34
A A P P C C A A The State of Tennessee and U.S. The State of Tennessee and U.S. Crop Agriculture as the New Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill Approaches Farm Bill Approaches Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center Soybean Promotion Board Pigeon Forge, TN January 18, 2006

APCA The State of Tennessee and U.S. Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill Approaches Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: APCA The State of Tennessee and U.S. Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill Approaches Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis

AAPPCCAA

The State of Tennessee and U.S. The State of Tennessee and U.S. Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill

ApproachesApproaches

Daryll E. RayUniversity of Tennessee

Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

Soybean Promotion BoardPigeon Forge, TN January 18, 2006

Page 2: APCA The State of Tennessee and U.S. Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill Approaches Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis

AAPPCCAA

Tennessee 1998Tennessee 1998Agricultural Cash ReceiptsAgricultural Cash Receipts

Other Livestock – 6%

Cotton – 10%

Soybeans – 10%

Corn – 6%

Tobacco – 10%

Other Crops – 18.1%

Cattle& Calves – 17%

Broilers – 13%

Dairy – 10%

Nursery not listed separately

Page 3: APCA The State of Tennessee and U.S. Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill Approaches Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis

AAPPCCAA

Tennessee 2004Tennessee 2004Agricultural Cash ReceiptsAgricultural Cash Receipts

Other Livestock – 6%

Cotton – 9%

Nursery – 10%

Soybeans – 11%

Corn – 6%

Tobacco – 3%Other Crops – 12%

Cattle& Calves – 19%

Broilers – 17%

Dairy – 7%

Page 4: APCA The State of Tennessee and U.S. Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill Approaches Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis

AAPPCCAA

Government Payments as a Government Payments as a Percent of Net Farm IncomePercent of Net Farm Income

9.13.7

2.03.5

3.05.6

13.3

12.27.4

5.6

9.2

26.0

51.8

62.4

20.6

34.6

12.4

22.453.9

18.7

9.228.28.2

0.9

4.4

65.329.0

29.2

58.9

44.9

33.9

45.0

57.0

10.8

29.19.4

27.1

8.8

50.9

6.4

3.2

19.6 56.3

61.7106.0

21.6

22.6

Government Payments as a Percentage of Net Farm Income

1998

Less than 24.9%

25.0% - 49.9%

50.0% - 74.9%

75.0% - 99.99%

100% and Above

Page 5: APCA The State of Tennessee and U.S. Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill Approaches Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis

AAPPCCAA

Government Payments as a Government Payments as a Percent of Net Farm IncomePercent of Net Farm Income

12.515.4

6.79.2

6.57.2

12.9

8.94.6

7.1

10.820.3

20.4

28.9

15.1

33.5

13.6

23.522.4

10.5

12.122.37.6

9.0

9.6

38.917.1

18.5

18.9

21.1

19.8

15.2

44.0

9.4

17.09.7

16.3

7.1

22.2

4.1

5.1

6.2 26.6

48.039.1

10.0

9.8

Government Payments as a Percentage of Net Farm Income

2004

Less than 24.9%

25.0% - 49.9%

50.0% - 74.9%

75.0% - 99.99%

100% and Above

Page 6: APCA The State of Tennessee and U.S. Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill Approaches Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis

AAPPCCAA

Government Payments as a Government Payments as a Percent of Net Farm IncomePercent of Net Farm Income

12.78.9

5.915.5

6.511.5

19.1

18.613.6

14.0

24.2202.0

53.8

165.2

37.3

87.3

25.0

65.3

148.6

29.0

16.844.712.7

2.8

6.7

69.039.0

42.1

154.3

82.7

60

52.3

85.8

14.2

36.510.8

20.5

12.7

121.5

11.9

3.6

29.2 104.5

129.3102.6

21.8

40.3

Government Payments as a Percentage of Net Farm Income

1999

Less than 24.9%

25.0% - 49.9%

50.0% - 74.9%

75.0% - 99.99%

100% and Above

Page 7: APCA The State of Tennessee and U.S. Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill Approaches Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis

AAPPCCAA

Net Farm Income and Government Net Farm Income and Government Payments, TennesseePayments, Tennessee

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003

Net Farm Income

Government PaymentsTh

ou

san

d D

oll

ars

• Net Farm income in Tennessee is down from its 1994 peak• Government payments to Tennessee farmers hit an all time high

in 2000—55% of net farm income compared to 87% in 1999

Page 8: APCA The State of Tennessee and U.S. Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill Approaches Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis

AAPPCCAA

Net Farm Income as a Percent of Net Farm Income as a Percent of Government Payments, TennesseeGovernment Payments, Tennessee

0

20

40

60

80

100

1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003

Per

cen

t

• With the 1996 and 2002 Farm Bills, farmers are less dependent on market receipts and more dependent on government payments

Page 9: APCA The State of Tennessee and U.S. Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill Approaches Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis

AAPPCCAA

Soybean, Corn, and Cotton Soybean, Corn, and Cotton Acreage in TennesseeAcreage in Tennessee

0

250

500

750

1000

1250

1500

1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005

Corn

Cotton

Th

ou

san

d A

cres

Soybeans

• Tennessee crop acres remain fairly stable with around 2.4 million acres being planted to soybeans, corn, and cotton

Page 10: APCA The State of Tennessee and U.S. Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill Approaches Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis

AAPPCCAA

Soybean Complex ExportsSoybean Complex Exports

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005

USMil

lio

n M

etri

c T

on

nes

Brazil

Argentina

Rest of World

• Exports from Brazil and Argentina have grown significantly over the last 18 years

• US exports have increased slightly• Rest of World exports are stable

Page 11: APCA The State of Tennessee and U.S. Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill Approaches Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis

AAPPCCAA

Comparison of Volume of Soy Complex Comparison of Volume of Soy Complex Exports and Share of World ExportsExports and Share of World Exports

0

10

20

30

40

50

1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005

0

10

20

30

40

50

US Soy Complex Export Volume

US Soy Complex Export Share

Mil

lio

n M

etri

c T

on

nes

Percen

t

• While US soybean complex exports have risen, the US share of world soybean complex exports has fallen

Page 12: APCA The State of Tennessee and U.S. Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill Approaches Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis

AAPPCCAA

Exports Have Not Delivered Exports Have Not Delivered

Index of US Population, US Demand for 8 Crops and US Exports* of 8 Crops1979=1.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1962 1965 1968 1971 1974 1977 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004

US Population

US Exports

US Domestic Demand

*Adjusted for grain exported in meat

Page 13: APCA The State of Tennessee and U.S. Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill Approaches Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis

AAPPCCAA

15 Crop Exports for US and 15 Crop Exports for US and Developing CompetitorsDeveloping Competitors

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

140,000

160,000

1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

Developing competitors: Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Pakistan, Thailand, Vietnam15 Crops: Wheat, Corn, Rice, Sorghum, Oats, Rye, Barley, Millet, Soybeans, Peanuts, Cottonseed, Rapeseed, Sunflower, Copra, and Palm Kernel

Th

ou

san

d M

etri

c T

on

s

US

Developing Competitors

Page 14: APCA The State of Tennessee and U.S. Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill Approaches Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis

AAPPCCAA

U.S. Total Ag Exports Have Grown Slower U.S. Total Ag Exports Have Grown Slower Than Total Ag ImportsThan Total Ag Imports

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

Ag Exports

Ag Imports

Bil

lio

n D

oll

ars

• In recent years, the value of US imports of agricultural products has risen faster than the value of exports

• Some of this is due to our low price strategy for commodities

Page 15: APCA The State of Tennessee and U.S. Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill Approaches Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis

AAPPCCAA

40

60

80

100

120

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000

Acreage Response toAcreage Response toLower Prices?Lower Prices?

Ind

ex (

1996

=10

0)

Four Crop Acreage

Four Crop Price Adjusted for Coupled and Decoupled Payments

Four Crop Price Adjusted for Coupled Payments Four Crop Price

Between 1996 and 2000• Aggregate US corn, wheat, soybean, and cotton acreage changed little• While “prices” (take your pick) dropped by 40, 30 or 22%

Page 16: APCA The State of Tennessee and U.S. Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill Approaches Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis

AAPPCCAA

40

60

80

100

120

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

Acreage Response toAcreage Response toLower Prices?Lower Prices?

Acreage Response toAcreage Response toLower Prices?Lower Prices?

Ind

ex (

1996

=10

0)

Four Crop Acreage

Four Crop Price

Since 1996 “Freedom to Farm”• Aggregate US corn, wheat, soybean, and cotton acreage changed little

despite a wide fluctuation in price

Page 17: APCA The State of Tennessee and U.S. Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill Approaches Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis

AAPPCCAA

Factors Influencing Soybean PriceFactors Influencing Soybean Price

• Near record year-ending carryover levels

• Recent influence of commodity index funds

• Anticipation of normal crop in Argentina and Brazil

• Expect sub-$5.50 beans with normal crop

Page 18: APCA The State of Tennessee and U.S. Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill Approaches Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis

AAPPCCAA

Acreage Next YearAcreage Next Year

• Likely increase in soybean acreage

– High cost of production for corn and cotton

– High fertilizer costs

– Less concern about Asian Soybean Rust

Page 19: APCA The State of Tennessee and U.S. Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill Approaches Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis

AAPPCCAA

Farm ProgramsFarm Programs• Where will US farm policy be

determined?– Washington?

– Geneva?

• Farm program possibilities– Farmers content with current program

– WTO influences• More conservation/environment

• Revenue insurance/risk mitigation

Page 20: APCA The State of Tennessee and U.S. Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill Approaches Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis

AAPPCCAA

Agriculture Has Chronic Price and Income Problems Agriculture Has Chronic Price and Income Problems Because It Does Not Self-Correct QuicklyBecause It Does Not Self-Correct Quickly

The Logic is Straight ForwardThe Logic is Straight Forward • Technology expands output faster than population

and exports expand demand

• Market failure: lower prices do not solve the problem

• Little self-correction on the demand side

– People will pay almost anything when food is short

– Low prices do not induce people to eat more

• Little self-correction on the supply side

– Farmers tend to produce on all their acreage

– Few alternate uses for most cropland

Page 21: APCA The State of Tennessee and U.S. Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill Approaches Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis

AAPPCCAA

Agricultural Policy Analysis Center The University of Tennessee 310 Morgan Hall 2621 Morgan Circle Knoxville, TN 37996-4519

www.agpolicy.org

Thank YouThank You

Page 22: APCA The State of Tennessee and U.S. Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill Approaches Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis

AAPPCCAA

To receive an electronic version of our weekly ag policy column send an email to: [email protected] to be added to APAC’s Policy Pennings listserv

Weekly Policy ColumnWeekly Policy Column

Page 23: APCA The State of Tennessee and U.S. Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill Approaches Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis

AAPPCCAA

Government Payments as a Government Payments as a Percent of Net Farm IncomePercent of Net Farm Income

4.45.6

1.32.2

7.74.6

10.2

4.92.2

3.4

4.4

10.9

28.5

30.9

14.7

18.1

7.4

16.228.5

21.6

10.147.39.3

1.8

4.8

47.328.6

32.7

38.9

24.9

31.6

32.2

49.1

15.0

28.213.7

19.6

6.8

29.3

4.3

6.4

16.6 25.1

77.270.1

12.6

23.0

Government Payments as a Percentage of Net Farm Income

1990

Less than 24.9%

25.0% - 49.9%

50.0% - 74.9%

75.0% - 99.99%

100% and Above

Page 24: APCA The State of Tennessee and U.S. Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill Approaches Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis

AAPPCCAA

Government Payments as a Government Payments as a Percent of Net Farm IncomePercent of Net Farm Income

3.63.7

1.00.9

2.14.7

9.0

5.22.0

2.2

4.0

12.3

25.3

49.6

19.0

13.1

6.6

22.393.8

12.3

6.041.95.7

1.6

7.1

61.525.1

35.7

43.0

21.6

30.3

39.4

59.0

13.0

28.914.1

13.5

5.4

34.9

5.8

7.3

16.6 37.4

98.951.5

16.6

20.6

Government Payments as a Percentage of Net Farm Income

1991

Less than 24.9%

25.0% - 49.9%

50.0% - 74.9%

75.0% - 99.99%

100% and Above

Page 25: APCA The State of Tennessee and U.S. Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill Approaches Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis

AAPPCCAA

Government Payments as a Government Payments as a Percent of Net Farm IncomePercent of Net Farm Income

3.23.4

1.22.9

5.13.6

7.6

4.82.5

3.1

3.9

8.6

28.8

24.6

16.0

16.2

5.5

14.627.3

18.3

10.339.510.8

1.8

6.0

51.630.1

28.3

32.9

19.1

24.3

25.3

32.8

11.8

24.812.0

14.3

10.9

24.2

8.0

17.4

16.7 33.8

40.153.2

14.7

14.5

Government Payments as a Percentage of Net Farm Income

1992

Less than 24.9%

25.0% - 49.9%

50.0% - 74.9%

75.0% - 99.99%

100% and Above

Page 26: APCA The State of Tennessee and U.S. Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill Approaches Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis

AAPPCCAA

Government Payments as a Government Payments as a Percent of Net Farm IncomePercent of Net Farm Income

5.32.9

1.52.4

3.14.7

12.2

8.2 5.7

5.0

7.6

6.8

45.0

52

40.2

23.0

8.3

28.942.9

29.0

14.873.612.7

4.4

14.1

73.831.4

57.7

80.5

40.1

42.4

31.9

48.0

13.3

25.011.3

14.9

14.1

137.8

8.4

5.7

14.1 953.5

78.937.6

13.9

13.8

Government Payments as a Percentage of Net Farm Income

1993

Less than 24.9%

25.0% - 49.9%

50.0% - 74.9%

75.0% - 99.99%

100% and Above

Page 27: APCA The State of Tennessee and U.S. Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill Approaches Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis

AAPPCCAA

Government Payments as a Government Payments as a Percent of Net Farm IncomePercent of Net Farm Income

4.23.5

1.33.2

2.73.8

8.4

4.74.2

2.5

4.5

5.8

32.5

13.0

22.6

11.8

4.4

9.615.0

11.1

6.526.87.6

2.4

10.4

28.220.3

19.8

31.3

15.5

21.9

19.8

24.8

12.3

27.914.2

30.4

14.6

23.6

4.3

7.1

12.4 46.3

43.656.3

17.2

12.7

Government Payments as a Percentage of Net Farm Income

1994

Less than 24.9%

25.0% - 49.9%

50.0% - 74.9%

75.0% - 99.99%

100% and Above

Page 28: APCA The State of Tennessee and U.S. Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill Approaches Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis

AAPPCCAA

Government Payments as a Government Payments as a Percent of Net Farm IncomePercent of Net Farm Income

5.44.5

1.72.1

2.36.9

11.9

7.03.7

1.5

3.9

9.4

24.7

65.0

23.6

7.7

8.1

16.048.8

8.5

3.618.26.1

2.7

15.4

24.720.5

25.6

62.1

30.5

31.3

42.8

42.5

15.8

29.614.7

26.9

1.2

34.1

4.7

8.3

11.8 60.0

55.146.8

11.3

11.2

Government Payments as a Percentage of Net Farm Income

1995

Less than 24.9%

25.0% - 49.9%

50.0% - 74.9%

75.0% - 99.99%

100% and Above

Page 29: APCA The State of Tennessee and U.S. Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill Approaches Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis

AAPPCCAA

Government Payments as a Government Payments as a Percent of Net Farm IncomePercent of Net Farm Income

4.42.9

1.51.0

1.23.5

7.6

4.23.8

2.3

4.3

12.3

26

14.1

12.1

14.2

5.9

11.214.7

8.5

5.516.87.2

1.1

3.8

21.425.3

16.9

21.5

11.2

13.7

50.3

26.5

15.1

21.410.3

26.2

7.0

11.5

4.7

4.2

12.3 16.7

26.667.6

11.6

9

Government Payments as a Percentage of Net Farm Income

1996

Less than 24.9%

25.0% - 49.9%

50.0% - 74.9%

75.0% - 99.99%

100% and Above

Page 30: APCA The State of Tennessee and U.S. Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill Approaches Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis

AAPPCCAA

Government Payments as a Government Payments as a Percent of Net Farm IncomePercent of Net Farm Income

5.23.3

1.40.8

2.15.4

21.8

7.26.2

2.7

5.9

24.4

30.8

25.0

20.8

13.9

6.5

9.919.4

8.5

5.516.56.1

0.8

6.9

25.017.5

14.5

21.3

22.5

23.1

24.9

30.2

7.4

24.99.0

10.2

6.3

18.7

3.3

4.2

9.5 49.6

109.776.1

16.1

14.9

Government Payments as a Percentage of Net Farm Income

1997

Less than 24.9%

25.0% - 49.9%

50.0% - 74.9%

75.0% - 99.99%

100% and Above

Page 31: APCA The State of Tennessee and U.S. Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill Approaches Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis

AAPPCCAA

Government Payments as a Government Payments as a Percent of Net Farm IncomePercent of Net Farm Income

17.820.0

9.813.1

8.113.4

29.8

21.916.1

13.5

21.545.5

105.8

123.0

78.7

55.2

26.2

49.1

105.8

25.5

18.658.614.2

2.1

7.5

88.142.0

55.8

87.0

100.6

56.9

42.6

114.9

16.3

46.915.6

25.5

15.0

97.5

12.3

3.9

36.0 113.3

117.8174.3

28.0

35.3

Government Payments as a Percentage of Net Farm Income

2000

Less than 24.9%

25.0% - 49.9%

50.0% - 74.9%

75.0% - 99.99%

100% and Above

Page 32: APCA The State of Tennessee and U.S. Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill Approaches Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis

AAPPCCAA

Government Payments as a Government Payments as a Percent of Net Farm IncomePercent of Net Farm Income

10.96.0

5.018.5

7.79.8

15.3

19.710.5

9.7

19.815.6

102.0

117.9

36.3

40.1

23.3

50.280.3

18.6

17.147.414.6

4.4

5.0

80.437.9

47.6

74.7

70.1

58.3

38.8

83.4

12.2

25.910.8

22.6

10.0

86.3

12.2

5.0

27.5 132.9

127.1118.6

18.4

41.8

Government Payments as a Percentage of Net Farm Income

2001

Less than 24.9%

25.0% - 49.9%

50.0% - 74.9%

75.0% - 99.99%

100% and Above

Page 33: APCA The State of Tennessee and U.S. Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill Approaches Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis

AAPPCCAA

Government Payments as a Government Payments as a Percent of Net Farm IncomePercent of Net Farm Income

34.475.1

12.217.8

5.822.9

74.2

21.17.0

20.9

40.5127.0

57.1

85.1

34.9

53.5

26.9

40.776.5

34.2

35.864.524.3

3.8

22.0

105.221.1

50.5

67.9

66.3

76.3

25.4

136.3

16.4

31.627.8

81.2

5.5

38.3

7.8

15.7

18.4 67.1

80.9151.5

16.7

23.5

Government Payments as a Percentage of Net Farm Income

2002

Less than 24.9%

25.0% - 49.9%

50.0% - 74.9%

75.0% - 99.99%

100% and Above

Page 34: APCA The State of Tennessee and U.S. Crop Agriculture as the New Farm Bill Approaches Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis

AAPPCCAA

Government Payments as a Government Payments as a Percent of Net Farm IncomePercent of Net Farm Income

19.131.4

10.320.0

7.815.5

29.2

14.86.8

23.7

37.673.8

34.4

51.3

29.8

51.1

22.4

3436.5

19.3

22.758.414.2

6.5

10.4

58.431.5

44.8

49.9

25.9

33.9

29.3

41.2

18.0

37.721.4

27.0

15.4

52.1

9.7

13.4

14.5 46.7

42.774.3

18.2

17.3

Government Payments as a Percentage of Net Farm Income

2003

Less than 24.9%

25.0% - 49.9%

50.0% - 74.9%

75.0% - 99.99%

100% and Above