEP Amplitude in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=6.7102, p=.01505Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 1.287792 0.113771 1.054742 1.520842 152 1.704580 0.113771 1.471530 1.937630 15

CONDITIO; Unweighted Means (MEP Amplitude in Part3)Current effect: F(4, 112)=1.1047, p=.35797Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345

Phasic_HAND 1.532161 0.081109 1.366017 1.698306 30Phasic_IN_IPS 1.553129 0.080464 1.388306 1.717953 30

Phasic_IN_CNT 1.441853 0.088703 1.260154 1.623552 30Phasic_AN_IPS 1.480299 0.094985 1.285730 1.674867 30

Phasic_AN_CNT 1.473487 0.099450 1.269772 1.677202 30

CONDITIO*group; Unweighted Means (MEP Amplitude in Part3)Current effect: F(4, 112)=1.3751, p=.24710Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678910

1 Phasic_HAND 1.324502 0.114705 1.089539 1.559466 151 Phasic_IN_IPS 1.341749 0.113794 1.108653 1.574845 151 Phasic_IN_CNT 1.283821 0.125444 1.026859 1.540782 151 Phasic_AN_IPS 1.190513 0.134330 0.915352 1.465675 151 Phasic_AN_CNT 1.298373 0.140644 1.010277 1.586470 152 Phasic_HAND 1.739820 0.114705 1.504857 1.974784 152 Phasic_IN_IPS 1.764510 0.113794 1.531414 1.997606 152 Phasic_IN_CNT 1.599885 0.125444 1.342923 1.856846 152 Phasic_AN_IPS 1.770084 0.134330 1.494922 2.045245 152 Phasic_AN_CNT 1.648601 0.140644 1.360504 1.936697 15

3.10.5 MEP Amplitude- comparison within tonic hand activation2 x 5 [GROUP x CONDITION] ANOVA Caption Group: 1= older group, 2= younger groupCondition: 1= hand only, 2= contralateral DF, 3= ipsilateral DF, 4= contralateral PF, 5= ipsilateral PF


60

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (MEP Amplitude in Part3)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectSS Degr. of

FreedomMS F p


239.2062 1 239.2062 182.2483 0.0000001.5397 1 1.5397 1.1730 0.288015

36.7508 28 1.31250.0848 4 0.0212 0.7750 0.5437290.0855 4 0.0214 0.7819 0.5392383.0632 112 0.0273

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (MEP Amplitude in Part3)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. ofFreedom

F p -i-df

-df

-dp

H-FEpsilon

H-FAdj. df1

H-FAdj. df2

H-FAdj. p

Lowr.BndEpsilon

Lowr.BndAdj. df1

Lowr.BndAdj. df2

Lo


4 0.774962 0.543729#### 0.979793 3.919173 109.7369 0.541407 0.250000 1.000000 28.000004 0.781913 0.539238#### 0.979793 3.919173 109.7369 0.536961 0.250000 1.000000 28.00000

group; Unweighted Means (MEP Amplitude in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=1.1730, p=.28801Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 1.161504 0.132289 0.890522 1.432486 152 1.364131 0.132289 1.093149 1.635113 15

CONDITIO; Unweighted Means (MEP Amplitude in Part3)Current effect: F(4, 112)=.77496, p=.54373Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345

Tonic_HAND 1.228718 0.092953 1.038311 1.419124 30Tonic_IN_IPS 1.248760 0.101039 1.041791 1.455728 30

Tonic_IN_CNT 1.284549 0.096177 1.087540 1.481559 30Tonic_AN_IPS 1.258084 0.096265 1.060894 1.455274 30

Tonic_AN_CNT 1.293977 0.100158 1.088814 1.499140 30

CONDITIO*group; Unweighted Means (MEP Amplitude in Part3)Current effect: F(4, 112)=.78191, p=.53924Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678910

1 Tonic_HAND 1.087594 0.131456 0.818319 1.356869 151 Tonic_IN_IPS 1.164231 0.142890 0.871533 1.456928 151 Tonic_IN_CNT 1.169166 0.136015 0.890553 1.447780 151 Tonic_AN_IPS 1.168290 0.136139 0.889421 1.447159 151 Tonic_AN_CNT 1.218239 0.141644 0.928095 1.508384 152 Tonic_HAND 1.369841 0.131456 1.100566 1.639116 152 Tonic_IN_IPS 1.333289 0.142890 1.040591 1.625986 152 Tonic_IN_CNT 1.399932 0.136015 1.121318 1.678546 152 Tonic_AN_IPS 1.347877 0.136139 1.069008 1.626746 152 Tonic_AN_CNT 1.369714 0.141644 1.079569 1.659859 15

3.11.1 Silent Period duration- comparison between mean MEP amplitude of phasic and tonic hand activation)


61

Dependent t-testCaption condition: 1= phasic 2= tonic

T-test for Dependent Samples (Silent period-1SD in Part3)Marked differences are significant at p < .05000

VariableMean Std.Dv. N Diff. Std.Dv.

Diff.t df p

total phasictotal tonic

138.2723 29.32976152.5371 23.48753 30 -14.2648 22.54690 -3.46528 29 0.001670

3.11.2 Silent Period duration- comparison within phasic hand activation2 x 5 [GROUP x CONDITION] ANOVA Caption Group: 1= older group, 2= younger groupCondition: 1= hand only, 2= contralateral isodirectional, 3= ipsilateral isodirectional, 4= contralateral non-isodirectional, 5= ipsilateral non-isodirectional

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (Silent period-1SD in Part3)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectSS Degr. of

FreedomMS F p


2867886 1 2867886 643.8687 0.00000018 1 18 0.0040 0.949846

124716 28 44541790 4 447 4.0108 0.0044491976 4 494 4.4290 0.002320

12493 112 112

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (Silent period-1SD in Part3)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. ofFreedom

F p H-FEpsilon

H-FAdj. df1

H-FAdj. df2

H-FAdj. p

Lowr.BndEpsilon

Lowr.BndAdj. df1

Lowr.BndAdj. df2

LowA


4 4.010822 0.004449 0.858630 3.434518 96.16652 0.007083 0.250000 1.000000 28.00000 04 4.428999 0.002320 0.858630 3.434518 96.16652 0.004004 0.250000 1.000000 28.00000 0



Phasic_HAND Phasic_IN_IPS Phasic_IN_CNT Phasic_AN_IPS Phasic_AN_CNT

CONDITIO

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

155

160

DV_


62

CONDITIO*group; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(4, 112)=4.4290, p=.00232


group 1 group 2

Phasic_HANDPhasic_IN_IPS

Phasic_IN_CNTPhasic_AN_IPS

Phasic_AN_CNT

CONDITIO

100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

DV_

1

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (Silent period-1SD in Part3)Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Within MS = 111.55, df = 112.00


136.01{2}

142.04{3}

134.83{4}

142.89{5}

135.5912345

Phasic_HAND 0.183901 0.992609 0.092831 0.999891Phasic_IN_IPS 0.183901 0.069540 0.997915 0.133674

Phasic_IN_CNT 0.992609 0.069540 0.030525 0.998685Phasic_AN_IPS 0.092831 0.997915 0.030525 0.064116

Phasic_AN_CNT 0.999891 0.133674 0.998685 0.064116

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (Silent period-1SD in Part3)Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Between; Within; Pooled MS = 980.07, df = 33.806

Cegroup CONDITIO {1}

139.47{2}

139.89{3}

138.72{4}

137.36{5}

137.64{6}

132.55{7}

144.18{8}

130.93{9}

148.42{10}

133.5512345678910

1 Phasic_HAND 1.0000 1.0000 0.9999 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9989 0.9984 0.99991 Phasic_IN_IPS 1.0000 1.0000 0.9997 0.9999 0.9997 1.0000 0.9984 0.9989 0.99991 Phasic_IN_CNT 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9999 1.0000 1.0000 0.9971 1.00001 Phasic_AN_IPS 0.9999 0.9997 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9998 0.9999 1.0000 1.00001 Phasic_AN_CNT 1.0000 0.9999 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9999 0.9998 0.9936 1.00002 Phasic_HAND 1.0000 0.9997 0.9999 1.0000 1.0000 0.0889 1.0000 0.0030 1.00002 Phasic_IN_IPS 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9998 0.9999 0.0889 0.0276 0.9838 0.16482 Phasic_IN_CNT 0.9989 0.9984 1.0000 0.9999 0.9998 1.0000 0.0276 0.0007 0.99962 Phasic_AN_IPS 0.9984 0.9989 0.9971 1.0000 0.9936 0.0030 0.9838 0.0007 0.00722 Phasic_AN_CNT 0.9999 0.9999 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.1648 0.9996 0.0072

group; Unweighted Means (Silent period-1SD in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=.00403, p=.94985Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 138.6182 7.706401 122.8323 154.4040 152 137.9265 7.706401 122.1406 153.7123 15


63

CONDITIO; Unweighted Means (Silent period-1SD in Part3)Current effect: F(4, 112)=4.0108, p=.00445Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345

Phasic_HAND 136.0110 5.520169 124.7034 147.3185 30Phasic_IN_IPS 142.0360 5.617754 130.5286 153.5435 30

Phasic_IN_CNT 134.8279 5.864788 122.8144 146.8414 30Phasic_AN_IPS 142.8920 5.419641 131.7903 153.9936 30

Phasic_AN_CNT 135.5948 6.127398 123.0434 148.1462 30

CONDITIO*group; Unweighted Means (Silent period-1SD in Part3)Current effect: F(4, 112)=4.4290, p=.00232Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678910

1 Phasic_HAND 139.4675 7.806698 123.4762 155.4588 151 Phasic_IN_IPS 139.8942 7.944703 123.6202 156.1682 151 Phasic_IN_CNT 138.7234 8.294063 121.7338 155.7131 151 Phasic_AN_IPS 137.3632 7.664530 121.6631 153.0632 151 Phasic_AN_CNT 137.6426 8.665450 119.8922 155.3929 152 Phasic_HAND 132.5544 7.806698 116.5631 148.5457 152 Phasic_IN_IPS 144.1778 7.944703 127.9038 160.4518 152 Phasic_IN_CNT 130.9324 8.294063 113.9428 147.9220 152 Phasic_AN_IPS 148.4208 7.664530 132.7207 164.1209 152 Phasic_AN_CNT 133.5470 8.665450 115.7967 151.2974 15

3.11.3 Silent Period duration- comparison within tonic hand activation2 x 5 [GROUP x CONDITION] ANOVA Caption Group: 1= older group, 2= younger groupCondition: 1= hand only, 2= contralateral DF, 3= ipsilateral DF, 4= contralateral PF, 5= ipsilateral PF

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (Silent period-1SD in Part3)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectSS Degr. of

FreedomMS F p


3490135 1 3490135 1222.377 0.00000046 1 46 0.016 0.900344

79946 28 2855464 4 116 1.699 0.15516471 4 18 0.260 0.903263

7650 112 68

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (Silent period-1SD in Part3)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectDegr. of

FreedomF p H-F

EpsilonH-F

Adj. df1H-F

Adj. df2H-F

Adj. pLowr.Bnd


Lowr.BndAdj. df2

LowAd

CONDITIOCONDITIO*groupError

4 1.699219 0.155164 0.920038 3.680154 103.0443 0.160829 0.250000 1.000000 28.00000 0.24 0.259561 0.903263 0.920038 3.680154 103.0443 0.890043 0.250000 1.000000 28.00000 0.6

112


64

group; Unweighted Means (Silent period-1SD in Part3)Current effect: F(1, 28)=.01597, p=.90034Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 151.9859 6.170038 139.3471 164.6246 152 153.0883 6.170038 140.4496 165.7271 15

CONDITIO; Unweighted Means (Silent period-1SD in Part3)Current effect: F(4, 112)=1.6992, p=.15516Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345

Tonic_HAND 150.3308 4.218222 141.6902 158.9714 30Tonic_IN_IPS 153.6750 4.895684 143.6467 163.7034 30

Tonic_IN_CNT 150.7326 4.895976 140.7036 160.7615 30Tonic_AN_IPS 152.9911 4.531076 143.7096 162.2726 30

Tonic_AN_CNT 154.9560 4.244853 146.2608 163.6511 30

CONDITIO*group; Unweighted Means (Silent period-1SD in Part3)Current effect: F(4, 112)=.25956, p=.90326Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678910

1 Tonic_HAND 150.5842 5.965466 138.3645 162.8039 151 Tonic_IN_IPS 152.2496 6.923542 138.0673 166.4318 151 Tonic_IN_CNT 150.4561 6.923955 136.2730 164.6392 151 Tonic_AN_IPS 152.9916 6.407910 139.8656 166.1176 151 Tonic_AN_CNT 153.6478 6.003128 141.3510 165.9447 152 Tonic_HAND 150.0774 5.965466 137.8577 162.2971 152 Tonic_IN_IPS 155.1005 6.923542 140.9183 169.2827 152 Tonic_IN_CNT 151.0091 6.923955 136.8260 165.1922 152 Tonic_AN_IPS 152.9907 6.407910 139.8647 166.1167 152 Tonic_AN_CNT 156.2641 6.003128 143.9672 168.5609 15


65

Documents

Appendix F EXP3 - eprints.utas.edu.au F_EXP3.pdf · Appendix F STATISTICAL RESULTS FOR EXPERIMENT 3 Hakuei Fujiyama 1. Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1