Upload
arun
View
55
Download
5
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Evaluation of antibacterial properties of celtis australis against S. aureus and P.aureginosa
INTRODUCTION
There is a continuous and urgent need to discover new antimicrobial
compound with divers and novel mechanism of action because there has
been an alarming increase in the incidence of new and re-emerging
infectious diseases. Another big concern is the development of resistance to
the antibiotics in current clinical use. In recent years, drug resistance to
human pathogenic bacteria has been commonly reported from all over the
world. (Dowzicky and park,2008).
The bacterial infection diseases causes problem for humankind beyond
historical age. The researcher to find antimicrobial medicine have been
launched for over 50 year(Rudrappa and bais,2008).However, we
discovered many anti-biotic drug,we still facing multidrug resistance
bacteria(Dowzicky and park,2008,Saonuam et al,2008;Tilloston et al.,2008) .
There are the report about the adverse effect of antibiotic treatment in
children (Khotaei et al.,2008) and adults (Lin et al.,2009).Furthermore
reported about the decreasing susceptibility in pathogenic bacteria
(Dowzicky and park,2008;Saonuam et al.,2008) .
Commonly Drug resistance to human pathogenic bacteria has been reported
all over the world (Piddok and wise,1989; Singh et al.,1992;Mulligen et
al.,1993;Davis,1994;Robin et al.,1998).
However, the situation is alarming in developing as well as developed
countries due to indiscriminate use of antibiotics. The drug resistance
bacteria and fungal pathogens have further complicated the treatment of
infectious diseases in immunocompromised, AIDS and cancer patient
(Rinaldi,1991;Diamond,1993).In the present scenario of emergence of
multiple drug resistance to human pathogenic organism, has necessitated a
search for new antimicrobial substances from other sources including plants.
Therefore, the antimicrobial research was become interesting to support the
information
2
Evaluation of antibacterial properties of celtis australis against S. aureus and P.aureginosa
for development of the anti -infection diseases remedy especially the
development of folkloric medicine which has been used locally before
(Nascimento et al.,2000; Tongson et al .,2005).
Nature has been a source of medicinal Plant for thousands of years and since
the beginning of man . In Nigeria ,almost all plants are medicinal and the
application of medicinal plants especially in traditional medicine is a
currently well acknowledge and established as a viable
profession(Kafaru,1994).Traditionally medicinal plants are used to produce
variety of compounds of known therapeutic properties
(Lyengar ,1985;Chopra et al ,1992;Harborne and Baxter,1995).
The use of medicinal plants as a source for relief from illness can be traced
back over five millennia to written documents of the early civilization in
China ,India and the Neareast, but it is doubtness an art as old as mankind .
In present day Iraq used plants such as holyback, these plants are still widely
used in ethnomedicine around the world (Thomson et al .,1978,Stockwell et
al .,1988).
Antimicrobial properties of medicinal plants are being increasingly reported
from differents parts of the word (Grosvenor et al .,saxena and
Sharma,1999). Medicinal plants of India have been found of immense global
importance in treatment because of adverse effect of synthetic drug had
created varied type of complicated diseases.(Govindrajan et al.,2005).
The substances that can either inhibit the growth of pathogens or kill them
and have no or least toxicity to host cell are considered candidates for
developing new antimicrobial drugs. so far, more than 100,000 biologically
active secondary plant compound have been isolated from higher
plants ,with most of these diverse structures falling in to four main chemical
classes, the phenolics (phenol, flavonoids, quinines, tannins and linins),
terpenoids(monoterpenes ,saponins ),sulphur compounds (disulphide and
acetynic thiophenes)and nitrogen compound (alkaloids, amines ,non-
proteins, amino acid and cyanogenic glycosides).
3
Evaluation of antibacterial properties of celtis australis against S. aureus and P.aureginosa
Antimicrobial activities of plants have been evaluated by earlier workers(At
Delaimy and Ali,1970;Watanab,1974;Tansey and Appleton,1975;Thinel and
dehia,1976;et al.,1977)
Higher and aromatic plants have been used traditionally in folk medicine as
well as to extend the shelf life of foods, showing inhibition against
bacteria ,fungi ,and yeast(Hulin et al.,1998).
There are about 47,000 plants species in india out which 7,500 plants
species are medicinal value .only 800 plants species are used in preparation
of herbal drugs.
Plants produces many substances for self-defence against microbial
infection and deterioration.these phytochemicals possess potential
significant therapeutic application against human pathogens such as
bacteria and fungi(Perez,2003).
Medicinal plants represent a rich source of antimicrobial agent (Mahesh and
Satis,2008) Due to a rapid increase in the rate of infections, antibiotic
resistance in microorganisms and due to side effects of synthetic antibiotics,
medicinal plants are gaining popularity over these drugs.( Mahesh, B S, 2008
).
Celtis australis vern. Kharik belonging to family Ulmaceae is a deciduous
tree distributed to montane and submontane Himalaya . The paste obtained
from the bark of C. australis is effective remedy for bone fracture and also
applied on pimples, contusions, sprains and joint pains . Previously, betulin-
3,3’-di-O-methylellagic acid, gallic acid and quebrachilol were reported from
the bark whereas acacetin 7-O-glucoside, isovitexin and cytisoside were
isolated from leaves of the plant . Recently, we have isolated a novel
sulphonated phenolic celtisanin from the fruits of this plant . This is the first
chemical report together with antimicrobial activity on fruits of this plant.
OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
4
Evaluation of antibacterial properties of celtis australis against S. aureus and P.aureginosa
Considering the therapeutic potentials of celtis australis Following
objectives are scheduled for experimentation :
Determination of antimicrobial activity of celtis australis leaf extract
(aquous& Methanol) against Staphylococcus aureus .
Determination of antimicrobial activity of celtis australis leaf
extract(aquous& methanol) against Pseudomonas Aureginosa.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
5
Evaluation of antibacterial properties of celtis australis against S. aureus and P.aureginosa
The present literature deals with the antimicrobial activity of various
medicinal plants , general introduction of test pathogen and description of
celtis australis.
ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY OF MEDICINAL PLANT
An anti-microbial is a substance that kills or inhibits the growth of
microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi, or protozoan’s (Merriam-Webster.,
2009-05-02). The discovery, development, and clinical use of antibiotics
during the 20th century have decreased substantially the mortality from
bacterial infections. The antibiotic era began with the pneumatic application
of nitroglycerine drugs, followed by a “golden” period of discovery from
about 1945 to 1970, when a number of structurally diverse, highly effective
agents were discovered and developed. However, since 1980 the
introduction of new antimicrobial agents for clinical use has declined, in part
because of the enormous expense of developing and testing new drugs.
Paralleled to this there has been an alarming increase in bacterial resistance
to existing agents. (Levy SB, 1994)
6
Evaluation of antibacterial properties of celtis australis against S. aureus and P.aureginosa
GENERAL INTRODUCTION OF TEST PATHOGENS
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a common bacterium that can cause disease in animals, including humans. It is found in soil, water, skin flora, and most man-made environments throughout the world. It thrives not only in normal atmospheres but also in hypoxic atmospheres, and has, thus, colonized many natural and artificial environments. It uses a wide range of organic material for food; in animals, the versatility enables the organism to infect damaged tissues or people with reduced immunity. The symptoms of such infections are generalized inflammation and sepsis. If such colonizations occur in critical body organs, such as the lungs, the urinary tract, and kidneys, the results can be fatal (Balcht, Aldona & Smith, Raymond 1994) Because it thrives on most surfaces, this bacterium is also found on and in medical equipment, including catheters, causing cross-infections in hospitals and clinics. It is implicated in hot-tub rash. It is also able to decompose hydrocarbons and has been used to break down tarballs and oil from oil spills.( A. Y. Itah and J. P. Essien)
Scientific classification
Kingdom:
Bacteria
Phylum:
Proteobacteria
Class:Gamma Proteobacteria
Order:Pseudomonadales
Family:Pseudomonadaceae
Genus: Pseudomonas
Species:
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
7
Evaluation of antibacterial properties of celtis australis against S. aureus and P.aureginosa
Characteristics
Members of the genus display the following defining characteristics.( Cornelis P (editor). (2008).
Rod shaped Gram-negative One or more polar flagella, providing motility Aerobic Non–spore forming positive catalase test positive oxidase test.
Other characteristics which tend to be associated with Pseudomonas species (with some exceptions) include secretion of pyoverdine, a fluorescent yellow-green siderophore under iron-limiting conditions. Certain Pseudomonas species may also produce additional types of siderophore, such as pyocyanin by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. (Fine MJ, Smith MA, Carson CA et al. (1996)and thioquinolobactin by Pseudomonas fluorescens,. (Diekema DJ, Pfaller MA, Jones RN et al. (1999) Pseudomonas species also typically give a positive result to the oxidase test, the absence of gas formation from glucose, glucose is oxidised in oxidation/fermentation test using Hugh and Leifson O/F test, beta hemolytic (on blood agar), indole negative, methyl red negative, Voges–Proskauer test negative, and citrate positive.
The members of the genus demonstrate a great deal of metabolic diversity, and consequently are able to colonise a wide range of niches. King EO, Ward MK, Raney DE (1954).Their ease of culture in vitro and availability of an increasing number of Pseudomonas strain genome sequences has made the genus an excellent focus for scientific research; the best studied species include P. aeruginosa in its role as an opportunistic human pathogen, the plant pathogen P. syringae, the soil bacterium P. putida, and the plant growth promoting P. fluorescens.
Antibiotic resistance
Being Gram-negative bacteria, most Pseudomonas spp. are naturally resistant to penicillin and the majority of related beta-lactam antibiotics, but a number are sensitive to piperacillin, imipenem, ticarcillin, tobramycin, or ciprofloxacin.(University of Chicago Medical Center (2009-04-14)
8
Evaluation of antibacterial properties of celtis australis against S. aureus and P.aureginosa
This ability to thrive in harsh conditions is a result of their hardy cell wall that contains porins. Their resistance to most antibiotics is attributed to efflux pumps, which pump out some antibiotics before the antibiotics are able to act.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a highly relevant opportunistic human pathogen. One of the most worrying characteristics of P. aeruginosa is its low antibiotic susceptibility. This low susceptibility is attributable to a concerted action of multidrug efflux pumps with chromosomally-encoded antibiotic resistance genes (e.g. mexAB-oprM, mexXY, etc., and the low permeability of the bacterial cellular envelopes. Besides intrinsic resistance, P. aeruginosa easily develops acquired resistance either by mutation in chromosomally-encoded genes, or by the horizontal gene transfer of antibiotic resistance determinants. Development of multidrug resistance by P. aeruginosa isolates requires several different genetic events that include acquisition of different mutations and/or horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance genes. Hypermutation favours the selection of mutation-driven antibiotic resistance in P. aeruginosa strains producing chronic infections, whereas the clustering of several different antibiotic resistance genes in integrons favours the concerted acquisition of antibiotic resistance determinants. Some recent studies have shown phenotypic resistance associated to the emergence of small-colony-variants may be important in the response of P. aeruginosa populations to antibiotic treatment.( Worlitzsch D, Tarran R, Ulrich M et al. (2002).
Pathogenicity
Animal pathogens
Infectious species include P. aeruginosa, P. oryzihabitans, and P. plecoglossicida. P. aeruginosa flourishes in hospital environments, and is a particular problem in this environment since it is the second most common infection in hospitalized patients(nosocomial infections). This pathogenesis may in part be due to the proteins secreted by P. aeruginosa. The bacterium possesses a wide range of secretion systems, which export numerous proteins relevant to the pathogenesis of clinical strains.( Rahme LG, Tan MW, Le et al. (1997)
Plant pathogens
P. syringae is a prolific plant pathogen. It exists as over 50 different pathovars, many of which demonstrate a high degree of host plant specificity. There are numerous other Pseudomonas species that can act as
9
Evaluation of antibacterial properties of celtis australis against S. aureus and P.aureginosa
plant pathogens, notably all of the other members of the P. syringae subgroup, but P. syringae is the most widespread and best studied.
Although not strictly a plant pathogen, P. tolaasii can be a major agricultural problem, as it can cause bacterial blotch of cultivated mushrooms. Similarly, P. agarici can cause drippy gill in cultivated mushrooms.( Mahajan-Miklos S, Tan MW, Rahme LG, Ausubel FM 1999)
Staphylococcus aureusDomain: Bacteria
Kingdom: Eubacteria
Phylum: Firmicutes
Class: Bacilli
Order: Bacillales
Family: Staphylococcaceae
Genus: Staphylococcus
Species: aureus
Binomialname:Staphylococcusaureus
Scanning electron micrograph of S. aureus, 20,000 times enlargement,
Staphylococcus aureus meaning the "golden grape-cluster berry," and
also known as "golden staph" and Oro staphira, is a facultative anaerobic
Gram-positive coccal bacterium. It is frequently part of the skin flora found in
the nose and on skin, and in this manner about 20% of the human population
are long-term carriers of S. aureus.( Kluytmans J,et.al. 1997). S. aureus is the
most common species of staphylococci to cause Staph infections. One of the
reasons for this is a carotenoid pigment staphyloxanthin that is responsible
for the characteristic golden colour of S. aureus colonies. This pigment acts
as a virulence factor, with an antioxidant action that helps the microbe evade
death by reactive oxygen species used by the host immune system.( Clauditz
A, et.al. 2006 ,Liu GY,et.al.2000).
Yellow colonies of S. aureus on a blood agar plate, note regions of
clearing around colonies caused by lysis of red cells in the agar (beta
hemolysis) Strains are responsible for food poisoning through the
10
Evaluation of antibacterial properties of celtis australis against S. aureus and P.aureginosa
production of an enterotoxin, and pathogenicity is also associated with
coagulase positivity. S. aureus may occur as a commensal on skin; it
also occurs in the nose frequently (in about a third of the population).(
Whitt, et.al. 2002) and the throat less commonly. The occurrence of S.
aureus under these circumstances does not always indicate infection
and, therefore, does not always require treatment (indeed, treatment
may be ineffective and recolonisation may occur). It can survive on
domesticated animals, such as dogs, cats, and horses, and can cause
bumblefoot in chickens. It can survive for hours to weeks, or even
months, on dry environmental surfaces, depending on strain.( Cimolai
et.al.2008) It can host phages, such as Panton-Valentine leukocidin,
that increase its virulence. S. aureus can infect other tissues when
barriers have been breached (e.g., skin or mucosal lining). This leads
to furuncles and carbuncles (a collection of furuncles). In infants, S.
aureus infection can cause a severe disease - staphylococcal scalded
skin syndrome (SSSS). (Curran JP, et.al.1980).
S. aureus reproduces asexually. It starts this process by reproducing its
DNA. The membrane stretches out and separates the DNA molecules.
The cells form a hollow space that eventually divides into two new
cells. The new cell wall does not fully separate from the existing cell
wall, which is why the cells are observed in clusters. This cell will
eventually reproduce, and cells will attach to it.( Staphylococcus
aureus: Reproduction". palexander13.webs.com.)
The treatment of choice for S. aureus infection is penicillin; in most
countries, though, penicillin resistance is extremely common, and first-
line therapy is most commonly a penicillinase-resistant β-lactam
antibiotic (for example, oxacillin or flucloxacillin). Combination therapy
with gentamicin may be used to treat serious infections, such as
endocarditis. (Korzeniowski O,et.al. 1982). (BayerAS, Bolger AF,
Taubert KA, et al. 1998). but its use is controversial because of the
11
Evaluation of antibacterial properties of celtis australis against S. aureus and P.aureginosa
high risk of damage to the kidneys.( Cosgrove SE, Vigliani GA, Campion
M, et al. 2009). Antibiotic resistance in S. aureus was uncommon when
penicillin was first introduced in 1943. Indeed, the original petri dish on
which Alexander Fleming of Imperial College London observed the
antibacterial activity of the Penicillium fungus was growing a culture of
S. aureus. By 1950, 40% of hospital S. aureus isolates were penicillin-
resistant; and, by 1960, this had risen to 80%.( Chambers HF (2001).
"The changing epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus?". Emerg Infect
Dis 7 (2): 178–82.
GENERAL INTRODUCTION OF PLANT TAKEN DURING THE
COURSE OF STUDY
Celtis Australis
Chinese Hackberry (C. sinensis) leaves and fruit
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Plantae
(unranked): Angiosperms
(unranked): Eudicots
(unranked): Rosids
Order: Rosales
Family: ulmaceae
Genus:Celtis
12
Evaluation of antibacterial properties of celtis australis against S. aureus and P.aureginosa
Celtis (Hackberry) is a genus of about 60-70 species of deciduous trees widespread in warm temperate regions of the Northern Hemisphere, in southern Europe, southern and eastern Asia, and southern and central North America, south to central Africa, and northern and central South America. The genus is present in the fossil record at least since the Miocene of Europe. (BROWER, ANDREW V.Z. 2006)
Previously included either in the elm family (Ulmaceae) or a separate family, Celtidaceae, the APG II system places Celtis in the hemp family (Cannabaceae). The generic name originated in Latin and was applied by Pliny the Elder (23-79) to the unrelated Ziziphus lotus. (KEELER, HARRIET L. 1900)
Description
Celtis species are generally medium-sized trees, reaching 10–25 m (33–82 ft) tall, rarely up to 40 m (130 ft) tall. The leaves are alternate, simple, 3–15 cm (1.2–5.9 in) long, ovate-acuminate, and evenly serrated margins.
Small monoecious flowers appear in early spring while the leaves are still developing. Male flowers are longer and fuzzy. Female flowers are greenish and more rounded.
The fruit is a small drupe 6–10 mm (0.24–0.39 in) in diameter, edible in many species, with a dryish but sweet, sugary consistency, reminiscent of a date.
Formerly placed here
Trema cannabina Lour. (as C. amboinensis Willd.) Trema lamarckiana (Schult.) Blume (as C. lamarckiana Schult.) Trema orientalis (L.) Blume (as C. guineensis Schumach. or C.
orientalis L.) Trema tomentosa (Roxb.) H.Hara (as C. aspera Brongn. or C.
tomentosa Roxb.) ( HALLWACHS, WINNIE ,2004)
Uses and ecology
Several species are grown as ornamental trees, valued for their drought tolerance. They possess the most bending tolerance of all species of wood. They are a regular feature of arboretums and botanical gardens, particularly in North America. Chinese Hackberry (C. sinensis) is suited for bonsai culture, while a magnificent specimen in Daegu-myeon is one of the natural monuments of South Korea. Some, including Common Hackberry (C.
13
Evaluation of antibacterial properties of celtis australis against S. aureus and P.aureginosa
occidentalis) and C. brasiliensis, are honey plants and pollen source for honeybees of lesser importance.
The berries are often eaten locally. The Korean tea gamro cha contains C. sinensis leaves.
Pathogens
The plant pathogenic basidiomycete fungus Perenniporia celtis was first described from a Celtis hostplant. Some species of Celtis are threatened by habitat destruction.
MATERIAL AND METHOD
Material required
14
Evaluation of antibacterial properties of celtis australis against S. aureus and P.aureginosa
Plant sample -
Plant material i.e. leaves of celtis australis were collected from kashmir
region.
Leaves were washed and dried for one weak in shady place. Fine
powdered of leaves was prepared by grinding leaves in mixer grinder.
Apparatus used:
Table :1 list of equipments used for study.
S.N. Apparatus Company
1 Autoclave Scientific equipment
2 Hot air oven Scientific equipment
3 Electronic balance Sartorius
4 Laminar air flow Zenith
5 Incubator Toshiba
6 Refrigerator Sanyo
7 Sterile cotton & swab
tubes
Hi -media
8 Micropipette Torson
9 Glassware Borosil
Soxhlet Assembly, clevanger, Rotatory evaporator, Distillation
assembly and other glassware of general use.
15
Evaluation of antibacterial properties of celtis australis against S. aureus and P.aureginosa
Soxhlet assembly
Soxhlet assembly is used for extraction of compound from leaf of
plant: It is composed of RBF (Round Bottom flask), Soxhlet and condensor.
Clevanger is used to extract essential oil from leaf. It is also composed of
RBF (Round Bottom flask), clevanger and condensor. Rotatory evaporator is
used to concentrate the extract of leaves and waste of essential oil which is
called "Hydrosol".
Chemical used: Petroleum ether (100%), Benzene, (100%), chloroform
(100%) Benzene (100%).
Bacterial strain: Bacterial type used for testing were Eschrichia coli,
Bacillus cereus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella typhimurium,
Micrococcus luteus.
METHODS
16
Evaluation of antibacterial properties of celtis australis against S. aureus and P.aureginosa
Table:2 Preparation of Media (Nutrient Broth) for revival of Bacterial
culture.
Nutrient Broth with following composition was used for Bacterial
culture.
S. No. Composition Amount (1000ml)
1 Beef Extract 1.5g
2 Yeast Extract 1.5g
3 Peptone 5.0g
4 NaCl 5.0g
5 Distilled water 1000ml
6 pH 7.0
Preparation of Bacterial Inoculum
5 test tube containing 10 ml of nutrient broth each was autoclaved at
15lbs (121OC) for 15 min. for inoculum of bacterial species with the help of
sterilized inoculating loop , bacterial culture was transferred in 5 test tubes.
Kept the tubes at 37OC in incubator for 24 hrs.
The bacterial culture in broth was streaked on the nutrient agar plates.
The media was autoclaved at 15 lbs (121OC) for 15 min..
The plates kept in incubator at 37OC for active growth of culture. The
test organism maintained in the agar plates were used for inoculum.5 test
tubes containing sterilized nutrient broth was inoculated with bacterial
culture maintained in agar plate and tube kept in incubator at 37OC till the
conc. of test organism matched with the MacFarland standard (9950 l, 1%
H2SO4 + 50l BaCl2) .
Preparation of Media (Muller Hinton) for revival of Bacterial culture.
17
Evaluation of antibacterial properties of celtis australis against S. aureus and P.aureginosa
Table:3 Muller Hinton media with following compound was used for
Bacterial culture.
S.No. Composition Amount 1000ml
1 Beef infusion 300g
2 Casamino acid 17.5g
3 Starch 1.5g
4 Agar 17.0g
5 Distilled 1000ml
6 pH 7.0
The media was autoclaved (121OC) for 15 min, at 15 lbs and agar plates
were prepared for use in Disc Diffusion Method
Extract Preparation
Methodology
25 gm of dry powder of leaves was added in 250 ml of different solvent
and packed in soxhlet apparatus for extraction of respective soluble
bioactive molecules from the plant. Soxhlet apparatus is combination of
soxhlet; condenser and R.B.F.
For extraction of compounds the RBF is heated on the heating mentle
and evaporated solvent goes to soxhlet. Here it is cooled by the water
moving in the condenser and then solvent come back to R.B.F. with
compound of leaf. Extract containing volatile solvent, were concentrated
18
Evaluation of antibacterial properties of celtis australis against S. aureus and P.aureginosa
with the help of Rotary evaporator (Rota vapor) under reduce pressure, first
of all vaccum compressor was switched “on” and extract was taken in a flask
and it was set to adaptor and vaccum released nobe was closed, flask was
dipped in water bath and the flask. Keep rotating with attached vaccum
handle which lead to low temp condensing region were volatile from of
solvent in condense to liquid and get collected with flask attached to bottom
side. When sample was concentrated then rotor was switch off and vaccum
was released to remove the flask. The concentrated extract was unloaded to
sterilize collecting tube.
Sample Preparation
200mg of extract was dissolve in 1ml of DMSO i.e., 200mg/ml stock
solution was prepared and different dilution were prepared i.e., 50 mg/ml,
100 mg/ml and 200 mg/ml and kept in refrigerator at 4°C.
Screening of Antimicrobial Activity of Plant Extract
To check the presence of Antimicrobial Substance, the antimicrobial
susceptibility tests were preformed by standard disc diffusion method
(Beghe, D.A.V., et al., 1991).
Approximately 100 l of inoculum, which contain 105cells/ml were
poured on agar plate. The culture was equally spread by a spreader
under fully aseptic condition and was left for 5-10 min.
Whatmann filter paper disc prepared and sterilized by dry heat at
140°C in hot air oven for one or two hours, were used to determine
Antimicrobial activity.
The test compound (10l) was loaded onto the filter paper disc and
allow to dry.
19
Evaluation of antibacterial properties of celtis australis against S. aureus and P.aureginosa
Already prepared antibiotics as standard (Chloramphenicol 10g/disc,
Ampicillin 10g/disc, Levofloxacin/10g) positive control for testing of
antimicrobial activity
The disc were placed over the plates preceded with respective
microorganism.
The plates were kept inside the incubator at 37°C for overnight.
The antimicrobial Activity was determined by measuring the zone of
inhibition around the disc. The zone of inhibition if any was observed
and recorder in comparison to positive control.
RESULTS
20
Evaluation of antibacterial properties of celtis australis against S. aureus and P.aureginosa
ANTIBIOGRAM (ANTIBIOTIC DRUG SENSITIVITY) OF
P.AERUGINOSA AND S.AUREUS
Staphylococcus aureus and P. aeruginosa isolated were assessed for
the antibacterial drug susceptibility by using disc diffusion method .the
results are given in table.
Out of eight antibiotics Staphylococcus aureus isolate was found to be
resistance for cefuroxime and ciprofloxacin and shown intermediate
effect for gentamicin and cefriaxone with inhibition zone diameter
ranging between 10-12 mm. Staphylococcus aureus. Strain was highly
sensitive to chloramphenicol, ampicillin ,tetracycline and co-
trimoxazole producing inhibition zone of 20mm.,18mm,16mm,and
15mm respectively. While of eight antibiotics, the P aeruginosa isolate
was found to be resistant for chloramphenicol, ampicillin, tetracycline ,
cefuroxime and ciprofloxacin .Intermediates for co-trimoxazole with
inhibition zone diameter ranging between 12mm p aeruginosa strain
was sensitive gentamicin and cefriaxone with inhibition zone diameter
ranging between 20mm and 15mm. It appeared that isolates have
become resistance to some antibiotics because of constant exposure
with these antibiotics.
Table-:4 Antibiogram of isolated Pseudomonas aeruginosa :
Determinatio
21
Evaluation of antibacterial properties of celtis australis against S. aureus and P.aureginosa
S No. Antibiotics Symbol
n of Zone of
inhibition in
(mm)Result
1
Chloramphenico
l
C
8 intermediate
2
Ampicillin
A
No zone Resistant
3
Tetracycline
T
6 Intermediat
e
4
Gentamicin
G
10 sensitive
5
Co-trimoxazole
Co
8 intermediate
6
Cefriaxone
Ci
7 intermediate
7
Cefuroxime
Cu
6 intermediate
8
Ciprofloxine
Cf
15 sensitive
22
Evaluation of antibacterial properties of celtis australis against S. aureus and P.aureginosa
Table-:5 Antibiogram of isolated Staphylococcus aureus.
Determinatio
n of Zone of
23
Evaluation of antibacterial properties of celtis australis against S. aureus and P.aureginosa
S No. Antibiotics Symbol
inhibition in
(mm)Result
1
Chloramphenico
l
C
10 Sensitive
2
Ampicillin
A
No zone Resistant
3
Tetracycline
T
12 sensitive
4
Gentamicin
G
14 sensitive
5
Co-trimoxazole
Co
16 sensitive
6
Cefriaxone
Ci
8 intermediate
7
Cefuroxime
Cu
6 intermediate
8
Ciprofloxine
Cf
13 sensitive
24
Evaluation of antibacterial properties of celtis australis against S. aureus and P.aureginosa
ANTIMICROBIAL PROPERTIES OF CELTIS AUSTRALIS
25
Evaluation of antibacterial properties of celtis australis against S. aureus and P.aureginosa
The study on antimicrobial properties of celtis australis of family of ulmaceae
against various pathogen were conducted.The different leaf fraction of celtis
australis at different concentration (200 mg/ml,100 mg/ml,50 mg/ml,25
mg/ml,12.5 mg/ml,6.25 mg/ml) were prepared and studied for the
antimicrobial properties .The antibacterial activity of the plant was studied
against two bacterial strain Staphylococcus aureus. and Pseudomonas
aeruginosa. different culture media was used for performing experiment and
maintenance of strain. Nutrient broth and nutrient agar were used for
antibacterial study.The antimicrobial properties of the test pathogen were
checked by different standard method. The antibacterial activity against
both bacterial strain was studied by Disc diffusion method (Mukherjee et
al.,1995) .
ANTIBACTERIAL PROPERTIES:
The data in table showing zone of inhibition for the both bacteria
Staphylococcus aureus.and Pseudomonas aeruginosa due to the leaf fraction
obtained from the celtis australis in comparison to control.
This is clear from the table that leaf fraction of celtis australis plant showed
inhibition against both the bacteria in more or less extent. It is also clear
from the table that different leaf fraction obtained from celtis australis under
study showed various degree of inhibition against both the bacteria
Staphylococcus aureus.and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. We use both organic
and inorganic solvent for the preparation of different leaf fraction of active
compound from the celtis australis. The antibacterial activity of leaf fraction
of celtis australis was assessed using the Disc diffusion method. By
measuring the diameter of growth inhibition zone with different
concentration (200 mg/ml,100 mg/ml,50 mg/ml,25 mg/ml,12.5 mg/ml,6.25
mg/ml) .the result showed that the fraction possesses antibacterial activity
against tested pathogen i.e. Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas
aeruginosa.
26
Evaluation of antibacterial properties of celtis australis against S. aureus and P.aureginosa
Table-:6 Zone of inhibition (in mm) of different leaves fractions of celtis australis
against Pseudomonas aeruginosa :
Plant Fractions Code given
on plate
Cons./ml Zone of
inhibition
(in mm)
Celtis
australi
s
Leaves
Aque
ous
T 200 mg/ml 8
T1 100 mg/ml 7.5
T2 50 mg/ml 6.5
T3 25 mg/ml No zone
T4 12.5mg/ml No zone
T5 6.25mg/ml No zone
Methan
ol
T 200mg/ml 9
T1 100mg/ml 8.5
T2 50mg/ml 7.5
T3 25mg/ml 6
T4 12.5mg/ml No zone
T5 6.25mg/ml No zone
Cephotaxime Drug 30mcg 15
27
Evaluation of antibacterial properties of celtis australis against S. aureus and P.aureginosa
Fig :Aqueous zone of inhibition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Fig :Methanol zone of inhibition of Pseudomonas aureginosa
Table-:7 Zone of inhibition (in mm) of different leaves fractions of celtis australis
against Staphylococcus aureus.
28
Evaluation of antibacterial properties of celtis australis against S. aureus and P.aureginosa
Plant Fractions Code given
on plate
Cons./ml Zone of
inhibition
(in mm)
Celtis
australi
s
Leaves
Aque
ous
T 200 mg/ml 8.5
T1 100 mg/ml 7.5
T2 50 mg/ml 6.5
T3 25 mg/ml No zone
T4 12.5mg/ml No zone
T5 6.25mg/ml No zone
Methan
ol
T 200mg/ml 10.5
T1 100mg/ml 9
T2 50mg/ml 8.5
T3 25mg/ml 7
T4 12.5mg/ml No zone
T5 6.25mg/ml No zone
Cephotaxime Drug 30mcg 15
29
Evaluation of antibacterial properties of celtis australis against S. aureus and P.aureginosa
Fig :Aqueous zone of inhibition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Fig: Methanol zone of inhibition of Pseudomonas aureginosa
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSSION
30
Evaluation of antibacterial properties of celtis australis against S. aureus and P.aureginosa
The aqueous and Methanol extract of celtis australis where study for the
antibacterial activity against the two pathogens strains i.e. P.aeruginosa and
S.aureus.The two microbial strain taken in the study have an intrinsic
resistant to several antibiotics and are capable to acquire resistant during
antibiotic therapy.Both extract of celtis australis shows inhibitory effect
against both the test pathogens.the inhibitory effect of these extract of celtis
australis against the test mircroorganism may be due to the presence of
bioactive compound .among the two extract of celtis australis leaves
Methanol shows MIC of about 25 mg/ml and aqueous shows MIC of about 50
mg/ml against S.aureus while in case of P.aeruginosa MIC of methanol 25
mg/ml while MIC of aqueous is 50 mg/ml.
The some active substances were present in water extracts, but in low
concentrations.
Active substances were soluble in organic fraction solvents and therefore,
not present in water extracts.
Results also indicates that inhibitory effects of different fraction of plant
against both the bacterial strains increased with an increases in
concentration of different fractions .However degree of toxicity of different
concentration of different fraction of plant may differ from one
microorganism to another.The antibacterial activity of aqueous, and
methanol extracts of celtis australis was reported against P.aeruginosa and
S.aures (petronic et al.,2004).
In most of the cases of root fraction showed comparatively higher degree of
inhibition in regard to the leaf fractions.It may be because the leaf are rich in
bioactive molecules which are known to show medicinal activity as well as
exhibiting physiology and antimicrobial activities(Victinck and Pieter,2005).
Celtis australis plant was active against gram negative and gram positive
bacteria(Farrukh Aqil and Iqbal Ahmad,2003).
This is evident from the result that the extract of plant studied.High
inhibition against S.aureus is as compared to P.aeruginosa. According to
31
Evaluation of antibacterial properties of celtis australis against S. aureus and P.aureginosa
(Nair and Chandra2007) in gram negative bacteria outer membrane acting
as a barrier to many environmental substances including
antibiotics(Burt,2004).It is not yet clear what are the mechanism of action of
the antibacterial activity of the fraction; it is therefore difficult to speculate
what could be the factor responsible for the differential response. It is
however sufficed to mention for new that effect of the fraction is broad
spectrum .Further study is therefore strongly indicated. It is important to
investigate our plant kingdom, especially the world tropical reserves as an
alternative for finding new and better drugs .it should therefore be essential
to up this type of investigation to isolate and elucidate the active
antimicrobial principles of this bioactive plant.
It can be concluded that the plant fractions under study have great potential
as antimicrobial compounds against microorganisms and they can be use in
the treatment of infectious diseases caused by resistant micro organisms.
Such screening of various natural organic compound and identification of
active agent is the need of the hour because successful prediction of lead
molecule and drug discovery will pay off late in drug development (Villsenor
e al.,1995;Ghule et al.,2006;Oyetayo et al.,2007).
BIBLIOGRAPHY
32
Evaluation of antibacterial properties of celtis australis against S. aureus and P.aureginosa
1. A. Y. Itah and J. P. Essien, Growth Profile and
Hydrocarbonoclastic Potential of Microorganisms Isolated from
Tarballs in the Bight of Bonny, Nigeria, World Journal of Microbiology
and Biotechnology, Volume 21, Numbers.
2. At-Deleimy K.S. & Ali S.H. 1970. Antibacterial action of vegetable
extract on the growth of pathogenic bacteria J. sci. Food. Agric.21:110-
111.
3. Balcht, Aldona & Smith, Raymond (1994). Pseudomonas
Aeruginosa: Infections and Treatment. Informa Health Care. pp. 83–
84. ISBN 0-8247-9210-6
4. Bayer AS, Bolger AF, Taubert KA, et al. 1998. "Diagnosis and
management of infective endocarditis and its complications". Circulation
98 (25): 2936–48.
5. BROWER, ANDREW V.Z. (2006): Problems with DNA barcodes for species delimitation:
‘ten species’ of Astraptes fulgerator reassessed (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae).
Systematics and Biodiversity 4(2): 127–132.
6. Chambers HF 2001. "The changing epidemiology of
Staphylococcus aureus?". Emerg Infect Dis 7 (2): 178–82.
7. Chambers HF 2001. "The changing epidemiology of Staphylococcus
aureus?". Emerg Infect Dis 7 (2): 178–82.
Chopra R.N.,Nayer S.l., Chopra I.C.1992 Glossary of Indian
Medical plants,3rd Edn.CSIR,New Delhi,7-246
8. Cimolai. 2008. MRSA and the environment: implications for
comprehensive control measures. European journal of clinical
microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the
European Society of Clinical Microbiology vol. 27 (7) pp. 481-93.
9. Clauditz A, Resch A, Wieland KP, Peschel A, Götz F 2006.
"Staphyloxanthin plays a role in the fitness of Staphylococcus
aureus and its ability to cope with oxidative stress". Infection and
immunity 74 (8): 4950–3. doi:10.1128/IAI.00204-06.
33
Evaluation of antibacterial properties of celtis australis against S. aureus and P.aureginosa
10. Cooper M, Tavankar GR, Williams HD (2003). "Regulation of
expression of the cyanide-insensitive terminal oxidase in
Pseudomonas aeruginosa". Microbiology 149 s(Pt 5): 1275–1284
11. Cosgrove SE, Vigliani GA, Campion M, et al. 2009. "Initial
low‐dose gentamicin for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and
endocarditis is nephrotoxic". Clin Infect Dis 48 (6): 713–721.
12.Curran JP, Al-Salihi FL 1980. "Neonatal staphylococcal scalded skin
syndrome: massive outbreak due to an unusual phage type". Pediatrics
66 (2): 285–90.
13. Davis j.,1994 inactivation of antibiotic & the dissemination of
resistance gene . science 264:375-382.
14.Diamond R.D.,1993. The growing problem of mycoses in patients
infected with HIV. Review of infectious diseases.13:480-486.
15. Dowzicky M. J. and Park C.H. 2008. Update on antimicrobial
susceptibility rates among gram-negative and gram-positve
organism in United states: result from the tigecycline evaluation
and surveillance trial (TEST)2005 to 2007. Clin. Ther.,30, 2040-
2050.
16. Farrukh A., & Ahamad I.2003. Board spectrum antibacterial and
antifungal properties of certain traditionally used Indian medicinal plant.
World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 19:653-657.
17. Ghule B.V.,Gghante M.H., soaji A.N. & yeole P.G.
2006 .hypolipidemic & antihyperlipidemic effects of lagenaria siuraria
fruit extracts .Indian J. exp.biol. 44 (11):905-909.
18.Govindarajan R.,Vijayakumar M. Singh, M. Rao. C.L.V.
Ashirwaikar A.K.S. pushpangadan P. 2005.Antiulcers and
antimicrobial activity of some anogeissum latifolia, J.
Ethanopharmacology.101:57-61.
19.Grosvenor P.W., Spriono A. and Gray D.O. 1995. Medicinal plant
from Riau province, Sumatra, Indonesia. Part 2, Antibacterial and
antifungal activity. J. of Ethanopharmacology.45.97-111.
34
Evaluation of antibacterial properties of celtis australis against S. aureus and P.aureginosa
20. Harborne S.B. and Baxter H.1995. Phytochemical
dictionary.A handook of bioactive compound from plants.
21. HÉBERT, PAUL D.N.; PENTON, ERIN H.; BURNS, JOHN M.; JANZEN, DANIEL H. &
HALLWACHS, WINNIE (2004): Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species
in the semitropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. PNAS 101(41):
22.Hulin V., Mathat A.G.,Mafart P. and Dufosse L. 1998. Lee
proprieties antimicrobiennes des hiles essentielles et composes daromes.
Sci. Aliments,18:563-582.
23. Kafaru E.,1994.immense help from nature’ workshop.Elika help
services Ltd.academic press Plc. Lagos Njgeria.pp.1-27
24. KEELER, HARRIET L. (1900): Our Native Trees and How to Identify Them. Charles
Scriber's Sons, New York
25. Khotaei G.T.,Fattahi F., Purpak Z.,Moinfar Z., Aghaee
F.M., Gholami K. and Moin M. 2008. Adverse reaction to
antibiotics in hospitalized Iranian children. J. Microbiol. Immunel.
Infect.,41: 160-164.
26. Kluytmans J, van Belkum A, Verbrugh H 1997. "Nasal
carriage of Staphylococcus aureus : epidemiology, underlying
mechanisms, and associated risks". Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 10 (3):
505–20
27. Korzeniowski O, Sande MA 1982. "Combination antimicrobial
therapy for Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis in patients addicted
to parenteral drugs and in nonaddicts: a prospective study". Ann
Intern Med 97 (4): 496–503.
28. Len R.Y. Nusuzzaman F. & shah S.N. 2009.Incidence & impact of
adverse effect to antibiotics in hospitalized adults with pneumonia J.
hosp.med 4:E7-E15.
29. lglewski BH (1996). Pseudomonas. In: Baron's Medical
Microbiology (Baron S et al., eds.) (4th ed.). Univ of Texas Medical
Branch.
35
Evaluation of antibacterial properties of celtis australis against S. aureus and P.aureginosa
30.Liu GY, Essex A, Buchanan JT, Datta V, Hoffman HM, Bastian JF,
Fierer J, Nizet V 2005. "Staphylococcus aureus golden pigment impairs
neutrophil killing and promotes virulence through its antioxidant activity".
J Exp Med 202 (2): 209–15.
31. Lyengar M.A.1985.study of crude drug,2nd Edn. College of
pharmaceutical sciences,Manipal.13-78.
32.Mahesh B. & Satish S. 2008. Antimicrobial activity of some important
medicinal plant against plants and human pathogens. world J. of
agricultural science 4: 839-843.
33. Mulligen M.E. murry –leisure K.A. ribner B.S. standiford H.C.,john
J.F.,karvick J.A. kaufman C.A.,Yu,V.L.,1993.methicillin resistant S. aureus
American J. of medicine 94:313-328.
34. Nair R. & Chanda S. 2007. Invitro antimicrobial activity of Psidium
guajava L. Leaf extracts against clinically important pathogenic microbial
strains. Braz J. Microbiol. 38:452-458.
35. Nascimento G.G.F., Locatelli J., Freitas P.C. and Silva
G.L.2000. Antibacterial activity of plant extracts and
phytochemicals on antibiotic resistant bacteria. Braz. J. Microbiol.
31: 247-256
36. Oyetayo F.L.,, oyetayo V.O. & Ajcwole V.2007. phytochemical
profile & antibacterial properties of the seed & leaf of the luffa
cylindrical.J. of pharmacology & Toxicology. 2(6):586-589.
37. Petrovie J., Stanojkovie A. Comic L. & Curcic 2004. Antibacterial
activity of Antibacterial activity of plant name Fitoteratina 75:737-739.
38. Piddock K.J.V., Wise R., 1989. Mechanisms of resistance to
quinolones and clinical perspective. J. of Antimicrobial
Chemotherapy 23: 475- 483.
39. Rinaldi M.G.,1991. Problems in the diagnosis of invasive
fungal diseases. Review of infectious diseases 13: 493-495.
40. Robin E.H.,Anil W.,Alexander M., Loeto M.,Kath K.,1998.
Nasopharyngeal carriage & antimicrobial resistance in isolates of
36
Evaluation of antibacterial properties of celtis australis against S. aureus and P.aureginosa
S.aureus & Heamophilus influenzae type b in children ,under 5 year of
age in Botswana. International J.of infectious diseases 1:18-25.
41. Rudrappa T. and Bais H.P. 2008. Curcumin a known phenolic
from Curcuma longa, attenuates the virulence of pseudomonas
aeruginosa PAO1 in whole plant and animal pathogenicity models. J.
Agric. Food Chem.,56: 1955-1962.
42. Saunuam P., Hiransuthikul N., saun kratay C., Malathum K. &
Danchaivijtra S. 2008 Risk factors for noscomial infections caused by
extended –spectrum a-lactamare producing E.coli or pneumonia in
Thailand.Asian biomed.,2:485-491.
43. Singh M.,chaudhary M.A., yadav J.N.S. & sanyal S.C.1992- the
spectrum of antibiotic resistance in human & veterinary isolates of E.coli
collected from 1984,1986 in northern Indian J. of antimicrobial
chemotherapy 29:159-168
44.Stockwell C.,1988. Nature’s pharmacy London, United Kingdom.
Century Hutchinson Ltd.
45.Tansey M.R. & Appletonl J.A. 1975. Inhibition of fungal growth by
garlic extract mycologia 67:409-413.
46.Thinnel T.S. Dahiya M.S. 1976. Inhibitory effect of essential oils of
some medicinal plants against soil inhibiting dematophytes. Indian
Drugs.14(11):17-18.
47. Thomson W.A.R.,1978. Medicines from the earth.
Maindendhead, U.K. McGraw-hill books.
48. Tillotson G.S., Draghi D.C., sahm D.F., Tomfohrde K.M.,del
fabro T. & gitch lay I.A. 2008. Susceptibility of infections in the united
state 2005-2007: laboratory-based surveillance study.J. antimicrobs
chemother.,62: 109-115.
49.Tongson C., Davidson P.M., Mahakarnchanakul W. & Vibulsresth
P. 2005. Antimicribial effect of Thai spices against Listereia
monocytogenes and Salmonella typhimurium DT 104. J. F ood
prot.,68:2054-2058.
37
Evaluation of antibacterial properties of celtis australis against S. aureus and P.aureginosa
50. Vlictink A.J. & Pieters L. 2005. Bio-guided Isolation of
pharmacologically active plant components, still a valuable strategy for
finding of new load compounds J. Ethanopharmacol.,100:57-60.
51.Watanab T. 1974. Garlic Therapy Japan Publiation Inc. Tokyo 66.
52. Worlitzsch D, Tarran R, Ulrich M et al. (2002). "Effects of
reduced mucus oxygen concentration in airway Pseudomonas
infections of cystic fibrosis patients". J. Clin. Invest. 109 (3): 317–
325