Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Appendix B - Site Specific Advice Carlisle
Site Address Site Capacity
Lead Local Flood Authority Comments
Historic Environment Comments
Landscape Comments
Mineral and Waste Advice
Other Site Specific Comments – See Appendix C for site specific Highway Advice and Appendix E for strategic Education Advice
CARL1 Land to the south east of Junction 44
217 If possible best to drain to School Sike / Brunstock Beck catchment as flooding implications on California Road and Gosling Sike catchment. Small area of sw flooding predicted on site - consider this area to be left as green space.
No designated heritage assets within site. There is the potential for unknown archaeological remains to survive and so any future application for the site would need to be accompanied by appropriate level of archaeological assessments and evaluation.
CARL 1 retains a rural character, despite its proximity to M6 Jn. 44. Screening planting to the northern boundary should be incorporated. A number of public footpaths lie adjacent to the site boundary. Good opportunities exist to develop green infrastructure linkages to the more rural area to the east, and to CARL 10 to the south.
No minerals or waste constraints.
The openness, overlooking and privacy of the outdoor play area spaces for James Rennie specialist communication and interaction college should be taken into account in the design and layout. Development should not overshadow the school. The density of the site might have to be reconsidered - favour bungalows in proximity to the school. There are currently insufficient school places to accommodate a development of this scale within walking distance of this site. There will therefore be a requirement for these developments to fund the delivery of a new primary school, including the provision of a school site.
CARL2 Land north of Califo rnia Rd, east of CARL1
200 If possible best to drain to School Sike / Brunstock Beck catchment as flooding implications on California Road and Gosling Sike catchment. Small area of sw flooding predicted on site - consider this area to be left as green space.
No designated heritage assets within site. There is the potential for unknown archaeological remains to survive and so any future application for the site would need to be accompanied by appropriate level of archaeological assessments and evaluation.
See general advice contained in response to proposed Policy 60.
No minerals or waste constraints.
The openness, overlooking and privacy of the outdoor play area spaces for James Rennie specialist communication and interaction college should be taken into account in the design and layout and screen-planting. Development should not overshadow the school. The density of the site might have to be reconsidered - favour bungalows in proximity to the school. There are currently insufficient school places to accommodate a development of this scale within walking distance of this site. There will therefore be a requirement for these developments to fund the delivery of a new primary school, including the provision of a school site.
CARL3 Site of Pennine Way School
112 Historic flooding of this site - most recent summer 2013. Will need careful approach to ensure any development is not affected by sw flooding. Careful consideration of upstream sites will be required (CARL4,
No known archaeological issues.
See general advice contained in response to proposed Policy 60.
No minerals or waste constraints.
The proposed allocation of the site of Pennine Way Primary School for housing upon its closure is welcomed by the County Council as owner of the site.
CARL5, CARL14, CARL16, CARL17). To prevent further flooding - discharge rates restricted to Qbar for upstream sites discharging to Durranhill Beck catchment.
CARL4 Land North of Moorside Drive/Valley Drive
140 Localised sw flooding issues to Moorside Drive and Huntsman's Lane - solution to resolve should be considered as part of further development. Also see CARL3 for discharge comments.
No designated heritage assets within site. There is the potential for unknown archaeological remains to survive and so any future application for the site would need to be accompanied by appropriate level of archaeological assessments and evaluation.
CARL4 lies on fields which slope up, eastwards towards the M6. The site overlooks the existing residential area to the west, and is visually prominent from some aspects. The allocation would create a new field boundary to the east. This boundary should be demarcated by hedgerow and hedgerow trees. The incorporation of belts of trees within the development, alongside an appropriate layout, would serve to screen the development in the longer term, and break up its overall massing – which is key, given the topography and visual prominence of the site.
No minerals or waste constraints.
No other advice.
CARL5 Land between Carleton Road and Cumwhinton Road
204 See CARL 3 . No designated heritage assets within site. There is the potential for unknown archaeological remains to survive and so any future application for the site would need to be accompanied by appropriate level of archaeological assessments and evaluation.
See general advice contained in response to proposed Policy 60.
No minerals or waste constraints. It should be noted that a planning consent exists at the Carlton Depot Site for Storage of Reclaimed & Scrap Building Materials & Scaffolding is (ref. 1/96/9021). This site is approx 100m south-east of the site.
No other advice.
CARL6 Land at Garden Village, west of Wigton Road
169 Greenfield runoff rates will be required. SUDs preferable for water quality.
No archaeological issue.
CARL 6 lies on the suburban-rural periphery of the city, and are clearly visible from the recently upgraded trunk road to the south west. The site features intact hedgerows and field boundaries, and benefits from extensive mature tree belt screening on its NW/SW boundary. This should therefore be incorporated into any subsequent development. Given the location of the sites, there is potential to create green infrastructure links through the sites to the wider countryside.
No minerals or waste constraints.
No other advice.
CARL7 Land at Newhouse Farm, south-west of Orton Road
509 Greenfield runoff rates will be required. SUDs preferable for water quality.
No designated heritage assets within site. There is the potential for unknown archaeological remains to survive and so any future application for the site would need to be accompanied by appropriate level of archaeological assessments and evaluation.
CARL 7 lies on the suburban-rural periphery of the city, and are clearly visible from the recently upgraded trunk road to the south west. The site features intact hedgerows and field boundaries, and benefits from extensive mature tree belt screening on its NW/SW boundary. This should therefore be incorporated into any subsequent development. Given the location of the sites, there is potential to create green infrastructure links through the sites to the wider countryside.
No minerals or waste constraints.
No other advice.
CARL8 Land north of Burgh Road
66 Ideal to discharge direct to Eden. No known flooding issues on site.
Within visual impact zone of Hadrian's Wall WHS and the visual impact of any development on the significance of the WHS will need to be considered as part of any planning application. No designated heritage assets within site. There is the potential for unknown archaeological
See general advice contained in response to proposed Policy 60.
No minerals or waste constraints.
No other advice.
remains to survive and so any future application for the site would need to be accompanied by appropriate level of archaeological assessments and evaluation.
CARL9 Site of former Morton Park Primary School, Bunrigg
54 No known flooding issues. Development likely to increase impermeable areas.
No archaeological issue.
See general advice contained in response to proposed Policy 60.
No minerals or waste constraints.
As owner of the site, the County Council supports the proposed residential allocation of the former Morton Park Primary School site.
CARL10 Land off Windsor Way
300 EA FDGiA bid for storage basin on Gosling Sike but scheme is likely to require a development contribution. There have been some pre-app discussions for CARL10 - EA have provided comment (poss. for Persimmons). Requirement to detail need for flood storage in Local Plan text.
No designated heritage assets within site. There is the potential for unknown archaeological remains to survive and so any future application for the site would need to be accompanied by appropriate level of archaeological assessments and evaluation.
See general advice contained in response to proposed Policy 60.
No minerals or waste constraints.
There are currently insufficient school places to accommodate a development of this scale within walking distance of this site. There will therefore be a requirement for these developments to fund the delivery of a new primary school, including the provision of a school site.
CARL11 Land east of Landsowne Close/Lansdowne Court
75 See comments for CARL 10.
No designated heritage assets within site. There is the potential for unknown archaeological remains to survive and so any future application for the site would need to be accompanied by appropriate level of archaeological assessments and evaluation.
See general advice contained in response to proposed Policy 60.
No minerals or waste constraints.
There are currently insufficient school places to accommodate a development of this scale within walking distance of this site. There will therefore be a requirement for these developments to fund the delivery of a new primary school, including the provision of a school site.
CARL12 Land to the rear of the Border Terrier, Asheness Drive
15 No suitable watercourses to discharge to. There are separate UU sewers in the area but also UU flooding issues identified - will need further investigation.
No known archaeological issue.
See general advice contained in response to proposed Policy 60.
No minerals or waste constraints.
No other advice.
CARL13 Former Printwords, Newtown Industrial Estate
40 No major surface water issues.
Within visual impact zone of Hadrian's Wall WHS and the visual impact of any development on the significance of the WHS will need to considered as part of any planning application. No other archaeological issue.
See general advice contained in response to proposed Policy 60.
No minerals or waste constraints.
No other advice.
CARL14 Land east of Beverley Rise
30 See CARL 3 No designated heritage assets within site. There is the potential for unknown archaeological remains to survive
See general advice contained in response to proposed Policy 60.
No minerals or waste constraints. It should be noted that there is a former inert landfill site north of railtracks.
No other advice.
and so any future application for the site would need to be accompanied by appropriate level of archaeological assessments and evaluation.
CARL15 Land off Tree Road, south of Chertsey Mount
20 No known flooding or drainage issues.
No designated heritage assets within site. There is the potential for unknown archaeological remains to survive and so any future application for the site would need to be accompanied by appropriate level of archaeological assessments and evaluation.
See general advice contained in response to proposed Policy 60.
No minerals or waste constraints.
No other advice.
CARL 16 Land north of Carleton Clinic, east of Cumwhintin Drive
150 See CARL 3 No designated heritage assets within site. There is the potential for unknown archaeological remains to survive and so any future application for the site would need to be accompanied by appropriate level of archaeological assessments and evaluation.
The visual impact of the development of CARL16 is limited to the adjacent development in the vicinity of the Carleton Clinic, and users of the M6. The site slopes down eastwards towards the motorway. The incorporation of a tree belt on the eastern boundary of the site would serve to screen both the motorway and housing development, as well
No minerals or waste constraints.
No other advice.
as reflecting wider landscape character.
CARL17 Land at Carleton Clinic
100 See CARL 3 No designated heritage assets within site. There is the potential for unknown archaeological remains to survive and so any future application for the site would need to be accompanied by appropriate level of archaeological assessments and evaluation.
See general advice contained in response to proposed Policy 60.
No minerals or waste constraints.
No other advice.
CARL18 Land to rear of Hilltop Hotel, London Road/Tree Road
40 Likely to be a difficult site to develop due to gradients which may make drainage design difficult.
No designated heritage assets within site. There is the potential for unknown archaeological remains to survive and so any future application for the site would need to be accompanied by appropriate level of archaeological assessments and evaluation.
See general advice contained in response to proposed Policy 60.
No minerals or waste constraints.
No other advice.
CARL19 Durranhill Road
65 Control of surface water runoff would be required. Surface water flooding predicted in southeast corner.
No designated heritage assets within site. There is the potential for unknown archaeological remains to survive and so any future application for the site would need to be accompanied by appropriate level of archaeological assessments and evaluation.
See general advice contained in response to proposed Policy 60.
No minerals or waste constraints. N.B. Land to south of railtrack was former inert landfill site.
No other advice.
CARL20 Laings Site, Dalston Road
60 Dow Beck (main river) runs next to site. Brownfield site - betterment on existing runoff rate required.
No archaeological issue.
See general advice contained in response to proposed Policy 60.
No minerals or waste constraints.
No other advice.
CARL21 Former Dairy Site, Holywell Crescent
66 Watercourse runs through site. UU have various systems in the area.
No archaeological issue.
See general advice contained in response to proposed Policy 60.
No minerals or waste constraints.
No other advice.
CARL22 Land Bounded by Hammonds Pond,
318 Planning permission already granted. FRA dealt with flooding issues affecting the site.
No designated heritage assets within site. There is the potential for unknown archaeological remains to survive and so any future application for the site would need to be accompanied by appropriate level of archaeological assessments and evaluation.
Planning permission was recently granted. With this there was a consideration of landscape impacts.
No minerals or waste constraints.
As the City Council will be aware the area of land neighbouring to the north-west that is now playing field, was formerly a brickworks that was used as a domestic refuse tip by the city council. This area appears to be outside the allocated site. Ref. BA356.
Brampton
BRAM1 Land south of Carlisle Road
200 The area is sandy so infiltration SUDs may be feasible
No designated heritage assets within site. There is the potential for unknown archaeological remains to survive and so any future application for the site would need to be accompanied by appropriate level of archaeological assessments and evaluation
Allocation BRAM1, to the south west of the settlement, encroaches significantly into the surrounding open countryside. The allocation suggests that a new field boundary will be created on the western edge of the site. The site is visually prominent – it is clearly visible from the local road network, and from the A689. Given the prominence of this allocation, it can be regarded as a ‘gateway’ site, and as such, all suitable measures should be taken to sensitively integrate development into wider landscape and townscape character. The site is undulating, with characteristic hedgerow boundaries, of varying condition. A green infrastructure based approach, as highlighted above, retaining and
No minerals or waste constraints. Settlement benefits from HWRC facility.
No other advice
enhancing existing established hedgerows and trees should be taken to development. New boundaries should be delineated by hedgerows, reflecting local character. There is an opportunity to link the site to the wider footpath network, at the junction with Well Lonning, to the north east of the site. The development of the site should be informed by a design appraisal of Brampton, in particular the vernacular core, which would assess characteristic features including building material, design, layout, and line. The preferred design solution should seek to respond to the undulating topography of the site, rather than taking a heavily engineered approach.
BRAM2 Land west of Kingwater Close
65 No known flooding issues
No designated heritage assets within site. There is the potential for unknown
Allocation BRAM 2 rises steeply towards the site’s centre, and although it is overall less visually
No minerals or waste constraints. No minerals or waste constraints or planning issues.
No other advice.
archaeological remains to survive and so any future application for the site would need to be accompanied by appropriate level of archaeological assessments and evaluation
prominent than BRAM 1, development on the more elevated areas would be clearly visible. Its proximity to the vernacular core of the settlement should form a key consideration in this respect. The good practice suggested in respect of BRAM 1 would also apply to the development of this site. An opportunity exists to link BRAM 2 and BRAM 1 to one another, and the wider footpath network, through linking into Well Lonning, and the path to the south of the site.
Settlement benefits from HWRC facility.
BRAM3 Land east of Gelt Rise
25 No known flooding issues
Site is within Conservation Area. No archaeological issue.
Allocation BRAM 3 is enclosed by topography, and by a mature tree belt to the south and west. These tree belts should be retained and enhanced. Opportunities should be taken to improve the existing poor quality boundary to the existing development to the north. Opportunities again exist to link the
No minerals or waste constraints. No minerals or waste constraints or planning issues. Settlement benefits from HWRC facility.
No other advice.
site with the wider footpath network.
BRAM4 Land North of Greenfield Lane
153 Open watercourse runs through site. No known flooding issues
Within visual impact zone of Hadrian's Wall WHS and the visual impact of any development on the significance of the WHS will need to considered as part of any planning application. No designated heritage assets within site. There is the potential for unknown archaeological remains to survive and so any future application for the site would need to be accompanied by appropriate level of archaeological assessments and evaluation.
BRAM 4, to the north of the settlement, is screened by existing mature hedgerows and tree belts. It lies adjacent to the Oakwood Park Hotel, the grounds of which display a strong parkland character. A number of mature trees lie within the allocation. Given these factors, the retention of existing trees and boundary planting in any subsequent development would serve to link the site with its context, screen wider views of the site, and break up the overall massing of the development. Two public rights of way link the site to the settlement to the south, and wider countryside to the north – presenting good opportunities for the development of green corridors to and through the site.
No minerals or waste constraints. Settlement benefits from HWRC facility.
There is a small existing scrap-yard site approx 300m to north of proposed site - Jeremy Paterson Scrap Metal & Auto Spares. Potential for amenity impacts.
Brugh by Sands
BURG1 Land to the west of and including, Highfield
10 There are drainage issues in Burgh so careful consideration of surface water disposal will be required
See general advice contained in response to proposed Policy 60.
No minerals or waste constraints
No other advice.
Cummersdale
CUMM1 Land east of Cummersdale Road
14 No known issues No designated heritage assets within site. There is the potential for unknown archaeological remains to survive and so any future application for the site would need to be accompanied by appropriate level of archaeological assessments and evaluation
See general advice contained in response to proposed Policy 60.
No minerals or waste constraints.
No other advice
Cumwhinton
CUMW1 Land west of How Croft
25 Recent land drainage issues - would not prevent development
No designated heritage assets within site. There is
See general advice contained in response to
No minerals or waste constraints. Cocklakes Gypsum
No other advice
but needs to be considered during development
the potential for unknown archaeological remains to survive and so any future application for the site would need to be accompanied by appropriate level of archaeological assessments and evaluation
proposed Policy 60. Mine formerly located below this area (now restored).
CUMW2 Land north of B6263 at St John's Hall
20 Historic flooding known in this area. Flood route through site will need to be maintained. Would be useful to de-culvert watercourse
no designated heritage assets within site. There is the potential for unknown archaeological remains to survive and so any future application for the site would need to be accompanied by appropriate level of archaeological assessments and evaluation
See general advice contained in response to proposed Policy 60.
No minerals or waste constraints. Cocklakes Gypsum Mine formerly located below this area (now restored).
No other advice
CUMW3 Land adjacent to Beech Cottage
15 Planning permission already granted
No archaeological issue
See general advice contained in response to proposed Policy 60.
No minerals or waste constraints. Cocklakes Gypsum Mine formerly located below this area (now restored).
No other advice.
Dalston
DALS1 Land between Station Road/Townhead Road
121 Planning permission already granted. UU WwTW is at full capacity.
Archaeological remains revealed on the site. These will need to be archaeologically recorded in advance of any development.
See general advice contained in response to proposed Policy 60.
No minerals or waste constraints. No other advice.
Harker
HARK1 Kingmoor Park Harker Estate
300 Watercourse at rear is part of Cargo Beck catchment. Some surface water flooding predicted in southwest corner. Brownfield site.
No archaeological issue
See general advice contained in response to proposed Policy 60.
No minerals or waste constraints. One small waste operation was permitted on site in 2005, but of size and type that could be accommodated elsewhere (ref. 1/05/9016 - Breaking and repair of motorcycles - High Performance Bikes Ltd). Unknown whether or not that business is still operating from that site. N.B. Similar waste/recycling uses should not be discounted if this site is to be allocated for employment use.
No other advice
Houghton
HOUG1 Land at Hadrian's Camp
96 Already has planning permission
Within visual impact zone of Hadrian's Wall WHS and the visual impact of any development on the significance of the WHS will need to considered as part of any planning application. No designated heritage assets within site. There is the potential for unknown archaeological remains to survive and so any future application for the site would need to be accompanied by appropriate level of archaeological assessments and evaluation.
See general advice contained in response to proposed Policy 60.
No minerals or waste constraints.
No other advice.
Linstock
LINS1 Linstock North
10 May be possible discharge issues
Within visual impact zone of Hadrian's
See general advice contained in
No minerals or waste constraints.
No other advice.
Wall WHS and the visual impact of any development on the significance of the WHS will need to considered as part of any planning application. No designated heritage assets within site. There is the potential for unknown archaeological remains to survive and so any future application for the site would need to be accompanied by appropriate level of archaeological assessments and evaluation.
response to proposed Policy 60.
Longtown
LONG1 Site of former Lochinvar School
106 Watercourse to north of site for possible discharge point. Part of the site will be brownfield and the remaining ex school playing field.
No designated heritage assets within site. There is the potential for unknown archaeological remains to survive and so any future application for the site would need to be accompanied by appropriate level of archaeological assessments and evaluation
See general advice contained in response to proposed Policy 60.
No minerals or waste constraints.
As owner of the site, the County Council supports the proposed residential allocation on part of the former Lochinvar School site.
Moorhouse
MOOR1 Land east of Monkhill Road
10 Surface water disposal may be difficult - investigations will be required to determine suitable sw discharge point
No designated heritage assets within site. There is the potential for unknown archaeological remains to survive and so any future application for the site would need to be accompanied by appropriate level of archaeological assessments and evaluation
See general advice contained in response to proposed Policy 60.
No minerals or waste constraints.
No other advice
Rickerby
RICK1 Land at Tower Farm
10 May be access issues during high river levels
Within Conservation Area and visual impact zone of WHS and the visual impact of any development on the significance of the Conservation Area and WHS will need to considered as part of any planning application. No designated heritage assets within site. There is the potential for unknown archaeological remains to survive and so any future application for the
See general advice contained in response to proposed Policy 60.
No minerals or waste constraints.
No other advice
site would need to be accompanied by appropriate level of archaeological assessments and evaluation.
Scotby
SCOT1 Land east of Scotby Rd
44 Might be difficult to locate discharge point for surface water. Not possible to discharge surface water to public sewer as there are known issues already
No designated heritage assets within site. There is the potential for unknown archaeological remains to survive and so any future application for the site would need to be accompanied by appropriate level of archaeological assessments and evaluation.
See general advice contained in response to proposed Policy 60.
No minerals or waste constraints.
No other advice.
SCOT2 Land at Broomfallen Rd
28 No known issues
Archaeological remains revealed on the site. These will need to be archaeologically recorded in advance of any development.
See general advice contained in response to proposed Policy 60.
No minerals or waste constraints. N.B. Tipping of sub-soil was permitted in 1990 on the western section of this site. Ref. 1/90/0230. A public right of way also runs along the site.
No other advice.
Warwick Bridge
WARW1 Warwick Bridge/Little Corby North
66 No particular flooding/drainage issues known at this site.
No archaeological issues.
See general advice contained in response to proposed Policy 60.
No minerals or waste constraints. N.B. WwTW approx 500m N-W of site.
No other advice.
Wetheral
WETH1 Wetheral South, Wetheral
50 UU WwTW at capacity. Flooding issues in Wetheral already known so surface water disposal needs careful consideration. It may be difficult to determine suitable discharge route.
No designated heritage assets within site. There is the potential for unknown archaeological remains to survive and so any future application for the site would need to be accompanied by appropriate level of archaeological assessments and evaluation.
See general advice contained in response to proposed Policy 60.
No minerals or waste constraints. Cocklakes Gypsum Mine formerly located below this area (now restored).
No other advice.
WETH2 Land west of Steele's Bank
50 See WETH1 No designated heritage assets within site. There is the potential for unknown archaeological remains to survive and so any future application for the site would need to be accompanied by appropriate level of archaeological assessments and
See general advice contained in response to proposed Policy 60.
No minerals or waste constraints. Cocklakes Gypsum Mine formerly located below this area (now restored).
No other advice.
evaluation.
Wreay
WREA1 Land to West of Wreay School
10 Some historic drainage issues in the area.
No designated heritage assets within site. There is the potential for unknown archaeological remains to survive and so any future application for the site would need to be accompanied by appropriate level of archaeological assessments and evaluation.
See general advice contained in response to proposed Policy 60.
No minerals or waste constraints.
No other advice.
![[248 mm] - 广远股份56751 Polch, Germany Made by Meyer Sound Laboratories Berkeley, Califo rnia USA Created Date 1/10/2009 9:34:50 AM](https://img.pdfslide.us/doc/110x75/610f303fee5fe745b169e946/248-mm-eoee-56751-polch-germany-made-by-meyer-sound-laboratories-berkeley.jpg)
