Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
APPENDIX B
FiguresFigure 1 Affordability 80 AMI .................................................................B-1
Figure 2 Affordability CNT AMI ............................................................B-2
Figure 3 Affordability Housing RFP ....................................................B-3
Figure 4 Citywide Data Exports .......................................................... B-4
Figure 5 Employment 2002 Jobs All ................................................. B-5
Figure 6 Employment 2013 Jobs HS .................................................. B-6
Figure 7 Employment 2013 Jobs All ...................................................B-7
Figure 8 Employment 2050 Jobs All ................................................. B-8
Figure 9 Employment 2050 Jobs Change ...................................... B-9
Figure 10 Employment Access to Opportunity - 30 minutes ...B-10
Figure 11 Employment Acess to Opportunity - 45 minutes ....... B-11
Figure 12 Employment Block Map ....................................................... B-12
Figure 13 Employment Heat Map ........................................................B-13
Figure 14 Growth 2050 Housing Projection Density ....................B-14
Figure 15 Growth Housing 2050 Projection .................................... B-15
Figure 16 Growth Scenarios ...................................................................B-16
Figure 17 Growth TOD Locations ......................................................... B-17
Figure 18 Housing Vacancy 2003 ........................................................B-18
Figure 19 Housing Vacancy 2015 .........................................................B-19
Figure 20 Income Median Household ................................................B-20
Figure 21 MIM Rent 30 .............................................................................B-21
Figure 22 MIM Rent 50 ............................................................................B-22
Figure 23 Mode Bike Density ................................................................B-23
Figure 24 Mode Bike Dot ........................................................................B-24
Figure 25 Mode Bike .................................................................................B-25
Figure 26 Mode Carpool Density .........................................................B-26
Figure 27 Mode Carpool ......................................................................... B-27
Figure 28 Mode Drove .............................................................................B-28
Figure 29 Mode Transit Density ...........................................................B-29
Figure 30 Mode Transit Dot ...................................................................B-30
Figure 31 Mode Transit .............................................................................B-31
Figure 32 Mode Walk Density ...............................................................B-32
Figure 33 Mode Walk ...............................................................................B-33
Figure 34 Mode Bike Change PRCT ...................................................B-34
Figure 35 Mode Bike Change ................................................................B-35
Figure 36 Mode Carpool Change PRCT ............................................B-36
Figure 37 Mode Carpool Change ........................................................ B-37
Figure 38 Mode Drove Change PRCT ................................................B-38
Figure 39 Mode Drove Change .............................................................B-39
Figure 40 Mode Transit Change PRCT.............................................. B-40
Figure 41 Mode Transit Change ............................................................B-41
Figure 42 Mode Walk Change...............................................................B-42
Figure 43 Mode Walk Change PRCT ..................................................B-43
Figure 44 Population Density ...............................................................B-44
Figure 45 Population Persons of Color .............................................B-45
Figure 46 Population Under 18 Density with Transit ....................B-46
Figure 47 Population Under 18 Density .............................................B-47
Figure 48 Population Over 60 Density with Transit .....................B-48
Figure 49 Population Over 60 Density ..............................................B-49
Figure 50 Poverty 100 ..............................................................................B-50
Figure 51 Poverty 200 ..............................................................................B-51
Figure 52 Poverty 200 BG .....................................................................B-52
Figure 53 Poverty 200 Density ............................................................B-53
Figure 54 Poverty Concentrated Low Income Areas ...................B-54
Figure 55 Table Metro Ridership ..........................................................B-55
Figure 56 Transit BRT with Employment ..........................................B-56
Figure 57 Transit BRT ............................................................................... B-57
Figure 58 Vehicles Change ....................................................................B-58
Figure 59 Population Change - Housing Units ...............................B-59
Figure 60 Population Change .............................................................. B-60
Figure 61 Road Bike Counts ...................................................................B-61
Figure 62 Road Pavement Ratings .....................................................B-62
Figure 63 Road Traffic Counts ..............................................................B-63
Figure 64 Transit Boardings ...................................................................B-64
Figure 65 Vehicles Carless Household Change ..............................B-65
Figure 66 Vehicles Carless BG Prct .....................................................B-66
Figure 67 Vehicle Carless Density .......................................................B-67
B-1APPENDIX B
Figure 1
February, 2016
H+T Index
Income spent on H+T for 80% AMI HH
<40%
40.1% - 50%
50.1% - 60%
60.1% - 70%
70.1% - 80%
80.1% - 90%
>90%
Source:Center for Neighborhood TechnologyH+T Index - 2015
Affordability
B-2 Madison in Motion
Figure 2
February, 2016
H+T IndexIncome spend on H+T for AMI HH
<30%
30.1% - 40%
40.1% - 50%
50.1% - 60%
60.1% - 70%
70.1% - 80%
>80%
Madison City Limits
Source:Center for Neighborhood TechnologyH+T Index - 2015
Affordability
B-3APPENDIX B
Figure 3
February, 2016
Targeted Affordable Housing Areas
New Affordable Housing Discouraged
Metro Busses/Hour
AM Peak
9 - 52
5 - 8
3 - 4
2
1
City of Madison
Population and Housing
Source:City of Madison Affordable Housing RFP
B-4 Madison in Motion
Figure 4 Citywide Data Exports
B08601: MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION TO WORK FOR WORKPLACE GEOGRAPHYUniverse: Workers 16 years and overACS 1 Year Estimates
Drove alone Carpooled Transit Bike Walked Other Work at Home2014 140,928 17,146 16,305 6,870 13,957 1,225 5,419 201,8502010 132,676 17,540 11,879 7,794 11,425 1,754 4,131 187,1992006 141,318 19,882 10,891 4,724 12,135 1,745 3,282 193,977
Drove alone Carpooled Transit Bike Walked Other Work at Home2014 69.8% 8.5% 8.1% 3.4% 6.9% 0.6% 2.7% 100%2010 70.9% 9.4% 6.3% 4.2% 6.1% 0.9% 2.2% 100%2006 72.9% 10.2% 5.6% 2.4% 6.3% 0.9% 1.7% 100%
Change 2014-2006-3.0% -1.8% 2.5% 1.0% 0.7% -0.3% 1.0%
B-5APPENDIX B
Figure 5 Employment 2002 Jobs All
February, 2016
2002 Job Density (jobs/acre)
All Jobs
0 - 2
2.1 - 5
5.1 - 10
10.1 - 25
25.1 - 75
>75
City of Madison
Access to Opportunity
Source:Census OnTheMapCensus Center for Economic Studies
B-6 Madison in Motion
Figure 6 Employment 2013 Jobs HS
February, 2016
2013 Job Density (jobs/acre)
High school education or less
0 - 2
2.1 - 5
5.1 - 10
10.1 - 15
15.1 - 20
>20
City of Madison
Access to Opportunity
Source:Census OnTheMapCensus Center for Economic Studies
B-7APPENDIX B
Figure 7 Employment 2013 Jobs All
February, 2016
2013 Job Density (jobs/acre)
All Jobs
0 - 2
2.1 - 5
5.1 - 10
10.1 - 25
25.1 - 75
>75
City of Madison
Access to Opportunity
Source:Census OnTheMapCensus Center for Economic Studies
B-8 Madison in Motion
Figure 8 Employment 2050 Jobs All
February, 2016
2050 Projected Employment
Jobs/acre
0 - 2
2.1 - 5
5.1 - 10
10.1 - 25
25.1 - 75
>75
Access to Opportunity
Source: MATPB 2050 TAZ ProjectionsCounty-wide Future Land Use Plan
B-9APPENDIX B
Figure 9 Employment 2050 Jobs Change
February, 2016
2050 Change in Employment
Projected new Jobs/acre
0 - 2
2.1 - 5
5.1 - 10
10.1 - 25
25.1 - 75
>75
City of Madison
Access to Opportunity
Source: MATPB 2050 TAZ ProjectionsCounty-wide Future Land Use Plan
B-10 Madison in Motion
Figure 10 Employment Access to Opportunity - 30 minutes
February, 2016
Jobs within 30 min via transit0% - 5%
5.1% - 10%
10.1% - 15%
15.1% - 20%
20.1% - 25%
25.1% - 30%
30.1% - 40%
40.1% - 50%
50.1% - 65%
Metro Busses/Hour
AM Peak
9 - 52
5 - 8
3 - 4
2
1
Access to Opportunity
Source: MATPB2010 Census Block Data2010 Employment (InfoUSA/MATPB).2014 Metro Transit Routes (GTFS)
B-11APPENDIX B
Figure 11 Employment Acess to Opportunity - 45 minutes
February, 2016
Jobs within 45 min via transit0% - 5%
5.1% - 10%
10.1% - 15%
15.1% - 20%
20.1% - 25%
25.1% - 30%
30.1% - 40%
40.1% - 50%
50.1% - 65%
Metro Busses/Hour
AM Peak
9 - 52
5 - 8
3 - 4
2
1
Access to Opportunity
Source: MATPB2010 Census Block Data2010 Employment (InfoUSA/MATPB).2014 Metro Transit Routes (GTFS)
B-12 Madison in Motion
Figure 12 Employment Block Map
February, 2016
Employment Density (jobs/acre)
0 - 2
2.1 - 5
5.1 - 25
25.1 - 75
75.1 - 250
>250
Madison City Limits
Access to Opportunity
Source: MATPB2010 Census Block Data2010 Employment (InfoUSA/MATPB).
B-13APPENDIX B
Figure 13 Employment Heat Map
February, 2016
Employment Density (Jobs/Ac)
75.1 or Greater
25.1 to 75.0
10.1 to 25
5.1 to 10.0
2.1 to 5.0
0 to 2.0
Madison City Limits
Access to Opportunity
Source: MATPB2010 Census Block Data2010 Employment (InfoUSA/MATPB).
B-14 Madison in Motion
Figure 14 Growth 2050 Housing Projection Density
160160
160
70
50
180
300
120
440
110
110
170
7030
120
90
30
10250
90
20
60
20
950
10
10
100
160
10
30
240
30
10
20
350
280
120
410
600
100
150
40
20
220
30
400
130
10
10
40
70 110
40100
10
120
10
300
280
10
140
80
50
200
220
10
10
280
80
500
30
150
680
70
90
230
290
280
20
280
10
210
33020
310
310
3010
700
410
670
420
350
30
20
10
10
40
40
20
10
140
210
400
10
40
150
20
10220
500
410
30
20
120
60
270
50
70
10
10
220
50
30
350
80
30
10
80
120
500
240 830
40
270
290
30
20
70
80
30
270
300
360
280
20
450180
150
170
350
50
20
420
60
240
110110
270
60
70
80
90
20
200
70
10
70
260
30
90
20
110
530
150
240
100
140
210
150
20
40
70
190 50
70
70
40
290
350
150
270
110
1100
40
220
80
100
60
130
350
30
150
190
30
20
320
460
480
130
70
30
100
110
320
90
190
70
10
190
60
210
380
10
970
150
10
270
10
280
130 20 310
30
60
930
170
10
180
190
190
20
40
400
20730
150
100
250
210
20 10
110
200
40
30
80
20
130
200
240
70
40
610
170
680
90
30
100
30
450
40
200
20
110
110
30
40
40
30
180
440
200
30
70
February, 2016
Project Household Growth
Household Change 2050 / Acres
<1.0
1.1 - 2.0
2.1 - 4.0
4.1 - 6.0
6.1 - 10.0
10.1 - 20.0
20.1 - 40.0
40.1 - 80.0
80.1 - 83.9
0 1 20.5Miles
Population and Housing
Source: MATPB 2050 TAZ ProjectionsCounty-wide Future Land Use Plan
Note: Acreages correspond to TAZ area
B-15APPENDIX B
Figure 15 Growth Housing 2050 Projection
February, 2016
Projected 2050 Households
Total Households 2050 / Acres
0.0 - 1.0
1.1 - 2.0
2.1 - 4.0
4.1 - 6.0
6.1 - 10.0
10.1 - 20.0
20.1 - 40.0
40.1 - 80.0
>80
Population and Housing
Source: MATPB 2050 TAZ ProjectionsCounty-wide Future Land Use Plan
Note: Acreages correspond to TAZ area
B-16 Madison in Motion
Figure 16 Growth Scenarios
MADISON
IN MOTION
Sustainable MadisonTransportation Master Plan
Future Development Growth ScenariosOctober 6, 2014
West Towne to WestgateScenario ‘A’
HH:
POP:
EMP:
+606
+967
+3,449
HH:
POP:
EMP:
+6,815
+10,904
+6,550
Scenario ‘B’
BeltlineScenario ‘A’
HH:
POP:
EMP:
+98
+157
+1,671
HH:
POP:
EMP:
+1,700
+2,720
+4,160
Scenario ‘B’ Park StreetScenario ‘A’
HH:
POP:
EMP:
+905
+1,448
+1,879
HH:
POP:
EMP:
+2,270
+3,633
+3,390
Scenario ‘B’
John Nolen DriveScenario ‘A’
HH:
POP:
EMP:
+283
+453
+750
HH:
POP:
EMP:
+800
+1,280
+2,500
Scenario ‘B’
Sherman AvenueScenario ‘A’
HH:
POP:
EMP:
+347
+555
+548
HH:
POP:
EMP:
+800
+1,280
+1,547
Scenario ‘B’
Downtown to E. Wash.Scenario ‘A’
HH:
POP:
EMP:
+9,458
+15,133
+6,205
HH:
POP:
EMP:
+12,765
+20,421
+6,605
Scenario ‘B’
Milwaukee StreetScenario ‘A’
HH:
POP:
EMP:
+362
+580
+200
HH:
POP:
EMP:
+1,725
+2,760
+2,770
Scenario ‘B’
Cottage Grove RoadScenario ‘A’
HH:
POP:
EMP:
+298
+477
+150
HH:
POP:
EMP:
+1,525
+2,440
+1,160
Scenario ‘B’
Dutch MillScenario ‘A’
HH:
POP:
EMP:
+41
+66
+800
HH:
POP:
EMP:
+41
+66
+2,390
Scenario ‘B’
East TowneScenario ‘A’
HH:
POP:
EMP:
+250
+400
+1,471
HH:
POP:
EMP:
+3,410
+5,456
+3,100
Scenario ‘B’
General Scenario Assumptions100,000 overall increase in population80,000 overall increase in employees
Scenario ‘A’ : 70% Peripheral Growth
Scenario ‘B’: 30% Peripheral Growth
Key:HH = Households, POP = Population, EMP = Employees
University Ave / HilldaleScenario ‘A’
HH:
POP:
EMP:
+1,125
+1,800
+3,200
HH:
POP:
EMP:
+2,000
+3,200
+3,940
Scenario ‘B’
Peripheral Areas
B-17APPENDIX B
Figure 17 Growth TOD Locations
February, 2016
Potential TOD Locations
Population and Housing
Source:City of Madison Comprehensive Plan
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Low Density (0-15 units/acre) Medium Density (16-40 units/acre) High Density (41-60 units/acre)MIXED USE DISTRICTS Neighborhood Mixed-Use Community Mixed-Use Regional Mixed-UseCOMMERCIAL/EMPLOYMENT DISTRICTS General Commercial Regional Commercial Employment IndustrialOPEN SPACE - AGRICULTURE DISTRICTS Park and Open Space Agriculture/Rural UsesSPECIAL DISTRICTS Special Institutional Airport Campus
Downtown DistrictsNPA Neighborhood Planning Area
B-19APPENDIX B
Figure 19 Housing Vacancy 2015
0.56%
2.14%
3.55%
1.78%
2.53%
3.87%
2.15%
3.27%
3.31%
2.07%
1.31%
1%
1.08%
February, 2016
Rental Vacancy Rate by Zip Code
2015
0% - 1%
1.1% - 2%
2.1% - 3%
3.1% - 4%
4.1% - 5%
5%+
0 1 20.5Miles
Source:Madison Gas and Electric
Population and Housing
B-18 Madison in Motion
Figure 18 Housing Vacancy 2003
5.27%
3.03%
1.02%
2.91%
3.83%
7.43%
5.95%
6.48%
4.51%
2.76%
0.74%
4.2%
5.15%
February, 2016
Rental Vacancy Rate by Zip Code2003
0% - 1%
1.1% - 2%
2.1% - 3%
3.1% - 4%
4.1% - 5%
5%+
0 1 20.5Miles
Source:Madison Gas and Electric
Population and Housing
B-20 Madison in Motion
Figure 20 Income Median Household
103,000
88,500
35,300
41,200
38,800
48,000
31,600
34,400
65,700
28,90058,800
39,600
58,100
108,000
87,300
26,800
51,60062,700
26,800
69,100
41,500
34,500
70,300
57,500
55,500
46,500
80,200
113,000
82,400
107,000
82,700
141,000
79,400 86,500
44,300
57,000
66,200
51,000
85,400
100,000
44,000
97,400 78,600
58,700
149,000
60,300
64,800
80,300
50,200
90,400
52,400
40,200
31,700
45,600
32,500
70,300
36,400
137,000
132,000
80,700
64,900
64,300
44,500
72,200
72,000
107,000
45,800
38,100
93,100
67,300
42,200
108,000
79,400
81,100
31,400
30,600
46,100
54,700
65,800
57,300
84,200
83,600134,000
64,500
46,900
115,000
57,400
54,500
45,300
71,100
74,500 34,600
127,00075,100
77,80077,800
65,800
97,300
89,40038,600
55,00047,700
62,200
54,000 75,200
63,500 85,400
96,100
54,400
48,100
39,900
42,800
97,600
65,800
79,700
91,600
30,100
59,600
50,900
76,800
91,900116,000
84,800
26,300
45,900
30,100
64,300
64,300
64,300
29,800
73,400
72,600
55,600
44,000
54,500
40,600
80,000
135,000
28,500
41,900
56,00073,300
28,800
39,600
94,000
154,000
92,700
43,300
49,200
102,000
71,100
73,000
43,800
135,000
62,100
81,200
74,300 74,300
110,000
85,000
72,700
50,200
75,900
84,200104,000 119,000
14,300
29,100
21,400
7,310
20,000 50,700
76,700
64,600
31,000
85,100
93,100
8,160
58,000
24,600
13,700
32,600
21,700
36,600
43,000
40,900
51,500
26,500
110,000
24,700
54,10058,900
31,900
28,400
39,600
50,600
55,600
77,000
71,700
31,500
39,200
78,000
82,90041,700
47,500
52,800
74,800
46,300
37,40065,900
55,100
119,000
61,300
118,000
39,500
53,700
February, 2016
Median Income% of Dane Co. Median
<60%
61% - 80%
81% - 95%
96% - 105%
106% - 120%
121% - 140%
>140%
Madison City Limits
0 1 20.5Miles
Income and Poverty
Source:2014 ACS 5 Year Estimates Table B19013Household Median IncomeBlock Group Level and Dane County
B-24 Madison in Motion
Figure 24 Mode Bike Dot
February, 2016
Bike
1 Dot = 2
Bicycle
Bike Paths (off-street)
On-Street Bike Facilities
City of Madison
Source:2014 ACS 5 Year Estimates Table B08301Means Of Transportation To Work ForWorkers 16 Years And OverBlock Group Level
Mode Split - Journey to Work
B-21APPENDIX B
Figure 21 MIM Rent 30
February, 2016
>30% of HH income spent on rent0% - 20%
20.1% - 40%
40.1% - 60%
60.1% - 80%
80.1% - 100%
Madison City Limits
Cost Burdened Residents
Note: Block group data is more prone tosampling error and has higher margins oferror than tract-level or place-level data.
Source:2014 ACS 5 Year Estimates Table B25070Rent As A Percentage Of HH IncomeBlock Group Level
B-22 Madison in Motion
Figure 22 MIM Rent 50
February, 2016
>50% of HH income spent on rent0% - 20%
20.1% - 40%
40.1% - 60%
60.1% - 80%
80.1% - 100%
Madison City Limits
Cost Burdened Residents
Note: Block group data is more prone tosampling error and has higher margins oferror than tract-level or place-level data.
Source:2014 ACS 5 Year Estimates Table B25070Rent As A Percentage Of HH IncomeBlock Group Level
B-25APPENDIX B
Figure 25 Mode Bike
February, 2016
Bike0% - 2%
2.1% - 5%
5.1% - 10%
10.1% - 15%
15.1% - 20%
20.1% - 30%
30.1% - 100%
Bike Paths (off-street)
On-Street Bike Facilities
Madison City Limits
Source:2014 ACS 5 Year Estimates Table B08301Means Of Transportation To Work ForWorkers 16 Years And OverBlock Group Level
Mode Split - Journey to Work
Note: Block group data is more prone tosampling error and has higher margins oferror than tract-level or place-level data.
B-23APPENDIX B
Figure 23 Mode Bike Density
February, 2016
Bike Paths (off-street)
On-Street Bike Facilities
Bike Commuters
Per acre
0 - 0.25
0.26 - 0.5
0.51 - 1
1.1 - 2
2.1 - 4
4.1 - 8
>8
City of Madison
Mode Split - Journey to Work
Note: Block group data is more prone tosampling error and has higher margins oferror than tract-level or place-level data.
2010 Land UseMadison Metro GTFS DataMATPB (MPO)
Source:2014 ACS 5 Year Estimates Table B08301Means Of Transportation To Work ForWorkers 16 Years And Over
B-26 Madison in Motion
Figure 26 Mode Carpool Density
February, 2016
Carpool Commuters
Per acre
0 - 0.5
0.6 - 1
1.1 - 2
2.1 - 4
4.1 - 8
>8
City of Madison
Mode Split - Journey to Work
Note: Block group data is more prone tosampling error and has higher margins oferror than tract-level or place-level data.
2010 Land UseMadison Metro GTFS DataMATPB (MPO)
Source:2014 ACS 5 Year Estimates Table B08301Means Of Transportation To Work ForWorkers 16 Years And Over
B-27APPENDIX B
Figure 27 Mode Carpool
February, 2016
Carpool0% - 2%
2.1% - 5%
5.1% - 10%
10.1% - 15%
15.1% - 20%
20.1% - 30%
30.1% - 100%
Madison City Limits
Source:2014 ACS 5 Year Estimates Table B08301Means Of Transportation To Work ForWorkers 16 Years And OverBlock Group Level
Mode Split - Journey to Work
Note: Block group data is more prone tosampling error and has higher margins oferror than tract-level or place-level data.
B-28 Madison in Motion
Figure 28 Mode Drove
88.4%
55.9%
54.4%
63.3%
36.9%
90.5%
95.3%
52.7%
80.2%
63.9%74.6%
33.9%
88.2%
81.3%
77.5%
81.2%
21.5%
22%
82.5%83.9%
67.9%
82.6%
80.4%
56.5%
69.7%
79.2%
68.4%
87.5%
80.7%
82.4%
87.1%
84.2%
79.8%
69.3%
81.7%
90.5%
83.4%
74.5%
71.2%
82.2%
80.4%
82.2%94%
84.1%
90%
94.1%
87.8%
76.7%65.7%
77.2%
83.2%
62.6%
79.1%
67.9%
59%
89.1%
20.3%
52.5%
78.6%
89.4%
93.8%
48.2%
52.6%
90.3%
87.2%
96.5%
85.7%
69.5%
90.1%
72.2%
64.4% 82.4%
76.3%
77.4%
57.5%
77.4%
69.2%
64.9%
69.5%
55.2%
65.4%
71.1%
74.4%
70.5%
79%
58.6%
83%
72%
82.4%
91.3%
90.3%
70.8%74.4%
60.2%76.4%
68.4%
59.3%
66.1%66.3%
67.5%76.2%
75.6%86.6% 75.1%
64.6% 64.5%
43.2%
60.3%40.1%
58.6%
61.8%
84.4%
58.8%
38.7%27.7%
51.4%
43.4%
55.7%39.9%
47.4%
50.6%
45.4%
41.1%
63.7%
69.1%
31.9%
86.8%
78.4%
85.5%
82.3%
89.1%
81%
28.9%
55.4%
80.7%
82.2%
71.1%
79.2%
78.8%
70.3%
82.2%
72.7%
42.4%
82.3%
79%
78.1%
82.4%
94%
88.7%
78.8%
82.5%
79.4%78%
82.2%
78.8%83.4% 75.8%
24%
24.8%
15.8%
8.8%4.5%
12.8%
34.7%
2%
38.1%
91.7%
85.4%
74.5%
85.3%
92.5%
16.2%28.2%
45.3%
34.9%
42.8%
40.2%
25.3%
55.8%
83.1%
80.6%
50.1%
73.6%
60%
35.8%
64.6%
48.5%
54.5%76.7%
68%
83.5%
87.6%
91.3%
93.9%
73.7%
65.9%
76.4%
64.6%
72.7%
45.3%
33.2%
43.1%
33.4%
61.1%
43.8%
55.4%
80.6%
73.3%
82.5%
67.6%
February, 2016
Drove alone0% - 25%
25.1% - 50%
50.1% - 60%
60.1% - 70%
70.1% - 80%
80.1% - 90%
90.1% - 100%
Madison City Limits
Source:2014 ACS 5 Year Estimates Table B08301Means Of Transportation To Work ForWorkers 16 Years And OverBlock Group Level
Mode Split - Journey to Work
Note: Block group data is more prone tosampling error and has higher margins oferror than tract-level or place-level data.
B-29APPENDIX B
Figure 29 Mode Transit Density
February, 2016
Transit Commuters
Per Acre
0 - 0.25
0.26 - 0.5
0.51 - 1
1.1 - 2
2.1 - 4
4.1 - 8
>8
Metro Busses/Hour
AM Peak
9 - 52
5 - 8
3 - 4
2
1
City of Madison
Mode Split - Journey to Work
Note: Block group data is more prone tosampling error and has higher margins oferror than tract-level or place-level data.
2010 Land UseMadison Metro GTFS DataMATPB (MPO)
Source:2014 ACS 5 Year Estimates Table B08301Means Of Transportation To Work ForWorkers 16 Years And Over
B-30 Madison in Motion
Figure 30 Mode Transit Dot
February, 2016
Transit
1 Dot = 2
Transit
Metro Busses/Hour
2013 AM Peak
9 - 52
5 - 8
3 - 4
2
1
City of Madison
Source:2014 ACS 5 Year Estimates Table B08301Means Of Transportation To Work ForWorkers 16 Years And OverBlock Group Level
Mode Split - Journey to Work
B-31APPENDIX B
Figure 31 Mode Transit
0%
8.7%
16.5%
8.4%
18.8%
4.7%
0%
11.6%
3.5%
16.5%5%
28.6%
4.1%
0.8%
3.9%
4.6%
7.6%
8.6%1.5%
2.8%
6.5%
6.4%
3.2%
1.2%
1.8%
13.3%
1.6%
1.6%
1.3%
5.4%
0.6%
1.8%
2.3%
0%
0%
0%
6.2%
12%
6.4%
3.7%
0% 0%
2.7%
0%
2.1%
4.3%
5%0.8%
4.3%
4.3%
21.1%
0%
8.2%
5.8%
1.8%
61%
6%
4.2%
1.7%
0%
15.5%
11.8%
0%
3.1%
0%
1%
8.6%
0%
0%
7.7% 0%
4%
9.6%
21.6%
2.6%
12.9%
12.7%
9.5%
15.1%
11%
12.8%
8.5%
2.4%
2.8%
27.3%
1.3%
2.6%
3.6%
0%
0%
0%20.9%
8.5%6.5%
8.6%
10.5%
1.5%13.8%
7.6%7.6%
8.8%6% 7.9%
9.4%4.6%
10.8%
8.6%
24%
11.8%
5.8%
4.6%
4.9%
10.9%11.3%
0%
10.2%
14.8%12.4%
14.6%
14.4%
20.5%
10.4%
5.2%
7.2%
6.6%
2.9%
6.8%
6.9%
8.2%
1.4%
0%
53.4%
11.9%
2.5%
0%
7.8%
4.4%
0%
0.5%
2.2%
3.5%
17%
0%
2.1%
11.3%
1.7%
0%
0%
1.2%
0%
0.9%
1.7%
0%
1.6%0% 2.3%
12.6%
15.8%
14.7%
4.1%
19.6%19.8%
16.2%0%
15.9%
0.1%
1%
13.5%
1.3%
0%
0.7%5.2%
19.6%
6.7%
14.1%
20.8%
8.8%
17.2%
3.1%
3.2%
3.7%
7.1%
0%
26.5%
8%
17%
14.3%10.2%
3.1%
8.8%
0%
0%
0.5%
4.8%
19.3%
0%
1.2%
3%
12.8%
10.9%
16.6%
32.6%
8.2%8%
15.1%
1.8%
12.8%
6.3%
15.7%
February, 2016
Transit0% - 2%
2.1% - 5%
5.1% - 10%
10.1% - 15%
15.1% - 20%
20.1% - 30%
30.1% - 100%
Metro Busses/Hour2013 AM Peak
9 - 52
5 - 8
3 - 4
2
1
Madison City Limits
Source:2014 ACS 5 Year Estimates Table B08301Means Of Transportation To Work ForWorkers 16 Years And OverBlock Group LevelMadison Area Transportation PlanningBoard (MPO)Metro GTFS Data 2013
Note: Block group data is more prone tosampling error and has higher margins oferror than tract-level or place-level data.
Mode Split - Journey to Work
B-32 Madison in Motion
Figure 32 Mode Walk Density
February, 2016
Walk Commuters
Per acre
0 - 0.25
0.26 - 0.5
0.51 - 1
1.1 - 2
2.1 - 4
4.1 - 8
>8
City of Madison
Mode Split - Journey to Work
Note: Block group data is more prone tosampling error and has higher margins oferror than tract-level or place-level data.
2010 Land UseMadison Metro GTFS DataMATPB (MPO)
Source:2014 ACS 5 Year Estimates Table B08301Means Of Transportation To Work ForWorkers 16 Years And Over
B-33APPENDIX B
Figure 33 Mode Walk
0.9%
4.1%
2.9%
9.8%
9.3%
0%
0%
3.7%
0%
0.6%1.7%
6%
0%
0%
0%
6.1%
39.8%
47.1%
2.4%0%
4.2%
2.8%
2.9%
3.8%
1.1%
1.6%
2.7%
0%
0%
0.3%
3.5%
1.5%
1.4%
2%
2.3%
1.8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1.5%
0% 2.7%
1.7%
0%
0%
0.9%
7.9%4.4%
0%
1.8%
0%
0%
5.4%
1.4%
0.2%
7.5%
7%
1.7%
0%
0%
3.9%
8.9%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5.3% 2.5%
1.2%
7.1%
1.7%
2.1%
1.3%
1%
0.1%
0%2.8%
1%
0%
3.1%
0%
0%
0%
4%
3.8%
0%
2.7%
3.6%0%
6.7%3.5%
0%
4.5%
1%0%
0%0%
0%0.9% 0%
4.8% 0%
24.1%
7.5%
16.4%
1.5%
0%
0%
9.4%
25.5%25.7%
21.5%
27.4%
15.2%7%
5%
13.3%
14.9%
19.8%
2.5%
0%
17.5%
0.6%
0%
3.9%
1.1%
1.4%
1%
14.3%
4.9%
1.3%
3.4%
2.8%
3.9%
4.7%
9.1%
0.2%
0%
9.6%
0%
0.6%
5.2%
0%
0%
0%
0.3%
0.6%
5.4%
1%
0%
0%0% 2%
46.6%
51.4%
48.6%
66.5%51.1%
57.3%
16.9%
87%
31.1%
3.1%
1.2%
2.2%
1.3%
0%
72.1%39%
18.7%
40.6%
26.3%
24.3%
38.1%
3.7%
1.2%
4.8%
24.5%
0.8%
0%
16.2%
4.4%
9.9%
5.2%6.1%
1.8%
1.1%
12.4%
0%
2.3%
0%
0%
6.9%
4.8%
7.3%
20.8%
18.6%
8.8%
8.6%
26.1%
6.5%
3.8%
0%
1.6%
0%
0%
February, 2016
Walk0% - 2%
2.1% - 5%
5.1% - 10%
10.1% - 15%
15.1% - 20%
20.1% - 30%
30.1% - 100%
Madison City Limits
Source:2014 ACS 5 Year Estimates Table B08301Means Of Transportation To Work ForWorkers 16 Years And OverBlock Group Level
Mode Split - Journey to Work
Note: Block group data is more prone tosampling error and has higher margins oferror than tract-level or place-level data.
B-34 Madison in Motion
Figure 34 Mode Bike Change PRCT
February, 2016
2000-2014 Change: Bike (%)<-10%
-9.9% - -5%
-4.9% - -1%
-0.9% - 1%
1.1% - 5%
5.1% - 10%
>10%
Source:2000 Census Table P030Means Of Transportation To Work ForWorkers 16 Years And OverBlock Group Level2014 ACS 5 Year Estimates Table B08301Means Of Transportation To Work ForWorkers 16 Years And OverAggregated to 2000 Block Groups
Mode Split - Journey to Work
Note: Block group data is more prone tosampling error and has higher margins oferror than tract-level or place-level data.
B-35APPENDIX B
Figure 35 Mode Bike Change
February, 2016
2000-2014 Change: Bike<-200
-199 - -100
-99 - -25
-24 - 25
26 - 100
101 - 200
>200
Source:2000 Census Table P030Means Of Transportation To Work ForWorkers 16 Years And OverBlock Group Level2014 ACS 5 Year Estimates Table B08301Means Of Transportation To Work ForWorkers 16 Years And OverAggregated to 2000 Block Groups
Mode Split - Journey to Work
Note: Block group data is more prone tosampling error and has higher margins oferror than tract-level or place-level data.
B-36 Madison in Motion
Figure 36 Mode Carpool Change PRCT
February, 2016
2000-2014 Change: Carpool (%)<-10%
-9.9% - -5%
-4.9% - -1%
-0.9% - 1%
1.1% - 5%
5.1% - 10%
>10%
Source:2000 Census Table P030Means Of Transportation To Work ForWorkers 16 Years And OverBlock Group Level2014 ACS 5 Year Estimates Table B08301Means Of Transportation To Work ForWorkers 16 Years And OverAggregated to 2000 Block Groups
Mode Split - Journey to Work
Note: Block group data is more prone tosampling error and has higher margins oferror than tract-level or place-level data.
B-37APPENDIX B
Figure 37 Mode Carpool Change
February, 2016
2000-2014 Change: Carpool<-200
-199 - -100
-99 - -25
-24 - 25
26 - 100
101 - 200
>200
Source:2000 Census Table P030Means Of Transportation To Work ForWorkers 16 Years And OverBlock Group Level2014 ACS 5 Year Estimates Table B08301Means Of Transportation To Work ForWorkers 16 Years And OverAggregated to 2000 Block Groups
Mode Split - Journey to Work
Note: Block group data is more prone tosampling error and has higher margins oferror than tract-level or place-level data.
B-38 Madison in Motion
Figure 38 Mode Drove Change PRCT
February, 2016
2000-2014 Change: Drove (%)<-10%
-9.9% - -5%
-4.9% - -1%
-0.9% - 1%
1.1% - 5%
5.1% - 10%
>10%
Source:2000 Census Table P030Means Of Transportation To Work ForWorkers 16 Years And OverBlock Group Level2014 ACS 5 Year Estimates Table B08301Means Of Transportation To Work ForWorkers 16 Years And OverAggregated to 2000 Block Groups
Mode Split - Journey to Work
Note: Block group data is more prone tosampling error and has higher margins oferror than tract-level or place-level data.
B-42 Madison in Motion
Figure 42 Mode Walk Change
February, 2016
2000-2014 Change: Walk (%)<-10%
-9.9% - -5%
-4.9% - -1%
-0.9% - 1%
1.1% - 5%
5.1% - 10%
>10%
Source:2000 Census Table P030Means Of Transportation To Work ForWorkers 16 Years And OverBlock Group Level2014 ACS 5 Year Estimates Table B08301Means Of Transportation To Work ForWorkers 16 Years And OverAggregated to 2000 Block Groups
Mode Split - Journey to Work
Note: Block group data is more prone tosampling error and has higher margins oferror than tract-level or place-level data.
B-39APPENDIX B
Figure 39 Mode Drove Change
February, 2016
2000-2014 Change: Drove<-400
-399 - -200
-199 - -100
-99 - -25
-24 - 25
26 - 100
101 - 200
201 - 400
>401
Source:2000 Census Table P030Means Of Transportation To Work ForWorkers 16 Years And OverBlock Group Level2014 ACS 5 Year Estimates Table B08301Means Of Transportation To Work ForWorkers 16 Years And OverAggregated to 2000 Block Groups
Mode Split - Journey to Work
Note: Block group data is more prone tosampling error and has higher margins oferror than tract-level or place-level data.
B-40 Madison in Motion
Figure 40 Mode Transit Change PRCT
February, 2016
2000-2014 Change: Transit (%)<-10%
-9.9% - -5%
-4.9% - -1%
-0.9% - 1%
1.1% - 5%
5.1% - 10%
>10%
Source:2000 Census Table P030Means Of Transportation To Work ForWorkers 16 Years And OverBlock Group Level2014 ACS 5 Year Estimates Table B08301Means Of Transportation To Work ForWorkers 16 Years And OverAggregated to 2000 Block Groups
Mode Split - Journey to Work
Note: Block group data is more prone tosampling error and has higher margins oferror than tract-level or place-level data.
B-43APPENDIX B
Figure 43 Mode Walk Change PRCT
February, 2016
2000-2014 Change: Walk<-200
-199 - -100
-99 - -25
-24 - 25
26 - 100
101 - 200
>201
Source:2000 Census Table P030Means Of Transportation To Work ForWorkers 16 Years And OverBlock Group Level2014 ACS 5 Year Estimates Table B08301Means Of Transportation To Work ForWorkers 16 Years And OverAggregated to 2000 Block Groups
Mode Split - Journey to Work
Note: Block group data is more prone tosampling error and has higher margins oferror than tract-level or place-level data.
B-41APPENDIX B
Figure 41 Mode Transit Change
February, 2016
2000-2014 Change Transit<-200
-199 - -100
-99 - -25
-24 - 25
26 - 100
101 - 200
>200
Source:2000 Census Table P030Means Of Transportation To Work ForWorkers 16 Years And OverBlock Group Level2014 ACS 5 Year Estimates Table B08301Means Of Transportation To Work ForWorkers 16 Years And OverAggregated to 2000 Block Groups
Mode Split - Journey to Work
Note: Block group data is more prone tosampling error and has higher margins oferror than tract-level or place-level data.
B-44 Madison in Motion
Figure 44 Population Density
February, 2016
PopulationPerson Per Square Mile
0 - 1,000
1,001 - 2,000
2,001 - 4,000
4,001 - 8,000
8,001 - 20,000
20,001 - 40,000
>40,000
Madison City Limits
Population and Housing
Source:2014 ACS 5 Year Estimates Table B01003PopulationBlock Group Level
B-46 Madison in Motion
Figure 46 Population Under 18 Density with Transit
February, 2016
Population 18 and Under
Persons/acre
0 - 1
1.1 - 2
2.1 - 4
4.1 - 8
8.1 - 12
>12
Metro Busses/Hour
AM Peak
9 - 52
5 - 8
3 - 4
2
1
City of Madison
Note: Block group data is more prone tosampling error and has higher margins oferror than tract-level or place-level data.
Population and Housing
2010 Land Use
Source:2014 ACS 5 Year Estimates Table B01001Sex by AgeBlock Group Level
B-45APPENDIX B
Figure 45 Population Persons of Color
February, 2016
Percent Persons of Color0.0% - 2.0%
2.1% - 5.0%
5.1% - 10.0%
10.1% - 20.0%
20.1% - 30.0%
30.1% - 40.0%
40.1% - 100.0%
Source:Madison Gas and Electric
Population and Housing
B-47APPENDIX B
Figure 47 Population Under 18 Density
February, 2016
Population 18 and Under
Persons/acre
0 - 1
1.1 - 2
2.1 - 4
4.1 - 8
8.1 - 12
>12
City of Madison
Note: Block group data is more prone tosampling error and has higher margins oferror than tract-level or place-level data.
Population and Housing
2010 Land Use
Source:2014 ACS 5 Year Estimates Table B01001Sex by AgeBlock Group Level
B-48 Madison in Motion
Figure 48 Population Over 60 Density with Transit
February, 2016
Population 60 and Over
Persons/acre
0 - 1
1.1 - 2
2.1 - 4
4.1 - 8
8.1 - 12
>12
Metro Busses/Hour
AM Peak
9 - 52
5 - 8
3 - 4
2
1
City of Madison
Note: Block group data is more prone tosampling error and has higher margins oferror than tract-level or place-level data.
0 1 20.5Miles
Population and Housing
2010 Land Use
Source:2014 ACS 5 Year Estimates Table B01001Sex by AgeBlock Group Level
B-49APPENDIX B
Figure 49 Population Over 60 Density
February, 2016
Population 60 and Over
Persons/acre
0 - 1
1.1 - 2
2.1 - 4
4.1 - 8
8.1 - 12
>12
City of Madison
Note: Block group data is more prone tosampling error and has higher margins oferror than tract-level or place-level data.
Population and Housing
2010 Land Use
Source:2014 ACS 5 Year Estimates Table B01001Sex by AgeBlock Group Level
B-50 Madison in Motion
Figure 50 Poverty 100
February, 2016
Income below poverty level0% - 5%
5.1% - 15%
15.1% - 30%
30.1% - 60%
60.1% - 100%
Madison City Limits
Note: Block group data is more prone tosampling error and has higher margins oferror than tract-level or place-level data.
Source:2014 ACS 5 Year Estimates Table C17002Ratio Of Income To Poverty LevelBlock Group Level
Low Income Residents
B-51APPENDIX B
Figure 51 Poverty 200
February, 2016
Population below Povery Level
Persons/acre
0 - 2
2.1 - 4
4.1 - 8
8.1 - 12
12.1 - 16
16.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
>40
City of Madison
Source:2014 ACS 5 Year Estimates Table C17002Ratio Of Income To Poverty LevelBlock Group LevelMadison Area Transportation PlanningBoard (MPO)2010 Land Use
Income and Poverty
B-52 Madison in Motion
Figure 52 Poverty 200 BG
February, 2016
Income <200% of poverty level0% - 20%
20.1% - 40%
40.1% - 60%
60.1% - 80%
80.1% - 100%
Metro Busses/Hour2013 AM Peak
9 - 52
5 - 8
3 - 4
2
1
Madison City Limits
Note: Block group data is more prone tosampling error and has higher margins oferror than tract-level or place-level data.
Source:2014 ACS 5 Year Estimates Table C17002Ratio Of Income To Poverty LevelBlock Group Level
Low Income Residents
B-53APPENDIX B
Figure 53 Poverty 200 Density
February, 2016
Population below 200% of Poverty Level
Persons/acre
0 - 2
2.1 - 4
4.1 - 8
8.1 - 12
12.1 - 16
16.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
>40
City of Madison
Source:2014 ACS 5 Year Estimates Table C17002Ratio Of Income To Poverty LevelBlock Group LevelMadison Area Transportation PlanningBoard (MPO)2010 Land Use
Income and Poverty
B-54 Madison in Motion
Figure 54 Poverty Concentrated Low Income Areas
February, 2016
Concentrated Low Income Areas
Metro Busses/Hour
AM Peak
9 - 52
5 - 8
3 - 4
2
1
City of Madison
Source:2014 ACS 5 Year Estimates Table C17002Ratio Of Income To Poverty LevelBlock Group LevelMadison Area Transportation PlanningBoard (MPO)2010 Land Use
Income and Poverty
B-55APPENDIX B
Figure 55 Table Metro Ridership
7,49
4,00
0 7,
405,
000
8,47
1,00
0 9,
185,
000
10,1
20,0
00
11,0
22,0
00
11,4
18,0
00
11,8
00,0
00
12,2
99,0
00
13,9
53,0
00
11,9
34,0
00
12,3
99,0
00
13,3
89,0
00
12,0
08,0
00
12,2
29,0
00
11,9
46,0
00
11,3
01,0
00
10,0
63,0
00
9,54
1,00
0 9,
048,
000
9,09
6,00
0 9,
390,
000
9,56
1,00
0 9,
555,
000
9,65
6,00
0 9,
601,
000
9,81
6,00
0 10
,370
,000
10
,098
,000
10
,110
,000
10
,065
,000
10
,211
,000
10
,895
,000
10
,934
,000
10
,962
,000
11
,476
,000
12
,034
,000
12
,672
,000
13
,433
,000
13
,588
,000
13
,623
,000
14
,924
,000
14
,592
,000
14
,741
,000
15
,224
,000
14
,358
,000
0
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
12,000,000
14,000,000
16,000,000
1970
19
71
1972
19
73
1974
19
75
1976
19
77
1978
19
79
1980
19
81
1982
19
83
1984
19
85
1986
19
87
1988
19
89
1990
19
91
1992
19
93
1994
19
95
1996
19
97
1998
19
99
2000
20
01
2002
20
03
2004
20
05
2006
20
07
2008
20
09
2010
20
11
2012
20
13
2014
20
15
Annual Fixed Route Ridership 1970-2015
B-56 Madison in Motion
Figure 56 Transit BRT with Employment
February, 2016
Bus Rapid Transit
Routes
Potential Extentsions
BRT Stations
Metro Transit Routes
City of Madison
Employment Density (Jobs/Ac)
75.1 or Greater
25.1 to 75.0
10.1 to 25
5.1 to 10.0
2.1 to 5.0
0 to 2.0
Source:Madison MetroMATPB (MPO)
Future Transit
B-57APPENDIX B
Figure 57 Transit BRT
February, 2016
Bus Rapid Transit
Routes
Potential Extentsions
BRT Stations
Metro Transit Routes
Madison City Limits
Source:Madison MetroMATPB (MPO)
Future Transit
B-58 Madison in Motion
Figure 58 Vehicles Change
February, 2016
Change in Vehicles Available
0.5
Change: 0 Car HH (%)
Change: 1 Car HH (%)
Change: 2+ Car HH (%)
City of Madison
Note: Block group data is more prone tosampling error and has higher margins oferror than tract-level or place-level data.
Access to Opportunity
B-59APPENDIX B
Figure 59 Population Change - Housing Units
February, 2016
Change in Housing Units<25
26 - 100
101 - 250
251 - 500
501 - 1,000
1,001 - 2,000
>2,000
Note: Block group data is more prone tosampling error and has higher margins oferror than tract-level or place-level data.
Population and Housing
Source:2000 Census Table H001Housing UnitsBlock Group Level2014 ACS 5 Year Estimates Table B25002Housing UnitsAggregated to 2000 Block Groups
B-60 Madison in Motion
Figure 60 Population Change
February, 2016
Change in Population<50
51 - 250
251 - 500
501 - 1,000
1,001 - 2,000
2,001 - 4,000
>4,000
Note: Block group data is more prone tosampling error and has higher margins oferror than tract-level or place-level data.
Population and Housing
Source:2000 Census Table P001PopulationBlock Group Level2014 ACS 5 Year Estimates Table B01003PopulationAggregated to 2000 Block Groups
B-61APPENDIX B
Figure 61 Road Bike Counts
ƽ
ƽ
ƽ
ƽ
ƽ
ƽ
ƽ
ƽ
ƽ
ƽƽ
ƽ
ƽ
ƽ
ƽ
ƽ
ƽ
ƽ
ƽ
ƽ
ƽ
ƽ
ƽ
ƽ
ƽƽ
ƽ
ƽ
ƽ
ƽ
ƽ
ƽ
ƽ
67
530
1700
2700
1700
310
7301700610
950
320
630
170
81
150
February, 2016
ƽ Bike Count Stations (ADB)
Bike Paths (off-street)
On-Street Bike Facilities
City of Madison
0 1 20.5Miles
Existing Transportation Network
Source:City of Madison EngineeringTraffic Engineering Divison
B-62 Madison in Motion
Figure 62 Road Pavement Ratings
February, 2016
Pavement Ratings0 - 3
4 - 5
6 - 7
8
9 - 10
Madison City Limits
Source:City of Madison EngineeringTraffic Engineering Divison
Existing Transportation Network
B-63APPENDIX B
Figure 63
February, 2016
Average Daily Traffic Counts0 - 5,000
5,001 - 10,000
10,001 - 15,000
15,001 - 20,000
20,001 - 30,000
30,001 - 40,000
40,001 - 88,050
Madison City Limits
Source:Madison Traffic Engineering Divison
Existing Transportation Network
B-64 Madison in Motion
Figure 64 Transit Boardings
February, 2016
Transit Boarding: Avg weekday! 0 - 10
! 11 - 50
! 51 - 100
! 101 - 500
! 501 - 1000
! 1001 - 2423
Metro Transit Routes
Madison City Limits
Source:Madison MetroMATPB (MPO)
Existing Transportation Network
B-65APPENDIX B
Figure 65 Vehicles Carless Household Change
February, 2016
Carless Households
0.0% - 5.0%
5.1% - 10.0%
10.1% - 15.0%
15.1% - 20.0%
20.1% - 30.0%
30.1% - 40.0%
40.1% - 100.0%
Change in Carless HH since 2000-100% - -20%
-19.9% - -10%
-9.9% - -6%
-5.9% - -2%
-1.9% - 2%
2.1% - 6%
6.1% - 10%
10.1% - 20%
20.1% - 100%
City of Madison
Note: Block group data is more prone tosampling error and has higher margins oferror than tract-level or place-level data.
Access to Opportunity
B-66 Madison in Motion
Figure 66 Vehicles Carless BG Prct
0%
3.8%
16.3%
17.8%20.2%
1.9%
17.5%
18.3%
2.4%
14.9%6%
14.5%
10.3%
0%
0%
6.6%
58.5%
7.5%0%
27.3%
1.8%
14.7%
15.6%
1.2%
3.6%
3.5%
0%
3.8%
0%
0%
0%
2.6%
3.2%
2.8%0%
7.6%
4.5%
4.3%
9.8%
0%
2.4%
5.2%
0% 0%
2.4%
0%
3.6%
1.1%
0%
7.3%
0%
5.1%
17.9%
1.2%
22.5%
17.7%
8.4%
19.4%
0%
0.5%
0%
19.1%
6.9%
7.2%
1.6%
4%
11%
4.3%
12.3%
0%
0%
12.4%
1.4%
3.6%
0.7%
3.2%
28.7%
11.5%9.8%
1.3%
11.1%
2.9% 0%
0%
3%
20.8%
5.3%
10.3%
8%
7.1%
12.3%
3.1% 5.2%
0%0%
6.4%4%
4.7%
6.6%
3%12%
0%5.9%
7.5%1.5% 0%
3.4% 2%
4.3%
5%
14.1%
7.1%
8%
0%
1.2%
0%
1.2%
30%
5.5%
13.5%
6.6%
11.1%4.7%
5.2%
25.1%
5.8%
10.2%
3%
3%
3%
14.2%
4.9%
6.7%
4.5%
3.9%
10.5%
10.2%
0%
3.6%
29.3%
23.8%
1%
0%
22.7%
7%
0%
0.9%
0.8%
4.9%
6.7%
0%
10.1%
2.5%
10.1%
0%
5.1%
4.1%
2.9% 2.9%
0%
0.5%
1.3%12%
0%
1.4%0% 0%
56.1%
80.7% 68.8%77.2%
28.1%
100%
20.5%
7.2%
3.3%
25.7%
1.1%
0%
27.5%
34.8%36.5%
27.3%
38.2%
19.1%
5.2%
10.9%
9%
9.7%
0%
21.6%
12%6.8%
15.6%
16.2%
14%
13.1%
18.7%
3%
9.8%
13.9%
10.2%
1.1%
3.4%10.6%
10%
14.7%
3.6%
16.4%
11.5%0%
10.5%
1.8%
8.4%
5%
0%
0%
February, 2016
Carless Households0.0% - 5.0%
5.1% - 10.0%
10.1% - 15.0%
15.1% - 20.0%
20.1% - 30.0%
30.1% - 40.0%
40.1% - 100.0%
Madison City Limits
Note: Block group data is more prone tosampling error and has higher margins oferror than tract-level or place-level data.
Source:2014 ACS 5 Year Estimates Table B25044Vehicles AvailableBlock Group Level
Access to Opportunity
0 1 20.5Miles
B-67APPENDIX B
Figure 67 Vehicle Carless Density
February, 2016
Carless Households
Per acre
0 - 0.5
0.6 - 1
1.1 - 2
2.1 - 4
4.1 - 8
8.1 - 16
>16
Metro Busses/Hour
AM Peak
9 - 52
5 - 8
3 - 4
2
1
City of Madison
Note: Block group data is more prone tosampling error and has higher margins oferror than tract-level or place-level data.
Source:2014 ACS 5 Year Estimates Table B25044Vehicles AvailableBlock Group Level
Access to Opportunity
2010 Land UseMadison Metro GTFS DataMATPB (MPO)
