AP Frog Calls - Evolution

  • Upload
    aa

  • View
    221

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/9/2019 AP Frog Calls - Evolution

    1/4

    Call Duration as an Indicator o Genetic Quality

    in Male Gray Tree Frogs

    Allison M. Welch,* Raymond D Semlitsch, H Carl Gerhardt

    The good genes hypothesis predicts that mating preferences enable females to select

    mates of superior genetic quality. The genetic consequences of the preference shown

    by female gray tree frogs for long-duration calls were evaluated by comparing the

    performance of maternal half-siblings sired by males with different call durations. Off

    spring of male gray tree frogs that produced long calls showed better performance during

    larval and juvenile stages than i offspring of males that produced short calls. These

    data suggest that call duration can function as a reliable indicator of heritable genetic

    quality.

    e good genes mode l of sexual selec

    tion predicts that some attributes of male

    courtship displays advertise genetic quality.

    Preferences for such attributes should allow

    females to mate with high-quality males

    and thereby benefit indirectly through en-

    hanced quality of offspring (1). Although

    the good genes hypothesis has been tested

    several times (2), few stud ies have prOVided

    direct genetic evidence supporting this hy

    pothesis (3). Only

    one

    such study involved

    a species in which females cannot benefit

    directly from their choice of mates (4) .

    Because selection for direct benefits such as

    courtship feeding or parental care should

    overwhelm any selection for indirect (ge

    netic) benefits (5), the role of good genes

    selection in the evolution and maintenance

    of female preferences is best tested in spe

    cies in which females do not benefit directly

    fr

    om mate choice.

    Female gray tree frogs Hy/a versicolcrr

    strongly prefer male advertisement calls of

    long duration in laboratory experiments (6,

    7). In the field, females freely initiate mat

    ings with calling males and do not always

    choose the first male encountered (7). Be

    cause males do not defend oviposition sites,

    offer nuptial gifts, or contribute parental care

    (8 , 9), and no difference has been found in

    fertilization success as a function of call du

    ration (10), there are no apparent direct

    benefits of a female's mate choice. We there

    fore predicted that females selecting mates

    with long calls should benefit in.directly

    Division of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri ,

    Columbia, MO 65211 , USA.

    To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:

    [email protected]

    through increased fitness of offspring. This

    prediction can be tested

    by evaluating the

    relation between paternal call duration and

    the genetic quality of offspring.

    Male gray tree frog advertisement calls

    consist of rapidly repeated pulses In dense

    choruses and in re sponse to playbacks, males

    tend to increase call duration by increasing

    the number of pulses per call (11, 12 . None-

    theless, some males conSistently produce

    longer calls

    than

    others in the same acoustic

    environment (7, 12- 14), Although long

    calls are usually produced at slow rates,

    thereby keeping aerobic metabolic costs rel

    ati ve Iy constant (11 , 14), males that produce

    long calls spend less time calling per night

    (11) and attend fewer choruses per season

    (8) than males that produce short calls. Long

    calls thus appear to impose higher nonaero

    bic costs than short calls. Call duration may,

    therefore, be

    an

    honest indicator

    of

    male

    genetic quality.

    We tested whether call duration indicates

    heritable genetic quality by using maternal

    half-siblingships (half-sibships) to compare

    the performance of different males' off

    spring while experimentally controlling for

    all maternal effects. Maternal half-sibships

    were generated by artificially crossing each

    female with two males that had been giv

    ing calls of distinctly different durations in

    the same social environment Table 1).

    Thus, within each maternal half-sibship,

    one sibship was sired by a male with calls of

    longer duration than the male siring the

    other sibship . Because call duration varies

    with chorus density, males' calls must be

    assessed in the same social context in order

    to be validly compared. Uws, in 1995 we

    selected

    nine

    sets

    of

    two males

    that

    had

    SC IENCE VOL. 280 19 JUNE 1998 www.science mag.org

    mailto:[email protected]:///reader/full/www.sciencemag.orghttp:///reader/full/www.sciencemag.orghttp:///reader/full/www.sciencemag.orghttp:///reader/full/www.sciencemag.orghttp:///reader/full/www.sciencemag.orgmailto:[email protected]:///reader/full/www.sciencemag.org
  • 8/9/2019 AP Frog Calls - Evolution

    2/4

    1995

    a different of males to

    in

    orooortion

    t test

    among environments is

    TIle consistency of the

    alized by of

    increased fitness of

    1995 L.cng-callers 28.3 1.74

    4

    Short-callers 1.05

    0.188

    Difference 10.1 :!:4.9t 0.69:!:0.36t

    0.026 :!: 0040:j:

    1996

    1.41 0.092

    0.68

    0.082

    Difference 0.72 0.24t

    0.010 :!: 0.048j.:

    effort wasmeasured asduty of time duringwhichthe individual

    tP 0.001;pairedt test

    "",fnrrn

  • 8/9/2019 AP Frog Calls - Evolution

    3/4

    Proe, R Soc, London Ser, B264,297(1997)

    29,

    4, M,Petrie, Nature 371,598

    5, M, and N, H Natf. Aead,

    Sci. 94 1282

    6, G. M. KlumpandH.

    7.

    Dyson,S D. Tanner, Be/JEJV bothunivariateand mll i t"""i"; 'A

    26, R R,Sokaland F J,

    8. Hinshaw, nimBehav. 44,

    27, H, Fl, Collins,

    SCience 182,1305

    9,

    1979,286 (1979).

    J,Travis, 44,502

    10,

    IDUICJII>iICl!OO data,

    28, E,Ritke.J,G,Babb, M,K, RJ!ke, Herpelof, 24

    11.

    Taigen, Behav Ecol Soc/obiof,

    135(1990), 12December 1997:accepted 22 April 1998

    12,

    13

    14.

    15,

    16,

    17

    18.

    19,

    20,

    21

    22

    wascalculatedas

    each family surviving

    onslrr1el"mmr,hirogrmvthwas asthe dit,

    wet massachieved30

    metamorphosisandwet massat

    23, K, A Bervenand D, E, Gill,An" Zoo!.23,

    C,

    Smrth,

    68,344

    (1987),

    24, Mixed-model analyses

    (ANOVAs) were foreach

    able,at food each

    the main effectsof call identrty,

    identity(1996only),and blockingfactors,as

    as forinteractions, In order to account forcor-

    relations between larval period and mplArnm'nhirc

    mass,eachwas usedasacovariateinthe

    of theother.

    25,

    1930 SCIENCE VO 280 19 JUNE [998

  • 8/9/2019 AP Frog Calls - Evolution

    4/4

    ~ ~ ~ ~ l .

    ;.b ' ~ ' - r : ,(o:y:, ' ; ' ;

    Do females select mates based on traits

    indicative of good genes ?

    EXPERIMENT

    Female gray tree frogs prefer

    to

    mate with

    males that give long mating calls, Allison Welch and c o l l e g u e ~

    at the University of Missouri , tested whether the genetic makel

    of long-calling (LC) males is superior to that of short-calling SC

    males, The researchers fertilized half the eggs of each female

    with sperm from an LC male and fertilized the remaining eggs

    with sperm from an SC male, The resulting half-sibling offsprin

    were raised in a common environment and tracked

    for

    two

    yea

    Recording of SC

    Recording of LC

    male's ca ll

    male's call

    . 1

    ~ ~

    -

    . 1

    1

    1

    1

    Fema le gray

    tree frog

    SC male gray .

    LC malegri

    tree frog tree

    frog

    l

    SC sperm x Eggs x LC sperm

    Offspring of

    Offspring of

    SC father LC father

    ~

    itness of these ha lf-Sibling offspring compared

    RESULTS

    Fitness Measure

    995 1996

    Larval growth

    NSD LC better

    Larval survival

    LC better NSD

    Time to metamorphosis

    LC better LC better

    shorter)

    shor

    ter

    NSD = no Significant difference; LC

    better

    = offspring of LC males

    superior to offspring of SC males,

    ON LUSION Because offspring fathered by an LC male had

    higher fitness than their half-Siblings fathered by an SC male, the

    team concluded that the duration

    of

    a mal

    e's

    mating

    call

    is

    in-

    dicative of the male's overall genetic quality, This result supports

    the hypothesiSthat female mate choice can be based on a trait

    that indicates whether the male has good genes."

    SOUR E

    AM, Welch et aI., Call duration as an indicator

    of gener

    quality in male gray tree frogs, Science 280:1928-1930 (1998).

    Inquiry Action

    Read and analyze the original paper in

    Inquiry in Action. Interpreting Scientific apers ,

    -',f :t,iliM Why did the researchers split each female frog's

    eggs into two batches for fertilization by different males

    7

    Why

    didn't they mate each female with a single male frog?