Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
APPENDICES
APPENDICES
Appendix 1 Member List of the Study Team
Appendix 2 Study Schedule
Appendix 3 List of Parties Concerned in the Recipient Country
Appendix 4 Minutes of Discussions 4.1 Minutes of Discussion (M/D) Preparatory Survey ① 4.2 Minutes of Discussion (M/D) Preparatory Survey ②
Appendix 5 Reference Data
5.1 Technical Note 5.2 Documents relevant to GPHA
5.2.1 Management and Operations Plan for the Sekondi Fishing Harbour
5.2.2 Indemnity for Temporal and Permanent Relocation of Kiosks due to Project Implementation
Appendix 6 Other Relevant Data and Information
6.1 Social and Environmental Considerations 6.2 Natural Condition
A-1
Appendix 1 Member List of the Study Team
(1) Preparatory Survey
Assignment Name and Position Team Leader Mr. Shunji SUGIYAMA
Senior Advisor (fisheries sector) Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
Planning Coordinator Mr. Isao KOYA Senior Advisor to the Director General Rural Development Department Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
Technical Councilor Mr. Haruhiko IGAWA Deputy Director Arid and Semi-Arid Farming Area Division 2, Rural Development Department Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
Fisheries Advisor Mr. Ken HOMMA Technical Advisor on Fisheries and Aquaculture, Expert in Cote d’Ivoire Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
Chief Consultant / Operation and Management Planning 1)
Mr. Hitoshi TAKEMOTO ECOH CORPORATION
Chief Consultant / Operation and Management Planning 1 2)
Mr. Yutaka OCHI ECOH CORPORATION
Facility Design / Fisheries Marketing
Mr. Wataru IWASAKI OAFIC Co., Ltd.
Civil Engineering Design / Cost Estimation 1)
Civil Engineering Design / Operation and Management Planning 2 2)
Mr. Kenji KUROKI ECOH CORPORATION
Natural Condition Survey 1)
Natural Condition Survey / Operation and Management Planning 3 2)
Mr. Osamu SASE ECOH CORPORATION.
Equipment Planning / Procurement Planning
Mr. Junichiro MORI OAFIC Co., Ltd.
Social and Environmental Considerations
Mr. Kazuishi WATABE ICI, Ltd.
Construction Plan / Cost Estimation 2)
Mr. Yuhei Yamamoto ECOH CORPORATION
Note
1): Preparatory Survey ①
2): Preparatory Survey ②
A-2
Appendix 2 Study Schedule
(1) Preparatory Survey ①
Shunji SUGIYAMA Isao KOYA Haruhiko IGAWA Ken Homma Hitoshi TAKEMOTO Wataru IWASAKI Kazuishi WATABE Osamu SASE Kenji KUROKI Junichiro MORI
(a) Leader (b) Technical councilor (c) Planning Coordinator (d) Fisheries Advisor(a) Chief Consultant/
O&M Planning(b) Facility Design/Fisheries Marketing
(f) Social and EnvironmentalConsiderations
(d) Natural Conditions Survey(c) Civil Engineering Design/
Cost Estimation(e) Equipment Planning/Procurement Planning
1 6/30 Sun
2 7/1 Mon
3 7/2 Tue
4 7/3 WedGPHA HQ on Env ironmental Survey ,
Courtesy Call to Min. of Fisheries
Custon Clearance of Current Meter,
Negotiation of Sub-contract of Natural
Condition Surv ey
5 7/4 Thu
Accra to Sekondi
Field Reconnaissance,
Courtesy Call to Sekondi Office
Meeting w / Min. of Fisheries and Data
Collection
Env ironmental Surv ey (Regulation,
Procedure and Schedule)
Accra to Sekondi
Field Reconnaissance,
Courtesy Call to Sekondi Office
6 7/5 FriCourtesy Call to GPHA Takoradi Office,
City Counsil and Sekondi Naval Port
Accra to Sekondi
Field Reconnaissance of
Sekondi Fishing Port
Env ironmental Surv ey (Regulation,
Procedure and Schedule)
Courtesy Call to GPHA Takoradi Office,
City Counsil and Sekondi naval Port
7 7/6 SatAccra to Sekondi
Field ReconnaissanceTidal Current Survey (1st) Narita 22:00 (EK319) to
8 7/7 Sun Abidjan to Accra
Tidal Current Survey (2st)
Meeting on Baseline Survey ,
Survey on Berthing Boats
Dubai 04:55, Dubai 07:30
(EK787) to Accra 12:00
9 7/8 Mon 〇
Preparation for Stakeholder Meeting,
Data Collection of GPHA Takoradi and
Fisheries Office
Preparation for stakeholder meeting
Data Collection of Fisheries Office,
Visit to Cold Strage Company
Preparation for Stakeholder Meeting,
Data Collection of GPHA Takoradi
Data Collection on Natural Condition,
Consultation of Local Survey Company
Accra to Sekondi
Field Reconnaissance
10 7/9 TueCourtesy Call to Fishing Harbour Office,
Site Visit, Team Meeting
11 7/10 WedData Collection on Natural Condition,
Superv ision of Sub-contracted Surv eys
Stakeholder Plenary Meeting (1st),
Site Survey
12 7/11 ThuStakeholder Meeting,
Survey on Resettlement
Data Collection on Natural Condition,
Superv ision of Sub-contracted Surv eys
Stakeholder Meeting,
Site Survey
13 7/12 FriData Collection on Natural Condition,
Superv ision of Sub-contracted Surv eys
Stakeholder Meeting,
Site Survey
14 7/13 SatData Collection on Natural Condition,
Superv ision of Sub-contracted Surv eys
Stakeholder Meeting,
Site Survey
15 7/14 SunSite Survey ,
Sekondi to Accra, Team meeting
Data Collection on Natural Condition,
Superv ision of Sub-contracted Surv eysNarita 22:00 (EK319) to
Sekondi to Accra,
Team Meeting
16 7/15 Mon Superv ision of Baseline SurveyDubai 04:55, Dubai 07:30 (EK787)
to Accra 12:00
Survey on Ice Factory and
Fish Market
17 7/16 Tue Data Colletion at Min. of FisheriesDiscussion and Preparation of
Minutes of Discussion
Superv ision of Sub-contracted Surv eys
Sekondi to Accra
Request relatd to Cost Estimation to
Construction Company
Estimation Request of
Material Unit Prices
18 7/17 Wed Data Colletion at Min. of FisheriesData Collection on
Env ironmental AspectsData Collection on Natural Condition
Request relatd to Cost Estimation to
Construction Company
Survey at Ice Factory and
Fish Market
19 7/18 Thu Data Colletion at Min. of FisheriesData Collection on
Env ironmental AspectsData Collection on Natural Condition
Request for Construction Machinery and
Material Unit Prices
Survey at Ice Factory and
Fish Market
20 7/19 Fri Data Colletion at Min. of FisheriesData Collection on
Env ironmental Aspects
Accra to Sekondi
Superv ision of Sub-contracted Surv eys
Request for Construction Material and
Unit Prices
Meeting at GPHA HQ
Survey on Ice Factory in Tema Port
Survey on Procurement
21 7/20 SatFrankfurt 05:20
Frankfurt 13:50 (LH710) toAccra 17:35 (EK788) to Accra 20:50 (KQ509) to Accra →Abidjan Data Collection and Processing
Data Collection on Food Hygiene and
Fishing GearsData Collection and Processing
Data Collection on Natural Condition,
Superv ision of Sub-contraccted Surveys
22 7/21 Sun Narita 07:50 Dubai 05:50 Nairobi 05:45Data Collection and Processing,
Team Meeting
Visit to Fish Landing Beach,
Team Meeting
Data Collection and Processing,
Team MeetingSurvey on ice Making Facilities
23 7/22 Mon Dubai 02:50 (EK318) to
Narita 17:35
Data Collection at Min. of Treasury
and Min. of Transport
Visist to Ministry of Fisheries, GSA
Fisheries, Visit Bureau and FDB
Data Collection and Interv iew Survey
on Env ironmental Aspects
Data Collection on Natural Condition,
Superv ision of Sub-contraccted Surveys
Interv iew at Fishing Harbour Office,
Site Survey
Survey on ice Making Facilities
Site Survey
24 7/23 Tue ●Consultation w / Sub-consultant
Visit to Min. of Transport
Data Collection on Food Hygiene and
Fishing Gears
Data Collection and Interv iew Survey
on Env ironmental Aspects
Berthing Boat Observation,
Superv ision of Sub-contraccted Surveys
Survey on Berthing Boats
and their Drafts
Survey on Ice Factory in Tema Port
Survey on Procurement
25 7/24 Wed Accra to SekondiData Collection at Min. of Fisheries,
Consultation on Seminor
Accra to Sekondi
Meeting w/ GPHA Sekondi
Data Collection on Natural Condition,
Superv ision of Sub-contraccted Surveys
Visit to Slipway in Takoradi,
Meeting w / GPHA Takorad
Survey on Ex isting Ice Making
Facilities, Procurement Survey
26 7/25 ThuSite Confirmation Survey ,
Superv ison on Baseline Survey
Data Collection at Min. of Fisheries,
Consultation on Seminor
Data Collection and Interv iew Survey
on Env ironmental AspectsSekondi to Accra
Observ ation of Quarry Site, Surv ey on
Cost Estimation, Superv ision on Sub-
contracted Survey s
Survey on Ex isting Ice Making
Facilities, Site Survey
27 7/26 FriSite Confirmation Survey ,
Land Owner Boundry SurveyAccra to Sekondi v ia Elmina
Data Collection and Interv iew Surv ey ,
Land Ow ner Boundary Survey
Data Collection on Natural Condition
(Meteo. Conditon)
Visit to Ghana Cement Co. and Ready
Mix ed Concrete Co.,
Superv ision of Sub-contractor
Procurement Survey on Construction
Material and Equipment,
Survey on Ice Making Facilities
28 7/27 Sat Site Survey Accra 17:35 (EK788) toRequest for Construction Material
and Unit Prices
Survey on Ice Making Facilities,
Procurement and Cost Survey
29 7/28 Sun Site Survey Dubai 05:50Request for Construction Material
and Unit Prices
Survey on Ice Making Facilities,
Procurement and Cost Survey
30 7/29 MonVisit to STMA
Visit to Sekondi Tradutuibak Council
Consultation on Seminor,
Collection of Fishery Policy
Visit to STMA
Visit to Sekondi Tradutuibak Council
Dubai 02:50 (EK318) to
Narita 17:35
Request for Construction Material
and Unit Prices
Survey on Ice Making Facilities,
Procurement and Cost Survey
31 7/30 TueSeminar Perticipation,
Site Survey
Field Survey on Adjacent Fish
Landing BeachSeminar Perticipation
32 7/31 WedStakeholder Meeting related to
Resettlement
Request for Construction Material
and Unit Prices
Survey on Ice Making Facilities,
Procurement and Cost Survey
33 8/1 Thu Site SurveySite Survey ,
Interv iew with Stakeholders
Stakeholder Meeting related to Fuel
Retailer
Request for Construction Machinery
Lease, Visit to Meteo. Office
Survey on Ice Making Facilities,
Procurement and Cost Survey
34 8/2 FriConsultation at Fishing Harbour Office
(Technical Note)
Site Survey ,
Interv iew with StakeholdersConsultation w / GPHA Takoradi Accra to Sekondi Accra 17:35 (EK788) to
35 8/3 SatSite Surv ey ,
Superv ision on Baseline Surveys
Site Survey ,
Interv iew with Stakeholders
Preparation of Monitoring Form
and IEE of Env iromental Aspects
Data Collection of Construction and
Material Costs, Supev ision of Sub-
contracted Surveys
Dubai 05:50
36 8/4 SunData Collection of Construction and
Material Costs, G.M. of GPHA
Dubai 02:50 (EK318) to
Narita 17:35
37 8/5 MonSite Surv ey ,
Meeting w / Sub-consultant
Meeting w / Fire Dept. and Electricity
Depts. of GPHA TakoradiSite Survey
Data Collection of Construction and
Material Costs, Berthing Boat Survey
38 8/6 TueMeeting at GPHA HQ
Sekondi to Accra
Meeting on Baseline Survey ,
Sekondi to Kumasi
Site Survey ,
Sekondi to AccraSekondi to Accra
39 8/7 Wed 〇Data Collection at Min. of Transort,
Tax Exemtion Procedure
Fish Distribution Survey in Kumashi,
Kumashi to Accra
Consultation at Env ironmental Control
Administration
Data Collection of Construction and
Material Costs
40 8/8 ThuTeam Meeting, Preparation
of Field Report
41 8/9 FriReport to Japanese Embassy
and JICA Office
42 8/10 Sat Accra 17:35 (EK788) to
43 8/11 Sun Dubai 05:50
44 8/12 Mon Dubai 02:50 (JL5096) to
Narita 17:35
Consultation at Sekondi Fishing Harbour Office,
Site survey
Site Survey ,
Meeting on Baseline Survey
Stakeholder Meeting (related to Distribution),
Site Surv ey
Site Survey on Sekondi Fishing Horbour,
Sekondi to Elmina to Accra v ia Other Fish Landing Site, Team meeting
Consultation on Baseline Surv ey ,
Sekondi to Accra, Team Meeting
Visit of Tema Fishing Harbour, Meeting at GPHA HQ, Visit to KAWASHO FOODS Ghana Office,
Preparation of Draft of Minutes of Discussion, Team Meeting
Visit of Tema Fishing Harbour, Meeting at GPHA HQ,
Preparation of Draft of Minutes of Discussion, Team Meeting
Stakeholder Meeting (related to Processing),
Site Surv ey
Courtesy Call to Ministry of Fisheries, Visit at Tema Fishing Harbour,
Visit to KAWASHO FOODS Ghana Office
Visit to Acuaculture Centers and Firms, Preparing Report, Team Meeting
Sekondi to Accra
Reporting and Consulting on Survey Breif to G.M. of GPHA and Port Masters fo Sekondi and Takoradi Ports
Team Meeting, Preparation of Field Report
Report to Japanese Embassy and JICA Office
Accra 17:35 (EK788) to
Dubai 05:50
Dubai 02:50 (EK318) to Narita 17:35
Site Survey , Consultation on Baseline Surv ey Contents
Interv iew w ith Stakeholders
Site Survey , Consultation on Baseline Surv ey Contents
Interv iew w ith Stakeholders
Site Survey ,
Interv iew w ith Stakeholders
Repot to Japanese Embassy , Report to JICA Office
(Team Leader: Accra 20:45 (LH567) to )
Discussion of Minutes of Discussion,
Visit to Aquacultural Center, Team Meeting
Wrap-up Meeting, Signing of Minutes of Discussion, Report Preparation, Team Meeting
Observation and Situation Management of Baseline Survey
Tidal current survey (2nd)
Site Survey of Sekondi Fishing Horbour, Takoradi Fish Landing Beach and Market,
Stakeholder Meeting (related to Distribution), Team Meeting
Site Survey of , Wrap up Meeting on Sekondi Fishing Horbour,
Stakeholder Meeting (related to Processing), Team Meeting
Accra to Sekondi
Courtesy Call to Japanese Embassy
Accra to Sekondi, Team meetingSite survey , Data Processing, Team Meeting
Site Survey of Sekondi Fishing Horbour, Consultation of Horbour Master,
Stakeholder Plenary Meeting (1st)
Stakeholder Meeting (Fishery Related Person)
Survey on Fisheries Facilities and Visit to Fisheries Related Organization
Stakeholder Meeting (Fishery Related Person),
Site Survey
Narita 22:00 (EK319) to
Dubai 04:55, Dubai 07:30 (EK787) to Accra 12:00
Courtesy Call to JICA Office and GPHA HQ, Meeting at GPHA HQ (Inception, Questionnaires)
Narita 22:00 (EK319) to
Dubai 03:50, Dubai 07:30 (EK787) to Accra 12:00
Courtesy Call to GPHA HQ, Min. of Transport and Min. of Fisheries
Courtesy Call to JICA Office
Day
Date
T
i
d
e
JICA members Consultants
Republic Day
to Narita
Republic Day
A-3
(2) Preparatory Survey ②
No. Date
JICA Member Consultant
Shunji SUGIYAMA
Haruhiko IGAWA
Yutaka OCHI Wataru IWASAKI
Kazuishi WATABE
Kenji KUROKI
Day Date Team Leader Planning Coordinator
Chief Consultant/Operation
and Management Planning
Facility Design / Fisheries
Marketing
Equipment Planning /
Procurement Planning
Civil Engineering
Design / Cost
Estimation
1 12/14 Sat Narita→
2 12/15 Sun Accra Dubai Accra
Team meeting
3 12/16 Mon Meeting with JICA Office Meeting with Min. of Tranport Moving: Accra Sekondi
Moving: Sekondi Meeting with GPHA Takoradi office
4 12/17 Tue Report Explanation to Takoradi Harbour and Sekondi Fishing Harbour concerned, Stakeholder Meeting, Moving: Sekondi Accra
5 12/18 Wed Discussion on Draft Report and Minutes with MOT, MOT, MOFAD, GPHA
6 12/19 Thu Preparing of Report, Team Meeting
7 12/20 Fri Meeting with GPHA Discussion and Signing Minutes of Meeting, Reporting to JICA Office
8 12/21 Sat Accra
9 12/22 Sun Dubai Dubai
10 12/23 Mon Narita Narita
A-4
Appendix 3 List of Parties Concerned in the Recipient Country
(1) Government Offices
1) Ministry of Transport (MOT)
Joyce A. B. Mogkui Hon. Deputy Minister
Selby Twumasi-Ankra Chief Director
Siisi E. Ocran Director, Policy and Planning
Alhaji Ibrahim Tyani Director, Finance
2) Ministry of Fisheries and Aquaculture Development (MOFAD)
Hon. Nayon Bilijo Minister
Matilda Quist Director of Marine Resources
Emmanuel Aryee Director of Inland Fishing
Cecilia Erzuah Director of Finance
Samuel Quaatey Director of Fishery Commission
Thomas Insaidoo Deputy Director of Fisheries Commission
Rebecca Amooh Aboagye Ministry Officer
Alex Sarbah Regional Director of Fisheries Commission/ Takoradi
Paul Bannerman Head of Marine Research
3) Ministry of Finance (MOF)
Kwadwo Awua-Peasah Director, External Resources Mobilization/Bilateral
David Quist Deputy Director
Edward Yeboah Program Officer
Philip Ihompson Tax Policy Unit
4) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Lawrence Kotoe Programme Officer
Ebenzer K.Appah-Sampong Director of Planning, Programming, Monitoring & Evaluation
Hakeem Seidu Western Regional Officer
5) Forestry Commission (FC)
Nana Kofi Adu-nsiah Executive Director
6) Lands Commission (LC) Western Region
Stephen Oduro-Kwarteng Division Head
7) Naval Base Sekondi
G.K. Zowonoo, Cdr. FOC (WNC)
E. Osei, Cdr. CO WTTS
W. Nyasembi, Cdr. CTO (WNC)
S. Walker, GN., Capt. A/ FOF
E. Adu, GN., Capt. COO (WNC)
A-5
A. Kennedy, S/LT. SEC/ FOC
8) Sekondi-Takoradi Metropolitan Assembly (STMA)
Hon Anthony R. Cudjoe Metro Chief Executive
Jacob A. Ntiamoah Dev. Planning
Isaac Affum Physical Planning
Anthony Moses Budget & Rating
Opoku Boateng Assistant P. R. O
Henry Owusu Metro Div. Planning Officer
John Gorkeh-Miah Waste Management Department
(2) Ghana Ports and Harbours Authority (GPHA)
1) Tema Head Quarter
Richard A-Y Anamoo Director-General
James Owusu-Koranteng, Capt. Ag. Director General
Komla Wogbemase Ofori, Ing. Project Engineer
Abraham Mensah General Manager of Administration
Mike Greffin General Manager of Special Project
James Benjamin Gaisie Manager of Port Estate and Environment
2) Takoradi Office
James Owusu-Koranteng, Capt. Ag. Director General
Alhaji Husein Suleman General Manager (Engineering)
Robert Darku Personal & Admin Manager
Tebon Zumah Financial Manager
K. Asamoah, Ing. Port Civil Engineer
David K.S. Halm Ag. Estate & Environment Manager
Mathew Nunoo Ag. Audit Manager
Samuel Ohene Amoako Marketing
3) Sekondi Office
Peter Guzee Cudjoe Fishing Harbour Manager / Sekondi Fishing Port
(3) Private Company
Danny Kirk-Mensah Chief Executive/Chairman, Mass Fisheries
Goichi Fujita Representative Kawasho Foods Ghana Office
(4) Japanese Parties
1) Embassy of Japan in Ghana
Shinichi Honda First secretary
Hirohumi Kurata Second Secretary
A-6
2) JICA Ghana Office
Koji Makino Chief Representative
Jiro Inamura Former Chief Representative
Hiroshi Sumiyoshi Senior Representative
Huyuki Sagara Former Senior Representative
Hajime Usukura Assistant Resident Representative
Osamu Sakurai Project Formulation Advisor (Infrastructure)
Yasutaka Nagatomo Local Consultant (Infrastructure)
A-7
Appendix 4 Minutes of Discussions (M/D)
Appendix 4.1 Minutes of Discussions (Preparatory Survey ①, July 2013)
A-8
A-9
A-10
A-11
A-12
A-13
A-14
A-15
A-16
A-17
A-18
A-19
A-20
A-21
A-22
A-23
A-24
A-25
Appendix 4.2 Minutes of Discussion (Preparatory Survey ②, December 2013)
A-26
A-27
A-28
A-29
CONFIDENTIAL
A-30
Appendix 5 Reference Data
Appendix 5.1 Technical Notes(T/N) (Preparatory Survey ①, August 2013)
A-31
A-32
Appendix 5.2 Documents relevant to GPHA
5.2.1 Management and Operations Plan for the Sekondi Fishing Harbour (November 11, 2013)
A-33
A-34
A-35
A-36
A-37
A-38
A-39
A-40
A-41
5.2.2 Indemnity for Temporal and Permanent Relocation of Kiosks due to Project
Implementation
A-42
Appendix 6 Other Relevant Data and Information
Appendix 6.1 Social and Environmental Considerations
1. Environmental Impact Assessment
1-1 General Project Components Affecting Environmental and Social Aspects
The major Project components requested by the Government of Ghana are, improvement of
existing lay-by wharf, construction of access driveway, renovation of administration compound,
construction of additional ice making facilities and pavement of in-port road. The followings
briefly describe the contents of the Project’s components.
(1) Improvement of Existing Lay-By Wharf
There are sunken vessels abandoned near the existing lay-by wharf. These vessels will not
only be nuisance for Project’s construction activities also cause some trouble if they are salvaged
and scrapped without permission from their owner. Those vessels may also cause nuisance during
construction period especially for the mooring spaces for canoes and inshore fishery vessels
which utilize the existing Sekondi Harbour.
(2) Construction of Additional Ice Making Facilities
There are several used boat engines, which are left on the back yard of existing ice making
facilities, will be cleared upon the construction phase. It may cause trouble if they are cleared and
scrapped without permission of their owners.
(3) Pavement of In-Port Road
The Project plans to connect the existing in-port roads to access road. There are several fuel
tanks, which are set on the ground close to the existing in-port road, have no appropriate fences
which prohibit the intruders. This situation poses a safety hazardous issue thus it is essential for
the Government of Ghana to plan the amalgamation of the fuel tanks and setting appropriate
fences for safety reasons.
(4) Construction of Access Driveway
The existence of the sunken vessels, of which may cause some trouble if they are salvaged
and scrapped without permission from owner of vessels, will also pose nuisance for the
construction of an access driveway. Moreover, construction of the access road will cause temporal
relocation of existing several small shops called “kiosk” and “container”.
(5) Renovation of Administration Compound
As the result of renovation of administration compound which will have toilet sewerage, will
cause water contamination.
A-43
1-2 Project Back Ground of Social Aspects
The Project site locates at municipality of STMA of Western Region. The table below shows
the basic data for socio-economic aspects.
Table A6.1(1) Western Region and STMA’s Socio-economic Data
Western Region’s Area size & Population
Area size:23,921 km2
Population:2,376,021( year 2012) Number of household: 553,635 (year 2012) Average person per household: 4.2 (year 2012)
Population growth rate:2.0% ( year 2012 )General Socio-economic Indicator
GDP per capita (whole country):1,475US$( year 2010) Unemployment rate (whole country):3.6 % (year 2006) Average longevity at birth (whole country):64(year 2010) Literacy rate (Western region):70.8% (year 2012)
HIV /AIDS (Western region):4.6% (year 2004) Number of hospitals, clinics, school in STMA
Number of primary schools:166(year 2012) Number of secondary schools:164(year 2012) Number of tertiary schools:6(year 2012) Number of clinics:4 (year 2012) Number of hospitals:4 (year 2012)
Source:Ghana national census of year 2012 & Data provided by STMA
Table A6.1(2) STMA’s Population and Number of Households by Districts
Name of district Area size
(km²)
Population
(person)
Number of
households
Kwesimintsim 66.6 232,617 59,071
Takoradi 83.2 97,352 24,440
Sekondi 16.6 70,361 19,176
Essikadu-Ketan 12.9 159,218 39,873
TOTAL 179.3 559,548 142,560
Source:Ghana national census of year 2010
Important items, which shall be noted from an environmental and social consideration point
of view, are briefly summarized below.
(1) Temporal and Permanent Relocation of Kiosks and Container
Temporal Relocation of Kiosks and Container
The Project plans to construct the access road from the existing canoe jetty to southward
along the shoreline. The construction of the road will require temporal and permanent relocation
of several small shops called “kiosks” and “containers” thus a meeting was held by GPHA to
discuss the temporal relocation places and procedures with the participants on 13th, July, 2013
while the Study Team conducted survey at the Sekondi Harbour.
GPHA has carried out surveys to figure out the number of kiosks and containers which will
be subject to temporal relocation including the size, selling items and name of owners as well as
A-44
the places for the temporal relocation and the possible assistance such as provision of forklift
GPHA. As the result, GPHA has found that there would be 15 kiosks and containers owned by
13 people for the temporal relocation. GPHA explained the results of the survey to the
participants at the meeting held for the consultation for temporal relocation and could reach
agreement for the procedure of temporal relocation on 1st, August, 2013. GPHA would provide
temporal relocation places which locate in Sekondi Harbour and could accommodate all of them.
It has also been anticipated that 11 of them would be able to return the original places upon the
completion of the construction of access road. The followings briefly describe the small shops
which will be anticipated for permanent relocation upon the completion of the access road.
Permanent Relocation of Kiosks and Container
Among the above 15 small shops, 3containers and one kiosk have been anticipated for
permanent relocation upon the completion of the access road. The four small shops (3containers
and one kiosk) would be able to shift to some of the spaces within Sekondi Harbour which could
accommodate for them. GPHA also plans to provide forklift as well as some staff to drive it.
Indemnity
GPHA is going to indemnify all matters to the people suffering from the new location place,
relocation means, non-business period caused by the relocation in conjunction with “Temporal
and Permanent Relocation of Kiosks and Containers” in this project and so described in attached
Appendix 5.2.2 .
(2) Clearance of Sunken Vessels
Several sunken vessels left on the Sekondi Harbour will be salvaged and scrapped upon the
commencement of construction activities. GPHA has held meetings to explain about the clearance
of those sunken vessels by the following procedures to canoe owners and inshore vessel owners.
GPHA has succeeded to reach agreement with those people to do so.
First, GPHA will contact vessels owners to remove sunken vessels. If they agree to remove
them within a time frame, then they would be no problem.
If vessel owners don’t agree due to some constraints, still GPHA would insist on the removal of
the vessels. If they say they cannot remove and they give up ownership of the vessels, then
GPHA would salvage them, then scrap them or otherwise.
(3) Clearance of Abandoned Vessels
Abandoned vessels left on the ground of both Old Beach area and sandy beach located
northward from the harbour will be cleared by the following procedures which are explained by
GPHA, and agreed by the canoe owners and inshore vessel owners attended at meetings held by
GPHA.
A-45
1) Abandoned Inshore Vessels
The Ghana Inshore Fisheries Association (GIFA) would inform all vessels owners about the
removal of their abandon vessels within a time frame.
If they don’t agree to remove them after the stipulated time then GPHA and GIFA would mark
them and demolish them and give the woods to the fish smokers to be used as fire wood or give
the woods to the prison service.
2) Abandoned Canoes at Old Beach
The chief fisherman would inform all abandon canoe owners for the removal of their canoes
with in a given time.
If they don’t remove them and the time elapses then GPHA and the chief fisherman would
mark the abandon canoes and demolish them and give to the local people for firewood.
(4) Removal of Engines
The following procedures of clearance of used boat engines left on the west side of ice
making facilities were explained by GPHA to the inshore boat owners attended meetings also
held by GPHA.
Ghana Inshore Fisheries Association (GIFA) to inform boat owners to remove all engines.
If they don’t remove them then GPHA and GIFA would remove them from the harbour with in
one (1) month, and sell them as scraps to defray the cost of fuel used by the forklift and the
truck hired.
(5) Removal of Existing Fuel Tanks
Altogether of 15 fuel tanks at Sekondi Harbour will be cleared upon the commencement of
construction activities. GPHA has held meetings with existing fuel dealers to discuss the issue.
GPHA has explained that GPHA planned to install two fuel tanks upon the completion of new
harbour but has not been able to reach agreement with them. GPHA plans to continue dialogue
with them by holding some meetings in order to reach agreement.
(6) Present Situation of Waste Treatment and Sewerage Treatment at Sekondi Harbour
As the results of our interview survey and field survey conducted during this mission, the
following key items have been revealed.
There are mainly three sewerage pipes flushing sewerage directly into seawater of Sekondi
Harbour. Currently, GPHA plans to divert sewerage water to prevent this sewerage water from
flowing directly into Sekondi Harbour based on the results of discussion between GPHA and
STMA.
Toilet sewerage of both Takoradi and Sekondi Harbour will be collected into one cesspit at
each of the harbour. The toilet sewerage is regularly transported and treated at the STMA’s
designated are by GPHA’s trucks. Frequency of the treatment is almost daily basis during high
A-46
fishing season and 3times per week during low fishing season. The cost of the treatment is
20GHC per unit and the expense is paid to STMA. Total frequency of treatment for both of two
harbours is approximately 50-70 units per week.
Used boat engines left on the west side of ice making facilities supposed to be re-used as spare
parts of engines, however, it seemed that they were hardly used.
There are at least of around 100 households living on Old Beach. The Project has no plan to
construct or install some things over there thus it will be NO involuntary resettlement caused
by the implementation of the Project.
GPHA has been entrusted the task of cleaning of harbour, collection of garbage and mowing
grass to some private entities. Total cost of these tasks is approximately 3,000 GHC per month.
Transporting and dumping of the garbage is also entrusted to some private entities. It costs
GPHA approximately altogether 9,000GHC per month for the two harbours.
Water quality monitoring has not been carried out at Sekondi Harbour. However, GPHA did the
water quality sampling once in year 2010, but it was hard to collect the results.
(7) STMA’s Dumping Site
Toilet sewerage and garbage/ wastes are transported and dumped at the STMA’s designated
area by the private entities entrusted by GPHA. The dumping area was constructed by World
Bank’s assistance and was completed in 2010. The dumping area, which is called Sofokrom
(Engineer Landfill Site) with approximately 36ha of surface area and located 7km onward to
Accra from the Project site, has a capacity of accommodating all kinds of wastes including
industrial hazardous wastes except for the medical wastes up until year 2025. Garbage is sorted
by the following three categories at Sofokrom except for the medical wastes.
Solid wastes (general garbage: both organic wastes and nonorganic wastes): Some private
individual come to visit to separate plastics, bins, wooden materials, concrete materials, metals
which are worth to sell as recycled materials.
Liquid wastes mostly toilet sewerage: 6 pools for processing and 2 pools for the final
processing are installed.
Industrial hazardous wastes (oil, contaminated soil with heavy metals): The site is ready to be
sealed for several layers by the special plastic protection sheets for each of the waste. This is
the place for the sledge of Sekondi Harbour generated by construction activities will be treated.
1-3 Outline of Relevant Agency Responsible for Environmental and Social Considerations
(1) Outline of Relevant Agency Responsible for Environmental and Social Considerations
The Ministry of Science and Environment has Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),
which is the Ghana Government’s main body responsible for environmental conservation and its
policy, related laws and regulations, coordination and assessment of policies on environment. EPA
was established based on the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Act (Act 490) in 1994.
A-47
Environmental Assessment Regulations LI1652, which plays a basic role for implementing EIA
process, was officially enforced in 1999.
EPA’s organization chart is shown on the figure A6.1(1). EIA contents are assessed by EPA’s
Environmental Assessment and Audit Department coming under Environmental Compliance and
Enforcement Division. EPA headquarter executes the task of registration of project proponents,
review of scoping reports and TOR approval. There are 20 staff allocated at Environmental
Compliance & Enforcement Division, and EPA’s 13 regional offices handle for field survey for
the registered projects for the environmental permit. Overall, there is 360 staff at all of the EPA
offices. Breakdown of the 13 regional offices is 10 regional offices, one regional office in Accra,
one in Tema and another one in Takuwa.
(2) Related Laws and Regulations
The followings are the related laws and regulations in view of environmental and social
consideration.
(a) Environmental Management
Environmental Protection Agency Act (Act 490), 1994
Environmental Assessment Regulations (LI 1652), 1999
(b) Air Pollution
Management of Ozone depleting Substances and Products Regulations (LI 1812), 2005
(c) Water Quality
Ghana Water and Sewerage Corporation Act (Act 310), 1965
Water Resources Commission Act (Act 522), 1996
(d) Wastes Management
Abandoned Property (Disposal) Act, 1974
Local Government Act (Act 462), 1993
Mercury Act, 1989
(e) Fisheries
Fisheries Act (Act 625), 2002
Fisheries Regulations (LI 1968), 2010
(f) Nature Environment
Forest Plantation Development Fund Act(Act 583), 2000
Wild Animals Preservation Act (Act 43), 1961
(g) Land Acquisition
Lands Commission Act (Act 483), 1994
Town and Country Planning Act, 1945
(h) Labour
Labour Act, 2003
Labour Regulations, 2007
A-48
Source:JICA Study Report on Ghana Kumasi Urban Development Project (2011) and JICA Preliminary Study
Report on BOP Business in Ghana (2013)
Source:EPA
Figure A6.1(1) Organization Chart of EPA
(3) Ghana’s Procedure of Environmental Requirements
Project proponents are required to obtain an environmental permit issued by EPA to
implement projects. Ghana’s Environmental Assessment Regulations are applied upon the
assessment of the required procedures set out by EPA. There are 37 project items required to
obtain the permit listed by the regulations. As for the Project, item No 22 for construction of
roads and infrastructure including sewerage treatment facilities and hydroelectric power stations,
No 31 for land reclamation of water bodies, No 32 for construction of fisheries infrastructure such
as fishing harbours, are related to the procedures of obtaining the permit.
Ghana’s responsible government agency for the execution of environmental policy,
environmental conservation and its laws is EPA which is described on the above section.
Ghana’s Environmental Assessment Regulations list up the projects for each sector being for
subject to the assessment and EPA judges the environmental category based on the regulations.
The procedures of assessment of the project proponent’s application of the permit and issuing the
permit are shown on the figure A6.1(2) below.
A-49
Source:EPA
Figure A6.1(2) Procedures of EPA Environmental Permit
The environmental category judged by EPA has two folds, which are Schdule-1 and
Schdule-2. Schdule-1 is designated for the projects which generate minor or negligible negative
impacts, whereas Schdule-2 for the projects which generate some or serious negative impacts.
EIA is obligated to carry out for the Schdule-2, whereas Schdule-1 is not required EIA.
It normally takes 90 working days which is equal to 18 weeks for the assessment of EIA by
EPA plus some more days to be prepared EIA by project proponents. Length of preparation of
EIA varies depending on the project proponents and the scale of the projects. Upon conducting
EIA which is instructed by EPA to project proponents, a public consultation is required to hold at
either the time of scoping reports preparation period or preparation of EIA reports. When submit
the results of the public consultation report to EPA, the results must show the minutes of meeting
and list up all the participants’ name, address and contact phone number.
Ghana’s Environmental Assessment Regulations, 1999 do not include the clear guideline of
social aspects such as, of involuntary resettlement, impacts to people in poverty, gender issues
A-50
and rights of children. However, along the process of conducting EIA and obtaining the EPA’s
environmental permit, project proponents are obligated to deal with the issues of these social
aspects plus wide range of environmental issues such as pollution controls. For instance, on the
event of relocation of residents and commercial facilities occupying the site illegally, EIA process
requires to project proponents to deal with these issues. The compensation of these people will be
either the payment of cash equivalent value for each case or providing alternative places and
houses for living or commercial facilities to continue business. Discrepancy of the compensation
for relocation between the illegal residents / commercial facilities and legal residents /
commercial facilities is that the payment is calculated based on the assessment of each of the
house and commercial facility and this automatically sets out the discrepancy because the illegal
ones are relatively low value due to the nature of the houses and facilities.
As for the related ports and harbour construction projects, which has been through EPA’s
environmental permit procedures, Study Team could collect some documents of Takoradi Harbour
Reconstruction Project in 2012 implemented by GPHA and the Londhro Port Development
Project included the oil refinery facilities implemented by some private entity.
1-4 Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)
The project has carried out Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) with GPHA staff, and
proposed monitoring items and contents for the aspects on the environmental and social
consideration together with the planning of the environmental check list. The following describes
the results of IEE and the contents of negative impacts on the aspects of environmental and social
consideration.
(1) Environmental Category
The Project will not have serious negative impacts on the aspects of environmental and
social consideration. However, the Project will cause some negative impacts on the aspects thus
the Project is judged to be Category B for JICA’s environmental and social consideration
guideline.
(2) Anticipated Negative Impacts
Implementation process of the Project will cause some negative impacts on both
environment and social aspects at and around the project site. The table shown below is the
results of the impacts assessment.
A-51
Table A6.1(3) Possible Adverse Impacts N
o
Likely Impacts Reason and Description
Rat
ing
Pri
or t
o an
d D
urin
g
Con
stru
ctio
n
Ope
rati
on P
hase
Pollution
1 Air pollution During the reconstruction of the Sekondi Harbour, operation of heavy vehicles and machineries will generate dust and gas emission thus it will cause air pollution. The Project will not cause any air pollution upon the completion of new fishing harbour.
B- D
2 Water contamination Construction activities such as, on the existing lay-by wharf will cause water contamination to the sea around the Project site.
Operation of the new Sekondi Harbour will generate sewerage water which will affect water quality around the project site if it is untreated.
The Project requested GPHA to manage the existing three sewerage pipes at Old Beach area, which are the major source of sewerage effluents to the Sekondi Harbour. GPHA will divert sewerage water to prevent from flowing into the Sekondi Harbour. Thus this treatment will reduce the water contamination at Sekondi Harbour.
B- B-
3 Wastes Construction process will generate waste. Some of them will be recycled and the rest will be carried to STMA waste dumping site.
Operation of the new Sekondi Harbour, harbour users and visitors may litter some garbage around the site.
B- B-
4 Soil contamination Construction activities will generate sledge from the harbour sediment thus it will cause soil contamination. No soil contamination is anticipated upon the operation of new harbour.
B- D
5 Noise and vibration During the construction of the new Sekondi Harbour, operation of heavy vehicles and machineries will generate noise and vibration in and around the proposed project site.
Operation of the new Sekondi Harbour, increase of noise and vibration around the site will not occur.
B- D
6 Ground subsidence No ground subsidence is anticipated. D D
7 Offensive odour During the construction and operation of the new Sekondi Harbour, some of organic materials will cause offensive odour if they are left untreated.
B- B-
8 Bottom Sediment No negative impacts on bottom sediment are anticipated. D D
Nature Environment
9 Protected Area The Project site does not encompass to any of the protected areas. D D
10 Fauna and flora and biodiversity
No negative impacts on fauna and flora and biodiversity are anticipated. No coral reef has been found around Sekondi region. D D
11 Hydrological situation No negative impacts on hydrological situation are anticipated. D D
12 Topography and geographic features
No negative impacts on the topography and geographic features are anticipated. D D
Social Environment
13 Involuntary resettlement No involuntary resettlement is anticipated. D D
14 People in poverty The project will not negatively affect the people in poverty. D D
15 Indigenous and ethnic people
The project will not negatively affect indigenous and ethnic minority people. D D
16 Local economy such as employment and livelihood
Some of the small shops called kiosks and containers at the existing Sekondi Harbour will be negatively affected by temporally relocation process. The total numbers of those shops have been estimated as 15.11 small shops will be anticipated to be able to be back the original places and 4 small shops will be required to relocate the new places
B- B-
A-52
within the Sekondi Harbour. The Project will require the site clearance including existing small fuel tanks which are operated by about 10 individual private fuel distributers. Upon the completion of the new harbour, GPHA will amalgamate those tanks into two to four thus those people will be affected.
17 Land use and utilization of local resource
Land use and utilization of local resource will not have any negative impacts caused by the project. D D
18 Water usage or water rights and rights of common
There are neither water rights nor rights of common in the sea area which is close to the proposed project site. D D
19 Existing social infrastructures such as services
The Project will not affect any social infrastructure services such as water supply, electricity. D D
20 Social institutions and local decision-making
Social institutions and local decision-making are not negatively affected by the Project. D D
21 Misdistribution of benefit Misdistribution of benefit is not anticipated. D D
22 Local conflicts of interests Local conflicts of interests may be caused between fisher folks operating canoe fishery and inshore fishery for the usage of available landing space and mooring space during construction period. Also, upon the operation of new Sekondi Harbour, same conflicts may occur.
B- B-
23 Cultural heritage There is no cultural heritage near by the proposed project site. D D
24 Landscape The structure of the new Sekondi Harbour will not affect the landscape around the proposed project site. D D
25 Gender The project will not negatively affect the gender equity. D D
26 Rights of children The project will not negatively affect the rights of children. D D
27 Hazards(Risks) Infectious disease such as HIV/AIDS
The project will not increase the infectious disease such as HIV/AIDS. During the construction period, the camp of works is not planned thus the spreading of infection disease will not be assumed.
D D
28 Labour condition During reconstruction activities, some accidents may occur. B- D
Others
29 Accidents During the reconstruction of the new Sekondi Harbour, operation of heavy vehicles and machineries may cause traffic accidents in and around the proposed project site. Also, accidents may occur to the workers during the construction. Operation of the new Sekondi Harbour will also cause maritime accidents.
B- B-
30 Global scale of impacts / Global warming
No negative impacts which will pass and affect the neighbouring countries. D D
A+/-:Significant positive/negative impact is expected B+/-:Positive/negative impact is expected to some extent C+/-:Extent of positive/negative impact is unknown(A future examination is needed, and the impact could be clarified as
the study progresses) D+/-:No impact is expected
A-53
1-5 Alternatives
The following table shows the alternatives for the Project. The proposed Project contents are
the best comparing with the zero option and alternative 2 thus the project shall be implemented.
Table A6.1(4) Alternatives
Alternative1 Proposed Project Alternative 2
Zero
Option
Expansion of lay-by wharf Reconstruction of administration building
Construction of drive way Construction of new ice making facility
Construction of the place for fuel supply
Removal of sunken vessels and abandoned canoe boats
Removal of used engines Clearance of existing fuel tanks
Land reclamation between existing canoe jetty and landing site for lay-by wharf construction
Reconstruction of administration building
Construction of drive way Construction of new ice making facility
Construction of the place for fuel supply
Removal of sunken vessels and abandoned canoe boats
Removal of used engines Clearance of existing fuel tanks
Eff
icie
ncy,
Con
veni
ence
, Saf
ety
Congestion of Vessels × Landing Place & Fish
handling space×
Fish Net Mending Space × Mooring Places for Canoe × Mooring Places for Inshore
Vessels
AdministrativeManagement
Hazardous (Fire Safety) × Ice Availability
Env
iron
men
tal &
Soc
ial I
mpa
cts
Beauty & Landscape Negative Economic Impacts
on Small Shops & Fuel dealers
Occurrence of Boat Accidents × Effect on Sea water
Circulation
Hygiene and Sanitation × Land Reclamation
No Land reclamation
No Land reclamation × (0.5ha)
Land reclamation for lay-by wharf
Others (Wastes, etc.) Cost No Cost Less Cost than the
Alternative 3Highest Cost
Overall Rating × △ :No Negative Impacts / Sufficient / Efficient :Moderate Negative Impacts / Not Sufficient / Moderate Inefficiency ×:Negative impacts / Inconvenience, Insufficient / High Inefficiency
A-54
1-6 TOR for Environmental and Social Consideration
The following describes the contents of TOR for Environmental and Social Consideration.
Table A6.1(5) Contents of TOR for Environmental and Social Consideration
Likely Impacts Survey Items Survey Methods Air Pollution a) Impacts during construction period a) Check for the construction methods, contents,
duration, water spray methods and area, construction machineries (machinery items, numbers working area, duration)
Water Quality a) Installing of oil fencing for the prevention of water contamination
b) Water quality in and around the Sekondi Harbour
a) Check for the construction methods, duration, installing procedures of oil fencing & area, checking the construction machinery items
b) Implement water quality monitoring survey in and around the Sekondi Harbour
Wastes a) Procedures for the wastes treatment
b) GPHA’s wastes treatment in Sekondi Harbour
a) Check for the construction methods, procedures for the wastes treatment , interview survey to STMA municipality
b) Check for the GPHA’s wastes treatment and its record including its entrusting procedure to private entities
Soil Contamination
a) Treatment of sledge of the Sekondi Harbour generated by the construction process
a) Check for the construction methods, procedures for the wastes treatment, estimated amount of sledge, treatment procedures of sledge
b) Carry out field survey for the places for the treatment and interview survey to STMA municipality
Noise and Vibration
a) Impacts during construction period a) Carry out field survey and interview survey b) Check for the construction methods, contents,
duration, construction machineries (machinery items, numbers, working area, duration)
Local Economy such as
Employment and Livelihood
a) Procedures of temporal relocation of small shops and kiosks
b) Procedures of amalgamation of existing fuel dealers
a) Check for GPHA’s relocation procedures, record of minutes of meetings
b) Carry out interview survey to the temporal relocation shops and kiosks
c) Check for the GPHA’s minutes of meetings and the record of amalgamation procedures
d) Carry out interview survey to the existing fuel dealers
Local Conflicts of Interests
a) Situation of landing places and mooring spaces and places utilized by canoes and inshore vessels
a) Check for the minutes of meetings and carry out interview survey to both canoe owners and inshore vessels’
Labour Condition
a) Situation of handling the labour safety
a) Check for the construction company’s education for safety and prevention measures for the accidents
b) Carry out interview survey to the construction workers in view of safety prevention measures
Accidents a) Situation of number of accidents upon the operation
a) Check for the available records and reports b) Carry out interview survey to GPHA
A-55
1-7 Results of Survey for Environmental and Social Consideration
The results of survey for environmental and social consideration are summarized below.
Table A6.1(6) Results of Survey for Environmental and Social Consideration Likely Impacts Results of Survey
Air Pollution The project will generate dust during construction period. There are approximately 200 small shops and kiosks operating business. It is anticipated to be a little effect for those people except for the several shops locating near the construction site of access roads. Project plans to prepare the temporal yards for the construction which will be located GPHA’s Sekondi Harbour thus it will have very little impact to the local residents. There are some residential areas around the roads between the Project site and the waste treatment area and excavation pit holes thus heavy vehicles will generate dust.
Water Quality Water quality samplings carried out during this mission reveal the existence of coliforms, nitrogen, phosphorus, dissolved oxygen which exceed well over the international standards for the fishing harbour water quality. This could be attributed to the existence of sewerage water generated by the surrounding commercial and residential areas flowing to the Sekondi Harbour as well as the local people’s open defecation including people operating small shops and kiosks. Sewerage water generated from the administration building which will have some annex is anticipated to have some negative impact on the water quality of the Sekondi Harbour but not as serious.
Wastes GPHA has been entrusted the business of treatment of waste within Sekondi Harbour to private entities which collect and transport the waste on daily basis. GPHA plans to continue the entrustment thus the treatment of the waste during the construction period will be handled properly and cause hardly any problems. GPHA also plans to salvage sunken ships and clean the abandoned boats on the land as well as used boat engines left on the land, which will be mostly sold and recycled. This action will generate a little amount of waste. Project will be able to handle the wastes generated by the construction activities by transporting them to the STMA’s designated waste dumping site.
Soil Contamination
It is anticipated that the sledge from the Sekondi Harbour sediment generated by construction activities will cause soil contamination. The sledge will be treated at the STMA’s designated dumping site thus it will not cause any soil contamination.
Noise and Vibration
It is anticipated to cause noise and vibration during construction activities. However, there is no residential area located within 200m from the Project site. Some small shops and kiosks operated their business close to the planned access road area will be affected.
Offensive Odor Organic wastes which cause offensive odour are collected and transported to the designated area by the entrusted private entities on daily basis, and GPHA plans to continue this practice. Fish landed on the Sekondi Harbour are processed only for cutting fins and removing scales by the middlemen (fishmonger) upon the landing at the harbour, and those organic wastes are also collected by the private entities thus those organic wastes will be also caused any problems during construction activities as well as upon the operation of the new harbour.
Local Economy such as
Employment and Livelihood
Temporal relocation of 15 small shops and kiosks during construction for the access road. GPHA has already had series of meetings with those who will be affected to discuss the contents of assistance, temporal places for relocation and procedures GPHA will take. It is anticipated that 11 small shops will be able to be back to the original places and 4 small shops be required to relocate to the new places within Sekondi Harbour. Upon the operation of the new harbour, GPHA plans to amalgamate the fuel tanks to 2 to 4 thus the existing fuel dealers will be affected, and GPHA plans to hold meetings to discuss this issue with those fuel dealers.
Local Conflicts of Interests
The existing Sekondi Harbour is utilized by canoe boats and inshore fishing vessels for landing their catch and mooring their canoes and vessels. These two groups have some conflicts on the issues of the sharing space which will be continued during construction. It is necessary for GPHA to have meetings to discuss the issue and to instruct the space for each group in order to solve this issue. Harbour Advisory Committee, which will handle the management of the new harbour including utilization of the new harbour, will be established upon the operation of the new harbour. It is expected that the forthcoming Harbour Advisory Committee will also handle this issue and thus the conflicts will be mitigated.
Labour Condition
It is anticipated that accidents may occur to the construction workers and people engaging construction activities during construction because of the operation of heavy vehicles and construction activities. The occurrence of accidents will be prevented by implementing safety education and safety practices.
Accidents It is anticipated that accidents may occur not only to the people involved in construction activities but also to the visitors to the harbour and people operating small shops and kiosks because of the operation of heavy vehicles and construction activities. The occurrence of accidents will be prevented by implementing safety education and safety practices as well as installing fences, allocating security personnel, informing construction activities and its duration. Upon the operation of the new harbour, the forthcoming Harbour Advisory Committee will implement the accidents prevention instruction thus the maritime accidents will be reduced.
A-56
1-8 The Results of the Impact Assessment
The following table shows the results of the impact assessment.
Table A6.1(7) Results of the Impact Assessment
Cat
egor
y
No.
Likely Impacts
Assessment at
Scoping
Assessment
based on Survey
Reason P
lan
ning
and
Con
stru
ctio
n P
hase
Ope
rati
on P
hase
Pla
nni
ng a
nd
Con
stru
ctio
n P
hase
Ope
rati
on P
hase
Pol
luti
on C
ontr
ol
1 Air Pollution B- B- D D Construction Phase: Dust, which will be generated by the operation of heavy vehicles, will be reduced by watering at and around the Project site.
2 Water Contamination
B- B- D D Construction Phase: Construction activities for reconstruction of existing wharf may cause water contamination. This will be mitigated by installing oil fences and well maintenance of machinery used for the construction as well as education on water contamination to the people engaging construction activities.
Operation Phase: Sewerage generated from the administration building will be treated at the designated STMA dumping site as usual as GPHA practiced.
3 Wastes B- D D D Construction Phase: Construction activities generate waste such as, wooden materials, iron pipes which will be mostly recycled and the rest will be carried and treated at the STMA’s dumping site. Organic waste generated by fishing activities will be collected and carried to the designated dumping site by private entities entrusted by GPHA on daily basis.
Operation Phase: Upon the operation of the new harbour, organic waste generated by fishing activities as well as litter thrown by people utilizing harbour including visitors will be collected and carried to the designated dumping site by private entities entrusted by GPHA on daily basis. GPHA will also be able to prevent littering by closely working with NGO to implement public awareness activities.
4 Soil Contamination
B- D D D Construction Phase: Construction activities generate sledge from the harbour sediment. This sledge will be required treatment which will cause soil contamination. The sledge will be carried to STMA’s designated dumping site and accommodated and buried on the sealed places which prevent soil contamination.
5 Noise and Vibration
B- D B- D Construction Phase: Construction activities generate noise and vibration. These will be mitigated by restricting construction activities only during daytime. Moreover, the residential areas do not exist within 200m from the Project site thus the noise and vibration will be hardly affect residential area.
6 Ground Subsidence
D D N/A N/A
7 Offensive Odour B- B- D D Construction Phase: Organic waste generated by fishing activities during construction period will be collected and carried to the designated dumping site by private entities entrusted by GPHA on daily basis.
Operation Phase: Upon the operation of the new harbour, organic waste generated by fishing activities as well as litter thrown by people utilizing harbour including visitors will be collected and carried to the designated dumping site by private entities entrusted by GPHA on daily basis.
8 Bottom Sediment D D N/A N/A
Nat
ure
- en
viro
nmen
t
9 Protected Area D D N/A N/A
10 Fauna and Flora and Biodiversity
D D N/A N/A
11 Hydrological Situation
D D D D
12 Topography and Geographic Features
D D D D
A-57
Cat
egor
y
No.
Likely Impacts
Assessment at
Scoping
Assessment
based on Survey
Reason
Pla
nni
ng a
nd
Con
stru
ctio
n P
hase
Ope
rati
on P
hase
Pla
nni
ng a
nd
Con
stru
ctio
n P
hase
Ope
rati
on P
hase
Soc
ial A
spec
ts
13 Involuntary Resettlement
D D D D
14 People in Poverty D D D D
15 Indigenous and Ethnic People
D D N/A N/A
16 Local Economy such as Employment and Livelihood
B- B- D B- Planning and Construction Phase: GPHA has already held a series of meetings with those who will be affected to discuss the contents of assistance of providing forklift and temporal places for relocation. GPHA also plans to have some meetings with those people prior to the construction and during the construction thus the negative economic impact will be minimum level.
Operation Phase: GPHA will have meetings with existing fuel dealers to discuss the contents of amalgamation in order to have agreement. However, the fuel dealers will be still affected.
17 Land use and utilization of Local Resource
D D N/A N/A
18 Water usage or Water rights and Rights of common
D D D D
19 Existing Social Infrastructures such as Services
D D D D
20 Social Institutions and Local Decision-making
D D D D
21 Misdistribution of Benefit
D D N/A N/A
22 Local Conflicts of Interests
B- B- B- B- Construction Phase: GPHA will intervene the conflicts of sharing space for landing and mooring between the canoe fishery and inshore fishery vessels in order to reduce the conflicts but it will remain.
Operation Phase: GPHA will establish the Fishing Harbour Advisory Committee to handle the issue of sharing space between canoe fishery and inshore fishery but the conflicts will remain.
23 Cultural Heritage D D N/A N/A
24 Landscape D D N/A N/A
25 Gender D D D D
26 Rights of Children D D D D
27 Hazards(Risks) Infectious disease such as HIV/AIDS
D D D D
28 Labour Condition B- D B- D Construction Phase: The occurrence of accidents will be prevented by implementing safety education and safety practices.
Oth
ers
29 Accidents B- B- B- B- Construction Phase: The occurrence of accidents will be prevented by implementing safety education and safety practices.
Operation Phase: GPHA will establish the Fishing Harbour Advisory Committee to discuss and handle the issue of maritime safety with canoe fishery and inshore fishery vessel owners.
30 Global scale of impacts / Global warming
D D N/A N/A
A-58
1-9 Mitigation Measures and Cost
(1) Mitigation Measures
The following Table A6.1(8) describes the mitigation measures.
Table A6.1(8) Mitigation Measures
Likely Impacts
Rat
ing Impact Severity(e.g. magnitude, area
extent, duration, frequency, reversibility, likelihood of occurrence)
Assumed Mitigation Measures
Air Pollution B
During the reconstruction of the Sekondi Harbour, operation of heavy vehicles and machineries will generate dust and gas emission thus it will cause air pollution.
Construction Phase: Plan appropriate measures, such as, cut the
engines of heavy vehicles and machineries when they are not in use, frequent watering to the site, in order to minimize dust and gas emission from the vehicles and other machineries during construction. Implement them.
Water Contamination
B
Construction activities will cause water contamination to the sea around the project site.
Operation of the new Sekondi Harbour will generate sewerage water which will affect water quality around the project site if it is untreated.
The Project requested GPHA to manage the existing three sewerage pipes at Old Beach area, which are the major source of sewerage effluents to the Sekondi Harbour. GPHA will divert sewerage water to prevent the flow into the Sekondi Harbour. Thus this treatment will reduce the water contamination at Sekondi Harbour.
Planning Phase: Plan appropriate sewerage treatment septic
tanks to comply with Ghana’s effluent standard to treat the sewerage generated by the new administration building.
Construction Phase: Using machineries minimising water turbidity
and installing oil fences. Operation Phase: Check the GPHA’s construction activities on
the improvement (diversion of sewerage) of existing three sewerage pipes set on the Old Beach.
Soil
Contamination B
Construction activities will generate sledge which will cause soil contamination.
Construction Phase: Plan the treatment of the sledge to carry to
STMA’s designated dumping site and accommodate and bury on the sealed places which prevent soil contamination. Implement the plan.
Wastes B
Construction process will generate waste and some of them will be recycled and the rest will be carried to STMA waste dumping site.
Operation of the new Sekondi Harbour, harbour users and visitors may litter some garbage around the site.
Construction Phase: Plan the wastes management plan which will
recycle for most of the construction wastes and be able to carry the rest to the STMA’s designated dumping site. Implement the wastes management plan.
Operation Phase: GPHA hires both local staff such as task force
who clean the harbour and local contractors who collect garbage from the pit and carry to the STMA’s designated area. GPHA shall continue this system to treat garbage.
Also, GPHA will conduct some local awareness campaigns and education on littering by closely working with local people including NGOs.
A-59
Noise and
Vibration B
During the construction of the new Sekondi Harbour, operation of heavy vehicles and machineries will generate noise and vibration in and around the proposed Project site. However, there is no residential area located within 200m from the Project site.
Operation of the new Sekondi Harbour, increase of noise and vibration in and around the site will not occur.
Construction Phase: Use the vehicles and machineries of low noise type. Install noise reduction walls. Implement maximum speed limits within the
site and around the site. Control reconstruction works at night.
Offensive Odour B
During the construction and upon the operation of the new Sekondi Harbour, some organic materials will cause offensive odour if they are left untreated.
Construction and Operation Phase: GPHA hires local staff such as task force who
clean the harbour and local contractors who collect garbage from the pit and carry to the STMA’s designated area. GPHA shall continue this system to treat garbage.
Conduct some local awareness campaign and education to treat garbage appropriately by closely working with local people including NGOs.
Local Economy such as
Employment and Livelihood
B
Some small shops called kiosks and containers at the existing Sekondi Harbour will be negatively affected by the temporal relocation process. The total number of those shops has been estimated as 15 and people own those shops as 13. The Project will require the site clearance including existing small fuel tanks which are operated by about 10 individual private fuel distributers.
Upon the completion of the new harbour, GPHA will amalgamate those tanks into two to four thus those people will be affected.
Planning Phase: GPHA have had a series of meetings with
small shop owners to discuss the temporal places to relocate and assistance measures such as providing forklift together with and operation personnel.
Construction Phase: Hold meetings between GPHA and those
people prior and during the construction to confirm the procedures.
Operation Phase: Hold meetings between GPHA and existing
fuel dealers to discuss the issue of amalgamation and its process in order to reach agreement on this issue.
Local Conflicts of Interests
Local conflicts of interests may be caused between fisher folks operating canoe fishery and inshore fishery for the usage of available landing space and mooring space during construction period.
Also, upon the operation of new Sekondi Harbour, same conflicts may occur.
Construction Phase: GPHA intervene fisher folks operating canoe
fishery and inshore fishery for the usage of available landing space and mooring space during construction period.
Operation Phase: GPHA will establish the Harbour
Management Committee which will encourage and assist the fair utilization of landing and mooring spaces between fisher folks operating canoe fishery and inshore fishery.
Labour Condition BDuring construction activities, some accidents may occur.
Construction Phase: Conduct education to the drivers of the
construction vehicles to drive safely.
Accidents B
During the construction of the new Sekondi Harbour, operation of heavy vehicles and machineries may cause traffic accidents in and around the Project site. Also, accidents may occur to the workers during construction.
Upon the operation of the new harbour, increased frequency of vessels to the new harbour may cause maritime accidents.
Construction Phase: Conduct education to the drivers of the
construction vehicles to drive safely. Operation Phase: GPHA will establish the Harbour
Management Committee which will plan the prevention measures to the maritime accidents by discussing the issue with fisher folks operating canoe fishery and inshore fishery.
A-60
(2) Mitigation Measures and the Cost
The following Table A6.1(9) describes the cost for mitigation measures of the Project.
Table A6.1(9) Cost for Mitigation Measures
No.
Likely Impacts Mitigation Measures Responsible
Organization
Executing
Organization
Cost (Unit: GHS)
Construction Phase
1 Air Pollution Frequent watering to the site and roads in order to minimize dust. GPHA
Construction Company
No Cost (Cost is included as general construction cost)
2 Water Contamination
Installing oil fence around the wharf. Oil leaking will be prevented by the well maintenance of machinery. Education of water contamination prevention will also play role to reduce the water contamination.
GPHA
Construction Company
Water quality monitoring Cost:
32000
3 Soil Contamination
Sledge will be transported and treated at the designated STMA’s dumping site. GPHA
Construction Company
Transport and treatment Cost: 68000
4 Wastes GPHA will recycle most of the waste generated by construction activities and the rest will be transported to the designated STMA’s dumping site.
GPHA Construction
Company No Cost
5 Noise and Vibration
Limit construction activities only at daytime and restrict construction after 8:00 at night. Education of reduction of noise for construction workers and use low noise level machinery will reduce noise and vibration.
GPHA
Construction Company
No Cost
6 Offensive Odour GPHA will continue the entrusting practice of private entities’ treating wastes. GPHA
Construction Company
Transport and treatment Cost: 144000
7 Local Economy such as Employment and Livelihood
Confirm the temporal relocation places which have been agreed between GPHA and small shops and kiosks and GPHA will provide assistance of relocation in order to secure the business of those people.
GPHA
Construction Company
Assistance Cost: 4500
8 Local Conflicts of Interests
GPHA will hold meetings with canoe fishery folks and inshore fishery folks on regular basis in order to discuss and monitor the utilization of landing and mooring space thus the conflicts will be reduced.
GPHA
GPHA No Cost
9 Labour Condition Implement the education of safety for driving and handling heavy vehicles and machineries to construction worker which will prevent accidents.
GPHA Construction
Company No Cost
10 Accidents Forthcoming the Harbour Management Committee established by GPHA will also handle maritime safety.
GPHA GPHA No Cost
Operation Phase 1 Water Contamination Installing oil fences during construction of wharf. New
administration compound will be installed the cesspit and the toilet sewerage in the cesspit will be transported and treated as usual.
GPHA
Construction Company
Transport and treatment Cost:
6000/month 2 Wastes GPHA will continue the entrusting practice to the
private entities for handling wastes which are transported and treated at the designated site.
GPHA GPHA
3 Offensive Odour GPHA will continue the entrusting practice to the private entities for handling wastes.
GPHA GPHA
4 Local Conflicts of Interests
Forthcoming the Harbour Management Committee established by GPHA will have some member from one person from each of canoe and inshore fishery in order to reduce the conflicts between the two groups.
GPHA
GPHA No Cost
A-61
1-10 Procedures of Environmental Permit and its Schedule
(1) GPHA’s Responsible Unit
GPHA has a special unit named ”Port Estate and Environment” which handles the
environmental management and management of ports and harbours land. Both Takoradi Harbour
and GPHA’s headquarter in Tema Harbour have this unit which altogether has 38 staff including 2
administrative staff. Followings describe the major tasks carried out by this unit. In addition to the
following description, the unit also handles the task of obtaining the environmental license from
EPA thus the unit is anticipated to play a major role to obtain the environmental license from EPA
for the Project.
Harbour land (within GPHA’s harbour) lease
Harbour development
Management of harbour facilities
Management of wastes and sewerage treatment generated in harbour
Management of oil leakage in harbour
Environmental awareness
Environmental monitoring of harbour
(2) Schedule of Procedures of EPA’s Permit
The Project site locates at the STMA’s administrative area so that the EPA headquarter and
EPA’s Western Region Office as regional office of EPA will closely working with the procedure of
issuing environmental permit. The EPA headquarter will coordinate the whole process of the
permit and the Western Region Office will assist to hold local stakeholders meetings as well as
conducting local field survey.
EPA has predicted that the Project’s EPA’s environmental category will be “Schedule 2”
mainly because the Project is an expansion of the existing Sekondi Harbour thus the Project will
be required to conduct EIA. On the other hand, GPHA has anticipated that the Project’s EPA’s
environmental category will be “Schedule 1”, for which the EIA is not compulsory, based on their
previous experiences of similar construction projects for ports and harbours and the scale of the
proposed Project.
It is anticipated that the Project’s whole duration of obtaining EPA’s environmental permit is
approximately 8 to 9 months as the table shown below if the Project is judged to be “Schedule 2”
by EPA. However, the whole duration of up to 9months will be shortened.
As for the progress of obtaining an EPA’s environmental permit for the Project, the study team
has confirmed that GPHA would be able to obtain the permit by the end of July, 2014 as the final
deadline. Upon the study team’s visit to Ghana for the explanation of draft report on December, 2013,
the team also confirmed that GPHA had commenced the preparation for the required procedures of
obtaining the EPA’s environmental permit including selection of a local consulting firm to carry out
EIA.
A-62
Table A6.1(10) Duration of Obtaining EPA’s Environmental Permit for Schedule-2
Each Step of Procedure Task for GPHA & Local
Consultant Task for EPA Approximate
Duration
Applying EPA’s environmental permit 〇
Project’s screening and the EPA’s environmental category
〇 3~4weeks
Holding stakeholders meetings and prepare & submit scoping report
〇 6~7 weeks
EPA’s assessment of scoping report and instruction of EIA TOR
〇 1~2 weeks
EIS report preparation and submit the draft 〇 10 weeksEPA’s assessment of EIS draft report and instruction of revising the draft
〇 10 weeks
Preparation of EIS final report and submission 〇 2 weeksEPA‘s assessment of EIS final report and issuing environmental permit
〇 3 weeks
Total 8~9months
(note:EIS report implies final results and the action taken place by EIA process)
As for the procedure of obtaining the Project’s environmental permit, Mr. Anamo, Director
General of GPHA, made promise to obtain the Project’s environmental permit by the end of July,
2014 when Mr. Anamo discussed the Project contents with the JICA Study Team on 4th, August,
2013 at Sekondi Harbour. An environmental and social consideration staff of the JICA Study
Team explained the matter to the Manager of Port Estate and Environment at Tema GPHA
headquarter, and confirmed their action of sending e-mail to the Study Team to inform the
commencement of the procedures of EPA environmental permit including appointing the local
consultant for the procedures after the team returned back to Accra. The Team has contacted with
GPHA relevant person by e-mail at the end of October, 2013 to confirm the progress of the
obtaining EPA environmental permit, GPHA informed that GPHA appointed the local consultant
to engage the procedures as well as the contents of EIA TOR being set, therefore GPHA would
plan to commence EIA process from November, 2013 and expect to be able to obtain the permit
by the end of March, 2014.
(3) Cost
The Project’s process of obtaining EPA’s environmental permit is described on the above.
The followings describe the cost for the procedure.
Major cost of obtaining EPA’s environmental permit are hiring local consultant to carry the
required tasks and the fee for the assessment by EPA. One of the examples of those costs is the
case of Takoradi Harbour reconstruction project on the year of 2012, which was applied and
obtained the permit by GPHA. This project took almost 9months to be able to obtain the permit
from the time of completion of appointing a local consultant, and cost of GPHA US$205,000 for
hiring the consultant.
According to the local consultant who has conducted EIA and EIS report preparation for the
Takoradi Harbour reconstruction project, for the cost of conducting EIA and EIS report
preparation for the Project, which will be carried by some local consultant, may cost
A-63
US$80,000~95,000.
There are both Assessment Fee and Permission Fee, which shall be paid to EPA for obtaining
EPA’s environmental permit. Ghana’s Environmental Law stipulates that 1% of the total cost of a
project shall be paid to EPA for obtaining the permit by the project proponent. However, this is a
high cost for the project proponent to pay for this kind of fee thus the fee system has been altered
to a system for the Assessment Fee and Permission Fee based on the scale of a project and
severity of its negative impacts, which regulated by amendment of Fees and Charges
(Amendment)Instrument, 2011(L1-1986).
As for the Project, the following fees shall be paid to EPA. In addition to these fees, upon the
issuing the permit, project proponent (GPHA) shall pay the cost for preparation of stakeholder
meetings such as, booking for the places, food and beverage, invitation of the expertise including
daily allowances and accommodation for those persons.
Assessment Fee: 7,790 Cedi
Permission Fee: 2,000 Cedi
1-11 Stakeholder Meeting
A stakeholder meeting for the Project was held at Sekondi Harbour outside of GPHA’s
administration compound on 10th, July, 2013. There were 58 participants attended for the meeting,
who were, GPHA staff at both Sekondi Harbour and Takoradi Harbour, representative of inshore
fishery association, representative of canoe fishery association, representative of middlemen
association, representative of smokers association, representative of Sekondi Harbour commercial
association, representative of Ghana fishermen association, NGOs, local police, department of
immigration, representative of task force of Sekondi Harbour, as well as JICA Study Team
member. The followings describe the major items of the agenda of the meeting.
Explanation of GPHA’s request to Japanese Government
Explanation of time schedule and duration of construction activities
Request of cooperation and understanding of causing inconvenience during the construction
period
Request of cooperation and understanding of clearance of the abandoned boats on both at sea
and on the land as well as used boat engines left over the land
Explanation of time schedule for the group meetings commenced from 11th, July to 13th
July,2013 and request of cooperation for the interview and other forms of survey conducted by
the Study Team
Request of cooperation and understanding of causing inconvenience to the small shops and
kiosks during the construction period
Question and Answer
After the stakeholder meeting, five groups, which are, inshore fishery association, canoe
fishery association, middlemen (fishmonger) association, smokers association and Sekondi
A-64
Harbour commercial association, were invited to attend the stakeholder meeting for each group
commenced from 11th, July to 13th July. Purpose of meetings was to ask their needs and to have
question and answer session. Environmental and social consideration point of view, the key items
and conclusion of the meetings can be summarized as follows.
Members of both inshore fishery association and canoe fishery association attended the
meetings as participants showed understandings of causing inconvenience, and reached
agreement of causing inconveniences of minor relocation of landing space and mooring space
during construction period.
Members of middlemen association, smokers association and Sekondi Harbour commercial
association, who attended the meetings as participants, showed understandings of causing
inconvenience and causing dust and noise during the construction period and reached
agreement of causing these inconveniences.
2. Involuntary Resettlement and Land Acquisition
Involuntary resettlement will not be occurred by the implementation of the Project.
3. Environmental Monitoring and Environmental Check List
(1) Project Proponent’s Monitoring System
GPHA has the unit named “Port Estate and Environment” as mentioned on the above section
which is responsible for the environmental management as well as land management. This unit is
expected to execute the monitoring for water quality and waste treatment. As for the monitoring
activities for social aspects, they will be carried out by both the unit and Sekondi Harbour
Administration of GPHA.
(2) Monitoring Forms
Monitoring items both for construction phase and operation phase are shown on Table
A6.1(11), (12). As for the water quality monitoring for construction phase, country of Ghana has
yet to set standard of water quality at ports and harbours thus the standards shown on the table are
only international one. Moreover, as the results of the water quality survey conducted by this
study mission on July, 2013 revealed that the water quality in Sekondi Harbour exceeded well
over the international standard limits thus the Project shall not have the targeted numerical values
in order to prevent water contamination. For this reason, the water quality monitoring for the
Project aims to monitor the water quality rather than set standard for the limit. Stations set out for
the water quality monitoring shall be the same location set out by the July’s survey.
A-65
Table A6.1(11) Monitoring for Construction Phase
A-66
A-67
Table A6.1(12) Monitoring for Operation Phase
A-68
A-69
(3) Environmental Check List
The following table shows the contents of the environmental check list.
Table A6.1(13) Environmental Check List
A-70
A-71
A-72
A-73
A - 74
Appendix 6.2 Natural Conditions
1. Climate Condition
The climate of Ghana is a tropical climate and subject to the influence of north-eastern trade
wind called Hamattan blown from Sahara Desert and south-western monsoon wind.
Seasonally, it is divided roughly into the rainy season and wet season, rainy season as from
April to October, dry season from November to March.
In this study, the weather condition of the Project site is arranged based on the observation
results in the Takoradi Meteorological Observatory nearest to the project sitr.
1-1 Temperature and Precipitation
Figure A6.2(1) shows the yearly changes of monthly average temperature and precipitation
at Takoradi Meteorological Observatory. Average temperature is about 27°C and little fluctuated
from 25°C to 29°C as well as maximum temperature is 30.5°C and minimum temperature is
23.0°C. Range of temperature is rather small as difference of maximum and minimum
temperature in a month is about 3°C as shown in Table A6.2(1).
Yearly precipitation is about 1,200mm. Monthly precipitation is much from April to July in
rainy season and total precipitation of this four months is about half of yearly volume. Number of
days exceeding 10mm in a day is shown in Table A6.2(2). These are about 30 days in a year, and
many in May and June.
Figure A6.2(1) Monthly Average Temperature and Precipitation (2008-2012)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
1月 2月 3月 4月 5月 6月 7月 8月 9月 10月 11月 12月
Pre
cipu
tati
on(
mm
)
Tem
pera
ture(℃
)
Month(Average of 2008 - 2012)
Average Precipitation
Average Temperature
A - 75
Table A6.2(1) Average Maximum, Minimum and Average Temperature
Table A6.2(2) Average Number of Days Exceeding 10mm Precipitation per Day
1-2 Winds and Atmospheric Pressure
Wind feature around Sekondi is analysed by wind data which is observed at meteorological
observatory of Takoradi airport every hour. Dominant wind direction is SW and rather calm as
wind speed is almost less than 10m/s and frequency less than 5m/s is about 90%.
Moreover, the appearance ratio of the Easterly wind which affects calmness off the fishing
harbour and vessel damage is about 1%. The wind rose at the Takoradi point is shown in Figure
A6.2(2).
Monthly average atmospheric pressure is shown in Table A6.2(3), although there is lack of
data, it is from 1010 hPa to 1011 hPa through a year, there is a tendency it goes up in rainy
season and falls at dry season.
Figure A6.2(2) Wind Rose (Observed at Takoradi Airport, June, 2011 – June,2012)
2008- 2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec AverageMax. Temp. 31.62 31.78 32.32 31.92 31.18 29.7 28.56 27.86 28.64 30 31.18 31.66 30.5Min. Temp. 23.08 24.18 24.9 24.86 24.54 23.98 23.24 22.72 23.16 23.74 24.08 24.14 23.9
Average Temp. 27.35 27.99 28.61 28.39 27.86 26.84 25.9 25.29 25.9 26.87 27.63 27.9 27.2
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Average2008 1 0 1 4 5 7 4 1 2 1 2 2 302009 1 0 1 3 6 10 5 0 0 2 0 1 292010 1 0 1 5 8 6 1 2 2 5 4 0 352011 1 0 0 2 3 7 3 2 1 4 1 0 242012 0 2 0 1 11 9 1 0 0 3 4 2 33
Average 0.8 0.4 0.6 3.0 6.6 7.8 2.8 1.0 1.0 3.0 2.2 1.0 30.2
Total Yearly
10
20
30%
E
ENE
NE
NNE N
NNW
NW
WNW
W
WSW
SW
SSW S
SSE
SE
ESE
0.0 - 2.5
2.5 - 5.0
5.0 - 10.0
10.0 - m/s
Total DRY
10
20
30%
E
ENE
NE
NNE N
NNW
NW
WNW
W
WSW
SW
SSW S
SSE
SE
ESE
Total WET
10
20
30%
E
ENE
NE
NNE N
NNW
NW
WNW
W
WSW
SW
SSW S
SSE
SE
ESE
A - 76
Table A6.2(3) Average Atmospheric Pressure (unit: hPa) Mon Year J
an.
F
eb.
M
arc
h
A
pril
M
ay
J
une
J
uly
A
ug.
S
ept
.
O
ct.
N
ov.
D
ec.Yearly
2011 1012.1 1012.7 1013 1012.6 1010.2 1010.3 1010.4 1011.6
2012 1010.2 1009.2 1009.4 1009.7 1011.3 1012.7 1013.9 1014.2 1014.6 1011.3 1010.3 1009.9 1011.4
2013 1010.4 1009.1 1009.3 1010.2 1012.7 1010.3
Average 1010.3 1009.15 1009.35 1009.95 1011.3 1012.5 1013.3 1013.6 1013.6 1010.8 1010.3 1010.2 1011.1
2. Geographical Feature
The topographical survey and bathymetric survey at the project site are carried out in July,
2013, of which results are shown in Figure A6.2(3). Moreover, in order to evaluate a
geographical change of the adjacent area, past geographical feature carried out in April, 1996 is
shown in Figure A6.2(4).
Although the forms of the both contour lines are almost same, depth of the area of -3.0m
contour line at the centre of the breakwater in July, 2013 turn out to the depth of -2.5 m in April,
1994. Moreover, depth at the tip of breakwater is changed from -3.5m in April, 1994 to -3.0m in
July, 2013.
As it is described, about 50cm deep deposition in the area of Sekondi Bay and Sekondi
Fishing Harbour in about 17 years. It means that it was accretion tendency of about 3cm per
every year.
According to the interview survey, these tendencies also appeared in the Takoradi
Commercial Harbour and Sekondi Naval Harbour, and dredging works are carrying out at
north-side of the breakwater.
On the other hand, the situation around the Sekondi Naval Harbour is shown in Figure
A6.2(5), rubble type revetment shore protection is installed on the south of the naval harbour as
shown in Figure A6.2(6). This is considered to be shore protection maintenance for protecting a
hinterland and a road from beach erosion.
A - 77
図-2-2-3(3) 本調査(2013 年 7 月)で実施した陸上地形測量及び深浅測量結果
Figure A6.2(3) Results of Topographical and Bathymetric Survey (July, 2013)
-1.
0m -2.
-3.
-4.
-3.0m
-2.
-2.0m
-1.
-1.
±
0 0
±
0 0
-2.5
-2.5
-1.5m
-1.5
-1.5m
-3.5
-2.5
-1.5
±0.0m
-1.-2.0m
±
0 0
Note: above CDL
A - 78
図-2-2-3(4) 1996 年 4 月に実施された陸上地形測量及び深浅測量結果
Figure A6.2(4) Results of Topographical and Bathymetric Survey (April,1996)
(注)CDL 基準による図面
A - 79
Figure A6.2(5) Erossion of Naval Harbour Figure A6.2(6) Situation near Naval Harbour
3. Sea Conditions
3-1 Tide Condition
Tide condition in Sekondi Fishing Harbour is same as previous study of the Phase 1 Project.
This tide level relation is as shown in Figure A6.2(7). Chart datum line (CDL) of the site is as
same as that of at Takoradi Harbour. A tidal range is about 1.6m in spring tide and about 1.3m in
neap tide.
Figure A6.2(7) Tide Condition
3-2 Wave Condition
(1) Offshore Wave Condition
Around Sekondi and Takoradi area, a wave observation is not performed. But three kind of
Erosion
Naval Port
Deposit Naval Port
Secondi Fishing Harbour
Deposit
M2.00
1.00
0.00
0.980
0.340
1.620
0.477
MHWS
(MSL)
MLWS
1.294
0.666
MHWN
MLWN
0.00 CDL
0.00
0.640
-0.811
-0.980
0.477
-0.477
<above CDL> <above MSL>
(H.W.L)
(L.W.L)
(M.S.L)
1.791 HHWL
0.811
0.811
0.640
0.640
0.477
0.811
0.169 LLWL
-0.640
A - 80
stormy wave data are obtained as described in below.
1. The wave database of US Navy calculated by spectrum wave model which is used by
previous project, 2. The design wave used for "The Takoradi Harbour Master Plan (June, 2012)",
3. Stomy wave data hindcasted by spectrum wave model and gloval wind database. Wave heights
are 3.7 m, 3.0 m and 3.3 m, respectively. In this project, offshore wave height of 3.7 m of US
Navy wave database shall be used for design wave height on the danger side.
Wave deformation analysis is carried out to set the incident wave condition at Project Site.
Energy balance equation model are applied for wave deformation by water depth changes at
shallow water area and wave diffraction model are used for wave reduction by the naval harbour
breakwater. In energy balance equation model, a large size calculation area and a small size
calculation area around the Project Site are set up to simulate precisely.
(2) Wave Condition of the Project Site
1) Incident Wave at the Tip of Naval Harbour Breakwater
Wave deformation calculation results are shown in Figure A6.2(8) and (9). According to the
results, the specifications of offshore wave and incident wave conditions are described in Table
A6.2(4) and (5).
Table A6.2(4) Offshore Wave Conditions
Wave Direction SE Wave Height 3.7m Wave Period 12 sec
Table A6.2(5) Incident Wave Conditions (Tip of Naval Harbour Breakwater)
Incident Wave Direction S37°E Wave Refraction Co-efficient 0.92
2) Incident Wave at Sekondi Habour Entrance
Diffraction analysis from the tip of the naval harbour breakwater to harbour entrance is
carried out. Result is shown in Figure A6.2(10). Incident wave direction is set as S47°E changed
10° East direction side in consideration of the danger side. In this analysis, wave reflection by the
naval harbour breakwater is considered, because the breakwater’s alignment is long straight line,
influence of reflected wave may have become large. Incident wave specifications of harbour
mouse are described as Table A6.2(6).
Table A6.2(6) Wave Condition at Harbour Entrance Wave
Direction Wave Period Wave Height
Offshore wave SE 12.0s 3.7m Tip of Breakwater (wave refraction) S47°E 〃 3.7×0.92=3.4m
Harbour Entrance (wave diffraction, wave reflection) E 〃 3.7×0.92×0.4=1.36m
A - 81
Figure A6.2(8) Wave Deformation Pattern (Large Area)
5
5
10
15
20
25
30
20000 m
UNIT:%
DirecTION SE
pERIOD 12.0s
Smax 25
INCIDENT WAVE
Sekondi
K
1 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 49
1
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
37
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99 99 99
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99 99 99
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99 99 99 99
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 98 98
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 98 98 97
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 98 97 97
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 98 97 97
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 98 98 98 99 98 97 96
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 98 99 100 100 100 99 97 98 99 98 98 98
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99 99 99 100 100 101 102 101 99 98 99 101 103 104 102 99 99 102 110 113 113
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99 100 100 99 99 99 99 99 100 100 102 104 105 104 102 101 105 116 120 114 108 141
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 100 101 102 105 108 109 161
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 100 99 98 99 101 103
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99 100 100 100 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 98 99 99 99 98 97 99 99 75 73
100 100 100 100 99 99 100 100 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 98 98 99 99 97 96 96 96 87 86
99 99 99 100 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 98 99 98 98 98 98 96 95 94 94 88 91
99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 98 98 98 98 99 99 98 98 98 98 97 97 95 93 92 93 90 85
99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 97 97 96 95 93 91 91 90 148
99 98 98 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 98 98 98 99 99 99 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 97 96 96 94 92 90 90 91
98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 99 99 98 98 97 97 97 97 97 98 98 98 97 97 96 95 94 92 90 89 91
98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 99 99 99 98 97 97 97 97 97 97 98 97 97 96 96 95 93 93 92 91
98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 99 98 99 99 98 98 97 97 96 97 97 97 97 97 96 96 95 95 96 86
98 98 98 98 98 97 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 99 99 99 100 100 99 98 97 96 96 97 97 99 101 101 99 100 142
97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 98 98 98 98 98 99 99 100 99 98 98 96 96 96 97 99 103 165 668
97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 98 97 98 98 98 98 99 99 99 98 97 96 95
97 97 97 97 97 96 97 97 97 97 97 98 97 98 97 97 98 98 98 98 98 96 95 95 62 42 29
97 97 97 97 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 97 97 98 97 97 97 97 98 98 99 98 96 96 76 58 46
97 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 97 97 97 97 98 96 96 98 99 99 99 97 95 84 68 54
5
5
10
15
20
25
30
20000 m
DirecTION SE
pERIOD 12.0s
Smax 25
T WAVE
Sekondi
D
1 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 49
1
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
37
Refraction
Co-Efficient
Wave
Direction
A - 82
5
5
10
10
15
20
10000 m
UNIT:%
W.DirOff SE
PERIOD 12.0s
Smax 25
W.D.
Honiala
K
1 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 59
1
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99 99
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99 99 99
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99 99 99
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99 99 99 99
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99 99 99 99 100 99 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99 99 99 99 99 99
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99 99 99 99 99 99
100 100 100 100 100 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99
100 100 100 100 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99
100 100 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99
99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 98 98 98 98 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 98
99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99 99 100 99 99 99 99 99 98 98 98
99 99 99 99 99 99 98 99 99 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 100 99 99 99 99 99 98 98 98
99 99 99 99 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 100 99 99 99 99 99 98 98 98
99 99 99 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 98 98 98
98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 97 97 97 97 97 97 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 98 98 98
98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 98 98 98
98 98 98 98 98 98 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 98 98 98 98
98 98 98 98 98 98 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 98 98 98 98 98
98 98 98 98 98 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 96 96 97 97 97 97 97 97 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 98 98 98 98 98
98 98 98 98 98 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 96 96 97 97 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 97 97 97 97 97 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 99 99 99 100 100 100 100 99 99 99 99 98 98 98 98 98 97
98 98 98 98 98 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 97 97 97 97 97 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 99 99 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99 98 98 98 97 97 97
98 98 98 98 98 98 97 97 97 97 97 97 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 97 97 97 97 97 97 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 99 99 100 100 100 101 101 101 100 99 99 98 98 97 97 97
98 98 98 98 98 98 97 97 97 97 97 97 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 95 95 95 96 96 96 96 97 97 97 97 97 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 99 100 100 101 101 102 102 101 100 100 99 98 98 97 97
99 98 98 98 98 98 98 97 97 97 97 97 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 95 95 95 95 95 96 96 96 97 97 97 97 97 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 99 99 100 101 102 103 103 103 102 101 101 100 99 98 97
99 99 98 98 98 98 98 97 97 97 97 97 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 96 96 96 96 97 97 97 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 99 100 101 102 104 105 105 104 103 103 102 100 99 98
99 99 98 98 98 98 98 98 97 97 97 97 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 95 95 95 94 95 95 95 95 95 96 96 96 96 97 97 97 98 98 98 98 98 98 99 101 102 104 106 107 107 106 107 105 103 101 100
99 99 98 98 98 98 98 98 97 97 97 97 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 95 95 94 94 94 94 94 95 95 95 95 96 96 96 97 97 97 98 98 98 97 97 98 99 101 104 107 108 109 110 112 110 107 105 102
99 99 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 97 97 97 97 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 95 95 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 95 95 95 95 96 96 97 97 97 98 98 97 97 97 98 100 103 106 109 111 113 117 117 114 108
99 99 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 97 97 97 97 96 97 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 95 95 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 95 95 96 96 97 97 97
99 99 99 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 97 97 97 97 97 96 96 96 96 95 96 96 95 96 95 95 95 94 94 94 93 93 94 94 94 94 94 95 95 95 96
99 99 99 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 97 97 97 97 97 97 96 96 96 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 94 94 94 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 94 94 95 95
99 99 99 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 96 96 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 94 94 94 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 94
99 99 99 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 96 96 96 95 95 95 95 95 95 94 94 94 93 93 93 93 93 93 92 92 92 93
99 99 99 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 97 97 97 97 97 97 96 96 96 95 95 95 95 95 95 94 94 94 93 93 93 93 93 93 92 92 92 92 59 40 28 20
99 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 97 97 97 97 97 97 96 96 96 95 95 95 95 95 94 94 94 94 93 93 93 93 93 93 92 92 92 91 73 56 43 34 24 18 14 10 8 6 5 4 3 3 2 2 2 2
99 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 97 97 97 97 97 96 96 96 95 95 95 95 94 94 94 94 94 93 93 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 91 79 66 55 44 36 28 23 18 15 12 10 8 7 6 5 4 4 3
99 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 97 97 97 97 96 96 96 96 96 95 95 95 94 94 94 94 93 93 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 91 83 73 63 53 45 37 31 26 21 18 15 13 11 9 8 7 6 5
98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 97 97 97 97 97 96 96 96 95 95 95 94 94 94 93 93 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 86 78 69 60 52 45 38 33 28 24 20 17 15 13 11 10 9 8
98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 97 97 97 97 97 96 96 96 95 95 95 94 94 94 93 93 92 92 91 91 91 91 92 92 92 92 87 81 74 66 58 51 45 39 34 29 26 22 19 17 15 13 12 11
98 98 98 98 98 98 98 97 97 98 98 98 98 98 97 97 97 97 97 96 96 96 95 95 94 94 94 93 93 92 91 91 91 91 91 91 92 92 92 89 84 77 70 63 57 51 45 39 35 30 26 23 20 17 15 13 12
98 98 98 98 98 97 97 97 97 98 99 99 98 98 98 98 97 97 97 96 96 96 95 95 95 94 94 93 93 92 91 91 91 90 90 90 91 91 92 89 85 80 73 67 61 55 50 45 40 35 31 27 23 20 18 15 14
98 98 98 98 98 97 97 97 97 98 99 99 99 98 98 98 98 97 97 97 97 96 96 95 95 94 94 93 93 92 91 91 90 90 89 89 90 90 91 90 86 81 76 70 64 59 54 49 45 40 36 31 27 24
98 98 98 98 98 97 97 97 97 98 98 99 99 99 98 98 98 98 98 97 97 97 96 96 95 95 94 94 93 92 91 90 90 90 89 88 89 89 90 90 87 83 77 72 66 61 57 53 49 45 40 36
98 98 98 98 97 97 97 97 97 97 98 98 99 99 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 97 97 97 96 95 95 94 93 92 91 90 90 90 88 88 88 89 90 91 89 84 78 73 67 63 59 56 53 49 45 41 28
5
5
10
10
15
20
10000 m
W.DirOff SE
PERIOD 12.0s
Smax 25
W.D.
Honiala
D
1 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 59
1
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Figure A6.2(9) Wave Deformation Pattern (Small Area)
Refraction
Co-Efficient
Wave
Direction
A - 83
Figure A6.2(10) Results of Wave Diffraction
3) Wave Heights by Water Depth
Wave conditions by water depth are calculated in considers of wave breaking. Results are
shown in Table A6.2(7).
Equivalent offshore wave height (H0’): 1.36m
Wave period (T): 12s
Wave length (L0): 225m
Water depth (not include tide level (h)): 3.0~5.0m
Seabed slope: 1/50
Table A6.2(7) Wave Conditions by Water Depth
Water depth*
Period Equivalent offshore
wave height
Seabed slope
(inverse)
Wave steepness
Depth / wave height
ratio
Significant wave height
ratio
Significant wave height
D(m) T(s) Ho'(m) 1/slope Ho'/Lo h/Ho' H1/3/Ho' H1/3(m)
3.0 12 1.36 50 0.006 2.206 1.711 2.327
3.5 12 1.36 50 0.006 2.574 1.585 2.155
4.0 12 1.36 50 0.006 2.941 1.477 2.008
4.5 12 1.36 50 0.006 3.309 1.392 1.893
5.0 12 1.36 50 0.006 3.676 1.325 1.802
*Note: Water depth including tide level, not including wave set up
3-3 Wave Calmness in Present Condition
Wave agitation analysis in the fishing harbour is carried out in the present harbour condition.
The wave height ratios in each area shown in Figure A6.2(11) are obtained, and rates of
operational days in each point are examined.
0.4 0.50.60.7 0.80.9 1.0
5000 m
(UNIT:%)
W.D. S47°E
W.HEIGHT 1.0
W.PERIOD 12.0sec
Smax 50
INCIDENT WAVE
48
59
73
77
84
89
93
42
56
67
76
84
90
94
98
31
47
59
74
85
91
95
99
100
34
53
72
85
94
98
100
102
103
43
69
88
98
100
102
103
104
104
65
94
103
104
105
105
105
105
105
111
107
106
106
106
106
106
105
106
32
31
37
43
49
55
31
32
40
46
53
58
31
35
43
50
56
62
32
38
46
54
60
66
34
42
51
58
65
71
36
37
47
55
62
71
78
36
42
52
60
70
77
82
38
47
56
69
77
83
87
0.4 0.50.60.7 0.80.9 1.0
A - 84
Ordinary waves are hindcasted for 5 years period by spectrum wave model and global wind
database, and wave frequency table is integrated. Wave direction of E and wave period of 8 s are
used in this calculation in consider of these wave characteristics.
Result is shown in Figure A6.2(12). Average wave height ratios of each area are described in
Table A6.2(8). In the case of the present condition, wave height ratio by incident wave height is
higher for E direction wave, and is highest at area A of around the preparation berth as 0.74.
Unexceedance frequency ratio in each point is calculated by using ordinary wave frequency
table and above results of harbour calmness analysis. Figure A6.2(13) shows the simulation
process of unexceedance frequency ratio. Rate of operational days of each area for critical wave
height of from 0.3 to 0.6m are calculated as Table A6.2(9).
Unexceedance frequency ratio to the wave height of 0.5 m is 85% in offshore wave, but it is
already 97% or more in the present condition in the harbour.
This frequency situation of wave height, for example about several times exceed 0.5m per
year is similar to the situation of wave conditions estimated by local interview surveys and
fishing vessel damage records.
Rate of operation at area A is about 90% or over for critical wave height of 40cm in
consideration of preparation works or fish landing works.
Table A6.2(8) Average Wave Height Ratio
Area A B C D E F Wave Height
Ratio 0.74 0.58 0.14 0.34 0.45 0.97
Figure A6.2(11) Layout of Water Basin
1000 m
Area A
Area B
Area C
Area D
Area E
Area F
A - 85
Figure A6.2(12) Result of Harbour Wave Calmness Analysis
Figure A6.2(13) Unexceedance Frequency
Table A6.2(9) Result of Workable Ratio of Each Area (Unit: %)
Critical Wave Height
\Area 30cm 40cm 50cm 60cm
A 70.08% 89.75% 97.69% 99.57%
B 87.34% 98.07% 99.76% 99.97%
C 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
D 99.82% 99.98% 100.00% 100.00%
E 97.41% 99.83% 99.98% 99.99%
F 49.81% 71.41% 87.14% 88.8%
Note: Limit Wave Height is set by Japanese Standard
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.11.1
1.1
1.2
1000 m
(UNIT:%)
W.DIREC E
W.HEIGHT 1.0
W.PERIOD 8.0sec
Smax 50
INCIDENT W.
90
91
93
93
91
92
92
95
93
92
94
94
94
94
93
94
94
95
94
94
94
95
95
95
94
96
95
96
95
96
95
95
96
95
97
96
96
96
96
96
96
97
97
96
97
96
97
97
97
98
98
98
98
97
98
98
98
98
100
98
98
99
98
98
99
98
98
99
99
99
99
99
98
100
100
99
101
98
100
100
100
101
104
105
99
99
100
100
101
101
107
103
101
100
100
102
101
110
105
103
100
101
101
105
111
108
107
103
101
102
105
108
112
110
108
106
103
98
100
110
114
113
113
106
86
94
94
102
113
114
116
80
75
77
75
84
95
104
121
70
65
67
57
65
73
73
88
65
58
59
50
49
56
52
51
57
55
59
51
46
50
46
46
53
52
52
52
49
45
44
50
46
47
46
49
49
47
36
41
38
41
48
42
52
34
39
41
40
40
42
45
35
36
42
37
34
44
38
40
39
37
38
40
42
35
56
97
96
97
96
96
97
95
93
93
95
96
98
99
97
95
95
95
95
95
95
93
95
97
97
97
98
97
95
94
95
95
94
94
99
101
99
98
97
96
94
95
94
96
96
97
99
98
98
96
96
95
95
96
100
99
99
99
97
95
96
96
96
100
99
97
96
97
98
96
97
96
100
99
100
99
97
97
98
96
97
101
99
99
99
97
97
97
97
100
102
102
101
97
97
99
98
98
103
100
100
100
98
97
98
98
105
105
101
99
99
100
98
99
105
103
101
99
98
98
100
106
107
102
100
101
99
101
105
106
103
99
99
112
102
105
104
102
100
141
114
103
105
102
102
145
116
105
105
106
143
117
109
132
116
91
99
97
99
97
103
91
96
96
99
101
100
95
97
97
99
99
95
96
97
99
98
100
93
99
97
97
99
100
102
92
101
98
99
98
100
102
95
101
96
98
98
100
102
110
97
104
100
100
100
101
102
108
101
104
100
100
100
102
104
105
100
104
103
104
103
101
102
105
96
104
102
103
103
103
104
91
101
99
103
105
105
105
90
98
98
100
102
106
108
108
94
96
95
97
100
105
110
113
94
95
97
98
106
118
94
94
105
73
50
62
52
51
57
55
57
57
60
59
33
62
49
55
55
52
51
62
43
64
54
58
56
58
56
57
61
73
89
59
69
61
67
67
68
66
64
60
70
72
76
74
71
76
73
76
76
73
79
74
77
87
92
52
84
74
79
79
78
79
80
90
95
100
105
117
52
88
72
81
76
81
83
84
91
96
99
102
94
108
60
86
74
81
78
83
85
83
82
82
84
84
88
88
76
82
75
84
79
83
82
78
74
72
71
72
67
74
75
73
79
77
74
72
69
67
67
67
63
41
65
64
62
66
65
64
65
61
64
63
62
58
47
54
49
50
51
50
52
56
56
57
55
57
54
45
46
39
43
44
40
45
46
49
49
49
49
48
41
39
35
36
37
37
38
41
45
46
47
47
46
40
32
31
35
33
35
36
36
38
40
41
42
41
30
31
34
35
35
34
36
38
38
41
28
31
31
33
34
37
28
36
40
31
34
40
33
42
46
51
32
44
42
45
49
65
49
37
16
17
19
20
23
27
27
26
13
20
19
21
23
22
23
26
26
27
28
28
14
23
19
22
22
22
24
23
25
25
27
26
26
25
26
30
13
24
21
24
22
23
26
23
24
23
24
24
23
25
24
28
21
18
22
21
22
22
24
22
22
24
23
22
24
21
23
22
22
25
25
17
20
18
20
20
18
19
20
20
21
23
19
21
23
17
27
12
20
18
17
17
16
15
17
17
18
19
17
19
22
15
14
18
18
15
16
14
16
15
14
17
16
17
18
17
19
18
14
16
15
14
13
15
13
15
15
14
17
17
13
20
11
15
14
13
12
12
13
15
13
13
15
15
13
12
13
12
11
11
11
11
12
12
13
13
13
15
11
10
10
10
11
10
11
12
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.11.1
1.1
1.2
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.010
0.100
1.000
2.500
5.000
10.000
20.000
30.000
40.000
50.000
60.000
70.000
80.000
90.000
95.000
97.500
99.000
99.900
99.990
99.999
WAVE HEIGHT (m)
UNEXEEDANCE PROBABILTY (%)
Sekondi
OFFSHORE
PRESENT A
B
C
D
E
F
A - 86
3-4 Current Conditions
Current observations are carried out at eight points in Sekondi Bay using the
electromagnetic current meter.
Observation is conducted at spring tide (July 21, 2013) and neap tide (July 6-7, 2013)
periods and flood tide and ebb tide, respectively. Current direction and speed are observed at
upper, middle and lower layers in depth.
The current vectors in spring tide situation are shown in Figure A6.2(14). Current directions
and speeds in spring tide and neap tide situation are shown in Table A6.2(10) and (11). Average
current speed is about 20cm/s, current direction goes toward inside of the harbour and has no
connection with flood or ebb tide situations.
Figure A6.2(14) Current Distribution in Spring Tide (21st July, 2013)
Table A6.2(10) Current Situation in Spring Tide
Speed(cm/sec) Direction Speed(cm/sec) Direction Speed(cm/sec) Direction
Flood St-A 18.63 97 18.13 302 16.33 19221st July,2013 St-B 12.63 116 17.93 108 9.77 316
(Spring) St-C 19.67 35 18.27 67St-D 27.07 321 30.87 133 12.57 342St-a 21.77 99 23.80 326 14.93 325St-b 23.60 92 23.07 346 24.60 182St-c 24.30 80 21.83 284 20.53 317St-d 24.47 233 22.87 133 15.97 325
Ebb St-A 22.47 95 17.33 320 13.93 17021st July,2013 St-B 22.00 57 20.90 108 23.43 123
(Spring) St-C 25.00 197 20.60 71 16.60 118St-D 26.67 102 17.70 214 26.60 268St-a 18.37 113 17.60 258 16.83 175St-b 20.23 120 25.30 281 20.80 321St-c 25.83 177 21.43 117 23.83 295St-d 12.47 134 11.53 89 10.87 49
Condition PointUpper Layer Middle Layer Lower Layer
A - 87
Table A6.2(11) Current Situation in Neap Tide
3-5 Sediment Transport and Shoreline Change
Situation of sediment transport and shoreline change at Sekondi Bay are analysed by
comparison of bathymetric survey results performed at 1996 and 2013. Figure A6.2(15) shows
the comparison of contour lines of 0.0,-1.0, -2.0 and -3.0m water depth.
According to this, water depth in the north side of the fishing harbour becomes shallower
about 50cm generally. North-side of the naval harbour area including the fishing harbour area is
rather calm area because there is wav sheltered area of the naval harbour from incident wave
direction.
It is generally recognized that sand deposition easily occurred at calm area. Above water
depth changes are concerned with this situation.
Moreover, contour line of -3.0m depth moves toward offshore, and contour line of -1.0m
depth moves toward nearshore. It means mild slope cross section topography called “bar” is
formed at -2m water depth area.
It is surmised that sand bar will be formed at the wave breaking area because bottom
sediments are rolled up there and moved offshore and nearshore area. The formed bar will be
disappeared if a calm wave affects continuously after that. That bar shaped bottom topography is
observed this time suggests that a certain high waves attacked before this time bathymetric
survey.
Since the water depth of wave breaking point is about 2 times of the incident wave height,
waves of 1.0 m wave height is considered to attack by a certain amount of frequency around
Project Site.
Speed(cm/sec) Direction Speed(cm/sec) Direction Speed(cm/sec) Direction
Flood St-A 22.20 225 22.17 213 24.57 1897th July,2013 St-B 20.30 213 20.87 206 18.40 248
(Neap) St-C 21.50 208 12.23 160 17.43 173St-D 21.07 246 18.60 244 27.23 213St-a 23.57 240 21.67 209 22.00 208St-b 23.10 233 18.47 230 25.70 204St-c 24.17 224 24.57 224 23.27 205St-d 18.33 184 27.37 207 14.60 204
Ebb St-A 26.87 209 29.67 215 24.23 2346th July,2013 St-B 27.20 151 22.20 129 17.43 53
(Neap) St-C 32.93 225 25.33 227 27.70 170St-D 30.80 205 28.23 191 28.20 181St-a 27.43 210 34.83 224 39.17 241St-b 24.33 179 25.07 183 27.97 109St-c 32.57 207 38.63 222 33.23 216St-d 8.23 106 9.63 129 10.63 257
Condition PointUpper Layer Middle Layer Lower Layer
A - 88
Figure A6.2(15) Contour Line Changes (1996 and 2013)
4. Seabed Material Survey
Seabed material survey is performed at seven points shown in Figure A6.2(16). Laboratory
tests of moisture contents, specific gravity and sieve analysis are carried out on July 8, 2013.
Moreover, examination of heavy metal contents is carried out at the point of S-1, S-2 and S-3.
Laboratory test results of moisture contents, specific gravity, and sieve analysis are shown in
Table A6.2(12) and a heavy metal content results are shown in Table A6.2(13).
At the point S-3 and S-5 where are outside of the fishing harbour, specific gravity is light
and particle diameter size is small than that of point S-1, S-2 and S-3 where are inside of the
harbour.
Heavy metal contents are mostly less than the standard value of Japan or Australia, however,
disposal in the predetermined dumping site will be needed in excavation at construction work.
Figure A6.2(16) Seabed Material Investigation Points
1000 m
1996 (0-3m)
2013 (0-3m)
0m
-1m
-2m
-3m
-1m
-2m
-3m
0m
Silty and light grainarea
A - 89
Table A6.2(12) Seabed Material Survey Result (Water Contents, Specific Gravity, Grain Size)
Point Water
Contents (%)
Specific Gravity
(g/cm3)
D50 (mm)
Composition of Soil Material
Silt Sand Others
S-1 74.50 2.43 0.140 37.45% 62.36% 0.19%
S-2 79.63 2.54 0.120 39.41% 60.46% 0.13%
S-3 57.24 2.50 0.078 47.85% 52.14% 0.01%
S-4 83.18 2.21 0.100 30.72% 69.04% 0.24%
S-5 61.76 2.41 0.069 52.41% 47.59% 0.00%
S-6 36.85 2.70 0.110 42.14% 57.86% 0.00%
S-7 24.32 2.67 0.180 33.63% 63.94% 2.43%
平均 59.64 2.49 0.202
Table A6.2(13) Seabed Material Survey Result (Heavy Metal Contents)
Item S-1
(Old Beach)
S-2
(In Harbour)
S-3
(Entrance) Standard Source
S (mg/kg) 127 129 135 200 *7
As (mg/kg) 2.5 < 0.025 < 0.025 20~70 *1
Cd (mg/kg) 0.75 1.25 0.50 1.5~10
1.0
*1
*4
Cr (mg/kg) < 0.025 25.0 25.0 80 *4
Ag (mg/kg) 5.5 6.75 4.25 65~270
125
34
45~90
*1
*2
*4
*5
Pb (mg/kg) 15.3 26.5 23.3 50~220
25,000
*1
*3
Hg (mg/kg) 0.25 6.00 3.00 150~1,000
10 (Fishing
Harbour)
*1
*3
Ni (mg/kg) < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025 20 *4
Zn (mg/kg) 15.5 25.3 16.5 150 *4
DDT (μg/kg) 0.621 0.675 4.054 4.77 *6 Note *1 National Assessment Guideline for Dredging,2009
*2:Japanese Standard for Soil Material *3:Japanese Standard for Soil Material Discharge *4:ERL (Effects range-Low) *5:French Standard for Soil Material *6:Canada Sediment Quality Guidelines 1998) *7:Japanese Standard for Fisheries (2005)
A - 90
5. Soil Investigation
Soil conditions around the breakwater area by previous study are described below. Soil
qualities of surface layer are clay including 30% silt up to the depth of 2m and N value is from 5
to 15. At the layer of deeper than 2m., the soils are weathered sandstone and shows N value of 50
or more.
Soil investigation results performed by this study are described below. Standard penetration
tests are carried out at 4 points (B-1 to B-4). B-1, B-2 and B-3 are sea area and B-2 is land area.
Plate bearing tests are carried out at 2 points (P-1 and P-2).
Figure A6.2(18), (19) show the boring logs of N values and soil characteristics in each point.
Water depth at B-1 and B-3 are almost -3m and surface layer are silty clay up to 1m or 1.3m
below seabed. Water depth of B-2 is about -5m, and surface layer is silty clay up to 0.4m below
seabed and layer of deeper up to 10.5m below seabed is sandstone or shale stone including gravel
and N value is from 20 to 58 getting greater as it became deeper.
Point B-4 is located near the breakwater base, surface is silty sand including gravel up to
4.5m below ground level, N value is from 14 to 50 getting greater as it became deeper. Layer
deeper up to 15m is hard sandstone.
Table A6.2(14) to (16) show the results of unconfined compression test, moisture content
test and specific gravity test. Unconfined compression strength shows 85 to 90MPa (N/mm2) for
sand, and 150 to 155MPa (N/mm2) for sandstone. Moisture contents shows about 10 to 20%.
Moreover, specific gravity shows 2.57 to 2.65.
Figure A6.2(17) Soil Sampling Points
B-1
B-2
B-3
P-2B-4
P-1
A - 91
Table A6.2(14) Result of Unconfined Compression Test
Unit: MPa
Sample B-1 B-2 B-3 B-4
1 2 Average 1 2 Average 1 2 Average 1 2 Average
Sand 85.0 88.0 86.5 90.0 88.0 89.0 85.0 86.0 85.5 87.0 91.0 89.0
Sandstone 152.0 150.0 151.0 152.0 154.0 153.0 155.0 152.0 153.5 155.0 152.0 153.5
Table A6.2(15) Result of Moisture Contents Test
B-1 B-2 B-3 B-4
Depth(m) Water
Contents (%)Depth(m)
Water Contents (%)
Depth(m)Water
Contents (%)Depth(m)
Water Contents
(%)
0.0-1.10 15.59 0.20-0.40 17.64 0.0-0.70 10.37 1.50-1.95 12.85
1.10-1.30 12.04 2.00-2.55 19.40 0.70-0.90 14.59 3.00-3.45 19.38
2.80-3.25 15.61 0.90-1.35 11.04 4.50-4.80 18.94
4.30-4.75 13.38
6.20-6.65 14.03
Table A6.2(16) Result of Specific Gravity Test Unit: t/m3
B-1 B-2 B-3 B-4 Depth(m) Specific
Gravity Depth(m) Specific
Gravity Depth(m) Specific
Gravity Depth(m) Specific
Gravity
0.0-1.10 2.62 0.0-0.20 2.61 0.0-0.70 2.60 1.50-1.95 2.62
1.10-1.30 2.53 0.20-0.40 2.57 0.70-0.90 2.63 3.00-3.45 2.65
1.30-1.75 2.60 2.00-2.45 2.63 0.90-1.35 2.62 4.50-4.80 2.64
4.30-4.75 2.62 3.50-3.85 2.63 4.80-5.25 2.59
The plate loading test is performed using total weight of 42 t truck for counter weight and
circular board of 30cm diameter. Test result is shown in Figure A6.2(17). K30 value of P-1 and
P-2 are 420MPa/m3 and 590MPa/m3, respectively. It is considered that these have sufficient
capacity like a pavement works etc. .
A - 92
Equipment & Methods LOCATION: SEKONDI FISHING HARBOURDate Begun: 22/11/13
CLIENT: ECOH Date Completed: 22/11/13
El=3mCore Sizes: 0.050m Orientation Ground Level:
vertical
0.0
Remarks:
Sheet 1 of 1Logged by Checked by
PROJECT:
B-1
Rotary coring with Central Mine Equipment 6200N Broadway STLouis MO.63147 drilling rig to 15.0m to produce 50mm cores.
N 04o 56.572' 001o 42.401'W
Depth(m)
DrillingProgres
s
Waterreturn
Cas
ing Rock Quality
discontinuities
f Cr rCorerun T
hic
knes s (m)
description O.D Level (m) Legend
0.0 22/11/13
Sea
3.6
Very soft wet dark grey/black siltyCLAY
DS 01 3.60-4.70
4.7 22/11/13
70%Medium dense wet light brownsilty SAND with shells and somegravels
DS 02 4.70-4.90
22/11/13
4.9
65%
SPT 01 17,23,37 N=60 4.90-5.35
1.5m
Highly decomposed reddish,light/choclate brown SHALEwith sand
22/11/131.5m
5.6
60%
Moderately strongreddish/yellowish brown slightlyfractured, fine grainedSANDSTONE
SPT 02 28,32,40 N=72 6.40-6.85
22/11/13
SPT 03 36,38,52 N=80 7.90-8.35
10.25 SPT 04 34,40,60 N=100 9.80-10.25
ebenezer Ansah
End of drilling
LEGEND:Cr - Percentage Core Recovery
r - Rock Quality Designation
f - No of fracture per metre
Equipment & Methods LOCATION: SEKONDI FISHING HARBOUR Date Begun: 21/11/13El=3m
CLIENT: ECOH Date Completed: 22/11/13
Core Sizes: 0.050m Orientation Ground Level:vertical
0.0
Remarks:
Sheet 1 of 1Logged by Checked by
PROJECT:B-2
Rotary coring with Central Mine Equipment 6200N Broadway STLouis MO.63147 drilling rig to 15.0m to produce 50mm cores.
N 04o 56.492' 001o 42.371'W
DrillingProgres
s
Waterreturn
Cas
ing Rock Quality
discontinuities
f Cr rCorerun T
hic
kn
ess
(m)
description O.D Level (m) Legend
0.0 21/11/13
Sea
5.1
Depth(m)
Very soft wet dark grey/black siltyCLAY
DS 01 5.10-5.30
5.3 21/11/13
65%Loose wet light brown silty SANDwith shells and some gravels
DS 02 5.30-5.50
21/11/13
5.5
60%
SPT 01 9,8,12 N=20 5.50-5.95
Highly decomposed reddish,light/choclate brown SHALEwith some sand
21/11/131.5m
SPT 02 9,14,14 N=28 7.10-7.55
8.9
50%
Moderately strongreddish/yellowish brown slightlyfractured, fine grainedSANDSTONE interbeded with stiffsilty CLAY (SHALE)
SPT 03 10,18,25 N=41 8.60-9.05
22/11/131.5m
SPT 04 21,28,30 N=58 10.10-10.55
10.55
ebenezer Ansah
End of drilling
LEGEND:Cr - Percentage Core Recovery
r - Rock Quality Designation
f - No of fracture per metre
Figure A6.2(18) Boring Logs (B-1、B-2)
A - 93
Equipment & Methods LOCATION: SEKONDI FISHING HARBOURDate Begun: 20/11/13El=1m
CLIENT: ECOH Date Completed: 21/11/13
Core Sizes: 0.050m Orientation Ground Level:vertical
0.0
Remarks:
Sheet 1 of 1Logged by Checked by
PROJECT:B-3
Rotary coring with Central Mine Equipment 6200N Broadway STLouis MO.63147 drilling rig to 15.0m to produce 50mm cores.
N 04o 56.512' 001o 42.412'W
DrillingProgres
s
Waterreturn
Cas
ing Rock Quality
discontinuities
f Cr rCorerun T
hic
kn
ess
(m)
description O.D Level (m) Legend
0.0 20/11/13
Sea
3.4
Depth(m)
Very soft wet dark grey/black siltyCLAY
DS 01 3.40-4.10
4.1 20/11/13
80%Loose to medium dense moistgreyish brown silty SAND withtraces of gravel (pebbles)
DS 02 4.10-4.30
20/11/13
4.3
80%
SPT 01 29,32,37 N=69 4.30-4.75
SPT 02 36,40,45 N=85 5.80-6.25
49,59,60 N=115 8.20-8.65
6.1
60%
SPT 03 38,49,53 N=101 6.70-7.15
21/11/131.5m
SPT 04
10.0 SPT 05 56,68 N>100 9.70-10.0099%
Moderately strongreddish/yellowish brown slightlyfractured, fine grainedSANDSTONE interbeded with stiffsilty CLAY (SHALE)
21/11/131.5m
ebenezer Ansah
End of drilling
LEGEND:Cr - Percentage Core Recovery
r - Rock Quality Designation
f - No of fracture per metre
Equipment & Methods LOCATION: SEKONDI FISHING HARBOURDate Begun: 03/08/13
CLIENT: ECOH Date Completed: 04/08/13
Core Sizes: 0.050m Orientation Ground Level:vertical
0.0
Remarks:
Sheet 1 of 1Logged by Checked by
End of drilling
8,10,18 N=28SPT 02
100%
99%
90%
04/08/133.0m
0.5m 90%
3.00-3.45
23,30 N>50SPT 03 4.50-4.80
(3.0)
75%
76%
87%
Legend
Rock QualityDepth
(m)
03/08/130.0
Corerun
ebenezer
7.5
8.5
03/08/131.0m
Moderately strongreddish/yellowish brown slightlyfractured, fine grainedSANDSTONE interbeded with stiffs ilty CLAY (SHALE)
3.0m
Ansah
15.0
03/08/13
04/08/13
03/08/13
SPT 04
69%
B-4
Waterreturn
Cas
ing
(1.0)
Cr
Th
ick
nes
s(m
)
description
65%
O.D Level (m)
DS 01
Rotary coring with Central Mine Equipment 6200N Broadway STLouis MO.63147 drilling rig to 15.0m to produce 50mm cores.
PROJECT:
DrillingProgres
sf r
discontinuities
80%
95%
3.0
14.5
(0.5)
98%
84%
Loose to medium dense moistgreyish brown silty SAND withtraces of gravel (pebbles)
Loose moist brownish silty SAND
(3.0)
5,8,14
Moderately strongchocolate/yellowish brownslightly fractured, fine grainedSANDSTONE
Moderately strongreddish/yellowish brown slightlyfractured, fine grainedSANDSTONE interbeded with stiffs ilty CLAY (SHALE)
11.50-11.55
1.5
03/08/13
SPT 01
0.5-0.8
4.5
Dense, wet, dark grey SAND withshells and pebbles
90%
N=14 1.50-1.95
03/08/13
3.0m 40% 32% (3.0)
11.5
101 8.50-8.60
SPT 05 56
LEGEND:Cr - Percentage Core Recovery
r - Rock Quality Designation
f - No of fracture per metre
Figure A6.2(19) Boring Logs (B-3、B-4)
A - 94
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Subsidence(0.01mm)
Load(t/m2)
0
50
100
150
200
250
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Subsidence(0.01mm)
Load(t/m2)
P-1
P-2
Figure A6.2(20) Result of Plate Bearing Test (P-1、P-2)
A - 95
6. Water Quality Survey
Water quality survey is performed on July 10, 2013 in six points shown in Figure A6.2(21).
Moreover, the water quality survey of tap water at ice making plant and sewage which flows into
Old Beach are also performed. The water quality result in sea area is shown in Table A6.2(17).
Test result of tap water and sewage are shown in Table A6.2(18) and (19).
Tap water qualities are within the Japanese Standard value for tap water, especially, it is
without most crystal exposure of the calcium which will cause a trouble at ice making process.
Around the project site, the content values such as COD, suspended solids, phosphate and
nitrogen are exceeding the standard value of Japan except PH and salinity concentration.
The high value is especially detected from near to the harbour of W-1, W-2 and W-3.
It is considered that main causes are household waste water or human waste which is
discharged directly. Because GPHA is processing periodically and appropriately the waste
generated in the fishing harbour and human waste. Moreover, wastes which are generated on the
simple treatment process at the harbour by fishmonger such as fins, and scales etc. is discharged
appropriately.
There is no big change in the water quality of the project site by comparison with previous
report results.
Figure A6.2(21) Water Quality Sampling Points
NAVAL BASE
: To be dredgedW‐1
W
W‐2
W‐3
W‐5
W‐6
W‐4
T‐1
WW
W
W
W
0 100 200
W
T‐2W
A - 96
Table A6.2(17) Result of Water Quality Investigation (Upper: High Tide, Lower: Low Tide)
Item unit 1996 W-1 W-2 W-3 W-4 W-5 W-6 Standard Source
PH 7.2 7.9
7.447.53
7.597.76
7.69 7.77
7.76 7.83
7.77 7.81
7.72 7.64
7.8 ~8.3
*1&*2
COD mg/l 106 110
10590.0
14464.0
121 60.0
76.0 42.0
83.0 27.0
172 42.0
<2.0 <3.0
*1 *2
DO mg/l 6.6 5.9
7.647.06
8.287.07
8.87 6.63
7.79 6.87
9.56 9.41
11.2 8.43
>7.5 >5.0
*1 *2
SS
mg/l 81.0 91.0
54.773.6
43.345.0
52.7 70.3
58.2 66.0
123 38.3
55.0 46.0
<50
*3
N
mg/l 1.00.8
1.40.6
0.8 1.1
0.7 0.7
1.0 0.8
0.8 1.1
<0.3 <0.6
*1 *2
P mg/l 0.580.67
0.570.77
0.47 0.41
0.68 0.36
0.67 0.44
0.68 0.39
<0.03 <0.05
*1 *2
Chlorophyll A µg/l 2.5 2.4
7.446.46
2.312.69
2.92 2.65
4.20 4.77
7.20 3.08
2.04 3.23
Sanitary
Concentration
‰ 37.337.2
37.437.3
37.3 37.3
37.3 37.3
37.3 37.3
37.3 37.3
Note 1996: Water quality before previous project *1: Japanese Standard 1st grade *2: Japanese Standard 2nd grade *3: Ghana Standard for waste discharge
Table A6.2(18) Result of Water Quality Investigation (Tap Water at Ice Making Plant) Item Observed Value Japanese Standard for Tap WaterPH 6.5 5.8-8.6 Cl 0.069PPT <1.0PPT (Remain Volume)N <0.01mg/L <10mg (NO2)
Phenol 0.00005mg/L <0.005mg/LHg <0.001mg/L <0.0005mg/LPb <0.005mg/L <0.001mg/LZn 0.011mg/L <1.0mg/L Fe <0.010mg/L <0.3mg/L Cu 0.010mg/L <1.0mg/L Mg 0.032mg/L <0.05mg/L
Ca 14.2mg/L <300mg/L
Mg 3.72mg/L <300mg/L
Table A6.2(19) Result of Water Quality Investigation (Old beach)
Sample T2 (Wastewater) Test Value
pH (pH units) 6.82
BOD (mg/l) 8.07
COD (mg/l) 190
SS(mg/l) 193
Total Nitrogen (mg/l) 1.2
Total Phosphate (mg/l) 0.537
DO (mg/l) 0.52
A - 97
7. Construction Material Investigation
Construction material analysis is carried out. Two samples of sand, gravels and quarries
from two quarry sites are sampled namely SOFOKROM and JUSTMAC. JUSTMAC VENTURE
LIMITED of quarry-1 is already used as the quarry site for construction work around the site,
because it is only 2.5km distance from the project site and is also large scale for quarry site.
It is confirmed that main kind of this quarry material is granite, and quality and quantity are
considered to be satisfactory for this project.
The results of material investigation are shown in Table A6.2(20).
Figure A6.2(22) Location of Quarry Site
Table A6.2(20) Result of Construction Material Investigation
Quarry-1: Justmac Venture Limited
Quarry-2: Sofokrom Quarry
Sekondi Fishing Harbour
Naval Harbour
Comp strength
63.5mm50.8mm 14mm
12.5mm 5mm
2.36mm
0.425mm
0.075mm 1 2 Ave 1 2 3 Ave 1 2 Ave c
Coarse Aggregates 100 97 15 8 2.76 2.82 2.79
Quarry dust 100 94 79 35 3 2.90 2.84 2.87 1975 1977 2003 1985 7.1 6.8 6.95 18 31
Cobble 2690 2710 2700
N/mm2
M. Content(%)
25
Sample
Type of Test
Grading (% passing) S. gravity Density (kg/m3) Shear Box
Comp strength
37.5mm 20mm 14mm12.5m
m 5mm2.36m
m0.425m
m0.075mm 1 2 Ave 1 2 3 Ave 1 2 Ave c
Coarse Aggregates 100 76 62 50 28 19 8 3.0 2.65 2.69 2.67
Quarry dust 100 95 63 22 2 2.70 2.74 2.72 2058 2072 2061 2064 6.2 6.5 6.35 12 30
Cobble 2700 2710 2705
N/mm2
M. Content(% )
24
Sample
Type of Test
Grading (% passing) S. gravity Density (kg/m3) Shear Box