83
Aberrations

Aoptic-abbration

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Aoptic-abbration

Aberrations

Page 2: Aoptic-abbration

Aberrations

Aberrations are distortions that occur in images, usually due to imperfections in lenses, some unavoidable, some avoidable.

They include:

Chromatic aberration

Spherical aberration

Astigmatism

Coma

Curvature of field

distortion (Pincushion and Barrel )

Most aberrations can’t be modeled with ray matrices. Designers beat them with lenses of multiple elements, that is, several lenses in a row. Some zoom lenses can have as many as a dozen or more elements.

Page 3: Aoptic-abbration

Aberrations

Aberrations - deviations from Gaussian optics.Chromatic aberrations - n depends on wavelengthMonochromatic aberrations - rays deviate from Gaussian optics

• spherical aberrations• coma• astigmatism• field curvature• distortion

Paraxial approximation: sin

Third order theory:!3

sin3

Departures from the first order theory observed in the third order leave to the following primary aberrations:

Taylor series: ...!7!5!3

sin753

“The five Seidel aberrations”

Philipp Ludwig Seidel(1821-1896)

Page 4: Aoptic-abbration

Third order aberrations

• sin terms in Snell’s law can be expanded in power series

n sin = n’ sin ’

n ( - 3/3! + 5/5! + …) = n’ ( ’ - ’3/3! + ’5/5! +

…)

• Paraxial ray approximation: keep only terms (first order optics;

rays propagate nearly along optical axis)

• Third order aberrations: result from adding 3 terms

– Spherical aberration, coma, astigmatism, .....

Page 5: Aoptic-abbration

Spherical Aberration

.

Page 6: Aoptic-abbration

Spherical Aberration in Mirrors

For all rays to converge to a point a distance f away from a curved mirror requires a paraboloidal surface.

But this only works for rays with in = 0.

Spherical surface Paraboloidal surface

Page 7: Aoptic-abbration

Hubble Space Telescope suffered from Spherical Aberration

• In a Cassegrain telescope, the hyperboloid of the primary mirror must match the specs of the secondary mirror. For HST they didn’t match.

Page 8: Aoptic-abbration

Hubble telescope

COSTAR - corrective optics space telescope axial replacement module

Page 9: Aoptic-abbration

Spherical Aberration in Lenses

So we use spherical surfaces, which work better for a wider range of input angles.

Nevertheless, off-axis rays see a different focal length, so lenses have spherical aberration, too.

Page 10: Aoptic-abbration

Spherical aberrations

Paraxial approximation (First order):

R

nn

s

n

s

n

io

1221

Third order:

2

2

2

121221 11

2

11

2 iiooio sRs

n

Rss

nh

R

nn

s

n

s

n

deviation from the first-order theory

Paraxial approximation: sin

Third order theory:!3

sin3

Page 11: Aoptic-abbration

Spherical Aberration in Lenses

So we use spherical surfaces, which work better for a wider range of input angles.

Nevertheless, off-axis rays see a different focal length, so lenses have spherical aberration, too.

Page 12: Aoptic-abbration

Spherical aberrations

LC - circle of least confusion, smallest image blur

L.SA = longitudinal spherical aberrations image of an on-axis object is longitudinally stretched

T.SA = Transverse (lateral) spherical aberrations image of an on-axis object is blurred in image plane

Page 13: Aoptic-abbration

Lens arrangement and S.A

Spherical aberration depends on lens arrangement:

.

Page 14: Aoptic-abbration

Different ways to illustrate optical aberrations

Side view of a fan of rays

(No aberrations)

“Spot diagram”: Image at different focus positions

Shows “spots” where rays would strike a detector

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

Page 15: Aoptic-abbration

Spherical aberration

Through-focus spot diagram for spherical aberration

Rays from a spherically aberrated wavefront focus

at different planes

Page 16: Aoptic-abbration

• How to fixed spherical aberration

Page 17: Aoptic-abbration

Coddington Shape factor

2 1

2 1

R Rq

R R

q lens1 = [(+R+(-R)]/[R-(-R)] =0

q len2=[(-R+(+R)]/[(-R)-(+R)]=0

q = ?

R1 = Front surface radius of curvature

R2 = Back surface radius of curvature

Page 18: Aoptic-abbration

Coddington Shape factor curves

Page 19: Aoptic-abbration

Coddigton Position factor

• .

oi

oiP

o i

Example:

o =5 cm

i=10

P=[10+(-5)]/[10-(-5) =1/3

Page 20: Aoptic-abbration

Minimum S.A

• .

oi

oiP

Pn

n

2

)1(2 2

12

12

RR

RR

From “introduction to Geometrical and Physical optics” p 86-94;

Minimum S.A happens when:

Page 21: Aoptic-abbration

The radius of lens with minimum of S.A

• From lens maker equation:

1

)1(2

1

)1(2

)11

)(1(1

2

1

12

12

21

nfR

nfR

RR

RR

RRn

f

Page 22: Aoptic-abbration

Spherical aberration can

be also minimized

using additional lenses

The additional lenses cancel the spherical aberration of the first.

Page 23: Aoptic-abbration

Refractive Gradients

• Spherical aberration can be also minimized using gradient index lens .

no – SA: (gradient lens)

SA: normal lens

Page 24: Aoptic-abbration

Theory of refractive Gradient

• .L

L`

n

n`yn

dLy

n

n

Ln

y

n

1

.1

R

L = R

The angle is a function of the gradient index n and the length of path traversed.

Page 25: Aoptic-abbration

Theory of refractive Gradient

dLy

n

n

Ln

y

n

1

.1

The intergral is taken over the length L, traversed by the light. If:

1-The L is relatively short

2- The medium is honomgeneous

y

nn

R

LL

Ly

n

nRRL

Ly

n

ny

1

1

Page 26: Aoptic-abbration

Example

Determine

-The angle of deflection of light

-The radius of curvature which the light is bent.

Solution

n=1.4

n=1.6

52.0

5.1

53.102667.0)01.0(05.0

2.0

5.1

1

1

0

y

nn

R

rad

Ly

n

ny

n = (1.4+1.6)/2=1.5

5cm

1cm

Page 27: Aoptic-abbration

• Coma• Coma

causes rays from an off-axis point of light in the object plane to create a trailing "comet-like" blur directed away from the optic axis.

Page 28: Aoptic-abbration

For objects-image pints that are off-axis the

aberration is called coma

• Coma

The lens magnification is depend on the lens diameter and

Page 29: Aoptic-abbration

ComaComa causes rays from an off-axis point of light in the object plane to create a trailing "comet-like" blur directed away from the optic axis. A lens with considerable coma may produce a sharp image in the center of the field, but become increasingly blurred toward the edges. For a single lens, coma can be caused or partially corrected by tilting the lens.

Page 30: Aoptic-abbration

Coma

point off the axis depicted as comet shaped blob

Marc Pollefeys

Page 31: Aoptic-abbration

Coma (comatic aberration)

Reason: principal planes are not flat but curved surfacesFocal length is different for off-axis points/rays

Negative coma: meridional rays focus closer to the principal axis

Page 32: Aoptic-abbration

Coma (comatic aberration)

Vertical coma

Horizontal coma

Page 33: Aoptic-abbration

Removing the of coma by asymmetric lens

• Off axes rays and similar optical path for asymmetric lens

Page 34: Aoptic-abbration

How Coma can be fixed

These distortions are fixed by an “orthoscopic doublet” or a “Zeiss orthometer.”

Page 35: Aoptic-abbration

• Astigmatism

Page 36: Aoptic-abbration

Where does astigmatism come from?

From Ian McLean, UCLA

Page 37: Aoptic-abbration

Different view of astigmatism

Page 38: Aoptic-abbration

AstigmatismWhen the optical system lacks perfect cylindrical symmetry, we say it has astigmatism. A simple cylindrical lens or off-axis curved-mirror reflection will cause this problem.

Cure astigmatism with another cylindrical lens or off-axis curved mirror.

Model astigmatism

by separate x and y analyses.

Page 39: Aoptic-abbration

Astigmatism

http://www.microscopyu.com/tutorials/java/aberrations/astigmatism/

Focal length for rays in Sagittal and Meridional planes differ for off-axis points

Page 40: Aoptic-abbration

Oblique astigmatism

• Occurs when rays of light strike a spherical lens obliquely-

• Line of sight not parallel with principal axis of lens

Page 41: Aoptic-abbration

Astigmatism

Different focal length for inclined rays

Marc Pollefeys

Page 42: Aoptic-abbration

•Curvature of field

Page 43: Aoptic-abbration

Curvature of field

Curvature of field causes a planar object to project a curved (non-planar) image. Rays at a large angle see the lens as having an effectively smaller diameter and an effectively smaller focal length, forming the image of the off axis points closer to the lens.

Page 44: Aoptic-abbration

Field curvature

Focal plane is curved:Petzval field curvature aberration

http://www.microscopyu.com/tutorials/java/aberrations/curvatureoffield/index.html

Negative lens has field plane that curves away from the image plane:Can use a combination of positive and negative lenses to cancel the effect

Page 45: Aoptic-abbration

•distortion

Page 46: Aoptic-abbration

Pincushion and Barrel Distortion

These distortions are fixed by an “orthoscopic doublet” or a “Zeiss orthometer.”

Page 47: Aoptic-abbration

Barrel and pincushion distortion

Barrel

Pincushion

Page 48: Aoptic-abbration

DistortionTransverse magnification MT may be a function of off-axis image distance: distortions

http://www.microscopyu.com/tutorials/java/aberrations/distortion/index.html

Positive (pincushion) distortion

Negative (barrel) distortion

Page 49: Aoptic-abbration

Correcting monochromatic aberrations

• Use combinations of lenses with mutually canceling aberration effects

• Use apertures• Use aspherical elements

Example:

Page 50: Aoptic-abbration

Chromatic Aberration

Because the lens material has a different refractive index for each wavelength, the lens will have a different focal length for each wavelength. Recall the lens-maker’s formula:

1 21/ ( ) ( ( ) 1)(1/ 1/ )f n R R

Here, the refractive index is larger for blue than red, so the focal length is less for blue than red.

You can model spherical aberration using ray matrices, but only one color at a time.

Page 51: Aoptic-abbration

Chromatic aberration can be minimized using additional lenses

In an Achromat, the second lens cancels the dispersion of the first.

Achromats use two different materials, and one has a negative focal length.

Page 52: Aoptic-abbration

Chromatic aberrations

Refraction index n depends on wavelength

21

111

1

RRn

f l

Page 53: Aoptic-abbration

Chromatic aberrations

A.CA: axial chromatic aberration

L.CA: lateral chromatic aberration

21

111

1

RRn

f l

Page 54: Aoptic-abbration

Achromatic Doublets

http://www.microscopyu.com/tutorials/java/aberrations/chromatic/index.html

Combine positive and negative lenses so that red and blue rays focus at the same point

Achromatized for red and blue

For two thin lenses d apart:2121

111

ff

d

fff

21

111

1

RRn

f l

22112211 1111

1 nndnnf

Achromat: fR=fB

22112211

22112211

1111

1111

BBBB

RRRR

nndnn

nndnn

Page 55: Aoptic-abbration

Achromatic Doublets

22112211

22112211

1111

1111

BBBB

RRRR

nndnn

nndnn

Simple case: d = 0

RB

RB

nn

nn

11

22

2

1

Focal length in yellow light

(between red and blue):

11

YY

nf

Y

Y

Y

Y

f

f

n

n

1

2

1

2

2

1

1

1

1

1

111

222

1

2

YRB

YRB

Y

Y

nnn

nnn

f

f

Combine:

Page 56: Aoptic-abbration

Achromatic Doublets

http://www.microscopyu.com/tutorials/java/aberrations/chromatic/index.html

1

1

111

222

1

2

YRB

YRB

Y

Y

nnn

nnn

f

f

12

22

Y

RB

n

nnDispersive powers:

11

11

Y

RB

n

nn

Abbe numbers (dispersive indices, V-numbers):RB

Y

nn

nV

22

21

1

RB

Y

nn

nV

11

12

1

2

1

1

2

V

V

f

f

Y

Y 01122 VfVf YY

Typical BYR colors: B = 486.1327 nm (F-line of hydrogen)Y = 587.5618 nm (D3 line of helium)R = 656.2816 nm (C-line of hydrogen)Table of V numbers - page 270

Page 57: Aoptic-abbration

Achromatic lenses CrownFlint

http://www.microscopyu.com/tutorials/java/aberrations/chromatic/index.html

Achromatic triplet:focus match for 3 wavelengths

Cooke triplet(Denis Taylor, 1893)

Flint

Crown

Page 58: Aoptic-abbration

Achromatic doublet: exampleDesign an achromatic doublet with f = 50 cm Use thin lens approximation.

Solution:21

111

fff01122 VfVf

ff

fff

1

12

01121

1

VfVff

ff

fV

VVf

1

211

f

V

VVf

2

122

Technically: want smaller R, i.e. longest possible f1 and f2

Solution: use two materials with drastically different V

Use figure 6.39 (page 271)

Page 59: Aoptic-abbration

Achromatic doublet: example

V

V1= 63.46

V2= 36.37

Page 60: Aoptic-abbration

Achromatic doublet: exampleDesign an achromatic doublet with f = 50 cm

Solution:f

V

VVf

1

211

f

V

VVf

2

122

m 2134.050.0

46.63

37.3646.631

f m 3724.02 f

21

111

1

RRn

f l

f1 f2 n1=1.51009 (for yellow line!)n2 = 1.62004

Negative lens:

11

11

12

2 Rn

f m 2309.01221 nfR

Positive lens:

m2309.0

111

1

11

1 Rn

f m 2059.01 R

Page 61: Aoptic-abbration

Spherical aberration as “the parent of all other aberrations”

• Coma and astigmatism can be thought of as the aberrations from a de-centered bundle of spherically aberrated rays

• Ray bundle on axis shows spherical aberration only

• Ray bundle slightly de-centered shows coma

• Ray bundle more de-centered shows astigmatism

• All generated from subsets of a larger centered bundle of spherically aberrated rays

– (diagrams follow)

Page 62: Aoptic-abbration

Spherical aberration as the parent of coma

Big bundle of spherically aberrated rays

De-centered subset of rays produces coma

Page 63: Aoptic-abbration

Coma

Through-focus spot diagram for coma

Rays from a comatic wavefront

Note that centroid shifts:

Page 64: Aoptic-abbration

Spherical aberration as the parent of astigmatism

Big bundle of spherically aberrated rays

More-decentered subset of rays produces astigmatism

Page 65: Aoptic-abbration

Astigmatism

Through-focus spot diagram for astigmatism

Side view of rays

Top view of rays

Page 66: Aoptic-abbration

Concept Question

• How do you suppose eyeglasses correct for astigmatism?

Page 67: Aoptic-abbration

Off-axis object is equivalent to having a de-

centered ray bundle

Ray bundle from an off-axis object. How to view this as a de-centered ray bundle?

For any field angle there will be an optical axis, which is to the surface of the optic and || to the incoming ray bundle. The bundle is de-centered wrt this axis.

Spherical surface

New optical axis

Page 68: Aoptic-abbration

•Extra

Page 69: Aoptic-abbration

Zernike Polynomials

• Convenient basis set for expressing wavefront aberrations over a circular pupil

• Zernike polynomials are orthogonal to each other

• A few different ways to normalize – always check definitions!

Page 70: Aoptic-abbration
Page 71: Aoptic-abbration

Piston

Tip-tilt

Page 72: Aoptic-abbration

Astigmatism(3rd order)

Defocus

Page 73: Aoptic-abbration

Trefoil

Coma

Page 74: Aoptic-abbration

Spherical

“Ashtray”

Astigmatism(5th order)

Page 75: Aoptic-abbration
Page 76: Aoptic-abbration

Units: Radians of phase / (D / r0)5/6

Reference: Noll

Tip-tilt is single biggest contributor

Focus, astigmatism, coma also big

High-order terms go on and on….

Page 77: Aoptic-abbration

Seidel polynomials vs. Zernike polynomials

• Seidel polynomials also describe aberrations

• At first glance, Seidel and Zernike aberrations look very similar

• Zernike aberrations are an orthogonal set of functions used to decompose a given wavefront at a given field point into its components

– Zernike modes add to the Seidel aberrations the correct amount of low-order modes to minimize rms wavefront error

• Seidel aberrations are used in optical design to predict the aberrations in a design and how they will vary over the system’s field of view

• The Seidel aberrations have an analytic field-dependence—proportional to some power of field angle

Page 78: Aoptic-abbration

References for Zernike Polynomials

• Books:– Hardy pages 95-96 READ THIS

• Pivotal Paper: Noll, R. J. 1976, “Zernike polynomials and atmospheric turbulence”, JOSA 66, page 207

Page 79: Aoptic-abbration

Review of important points

• Both lenses and mirrors can focus and collimate light• Equations for system focal lengths, magnifications are quite similar for

lenses and for mirrors– But be careful of sign conventions

• Telescopes are combinations of two or more optical elements– Main function: to gather lots of light– Secondary function: magnification

• Aberrations occur both due to your local instrument’s optics and to the atmosphere– Can describe both with Zernike polynomials

Page 80: Aoptic-abbration

Spherical aberrations

Paraxial approximation:

R

nn

s

n

s

n

io

1221

Third order:

2

2

2

121221 11

2

11

2 iiooio sRs

n

Rss

nh

R

nn

s

n

s

n

deviation from the first-order theory

L.SA = longitudinal spherical aberrations image of an on-axis object is longitudinally stretched

T.SA = Transverse (lateral) spherical aberrations image of an on-axis object is blurred in image plane

positive L.SA - marginal rays intersect in front of Fparaxial

Page 81: Aoptic-abbration

Wavefront aberrations

John William Strutt(Lord Rayleigh)

1842-1919

Lord Rayleigh criterion: wavefront aberration of /4 produces noticeably degraded image (light intensity of a point object image drops by ~20%)

Page 82: Aoptic-abbration

Zero SA

For points P and P’ SA is zero

Oil-immersion microscope objective

http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/primer/java/aberrations/spherical/

Page 83: Aoptic-abbration

Minimizing spherical aberration in a focus

2 1

2 1

R Rq

R R

Plano-convex lenses (with their flat surface facing the focus) are best for minimizing spherical aberration when focusing.

One-to-one imaging works best with a symmetrical lens (q = ∞).

R1 = Front surface radius of curvature

R2 = Back surface radius of curvature