APPENDIX 1 - arlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com · detached, single-family attached, or multi-family), RPP program eligibility (yes –eligible to participate or no –not eligible to participate),

Appendix 1 Sampling Plan

APPENDIX 1 Sampling Plan

Sampling PlanIntroduction This memo summarizes the sample design for a probability-based public-opinion survey to evaluate awareness of, participation in, and perception of Arlington County’s Residential Parking Permit (RPP) program and to evaluate which aspects of the current program present concerns and preferences for the RPP program going forward. The sample design ensures that the responses are representative of Arlington County’s population and that responses from different sub-groups of interest can be compared.

The following steps are necessary to attain a sample that reflects the scope and objectives of the survey [1]:

Define the target population and corresponding sampling frame; Select a sample that is representative of the target population from the

sampling frame using scientific probability-based methods; and Account for the reporting of survey results by sub-groups of interest in the

selection method and sample size calculations.

Target Population The target population for a survey is “the entire set of units for which the survey data are to be used to make inferences” and “defines those units for which the findings of the survey are meant to generalize” [2]. The target population for this study is all households within Arlington County where each household is considered a sampling unit. The target sub-groups of interest are:i

• Households eligible to participate in the RPP program.• Households that are not eligible to participate in the RPP program.• Households living in different housing types defined as single-family detached,

single-family attached, or multi-family.

Based on response rates from the questionnaire, additional reach sub-groups may be evaluated in the analysis:

• Households with access to privately owned vehicles.• Households without access to privately owned vehicles.• Households in sub-areas of the County based on Arlington County Planning Zones.

i From the study proposal, the “assured” group represents the target population which includes all county households, the “target” groups are based on RPP program eligibility and household type, and the “reach” groups are based on privately-owned vehicle access and geographic location.

• Columbia Pike• Route 1• Rosslyn-Ballston• All other areas in Arlington County

Sampling Frame A sampling frame is a list of units that defines the target population from which a sample is selected [1][2]. The sampling frame should be constructed so that every eligible unit in the target population has a chance of being included in the survey sample. A sampling frame has complete coverage if there is a one-to-one match from the sampling frame to the target population units. The sampling frame should not contain duplicate, ineligible, or missing units, and it should contain information that allows all units to be distinguished from all others (e.g., a unique identifier) and to be easily located (e.g., a complete street address) [1][2][3].

The sampling frame for this study is a comprehensive list of all residential addresses in Arlington County. The sampling frame was constructed using two inventory files:

• Address_Pointso Point shapefile containing points representing individual street addresses

(excludes suites/apartments) in Arlington County, VA within propertyboundaries as of 2018.

• SFDU_MFDUo Tabular saturation file with individual street addresses in Arlington County,

VA sourced from USPS data by independent companies that compileresidential address data as of 02/11/2019; updated monthly andpurchased through Alesco Data.

Three additional datasets provided by Arlington County staff were used to attribute the sampling frame with each household’s status as a residential property, each household’s eligibility for participating in the RPP program, and each household’s location within an Arlington Planning Corridor to ensure adequate coverage for the sub-groups of interest:

• CPHD_MasterHousingUnitDatabase2017o Polygon shapefile describing the parcels in Arlington County that have

residential uses as of 2017; compiled by the Arlington County Departmentof Community Planning, Housing, and Development using files from theOffice of Real Estate Assessment and other files.

• rpp_eligible_20190212o Point shapefile describing the addresses of all households eligible to

participate in the Arlington County residential permit parking program as of02/12/2019; export of the County RPP database geocoded by using an

Arlington County address-point-based address locator; all households, including units with 2-unit, 3-unit, and multi-family housing, are represented by a row. Note that the database contains the primary street address or "house" address for each building with more than one unit; in cases where the primary address does not correspond to an individual housing unit, this under counts the number of addressable units.

• bg_2017_corridorso Polygon shapefile describing U.S. Census Block Groups (TIGERLine, 2017

vintage) that have been assigned to one of three Arlington PlanningCorridors for potential use in the 2019 RPP Review Household Survey. Blockgroups were selected by intersection with the Arlington CPHD-definedplanning corridors, as well as other, neighboring block groups containinghouseholds eligible/with RPP restrictions. Columbia Pike block groupsselected to conform to data collection area for 2017 on-street parkingstudy.

The SFDU_MFDU saturation file was used as the foundation for the sampling frame, while the Address_Points dataset was used to fill in gaps in coverage. A saturation file is a list of all occupied addresses in a given area. The saturation file used in this study is a list of all occupied residential addresses in all Arlington County zip codes (including zip codes shared with Fairfax County). Fairfax County addresses were removed from the list prior to developing the sampling frame. The tabular saturation file was converted to a shapefile using its latitude/longitude fields and displayed in a GIS with the attribution datasets. All Arlington County addresses in SFDU_MFDU and Address_Points located within the parcel boundaries in the CPHD_MasterHousingUnitDatabase2017 were attributed with housing type based on their parcel location using spatial joins. Spatial joins were also used to attribute RPP eligibility from rpp_eligible_20190212 and Arlington Planning Corridor location from bg_2017_corridors.

The SFDU_MFDU dataset was compared to the Address_Points dataset to assess under coverage. The SFDU_MFDU dataset was supplemented with non-duplicative Single-Family Detached and Single-Family Attached households from the Address_Points dataset to improve the sampling frame coverage. Multi-family households could not be compared between the two inventory files since individual multi-family units in the Address_Points dataset are aggregated into single property records. The final sampling frame contains 111,932 households – 111,107 from SFDU_MFDU and 825 from Address_Points. Table 1 provides a summary of household totals in the sampling frame by subgroup and compared to household totals as estimated in the U.S. Census 2017 American Community Survey (ACS) 1-Year Estimates with corresponding percent differences. Access to privately owned vehicles is excluded from the sampling frame totals since this attribute cannot be assigned at the individual household level from the U.S. Census data source. Table 2 provides a summary of household totals in the sampling frame by subgroup and compared to household totals as estimated from the CPHD Master Housing Unit Database, 2017 with corresponding percent differences.

Table 1. Household Totals by Subgroup in Sampling Frame and Estimated from U.S. Census Data

Subgroup Description

Estimated No. of Households (U.S. Census Bureau, 2017

American Community

Survey 1-Year Estimates)*

Estimated No. of

Households (Sampling

Frame)

Percent Difference

Assured All Households in Arlington County 104,750 111,932 7%

Target Households eligible to participate in the RPP program 11,290 11,135 -1%

Target Households that are not eligible to participate in the RPP program 93,460 100,797 8%

Total 104,750 111,932 7%

Target Households living in different housing types - single-family detached 28,760 27,813 -3%

Target Households living in different housing types - single-family attached 10,667 6,946 -35%

Target Households living in different housing types - multi-family 65,245 77,173 18%

Target Households living in different housing types - mobile home or other 78 N/A N/A

Total 104,750 111,932 7%

Reach Households located in the Columbia Pike Planning Corridor N/A 20,701 N/A

Reach Households located in the Route 1 Planning Corridor N/A 16,286 N/A

Reach Households located in the Rosslyn-Ballston Planning Corridor N/A 38,245 N/A

Reach Households located in all other areas of Arlington County N/A 36,700 N/A

Total N/A 111,932 N/A

Reach Households with access to privately owned vehicles 91,583 N/A N/A

Reach Households without access to privately owned vehicles 13,167 N/A N/A

Total 104,750 N/A N/A

*Data sources: S2504 Physical Housing Characteristics for Occupied Housing Units, 2017 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates; B25044 Tenure by Vehicles Available, Universe: Occupied Housing Units, 2017 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates

Table 2. Household Totals by Subgroup in Sampling Frame and Estimated from the CPHD Master Housing Unit Database, 2017

Subgroup Description

Estimated No. of Households

(CPHD Master Housing Unit

Database, 2017)

Estimated No. of

Households (Sampling

Frame)

Percent Difference

Assured All Households 113,944 111,932 -2%

Target Households eligible to participate in the RPP program 11,290 11,135 -1%

Target Households that are not eligible to participate in the RPP program 102,654 100,797 -2%

Total 113,944 111,932 -2%

Target Households living in different housing types - single-family detached 27,652 27,813 1%

Target Households living in different housing types - single-family attached 6,788 6,946 2%

Target Households living in different housing types - multi-family 79,504 77,173 -3%

Target Households living in different housing types - mobile home or other N/A N/A N/A

Total 113,944 111,932 -2%

Reach Households located in the Columbia Pike Planning Corridor 20,898 20,701 -1%

Reach Households located in the Jefferson Davis Planning Corridor 16,497 16,286 -1%

Reach Households located in the Rosslyn-Ballston Planning Corridor 39,665 38,245 -4%

Reach Households located in all other areas of Arlington County 36,884 36,700 <-1%

Total 113,944 111,932 -2%

Reach Households with access to privately owned vehicles N/A N/A N/A

Reach Households without access to privately owned vehicles N/A N/A N/A

Total N/A N/A N/A

*Data sources: CPHD_MasterHousingUnitDatabase2017; polygon shapefile describing the parcels in Arlington County that have residential uses as of 2017; compiled by the Arlington County Department of Community Planning, Housing, and Development using files from the Office of Real Estate Assessment and other files.

Selection Procedure The selection procedure recommended for this study is stratified random sampling. This is a probability-based method that uses auxiliary information on the sampling frame to ensure adequate representation for specified sub-groups and to improve survey precision by decreasing sampling variability [2][3][4][5]. The target population is grouped into non-overlapping strata defined by listed sub-group attributes and a random sample is selected within each stratum. Under this method, the variables used to define the stratification should be correlated with the statistic(s) of interest, each unit in the sampling frame should be assigned to one and only one stratum, the units within each stratum should be as similar as possible and each stratum should be as different as possible from the others, and the final sample should be drawn from all strata [2][3][5]. The explicit stratification variables used in this study are housing type (single-family detached, single-family attached, or multi-family), RPP program eligibility (yes – eligible to participate or no – not eligible to participate), and Arlington County Planning Corridor (Columbia Pike, Route 1, Rosslyn-Ballston, and all other county areas).

There are two basic types of stratified samples: proportionate and disproportionate. Proportionate sampling involves selecting the same proportion of units from each strata so that the resulting sample is distributed across the strata similarly to the underlying target population [2][4]. This approach is typically used to improve the precision of the total population estimates. Proportionate sampling can be combined with oversampling to account for very small strata. Disproportionate sampling involves sampling some strata at a higher rate than others, for instance by selecting an equal sized sample from each strata [2][4]. Disproportionate samples are typically used to improve precision for sub-group estimates.

This study proposes the use of disproportionate stratified sampling to ensure the desired level of precision is met for the target sub-groups as well as the target population as a whole. Since the sampling fractions are not equal across all strata under this method, design weights (calculated as the inverse of the sampling fraction) will need to be applied in the final analysis.

Sample Size The sample sizes for this study were calculated relative to the desired level of precision for target population and sub-group estimates and expected response rates. The precision of sub-group estimates will be contingent on response rate outcomes. The sample design is constructed to ensure the minimum sample necessary for a 95% confidence level with a margin of error of +/-3% for all Arlington County households with as low as a 1.7% response rate. Table 3 summarizes the response rates necessary to obtain the desired level of precision for sub-groups which vary due to subpopulation size differences. Access to privately owned vehicles is excluded since this attribute cannot be assigned at the individual household level from the U.S. Census data source.

Table 3. Minimum Response Rate Requirements

Subgroup Description Minimum Response

Rate Required

Total Allocated Mailings

Sampling Fraction

(Proportion of

Population Sampled)

Assured All Households in Arlington County 1.7% 60,000 0.5

Target Households eligible to participate in the RPP program 9.2% 11,135 1.0

Target Households that are not eligible to participate in the RPP program 2.1% 48,865 0.5

Total 60,000

Target Households living in different housing types - single-family detached 6.4% 15,875 0.6

Target Households living in different housing types - single-family attached 14.7% 6,946 1.0

Target Households living in different housing types - multi-family 2.7% 37,179 0.5

Total 60,000

Reach Households located in the Columbia Pike Planning Corridor 6.8% 15,000 0.7

Reach Households located in the Route 1 Planning Corridor 6.8% 15,000 0.9

Reach Households located in the Rosslyn-Ballston Planning Corridor 6.8% 15,000 0.4

Reach Households located in all other areas of Arlington County 6.8% 15,000 0.4

Total 60,000

Table 4 provides a summary of the sample allocation across the stratification groups with corresponding sample sizes based on the defined precision level and expected response rates. The totals for number of households by stratum are relative to comprehensive individual street address data sourced from USPS and supplemented with residential address data provided by Arlington County to produce the final sampling frame.

Table 4. Summary of Sample Sizes by Stratification Group and Response Rates

Representation in Population

Allocation of Mailings

Sampling Fraction

(Proportion of

Population Sampled)

No. Responses by Response Rate

Stratification Group* No. Households

% in Population

1.7% 2.1% 2.7% 6.4% 6.8% 9.2% 14.7%

HH SFD_HH RPP_Columbia Pike 964 1% 964 1.0 16 20 26 62 66 88 142

HH SFD_HH No RPP_Columbia Pike 3,202 3% 3,202 1.0 54 67 88 206 218 293 470

HH SFA_HH RPP_Columbia Pike 355 <1% 355 1.0 6 7 10 23 24 32 52

HH SFA_HH No RPP_Columbia Pike 1,411 1% 1,411 1.0 24 29 39 91 96 129 207

HH MF_HH RPP_Columbia Pike 213 <1% 213 1.0 4 4 6 14 14 19 31

HH MF_HH No RPP_Columbia Pike 14,556 13% 8,855 0.6 150 185 243 569 602 811 1,300

HH SFD_HH RPP_Route 1 1,277 1% 1,277 1.0 22 27 35 82 87 117 187

HH SFD_HH No RPP_Route 1 469 <1% 469 1.0 8 10 13 30 32 43 69

HH SFA_HH RPP_Route 1 224 <1% 224 1.0 4 5 6 14 15 21 33

HH SFA_HH No RPP_Route 1 103 <1% 103 1.0 2 2 3 7 7 9 15

HH MF_HH RPP_Route 1 268 <1% 268 1.0 5 6 7 17 18 25 39

HH MF_HH No RPP_Route 1 13,945 12% 12,659 0.9 215 263 347 814 861 1,159 1,858

HH SFD_HH RPP_Rosslyn-Ballston 2,180 2% 2,180 1.0 37 45 60 140 148 200 320

HH SFD_HH No RPP_Rosslyn-Ballston 829 1% 829 1.0 14 17 23 53 56 76 122

Representation in Population

Allocation of Mailings

Sampling Fraction

(Proportion of

Population Sampled)

No. Responses by Response Rate

Stratification Group* No. Households

% in Population

1.7% 2.1% 2.7% 6.4% 6.8% 9.2% 14.7%

HH SFA_HH RPP_Rosslyn-Ballston 1,265 1% 1,265 1.0 22 26 35 81 86 116 186

HH SFA_HH No RPP_Rosslyn-Ballston 1,080 1% 1,080 1.0 18 23 30 69 73 99 159

HH MF_HH RPP_Rosslyn-Ballston 2,065 2% 2,065 1.0 35 43 57 133 141 189 303

HH MF_HH No RPP_Rosslyn-Ballston 30,826 28% 7,581 0.2 129 158 208 487 516 694 1,113

HH SFD_HH RPP_All Other Areas 1,755 2% 1,755 1.0 30 37 48 113 118 161 258

HH SFD_HH No RPP_All Other Areas 17,137 15% 5,199 0.3 88 109 143 334 354 476 763

HH SFA_HH RPP_All Other Areas 230 <1% 230 1.0 4 5 6 15 16 21 34

HH SFA_HH No RPP_All Other Areas 2,278 2% 2,278 1.0 39 48 63 146 155 209 334

HH MF_HH RPP_All Other Areas 339 <1% 339 1.0 6 7 9 22 23 31 50

HH MF_HH No RPP_All Other Areas 14,961 13% 5,199 0.3 88 109 143 334 354 476 763

Total Mailings 60,000 Total Sample 1,020 1,252 1,648 3,856 4,080 5,494 8,808

* HH SFD_HH RPP = Single-Family Detached, RPP Program Eligible; HH SFD_HH No RPP = Single-Family Detached, Not RPP Program Eligible; HH SFA_HH RPP = Single-Family Attached, RPP Program Eligible; HH SFA_HH No RPP = Single-Family Attached, Not RPP Program Eligible; HH MF_HH RPP = Multi-Family, RPP Program Eligible; HH MF_HH No RPP = Multi-Family, Not RPP Program Eligible

Note: Single-Family Attached is comprised of Duplex, Side-by-Side, and Townhouse units; Multi-Family is comprised of Apartment Elevator, Apartment Garden, Condo Elevator, and Condo Garden units.

References World Health Organization (WHO). “WHO STEPS Surveillance Manual.” Geneva, 2005.

Lavrakas, P. J. Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 2008.

Hubbard, Frost, Yu-chieh (Jay) Lin, Dan Zahs, and Mengyao Hu. “Sample Design.” Guidelines for Best Practice in Cross-Cultural Surveys. Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 2016.

Piazza, Thomas. “Fundamentals of Applied Sampling.” Chapter 5 in Handbook of Survey Research, Bingley, UK: Emerald, 2010.

Department of Economics and Social Affairs, Statistics Division, United Nations. Studies in Methods, Series F No. 98. “Designing Household Survey Samples: Practical Guidelines.” New York, 2008.

Henry, Gary T. “Practical Sampling.” Applied Social Research Methods Series, Volume 21. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 1990.

Groves, Robert M., et al. Survey Methodology. Wiley, 2009.

Appendix 2 Recruitment Plan

APPENDIX 2 Recruitment Plan

Recruitment Plan Introduction This memo summarizes the recruitment plan based on the sample design that was developed for a probability-based public-opinion survey on Arlington County’s Residential Parking Permit (RPP) program. The recruitment plan includes an overview of the sample design, the method of recruitment, and the estimated number of potential participants to be contacted based on the quotas established in the sample design. This plan also recommends the number, value, and type of incentives that should be provided to minimize non-response and provides a method for uniquely identifying households for use in the recruitment materials.

Overview of Sample Design Under the sample design developed for this project, participants for the survey will be selected from a comprehensive list of residential addresses developed from a tabular saturation file with individual street addresses in Arlington County, VA. These addresses are sourced from USPS data and supplemented with non-duplicative households from Arlington County’s street addresses dataset to improve the sampling frame coverage. The final sampling frame is comprised of 111,932 households. The selection method for sampling households is stratified random sampling. Stratification of the sampling frame for the selection of households is based on the following sub-groups:

1. Columbia Pike Planning Area – Single-Family Detached Households – Eligible for RPP 2. Columbia Pike Planning Area – Single-Family Detached Households – Not Eligible for

RPP 3. Columbia Pike Planning Area – Single-Family Attached Households – Eligible for RPP 4. Columbia Pike Planning Area – Single-Family Attached Households – Not Eligible for

RPP 5. Columbia Pike Planning Area – Multi-Family Households – Eligible for RPP 6. Columbia Pike Planning Area – Multi-Family Households – Not Eligible for RPP 7. Route 1 Planning Area – Single-Family Detached Households – Eligible for RPP 8. Route 1 Planning Area – Single-Family Detached Households – Not Eligible for RPP 9. Route 1 Planning Area – Single-Family Attached Households – Eligible for RPP 10. Route 1 Planning Area – Single-Family Attached Households – Not Eligible for RPP 11. Route 1 Planning Area – Multi-Family Households – Eligible for RPP 12. Route 1 Planning Area – Multi-Family Households – Not Eligible for RPP 13. Rosslyn-Ballston Planning Area – Single-Family Detached Households – Eligible for

RPP 14. Rosslyn-Ballston Planning Area – Single-Family Detached Households – Not Eligible

for RPP 15. Rosslyn-Ballston Planning Area – Single-Family Attached Households – Eligible for RPP 16. Rosslyn-Ballston Planning Area – Single-Family Attached Households – Not Eligible for

RPP

17. Rosslyn-Ballston Planning Area – Multi-Family Households – Eligible for RPP 18. Rosslyn-Ballston Planning Area – Multi-Family Households – Not Eligible for RPP 19. All Other Areas in Arlington County – Single-Family Detached Households – Eligible

for RPP 20. All Other Areas in Arlington County – Single-Family Detached Households – Not

Eligible for RPP 21. All Other Areas in Arlington County – Single-Family Attached Households – Eligible

for RPP 22. All Other Areas in Arlington County – Single-Family Attached Households – Not

Eligible for RPP 23. All Other Areas in Arlington County – Multi-Family Households – Eligible for RPP 24. All Other Areas in Arlington County – Multi-Family Households – Not Eligible for RPP

Recruitment Method The recruitment method is the use of mailers to push respondents to a web-based survey. Postcards with information on accessing the web-based survey will be mailed to the sampled households. The total mailings for the first wave of recruitment is 60,000 based on the desire for a 95% confidence level with a margin of error of +/-3% for all Arlington County households with as low as a 1.7% response rate.

At least one follow up wave of correspondence is important to improve overall response rates. Strategies for implementing the follow up correspondence vary based on the scale of and resources available for a study. A popular system for mail survey administration was developed by Don A. Dillman, known as the Dillman Total/Tailored Design Method (TDM),i,ii, iii which uses timed, personalized mailings to encourage respondents to contribute towards a common goal by participating in the survey. Application of this method includes: 1) pre-notification letter in advance of the survey (less than a week before deploying survey), 2) survey with cover letter, 3) first thank you/reminder letter (within a week after survey is deployed), 4) replacement survey to non-respondents (2-4 weeks after original survey deployment), and 5) final thank you/reminder letter (2-4 weeks after replacement survey deployment).

The DTM can be reasonably adapted to other survey modes and based on the needs/resources of a study. For this study, if resources allow one subsequent wave of correspondence to all respondents, a follow up approach can be chosen from the following options:

i Dillman, D.A. (2000). Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method 2nd Edition. Wiley: New York. ii Messer, Benjamin L. and Don A. Dillman (2011). “Surveying the General Public Over the Internet Using Address-Based Sampling and Mail Contact Procedures.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(3):429-57. iii Dillman, D.A., Smyth, J.D., Christian, L.M. (2014). Internet, Phone, Mail and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method 4th Edition. Wiley: Hoboken, NJ.

1. Single thank you/reminder to all respondents within the first 12 business days after opening the survey

2. Single reminder to all non-respondents within the first 12 business days after opening the survey

3. Two follow up reminders to non-respondents only: a. One to all respondents who have not yet responded within the first 6 business

days after opening the survey b. One to all respondents who have not yet responded within the next 7-12

business days after opening the survey

This study will employ Option 1 to follow up with respondents to both reduce the logistical burden on the printing contractor and to express appreciation to all respondents for participating in the survey. One subsequent wave of recruitment communication will be deployed to the 60,000 sampled households within the first 12 business days after opening the survey. Call center services will be provided for up to 600 participants to call and take the ten minute survey, equivalent to 1% of households reached through the first round of the recommended sample plan, to result in an assumed 100 hours of call center services. The survey will be closed 22 business days after the survey is opened, i.e. 4 weeks and 2 days after recruitment materials are mailed. The survey will be available in English, Spanish, and Amharic to allow respondents to complete the survey using the language with which they are most comfortable.

Estimated Number of Participants The sample sizes for this study as calculated for the sample design were based on the response rates necessary to obtain the desired level of precision for sub-groups and vary due to subpopulation size differences. Table 1 summarizes the response rates necessary to obtain the desired level of precision by sub-group. The final sample design memorandum provides the detailed allocation of mailings by stratification group and the associated expected number of responses by response rate.

Table 1. Minimum Response Rate Requirements

Subgroup Description Minimum Response

Rate Required

Total Allocated Mailings

Sampling Fraction

(Proportion of

Population Sampled)

Assured All Households in Arlington County 1.7% 60,000 0.5

Target Households eligible to participate in the RPP program 9.2% 11,135 1.0

Target Households that are not eligible to participate in the RPP program 2.1% 48,865 0.5

Total 60,000

Target Households living in different housing types - single-family detached 6.4% 15,875 0.6

Target Households living in different housing types - single-family attached 14.7% 6,946 1.0

Target Households living in different housing types - multi-family 2.7% 37,179 0.5

Total 60,000

Reach Households located in the Columbia Pike Planning Corridor 6.8% 15,000 0.7

Reach Households located in the Route 1 Planning Corridor 6.8% 15,000 0.9

Reach Households located in the Rosslyn-Ballston Planning Corridor 6.8% 15,000 0.4

Reach Households located in all other areas of Arlington County 6.8% 15,000 0.4

Total 60,000

Recruitment Incentives This study will use incentives to help minimize non-response. Ten (10) $100 Visa gift cards will be rewarded to survey participants via a random drawing. Research has shown that 1) incentives increase response rates to surveys across all deployment modes, including mail and web-based, 2) monetary incentives increase response rates more than gifts, and 3) prepaid incentives increase response rates more than promised incentives or lotteries, but prepaid incentives are difficult to implement in web-based surveys.iv

iv Singer, E., & Ye, C. (2013). The Use and Effects of Incentives in Surveys. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 645(1), 112–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212458082

https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212458082

Household Unique Identifiers Unique identifiers were developed and assigned to the sampled households to link each recruitment postcard and its associated survey to an individual household. Each household is assigned a unique identifier with a two digit code that represents a household's stratum followed by a 5 digit sequential record number within each stratum. A 5 digit sequential record number is needed since the maximum number of sampled records within a single stratum is over 12,000. Table 2 summarizes the coding scheme.

Table 2. Household Unique Identifiers

Stratification Group Description Mailer ID Prefix

5 Digit Sequential Record Number Final Mailer Codes

Columbia Pike_SFD_RPP Eligible A1 00001, 00002, 00003, (…) A100001, A100002, A100003, (…)

Columbia Pike_SFD_Not RPP Eligible A2 00001, 00002, 00003, (…) A200001, A200002, A200003, (…)

Columbia Pike_SFA_RPP Eligible A3 00001, 00002, 00003, (…) A300001, A300002, A300003, (…)

Columbia Pike_SFA_Not RPP Eligible A4 00001, 00002, 00003, (…) A400001, A400002, A400003, (…)

Columbia Pike_MULTI_RPP Eligible A5 00001, 00002, 00003, (…) A500001, A500002, A500003, (…)

Columbia Pike_MULTI_Not RPP Eligible A6 00001, 00002, 00003, (…) A600001, A600002, A600003, (…)

Jefferson Davis_SFD_RPP Eligible B1 00001, 00002, 00003, (…) B100001, B100002, B100003, (…)

Jefferson Davis_SFD_Not RPP Eligible B2 00001, 00002, 00003, (…) B200001, B200002, B200003, (…)

Jefferson Davis_SFA_RPP Eligible B3 00001, 00002, 00003, (…) B300001, B300002, B300003, (…)

Jefferson Davis_SFA_Not RPP Eligible B4 00001, 00002, 00003, (…) B400001, B400002, B400003, (…)

Jefferson Davis_MULTI_RPP Eligible B5 00001, 00002, 00003, (…) B500001, B500002, B500003, (…)

Jefferson Davis_MULTI_Not RPP Eligible B6 00001, 00002, 00003, (…) B600001, B600002, B600003, (…)

Rosslyn-Ballston_SFD_RPP Eligible C1 00001, 00002, 00003, (…) C100001, C100002, C100003, (…)

Rosslyn-Ballston_SFD_Not RPP Eligible C2 00001, 00002, 00003, (…) C200001, C200002, C200003, (…)

Rosslyn-Ballston_SFA_RPP Eligible C3 00001, 00002, 00003, (…) C300001, C300002, C300003, (…)

Rosslyn-Ballston_SFA_Not RPP Eligible C4 00001, 00002, 00003, (…) C400001, C400002, C400003, (…)

Rosslyn-Ballston_MULTI_RPP Eligible C5 00001, 00002, 00003, (…) C500001, C500002, C500003, (…)

Rosslyn-Ballston_MULTI_Not RPP Eligible C6 00001, 00002, 00003, (…) C600001, C600002, C600003, (…)

All Other Areas_SFD_RPP Eligible D1 00001, 00002, 00003, (…) D100001, D100002, D100003, (…)

All Other Areas_SFD_Not RPP Eligible D2 00001, 00002, 00003, (…) D200001, D200002, D200003, (…)

All Other Areas_SFA_RPP Eligible D3 00001, 00002, 00003, (…) D300001, D300002, D300003, (…)

All Other Areas_SFA_Not RPP Eligible D4 00001, 00002, 00003, (…) D400001, D400002, D400003, (…)

All Other Areas_MULTI_RPP Eligible D5 00001, 00002, 00003, (…) D500001, D500002, D500003, (…)

All Other Areas_MULTI_Not RPP Eligible D6 00001, 00002, 00003, (…) D600001, D600002, D600003, (…)

Appendix 3 Questionnaire Design

APPENDIX 3 Questionnaire Design

Survey Questionnaire Design Introduction This memorandum summarizes the design of the household survey questionnaire for Arlington County’s Residential Parking Permit (RPP) program review. The design of the survey consisted of three elements:

• Sampling Plan

• Recruitment Plan

• Survey Questionnaire

This memo focuses on the questionnaire development, including the following items:

• Topics covered by survey

• Development of questions and answer categories

• Branching logic for target sub-groups (as per the Sampling Plan)

• Questionnaire versions (online and telephone) for survey administration

Topics To prepare for the development of the questionnaire, Arlington County first identified a set of topics that the survey would potentially cover. Seven major topics, each with a set of sub-topics, were identified based on the results from public outreach efforts conducted by Arlington County staff in summer and fall of 2018. These topics were then prioritized as high- and low-priority (Tier 1 vs. Tier 2) for the survey to cover.1 Topic prioritization was based on the following considerations:

• The issues most commonly identified by the public • The potential effectiveness of the survey for obtaining feedback about the

topic • The applicability of the topics to the target sub-groups identified in the

Sampling Plan • A limit on the survey length to encourage a higher response rate

Tables 1 through 7 show the final set of topics and the County’s research questions that guided the development of questions asked in the survey.

1 Tier 1: Prioritize inclusion in survey questionnaire vs. Tier 2: Incorporate in survey questionnaire if space allows

Topic 1 – RPP Program Satisfaction Table 1. Topic Summary: RPP Program Satisfaction

ID Sub-Topic Priority Research Questions to Inform Survey Questionnaire 1.1 Program fairness Tier 1 Are current RPP restrictions perceived to be fair or

unfair? How could current RPP enforcement change so that it is perceived to be fair?

1.2 Permit Access Tier 1 Is it easy to navigate the RPP program website to find the applicable type/class of permit? Have residents heard of others selling or offering to sell an RPP permit or pass? Is it possible to make photocopies of passes without consequences? Do residents lend out their RPP materials to otherwise ineligible users?

1.3 Permit Abuse Tier 1 Do residents consider the selling and photocopying of the RPP materials to be abuse of the program? Is permit abuse perceived to be a pervasive challenge to the RPP program? What approaches are recommended for use in reducing permit abuse (i.e. implementation of LPR)?

1.4 Business Patron Parking

Tier 1 Is business patron parking access perceived to be sufficient in and near RPP zones? How should policy or regulations change to enable business patron parking access in and near RPP zones?

1.5 Openness to changing the current RPP program

Tier 1 To what degree are residents receptive to changes in administration (fees), enforcement and eligibility of the RPP program?

1.6 Perceived RPP Zone Size

Tier 1 Are the current zones, zone-sizes perceived as a problem? Is intra-zone commuting a problem or even a benefit for the current operations of the RPP program?

1.7 Parking Supply and Demand - All

Tier 1 Is current parking demand perceived to match or exceed supply in RPP zones?

1.8 Parking Supply and Demand – Visitors

Tier 1 Is current parking demand perceived to match or exceed supply in RPP zones for visitor parking?

ID Sub-Topic Priority Research Questions to Inform Survey Questionnaire 1.9 Program

Enforcement Tier 1 Are the patrols and pro-active enforcement of the

RPP program satisfactory to residents? To business-owners? (To non-residents?) Have residents (participating in the program) ever called for a specific program enforcement response? Is the reactive enforcement satisfactory to the residents?

1.10 Perceived Impact on Parking Availability

Tier 2 Does the program seem to make parking easier for residents on the participating streets?

1.11 Perceived Parking Search Time

Tier 2 How much time do residents spend finding a parking spot near their home? Are there times where residents do not find a parking spot near their home (in participating neighborhoods)?

1.12 Perceived Sources of Parking Pressure in Neighborhoods

Tier 2 What are the perceived sources that put pressure on parking availability in resident’s neighborhoods?

Topic 2 – Problems the RPP program should solve Table 2. Topic Summary: Problems the RPP program should solve

ID Sub-Topic Priority Research Questions to Inform Survey Questionnaire 2.1 Value of the RPP

program Tier 1 What do participants value about the program?

Which are the most important benefits the program provides them, what are the least important?

2.2 Motivation for a petition

Tier 1 Why do residents without restrictions on their streets want RPP regulations?

2.3 Opinionated residents

Tier 1 How do residents who are not part of the RPP program feel about (the reasons) participating residents?

2.4 Demand management

Tier 1 Should the number of permits be capped to manage demand?

Topic 3 – Eligibility for the Program Table 3. Topic Summary: Eligibility for the Program

ID Sub-Topic Priority Research Questions to Inform Survey Questionnaire 3.1 Eligible Arlington

Residents Tier 1 Among all Arlington residents, who should be able to

get permits? Among all Arlington residents, who should be able to apply to the County for restrictions?

3.2 Eligible Visitor Types

Tier 1 What types of visitor, guests and other non-residents should be eligible for permits? For what duration should those permits be valid?

3.3 Permit Types and Enforcement

Tier 1 Should RPP permit classes/types change to influence the ease of enforcement of the program?

3.4 Adequacy of Permit Types

Tier 2 Are the current permit types/classes perceived by residents to be sufficient? Is there a group of potential users left out due to the current permit types and policy?

3.5 Opinions on Special Permits

Tier 2 How do residents feel about special permits for i. Teachers ii. Home health workers/social workers iii. Childe care providers iv. Building contractors v. Tourists/visitors from outside the County

Topic 4 – Program Fees Table 4. Topic Summary: Program Fees

ID Sub-Topic Priority Research Questions to Inform Survey Questionnaire 4.1 Coverage of the

program cost Tier 1 Should permit/pass fees cover the cost of program?

4.2 Variable fee permit types

Tier 1 How should the cost of different RPP permits change?

4.3 Demand management

Tier 1 Should fees be used to manage parking demand? Should demand management steer on zones (high-demand areas), permit types, or other?

ID Sub-Topic Priority Research Questions to Inform Survey Questionnaire 4.4 Basis of variable

fees Tier 1 Based on household’s access to off-street parking?

Based on household’s annual income Based on status of residency (non-resident vs resident)? Based on household’s number of vehicles in the program? Based on household’s composition or size?

4.5 Perceived cost of program

Tier 2 What is the perceived cost of the program? What changes should be made to balance program admin costs?

Topic 5 – Program Flexibility Table 5. Topic Summary: Program Flexibility

ID Sub-Topic Priority Research Questions to Inform Survey Questionnaire 5.1 Trade-offs

between program’s ease of use and neighborhood specific conditions

Tier 1 What is the balance between having a program that responds to individual neighborhood conditions and resident concerns with having a program that is easy for residents, guests, and County staff to understand?

5.2 Trade-offs between residents’ concerns and County’s ability to enforce

Tier 1 What is the balance between having a program that responds to individual neighborhood conditions and resident concerns with having a program that is easy for police to enforce?

5.3 Types of restrictions Tier 2 What types of restrictions do residents want for different types of parking generators, like stores, offices, community facilities, and so on?

Topic 6 – RPP and Infill Development Table 6. Topic Summary: RPP and Infill Development

ID Sub-Topic Priority Research Questions to Inform Survey Questionnaire 6.1 Infill Developments Tier 1 How RPP influences whether resident accept infill

development 6.2 Parking supply Tier 2 Using RPP to manage transportation demands, and

constraining parking supply for new development to reduce traffic and pollution

Topic 7 – Demographics, Vehicle Ownership, and Parking Behavior Table 7. Topic Summary: Demographics, Vehicle Ownership, and Parking Behavior

ID Sub-Topic Priority Research Questions to Inform Survey Questionnaire 7.1 Race Tier 1 Demographic characteristic about survey

participants

7.2 Ethnicity Tier 1 7.3 Income Tier 1 7.4 Housing tenure Tier 1 7.5 Housing type Tier 1 7.6 Housing

composition Tier 1

7.7 Number of vehicles available/owned

Tier 1

7.8 Access to a garage, parking lot, or driveway at home

Tier 1

7.9 Possession of handicapped placard or license plate

Tier 2

7.10 Typical parking location at home (in a garage, in a parking lot, in a driveway, on the street where the person lives, on a street nearby, on a lot or in a garage nearby)

Tier 2

7.11 Garage access Tier 2 Do residents park on the street because they are unable to access their garage or using it for storage?

7.12 Languages Tier 2 Linguistic characteristics of survey participants 1Tier 1 (Prioritize inclusion in survey questionnaire) vs. Tier 2 (incorporate in survey questionnaire if space allows)

Development of Questions and Answer Categories The survey was developed using the following process, which involved multiple rounds of dialogue between Arlington County staff and the project team:

1. The project team wrote a comprehensive set of potential questions for each topic and organized them by topic number as shown in the tables above. This first set of questions was more comprehensive than would be feasible to

include in the final survey. It also included introductory questions that would determine whether a respondent belonged to a target sub-groups, such as RPP participants and non-participants and eligible and ineligible households.

2. The project team removed low-priority topics, reorganized the questions to follow a more logical flow, and revised question and answer category wording to reduce cognitive burden for respondents and to increase response rates.

3. The project team finalized the question wording and order, including skip and branching logic, described in greater detail in the next section.

Branching Logic Branching logic2 was used to determine which questions and answer categories would appear for respondents in following different subgroups shown in Figure 1. It was also used to provide question wording and answer categories that would make sense for each type of respondent. For example, respondents who did not know about the RPP program were not shown answer categories containing terms like “FlexPass.” The final survey had sixteen (16) major sections, governed by branching logic based on sampling subgroups shown in Figure 1 and described in Table 8.

2 Branching logic is used in survey design to customize which questions and answer categories are shown based on the respondent’s answers.

Figure 1. Survey Section Branching for Sub-Groups

Table 8. Sections, Objectives, and Branching

Section Number

Section Heading Objective of Section and Branching Logic

1 Make your voice heard! 7-digit code allows respondent to access the survey and allows the project team to determine which target subgroup the respondent belongs to, including geographic area, household type, RPP eligibility, and RPP participation.

2 Introduction This section determines whether the respondent knows about the RPP. Branching logic determines which of the following sections are shown.

3 Restrictions on Your Street This section determines whether the respondent is eligible for RPP participation based on whether there are restrictions on the street in front of their home. Branching logic determines whether Section 4 and 5 are shown.

4 Opinion of Restrictions on Your Street

This section asks the respondent to evaluate their overall approval/disapproval of the program. Branching logic determines whether the respondent sees a question about keeping/removing or adding/not adding restrictions to their street.

5 Purpose of Parking Management

This section covers reasons why the respondent does or does not want to have parking restrictions on their street. Branching logic from Section 4 determines the question wording (want restrictions/wish to have restrictions/do not want restrictions) and answer categories provided.

6 Managing Parking Demand This section asks the respondent to select preferred parking demand management measures. Branching logic from Section 4 determines the answer categories provided (respondents who have and want to keep restrictions receive answer categories about permit limits and costs; respondents who do not have/don’t want restrictions receive answer categories about parking meters and hourly restriction signs).

7 Program Eligibility This section asks the respondent to select which types of residents they think should be eligible for the program. Based on branching logic from Section 2, this question is only shown to respondents who know about the RPP.

8 Trade-off: Visitor Parking This section asks the respondent to choose between two visitor parking scenarios. Based on branching logic from Section 2, this question is only shown to respondents who know about the RPP.

Section Number

Section Heading Objective of Section and Branching Logic

9 Trade-off: Program Flexibility vs. Enforcement

This section asks the respondent to choose between two program structure scenarios. Based on branching logic from Section 2, this question is only shown to respondents who know about the RPP.

10 Your Parking Characteristics This section covers general parking characteristics and determines whether the respondent participates in the RPP. All respondents receive questions about parking location and ease of parking, but based on branching logic from Section 3, only respondents who have RPP restrictions on their street are asked about their participation.

11 Your Visitors’ Parking Characteristics

This section covers visitor parking. Branching logic from Sections 2, 3, and 10 determines the answer categories provided (whether specific RPP permit types are included).

12 Residential Parking Preferences

This section covers opinions on potential policy changes related to permit costs, restrictions related to new housing construction, and eligible permit users.

13 Permit Misuse and Enforcement

This section covers measures for reducing permit misuse and frequency of enforcement. Based on branching logic from Section 2, this question is only shown to respondents who have RPP restrictions on the street in front of their home.

14 Your Housing This section covers housing type and tenure. 15 Demographics This section covers household composition,

vehicle ownership and use, racial/ethnic/linguistic background, gender, and household income. Based on branching logic from Section 14, respondents living in a single-family attached or detached home receive an additional question about use of carport or garage space.

16 Contact Information for Drawing

This section allows the respondent to provide their contact information, if desired, to enter the prize drawing.

Questionnaire Versions Two versions of the questionnaire were created so that respondents could choose to take it online or respond over the phone. Since telephone surveys can place more burden on the respondents and require call center staff to administer the survey, thus potentially reducing survey completion rates, the telephone survey was adjusted as follows:

• A stopping point was added after the last trade-off question (Section 9), during which the call center staff administering the survey would ask the respondent if they wanted to answer a few additional questions.

• If the respondent answered “Yes”, the staff would proceed through the rest of the survey sections.

• If the respondent answered “No”, the staff would end the survey and ask for the respondent’s contact information for the prize drawing.

The online survey contained all sections as outlined in Table 8 above, and was available in English, Spanish, and Amharic.

Attachment A Final Survey - English

Make your voice heard!Arlington County is reviewing its Residential Permit Parking (RPP) program toassess its purpose and identify needed changes. This survey is a major part of thereview, and your feedback will inform policy changes considered by the ArlingtonCounty Board.

At the end of the survey, you will be invited to enter a drawing for one of 10 $100Visa gift cards.

The survey is funded by Arlington County, but is being distributed and analyzed byan independent consultant. Your responses will be confidential and any identifyinginformation you provide will be removed from the survey results sent to the County.

1. Please enter the 7-digit code from the postcard you received from ArlingtonCounty.

*

1

Introduction

2. Did you know that Arlington County has a residential permit parking (RPP)program? The images below show the signs and permits for this program.

*

Yes

No

2

mkent

Text Box

If Question 2 = No: - Hide Section 3: Restrictions on Your Street - Hide Section 4: Opinion of Restrictions on Your Street - Hide Section 5: Purpose of Parking Management - SKIP TO Section 6: Managing Parking Demand, Q.11 [Hide Q.9, Q.10] - Hide Section 7: Program Eligibility - Hide Section 8: Trade-off: Visitor Parking - Hide Section 9: Trade-off: Program Flexibility vs. Enforcement - SKIP TO Section 10: Your Parking Characteristics [Hide Q.17] - SKIP TO Section 11: Your Visitors' Parking Characteristics, Q. 20 [Hide Q.18, Q.19] - SKIP TO Section 12: Residential Parking Preferences, Q.22 [Hide Q.21, Q.23] - Hide Section 13: Permit Misuse and Enforcement - SKIP TO Section 14: Your Housing - Show Section 15: Demographics - Show Section 16: Contact Information for Drawing If Question 1 = Yes: - Proceed through survey

Restrictions on Your Street

3. Are there residential permit parking (RPP) restrictions on the street in front ofyour home?

*

Yes

No

I don't know

3

mkent

Text Box

If Question 3 = Yes: - Show Q.4, [Hide Q.5] - Proceed through next sections - Show Section 10: Your Parking Characteristics - all questions (Q.15 - Q.17) - Proceed though next sections - Show Section 13: Permit Misuse and Enforcement If Question 3 = No: - SKIP TO Q.5 [Hide Q.4] - Proceed through next sections - Show Q.15, Q.16 [Hide Q.17] - SKIP TO Q. 19 [Hide Q. 18, Q. 20] - [Hide Section 13: Permit Misuse and Enforcement] If Question 3 = I don't know: - SKIP TO Q.5 [Hide Q.4] - Proceed through next sections - Show Q.15, Q.16 [Hide Q.17] - SKIP TO Q. 19 [Hide Q. 18, Q. 20] - [Hide Section 13: Permit Misuse and Enforcement]

Opinion of Restrictions on Your Street

4. Are you in favor of keeping the residential parking restrictions on the street infront of your home?

Yes, I want restrictions to stay

No, I want restrictions to be removed

No opinion

5. Would you like the street in front of your home to have residential permit parkingrestrictions?

Yes, I want restrictions

No, I do not want restrictions

No opinion

I need more information about the residential permit program to decide

4

mkent

Text Box

Q. 4/5 are variations of the same question - Respondent only receives 1 of them based on answer to Q.3

mkent

Text Box

Respondent has restrictions on their street

mkent

Text Box

Respondent does not have restrictions on their street / doesn't know if they do

mkent

Text Box

If Question 4 = Yes: - SKIP TO Q.6 [Hide Q.7, Q.8] - SKIP TO Q.9 [Hide Q.10, Q.11] If Question 4 = No: - SKIP TO Q.8 [Hide Q.6, Q.7] - SKIP TO Q.11 [Hide Q. 9, Q.10] If Question 4 = No Opinion: - SKIP TO Q.10 [Hide Q.6, Q.7, Q.8, Q.9, Q.11] If Question 5 = Yes: - SKIP TO Q.7 [Hide Q.6, Q.8] - SKIP TO Q.10 [Hide Q.9, Q.11] If Question 5 = No: - SKIP TO Q.8 [Hide Q.6, Q.7] - SKIP TO Q.11 [Hide Q. 9, Q.10] If Question 5 = No Opinion OR I need more information - SKIP TO Q.11 [Hide Q.6, Q.7, Q.8, Q.9, Q.10]

Purpose of Parking Management

6. Select the top three (3) reasons why you want residential parking restrictions tostay on your street:

To make sure that I can park near my home

To discourage commuter parking

To discourage parking by business customers

To reduce litter and noise

To improve neighborhood safety

To discourage parking by residents of nearby apartment or condo buildings

Other (please specify):

7. Select the top three (3) reasons why you wish to have residential parkingrestrictions on your street:








8. Select the top three (3) reasons why you do not wish to have residential parking 5

mkent

Text Box

Q. 6/7/8 are variations of the same question - Respondent only receives 1 of them based on answer to Q.4/5

mkent

Text Box

Respondent has restrictions on their street and wants to keep them

mkent

Text Box

Respondent does not have restrictions on their street and wants to add them

8. Select the top three (3) reasons why you do not wish to have residential parkingrestrictions on your street:

Everyone should have access to public street parking

There are nearby businesses that could use the parking on my street

The process to get passes is difficult

Curb space is better used for other things like bike lanes and more green space

The cost of permits and passes is too high

It is already easy to find parking

There are nearby facilities, such as a school or library, that could use the parking on my

street


6

mkent

Text Box

Respondent has OR does not have restrictions on their street and wants to remove them OR does not want to add them

Managing Parking Demand

9. If parking space availability became a problem on your street, which of thefollowing measures would you most support to manage parking demand?

Lower the maximum number of permits per household, but keep the cost per permit the

same

Do not change the maximum number of permits per household, but increase the cost for

each additional permit

Lower the maximum number of permits and increase the cost for each additional permit

Do nothing

No opinion

Other (please specify)


Install parking meters in areas with high demand

Install signs that restrict the number of hours that people can occupy a parking space

Add RPP restrictions

No nothing

No opinion


11. If parking space availability became a problem on your street, which of the 7

mkent

Text Box


mkent

Text Box


mkent

Text Box

Respondent has restrictions on their street and has no opinion about keeping/removing them OR respondent does not have restrictions and wants to add them




Do nothing

No opinion


8

mkent

Text Box

Respondent has restrictions on their street and wants to remove them, OR Respondent does not have restrictions and does not want to add them/no opinion/needs more information

Program Eligibility

12. Which type of resident should be eligible for a parking permit? Select all thatapply:

Residents with a private driveway, garage, or carport

Residents without a private driveway, garage, or carport

Residents of apartment and condo buildings

All residents of the neighborhood, no matter what housing type

9

Trade-off: Visitor Parking

13. Choose which statement you agree with most:

Visitors should be allowed to park in residential on-street parking spaces for a limited

time without a permit

Visitors should only be allowed to park in residential on-street parking spaces with a

permit or visitor pass

No opinion

10

Trade-off: Program Flexibility vs. Enforcement


I prefer a flexible residential parking program structure that can vary by neighborhood

I prefer a simple residential parking program structure that is easier to enforce

countywide and is easier to understand

No opinion

11

Your Parking Characteristics

15. Where did you park most recently near your home? Select one:

On the street

Carport, driveway, or garage at my house

Parking lot or parking deck/garage

Not applicable – I don’t drive or own a vehicle

16. Thinking of the last place you parked on the street near your home, choose whichstatement you agree with most:

It was easy to find parking, and it was the right distance away

It was easy to find parking, but it was too far away

It was difficult to find parking, but it was the right distance away

It was difficult to find parking, and it was too far away

Not applicable - I don't drive or own a vehicle

No opinion/don't know

17. What best describes your participation in the Arlington County ResidentialPermit Parking (RPP) Program? Select all that apply:

I or members of my household have a FlexPassFlexPass

I or members of my household have a permit or decal that is for my/their vehicle onlypermit or decal that is for my/their vehicle only

I or members of my household have a book of short-term visitor passesshort-term visitor passes

I and all members of my household do not participatedo not participate in the residential permit parking

program (we have no permits)

12

mkent

Text Box

If Question 17 = FlexPass, permit/decal, AND/OR short-term visitor pass: - Show Q.18 [Hide Q.19, Q.20] If Question 17 = Do not participate: - SKIP TO Q. 19 [Hide Q.18, Hide Q.20]

Your Visitors' Parking Characteristics

18. How did you handle parking for your most recent visitors who had a vehicle?

My visitors used my FlexPass

My visitors used a short-term visitor pass

My visitors parked off-street on my property/at my building

My visitors parked further away, outside the permit zone

My visitors parked in the permit zone with no permit, outside of the permit restriction

time period

My visitors parked in the permit zone with no permit, during the permit restriction time

period

I don’t know where my visitors parked


My visitors parked on the street


My visitors parked in the nearest permit zone with their own permit






13

mkent

Text Box

Q. 18/19/20 are variations of the same question - Respondent only receives 1 of them based on answer to Q.2 and Q.17

mkent

Text Box

Respondent knows about RPP, has restrictions on street, participates in program

mkent

Text Box

Respondent knows about RPP, has restrictions on street, does not participate in program OR doesn't have restrictions

mkent

Text Box

Respondent doesn't know about RPP OR knows about RPP but don't know if have restrictions

Residential Parking Preferences

21. The cost of a residential parking permit should vary based on the following(check all that apply):

Whether or not the household has access to parking in a garage, carport, parking lot, or

driveway

The number of vehicles in the household

The ability of the individual to pay for the permit

The age of the individual (e.g., discounts for residents 65 and older)

The demand for parking at that location

The cost should not vary (i.e., it should be the same for all residents)

22. Choose which statement you agree with most regarding your neighborhood:

I would support new housing construction (e.g., apartments, condominiums, or

townhomes) even if some new residents would park on the street


townhomes) only if residents of that building were not allowed to park on the street

I would not support new housing construction (e.g., apartments, condominiums, or

townhomes) no matter what parking measures are included

Don’t know/need more information to decide

23. Should the following groups of people be eligible for a permit to park on an RPP-14

Yes, at a higher pricethan residents

Yes, at the same priceas residents No No opinion

Landlords andproperty managers

Businessowners/employees

Service providers(e.g. medical homecare, social work,childcare,construction/homeimprovement)

Businesspatrons/customers

Schoolstaff/teachers

Car-share vehicles(such as Car2Go)

Visitors tocommunitycenters, libraries,or othercommunityfacilities

23. Should the following groups of people be eligible for a permit to park on an RPP-restricted street near their destination?

15

Permit Misuse and Enforcement

24. What are the top three (3) approaches you recommend to reduce problematicRPP participant behavior? Select up to three:

More options for reporting potential violations

Stronger penalties for selling or counterfeiting permits

Simplify or reduce the types of permits

Permits printed with the license plate number of the corresponding vehicle

Use license plate readers for enforcement

Reduce zone size to prevent residents from commuting in the same zone

Nothing needs to be done; permit abuse is not a problem


25. Have you ever requested parking enforcement in your neighborhood (forconcerns like: parking without a permit, giving resident decals to non-residents,using expired permits, etc.)?

Yes – often (i.e., every month)

Yes – sometimes (i.e., several times in the past year)

Yes – rarely (i.e., once in the past year)

No

16

Your Housing

26. Which of the following best describes the type of housing you live in?

Single-family detached (like a standalone house)

Single-family attached (like a townhouse)

Multi-family (like an apartment or condominium)

Other (Write in below)

27. Do you own or rent your home?

Own

Rent

Live with family or friends (do not pay rent)

Other/NA

17

mkent

Text Box

If Question 26 = Multi-family: - Hide Q. 32

Demographics

28. How many adults (age 18 or older) live in your household, including yourself?(enter number below)

29. How many children (age 17 or younger) live in your household more than halftime? (enter number below)

30. How many total personal vehicles (cars, SUVs, minivans, vans, pickup trucks,etc.) are kept by members of your household? (enter number below)

31. Do you or does someone in your household use a disabled parking placard orlicense plate?

Yes

No

32. Does use of your carport or garage for storage leave you unable to park a vehiclein it?

Yes

No

Not applicable - I don't have a carport or garage

33. How do you categorize your racial or ethnic background? Check all that apply: 18

mkent

Text Box

Respondent lives in single-family attached or detached or other home

33. How do you categorize your racial or ethnic background? Check all that apply:

Asian or Pacific Islander, including Native Hawaiian

Black/African American/Afro-Caribbean

Hispanic/Latino

Middle Eastern/North African

Native American, including Alaska Native

White/Caucasian

Prefer not to answer


34. What language(s) do you speak at home?

English

Spanish

Amharic

Arabic

Chinese

Haitian Creole

Hindi or Punjabi

Mongolian

Russian


35. How do you identify? 19

35. How do you identify?

Female

Male

Non-binary


Prefer to self-describe (please specify)

36. What is your total household income before taxes? Please include every memberof your household who contributes to household finances.

Less than $24,999

$25,000-$49,999

$50,000-$74,999

$75,000-$99,999

$100,000-$199,999

$200,000 or more

20

Thank you for providing your feedback!

Email Address

Phone Number

37. If you wish to be entered into the drawing for one of 10 $100 Visa gift cards,please enter your contact information below. This information will be confidential.

38. If you have any additional comments about the residential permit parkingprogram or parking in Arlington County, please enter them below. For more information on Arlington’s Residential Permit Parking (RPP) program:https://projects.arlingtonva.us/residential-permit-parking-rpp-review/

21

https://projects.arlingtonva.us/residential-permit-parking-rpp-review/

Attachment B Final Survey - Spanish

¡Haz que se escuche tu voz!El Condado de Arlington está revisando su programa de Permiso deEstacionamiento Residencial (RPP) para evaluar su propósito e identificar loscambios necesarios. Esta encuesta es una parte importante de la revisión, y suscomentarios informarán los cambios de política considerados por la Junta delCondado de Arlington.

Al final de la encuesta, se le invitará a participar en un sorteo por una de las 10tarjetas de regalo Visa de $100.

La encuesta es financiada por el Condado de Arlington, pero está siendo distribuiday analizada por un consultor independiente. Sus respuestas serán confidenciales ycualquier información de identificación que usted proporcione será eliminada de losresultados de la encuesta enviados al Condado.

1. Por favor introduzca el código de 7 dígitos de la tarjeta postal que recibió delCondado de Arlington.

*

1

Introducción

2. ¿Sabía usted que el Condado de Arlington tiene un programa de Permiso deEstacionamiento Residencial (RPP)? Las imágenes de abajo muestran las señales ylos permisos para este programa.

*

Sí

No

2

Restricciones en su calle

3. ¿Existen restricciones de Permiso de Estacionamiento Residencial (RPP) en lacalle en frente de su casa?

*

Sí

No

No se

3

Restricciones en su calle

4. ¿Está a favor de mantener las restricciones de estacionamiento residencial en lacalle en frente de su casa?

Sí, quiero que las restricciones permanezcan

No, quiero que se eliminen las restricciones

Sin opinión

5. ¿Le gustaría que la calle en frente de su casa tuviera restricciones de permiso deestacionamiento residencial?

Sí, quiero restricciones

No, no quiero restricciones

Sin opinión

Necesito más información sobre el programa de Permisos de Estacionamiento

Residencial (RPP) para decidir

4

Propósito de la Gestión de Estacionamiento

6. Seleccione las tres (3) razones principales por las cuales desea que lasrestricciones de estacionamiento residencial permanezcan en su calle:

Para asegurar de que me pueda estacionar cerca de mi casa

Para desalentar el estacionamiento de las personas que se desplazan diariamente para ir

a trabajar

Para desalentar el estacionamiento por parte de los clientes de negocios.

Para reducir la basura y el ruido

Para mejorar la seguridad del vecindario

Para desalentar el estacionamiento por parte de los residentes de los edificios de

apartamentos o condominios cercanos

Otro (por favor especifique)

7. Seleccione las tres (3) razones principales por las cuales desea tener 5

7. Seleccione las tres (3) razones principales por las cuales desea tenerrestricciones de estacionamiento residencial en su calle:

Para asegurar de que me pueda estacionar cerca de mi casa

Para desalentar el estacionamiento de las personas que se desplazan diariamente para ir

a trabajar

Para desalentar el estacionamiento por parte de los clientes de negocios.

Para reducir la basura y el ruido

Para mejorar la seguridad del vecindario

Para desalentar el estacionamiento por parte de los residentes de los edificios de

apartamentos o condominios cercanos


8. Seleccione las tres (3) razones principales por las cuales no desea tenerrestricciones de estacionamiento residencial en su calle:

Todos debería tener acceso al estacionamiento público

Hay negocios cercanos que podrían usar el estacionamiento de mi calle.

El proceso para conseguir el permiso es difícil

El espacio en la calle al lado de la acera se utilizaría mejor para otras cosas como carriles

para bicicletas y más espacios verdes.

El costo de los permisos y pases es demasiado alto

Ya es fácil encontrar estacionamiento

Hay instalaciones cercanas, como una escuela o una biblioteca, que podrían usar el

estacionamiento de mi calle.


6

Gestión de la Demanda de Aparcamiento

9. Si la disponibilidad de espacio de estacionamiento se convirtiera en un problemaen su calle, ¿cuál de las siguientes medidas apoyaría más para gestionar la demandade estacionamiento?

Reducir el número máximo de permisos por hogar, pero mantener el costo por permiso en

el mismo nivel.

No cambiar el número máximo de permisos por hogar, pero aumentar el costo de cada

permiso adicional.

Reducir el número máximo de permisos y aumentar el costo de cada permiso adicional.

No hacer nada

Sin opinión



Instalar parquímetros en zonas de alta demanda

Instalar letreros que restrinjan el número de horas que las personas pueden ocupar una

espacio de estacionamiento

Añadir restricciones de RPP

No hacer nada

Sin opinión


11. Si la disponibilidad de espacio de estacionamiento se convirtiera en un problema7


Instalar parquímetros en zonas de alta demanda

Instalar letreros que restrinjan el número de horas que las personas pueden ocupar una

espacio de estacionamiento

No hacer nada

Sin opinión


8

Requisitos Mínimos de Elegibilidad para el Programa

12. ¿Qué tipo de residente debe ser elegible para un permiso de estacionamiento?Seleccione todas los que correspondan:

Residentes con una entrada privada, garaje o cochera.

Residentes sin entrada privada, garaje o cochera

Residentes de edificios de apartamentos y condominios

Todos los residentes del vecindario, sin importar el tipo de vivienda

9

Decisiones de Intercambio: Estacionamiento para Visitantes

13. Elija la declaración con la que está más de acuerdo:

Los visitantes deberían poder estacionarse en espacios de estacionamiento residenciales

en la calle por un tiempo limitado sin un permiso

Los visitantes solo deberían estacionarse en espacios de estacionamiento residenciales

en la calle con un permiso o pase de visitante

Sin opinión

10

Decisiones de Intercambio: Flexibilidad del Programa vs. Ejecución

14. Elija la declaración con la que está más de acuerdo:

Prefiero un programa de estacionamiento residencial flexible que puede variar según el

vecindario

Prefiero un programa de estacionamiento residencial que sea simple, fácil de entender, y

sencillo de ejecutar a través de todo el condado

Sin opinión

11

¿Cuáles son sus características de estacionamiento?

15. ¿Dónde se estacionó recientemente cerca de su casa? Seleccione una:

En la calle

En la cochera, entrada de autos, o garaje en mi casa

Estacionamiento o estacionamiento de varios pisos/garaje

No aplica - No conduzco ni soy dueño de un vehículo

16. Pensando en el último lugar donde se estacionó en la calle cerca de su casa, elijacon qué declaración está más de acuerdo:

Era fácil encontrar estacionamiento, y estaba a la distancia adecuada.

Era fácil encontrar estacionamiento, pero estaba demasiado lejos.

Era difícil encontrar estacionamiento, pero estaba a la distancia adecuada.

Era difícil encontrar estacionamiento, y estaba demasiado lejos.

No aplica - No conduzco ni soy dueño de un vehículo.

Sin opinión/ No se

17. ¿Cuál es la opción que mejor describe su participación en el Programa de Permiso12

17. ¿Cuál es la opción que mejor describe su participación en el Programa de Permisode Estacionamiento Residencial (RPP) del Condado de Arlington? Seleccione todaslos que correspondan:

Yo o los miembros de mi hogar tenemos un FlexPassFlexPass

Yo o los miembros de mi hogar tenemos un permiso o calcomanía que es para mi/supermiso o calcomanía que es para mi/su

vehículo solamente.vehículo solamente.

Yo o los miembros de mi hogar tenemos un libro de pases de visitante a corto plazopases de visitante a corto plazo

Yo y todos los miembros de mi hogar no participamosno participamos en el Programa de Permiso de

Estacionamiento Residencial (no tenemos permisos)

13

¿Cuáles son sus visitantes características de estacionamiento?

18. ¿Dónde se estacionaron sus visitantes más recientes que tenían un vehículo?

Mis visitantes usaron mi FlexPass

Mis visitantes usaron un pase de visitante a corto plazo

Mis visitantes se estacionaron en mi propiedad / en mi edificio

Mis visitantes se estacionaron fuera de la zona de permiso

Mis visitantes se estacionaron en la zona de permiso sin permiso, fuera del periodo de

restricción del permiso

Mis visitantes se estacionaron en la zona de permiso sin permiso, durante el período de

restricción del permiso

No sé dónde se estacionaron mis visitantes.


Mis visitantes se estacionaron en la calle


Mis visitantes se estacionaron en la zona de permiso más cercana con su propio permiso



Mis visitantes se estacionaron en la calle



14

Preferencias de estacionamiento residencial

21. El costo de un permiso de estacionamiento residencial debe variar en base a losiguiente (marque todas los que correspondan):

Si el hogar tiene o no acceso a estacionamiento en un garaje, cochera, estacionamiento o

entrada de autos.

El número de vehículos en el hogar

La capacidad del individuo para pagar por el permiso

La edad de la persona (por ejemplo, descuentos para residentes de 65 años de edad o

más)

La demanda por estacionamiento en ese lugar

El costo no debería variar (es decir, debe ser el mismo para todos los residentes).

22. Elija la declaración con la que está más de acuerdo con respecto a su vecindario:

Apoyaría la construcción de viviendas nuevas (por ejemplo, apartamentos, condominios

o casas adosadas) incluso si algunos residentes nuevos fueran a estacionarse en la calle

No apoyaría la construcción de viviendas nuevas (por ejemplo, apartamentos,

condominios o casas adosadas) sin importar qué medidas de estacionamiento estén

incluidas

Apoyaría la construcción de viviendas nuevas (por ejemplo, apartamentos, condominios

o casas adosadas) solo si se les prohibiera que se pudieran estacionar en la calle.

No se/ Necesito más información para decidir

23. ¿Deberían los siguientes grupos de personas ser elegibles para un permiso para15

Sí, a un precio más

alto que losresidentes

Sí, al mismo precioque los residentes No Sin opinión

Propietarios yadministradores deedificios

Empresarios/empleados

Proveedores deservicios (por ejemplo,atención médicadomiciliaria, trabajosocial, cuidado deniños,construcción/mejoradel hogar).

Patrones denegocios/clientes

Personal de laescuela/maestros

Vehículos compartidos(como Car2Go)

Visitantes a centroscomunitarios,bibliotecas u otrasinstalacionescomunitarias

23. ¿Deberían los siguientes grupos de personas ser elegibles para un permiso paraestacionar en una calle restringida a carros con Permiso de EstacionamientoResidencial (RPP) cerca de su destino?

16

Uso indebido de permisos y Ejecución

24. ¿Cuáles son los tres (3) enfoques principales que usted recomienda para reducirel comportamiento problemático en los participantes del programa de Permiso deEstacionamiento Residencial? Seleccione hasta tres:

Más opciones para reportar violaciones

Sanciones más severas por venta o falsificación de permisos

Simplificar o reducir los tipos de permisos

Permisos impresos con el número de matrícula del vehículo correspondiente

Usar lectores de matrículas para hacer cumplir la ley

Reducir el tamaño de la zona para evitar que los residentes se desplacen en la misma

zona

No es necesario hacer nada; el abuso de permisos no es un problema.


25. ¿Alguna vez ha solicitado la aplicación de la ley de estacionamiento en suvecindario (por preocupaciones como: estacionar sin permiso, dar calcomanías deresidentes a no residentes, usar permisos vencidos, etc.)?

Sí - a menudo (es decir, cada mes)

Sí - a veces (es decir, varias veces en el último año)

Sí - rara vez (es decir, una vez en el último año)

No

17

Su Vivienda

26. ¿Cuál de las siguientes opciones describe mejor el tipo de vivienda en la quevive?

Hogar unifamiliar independiente (como una casa independiente)

Hogar unifamiliar adjunta (como una casa adosada)

Multi-familiar (como un apartamento o condominio)


27. ¿Es dueño de o alquila su casa?

Dueño

Alquilo

Vivo con familiares o amigos (no pago alquiler)

Otro/ No aplica

18

Información demográfica

28. ¿Cuántos adultos (de 18 años o más) viven en su casa, incluyéndose a ustedmismo? (escriba el número a continuación)

29. ¿Cuántos niños (de 17 años o menos) viven en su casa más de medio tiempo?(escriba el número a continuación)

30. ¿Cuántos vehículos personales en total (autos, SUVs, minivans, vans,camionetas, etc.) tienen los miembros de su hogar? (escriba el número acontinuación)

31. ¿Utiliza usted o alguien en su hogar un letrero o placa de estacionamiento paradiscapacitados?

Sí

No

32. ¿El uso de su garaje o cochera como almacén le impide estacionar un vehículo enél?

Sí

No

No aplica - No tengo garaje o cochera

33. ¿Cómo clasifica su origen racial o étnico? Marque todas las que correspondan: 19

33. ¿Cómo clasifica su origen racial o étnico? Marque todas las que correspondan:

Asiático o Isleño del Pacífico, incluyendo Hawaiano Nativo

Negro/Afro-Americano/Afro-Caribeño

Hispano o Latino

Oriente Medio y norte de África

Nativo Americano, incluyendo Nativo de Alaska

Blanco/Caucásico

Prefiero no responder


34. ¿Qué idioma(s) habla en su casa?

Inglés

Español

Amharca

Árabe

China

Haitian Creole

Hindi o Punjabí

Mongol

Federación Rusa


35. ¿Cómo identifica su género? 20

35. ¿Cómo identifica su género?

Mujer

Hombre

Género no binario

Prefiero no responder

Prefiero auto-describir (por favor especifique)

36. ¿Cuál es el ingreso total de su familia antes de impuestos? Por favor, incluya atodos los miembros de su familia que contribuyen a las finanzas del hogar.

Menos de $24,999

$25,000-$49,999

$50,000-$74,999

$75,000-$99,999

$100,000-$199,999

$200,000 o más

21

¡Gracias por darnos su opinión!

Dirección decorreo electrónico

N.º de teléfono

37. Si desea participar en el sorteo de una de las 10 tarjetas de regalo Visa de $100,ingrese su información de contacto a continuación. Esta información seráconfidencial.

38. Si tiene algún comentario adicional sobre el programa de Permiso deEstacionamiento Residencial o el estacionamiento en el Condado de Arlington, porfavor indíquelo a continuación.

Para más información sobre el programa de Permiso de EstacionamientoResidencial (RPP) de Arlington: https://projects.arlingtonva.us/residential-permit-parking-rpp-review/

22


Attachment C Final Survey - Amharic

ድምጽዎን እንንዲሰማ ያድርጉ!አላማውን ለመገምገምና መደረግ ያለባቸውን ለውጦች ለመለየት የአርሊንግተን ካውንቲ የመኖሪያ የመኪናማቆሚያ ፈቃድ (አር.ፒ.ፒ.) ፕሮግራምን እየከለሰ ነው። ይህ የዳሰሳ ጥናት የክለሳው ዋነኛ ክፍል ነው፣ የእርስዎግብረመልስም የአርሊንግተን ካውንቲ ቦርድ ግምት ውስጥ ለሚያስገባቸው የፖሊሲ ለውጦች ግብአትይሆናል።

በዳሰሳ ጥናቱ መጨረሻ ከ10ሩ የ$100 የቪዛ ካርድ ስጦታዎች ለማግኘት እጣ እንዲያገቡ ይጋበዛሉ።

የዳሰሳ ጥናቱ ወጪ በአርሊንግተን ካውንቲ የተሸፈነ ነው፣ ነገር ግን የዳሰሳ ጥናቱ እየተሰራጨ ያለውናየሚተነተነው በገለልተኛ አማካሪ (ኮንሳልታንት) ነው። የሚሰጥዋቸው ምላሾች በምስጢር የሚያዙ ሲሆን፣ማንኛቸውም ከተሰጡት ምላሾች እርሶን ሊለዩ የሚችሉ መረጃዎች ወደ ካውንቲው ከሚላኩ የዳሰሳ ጥናትውጤቶች ይወጣሉ።

1. እባክዎ ከአርሊንግተን ካውንቲ ከተላከልዎ ፖስትካርድ ላይ ያለውን 7-ዲጂት ኮድ ያስገቡ።*

1

መግቢያ

2. አርሊንግተን ካውንቲ የመኖሪያ የመኪና ማቆሚያ ፈቃድ (አር.ፒ.ፒ.) ፕሮግራም እንዳለው ያውቁ ነበር?ከታች ያሉ ምስሎች የዚህ ፕሮግራም ምልክቶችና ፈቃዶች ያሳያሉ።

*

አዎ

አይ

2

በጎዳናዎ ላይ ያሉ ገደቦች

3. ከቤትዎ ፊት ለፊት ላይ ባለው ጎዳና የመኖሪያ የመኪና ማቆሚያ ፈቃድ (አር.ፒ.ፒ.) ገደቦች አሉ?*

አዎ

አይ

አላውቅም

3

በጎዳናዎ ላይ ያሉ ገደቦች

4. ከቤትዎ ፊት ለፊት ላይ ባለው ጎዳና ያሉትን የመኖሪያ የመኪና ማቆሚያ (አር.ፒ.ፒ.) ገደቦች እንዲቀጥሉይደግፋሉ?

አዎ፣ ገደቦቹ እንዲቀጥሉ እፈልጋለሁ

አይ፣ ገደቦቹ እንዲነሱ እፈልጋለሁ

አስተያየት የለኝም

5. ከቤትዎ ፊት ለፊት ላይ ያለው ጎዳና የመኖሪያ የመኪና ማቆሚያ ፈቃድ ገደቦች እንዲኖሩት ይፈልጋሉ?

አዎ፣ ገደቦች እንዲኖሩ እፈልጋለሁ

አይ፣ ገደቦች እንዲኖሩ አልፈልግም


ውሳኔ ለመወሰን የመኖሪያ ፈቃድ ፕሮግራም በተመለከተ ተጨማሪ መረጃ እፈልጋለሁ

4

የመኪና ማቆሚያ አስተዳደር አላማ

6. የመኖሪያ የመኪና ማቆሚያ ገደቦች በጎዳናዎ እንዲቆዩ ለምን እንደሚፈልጉ ዋነኛ ናቸው የሚሏቸው ሶስት(3) ምክኒያቶች ይምረጡ፡

እቤቴ አከባቢ መኪናዬን ማቆም እንድችል

ተጓዦች እቤቴ አከባቢ መኪናቸው እንዳያቆሙ ለማድረግ

በአቅራቢያ ባሉ የአፓርትመንት ወይም ኮንዶ ህንጻዎች የሚኖሩ ነዋሪዎች መኪናቸው እንዳያቆሙ ለማድረግ

የንግድ ደምበኞች መኪናቸው እንዳያቆሙ ለማድረግ

ቆሻሻንና ጫጫታን ለመቀነስ

የአከባቢውን ደህንነት ለማሻሻል

ሌላ (እባክዎን ይግለጹ)፡

7. የመኖሪያ የመኪና ማቆሚያ ገደብ በጎዳናዎ እንዲኖር ለምን እንደሚፈልጉ ዋነኛ ናቸው የሚሏቸው ሶስት(3) ምክኒያቶች ይምረጡ፡

እቤቴ አከባቢ መኪናዬን ማቆም እንድችል

ተጓዦች እቤቴ አከባቢ መኪናቸው እንዳያቆሙ ለማድረግ

በአቅራቢያ ባሉ የአፓርትመንት ወይም ኮንዶ ህንጻዎች የሚኖሩ ነዋሪዎች መኪናቸው እንዳያቆሙ ለማድረግ

የንግድ ደምበኞች መኪናቸው እንዳያቆሙ ለማድረግ

ቆሻሻንና ጫጫታን ለመቀነስ

የአከባቢውን ደህንነት ለማሻሻል


8. የመኖሪያ የመኪና ማቆሚያ ገደቦች በጎዳናዎ እንዳይኖሩ ለምን እንደሚፈልጉ ዋነኛ ናቸው የሚሏቸው 5

8. የመኖሪያ የመኪና ማቆሚያ ገደቦች በጎዳናዎ እንዳይኖሩ ለምን እንደሚፈልጉ ዋነኛ ናቸው የሚሏቸውሶስት (3) ምክኒያቶች ይምረጡ፡

ማንኛውም ሰው መኪናውን በጎዳና ለማስቆም እድል ማግኘት ስላለበት

የጎዳናዬን የመኪና ማቆሚያ ሊጠቀሙ የሚችሉ በአቅራቢያ የሚገኙ የንግድ ቤቶች ስላሉ

በጎዳናዬ ያለውን የመኪና ማቆሚያ መጠቀም የሚችሉ እንደነ ትምህርት ቤት ወይም ላይብረሪ የመሳሰሉ በአቅራቢያየሚገኙ ተቋማት ስላሉ

ማለፊያዎች (ፓስስ) የማግኘት ሂደት አስቸጋሪ ስለሆነ

በጎዳና ጥግ ያለው ቦታ ለእንደነ የብስክሌት መስመሮችና ተጨማሪ አረንጓዴ ቦታዎች ጥቅም ቢውሉ የተሻለ ስለሆነ

የፈቃዶችና ማለፊያዎች ዋጋ በጣም ከፍተኛ ስለሆነ

የመኪና ማቆሚያ ማግኘት ቀላል ስለሆነ


6

የመኪና ማቆሚያ ፍላጎት ማስተዳደር

9. በጎዳናዎ የመኪና ማቆሚያ ቦታ የማግኘት ችግር ቢፈጠር፣ የመኪና ማቆሚያ ፍላጎትን ለማስተዳደርከሚከተሉት እርምጃዎች መሀከል በይበልጥ የሚደግፏቸው የትኞቹን ነው?

ለአንድ ፈቃድ የሚከፈል ክፍያ ሳይቀይሩ ለአንድ ቤተሰብ የሚሰጡ ከፍተኛ የፈቃዶች ቁጥር መቀነስ

ለያንዳንዱ ተጨማሪ ፈቃድ የሚከፈል ክፍያ በመጨመር ለአንድ ቤተሰብ የሚሰጡ ከፍተኛ የፈቃዶች ቁጥርአለመቀየር

ለአንድ ቤተሰብ የሚሰጡ ከፍተኛ የፈቃዶች ቁጥር መቀነስና ለያንዳንዱ ተጨማሪ ፈቃድ የሚከፈል ክፍያ መጨመር

ምንም አይደረግ/መልስ አልተሰጠም


ሌላ (እባክዎን ይግለጹ)፣


ከፍተኛ ፍላጎት ባላቸው አከባቢዎች የመኪና ማቆሚያ ሜትሮች መትከል

ሰዎች በመኪና ማቆሚያ ቦታ መኪና ማቆም የሚችሉባቸው ሰአታት የሚገድቡ ምልክቶች መትከል

የአር.ፒ.ፒ. ገደቦች መጨመር

መልስ አልተሰጠም



11. በጎዳናዎ የመኪና ማቆሚያ ቦታ የማግኘት ችግር ቢፈጠር፣ የመኪና ማቆሚያ ፍላጎትን ለማስተዳደር 7


ከፍተኛ ፍላጎት ባላቸው አከባቢዎች የመኪና ማቆሚያ ሜትሮች መትከል

ሰዎች በመኪና ማቆሚያ ቦታ መኪና ማቆም የሚችሉባቸው ሰአታት የሚገድቡ ምልክቶች መትከል

መልስ አልተሰጠም



8

የፕሮግራም ብቁነት

12. የመኪና ማቆሚያ ፈቃድ ማግኘት ያለበት ምን አይነት ነዋሪ ነው? የሚመለከታቸውን ሁሉ ይምረጡ፡

የግል የመኪና መንገድ (ድራይቭወይ)፣ ጋራጅ ወይም ካርፖርት ያላቸው ነዋሪዎች

የግል የመኪና መንገድ (ድራይቭወይ)፣ ጋራጅ ወይም ካርፖርት የሌላቸው ነዋሪዎች

የአፓርትመንትና ኮንዶ ህንጻዎች ነዋሪዎች

ሁሉም የሰፈሩ ነዋሪዎች፣ የመኖሪያ ቤታቸው አይነት ምን ይሁን ምን

9

አማካይ ስምምነት (ትሬድ-ኦፍ)፡ የጎብኚ የመኪና ማቆሚያ

13. ከሚከተሉት ሐሳቦች በይበልጥ የሚስማሙባቸውን ይምረጡ፡

ጎብኚዎች በነዋሪዎች የጎዳና የመኪና ማቆሚያ ቦታዎች ለተወሰኑ ሰአታት ያለ ፈቃድ ማቆም ሊፈቀድላቸው ይገባል

ጎብኚዎች በነዋሪዎች የጎዳና የመኪና ማቆሚያ ቦታዎች ማቆም ያለባቸው ፈቃድ በማግኘት ወይም በጎብኚዎችማለፊያ (ቪዚተር ፓስ) ነው


10

አማካይ ስምምነት (ትሬድ-ኦፍ)፡ የፕሮግራም ተለዋዋጭነት ተፈጻሚ ከማድረግ ሲነጻጸር

14. በይበልጥ የሚስማሙበትን ሐሳብ ይምረጡ፡

እንደየ አከባቢው ሊለያይ የሚችል ተለዋዋጭ የመኖሪያ የመኪና ማቆሚያ ፕሮግራም ቅርጽ እመርጣለሁኝ

በካውንቲው በሙሉ በቀላሉ ሊተገበር የሚችልና በቀላሉ ሰው ሊረዳው የሚችል ቀላል የመኖሪያ የመኪና ማቆሚያፕሮግራም ቅርጽ እመርጣለሁ


11

የመኪና ማቆሚያዎ ባህሪያት

15. 1. በቤትዎ አቅራቢያ በቅርብ ጊዜያት በብዛት መኪናዎ ያቆሙት የት ነው? አንድ ይምረጡ፡

በጎዳናው

እቤቴ ባለው ካርፖርት፣ የግል የመኪና መንገድ (ድራይቭወይ) ወይም ጋራጅ

በማቆሚያ (ፓርኪንግ ላት) ወይም ፓርኪንግ ዴክ/ጋራጅ

እኔን አይመለከተኝም– መኪና አልነዳም ወይም የለኝም

16. በቤትዎ አቅራቢያ በሚገኘው ጎዳና በቅርብ ጊዜያት መኪናዎን ያቆሙበት ቦታ ያስቡና፣ በይበልጥየሚስማሙበትን ሐሳብ ይምረጡ፡

የመኪና ማቆሚያ ማግኘት ቀላል ነበር፣ ርቀቱም ትክክል ነበር

የመኪና ማቆሚያ ማግኘት ቀላል ነበር፣ ነገር ግን በጣሙን ሩቅ ነበር

የመኪና ማቆሚያ ማግኘት ከባድ ነበር፣ ነገር ግን ርቀቱ ትክክል ነበር

የመኪና ማቆሚያ ማግኘት ከባድ ነበር፣ ርቀቱም ሩቅ ነበር

እኔን አይመለከተኝም– መኪና አልነዳም ወይም የለኝም

አስተያየት የለኝም/አላውቅም

17. በአርሊንግተን ካውንቲ የመኖሪያ የመኪና ማቆሚያ ፈቃድ (አር.ፒ.ፒ.) ፕሮግራም ያለዎትን ተሳትፎየትኛው በበለጠ ይገልጸዋል? የሚመለከትዎትን በሙሉ ይምረጡ፡

እኔ ወይም የቤተሰቤ አባላት ፍሌክስፓስ አለን

እኔ ወይም የቤተሰቤ አባላት ለመኪናዬ/መኪናቸው ብቻ የሚያገለግል ፈቃድ ወይም ዲካል አለን

እኔ ወይም የቤተሰቤ አባላት ለአጭር ጊዜ የሚያገለግል የጎብኚ ፈቃዶች (ፓስስ) አለን

እኔ ወይም የቤተሰቤ አባላት በመኖሪያ የመኪና ማቆሚያ ፈቃድ ፕሮግራም አንሳተፍም (ፈቃዶች የሉንም)

12

የመኪና ማቆሚያዎ ባህሪያት

18. በቅርቡ ላስተናገድዋቸው መኪና ያላቸው ጎብኚዎች የመኪና ማቆሚያ ለማግኘት ምን አደረጉ?

ጎብኚዎቼ ፍሌክስፓስስ ተጠቀሙ

ጎብኚዎቼ ለአጭር ጊዜ የሚያገለግል የጎብኚ ፓስ ተጠቀሙ

ጎብኚዎቼ በቤቴ/በህንጻዬ ካለው ጎዳና ውጪ አቆሙ

ጎብኚዎቼ ፈቃድ ከሚጠይቅ ዞን ውጪ ርቀው አቆሙ

ጎብኚዎቼ ፈቃዱ ከሚገድበው ጊዜ ውጪ ፈቃድ በሚያስፈልገው ዞን ያለ ፈቃድ አቆሙ

ጎብኚዎቼ ፈቃዱ በሚገድበው ጊዜ ውስጥ ፈቃድ በሚያስፈልገው ዞን ያለ ፈቃድ አቆሙ

ጎብኚዎቼ የት እንዳቆሙ አላውቅም


ጎብኚዎቼ በጎዳና አቆሙ

ጎብኚዎቼ ከቤቴ/ህንጻዬ ውጪ ባለው ጎዳና አቆሙ

ጎብኚዎቼ በራሳቸው ፈቃድ በአቅራቢያ በሚገኝ ፈቃድ የሚያስፈልገው ዞን አቆሙ



ጎብኚዎቼ በጎዳና አቆሙ

ጎብኚዎቼ ከቤቴ/ህንጻዬ ውጪ ባለው ጎዳና አቆሙ


13

የመኖሪያ የመኪና ማቆሚያ ምርጫዎች

21. የመኖሪያ የመኪና ማቆሚያ ፈቃድ ክፍያ ዋጋ በሚከተሉት መሰረት መለያየት አለባቸው (በሚመለከቱትሁሉ ምልክት ያድርጉ፡

ቤተሰቡ የመኪና ማቆሚያ ጋራጅ፣ ካርፖርት፣ ማቆሚያ ወይም የግል የመኪና መንገድ (ድራይቭወይ) ሊያገኝበትየሚችል እድል መኖርና አለመኖር

በቤተሰቡ ያሉ የተሽከርካሪዎች ቁጥር

የግለሰቡ ፈቃዱ ለማግኘት ክፍያ ለመክፈል ያለው ችሎታ

የግለሰቡ እድሜ (ለምሳሌ፣ 65 እና ከዛ በላይ እድሜ ላላቸው ቅናሾች ቢሰጡ)

በቦታው ያለው የመኪና ማቆሚያ ፍላጎት

ዋጋ መለያየት የለበትም (ይህም ማለት ለሁሉም ነዋሪዎች አንድ አይነት መሆን ይኖርበታል)።

22. ስለ አከባቢዎ በተመለከተ በይበልጥ የሚስማሙበት ሐሳብ ይምረጡ፡

ምንም እንኳን አንዳንድ አዳዲስ ነዋሪዎች በጎዳናው ሊያቆሙ ቢችሉም፣ አዳዲስ የቤቶች ግንባታን እደግፋለሁ(ለምሳሌ፣ አፓርትመንቶች፣ ኮንደሚንየሞች፣ ወይም ታውንሀውስስ)

የህንጻው ነዋሪዎች በጎዳናው ማቆም የማይፈቀድላቸው ከሆነ ብቻ ነው አዳዲስ የቤቶች ግንባታን የምደግፈው(ለምሳሌ፣ አፓርትመንቶች፣ ኮንደሚንየሞች፣ ወይም ታውንሀውስስ)

ማንኛቸውም የመኪና ማቆሚያ እርምጃዎች ቢካተቱም አዳዲስ የቤቶች ግንባታን አልደግፍም (ለምሳሌ፣አፓርትመንቶች፣ ኮንደሚንየሞች፣ ወይም ታውንሀውስስ)

አላውቅም/ለመወሰን ተጨማሪ መረጃ ያስፈልገኛል

23. የሚከተሉት ነዋሪ ያልሆኑ ተጠቃሚዎች በመዳረሻቸው አከባቢ ባሉ የአር.ፒ.ፒ.-ገደብ ያላቸው ጎዳናዎች14

አዎ፣ ነገር ግን ከነዋሪዎችየበለጠ ክፍያ ይክፈሉ

አዎ፣ ነዋሪዎችእንደሚከፍሉት ክፍያ

ይክፈሉ አይ አስተያየት የለኝም

አከራዮች እና የቤትስራ-አስኪሀጆች(ፕሮፐርቲ ማናጀርስ)

የንግድባለቤቶች/ሰራተኞች

ነጋዴዎች/ደምበኞች

አገልግሎትአቅራቢዎች(ለምሳሌ፣ ሜዲካልሆም ኬር፣ ሶሻልወርክ፣ የልጆችእንክብካቤ (ቻይልድኬር)፣ ግንባታ/ቤትንማሻሻል)

የትምህርት ቤትስታፎች/አስተማሪዎች

የመኪና-ማጋሪያ (ካርሼር) ተሽከርካሪዎች(እንደነ ካር-ቱ-ጎየመሳሰሉ)

የማህበረሰብማእከሎች፣ላይብረሪዎች፣ ወይምሌሎች የማህበረሰብተቋማት ጎብኚዎች

23. የሚከተሉት ነዋሪ ያልሆኑ ተጠቃሚዎች በመዳረሻቸው አከባቢ ባሉ የአር.ፒ.ፒ.-ገደብ ያላቸው ጎዳናዎችላይ ያቆሙ ዘንድ ፈቃድ ሊሰጣቸው ይገባል?

15

አላግባብ መጠቀም እና ተፈጻሚ ማድረግ

24. አስቸጋሪ የአር.ፒ.ፒ. ተሳታፊ ባህርይ ለመቀነስ እርሶ የሚመርጧቸው ዋነኛ ናቸው የሚሏቸው ሶስት (3)አቀራረቦች (መፍትሔ ሀሳቦች) የትኞቹ ናቸው? እስከ ሶስት ያህል ይምረጡ፡

ሊከሰቱ ለሚችሉ ጥሰቶች ሪፖርት የማድረግያ የተለያዩ አማራጮች መኖር

ፈቃዶችን ለሚሸጡና አስመስለው ለሚሰሩ ጠንከር ያሉ ቅጣቶች መቅጣት

የፈቃዶቹ አይነቶች ማቅለል ወይም መቀነስ

ፈቃዶች ከሚመለከተው መኪና የሰሌዳ ቁጥር ዘንድ እንዲታተሙ ማድረግ

የሰሌዳ ቁጥር ማንበብያዎች ለህግ ማስፈጸሚያ መጠቀም

የነዋሪዎችን በአንድ ዞን ውስጥ እንዳይጓዙ ለማድረግ የዞኑ ስፋት መቀነስ

ምንም ነገር መደረግ የለበትም፣ ችግሩ ፈቃድን አላግባብ መጠቀም አይደለም


25. በሚኖሩበት አከባቢ የመኪና ማቆሚያ ህግ ተፈጻሚ ይሆን ዘንድ ጠይቀው ያቃሉ (እንደነ ያለ ፈቃድማቆም፣ ነዋሪ ላልሆኑ የነዋሪዎች ዲካል መስጠት፣ ጊዜያቸው ያለፋቸው ፈቃዶች መጠቀም ወዘተ ለመሳሰሉትየሚያሳስቡ ነገሮች)?

አዎ – ብዙ ጊዜ (ማለት፣ በየወሩ)

አዎ – አንዳንዴ (ማለት፣ ባለፈው አመት ለበርካታ ጊዜያት)

አዎ – አልፎ አልፎ (ማለት፣ባለፈው አመት ውስጥ አንዴ)

አይ

16

መኖሪያዎ

26. ስለሚኖሩበት ቤት አይነት የትኛውን በበለጠ ይገልጻል?

ያልተያያዘ ሲንግል-ፋሚሊ (ከሌላ ቤት ያልተያያዘ አይነት ቤት)

የተያያዘ ሲንግል-ፋሚሊ (እንደ ታውንሃውስ)

ብዙ ቤተሰብ የሚኖሩባቸው (ማልቲ ፋሚሊ) (እንደ አፓርትመንት ወይም ኮንደሚንየም)

ሌላ (እባክዎን ይግለጹ):

27. የቤትዎ ባለቤት ነዎት ወይስ ተከራይ?

ባለቤት

ተከራይ

ከቤተሰብ ወይም ከጓደኞች ጋ ነው የምኖረው (ኪራይ አልከፍልም)

ሌላ/አይመለከትም

17

ስነ-ህዝብ

28. እርስዎን ጨምሮ በቤተሰብዎ ስንት አዋቂዎች (እድሜአቸው 18 እና ከዛ በላይ የሆናቸው) ይኖራሉ?(ቁጥሩን ከታች ይጻፉ)

29. እቤተሰብዎ ውስጥ ስንት ልጆች (እድሜያቸው 17 እና ከዛ በታች የሆኑ) ከግማሽ ጊዜ በላይ ይኖራሉ?(ቁጥሩን ከታች ይጻፉ)

30. በቤተሰብዎ አባላት በጠቅላላ ስንት የግል ተሽከርካሪዎች (መኪኖች፣ ኤስ.ዩ.ቪ.ዎች፣ ሚኒቫኖች፣ ቫኖች፣ፒችክአፕ ትራኮች፣ ወዘተ) አሉ? (ቁጥሩን ከታች ይጻፉ)

31. እርሶ፣ ወይም የቤተሰብዎ አባላት፣ የአካል ጉዳተኛ (ዲስኤብልድ) የመኪና ማቆሚያ ምልክት ወይምታርጋ ይጠቀማሉ?

አዎ

አይ

32. ለማከማቻ (ስቶሬጅ) በመጠቀምዎ ምክኒያት መኪናዎ በካርፖርትዎ ወይም ጋራጅዎን እንዳያስቆሙያደርጎታል?

አዎ

አይ

አይመለከተኝም- ካርፖርት ወይም ጋራጅ የለኝም

33. ዘርዎ ወይም የብሔር ዳራዎ እንዴት ይገልጹታል? የሚመለከታቸው ሁሉ ላይ ምልክት ያድርጉ፡ 18

33. ዘርዎ ወይም የብሔር ዳራዎ እንዴት ይገልጹታል? የሚመለከታቸው ሁሉ ላይ ምልክት ያድርጉ፡

የሀዋይን ተወላጅ ጨምሮ ኤሽያዊ ወይም ፓሲፊክ አይላንዳዊ

ጥቁር/አፍሪቃዊ አመሪካዊ/አፍሮ-ካሪብያን

ሂስፓኒክ/ላቲኖ

መካከለኛው ምስራቕ/ሰሜን አፍሪካዊ

የአመሪካ ተወላጅ፣ የአላስካ ተወላጅ ጨምሮ

ነጭ/ ካውኬሺያን

ባልመልስ እመርጣለሁ


34. እቤት የሚናገሩት(ዋቸው) ቋንቋ(ዎች) የትኞቹን ነው?

እንግሊዝኛ

ስፓኒሽ

አማርኛ

አረብኛ

ቻይንኛ

ሄሻን ክሪኦል

ሂንዲ ወይም ፑንጃቢ

ሞንጎልያን

ራሽያዊ


35. ጾታዎ ምንድን ነው? 19

35. ጾታዎ ምንድን ነው?

ሴት

ወንድ

ሁለት-አልባ ያልሆነ (ናን-ባይናሪ)

ባልመልስ እመርጣለሁ

ራሴን-መግለጽ እፈልጋለሁ (እባክዎን ይግለጹ)

36. ከግብር (ታክስ) በፊት ጠቅላላ የቤተሰብዎ ገቢ ምን ያህል ነው? እባክዎን ለቤተሰብዎ ፋይናንስ አበርክቶየሚያደርገውን ሁሉም የቤተሰብ አባል ያካትቱ።

ከ$24,999 በታች

$25,000-$49,999

$50,000-$74,999

$75,000-$99,999

$100,000-$199,999

$200,000 ወይም ከዛ በላይ

20

ለሰጡን ምላሾች እናመሰግናለን!

የኢመይል አድራሻ፡

የስልክ ቁጥር፡

37. ከ10ሩ የ$100 የቪዛ ካርድ ስጦታዎች ለማግኘት እጣ ውስጥ መግባት የሚፈልጉ ከሆነ እባክዎ የኢመይልአድራሻና የስልክ ቁጥርዎን ይጻፉ። ይህ መረጃ በምስጢር ይያዛል።

38. በአርሊንግተን ካውንቲ የመኖሪያ መኪና ማቆሚያ ፈቃድ ፕሮግራም ወይም የመኪና ማቆሚያ በተመለከተማንኛውም ተጨማሪ አስተያየት ቢኖርዎ እባክዎ ከታች ይጻፉ።

የአርሊንግተን የመኖሪያ የመኪና ማቆሚያ ፈቃድ (አር.ፒ.ፒ.) በተመለከተ ተጨማሪ መረጃ ቢፈልጉ፡


21


Attachment D Final Survey - Call Center

Make your voice heard!Arlington County Residential Parking Survey - Call CenterArlington County Residential Parking Survey - Call Center

Arlington County is reviewing its Residential Permit Parking (RPP) program toassess its purpose and identify needed changes. This survey is a major part of thereview, and your feedback will inform policy changes considered by the ArlingtonCounty Board.

At the end of the survey, you will be invited to enter a drawing for one of 10 $100Visa gift cards.

The survey is funded by Arlington County, but is being distributed and analyzed byan independent consultant. Your responses will be confidential and any identifyinginformation you provide will be removed from the survey results sent to the County.

1. Please enter the 7-digit code from the postcard you received from ArlingtonCounty.

*

1

Introduction

2. Did you know that Arlington County has a residential permit parking (RPP)program?

*

Yes

No

2

msanders

Text Box

If Question 2 = No: - Hide Section 3: Restrictions on Your Street - Hide Section 4: Opinion of Restrictions on Your Street - Hide Section 5: Purpose of Parking Management - SKIP TO Section 6: Managing Parking Demand, Q.11 [Hide Q.9, Q.10] - Hide Section 7: Program Eligibility - Hide Section 8: Trade-off: Visitor Parking - Hide Section 9: Trade-off: Program Flexibility vs. Enforcement - SKIP TO Section 10: Additional Questions, Q.15 - Q.15: Stop and ask if respondent would like to continue. - If no: SKIP TO Section 17: Contact Information for Drawing - If yes: Continue to Section 11: Your Parking Characteristics, Q.16, Q. 17 [Hide Q.18] - SKIP TO Section 12: Your Visitors' Parking Characteristics, Q. 21 [Hide Q.19, Q.20] - SKIP TO Section 13: Residential Parking Preferences, Q.23 [Hide Q.22, Q.24] - Hide Section 14: Permit Misuse and Enforcement - SKIP TO Section 15: Your Housing - Show Section 16: Demographics - Show Section 17: Contact Information for Drawing If Question 1 = Yes: - Follow survey up to Section 10, Q. 15. Stop and ask if respondent would like to continue. - If no: SKIP TO Section 17: Contact Information for Drawing - If yes: Continue to Section 11: Your Parking Characteristics, Q.16

Restrictions on Your StreetArlington County Residential Parking Survey - Call CenterArlington County Residential Parking Survey - Call Center

3. Are there residential permit parking (RPP) restrictions on the street in front ofyour home?

*

Yes

No

I don't know

3

mkent

Text Box

If Question 3 = Yes: - Show Q.4, [Hide Q.5] - Proceed through next sections - Show Section 10: Your Parking Characteristics - all questions (Q.16 - Q.18) - Proceed though next sections - Show Section 14: Permit Misuse and Enforcement If Question 3 = No: - SKIP TO Q.5 [Hide Q.4] - Proceed through next sections - Show Q.16, Q.17 [Hide Q.18] - SKIP TO Q. 20 [Hide Q. 19, Q. 21] - [Hide Section 14: Permit Misuse and Enforcement] If Question 3 = I don't know: - SKIP TO Q.5 [Hide Q.4] - Proceed through next sections - Show Q.16, Q.17 [Hide Q.18] - SKIP TO Q. 20 [Hide Q. 19, Q. 21] - [Hide Section 14: Permit Misuse and Enforcement]

Opinion of Restrictions on Your StreetArlington County Residential Parking Survey - Call CenterArlington County Residential Parking Survey - Call Center

4. Are you in favor of keeping the residential parking restrictions on the street infront of your home?

Yes, I want restrictions to stay

No, I want restrictions to be removed

No opinion

5. Would you like the street in front of your home to have residential permit parkingrestrictions?

Yes, I want restrictions

No, I do not want restrictions

No opinion

I need more information about the residential permit program to decide

4

mkent

Text Box

If Question 4 = Yes: - SKIP TO Q.6 [Hide Q.7, Q.8] - SKIP TO Q.9 [Hide Q.10, Q.11] If Question 4 = No: - SKIP TO Q.8 [Hide Q.6, Q.7] - SKIP TO Q.11 [Hide Q. 9, Q.10] If Question 4 = No Opinion: - SKIP TO Q.10 [Hide Q.6, Q.7, Q.8, Q.9, Q.11] If Question 5 = Yes: - SKIP TO Q.7 [Hide Q.6, Q.8] - SKIP TO Q.10 [Hide Q.9, Q.11] If Question 5 = No: - SKIP TO Q.8 [Hide Q.6, Q.7] - SKIP TO Q.11 [Hide Q. 9, Q.10] If Question 5 = No Opinion OR I need more information - SKIP TO Q.11 [Hide Q.6, Q.7, Q.8, Q.9, Q.10]

mkent

Text Box

Q. 4/5 are variations of the same question - Respondent only receives 1 of them based on answer to Q.3

mkent

Text Box

Respondent has restrictions on their street

mkent

Text Box

Respondent does not have restrictions on their street / doesn't know if they do

Purpose of Parking ManagementArlington County Residential Parking Survey - Call CenterArlington County Residential Parking Survey - Call Center

6. Select the top three (3) reasons why you want residential parking restrictions tostay on your street:








7. Select the top three (3) reasons why you wish to have residential parkingrestrictions on your street:








8. Select the top three (3) reasons why you do not wish to have residential parking 5

mkent

Text Box


mkent

Text Box


mkent

Text Box

Respondent does not have restrictions on their street and wants to add them

8. Select the top three (3) reasons why you do not wish to have residential parkingrestrictions on your street:

Everyone should have access to public street parking

There are nearby businesses that could use the parking on my street

The process to get passes is difficult

Curb space is better used for other things like bike lanes and more green space

The cost of permits and passes is too high

It is already easy to find parking

There are nearby facilities, such as a school or library, that could use the parking on my

street


6

mkent

Text Box

Respondent has OR does not have restrictions on their street and wants to remove them OR does not want to add them

Managing Parking DemandArlington County Residential Parking Survey - Call CenterArlington County Residential Parking Survey - Call Center


Lower the maximum number of permits per household, but keep the cost per permit the

same

Do not change the maximum number of permits per household, but increase the cost for

each additional permit

Lower the maximum number of permits and increase the cost for each additional permit

Do nothing

No opinion





Add RPP restrictions

No nothing

No opinion


11. If parking space availability became a problem on your street, which of the 7

mkent

Text Box


mkent

Text Box


mkent

Text Box

Respondent has restrictions on their street and has no opinion about keeping/removing them OR respondent does not have restrictions and wants to add them




Do nothing

No opinion


8

mkent

Text Box

Respondent has restrictions on their street and wants to remove them, OR Respondent does not have restrictions and does not want to add them/no opinion/needs more information

Program EligibilityArlington County Residential Parking Survey - Call CenterArlington County Residential Parking Survey - Call Center

12. Which type of resident should be eligible for a parking permit? Select all thatapply:

Residents with a private driveway, garage, or carport

Residents without a private driveway, garage, or carport

Residents of apartment and condo buildings

All residents of the neighborhood, no matter what housing type

9

Trade-off: Visitor ParkingArlington County Residential Parking Survey - Call CenterArlington County Residential Parking Survey - Call Center


Visitors should be allowed to park in residential on-street parking spaces for a limited

time without a permit

Visitors should only be allowed to park in residential on-street parking spaces with a

permit or visitor pass

No opinion

10

Trade-off: Program Flexibility vs. EnforcementArlington County Residential Parking Survey - Call CenterArlington County Residential Parking Survey - Call Center


I prefer a flexible residential parking program structure that can vary by neighborhood

I prefer a simple residential parking program structure that is easier to enforce

countywide and is easier to understand

No opinion

11

Additional QuestionsArlington County Residential Parking Survey - Call CenterArlington County Residential Parking Survey - Call Center

15. Would you like to answer a few additional questions?

Yes

No

12

Your Parking CharacteristicsArlington County Residential Parking Survey - Call CenterArlington County Residential Parking Survey - Call Center

16. Where did you park most recently near your home? Select one:

On the street

Carport, driveway, or garage at my house

Parking lot or parking deck/garage

Not applicable – I don’t drive or own a vehicle

17. Thinking of the last place you parked on the street near your home, choose whichstatement you agree with most:

It was easy to find parking, and it was the right distance away

It was easy to find parking, but it was too far away

It was difficult to find parking, but it was the right distance away

It was difficult to find parking, and it was too far away

Not applicable - I don't drive or own a vehicle

No opinion/don't know

18. What best describes your participation in the Arlington County ResidentialPermit Parking (RPP) Program? Select all that apply:

I or members of my household have a FlexPassFlexPass

I or members of my household have a permit or decal that is for my/their vehicle onlypermit or decal that is for my/their vehicle only

I or members of my household have a book of short-term visitor passesshort-term visitor passes

I and all members of my household do not participatedo not participate in the residential permit parking

program (we have no permits)

13

mkent

Text Box

If Question 18 = FlexPass, permit/decal, AND/OR short-term visitor pass: - Show Q.19 [Hide Q.20, Q.21] If Question 18 = Do not participate: - SKIP TO Q. 20 [Hide Q.19, Hide Q.21]

Your Visitors' Parking CharacteristicsArlington County Residential Parking Survey - Call CenterArlington County Residential Parking Survey - Call Center


My visitors used my FlexPass

My visitors used a short-term visitor pass


My visitors parked further away, outside the permit zone

My visitors parked in the permit zone with no permit, outside of the permit restriction

time period

My visitors parked in the permit zone with no permit, during the permit restriction time

period





My visitors parked in the nearest permit zone with their own permit






14

mkent

Text Box

Q. 19/20/21 are variations of the same question - Respondent only receives 1 of them based on answer to Q.2 and Q.18

mkent

Text Box

Respondent knows about RPP, has restrictions on street, participates in program

mkent

Text Box

Respondent knows about RPP, has restrictions on street, does not participate in program OR doesn't have restrictions

mkent

Text Box

Respondent doesn't know about RPP OR knows about RPP but don't know if have restrictions

Residential Parking PreferencesArlington County Residential Parking Survey - Call CenterArlington County Residential Parking Survey - Call Center

22. The cost of a residential parking permit should vary based on the following(check all that apply):

Whether or not the household has access to parking in a garage, carport, parking lot, or

driveway

The number of vehicles in the household

The ability of the individual to pay for the permit

The age of the individual (e.g., discounts for residents 65 and older)

The demand for parking at that location

The cost should not vary (i.e., it should be the same for all residents)

23. Choose which statement you agree with most regarding your neighborhood:


townhomes) even if some new residents would park on the street


townhomes) only if residents of that building were not allowed to park on the street

I would not support new housing construction (e.g., apartments, condominiums, or

townhomes) no matter what parking measures are included

Don’t know/need more information to decide

24. Should the following groups of people be eligible for a permit to park on an RPP-15

Yes, at a higher pricethan residents

Yes, at the same priceas residents No No opinion

Landlords andproperty managers

Businessowners/employees

Service providers(e.g. medical homecare, social work,childcare,construction/homeimprovement)

Businesspatrons/customers

Schoolstaff/teachers

Car-share vehicles(such as Car2Go)

Visitors tocommunitycenters, libraries,or othercommunityfacilities

24. Should the following groups of people be eligible for a permit to park on an RPP-restricted street near their destination?

16

Permit Misuse and EnforcementArlington County Residential Parking Survey - Call CenterArlington County Residential Parking Survey - Call Center

25. What are the top three (3) approaches you recommend to reduce problematicRPP participant behavior? Select up to three:

More options for reporting potential violations

Stronger penalties for selling or counterfeiting permits

Simplify or reduce the types of permits

Permits printed with the license plate number of the corresponding vehicle

Use license plate readers for enforcement

Reduce zone size to prevent residents from commuting in the same zone

Nothing needs to be done; permit abuse is not a problem


26. Have you ever requested parking enforcement in your neighborhood (forconcerns like: parking without a permit, giving resident decals to non-residents,using expired permits, etc.)?

Yes – often (i.e., every month)

Yes – sometimes (i.e., several times in the past year)

Yes – rarely (i.e., once in the past year)

No

17

Your HousingArlington County Residential Parking Survey - Call CenterArlington County Residential Parking Survey - Call Center

27. Which of the following best describes the type of housing you live in?

Single-family detached (like a standalone house)

Single-family attached (like a townhouse)

Multi-family (like an apartment or condominium)

Other (Write in below)

28. Do you own or rent your home?

Own

Rent

Live with family or friends (do not pay rent)

Other/NA

18

mkent

Text Box

If Question 27 = Multi-family: - Hide Q. 33

DemographicsArlington County Residential Parking Survey - Call CenterArlington County Residential Parking Survey - Call Center

29. How many adults (age 18 or older) live in your household, including yourself?(enter number below)

30. How many children (age 17 or younger) live in your household more than halftime? (enter number below)

31. How many total personal vehicles (cars, SUVs, minivans, vans, pickup trucks,etc.) are kept by members of your household? (enter number below)

32. Do you or does someone in your household use a disabled parking placard orlicense plate?

Yes

No

33. Does use of your carport or garage for storage leave you unable to park a vehiclein it?

Yes

No

Not applicable - I don't have a carport or garage

34. How do you categorize your racial or ethnic background? Check all that apply: 19

mkent

Text Box

Respondent lives in single-family attached or detached or other home

34. How do you categorize your racial or ethnic background? Check all that apply:

Asian or Pacific Islander, including Native Hawaiian

Black/African American/Afro-Caribbean

Hispanic/Latino

Middle Eastern/North African

Native American, including Alaska Native

White/Caucasian



35. What language(s) do you speak at home?

English

Spanish

Amharic

Arabic

Chinese

Haitian Creole

Hindi or Punjabi

Mongolian

Russian


36. How do you identify? 20

36. How do you identify?

Female

Male

Non-binary


Prefer to self-describe (please specify)

37. What is your total household income before taxes? Please include every memberof your household who contributes to household finances.

Less than $24,999

$25,000-$49,999

$50,000-$74,999

$75,000-$99,999

$100,000-$199,999

$200,000 or more

21

Thank you for providing your feedback!Arlington County Residential Parking Survey - Call CenterArlington County Residential Parking Survey - Call Center

Email Address

Phone Number

38. If you wish to be entered into the drawing for one of 10 $100 Visa gift cards,please enter your contact information below. This information will be confidential.

39. If you have any additional comments about the residential permit parkingprogram or parking in Arlington County, please enter them below. For more information on Arlington’s Residential Permit Parking (RPP) program:https://projects.arlingtonva.us/residential-permit-parking-rpp-review/

22


2 Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

APPENDIX 4 Sample Weighting

Sample Weighting Introduction This memorandum describes the weighting method used to prepare the sample data for analysis. The household data collection and weighting plan was designed to represent response distributions for the population of residential households in Arlington County. The sample stratification on RPP eligibility, housing type, and planning corridor location and disproportionate sampling on these groups was used to improve precision for sub-group estimates. Weights were applied to account for the sample selection method and resulting over-sampling of smaller sub-groups as classified by in the stratification and to compensate for non-response within the stratification groups. The weights measure the number of households in the population that are represented by each household in the sample and enable the final estimates to be more representative of the Arlington County household population.

Calculation of Weights The final weight for each stratum was calculated from the combination of two elements:

• Design weights are calculated by stratum as the inverse of the sampling fraction

• Non-response weights are calculated as the inverse of the response fraction.

The final weight was calculated as the design weight adjusted by the non-response weight, or the design weight * the non-response weight.

Final weights are provided on the following page.

Final Weights Final

Stratum Final Stratum Description Sampling

Fraction Design Weight

(1/Sampling Fraction)

Response Fraction (No. Responses/No. Mailings Allocated)

Nonresponse Weight (1/Response Fraction)

Final Weight (Design Weight *

Nonreponse Weight)

A1 Columbia Pike Single Family Detached RPP Eligible 1.00 1.00 0.16 6.19 6.19 A2 Columbia Pike_Single Family Detached_RPP Ineligible 1.00 1.00 0.12 8.37 8.37 A3 Columbia Pike Single Family Attached RPP Eligible 1.00 1.00 0.08 13.15 13.15 A4 Columbia Pike Single Family Attached RPP Ineligible 1.00 1.00 0.10 10.07 10.07 A5 Columbia Pike Multi-Family RPP Eligible 1.00 1.00 0.09 11.21 11.21 A6 Columbia Pike Multi-Family RPP Ineligible 0.61 1.64 0.04 24.27 39.89 B1 Route 1 Single Family Detached RPP Eligible 1.00 1.00 0.18 5.69 5.69 B2 Route 1 Single Family Detached RPP Ineligible 1.00 1.00 0.15 6.63 6.63 B3 Route 1 Single Family Attached RPP Eligible 1.00 1.00 0.13 8.00 8.00 B4 Route 1 Single Family Attached RPP Ineligible 1.00 1.00 0.07 14.71 14.71 B5 Route 1 Multi-Family RPP Eligible 1.00 1.00 0.13 7.97 7.97 B6 Route 1 Multi-Family RPP Ineligible 0.91 1.10 0.04 26.93 29.67 C1 Rosslyn-Ballston Single Family Detached RPP Eligible 1.00 1.00 0.18 5.67 5.67 C2 Rosslyn-Ballston Single Family Detached RPP Ineligible 1.00 1.00 0.13 7.53 7.53 C3 Rosslyn-Ballston Single Family Attached RPP Eligible 1.00 1.00 0.12 8.64 8.64 C4 Rosslyn-Ballston Single Family Attached RPP Ineligible 1.00 1.00 0.11 9.35 9.35 C5 Rosslyn-Ballston Multi-Family RPP Eligible 1.00 1.00 0.08 12.19 12.19 C6 Rosslyn-Ballston Multi-Family RPP Ineligible 0.25 4.07 0.05 19.99 81.33 D1 All Other Areas Single Family Detached RPP Eligible 1.00 1.00 0.12 8.28 8.28 D2 All Other Areas Single Family Detached RPP Ineligible 0.30 3.30 0.11 9.49 31.27 D3 All Other Areas Single Family Attached RPP Eligible 1.00 1.00 0.12 8.29 8.29 D4 All Other Areas Single Family Attached RPP Ineligible 1.00 1.00 0.10 9.64 9.64 D5 All Other Areas Multi-Family RPP Eligible 1.00 1.00 0.10 9.77 9.77 D6 All Other Areas Multi-Family RPP Ineligible 0.35 2.88 0.05 20.62 59.36

2 Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

APPENDIX 5 Survey Results

Attachment A Distributions

Income:

VAR28 Frequency Percent Weighted Percent

Percentage of Arlington County

PopulationLess than $24,999 122 3.2 3.8 9.7$25,000‐$49,999 174 4.5 4.7 9.3$50,000‐$74,999 388 10.1 12.6 12.2$75,000‐$99,999 491 12.8 15.2 12.6$100,000‐$199,999 1594 41.6 43.6 34.2$200,000 or more 1064 27.8 20.1 21.8Total 3833 100.0 100.0 100.0Frequency Missing = 706

Gender:



PopulationFemale 1828 48.6 48.6 50.2Male 1921 51.1 51.0 49.8Non‐binary 11 0.3 0.4Total 3760 100.0 100.0Frequency Missing = 779

Race and Ethnicity:



PopulationAsian or Pacific Islander 195 5.8 6.7 10.4Black/African American/Afro‐Caribbean 122 3.6 4.0 8.8Hispanic/Latino 121 3.6 4.0 15.5Middle Eastern/North African 18 0.5 0.6Native American, including Alaskan Native 7 0.2 0.2 0.4White/Caucasian 2643 78.9 76.9 71.5Other 1 0.0 0.0 5.7Multi‐racial 242 7.2 7.5 3.2Total 3349 100.0 100.0Frequency Missing = 1190

Distribution Tables

For distribution, only respondents answering strictly male, strictly female, or strictly non‐binary were included in the breakdown in order to compare to census numbers.

How do you identify? ‐ recoded as female only, male only, or non‐binary only

What is your total household income before taxes?

How do you categorize your racial or ethnic background? ‐ recoded

Respondents were able to select more than one answer. Those who selected more than one race were considered multi‐racial. Any remaining other answers that were a singular race were grouped as Other. *It should be noted that our survey considered Hispanic/Latino to be an option among race while the ACS considers Hispanic/Latino as ethnicity rather than race. People who identify as Hispanic/Latino may be any race. This results in our survey’s Hispanic/Latino answer to be mutually exclusive from white, black, etc. while the ACS is inclusive of white.

Frequency Percent Weighted Percent3701 88.5 88.3

Spanish 192 4.6 4.0Amharic 3 0.1 0.1Arabic 10 0.2 0.2Chinese 31 0.7 0.9Haitian Creole 0 0.0 0.0Hindi or Punjabi 12 0.3 0.3Mongolian 3 0.1 0.1Russian 15 0.4 0.4Other 102 2.4 2.6Two or more languages 59 1.4 1.5

12 0.3 0.52 0.0 0.01 0.0 0.18 0.2 0.20 0.0 0.01 0.0 0.11 0.0 0.02 0.0 0.025 0.6 0.61 0.0 0.0

4181 100.00 100.00Frequency Missing = 358

VAR26 Frequency Percent Weighted Percent1 3753 89.8 89.82 369 8.8 8.73 53 1.3 1.44 5 0.1 0.19 1 0.0 0.0Total 4181 100.0 100.0Frequency Missing = 358

Other onlyArabic & Other

Total Respondents

Language:

Haitian Creole only

Arabic onlyChinese only

Hindi or Punjabi onlyMongolian only

Russian only

VAR26aa ‐ VAR26ajEnglish only

English &

Spanish onlyAmharic only

Respondents were able to select more than one answer. The majority of respondents who selected more than one answer selected English and a second language. All of the languages listed under other were grouped together and listed as Other. *According to ACS, 70.5% of the population in Arlington county speaks only English, 13.7% speak Spanish, 6.8% speak other Indo‐European languages, 5.7% speak an Asian or Pacific Islander language, and 3.4% speak other languages.

How many languages do you speak at home? ‐ recoded from what languages are spoken at home

RPP Zone:

RPP Zone Number of Responses

Percent of Survey Responses

Weighted Percentage

Percent of Survey Respondents who are RPP Participants

Weighted Percentage of RPP Eligible Households

Percent of Arlington County Households

Percent of Arlington County Households that are RPP Eligible

1 79 1.7% 0.4% 5.4% 4.2% 0.5% 4.7%1A 66 1.5% 0.4% 4.5% 4.0% 0.4% 4.1%1B 81 1.8% 0.5% 5.5% 4.5% 0.4% 4.4%1C 68 1.5% 0.4% 4.7% 3.7% 0.3% 3.3%2 52 1.1% 0.4% 3.6% 3.8% 0.3% 3.3%3 52 1.1% 0.3% 3.6% 2.9% 0.2% 2.3%4 115 2.5% 1.2% 7.9% 11.6% 1.0% 10.3%5 45 1.0% 0.5% 3.1% 4.7% 0.5% 4.6%6 357 7.9% 2.0% 24.4% 20.3% 1.9% 19.1%7 22 0.5% 0.1% 1.5% 1.4% 0.1% 1.3%8 183 4.0% 1.3% 12.5% 12.7% 1.5% 15.3%9 96 2.1% 0.7% 6.6% 7.2% 0.6% 6.3%10 41 0.9% 0.3% 2.8% 3.0% 0.4% 3.6%11 32 0.7% 0.3% 2.2% 2.8% 0.3% 2.8%12 20 0.4% 0.1% 1.4% 1.5% 0.2% 2.2%13 19 0.4% 0.1% 1.3% 1.4% 0.2% 1.9%14 17 0.4% 0.2% 1.2% 1.6% 0.1% 1.0%15 9 0.2% 0.1% 0.6% 0.7% 0.1% 0.6%16 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.2%20 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.1%21 25 0.6% 0.1% 1.7% 1.4% 0.2% 1.9%22 51 1.1% 0.3% 3.5% 3.5% 0.3% 3.5%23 8 0.2% 0.1% 0.5% 0.6% 0.1% 0.6%24 21 0.5% 0.2% 1.4% 2.1% 0.2% 2.5%4/6 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1%Not in RPP 3072 67.8% 90.0% 90.0%Total 4536Frequency Missing = 3

Planning Corridor:

PlanningCorridor Frequency Percent Weighted Percent

Estimated No. of Households

(Sampling Frame)Percent of Population

Columbia Pike 1089 24.0 18.5 20,701 18.5%Route 1 834 18.4 14.5 16,286 14.5%Rosslyn‐Ballston 1305 28.8 34.2 38,245 34.2%All Other Areas 1311 28.9 32.8 36,700 32.8%Total 4539 100.0 100.0 111,932 100.0%

Housing Type:

Housing Type Frequency Percent Weighted PercentSFD 2088 46.0 24.9SFA 725 16.0 6.2Multi‐Family 1726 38.0 69.0Total 4539 100.0 100.0

Housing Type ‐ from sampling frame

Arlington County Planning Corridor ‐ from sampling frame

Civic Association:

Civic Association Number of ResponsesPercentage of Responses

Weighted Percentage

24th Rd S 3 0.1% 0.2%Alcova Heights 74 1.6% 0.8%Arlington ‐ East Falls Church 141 3.1% 2.2%Arlington Forest 44 1.0% 1.2%Arlington Heights 100 2.2% 1.0%Arlington Mill 78 1.7% 1.7%Arlington Ridge 302 6.7% 3.7%Arlington View 21 0.5% 0.3%Arlingwood 4 0.1% 0.1%Ashton Heights 185 4.1% 1.6%Aurora Highlands 296 6.5% 4.3%Ballston ‐ Virginia Square 256 5.6% 9.5%Barcroft 134 3.0% 1.1%Bellevue Forest 8 0.2% 0.2%Bluemont 122 2.7% 2.3%Boulevard Manor 17 0.4% 0.5%Buckingham 67 1.5% 2.8%Cathcart Springs 17 0.4% 0.1%Chain Bridge Forest 2 0.0% 0.1%Cherry Valley Nature Area 1 0.0% 0.0%Cherrydale 55 1.2% 1.1%Claremont 51 1.1% 0.4%Clarendon ‐ Courthouse 116 2.6% 5.3%Colonial Village 94 2.1% 1.7%Columbia Forest 88 1.9% 1.4%Columbia Heights 113 2.5% 3.5%Crystal City 210 4.6% 5.6%Dominion Hills 25 0.6% 0.7%Donaldson Run 38 0.8% 0.8%Douglas Park 174 3.8% 3.0%Dover Crystal 9 0.2% 0.3%Fairlington 133 2.9% 5.7%Forest Glen 20 0.4% 0.1%Foxcroft Heights 6 0.1% 0.1%Glebewood 32 0.7% 0.3%Glencarlyn 21 0.5% 0.5%Gulf Branch 5 0.1% 0.1%Highland Park ‐ Overlee Knolls 26 0.6% 0.7%John M Langston 27 0.6% 0.5%Leeway Overlee 26 0.6% 0.6%Long Branch Creek 45 1.0% 1.2%Lyon Park 135 3.0% 2.1%Lyon Village 160 3.5% 1.4%Madison Manor 37 0.8% 0.6%Marymount Washington Golf 9 0.2% 0.3%Maywood 21 0.5% 0.7%Nauck 111 2.4% 1.9%North Highlands 66 1.5% 2.1%North Rosslyn 44 1.0% 1.1%Old Dominion 25 0.6% 0.5%Old Glebe 14 0.3% 0.3%Penrose 160 3.5% 2.9%Potomac Yard 44 1.0% 1.2%Radnor/Ft. Myer Heights 154 3.4% 7.4%Rivercrest 1 0.0% 0.0%Riverwood 3 0.1% 0.1%Rock Spring 14 0.3% 0.4%S Buchanan St ‐ S Four Mile Run 6 0.1% 0.0%S Four Mile Run 35 0.8% 1.2%Shirlington 49 1.1% 2.4%Spout Run ‐ Lee Highway 16 0.4% 0.8%Stafford‐Albemarle‐Glebe 8 0.2% 0.2%Tara ‐ Leeway Heights 30 0.7% 0.7%Waverly Hills 48 1.1% 1.3%Waycroft ‐ Woodlawn 53 1.2% 0.5%Westover Village 21 0.5% 0.6%Williamsburg 31 0.7% 0.7%Woodmont 7 0.2% 0.2%Yorktown 45 1.0% 0.9%Grand Total 4533Frequency Missing = 6

RPP Awareness:

Aware of the RPP Program Number of RespondentsPercentage of Respondents

Weighted Percentage of Respondents

Yes 3909 86.3 78.9No 621 13.7 21.1Total Responses 4530 100.0 100.0Frequency Missing = 9

RPP Participation:

VAR29 Frequency Percent Weighted PercentHousehold buys permits 1297 29.2 8.8Household is eligible but not buying permits 66 1.5 0.5Household is not in the RPP Program 3072 69.3 90.7Total 4435 100.0 100.0Frequency Missing = 104

Level of Participation in the RPP Program

Attachment B Overall Frequencies

Q1 Are you aware that Arlington County has an RPP Program?

VAR1 Frequency PercentWeightedPercent

Yes 3909 86.3 78.9No 621 13.7 21.1Total 4530 100.0 100.0Who Was Shown the Question EveryoneFrequency Missing from that Group 9Response Rate 99.8%

Q2 Are there residential permit parking (RPP) restrictions on the street in front of your home?


Yes 1579 40.4 20.8No 2188 56.0 72.3I don't know 139 3.6 6.9Total 3906 100.0 100.0Who Was Shown the Question Answered Yes to Q1Frequency Missing from that Group 3Response Rate 99.9%

Q3a Are you in favor of keeping the residential parking restrictions on the street in front of your home?

VAR3a Frequency PercentWeightedPercent

Yes 1365 86.0 71.5No 156 9.8 20.3No opinion 66 4.2 8.2Total 1587 100.0 100.0Who Was Shown the QuestionFrequency Missing from that Group 0Response Rate 100.0%

Q3b Would you like the street in front of your home to have residential permit parking restrictions?

VAR3b Frequency PercentWeightedPercent

Yes 487 20.9 14.4No 1299 55.8 60.9No opinion 191 8.2 9.7Need more information 353 15.2 15.1Total 2330 100.0 100.0Who Was Shown the QuestionFrequency Missing from that Group 0Response Rate 100.0%

Overall Frequencies

Answered Yes to Q1 AND Answered Yes to Q2

Answered Yes to Q1 AND Answered No or I Don't Know to Q2

Q4a Top (3) reasons why you want residential parking restrictions to stay on your street

VAR4a Frequency PercentWeighted Percent

To make sure that I can park near my home 871 80.6 79.2To discourage commuter parking 881 81.6 76.8To discourage parking by business customers 367 34.0 36.6To reduce litter and noise 196 18.1 20.1To improve neighborhood safety 368 34.1 34.8To discourage parking by residents of nearby apartment or condo buildings 415 38.4 40.2Other 142 13.1 12.2Total 1080620 Responses Omitted for Selecting more or less than 3 answer choicesWho Was Shown the Question Answered yes to Q1 AND Answered Yes to Q2 AND Answered Yes to Q3a Frequency Missing from that Group 9 did not answer at all, 276 answered with more or less than 3 answer choicesResponse Rate 79.1%

Q4b Top (3) reasons why you wish to have residential parking restrictions on your street

VAR4b Frequency PercentWeighted Percent

To make sure that I can park near my home 269 74.7 76.2To discourage commuter parking 221 61.4 65.6To discourage parking by business customers 117 32.5 36.9To reduce litter and noise 94 26.1 23.9To improve neighborhood safety 149 41.4 39.7To discourage parking by residents of nearby apartment or condo buildings 158 43.9 38.8Other 72 20.0 18.9Total 360286 Responses Omitted for Selecting more or less than 3 answer choicesWho Was Shown the Question Answered Yes to Q1 AND Answered No or I Don't Know to Q2 AND Answered Frequency Missing from that Group 127 answered with more or less than 3 answer choicesResponse Rate 73.9%

Q4c Top (3) reasons why you do not wish to have residential parking restrictions on your street

VAR4c Frequency PercentWeighted Percent

Everyone should have access to public street parking 630 76.5 80.1There are nearby businesses that could use the parking on my street 180 21.9 28.3The process to get passes is difficult 234 28.4 27.3Curb space is better used for other things 145 17.6 20.7The cost of permits & passes is too high 287 34.9 34.7It is already easy to find parking 530 64.4 55.4There are nearby facilities that could use the parking on my street 179 21.7 20.5Other 284 34.5 32.9Total 823986 Responses Omitted for Selecting more or less than 3 answer choicesWho Was Shown the Question Answered No to Q3a OR Answered No to Q3bFrequency Missing from that Group 632 answered with more or less than 3 answer choicesResponse Rate 56.6%


Lower the max number of permits, but keep cost same 339 25.1 28.6Do not change the max number of permits per household, but increase the cost 304 22.5 18.9Lower the max number of permits and increase the cost 287 21.2 20.1Do nothing 97 7.2 6.4No opinion 113 8.4 12.0Other 211 15.6 14.0Total 1351 100.0 100.0Who Was Shown the Question Answered Yes to Q1 AND Answered Yes to Q2 AND Answered Yes to Q3aFrequency Missing from that Group 14Response Rate 99.0%


Install parking meters in areas with high demand 35 6.3 9.4Install signs that restrict the number of hours that people can occupy a space 77 13.8 16.9Add RPP restrictions 371 66.4 60.8Do nothing 9 1.6 2.2No opinion 22 3.9 4.0Other 45 8.1 6.8Total 559 100.0 100.0Who Was Shown the Question Answered No Opinion to Q3a OR Answered Yes to Q3bFrequency Missing from that Group 0Response Rate 100.0%

VAR5c Frequency PercentWeightedPercent

Install parking meters in areas with high demand 356 13.7 17.0Install signs that restrict the number of hours that people can occupy a space 973 37.5 35.4Do nothing 322 12.4 12.9No opinion 248 9.6 10.5Other 697 26.8 24.2Total 2596 100.0 100.0Who Was Shown the Question

Frequency Missing from that Group 32Response Rate 98.8%

Q6 Which type of resident should be eligible for a parking permit?


Residents with a private driveway, garage, or carport 936 24.4 16.1Residents without a private driveway, garage, or carport 1472 38.4 41.4Residents of apartment and condo buildings 697 18.2 27.6All residents of the neighborhood, no matter what housing type 2515 65.6 65.5Total 3836Who Was Shown the Question Answered Yes to Q1Frequency Missing from that Group 73Response Rate 98.1%

Q5c If parking space availability became a problem on your street, which of the following measures would you most support to manage parking demand?

Q5a If parking space availability became a problem on your street, which of the following measures would you most support to manage parking demand?

Q5b If parking space availability became a problem on your street, which of the following measures would you most support to manage parking demand?

Answered No to Q1 OR (Answered No to 3a OR Answered No, No Opinion, or Need More Information for Q3b)

Q7 Choose which statement you agree with most:


Visitors should be allowed to park...for a limited time 2144 55.4 65.5Visitors should only be allowed...with a permit or visitor pass 1531 39.6 28.3No opinion 193 5.0 6.2Total 3868 100.0 100.0Who Was Shown the Question Answered Yes to Q1Frequency Missing from that Group 41Response Rate 99.0%



I prefer a flexible residential parking program structure... 2082 54.0 52.1I prefer a simple residential parking program structure... 1504 39.0 41.2No opinion 273 7.1 6.7Total 3859 100.0 100.0Who Was Shown the Question Answered Yes to Q1Frequency Missing from that Group 41Response Rate 99.0%

Q9 Where did you park most recently near your home? Select one:


On the street 1607 36.2 26.4Carport, driveway, or garage at my house 1584 35.7 24.6Parking lot or parking deck/garage 1131 25.5 44.8Not applicable ‐ I don't drive or own a vehicle 117 2.6 4.2Total 4439 100.0 100.0Who Was Shown the Question EveryoneFrequency Missing from that Group 100Response Rate 97.8%

Q10 Thinking of the last place you parked on the street near your home, choose which statement you agree with most:


It was easy to find parking, and it was the right distance away 2712 61.2 52.4It was easy to find parking, but it was too far away 269 6.1 6.4It was difficult to find parking, but it was the right distance away 612 13.8 16.9It was difficult to find parking, and it was too far away 518 11.7 14.1Not applicable ‐ I don't drive or own a vehicle 100 2.3 3.6No opinion/don't know 222 5.0 6.5Total 4433 100.0 100.0Who Was Shown the Question EveryoneFrequency Missing from that Group 106Response Rate 97.7%

Q11 What best describes your participation in the Arlington County RPP Program?


I or members of my household have a FlexPass 1084 70.0 46.0I or members of my household have a permit or decal that is for my/their vehicle only 998 64.5 49.6I or members of my household have a book of short‐term visitor passes 1037 67.0 44.9I and all members of my household do not participate in the residential permit parking program (we have no permits) 204 13.2 33.7Total 1548Who Was Shown the Question Answered Yes to Q1 AND Answered Yes to Q2Frequency Missing from that Group 31Response Rate 98.0%

Q12a How did you handle parking for your most recent visitors who had a vehicle?


My visitors used my FlexPass 366 27.3 23.7My visitors used a short‐term visitor pass 578 43.1 41.1My visitors parked off‐street on my property/at my building 161 12.0 12.7My visitors parked further away, outside the permit zone 38 2.8 6.5My visitors parked in the permit zone with no permit, outside of the permit restriction time period 144 10.7 10.8My visitors parked in the permit zone with no permit, during the permit restriction time period 31 2.3 3.1I don’t know where my visitors parked 22 1.6 2.0Total 1340 100.0 100.0Who Was Shown the Question Answered Yes to Q1 AND Answered Yes to Q2 AND Answered Yes to Q3aFrequency Missing from that Group 25Response Rate 98.2%

Q12b How did you handle parking for your most recent visitors who had a vehicle?


My visitors parked on the street 1730 73.6 72.1My visitors parked off‐street on my property/at my building 530 22.5 23.5My visitors parked in the nearest permit zone with their own permit 9 0.4 0.3I don’t know where my visitors parked 83 3.5 4.1Total 2352 100.0 100.0Who Was Shown the Question

Frequency Missing from that Group 40Response Rate 98.3%

Q12c How did you handle parking for your most recent visitors who had a vehicle?

VAR12c Frequency PercentWeightedPercent

My visitors parked on the street 421 57.0 56.2My visitors parked off‐street on my property/at my building 275 37.2 37.8I don’t know where my visitors parked 43 5.8 6.1Total 739 100.0 100.0Who Was Shown the Question Answered No to Q1 OR Answered Don't Know to Q2Frequency Missing from that Group 6Response Rate 99.1%

Answered No to Q2 OR (Answered Yes to Q2 AND Answered that their household did not participate in the RPP program in Q11)

Q13 The cost of a residential parking permit should vary based on the following


Whether or not the household has access to parking 902 24.1 31.7The number of vehicles in the household 1420 38.0 37.4The ability of the individual to pay for the permit 633 16.9 20.6The age of the individual (e.g., discounts for residents 65 and older 1200 32.1 32.4The demand for parking at that location 1026 27.4 30.2The cost should not vary 1596 42.7 39.3Total 3739Who Was Shown the Question Answered Yes to Q1Frequency Missing from that Group 170Response Rate 95.7%

Q14 Choose which statement you agree with most regarding your neighborhood:


I would support new housing construction (e.g., apartments, condominiums, or townhomes) even if some new residents would park on the street 909 20.8 24.5I would support new housing construction (e.g., apartments, condominiums, or townhomes) only if residents of that building were not allowed to park on the street 1236 28.3 25.9I would not support new housing construction (e.g., apartments, condominiums, or townhomes) no matter what parking measures are included 1153 26.4 25.2Don’t know/need more information to decide 1075 24.6 24.5Total 4373 100.0 100.0Who Was Shown the Question EveryoneFrequency Missing from that Group 166Response Rate 96.3%

Q15 Should the following groups of people be eligible for a permit to park on an RPP‐restricted street near their destination?


Yes, at a higher price than residents 726 19.6 20.4Yes, at the same price as residents 1593 42.9 45.9No 1061 28.6 24.1No opinion 332 8.9 9.6Total 3712 100.0 100.0






Yes, at a higher price than residents 245 6.6 6.7Yes, at the same price as residents 1510 40.5 47.7No 1534 41.1 33.5No opinion 440 11.8 12.2Total 3729 100.0 100.0Who Was Shown the Question Answered Yes to Q1Frequency Missing from that Group

Response Rate Ranged from 94.7% to 95.4%

Landlords & property managers

Business owners/employees

Service providers

Ranged per Category, 3909 respondents were shown this question and the total for each category shows how many answered

School staff/teachers

Car‐share vehicles

Visitors to community facilities

Business patrons/customers

Q16 Top (3) approaches you recommend to reduce problematic RPP participant behavior


More options for reporting potential violations 331 50.1 43.0Stronger penalties for selling or counterfeiting permits 466 70.5 66.3Simplify or reduce the types of permits 175 26.5 36.4Permits printed with the license plate number of the corresponding vehicle 356 53.9 57.4Use license plate readers for enforcement 424 64.1 63.2Reduce zone size to prevent residents from commuting in the same zone 98 14.8 15.1Nothing needs to be done; permit abuse is not a problem 69 10.4 10.6Other 64 9.7 8.0Total 6611298 Responses Omitted for Selecting more or less than 3 answer choicesWho Was Shown the Question Answered Yes to Q1 AND Answered Yes to Q2Frequency Missing from that Group 70 did not answer at all, 848 answered with more or less than 3 answer choiceResponse Rate 41.9%

Q17 Have you ever requested parking enforcement in your neighborhood?


Yes, often 61 4.0 2.8Yes, sometimes 154 10.1 8.0Yes, rarely 246 16.1 11.8No 1065 69.8 77.4Total 1526 100.0 100.0Who Was Shown the Question Answered Yes to Q1 AND Answered Yes to Q2Frequency Missing from that Group 53Response Rate 96.6%

Q18 Which of the following best describes the type of housing you live in?


SFD 2053 46.9 25.5SFA 810 18.5 11.6Multi‐Family 1515 34.6 62.9Total 4378 100.0 100.0Who Was Shown the Question EveryoneFrequency Missing from that Group 161Response Rate 96.5%

Q19 Do you own or rent your home?


Own 3164 72.3 57.1Rent 1192 27.2 42.3Live with family or friends & do not pay rent 10 0.2 0.1Other/NA 12 0.3 0.5Total 4378 100.0 100.0Who Was Shown the Question EveryoneFrequency Missing from that Group 161Response Rate 96.5%

Q20 How many adults (age 18 or older) live in your household, including yourself?


0 34 0.8 1.01 1288 30.1 39.32 2398 56.0 50.73 385 9.0 6.44 136 3.2 2.15 29 0.7 0.36 6 0.1 0.17 3 0.1 0.120 1 0.0 0.022 3 0.1 0.1Total 4283 100.0 100.0Who Was Shown the Question EveryoneFrequency Missing from that Group 256Response Rate 94.4%

Q21 How many children (age 17 or younger) live in your household more than half time?


0 3248 76.7 83.31 473 11.2 8.62 398 9.4 6.63 93 2.2 1.24 16 0.4 0.25 1 0.0 0.06 4 0.1 0.013 1 0.0 0.0Total 4234 100.0 100.0Who Was Shown the Question EveryoneFrequency Missing from that Group 305Response Rate 93.3%

Q22 How many total personal vehicles (cars, SUVs, minivans, vans, pickup trucks, etc.) are kept by members of your household?


0 131 3.1 4.91 1822 42.6 52.62 1764 41.2 34.13 436 10.2 6.54 97 2.3 1.35 15 0.4 0.26 7 0.2 0.27 4 0.1 0.18 1 0.0 0.020 1 0.0 0.0Total 4278 100.0 100.0Who Was Shown the Question EveryoneFrequency Missing from that Group 261Response Rate 94.2%

Q23 Do you or does someone in your household use a disabled parking placard or license plate?


Yes 332 7.7 6.4No 3976 92.3 93.6Total 4308 200.0 100.0Who Was Shown the Question EveryoneFrequency Missing from that Group 231Response Rate 94.9%

Q24 Does use of your carport or garage for storage leave you unable to park a vehicle in it?


Yes 467 16.4 15.1No 1181 41.6 38.8Not applicable ‐ I don't have a carport or garage 1192 42.0 46.1Total 2840 100.0 100.0Who Was Shown the Question Did Not Answer Multi‐Family Housing for Q18Frequency Missing from that Group 23Response Rate 99.2%

Attachment C Crosstabulations


RPP Participation VAR1 Frequency Percent

Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Household uses permits Yes 1297 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 100.0

No 0 0.0 . . . .Total 1297 100.0 100.0

Household is eligible but not using

permits Yes 66 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 100.0

No 0 0.0 . . . .Total 66 100.0 100.0

Household is not in the RPP Program Yes 2462 80.3 76.7 0.9 74.9 78.6

No 604 19.7 23.3 0.9 21.4 25.1Total 3066 100.0 100.0

Total Yes 3825 86.4 78.9 0.9 77.2 80.6

No 604 13.6 21.1 0.9 19.4 22.8Total 4429 100.0 100.0

Who Was Shown the Question Everyone

Frequency Missing from that Group 9

Response Rate 99.8%


RPP Participation VAR3a Frequency Percent

Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent


No 66 5.1 5.0 0.6 3.8 6.2

No opinion 29 2.2 2.1 0.4 1.3 2.9Total 1295 100.0 100.0


permits Yes 33 50.0 50.0 6.4 37.5 62.4

No 22 33.3 31.8 5.9 20.2 43.3

No opinion 11 16.7 18.3 5.1 8.3 28.3Total 66 100.0 100.0


No 65 32.7 37.9 4.3 29.5 46.3

No opinion 26 13.1 15.1 3.3 8.7 21.5Total 199 100.0 100.0

Total Yes 1341 86.0 71.3 2.2 67.0 75.6

No 153 9.8 20.3 2.1 16.3 24.4

No opinion 66 4.2 8.3 1.5 5.4 11.3Total 1560 100.0 100.0

Who Was Shown the Question Answered Yes to Q1 AND Answered Yes to Q2


Response Rate 100.0%

95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent

Survey Responses Weighted Population Estimate95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent

Survey Responses Weighted Population Estimate

RPP Participation CrosstabsFrequency missing RPP Participation Status: 101


RPP Participation VAR3b Frequency Percent

Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent


No 0 0.0 . . . .

No opinion 0 0.0 . . . .

Need more information 0 0.0 . . . .Total 3 100.0 100.0


permits Yes 0 0.0 . . . .

No 1 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 100.0

No opinion 0 0.0 . . . .



No 1281 56.4 61.1 1.3 58.6 63.5

No opinion 185 8.1 9.7 0.8 8.1 11.2

Need more information 346 15.2 15.1 0.9 13.3 17.0Total 2270 100.0 100.0

Total Yes 461 20.3 14.2 0.8 12.5 15.8

No 1282 56.4 61.0 1.3 58.6 63.5

No opinion 185 8.1 9.7 0.8 8.1 11.2


Who Was Shown the Question Answered Yes to Q1 AND Answered No or I Don't Know to Q2



Q5a


Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Household uses permits Lower the max number of permits, but keep cost same 295 24.7 25.2 1.3 22.6 27.8

Do not change the max number of permits per household, but increase the cost 275 23.0 21.9 1.2 19.5 24.3

Lower the max number of permits and increase the cost 258 21.6 21.6 1.2 19.1 24.0

Do nothing 88 7.4 7.3 0.8 5.8 8.9

No opinion 88 7.4 7.5 0.8 5.9 9.1

Other 192 16.1 16.5 1.1 14.3 18.7Total 1196 100.0 100.0


permits Lower the max number of permits, but keep cost same 9 27.3 29.8 8.3 13.5 46.0



Do nothing 3 9.1 9.7 5.4 0.0 20.3

No opinion 2 6.1 7.4 5.0 0.0 17.3

Other 4 12.1 11.2 5.6 0.2 22.2Total 33 100.0 100.0

Household is not in the RPP Program Lower the max number of permits, but keep cost same 31 30.4 37.2 6.2 25.0 49.5



Do nothing 5 4.9 3.8 2.4 0.0 8.5

No opinion 19 18.6 23.2 5.5 12.5 33.9

Other 15 14.7 8.8 3.0 2.8 14.7Total 102 100.0 100.0

Total Lower the max number of permits, but keep cost same 335 25.2 28.7 2.0 24.7 32.7



Do nothing 96 7.2 6.4 0.9 4.7 8.1

No opinion 109 8.2 11.9 1.7 8.6 15.2

Other 211 15.9 14.2 1.2 11.8 16.5Total 1331 100.0 100.0

Who Was Shown the Question Answered Yes to Q1 And Answered Yes to Q2 AND Answered Yes to Q3a


Response Rate 99.0%


Limits

for Row Percent

If parking space availability became a problem on your street, which of the following measures would you most

support to manage parking demand?Survey Responses Weighted Population Estimate

95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent

Q5b


Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Household uses permits Install parking meters in areas with high demand 6 18.2 17.0 6.5 4.2 29.7

Install signs that restrict the number of hours that people can occupy a space 6 18.2 17.9 6.8 4.6 31.3

Add RPP restrictions 14 42.4 44.0 9.0 26.3 61.6

Do nothing 1 3.0 2.6 2.6 0.0 7.8

No opinion 4 12.1 13.6 6.6 0.7 26.6

Other 2 6.1 4.9 3.4 0.0 11.5Total 33 100.0 100.0


permits Install parking meters in areas with high demand 4 36.4 33.4 14.4 5.2 61.5



Do nothing 1 9.1 5.7 5.6 0.0 16.7

No opinion 1 9.1 7.6 7.4 0.0 22.2

Other 0 0.0 . . . .Total 11 100.0 100.0

Household is not in the RPP Program Install parking meters in areas with high demand 25 5.1 9.1 2.1 5.1 13.2



Do nothing 7 1.4 2.2 1.0 0.2 4.1

No opinion 15 3.1 3.7 1.2 1.2 6.1

Other 41 8.4 6.9 1.5 4.0 9.8Total 489 100.0 100.0

Total Install parking meters in areas with high demand 35 6.6 9.5 2.0 5.6 13.5



Do nothing 9 1.7 2.2 1.0 0.3 4.1

No opinion 20 3.8 3.9 1.2 1.5 6.3

Other 43 8.1 6.8 1.4 4.0 9.6Total 533 100.0 100.0

Who Was Shown the Question Answered No Opinion to Q3a OR Answered Yes to Q3b



If parking space availability became a problem on your street, which of the following measures would you most support to

manage parking demand?Survey Responses Weighted Population Estimate

95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent

Q5c

RPP Participation VAR5c Frequency Percent

Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Household uses permits Install parking meters in areas with high demand 9 13.8 13.6 4.5 4.9 22.3


Do nothing 10 15.4 16.3 4.9 6.8 25.9

No opinion 7 10.8 11.6 4.3 3.2 20.0

Other 18 27.7 26.6 5.5 15.8 37.5Total 65 100.0 100.0


permits Install parking meters in areas with high demand 3 13.6 15.1 8.1 0.0 30.9


Do nothing 4 18.2 19.6 8.9 2.2 37.1

No opinion 4 18.2 17.8 8.5 1.1 34.6

Other 3 13.6 12.7 7.3 0.0 27.1Total 22 100.0 100.0

Household is not in the RPP Program Install parking meters in areas with high demand 340 13.8 17.0 0.9 15.2 18.9


Do nothing 301 12.2 12.9 0.8 11.3 14.5

No opinion 231 9.4 10.5 0.8 9.0 12.0

Other 663 26.9 24.2 1.0 22.2 26.2Total 2461 100.0 100.0



Do nothing 315 12.4 12.9 0.8 11.3 14.5

No opinion 242 9.5 10.5 0.8 9.0 12.0

Other 684 26.8 24.2 1.0 22.2 26.2Total 2548 100.0 100.0

Who Was Shown the Question


Response Rate 98.8%



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Household uses permits Visitors should be allowed to park...for a limited time 406 31.4 31.5 1.3 28.9 34.1

Visitors should only be allowed...with a permit or visitor pass 860 66.5 66.1 1.4 63.4 68.7

No opinion 28 2.2 2.4 0.5 1.5 3.4Total 1294 100.0 100.0


permits Visitors should be allowed to park...for a limited time 50 75.8 77.0 5.2 66.8 87.2


No opinion 4 6.1 5.2 2.6 0.1 10.3Total 66 100.0 100.0

Household is not in the RPP Program Visitors should be allowed to park...for a limited time 1657 68.1 70.0 1.2 67.7 72.2


No opinion 160 6.6 6.7 0.6 5.5 7.9Total 2434 100.0 100.0

Total Visitors should be allowed to park...for a limited time 2113 55.7 65.7 1.0 63.7 67.7


No opinion 192 5.1 6.2 0.6 5.1 7.3Total 3794 100.0 100.0

Who Was Shown the Question Answered Yes to Q1


Response Rate 99.0%



95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent


Answered No to Q1 OR (Answered No to 3a OR Answered No, No Opinion, or

Need More Information for Q3b)

95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Household uses permits I prefer a flexible residential parking program structure... 685 52.9 51.6 1.4 48.8 54.5

I prefer a simple residential parking program structure... 510 39.4 40.5 1.4 37.7 43.3

No opinion 100 7.7 7.9 0.8 6.3 9.4Total 1295 100.0 100.0


permits I prefer a flexible residential parking program structure... 25 37.9 36.5 6.1 24.5 48.4


No opinion 5 7.6 8.1 3.6 1.1 15.1Total 66 100.0 100.0

Household is not in the RPP Program I prefer a flexible residential parking program structure... 1340 55.3 52.3 1.3 49.9 54.8


No opinion 162 6.7 6.5 0.6 5.3 7.8Total 2423 100.0 100.0

Total I prefer a flexible residential parking program structure... 2050 54.2 52.2 1.1 50.0 54.3


No opinion 267 7.1 6.7 0.6 5.6 7.8Total 3784 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 99.0%



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Household uses permits On the street 673 52.0 53.5 1.4 50.7 56.3

Carport, driveway, or garage at my house 518 40.0 36.1 1.3 33.6 38.5

Parking lot or parking deck/garage 97 7.5 9.8 0.9 8.1 11.5

Not applicable ‐ I don't drive or own a vehicle 7 0.5 0.7 0.3 0.2 1.2Total 1295 100.0 100.0


permits On the street 10 15.2 14.7 4.4 6.0 23.4




Household is not in the RPP Program On the street 894 29.7 23.8 0.9 22.1 25.5




Total On the street 1577 36.1 26.4 0.8 24.8 27.9






Response Rate 97.8%


Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent

Q10 Thinking of the last place you parked on the street near your home, choose which statement you agree with most


Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Household uses permits It was easy to find parking, and it was the right distance away 933 72.1 69.1 1.3 66.5 71.6

It was easy to find parking, but it was too far away 66 5.1 5.2 0.6 3.9 6.5

It was difficult to find parking, but it was the right distance away 150 11.6 13.0 1.0 11.0 15.0

It was difficult to find parking, and it was too far away 107 8.3 9.8 0.9 8.0 11.6

Not applicable ‐ I don't drive or own a vehicle 6 0.5 0.6 0.3 0.1 1.1

No opinion/don't know 32 2.5 2.3 0.4 1.5 3.1Total 1294 100.0 100.0


permits It was easy to find parking, and it was the right distance away 27 40.9 38.4 6.1 26.5 50.3






Household is not in the RPP Program It was easy to find parking, and it was the right distance away 1711 57.0 50.9 1.1 48.8 52.9






Total It was easy to find parking, and it was the right distance away 2671 61.2 52.4 1.0 50.5 54.3








Response Rate 97.7%



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Household uses permits My visitors used my FlexPass 361 28.0 27.9 1.3 25.4 30.4

My visitors used a short‐term visitor pass 564 43.7 43.3 1.4 40.5 46.0

My visitors parked off‐street on my property/at my building 148 11.5 11.0 0.9 9.2 12.7

My visitors parked further away, outside the permit zone 30 2.3 2.9 0.5 1.8 3.9

My visitors parked in the permit zone with no permit, outside of the permit

restriction time period 141 10.9 11.4 0.9 9.6 13.3

My visitors parked in the permit zone with no permit, during the permit


I don’t know where my visitors parked 20 1.5 1.7 0.4 0.9 2.5Total 1291 100.0 100.0


permits My visitors used my FlexPass 5 10.2 5.2 3.1 0.0 11.3









Total My visitors used my FlexPass 366 27.3 23.7 1.3 21.1 26.3









Who Was Shown the Question Answered Yes to Q1 AND Answered Yes to Q2 AND Answered Yes to Q3a


Response Rate 98.2%

95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent




Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Household uses permits My visitors parked on the street 1 50.0 41.7 34.4 0.0 100.0


My visitors parked in the nearest permit zone with their own permit 0 0.0 . . . .

I don’t know where my visitors parked 0 0.0 . . . .Total 2 100.0 100.0


permits My visitors parked on the street 29 43.9 45.3 6.3 33.0 57.6




Household is not in the RPP Program My visitors parked on the street 1668 74.5 72.3 1.2 70.0 74.7


My visitors parked in the nearest permit zone with their own permit 8 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.4


Total My visitors parked on the street 1698 73.6 72.1 1.2 69.8 74.4






Response Rate 98.3%

Answered No to Q2 OR (Answered Yes to Q2 AND Answered that their

household did not participate in the RPP program in Q11)


Limits

for Row Percent



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Household uses permits


townhomes) even if some new residents would park on the street 206 16.1 16.4 1.1 14.2 18.5


townhomes) only if residents of that building were not allowed to park on the

street 436 34.1 34.4 1.4 31.7 37.1

I would not support new housing construction (e.g., apartments, condominiums,

or townhomes) no matter what parking measures are included 307 24.0 23.7 1.2 21.3 26.1

Don’t know/need more information to decide 330 25.8 25.5 1.3 23.1 28.0Total 1279 100.0 100.0


permits





street 19 28.8 29.8 5.9 18.2 41.3




Household is not in the RPP Program





street 765 25.8 25.0 1.0 23.1 26.9




Total





street 1220 28.3 25.9 0.9 24.1 27.6






Response Rate 96.3%

95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent


Q17


Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Household uses permits Yes, often 58 4.5 4.4 0.6 3.3 5.6

Yes, sometimes 141 11.0 10.5 0.9 8.8 12.2

Yes, rarely 220 17.2 16.4 1.1 14.4 18.5

No 863 67.3 68.6 1.3 66.0 71.2Total 1282 100.0 100.0


permits Yes, often 2 3.1 3.2 2.2 0.0 7.5

Yes, sometimes 1 1.6 1.4 1.4 0.0 4.1

Yes, rarely 6 9.4 9.8 3.9 2.1 17.5

No 55 85.9 85.6 4.5 76.7 94.5Total 64 100.0 100.0

Household is not in the RPP Program Yes, often 1 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.0 2.4

Yes, sometimes 12 6.7 5.1 2.0 1.2 9.0

Yes, rarely 20 11.2 6.0 2.0 2.1 9.9

No 146 81.6 88.1 2.8 82.5 93.7Total 179 100.0 100.0

Total Yes, often 61 4.0 2.8 0.5 1.9 3.8

Yes, sometimes 154 10.1 8.0 1.0 6.1 9.9

Yes, rarely 246 16.1 11.8 1.1 9.7 13.9

No 1064 69.8 77.4 1.5 74.5 80.3Total 1525 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 96.6%



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Household uses permits SFD 900 70.2 59.9 0.8 58.4 61.4

SFA 218 17.0 20.8 0.8 19.2 22.4

Multi‐Family 164 12.8 19.3 0.8 17.6 20.9Total 1282 100.0 100.0


permits SFD 17 26.2 17.8 4.1 9.8 25.9

SFA 26 40.0 39.1 5.9 27.5 50.8


Household is not in the RPP Program SFD 1093 36.9 22.0 0.2 21.7 22.4

SFA 558 18.8 10.5 0.5 9.5 11.5


Total SFD 2010 46.6 25.4 0.2 25.0 25.7

SFA 802 18.6 11.6 0.5 10.6 12.5




Response Rate 96.5%

95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent

Have you ever requested parking enforcement in your neighborhood (for concerns like: parking without a permit, giving

resident decals to non‐residents, using expired permits, etc.)?Survey Responses Weighted Population Estimate

95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent




Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Household uses permits Own 1107 86.5 83.3 1.1 81.1 85.4

Rent 168 13.1 16.4 1.1 14.2 18.5

Live with family or friends & do not pay rent 4 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.5

Other/NA 1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.3Total 1280 100.0 100.0


permits Own 39 60.0 57.8 6.3 45.4 70.2

Rent 26 40.0 42.2 6.3 29.8 54.6

Live with family or friends & do not pay rent 0 0.0 . . . .

Other/NA 0 0.0 . . . .Total 65 100.0 100.0

Household is not in the RPP Program Own 1964 66.3 54.4 1.0 52.3 56.4

Rent 983 33.2 45.0 1.0 42.9 47.0


Other/NA 11 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.8Total 2964 100.0 100.0

Total Own 3110 72.2 57.0 0.9 55.1 58.9

Rent 1177 27.3 42.4 1.0 40.5 44.3


Other/NA 12 0.3 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.8Total 4309 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 96.5%



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent


No 1153 91.6 92.4 0.7 91.0 93.8Total 1259 100.0 100.0


permits Yes 3 4.9 4.8 2.8 0.0 10.4

No 58 95.1 95.2 2.8 89.6 100.0Total 61 100.0 100.0


No 2705 92.6 93.8 0.5 92.8 94.8Total 2920 100.0 100.0

Total Yes 324 7.6 6.3 0.5 5.4 7.2

No 3916 92.4 93.7 0.5 92.8 94.6Total 4240 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 94.9%


Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent


No 455 41.3 40.1 1.5 37.1 43.0

Not applicable ‐ I don't have a carport or garage 466 42.3 44.4 1.5 41.5 47.4Total 1102 100.0 100.0


permits Yes 5 12.5 11.8 5.1 1.8 21.8

No 23 57.5 55.1 8.1 39.2 71.0



No 679 41.2 38.2 1.4 35.4 41.0


Total Yes 456 16.3 15.1 0.8 13.4 16.7

No 1157 41.5 38.7 1.2 36.4 41.0


Who Was Shown the Question Did Not Answer Multi‐Family Housing for Q18


Response Rate 99.2%

95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent



PlanningCorridor VAR1 Frequency Percent

Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Columbia Pike Yes 932 85.7 77.5 1.7 74.1 80.8

No 155 14.3 22.5 1.7 19.2 25.9Total 1087 100.0 100.0

Route 1 Yes 637 76.6 65.6 1.9 61.8 69.4

No 195 23.4 34.4 1.9 30.6 38.2Total 832 100.0 100.0

Rosslyn‐Ballston Yes 1187 91.1 79.8 1.8 76.3 83.3

No 116 8.9 20.2 1.8 16.7 23.7Total 1303 100.0 100.0

All Other Areas Yes 1153 88.1 84.7 1.3 82.2 87.1

No 155 11.9 15.3 1.3 12.9 17.8Total 1308 100.0 100.0

Total Yes 3909 86.3 78.9 0.8 77.3 80.6

No 621 13.7 21.1 0.8 19.4 22.7Total 4530 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 99.8%



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent


No 667 71.5 75.9 1.7 72.6 79.2

I don't know 34 3.6 7.2 1.3 4.8 9.7Total 933 100.0 100.0

Route 1 Yes 298 46.9 22.4 1.4 19.7 25.1

No 297 46.7 66.5 2.0 62.6 70.4

I don't know 41 6.4 11.1 1.6 7.9 14.3Total 636 100.0 100.0


No 388 32.7 57.5 2.1 53.3 61.6

I don't know 43 3.6 9.8 1.5 6.8 12.7Total 1185 100.0 100.0


No 836 72.6 87.1 0.9 85.3 88.9

I don't know 21 1.8 2.5 0.6 1.2 3.7Total 1152 100.0 100.0

Total Yes 1579 40.4 20.8 0.7 19.3 22.2

No 2188 56.0 72.3 0.9 70.6 74.1

I don't know 139 3.6 6.9 0.6 5.7 8.2Total 3906 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 99.9%

Planning Corridor Crosstabs

Weighted Population EstimateSurvey Responses

95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent


95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent


PlanningCorridor VAR3a Frequency Percent

Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent


No 42 17.9 29.1 4.5 20.3 37.9

No opinion 5 2.1 2.7 1.6 0.0 5.8Total 235 100.0 100.0

Route 1 Yes 259 86.9 83.1 3.2 76.9 89.4

No 23 7.7 9.9 2.6 4.9 14.9

No opinion 16 5.4 7.0 2.2 2.6 11.3Total 298 100.0 100.0


No 58 7.7 22.2 3.2 15.8 28.5

No opinion 32 4.2 10.6 2.5 5.8 15.5Total 757 100.0 100.0


No 33 11.1 14.5 3.4 7.9 21.2

No opinion 13 4.4 6.5 2.5 1.5 11.4Total 297 100.0 100.0

Total Yes 1365 86.0 71.5 2.2 67.2 75.8

No 156 9.8 20.3 2.0 16.3 24.2

No opinion 66 4.2 8.2 1.5 5.3 11.1Total 1587 100.0 100.0





PlanningCorridor VAR3b Frequency Percent

Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent


No 329 46.9 52.5 2.4 47.9 57.2

No opinion 49 7.0 9.5 1.5 6.6 12.4


Route 1 Yes 43 12.7 12.3 1.9 8.5 16.0

No 196 58.0 57.1 2.9 51.4 62.8

No opinion 52 15.4 15.9 2.2 11.7 20.2



No 233 53.8 60.8 2.9 55.0 66.6

No opinion 39 9.0 10.9 1.9 7.1 14.7



No 541 63.1 66.0 1.8 62.5 69.5

No opinion 51 5.9 7.0 1.0 5.0 9.1


Total Yes 487 20.9 14.4 0.8 12.7 16.0

No 1299 55.8 60.9 1.3 58.4 63.3

No opinion 191 8.2 9.7 0.8 8.1 11.2





Answered Yes to Q1 AND Answered No or I Don't Know to Q2

95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent


Answered Yes to Q1 AND Answered Yes to Q2

Q5a


Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Columbia Pike Lower the max number of permits, but keep cost same 46 25.1 25.9 4.3 17.5 34.2



Do nothing 9 4.9 3.1 1.0 1.1 5.2

No opinion 16 8.7 11.7 3.8 4.3 19.1

Other 46 25.1 25.2 4.0 17.3 33.1Total 183 100.0 100.0

Route 1 Lower the max number of permits, but keep cost same 77 29.8 32.0 3.7 24.7 39.3



Do nothing 21 8.1 8.1 2.1 4.1 12.1

No opinion 13 5.0 6.6 2.3 2.1 11.2

Other 27 10.5 8.8 1.7 5.5 12.1Total 258 100.0 100.0

Rosslyn‐Ballston Lower the max number of permits, but keep cost same 155 23.4 29.7 3.2 23.3 36.0



Do nothing 45 6.8 6.4 1.4 3.6 9.2

No opinion 52 7.9 11.5 2.6 6.5 16.5

Other 104 15.7 13.0 1.7 9.7 16.3Total 662 100.0 100.0

All Other Areas Lower the max number of permits, but keep cost same 61 24.6 25.0 3.7 17.8 32.3



Do nothing 22 8.9 7.1 1.5 4.1 10.1

No opinion 32 12.9 17.5 3.9 9.8 25.2

Other 34 13.7 13.0 2.4 8.2 17.8Total 248 100.0 100.0




Do nothing 97 7.2 6.4 0.9 4.7 8.1

No opinion 113 8.4 12.0 1.7 8.7 15.3

Other 211 15.6 14.0 1.2 11.7 16.3Total 1351 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 99.0%


Limits

for Row Percent


support to manage parking demand?

Q5b


Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Columbia Pike Install parking meters in areas with high demand 6 2.8 5.9 2.5 0.9 10.9



Do nothing 5 2.3 2.3 1.4 0.0 5.0

No opinion 6 2.8 3.9 1.9 0.1 7.6

Other 21 9.8 8.0 2.2 3.7 12.2Total 214 100.0 100.0

Route 1 Install parking meters in areas with high demand 10 16.4 16.6 5.5 5.8 27.5



Do nothing 2 3.3 3.7 2.7 0.0 8.9

No opinion 3 4.9 5.4 3.4 0.0 12.0

Other 3 4.9 3.5 2.5 0.0 8.4Total 61 100.0 100.0

Rosslyn‐Ballston Install parking meters in areas with high demand 14 11.8 18.1 5.6 7.2 29.0



Do nothing 1 0.8 2.3 2.3 0.0 6.9

No opinion 5 4.2 5.4 3.2 0.0 11.7

Other 9 7.6 6.4 3.3 0.0 12.8Total 119 100.0 100.0

All Other Areas Install parking meters in areas with high demand 5 3.0 2.3 1.2 0.0 4.6



Do nothing 1 0.6 1.5 1.5 0.0 4.4

No opinion 8 4.8 2.4 1.0 0.4 4.3

Other 12 7.3 7.4 2.4 2.7 12.1Total 165 100.0 100.0




Do nothing 9 1.6 2.2 1.0 0.3 4.1

No opinion 22 3.9 4.0 1.2 1.6 6.3

Other 45 8.1 6.8 1.4 4.1 9.6Total 559 100.0 100.0





Limits

for Row Percent


manage parking demand?

Q5c

PlanningCorridor VAR5c Frequency Percent

Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Columbia Pike Install parking meters in areas with high demand 70 10.2 14.0 1.7 10.7 17.3


Do nothing 95 13.9 14.4 1.6 11.2 17.7

No opinion 74 10.8 12.5 1.6 9.4 15.6

Other 190 27.8 23.2 1.9 19.5 26.9Total 683 100.0 100.0

Route 1 Install parking meters in areas with high demand 135 26.4 29.9 2.2 25.6 34.1


Do nothing 52 10.2 9.7 1.4 7.0 12.4

No opinion 42 8.2 8.2 1.3 5.7 10.7

Other 105 20.5 18.7 1.8 15.1 22.2Total 511 100.0 100.0

Rosslyn‐Ballston Install parking meters in areas with high demand 103 20.0 24.1 2.3 19.6 28.5


Do nothing 59 11.5 11.7 1.7 8.4 15.0

No opinion 57 11.1 11.9 1.7 8.5 15.3

Other 119 23.2 20.3 2.1 16.2 24.4Total 514 100.0 100.0

All Other Areas Install parking meters in areas with high demand 48 5.4 6.2 1.0 4.3 8.1


Do nothing 116 13.1 14.6 1.4 11.9 17.4

No opinion 75 8.4 9.1 1.1 6.9 11.3

Other 283 31.9 30.8 1.7 27.5 34.2Total 888 100.0 100.0



Do nothing 322 12.4 12.9 0.8 11.3 14.5

No opinion 248 9.6 10.5 0.8 9.0 12.0

Other 697 26.8 24.2 1.0 22.3 26.2Total 2596 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 98.8%



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Columbia Pike Visitors should be allowed to park...for a limited time 532 57.5 61.6 2.0 57.7 65.6


No opinion 65 7.0 7.7 1.2 5.4 9.9Total 926 100.0 100.0

Route 1 Visitors should be allowed to park...for a limited time 336 53.4 62.4 2.3 57.9 66.9


No opinion 26 4.1 5.4 1.2 3.1 7.7Total 629 100.0 100.0

Rosslyn‐Ballston Visitors should be allowed to park...for a limited time 533 45.5 62.9 2.1 58.8 67.1


No opinion 39 3.3 4.7 1.0 2.7 6.7Total 1171 100.0 100.0

All Other Areas Visitors should be allowed to park...for a limited time 743 65.1 71.2 1.6 68.1 74.3


No opinion 63 5.5 7.1 1.0 5.2 9.0Total 1142 100.0 100.0



No opinion 193 5.0 6.2 0.6 5.1 7.3Total 3868 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 99.0%

95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent




Answered No to Q1 OR (Answered No to 3a OR Answered No, No Opinion, or Need More Information for Q3b)



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Columbia Pike I prefer a flexible residential parking program structure... 506 54.8 52.2 2.1 48.0 56.4


No opinion 71 7.7 7.8 1.1 5.6 10.1Total 923 100.0 100.0

Route 1 I prefer a flexible residential parking program structure... 309 49.4 44.5 2.4 39.8 49.2


No opinion 43 6.9 7.2 1.3 4.7 9.6Total 625 100.0 100.0

Rosslyn‐Ballston I prefer a flexible residential parking program structure... 591 50.6 43.8 2.3 39.3 48.3


No opinion 77 6.6 6.2 1.1 4.0 8.4Total 1168 100.0 100.0

All Other Areas I prefer a flexible residential parking program structure... 676 59.1 62.8 1.7 59.4 66.1


No opinion 82 7.2 6.5 0.9 4.8 8.2Total 1143 100.0 100.0



No opinion 273 7.1 6.7 0.6 5.6 7.8Total 3859 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 99.0%



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Columbia Pike On the street 460 43.4 35.4 1.8 31.8 38.9




Route 1 On the street 183 22.4 11.8 1.1 9.7 13.9




Rosslyn‐Ballston On the street 452 35.5 18.6 1.4 15.8 21.3




All Other Areas On the street 512 39.8 36.1 1.5 33.0 39.1










Response Rate 97.8%


Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Columbia Pike It was easy to find parking, and it was the right distance away 623 59.0 50.4 1.9 46.6 54.2






Route 1 It was easy to find parking, and it was the right distance away 442 54.0 40.4 1.9 36.7 44.2






Rosslyn‐Ballston It was easy to find parking, and it was the right distance away 691 54.2 40.0 2.0 36.0 44.0






All Other Areas It was easy to find parking, and it was the right distance away 956 74.4 71.8 1.5 68.9 74.7














Response Rate 97.7%

95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent




Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Columbia Pike My visitors used my FlexPass 50 27.0 26.6 3.4 20.0 33.2









Route 1 My visitors used my FlexPass 79 29.7 28.9 3.1 22.9 34.9









Rosslyn‐Ballston My visitors used my FlexPass 162 25.5 19.7 1.8 16.3 23.2









All Other Areas My visitors used my FlexPass 75 29.5 27.9 3.4 21.2 34.5




















Response Rate 98.2%


Limits

for Row Percent



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Columbia Pike My visitors parked on the street 532 76.3 70.6 2.2 66.2 75.0




Route 1 My visitors parked on the street 168 53.2 48.5 3.0 42.5 54.4




Rosslyn‐Ballston My visitors parked on the street 331 68.8 69.5 2.7 64.1 74.8




All Other Areas My visitors parked on the street 699 81.5 81.3 1.5 78.3 84.3










Response Rate 98.3%


PlanningCorridor VAR12c Frequency Percent

Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Columbia Pike My visitors parked on the street 105 59.3 55.6 4.1 47.5 63.6



Route 1 My visitors parked on the street 106 45.3 44.9 3.3 38.4 51.3



Rosslyn‐Ballston My visitors parked on the street 85 54.8 55.4 4.3 46.9 63.9



All Other Areas My visitors parked on the street 125 72.3 70.0 4.1 62.0 78.0






Who Was Shown the Question Answered No to Q1 OR Answered Don't Know to Q2


Response Rate 99.1%


Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent





Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Columbia Pike





street 310 29.7 27.4 1.7 24.1 30.8




Route 1





street 222 27.5 29.1 1.9 25.5 32.8




Rosslyn‐Ballston





street 426 33.9 28.7 1.9 25.0 32.5




All Other Areas





street 278 22.0 20.6 1.4 17.9 23.2




Total





street 1236 28.3 25.9 0.9 24.1 27.6






Response Rate 96.3%


Limits

for Row Percent

Q17


Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Columbia Pike Yes, often 20 9.1 6.0 1.4 3.2 8.7

Yes, sometimes 28 12.7 9.3 2.2 5.1 13.6

Yes, rarely 36 16.4 10.7 1.9 6.9 14.4

No 136 61.8 74.0 3.2 67.8 80.3Total 220 100.0 100.0

Route 1 Yes, often 5 1.7 1.4 0.6 0.2 2.6

Yes, sometimes 25 8.7 7.9 1.8 4.3 11.5

Yes, rarely 35 12.2 9.6 1.6 6.4 12.8

No 223 77.4 81.1 2.5 76.3 86.0Total 288 100.0 100.0

Rosslyn‐Ballston Yes, often 26 3.5 1.9 0.4 1.1 2.7

Yes, sometimes 67 9.1 7.1 1.5 4.2 10.1

Yes, rarely 123 16.8 11.3 1.6 8.1 14.5

No 517 70.5 79.7 2.2 75.4 84.0Total 733 100.0 100.0

All Other Areas Yes, often 10 3.5 4.4 2.1 0.4 8.5

Yes, sometimes 34 11.9 9.5 1.6 6.2 12.7

Yes, rarely 52 18.2 16.0 2.4 11.4 20.7

No 189 66.3 70.1 3.3 63.6 76.6Total 285 100.0 100.0

Total Yes, often 61 4.0 2.8 0.5 1.9 3.8

Yes, sometimes 154 10.1 8.0 1.0 6.1 9.9

Yes, rarely 246 16.1 11.8 1.1 9.7 13.9

No 1065 69.8 77.4 1.5 74.5 80.3Total 1526 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 96.6%



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Columbia Pike SFD 524 50.3 21.6 0.6 20.5 22.7

SFA 202 19.4 18.3 1.4 15.7 21.0


Route 1 SFD 291 36.0 11.5 0.4 10.7 12.3

SFA 40 5.0 2.1 0.3 1.6 2.7


Rosslyn‐Ballston SFD 488 38.7 8.1 0.1 7.9 8.4

SFA 252 20.0 6.8 0.4 6.0 7.6


All Other Areas SFD 750 59.1 52.2 0.4 51.5 53.0

SFA 316 24.9 17.0 1.1 14.8 19.3


Total SFD 2053 46.9 25.5 0.2 25.2 25.9

SFA 810 18.5 11.6 0.5 10.6 12.5




Response Rate 96.5%


Limits

for Row Percent



resident decals to non‐residents, using expired permits, etc.)?

95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Columbia Pike Own 790 75.7 58.9 1.9 55.1 62.6

Rent 245 23.5 40.1 1.9 36.4 43.9


Other/NA 4 0.4 0.6 0.3 0.0 1.3Total 1043 100.0 100.0

Route 1 Own 406 50.2 30.5 1.7 27.2 33.7

Rent 399 49.4 69.1 1.7 65.8 72.4


Other/NA 2 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.9Total 808 100.0 100.0

Rosslyn‐Ballston Own 874 69.5 46.2 2.1 42.2 50.3

Rent 378 30.0 53.1 2.1 49.0 57.1


Other/NA 3 0.2 0.7 0.4 0.0 1.4Total 1258 100.0 100.0

All Other Areas Own 1094 86.2 79.3 1.4 76.6 82.0

Rent 170 13.4 20.3 1.4 17.6 23.0


Other/NA 3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.4Total 1269 100.0 100.0

Total Own 3164 72.3 57.1 0.9 55.2 58.9

Rent 1192 27.2 42.3 0.9 40.4 44.2


Other/NA 12 0.3 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.8Total 4378 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 96.5%



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent


No 945 91.3 92.4 1.0 90.4 94.4Total 1035 100.0 100.0

Route 1 Yes 58 7.3 5.5 0.9 3.7 7.2

No 732 92.7 94.5 0.9 92.8 96.3Total 790 100.0 100.0


No 1172 94.5 96.1 0.8 94.5 97.6Total 1240 100.0 100.0


No 1127 90.7 91.4 0.9 89.7 93.2Total 1243 100.0 100.0

Total Yes 332 7.7 6.4 0.5 5.4 7.3

No 3976 92.3 93.6 0.5 92.7 94.6Total 4308 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 94.9%


Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent


No 248 34.1 29.5 2.0 25.6 33.4


Route 1 Yes 65 19.8 18.9 2.3 14.3 23.4

No 146 44.5 43.1 3.1 37.1 49.1



No 333 45.2 44.4 2.5 39.4 49.4



No 454 43.4 40.1 1.7 36.7 43.5


Total Yes 467 16.4 15.1 0.8 13.5 16.8

No 1181 41.6 38.8 1.2 36.4 41.1




Response Rate 99.2%

95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent


Planning Corridor VAR4a Frequency Percentage Weighted Percentage

Columbia Pike To make sure that I can park near my home 120 79.5 83.0

To discourage commuter parking 100 66.2 66.7

To discourage parking by business customers 48 31.8 30.7

To reduce litter and noise 30 19.9 19.9

To improve neighborhood safety 51 33.8 35.2

To discourage parking by residents of nearby apartment or condo buildings 76 50.3 50.1

Other 28 18.5 14.3

Total 151

Route 1 To make sure that I can park near my home 173 82.8 79.0






Other 21 10.0 8.7

Total 209

Rosslyn‐Ballston To make sure that I can park near my home 429 79.4 78.3






Other 53 9.8 9.6

Total 540

All Other Areas To make sure that I can park near my home 149 82.8 79.0






Other 40 22.2 20.8

Total 180

Total Respondents To make sure that I can park near my home 871 80.6 79.2






Other 142 13.1 12.2

Total 1080

Planning Corridor VAR4b Frequency Percentage Weighted Percentage

Columbia Pike To make sure that I can park near my home 127 75.1 78.5






Other 36 21.3 22.9

Total 169

Route 1 To make sure that I can park near my home 21 72.4 67.6






Other 4 13.8 10.9

Total 29

Rosslyn‐Ballston To make sure that I can park near my home 42 77.8 74.5






Other 6 11.1 9.5

Total 54

All Other Areas To make sure that I can park near my home 79 73.1 76.9






Other 26 24.1 21.6

Total 108

Total Respondents To make sure that I can park near my home 269 74.7 76.2






Other 72 20.0 18.9

Total 360

Q4a Top (3) reasons why you want residential parking restrictions to stay on your street

Q4b Top (3) reasons why you wish to have residential parking restrictions on your street

Planning Corridor VAR4c Frequency Percentage Weighted Percentage

Columbia Pike Everyone should have access to public street parking 170 76.6 79.7

There are nearby businesses that could use the parking on my street 33 14.9 19.0

The process to get passes is difficult 51 23.0 22.4

Curb space is better used for other things 32 14.4 16.6

The cost of permits & passes is too high 81 36.5 37.7

It is already easy to find parking 155 69.8 62.7

There are nearby facilities that could use the parking on my street 60 27.0 24.1

Other 84 37.8 37.8

Total 222

Route 1 Everyone should have access to public street parking 92 73.6 76.0







Other 45 36.0 33.2

Total 125

Rosslyn‐Ballston Everyone should have access to public street parking 139 84.8 87.9







Other 54 32.9 30.5

Total 164

All Other Areas Everyone should have access to public street parking 229 73.4 74.9







Other 101 32.4 32.8

Total 312

Total Respondents Everyone should have access to public street parking 630 76.5 80.1







Other 284 34.5 32.9

Total 823

Q6 Which type of resident should be eligible for a parking permit?PlanningCorridor VAR6 Frequency Percent Weighted Percentage

Columbia Pike Residents with a private driveway, garage, or carport 235 25.6 17.0

Residents without a private driveway, garage, or carport 343 37.4 41.8

Residents of apartment and condo buildings 161 17.6 29.0

All residents of the neighborhood, no matter what housing type 587 64.0 63.0

Total Respondents 917

Route 1 Residents with a private driveway, garage, or carport 152 24.4 16.0





Rosslyn‐Ballston Residents with a private driveway, garage, or carport 333 28.7 15.5





All Other Areas Residents with a private driveway, garage, or carport 216 19.0 16.2





Total Respondents Residents with a private driveway, garage, or carport 936 24.4 16.1





Q4c Top (3) reasons why you do not wish to have residential parking restrictions on your street


Housing Type VAR1 Frequency Percent

Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

SFD Yes 1989 95.4 93.4 0.8 91.9 94.9

No 96 4.6 6.6 0.8 5.1 8.1Total 2085 100.0 100.0

SFA Yes 652 90.2 90.0 1.1 87.9 92.2

No 71 9.8 10.0 1.1 7.8 12.1Total 723 100.0 100.0

Multi‐Family Yes 1268 73.6 72.7 1.2 70.4 75.0

No 454 26.4 27.3 1.2 25.0 29.6Total 1722 100.0 100.0

Total Yes 3909 86.3 78.9 0.8 77.3 80.6

No 621 13.7 21.1 0.8 19.4 22.7Total 4530 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 99.8%



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

SFD Yes 946 47.6 23.6 0.4 22.9 24.3

No 1032 51.9 75.8 0.4 75.0 76.7

I don't know 11 0.6 0.6 0.2 0.1 1.0Total 1989 100.0 100.0

SFA Yes 279 42.9 41.1 1.2 38.8 43.3

No 359 55.1 56.9 1.2 54.4 59.3

I don't know 13 2.0 2.1 0.6 1.0 3.2Total 651 100.0 100.0

Multi‐Family Yes 354 28.0 17.2 1.1 15.0 19.4

No 797 63.0 72.4 1.4 69.7 75.1

I don't know 115 9.1 10.4 1.0 8.4 12.3Total 1266 100.0 100.0

Total Yes 1579 40.4 20.8 0.7 19.3 22.2

No 2188 56.0 72.3 0.9 70.6 74.1

I don't know 139 3.6 6.9 0.6 5.7 8.2Total 3906 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 99.9%


Housing Type VAR3a Frequency Percent

Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

SFD Yes 861 90.9 90.9 0.9 89.1 92.8

No 62 6.5 6.7 0.8 5.1 8.3

No opinion 24 2.5 2.4 0.5 1.4 3.3Total 947 100.0 100.0

SFA Yes 230 82.1 81.7 2.3 77.2 86.2

No 33 11.8 12.1 2.0 8.3 16.0

No opinion 17 6.1 6.1 1.5 3.3 9.0Total 280 100.0 100.0

Multi‐Family Yes 274 76.1 56.9 3.6 49.8 64.1

No 61 16.9 30.7 3.5 23.7 37.6

No opinion 25 6.9 12.4 2.7 7.1 17.7Total 360 100.0 100.0

Total Yes 1365 86.0 71.5 2.2 67.2 75.8

No 156 9.8 20.3 2.0 16.3 24.2

No opinion 66 4.2 8.2 1.5 5.3 11.1Total 1587 100.0 100.0





Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent

Housing Type Crosstabs


Housing Type VAR3b Frequency Percent

Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

SFD Yes 236 22.6 16.5 1.2 14.1 18.9

No 601 57.6 64.9 1.7 61.6 68.2

No opinion 56 5.4 5.2 0.8 3.7 6.8


SFA Yes 137 36.7 36.7 2.5 31.8 41.6

No 153 41.0 40.9 2.6 35.9 45.9

No opinion 19 5.1 5.0 1.1 2.8 7.3


Multi‐Family Yes 114 12.5 11.7 1.1 9.5 13.9

No 545 59.6 60.7 1.7 57.3 64.1

No opinion 116 12.7 12.0 1.1 9.7 14.2


Total Yes 487 20.9 14.4 0.8 12.7 16.0

No 1299 55.8 60.9 1.3 58.4 63.3

No opinion 191 8.2 9.7 0.8 8.1 11.2





Q5a


Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

SFD Lower the max number of permits, but keep cost same 200 23.3 23.4 1.5 20.4 26.4



Do nothing 65 7.6 7.6 0.9 5.8 9.4

No opinion 70 8.2 8.8 1.1 6.6 10.9

Other 129 15.1 15.6 1.4 12.9 18.3Total 857 100.0 100.0

SFA Lower the max number of permits, but keep cost same 62 27.3 27.8 3.0 21.8 33.7



Do nothing 17 7.5 7.0 1.6 3.8 10.3

No opinion 11 4.8 4.7 1.4 2.0 7.4

Other 41 18.1 18.5 2.6 13.3 23.6Total 227 100.0 100.0

Multi‐Family Lower the max number of permits, but keep cost same 77 28.8 34.2 4.3 25.7 42.6



Do nothing 15 5.6 4.9 1.7 1.5 8.3

No opinion 32 12.0 18.0 3.7 10.7 25.3

Other 41 15.4 10.8 2.2 6.5 15.0Total 267 100.0 100.0




Do nothing 97 7.2 6.4 0.9 4.7 8.1

No opinion 113 8.4 12.0 1.7 8.7 15.3

Other 211 15.6 14.0 1.2 11.7 16.3Total 1351 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 99.0%


Limits

for Row Percent



95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent

Q5b


Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

SFD Install parking meters in areas with high demand 9 3.4 3.0 1.3 0.4 5.7



Do nothing 3 1.1 0.6 0.3 0.0 1.3

No opinion 6 2.3 1.9 1.0 0.0 3.8

Other 27 10.2 10.1 2.3 5.6 14.7Total 265 100.0 100.0

SFA Install parking meters in areas with high demand 7 4.6 4.4 1.6 1.2 7.6



Do nothing 2 1.3 1.7 1.2 0.0 4.0

No opinion 9 5.9 5.7 1.9 2.1 9.4

Other 12 7.8 7.8 2.2 3.6 12.0Total 153 100.0 100.0

Multi‐Family Install parking meters in areas with high demand 19 13.5 13.7 3.3 7.3 20.2



Do nothing 4 2.8 3.1 1.6 0.0 6.3

No opinion 7 5.0 4.6 2.0 0.8 8.5

Other 6 4.3 4.9 2.1 0.8 9.0Total 141 100.0 100.0




Do nothing 9 1.6 2.2 1.0 0.3 4.1

No opinion 22 3.9 4.0 1.2 1.6 6.3

Other 45 8.1 6.8 1.4 4.1 9.6Total 559 100.0 100.0






95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent

Q5c

Housing Type VAR5c Frequency Percent

Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

SFD Install parking meters in areas with high demand 38 4.0 3.5 0.7 2.2 4.9


Do nothing 114 11.9 11.5 1.2 9.2 13.9

No opinion 77 8.1 7.8 1.0 5.8 9.8

Other 337 35.3 35.7 1.8 32.1 39.2Total 954 100.0 100.0

SFA Install parking meters in areas with high demand 31 9.2 8.9 1.5 5.9 11.9


Do nothing 39 11.5 11.5 1.7 8.1 14.9

No opinion 30 8.9 9.1 1.6 6.0 12.3

Other 94 27.8 27.6 2.4 22.8 32.4Total 338 100.0 100.0

Multi‐Family Install parking meters in areas with high demand 287 22.0 21.2 1.2 18.9 23.6


Do nothing 169 13.0 13.4 1.0 11.4 15.4

No opinion 141 10.8 11.3 1.0 9.4 13.2

Other 266 20.4 20.7 1.2 18.3 23.1Total 1304 100.0 100.0



Do nothing 322 12.4 12.9 0.8 11.3 14.5

No opinion 248 9.6 10.5 0.8 9.0 12.0

Other 697 26.8 24.2 1.0 22.3 26.2Total 2596 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 98.8%



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

SFD Visitors should be allowed to park...for a limited time 1041 52.8 65.3 1.2 62.9 67.7


No opinion 87 4.4 5.2 0.7 3.9 6.6Total 1970 100.0 100.0

SFA Visitors should be allowed to park...for a limited time 327 50.7 51.2 1.9 47.4 54.9


No opinion 27 4.2 4.3 0.8 2.7 5.9Total 645 100.0 100.0

Multi‐Family Visitors should be allowed to park...for a limited time 776 61.9 67.2 1.5 64.3 70.2


No opinion 79 6.3 6.8 0.8 5.2 8.4Total 1253 100.0 100.0



No opinion 193 5.0 6.2 0.6 5.1 7.3Total 3868 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 99.0%



95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent





95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

SFD I prefer a flexible residential parking program structure... 1167 59.3 64.1 1.4 61.5 66.8


No opinion 148 7.5 7.1 0.7 5.7 8.5Total 1967 100.0 100.0

SFA I prefer a flexible residential parking program structure... 335 51.9 52.1 2.0 48.2 56.0


No opinion 39 6.0 6.2 1.0 4.3 8.1Total 645 100.0 100.0

Multi‐Family I prefer a flexible residential parking program structure... 580 46.5 46.5 1.6 43.4 49.7


No opinion 86 6.9 6.6 0.8 5.0 8.1Total 1247 100.0 100.0



No opinion 273 7.1 6.7 0.6 5.6 7.8Total 3859 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 99.0%



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

SFD On the street 974 47.6 45.2 1.4 42.5 48.0




SFA On the street 254 36.1 36.1 1.8 32.6 39.6




Multi‐Family On the street 379 22.5 18.8 1.0 16.8 20.8










Response Rate 97.8%


Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

SFD It was easy to find parking, and it was the right distance away 1628 79.8 84.0 0.9 82.2 85.9






SFA It was easy to find parking, and it was the right distance away 376 53.6 53.7 1.9 50.0 57.4






Multi‐Family It was easy to find parking, and it was the right distance away 708 41.8 41.0 1.3 38.4 43.6














Response Rate 97.7%


Limits

for Row Percent



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

SFD My visitors used my FlexPass 255 28.4 28.2 1.5 25.2 31.2









SFA My visitors used my FlexPass 56 27.6 27.8 3.2 21.5 34.0









Multi‐Family My visitors used my FlexPass 55 23.1 15.9 2.4 11.2 20.7




















Response Rate 98.2%



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

SFD My visitors parked on the street 912 87.8 89.8 1.1 87.7 91.9




SFA My visitors parked on the street 260 61.6 62.1 2.3 57.5 66.7




Multi‐Family My visitors parked on the street 558 62.6 65.3 1.7 62.0 68.7










Response Rate 98.3%


Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent




Housing Type VAR12c Frequency Percent

Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

SFD My visitors parked on the street 77 74.0 76.0 4.9 66.4 85.5



SFA My visitors parked on the street 54 68.4 68.3 5.2 58.0 78.5



Multi‐Family My visitors parked on the street 290 52.2 54.3 2.3 49.8 58.8








Response Rate 99.1%



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

SFD





street 545 27.1 22.8 1.1 20.5 25.0




SFA





street 233 33.4 33.3 1.8 29.8 36.7




Multi‐Family





street 458 27.5 26.4 1.2 24.0 28.7




Total





street 1236 28.3 25.9 0.9 24.1 27.6






Response Rate 96.3%


Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent

Q17


Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

SFD Yes, often 45 4.9 4.8 0.7 3.4 6.2

Yes, sometimes 107 11.7 11.5 1.1 9.4 13.6

Yes, rarely 173 18.8 19.3 1.4 16.5 22.1

No 593 64.6 64.4 1.7 61.2 67.7Total 918 100.0 100.0

SFA Yes, often 10 3.7 4.3 1.3 1.7 6.9

Yes, sometimes 28 10.4 10.2 1.9 6.6 13.8

Yes, rarely 42 15.7 15.9 2.3 11.5 20.4

No 188 70.1 69.6 2.9 63.9 75.2Total 268 100.0 100.0

Multi‐Family Yes, often 6 1.8 1.2 0.7 0.0 2.6

Yes, sometimes 19 5.6 5.1 1.6 1.9 8.3

Yes, rarely 31 9.1 5.9 1.6 2.8 9.1

No 284 83.5 87.8 2.3 83.2 92.3Total 340 100.0 100.0

Total Yes, often 61 4.0 2.8 0.5 1.9 3.8

Yes, sometimes 154 10.1 8.0 1.0 6.1 9.9

Yes, rarely 246 16.1 11.8 1.1 9.7 13.9

No 1065 69.8 77.4 1.5 74.5 80.3Total 1526 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 96.6%



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

SFD SFD 2007 99.3 99.5 0.1 99.3 99.8

SFA 8 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.6


SFA SFD 28 4.0 4.1 0.8 2.6 5.6

SFA 638 91.7 91.2 1.0 89.3 93.2


Multi‐Family SFD 18 1.1 0.6 0.2 0.3 0.9

SFA 164 9.9 8.6 0.7 7.2 9.9


Total SFD 2053 46.9 25.5 0.2 25.2 25.9

SFA 810 18.5 11.6 0.5 10.6 12.5




Response Rate 96.5%



95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent




Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

SFD Own 1892 93.7 94.7 0.6 93.6 95.9

Rent 118 5.8 4.8 0.6 3.7 6.0


Other/NA 4 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.6Total 2019 100.0 100.0

SFA Own 583 83.6 84.0 1.4 81.3 86.7

Rent 111 15.9 15.6 1.4 12.9 18.2


Other/NA 0 0.0 . . . .Total 697 100.0 100.0

Multi‐Family Own 689 41.5 41.0 1.3 38.4 43.7

Rent 963 57.9 58.2 1.3 55.6 60.9


Other/NA 8 0.5 0.6 0.2 0.1 1.0Total 1662 100.0 100.0

Total Own 3164 72.3 57.1 0.9 55.2 58.9

Rent 1192 27.2 42.3 0.9 40.4 44.2


Other/NA 12 0.3 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.8Total 4378 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 96.5%


Income VAR1 Frequency Percent

Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

SFD Yes 198 10.0 9.9 0.9 8.2 11.6

No 1788 90.0 90.1 0.9 88.4 91.8Total 1986 100.0 100.0

SFA Yes 52 7.6 7.6 1.0 5.6 9.6

No 636 92.4 92.4 1.0 90.4 94.4Total 688 100.0 100.0

Multi‐Family Yes 82 5.0 4.9 0.6 3.8 6.1

No 1552 95.0 95.1 0.6 93.9 96.2Total 1634 100.0 100.0

Total Yes 332 7.7 6.4 0.5 5.4 7.3

No 3976 92.3 93.6 0.5 92.7 94.6Total 4308 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 94.9%



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

SFD Yes 385 19.4 19.5 1.1 17.3 21.8

No 847 42.8 43.1 1.4 40.3 45.9


SFA Yes 74 11.3 11.3 1.2 8.9 13.7

No 293 44.6 44.5 1.9 40.7 48.2


Multi‐Family Yes 8 3.9 3.3 1.4 0.5 6.1

No 41 20.2 19.7 3.2 13.4 26.0


Total Yes 467 16.4 15.1 0.8 13.5 16.8

No 1181 41.6 38.8 1.2 36.4 41.1




Response Rate 99.2%

95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent


Q4a Top (3) reasons why you want residential parking restrictions to stay on your streetHousing Type VAR4a Frequency Percentage Weighted Percentage

SFD To make sure that I can park near my home 559 80.5 80.3






Other 105 15.1 15.7

Total 694

SFA To make sure that I can park near my home 142 76.8 77.2






Other 23 12.4 12.7

Total 185

MF To make sure that I can park near my home 170 84.6 78.9






Other 14 7.0 8.2

Total 201

Total To make sure that I can park near my home 871 80.6 79.2






Other 142 13.1 12.2

Total 1080

Q4b Top (3) reasons why you wish to have residential parking restrictions on your streetHousing Type VAR4b Frequency Percentage Weighted Percentage

SFD To make sure that I can park near my home 143 78.6 79.6






Other 43 23.6 25.3

Total 182

SFA To make sure that I can park near my home 63 65.6 66.0






Other 16 16.7 16.6

Total 96

MF To make sure that I can park near my home 63 76.8 76.4






Other 13 15.9 15.3

Total 82







Other 72 20.0 18.9

Total 360

Q4c Top (3) reasons why you do not wish to have residential parking restrictions on your streetHousing Type VAR4c Frequency Percentage Weighted Percentage

SFD Everyone should have access to public street parking 260 71.0 70.8







Other 137 37.4 36.2

Total 366

SFA Everyone should have access to public street parking 77 76.2 75.9







Other 33 32.7 32.9

Total 101

MF Everyone should have access to public street parking 293 82.3 83.9







Other 114 32.0 31.6

Total 356

Total Everyone should have access to public street parking 630 76.5 80.1







Other 284 34.5 32.9

Total 823

Q6 Which type of resident should be eligible for a parking permit?Housing Type VAR6 Frequency Percentage Weighted Percentage

SFD Residents with a private driveway, garage, or carport 645 33.0 27.0




Total 1957

SFA Residents with a private driveway, garage, or carport 156 24.3 24.2




Total 641

MF Residents with a private driveway, garage, or carport 135 10.9 10.1




Total 1238

Total Residents with a private driveway, garage, or carport 936 24.4 16.1




Total 3836

Q11 What best describes your participation in the Arlington County RPP Program?Housing Type VAR11 Frequency Percentage Weighted Percentage

SFD I or members of my household have a FlexPass 738 79.5 78.3

I or members of my household have a permit or decal that is for my/their vehicle only 691 74.5 72.7

I or members of my household have a book of short‐term visitor passes 717 77.3 76.1

I and all members of my household do not participate in the residential permit parking program (we have no permits) 27 2.9 4.2

Total 928

SFA I or members of my household have a FlexPass 170 62.3 61.3




Total 273

MF I or members of my household have a FlexPass 176 50.7 21.4




Total 347

Total I or members of my household have a FlexPass 1084 70.0 46.0




Total 1548

Q13 The cost of a residential parking permit should vary based on the followingHousing Type VAR13 Frequency Percentage Weighted Percentage

SFD Whether or not the household has access to parking 306 16.0 19.3

The number of vehicles in the household 709 37.1 37.3

The ability of the individual to pay for the permit 268 14.0 16.2

The age of the individual (e.g., discounts for residents 65 and older 667 34.9 38.2

The demand for parking at that location 477 24.9 29.3

The cost should not vary 865 45.2 40.2

Total 1912

SFA Whether or not the household has access to parking 149 23.8 23.7






Total 625

MF Whether or not the household has access to parking 447 37.2 38.4






Total 1202

Total Whether or not the household has access to parking 902 24.1 31.7






Total 3739

Q16 Top (3) approaches you recommend to reduce problematic RPP participant behaviorHousing Type VAR16 Frequency Percentage Weighted Percentage

SFD More options for reporting potential violations 207 52.8 52.6

Stronger penalties for selling or counterfeiting permits 289 73.7 71.8

Simplify or reduce the types of permits 79 20.2 21.1

Permits printed with the license plate number of the corresponding vehicle 201 51.3 51.1

Use license plate readers for enforcement 251 64.0 65.1

Reduce zone size to prevent residents from commuting in the same zone 63 16.1 16.3

Nothing needs to be done; permit abuse is not a problem 45 11.5 11.2

Other 41 10.5 10.8

Total 392

SFA More options for reporting potential violations 56 51.4 51.6







Other 12 11.0 11.0

Total 109

MF More options for reporting potential violations 68 42.5 36.0







Other 11 6.9 5.8

Total 160

Total More options for reporting potential violations 331 50.1 43.0







Other 64 9.7 8.0

Total 661

Housing Type VAR5c Frequency Percentage

Weighted

Percentage

SFD Install parking meters in areas with high demand 13 4.7 4.5

Install signs that restrict the number of hours that

people can occupy a space 106 38.3 38.7

Do nothing 34 12.3 12.1

No opinion 22 7.9 7.7

Other 102 36.8 37.0Total 277 100.0 100.0

SFA Install parking meters in areas with high demand 5 5.4 5.4



Do nothing 15 16.3 16.4

No opinion 10 10.9 11.4

Other 24 26.1 25.7Total 92 100.0 100.0

MF Install parking meters in areas with high demand 52 16.6 16.4



Do nothing 46 14.6 14.7

No opinion 42 13.4 13.4

Other 64 20.4 20.5Total 314 100.0 100.0

Total Install parking meters in areas with high demand 70 10.2 14.0



Do nothing 95 13.9 14.4

No opinion 74 10.8 12.5

Other 190 27.8 23.2Total 683 100.0 100.0

Q5c If parking space availability became a problem on your street, which of the following measures would you

most support to manage parking demand?Columbia Pike




Do nothing 11 13.6 13.7


Other 26 32.1 32.6Total 81 100.0 100.0

SFA Install parking meters in areas with high demand 0.0 0.0



Do nothing 0.0 0.0


Other 1 14.3 16.4Total 7 100.0 100.0




Do nothing 41 9.7 9.6


Other 78 18.4 18.1Total 423 100.0 100.0






Other 105 20.5 18.7Total 511 100.0 100.0

Route 1




Do nothing 11 11.6 11.5

No opinion 10 10.5 10.4

Other 28 29.5 30.1Total 95 100.0 100.0






Other 24 30.4 30.5Total 79 100.0 100.0




Do nothing 40 11.8 11.8

No opinion 40 11.8 12.0

Other 67 19.7 19.8Total 340 100.0 100.0




Do nothing 59 11.5 11.7

No opinion 57 11.1 11.9

Other 119 23.2 20.3Total 514 100.0 100.0

Rosslyn‐Ballston




Do nothing 58 11.6 11.4


Other 181 36.1 35.8Total 501 100.0 100.0




Do nothing 16 10.0 10.0


Other 45 28.1 28.0Total 160 100.0 100.0




Do nothing 42 18.5 19.0

No opinion 24 10.6 10.9

Other 57 25.1 25.4Total 227 100.0 100.0




Do nothing 116 13.1 14.6


Other 283 31.9 30.8Total 888 100.0 100.0

All Other Areas




Do nothing 114 11.9 11.5


Other 337 35.3 35.7Total 954 100.0 100.0




Do nothing 39 11.5 11.5


Other 94 27.8 27.6Total 338 100.0 100.0




Do nothing 169 13.0 13.4

No opinion 141 10.8 11.3

Other 266 20.4 20.7Total 1304 100.0 100.0




Do nothing 322 12.4 12.9

No opinion 248 9.6 10.5

Other 697 26.8 24.2Total 2596 100.0 100.0

Total



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Less than $24,999 Yes 85 69.7 62.5 5.5 51.6 73.4

No 37 30.3 37.5 5.5 26.6 48.4Total 122 100.0 100.0

$25,000‐$49,999 Yes 140 80.5 71.5 4.7 62.3 80.8

No 34 19.5 28.5 4.7 19.2 37.7Total 174 100.0 100.0

$50,000‐$74,999 Yes 317 81.7 75.6 2.9 70.0 81.2

No 71 18.3 24.4 2.9 18.8 30.0Total 388 100.0 100.0

$75,000‐$99,999 Yes 404 82.3 76.2 2.5 71.3 81.1

No 87 17.7 23.8 2.5 18.9 28.7Total 491 100.0 100.0

$100,000‐$199,999 Yes 1368 85.8 78.2 1.5 75.3 81.0

No 226 14.2 21.8 1.5 19.0 24.7Total 1594 100.0 100.0

$200,000 or more Yes 972 91.4 84.3 1.8 80.8 87.9

No 92 8.6 15.7 1.8 12.1 19.2Total 1064 100.0 100.0

Total Yes 3286 85.7 77.9 0.9 76.0 79.7

No 547 14.3 22.1 0.9 20.3 24.0Total 3833 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 99.8%



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Less than $24,999 Yes 37 43.5 30.1 6.5 17.4 42.8

No 44 51.8 63.8 6.8 50.5 77.2

I don't know 4 4.7 6.1 3.3 0.0 12.6Total 85 100.0 100.0

$25,000‐$49,999 Yes 53 37.9 29.1 5.2 18.9 39.3

No 86 61.4 70.0 5.2 59.7 80.3

I don't know 1 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.0 2.7Total 140 100.0 100.0

$50,000‐$74,999 Yes 116 36.6 19.5 2.6 14.4 24.5

No 177 55.8 69.1 3.2 62.8 75.5

I don't know 24 7.6 11.4 2.4 6.7 16.1Total 317 100.0 100.0

$75,000‐$99,999 Yes 142 35.1 17.0 2.1 12.9 21.1

No 239 59.2 73.6 2.7 68.3 79.0

I don't know 23 5.7 9.4 2.1 5.3 13.4Total 404 100.0 100.0

$100,000‐$199,999 Yes 526 38.5 19.8 1.3 17.2 22.3

No 792 57.9 72.8 1.6 69.7 76.0

I don't know 50 3.7 7.4 1.1 5.2 9.6Total 1368 100.0 100.0

$200,000 or more Yes 450 46.3 23.6 1.5 20.5 26.6

No 507 52.2 73.0 1.8 69.6 76.5

I don't know 15 1.5 3.4 1.1 1.3 5.5Total 972 100.0 100.0

Total Yes 1324 40.3 20.9 0.8 19.3 22.5

No 1845 56.1 72.1 1.0 70.2 74.1

I don't know 117 3.6 7.0 0.7 5.6 8.4Total 3286 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 99.9%


Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent

Income CrosstabsFrequency without self‐reported Income: 706


Income VAR3a Frequency Percent

Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Less than $24,999 Yes 31 83.8 72.8 12.1 49.2 96.4

No 4 10.8 13.6 7.9 0.0 29.1

No opinion 2 5.4 13.6 10.8 0.0 34.8Total 37 100.0 100.0

$25,000‐$49,999 Yes 41 75.9 48.0 10.3 27.7 68.2

No 10 18.5 40.3 11.0 18.7 62.0

No opinion 3 5.6 11.7 6.7 0.0 24.9Total 54 100.0 100.0

$50,000‐$74,999 Yes 92 80.0 58.1 7.5 43.3 72.8

No 20 17.4 33.5 7.5 18.8 48.1

No opinion 3 2.6 8.5 5.3 0.0 19.0Total 115 100.0 100.0

$75,000‐$99,999 Yes 124 86.7 77.2 6.6 64.3 90.2

No 13 9.1 12.3 4.8 2.9 21.8

No opinion 6 4.2 10.4 5.5 0.0 21.2Total 143 100.0 100.0

$100,000‐$199,999 Yes 452 85.3 69.0 3.9 61.3 76.8

No 56 10.6 22.5 3.7 15.2 29.8

No opinion 22 4.2 8.5 2.6 3.3 13.7Total 530 100.0 100.0

$200,000 or more Yes 399 88.5 77.4 4.3 69.0 85.8

No 34 7.5 17.1 4.2 8.9 25.2

No opinion 18 4.0 5.5 2.2 1.2 9.8Total 451 100.0 100.0

Total Yes 1139 85.6 69.6 2.4 64.9 74.4

No 137 10.3 21.9 2.3 17.4 26.4

No opinion 54 4.1 8.4 1.6 5.2 11.7Total 1330 100.0 100.0





Income VAR3b Frequency Percent

Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Less than $24,999 Yes 11 22.9 13.1 4.7 3.9 22.2

No 26 54.2 59.5 8.5 42.8 76.1

No opinion 4 8.3 9.3 5.4 0.0 20.0


$25,000‐$49,999 Yes 19 21.8 19.0 5.3 8.5 29.4

No 50 57.5 61.1 6.8 47.8 74.3

No opinion 8 9.2 9.6 4.1 1.5 17.6


$50,000‐$74,999 Yes 45 22.4 15.4 2.9 9.8 21.1

No 105 52.2 53.1 4.2 44.8 61.4

No opinion 17 8.5 8.5 2.1 4.3 12.7


$75,000‐$99,999 Yes 40 15.2 12.8 2.4 8.0 17.6

No 154 58.6 61.7 3.6 54.7 68.8

No opinion 28 10.6 11.8 2.5 7.0 16.6


$100,000‐$199,999 Yes 171 20.3 13.8 1.4 11.1 16.5

No 465 55.1 60.8 2.1 56.7 64.9

No opinion 70 8.3 9.7 1.3 7.0 12.3


$200,000 or more Yes 130 24.8 18.1 1.9 14.3 21.9

No 302 57.5 64.1 2.6 59.1 69.2

No opinion 31 5.9 7.1 1.5 4.2 10.0


Total Yes 416 21.1 14.9 0.9 13.1 16.7

No 1102 56.0 60.7 1.4 58.0 63.4

No opinion 158 8.0 9.3 0.8 7.6 11.0





95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent


Q5a


Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Less than $24,999 Lower the max number of permits, but keep cost same 8 25.8 45.8 14.6 17.1 74.5



Do nothing 3 9.7 6.0 3.8 0.0 13.5

No opinion 5 16.1 23.5 13.9 0.0 50.8

Other 4 12.9 7.8 4.3 0.0 16.3Total 31 100.0 100.0

$25,000‐$49,999 Lower the max number of permits, but keep cost same 14 34.1 50.9 11.8 27.8 74.0



Do nothing 6 14.6 11.1 5.0 1.3 20.9

No opinion 3 7.3 10.5 7.8 0.0 25.9

Other 6 14.6 10.3 4.7 1.1 19.6Total 41 100.0 100.0




Do nothing 13 14.3 12.1 3.9 4.5 19.7

No opinion 11 12.1 24.4 8.5 7.7 41.1

Other 17 18.7 15.3 3.9 7.8 22.9Total 91 100.0 100.0




Do nothing 15 12.2 8.3 2.3 3.8 12.9

No opinion 12 9.8 16.7 6.4 4.1 29.3

Other 17 13.8 9.7 2.5 4.7 14.7Total 123 100.0 100.0




Do nothing 30 6.7 6.4 1.9 2.6 10.2

No opinion 32 7.1 8.9 2.6 3.9 14.0

Other 65 14.4 12.8 1.9 9.1 16.5Total 450 100.0 100.0

$200,000 or more Lower the max number of permits, but keep cost same 90 22.7 25.1 3.0 19.2 31.0



Do nothing 16 4.0 3.7 0.9 1.9 5.6

No opinion 23 5.8 7.3 1.8 3.8 10.8

Other 57 14.4 14.3 1.9 10.6 18.0Total 396 100.0 100.0




Do nothing 83 7.3 6.7 1.0 4.7 8.6

No opinion 86 7.6 11.7 1.9 8.0 15.4

Other 166 14.7 12.7 1.1 10.5 14.8Total 1132 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 99.0%



95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent

Q5b


Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Less than $24,999 Install parking meters in areas with high demand 1 7.7 13.2 12.3 0.0 37.4



Do nothing 0 0.0 . . . .

No opinion 0 0.0 . . . .

Other 0 0.0 . . . .Total 13 100.0 100.0

$25,000‐$49,999 Install parking meters in areas with high demand 0 0.0 . . . .



Do nothing 0 0.0 . . . .

No opinion 1 4.5 1.8 1.8 0.0 5.3

Other 1 4.5 1.8 1.9 0.0 5.5Total 22 100.0 100.0

$50,000‐$74,999 Install parking meters in areas with high demand 3 6.1 5.8 3.7 0.0 13.0



Do nothing 1 2.0 2.9 2.9 0.0 8.6

No opinion 2 4.1 6.6 5.7 0.0 17.8

Other 5 10.2 7.1 3.8 0.0 14.6Total 49 100.0 100.0

$75,000‐$99,999 Install parking meters in areas with high demand 0 0.0 . . . .



Do nothing 3 6.4 7.1 5.6 0.0 18.2

No opinion 0 0.0 . . . .

Other 4 8.5 4.7 3.0 0.0 10.6Total 47 100.0 100.0




Do nothing 3 1.5 2.2 1.5 0.0 5.2

No opinion 10 5.0 4.9 2.2 0.5 9.3

Other 9 4.5 5.0 2.2 0.6 9.4Total 199 100.0 100.0

$200,000 or more Install parking meters in areas with high demand 9 6.1 10.6 4.6 1.5 19.6



Do nothing 0 0.0 . . . .

No opinion 4 2.7 3.1 1.8 0.0 6.6

Other 13 8.8 7.7 2.9 2.0 13.3Total 148 100.0 100.0




Do nothing 7 1.5 2.3 1.1 0.2 4.4

No opinion 17 3.6 3.7 1.3 1.2 6.2

Other 32 6.7 5.6 1.3 3.0 8.2Total 478 100.0 100.0






95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent

Q5c

Income VAR5c Frequency Percent

Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Less than $24,999 Install parking meters in areas with high demand 8 10.3 13.3 4.7 4.0 22.5


Do nothing 15 19.2 15.8 4.5 7.1 24.6

No opinion 15 19.2 21.3 5.5 10.4 32.2

Other 16 20.5 20.8 5.4 10.2 31.5Total 78 100.0 100.0



Do nothing 18 16.2 20.7 5.3 10.4 31.1

No opinion 17 15.3 15.1 4.3 6.7 23.6

Other 26 23.4 21.2 4.7 12.0 30.3Total 111 100.0 100.0



Do nothing 33 13.3 13.8 2.5 8.9 18.8

No opinion 30 12.1 12.1 2.3 7.6 16.7

Other 54 21.8 21.5 3.1 15.4 27.5Total 248 100.0 100.0



Do nothing 47 14.6 14.5 2.3 9.9 19.1

No opinion 35 10.8 11.8 2.1 7.6 16.0

Other 70 21.7 18.1 2.3 13.5 22.7Total 323 100.0 100.0



Do nothing 104 10.9 10.8 1.2 8.4 13.2

No opinion 67 7.1 7.6 1.1 5.5 9.7

Other 234 24.6 21.6 1.6 18.6 24.7Total 950 100.0 100.0

$200,000 or more Install parking meters in areas with high demand 60 11.5 16.9 2.3 12.3 21.5


Do nothing 52 10.0 10.9 1.8 7.4 14.5

No opinion 40 7.7 7.9 1.6 4.9 10.9

Other 161 30.9 30.5 2.6 25.4 35.5Total 521 100.0 100.0



Do nothing 269 12.1 12.5 0.9 10.8 14.1

No opinion 204 9.1 9.8 0.8 8.2 11.3

Other 561 25.1 22.6 1.1 20.6 24.7Total 2231 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 98.8%



95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent





Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Less than $24,999 Visitors should be allowed to park...for a limited time 41 48.2 58.0 6.9 44.4 71.6


No opinion 7 8.2 8.3 3.6 1.2 15.4Total 85 100.0 100.0

$25,000‐$49,999 Visitors should be allowed to park...for a limited time 81 57.9 64.5 5.4 53.9 75.0


No opinion 11 7.9 6.5 2.6 1.4 11.6Total 140 100.0 100.0



No opinion 21 6.6 7.8 1.9 4.0 11.6Total 317 100.0 100.0



No opinion 22 5.4 8.5 2.1 4.4 12.5Total 404 100.0 100.0



No opinion 54 4.0 4.3 0.8 2.8 5.8Total 1367 100.0 100.0

$200,000 or more Visitors should be allowed to park...for a limited time 547 56.4 67.0 2.1 63.0 71.1


No opinion 39 4.0 5.5 1.2 3.2 7.7Total 969 100.0 100.0



No opinion 154 4.7 5.8 0.6 4.7 7.0Total 3282 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 99.0%



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Less than $24,999 I prefer a flexible residential parking program structure... 49 57.6 64.8 6.7 51.6 78.0


No opinion 8 9.4 5.1 2.7 0.0 10.4Total 85 100.0 100.0

$25,000‐$49,999 I prefer a flexible residential parking program structure... 81 57.9 60.0 5.7 48.9 71.1


No opinion 8 5.7 3.2 1.4 0.3 6.0Total 140 100.0 100.0



No opinion 29 9.2 8.2 1.9 4.5 11.9Total 316 100.0 100.0



No opinion 31 7.7 8.7 1.9 5.1 12.4Total 402 100.0 100.0



No opinion 71 5.2 4.8 0.8 3.2 6.4Total 1364 100.0 100.0

$200,000 or more I prefer a flexible residential parking program structure... 568 58.6 59.2 2.3 54.7 63.6


No opinion 64 6.6 6.6 1.1 4.4 8.8Total 970 100.0 100.0



No opinion 211 6.4 6.1 0.6 5.0 7.2Total 3277 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 99.0%


Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Less than $24,999 On the street 41 34.2 25.1 4.6 16.0 34.1




$25,000‐$49,999 On the street 72 41.4 33.5 4.6 24.5 42.6




$50,000‐$74,999 On the street 107 27.6 17.0 2.1 12.8 21.2




$75,000‐$99,999 On the street 156 31.8 23.5 2.3 19.0 28.0




$100,000‐$199,999 On the street 560 35.2 25.5 1.4 22.8 28.1




$200,000 or more On the street 431 40.5 33.5 1.9 29.8 37.3










Response Rate 97.8%


Limits

for Row Percent



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Less than $24,999 It was easy to find parking, and it was the right distance away 48 39.7 35.3 5.5 24.5 46.1






$25,000‐$49,999 It was easy to find parking, and it was the right distance away 102 59.0 50.3 5.1 40.4 60.2
























$200,000 or more It was easy to find parking, and it was the right distance away 755 71.0 64.7 2.1 60.5 68.9














Response Rate 97.7%


Limits

for Row Percent



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Less than $24,999 My visitors used my FlexPass 5 17.9 8.3 4.4 0.0 16.9







restriction time period 0 0.0 . . . .


$25,000‐$49,999 My visitors used my FlexPass 7 15.9 11.5 4.9 2.0 21.1




































$200,000 or more My visitors used my FlexPass 115 28.5 28.1 2.3 23.6 32.6




















Response Rate 98.2%


Limits

for Row Percent



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Less than $24,999 My visitors parked on the street 31 59.6 52.9 8.5 36.2 69.6




$25,000‐$49,999 My visitors parked on the street 66 69.5 65.0 6.3 52.6 77.5
















$200,000 or more My visitors parked on the street 433 78.3 81.2 2.0 77.2 85.2










Response Rate 98.3%


Income VAR12c Frequency Percent

Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Less than $24,999 My visitors parked on the street 22 55.0 52.5 9.0 34.9 70.1















$200,000 or more My visitors parked on the street 61 57.5 56.8 6.0 45.1 68.4








Response Rate 99.1%

95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent






Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Less than $24,999





street 26 21.5 17.3 4.0 9.5 25.2




$25,000‐$49,999





street 43 24.9 27.5 4.5 18.6 36.4




$50,000‐$74,999





street 91 23.5 24.6 2.9 19.0 30.2




$75,000‐$99,999





street 110 22.4 18.5 2.1 14.3 22.6




$100,000‐$199,999





street 473 29.8 29.3 1.6 26.3 32.4




$200,000 or more





street 349 33.0 27.5 1.9 23.8 31.2




Total





street 1092 28.6 26.2 1.0 24.3 28.0






Response Rate 96.3%


Limits

for Row Percent

Q17


Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Less than $24,999 Yes, often 1 2.8 0.9 0.9 0.0 2.6

Yes, sometimes 3 8.3 27.0 14.0 0.0 54.5

Yes, rarely 2 5.6 3.3 2.5 0.0 8.2

No 30 83.3 68.8 13.8 41.8 95.8Total 36 100.0 100.0

$25,000‐$49,999 Yes, often 3 5.7 1.9 1.2 0.0 4.2

Yes, sometimes 5 9.4 4.4 2.2 0.1 8.6

Yes, rarely 4 7.5 2.4 1.3 0.0 5.0

No 41 77.4 91.3 3.0 85.3 97.2Total 53 100.0 100.0

$50,000‐$74,999 Yes, often 4 3.5 4.5 3.3 0.0 11.0

Yes, sometimes 8 7.0 3.9 1.5 1.0 6.8

Yes, rarely 13 11.3 6.4 1.9 2.6 10.2

No 90 78.3 85.2 4.1 77.2 93.1Total 115 100.0 100.0

$75,000‐$99,999 Yes, often 7 4.9 3.0 1.2 0.6 5.4

Yes, sometimes 16 11.3 6.8 1.8 3.2 10.3

Yes, rarely 18 12.7 7.4 1.9 3.6 11.2

No 101 71.1 82.8 3.2 76.6 89.0Total 142 100.0 100.0

$100,000‐$199,999 Yes, often 19 3.6 2.3 0.6 1.2 3.4

Yes, sometimes 53 10.1 6.5 1.1 4.4 8.5

Yes, rarely 92 17.5 12.9 2.1 8.8 16.9

No 361 68.8 78.4 2.4 73.7 83.1Total 525 100.0 100.0

$200,000 or more Yes, often 13 2.9 2.6 0.8 1.1 4.1

Yes, sometimes 48 10.7 9.2 1.5 6.3 12.1

Yes, rarely 78 17.4 15.4 1.9 11.6 19.1

No 310 69.0 72.8 2.6 67.7 77.8Total 449 100.0 100.0

Total Yes, often 47 3.6 2.6 0.5 1.6 3.6

Yes, sometimes 133 10.1 7.6 1.0 5.7 9.5

Yes, rarely 207 15.7 11.1 1.0 9.0 13.1

No 933 70.7 78.7 1.5 75.8 81.6Total 1320 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 96.6%



95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent




Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Less than $24,999 SFD 37 31.1 13.5 2.9 7.9 19.1

SFA 16 13.4 7.7 2.5 2.8 12.6


$25,000‐$49,999 SFD 69 39.7 16.3 2.6 11.2 21.4

SFA 25 14.4 5.2 1.1 3.0 7.4


$50,000‐$74,999 SFD 102 26.3 11.4 1.4 8.7 14.2

SFA 68 17.5 8.9 1.5 6.1 11.8


$75,000‐$99,999 SFD 165 33.6 15.4 1.5 12.5 18.3

SFA 67 13.6 9.2 1.5 6.3 12.1


$100,000‐$199,999 SFD 664 41.7 20.8 0.9 19.1 22.5

SFA 318 20.0 13.0 0.9 11.2 14.9


$200,000 or more SFD 686 64.6 49.0 2.0 45.2 52.9

SFA 226 21.3 14.3 1.2 12.0 16.5


Total SFD 1723 45.0 24.0 0.3 23.3 24.6

SFA 720 18.8 11.6 0.5 10.6 12.6




Response Rate 96.5%



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Less than $24,999 Own 58 47.9 27.1 4.4 18.6 35.7

Rent 61 50.4 71.0 4.5 62.1 79.8


Other/NA 2 1.7 1.9 1.4 0.0 4.6Total 121 100.0 100.0

$25,000‐$49,999 Own 95 54.6 33.6 4.4 24.9 42.3

Rent 79 45.4 66.4 4.4 57.7 75.1


Other/NA 0 0.0 . . . .Total 174 100.0 100.0

$50,000‐$74,999 Own 205 53.0 41.5 3.1 35.4 47.6

Rent 178 46.0 57.9 3.1 51.8 64.1


Other/NA 0 0.0 . . . .Total 387 100.0 100.0

$75,000‐$99,999 Own 298 60.7 48.1 2.8 42.5 53.6

Rent 192 39.1 51.9 2.8 46.3 57.5


Other/NA 0 0.0 . . . .Total 491 100.0 100.0

$100,000‐$199,999 Own 1108 69.5 54.9 1.7 51.6 58.1

Rent 481 30.2 44.8 1.7 41.6 48.0


Other/NA 2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.3Total 1594 100.0 100.0

$200,000 or more Own 941 88.4 79.3 2.0 75.4 83.3

Rent 122 11.5 20.6 2.0 16.7 24.6


Other/NA 0 0.0 . . . .Total 1064 100.0 100.0

Total Own 2705 70.6 55.0 1.0 53.0 57.0

Rent 1113 29.1 44.7 1.0 42.7 46.7


Other/NA 4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.3Total 3831 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 96.5%

95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent




Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Less than $24,999 Yes 22 18.0 16.2 4.3 7.8 24.7

No 100 82.0 83.8 4.3 75.3 92.2Total 122 100.0 100.0

$25,000‐$49,999 Yes 32 18.5 13.6 3.1 7.6 19.7

No 141 81.5 86.4 3.1 80.3 92.4Total 173 100.0 100.0

$50,000‐$74,999 Yes 36 9.3 8.3 1.8 4.8 11.7

No 352 90.7 91.7 1.8 88.3 95.2Total 388 100.0 100.0

$75,000‐$99,999 Yes 42 8.6 6.6 1.3 4.1 9.0

No 445 91.4 93.4 1.3 91.0 95.9Total 487 100.0 100.0

$100,000‐$199,999 Yes 112 7.1 4.8 0.6 3.6 6.1

No 1474 92.9 95.2 0.6 93.9 96.4Total 1586 100.0 100.0

$200,000 or more Yes 41 3.9 4.3 0.8 2.7 5.9

No 1019 96.1 95.7 0.8 94.1 97.3Total 1060 100.0 100.0

Total Yes 285 7.5 6.3 0.5 5.3 7.2

No 3531 92.5 93.7 0.5 92.8 94.7Total 3816 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 94.9%



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Less than $24,999 Yes 9 15.0 8.8 3.7 1.5 16.1

No 21 35.0 23.1 6.1 11.1 35.1


$25,000‐$49,999 Yes 12 12.8 17.2 5.5 6.5 27.9

No 42 44.7 47.3 6.4 34.8 59.8


$50,000‐$74,999 Yes 19 10.9 8.4 2.3 3.8 12.9

No 75 43.1 39.3 4.9 29.6 48.9


$75,000‐$99,999 Yes 30 12.9 11.4 2.5 6.5 16.3

No 80 34.3 30.8 4.0 23.0 38.7


$100,000‐$199,999 Yes 152 15.3 14.3 1.4 11.5 17.2

No 374 37.7 33.3 2.0 29.5 37.2


$200,000 or more Yes 184 20.2 18.4 1.6 15.3 21.5

No 433 47.5 46.9 2.1 42.7 51.1


Total Yes 406 16.5 14.9 0.9 13.1 16.6

No 1025 41.6 38.3 1.3 35.8 40.8




Response Rate 99.2%

95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent


Q13 The cost of a residential parking permit should vary based on the following


Weighted

Percentage

Less than $24,999 Whether or not the household has access to parking 15 12.3 16.6






Total 122

$25,000‐$49,999 Whether or not the household has access to parking 29 16.7 22.4






Total 174







Total 388







Total 491







Total 1594

$200,000 or more Whether or not the household has access to parking 188 17.7 20.5






Total 1064







Total 3833


Race VAR1 Frequency Percent

Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

White Yes 2305 87.2 80.1 1.1 77.9 82.3

No 338 12.8 19.9 1.1 17.7 22.1Total 2643 100.0 100.0

Black Yes 80 65.6 58.5 5.5 47.6 69.4

No 42 34.4 41.5 5.5 30.6 52.4Total 122 100.0 100.0

Hispanic Yes 94 77.7 68.3 5.6 57.4 79.2

No 27 22.3 31.7 5.6 20.8 42.6Total 121 100.0 100.0

Asian Yes 146 74.9 65.4 4.5 56.5 74.2

No 49 25.1 34.6 4.5 25.8 43.5Total 195 100.0 100.0

Multi‐racial or Other Yes 229 85.4 78.7 3.4 72.1 85.4

No 39 14.6 21.3 3.4 14.6 27.9Total 268 100.0 100.0

Total Yes 2854 85.2 77.6 1.0 75.7 79.6

No 495 14.8 22.4 1.0 20.4 24.3Total 3349 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 99.8%



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

White Yes 953 41.3 20.9 1.0 18.9 22.8

No 1281 55.6 73.0 1.2 70.7 75.3

I don't know 71 3.1 6.2 0.8 4.6 7.7Total 2305 100.0 100.0

Black Yes 23 28.8 20.3 5.2 10.1 30.5

No 56 70.0 75.6 6.1 63.7 87.5

I don't know 1 1.3 4.1 4.0 0.0 11.8Total 80 100.0 100.0

Hispanic Yes 37 39.4 24.8 5.7 13.7 35.9

No 53 56.4 68.4 6.4 56.0 80.9

I don't know 4 4.3 6.7 3.9 0.0 14.4Total 94 100.0 100.0

Asian Yes 41 28.1 13.1 2.6 7.9 18.2

No 91 62.3 75.5 4.0 67.7 83.4I don't know 14 9.6 11.4 3.2 5.2 17.7

Total 146 100.0 100.0


No 121 52.8 67.2 4.2 58.9 75.5

I don't know 13 5.7 11.5 3.3 5.1 18.0Total 229 100.0 100.0

Total Yes 1149 40.3 20.6 0.9 18.9 22.3

No 1602 56.1 72.6 1.1 70.5 74.6

I don't know 103 3.6 6.9 0.7 5.4 8.3Total 2854 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 99.9%

Race CrosstabsFrequency missing self reported race: 1190


Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent


Race VAR3a Frequency Percent

Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

White Yes 827 86.2 70.5 2.9 64.8 76.2

No 94 9.8 24.0 2.9 18.4 29.6

No opinion 38 4.0 5.5 1.5 2.6 8.4Total 959 100.0 100.0

Black Yes 18 78.3 53.8 14.1 26.2 81.5

No 4 17.4 31.5 13.5 5.0 58.0

No opinion 1 4.3 14.6 13.0 0.0 40.0Total 23 100.0 100.0

Hispanic Yes 30 81.1 58.3 13.6 31.6 85.0

No 4 10.8 11.5 7.1 0.0 25.5

No opinion 3 8.1 30.2 14.7 1.4 58.9Total 37 100.0 100.0

Asian Yes 35 85.4 78.8 9.2 60.7 96.9

No 4 9.8 17.2 9.1 0.0 35.1

No opinion 2 4.9 4.0 2.8 0.0 9.5Total 41 100.0 100.0


No 9 9.5 5.8 2.1 1.7 9.9

No opinion 4 4.2 18.7 8.8 1.5 35.9Total 95 100.0 100.0

Total Yes 992 85.9 70.2 2.6 65.1 75.3

No 115 10.0 21.9 2.5 17.1 26.7

No opinion 48 4.2 7.9 1.7 4.6 11.2Total 1155 100.0 100.0





Race VAR3b Frequency Percent

Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

White Yes 240 17.7 13.3 1.1 11.2 15.4

No 818 60.3 64.2 1.6 61.0 67.3

No opinion 114 8.4 9.5 1.0 7.5 11.5


Black Yes 9 15.8 9.6 3.7 2.3 16.9

No 34 59.6 62.0 8.1 46.1 78.0

No opinion 2 3.5 8.8 5.9 0.0 20.5


Hispanic Yes 18 32.1 24.7 7.3 10.4 38.9

No 27 48.2 48.2 8.4 31.7 64.8

No opinion 4 7.1 8.0 4.4 0.0 16.6


Asian Yes 26 24.5 19.0 4.4 10.3 27.8

No 43 40.6 46.5 6.0 34.8 58.2

No opinion 15 14.2 14.5 4.3 6.2 22.9



No 68 50.4 52.7 5.3 42.4 63.0

No opinion 5 3.7 7.3 3.2 1.0 13.5


Total Yes 325 19.0 14.2 1.0 12.2 16.1

No 990 57.9 61.5 1.5 58.6 64.3

No opinion 140 8.2 9.6 0.9 7.8 11.4






Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent

Q5a


Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

White Lower the max number of permits, but keep cost same 208 25.3 28.2 2.5 23.2 33.1



Do nothing 63 7.7 6.2 0.9 4.5 7.9

No opinion 75 9.1 13.6 2.3 9.0 18.2

Other 105 12.8 11.3 1.4 8.5 14.1Total 821 100.0 100.0

Black Lower the max number of permits, but keep cost same 9 50.0 49.9 14.5 21.5 78.3


Lower the max number of permits and increase the cost 0 0.0 . . . .

Do nothing 0 0.0 . . . .

No opinion 2 11.1 21.1 15.3 0.0 51.2

Other 2 11.1 9.4 6.7 0.0 22.5Total 18 100.0 100.0

Hispanic Lower the max number of permits, but keep cost same 10 33.3 51.3 11.5 28.9 73.8



Do nothing 3 10.0 7.7 4.6 0.0 16.7

No opinion 0 0.0 . . . .

Other 6 20.0 17.4 7.2 3.3 31.6Total 30 100.0 100.0

Asian Lower the max number of permits, but keep cost same 10 29.4 30.7 9.6 11.9 49.6



Do nothing 1 2.9 2.4 2.4 0.0 7.1

No opinion 1 2.9 3.6 3.5 0.0 10.4

Other 5 14.7 15.5 6.7 2.4 28.6Total 34 100.0 100.0

Multi‐racial or Other Lower the max number of permits, but keep cost same 13 15.9 27.6 10.2 7.7 47.6



Do nothing 2 2.4 2.3 1.7 0.0 5.5

No opinion 8 9.8 14.8 8.3 0.0 31.1

Other 16 19.5 16.8 5.5 6.0 27.6Total 82 100.0 100.0




Do nothing 69 7.0 5.6 0.7 4.1 7.0

No opinion 86 8.7 13.0 2.1 8.9 17.2

Other 134 13.6 12.1 1.3 9.5 14.7Total 985 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 99.0%



95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent

Q5b


Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

White Install parking meters in areas with high demand 26 9.2 11.0 2.7 5.7 16.3



Do nothing 3 1.1 2.4 1.5 0.0 5.3

No opinion 10 3.5 4.3 1.9 0.6 8.1

Other 17 6.0 5.4 1.8 2.0 8.9Total 284 100.0 100.0

Black Install parking meters in areas with high demand 0 0.0 . . . .



Do nothing 0 0.0 . . . .

No opinion 0 0.0 . . . .

Other 0 0.0 . . . .Total 10 100.0 100.0

Hispanic Install parking meters in areas with high demand 3 14.3 20.2 12.8 0.0 45.3



Do nothing 0 0.0 . . . .

No opinion 1 4.8 1.6 1.6 0.0 4.8

Other 1 4.8 1.6 1.6 0.0 4.8Total 21 100.0 100.0

Asian Install parking meters in areas with high demand 0 0.0 . . . .



Do nothing 2 7.1 10.8 8.7 0.0 27.9

No opinion 0 0.0 . . . .

Other 3 10.7 15.6 9.6 0.0 34.3Total 28 100.0 100.0

Multi‐racial or Other Install parking meters in areas with high demand 1 2.7 8.6 8.0 0.0 24.2



Do nothing 1 2.7 0.9 0.9 0.0 2.6

No opinion 2 5.4 5.3 4.2 0.0 13.6

Other 1 2.7 3.3 3.3 0.0 9.7Total 37 100.0 100.0




Do nothing 6 1.6 2.6 1.3 0.1 5.1

No opinion 13 3.4 3.8 1.5 0.9 6.7

Other 22 5.8 5.5 1.5 2.5 8.5Total 380 100.0 100.0






95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent

Q5c

Race VAR5c Frequency Percent

Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

White Install parking meters in areas with high demand 211 13.7 17.2 1.2 14.8 19.6


Do nothing 182 11.8 11.6 1.0 9.7 13.5

No opinion 142 9.2 10.3 1.0 8.4 12.2

Other 423 27.4 24.9 1.3 22.3 27.5Total 1545 100.0 100.0

Black Install parking meters in areas with high demand 19 20.4 26.9 5.7 15.8 38.1


Do nothing 12 12.9 11.4 3.7 4.1 18.8

No opinion 6 6.5 8.2 3.5 1.4 15.0

Other 16 17.2 16.0 4.5 7.3 24.8Total 93 100.0 100.0

Hispanic Install parking meters in areas with high demand 10 14.5 16.2 5.7 5.0 27.3


Do nothing 5 7.2 9.3 4.1 1.3 17.4

No opinion 8 11.6 10.2 4.1 2.1 18.2

Other 15 21.7 21.4 5.7 10.3 32.5Total 69 100.0 100.0

Asian Install parking meters in areas with high demand 29 21.8 23.6 4.3 15.0 32.1


Do nothing 10 7.5 7.1 2.8 1.7 12.5

No opinion 12 9.0 7.2 2.7 1.9 12.4

Other 24 18.0 18.7 4.2 10.5 26.8Total 133 100.0 100.0

Multi‐racial or Other Install parking meters in areas with high demand 28 18.7 21.3 4.2 13.0 29.7


Do nothing 21 14.0 15.7 3.8 8.2 23.2

No opinion 10 6.7 5.3 1.9 1.6 8.9

Other 35 23.3 19.5 3.5 12.5 26.4Total 150 100.0 100.0



Do nothing 230 11.6 11.5 0.9 9.8 13.2

No opinion 178 8.9 9.6 0.8 8.0 11.2

Other 513 25.8 23.5 1.1 21.3 25.8Total 1990 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 98.8%



95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent





Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

White Visitors should be allowed to park...for a limited time 1335 58.0 67.1 1.3 64.5 69.7


No opinion 109 4.7 5.8 0.7 4.4 7.1Total 2302 100.0 100.0

Black Visitors should be allowed to park...for a limited time 51 63.8 68.7 6.5 56.0 81.5


No opinion 5 6.3 6.5 3.2 0.2 12.8Total 80 100.0 100.0

Hispanic Visitors should be allowed to park...for a limited time 51 54.3 63.2 6.7 50.0 76.4


No opinion 5 5.3 3.2 1.9 0.0 6.8Total 94 100.0 100.0

Asian Visitors should be allowed to park...for a limited time 87 59.6 69.3 4.8 59.9 78.8


No opinion 5 3.4 5.4 2.7 0.1 10.8Total 146 100.0 100.0

Multi‐racial or Other Visitors should be allowed to park...for a limited time 121 52.8 61.4 4.4 52.8 69.9


No opinion 9 3.9 3.9 1.4 1.1 6.8Total 229 100.0 100.0



No opinion 133 4.7 5.5 0.6 4.3 6.7Total 2851 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 99.0%



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

White I prefer a flexible residential parking program structure... 1283 55.9 54.2 1.4 51.3 57.0


No opinion 159 6.9 6.8 0.7 5.4 8.3Total 2297 100.0 100.0

Black I prefer a flexible residential parking program structure... 30 37.5 36.9 7.1 23.1 50.8


No opinion 5 6.3 6.4 3.6 0.0 13.3Total 80 100.0 100.0

Hispanic I prefer a flexible residential parking program structure... 45 47.9 45.3 7.0 31.6 59.0


No opinion 4 4.3 1.6 0.8 0.0 3.1Total 94 100.0 100.0

Asian I prefer a flexible residential parking program structure... 64 43.8 44.6 5.4 34.1 55.1


No opinion 5 3.4 4.5 2.5 0.0 9.3Total 146 100.0 100.0

Multi‐racial or Other I prefer a flexible residential parking program structure... 115 50.2 49.4 4.6 40.4 58.3


No opinion 7 3.1 3.3 1.7 0.0 6.7Total 229 100.0 100.0



No opinion 180 6.3 6.2 0.6 5.0 7.4Total 2846 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 99.0%


Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

White On the street 908 34.4 24.5 1.0 22.6 26.5




Black On the street 36 29.5 21.9 4.3 13.4 30.4




Hispanic On the street 56 46.3 41.4 5.8 30.0 52.7




Asian On the street 63 32.6 23.7 3.7 16.5 30.9




Multi‐racial or Other On the street 107 39.9 31.4 3.6 24.4 38.4










Response Rate 97.8%


Limits

for Row Percent



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

White It was easy to find parking, and it was the right distance away 1684 63.8 54.3 1.3 51.8 56.8






Black It was easy to find parking, and it was the right distance away 66 54.1 46.6 5.6 35.7 57.5






Hispanic It was easy to find parking, and it was the right distance away 62 51.2 45.1 5.8 33.6 56.6






Asian It was easy to find parking, and it was the right distance away 111 57.2 50.2 4.6 41.3 59.2






Multi‐racial or Other It was easy to find parking, and it was the right distance away 152 57.1 51.3 4.1 43.2 59.3














Response Rate 97.7%


Limits

for Row Percent



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

White My visitors used my FlexPass 227 27.1 23.8 1.7 20.4 27.2









Black My visitors used my FlexPass 2 15.4 15.5 10.2 0.0 35.5



My visitors parked further away, outside the permit zone 0 0.0 . . . .






Hispanic My visitors used my FlexPass 6 21.4 12.7 5.9 1.1 24.3









Asian My visitors used my FlexPass 5 13.9 12.4 5.7 1.2 23.5









Multi‐racial or Other My visitors used my FlexPass 24 31.2 26.8 6.0 15.1 38.6




















Response Rate 98.2%


Limits

for Row Percent



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

White My visitors parked on the street 1025 73.5 71.7 1.5 68.7 74.7




Black My visitors parked on the street 45 68.2 60.7 7.6 45.8 75.6




Hispanic My visitors parked on the street 50 82.0 82.0 6.5 69.3 94.7




Asian My visitors parked on the street 72 75.0 76.9 5.1 67.0 86.8




Multi‐racial or Other My visitors parked on the street 105 75.5 73.5 4.9 63.9 83.1










Response Rate 98.3%


Race VAR12c Frequency Percent

Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

White My visitors parked on the street 220 53.9 52.5 2.9 46.8 58.2



Black My visitors parked on the street 19 44.2 48.2 8.8 30.9 65.5



Hispanic My visitors parked on the street 22 71.0 70.3 9.1 52.4 88.1



Asian My visitors parked on the street 44 71.0 61.9 7.4 47.3 76.5



Multi‐racial or Other My visitors parked on the street 30 57.7 58.8 7.7 43.7 73.8








Response Rate 99.1%


Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent





Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

White





street 697 26.5 25.8 1.2 23.5 28.1




Black





street 31 25.4 21.2 4.3 12.8 29.7




Hispanic





street 31 25.6 19.0 4.5 10.2 27.8




Asian





street 69 35.6 29.4 4.1 21.2 37.5




Multi‐racial or Other





street 87 32.6 26.3 3.4 19.7 33.0




Total





street 915 27.5 25.6 1.0 23.6 27.6






Response Rate 96.3%


Limits

for Row Percent

Q17


Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

White Yes, often 29 3.0 2.4 0.7 1.2 3.7

Yes, sometimes 88 9.3 6.5 0.8 4.9 8.1

Yes, rarely 152 16.0 11.8 1.4 9.2 14.5

No 682 71.7 79.2 1.7 75.8 82.5Total 951 100.0 100.0

Black Yes, often 1 4.5 3.6 3.6 0.0 10.7

Yes, sometimes 4 18.2 9.9 5.3 0.0 20.3

Yes, rarely 3 13.6 6.6 4.1 0.0 14.5

No 14 63.6 80.0 8.0 64.3 95.7Total 22 100.0 100.0

Hispanic Yes, often 2 5.4 2.6 1.9 0.0 6.3

Yes, sometimes 6 16.2 10.1 4.6 1.1 19.1

Yes, rarely 2 5.4 2.6 1.9 0.0 6.3

No 27 73.0 84.8 5.7 73.7 95.9Total 37 100.0 100.0

Asian Yes, often 2 4.9 2.9 2.1 0.0 7.1

Yes, sometimes 2 4.9 3.1 2.3 0.0 7.5

Yes, rarely 4 9.8 6.1 3.3 0.0 12.6

No 33 80.5 87.8 4.6 78.8 96.9Total 41 100.0 100.0

Multi‐racial or Other Yes, often 6 6.3 4.1 1.9 0.4 7.8

Yes, sometimes 6 6.3 9.7 6.5 0.0 22.5

Yes, rarely 17 17.9 10.7 3.0 4.8 16.7

No 66 69.5 75.4 7.0 61.7 89.1Total 95 100.0 100.0

Total Yes, often 40 3.5 2.6 0.6 1.5 3.8

Yes, sometimes 106 9.2 6.9 0.9 5.1 8.7

Yes, rarely 178 15.5 11.0 1.2 8.7 13.3

No 822 71.7 79.4 1.6 76.4 82.5Total 1146 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 96.6%



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

White SFD 1276 48.4 26.0 0.6 24.8 27.3

SFA 469 17.8 11.9 0.7 10.6 13.2


Black SFD 20 16.5 10.2 2.7 5.0 15.5

SFA 36 29.8 10.3 1.9 6.6 14.0


Hispanic SFD 38 31.4 15.4 3.2 9.2 21.7

SFA 23 19.0 7.3 1.8 3.7 10.9


Asian SFD 57 29.4 15.7 2.6 10.7 20.7

SFA 40 20.6 11.0 2.4 6.4 15.6


Multi‐racial or Other SFD 113 42.2 22.1 2.6 16.9 27.2

SFA 51 19.0 10.5 2.0 6.6 14.5


Total SFD 1504 45.0 24.0 0.4 23.1 24.8

SFA 619 18.5 11.5 0.6 10.4 12.6




Response Rate 96.5%




95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent

95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

White Own 1943 73.5 58.7 1.3 56.2 61.2

Rent 692 26.2 41.0 1.3 38.5 43.5


Other/NA 3 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.3Total 2642 100.0 100.0

Black Own 65 53.3 38.7 5.3 28.4 49.0

Rent 57 46.7 61.3 5.3 51.0 71.6


Other/NA 0 0.0 . . . .Total 122 100.0 100.0

Hispanic Own 74 61.2 46.6 5.8 35.2 57.9

Rent 46 38.0 52.3 5.8 40.8 63.7


Other/NA 0 0.0 . . . .Total 121 100.0 100.0

Asian Own 106 54.6 42.1 4.5 33.3 50.8

Rent 85 43.8 57.1 4.5 48.3 65.9


Other/NA 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 1.5Total 194 100.0 100.0

Multi‐racial or Other Own 160 59.7 41.5 3.9 33.9 49.1

Rent 106 39.6 58.3 3.9 50.7 65.8


Other/NA 0 0.0 . . . .Total 268 100.0 100.0

Total Own 2348 70.2 54.8 1.1 52.7 57.0

Rent 986 29.5 44.8 1.1 42.7 47.0


Other/NA 4 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.3Total 3347 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 96.5%



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

White Yes 176 6.7 6.0 0.6 4.8 7.1

No 2460 93.3 94.0 0.6 92.9 95.2Total 2636 100.0 100.0

Black Yes 16 13.1 9.3 3.0 3.4 15.2

No 106 86.9 90.7 3.0 84.8 96.6Total 122 100.0 100.0

Hispanic Yes 19 15.8 7.6 2.3 3.2 12.1

No 101 84.2 92.4 2.3 87.9 96.8Total 120 100.0 100.0

Asian Yes 13 6.7 5.5 2.0 1.7 9.4

No 182 93.3 94.5 2.0 90.6 98.3Total 195 100.0 100.0


No 245 91.8 93.6 1.8 90.1 97.1Total 267 100.0 100.0

Total Yes 246 7.4 6.2 0.5 5.1 7.2

No 3094 92.6 93.8 0.5 92.8 94.9Total 3340 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 94.9%

95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent




Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

White Yes 297 16.9 15.0 1.0 13.0 17.1

No 720 41.0 38.4 1.5 35.4 41.4


Black Yes 8 14.0 13.0 5.1 3.1 23.0

No 20 35.1 33.8 7.4 19.2 48.3


Hispanic Yes 12 19.4 20.6 6.5 7.9 33.4

No 20 32.3 32.3 7.5 17.5 47.0


Asian Yes 10 10.1 8.0 3.1 1.9 14.1

No 48 48.5 44.0 6.5 31.3 56.6



No 70 41.7 35.3 4.7 26.0 44.6


Total Yes 355 16.6 14.8 1.0 12.9 16.7

No 878 41.0 38.2 1.4 35.5 16.7

Not applicable ‐ I don't have a carport or garage 909 42.4 47.0 1.4 44.3 16.7Total 2142 100.0 100.0 16.7



Response Rate 99.2%


Limits

for Row Percent


Rent or Own Their Residence VAR1 Frequency Percent

Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Own Yes 2893 91.4 85.9 1.0 84.0 87.7

No 271 8.6 14.1 1.0 12.3 16.0Total 3164 100.0 100.0

Rent Yes 859 72.1 68.8 1.6 65.7 71.9

No 333 27.9 31.2 1.6 28.1 34.3Total 1192 100.0 100.0

Live with family or friends & do

not pay rent Yes 9 90.0 93.8 6.5 80.9 100.0

No 1 10.0 6.2 6.5 0.0 19.1Total 10 100.0 100.0

Other/NA Yes 11 91.7 94.1 5.9 82.5 100.0

No 1 8.3 5.9 5.9 0.0 17.5Total 12 100.0 100.0

Total Yes 3772 86.2 78.7 0.9 77.0 80.4

No 606 13.8 21.3 0.9 19.6 23.0Total 4378 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 99.8%



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Own Yes 1240 42.8 20.5 0.7 19.1 21.9

No 1604 55.4 75.8 0.9 74.0 77.5

I don't know 50 1.7 3.7 0.6 2.5 4.9Total 2894 100.0 100.0

Rent Yes 279 32.5 21.5 1.7 18.2 24.7

No 501 58.3 66.7 2.0 62.9 70.6

I don't know 79 9.2 11.8 1.4 9.1 14.5Total 859 100.0 100.0


not pay rent Yes 5 55.6 23.3 13.8 0.0 50.4

No 4 44.4 76.7 13.8 49.6 100.0

I don't know 0 0.0 . . . .Total 9 100.0 100.0

Other/NA Yes 1 9.1 1.8 1.8 0.0 5.3

No 7 63.6 55.4 17.8 20.4 90.4

I don't know 3 27.3 42.9 17.9 7.7 78.1Total 11 100.0 100.0

Total Yes 1525 40.4 20.8 0.7 19.3 22.2

No 2116 56.1 72.3 0.9 70.5 74.1I don't know 132 3.5 6.9 0.7 5.6 8.2

Total 3773 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 99.9%

Residence Ownership StatusFrequency missing self reported residence ownership status: 152


Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent


Rent or Own Their Residence VAR3a Frequency Percent

Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Own Yes 1122 90.0 84.1 2.0 80.1 88.1

No 84 6.7 10.6 1.7 7.2 14.0

No opinion 40 3.2 5.3 1.4 2.6 8.0Total 1246 100.0 100.0

Rent Yes 193 68.9 50.4 4.4 41.9 59.0

No 64 22.9 36.1 4.4 27.5 44.7

No opinion 23 8.2 13.5 3.3 6.9 20.0Total 280 100.0 100.0


not pay rent Yes 4 80.0 82.4 16.3 50.5 100.0

No 1 20.0 17.6 16.3 0.0 49.5

No opinion 0 0.0 . . . .Total 5 100.0 100.0

Other/NA Yes 1 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 100.0

No 0 0.0 . . . .

No opinion 0 0.0 . . . .Total 1 100.0 100.0

Total Yes 1320 86.2 71.2 2.2 66.8 75.6

No 149 9.7 20.4 2.1 16.3 24.5

No opinion 63 4.1 8.4 1.5 5.4 11.4Total 1532 100.0 100.0





Rent or Own Their Residence VAR3b Frequency Percent

Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Own Yes 397 24.0 16.7 1.1 14.6 18.8

No 909 54.9 61.4 1.5 58.5 64.4

No opinion 105 6.3 7.8 0.9 6.0 9.7


Rent Yes 71 12.2 10.7 1.4 7.9 13.5

No 347 59.4 60.4 2.3 55.9 65.0

No opinion 70 12.0 11.6 1.5 8.7 14.5



not pay rent Yes 0 0.0 . . . .

No 3 75.0 91.3 9.6 72.5 100.0

No opinion 1 25.0 8.7 9.6 0.0 27.5


Other/NA Yes 1 10.0 8.6 8.4 0.0 25.1

No 3 30.0 41.4 18.2 5.7 77.1

No opinion 4 40.0 34.7 16.9 1.5 67.8


Total Yes 469 20.8 14.4 0.9 12.7 16.1

No 1262 56.0 61.0 1.3 58.5 63.5

No opinion 180 8.0 9.4 0.8 7.9 11.0






Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent

Q5a


Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Own Lower the max number of permits, but keep cost same 262 23.5 24.9 1.9 21.3 28.5



Do nothing 77 6.9 6.8 1.1 4.7 8.9

No opinion 88 7.9 9.8 1.4 6.9 12.6

Other 187 16.8 17.3 1.5 14.4 20.2Total 1115 100.0 100.0

Rent Lower the max number of permits, but keep cost same 68 35.6 40.6 5.5 29.8 51.4



Do nothing 18 9.4 5.5 1.5 2.6 8.5

No opinion 17 8.9 16.4 4.8 7.1 25.7

Other 17 8.9 6.0 1.7 2.6 9.3Total 191 100.0 100.0


not pay rent Lower the max number of permits, but keep cost same 1 25.0 28.6 23.7 0.0 75.1



Do nothing 0 0.0 . . . .

No opinion 1 25.0 19.6 18.3 0.0 55.4

Other 1 25.0 19.6 18.3 0.0 55.4Total 4 100.0 100.0

Other/NA Lower the max number of permits, but keep cost same 0 0.0 . . . .

Do not change the max number of permits per household, but increase the cost 0 0.0 . . . .


Do nothing 0 0.0 . . . .

No opinion 0 0.0 . . . .

Other 1 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 100.0Total 1 100.0 100.0




Do nothing 95 7.2 6.5 0.9 4.7 8.2

No opinion 106 8.1 11.6 1.7 8.3 14.9

Other 206 15.7 14.3 1.2 11.9 16.7Total 1311 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 99.0%



95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent

Q5b


Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Own Install parking meters in areas with high demand 20 4.5 7.5 2.2 3.2 11.9



Do nothing 5 1.1 1.0 0.6 0.0 2.2

No opinion 16 3.6 3.8 1.4 1.1 6.5

Other 41 9.3 9.1 1.9 5.2 12.9Total 442 100.0 100.0

Rent Install parking meters in areas with high demand 13 13.4 12.6 4.1 4.6 20.6



Do nothing 3 3.1 4.6 2.7 0.0 10.0

No opinion 5 5.2 4.3 2.4 0.0 9.1

Other 2 2.1 2.4 1.8 0.0 5.8Total 97 100.0 100.0

Other/NA Install parking meters in areas with high demand 1 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 100.0

Install signs that restrict the number of hours that people can occupy a space 0 0.0 . . . .

Add RPP restrictions 0 0.0 . . . .

Do nothing 0 0.0 . . . .

No opinion 0 0.0 . . . .

Other 0 0.0 . . . .Total 1 100.0 100.0




Do nothing 8 1.5 2.2 1.0 0.2 4.1

No opinion 21 3.9 4.0 1.2 1.6 6.4

Other 43 8.0 6.9 1.4 4.0 9.7Total 540 100.0 100.0






95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent

Q5c

Rent or Own Their Residence VAR5c Frequency Percent

Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Own Install parking meters in areas with high demand 133 8.3 11.4 1.1 9.2 13.5


Do nothing 204 12.7 13.1 1.1 11.0 15.2

No opinion 134 8.3 8.9 0.9 7.1 10.8

Other 513 31.9 30.1 1.4 27.3 32.9Total 1609 100.0 100.0

Rent Install parking meters in areas with high demand 218 24.1 24.3 1.6 21.1 27.5


Do nothing 105 11.6 12.3 1.3 9.9 14.8

No opinion 95 10.5 10.9 1.2 8.6 13.2

Other 164 18.1 17.7 1.4 14.9 20.5Total 906 100.0 100.0


not pay rent Install parking meters in areas with high demand 0 0.0 . . . .


Do nothing 1 16.7 5.0 5.5 0.0 15.8

No opinion 1 16.7 44.9 28.8 0.0 100.0

Other 2 33.3 37.8 26.0 0.0 88.8Total 6 100.0 100.0

Other/NA Install parking meters in areas with high demand 1 10.0 8.8 8.6 0.0 25.6


Do nothing 0 0.0 . . . .

No opinion 2 20.0 15.3 10.7 0.0 36.2

Other 5 50.0 51.1 18.0 15.8 86.4Total 10 100.0 100.0



Do nothing 310 12.2 12.7 0.8 11.1 14.3

No opinion 232 9.2 9.9 0.7 8.5 11.4

Other 684 27.0 24.5 1.0 22.5 26.5Total 2531 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 98.8%



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Own Visitors should be allowed to park...for a limited time 1540 53.4 64.1 1.2 61.7 66.5


No opinion 142 4.9 6.7 0.7 5.3 8.2Total 2884 100.0 100.0

Rent Visitors should be allowed to park...for a limited time 550 64.1 69.0 1.9 65.3 72.7


No opinion 38 4.4 4.5 0.9 2.8 6.2Total 858 100.0 100.0


not pay rent Visitors should be allowed to park...for a limited time 7 77.8 89.6 8.5 72.9 100.0


No opinion 0 0.0 . . . .Total 9 100.0 100.0

Other/NA Visitors should be allowed to park...for a limited time 6 54.5 66.3 15.0 36.9 95.7


No opinion 2 18.2 15.1 10.4 0.0 35.5Total 11 100.0 100.0



No opinion 182 4.8 6.0 0.6 4.9 7.0Total 3762 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 99.0%



95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent





Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Own I prefer a flexible residential parking program structure... 1656 57.5 57.5 1.3 54.9 60.0


No opinion 199 6.9 7.0 0.7 5.6 8.3Total 2879 100.0 100.0

Rent I prefer a flexible residential parking program structure... 377 43.9 44.4 2.1 40.3 48.5


No opinion 60 7.0 5.8 0.9 4.0 7.7Total 858 100.0 100.0


not pay rent I prefer a flexible residential parking program structure... 3 33.3 38.1 23.1 0.0 83.3


No opinion 0 0.0 . . . .Total 9 100.0 100.0

Other/NA I prefer a flexible residential parking program structure... 3 27.3 25.6 15.8 0.0 56.5


No opinion 2 18.2 14.7 10.2 0.0 34.8Total 11 100.0 100.0



No opinion 261 6.9 6.6 0.6 5.5 7.7Total 3757 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 99.0%



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Own On the street 1290 40.8 32.3 1.1 30.2 34.4




Rent On the street 286 24.0 18.6 1.3 16.1 21.1





not pay rent On the street 6 60.0 60.2 22.0 17.1 100.0



Not applicable ‐ I don't drive or own a vehicle 0 0.0 . . . .Total 10 100.0 100.0

Other/NA On the street 3 25.0 9.5 6.8 0.0 22.9










Response Rate 97.8%


Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Own It was easy to find parking, and it was the right distance away 2133 67.7 61.4 1.2 59.0 63.7






Rent It was easy to find parking, and it was the right distance away 532 44.7 40.4 1.7 37.1 43.7







not pay rent It was easy to find parking, and it was the right distance away 5 50.0 55.6 22.5 11.4 99.7



It was difficult to find parking, and it was too far away 0 0.0 . . . .

Not applicable ‐ I don't drive or own a vehicle 0 0.0 . . . .

No opinion/don't know 0 0.0 . . . .Total 10 100.0 100.0

Other/NA It was easy to find parking, and it was the right distance away 4 33.3 40.3 17.1 6.7 73.9

It was easy to find parking, but it was too far away 0 0.0 . . . .













Response Rate 97.7%


Limits

for Row Percent



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Own My visitors used my FlexPass 332 29.4 28.5 1.5 25.4 31.5









Rent My visitors used my FlexPass 29 15.3 9.4 1.9 5.6 13.1










not pay rent My visitors used my FlexPass 0 0.0 . . . .


My visitors parked off‐street on my property/at my building 0 0.0 . . . .







Other/NA My visitors used my FlexPass 0 0.0 . . . .



My visitors parked further away, outside the permit zone 0 0.0 . . . .

















Response Rate 98.2%


Limits

for Row Percent



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Own My visitors parked on the street 1301 76.1 74.9 1.4 72.2 77.6




Rent My visitors parked on the street 390 66.2 67.2 2.2 62.8 71.5





not pay rent My visitors parked on the street 2 50.0 85.6 12.6 60.9 100.0




Other/NA My visitors parked on the street 6 85.7 84.8 14.3 56.7 100.0










Response Rate 98.3%


Rent or Own Their Residence VAR12c Frequency Percent

Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Own My visitors parked on the street 193 60.5 56.7 3.5 50.0 63.5



Rent My visitors parked on the street 224 54.4 55.7 2.7 50.4 61.1




not pay rent My visitors parked on the street 0 0.0 . . . .



Other/NA My visitors parked on the street 1 25.0 35.0 26.9 0.0 87.8








Response Rate 99.1%


Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent





Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Own





street 923 29.4 25.8 1.1 23.7 27.9




Rent





street 308 25.9 26.4 1.5 23.4 29.4





not pay rent





street 1 10.0 6.2 6.5 0.0 19.1




Other/NA





street 1 8.3 5.9 5.9 0.0 17.5




Total





street 1233 28.3 25.9 0.9 24.2 27.7






Response Rate 96.3%


Limits

for Row Percent

Q17


Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Own Yes, often 57 4.6 4.4 0.7 2.9 5.8

Yes, sometimes 143 11.6 9.9 0.9 8.1 11.7

Yes, rarely 229 18.5 16.4 1.3 13.9 18.9

No 809 65.3 69.4 1.7 66.1 72.6Total 1238 100.0 100.0

Rent Yes, often 2 0.7 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.6

Yes, sometimes 10 3.6 4.9 2.1 0.7 9.0

Yes, rarely 16 5.8 4.5 1.8 1.0 7.9

No 249 89.9 90.4 2.7 85.2 95.7Total 277 100.0 100.0


not pay rent Yes, often 0 0.0 . . . .

Yes, sometimes 0 0.0 . . . .

Yes, rarely 1 20.0 26.6 21.9 0.0 69.5

No 4 80.0 73.4 21.9 30.5 100.0Total 5 100.0 100.0

Other/NA Yes, often 0 0.0 . . . .

Yes, sometimes 0 0.0 . . . .

Yes, rarely 0 0.0 . . . .

No 1 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 100.0Total 1 100.0 100.0

Total Yes, often 59 3.9 2.8 0.5 1.9 3.7

Yes, sometimes 153 10.1 8.0 1.0 6.0 9.9

Yes, rarely 246 16.2 11.9 1.1 9.8 13.9

No 1063 69.9 77.4 1.5 74.5 80.3Total 1521 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 96.6%



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Own SFD 1914 60.6 42.1 0.7 40.7 43.6

SFA 681 21.6 16.3 0.7 14.9 17.8


Rent SFD 125 10.5 3.1 0.4 2.4 3.8

SFA 126 10.6 5.3 0.6 4.1 6.5



not pay rent SFD 5 50.0 20.1 11.7 0.0 43.1

SFA 3 30.0 18.3 12.0 0.0 41.7


Other/NA SFD 5 41.7 21.7 10.9 0.2 43.1

SFA 0 0.0 . . . .


Total SFD 2049 46.9 25.5 0.2 25.2 25.9

SFA 810 18.5 11.6 0.5 10.7 12.5




Response Rate 96.5%




95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent

95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Own Yes 283 9.1 8.4 0.7 7.1 9.8

No 2823 90.9 91.6 0.7 90.2 92.9Total 3106 100.0 100.0

Rent Yes 46 3.9 3.6 0.6 2.4 4.8

No 1129 96.1 96.4 0.6 95.2 97.6Total 1175 100.0 100.0


not pay rent Yes 3 30.0 14.5 9.8 0.0 33.7

No 7 70.0 85.5 9.8 66.3 100.0Total 10 100.0 100.0

Other/NA Yes 0 0.0 . . . .

No 10 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 100.0Total 10 100.0 100.0

Total Yes 332 7.7 6.4 0.5 5.5 7.3

No 3969 92.3 93.6 0.5 92.7 94.5Total 4301 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 94.9%



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Own Yes 429 16.8 16.0 0.9 14.2 17.8

No 1084 42.3 39.8 1.2 37.3 42.2


Rent Yes 34 13.0 8.5 2.2 4.2 12.8

No 91 34.7 31.3 4.0 23.4 39.1



not pay rent Yes 2 25.0 22.5 14.5 0.0 51.0

No 4 50.0 50.5 18.2 14.9 86.1


Other/NA Yes 0 0.0 . . . .

No 2 50.0 39.4 25.8 0.0 90.0


Total Yes 465 16.4 15.1 0.8 13.5 16.7

No 1181 41.7 38.8 1.2 36.5 41.2




Response Rate 99.2%

95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent


Q4a Top (3) reasons why you want residential parking restrictions to stay on your streetHousing Ownership VAR4a Frequency Percentage Weighted Percentage

Own To make sure that I can park near my home 727 80.2 78.4






Other 130 14.3 13.2

Total 906

Rent To make sure that I can park near my home 116 83.5 82.3






Other 10 7.2 8.7

Total 139

Live with family or friends & do not pay rent To make sure that I can park near my home 3 100.0 100.0






Other 0 0.0 0.0

Total 3

Other or N/A To make sure that I can park near my home 1 100.0 100.0






Other 0 0.0 0.0

Total 1







Other 140 13.3 11.9

Total 1049

Q4b Top (3) reasons why you wish to have residential parking restrictions on your streetHousing Ownership VAR4b Frequency Percentage Weighted Percentage

Own To make sure that I can park near my home 216 72.5 73.6






Other 67 22.5 22.7

Total 298

Rent To make sure that I can park near my home 41 82.0 80.7






Other 3 6.0 6.7

Total 50

Live with family or friends & do not pay rent To make sure that I can park near my home 0 0.0 0.0






Other 0 0.0 0.0

Total 0

Other or N/A To make sure that I can park near my home 0 0.0 0.0






Other 0 0.0 0.0

Total 0







Other 70 20.1 18.6

Total 348

Q4c Top (3) reasons why you do not wish to have residential parking restrictions on your streetHousing Type VAR4c Frequency Percentage Weighted Percentage

Own Everyone should have access to public street parking 396 74.0 77.2







Other 200 37.4 37.2

Total 535

Rent Everyone should have access to public street parking 211 80.8 83.0







Other 73 28.0 26.7

Total 261

Live with family or friends & do not pay rent Everyone should have access to public street parking 3 100.0 100.0







Other 1 33.3 75.7

Total 3

Other or N/A Everyone should have access to public street parking 2 100.0 100.0







Other 1 50.0 26.7

Total 2

Total Everyone should have access to public street parking 612 76.4 80.0







Other 275 34.3 32.5

Total 801

Q6 Which type of resident should be eligible for a parking permit?Housing Type VAR6 Frequency Percent Weighted Percentage

Own Residents with a private driveway, garage, or carport 799 28.0 18.9




Total 2856

Rent Residents with a private driveway, garage, or carport 112 13.1 11.6




Total 854

Live with family or friends & do not pay rent Residents with a private driveway, garage, or carport 0 0.0 0.0




Total 9

Other/NA Residents with a private driveway, garage, or carport 0 0.0 0.0




Total 10

Total Residents with a private driveway, garage, or carport 911 24.4 16.0




Total 3729

Q11 What best describes your participation in the Arlington County RPP Program?Housing Type VAR11 Frequency Percent Weighted Percentage

Own I or members of my household have a FlexPass 935 75.5 63.2




Total 1239

Rent I or members of my household have a FlexPass 130 46.6 18.4




Total 279

Live with family or friends & do not pay rent I or members of my household have a FlexPass 3 60.0 55.8




Total 5

Other/NA I or members of my household have a FlexPass 1 100.0 100.0




Total 1

Total I or members of my household have a FlexPass 1069 70.1 46.1




Total 1524

Q13 The cost of a residential parking permit should vary based on the followingHousing Type VAR13 Frequency Percent Weighted Percentage

Own Whether or not the household has access to parking 557 19.5 24.2






Total 2853

Rent Whether or not the household has access to parking 332 39.2 43.9






Total 846

Live with family or friends & do not pay rent Whether or not the household has access to parking 3 33.3 50.3






Total 9

Other/NA Whether or not the household has access to parking 4 36.4 35.9






Total 11







Total 3708

Q16 Top (3) approaches you recommend to reduce problematic RPP participant behaviorHousing Type VAR16 Frequency Percent Weighted Percentage

Own More options for reporting potential violations 283 51.7 49.4







Other 54 9.9 8.7

Total 547

Rent More options for reporting potential violations 45 40.9 33.8







Other 10 9.1 7.1

Total 110

Live with family or friends & do not pay rent More options for reporting potential violations 1 50.0 53.1







Other 0 0.0 0.0

Total 2

Other or N/A More options for reporting potential violations 1 100.0 100.0







Other 0 0.0 0.0

Total 1

Total More options for reporting potential violations 330 50.0 43.0







Other 64 9.7 8.0

Total 660


Does the household have children? VAR1 Frequency Percent

Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Yes Yes 899 91.2 84.4 1.8 80.9 87.9

No 87 8.8 15.6 1.8 12.1 19.1Total 986 100.0 100.0

No Yes 2746 84.5 77.3 1.0 75.3 79.3

No 502 15.5 22.7 1.0 20.7 24.7Total 3248 100.0 100.0

Total Yes 3645 86.1 78.5 0.9 76.8 80.2

No 589 13.9 21.5 0.9 19.8 23.2Total 4234 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 99.8%



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Yes Yes 404 44.9 26.4 1.8 22.8 30.0

No 483 53.7 70.8 2.0 67.0 74.7

I don't know 12 1.3 2.7 1.0 0.8 4.6Total 899 100.0 100.0

No Yes 1074 39.1 19.9 0.9 18.2 21.6

No 1559 56.8 72.3 1.1 70.2 74.5

I don't know 113 4.1 7.8 0.8 6.2 9.3Total 2746 100.0 100.0

Total Yes 1478 40.5 21.1 0.8 19.6 22.6

No 2042 56.0 72.1 0.9 70.2 73.9

I don't know 125 3.4 6.9 0.7 5.5 8.2Total 3645 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 99.9%


Does the household have children? VAR3a Frequency Percent

Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Yes Yes 350 86.4 76.4 4.3 68.0 84.8

No 38 9.4 15.3 3.6 8.2 22.4

No opinion 17 4.2 8.4 3.2 2.1 14.6Total 405 100.0 100.0

No Yes 928 85.9 69.2 2.7 64.0 74.4

No 107 9.9 22.2 2.5 17.2 27.1

No opinion 45 4.2 8.6 1.8 5.1 12.1Total 1080 100.0 100.0

Total Yes 1278 86.1 70.8 2.3 66.3 75.3

No 145 9.8 20.7 2.1 16.5 24.8

No opinion 62 4.2 8.6 1.6 5.5 11.6Total 1485 100.0 100.0




Frequency Missing = 3054

Household Has Children CrosstabsFrequency missing self reported number of children: 296


Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent


Does the household have children? VAR3b Frequency Percent

Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Yes Yes 135 27.3 19.7 2.1 15.6 23.8

No 243 49.1 56.1 2.8 50.7 61.5

No opinion 34 6.9 7.2 1.4 4.4 9.9


No Yes 325 19.4 13.8 1.0 11.9 15.7

No 969 57.7 61.8 1.5 58.9 64.7

No opinion 139 8.3 9.9 0.9 8.0 11.7


Total Yes 460 21.2 14.8 0.9 13.0 16.5

No 1212 55.7 60.9 1.3 58.3 63.4

No opinion 173 8.0 9.4 0.8 7.8 11.0





Q5a


Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Yes Lower the max number of permits, but keep cost same 82 23.6 32.5 4.5 23.7 41.3



Do nothing 15 4.3 3.7 1.0 1.7 5.6

No opinion 21 6.0 5.7 1.5 2.8 8.6

Other 58 16.7 15.1 2.2 10.8 19.4Total 348 100.0 100.0

No Lower the max number of permits, but keep cost same 241 26.2 28.5 2.4 23.9 33.1



Do nothing 79 8.6 7.4 1.2 5.2 9.7

No opinion 81 8.8 13.5 2.2 9.3 17.8

Other 134 14.5 13.1 1.4 10.3 15.9Total 921 100.0 100.0




Do nothing 94 7.4 6.5 0.9 4.7 8.3

No opinion 102 8.0 11.7 1.7 8.3 15.0

Other 192 15.1 13.6 1.2 11.2 16.0Total 1269 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 99.0%


Limits

for Row Percent



95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent

Q5b


Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Yes Install parking meters in areas with high demand 9 5.8 5.0 2.1 0.8 9.2



Do nothing 2 1.3 1.6 1.2 0.0 4.0

No opinion 7 4.5 4.5 2.1 0.4 8.7

Other 15 9.6 9.7 3.2 3.5 16.0Total 156 100.0 100.0

No Install parking meters in areas with high demand 24 6.4 10.7 2.5 5.7 15.6



Do nothing 5 1.3 2.2 1.2 0.0 4.6

No opinion 14 3.7 3.9 1.5 1.0 6.8

Other 25 6.7 5.6 1.6 2.5 8.8Total 374 100.0 100.0




Do nothing 7 1.3 2.1 1.0 0.1 4.0

No opinion 21 4.0 4.0 1.2 1.6 6.4

Other 40 7.5 6.5 1.4 3.7 9.4Total 530 100.0 100.0




Q5c

Does the household have children? VAR5c Frequency Percent

Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Yes Install parking meters in areas with high demand 51 10.5 12.5 1.9 8.7 16.3


Do nothing 44 9.1 10.2 1.8 6.7 13.6

No opinion 30 6.2 6.3 1.4 3.4 9.1

Other 152 31.3 30.0 2.6 25.0 35.0Total 485 100.0 100.0

No Install parking meters in areas with high demand 292 14.9 18.5 1.1 16.3 20.6


Do nothing 252 12.9 13.1 0.9 11.3 14.9

No opinion 194 9.9 10.5 0.9 8.9 12.2

Other 503 25.7 23.1 1.1 20.9 25.3Total 1957 100.0 100.0



Do nothing 296 12.1 12.6 0.8 11.0 14.3

No opinion 224 9.2 9.9 0.8 8.4 11.4

Other 655 26.8 24.1 1.0 22.1 26.1Total 2442 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 98.8%


Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent









Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Yes Visitors should be allowed to park...for a limited time 483 53.8 62.2 2.2 57.9 66.6


No opinion 43 4.8 6.0 1.1 3.8 8.2Total 898 100.0 100.0

No Visitors should be allowed to park...for a limited time 1555 56.8 66.9 1.2 64.5 69.2


No opinion 129 4.7 5.6 0.6 4.4 6.8Total 2740 100.0 100.0



No opinion 172 4.7 5.7 0.5 4.6 6.7Total 3638 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 99.0%



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Yes I prefer a flexible residential parking program structure... 520 57.8 60.5 2.3 56.0 64.9


No opinion 58 6.5 5.0 0.8 3.4 6.7Total 899 100.0 100.0

No I prefer a flexible residential parking program structure... 1458 53.3 50.7 1.3 48.2 53.3


No opinion 185 6.8 6.6 0.7 5.3 7.9Total 2736 100.0 100.0



No opinion 243 6.7 6.3 0.6 5.2 7.4Total 3635 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 99.0%



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Yes On the street 460 46.7 40.1 2.1 35.9 44.2




No On the street 1068 32.9 23.7 0.9 21.9 25.4










Response Rate 97.8%


Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Yes It was easy to find parking, and it was the right distance away 703 71.4 66.8 2.2 62.5 71.0






No It was easy to find parking, and it was the right distance away 1888 58.3 49.5 1.1 47.3 51.7














Response Rate 97.7%



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Yes My visitors used my FlexPass 118 32.0 28.8 3.1 22.7 34.9









No My visitors used my FlexPass 235 25.7 21.8 1.5 18.9 24.7


















Who Was Shown the Question Answered Yes to Q1 And Answered Yes to Q2 AND Answered Yes to Q3a


Response Rate 98.2%


Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Yes My visitors parked on the street 428 82.8 84.2 2.0 80.2 88.2




No My visitors parked on the street 1217 71.0 69.7 1.4 66.9 72.4










Response Rate 98.3%


Does the household have children? VAR12c Frequency Percent

Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Yes My visitors parked on the street 68 68.7 69.2 5.5 58.5 80.0



No My visitors parked on the street 340 55.5 54.6 2.3 50.0 59.1








Response Rate 99.1%


Limits

for Row Percent




95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Yes





street 291 29.7 25.1 1.9 21.4 28.7




No





street 901 27.9 26.2 1.0 24.2 28.2




Total





street 1192 28.3 26.0 0.9 24.2 27.8






Response Rate 96.3%

Q17


Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Yes Yes, often 12 3.0 3.7 1.6 0.5 6.9

Yes, sometimes 42 10.4 9.4 2.3 4.9 14.0

Yes, rarely 63 15.6 12.3 1.9 8.6 15.9

No 286 71.0 74.6 3.2 68.4 80.8Total 403 100.0 100.0

No Yes, often 46 4.3 2.6 0.4 1.8 3.3

Yes, sometimes 102 9.5 7.3 1.1 5.1 9.4

Yes, rarely 177 16.5 11.8 1.3 9.3 14.3

No 746 69.7 78.4 1.7 75.1 81.7Total 1071 100.0 100.0

Total Yes, often 58 3.9 2.8 0.5 1.9 3.8

Yes, sometimes 144 9.8 7.8 1.0 5.8 9.7

Yes, rarely 240 16.3 11.9 1.1 9.8 14.0

No 1032 70.0 77.5 1.5 74.6 80.5Total 1474 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 96.6%


Limits

for Row Percent



95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Yes SFD 667 67.7 52.0 2.0 48.0 56.0

SFA 189 19.2 15.7 1.5 12.8 18.5


No SFD 1302 40.2 19.9 0.4 19.1 20.7

SFA 598 18.5 10.9 0.5 9.9 12.0


Total SFD 1969 46.6 25.3 0.2 24.8 25.7

SFA 787 18.6 11.7 0.5 10.8 12.7




Response Rate 96.5%



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Yes Own 822 83.4 69.5 2.2 65.2 73.9

Rent 158 16.0 30.2 2.2 25.8 34.5


Other/NA 1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1Total 986 100.0 100.0

No Own 2228 68.7 54.3 1.1 52.1 56.5

Rent 1003 30.9 45.2 1.1 43.0 47.4


Other/NA 8 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.7Total 3244 100.0 100.0

Total Own 3050 72.1 56.8 1.0 54.9 58.7

Rent 1161 27.4 42.7 1.0 40.8 44.6


Other/NA 9 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.6Total 4230 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 96.5%



Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Yes Yes 52 5.3 6.8 1.2 4.5 9.2

No 928 94.7 93.2 1.2 90.8 95.5Total 980 100.0 100.0

No Yes 271 8.4 6.3 0.5 5.3 7.3

No 2964 91.6 93.7 0.5 92.7 94.7Total 3235 100.0 100.0

Total Yes 323 7.7 6.4 0.5 5.5 7.3

No 3892 92.3 93.6 0.5 92.7 94.5Total 4215 100.0 100.0



Response Rate 94.9%

95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent


Limits

for Row Percent




Weighted Row

Percent

Std Err of

Row

Percent

Yes Yes 158 18.5 18.8 1.8 15.3 22.3

No 347 40.5 38.9 2.2 34.7 43.2


No Yes 301 15.7 13.8 0.9 11.9 15.6

No 804 41.9 38.6 1.4 35.7 41.4


Total Yes 459 16.5 15.3 0.9 13.6 16.9

No 1151 41.5 38.7 1.2 36.3 41.0




Response Rate 99.2%

95% Confidence

Limits

for Row Percent


Documents

APPENDIX 1 - arlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com · detached, single-family attached, or multi-family), RPP program eligibility (yes –eligible to participate or no –not eligible to participate),