Upload
haitao-meng
View
214
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Antitumor activity of fludarabine against human multiplemyeloma in vitro and in vivoHaitao Meng1, Chunmei Yang1, Wanmao Ni1, Wei Ding1, Xiudi Yang1, Wenbin Qian1,2
1Institute of Hematology, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University; Key lab of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation,
Ministry of Public Health, Hangzhou; 2Xinyuan Institute of Medicine and Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University of Technology
and Sciences, Hangzhou, China
Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable B-cell malig-
nancy resulting in significant morbidity and mortality
(1). MM accounts for 1% of all cancers and slightly
more than 10% of hematological malignancies. Although
many therapeutic advances such as combined chemo-
therapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation have
been made to improve the survival rate of patients with
MM, a higher proportion of the patients cannot expect
the long-term remission due to drug-resistant disease,
and minimal residual disease, leaving limited therapeutic
option (2). Therefore, new approaches to therapy are
required.
Fludarabine, an arabino-adenosine analogue, inhibits
DNA synthesis in proliferating cells; however, in indolent
cells fludarabine has an inhibitory effect on RNA tran-
scription (3), thus playing a major role in the treatment
of B-cell lymphocytic leukemia, hairy cell leukemia, and
indolent lymphomas. Because MM cells proliferate very
slowly, it is plausible that inhibition of RNA synthesis
may be an important growth inhibitory effect in MM
cells. In fact, the in vitro anticancer activity of fludara-
bine against MM cell lines is demonstrated (4). Although
previous results of phase II clinical trials in MM with
fludarabine were completely negative (5, 6), recent stud-
ies show that the treatment of fludarabine combined with
other chemotheraputic agents is clinically effective in the
patients with newly diagnosed and relapse or refractory
MM (7, 8). Moreover, 8-amino-adenosine (a novel pur-
ine analogue) and gemcitabine have been demonstrated
to be effective in the induction of apoptosis in myeloma
Abstract
Fludarabine, a nucleoside analogue, plays a major role in the treatment of B-cell lymphocytic leukemia,
hairy cell leukemia, and indolent lymphomas. There is a controversy about antitumor activity of fludarabine
in multiple myeloma (MM). The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity of fludarabine against human
myeloma cells both in vivo and in vitro. We demonstrated that myeloma cell line RPMI8226 was efficiently
inhibited by fludarabine, concomitantly with decreased phosphorylation of Akt, down-regulation of the
inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAP) family, including XIAP and survivin, and induction of apoptosis related
to activation of caspase cascade. Contrary to dexamethasone, the effect of fludarabine on RPMI8226 cells
was independent of interleukin-6. Fludarabine also induced cytotoxicity in dexamethasone-sensitive
(MM.1S) and -resistant (MM.1R) cells at 48 h with IC50 of 13.48 lg ⁄ mL and 33.79 lg ⁄ mL, respectively. In
contrast, U266 cells were resistant to fludarabine. Moreover, RPMI8226 myeloma xenograft model was
established using severe combined immunodeficient mice. The tumors treated with fludarabine at
40 mg ⁄ kg increased less than 5-fold in 25 d comparing with approximately 10-fold in the control tumors,
demonstrating the antitumor activity of fludarabine in vivo. These results suggest that fludarabine may be
an important therapeutic option for MM patients who are resistant to dexamethasone.
Key words multiple myeloma; fludarabine; apoptosis
Correspondence W. Qian, Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Qingchun
Road 79, Hangzhou, 310003, China. Tel: 86-571-56723008; Fax: 86-571-87236702; e-mail: [email protected]
Accepted for publication 15 August 2007 doi:10.1111/j.1600-0609.2007.00968.x
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
European Journal of Haematology ISSN 0902-4441
486ª 2007 The Authors
Journal compilation 79 (486–493) ª 2007 Blackwell Munksgaard
(9–11). These data provide an impetus to evaluate the
role of fludarabine in MM.
In this study, we examined the effects of fludarabine
on MM cell lines, and studied the mechanisms of cyto-
toxicity of fludarabine in myeloma cells with attention to
the alteration of survival pathways, including Akt and
the inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAP) family. Further-
more, we also evaluated the potent antitumor activity of
fludarabine in human myeloma RPMI8226 xenograft
mice model.
Materials and methods
Cell lines, cultures, and reagents
Dexamethasone-sensitive (MM.1S) and -resistant
(MM.1R) human MM cell lines were kindly provided by
Steven Rosen (Northwestern University, Chicago, IL,
USA). RPMI8226 and U266 cell lines were purchased
from American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD,
USA). Cells were cultured with RPMI 1640 (Hyclone
Laboratories, Logan, UT, USA) supplemented with 5%
fetal bovine serum (Hyclone Laboratories), 1% l-gluta-
mine, and 0.1% gentamycin, and maintained at 37 �C in
an incubator with 5%CO2. Reagents were purchased
from the following vendors: fludarabine phosphate
(Schering, Germany); interleukin-6 (IL-6; Upstate, New
York, NY, USA); pan-caspase inhibitor zVAD-FMK
(BioVision, Mountain View, CA, USA); dexamethasone
(Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA).
Growth inhibition assay
The inhibitory effect of fludarabine on proliferation of
MM cell lines was assessed by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-
2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT; Sigma)
assay as described previously (12).
Cell-cycle analysis and apoptosis determination
Cells (5 · 105 cells) were washed twice in phosphate-
buffered saline (PBS) and fixed with 70% ice-cold
ethanol, then centrifuged and suspended in PBS
containing 100 lg ⁄mL RNase A. After incubated for
30 min at 37�C, samples were resuspended in
25 lg ⁄mL propidium iodide (Sigma). Flow cytometry
was performed on a FACSCalibur automated system
(Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Apop-
tosis was determined by Annexin V-FITC apoptosis
detection kit (BD Pharmingen, SanDiego, CA, USA),
according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For
TUNEL (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-
mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate nick end labeling)
assay, cells were analyzed by flow cytometry using the
in situ cell death detection kit (Roche, Philadelphia,
PA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s
instructions.
Mitochondrial membrane potential measurement
PRMI8226 cells treated with fludarabine were washed
and stained with 5 lg ⁄mL of Rhodamine 123 (Molecu-
lar Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) at 37�C for 30 min.
Rhodamine 123 was excited with a 488 nm argon ion
laser; fluorescence emission was measured at 530 nm
using flow cytometry.
Western bolts
Western blots were done as previously described (12).
The primary antibodies used here were as follows: poly
(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP), cas-
pase-8, -9, -7, -3, Bax, Bid, Bak, Survivin, XIAP, and
cIAP were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology
(Beverly, MA, USA); Rabbit monoclonal antibodies to
total Akt, Ser 473 phosphorylated Akt, and GAPDH
were provided by Kangchen (Shanghai, China); Mono-
clonal second mitochondrial-derived activator of caspase
(Smac) antibody and b-actin were purchased from Santa
Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA).
Establishment of subcutaneous and disseminated MMxenografts and therapy
Severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice (Shang-
hai Experimental Animal Center of the Chinese Acad-
emy of Sciences, China) were housed and maintained
in facilities under an institute-approved animal proto-
col. For the s.c. xenograft MM RPMI 8226 mouse
model, 3- to 4-wk-old female mice were inoculated
subcutaneously with 10 · 106 RPMI 8226 cells. When
tumor volumes approached 100 mm3, the mice were
divided into experimental cohorts of six mice each.
Injections (i.p.) of fludarabine or PBS (control) were
administered each day for 3 d. Tumor volume was cal-
culated by using the formula: 4p ⁄3 · (tumor
width ⁄ 2)2 · (tumor length ⁄ 2) described as previously
(13).
Immunohistochemistry
Seven days after treatment of fludarabine, some addi-
tional mice were humanely killed with CO2, and the
tumor mass was bisected using a razor blade. The
tumors were immediately placed in 10% buffered formal-
dehyde overnight. Formaldehyde-fixed tumors were
embedded in paraffin and cut into 4 lm-thick serial
sections using standard histologic procedures.
Meng et al. Antitumor activity of fludarabine against multiple myeloma
ª 2007 The Authors
Journal compilation 79 (486–493) ª 2007 Blackwell Munksgaard 487
Statistical analysis
Tumor volumes were calculated as mean ± SEM. The
statistical of experimental results was calculated by
one-way analysis of variance (anova) and Student’s
t-test. P < 0.05 considered to be significant.
Results
Treatment with fludarabine reduced myeloma cellproliferation independent of interleukin-6
The effect of fludarabine on growth of MM cell lines
was determined using MTT assays. Fludarabine inhibited
efficiently the proliferation of RPMI 8226 cells in a
dose–time-dependent fashion, with 50% inhibition (IC50)
at 24 h of 1.54 lg ⁄mL (Fig. 1A). The IC50 of MM.1S
and MM.1R cells at 48 h was 13.48 lg ⁄mL and
33.79 lg ⁄mL, respectively (Fig. 1B). In contrast, U266
cells were resistant to fludarabine with IC50 of
222.2 lg ⁄mL at 48 h (data not shown). Because IL-6 acts
as a growth factor for MM cells (14), we evaluated the
effect of fludarabine on RPMI 8226 in the presence of
exogenous IL-6. IL-6 (50 ng ⁄mL) did not provide protec-
tion against fludarabine-induced growth inhibition and
apoptosis (data not shown). We next examined whether
fludarabine could enhance the effect of dexamethasone
on MM1.S cell line. The results showed that fludarabine
enhanced significantly the effect of dexamethasone
(P < 0.01; Fig. 1C).
Inhibition of myeloma cell proliferation was due to G1arrest and apoptosis induction
We next did cell cycle analysis using propidium iodide-
staining and subsequent flow cytometry sorting. As
depicted in Fig. 2A, fludarabine treatment resulted in
increased number of cells in the G1 phase of cell cycle,
accompanied with a concomitant reduction of cells at the
S phase of cell cycle in a time-dependent manner. The
apoptotic nature of cell death induced by fludarabine
was further confirmed by Annexin-V binding (Fig. 2B),
and TUNEL assay (Fig. 2C). These results indicate that
fludarabine induces a cell cycle block and triggers apop-
tosis in MM cells.
Apoptosis triggered by fludarabine is mediated viacaspase-3, caspase-7, and PARP cleavage
We further used immunoblotting to assess activation of
caspases in RPMI 8226 cells. As shown in Fig. 3A,
fludarabine triggered time-dependent cleavage of caspase-
8, -9, and -3, -7, followed by PARP cleavage. The pan-
caspase inhibitor zVAD-FMK (30 lm) resulted in an
almost 50% reduction of apoptosis (data not shown),
suggesting that caspase activation is involved in the
mechanism of fludarabine-induced apoptosis.
Previous studies suggest the involvement of bcl-2
family protein in myeloma cell death (15, 16). We found
that fludarabine induced increased expression of Bax in a
0 8 16 64 µg/mL32
A B
00
20
40
60
% V
iabi
lity
Via
bilit
y (%
)
Via
bilit
y (%
)
80
0
20
10
40
30
60
50
80
90
70
100
12024 h48 h
MM.1S; 24 hMM.1S; 48 hMM.1R; 24 hMM.1R; 48 h
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0.5 2 4 µg/mL1
C
Dex 1 µM Flud 8 µg/mL Dex +Flud 4 µg/mL
Dex +Flud 8 µg/mL
Flud 4 µg/mL
P < 0.01P < 0.01
***
P < 0.01P < 0.01
***
Figure 1 Fludarabine reduces the viability of
multiple myeloma cell lines. The cells were cul-
tured with indicated concentration of fludarabine
for 24 and 48 h. Cell viability was measured by
MTT assay. (A) RPMI8226. (B) MM.1S and
MM.1R. (C) Synergistic effects of fludarabine
with dexamethasone. MM.1S cells were treated
with dexamethasone (1 lM) or fludarabine at
4 lg ⁄ mL and 8 lg ⁄ mL alone, and combination
of two agents for 24 h. Bars represent mean ±
SEM, n = 3. *P < 0.01 vs. fludarabine;
**P < 0.01 vs. dexamethasone.
Antitumor activity of fludarabine against multiple myeloma Meng et al.
488ª 2007 The Authors
Journal compilation 79 (486–493) ª 2007 Blackwell Munksgaard
time-dependent fashion, while the expression of Bak
didn’t change (Fig. 3B). Importantly, decreased expres-
sion of Bid, a bcl-2 family member which cooperates
with Bax to cause mitochondrial dysfunction (17), was
triggered by fludarabine (Fig. 3B), suggesting that cross-
talk of apoptotic signaling from caspase-8 to caspase-9
occurs. After exposure to fludarabine for 12 h, RPMI
8226 cells showed a loss of membrane potential with
61.05% of the cells expressing low fluorescence of rhoda-
mine 123 compared with 8.62% of cells in untreated con-
trol (data not shown). Finally, the release of Smac was
also observed in response to this agent (Fig. 3B).
Alterations of survival pathways are associated withfludaranine-mediated apoptosis
Because Smac reportedly promotes apoptosis by binding
to and antagonizing the IAP family multiple proteins
including XIAP, cIAPs, and survivin (18), the expression
of these genes was examined. Downregulation expression
of XIAP and survivin was observed in fludarabine-
treated RPMI8226 cells, whereas expression of cIAP did
not change (Fig. 4A). Furthermore, decreased expression
of survivin was also observed in MM.1S, and MM.1R,
but not in U266 cells that is resistant to fludarabine
(Fig. 4B).
S 65%
6 h
G0/G1 68%Sub-G1 27%S 32%
PI
Control
Control 6 h 2 h 24 h
dUTP-Fluos
Counts
Annexin-FITC
G0/G1 27%Sub-G1 1%R
PM
I 8226
ControlA
B
C
24 h12 h
G0/G1 42%Sub-G1 12%S 53%
3.65% 6.44% 58.15% 67.76%
G0/G1 53%Sub-G1 25%S 46%
1 µg 2 µg 4 µg
Figure 2 Treatment of fludarabine results in
G1-arrest and apoptosis of myeloma cells. (A)
RPMI8226 cells were treated with fludarabine
(2 lg ⁄ mL) for indicated times. Cell cycle analy-
sis was done after propidium iodide staining.
(B) RPMI 8226 cells incubated with indicated
concentration of fludarabine for 24 h, stained
with FITC-conjugated Annexin V and propidium
iodide, and then subjected to flow cytometric.
(C) RPMI 8226 cells were treated with 2 lg ⁄ mL
fludarabine for the indicated times. Apoptotic
cells were evaluated by TUNEL assay. A repre-
sentative of three separate experiments is
shown.
A
B
Figure 3 Apoptosis triggered by fludarabine is mediated via caspase
cascade. (A) Activation of caspases. (B) Expression of bcl-2 family pro-
tein. Cells were treated with fludarabine (2 lg ⁄ mL) for the indicated
times. Whole cell extracts were prepared and immunoblotted. The
data are representative of two determinations with identical results.
Meng et al. Antitumor activity of fludarabine against multiple myeloma
ª 2007 The Authors
Journal compilation 79 (486–493) ª 2007 Blackwell Munksgaard 489
We next examined expression of Akt. The phosphory-
lation of Akt at position Ser 473 was highly expressed in
MM.1R, MM.1S, and RPMI8226, but lower in U266
cells that are resistant to fludarabine (Fig. 4C). Fludara-
bine inhibited phosphorylation of Akt in some, but not
all, myeloma cell lines (Fig. 4D), reflecting a high degree
of heterogeneity. We therefore evaluated the contribution
of this pathway in fludarabine-mediated apoptosis.
Apoptosis assays were done on myeloma cell lines trea-
ted with the Akt inhibitor (30 lm LY294002) in the pres-
ence or absence of fludarabine (2 lg ⁄mL). LY294002
slightly induced the apoptosis of RPMI8226 and not of
U266 cells. Interestingly, pronounced apoptosis of
MM.1S and MM.1R cells were observed (Fig. 4E). Slight
potentiation was observed in all of tested cell lines except
U266 when LY294002 (30 lm) and fludarabine
(2 lg ⁄mL) were added together (Fig. 4E).
Fludarabine induces apoptosis and significantlyinhibits myeloma cell growth in vivo
We also addressed the issue of whether fludarabine could
inhibit tumor growth in vivo. The results showed that
control tumors treated with PBS grew rapidly to approx-
imately 10-fold their initial volume in 25 d, whereas, the
tumors in the fludarabine at 40 mg ⁄kg increased less
than 5-fold. A significant (P < 0.05) antitumor effect of
40 mg ⁄kg fludarabine on RPMI8226 tumor growth was
demonstrated (Fig. 5A). In contrast, fludarabine at
8 mg ⁄kg had no effect (P > 0.05). TUNEL assay
showed an evident increase in apoptotic nuclei in
RPMI8226 tumors treated with 40 mg ⁄kg fludarabine at
day 10 (Fig. 5B). Together, these data suggest that flu-
darabine is effective in suppressing RPMI8226 myeloma
xenografts in SCID mice.
Discussion
Fludarabine, combined with VAD regimen (19), has been
used for treating newly diagnosed MM patients (7). Of
the ten patients, nine responses at 1 month post-therapy
follow-up with two in complete remission (CR) and
seven patients in partial remission (PR). In contrast, of
the nine patients treated with VAD alone, five responses
in PR. In a clinical investigation reported by Luo et al.
(8), 11 heavily pretreated MM patients receive two cycles
of fludarabine combined with mitoxantrone and
dexamethasone. The response rate was 45.5% (five PR),
compared with 22.7% in the VAD regimen. Here, we
show that RPMI8226, MM.1S, and MM.1R myeloma
cell lines are blocked in G1 phase of the cell cycle and
undergo apoptosis when treated with pharmacological
concentrations of fludarabine (20). The activation of
both caspase-8 and -9 followed by downstream activa-
tion of caspase-3, -7, and PARP is observed in fludara-
bine-treated MM cells. Those results are supported with
previous reports showing that most conventional
Control 6 12 24 h
MM.1R
MM.1R
MM.1R
MM.1R
Control 24 h Control 24 h Control 24 h Control 24 h
survivin
0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 h
16Kd
36Kd
36KD
60kD
60kD
36KDa
60kDa
60kDa
GAPDH
GAPDH
GAPDH
80
70
60
50
40
Apo
ptot
ic c
ells
(%
)
30
20
10
0
pAKT
pAKT
tAKT
tAKT
MM.1S
MM.1S
MM.1S
MM.1S
RPMI8226
RPMI8226
RPMI8226
RPMI8226
Con Ly Flud L+F Con Ly Flud L+FCon Ly Flud L+FCon Ly Flud L+F
U266
U266
U266
U266
A
B
C
D
E
Figure 4 Effects of fludarabine on survival pathways. (A) RPMI8226
cells were treated with fludarabine (2 lg ⁄ mL) for the indicated times
and cell lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting for the expression
of IAPs proteins. (B) MM cell lines were incubated with fludarabine at
2 lg ⁄ mL for 6 h. Immunoblotting was performed. (C) The whole cell
lysates from RPMI8226, U266, MM.1S, and MM.1R myeloma cell line
were examined using immunoblotting with specific antibodies against
Akt and phospho-Akt (at Ser473). (D) Myeloma cells were cultured
with 2 lg ⁄ mL fludarabine for 24 h and cell lysates were subjected to
western blot analysis. (E) The combined effects of fludarabine and Akt
inhibitor LY294002. Myeloma cell lines were cultured with fludarabine
(2 lg ⁄ mL) or LY294002 (30 lM), and combination of two agents for
36 h, and then analyzed by flow cytometry for apoptosis. The results
are representative of three independent experiments. Bars represent
mean ± SEM, n = 3.
Antitumor activity of fludarabine against multiple myeloma Meng et al.
490ª 2007 The Authors
Journal compilation 79 (486–493) ª 2007 Blackwell Munksgaard
including dexamethasone, and novel chemotherapeutic
agents trigger the apoptosis of MM cell via activation of
caspase-8 (15, 21, 22) or caspase-9 (10, 23). In our mye-
loma model, increased expression of Bax, decreased
mitochondrial membrane potential, and release of Smac
occur. These data suggest that two main pathways of
procaspase activation (intrinsic mitochondrial pathway
and extrinsic death receptor pathway) are involved in flu-
darabine-induced apoptosis of myeloma cell.
IL-6 triggers proliferation and survival of MM cells
via activation of multiple signal pathways (24, 25). Spe-
cifically, dexamethasone resistance conferred by IL-6 is
mediated via the phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3-
K) ⁄Akt signaling cascade (14, 26). Our data indicate that
IL-6 does not abrogate fludarabine-induced apoptosis of
RPMI8226, consistent with a previous report showing
that the cytotoxicity of gemcitabine against MM cells is
independently of IL-6 (11). In addition, we show that flu-
darabine enhances significantly the effect of dexametha-
sone on MM.1S cells. Collectively, fludarabine, contrary
to dexamethasone, have the pathways bypassing IL-6,
and therefore might become an important therapeutic
option for MM patients who are resistant to dexametha-
sone.
The Akt kinase is a well-studied viability-promoting
effector molecule that is activated downstream of PI3-K.
Recently, activated Akt kinase has been demonstrated in
MM cell lines (26) and patient’s tumors (27). Our preli-
minary data show a different degree of activation level
of Akt in all tested MM cell lines. Interestingly, Akt
inhibitor LY294002 produces a much stronger cytotoxic-
ity in MM.1S and MM.1R that have highly phosphory-
lated Akt at Ser473, compared with RPMI8226 cells that
contained weak activation of Akt. In contrast, U266 cells
are resistant to LY294002 or fludarabine due to its low-
est phosphorylation of Akt. These data suggest that the
activation of Akt correlates with the sensitivity of MM
cells to AKT inhibitor, and is involved in fludarabine-
induced myeloma cell death.
XIAP inhibits apoptosis targeting the effector caspase-
3 and -7, as well as the initiator caspase-9 (28–30). Fur-
thermore, XIAP may play a role in worsening the prog-
nosis of MM patients in association with chemotherapy-
induced overexpression of multidrug-resistant protein or
lung resistance protein (31). Our data show that the
expression of XIAP was decreased during fludarabine-
induced apoptosis. Survivin is also a fascinating member
of IAP family with its dual roles in mitosis and apoptosis,
Control
00
200
400
600
800
Tum
or V
ol (
mm
3 )
1000
1200
1400ControlFludarabine (8mg/kg)Fludarabine (40mg/kg)
7 10 13 16 19 22 25 Days
Fludarabine
*
A
BFigure 5 Antitumoral efficacy of fludarabine in
established RPMI8226 tumors in vivo. (A)
RPMI8226 human myeloma xenografts implanted
in severe combined immunodeficient mice. PBS
or fludarabine were injected intraperitoneally on
three consecutive days. Tumor growth of the
mice was measured at the indicated times. Data
are presented as the tumor mean volume ± SE.
*P < 0.05 vs. control without fludarabine
(Student’s t-test). (B) Tumor sections were
excised and analyzed for induction of apoptosis
by TUNEL staining. Arrows denote cells under-
going apoptosis. Original magnification, ·40.
Meng et al. Antitumor activity of fludarabine against multiple myeloma
ª 2007 The Authors
Journal compilation 79 (486–493) ª 2007 Blackwell Munksgaard 491
and emerges as an attractive target for cancer therapy
(32). A significant correlation between survivin expression
at protein level and clinical course of MM is demon-
strated (33). Moreover, survivin knockdown by RNA
interference leads to growth inhibition, apoptosis, and
enhanced sensitivity of myeloma cell to conventional
anti-myeloma agents (33). We demonstrate that the
action of fludarabine correlates to the downregulation of
survivin. Altogether, cellular cytotoxicity of fludarabine
in myeloma cells appears to be mediated through multiple
pathways, although the precise pathways and exact mech-
anisms involved in apoptotic cell death are still unknown.
In summary, this study provides evidence that fludara-
bine induces significant cytotoxicity in dexamethasone-
sensitive and -resistant myeloma cell lines in vitro. The
mechanisms of fludarabine cytotoxicity are related to cell
cycle arrest and induction of apoptosis, which appears to
be regulated by multiple pathways including Akt and
IAP family, and activation of caspases. Moreover, in vivo
antitumor activity of fludarabine is demonstrated in mye-
loma xenograft model. We conclude that fludarabine
may be clinically effective in a subset of MM patients,
but responders cannot be easily pre-selected on the basis
of either the conventional clinical and pathologic
characteristics.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a grant from Science and
Technology of Zhejiang Province, China (2005c23017).
References
1. Kyle RA. Multiple myeloma: an odyssey of discovery.
Br J Haematol 2000;111:1035–44.
2. Hideshima T, Anderson KC. Molecular mechanisms of
novel therapeutic approaches for multiple myeloma. Nat
Rev Cancer 2002;2:927–37.
3. Huang P, Plunkett W. Action of 9-h-D arabinofuranosyl-
2-fluroradenine on RNA metabolism. Mol Pharmacol
1991;39:449–55.
4. Krett NL, Ayres M, Nabhan C, Ma C, Nowak B,
Nawrocki S, Rosen ST, Gandhi V. In vitro assessment of
nucleoside analogs in multiple myeloma. Cancer Chemo-
ther Pharmacol 2004;54:113–21.
5. Kraut EH, Crowley JJ, Grever MR. Phase II study of
fludarabine phosphate in multiple myeloma. Invest New
Drugs 1990;8:199–200.
6. Lichman SM, Mittelman A, Budman DR, et al. Phase II
trials of fludarabine phosphate in multiple myeloma using
a loading dose and continuous infusion schedule. Leuk
Lymphoma 1991;6:61–3.
7. Bjorkstrand B, Rasmussen T, Remes K, Gruber A,
Pelliniemi TT, Johnsen HE. Feasibility of fludarabine
added to VAD during induction therapy in multiple
myeloma: a randomised phase II-study. Eur J Haematol
2003;70:379–83.
8. Luo S, Li J, Hong W, Zhao Y, Tong X. Preliminary
report of fludarabine, mitoxantrone and dexamethasone in
treating refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma. Ai
Zheng 2005;24:1518–21.
9. Ghias K, Ma C, Gandhi V, Platanias LC, Krett NL,
Rosen ST. 8-Amino-adenosine induces loss of phosphory-
lation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase, extra-
cellular signal-regulated kinase 1 ⁄ 2, and Akt kinase: role
in induction of apoptosis in multiple myeloma. Mol
Cancer Ther 2005;4:569–77.
10. Krett NL, Davies KM, Ayres M, Ma C, Nabhan C,
Gandhi V, Rosen ST. 8-Amino-adenosine is a potential
therapeutic agent for multiple myeloma. Mol Cancer Ther
2004;3:1411–9.
11. Nabhan C, Gajria D, Krett NL, Gandhi V, Ghias K,
Rosen ST. Caspase activation is required for gemcitabine
activity in multiple myeloma cell lines. Mol Cancer Ther
2002;1:1221–7.
12. Qian W, Liu J, Jin J, Ni W, Xu W. Arsenic trioxide
induces not only apoptosis but also autophagic cell death
in leukemia cell lines via up-regulation of Beclin-1. Leuk
Res 2007;31:329–39.
13. LeBlanc R, Catley LP, Hideshima T, et al. Proteasome
inhibitor PS-341 inhibits human myeloma cell growth in
vivo and prolongs survival in a murine model. Cancer Res
2002;62:4996–5000.
14. Hideshima T, Nakamura N, Chauhan D, Anderson KC.
Biologic sequelae of interleukin-6 induced PI3-K ⁄Akt
signaling in multiple myeloma. Oncogene 2001;20:5991–
6000.
15. Evens AM, Prachand S, Shi B, Paniaqua M, Gordon LI,
Gartenhaus RB. Imexon-induced apoptosis in multiple
myeloma tumor cells is caspase-8 dependent. Clin Cancer
Res 2004;10:1481–91.
16. Panaretakis T, Pokrovskaja K, Shoshan MC, Grander D.
Activation of Bak, Bax, and BH3-only proteins in the
apoptotic response to doxorubicin. J Biol Chem
2002;277:44317–26.
17. Desagher S, Osen-Sand A, Nichols A, Eskes R, Montes-
suit S, Lauper S, Maundrell K, Antonesson B, Martinou
JC. Bid-induced conformational change of Bax is
responsible for mitochondrial cytochrome c release
during apoptosis. J Cell Biol 1999;144:891–901.
18. Verhagen AM, Ekert PG, Pakusch M, Silke J, Connolly
LM, Reid GE, Montz RL, Simpson RJ, Vaux DL.
Identification of DIABLO, a mammalian protein that
promotes apoptosis by binding to and antagonizing IAP
proteins. Cell 2000;102:43–53.
19. Barlogie B, Smith L, Alexanian R. Effective treatment of
advanced multiple myeloma refractory to alkylating
agents. N Engl J Med 1984;310:1353–6.
20. Gregoire V, Ang KK, Rosier JF, et al. A phase I study of
fludarabine combined with radiotherapy in patients with
Antitumor activity of fludarabine against multiple myeloma Meng et al.
492ª 2007 The Authors
Journal compilation 79 (486–493) ª 2007 Blackwell Munksgaard
intermediate to locally advanced head and neck squamous
cell carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 2002;63:187–93.
21. Chauhan D, Hideshima T, Anderson KC. Apoptotic sig-
naling in multiple myeloma: therapeutic implications. Int J
Hematol 2003;78:114–20.
22. Mitsiades N, Mitsiades CS, Poulaki V, Chauhan D, Rich-
ardson G, Hideshima T, Munshi NC, Treon SP, Anderson
KC. Apoptotic signaling induced by immunomodulatory
thalidomide analogs in human multiple myeloma cells:
therapeutic implications. Blood 2002;99:4525–30.
23. Chauhan D, Hideshima T, Rosen S, Reed JC, Kharbanda
S, Anderson KC. Apaf-1 ⁄ cytochrome c independent and
Smac dependent induction of apoptosis in multiple mye-
loma cells. J Biol Chem 2001;276:24453–6.
24. Ogata A, Chauhan D, Teoh G, Treon SP, Urashima M,
Schlossman RL, Anderson KC. Interleukin-6 triggers cell
growth via the ras-dependent mitogenactivated protein
kinase cascade. J Immunol 1997;159:2212–21.
25. Catlett-Falcone R, Landowski TH, Oshiro MM, et al.
Constitutive activation of Stat3 signaling confers
resistance to apoptosis in human U266 myeloma cells.
Immunity 1999;10:105–15.
26. Tu Y, Gardner A, Lichtenstein A. The phosphatidylinosi-
tol 3-kinase ⁄AKT kinase pathway in multiple myeloma
plasma cells: roles in cytokine-dependent survival and
proliferative responses. Cancer Res 2000;60:6763–70.
27. Hsu JH, Shi Y, Krajewski S, Renner S, Fisher M, Reed
JC, Franke TF, Lichtenstein A. The AKT kinase is
activated in multiple myeloma tunor cells. Blood
2001;98:2853–5.
28. Chawla-Sarkar M, Bae SI, Reu FJ, Jacobs BS, Lindner
DJ, Borden EC. Downregulation of Bcl-2, FLIP or IAPs
(XIAP and survivin) by siRNAs sensitizes resistant mela-
noma cells to Apo2L ⁄TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Cell
Death Differ 2004;11:915–23.
29. Deveraux QL, Takahashi R, Salvesen GS, Reed JC.
X-linked IAP is a direct inhibitor of cell death proteases.
Nature 1997;388:300–4.
30. Deveraux Q, Leo E, Stennicke H, Welsh K, Salvesen G,
Reed J. Cleavage of human inhibitor of apoptosis protein
xiap results in fragments with distinct specificities for
caspases. EMBO J 1999;18:5242–51.
31. Nakagawa Y, Abe S, Kurata M, Hasegawa M, Yamam-
oto K, Inoue M, Takemura T, Suzuki K, Kitaqawa M.
IAP family protein expression correlates with poor out-
come of multiple myeloma patients in association with
chemotherapy-induced overexpression of multidrug
resistance genes. Am J Hematol 2006;81:824–31.
32. Hideshima T, Bergsagel PL, Kuehl WM, Anderson KC.
Advances in biology of multiple myeloma: clinical applica-
tions. Blood 2004;104:607–18.
33. Romagnoli M, Trichet V, David C, Clement M, Moreau
P, Bataille R, Barille-Nion S. Significant impact of survi-
vin on myeloma cell growth. Leukemia 2007;21:1070–8.
Meng et al. Antitumor activity of fludarabine against multiple myeloma
ª 2007 The Authors
Journal compilation 79 (486–493) ª 2007 Blackwell Munksgaard 493