76
Naval Postgraduate School Distance Learning Antennas & Propagation LECTURE NOTES VOLUME II BASIC ANTENNA PARAMETERS AND WIRE ANTENNAS by Professor David Jenn PROPAGATION DIRECTION H r E r l k ˆ ANTENNA (ver 1.3)

Antenna parameters

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Antenna parameters

Naval Postgraduate School Distance Learning

Antennas & Propagation

LECTURE NOTESVOLUME II

BASIC ANTENNA PARAMETERS AND WIREANTENNAS

by Professor David Jenn

PROPAGATION DIRECTION

Hr

Er λ

k

ANTENNA

(ver 1.3)

Page 2: Antenna parameters

1

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Antennas: Introductory Comments

Classification of antennas by size:

Let l be the antenna dimension:

1. electrically small, l << λ : primarily used at low frequencies where the wavelengthis long

2. resonant antennas, l ≈ λ / 2: most efficient; examples are slots, dipoles, patches3. electrically large, l >> λ : can be composed of many individual resonant

antennas; good for radar applications (high gain, narrow beam, low sidelobes)

Classification of antennas by type:

1. reflectors2. lenses3. arrays

Other designations: wire antennas, aperture antennas, broadband antennas

Page 3: Antenna parameters

2

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Radiation Integrals (1)

Consider a perfect electric conductor (PEC) with an electric surface current flowing on S.In the case where the conductor is part of an antenna (a dipole), the current may be causedby an applied voltage, or by an incident field from another source (a reflector). Theobservation point is denoted by P and is given in terms of unprimed coordinate variables.Quantities associated with source points are designated by primes. We can use anycoordinate system that is convenient for the particular problem at hand.

),,( zyxJ s ′′′r

x

y

z),,(or ),,( φθrPzyxP

rr′

rr

rrRrrr′−=

PEC WITHSURFACE CURRENT

OBSERVATIONPOINT

( ) ( ) ( )222 zzyyxxRR ′−+′−+′−==r

S

O

The medium is almost always free space ( oo εµ , ), but we continue to use ( εµ, ) to covermore general problems. If the currents are known, then the field due to the currents can bedetermined by integration over the surface.

Page 4: Antenna parameters

3

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Radiation Integrals (2)

The vector wave equation for the electric field can be obtained by taking the curl ofMaxwell’s first equation:

sJjEkErrr

ωµ−=×∇×∇ 2

A solution for Er

in terms of the magnetic vector potential )(rA rr is given by

( )ωµε

ωj

rArAjrE

)()()(

rrrrrr •∇∇

+−= (1)

where )(rr is a shorthand notation for (x,y,z) and sdeRJ

rA jkR

S

s ′= −∫∫rrr

πµ

4)(

We are particularly interested in thecase were the observation point is in thefar zone of the antenna ( ∞→P ). As Precedes to infinity, the vectors rr and R

rbecome parallel.

x

y

z

rr′

rr

OBSERVATIONPOINT

( )rrrrR ˆˆ •′−≈rrr

rr ˆ•′r

Page 5: Antenna parameters

4

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Radiation Integrals (3)

In the expression for )(rA rr we use the approximation rR /1/1 ≈ in the denominator and

( )[ ]rrrrrRr ˆˆˆˆ ••• ′−≈ rrr in the exponent. Equation (2) becomes

( )[ ] ( ) sdeJer

sdeJr

rA rrjk

Ss

jkrrrrrrjk

Ss ′=′≈ •′−•′−•− ∫∫∫∫ ˆˆˆˆ

44)(

rrr rrrrπµ

πµ

When this is inserted into equation (1), the del operations on the second term lead to 2/1 rand 3/1 r terms, which can be neglected in comparison to the Aj

rω− term, which depends

only on r/1 . Therefore, in the far field,

( ) sdeJer

jrE rrjk

Ss

jkr ′−≈ •′− ∫∫ ˆ

4)(

rrrrπωµ

(discard the rE component) (3)

Explicitly removing the r component gives,

( )[ ] ( ) sdeJrJer

jkrE rrjk

S

rssjkr ′−

−≈ •′•− ∫∫ ˆˆˆ

4)(

rrrrrπ

η

The radial component of current does not contribute to the field in the far zone.

Page 6: Antenna parameters

5

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Radiation Integrals (4)

Notice that the fields have a spherical wave behavior in the far zone: r

eE

jkr−~

r. The

spherical components of the field can be found by the appropriate dot products with Er

.More general forms of the radiation integrals that include magnetic surface currents ( msJ

r)

are:

∫∫ ′

+

−= ⋅′•

•−

S

rrkjmss

jkr sdeJ

Jer

kjrE ˆˆ

ˆ4

),,(rrr

ηφ

θπ

ηφθθ

∫∫ ′

−= ⋅′•

•−

S

rrkjmss

jkr sdeJ

Jer

kjrE ˆˆ

ˆ4

),,(rrr

ηθ

φπ

ηφθφ

The radiation integrals apply to an unbounded medium. For antenna problemsthe following process is used:

1. find the current on the antenna surface, S,2. remove the antenna materials and assume that the currents are suspended

in the unbounded medium, and3. apply the radiation integrals.

Page 7: Antenna parameters

6

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Hertzian Dipole (1)

Perhaps the simplest application of the radiation integral is the calculation of the fields ofan infinitesimally short dipole (also called a Hertzian dipole). Note that the criterion forshort means much less than a wavelength, which is not necessarily physically short.

zJzJ os ˆ),,( =′′′ φρr

a2

l

z

x

ya=′ρ

φ ′

z′

• For a thin dipole (radius, λ<<a ) thesurface current distribution is independentof φ ′. The current crossing a ring aroundthe antenna is aJI s π2

A/m

r=

• For a thin short dipole ( λ<<l ) we assumethat the current is constant and flows alongthe center of the wire; it is a filament ofzero diameter. The two-dimensionalintegral over S becomes a one-dimensionalintegral over the length,

∫∫ ∫ ′→′S L

s dIasdJ lrrπ2

Page 8: Antenna parameters

7

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Hertzian Dipole (2)

Using zzr ′=′ ˆr and θφθφθ cosˆsinsinˆcossinˆˆ zyxr ++= gives θcosˆ zrr ′=′ •

r . Theradiation integral for the electric field becomes

( ) ∫∫ ′−=′−

≈ ′−−

•′ll

rrr

00

ˆ cos4

ˆˆ

4),,( zde

rzIjk

zdzIer

jkrE zjkejkrejkr

ld

rrjk θπη

πη

φθ

However, because l is very short, 0→′zk and 1cos ≈′ θzjke . Therefore,

( ) jkrjkr er

zIjkzde

rzIjk

rE −− −=′−

≈ ∫ πη

πη

φθ4

ˆ1

),,(0

lr l

leading to the spherical field components

0ˆ4

sin4

ˆˆˆ

==

=

−≈=

−••

EE

er

Ijk

er

zIjkEE

jkr

jkr

rl

lr

φπ

θηπ

θηθ

φ

θ

x y

z

lz′

SHORT CURRENTFILAMENT

Page 9: Antenna parameters

8

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Hertzian Dipole (3)

Note that the electric field has only a 1/r dependence. The absence of higher order termsis due to the fact that the dipole is infinitesimal, and therefore 0→ffr . The field is aspherical wave and hence the TEM relationship can be used to find the magnetic fieldintensity

jkrer

jkIErEkH −= =

××=

πθ

φη

θη

θ

4sinˆˆˆˆˆ lr

The time-averaged Poynting vector is

rr

IkrHEHEW ˆ

32

sinˆ

21ˆ

21

22

2222**

avπ

θηφθ

lrr=ℜ=×ℜ=

The power flow is outward from the source, as expected for a spherical wave. Theaverage power flowing through the surface of a sphere of radius r surrounding the sourceis

πη

φθθθπ

η

π

π ππ π

12sinˆˆsin

32ˆ

222

3/8

22

0 0

222

2222

0 0avrad

l

44444 344444 21

lr Ikddrrr

r

IkdsnWP ===

=

•• ∫ ∫∫ ∫ W

Page 10: Antenna parameters

9

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Solid Angles and Steradians

Plane angles: s = Rθ , if s = R then θ =1 radian

R

θ

ARC LENGTH

s

Solid angles: Ω = A / R2 , if A = R2, then Ω =1 steradian

SURFACE AREA

ARΩ = A / R2

Page 11: Antenna parameters

10

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Directivity and Gain (1)

The radiation intensity is defined as

av2

av2rad ˆ),( WrWrr

ddP

Urr

==Ω

= •φθ

and has units of Watts/steradian (W/sr). The directivity function or directive gain isdefined as

rad

2

rad

rad av4)4/(

/angle solidunit per radiatedpower average

angle solidunit per radiatedpower ),(

P

Wr

PddP

D

πφθ =

Ω==

For the Hertzian dipole,

θ

πη

π

θη

ππφθ 2222

22

22222

rad

2

sin23

12

32

sin

44),( av ===l

lr

Ik

r

Ikr

P

WrD

The directivity is the maximum value of the directive gain

23

),(),( maxmaxmax === φθφθ DDDo

Page 12: Antenna parameters

11

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Dipole Polar Radiation Plots

Half of the radiation pattern of the dipole is plotted below for a fixed value of φ . The half-power beamwidth (HPBW) is the angular width between the half power points (1/ 2below the maximum on the voltage plot, or –3dB below the maximum on the decibel plot).

0.5

1

1.5

30

210

60

240

90

270

120

300

150

330

180 0

-20

-10

0

10

30

210

60

240

90

270

120

300

150

330

180 0

-20

-10

0

10

30

210

60

240

90

270

120

300

150

330

180 0

-20

-10

0

10

30

210

60

240

90

270

120

300

150

330

180 0

FIELD (VOLTAGE) PLOT DECIBEL PLOT

θ θ

The half power beamwidth of the Hertzian dipole, Bθ :

( ) oo 90245707.0sinsin~ HPHPHPnorm ==⇒=⇒=⇒ θθθθθ BE

Page 13: Antenna parameters

12

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Dipole Radiation Pattern

Radiation pattern of a Hertzian dipole aligned with the z axis. Dn is the normalizeddirectivity. The directivity value is proportional to the distance from the center.

Page 14: Antenna parameters

13

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Directivity and Gain (2)

Another formula for directive gain is

2norm ),(

4),( φθ

πφθ ED

A

=

where AΩ is the beam solid angle

φθθφθπ π

ddEA sin),(2

norm

2

0 0

r∫ ∫=Ω

and ),(norm φθEr

is the normalized magnitude of the electric field pattern (i.e., thenormalized radiation pattern)

),,(

),,(),(

maxnorm

φθ

φθφθ

rE

rEE r

rr=

Note that both the numerator and denominator have the same 1/r dependence, and hencethe ratio is independent of r. This approach is often more convenient because most of ourcalculations will be conducted directly with the electric field. Normalization removes allof the cumbersome constants.

Page 15: Antenna parameters

14

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Directivity and Gain (3)

As an illustration, we re-compute the directivity of a Hertzian dipole. Noting that themaximum magnitude of the electric field is occurs when 2/πθ = , the normalized electricfield intensity is simply

θφθ sin),(norm =Er

The beam solid angle is

38

sin2

sin),(

3/4

0

3

2norm

2

0 0

πθθπ

φθθφθ

π

π π

==

=

∫ ∫

43421

r

d

ddEA

and from the definition of directivity,

θθππ

φθπ

φθ 222norm sin

23

sin3/8

4),(

4),( ==

Ω= ED

A

r

which agrees with the previous result.

Page 16: Antenna parameters

15

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Example

Find the directivity of an antenna whose far-electric field is given by

2

4

6

8

10

30

210

60

240

90

270

120

300

150

330

180 0

≤≤

≤≤= −

oo

oo

18090,cos

900,cos10

),,(θθ

θθφθθ

re

re

rE jkr

jkr

The maximum electric field occurs when rE /101cos max =→=r

θ . The normalizedelectric field intensity is

≤≤

≤≤= oo

oo

18090,cos1.0

900,cos),(

norm θθ

θθφθθE

which gives a beam solid angle of

)1.1(3

2sincos01.0sincos 2

2

0 2/

22

0

2/

0

πφθθθφθθθ

π π

π

π π=+=Ω ∫ ∫∫ ∫ ddddA

and a directivity of 37.745.5 ==oD dB.

Page 17: Antenna parameters

16

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Beam Solid Angle and Radiated Power

In the far field the radiated power is

radrad2

2

0 0

22

0 0

*rad 2sin

21

ˆ21

rad/2

PFddrEdsrHEP

FE

ηφθθη

π ππ π

η

=⇒=×ℜ=

∫ ∫∫ ∫

4444 34444 21

rrr44 344 21

r

From the definition of beam solid angle

22maxrad

222

0 022

max

2norm

2

0 0

rad

sin1

sin),(

rEFddrErE

ddE

A

F

A

r

4444 34444 21

rr

r

Ω=⇒==

∫ ∫

∫ ∫

φθθ

φθθφθ

π π

π π

Equate the expressions for radF

η2

22max

radrE

PA

=

Page 18: Antenna parameters

17

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Gain vs. Directivity (1)

Directivity is defined with respect to the radiated power, radP . This could be less than thepower into the antenna if the antenna has losses. The gain is referenced to the power intothe antenna, inP .

inPincP

refP aRlR

ANTENNAI

Define the following:

=incP power incident on the antenna terminals=refP power reflected at the antenna input

=inP power into the antenna

=lossP power loss in the antenna (dissipated in resistor ll RIPR 221

loss, = )

=radP power radiated (delivered to resistor aa RIPR 221

rad, = , aR is the radiation

resistance)

The antenna efficiency, e, is inrad ePP = where 10 ≤≤ e .

Page 19: Antenna parameters

18

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Gain vs. Directivity (2)

Gain is defined as

),(//

4)4/(

/),(

rad

rad

in

rad φθππ

φθ eDePddP

PddP

G =Ω

=

Most often the use of the term gain refers to the maximum value of ),( φθG .

Example: The antenna input resistance is 50 ohms, of which 40 ohms is radiationresistance and 10 ohms is ohmic loss. The input current is 0.1 A and the directivity of theantenna is 2.

The input power is 25.0)50(1.0 221

in2

21

in === RIP W

The power dissipated in the antenna is 05.0)10(1.0 2212

21

loss === lRIP W

The power radiated into space is 2.0)40(1.0 2212

21

rad === aRIP W

If the directivity is 2=oD then the gain is 6.1)2(25.02.0

in

rad =

=

== D

PP

eDG

Page 20: Antenna parameters

19

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Azimuth/Elevation Coordinate System

Radars frequently use the azimuth/elevation coordinate system: (Az,El) or (α ,γ ) or( ae φθ , ). The antenna is located at the origin of the coordinate system; the earth's surfacelies in the x-y plane. Azimuth is generally measured clockwise from a reference (like acompass) but the spherical system azimuth angle φ is measured counterclockwise from thex axis. Therefore α = 360− φ and γ = 90 −θ degrees.

CONSTANT ELEVATION

x

y

z

θ

φγ

ZENITH

HORIZON

P

α

r

Page 21: Antenna parameters

20

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Approximate Directivity Formula (1)

Assume the antenna radiation pattern is a “pencil beam” on the horizon. The pattern isconstant inside of the elevation and azimuth half power beamwidths ( ae φθ , ) respectively:

x

y

z

aφeθ

2/0πθ

φ==

0=θ

Page 22: Antenna parameters

21

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Approximate Directivity Formula (2)

Approximate antenna pattern

( ) ( )

≤≤−+≤≤−=−

else ,0

2/2/ and 2/2/2/2/,ˆ),( aaee

jkro

reE

E φφφθπθθπθφθr

The beam solid angle is

( ) ( )[ ][ ] eaeea

eea

A dd

e

e

a

a

θφθθφθθφ

φθθ

θπ

θπ

φ

φ

=−−≈−−=

=Ω≈

∫ ∫+

− −

)2/(2/2/sin2/sin

sin1

22

22

2

2

This leads to an approximation for the directivity of aeA

oDφθππ 44

= . Note that the

angles are in radians. This formula is often used to estimate the directivity of an omni-directional antenna with negligible sidelobes.

Page 23: Antenna parameters

22

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Thin Wire Antennas (1)

Thin wire antennas satisfy the condition λ<<a . If the length of the wire (l ) is an integermultiple of a half wavelength, we can make an “educated guess” at the current based onan open circuited two-wire transmission line

OPENCIRCUIT

I(z)

zλ / 4

FEED POINTS

2/λ

For other multiples of a half wavelength the current distribution has the following features

l = λ / 2 l = λ

l = 3λ / 2

FEED POINTLOCATED ATMAXIMUM

CURRENT GOESTO ZERO AT END

Page 24: Antenna parameters

23

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Thin Wire Antennas (2)

On a half-wave dipole the current can be approximated by

)cos()( kzIzI o= for 4/4/ λλ <<− z

Using this current in the radiation integral

′−

′−

′′−=

′′−=

4/

4/

cos

4/

4/

cos

)cos(ˆ4

)cos(ˆ4

),,(

λ

λ

θ

λ

λ

θ

πη

πη

φθ

zdezkzerIjk

zdezkIzer

jkrE

zjkjkro

zjko

jkrr

From a table of integrals we find that

22

10

][ )(sin)cos()cos(

BA

zBBzBAezdezB

zAzA

+

′+′=′′

±==′

′∫

4847648476

where θcosjkA = and kB = , so that θθ 2222222 sincos kkkBA =+−=+ . The θcomponent requires the dot product θθ sinˆˆ −=•z .

Page 25: Antenna parameters

24

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Thin Wire Antennas (3)

Evaluating the limits gives

θ

θπ

πη

θθ

πη

θ

θπθπ

θ

π

sin

cos2

cos

2sin

)1(sin

4 22

coscos2

2/cos2/cos ][2

=−−

= −

−− jkro

jjjkro e

rIj

k

eeke

rIjk

E

44444 844444 76

The magnetic field intensity in the far field is

φθ

θπ

πφ

η φ

θ ˆsin

cos2

cos

ˆ

==×

= − jkro er

jIHEEk

Hrr

The directivity is computed from the beam solid angle, which requires the normalizedelectric field intensity

( )2

22

max

22

normsin

coscos

θ

θπ

θ

θ ==E

EEr

Page 26: Antenna parameters

25

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Thin Wire Antennas (4)

( ) ( ))218.1)(2(

ynumericall Integrate

sin

2/coscos2sin

sin

2/coscos2 2

2

02

2

0

πθθ

θππθθ

θ

θππ

ππ

===Ω ∫∫4444 34444 21ddA

The directive gain is

( ) ( )θ

θ

θ

θ

ππ

φθπ

ππ

22

2

22

22

normsin

coscos64.1

sin

coscos

)218.1)(2(4

),(4

==Ω

= EDA

r

The radiated power is

aoooA

RIIr

rIrEP 22

2

22222

rad 21

57.36)2(2

)218.1(22

max ≡==Ω

=πη

ηπη

θ

where aR is the radiation resistance of the dipole. The radiated power can be viewed asthe power delivered to resistor that represents “free space.” For the half-wave dipole theradiation resistance is

13.73)57.36)(2(2

2rad ===

oa

I

PR ohms

Page 27: Antenna parameters

26

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Numerical Integration (1)

The rectangular rule is a simple way of evaluating an integral numerically. The area underthe curve of )( xf is approximated by a sum of rectangular areas of width ∆ and height

)( nxf , where anxn +−+= ∆ )1(2

is the center of the interval nth interval. Therefore, if

all of the rectangles are of equal width

∑≈∫ ∆b

an

b

a

xfdxxf )()(

Clearly the approximation can be made as close to the exact value as desired by reducingthe width of the triangles as necessary. However, to keep computation time to a minimum,only the smallest number of rectangles that provides a converged solution should be used.

x

f ( x)

ba

L

1

2 3

4

N

1x 2x Nx•• •

Page 28: Antenna parameters

27

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Numerical Integration (2)

Example: Matlab programs to integrate ( )

θθ

θππ

dsin

2/coscos2

0∫

Sample Matlab code for the rectangular rule% integrate dipole pattern using the rectangular ruleclearrad=pi/180;% avoid 0 by changing the limits slightlya=.001; b=pi-.001;N=5delta=(b-a)/N;sum=0;for n=1:N

theta=delta/2+(n-1)*delta;sum=sum+cos(pi*cos(theta)/2)^2/sin(theta);

endI=sum*delta

Convergence: N=5, 1.2175; N=10, 1.2187; N=50, 1.2188. Sample Matlab code using thequad8 function

% integrate to find half wave dipole solid angleclearI=quad8('cint',0.0001,pi-.0001,.00001);disp(['cint integral, I: ',num2str(I)])

function P=cint(T)% function to be integratedP=(cos(pi*cos(T)/2).^2)./sin(T);

Page 29: Antenna parameters

28

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Thin Wires of Arbitrary Length

For a thin-wire antenna of length l along the z axis, the electric field intensity is

= −

θ

θ

πη

θ sin2

coscos2

cos

2

ll kk

erIj

E jkr

Example: λ5.1=l (left: voltage plot; right: decibel plot)

1

2

30

210

60

240

90

270

120

300

150

330

180 0

-20

-10

0

10

30

210

60

240

90

270

120

300

150

330

180 0

-20

-10

0

10

30

210

60

240

90

270

120

300

150

330

180 0

-20

-10

0

10

30

210

60

240

90

270

120

300

150

330

180 0

Page 30: Antenna parameters

29

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Feeding and Tuning Wire Antennas (1)

When an antenna terminates a transmission line, as shown below, the antenna impedance( aZ ) should be matched to the transmission line impedance ( oZ ) to maximize the powerdelivered to the antenna

oZ aZoa

oa

ZZZZ

+−

=Γ and Γ−Γ+

=11

VSWR

The antenna’s input impedance is generally a complex quantity, ( ) aaa jXRRZ ++= l .The approach for matching the antenna and increasing its efficiency is

1. minimize the ohmic loss, 0→lR2. “tune out” the reactance by adjusting the antenna geometry or adding lumped

elements, 0→aX (resonance occurs when aZ is real)3. match the radiation resistance to the characteristic impedance of the line by

adjusting the antenna parameters or using a transformer section, oa ZR →

Page 31: Antenna parameters

30

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Feeding and Tuning Wire Antennas (2)

Example: A half-wave dipole is fed by a 50 ohm line

1870.050735073

=+−

=+−

=Γoa

oa

ZZZZ

46.111

VSWR =Γ−Γ+

=

The loss due to reflection at the antenna terminals is

965.01 22 =Γ−=τ

( ) 155.0log10 2 −=τ dB

which is stated as “0.155 dB of reflection loss” (the negative sign is implied by using theword “loss”).

Page 32: Antenna parameters

31

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Feeding and Tuning Wire Antennas (3)

The antenna impedance is affected by1. length2. thickness3. shape4. feed point (location and method of feeding)5. end loading

Although all of these parameters affect both the real and imaginary parts of aZ , they aregenerally used to remove the reactive part. The remaining real part can be matched usinga transformer section.Another problem is encountered when matching a balanced radiating structure like adipole to an unbalanced transmission line structure like a coax.

gV+

λ /2

COAX

DIPOLE

gV+

−λ / 2

TWO-WIRE LINE

DIPOLE

UNBALANCED FEED BALANCED FEED

Page 33: Antenna parameters

32

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Feeding and Tuning Wire Antennas (4)

If the two structures are not balanced, a return current can flow on the outside of thecoaxial cable. These currents will radiate and modify the pattern of the antenna. Theunbalanced currents can be eliminated using a balun (balanced-to-unbalanced transformer)

UNBALANCED FEED BALANCED FEED

ba VV =ba VV ≠

)(zI

. . ..ba a b

Baluns frequently incorporate chokes, which are circuits designed to “choke off” currentby presenting an open circuit to current waves.

Page 34: Antenna parameters

33

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Feeding and Tuning Wire Antennas (5)

An example of a balun employing a choke is the sleeve or bazooka balun

4/λoZ ′

oZ

1I2I

1I2I

HIGH IMPEDANCE (OPEN CIRCUIT)PREVENTS CURRENT FROM FLOWINGON OUTSIDE

SHORT CIRCUIT

The choke prevents current from flowing on the exterior of the coax. All current isconfined to the inside of surfaces of the coax, and therefore the current flow in the twodirections is equal (balanced) and does not radiate. The integrity of a short circuit is easierto control than that of an open circuit, thus short circuits are used whenever possible.Originally balun referred exclusively to these types of wire feeding circuits, but the termhas evolved to refer to any feed point matching circuit.

Page 35: Antenna parameters

34

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Calculation of Antenna Impedance (1)

The antenna impedance must be matched to that of the feed line. The impedance of anantenna can be measured or computed. Usually measurements are more time consuming(and therefore expensive) relative to computer simulations. However, for a simulation toaccurately include the effect of all of the antenna’s geometrical and electrical parameterson aZ , a fairly complicated analytical model must be used. The resulting equations mustbe solved numerically in most cases.One popular technique is the method of moments (MM) solution of an integral equation(IE) for the current.

gV+

−gE

a2

2/l−

2/l

z

2/b−

2/b

1. )(zI ′ is the unknown current distribution on thewire

2. Find the z component of the electric field interms of )(zI ′ from the radiation integral

3. Apply the boundary condition

Ez (ρ = a) =

0, b /2 ≤ z ≤ l / 2Eg , b /2 ≥ z

in order to obtain an integral equation for )(zI ′

Page 36: Antenna parameters

35

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Calculation of Antenna Impedance (2)

One special form of the integral equation for thin wires is Pocklington’s equation

k2 +

∂2

∂z2

I( ′ z )

e− jkR

4πR−l / 2

l / 2

∫ d ′ z =0, b / 2 ≤ z ≤ l / 2− jωεEg, b / 2 ≥ z

where 22 )( zzaR ′−+= . This is called an integral equation because the unknownquantity )(zI ′ appears in the integrand.

4. Solve the integral equation using the method of moments (MM). First approximate thecurrent by a series with unknown expansion coefficients nI

I( ′ z ) = InΦn( ′ z )n=1

N

The basis functions or expansion functions nΦ are known and selected to suit theparticular problem. We would like to use as few basis functions as possible forcomputational efficiency, yet enough must be used to insure convergence.

Page 37: Antenna parameters

36

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Calculation of Antenna Impedance (3)

Example: a step approximation to the current using a series of pulses. Each segment iscalled a subdomain. Problem: there will be discontinuities between steps.

′ z

I( ′ z )

−l2

l2

I1Φ1

I2Φ2

IN ΦN L L

CURRENT STEP APPROXIMATION

z1 z2 zN0• • • •

A better basis function is the overlapping piecewise sinusoid

′ z

I( ′ z )

−l2

l2

I1Φ1

I2Φ2

INΦN L L

CURRENT PIECEWISESINUSOID

z1 z2 zN0• • •

Page 38: Antenna parameters

37

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Calculation of Antenna Impedance (4)

A piecewise sinusoid extends over two segments (each of length ∆ ) and has a maximum atthe point between the two segment

′ z

Φn( ′ z )

zn)( 1+=

∆+n

nz

z)( 1−=

∆−n

nz

z

Φn( ′ z ) =

′ z − ′ z n−1

′ z n − ′ z n−1, ′ z n−1 ≤ ′ z ≤ ′ z n

′ z n+1 − ′ z ′ z n+1 − ′ z n

, ′ z n ≤ ′ z ≤ ′ z n+1

0, elsewhere

Entire domain functions are alsopossible. Each entire domainbasis function extends over theentire wire. Examples aresinusoids.

′ z

−l2

l2

Φ1

Φ2Φ3

Φn( ′ z )

Page 39: Antenna parameters

38

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Calculation of Antenna Impedance (5)

Solving the integral equation: (1) insert the series back into the integral equation

k2 +

∂2

∂z2

InΦn ( ′ z )

n=1

N

e− jkR

4πR−l / 2

l / 2

∫ d ′ z =0, b / 2 ≤ z ≤ l / 2− jωεEg, b / 2 ≥ z

Note that the derivative is with respect to z (not ′ z ) and therefore the differential operatesonly on R. For convenience we define new functions f and g:

44444 344444 21l

4444444 34444444 21

l

lg

g

N

n

zff

zzjkR

nn zbEjzb

zdzzR

ez

zkI

nn≡

=

→Φ≡

′−

≥−≤≤

=∑

′∫ ′′Φ

∂+ 2/,

2/2/,0),(4

)(1

)()(

2/

2/

),(

2

22

ωεπ

Once Φn is defined, the integral can be evaluated numerically. The result will still be afunction of z, hence the notation )(zfn .(2) Choose a set of N testing (or weighting) functions Χm . Multiply both sides of theequation by each testing function and integrate over the domain of each function ∆ m toobtain N equations of the form

dzzgzdzzfIz

mm

mN

nnnm ∫∫

∆∆ =Χ=∑Χ )()()()(

1, m =1,2,..., N

Page 40: Antenna parameters

39

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Calculation of Antenna Impedance (6)

Interchange the summation and integration operations and define new impedance andvoltage quantities

44 344 21444 3444 21m

mm

V

m

mn

mnm

N

nn dzzgz

Z

dzzfzI ∫∫∑∆∆=

Χ=

Χ )()()()(1

This can be cast into the form of a matrix equation and solved using standard matrixmethods

Inn=1

N

∑ Zmn = Vm → Z[ ] I[ ] = V[ ] → I[ ] = Z[ ]−1 V[ ]

[ ]Z is a square impedance matrix that depends only on the geometry and materialcharacteristics of the dipole. Physically, it is a measure of the interaction between thecurrents on segments m and n. [ ]V is the excitation vector. It depends on the field in thegap and the chosen basis functions. [ ]I is the unknown current coefficient vector.After [ ]I has been determined, the resulting current series can be inserted in the radiationintegral, and the far fields computed by integration of the current.

Page 41: Antenna parameters

40

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Self-Impedance of a Wire Antenna

The method of moments current allows calculation of the self impedance of the antenna bytaking the ratio Zself = Vg / Io

RESISTANCE REACTANCE

Page 42: Antenna parameters

41

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

The Fourier Series Analog to MM

The method of moments is a general solution method that is widely used in all ofengineering. A Fourier series approximation to a periodic time function has the samesolution process as the MM solution for current. Let )(tf be the time waveform

( ) ( )[ ]∑ ++=∞

=1sincos

2)(

nnnnn

o tbtaTT

atf ωω

For simplicity, assume that there is no DC component and that only cosines are necessaryto represent )(tf (true if the waveform has the right symmetry characteristics)

( )∑=∞

=1cos

2)(

nnn ta

Ttf ω

The constants are obtained by multiplying each side by the testing function cos(ωmt) andintegrating over a period

( ) ( ) ( )

=≠

=∫

∑=∫−

=− nmanm

dtttaT

dtttfn

T

Tm

nnnm

T

T ,,0

coscos2

cos)(2/

2/ 1

2/

2/ωωω

This is analogous to MM when )()( zItf ′→ , nn Ia → , )cos( tnn ω→Φ , and)cos( tmm ω→Χ . (Since )(tf is not in an integral equation, a second variable ′ t is not

required.) The selection of the testing functions to be the complex conjugates of theexpansion functions is referred to as Galerkin’s method.

Page 43: Antenna parameters

42

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Reciprocity (1)

When two antennas are in close proximity to each other, there is a strong interactionbetween them. The radiation from one affects the current distribution of the other, whichin turn modifies the current distribution of the first one.

V1

+

I1

Z1

I2

Z2

V21Eg

ANTENNA 1(SOURCE)

ANTENNA 2(RECEIVER)

Consider two situations (depicted on the following page) where the geometricalrelationship between two antennas does not change.

1. A voltage is applied to antenna 1 and the current induced at the terminals of antenna 2 ismeasured.

2. The situation is reversed: a voltage is applied to antenna 2 and the current induced at theterminals of antenna 1 is measured.

Page 44: Antenna parameters

43

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Reciprocity (2)

Case 1:

V1

+

ANTENNA 1

ANTENNA 2

I2

ENERGY FLOW

CURRENTMETER

Case 2:

ANTENNA 1

ENERGY FLOW

CURRENTMETER

I1

V2

ANTENNA 2

+

Page 45: Antenna parameters

44

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Mutual Impedance (1)

Define the mutual impedance or transfer impedance as

Z12 =V2I1

and Z21 =V1I2

The first index on Z refers to the receiving antenna (observer) and the second index to thesource antenna.

Reciprocity Theorem: If the antennas and medium are linear, passive and isotropic, thenthe response of a system to a source is unchanged if the source and observer (measurer)are interchanged.With regard to mutual impedance:

• This implies that Z21 = Z12• The receiving and transmitting patterns of an antenna are the same if it is

constructed of linear, passive, and isotropic materials and devices.In general, the input impedance of antenna number n in the presence of other antennas isobtained by integrating the total field in the gap (gap width bn )

Zn =

VnIn

=1In

r E n •

bn

∫ dr l

Page 46: Antenna parameters

45

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Mutual Impedance (2)

r E n is the total field in the gap of antenna n (due to its own voltage plus the incident fieldsfrom all other antennas).

Vn En

In

Page 47: Antenna parameters

46

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Mutual Impedance (3)

If there are a total of N antennas

r E n =

r E n1 +

r E n2 +L+

r E nN

Therefore,

Zn =

1In

r E nm

m=1

N∑ •

bn

∫ dr l n

Define

∫ •=nb

nnmnm dEV lrr

The impedance becomes

nm

N

m

Zn

nmN

m

V

N

mnm

nn Z

IV

VI

Z

nmn

∑=∑=∑==

=

= 111

1

321For example, the impedance of dipole n=1 is written explicitly as

Z1 = Z11 + Z12 +L+ Z1N

When m = n the impedance is the self impedance. This is approximately the impedancethat we have already computed for an isolated dipole using the method of moments.

Page 48: Antenna parameters

47

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Mutual Impedance (4)

The method of moments can also be used to compute the mutual coupling betweenantennas. The mutual impedance is obtained from the definition

Zmn =Vm

In Im =0= mutual impedance at port m due to a

current in port n, with port m open ciruited

By reciprocity this is the same as Zmn = Znm =Vn

Im In =0. Say that we have two dipoles, one

distant (n) and one near (m). To determine Zmn a voltage can be applied to the distantdipole and the open-circuited current computed on the near dipole using the method ofmoments. The ratio of the distant dipole’s voltage to the current induced on the near onegives the mutual impedance between the two dipoles.

Plots of mutual impedance are shown on the following pages:

1. high mutual impedance implies strong coupling between the antennas2. mutual impedance decreases with increasing separation between antennas3. mutual impedance for wire antennas placed end to end is not as strong as when they are placed parallel

Page 49: Antenna parameters

48

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Mutual Impedance of Parallel Dipoles

0 0.5 1 1.5 2-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

Separation, d (wavelengths)

R or

X (

ohm

s)

d2/λ

12R

12X

Page 50: Antenna parameters

49

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Mutual Impedance of Colinear Dipoles

0 0.5 1 1.5 2-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

Separation, s (wavelengths)

R or

X (o

hms)

2/λ

s

21R

21X

Page 51: Antenna parameters

50

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Mutual-Impedance Example

Example: Assume that a half wave dipole has been tuned so that it is resonant (Xa = 0).We found that a resonant half wave dipole fed by a 50 ohm transmission line has a VSWRof 1.46 (a reflection coefficient of 0.1870). If a second half wave dipole is placed parallelto the first one and 0.65 wavelength away, what is the input impedance of the first dipole?

From the plots, the mutual impedance between two dipoles spaced 0.65 wavelength is

Z21 = R21 + jX21 = −24.98 − j7.7Ω

Noting that 1221 ZZ = the total input impedance is

Zin = Z11 + Z21= 73 + (−24.98 − j7.7)= 48.02 − j7.7 Ω

The reflection coefficient is

Γ =

Zin − Zo

Zin + Zo=

(48.02 − j7.7)− 50(48.02 − j7.7) + 50

= −0.0139− j0.0797 = 0.081e− j99.93o

which corresponds to a VSWR of 1.176. In this case the presence of the second dipole hasimproved the match at the input terminals of the first antenna.

Page 52: Antenna parameters

51

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Broadband Antennas (1)

The required frequency bandwidth increases with the rate of information transfer (i.e., highdata rates require wide frequency bandwidths). Designing an efficient wideband antennais difficult. The most efficient antennas are designed to operate at a resonant frequency,which is inherently narrow band.

Two approaches to operating over wide frequency bands:

1. Split the entire band into sub-bands and use a separate resonant antenna in each band

Advantage: The individual antennas are easy to design (potentially inexpensive)Disadvantage: Many antennas are required (may take a lot of space, weight, etc.)

FRE

QU

EN

CY

MU

LT

IPL

EX

ER

BROADBANDINPUT SIGNAL

1

2

N

M

∆f1

∆f2

∆fN

L

∆f1 ∆f2 ∆fNf

τ

BANDWIDTH OF AN INDIVIDUAL ANTENNA

TOTAL SYSTEMBANDWIDTH

Page 53: Antenna parameters

52

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Broadband Antennas (2)

2. Use a single antenna that operates over the entire frequency band

Advantage: Less aperture area required by a single antennaDisadvantage: A wideband antenna is more difficult to design than a narrowband antenna

Broadbanding of antennas can be accomplished by:

1. interlacing narrowband elements having non-overlapping sub-bands (stepped bandapproach)

Example: multi-feed point dipole

dmin

dmax

TANK CIRCUIT USINGLUMPED ELEMENTS

OPEN CIRCUIT ATHIGH FREQUENCIES

SHORT CIRCUIT AT LOW FREQUENCIES

Page 54: Antenna parameters

53

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Broadband Antennas (3)

2. design elements that have smooth geometrical transitions and avoid abruptdiscontinuitiesExample: biconical antenna

dmin

dmax

spiral antenna

FEED POINT

WIRES

dmin

dmax

Page 55: Antenna parameters

54

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Circular Spiral in Low Observable Fixture

Page 56: Antenna parameters

55

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Broadband Antennas (4)

Another example of a broadband antenna is the log-periodic array. It can be classified as asingle element with a gradual geometric transitions or as discrete elements that areresonant in sub-bands. All of the elements of the log periodic antenna are fed.

dmin dmaxDIRECTION OF MAXIMUM

RADIATION

The range of frequencies over which ana antenna operates is determined approximately bythe maximum and minimum antenna dimensions

dmin ≈λH

2 and dmax ≈

λL

2

Page 57: Antenna parameters

56

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Yagi-Uda Antenna

A Yagi-Uda (or simply Yagi) is used at high frequencies (HF) to obtain a directionalazimuth pattern. They are frequently employed as TV/FM antennas. A Yagi consists of afed element and at least two parasitic (non-excited) elements. The shorter elements in thefront are directors. The longer element in the back is a reflector. The conventional designhas only one reflector, but may have up to 10 directors.

REFLECTOR DIRECTORS

FEDELEMENT

MAIN LOBEMAXIMUM

DIRECTIVITY

BACK LOBEMAXIMUM

DIRECTIVITY

POLAR PLOT OFRADIATION PATTERN

The front-to-back ratio is the ratio of the maximum directivity in the forward direction tothat in the back direction: Dmax / Dback

Page 58: Antenna parameters

57

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Ground Planes and Images (1)

In some cases the method of images allows construction of an equivalent problem that iseasier to solve than the original problem.

When a source is located over a PEC ground plane, the ground plane can be removed andthe effects of the ground plane on the fields outside of the medium accounted for by animage located below the surface.

ORIGINAL PROBLEM EQUIVALENT PROBLEM

h h

h

ORIGINALSOURCES

IMAGESOURCES

REGION 1

REGION 2

GROUND PLANEREMOVED

I dl→

I dl→

I dl→

I dl→

I dl→

I dl→

PEC

The equivalent problem holds only for computing the fields in region 1. It is exact for aninfinite PEC ground plane, but is often used for finite, imperfectly conducting groundplanes (such as the Earth’s surface).

Page 59: Antenna parameters

58

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Ground Planes and Images (2)

The equivalent problem satisfies Maxwell’s equations and the same boundary conditionsas the original problem. The uniqueness theorem of electromagnetics assures us that thesolution to the equivalent problem is the same as that for the original problem.

Boundary conditions at the surface of a PEC: the tangential component of the electric fieldis zero.

ORIGINAL PROBLEM EQUIVALENT PROBLEM

PEC

h

h

h

Idz→

Idz→

Idz→

Eθ Eθ1 Eθ2E⊥

E|| =0

θ2

θ1TANGENTIALCOMPONENTS

CANCEL

A similar result can be shown if the current element is oriented horizontal to the groundplane and the image is reversed from the source. (A reversal of the image current directionimplies a negative sign in the image’s field relative to the source field.)

Page 60: Antenna parameters

59

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Ground Planes and Images (3)

Half of a symmetric conducting structure can be removed if an infinite PEC is placed onthe symmetry plane. This is the basis of a quarter-wave monopole antenna.

z = 0

I

Vg

+

−2b

I

Vg+

−b

λ / 4 λ / 4

ORIGINALDIPOLE

MONOPOLE

PEC

• The radiation pattern is the same for the monopole as it is for the half wave dipoleabove the plane z = 0

• The field in the monopole gap is twice the field in the gap of the dipole• Since the voltage is the same but the gap is half of the dipole’s gap

56.36212.73

dipole21

monopole === aa RR ohms

Page 61: Antenna parameters

60

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Crossed Dipoles (1)

Crossed dipoles (also known as aturnstile) consists of two orthogonaldipoles excited 90 degrees out of phase.

Ix = Io

Iy = Ioe jπ / 2 = jIo

Ix

x

z

y

Iy

The radiation integral gives two terms

∫ ′+∫ ′−

•−

−=

2/

2/

sinsin

ˆˆ

2/

2/

cossin

ˆˆ

sincoscoscos4

l

l

l

l 4342143421 ydeIjxdeIjkro kyj

y

okxj

x

oer

jkE φθ

θ

φθ

θ

φθφθθ πη

If 1<<lk then ∫−

′ ≈′2/

2/

cossinl

llxde kxj φθ and similarly for the y integral. Therefore,

( ) ( )φφθφφθθ πη

sincoscossincoscos4

jjkr

ojjkr

E

or

eE

reIjk

E

o

+−

=+−

−=

43421l

Page 62: Antenna parameters

61

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Crossed Dipoles (2)

A similar result is obtained for Eφ

( ) ( )φφφφφ πη

cossincossin4

jjkr

ojjkr

E

or

eE

reIjk

E

o

−−

−=−−

−≡

=321l

Consider the components of the wave propagating toward an observer on the z axisθ = φ = 0 : Eθ = Eo , Eφ = jEo, or

( )yjxr

eEE

jkr

o ˆˆ +=−r

which is a circularly polarized wave. If the observer is not on the z axis, the projectedlengths of the two dipoles are not equal, and therefore the wave is elliptically polarized.The axial ratio (AR) is a measure of the wave’s ellipticity at the specified θ,φ :

AR =EmaxEmin

, 1 ≤ AR ≤ ∞

For the crossed dipoles

AR =Eφ

Eθ=

1

cos2 θ cos2 φ + sin2 φ( )=

1cosθ

Page 63: Antenna parameters

62

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Crossed Dipoles (3)

The rotating linear pattern is shown. A linear receive antenna rotates like a propeller bladeas it measures the far field at range r. The envelope of the oscillations at any particularangle gives the axial ratio at that angle. For example, at 50 degrees the AR is about1/ 0.64 =1.56 = 1.93 dB.

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 3500

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

NO

RM

AL

IZE

D F

IEL

D

PATTERN ANGLE, θ (DEGREES)

Eφ =1

ROTATING LINEARPOLARIZATION

Page 64: Antenna parameters

63

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Crossed Dipoles (4)

Examples of rotating linear patterns on crossed dipoles that are not equal in length

0.5

1

30

210

60

240

90

270

120

300

150

330

180 0

-30

-20

-10

0

30

210

60

240

90

270

120

300

150

330

180 0

VOLTAGE PLOT DECIBEL PLOT

Page 65: Antenna parameters

64

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Polarization Loss (1)

For linear antennas an effective height ( r h e ) can be defined

Voc =r E inc •

r h e Voc

r E inc

r h e

The open circuit voltage is a maximum when the antenna is aligned with the incidentelectric field vector. The effective height of an arbitrary antenna can be determined bycasting its far field in the following form of three factors

[ ] [ ]),(),,( φθφθ e

jkr

o hr

eErE

rr

=

The effective height accounts for the incident electric field projected onto the antennaelement. The polarization loss factor (PLF) between the antenna and incident field is

PLF, p =

r E inc •

r h e

2

r E inc

2 r h e

2

Page 66: Antenna parameters

65

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Polarization Loss (2)

Example: The Hertzian dipole’s far field is

[ ]43421lr

r),(

ˆsin4

),,(

φθ

θθπ

ηφθ

eh

jkro

rekIj

rE

=

If we have a second dipole that is rotated by an angle δ in a plane parallel to the planecontaining the first dipole, we can calculate the PLF as follows. First,

Voc =r E inc •

r h e =

r E inc ˆ z •

r h e ˆ ′ z =

r E inc

r h e ˆ z • ˆ ′ z =

r E inc

r h e cosδ

Voc

r E inc

r h e

z

x

z′ z

yyδ

TRANSMIT RECEIVE

Page 67: Antenna parameters

66

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Polarization Loss (3)

The PLF is

δδ 2

22inc

222inc

22inc

2inc

coscos

==•

=e

e

e

e

hE

hE

hE

hEp rr

rrrrrr

When the dipoles are parallel, p=1, and there is no loss due to polarization mismatch.However, when the dipoles are at right angles, p=0 and there is a complete loss of signal.

A more general case occurs when the incident field has both θ and φ components

r E inc = Eiθ

ˆ θ + Eiφˆ φ

( )22

2

ˆˆ

ˆˆ

eii

eii

hEE

hEEp r

r

φθ

φθ

φθ

φθ

+

•+=

Example: The effective height of a RHCP antenna which radiates in the +z direction isgiven by the vector ( )φθ ˆˆ jhh oe −=

r. A LHCP field is incident on this antenna (i.e., the

incident wave propagates in the –z direction):

( ) jkzo ejEE φθ ˆˆ

inc −=r

Page 68: Antenna parameters

67

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Polarization Loss (4)

The PLF is

( ) ( )0

22

ˆˆˆˆ

22

2

=−•−

=oo

jkzoo

hE

ejjhEp

φθφθ

If a RHCP wave is incident on the same antenna, again propagating along the z axis in thenegative direction, ( ) jkz

o ejEE φθ ˆˆinc +=

r. Now the PLF is

( ) ( )1

22

ˆˆˆˆ

22

2

=+•−

=oo

jkzoo

hE

ejjhEp

φθφθ

Finally, if a linearly polarized plane wave is incident on the antenna, jkzoeEE θinc =

r

( )2/1

2

ˆˆˆ

22

2

=•−

=oo

jkzoo

hE

ejhEp

θφθ

If a linearly polarized antenna is used to receive a circularly polarized wave (or the reversesituation), there is a 3 dB loss in signal.

Page 69: Antenna parameters

68

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Antenna Polarization Loss

Summary of polarizationlosses for polarizationmismatched antennas

TRANSMIT ANTENNA

RECEIVE ANTENNA

RHCP

LHCP

V

H

RHCP

V

0 dB

3 dB

3 dB

> 25 dB

0 dB

3 dB

> 25 dB

Page 70: Antenna parameters

69

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Aircraft Blade Antenna

Blade antennas are used for telemetry and communications. They have nearlyhemispherical coverage, allowing the aircraft to maneuver without a complete loss ofsignal. The resulting polarization is often called slant because it contains both horizontaland vertical components.

Blade antenna

3. ′ ′ 0 (7.62 cm)

1.5 ′ ′ 8 (4.01cm)h

45o

λ / 4 THIN WIRE

Method of moments model:

Location of sourceexcitation

Comparison of measured and calculatedpatterns for a blade installed on a cylinder

Page 71: Antenna parameters

70

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Blade Antennas Installed on an Aircraft

The top antenna (A) provides coverage in the upper hemisphere, while the bottom antenna(B) covers the lower hemisphere. The two antennas can be duplexed (switched) or theirsignals combined using a coupler.

Method of moments patch model: Elevation pattern: (signalscombined with 3 dB coupler)

Ro ll

Pit ch

Yaw

A

B

xy z

Page 72: Antenna parameters

71

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Small Loop Antenna (1)

By symmetry, we expect that the field of a small wire loop located in the z = 0 plane willdepend only on the angle off of the wire axis, θ . Because of the azimuthal symmetrycylindrical coordinates are required to solve this problem. If the wire is very thin (afilament) and has a constant current φ ′oI flowing in it, the radiation integral is

( )∫′

•′ ′′−≈ −

π

φφπ

ηφθ

2

0

ˆ ˆ4

),,( 43421 r

rrld

rrjk daIer

jkrE eo

jkr

φ′

z

x

y

θ

ρ ′=′ ˆarr

rrRr

Using the transformation tables

( )( )φφφφθ

φφρθφθφθ

′+′=′′+′=′=′++=

• sinsincoscossinˆsinˆcosˆˆ

cosˆsinsinˆcossinˆˆ

arryxaar

zyxr

rr

We also need φ ′ in terms of the cartesianunit vectors (φ ′ is not a constant that can bemoved outside of the integral)

φφφ ′+′−=′ cosˆsinˆˆ yx

Page 73: Antenna parameters

72

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Small Loop Antenna (2)

The radiation integral becomes

( ) ( )∫ ′′+′−−

≈ ′+′−π

φφφφθ φφφπη

φθ2

0

sinsincoscossincosˆsinˆ4

),,( deyxer

aIjkrE jkajkror

For a small loop 1<<ka and the exponential can be represented by the first two terms of aTaylor’s series to get ( ) ( )φφφφθφφφφθ ′+′+≈

′+′ sinsincoscossin1cossinsincossin jkae jka

Inserting the approximation in the integral

( ) ( )[ ]∫ ′′+′+′+′−π

φφφφφθφφ2

0

sinsincoscossin1cosˆsinˆ djkayx

Since 0cossin2

0

2

0

=′′=′′ ∫∫ππ

φφφφ dd the 1 in the square brackets can be dropped. The

remaining terms in the integrand involve the following factors:

φφφφφφφφ

φφφφφφφφ

′′′→′′′

′′′→′′′

of function odd an is cossin because zero tointegratescossinsincoscos

of function odd an is cossin because zero tointegratescoscossinsinsin

2

2

Page 74: Antenna parameters

73

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Small Loop Antenna (3)

The only two terms that do not integrate to zero are of the form

πφφφφππ

=′′=′′ ∫∫2

0

2

0

22 cossin dd

Therefore,( )

( ) jkrojkro

jkro

er

aIkyxe

raIk

dydxerjkaIjka

rE

−−

=

=

+−=

′′+′′−

−≈ ∫∫

θη

φ

φ

φφθη

φφφφφφπ

θηφθ

ππ

sin4

ˆ

ˆcosˆsinˆsin

4

coscosˆsinsinˆ4

sin),,(

2222

222

0

2

0

4444 34444 21

r

The radiation pattern of the small loop is the same as that of a short dipole aligned with theloop axis. The radiated power is

12

424

radaIk

P o πη=

and the radiation resistance4

44444

2rad 320

6)120()/2(

62

====

λπ

ππλπηπ aaak

I

PR

oa

Page 75: Antenna parameters

74

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Helix Antenna (1)

A helix is described by the following parameters:

D = diameterA = axial lengthC = circumference ( Dπ )S = center-to-center spacing

between turnsL = length of one turnN = number of turns

== − )/(tan 1 DS πα pitch angle

d

D

S

DC π=

S

GROUND PLANE

z

Conventional helices are constructed with air or low-dielectric cores. A helix is capable ofoperating in several different radiation modes and polarizations, depending on thecombination of parameter values and the frequency.

Page 76: Antenna parameters

75

Naval Postgraduate School Antennas & Propagation Distance Learning

Helix Antenna (2)

Radiation modes of a helix:

λ>C

SMALL (LOOKSLIKE A LOOP)

LARGE

NORMAL MODE AXIAL MODE In both cases the radiation is circularlypolarized:

Normal mode: 222

ARπ

λ

D

S=

Axial mode: n

n2

12AR

+=

In the axial mode, the beamwidth decreaseswith increasing helix length, NS

λλ /)/(115

BWFNNSC

o=

for oo 1312 << α .