Upload
lagatadezinc5733
View
220
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/9/2019 Anthony Grafton - The world of the polyhistors
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/anthony-grafton-the-world-of-the-polyhistors 1/17
The World o f the Polyhistors:
Humanism and Encyclopedism
A N T H O N Y G R A F T O N
IN 1713 and 1715 Johann Burkhard M encke subjected the scholars o f
the H oly Rom an Em pire to a searching examination. Th ey failed
it. His tw o speeches “ O n the Charlatanry o f the Learned”— best
sellers whe reve r they w ere n ot banned— ridiculed the minds and the
mores o f the polyhistors w ith equal zest. Me nck e anatomized their love
for overblown titles:
Tod ay . . . you see many demanding to be called Clarissimus who are abso-
lutely un known outside the walls o f their city; Magnificus, who have scarcely
any dign ity at home; Consullissimus, w ho have little or no advice to give: and
Excellentissimus, w ho do not know as much about anything worth know ing
as the veriest tyro.1
H e savaged the equally fatuous titles that they assigned to their books—
for exam ple, “ Public Law ; that is, a Medical Treatise on Headache.” H e
demolished their ridiculous efforts to capture all knowledge in single
encyclopedias or treatises— “ Golden Keys, Roy al M eth od s, . . . Oceanic
M acroM icroCo sm icos, . . . and other such grandiose w ork s that are
p u t ou t to ensnare buy ers.” 2 H e heaped special scorn on their be lie f thattheir scholarship could recov er an ancient, perfect philosophy , en coded
b y d ie wis e priests o f ancient E g y p t in th eir m ys terious hie rogly phs:
Some mischievous youths o f Rom e, hearing that a building was to be erected
on a certain site, resolved to put [Athanasius] Kircher’s ingen uity to the test.
So they secretly buried there a rough stone on which they had designed some
appealing voluptuous figures. W he n the foundation o f the new structure was
being dug, the stone was found . . . A t once an interpreter was sought, and
Kircher was chosen. As soon as he saw the stone, he began to leap and dance
1. J. B . M encke, Th e Charlatanry o f the Learned, tr. F. E. Litz, ed. H. L. Men cken (N ew
Y o rk , 1937), 61 62.
2. Ibid., 6869.
31
8/9/2019 Anthony Grafton - The world of the polyhistors
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/anthony-grafton-the-world-of-the-polyhistors 2/17
for jo y — and to g ive a beautiful interpretation o f the circles, the crosses, and
all the other meaningless signs.3
So much for the efforts at deciphering hieroglyphs that had fascinated
humanists from C yria c o f Ancon a to N icolas Caussin. So m uch for the
b elie f in a prisca theologia that had deluded NeoPlatonists from Ficino
to Fludd.4
A n early philosophe, Mencke found the erudite compilers who had
loaded seventeenthcentury bookshelves to breaking point with their
hug e folios to be figures o f fun rather than types o f learning. A nd m any
contem poraries shared his view s. V ernacular writers join ed him in sati-rizing the pedantry o f the old scholarship— one o f the best was Rabener,
w h o w rote a mockd issertation entirely in footn ote s.5 Educational re-
formers join ed him in attacking the sterility o f the old curriculum— one
o f the most effective was C hristian Thom asius, w h o tried to rcplace
scholastic with m odern philosop hy and Latin w ith G erman in university
teaching.5 Such critics o f the old system seem sympathetic figures even
no w , and they have had at least their fair share o f attention from mo dern
scholars. B ut the objects o f their abuse, the men whose ideals and prac-tices dominated the schools, academies, and universities o f the old E m -
pire from the midsixteenth to the mideighteenth century— these men
have had not o nly little sym pathy but little attention o f any kind. T o
the exploration o f the obscure, forbidd ing territory that was theirs w e
now turn.
It is not surprising that the wo rld o f the polyhistors has attracted few
explorers in recent times. Its inhabitants wrote at fantastic length in
barbarous Latin about tedious and terrifyin g subjects. Caspar Barth ’s Adversaria was one o f their most quoted and bestrespected products. O f
it A . E . H ousman w rote : “ to read 3000 tall columns o f close print b y a
thirdrate scholar is no proper occup ation for m ortals.” 7 W ha t could be
3. Ibid., 8586.
4. For the history o f the former be lief see E. Iversen, The Myth o f Egypt and its Hiero-
glyphs in European Tradition (Copenhagen, 1961); for that o f the latter D . P. Walke r,
The Ancient Theology (London, 1972).
5. Hinkmar von Repkows Noten ohne Text (1745). O n this and similar literature see W . Martens, “ V on Thomasius bis Lichtenberg: Zur Gelehrtensatire der Aufk la nm g,”
Lessing Yearbook 10 (1978): 734.
6. See R. Spaethling, “ O n Christian Thomasius and his Alleged Offspring: The Ger-
man Enlightenment,” ibid. 3 (1971): 194213.
7. M . Manilii Astronomicon liber primus, ed. A. E. Housman, 2d ed. (Cambridge,
1937), xv.
32 The World o f the Polyhistors
8/9/2019 Anthony Grafton - The world of the polyhistors
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/anthony-grafton-the-world-of-the-polyhistors 3/17
Anthony Grafton 33
m ore dismal than 3,000 colum ns to o crabb ed even fo r the chalcenteric
Housm an? Y e t B arth, a great manu script hunter and pioneering student
o f m ediev al Latin, has mo re to offer m od em classicists, at least, than
does Dan iel Geo rg M orh of, w ith w ho m he shared intellectual preemi-
nence in the seventeenthcentury Em pire.8 Tr ue , a fe w hard y souls have
tried to w or k ou t the lay o f this unpromising land. Erich Tr un z sur-
v ey e d th e poly his tors’ w h o le territ ory in one brisk essay fif ty years ago ,
achieving clarity and broad cove rage but losing detail and local color in
the process.9 M or e re cen dy , so m e literary and intellectual historians
have travelled on foot through individual provinces, enriching Trunz’s
sketchy ge ograp hy w ith r ich i f isolated chorographies.10 A nd W ilhe lm
K iihlm an n has distilled an im po sing synthesis fro m these m ono grap hs
and dozens o f prim ary sources.11 B u t all too m any regions lie untrav-
elled and uncultivated. T h e n ew survey that fol low s, thoug h produced
after some long tramps through the respublica litterarum, is offered w ith
many reservations.
T h e general shape o f the map w e need to dra w seems as clear as its
details are elusive. For i f the polyhistors bew ilder a ny m od em scholar
b y th e breadth o f th eir interests, alm ost all o f th eir in te llectu al activitie s
nonetheless fall within a welldefined area, bound ed b y the tw o enter
8. F or the linking o f Barth w ith M or ho f see J. A . Fabricius’s praefatio to D . G . M o r h o f
Polyhistor literarius, phtlosophtcus et practicus, 4th ed. (Lubeck, 1747; reprint Aalen, 1970),
1: ix: “ M ultum semper debere me professus sum, ac profiteor libenter duum viris eruditis
G erm anis nostris C A S P A R I B A R T H I O , & D A N I E L I G E O R G I O M O R H O F I O . . ”
In the absence o f a m ode m appreciation o f Barth’s w ork , one m ay consult Fabricius’s
(ibid.); he makes clear that Barth’s example o f comm and o f “ilium orbem scicntiarum”
inspired him to b ecom e the greatest bibliographer o f his (or any other) era.
9. E. Trunz, “Der deutsche Spathumanismus um 1600 als Standeskultur,” in Deutsche
Barockforschung, ed. R. Alewyn, 3d ed. (Cologne and Berlin, 1968), 14781 (originally
published in 1932); o f m ore recent gen eral essays the most stimulating are perhaps
C . W iedemann, ‘ ‘Polyhistors Gluck und Endc: Vo n D . G . M orh of zum jungen Lessing/*
Festschrift Gottfried Weber (Bad Homburg v.d.H., Berlin, and Zurich, 1967), 21535;
R. J. W . Evans, “ Rantzau and Welser: Aspects o f Later German Humanism,” History o f
European Ideas 5 (1984): 25772.
10. Som e particularly useful mono graphs include: T . Bleicher, Homer in der deutschen
Literatur(14501740) (Stuttgart, 1972); N . H a m m c n t c i n , J « 5 ( G o t t i n g e n , 1972);
G. Homi g , D ie Anfdnge der historischkritischen Theologie (Gottingen, 1961); A . Klem pt,
D ie Sdkularisierung der universalhistorischen Auffassung (Gottingen, Berlin, and Frankfurt,i960); G. Oestreich, Neostoicism and the Early Modem State (Cambridge, 1982).
11 . W . Ki ihlmann, Gelehrtenrepublik und Furstenstaat (Tubingen, 1982); the footnotes
and bibliography o f this massive boo k stimulate and inform even wh en it does not
com man d assent; all future wo rk in the field must begin from it. See also the comple-
men tary case study by Kiihlmann and W . Schafer, Friihbarocke Stadtkultur am Oberrhein:
Studien zum literarischen WerdegangJ, M . Moscheroschs (16011669) (Berlin, 1983).
8/9/2019 Anthony Grafton - The world of the polyhistors
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/anthony-grafton-the-world-of-the-polyhistors 4/17
prises mentioned in the title o f this essay. Humanism and en cyclopedism ,
eloquence and erudition— these we re the pursuits that the polyhistorsmade their own.
Hu man ism is not difficult to define. For the intellectuals o f the Em pire
it retained until deep in the eighteenth century the original form that
Erasmus and his contemporaries had give n it. It meant the cluster o f
disciplines that trained a scholar to interpret and produce literary texts
in Latin. A b o ve all, it meant rhetoric— the art o f arts and science o f
sciences, wh ich too k as its lofty goa l the production o f the eloquent and
effective citizen, the vir bonus peritus dicendi, and imposed as its humbletask the mem orization o f hundreds o f examples, aphorisms, and tropes,
the copia rerum ac verborum.12 Latin schools, academies, and universities
throughout Germany forced their inhabitants to speak and argue in
Latin on everything from m etono m y to M ersenne.13 M ore ambitiously,
the y offered the art o f rhetoric, w ith its clearly defined goals and
methods, its fiv e m ajor subdivisions and its three (or four) general types
o f speeches, as the model for any other discipline that aspired to b e a
liberal art. The intellectual who wished to praise painting claimed thatit too c ould “ kindle its audiences to seek glo ry and virtue” ; that it too
had to seek subjects out, arrange them attractively, adorn them appro-
priately, and giv e them life w ith “ m otion and gesture” ; that it too had
to rest on k no w led ge o f the ideas and m aterial realities o f the ancient
w o rld .14 Th e painter, in short, had to be a vir bonus peritus pingendi\ and
other disciplines from theology to sculpture were envisioned in analo-
gous terms.
For the m ost part rhetoric was far mo re a m atter o f practice than o ftheo ry. T he learned m an had to b e ju st as deft in 1700 as his forbears had
been a centu ry and a h a lf before at speaking Latin on public occasions,
w rit in g Latin about offic ial business, com posin g poems in Latin on de-
mand and treatises in Latin o n subjects the ancients had never im agined
— like the compass, the barometer, and the properties o f Iceland spar.
12. For the tradition o f humanist rhetoric see H . H . Gray, “ Renaissance Humanism:
the Pursuit o(Eloquence,** Journal ofthe History o f Ideas 24 (1963); reprinted in Renaissance
Essays, ed. P. O . Kristeller and P. P. W iene r (N ew Y or k and Evanston, 1968), 199216;
for its German form see above all Kuhlmarui, Gelehrtenrepublik, pt. I.
13. F .J. Stopp, The Emblems o fthe AltdorfAcademy (London, 1974) provides interesting
samples and analyses o f schoolboy oratory.
14. G. J. Vossius, D e quatuor artibus popularibus (Amsterdam, 1660), 67, 7174. Cf.
A . Ellenius, D e arte pingettdi (Uppsala, i960).
34 The World of the Polyhistors
8/9/2019 Anthony Grafton - The world of the polyhistors
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/anthony-grafton-the-world-of-the-polyhistors 5/17
Such skil ls we re n ot easy to a ttain.15 M ure t and de T h ou , the masters to
w h o m th e poly histors lo o k e d back, achie ved th eir elo quence b y dir ectstudy o f the ancients . B ut the you ng Germ an student in search o f a
career in the Gelehrtenstand had too l ittle leisure to dev ote him self to
digesting the classics themselves. H ence the presses we re ke p t busy w ith
the oldfashioned but still useful shortcuts to eloquence that Renais-
sance humanists had devised, and w ith n ew er additions to the stock o f
teaching aids, distinguished less b y hig h ideals or d eep learning than by
their austerely practical character.
O ne typical collection o f rhetoric texts, aimed at the learned you ng o fthe 1650s, begins w ith that shortest o f all shortcuts to loqu acity in
Latin, Erasmus’s D e copia. T h e bo ok is just ly famou s for i ts exuberant
pursuit o f synonym s and metaphors, i ts table o f 150 wa ys to say “ Th ank
y o u fo r th e le tter” in g o o d Latin:
Tuis literis nulla res unquam accidit mihi festivior: nihil unquam vidi tuis
literis lubentius: haud est quicquam, quod gaudentiore acceperim animo,
quam proximas Fausti mei litcras: quo m e credis affluxisse gaudio, cu m tuum
animum tuis in literis agnoscerem? cu m tabellarius tuam mihi traderet epistolam, statim animus mihi laetitia ineffabili prurire co e p it . . .16
I f Erasmus’s mastery o f classical literature and sheer jo y in the accum u-
lation o f w ord s som etimes suffused his d ry instructions w ith a curiously
poetic character, his seventeenthcentury successors had far lower ends
in vie w and applied far low er means to attain them. T h e w or k that
follow s Erasmus in the corpus I describe bears the title “ M arro w o f the
transitions mo st used in orations.” 17 W ritten for the Gym nasium stu-
dents o f Livon ia, it offers no t guidance in independent comp osition bu t
model exordia, transitions, and conclusions, in which the student had
only to fill in the blanks as his occasion dictated:
T ho ug h our ancestors ordained m any splendid things, none o f these was
more splendid, more useful, more prudent, more carefully adapted to pre-
serve scholarship, more efiiciendy designed to promo te the studiousness o f
15. Sec the useful study by M . Benner and E. Te ngstrom, On the Interpretation of
Learned NeoLa tin (Goteborg, 1977), and E. Tengstrom, A Latin Funeral Oration from
Early iSth Century Sweden (Go teborg, 1983), wh ich illuminate die German as w ell as the
Swedish scene.
16. Erasmus, D e utraque verborum ac rerum copia lib. II , I.31 (Amsterdam, 1645), 62.
17 . H. Amingk, Medulla variorum earumque in orationibm usitatissimarum connexionum
(Altcnburgi, 1652).
Anthony Grafton 35
8/9/2019 Anthony Grafton - The world of the polyhistors
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/anthony-grafton-the-world-of-the-polyhistors 6/17
the you ng, more brilliantly appropriate to preserving the authority o f ranks
and orders in society and enlarging the prestige o f letters, than .1S
W h a t could be m ore practica l than this? O r fu rther fr om Erasm us’ s
spirit?
The search for eloquentia occupied a prominent place even in the
interests o f m ature scholars. S eth C alvisius, professor o f music at Leip zig
and a highly proficient chronologer in his own right, corresponded
extensively ab out the latter field w ith the greatest expert in the w orld ,
Joseph S caliger. T h e drafts o f his letters, preserved in Go ttinge n, record
no t me rely some heated arguments about the dating and order o f thekin gs o f ancient Israel, but also a passionate search for the p rop er Latin
adjcctives a nd turns o f phrase. Ea ch pa ragra ph is a little setpiece:
Y o ur Elettchus [o f Christopher Clavius] has also reached m e . . . I read it with
great pleasure, because you lay him out and overw helm him w ith such mani-
fest [lined out: arguments] proofs and such vigorous [later amended to:
severe and vigorous] prose that he seems quite defeated. Therefore, though he
wro te against me, I think I should remain silent now, lest I seem to insult a
dead dog and write an Iliad after Homer.19
C lav iu s’s selfconscious effort to a ccumu late laud atory terms and paral-
lel clauses, his ov eruse o f classical prove rbs, his v er y emphasis on
Scaliger’s virtu osity as a stylist— all these traits o f the m ature scholar
w ere acq uired at the schoolb oy’s desk, and firm ly in ternalized.
Y e t even this appare ntly atavistic obsession w ith go o d Latin had its
uses in the seventeenth century. It meant that Latin rem ained upto date
and accessible— and thus preserved it as a means o f w inn ing advance-
m ent (and, o f course, o f keeping those unfitted b y b irth and position
from winning advancement in their turn). It inspired some polyhistors
to m ake real additions to the expressive possibilities o f Latin (as they d id
w ith those strange com positions, h a lf poem and h a lf inscription, that
w ere th e fash ionab le w a y to w rit e political la m poons in th e 1660s, and
the textbo ok for w hich was w ritten b y a Jena professor o f eloquence in
18. Ibid., 11.
19. Calvisius to J. J. Scaliger, n.d.; Go ttingen, Nicdersachsische Staats und Un iversitatsbibliothek, MS philos. 103, vol. 3, p. 95 (draft); cop y ibid., vol. 2, p. 31 : “ Elenchus
etiam tuus ad me per vc ni t. . . Magna eum cum voluptate legi quod adeo evidentissiinis
(lined through: argumentis] dcmonstrationibus et oratione [lined through: nervosa]
gravi et nervosa eum ita prostemis et obruis ut depositus fere videatur. Ideo quamvis in
me scripsit, quiescendum tamen mihi jam puto, ne mortuo cani videar insultare et post
Homerum Iliada scribere.”
36 The World o f the Polyhistors
8/9/2019 Anthony Grafton - The world of the polyhistors
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/anthony-grafton-the-world-of-the-polyhistors 7/17
1670).20 A n d it m ade the rulers o f the Kleinstaat far mo re cosmopolitan
than they would have been had they not had immediate access to the
normal language o f European science and learning. W e customarilytake our cue from Descartes and Thomasius and denounce the schools’
obsession with blowing artificial life into a dead language. In doing so
w e fo rget that there was no alternative save French— and that to accept
that w ou ld have m ade Germ any a cultural pro vince o f France instead o f
an independent mem ber state o f w ha t Germans a lways insisted on seeing
as a Europew ide, Latinspeaking Repu blic o f Letters. T o that extent
the pursuit o f eloquence was still a coherent and plausible as we ll as a
pragmatic and useful enterprise.Encyclopedism is harder than humanism to define. It refers not only
to the specific effort to organize knowledge in systematic compendia
but also to the m ore general intellectual aspirations o f the polyhistors—
aspirations so sweeping as to bo gg le the m ode m m ind.21 Th e polyh istor
w as a figure very alien to us, w it h our closefitting specialties and our
contented refusal to ha ve anything to do w ith our intellectual neighbors
(except the occasional pleasure o f den ying the value o f their pursuits).
He wanted to cover every base on the intellectual field. His ideal wasembod ied in the great polym aths o f the years around 1600, like Claudius
Salmasius, “ a man fro m w h om one cou ld cut three specialists.” T h e
scholar had to k no w the structure and relations o f all disciplines, the
titles and contents o f all books, the character traits and oddities o f all
significant earlier scholars. G iven the proliferation o f books since 1450
and o f ne w kn ow led ge since the Renaissance the ideal had become
desperately hard to realize by the time that M o rh o f gave it an appro-
priately ambitious name and an appropriately chaotic handbook withhis Polyhistor o f 1697.
T h e polyhistors hit on a v ariety o f expedients for setting in order and
passing on the universal knowledge they needed. They did produce
some genuine encyclopedias— like Alsted’s, w hich ramm ed together
introdu ctory wo rks from a variety o f disciplines, and Z w in ge r’s, which
amassed passages on all subjects from over 500 authors on over 5,000
folio pages.22 T h ey charted the relations o f the disciplines to one a n
20. J. Sparrow, Visible Words (Cambridge, 1969). Kiihlmann provides an exhaustive
treatment o f the modernization o f Latin rhetoric in Gelehrtenrepublik, pt. I, chap. v.
21. See in general L. E. Loemker, Struggle for Synthesis (Cambridge, Mass., 1972),
chap. 2.
22. W . O ng , “ Comm onplace Rhapsody: Ravisius Texto r, Zw ing er and Shakespeare,”
Classical Influences on European Culture, A .D . 15001700, ed. R. R. Bolgar (Cambridge,
1976), 11118.
Anthony Grafton 37
8/9/2019 Anthony Grafton - The world of the polyhistors
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/anthony-grafton-the-world-of-the-polyhistors 8/17
other, laying these out in tables that always differed from one another
and gen erally revealed no great measure o f internal coherence.23 T he y
tried to for ce the basic content o f individual disciplines and the basic
rules fo r studying a ny subject into concise introducto ry textbooks. A
standard c ollection o f tracts by G. J. Vossius and others covers these
topics (I keep the original o rder): a survey o f the legitimate disciplines,
chronology, history, imitation in oratory and poetry, history again,
public speaking, ancient shorthand, letterwriting, punctuation, the or-
ganization o f libraries, the study o f law , the study o f law again, the
m ethod o f study in all fields, theolo gy, th eolo gy again, H eb rew and
Aram aic , law again, med icine, natural philosophy, music, and ethics—
all in 720 small pages.24 It is m ore orde rly than some o f its com petitors.
Cle arly such compendia neither reflected an y clear idea o f the hier-
archy o f the liberal arts, professions, and philosophies nor offered any
serious grasp o f their content, m ethods, and data. Th e object o f the
exercise was at best the lexical one traditional since Martianus Capella
and Isidore o f Seville: to acquaint the student w ith the names and ter-
m inologies o f disciplines so that he could recogn ize them w hen he en-
countered them in his reading.25 A t w ors t it degenerated into mere
quack ery. T h e ears o f the seventeenthcentury student rang w ith pro m -
ises to teach him “ Latin in eigh t months, Gre ek in tw en ty days, astron-
o m y in eight o r ten days, philosop hy and m usic in a m onth or less.” 26
Bartholomaeus Ernestus promised his readers that his methods would
enable them “ T o teach an art and language in an orderly w ay and learn
it at a m odera tely high level, b y means o f reasonable diligence, in 8 or
14. days” ; that he cou ld train “ city d w eller and peasant to be able to fill
som e 100 sheets with co rrect Latin verses.” 27 Ev en Andreas Gryph ius, a
genuinely learned man as well as a gifted poet, can hardly have been
com petent to deal w ith all the topics encompassed by the “ Co llegiu m
Metaphysicum, G eographicum & Trigonom etricum , Logicum, Physi
ognom icum & Tragicum ” — “ Course on metaphysics, geography, and
trigonom etry, logic, physiognomies, and tragedy” — that he gave at
23. See, e.g., P. R. Sellin, “T he Last o f the Renaissance Monsters. . . in AtigloDutdi
Cross Currents in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries (Los Angeles, 1976), [i][39].24. G. J. Vossius et al., Dissertationes de studiis bene tnstituendis (Utrecht, 1658).
25. See H. I. Marrou, A History o f Education in Antiquity, tr. G. Lamb (New York,
1956), pt. Ill, chap. 5; A . T . Grafton and L. Jardine, “ Humanism and the School o f
Guarino: A Problem o f Evaluation,” Past & Present, no. 96 (1982): 7073.
26. H. Aarsleff, From Locke to Saussure (Minneapolis, 1982), 106.
27. Schurzfleischiana (Wittenberg, 1741), 15.
38 The World of the Polyhistors
8/9/2019 Anthony Grafton - The world of the polyhistors
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/anthony-grafton-the-world-of-the-polyhistors 9/17
Leiden— no t to m ention his further lectures on peripatetic and m od em
philosophy, Roman antiquities, and astronomy.28 And even Leibniz,
certain ly n o charlatan, chased all his life an ideal as alluring and unattain-
able as Co m enius’s: the creation o f a survey o f all kn ow ledge , derived
from the best books and encoded in a universal language.29
The polyhistors, though quixotic, were not in all respects divorced
from the reality around them. M uch o f their effort was carefully di-
rected at meeting specifically modem needs. For example, they took
account in ev erything they did o f the revolution in the dissemination o f
kno w ledg e broug ht about by printing. U nlike most earlier encyclope-
dists, they did no t have to try to p reserve all o f learning between tw o
covers, since the printers ensured that every necessary book and many
others existed in thousands o f copies. O n the other hand they did feel an
irresistible pressure to su rve y the literature o f ev ery field as w ell as its
structure, since the ve ry richness o f the available offerings m eant that
readers and students needed gu idance in the choice o f books.
Gabriel Na ude sh ow ed ho w to m eet this need. His sprawling work s
on h ow to organize a library and on the bibliography o f politics pro-
vid ed a rich m ix o f book ch at, bib liophily, and illconsid ered advic e for
the student. Here are his instructions on where to look for competent
help in reading Aristotle’s Politics:
Thomas Aquina s. . . was followed by Nicole Oresme . . . [His] books are
n ow very hard to find and accordingly much esteemed by connoisseurs, since
they were printed 120 years ago at Paris in Lombardic scr ipt. . . the special
commentators Camerarius and Giphanius rarely put a foot w rong ; and more
or less consonant with them are Antonius Scainus . . . and that very eloquent
Jesuit Tarquinius Gallutius, who interpreted the first five books o f the Politics
so learnedly as to be far more o f a polymath than the rest. B ut he w ho
chooses Daniel Heinsius’s paraphrase with the commentaries o f Zw ing er and
Vettori as the basis o f his studies— he, I think, will have done well as regards
both ease o f learning and the utility o f his studies.30
N au de ’s ideal scholar was the late sixteenthcentury humanist and law -
y er Jean B od in , “ w h o vanquished the difficulties o f alm ost all languages
and sciences, built the theatre o f nature on n ew principles, and system
28. B . Siegmund von Stosch, “ Dan ck und DenckScule des Andreae Gryphii (1665),”
Texte + Kritik, 7/8 (n.d.): 6.
29. See the sympathetic account b y L. M . N ewm an, Leibniz (16461716) and the Gentian
Library Scene, Library Assoc. Pamphlet No. 28,1966.
30. G. Naude, “Bibliographia politics,” in H. Grotius et al., Dissertationes de studiis
instituendis (Amsterdam, 1645), 2526.
Anthony Grafton 39
8/9/2019 Anthony Grafton - The world of the polyhistors
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/anthony-grafton-the-world-of-the-polyhistors 10/17
atized the kinds, laws, institutions, secrets, virtues, and vices o f all the
w o rld ’s past and present kin gdom s.” 31 A n d his ideal public was in the
universities o f contem porary Germ any, where Hermann C on ring and
others reprinted his books and expanded on them in lectures.
Such courses in general literature becam e the rule throu gh out Protes-
tant Germ any . T h e teacher w ou ld p rint and distribute an outline o f his
system o f kn ow ledg e o r have his students bu y the printed catalogue o f a
great private library. He would then expatiate, offering information
abo ut the best editions o f texts and textb ook s, d escribing the styles and
virtues o f ancient and m odern authors, and enlivenin g the hour w ith
curious anecdotes about the lives and fortunes o f men o f letters. T he
student would scurry to keep up, often copying the teachers’ words
verbatim page after page.
T h e results hav e a certain pathos. O ften their leve l o f analysis is
terrifyingly meager and superficial:
Plato. His style is not philosophical but swollen and declamatory, and fur-
thermore allegorical and hieroglyphical. But his Republic and Laws have a
more philosophical style. Aristotle excelled at this, and sticks to the austereand accurate philosophical style.32
So m uch fo r the great debate between Platonists and Aristotelians. Y e t
at the same time teachers could m ake the m ost extravagan t demands on
their students’ willingness and a bility to bu y, bo rro w , or steal expensive
books:
In the history o f antiquities we indicate the following: Franciscus Ferrarius De
veterum acclamationibus libri VII, Milan 1627; on the ancients’ rings see
Ioannes Kirchmannus, Lubeck 1623, Fortun. Licetus, Udine 1646, Georgius
Longus on the ancients’ signet rings, Milan 1645; on the ancients’ bracelets
see Thomas Bartholinus, Amsterdam 1676; on the Roman toga Hieronymus
Borsius, Amsterdam 1671; on the ancient and mystic boot Benedictus Bal
duinus, Paris 161 j ; on the ancients’ crowns Carolus Paschalius . . .33
Fe w university libraries wo uld have offered this we alth o f ore to a
student’s spade, even i f they had been open to students (or to any one
for m ore than a few hours a w eek ). A nd few inhabitants o f an ordinary
city c ould ha ve hoped to taste mo re than a spoonful or tw o o f this
pullulating stew o f erudition.
31. Ibid., 23.
32. Schurzjkischiana, 102.
33. Ibid., 1718.
40 The World of the Polyhistors
8/9/2019 Anthony Grafton - The world of the polyhistors
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/anthony-grafton-the-world-of-the-polyhistors 11/17
The intent was clear; just as textbooks acquainted their readers with
the basic terms o f the arts, so lectures on literature acquainted their
hearers w ith the basic titles and authors, g ivin g a vision o f the wh ole
compass o f learning that must have been at once inspiring and deeply
frustrating. Y e t they did offer the student some sense o f the European
w orld o f learning, as one w hic h he could enter b y reading even i f he
lacked the means to travel to such capital cities o f the Respublica littera
rum as Leiden or Paris. And they were literally all that Germans could
afford, given the pov erty o f the coun try and the high price o f books.
Hence this oral and disorderly m ode o f imparting information remained
standard th rou gh the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. J. M . Gesner,
F. A . W o lf, and Au gust B ock h, no w remembered as the reformers o f
classical scholarship and teaching, offered to students who had never
seen the boo ks in question exactly this traditional form o f schematic
bibliogra phical co m m ent— and found auditors lo yal en ough to copy
out and publish what they had to say.34 In this and other respects the
polyhistors laid the foundations o f the new historical curriculum that
replaced theirs— and that is often seen, unfairly, as the antithesis o f all
that they held dear.35
W e find it easier to laugh at the p olyhistors than to understand them .
O u r ideal o f scholarship is no longer encapsulated b y M o rh o f’s hero
Julius Caesar Bottifanga, w h o k ne w all the arts and sciences, played —
and built— all the musical instruments, and embroidered m ore d eftly
than any w om an .36 W e find it easy to see that Peter Lam beck c ould
never h ave finished the w or k a sketch o f wh ich he published in the
1650s:
A literary history, containing a general narrative o f the origin, rise, transfor-
mation, fall, and restoration o f all the languages, sciences, faculties, and liberal
arts, in chronological order through all the centuries, with a special account
of famous men and women.37
Y e t w e should not m ock the polyhistors w it hout acknow ledgin g their
merits. Their broad interests did not lead only to chaotic or superficial
w ork . In history , fo r example, th ey en larged both the range o f subjects
34. For a late specimen o f this literature see A. Bo ckh, Encyklopadie und Methodologie
der philologischen Wissensthafien, ed. E Bratuschcck (Leipzig, 1877).
35. C f. A . Grafton, “ Polyhistor into Philolog . . . ,” History o f Universities 3 (1983):
159 92
36. Morhof, Polyhistor, 1:2.
37. Ibid., 10.
Anthony Grafton 41
8/9/2019 Anthony Grafton - The world of the polyhistors
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/anthony-grafton-the-world-of-the-polyhistors 12/17
and the range o f nations that the discipline studied. Universal history as
treated by sixteenthcentury teachers had confined itself to a political
narrative o f the fortunes o f the four biblical monarchies. But universal
history as treated by Georg Homius in his Area Noae included Egyp-
tians, Chinese and American Indians as well as Assyrians, Greeks and
Romans, and dealt at length with religious ritual, literature, and art as
well as w ith the deeds and deaths o f kings. The result was a history
curriculum far richer than anything a Renaissance university had pro-
vided. Hom ius’s w ork lacked the sharp concentration on d rawing m oral
and political lessons from the past that had given shape to late Renais-
sance historiography. But in its cosmopolitan breadth and richness it
look ed forw ard to the innovative historical school o f eighteenthcen-
tury Gottingen.38
T he general borders o f the coun try that the polyhistors inhabited are
now clear. T h ey were citizens less o f a terrestrial Em pire than o f an
imaginary Republic— the Respublica litterarum. Th ey w ere m ore at home
in its artificially preserved Latin than in their native German. They
prized the alba amicorum and letters from distinguished strangers that
were its badges o f citizenship as highly as their local distinctions. And
their desperate efforts to preserve its traditions o f universal curiosity and
eloquent rhetoric linked them to spiritual compatriots throughout Eu-
rope. In Scotland and Poland, Holland and Italy, many intellectuals
resisted the transformation o f the Latinspeaking Respublica litterarum
into a Frenchspeaking Republique des lettres, the turn from a humanism
bou nd to the past to a philoso phy intent u pon the future. Th ey kept one
another informed o f literary and scientific news by the oldfashioned
means o f formal Latin correspondence; they helped one another gain
access to the old materials from wh ich n ew wo rks o f erudition were to
be constructed; they form ed societies to distribute the best new Latin
books from northern Europe in the south, and vice versa. The Germans
w ho shared these tastes and interests saw themselves as threatened by the
ne w French ideal o f the cultivated but unscholarly honnete homme. But
they did not stand alone against the French. M agliabech i and Muratori,
Burman and Ruddiman shared their tastes and interests.
The problems that remain are easy to state i f difficult to answer. H ow
far were German polyhistors peculiarly German? An d h ow far did they
38. G. Homius, Area Node (Leiden and Rotterdam, 1666); see Klempt, Die Sakuhrisie
rung, pt. II, chap. C; E. Hassinger, Empmsdtrationaler Historismus (Bern and Munich,
1978), 12736, offers important qualifications, but is a trifle too ungenerous.
42 The World o f the Polyhistors
8/9/2019 Anthony Grafton - The world of the polyhistors
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/anthony-grafton-the-world-of-the-polyhistors 13/17
— could they— respond to the challenge o f the N ew Philosophy by
updating their own tools and interests?
T h e best w a y to answer the first question is to exc hange the telescopic
lens w e have been using for a microsco pic one. A single case study in
Polyhistorie will add some color, relief, and detail to our outline map.
A nd a singu larly curious specimen is available to be its object: Conrad
Samuel Schurzfleisch (16411708), the mo st distinguished W itten be rg
professor o f the generation after the Th irty Years’ W ar . Schurzfleisch
deserves attention less for the lasting distinction o f his thou gh t than for
the richness o f the evidence he left behind and the vividness wit h w hich
it reveals the impact o f Kleinstaat habits o f life and thou ght on a cosmo-
politan and idealistic man. W e have several hundred pages o f his letters,
several hundred mo re o f his Latin orations, and tw o collections o f
his informal lectures on general literature— one euphonious ly entitled
Schurzfleischiana, and uneuphoniously couched in a hideous m ixture o f
Latin and Germa n that bears the clear hallmark o f informal delivery .
Taken together, these enable us to see the polyhistor, as it were, in his
shirtsleeves— and thus to identify som e hig hly localized elements in a
cosmopolitan style o f life and thought.
In many respects, to be sure, Schurzfleisch was a traditional figure
whose duplicates could be found across Europe. H e lo ved to whip his
Latin rhetoric up to a fine frenzy o f highsou nding phrases quite devo id
o f sense:
[Frisia (he wrote to a young lady whose Latin prose and German modesty he
admired)]: You have joined the ranks o f the learned Heroides . . . You have
imitated the imperial virago Alexia Comnena. You have equalled Hroswitha,once the ornament o f all Saxony. Y ou have vanquished the rest, or at least
made the decision a close one. There w as nothing left for you save to transfer
those incomparable virtues to the wedding bed, and spread [them] among
your children and grandchildren . . ,39
H e took pride in his mastery o f the traditional but taxing craft o f
w rit in g pure Latin: “ I w ould find it difficult to maintain a consistent
style had I not w ork ed hard at it wh en I was y ou ng .” 40 H e ga ve his
students careful instruction in the avoidance o f solecisms— even thosethat had the sanction o f great humanist names behind them: “ A m on g
39. C . S. Schurzfleisch, Orationes pcmegyricae et allocutiones uarii argumenti (Wittenberg,
1697), 1:126.
40. Schurzfleischiana, 213.
Anthony Grafton 43
8/9/2019 Anthony Grafton - The world of the polyhistors
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/anthony-grafton-the-world-of-the-polyhistors 14/17
word s w e must distinguish those that are Roman from those that are
used in a Roman way . . . they commonly say that deputare someone
means the same as delegare, abschicken; even de T hou used it in this sense,
‘He was deputatus by him ,’ when the Latin w ay to say it is ‘delegatus.’ For
example, i f our academy sends someone to Dres den . . . , then don’t say,
he was deputatus, but he was delegatus.” 41 He agonized over those appar-
ent correspondences between vernacular and Latin words that often trap
students o f composition. N o student o f Schurzfleisch’s left W ittenberg
thinking that Latin circulus was the proper term for a Kreis o f the Holy
Roman Empire.42
Schurzfleisch treated the pursuit o f Latin eloquence as an enterprise
whose moral w orth was too obvious to need defense, and whose prac-
tical value was enormous. Its possessor could win high position and
w id e reputation in the m an y parts o f Europe where really good meta-
phors still mattered:
In Germany the humanities are taken very seriously, as in Sweden and Den-
mark. I praise the King o f France too. The Saxon court is especially dextrous
in German style, and has men highly skilled in Latin style as well. This theyesteem highly in the (Saxon) court at Weimar. Even in Vienna they pick up
Latin and German writings from our Elector like a Gospel, and they say
there, “ Herr Secretair, lemts auch”— “ Mr Secretary, you too should learn
how to do this.”43
Schurzfleisch looked back to the happy days before his time, when
really great scholars like Scaliger and Casaubon had flourished, as super-
ior to his own time in learning and literacy. He deeply admired the
earlier humanists’ ready w it and comm and o f Latin: T his was w hat hadenabled Frischlin to cap a faltering Latinist’s effort at extemporaneous
verse address, “ Tu, Frischline, vates” with the perfect complem ent—
“ T u m ihi lambe nates.” “ He was so witt y,” Schurzfleisch sighed. Y et he
saw no reason to think that the earlier humanists’ values and interests
need be abandoned. N o one had told him that the age o f Latin eloquence
was over.
Schurzfleisch’s curiosity was as boundless as his definition o f correct
Latin was strict. H e read with pleasure the great compendia o f seven-teenthcentury lore like Bochart’s Phaleg et Canaan and Huet’s Demon-
strate evangelica. He discussed for his students questions as varied as the
41. Ibid., 207.
42. Ibid., 151.
43. Ibid., 221.
44 The World of the Polyhistors
8/9/2019 Anthony Grafton - The world of the polyhistors
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/anthony-grafton-the-world-of-the-polyhistors 15/17
dating o f m edieval diplomas and the proba bility that men had drunk
w in e before the f lo od. H e to ok as m uch interest in Leibniz ’s discoveries
in algebra as he did in Scaliger’s principles o f ch ron olog y. H e m et even
the most bumptious manifestos o f the N ew Philosophy w ith calm
charity, assimilating the new data and methods that they offered and
igno ring or rejecting their critique o f the aggregate o f oldfashioned
scholarly disciplines w ith w hic h he occupied h imself. N o passage in
seventeenthcentury literature is a more memorable assault on human-
ism than the early sections o f Descartes’ Discourse on Method, in which
w e learn that the study o f rhetoric, history , and traditional philoso phy
had served o nly to teach Descartes the limitations o f his range o f expe-
rience and the bankru ptcy o f the traditional curriculum . N o reaction to
Descartes could seem more bizarre than Schurzfleisch’s:
I tell all students to concentrate on that study for which they feel a special
aptitude . . . Thus Descartes began as a rhetorician, but, ceasing to make
progress, applied his mind to the study o f physics.44
Schurzfleisch’s ver y calmness— his willingness to accept the ne w Carte-
sian science without becoming hysterical about the challenge it posedhim— marks him out a German, for wh om the N ew Philosophy meant
the renovation, no t the destruction, o f the old encyclopedia.
A less pleasing set o f stigmata is also visible on closer inspection.
Schurzfleisch and his brethren w ere after all men o f the Germ an Klein
staat, their vision o f the world narrowed b y a cramped and ossified
Protestantism. T he tolerance they sho wed fo r philosophical speculation
did n ot extend to matters o f m orality and behavior. A nd that explains
w h y even the broadm inded classicist Schurzfleisch could not recom -
mend all the classics to his pupils wit h an easy m ind. He felt impelled to
w arn them that
Tibullus wrote a pretty elegy, and purely, but with too many foulnesses
mixed in; but Catullus is an archpig and buffoon, w ho offers wagonloads o f
obscenities for sale 45
True , he w as no t so intolerant o f all the controversial pagans. H e carried
his Epicurus w ith him everyw here, finding him a rewarding and spiri-tual philosopher.46 But when sex became the topic Schurzfleisch shud-
dered and withdrew . This lover o f go od Latin found o nly one justifica
44. Ibid., 157.
45. Ibid., 18182.
46. Ibid., 180.
Anthony Grafton 45
8/9/2019 Anthony Grafton - The world of the polyhistors
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/anthony-grafton-the-world-of-the-polyhistors 16/17
tion for the study o f Catullus— “ one can learn from him the m any
rituals o f the ancients.” 47 A n d this pedantic wa rn ing in turn warns us
no t to overestimate the hum anity and openmindedness o f the polyhis-
tors. On social and sexual matters they were as smallminded as their
neighbors— and thus goo d citizens o f the old Emp ire.
This map o f the polyhistors’ w orld must remain sketchy and incom -
plete. To perfect it we would need to weave synchronic threads that do
no t no w exist across the diachronic ones that w e have traced here— to
sho w h o w individual sectors o f the polyhistors’ culture shifted ov er time
and across distances. It would be most revealing, for example, to draw
the co m plex and jag ge d path b y w hich the discipline o f hermeneutics
evolved from the time o f M artin Luther to that o f Johann Salomo
Sender tw o centuries later. This w ou ld reveal ho w German professors
o f biblical interpretation cou ld teach, in the sixteenth century, that the
central message o f the Bible w as to b e found in the teachings o f a few
select books, while the rest were to be played down or even excised
from the corpus; in the seventeenth cen tury, that the central message o f
the Bible was to be found in every book, every word, and every mark
o f punctuation in the O ld T estament as we ll as the N ew ; in the eigh-
teenth century, that each bo ok o f the Bib le had been written fo r a
specific audience and must be in interpreted in accordance with the
values, beliefs, and assumptions o f its orig in al readers.48 M od em ac-
counts hardly sug gest the richness o f the polyh istors’ w o rk in this central
field— far less the diversity o f their conclusions. Y e t a final assessment o f
their w or k must take account o f changes as radical as these in h a lf a
dozen other fields as well, from classical philology to music.49 Perhaps
that is enough to sho w that m uch m ore exp loration is still needed in the
regions we have travelled through so rapidly.
In the end, we may well share Mencke’s amusement at his prede-
cessors. W e cannot fail to see the com ic side o f m en like
Johann Seger, rector o f the University o f Wittenberg and imperial poet
laureate. He had an engraving made on copper, showing the crucified Christ
in the background and himself in front. From his lips came the words “ Lord
47. Ibid., 182.48. See in general Homig, Die Anfange der historischkritischen Theologie; O. Merk,
“ An fan ge neutestamendicher Wissenschaft im 18. Jahrhundert,” Hislorische Kr ilik in der
Theologie: Beilrage zu ihrer Ceschichte, ed. G. Schwaiger (Gottingen, 1980), 3759.
49. C f. W . Jens’s interesting remarks on the strange evolution o f legal thought in
Tubingen, Eine deutsche UniversildU 500 Jahre Tubinger Gelehrtenrepublik, 2d ed. (Munich,
1981), chap. 6.
46 The World of the Polyhistors
8/9/2019 Anthony Grafton - The world of the polyhistors
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/anthony-grafton-the-world-of-the-polyhistors 17/17
Jesus, do yo u love me?” , and from the lips o f Jesus came the answer “ Yes,
most eminent, excellent and learned Master Seger, imperial poet laureate and
w orth y rector o f W ittenberg, I do lo ve you.” 50
Y e t w e should n o t assume th at M en cke is te ll in g th e w h o le sto ry. A fter
all, it w ill go hard w ith o ur m em ory i f historians tw o centuries from
n o w rely solely upon ou r critics. If w e can muster energy, sym pathy,
and a willingness to read som e unprom ising sources, w e can find as
m uch that is solid as is funn y in the w or ld o f the polyhistors. Schurz-
fleisch h imself w ou ld have had enough o f a sense o f hum or and se lf-
m oc ke ry to find that an appropriate epitaph, for h im self and for his
culture.
Anthony Grafton 47
50. Mencke, Charlatanry o f the Learned, 64. For a w itty and vivid account o f the be-
hav ior o f the real polyhistors, see Jens, Eine deutsche Universitdt , chaps. 28.