8/12/2019 Antique Farm Tools - Breast Ploughs
1/3
Introduction (home-page)
Chaff Cutters
Broadcasting and Winnowing
Breast Ploughs
Tools 1-99
Tools 100-199
Tools 200-299
Tools 300-399
Tools 400-499
Tools 500-599
Tools 600-699
Tools 700-800
Notes on tools 1-800
Other Tools
Links
Contact
BREAST PLOUGHS
One of the most primitive hand-tools in agriculture was
misleadingly called a Breast Plough. It was used to
pare turf or other surface vegetation and comprised of a broad T
handle attached to a stout wooden shaft
which socketed into a flat angular blade with an upturned side.
Essentially it was a large parring spade
rather than a plough which was pushed manually and used mainly
in the process of paring and burning
once variously known as Denshiring, Devonshiring,
Denbighshiring, dentchering or down-sharing (both
Kent, Sussex) or Burn-baiting, burn-baking, burn-beating,
beat-burning (western counties) and beting or
torri-beting (Wales).
Denshiring involved the removal of a thin layer of weed and
larvae-ridden turf in short strips. These were
then dried by the elements and later collected to be burnt in
small constructed heaps by smothered fire.
The ashes were then scattered and ploughed back into the land to
improve the tilth or collected and spread
with manure. In effect, it was an early form of weed and pest
control combined with dressing which
probably originated in Devon and Cornwall prior to the 17th
century though not necessarily performed bythe Breast Plough. The
practice spread to many counties in England, Wales and parts of
Scotland
particularly in the late 18th century when high corn prices
prompted a considerable demand for additional
arable land. Then waste or heathland, old pastures, or leys were
cleared of vegetation in late spring or
early summer in preparation for ploughing and the ensuing wheat
crops. The depth and desirability of
paring depended on soil conditions: many stones would for
example quickly blunt a sharply honed blade.
Despite disadvantages this method made rough ground easier to
cultivate at a t ime when horse-drawn
ploughs were inadequate, could not be used on steeper ground or
the livestock to pull them was not
available.
Primarily a tool for small farmers Breast Ploughs were also used
for paring stubble and weeds, levelling
mole or anthills, ploughing in potatoes, sainform, or vetches,
work on water meadows and in some areas,
cutting peat for fuel. Cleaning roadside gutters and overgrown
grass verges in the West Country was
another task, performed by the road men of district
councils.
Working in rows from left to right with the handle held palms
uppermost, the feet splayed and the knees
bent, the plough was shoved forwards from the upper thighs in a
series of jerks which sliced off a thin
layer of turf or topsoil in lengths of one to three feet
(310-914 mm) to a depth of one to three inches (25-76
mm). The gait was aptly described by H J Massingham as a
duck-like waddle.
Then, with a dexterous twist of the handle it was overturned or
whelmed over from left to right opposite the
flange (or vice versa if a right-handed flange) depositing the
cut sod face down on the ground to weather
and dry. Finely cut turf dried more quickly but sometimes proved
less manageable while thicker slices
required greater physical effort but produced more fertilising
ash. To ease the pressure on the thighs and
groin from the chafing handle, pads of leather, wood or wool
known as beaters, clappers, or belly knappers
(Yorks) were worn strapped to the waist and the front of the
legs. Other methods of protection included
sacking, bags filled with straw, old pillows or discarded items
of clothing tied around the handle or waist as
appropriate and hard leather aprons. The pads were about a foot
long (305 mm) and between four and six
inches (102-152 mm)) wide but sizes varied.
Working the plough in straight lines across fields was
excessively hard work suited only to men of good
physic. A competent farmhand took four days to denshire an acre
of virgin land while paring stubble an inch
deep took half the time. Wages for such strenuous effort however
were minimal, the men receiving little
more than three shillings (15p) per day. In 19th century
Gloucestershire, the work was speeded up when as
many as ten men might be employed on a field of stubble. Some
Breast Ploughs were worked with the
assistance of an additional man pulling on the rope attached to
the lower end of the shaft which not only
produced a continuous slice but lighten the tasks
considerably.
This site lists antique hand farm tools (used mainly in England,
Wales and Scotland) collected by P. C. Dorrington between 1985 and
2001.
8/12/2019 Antique Farm Tools - Breast Ploughs
2/3
Breast Ploughs varied in size and shape from region to region
adapted no doubt to suit local conditions and
methods of construction and not least the made to measure
requirements of users. Though semi-circular,
crescent or intermediate blade patterns were produced, the
majority were of triangular form made by
blacksmiths from a single piece of iron or steel plate
approximately 1.6 to 6 mm thick, between 203-458
mm in width and up to 432 mm in length with a sharply honed soft
or deep V cutting edge, the point being
set in line with the shaft. The left side of the blade was
turned up at right angles to form a flange or wing
(called a cock in the north) which acted as a kind of coulter to
square cut the edge of the slice. Right-
handed versions which pared from left to right were less common.
In outline, the flanges resembled a
dorsal fin sometimes squared off at the top and measured between
25-160 mm in height. Being a weak
point this area was often strengthened by a small riveted corner
plate. The socket which held the shaft was
formed from the upper point of the blade. Many were short and
square-sided some with overlapping ends.
Open clasp sockets which gripped the shaft and sleeve sockets
which enclosed the lower part of the shaftwere also constructed. As
the blade ran parallel with the surface the shafts length and any
curvature had to
be taken into account. Short shafts were invariably curved
towards the base. Blades fitted to straight shafts
were usually lifted upwards by a few degrees. The blades final
position could be adjusted by means of a
wooden or iron wedge called a Quoin forced between the shaft and
the socket.
The Breast Ploughs from Kent, East Sussex differed. Though
retaining widths from 245 to 300 mm the
blades were more arrow-like in appearance and were riveted to
the base of a square or oblong-shaped
sleeve socket of varying length. The flanges too were higher and
more pronounced some rising to 200 mm
or so. Both the shaft and socket were often curved giving in
some cases a combined angle to the horizontal
of 10 to 15 degrees.
From the mid 19th century factory made blades became
increasingly available and could be purchased
more cheaply from the ironmongers than the village blacksmith.
Most conformed to a regular pattern made
with one piece of steel or two riveted together. One company
alone produced no less than seven different
widths between 8 and 14 inches (203-356 mm) and some also
offered shafts in six foot lengths.
Manufacturers included J Harrison, C T Skelton of Sheffield, W
Gilpin and Whitehouse Bros. of Cannock,
Skinner and Johnson of Ranskill, I.Nash of Stourbridge, Knapman
of Totnes and Fussell of Mells. Blades
were still being advertised in the 1930s.
The shafts which were usually fashioned by joiners or village
carpenters were made of ash, elm or oak.
They were square or rectangular in section and morticed into
large crosshead handles measuring between
two and three feet (610-914 mm) across. Some wore straight
beams, others were naturally forked lengths
of timber cut from the hedgerows or were split shafted i.e.
single poles split down the middle for a quarter or
third of their length at which pint a ring ferrule prevented
further branching. The bottom ends were tapered
down to the blades surface enabling the sod to pass up the shaft
smoothly. The handles were uniformly
rounded or were broad in the middle with short rounded ends
which fitted the body more comfortably.
Handles fixed to undivided shafts often braced by a pair of
wooden or iron cross supports. Shaft lengths
ranged from as little as 4.5 in (1372 mm) to as much as 8 feet
(2439 mm)) but beams of 6 or 7 feet were
more usual. The added blade attachment however made the longer
versions very heavy. In Cumberland
and Westmoreland the angle was called the Crown and the shaft a
Pole.
To support friable or longer lengths of turf two boards of
varying size and shape were sometimes fixed
immediately behind the blade and along each side of the lower
shaft. Other variations included a narrow
iron spine which ran down the centre of the shaft flattening to
an arrowhead just above and behind the
cutting edge which lifted the sod over the shaft. The most
innovative Breast Ploughs came from WestDevon and Cornwall. Someone
there realised that if an iron guide rail was attached to the shaft
and made
to rise up from the left hand corner of the blade, adjacent to
the flange it would act as a Breast or Mould
board by raising that side of the sod until it turned over and
fell to the ground face down, i.e. breasted
aside. A more elaborate affair with three rails in descending
order of height discharged its load in much the
same way. Both examples gave a continuous cut and avoided the
need to whelm over. This additional
facility afforded them plough status which most likely gave rise
to the term Breast Plough. In 1797 William
Marshall thought this type to be in decline though the name was
probably retained after the mould board
(in this case the iron framework) was laid aside. There is no
record that the raised guide rails were used
elsewhere.
The word breast also suggests that the plough was propelled from
the chest rather than the haunches. In
reality both methods were applied though its use in the upper
position became increasingly spasmodic. In
Scotland a contemporary implement called a Flaughter spade (from
the Teutonic verb to flauch or remove
the skin) was used instead. Despite being similar inmost
respects many were flangeless.
The age and origin of the Breast Plough is unknown. Some have
speculated on its possible use in Roman
times, that it may have been a development of the Parsnip(?)
shovel illustrated in Markhams Farewell to
Husbandry of 1620 or the doubleflanged trenching spade shown in
Bliths English Improver Improved(1653 Edilson), but there is little
or no evidence to support these theories. Following Worlidges
reference to
the Breast plough in his Systema Agriculturae 1669, the f irst
conclusive description of the implement
appeared in Dr. R Plots National history of Staffordshire
published in 1686. There he stated an
instrument calld a push plough, being a sort of spade, shod
somewhat in the form of an arrow, with a wing
at one side and having across piece of wood, and the upper end
of the helve, after the manner of a crutch,
to which they fasten a pillow, which setting to their thigh and
so thrusting it forward, they will commonly
dispatch a large turf at two cuts, and then turn it up to dry.
An early illustration appeared in J Mortimers
The whole art of Husbandry (1707). Taken with other contemporary
references it may be reasonably
assumed that the Breast Plough was in use by 1650 and continued
in service until circa 1850 when this
method of paring rapidly declined. After that it remained in
sporadic use in certain areas such as the
Cotswolds until the 19030s or 40s employed latterly as a garden,
allotment or small holdings tool often by
the men who had previously worked them across old pastures. A
number of examples have fortunately
been retained in museum or private collections.
The name Breast Plough was generally applied in the shire
counties of Berkshire, Dorset, Gloucester,
Lincoln, Oxford, Warwick and Worcester but elsewhere was better
known by other local or provincial namesincluding:
