View
215
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Teacher and Principal Evaluation
Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR)as approved by the Board of Regents, May 2011NOTE: Reflects guidance through September 13,
2011UPDATED
Growth on State Assessments
ELA/Math 4-82011-2012 and BeyondStudent Growth (eventually to include subgroups)1 Teacher of record (for now)
Other Teachers2012-2013 and BeyondSooner if possibleAs assessments become available – “core” subjects use state exam w/ goal settingCan’t use 3rd party if not on approved list
Growth on State Assessments
Must use from
approved list if state
test not ready
NOTE
If No State Test(s)?
This is “non-core” areasState approved 3rd party assessmentsRigorous (verified?)District or BOCES-developedAgreed to in goal setting
Growth on State Assessments
Can’t use 3rd party test that is not on the list, unless
you contract
for custom
Updates to list due in Jan/Feb
If NYSAA?Students not included in state growth or VA scoresLocally, NYSAA can be taken into accountOther local measures acceptable
Growth on State Assessments
NOTE
Locally SelectedSame across all classroomsState assessments can be usedChoose from approved 3rd party assessments
Student Achievement Measures
Locally SelectedSame across all classroomsState assessments can be usedChoose from approved 3rd party assessmentsStudent characteristics can be considered
Student Achievement Measures
No, 20% can not be
40%
NOTE
Locally SelectedSame across all classroomsRigorous (verified?)District or BOCES-developedCan be group measuresAgreed to in goal setting
Student Achievement Measures
RequiredMultiple measures≥ 2/3 based on observation (menu of approved tools)Principal or trained otherAll standards every year
The Other 60 Points
Limit overturned but is
being appealed
Change to rubric requires variance;
forms and
weighting do not require
approval
OptionalStructure review of teacher artifacts and/or portfolioFeedback from others using survey toolsGoals and reflection (≤5pts)
The Other 60 Points
Limit overturne
d
Student Growth 20%
Achievement20% Other 60% Composite
Ineffective 0-2 0-2
Rangesdetermined
locally
0-64
Developing 3-11 3-11 65-74
Effective 12-17 12-17 75-90
HighlyEffective 18-20 18-20 91-100
Scoring and Rating
Has to be revised.
Growth on State Assessments
Elem/MiddleResult of student growthAdded to as measures become availableOther measures being used for teachers in the school
High SchoolResult of student growthAdded to as availableProgress to graduationOther measures being used for teachers in the school
Growth on State Assessments
Elem/MiddleDistrict-wide achievement measuresAchievement on state testsGrowth or achievement for subgroups
Student Achievement Measures
High SchoolRegents participation ratesCollege ready ratesGraduation ratesCredit accumulationDropout ratesPSAT, SAT, AP, IB, etc.
Student Achievement Measures
RequiredMultiple measures≥ 2/3 based on broad assessment of actions via supervisor visitsInclude at least two:Feedback from constituenciesSchool visits from othersReview of documents
The Other 60 Points
No approved tools list will be made; local
decisions
RequiredLocally-selected measure of teacher effectiveness contribution, such as:
High performer retentionGranted v. denied tenureTeacher satisfaction w/ feedbackEvaluation quality
The Other 60 Points
OptionalTeacher and/or student attendanceSchool goalsGoals and reflection (≤5pts)
The Other 60 Points
Student Growth 20%
Achievement20% Other 60% Composite
Ineffective 0-2 0-2
Rangesdetermined
locally
0-64
Developing 3-11 3-11 65-74
Effective 12-17 12-17 75-90
HighlyEffective 18-20 18-20 91-100
Scoring and Rating
SED interpreting that this also
has to be revised.
Improvement Plans
Developing or ineffective (teachers and principals)Developed through negotiations – there is no language that says individual elements must be negotiatedWithin 10 days after report date for new school year
Collec-tively,
not indivi-dually
Appeals Process
Challenge the “substance” of the reviewChallenge adherence to standards and methodologiesChallenge adherence to regulations and negotiated procedures
Plan Requirements
In addition to 3012-c requirements, districts must post how all others are evaluated (old APPR) in 100.2(o).Do NOT have to use HEDI for all others.
Just need to post old plan for all the others
NOTE
Plan Requirements
Approved by BoE by September 1st
Posted to website by September 10th
Identify provisions that may change as a result of collective bargainingApprove and post amended plans
Plan Requirements
Process for data linkage and verificationProcess for data (subscores and scores)submissionAssessment security measures
• Teachers and principals can not score their own assessments.
• Secure locations.
• Secure answer keys.
Plan Requirements
Local achievement measures and scoring methodologyTeacher 60% rubricPrincipal 60% rubric
Plan Requirements
How APPR process will be used for PD for teachers and principalsHow principals and teachers will receive timely feedback
Plan Requirements
Improvement Plan processEvaluator training processEvaluator reliability over time (recertification)Appeals process
Plan Requirements
Improvement Plan processEvaluator training processEvaluator reliability over time (recertification)Appeals process
Evaluators & Training
Ensured by governing bodyDescribed in APPR planAll evaluators must be trained
Completed prior to
completion of
evaluation
Evaluators & Training
All lead evaluators must be trained and certified:
Evidence-based observationGrowth and value-added modelsRubric applicationApplication of assessment tools Locally selected measuresStatewide Instructional Reporting SystemScoring methodologiesSWD and ELL teacher consideration
Evaluators & Training
Non-administrators and evaluations:
Must be fully trained and collaborated before conducting any part of an evaluation