Answer of Exercises-Measures of Disease Frequency

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/14/2019 Answer of Exercises-Measures of Disease Frequency

    1/7

    MEASURES OF DISEASE FREQUENCY - EXERCISES

    1. In a mass screening of 1,000 65-year old men, 100 were found to

    have a certain disease. During the following 10-year period another

    200 contracted this disease. Which measure (s) of disease frequency

    can be calculated? Calculate this/these.

    Answer: P = 100 / 1,000 = 0.10

    CI Cumulative Incidence

    = 200/ 1000-100 = 0.22 over a 10-year period

    2. Among those admitted to a psychiatric treatment center there

    were carriers of hepatitis B in some wards but not in others. To

    investigate the extent to which this affected the occurrence of hepatitis

    B among personnel, employees of the treatment center were examined

    with regard to the presence of serological markers. Of 67 people

    working on the wards with carriers, 14 had markers for hepatitis B. Of

    72 people working on the other wards, 4 had these markers. Which

    measure of occurrence of markers can be calculated? Calculate this for

    each of the two personnel groups.

    Answer: P1 = 14 / 67 = 0.21

    P0 = 4 / 72 = 0.06

    3. To enable early discovery and treatment of cervical cancer,1

  • 8/14/2019 Answer of Exercises-Measures of Disease Frequency

    2/7

    regular gynaecological check-ups were carried out on women aged

    30-59 years. Follow-up of women who were found not to have the

    disease at the initial examination covered 338,294 person-years at risk

    and resulted in the identification of 123 new cases of carcinoma in

    situ. Which measure of occurrence can be calculated? Calculate this.

    Answer: I = 123 / 338,294 = 0.000363 per person-years

    = 36.3 / 10 5 person-years

    4. In a mass screening of 5,000 women, 25 of these were found to

    have breast cancer. During the next five years 10 more of the

    examined women developed breast cancer. Which measures of disease

    occurrence can be calculated? Calculate these.

    Answer: P = 25 / 5,000 = 0.005CI Cumulative Incidence

    = 10/ 5000-25 = 0.002 over a 5-year period

    5. During a 5-year period, 270 cases of duodenal ulcer occurred in

    the male population of a city. The number of men in the city was18,500 at the beginning of the period and 21,500 at the end. Which

    measure of disease occurrence can be calculated? Calculate this.

    Answer: Number of cases = 270

    Average population size = 18,500 + 21,500 / 2 = 20,000

    Observation period = 5 years

    2

  • 8/14/2019 Answer of Exercises-Measures of Disease Frequency

    3/7

    Total risk period = 20,000 x 5 = 100,000 person-years

    I = 270 / 100,000 = 0.0027 per person-years

    6. The figure below displays the follow-up experience of members

    of a small study cohort between 1 January 1994 to 30 June 1999 from

    entry (>) to follow-up until death (DC if due to disease C, DO for

    other causes) or censoring (o). For those subjects contracting disease

    C the time of diagnosis is also marked ( = onset of C).

    = disease onset o= censoring or withdrawal

    DC = death from disease C DO = death from other cause

    Calculate the values of the following measures:

    (a) incidence rate of disease C during the period from 1 Jan 1994 to31 Dec 1998,

    3

  • 8/14/2019 Answer of Exercises-Measures of Disease Frequency

    4/7

  • 8/14/2019 Answer of Exercises-Measures of Disease Frequency

    5/7

    Answer: Prevalence of C on 30 September 1996 was 1/7 = 14 %

    and Prevalence of C on 31 December 1998 was 3/5 = 60 %.

    7. In the table below are given the size (in 1000s) of the male

    population in Finland aged 0-14 years (the age range of childhood

    in pediatrics!) on the 31 December in each year from 1991 to 2000.

    The following numbers of cases describe the incidence and

    mortality of acute leukaemia in this population for two calendar

    periods: 5 years 1993 to 1997 (source: NORDCAN), and year 1999

    only (source: Finnish Cancer Registry http://www.cancerregistry.fi/ ).

    (a) Calculate the incidence rates of acute leukaemia in this

    population for the two periods.(b) Calculate similarly the mortality rates of leukaemia.

    1993-97 1999

    person-years (in100000s)

    1/2 (4.95+4.91)5=24.65 1/2 (4.85 + 4.81) 1 = 4.83

    (a): incidence rate(per 10 5 y)

    113/24.65 = 4.6 26/4.83 = 5.4

    (b): mortality rate(per 10 5 y)

    22/24.65 = 0.9 3/4.83 = 0.6

    5

    http://www.cancerregistry.fi/http://www.cancerregistry.fi/
  • 8/14/2019 Answer of Exercises-Measures of Disease Frequency

    6/7

    (c) Is there evidence about any change in the incidence and/or

    mortality between these two periods?

    Answer: There are too few cases for any conclusions.(d) What would you conclude about the fatality of leukemia in

    children?

    Answer: It appears that most children survive, but this is not the

    correct way of calculating survival or fatality measures!

    8. The Alpha Tocopherol Beta Caroten (ATBC) Prevention Trial (N

    Engl J Med 1994; 330:1029-35) addressed among other things the

    possible benefits of daily intake of vitamin E supplements in reducingthe incidence of cancer among male smokers. The study population of

    29133 regularly smoking 50-69 years old Finnish men were

    randomized into two groups: active treatment (vitamin E

    supplementation), and placebo (no supplementation). The following

    results were obtained for cancer of the prostate after an averagefollow-up time of 6 years:

    (a) Calculate the person-years at risk in the two study groups6

  • 8/14/2019 Answer of Exercises-Measures of Disease Frequency

    7/7

    separately.

    Answer: Person-years in the two groups:

    99(11.6/10000 )y= 85345 y,

    151(17.8/10000) y= 84831 y

    (b) Estimate the relative risk and excess risk measuring the

    effect of daily supplementation with vitamin E on the risk prostate

    cancer.

    Answer: Relative risk:

    incidence rate ratio = 11.6/17.8 = 0.652,

    Excess risk:

    rate difference = 11.6 17.8 = 6.2 per 10000 y,

    (c) Estimate preventive fraction, whichever more appropriate, to

    describe the proportional impact of vitamin E supplementation. Answer: Preventive fraction:

    from rates: (17.8 11.6)/17.8 = 0.348 = 35%,

    7