1
Andrew R. Thompson, West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine Background Methods Results Interregional analysis Materials Interregional by sex LIRV only analysis Summary of Findings References Acknowledgements LimitaFons and Future Research LIRV only by sex An odontometric analysis of interregional biological variaFon in the prehistoric Midwest ●TransiFon from Late Woodland to Mississippian period in the Midwest is characterized by dramaFc shiJs in sociocultural pracFces ●Previous studies in the lower Illinois River valley (LIRV) are inconclusive as to whether these changes were the result of migraFon or shiJs that occurred among staFonary groups: ●The most widely held expectaFon is that groups from the American BoOom (AB), and parFcularly from the Cahokia site, were involved in exchange networks with LIRV groups during the Mississippian period. However, populaFon movement between regions has never been directly evaluated ●Purpose of present study: Examine interregional biological variaFon in the LIRV and AB regions over the Late Woodland to Mississippian transiFon Study Method Findings Fields (1979) Odontometrics Con5nuity Droessler (1981) Craniometrics Con5nuity Steadman (1997) Craniometrics Mixed Raff (2008) mtDNA Mixed Map of Illinois showing sites used in this study. ●Maximum crown diameters of permanent denFFons ●Intraobserver error tested and found to be within ±0.03mm (see Thompson, 2013) Odontometrics Data preparaFon ●ExpectaFonmaximizaFon algorithm used to replace missing data: 2425/2930 (83%) of data points present prior to replacement ●Sex standardized using zscores on sexspecific pooled matrices ●Final 10 variables: UCMD, UCBL, UP1BL, UM1BL, LCMD, LM2MD, LI2BL, LCBL, LP1BL, and LM1BL StaFsFcal methods ●Rmatrix (Relethford and Blangero, 1990) ●Census esFmates made equal, making geneFc distances proporFonal to Mahalanobis distances (Relethford, 1997) ●Distance matrices ploOed using mulFdimensional scaling (MDS) ●Largest distance between Schild LW and Schild Miss ●ConFnuity at Yokem with smallest distance between Fme periods ●More within group variaFon among Late Woodland groups ●During LW period, more betweengroup distance among males ●During Miss period, more betweengroup distance among females ●Largest betweengroup distance in Miss period between females ●Small distances between Cahokia and LIRV Mississippian groups ●Schild LW sFll an outlier ●ESLSQ more similar to Yokem than AB groups ●Schild Miss females similar to individuals at Cahokia ●Schild Miss males tend to be more similar to LIRV groups ●Yokem Miss females plot away from most other groups ●VariaFon among LIRV groups suggests disconFnuity at Schild over the Late WoodlandMississippian transiFon ●Sexbased LIRV analysis suggests more female variaFon in Miss period, but possibly from different sources ●Interregional analysis shows strong similarity between Cahokia and Schild Miss individuals ●Sexbased interregional analysis suggests increased female movement between Schild and Cahokia, and slightly more regional conFnuity among males ●Yokem Miss females dissimilar to other groups, possibly movement from another region (central Illinois valley?) ●Take home: LWMiss transiFon in LIRV appears to have been somewhat variable with an increase in interregional interacFon, parFcularly among females ●Sample size becomes increasingly small as sex is considered, which required removal of some AB sites in the interregional analysis ●More AB sites needed to beOer assess regional variaFon ●Other forms of data (addiFonal aDNA studies, stronFum isotope, etc.) are needed to evaluate movement/relatedness I would like to thank the following individuals at for permiMng access to the skeletal remains used in this study: Illinois State MuseumDr. Terrance Mar5n ,Dawn Cobb, and Dee Ann WaT; Indiana University Dr. Della Cook; Center for Archeological Inves5ga5ons Dr. Heather Lapham. Special thanks to Della Cook for her input on the development of this research project. Droessler, JB. 1981. Craniometry and biological distance : Biocultural con5nuity and change at the Late Woodland Mississippian interface. Scien5fic papers Northwestern University Archeological Program. Northwestern University Archeological Program, Evanston. Fields, BA. 1979. A biological dimension of cultural change: Dental microevolu5on in a prehistoric Amerindian context, Indiana University, Bloomington. Raff, J. 2008. An ancient DNA perspec5ve on the prehistory of the lower Illinois Valley, Indiana University, Bloomington. Relethford, JH. 1997. Anthropometric data and popula5on history. In Human biologists in the archives: demography, health, nutri5on and gene5cs in historical popula5ons, edited by AD. Herring and AC. Swedlund, pp. 3252. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Relethford, JH. and J Blangero. 1990.Detec5on of differen5al gene flow from paTerns of quan5ta5ve varia5on. Hum Biol 62(1):525. Steadman, DW. 1997. Popula5on gene5c analysis of regional and interregional prehistoric gene flow in westcentral Illinois, University of Chicago, Chicago. Thompson, AR. 2013. An analysis of biological varia5on during the Late WoodlandMississippian period in the Midwest using the den55on, Indiana University, Bloomington. Site Region Date (AD) Cultural period Sample size Male Female Schild LIRV 8001050 LW 12 24 Schild LIRV 10501300 Miss 34 26 Yokem LIRV 7001050 LW 15 23 Yokem LIRV 10501300 Miss 15 18 Mound 72, Cahokia* AB 10001150 Miss 27 80 Kane Mounds AB 12001300 Miss 3 5 East St. Louis Stone Quarry AB 12001300 Miss 3 7 *Recent studies suggest most individuals in Mound 72 were local to the American BoOom region (Thompson et al., in prep). Feature 229lower omiOed from analyses.

An!odontometric!analysis!of!interregional!biological

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    6

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: An!odontometric!analysis!of!interregional!biological

 

     

 Andrew  R.  Thompson,  West  Virginia  School  of  Osteopathic  Medicine  

Background  

Methods  

Results  

Interregional  analysis  

Materials  

Interregional  by  sex  

LIRV  only  analysis  

Summary  of  Findings  

References  

Acknowledgements  

LimitaFons  and  Future  Research  

LIRV  only  by  sex  

An  odontometric  analysis  of  interregional  biological  variaFon  in  the  prehistoric  Midwest  

●TransiFon   from   Late   Woodland   to   Mississippian   period   in   the  Midwest  is  characterized  by  dramaFc  shiJs  in  sociocultural  pracFces  ●Previous   studies   in   the   lower   Illinois   River   valley   (LIRV)     are  inconclusive   as   to   whether   these   changes   were   the   result   of  migraFon  or  shiJs  that  occurred  among  staFonary  groups:  

●The  most  widely  held  expectaFon  is  that  groups  from  the  American  BoOom  (AB),  and  parFcularly  from  the  Cahokia  site,  were  involved  in  exchange   networks   with   LIRV   groups   during   the   Mississippian  period.  However,  populaFon  movement  between  regions  has  never  been  directly  evaluated  ●Purpose   of   present   study:   Examine   interregional   biological  variaFon   in   the   LIRV   and   AB   regions   over   the   Late   Woodland   to  Mississippian  transiFon  

Study   Method   Findings  Fields  (1979)   Odontometrics   Con5nuity  

Droessler  (1981)   Craniometrics   Con5nuity  Steadman  (1997)   Craniometrics   Mixed  

Raff  (2008)   mtDNA   Mixed  

Map  of  Illinois  showing  sites  used  in  this  study.  

●Maximum  crown  diameters  of  permanent  denFFons  ●Intraobserver  error  tested  and  found  to  be  within  ±0.03mm  (see  Thompson,  2013)  

Odontometrics  

Data  preparaFon  ●ExpectaFon-­‐maximizaFon  algorithm  used  to  replace  missing  data:  2425/2930  (83%)  of  data  points  present  prior  to  replacement  ●Sex  standardized  using  z-­‐scores  on  sex-­‐specific  pooled  matrices  ●Final  10  variables:  UCMD,  UCBL,  UP1BL,  UM1BL,  LCMD,  LM2MD,  LI2BL,  LCBL,  LP1BL,  and  LM1BL  

StaFsFcal  methods  ●R-­‐matrix  (Relethford  and  Blangero,  1990)  ●Census  esFmates  made  equal,  making  geneFc  distances  proporFonal  to  Mahalanobis  distances  (Relethford,  1997)  ●Distance  matrices  ploOed  using  mulFdimensional  scaling  (MDS)  

●Largest  distance  between  Schild  LW  and  Schild  Miss  ●ConFnuity  at  Yokem  with  smallest  distance  between  Fme  periods  ●More  within  group  variaFon  among  Late  Woodland  groups  

●During  LW  period,  more  between-­‐group  distance  among  males  ●During  Miss  period,  more  between-­‐group  distance  among  females  ●Largest  between-­‐group  distance  in  Miss  period  between  females  

●Small  distances  between  Cahokia  and  LIRV  Mississippian  groups  ●Schild  LW  sFll  an  outlier  ●ESLSQ  more  similar  to  Yokem  than  AB  groups  

●Schild  Miss  females  similar  to  individuals  at  Cahokia  ●Schild  Miss  males  tend  to  be  more  similar  to  LIRV  groups  ●Yokem  Miss  females  plot  away  from  most  other  groups  

●VariaFon  among  LIRV  groups  suggests  disconFnuity  at  Schild  over  the  Late  Woodland-­‐Mississippian  transiFon  ●Sex-­‐based  LIRV  analysis  suggests  more  female  variaFon  in  Miss  period,  but  possibly  from  different  sources  ●Interregional  analysis  shows  strong  similarity  between  Cahokia  and  Schild  Miss  individuals  ●Sex-­‐based  interregional  analysis  suggests  increased  female  movement  between  Schild  and  Cahokia,    and  slightly  more  regional  conFnuity  among  males  ●Yokem  Miss  females  dissimilar  to  other  groups,  possibly  movement  from  another  region  (central  Illinois  valley?)    ●Take  home:  LW-­‐Miss  transiFon  in  LIRV  appears  to  have  been  somewhat  variable  with  an  increase  in  interregional  interacFon,  parFcularly  among  females  

●Sample  size  becomes  increasingly  small  as  sex  is  considered,  which  required  removal  of  some  AB  sites  in  the  interregional  analysis  ●More  AB  sites  needed  to  beOer  assess  regional  variaFon  ●Other  forms  of  data  (addiFonal  aDNA  studies,  stronFum  isotope,  etc.)  are  needed  to  evaluate  movement/relatedness  

I  would  like  to  thank  the  following  individuals  at    for  permiMng  access  to  the  skeletal  remains  used  in  this  study:  Illinois  State  Museum-­‐Dr.  Terrance  Mar5n  ,Dawn  Cobb,  and  Dee  Ann  WaT;  Indiana  University-­‐  Dr.  Della  Cook;  Center  for  Archeological  Inves5ga5ons-­‐  Dr.  Heather  Lapham.  Special  thanks  to  Della  Cook  for  her  input  on  the  development  of  this  research  project.  

●Droessler,  JB.  1981.  Craniometry  and  biological  distance  :  Biocultural  con5nuity  and  change  at  the  Late  Woodland  -­‐  Mississippian  interface.  Scien5fic  papers  Northwestern  University  Archeological  Program.  Northwestern  University  Archeological  Program,  Evanston.  ●  Fields,  BA.  1979.  A  biological  dimension  of  cultural  change:  Dental  microevolu5on  in  a  prehistoric  Amerindian  context,  Indiana  University,  Bloomington.  ●  Raff,  J.  2008.  An  ancient  DNA  perspec5ve  on  the  prehistory  of  the  lower  Illinois  Valley,  Indiana  University,  Bloomington.  ●  Relethford,  JH.  1997.  Anthropometric  data  and  popula5on  history.  In  Human  biologists  in  the  archives:  demography,  health,  nutri5on  and  gene5cs  in  historical  popula5ons,  edited  by  AD.  Herring  and  AC.  Swedlund,  pp.  32-­‐52.  Cambridge  University  Press,  Cambridge.  ●  Relethford,  JH.  and  J  Blangero.  1990.Detec5on  of  differen5al  gene  flow  from  paTerns  of  quan5ta5ve  varia5on.  Hum  Biol  62(1):5-­‐25.  ●  Steadman,  DW.  1997.  Popula5on  gene5c  analysis  of  regional  and  interregional  prehistoric  gene  flow  in  west-­‐central  Illinois,  University  of  Chicago,  Chicago.  ●  Thompson,  AR.  2013.  An  analysis  of  biological  varia5on  during  the  Late  Woodland-­‐Mississippian  period  in  the  Midwest  using  the  den55on,  Indiana  University,  Bloomington.  

Site   Region   Date  (AD)   Cultural  period  

Sample  size    Male   Female  

Schild   LIRV   800-­‐1050   LW   12   24 Schild   LIRV   1050-­‐1300   Miss   34   26 Yokem   LIRV   700-­‐1050   LW   15   23 Yokem   LIRV   1050-­‐1300   Miss   15   18

Mound  72,  Cahokia*   AB   1000-­‐1150   Miss   27   80

Kane    Mounds   AB   1200-­‐1300   Miss   3   5

East  St.  Louis  Stone  Quarry  

AB   1200-­‐1300   Miss   3   7

*Recent  studies  suggest  most  individuals  in  Mound  72  were  local  to  the  American  BoOom  region  (Thompson  et  al.,  in  prep).  Feature  229-­‐lower  omiOed  from  analyses.