API 17G Updatemycommittees.api.org/standards/ecs/sc17/Meeting Materials/2018... · Paul Beauchamp: 8 - Validation of Connectors. Jim Kaculi & Ray Stawaisz. Dril-Quip. Andrew Grohmann:

API 17G UpdateAPI SC17 Summer Meeting

12 Jun 2018

API 17G Monthly Leadership Update 105/31/2018

Agenda

• task group leadership

• how we’re working

• where we are today

• results from ongoing reviews

• where we’re going

• key milestones

05/31/2018 API 17G Monthly Leadership Update 2

API 17G Task Group Leadership


Name Company Role Task Group

Walz, Gregg Anadarko Petroleum Company Co-Chair, API 17G Design and Manufacture of Subsea Well Intervention EquipmentByrd, Mike Byrd Energy Services Co-Chair, API 17G

Muff, Anthony TechnipFMC (Retired) Co-Chair, API 17G1 System Configuration and Operation of Subsea Well Intervention SystemsStawaisz, Ray Chevron Energy Technology Co Co-Chair, API 17G1

Hess, MikeShell International Exploration and Production

Chair, API 17G2 Subsea Pumping Well Intervention Systems

Dziekonski, Mitch Altiss Technologies, Inc Chair, API 17G3Design of Subsea Well Intervention Systems using Non-Ferrous Alloys

Crawford, Neil Oceaneering International, Inc Chair, API 17G4 Riserless Subsea Well Intervention

Hennig, Jake Anadarko Petroleum Company Co-Chair, API 17G5 Recommended Practice for Intervention Workover Controls Systems (IWOCS) (1)Hill, Chris Oceaneering International. Inc. Co-Chair, API 17G5

Approach to new 3rd Edition DraftPeople• 9 Workgroups made up of 75 volunteers from manufacturing, operating, and integration

companies • workgroups co-lead by Operator and Manufacturing representative• interface team – acts as advisory team to Co-Chairs and provides guidance to workgroups and

resolves contentious issuesProcess• Performance manage like a project• All “shall” statements and previous ballot comments will be evaluated• clear guidance, objectives, and scope for evaluating requirements

• New Requirement Guidelines (NRG)

• well defined and systematic process to review ALL “Shall” requirements and address previous ballot comments

Tools• provided workgroups with spreadsheets which have a:

• complete list of previous ballot comments• complete list of “Shall” statements (2nd & 3rd edition)


General Guidance Principles

• create fit for purpose document which promotes safety and allows for future innovation

• judicious use of shall/should statements

• define a minimum set of requirements and standards for international use. The document is not intended to be:

• used for monograming equipment

• a substitute for highly detailed regionally specific internal specifications for the manufacturer, integrator, or operator.

• minimize use of teaching and/or instruction

• maximize referencing of existing published industry documents and standards.

• will not attempt to fix other API documents (17D, TR7, TR8, etc).

• references to 17G1 will be informative only (no normative requirements)


• The requirement or “shall” is only necessary if it:• enhances environmental and personal safety

• enhances equipment reliability

• codifies relevant post-Macondo lessons

• codifies relevant new and accepted technology and manufacturing practices

• incorporates new and updated references to documents which may have changed or did not exist in 2006

• The requirement or “shall” needs to:• set a minimum requirement

• tell what needs to be done, not how to do it

• utilize an existing API or other standard requirement (if possible)

• work in all regions and not be regional specific

• be evaluated for negative impacts if it is or is not adopted

• be measurable or auditable so compliance is clear

• Adhere to API:• document format and style manual (2009)

• procedure for standards development (2016)

New Requirement Guidelines (NRG)


WorkgroupsWorkgroup Content Workscope

1Common - Scope, References, Datasheets, Functional

Clause 1 – ScopeClause 2 – Normative ReferencesClause 3 - Definitions, Abbreviations and SymbolsAnnex F - (informative) Equipment Specification DatasheetsClause 4 - Functional Requirements (Common)

2 Subsea Test Tree - Functional Requirements and Validation Testing

Clause 4 – Functional Requirements (Subsea Test Tree)

Annex G - (normative) Verification and Validation Testing of Subsea Test Tree Assemblies and Associated Accessories

3Open Water Systems - Functional Requirements and Validation Testing

Clause 4 – Functional Requirements (Open Water Systems)

Annex H - (normative) Verification and Validation Testing of Well Control Devices for open-water Intervention Systems

4 Design - Loading, FatigueClause 5 – Design RequirementsAnnex C - (normative) Load CapacitiesAnnex D - (normative) Fatigue Load Capacities

5 Materials & Welding Requirements Clause 7 – Welding RequirementsClause 6 – Material Requirements

7Quality, Shipping, Storage & Documentation Requirements

Clause 8 – Quality RequirementsClause 9 – Documentation RequirementsClause 10 – Marking Requirements Clause 11 – Preservation, Storage, and Shipping

8 Validation of Connectors Annex E - (normative) Validation of Connectors9 Interface Team API 17G & G1 - Interface Workgroup

10 IWOCS New Document - IWOCS05/31/2018 API 17G Monthly Leadership Update 7

17G Interface Team

Name Company Category

Walz, Gregg Anadarko Petroleum Company Co-Chair

Byrd, Mike Byrd Energy Services, LLC Co-Chair

Skeels, Brian TechnipFMC SC17 Committee Tag/Mfg

Kaculi, Jim DrilQuip Manufacturer

Smith, Craig OneSubsea Manufacturer

Stawaisz, Ray Chevron Energy Technology Company

Operator

Hess, Mike Shell International Exploration and Production

Operator

Cowan, Bill ENI Petroleum Operator


API 17G, 3rd Edition,

2017 (Ballot Doc &

comments)

NRGFilter

Creating a revised 3rd edition

API RP 17G, 2nd Edition,

2006


2018 (Ballot Draft)

Lot’s of good stuff here… let’s not

create anything new unless absolutely

necessary!


Sense check revised document against 2nd

edition for consistency and undergo group

review


2018 (Updated

Document)

Workflow

API 17G Monthly Leadership Update 10

Apply NRG to 3rd

Edition requirements and “shall” statements.

Address comments from 3rd Edition ballot

(4136)

Sense check the final results with the 2nd

Edition to make sure nothing important has

been omitted.

Each workgroup aggregates changes into respective draft clauses

Create Working Draft (WD)

reviewed by WG9 (Interface Team)

WD External Review(Workshop Attendees)

Create Ballot Draft (BD)Incorporate comments

from review.

BD reviewed by WG9 (Interface Team)

BD ready for submittal to API

(Oct 2018) WG9 (IT)

Workgroups

05/31/2018

2018 Winter Meeting Today

What we are not doing:

We are not:

• building a compendium of individual or personal lessons learned, preferred practices, and preferences.

• creating a “primer” document on how to design or build intervention equipment

• only addressing comments from the 3rd edition

• defining any particular component as a well control barrier – this will be left to the operator


17 G-G5 Status

• 17G

• Workgroup are nearly complete with the review of all previous ballot draft requirements and comments

• Sections are in various stages of development of document drafts

• 17G1-17G4

• documents are all on hold until a new Working Draft of 17G is complete.

• 17G5

• IWOCS was approved by CSOEM as stand-alone RP.

• Currently dispositioning previous ballot comments and reviewing requirements in previous ballot.

• Draft of document is in processAPI 17G Monthly Leadership Update 1205/31/2018

Workgroup Progress


Summary (since Jan 2018)• Excellent WG engagement and participation• To date, have resolved:

o 762 of 1,006 shall statementso 1,890 of 2,067 ballot comments

• Thorough and consistent application of NRG• NRG review has resulted in approximately:

o 42% reduction of “shall” statementso Elimination of approximately 140 specific requirements

• Re-write of all clauses well underway

Key 17G Milestones

• Oct 2017 – New leadership in place

• Nov 2017 – Held 17G Content Workshop to define the principles and plan to develop new draft

• Dec 2017 – Identification an deployment of workgroups, work began addressing requirements and comments

• Jun 2018 – Workgroups complete preliminary text edit of respective sections based on review of “shall” statements and previous ballot comments.

• Aug 2018 – Complete Working Draft

• Sep 2018 – Complete external review of Working Draft

• Oct 2018 – Complete and submit Ballot Draft to API

API 17G Monthly Leadership Update 1405/31/2018

Key 17G Milestones


Milestone Old Revised

Workgroups complete preliminary text edit of respective sections based on review of “shall” statements and previous ballot

May 2018 Jun 2018

Complete Working Draft Jun 2018 Aug 2018

Complete external review of Working Draft Jul 2018 Sep 2018

Complete and submit Ballot Draft to API Aug 2018 Oct 2018



17G Co-Chairs

Assumed new co-chair role Oct 2017

Gregg Walz (Anadarko Petroleum Company)

• Current role: Sr. Engineering Advisor

• Been at Anadarko for 4 years

• 37 years industry experience

Mike Byrd (Retired BP)

• Last role: Director Subsea Wells (Global Wells Organization)

• Worked for BP 23 years

• Major projects and wells organizations

• 38 years industry experience (offshore & deep water)


17G Interface TeamPurpose

• provide guidance and direction to the workgroups in application of the NRG’s

• ensure consistency in the work products

• participate in the review the final document

Team Make-Up and Responsibilities

• members are appointed and led by Co-Chairs

• members (7)

• 17G Co-Chairs x 2

• One representative from SC17 Leadership x 1

• Operator representative x 2

• Manufacturing representative x 2

• must be committed and accountable to:

• NRG application process (consistent, systematic, & rigorous)

• Principle of “more concise” and “less prescriptive” document

• must be prepared to challenge workgroup results if necessary

• ensure workgroups apply the NRG’s in a systematic, consistent, and rigorous manner

• need to be able to see big picture

• each Interface Team member will be assigned one or more workgroups


Workgroup Leadership

API 17G Workgroup Leadership Name Interface Team Tag

1 - Common - Scope, References, Datasheets, Functional Gregg Walz&

Mike ByrdChevron Energy Technology Company Steve PierceExpro Jamie Walker

2 - Subsea Test Tree - Functional and Validation TestingCraig SmithBP Exploration and Production, Inc. Paul Anderson

National Oilwell Varco Eric Wehner3 - Open Water Systems - Functional and Validation Testing

Mike HessExxonMobil Production Company Gaston GauthierTechnipFMC Roy Whiteman

4 - Design - Loading, Fatigue Jim Kaculi&

Ray StawaiszOneSubsea, A Schlumberger Company Gary RytlewskiShell International Exploration and Production Tom Klepcyk

5 - Materials & WeldingCraig SmithChevron Energy Technology Company Will Lamberth

OneSubsea, A Schlumberger Company Richard Marques7 - Common - Quality, Marking, Storage, etc Gregg Walz

&Mike Byrd

Anadarko Petroleum Corporation Ken PeurifoyNational Oilwell Varco Paul Beauchamp

8 - Validation of Connectors Jim Kaculi&

Ray StawaiszDril-Quip Andrew GrohmannENI Petroleum Bill Cowan

10 - IWOCSBrian SkeelsAnadarko Petroleum Corporation Jake Hennig

Oceaneering International, Inc. Chris Hill

2005/31/2018 API 17G Monthly Leadership Update

Progress


Workgroups

Shall Statements Comments

Total Shall's Resolved % Resolved Accepted (1) % of

Resolved Removed (2) % of Resolved Total Resolved

% Resolved

Workgroup 1 - (C 1, 2, 3, & 4 Common) 87 13 15% 11 85% 2 15% 125 29 23%

Workgroup 2 - (C2, AG) (In-Riser) 287 63 22% 30 48% 33 52% 61 61 100%Workgroup 3 - (C4, AH) (Open Water) 451 31 7% 19 61% 12 39% 155 0 0%Workgroup 4 - (C5, AC, AD) (Design) 494 36 7% 14 39% 22 61% 247 0 0%Workgroup 5 - (C6 & 7) (Materials & Welding) 150 0 0% 0 #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! 57 0 0%Workgroup 7 - (C8-11) (Quality, Doc, Mark, Pres) 189 0 0% 0 #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! 87 0 0%Workgroup 8 - (AE) (Connector Validation) 132 15 11% 0 0% 15 100% 57 2 4%Workgroup 9 - Misc Common Comments 16 0 0%Workgroup 10 - (G5) IWOCS 277 0 0% 0 #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! 201 0 0%Total 2067 158 8% 74 47% 84 53% 1006 92 9%

Notes:1. Accepted = “Agree” + “Agree in Principle”2. Removed = “Disagree” + “Noted”

17G Content Workshop

• Held 14 Nov 2017• 45 attendees (Operators, Manufacturers, Consultants, Integrators)• The purpose of the workshop was to:

• articulate the forward strategy, principles, and preliminary timing for producing a new ballot draft of 17g which is more concise and less prescriptive (without compromising safety)

• identify key issues which are important to voters (especially those that drove the previous ballot results)

• identify which organizations will be willing to provide resources in support of work groups

The deliverables of the workshop were:1. written guidance to work groups in order to create a new working draft of

17G which is more concise and less prescriptive (without compromising safety)

2. a list of workgroups required to address each clause and annex3. a list of organizations w/contacts support the workgroups


Documents

API 17G Updatemycommittees.api.org/standards/ecs/sc17/Meeting Materials/2018... · Paul Beauchamp: 8 - Validation of Connectors. Jim Kaculi & Ray Stawaisz. Dril-Quip. Andrew Grohmann: