58
Appeasement Based on a presentation by Kevin J. Benoy

Appeasement

  • Upload
    nerys

  • View
    37

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Appeasement. Based on a presentation by Kevin J. Benoy. Definition. The policy followed first by the British and later by the French, of avoiding war with aggressive powers by giving way to their demands – provided that they were not unreasonable . Two Phases. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Appeasement

Appeasement

Based on a presentation by Kevin J. Benoy

Page 2: Appeasement

Definition

• The policy followed first by the British and later by the French, of avoiding war with aggressive powers by giving way to their demands – provided that they were not unreasonable.

Page 3: Appeasement

Two PhasesThere were two phases to appeasement:• First Phase: from the mid-1920’s to 1937,

during which people generally felt a war must be avoided at all costs.

• Second Phase: from May 1937 to mid 1939, when British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain took the initiative in trying to reason with Hitler, showing him that negotiation, rather than force, would resolve all reasonable claims.

Page 4: Appeasement

Roots of Appeasement• Lloyd-George himself felt

that the Versailles Treaty was too harsh – but it was not politically acceptable for the British government to modify its position at the time.

• Many other Englishmen, including John Maynard Keynes, saw the treaty as draconian.

• Would anyone fight to enforce such a treaty?

Page 5: Appeasement

Roots of Appeasement• The Locarno Treaty of

1925 deliberately left the door open to revision of Germany’s Eastern boundaries.

• According to Foreign Minister Austen Chamberlain (Neville’s half-brother), “no British government would ever risk the bones of a British Grenadier in defense of the Polish Corridor.”

Page 6: Appeasement

Popular Support– It would avoid war, which modern

technology made unacceptably devastating.

– War or even deterrence through arms was considered too costly for any sensible government to fund.

– Both Italy and Germany had been badly treated at the Paris Peace Conference.

– The League of Nations had no teeth. Deals between the powers were needed to preserve peace.

– Economic cooperation between Germany and Britain would help both. Prosperity in Germany would reduce violence.

Page 7: Appeasement

Popular Support• Fear of communism

was particularly strong among conservatives. Stalin, not Hitler, was the chief threat.

• Some, in Britain, and many in France, admired Hitler.

Page 8: Appeasement

Popular Support• War at a time

when the USA was in isolation, France was politically divided, and Britain militarily unprepared, was thought foolish.

• Time was needed to allow Britain to regain her strength.

Page 9: Appeasement

France’s Position• Although France initially

opposed appeasement, early in the 1920’s, it late modified this position – sometimes supporting and sometimes opposing it.

• Poincare opposed modifying Versailles; Briand favoured conciliation.

• A later foreign minister who proposed being firm with Hitler, was assassinated.

• France was too politically divided to be decisive in the 1930’s.

Page 10: Appeasement

France’s Position• Militarily, France had invested

hugely in the static Maginot Line.• Her strategic position was,

therefore, predicated on defense and not mobility.

Page 11: Appeasement

Maginot Line

Page 12: Appeasement

German Revisionism

• Hitler moved quickly to rearm, but insisted that Germany would disarm if the rest of the world did so.

• Hitler was good at acting aggressively then making soothing comments.

Page 13: Appeasement

German Revisionism• Germany’s signing of a 10

year non-aggression pact with Poland in 1934 was seen as evidence of his willingness for peace.

• However, his real intention was to split the Franco-Polish alliance.

• British Lord Lothian, in January 1935, said “…what the Germans are after is a strong army which will enable them to deal with Russia.”

Page 14: Appeasement

The Dolfuss Affair• In 1934, Hitler suffered a

setback when he attempted to bring about Anschluss (union) with Austria.

• Austrian Nazis, directed by Hitler, staged a revolt, murdered the Austrian Chancellor Englebert Dollfuss, and tried to seize power.

• Italy responded by massing 3 tank divisions on its Austrian frontier.

• Hitler backed down.

Page 15: Appeasement

The Stresa Front• The Dollfuss Affair

seemed to push together Fascist Italy and the Western European democracies to contain Hitler.

• In April, 1935, Britain, Italy and France set up the Stresa Front to oppose further revision of Versailles.

• Hitler responded by acting with much more restraint.

Page 16: Appeasement

Saarland Returned

• In 1935 the Saar was returned to Germany after 90% of its inhabitants voted for union with Germany.

Page 17: Appeasement

Saarland returned

Page 18: Appeasement
Page 19: Appeasement

Anglo-German Naval Agreement

• In June, 1935, Britain and Germany signed the Anglo-German Naval Agreement, which set the allowable size of the German navy to 35% that of total British tonnage.

• This was inconsistent with previous arms limitations and it seemed to contradict the Stresa Front.

Page 20: Appeasement

The Abyssinian War• Feeling that

Britain and France needed his support, Mussolini expected a free hand in avenging Italy’s 19th century defeat at the hands of Abyssinia (Ethiopia).

Page 21: Appeasement

The Abyssinian War

• Newsreel film and eyewitness reports of the Italian use of poison gas and flame throwers brought public outrage in Britain and France.

Page 22: Appeasement

The Abyssinian War• In October, 1935 the

League of Nations denounced Italy as an aggressor and imposed limited economic sanctions.

• Austria, Hungary and Germany refused to apply sanctions.

• Coal, oil and steel, the goods most needed by Italy, were not restricted.

• Britain even allowed Italy to use the Suez Canal.

Page 23: Appeasement

The Abyssinian War• Trying to patch up

the Stresa Front, Britain and France proposed the Hoare-Laval Plan (Dec 1935), which would grant 2/3 of Abyssinia to Italy.

• When word of the secret agreement leaked, it forced the resignation of Sam Hoare, the British Foreign Minister.

Page 24: Appeasement

The Abyssinian War• In May, 1936

Addis Ababa, the Abyssinian capital fell.

• Italy had its way in Africa.

• The Stresa Front was also dead.

• Mussolini looked for a new friend.

Page 25: Appeasement

The Rhineland

• March 1936With the world’s attention focused on Abyssinia, Hitler marched into the demilitarized Rhineland.

Page 26: Appeasement

The Rhineland• German troops were

ordered to withdraw if they encountered any Allied resistance.

• They did not.• Britain was too

sympathetic to act, believing that Germany was “going into their own back garden.”

• The League of Nations protested feebly.

• France was too politically divided to act alone.

Page 27: Appeasement

Edward VIII• Britain gained,

briefly, a new and pro-German King – Edward VIII.

• However, his reign ended after only 11 months, as he abdicated in order to marry American divorce Wallis Simpson.

Page 28: Appeasement

The Spanish Civil War• In July, 1936 General

Francisco Franco rebelled against the Leftist government of Spain.

• A week after the rebellion commenced, Hitler agreed to provide the rebel general military aid.

• German aircraft were instrumental in transporting Franco’s Moroccan army to peninsular Spain.

Page 29: Appeasement

The Spanish Civil War• Italy also helped the

nationalist uprising – on land and at sea.

• The Republican government had sympathy abroad, but the Western democracies pledged neutrality.

• Only individual volunteers in the International Brigades, and the Soviet Union offered help to the Republic.

Page 30: Appeasement

The Spanish Civil War• German and Italian

forces gained significant combat experience and tested their weapon systems.

• The German bombing of Guernica gave notice of what air war would mean for civilians.

Page 31: Appeasement

Anschluss• With the world’s

attention focused on Spain and Britain consumed with the issues of the monarchy, Hitler again turned to his boyhood home.

• In February, Austrian Chancellor Schuschnigg was summoned to Hitler’s mountain retreat at Berchtesgarten and bullied into granting amnesty to Nazi plotters.

Page 32: Appeasement

Anschluss• To avoid further

street fighting, Schushnigg announced a plebiscite in March on whether or not Austrians wanted to unite with Germany.

• Fearing an embarrassing loss, Hitler demanded the resignation of the Austrian Chancellor.

Page 33: Appeasement

Anschluss• Schuschnigg

appealed for British and Italian support.

• None was offered.• On March 12, 1938,

German troops crossed into Austria and Hitler returned home in triumph to the cheers of Austrian crowds.

• Hitler’s plebiscite received 99% support.

Page 34: Appeasement

The Sudetenland• 1938:

Czechoslovakia felt vulnerable after Anschluss.

• It was now surrounded on three sides by Germany, at a time when Hitler was fomenting trouble among Czechoslovakia’s 3.5 million Sudeten Germans.

Page 35: Appeasement

The Sudetenland

• Konrad Henlein, the Sudeten Nazi leader, claimed Czechoslovak discrimination against the German minority.

Page 36: Appeasement

The Sudetenland• From June, 1938

German pressure on Czechoslovakia began to build.

• Chamberlain, the British Prime Minister, sent Lord Runciman to Czechoslovakia to report on the situation. He suggested Sudeten autonomy within Czechoslovakia.

Page 37: Appeasement

The Sudetenland• Hitler was unsatisfied.• He wanted the

immediate surrender of the entire area.

• The Czechoslovaks were opposed, as the territory included virtually all of their strong mountain defences and one of the world’s greatest armament factories – the Skoda Works.

Page 38: Appeasement

The Sudetenland• Chamberlain and

French Prime Minister Daladier suggested areas with more than 50% German population might be surrendered after a plebiscite.

• Fearing abandonment by its French ally, Czechoslovak President Benes agreed.

Page 39: Appeasement

The Sudetenland• Hitler refused to

compromise – but agreed to a meeting with Chamberlain at Bad Godesberg.

• Here, he ranted and raved, demanding everything by October 1 or there would be war.

• Chamberlain left, badly shaken.

Page 40: Appeasement

The Sudetenland• War seemed

imminent.• In Britain,

civilians filled sandbags for defense works.

Page 41: Appeasement

The Sudetenland• Stalin pledged to stand by

Czechoslovakia against Hitler.

• However, Benes mistrusted Stalin.– The USSR had no common

border with Czechoslovakia and there was no guarantee Poland or Romania would allow Soviet troops to pass through.

– The fighting ability of the recently purged Red Army was doubted.

– Benes was as unhappy at the prospect of Soviet troops in Prague as German ones.

Page 42: Appeasement

The Sudetenland• Chamberlain was

convinced that the British public did not want to fight for this “far away country.”

• British rearmament was now underway – but air defenses were dangerously weak.

Page 43: Appeasement

The Munich Conference• In the midst of the

Crisis, Mussolini offered to mediate in a 4 Power Conference in Munich. (Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and Italy)

• Czechoslovakia and the USSR were not invited.

• For the British and French, it offered a way out of war.

Page 44: Appeasement

The Munich Conference• Mussolini was hardly

the “honest broker” he claimed to be.

• The deal he proposed was drafted by the German Foreign Office.

• The deal gave Hitler everything he demanded at Godesberg – but by October 15.

Page 45: Appeasement

The Munich Conference• In a side deal,

Chamberlain got Hitler to sign a document promising no additional claims would be made in Europe – the famous “piece of paper.”

• Chamberlain believed he had “peace in our time.”

Page 46: Appeasement

The Munich Conference• Chamberlain’s deal

was welcomed by a wildly enthusiastic public.

• Others, however, felt otherwise.

• Duff Cooper, First Lord of the Admiralty, resigned in disgust.

• Churchill called Munich “a total and unmitigated defeat.”

Page 47: Appeasement

The Munich Conference - Results

• Czechoslovakia had no choice but to sign.

• It was crippled, losing 70% of its heavy industry and almost all of its border defenses.

• Slovakia, with German encouragement, began to demand autonomy.

• Poland and Hungary made territorial claims

• Hacha, the Czech leader, was pressured into requesting German help to restore order.

Page 48: Appeasement

The Czechs Betrayed• In March, 1939

German troops occupied the remainder of the Czech part of the country.

• Britain and France did nothing, though they had guaranteed Czechoslovakia against further German aggression. The promise was invalid, they claimed; the Germans were invited in.

Page 49: Appeasement

End of Appeasement• Chamberlain was

appalled.• Britain pledged to

defend Poland against attack and France renewed its 1919 alliance.

• After Italy invaded Albania at Easter, Britain and France gave guarantees to Romania and Greece.

Page 50: Appeasement

End of Appeasement

• Despite his ideological aversion to dealing with the Soviets, Britain and France opened military talks with the USSR.

Page 51: Appeasement

The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact

• However, the Western Democracies had nothing to offer – if war broke out in the East, Russia would do the fighting and would get nothing in return.

• Hitler had more to offer – a division of Eastern Europe between the two powers – with the lion’s share offered to Stalin.

Page 52: Appeasement

Poland• Hitler gambled and

won on every occasion since his first attempt at Anschluss.

• German pressure on Poland began as early as March, 1939 – when Hitler demanded the return of the Free City of Danzig to Germany and free passage through the Polish Corridor.

Page 53: Appeasement

Poland• British negotiators

still sought to preserve peace – but with little confidence that Hitler could be trusted.

• British rearmament was picking up dramatically.

• On March 30, Britain & France guaranteed Polish security

Page 54: Appeasement

Poland• Negotiations with Britain

continued, but Germany unilaterally withdrew from the German-Polish Non-Aggression Pact of 1934 and the 1935 London Naval Agreement.

• There was no prospect of success.

• On August 31, Hitler ordered German forces into action against Poland.

• Appeasement was finished.

Page 55: Appeasement

Conclusions• Hitler largely

guessed right until late 1939.

• His aggressive posture worked against leaders who wanted, above all, to keep the world safe from the horrors of world war.

• The appeasers were reasonable men, but Hitler was not.

Page 56: Appeasement

Conclusions• Hitler’s game of

brinksmanship won Germany much, but it ultimately plunged it into a war it realistically did not have much chance of winning.

• Chamberlain, more clearly than Hitler, understood that the alternative to reason was the destruction of Europe.

• In the end, he was willing to pay that price to halt Hitler’s megalomania.

Page 57: Appeasement

Conclusions• Czechoslovakia had been

a democracy; Poland was a dictatorship.

• Czechoslovakia had strong mountain defenses and a fine army that matched the Germans ranged against it. Poland was a flat country with obsolete forces – and the Wehrmacht had acquired all Czech armaments.

• In 1939 Stalin pledged to stand with the Czechs; In 1939 he was effectively a German ally.

Page 58: Appeasement

Conclusions• When war finally came,

Britain and France found themselves honouring commitments that they were ill-equipped to undertake.

• Germany found itself fighting a war that it was ill-equipped to wage over time.