Feb 3 2015

ANOTHER ASIAN AIRLINE CRASH, AND THIS ONE COULD BE REVEALING

A Trans Asia airlines has crashed into a river in Taipai Taiwan. Taiwanese twitter is full of tweets saying it was the top people in Taiwan's government aboard. There is nothing confirmed at this point, other than that the jet is in the river after hitting a viaduct on takeoff.

Obviously it could have been stuxnetted into the viaduct, I am having a tough time believing the official stories about airline crashes in Asia anymore. If it is the Taiwanese government that went into the river, you can bet this was foul play.

Update: 58 people were aboard.

UPDATE: Picture uploaded, from the looks of this there is no way this happened normally unless the plane had a major malfunction and the plane looks like it would not have been

for government use. Then again it is Taiwan . . . . More updates, and YES THIS WAS

BOUND FOR MALAYSIA. Coincidence? I BET NOT!

Airline whistleblower Rebecca Roth states a truth about 911 this web site stated years ago:

Gordon Duff is celebrating a new book by Rebecca Roth (Airline Stewardess) who clearly states that remote hijack recovery was part of every 767/57 aircraft ever made, which made the 911 plot impossible. But I have been saying this on forums and blogs since 2002, and also on this web site since shortly after the Fukushima

report in 2011.

I am saying this to show people exactly how far ahead of the curve this web site really is. I nailed this information early on via a hack on the Boeing web site I accidentally accomplished via a defective site mapping in 2002 during my 911 research. No one would believe it, so I have not pushed it hard, but now that Rebecca has also stepped forward with the same info and Duff is giving her a push I will give this another shot, and remember, this site was years ahead and my blog

posts to forums and other places were over a decade ahead:

Here is an excerpt from the past from this web site:

From Jimstonefreelance.com on 3/15/2012

To the reader who owns CCFIILE.COM, I am well aware of the fact that 911 was an inside job, and was one of the early fighters on this subject. There will be posts regarding this when I bring some of the old stuff from the other web sites forward. The thing that irritates me the most is the remote control issue - this was a published fact in 1981, that the new Boeing 757/67 aircraft were to be shipped stock from the factory with remote hijack recovery. This means that the ONLY way 911 could have happened is via remote control. All this garbage about global hawk and other stupid technologies is a diversion from the fact that ALL 757/67 aircraft ever shipped had this feature as a stock item. This is why the FAA grounded all 757/67 aircraft for a full month AFTER 911, while others were allowed to fly - they had to rip this feature out of them because the security of that system had obviously been compromised and used as a weapon. The Airbus A320 also had this feature but was allowed to keep

flying because the system was more secure and had not been hacked.

There are many other references to this system with a lot more detail than this scattered throughout the catacombs of this web site, this is just one of the early postings (in reference to this web site being converted over to a news blog rather

than a photography site)

Rebecca Roth goes into a lot more detail and has a very plausible explanation for how the impossible phone calls happened - that the planes were all landed within

20 minutes and the passengers were forced to read from a script on the ground. The FBI officially stated the phone calls never happened however, so either they are in the dark about the plot entirely and screwed up or Rebecca has the best plausible theory and does not know the FBI called B.S. on the phone calls. I would have to go with the FBI on this one, because they had all the phone records and based their investigation on them. Either way, Rebecca's book is probably a great read and I doubt any of the "hijacked" aircraft actually hit the towers (most likely

substitutes were used).

By the way, according to a woman who has written to this web site regarding Charlie Hebodo, the pay for partaking in a psy op like 911 is $600,000 USD, a safe house for six years, and then a totally new life with a totally new identity. If anyone is asking where the people went to if the "hijacked" planes never hit the towers (switched for substitutes), this is probably the answer and would help explain Rebecca's story, which at least has huge segments of truth to it.

My accidental hack on the Boeing web site revealed ALL INFORMATION, including where on each plane the computers were that controlled this remote hijack recovery system, and that if the airlines wished they could disable the system with a software upgrade that was "as simple as inserting a floppy disk". On all of the original aircraft this system was located under the floor at the front of the passenger section immediately behind the cockpit. I got ALL the details straight off the Boeing web site. Airbus was not grounded after 911 because their security on

the A320 was far better and far more difficult to hack.

Oh, I can just see it now - shills are going to say "how come the pilots did not insert that

disk to stop the hijacking?" well, obviously they would not have it with them, the disks were

probably in a file cabinet on floor minus five somewhere.

http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/