21
APEC Preliminary Workshop: Review of Drug Development in Clinical Trials Development in Clinical Trials Session 1.4 -Clinical Trial Environment United States (FDA) and European Union (EMEA) Susan D‘Amico Vice President and Global Head Clinical Quality Assurance

APEC Preliminary Workshop: Review of Drug Development in

  • Upload
    lamkiet

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: APEC Preliminary Workshop: Review of Drug Development in

APEC Preliminary Workshop: Review of DrugDevelopment in Clinical TrialsDevelopment in Clinical TrialsSession 1.4 -Clinical Trial EnvironmentUnited States (FDA) and European Union (EMEA)( ) p ( )Susan D‘AmicoVice President and Global HeadClinical Quality Assurance

Sarah
Text Box
© 2008 Novartis
Page 2: APEC Preliminary Workshop: Review of Drug Development in

The information within this presentation is based on the presenter’s expertise and experience, and represents the viewsof the presenter for the purposes of a training workshop

© 2008

Page 3: APEC Preliminary Workshop: Review of Drug Development in

U S Food and Drug AdministrationU.S. Food and Drug AdministrationFDA's Mission Statement

The FDA is responsible for protecting the public health by assuring the safety efficacy and security of human andassuring the safety, efficacy, and security of human and veterinary drugs, biological products, medical devices, our nation’s food supply, cosmetics, and products that emit radiation. The FDA is also responsible for advancing the public health by helping to speed innovations that make medicines and foods more effective safer and moremedicines and foods more effective, safer, and more affordable; and helping the public get the accurate, science-based information they need to use medicines and foods to improve their health.

Page 4: APEC Preliminary Workshop: Review of Drug Development in

Department of Health and Human ServicesF d d D Ad i i t tiFood and Drug Administration

Page 5: APEC Preliminary Workshop: Review of Drug Development in

TitleS btitlSubtitle

Page 6: APEC Preliminary Workshop: Review of Drug Development in

FDA Inspectionsp

*Data Slide Presentation by Matt T. Thomas, FDA, DSI

Page 7: APEC Preliminary Workshop: Review of Drug Development in

FDA Inspection Resultsp

*Data Slide Presentation by Matt T. Thomas, FDA, DSI

Page 8: APEC Preliminary Workshop: Review of Drug Development in

European Medicines Agency -Structurep g y

Page 9: APEC Preliminary Workshop: Review of Drug Development in

European Medicines AgencyEuropean Medicines AgencyMission statement

The mission of the European Medicines Agency is to foster scientific excellence in the evaluation and supervision of medicines, for the benefit of public and animal health.animal health.

Legal role

The European Medicines Agency is the European Union body responsible forThe European Medicines Agency is the European Union body responsible for coordinating the existing scientific resources put at its disposal by Member States for the evaluation, supervision and pharmacovigilance of medicinal products.products.

The Agency provides the Member States and the institutions of the EU the best-possible scientific advice on any question relating to the evaluation of the

lit f t d ffi f di i l d t f h t iquality, safety and efficacy of medicinal products for human or veterinary use referred to it in accordance with the provisions of EU legislation relating to medicinal products

Page 10: APEC Preliminary Workshop: Review of Drug Development in

HA Environment for Clinical Trials:*Wh th l ?Who are the players?

Procedures/processes

Legal basisEthics Committees

InspectionsAuditsFull

Compliance

Area

Trials/Investigators/Sponsors/CRO’sInspectoratesCompetent Authorities

Page 11: APEC Preliminary Workshop: Review of Drug Development in

What is Risk Perspective for HA?*F h ?For whom?

Trial subjects

M l bj i h i l ibl f i k• May place subjects in that trial at possible safety risk• May place future trial subjects at risk

Patients

• May place future patients or consumers at riskM d l il bili f di i• May delay availability of medicines

ProductsMa place prod ct(s) at q alit /safet /efficac risk• May place product(s) at quality/safety/efficacy risk

• Undermines business, availability of medicines

Health AuthorityHealth Authority• Jeopardizes the reliability of submitted and/or published data• Undermines the HA ability to protect and promote the public health• Undermines trust of public in company/pharma industry

Page 12: APEC Preliminary Workshop: Review of Drug Development in

HA Requirements*:L litiLegalities

Legal basis is essential:Legal basis is essential:

Rights (protection and access)

Requirements standards (minimum definite)Requirements, standards (minimum, definite)

Sanctions (professional, bureaucratic, punitive)

Qualifications, processes and proceduresQualifications, processes and procedures

Types of legislation:

National legislationg

EU legislation: Rules, regulations, directives, guidances, guidelines

Third Country

Professional standards

International complexities:

Rights, requirements, sanctions, legislation differences, teams

Page 13: APEC Preliminary Workshop: Review of Drug Development in

HA Requirements*:R ibilitiResponsibilities

Sponsor/applicant:p ppDevelopment process, Conduct clinical trialsComposition and content of dossierCompleteness of application dossier

InvestigatorSafety of subjects, quality of data,

AuthoritiesLegal basisAssessment of dossier: verification of quality, safety and completeness of dossier, inspections of clinical trials and monitoring of PharmacovigilanceLicenses (manufacturing, marketing)Licenses (manufacturing, marketing)

Page 14: APEC Preliminary Workshop: Review of Drug Development in

Inspection Practices *G l A h i EUGeneral Approach in EU

EMEA coordinates processes and procedures for CAPEMEA coordinates processes and procedures for CAP

For decentralized/local inspections in MS: many similarities

J i t i ti i l MSJoint inspections versus single MS

What is inspected:

“ All that is deemed necessary by HA/Inspectors ”

= Re(Leg)ality

Inspectorates choices (annual plan, risk analysis, fashion)

MEB/CHMP choices

EMEA/CHMP

For cause, calamity, complaint

Page 15: APEC Preliminary Workshop: Review of Drug Development in

Inspection Practices *C d tConduct

Inspection format:Inspection format:

System directed, company (sponsor) and/or facility (site) directed

Study/project directedStudy/project directed

Product directed (novel, generic, ...)

Cause directedCause directed

Ethics committees, safety committees

For cause, routine, thematic, ,

Inspection activities (external):

Systems verification

Data verification

Educational activities

Page 16: APEC Preliminary Workshop: Review of Drug Development in

Inspection Practices *Wh d H ?When and How?

Inspection timing:

Pre-, post approval

Obligations

Before, during, after trial

Inspection process:

Planning, preparing, conducting, reporting, follow up

Inspection strategies:

Review, interview, access, test, re-analyze, recalculate

Follow the process

Evaluation

EU Inspection frequency:

EMEA goal 15-30/annum (Sponsor/application/PhV)

Page 17: APEC Preliminary Workshop: Review of Drug Development in

Foremost EU Findings*All Cli i l t i l d f t i li t dAll Clinical trial and safety areas implicated

Patient safety, efficacy and data quality: EC approval, insurance, privacy (legal aspects/MS/third countries)IB, GLP (updates, present, IMPD)Protocol deviations (short cuts, trial vs. regular treatment)ContractsResponsibilities, work load (QP, QA, investigator, monitors)SAE/ADR reporting (CA, EC, Investigator)Information communication E-systems validation (awareness of users, new, archiving) No full Q-system (both GCP and PV )coverage (sponsor global vs. local vs. CRO vs. site)site)Monitoring (training, planning, activities, follow up)IMP aspects (manufacturing, blinding, distribution, IVRS, accountability)Sources (definition systems documentation filing archiving)Sources (definition, systems, documentation, filing, archiving)

SDV inconsistencies (sloppiness, misconduct, fraud)Fraud and misconduct

(Directly detected fraud in NL inspections: 4 in 2006)(Directly detected fraud in NL inspections: 4 in 2006)

Page 18: APEC Preliminary Workshop: Review of Drug Development in

High Level Root Cause*:Conclusion From Inspection FindingsConclusion From Inspection Findings

Common denominator: Sponsor• Preparation for trial• Timelines• Grip on trial and participants• Definition of responsibilities and terms• Investigator versus “name” • Evaluation of participants • Processes and procedures

Page 19: APEC Preliminary Workshop: Review of Drug Development in

Use of Inspection Results*

As part of the entire evaluation process; adds/completes informationAs part of the entire evaluation process; adds/completes information• Clinical assessment and inspection are two different aspects of

verification of compliance and safety• Inspection contributes to the verification of the quality of the data in

the dossier • Inspection will not enhance quality of data and dossier but enhance• Inspection will not enhance quality of data and dossier but enhance

certainty on the quality• There may be consequences for other notifications/ y q

applications/authorisations (positive/negative)

Page 20: APEC Preliminary Workshop: Review of Drug Development in

If Not*……..

What will happen in the event of observed non-compliance:• Education, facilitation• Inspection, re-inspection• Suspension of clinical trial, EC approval withdrawn• Warning• Naming• Urgent Safety restrictions variation of MA• Urgent Safety restrictions, variation of MA• Suspension of MA, • Revocation of MARevocation of MA• GMC, prosecution*Slides 9-19 adapted from a presentation entitled “A recent HA perspective –EU

Inspections” Helena M. van den Dungen

Page 21: APEC Preliminary Workshop: Review of Drug Development in

Thank YouThank You f tt ti !for your attention !

Questions ?Questions ?