32
Duk-Woo Park, MD, PhD Department of Cardiology, Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center Antithrombotic and Antiplatelet Choice in Complex PCI: Updated Issues in 2019 - 2020

Antithrombotic and Antiplatelet Choice in Complex PCI

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Antithrombotic and Antiplatelet Choice in Complex PCI

Duk-Woo Park, MD, PhD

Department of Cardiology, Ulsan College of Medicine,

Asan Medical Center

Antithrombotic and Antiplatelet

Choice in Complex PCI: Updated Issues in 2019 - 2020

Page 2: Antithrombotic and Antiplatelet Choice in Complex PCI

Disclosure

• Institutional grant/research funding to CardioVascular

Research Foundation (CVRF, Korea) and/or Asan

Medical Center from Daiichi-Sankyo, Abbott, Boston

Scientific, Medtronics, Edwards, Biosensor,

ChongKunDang Pharm and Daewoong Pharm,

Page 3: Antithrombotic and Antiplatelet Choice in Complex PCI

To Improve PCI Outcomes in Complex CAD

Stone GW et al. EHJ 2017;38:3135-38

Page 4: Antithrombotic and Antiplatelet Choice in Complex PCI

History of DAPT

2017 ESC Guidelines: Eur Heart J. 2018;39:213-260

Page 5: Antithrombotic and Antiplatelet Choice in Complex PCI

Simple DAPT Guideline, 2017 ESC

2017 ESC Guidelines: Eur Heart J. 2018;39:213-260

Page 6: Antithrombotic and Antiplatelet Choice in Complex PCI

Simple DAPT Guideline, 2016 ACC/AHA

J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;68:1082–115

Page 7: Antithrombotic and Antiplatelet Choice in Complex PCI

However, Real-World Practice Is Not Simple

J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;68:1082–115 Lancet 2017; 390: 810–20

Page 8: Antithrombotic and Antiplatelet Choice in Complex PCI

Good or Bad LeverageIschemic & Bleeding Leverage Is More Complex

in Real-World Setting

Theory

“Good Leverage”

Mortality

Bleeding events

Ischemic events

Common

Soil

Reality

“Bad Leverage”

Clustering effect

Page 9: Antithrombotic and Antiplatelet Choice in Complex PCI

Theory – One Spaghetti

Page 10: Antithrombotic and Antiplatelet Choice in Complex PCI

Reality – More than 100 Recipe of Spaghetti

Page 11: Antithrombotic and Antiplatelet Choice in Complex PCI

Recent RCTs for Antithrombotic Recipe in High-Risk (Ischemic or Bleeding) PCI Patients

• Aspirin omission, Ticagrelor mono: TWILIGHT,

GLOBAL-LEADERS

• Short DAPT, Clopidogrel mono: SMART-

CHOICE, STOPDAPT-2

• HBR patients: ONYX-ONE, LEADERS-FREE

• PCI & AF: PIONEER-AF, REDUAL,

AUGUSTUS, ENTRUST-AF

• PCI & Stable CAD/DM: COMPASS, THEMIS

• PCI & TAVR: GALILEO, GALILEO 4-D

• Finally, Headache, Headache, Headache....

Page 12: Antithrombotic and Antiplatelet Choice in Complex PCI

Optimal Antiplatelet Therapy

“Ethnic Difference”Can One Size Really Fit All?

Page 13: Antithrombotic and Antiplatelet Choice in Complex PCI

East-Asian Paradox

Levine, G. N. et al. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 11, 597–606 (2014);

Page 14: Antithrombotic and Antiplatelet Choice in Complex PCI

Different Ethnicity: TICAKOREA Trial

Park DW, Park SJ et al. Circulation. 2019;140

Page 15: Antithrombotic and Antiplatelet Choice in Complex PCI

Park DW, Park SJ et al. Circulation. 2019;140

Different Ethnicity: TICAKOREA Trial

Page 16: Antithrombotic and Antiplatelet Choice in Complex PCI

Different Scoring System

2017 ESC Guidelines: Eur Heart J. 2018;39:213-260

Optimal Antithrombotic Strategy in Elderly,

East-Asian Women With High DAPT Score

Receiving Complex Distal LM PCI?

==> Headache, Headache, Headache...

Page 17: Antithrombotic and Antiplatelet Choice in Complex PCI

Optimal Antithrombotic in Complex PCI Patients

• Diverse clinical and anatomic situations

• Different drugs

• Different DES

• Different ethnicity

• Different scoring system

One-Sized Pill Doesn’t Fit

All Diverse Situations

Page 18: Antithrombotic and Antiplatelet Choice in Complex PCI

One Recipe for Complex PCI: TWILIGHT Trial

Mehran et al. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:2032-2042

Page 19: Antithrombotic and Antiplatelet Choice in Complex PCI

TWILIGHT Inclusion Criteria

Clinical criteria

Age ≥65 years

Female gender

Troponin positive ACS

Established vascular disease (previous MI,

documented PAD or CAD/PAD revasc)

DM treated with medications or insulin

CKD (eGFR <60ml/min/1.73m2 or CrCl

<60ml/min)

Angiographic criteria

Multivessel CAD

Target lesion requiring total stent length >30mm

Thrombotic target lesion

Bifurcation lesion(s) with Medina X,1,1

classification requiring ≥2 stents

Left main (≥50%) or proximal LAD (≥70%) lesions

Calcified target lesion(s) requiring atherectomy

Trial inclusion required the presence of at least 1 additional clinical and angiographic

feature associated with a high risk of ischemic or bleeding events.

Patients undergoing successful PCI with at least 1 locally-approved DES whom

the treating clinician intended to discharge on ticagrelor plus aspirin were

enrolled in the study

Page 20: Antithrombotic and Antiplatelet Choice in Complex PCI

Study DesignEnrollment Period

3 Months

Randomization Period12 Months

Observation Period3 Months

High-Risk PCI Patients (N=9006)

N = 7119

Standard of Care

Standard of Care

15 M 18 M0 M 3 M

Not Randomized

(N=1887)

4 M 9 M

Ticagrelor + Placebo

Ticagrelor + Aspirin

Ticagrelor + Aspirin

(Open label)

TWILIGHT

Page 21: Antithrombotic and Antiplatelet Choice in Complex PCI

Patient Characteristics

VariableTica + Placebo

(N = 3555)

Tica + Aspirin

(N = 3564)

Age, years [Mean ± SD] 65.2 ± 10.3 65.1 ± 10.4

Female sex 23.8% 23.9%

Nonwhite race 31.2% 30.5%

BMI, kg/m2 28.6 ± 5.5 28.5 ± 5.6

Diabetes Mellitus 37.1% 36.5%

Insulin requiring 9.4% 10.5%

Chronic Kidney Disease 16.8% 16.8%

Anemia 19.8% 19.1%

ACS presentation 64.0% 65.7%

Current Smoker 20.4% 23.1%

Previous MI 28.7% 28.6%

Previous PCI 42.3% 42.0%

Previous CABG 10.2% 9.8%

Previous major bleed 0.9% 0.9%

Baseline Demographics

Page 22: Antithrombotic and Antiplatelet Choice in Complex PCI

Patient Characteristics

VariableTica + Placebo

(N = 3555)

Tica + Aspirin

(N = 3564)

Radial access 73.1% 72.6%

Multivessel CAD 63.9% 61.6%

Target vessel

LAD 75.1% 74.3%

RCA 53.5% 52.5%

LCX 46.8% 46.2%

Left Main Disease ≥50% 7.9% 8.6%

Number of lesions treated 1.5 ± 0.7 1.5 ± 0.7

Lesion morphology

Thrombus 10.4% 10.7%

Calcification,

moderate/severe14.0% 13.7%

Any bifurcation 12.2% 12.1%

Chronic total occlusion 6.2% 6.3%

Total stent length 40.1 ± 24.2 39.7 ± 24.3

Baseline Procedural Details

Page 23: Antithrombotic and Antiplatelet Choice in Complex PCI

3555 3474 3424 3366 3321Ticagrelor + Placebo

3564 3454 3357 3277 3213Ticagrelor + Aspirin

No. at risk

0

2

4

6

8

10

0 3 6 9 12

Months since randomization

Ticagrelor + Aspirin

Ticagrelor + Placebo

Cum

ula

tive

incid

en

ce (

%)

7.1%

4.0%

Placebo vs Aspirin

HR (95%CI): 0.56 (0.45 to 0.68)

P <0.001

Primary Endpoint: BARC 2, 3 or 5 BleedingITT Cohort

ARD = -3.08% (-4.15% to -2.01%)

NNT = 33

Page 24: Antithrombotic and Antiplatelet Choice in Complex PCI

Key Secondary Endpoint: Death, MI or Stroke PP Cohort

3524 3457 3412 3365 3330Ticagrelor + Placebo

3515 3466 3415 3361 3320Ticagrelor + Aspirin

No. at risk

0 3 6 9 12

Months since randomization

Ticagrelor + ASA

Ticagrelor + Placebo

Cum

ula

tive

incid

en

ce (

%)

3.9%

3.9%

Placebo vs Aspirin

HR (95%CI): 0.99 (0.78 to 1.25)

Pnon-inferiority <0.001

ARD = -0.06% (-0.97% to 0.84%)

0

2

4

6

8

10

Page 25: Antithrombotic and Antiplatelet Choice in Complex PCI

One Recipe for Complex PCI: TAILORED-CHIP Trial

Page 26: Antithrombotic and Antiplatelet Choice in Complex PCI

Korean Circ J. 2018;48(10):863-872.

Timing of Ischemic vs. Bleeding Risks

Is Different after PCI

Concept of TAILORED-CHIP Trial

Page 27: Antithrombotic and Antiplatelet Choice in Complex PCI

Potency of Low-Dose Ticagrelor: OPTIMA trial

Park DW, Lee PH, Park SJ, JACC 2018.

P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) Percent platelet inhibition

“Low-dose Ticagrelor > Clopidogrel

Low-dose Ticagrelor ≈ Standard-dose ticagrelor”

Page 28: Antithrombotic and Antiplatelet Choice in Complex PCI

TAILORED-CHIP Trial Study Hypothesis

Complex High-risk PCI

Ischemic

Bleeding

More Potent DAPT

For Ischemic Risk

“Low-dose

Ticagrelor + ASA”

Less Potent DAPT

For Bleeding Risk

“Clopidogrel Only”

Page 29: Antithrombotic and Antiplatelet Choice in Complex PCI

2,000 Patients Undergoing Complex High-Risk PCI*

Clopidogrel + Aspirin

12 months

Stratified randomization by (1) trial center or (2) diabetes

The primary endpoint was a composite outcome of death, MI, stroke,

stent thrombosis, urgent revascularization, and clinically relevant bleeding (BARC 2, 3, or 5)

at 12 months

TAILORED-CHIP Trial

TAILored versus COnventional AntithRombotic StratEgy

IntenDed for Complex HIgh-Risk PCI

*Complex High-Risk PCI

: Left main PCI, chronic total occlusion, bifurcation requiring two-stent technique, severe calcification, diffuse long lesion

(lesion length ≥ 30mm), multivessel PCI (≥ 2 vessels requiring stent implantation), ≥3 requiring stents implantation, ≥3

lesions will be treated, predicted total stent length for revascularization >60mm, diabetes, CKD (Cr-clearance

<60ml/min) or severe LV dysfunction (EF <40%).

Conventional Arm (N=1,000)

Low-dose (60 mg) Ticagrelor + Aspirin

Early 6 months (Early Escalation)

Tailored Arm (N=1,000)

Clopidogrel alone

Late 6 months (Late De-Escalation)

Page 30: Antithrombotic and Antiplatelet Choice in Complex PCI

Clinical Perspective of the TAILORED-CHIP

Impact on guideline

Recommendation Class Level Ref

Complex high-risk PCI

Early escalation and late de-escalation DAPT strategy should be considered in patients who underwent complex high-risk PCI.

I A

Page 31: Antithrombotic and Antiplatelet Choice in Complex PCI

• In the real-world setting, there is no single and

simple scenario.

• Antithrombotic strategies for high-ischemic and

bleeding risk patients are most challenging

issues in the contemporary practice.

• Balancing ischemic and bleeding complications

post PCI is an important dilemma for clinicians.

Tailored Antithrombotic for Complex PCI

How To Do ?

Page 32: Antithrombotic and Antiplatelet Choice in Complex PCI

• Addressing the clinical imperatives of lowering

bleeding while preserving ischemic benefit

requires therapeutic strategies that decouple

thrombotic from hemorrhagic risk.

• Diverse recipes are available for such complex

patients and actively under investigation, which

includes

- P2Y12 monotherapy with aspirin omission

- Short DAPT with smart DES

- Escalation and/or de-escalation

- Tailored and/or combined NOACs

Tailored Antithrombotic for Complex PCI

How To Do ?