Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Anticoagulation in
Non-Valvular
Atrial Fibrillation Dane Copeland, MD
PIH Neurology
Stroke Program Medical Director - PIH Downey
What is Atrial Fibrillation? - Rapid and irregular beating of the atria of the heart
- May be associated with palpitations, light headedness, or SOB but often no
symptoms at all
- Risk factors include HTN, valvular heart Dz, CHF, CAD, COPD, OSA,
obesity, DM II, thyrotoxicosis, smoking, and ETOH
- Affects 2-3% of the general population and is more prevalent with
advancing age
0.14% <50yo, 4% 60-70yo, 14% >80yo
Classification system
AF category Defining characteristics
First detected only one diagnosed episode
Paroxysmal recurrent episodes that stop on
their own in less than 7 days
Persistent recurrent episodes that last more
than 7 days
Permanent an ongoing long-term episode
Chronic AF & Risk of Stroke
in the 24-Year Follow-Up of
Framingham Study
Group Risk Ratio
_____________________________________________________
1. No AF or RHD 0.90
2. Chronic AF 5.60
3. RHD with chronic AF 17.56
Source: Wolf, PA et al. Neurologic Clinics 1983; 1: 317-383
Why Patients with AF
Have an Increased Risk of Stroke
Mechanism: Explanation:
Abnormal changes in blood flow Stasis in left atrium
Abnormal changes in atrial wall Dilatation, denudation, edema, and
Fibroelastic infiltration
Abnormal blood constituents. Hemostatic and platelet activation
Inflammation IL-6, hs-CRP, RAAS mediated
Growth factor changes Vascular endothelial growth factor & tissue
factor expression
Why Healthcare Providers Are
Worried About Strokes in AF:
• Approximately twice as likely to be fatal than non-AF strokes
• Functional deficits more likely to be severe
• Recurrent stroke is more frequent
Cryptogenic Stroke
Definition: Stroke of unknown origin
Large observational studies have shown that at least
50% of cryptogenic strokes are caused by AF
The rate of detection of AF in patients with cryptogenic stroke increases
with length of monitoring
EMBRACE : 30-day incidence of AF lasting at least 30 sec. found 16.1 %
CRYSTAL-AF : (s/c implantable device x 3yrs)
found 8.6% at 6mo, 12.4% at 12mo, 30% at 36mo
CHADS2 Risk Stratification in
Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation
CHF 1
HTN 1
Age>75 1
Diabetes 1
Stroke or TIA 2
CHADS2 Risk Stratification in
Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation
CHADS2 Score Risk Level Stroke Rate Recommendation
_____________________________________________________________
0 Low 1.0%/year ASA (77-325mg/d)
1 Low-moderate 1.5%/year Warfarin or ASA
2 Moderate 2.5%/year Warfarin
3 High 5.0%/year Warfarin
4 or + Very High >7%/year Warfarin
CHA2DS2-VASc Risk Stratification in
Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation
Range 0-9
Low = 0
Intermediate = 1
High = 2+
CHF 1
HTN 1
Age 75+ 2
Age 65 -74 1
Diabetes 1
Prior Embolism 2
Vascular Disease 1
Female 1
AHA/ASA Guidelines for First Stroke Prevention Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
• Active screening in patients >65yo in primary care settings
by pulse followed by ECG can be useful (Class IIa;
Level of Evidence [LOE] B)
• Adjusted-dose warfarin (target INR 2-3) recommended for
all patients with non-valvular AF deemed high risk & many
at moderate risk for stroke (Class I; LOE A)
• Antiplatelet therapy with ASA recommended for low risk
and some moderate risk patients with AF according to
patient preference, estimated bleeding risk, and access to
anticoagulation monitoring (Class I; LOE A)
AHA/ASA Guidelines for First Stroke Prevention Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
• For high risk patients with AF deemed unsuitable for
anticoagulation, dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel
and ASA offers more protection against stroke than ASA
alone but there is an increased risk of bleeding
(Class I; LOE A)
• Aggressive management of blood pressure coupled with
antithrombotic prophylaxis in elderly patients with AF may
be useful (Class IIa; LOE B)
AHA/ASA Guidelines for Recurrent Stroke Prevention Atrial Fibrillation
• The CHADS2 or CHA2DS2-VASc Risk Stratification Scales (or other
validated scales) are recommended for use in AF patients to judge risk of
stroke or systemic embolism in clinical practice
• If unable to take oral anticoagulation give ASA alone (Class I; LOE A); risk
of bleeding with ASA + clopidogrel is similar to that of warfarin & not
indicated with a hemorrhagic contraindication anticoagulation (Class III,
LOE B)
• For patients with AF at high risk (CHADS2= 5 or 6, mechanical or
rheumatic valve) & who require temporary interruption of oral
anticoagulation, bridging with LMWH s/c is reasonable (Class IIa; LOE C)
The HAS-BLED Score Risk Score to Predict Bleeding in Anticoagulated Patients with
Atrial Fibrillation
High risk (>4%/year) 4+ Moderate risk (2-4%/year) 2-3 Low risk (<2%/year) 0-1
HTN (>160 mmHg SBP) 1
Abnormal renal or hepatic function 1-2
Stroke 1
Bleeding history or anemia 1
Labile INR (time at goal range<60%) 1
Elderly (>75yrs) 1
Drugs (antiplatelet, NSAID) or alcohol 1-2
Rhythm versus Rate Control
AFFIRM Trial
- Showed that achieving NSR does not significantly reduce risk of
stroke.
- Majority of strokes occurred in patients who stopped AC suggesting
treatment of the atrial dysrhythmia does not eliminate the thrombogenic
substrate in AF.
- The rhythm control group was more likely to experience episodes of
undetected AF reinforcing the need for AC after achieving NSR.
Wyse et al. NEJM 20002; 347 (23): 185-233.
PROTECT trial (WATCHMAN device)
- AF patients with high stroke risk & contraindications to long term
anticoagulation (warfarin vs LAA closure)
- Primary endpoint: composite of stroke, embolism, and death (CV or UE)
- initial analysis showed non-inferiority
WM device vs warfarin (3/100 pt. yr. vs 4.9/100 pt. yr. efficacy)
(Holmes et al. Lancet 2009; 374 (9689): 534-42
- 4 yr. follow-up showed WM device had significant reduction in primary
endings c/w warfarin (8.4% vs 13.9%)
(Reddy et al. JAMA 2014; 312(19): 1988-98)
PREVAIL Trial
Inclusion Criteria
NVAF patients
CHADS2 Score >=2 (or 1 with additional RF)
Exclusion Criteria
Requirement for AC other than AF
Contraindication to warfarin or ASA
Previous stroke or TIA within 90 days
PREVAIL Trial
(Safety Data)
- 7 day procedure-related complications = 4.2%
(cardiac perforation, pericardial effusion with tamponade,
ischemic stroke, device embolization and other vascular
complications )
- pericardial effusions requiring surgery = 0.4%
- pericardial effusions requiring pericardiocentesis = 1.5%
- device embolization = 0.7%
Holmes et al. JACC 64(1) 2014: 1-12.
LARIAT Suture Delivery Device
LARIAT Suture Delivery Device
LARIAT Suture Delivery Device