Annual Environmental Report · This report fulfils the requirement for an Annual Environmental Report (AER) in accordance with Condition 11.8 of Integrated Pollution Prevention and

Millipore Ireland Limited Tullagreen, Carrigtwohill, Co. Cork

Annual Environmental Report

2010

Millipore Ireland Limited IPPC Licence Reg. No. P0571-03

Annual Environment Report 2010

ii

ANNUAL ENVIRONMENT REPORT 2010

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION 5

1.1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION 5 1.2 COMPANY PROFILE 6 1.3 SITE DESCRIPTION 6 1.4 SITE ACTIVITIES 7 1.5 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS 9 1.6 DEVELOPMENTS AT MILLIPORE IN 2009 9

2.0 SUMMARY INFORMATION 11

2.1 SELF MONITORING DATA – EMISSIONS TO SEWER 11 2.1.1 INTRODUCTION 11 2.1.2 SUMMARY OF MONITORING RESULTS 11 2.1.3 DISCUSSION OF MONITORING RESULTS 20 2.1.4 CONCLUSION 21 2.2 SELF MONITORING DATA – EMISSIONS TO SURFACE WATER 21 2.2.1 INTRODUCTION 21 2.2.2 SUMMARY OF SURFACE WATER EMISSION MONITORING RESULTS 21 2.2.3 DISCUSSION OF SURFACE WATER EMISSION MONITORING RESULTS 22 2.3 SELF MONITORING DATA – EMISSIONS TO ATMOSPHERE 22 2.3.1 INTRODUCTION 22 2.3.2 SUMMARY OF MONITORING RESULTS 22 2.3.3 DISCUSSION OF MONITORING RESULTS 25 2.4 SELF MONITORING DATA – WASTE EMISSIONS 28 2.4.1 INTRODUCTION 28 2.4.2 SUMMARY OF WASTE EMISSIONS 28 2.5 AGENCY MONITORING & ENFORCEMENT 31 2.5.1 AGENCY MONITORING 31 2.5.2 AGENCY ENFORCEMENT 31

3.0 RESOURCE CONSUMPTION 32

3.1 ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION 32 3.2 NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION 33 3.3 WATER CONSUMPTION 34



iii

4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL INCIDENTS & COMPLAINTS 36

4.1 ENVIRONMENTAL INCIDENTS 36 4.2 ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLAINTS 36 4.3 AER SUMMARY DATA TABLE 37

5.0 MANAGEMENT OF THE ACTIVITY 38

5.1 INTRODUCTION 38 5.2 ENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTIVES & TARGETS 39 5.3 EMP FOR 2010 40 5.4 POLLUTANT RELEASE AND TRANSFER REGISTER 40 5.4.1 POLLUTANT RELEASE AND TRANSFER REGISTER FOR 2009 40 5.4.2 POLLUTANT RELEASE AND TRANSFER REGISTER 40 5.5 SOLVENT MASS BALANCE & SOLVENT MANAGEMENT PLAN 41

6.0 LICENCE SPECIFIC REPORTS 42

6.1 NOISE 42 6.1.1 INTRODUCTION 42 6.2 TESTING OF UNDERGROUND TANKS, PIPELINES & BUNDS 44 6.2.1 TESTING OF UNDERGROUND TANKS 44 6.3 GROUNDWATER MONITORING 44 6.3.1 INTRODUCTION 44 6.4 ENERGY EFFICIENCY 46 6.4.1 INTRODUCTION 46 6.5 RESOURCE & MATERIALS EFFICIENCY 47 6.5.1 INTRODUCTION 47 6.6 WATER EFFICIENCY 47 6.6.1 INTRODUCTION 48 6.7 ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITIES RISK ASSESSMENT 48 6.7.1 INTRODUCTION 48 6.8 DECOMMISSIONING MANAGEMENT PLAN 48 6.8.1 INTRODUCTION 48



iv

List of Appendices

Appendix I Toxicity Reports

Appendix II Waste Management Record

Appendix III Print-Out of 2010 PRTR Emissions Data

Appendix IV Environmental Objectives and Targets 2010

Appendix V Proposed Objectives and Targets 2011

Appendix VI Solvent Management Plan 2010

Appendix VII Environmental Noise Survey 2010

Appendix VIII Groundwater Monitoring Report 2010

Appendix IX Energy Audit Report 2010

Appendix X Environmental Liabilities Risk Assessment

& DMP



Page 5 of 62 Version 1.0

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION This report fulfils the requirement for an Annual Environmental Report (AER) in

accordance with Condition 11.8 of Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control

Licence (IPPCL) Register No. P0571-03, concerning the scheduled action of Millipore

Ireland Limited, located at Tullagreen, Carrigtwohill, Co. Cork.

The Environmental Protection Agency (hereafter referred to as the ‘Agency’) granted

the current IPPCL to the site on March 09th, 2010. This operating IPPCL supercedes

the previous IPPCL Register No. P0571-01 & P0571-02.

Millipore is licensed for the following scheduled activities, under the Environmental

Protection Agency Act, 1992:

‘The surface treatment of objects or products using organic solvents, with a consumption

capacity of more than 200 tonnes per year’

&

‘The recovery of waste in a facility, within the meaning of the Act of 1996, which facility is

connected with another activity specified in this schedule in respect of which a licence under

Part IV is in force’.

This report is prepared in accordance with the Condition 11.8 of the operating IPPC

licence, which states:

“The licensee shall submit to the Agency, by the 31st March of each year, an AER covering the

previous calendar year. This report, which shall be to the satisfaction of the Agency, shall

include as a minimum the information specified in Schedule D: Annual Environmental Report

of this licence and shall be prepared in accordance with any relevant guidelines issued by the

Agency.”




This AER is compiled in accordance with the Agency Guidance Note for Annual

Environmental Reports and is applicable to the 12-month reporting period from

January 01st 2010 to December 31st 2010 inclusive.

1.2 COMPANY PROFILE Millipore Corporation is a Life Science Leader providing technologies, tools and

services for bioscience research and biopharmaceutical manufacturing. The company

was originally founded in 1954 and has since expanded into a worldwide corporation,

employing approximately 6,000 people worldwide. The company headquarters are

based in Billerica, Massachusetts, USA with subsidiaries and offices in more than 30

countries worldwide.

Millipore specifically provides a portfolio of products and services in: Life Sciences,

Drug Discovery and Development, Laboratory Filtration, Laboratory Water,

Upstream Bioprocessing, Downstream Bioprocessing and Process Monitoring.

In 2010, Millipore Ireland BV changed its legal entity in Ireland to Millipore Ireland

Limited (change effective since October 2009) as detailed in the Transfer Application

to the Agency dated 26th March 2010.

In July 2010, the Millipore Corporation was acquired by Merck KGaA and is now part

of the Merck Millipore division of Merck KGaA. At this stage, there has been little

change or impact to the Cork site, however should this change, the site will notify the

Agency under Condition 1 of the operating IPPC licence. The legal entity of Millipore

Ireland Limited in Cork remains unchanged at this time, however should this change

the licensee will inform the Agency accordingly and submit all required information.

1.3 SITE DESCRIPTION




The Millipore facility is a manufacturer of filtration/diagnostic membranes and

filtration devices and is located in Tullagreen, Carrigtwohill, Co. Cork. The entire site

area comprises 14.5 hectares situated approximately 1km south-west of the village of

Carrigtwohill, east of Cork City.

The facility was originally constructed in 1987 on a greenfield site which was

previously used for agriculture. Since initial commencement of site operations, the

manufacturing capabilities of the site have expanded significantly in the intervening

years.

There are currently approximately 480 personnel employed at the Millipore site. The

facility operates on a twenty-four hour, seven day per week shift basis.

1.4 SITE ACTIVITIES Millipore Ireland Limited manufactures filtration devices and diagnostic membranes

for analytical laboratories as well as the biopharmaceutical and microelectronics

industries at its facility. The primary processes that are carried out on-site include:

1. Membrane Manufacturing:

� IC1 & IC2; and

� Aircast (J1, J2, MW2, K)

2. Device Assembly

� Clean Room 1, 2 & 3

3. Controlled Pore Glass

� CPG

Manufacturing operations are supported by facilities and support services onsite.

Membrane Manufacturing

There are two membrane manufacturing processes operated onsite, namely Aircast

and Immersion Cast (IC).




Aircast membranes are manufactured using high grade nitrocellulose and cellulose

acetate. The lacquer is formed by mixing the high grade nitrocellulose and cellulose

acetate with solvents such as acetone, ethanol and butanol. The casting lacquer is then

carried through a series of formation and drying chambers, whereby the membrane is

formed. Once formed, it is rinsed, dried and slit into rolls.

In the IC process, plastic material is mixed with solvent to form a lacquer. This is then

cast on to a plastic film which carries it through a solvent bath to allow the membrane

to form. The membrane is subsequently washed and dried. It then undergoes further

heat treatment and hydrophilisation to form the finished product.

Assembly Plant:

Within the assembly plant, plastic components are injection moulded and assembled

within specific assembly areas with various types of Millipore membranes to produce

a range of medical and pharmaceutical filtration devices.

CPG:

The CPG process involves heating of the glass within furnaces, quenching, then

grinding and sieving of the glass beads. The glass is then treatment with an acid and

base to remove impurities and dried to form a product. The CPG process is mainly

physical in nature and with the exception of acid / base treatment does not involve

the use of any other chemicals or organic solvents.

Hours of Operation:

The majority of production departments within Millipore work varying shift patterns

over a 24 hour, 7 day period. The Membrane Manufacturing plant shuts down for two

weeks during the summer months for routine maintenance.




1.5 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS

The site is managed and controlled to ensure minimal impact to the environment. The

following environmental considerations apply:

• All process wastewater is directed to the onsite Wastewater Treatment Plant

(WWTP) where it undergoes aerobic treatment prior to discharge to the local

authority sewer for further treatment. The WWTP operates on a 24 hour basis, 7

days per week to coincide with production in the membrane manufacturing

plants.

• All process solvent exhausts are vented to the onsite thermal oxidizers, for

treatment prior to discharge to the environment. Thermal Oxidizers TO1 and TO2

operate either in tandem or on a duty / standby arrangement and TO3 operates

continuously. The thermal oxidizers operate on a 24 hour basis, 7 days per week

to coincide with production in the membrane manufacturing plants.

• Solvents utilised in the IC1 & IC2 manufacturing process are recovered in the

onsite solvent recovery unit and re-used within the manufacturing process.

• Millipore operates site wide programmes to reduce resource consumption,

improve energy efficiency and reduce waste. The Lean Six Sigma manufacturing

program launched in 2003 has contributed significantly towards achieving these

aims. This programme is continuing to go from strength to strength. This process

is driven by the process excellence group on site and has made significant

progress in reducing resource consumption.

1.6 DEVELOPMENTS AT MILLIPORE IN 2010

In 2010, the site EHS organisation structure was redefined and extended. Firstly, the

European EHS Manager was vacated and the role of Site EHS Manager was defined




instead, incorporating fully the role of the Environment Manager. In addition, the role

of Health & Safety Manager remained as part of the organisational structure. In

addition, two new WWTP technicians commenced in dedicated roles in the WWTP,

to provide supervision of the system over a 7 day basis. This extended structure is

outlined in Figure 1.1 below.

Figure 1.1 Overview of EHS Management Structure

EHS Manager

H&S Manager

EHSEngineer

EHS Engineer

EHS Engineer

EHS Engineer

OccupationalHealthNurse

EnvironmentTechnician

WWTP Technician

WWTP Technician

EHSEngineer

The following developments also took place in 2010:

• The IC2 process continued undergoing validation during 2010.

• The CPG process was undergoing commissioning and validation in 2010. In

addition, Phase I of equipment transfer was completed in 2010.




2.0 SUMMARY INFORMATION

2.1 SELF MONITORING DATA – EMISSIONS TO SEWER 2.1.1 Introduction Millipore Ireland Limited is licensed to discharge site wastewater to the local

authority sewer system and associated wastewater treatment plant in Carrigtwohill,

Co. Cork.

There are 6 licensed Emissions to Sewer discharge points as follows:

� SE1 – Discharge from site WWTP

� SE2 – Reject Water from Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant

� SE3 – Reject Water from Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant

� SE5 – Neutralised Wastewater (CPG)

� SE6 – Furnace Cooling Water (CPG)

� SE7 – Reject Water from Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant (CPG)

In accordance with IPPC licence Register No. P0571-03, Condition 5.1 and Schedule

B.3 outline the emission limit values for the emissions to sewer.

2.1.2 Summary of Monitoring Results The summary of monitoring results is provided from site monitoring programmes

carried out in accordance with the requirements of the operating IPPC licence,

Schedule C.3.2.

Tables 2.1, 2.3, 2.5 and 2.8 provide a summary of the mass emissions to sewer for 4

licensed emissions points for all parameters specified in Schedule C.3.2 of the IPPC

licence for the reporting year 2010. A comparison is also provided with mass

emissions for 2009.




Tables 2.2, 2.4, 2.6 and 2.7 provides a summary of the parameters for 5 licensed

emission points that Millipore are required to monitor under Schedule C.3.2 of the

operating IPPC licence.

Table 2.10 provides an overview of compliance with Emissions to Sewer for licensed

emission point SE1.

Emissions to Sewer: SE1 – Discharge from site WWTP

Table 2.1 – Summary of Mass Emissions to Sewer for Licensed Emission Point SE1

Parameter Licensed Mass

Emissions*

Average Mass

Emission

2010

Mass Emission

2010

Mass Emission

2009

Volume (m3) 219, 000 m3/annum

77.64 m3/day 28,185 m3/annum 26,295 m3/annum

Temperature (oC) 35 ºC 28.33 ºC Max 34.54 ºC Max 36.89ºC

pH (pH units) 6.0 – 9.0 7.48 Max = 8.34 Min = 6.51

Max = 8.39 Min = 6.20

BOD (Kg/annum) 251,850 - 9,770 2,638

COD (kg/annum) 569,400 - 18,870 11,335

Suspended Solids

(kg/annum) 98,550 - 4,783 3,593

Total Nitrogen (Kg/annum) 65,700 - 2,006 955

Sulphates (Kg/annum) 10,950 - 616 768

Total Heavy Metals

(Kg/annum) 219 - 3 < 13

OFG’s (Kg/annum) 6,570 - 259 200

*Acrylates (Kg/annum) <219 - < 13 < 6

Organic Solvents

(Kg/annum) 219 - < 28 < 13




Please note, Emission Limit Values as stipulated in the following tables, refer to

IPPC licence Reg. No. P0571-03 as this was the licence in effect for the reporting

period March-December 2010.

* Mass Emissions were calculated utilizing average parameter concentrations and

wastewater flow rates.

Table 2.2 – Summary of Emissions to Sewer for Licensed Emission Point SE1

Parameter Emission Limit

Value

Required

Monitoring

Frequency

Average

Measured Value

2009

Average

Measured Value

2010

Volume (m3/day) 600 Continuous 72.04 77.64

Temperature (oC) 35 Continuous 27.21 28.33

pH (pH units) 6.0 – 9.0 Continuous 7.53 7.48

BOD (mg/l) 1150 Weekly 100.3 346.6

COD (mg/l) 2600 Daily 431.1 669.5

Suspended Solids (mg/l) 450 Daily 136.6 169.7

Total Nitrogen (N) (mg/l) 300 Daily 36.3 71.2

Sulphates (mg/l) 250 Quarterly 29.2 21.9

Total Heavy Metals (mg/l) 1 Annually < 1 0.1

OFG’s (mg/l) 30 Quarterly 7.6 9.2

Acrylates (mg/l) <1 Quarterly < 0.2 < 0.5

Organic Solvents

(Kg/annum) 1 Quarterly < 0.5 <1







Emissions to Sewer: SE2 – Discharge from site ROUF



Emissions*

Average Mass

Emission

2010

Mass Emission

2010

Mass Emission

2009

Volume (m3/annum)

61,320 m3 - 47,220 34,726

Temperature (oC)

22 13.85 Max = 16.4 °C Max = 16.2 °C

pH (pH units) 6-9 8.08 Max = 8.52

Min = 7.35

Max = 8.37

Min = 7.75

COD (kg/year) 6132 - 503.11 470

Suspended Solids (kg/year)

613.2 - 70.8 99

Chlorides (kg/year)

15,530 - 4,982 1,867

Sulphates (kg/year)

15,330 - 4,368 3,632

Total Heavy Metals (kg/year)

61.32 - <11.57 <4.40




* Mass Emissions were calculated utilizing average parameter concentrations and



Parameter Emission

Limit Value

Required

Monitoring

Frequency

Average

Measured

Value

2009

Average

Measured

Value

2010

Volume (m3/day) 168 Bi-annually 95 129




Temperature (oC) 22 ºC Bi-annually 12.31 13.85

pH (pH units) 6.0 – 9.0 Weekly 8.18 8.08

COD (mg/l) 100 Fortnightly 13.55 10.65

Suspended Solids (mg/l) 10 Fortnightly 2.85 1.50

Chlorides (mg/l) 250 Bi-annually 53.75 105.50

Sulphates (mg/l) 250 Bi-annually 104.6 92.50

Total Heavy Metals (mg/l) 1 Annually <0.13 <0.25




Emissions to Sewer: SE3 – Discharge from IC2 ROUF



Emissions*

Average Mass

Emission

2010

Mass Emission

2010

Mass Emission

2009

Volume (m3/year)

43,800 m3 - 18,250 1,468

pH (pH units)

- 8.10 Max = 8.52

Min = 7.11 8.11

COD (Kg/year)

- - 203.10 42


- - 27.8 6

Chlorides (Kg/year)

- - 1,125.4 263

Sulphates (Kg/year)

21,900 - 1,326.2 297

Total Heavy Metals

- - 0.7 <1




(Kg/year)


IPPC licence Reg. No. P0571-03as this was the licence in effect for the reporting


* Mass Emissions were calculated utilsing average parameter concentrations and




Value

Required

Monitoring

Frequency

Average

Measured Value

2009

Average

Measured Value

2010

Volume (m3/day)

120 Bi-annually 4.02 50

pH (pH units) - Weekly 8.11 8.10

COD (mg/l) - Fortnightly 42 11.1

Suspended Solids (mg/l)

- Fortnightly 6 1.5

Chlorides (mg/l)

- Bi-annually 263 61.7

Sulphates (mg/l)

500 Bi-annually 297 72.7

Total Heavy Metals (mg/l)

- Annually <1 0.04

Please note, Emission Limit Values as stipulated in the following tables, refer to IPPC

licence Reg. No. P0571-03 as this was the licence in effect for the reporting period

March-December 2010.

Emissions to Sewer: SE4 – IC2 Cooling Tower Overflow

Emission Point SE-4 was not operational in 2010 and remained diverted to the WWTP

for treatment and subsequent discharge at SE1.




Emissions to Sewer: SE5 – Neutralised Wastewater (CPG)

Emission Point SE-5 was discharged to the onsite WWTP when production operations

started in July 2010.

Emissions to Sewer: SE6 – Furnace Cooling Water (CPG)

There was minimal discharge from Emission Point SE-6 during 2010, due to the

validation and commissioning of the CPG process. Table 2.7 below shows a summary

of average measured values for 2010.



Value

Required

Monitoring

Frequency

Average

Measured Value

2009

Average

Measured Value

2010

Volume (m3/year)

20 Bi-annually - 18

Temperature ((oC))

22 Bi-annually - 19.80

pH (pH units) 6.0-9.0 Monthly - 8.10

COD (mg/l) 100 Bi-annually - 3.7



Chlorides (mg/l)

250 Annually - 22.7

Sulphates (mg/l)

250 Annually - 28.5

Total Heavy Metals (mg/l)





Emissions to Sewer: SE7 – Reject Water from Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment

Plant (CPG)


Parameter Licensed Mass Average Mass Mass Emission Mass Emission




Emissions* Emission

2010

2010 2009

Volume (m3/year)

7,300 m3 - 800 -

pH (pH units) - 8.12 Max = 8.25

Min = 8.07 -

COD (Kg/year) - - 10 -


- - 4 -

Chlorides (Kg/year)

- - 28 -

Sulphates (Kg/year)

3,650 - 38 -

Total Heavy Metals (Kg/year)

- - 0 -




* Mass Emissions were calculated utilsing average parameter concentrations and




Value

Required

Monitoring

Frequency

Average

Measured Value

2009

Average

Measured Value

2010

Volume (m3/day)

20 Bi-annually - -

pH (pH units) - Monthly - 8.20

COD (mg/l) - Bi-annually - 13


- Bi-annually - 5

Chlorides (mg/l)

- Annually - 34.5

Sulphates (mg/l)

500 Annually - 48

Total Heavy - Bi-annually - 0.04




Metals (mg/l)




Table 2.10 - Summary of Exceedences for Emissions to Sewer – SE1

Month

Tem

p

pH

Susp

ende

d

Soli

ds

Sulp

hate

s

OFG

’s

Tota

l

January 0 0 0 0 0 0 February 0 0 0 0 0 0

March 0 0 0 0 0 0 April 0 0 0 0 0 0 May 0 0 0 0 0 0 June 0 0 0 0 0 0 July 0 0 0 0 0 0

August 0 0 0 0 0 0 September 0 0 0 0 0 0

October 0 0 0 0 0 0 November 0 0 0 0 0 0 December 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Non-

compliances 0 0 0 0 0 0

There were no exceedences for any licensed parameter at SE-1 during 2010. This is a

huge improvement on 2009 and previous years.

Millipore also carried out Toxicity Testing on the final effluent from licensed emission

point SE1, as required by the IPPC licence. A representative sample was collected

from the final effluent emission point SE1 on 18th October 2010. The final effluent was

tested against Scophthalmus maximus (turbot). The Toxicity result was 4.2 TU. The

Emission Limit Value for Toxicity is 10 TU.




SE1 Mass Emission 2010 Vs 2009

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

18000

20000

BOD

CODSus

pend

ed Soli

dsTota

l Nitr

ogen

(N)

Sulpha

tes

Total H

eavy M

etals

OFG's

Acryla

tesOrga

nic S

olven

ts

IPPC Licenced Parameters

Kg/

annu

m

2009

2010

A sample of activated sludge was collected on 10th August 2010. The Respirometry

Test result on this sample was <2 TU. The Emission Limit Value for Toxicity is 10 TU.

Both analyses reports demonstrate that the Millipore final discharge to sewer contains

a low level of toxicity. Analysis Reports are included in Appendix I.

2.1.3 Discussion of Monitoring Results The monitoring results as outlined in the above tables demonstrate that monitoring

results for emissions to sewer for compliance with the emission limit values set out in

Schedule B.3 of the IPPCL have improved by 100% in comparison with 2009.

Mass emissions of all licensed parameters in 2010 have increased due to an increase of

production operations. Compliance with all emission licensed parameters has

significantly improved due to an improvement in the performance of the onsite Waste

Water Treatment Plant, as demonstrated in Figure 2.1 below.

Figure 2.1 Mass Emissions 2010 Vs 2009




2.1.4 Conclusion Licensed emissions to sewer represent a significant improvement in compliance with

Emission Limit Values in comparison with 2009.

2.2 SELF MONITORING DATA – EMISSIONS TO SURFACE WATER 2.2.1 Introduction In accordance with Condition 6.15 and Schedule C.2.3 of the operating licence,

monitoring of surface water discharge is conducted at the facility. The emission point

reference no. SW1 is the outlet from the surface water drainage network which is then

discharged to receiving waters.

2.2.2 Summary of Surface Water Emission Monitoring Results Monitoring of surface water discharge is conducted in accordance with Condition

6.15 of the operating IPPC licence. There are no defined emission limit values within

the IPPC licence for surface water emissions. Condition 6.15.2 of the IPPC licence sets

a trigger level for COD at 100 mg/l at SW1. Results of monitoring of surface water

discharges are detailed in within Table 2.8.

Table 2.8 - Summary of Surface Water Monitoring Results 2010

Parameter Required Monitoring

Frequency

Average Measured Value

COD Weekly 20 mg/L

pH Weekly 7.56

Visual Inspection Daily Clean, colorless, odorless

Please note, surface water samples taken, as summarized in Table 2.8, were sampled

at a designated point from the Firewater Retention Ponds, as there was no discharge

of surface water to receiving water in 2010.




2.2.3 Discussion of Surface Water Emission Monitoring Results Surface water continues to be diverted to the local authority sewer system, as agreed

with the Agency in 2008. The site has completed the installation of a continuous TOC

monitoring system at SW1, however challenges with the TOC instrument has resulted

in the system still undergoing commissioning works. The commissioning and

validation process must be fully completed, prior to return to normal surface water

discharges. Full details are provided in the EMP for 2010.

2.3 SELF MONITORING DATA – EMISSIONS TO ATMOSPHERE

2.3.1 Introduction Under Condition 5.1 of the IPPC licence and according to Schedule C.1.1, the site is

required to monitor emissions to atmosphere at the required licensed emission points.

Emission limit values associated with licensed emission points are fully detailed in

Schedule B.1 of the IPPC licence.

The main emissions to atmosphere arising from the Millipore facility comprise point

emissions from the site Regenerative Thermal Oxidisers (RTOs).

2.3.2 Summary of Monitoring Results Condition 11.8 of Millipore’s IPPC licence requires that a summary report of

emissions to atmosphere is submitted to the Agency as part of the AER. Schedule C,

Control and Monitoring of the IPPC licence specifies the monitoring requirements.

Emission limit values are detailed within Schedule B of the IPPC licence.

Mass Emissions for the RTOs from licensed emission points A1-7 and A1-8 are

detailed within Table 2.9 and 2.11.

Table 2.10 and 2.12 provides a summary of emissions monitoring for RTO Emissions

in 2010.




Emissions to Atmosphere: A1-7 – Emissions from TO1/TO2

Table 2.9 – Summary of Mass Emissions to Atmosphere for Licensed Emission Point A1-7


Emissions*

(kg/day)

Mass Emission

2009

(kg/day)

Mass Emission

2010

(kg/annum)

Mass Emission

2009

(kg/annum)

Total Organics

(as C) 27 7.5 2,747 2,270

NOx (as NO2) 72 0.36 44.64 43.2

Table 2.10 – Summary of Emissions to Atmosphere for Licensed Emission Point A1-7

Parameter Emission

Limit

Value

Required

Monitoring

Frequency

Average

Measured

Value

2010

Average

Measured

Value

2009

%

Compliance

Total Organics

(as C) 75mg/m3 Continuously 0.31 kg/hr 0.25 kg/hr 100

NOx (as NO2) 200mg/m3 Quarterly 0.015 kg/hr 0.015 kg/hr 100

Table 2.11 – Summary of Non-Compliances for Licensed Emission Point A1-7

Month Total Organics NOx January 0 0

February 0 0

March 0 0

April 0 0

May 0 0

June 0 0

July 0 0




August 0 0

September 0 0

October 0 0

November 0 0

December 0 0

Total 0 0

Emissions to Atmosphere: A1-8 – Emissions from TO3

Table 2.12 – Summary of Mass Emissions to Atmosphere for Licensed Emission Point A1-8


Emissions*

(kg/day)

Mass Emission

2010

(kg/day)

Mass Emission

2010

(kg/annum)

Mass Emission

2009

(kg/annum)

Total Organics

(as C) 52.2 4.6 1667 2931

NOx (as NO2) 139.2 0.174 20.88 42.46

Table 2.13 – Summary of Emissions to Atmosphere for Licensed Emission Point A1-8


Value

Required

Monitoring

Frequency

Average

Measured

Value

2010

Average

Measured

Value

2009

Total Organics

(as C) 75mg/m3 Continuously 0.19 kg/hr 1.54 kg/hr

NOx (as NO2) 200mg/m3 Quarterly 0.00723kg/hr 0.015 kg/hr

Table 2.14 – Summary of Non-Compliances for Licensed Emission Point A1-8

Month Total Organics NOx

January 0 0

February 1 0




March 0 0

April 1 0

May 0 0

June 1 0

July 0 0

August 0 0

September 0 0

October 0 0

November 0 0

December 0 0

Total 3 0

2.3.3 Discussion of Monitoring Results

All site non-compliances for licensed emission point A1-8 relate directly to bypasses.

There were no ELV exceedances under normal RTO operations. The site developed a

Thermal Oxidiser Compliance Programme, supported by a cross-functional Project

Team to focus on the performance of the site RTO’s in 2009, prevention of bypasses

and non-compliances at licensed emission point A1-7 and A1-8. This dedicated

programme and team remained focused on this effort in 2010 to ensure full IPPC

licence compliance.

A summary of bypasses for 2010 for licensed emission point A1-7 is provided in

Figure 2.2. This trend includes planned bypasses, required for site shutdown in July,

August and December, in addition to the cold weather which resulted in an elevated

number for November due to a valve sticking. Issues with the internal monitoring

equipment LEL’s caused an increase in the number of bypasses in February and May.

However overall, the occurrence of bypasses continues to decrease in comparison

with previous years.




Figure 2.2 Bypass Trends for Licensed Emission Point A1-7 for 2010

A1-7 Bpass Trends 2010

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

A summary of bypasses for 2010 for licensed emission point A1-8 is provided in

Figure 2.3. This trend includes planned bypasses, required for site shutdown in July,

August and December. Issues with the residual air cleaner and signal faults caused an

increase in the number of non-planned bypasses in February. However overall, the

occurrence of bypasses continues to decrease in comparison with previous years. In

addition, the occurrence of non-compliant bypasses has reduced significantly in

comparison with 2009.




Figure 2.3 Bypass Trends for Licensed Emission Point A1-8 for 2010

As previously detailed, in 2009 the site developed a Thermal Oxidiser Compliance

Programme, supported by a cross-functional Project Team to focus on the

performance of the site RTOs, prevention of bypasses and non-compliances at

licensed emission point A1-7 and A1-8. This dedicated programme and team

remained focused on this effort in 2010 to ensure full IPPC licence compliance.




2.4 SELF MONITORING DATA – WASTE EMISSIONS

2.4.1 Introduction Wastes arising at the Millipore facility comprise hazardous and non-hazardous waste

materials, which are managed and controls in accordance with Condition 8 and

Condition 11.9 of the operating IPPC licence.

Total waste generation in 2010 from normal site operations was 3,033 tonnes.

Total waste production at Millipore is divided as follows:

� 56.3% hazardous waste

� 43.7% non-hazardous waste

Non-hazardous waste generated as a result of the site improvement and cleanup

programmes in 2010 was 8,569 tonnes. Please note: these waste disposal details are

not included in the PRTR for 2010 as these were considered abnormal operations and

do not represent typical operations onsite.

There were no rejected consignments of waste at the Millipore facility in 2010.

2.4.2 Summary of Waste Emissions

The following section summarizes waste statistics for the reporting period of January

01st to December 31st 2010. Additional waste generation data is presented in Table

2.15. A copy of the waste management record is included as Appendix II to this

report.




Table 2.15 – Summary of Hazardous and Non-hazardous Waste

.

Figure 2.4 Overview of Waste Generation 2009 Vs 2010

2010

Recovered /

Recycled off site (Tonnes)

Recovered on site

(Tonnes)

Disposed (Tonnes)

Total (Tonnes)

Non Hazardous Waste 574.4 0 758.3 1332.7

Hazardous Waste 219.8 1286.9 209.0 1715.7

Total 794.2 1286.9 967.3 3048.4

2009

Recovered /

Recycled off site (Tonnes)

Recovered on site

(Tonnes)

Disposed (Tonnes)

Total (Tonnes)

Non Hazardous Waste 691.5 0 917 1,608.5

Hazardous Waste 200.5 736.1 121.4 1058

Total 892 736.1 1038.4 2666.5







2.5 AGENCY MONITORING & ENFORCEMENT 2.5.1 Agency Monitoring The Agency conducts routine sampling and monitoring programmes of site emissions

to assess the environmental performance of the facility. In 2010, the Agency

conducted the following environmental sampling and monitoring events:

Date Detail of Agency Sampling & Monitoring

03rd February 2010 Monitoring of Licensed Emissions: SE-1, SE-2

28th April 2010 Monitoring of Licensed Emissions: SE-1, SE-2

19th September 2010 Monitoring of Licensed Emissions: SE-1, SE-2

27th October 2010 Monitoring of Licensed Emissions: SE-1, SE-2, SE-3

2.5.2 Agency Enforcement

In addition to monitoring, the Agency also conducts inspections and audits of the

facility to independently assess the site environmental performance. In 2010, the

Agency conducted the following site audits and inspections:

Date Detail of Agency Inspection/Audit

30th June 2010

Site Inspection Completed by Site Agency Inspector (Announced).

11 observations noted.

As part of this inspection, the site also participated in an assessment

regarding the European Commission IPPC Directive

Implementation, conducted by Entec.

01st December 2010 Site Inspection by Agency Inspector from the Licensing Division

(Scheduled). 3 observations noted.




3.0 RESOURCE CONSUMPTION

3.1 ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION Millipore’s electricity requirements are provided through the national grid and also

from a combined heat and power plant (CHP), which is operated onsite in association

with Bord Gais. The main electricity requirements onsite comprise plant equipment,

utilities, heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC), lighting, compressors,

process, office and other site use. Millipore continually strives for improved energy

efficiency. Table 3.1 provides an overview of electricity data for 2010. Figure 3.1

demonstrates the improvement in energy efficiencies onsite in 2010.

Table 3.1 - Overview of Electricity Consumption for 2010

Energy 2009 2010

Electricity (MwH) 17,205 19,065

Figure 3.1 – Trending of Electricity Consumption




Electricity Consumption vs Production Volume (1996 - 2010)

0

5,000,000

10,000,000

15,000,000

20,000,000

25,000,000

30,000,000

35,000,000

40,000,000

45,000,000

50,000,000

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Year

Vol

ume

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

Ele

ctri

city

Usa

ge M

Wh

Volume Total Electricity MWh

3.2 NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION Millipore operates two natural gas driven boilers, these serve to meet the heating

requirements of the facility. The combined heat and power plant also uses natural gas

as a fuel source. Millipore continually strives for improved energy efficiency. Table

3.2 provides an overview of natural gas data for 2010. Figure 3.2 demonstrates the

improvement in energy efficiencies onsite in 2010.

Table 3.2 - Overview of Natural Gas Consumption for 2010

Energy 2009 2010

Natural Gas 21,816 26,113

Figure 3.2 – Trending of Gas Consumption




Gas Consumption vs Production Volume (1996 - 2010)

0

5,000,000

10,000,000

15,000,000

20,000,000

25,000,000

30,000,000

35,000,000

40,000,000

45,000,000

50,000,000

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Year

Vol

ume

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

Gas

Usa

ge M

Wh

Volume Total Gas MWh

3.3 WATER CONSUMPTION Water is required at the Millipore facility for production, utilities and site

laboratories, canteen and support activities. Water is provided by the local authority

mains water supply. Table 3.3 provides an overview of water consumption data for

2010. Figure 3.3 demonstrates the trend in water use vs. production onsite in 2010.

Table 3.3 - Overview of Water Consumption for 2008

Resource 2009 2010

Water (m3) 96,304 111,892




Figure 3.3 – Trending of Water Consumption

Water Consumption vs Production Volume (1996 - 2010)

0

5,000,000

10,000,000

15,000,000

20,000,000

25,000,000

30,000,000

35,000,000

40,000,000

45,000,000

50,000,000

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Year

Vol

ume

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

Wat

er U

sage

m3

Volume Total Water m3




4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL INCIDENTS & COMPLAINTS

4.1 ENVIRONMENTAL INCIDENTS As part of the Millipore EHS Management System, all environmental incidents are

recorded and reported in accordance with the requirements of the IPPC licence.

Table 4.1 provides an overview of all reportable incidents to the Agency in 2010.

Table 4.1 Overview of Environmental Incidents 2010

Reference

No. Date

Incident Ref.

No. Details of Incident

EPA

Notification

01 17/02/2010 10-0259 Bypass of A1-8 and exceedences of

ELVs. Yes - 17/02/2010


ELVs. Yes - 27/04/2010

03 30/04/2010 10-0763 Malfunctioning continuous online

sampler at SE1 Yes - 04/05/2010


ELVs. Yes - 16/06/2010

05 13/08/2010 10-1568 IC1 Inprocess Test Bench Sink Outlet Yes – 13/08/2010

06 09/06/2010 10-1112 High SS in SE5 Yes – 09/06/2010

All incidents were immediately followup accordingly, with corrective actions, root

cause investigations and appropriate preventative actions. Full details are available

on site files and have been reported to the regulatory authorities as appropriate.

4.2 ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLAINTS As part of the Millipore EHS Management System, all environmental complaints are

recorded and reported in accordance with the requirements of the IPPC licence.

Table 4.2 provides an overview of all complaints received by the site in 2010:

Table 4.1 Overview of Environmental Complaints 2010




Reference

No. Date

Incident Ref.

No. Details of Complaint

EPA

Notification

01 25/06/2010 10-01260 Odour Complaint at the N25 Yes – 25/06/2010

The complaint was immediately follow-up accordingly, with corrective actions, root

cause investigations and appropriate preventative actions. Full details are available

on site files and have been reported to the regulatory authorities as appropriate.

4.3 AER SUMMARY DATA TABLE Emissions and Waste Transfers Data for the 2010 reporting year as included in the

Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (PRTR) were uploaded by Millipore into the

web-based reporting system. This PRTR was submitted electronically to the Agency

as part of this submission on 01st April 2011.

A hard copy of the PRTR report is also included in Appendix III.




5.0 MANAGEMENT OF THE ACTIVITY

5.1 INTRODUCTION An Environmental Management System (EMS) required under Condition 2 of the

operating IPPC licence, facilitates the management of the environmental impact of

site activities, implementation of environmental legislative requirements and site

business needs.

The Safety, Environmental and Quality Management systems were incorporated into

one Operations Management System for the site until 2010 when a decision was made

to create separate Quality and Environmental, Health & Safety Management Systems.

The new EHS Management System is an all encompassing EHS Management system

for Cork Operations, incorporating environmental, health and safety requirements,

which provides the framework and systems for IPPC licence and Seveso compliance

and facilitate successful recertification to ISO14000 and OSHAS 18000.

An overview of the company management organisation structure and the

Environment, Health and Safety department organization structure is illustrated

below.




Figure 5.1 Overview of EHS Management Structure

EHS Manager

H&S Manager

EHSEngineer

EHS Engineer

EHS Engineer

EHS Engineer

OccupationalHealthNurse

EnvironmentTechnician

WWTP Technician

WWTP Technician

EHSEngineer

5.2 ENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTIVES & TARGETS A report on the Environmental Management Programme for 2010 and progress on

same is provided in Appendix IV which forms the Environmental Management

Programme Report for the period 01st January 2010 to 31st December 2010.




EMP FOR 2011 The proposed Environmental Management Programme for 2011, as required under

Condition 2.2.2.3 and Objectives and Targets as required under Condition 2.2.2.2 of

the IPPCL are detailed in Appendix V – Environmental Management Programme

2011.

5.3 POLLUTANT RELEASE AND TRANSFER REGISTER

5.3.1 Pollutant Release and Transfer Register for 2010

In accordance with IPPC licence Condition 6.15, Millipore has prepared a Pollution

Release and Transfer Register for the site. The PRTR has been prepared in accordance

with the relevant guidelines issued by the Agency and has been submitted

electronically in the specified format as part of the AER. A copy of the PRTR is

provided in Appendix III.

Having referenced EC Regulation 166/2006, the only substance used at Millipore

which is listed in Annex II is NMVOCs. However, the quantity released to

atmosphere falls below the threshold of 100,000 kg/year and has not been reported

for 2010.

Millipore transfers in excess of 2 tonnes of hazardous waste per year beyond the

boundaries of its facility and the quantities for 2010 are reported in the PRTR. All

data is expressed in tonnes/year and with three significant digits. Millipore has also

reported the licensed emissions from its site for 2010 in the PRTR.

5.3.2 Pollutant Release and Transfer Register Millipore will prepare a Pollution Release and Transfer Register for the site for 2011.

Data relating to NMVOCs (and any new chemical listed in Annex II) will be gathered

for the PRTR and compared to the relevant thresholds in the Regulation. Millipore




will report any releases to air, water and land of any pollutant specified in Annex II

for which the applicable threshold value specified in Annex II have been exceeded.

For 2011, Millipore will report all licensed emissions and transfers of hazardous and

non-hazardous waste from its facility in the PRTR.

5.4 SOLVENT MASS BALANCE & SOLVENT MANAGEMENT PLAN

In accordance with IPPC licence Condition 6.8.4, Millipore has prepared a Solvent

Management Plan for the site. The solvent management plan was prepared in

accordance with the Emission of Volatile Organic Compounds from Organic Solvents

Regulations. The report is located in Appendix VI. The report examines six solvents

on site: DMAc, methanol, acetone, ethanol, butanol and N Methyl-2-Pyrrolidinone

(NMP).

Condition 6.8.1 of the Millipore IPPC license requires that ‘fugitive emission values shall

not exceed 5% of solvent input’. In 2010, fugitive emissions accounted for only 1.21 % of

input.

Millipore Ireland uses DMAc which carries the R61 risk phrase. Under condition

6.8.2, such substances should be replaced. However, in Millipore’s case this is not

currently possible. DMAc on site is a base solvent for the membrane manufacturing

process and is core to the Millipore manufacturing activity. At this stage there is no

programme in place to replace this solvent as this change would require a whole new

reformulation of the membrane product as well as total revalidation of the process

which would be a huge undertaking. Longer term, the Millipore strategy is to replace

all Durapore membrane products on the market with PES membranes, the

manufacture of which does not require the use of DMAc. DMAc is used on site

having regard to all applicable Health and Safety legislation to ensure there is no

health risk to employees or the public.




6.0 LICENCE SPECIFIC REPORTS

6.1 NOISE 6.1.1 Introduction In accordance with Condition 6.14 of the IPPC license an environmental noise survey

was carried out at Millipore site on the 9th – 10th December 2010. This survey was

conducted in accordance with the requirements of the:

• EPA Environmental Noise Survey Guidance Document (2003)

• EPA Guidance for Noise in Relation to Scheduled Activities (2006)

• ISO 1996 Description and measurement of environmental noise

Condition 4.5 and Schedule B4 of the licence assigns a noise limit of 55dB(A) by day

and 45 dB(A) by night at the nearest noise sensitive locations (Leq 30 minutes). Appendix

VII contains a copy of the Noise Survey for 2010.

Night-time noise levels were above the EPA scheduled limit of LAeq

45dB (A) on both

occasions. It was observed that elevated the LAeq

noise levels (which takes account of

all noise sources and then deduces an averages level) was dominated by two constant

traffic sources within an immediate proximity to Tullagreine House.

However, if the LA10

values are assessed against the LAeq

values; a difference of only

~2dB is observed. Therefore LA10,

which is a measure of locally generated noise i.e. the

higher noise levels present in the ambient noise, seems to greatly effect the average

noise environment (LAeq

). LA10

can be used as a measure of traffic as traffic is the

generated locally.

This indicates that Millipore’s nighttime operations (which can be considered

background noise) can be considered low in terms of its influence over the average

ambient noise environment (LAeq

) at the noise sensitive receptor.




Daytime noise levels ranged from LAeq

60.5 - 55.8dB (A). The noise environment was

again primarily influenced by the N25 and Cobh Road. Plant noise was periodically

audible during lulls in traffic. Plant noise when audible was considered steady state.

Daytime noise levels were above the EPA scheduled limit of 55dB (A) on both

occasions. Again both the LAeq

and LA10

values show similar values with a variation of

~2dB. Therefore traffic was concluded to be the dominant noise source in the ambient

noise environment.

The noise sensitive location of the house and NSL 1 is subject to the IPPC noise limits.

Boundary positions are not subject to limits. Table 6.1 outlines the noise levels

identified from the Millipore site:

Table 6.1 - Noise Survey Results

Ambient Noise Day Time (dB (A)

LAeq 30mins)

Ambient Noise Night Time (dB(A) LAeq

30mins)

Ambient Noise Day Time

(dB (A) LA10

30mins)

Ambient Noise Night Time

(dB(A) LA10

30mins)

Description

2009 2010 2009 2010 2010 2010

Nearest House <49 N/A 43 N/A N/A N/A

NSL 1 (Result 1) N/A 60.5 N/A 50.3 62.2 52.9

NSL 1 (Result 2) N/A 55.8 N/A 50.7 56.7 52.8

Location A – Western Boundary

<53 54.3 47 52.3 55.1 53.5

Location B –Western Boundary

<55 55.4 51 52.5 56.8 54.2

Location C– Southern Boundary

53 55.7 46 51.1 56.7 52.8

Location D – Facing Canteen

<52 54.9 <45 51.1 56.7 52.7




Location E – Northern Boundary

<60 62.5 54 60.0 63.8 60.7

Location F – Northern Boundary

60 66.0 56 56.7 66.7 59.8

Location G – Eastern Boundary

<49 54.7 45 53.0 56.7 55.5

6.2 TESTING OF UNDERGROUND TANKS, PIPELINES & BUNDS 6.2.1 Introduction In accordance with IPPC license condition 6.11, the integrity and water tightness of all

underground pipes, tanks, bunding structures and their resistance to penetration by

water or other materials carried or stored therein shall be tested. The testing shall be

carried out at least once every three years.

Millipore undertook an extensive underground structure review programme in

December 2009. The comprehensive programme included a review and

inspection/test of all fixed/temporary bunds, underground tanks/sumps and

underground pipelines by a chartered engineer. The proposed scope of works and

programme detail was submitted to the EPA on the 29th Sep 2009 and commenced

formally onsite in December 2009. The programme has been ongoing since this time,

and to date this programme is 90% complete and on completion will be submitted to

the EPA in the form of a full report. This will be completed in 2011.

6.3 GROUNDWATER MONITORING 6.3.1 Introduction In accordance with Schedule C6 of the IPPC licence, ERM were commissioned to

complete groundwater monitoring at the Millipore facility in 2010. Ground water

monitoring was completed at all five licensed monitoring points in October 2010.

Orthophosphate, sodium, chloride and potassium were detected at concentrations

above the IGV criteria. The orthophosphate results are consistent across the site and

are believed to be representative of the aquifer in this area.




Potassium is elevated in the site monitoring wells but not the background monitoring

wells. The potassium may be as a result of localised geological conditions or the use

of fertilisers in the area.

AGW5 has historically shown elevated sodium and chloride levels since it was first

installed in 2003. The reported related to the installation of the boreholes on site

indicates clean beach sands were encountered at the base of this borehole which may

signify an ancient raised beach at this location and may result in sea water

contributing to the groundwater regime at this location. This would explain the

elevated sodium, chloride and conductivity readings at this location. In addition, due

to the extreme weather conditions in Q4 2009 and Q1 2010, the site used salt as a

deicing agent to ensure safety of site personnel and vehicles. AGW5 is adjacent to the

main access roadway into the site and therefore this activity may have resulted in an

impact. It should also be noted that the receptor of concern, the Slatty Water, will be

saline. It is therefore considered the groundwater from the site is unlikely to represent

a significant risk to the Slatty water.

ERM were also commissioned in 2010 to complete quarterly groundwater monitoring

at additional monitoring locations, provide a status of groundwater quality onsite

following spill incidents onsite in 2008 and assess effectiveness of associated

remediation works.

Based on the Q4 2010 groundwater monitoring results, ERM concludes that previous

contaminants ethanol and butanol from 2008 were below laboratory detection limits.

Acetone was only detected in two monitoring points: SB4 and SB8. The concentration

in SB4 was below the US EPA value. The concentration in SB8 of was slightly above

the US EPA value of 1.5mg/l showing an increase from Q3 (concentration of 0.3mg/l

in Q3), but still well below the concentration of 36mg/l detected in the Q2 monitoring

round. IPA was detected in SB4 and SB8. These concentrations are below the Dutch

Intervention Value (DIV).




Five of the nine results for COD were below the laboratory detection limit of 7mg/l.

Three of the remaining five samples were below 100mg/l, the limit specified in the

IPPC licence for surface water discharge for the site. The remaining samples, SB2 and

SB8, had concentrations of 223mg/l and 1,842mg/l respectively.

ERM note that COD levels within the monitoring wells also show a marked

improvement. Results for COD are all below 100mg/l, the limit specified in the IPPC

licence for surface water discharge for the site with the exception of SB2 and SB8.

ERM conclude that SB8 remains the sampling location with the highest number of

detections. The well at this location exhibits low recharge which is thought to reflect a

discontinuous perched water unit. This limits the potential for the lateral migration of

any impacted waters. This is supported by the absence of these compounds in

samples taken from the adjacent (SB7, less than 10m from SB8) and down gradient

monitoring wells (SB5). ERM recommend continued sampling of SB8 and wells in the

vicinity of this location (SB2, SB4 and SB7) and downgradient (SB5) to establish the

trend over time.

ERM Groundwater Reports are included in Appendix VIII.

6.4 ENERGY EFFICIENCY 6.4.1 Introduction In accordance with Condition 7.1 of the IPPC license Millipore commissioned an

internal source in the Millipore Corporation to complete an Energy Audit of site

operations in Quarter 1, 2010. The goal of this Energy Audit was to identify 3,000,000

kWh of energy efficiency measures (EEMs) at the Cork, Ireland facility in order to

propose an energy action plan specific to the Cork facility and ultimately reduce the

consumption of non-renewable resources. The audit comprised a detailed site survey

and analysis of historical site data from the utility provider (Dalkia) in order to set a




baseline for utility use at the Cork facility. Electrical and natural gas usage data spans

from January 2006 to March 2010.

Following completion of the audit, Millipore Corporation issued a comprehensive

report on findings and proposed energy efficient measures, greenhouse gas emissions

savings and cost saving opportunities. The report from this energy audit is provided

within Appendix IX.

The proposed Energy Efficiencies from the report were identified in the following

systems, which will be progressed as part of site improvement programmes over

forthcoming years:

� Lighting

� Compressed Air

� Boilers

� Chillers

6.5 RESOURCE & MATERIALS EFFICIENCY 6.5.1 Introduction In accordance with IPPC licence Condition 7.4, Millipore prepared a Resource

Efficiency Report which was submitted with the 2007 AER. This report outlined the

programmes in place to increase process efficiency and raw materials consumption

and reduce waste. Programmes which impact this issue include the Lean Six Sigma

Process, Sustainability Initiative as well as the Waste and Energy Management

Programmes. Findings from the report and improvement opportunities have been

included in the Environmental Management Programme for 2010.

6.6 WATER EFFICIENCY




6.6.1 Introduction

In accordance with IPPC licence Condition 7.3 of the IPPC licence, Millipore prepared

a report on progress made and proposals being developed to reduce water demand and

the volume of trade effluent discharge. This report was included in the 2007 AER.

6.7 ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITIES RISK ASSESSMENT 6.7.1 Introduction In accordance with Condition 12 of the IPPC licence, Millipore commissioned external

consultants, ERM to complete a full Environmental Liabilities Risk Assessment in

February 2010. This was then independently reviewed by external consultants

Environet Solutions in March 2011, for formal submission as part of this AER. The

ERM & Environet Solutions report is provided in Appendix X.

Based on the costs identified within the Environmental Liabilities Risk Assessment,

ERM recommend that the worst case scenario cost identified in this assessment,

including immediate response costs, clean up and long term monitoring is estimated

to be �1,000,000, revised to �897,500 by Environet Solutions as part of the 2011

Review.

Millipore currently hold insurance policies, however the site are currently

investigating the options to provide supplementary financial provision through other

means. Confirmation on this financial provision will be forwarded to the EPA shortly.

6.8 DECOMMISSIONING MANAGEMENT PLAN 6.8.1 Introduction In accordance with Condition 10 of the IPPC licence, Millipore commissioned ERM to

complete a full Residuals Management Plan in February 2010. This was then




independently reviewed by external consultants Environet Solutions in March 2011,

for formal submission as part of this AER. The ERM & Environet Solutions report is

provided in Appendix XI.

Following completion of the Residuals Management Plan, ERM has identified that the

cost associated with the Closure of the site has been estimated as �900,000. This cost

remains valid and has not been revised by Environet Solutions as part of the 2011

Review.

Millipore currently hold insurance policies, however the site are currently

investigating the options to provide supplementary financial provision through other

means. Confirmation on this financial provision will be forwarded to the EPA shortly.



Appendix I

Toxicity Reports

Sheet no. 1 of 5 sheets

CONFIDENTIAL REPORT

This report relates only to the sample(s) tested.

Client: Title:

Millipore Ireland Ltd Respirometry Test - Inhibition of

Tullagreen oxygen consumption by activated

Carrigtwohill sludge.

Co Cork (IPPC Licence Reg. No P0571-03)

Attn: Lorena Gordillo

Job Ref. D082 Report by: Joe McNamee, MSc

Date Sample Received: 10th August 2010

Purchase Order No.: N3041401

Copies to: Date Reported: 16th August 2010.

Client work - terms and conditions of acceptance

1. Reports issued by Enterprise Environmental are copyright to Enterprise Environmental and shall not be used, either in whole or in part, for

the purposes of advertising, publicity or litigation without the prior written consent of Enterprise Environmental.

2. All reports shall only be reproduced in full.

3. All samples received for testing or laboratory work are considered perishable and shall be disposed of or returned to the client one week after

the date of the final report unless instructions to the contrary have been notified to Enterprise Environmental by the client within the said

one week period.

4. Payment for work carried out shall be in accordance with the terms and conditions stated on Enterprise Environmental invoices.

5. No action or legal proceeding shall be taken (except in the case of wilful neglect or default) against Enterprise Environmental by reason of

or arising out of the carrying out of any research, investigation, test or analysis or the publication of the results thereof in the name of

Enterprise Environmental.

6. Enterprise Environmental will not release any information received from or provided to the client in relation to this report except as may be

required by law or as specified by the client.

7. The laws of Ireland shall apply.

Enterprise Environmental

Unit 1D

M4 Interchange Park

Celbridge

Co Kildare

Business Registration No. 321939

EEEEnterprise EEEEnvironmental “a specialist environmental monitoring service”

Contact: Phone: 01 6279935, Mob: 087 6488690, Fax: 01 6279935, Email: [email protected]

Millipore Ireland Ltd, - IPPC Reg. No. P0571-03 - August 2010

Job No: D082 Report By: Enterprise Environmental Page 2 of 5

Introduction Enterprise Environmental was requested by Millipore Ireland Ltd, to carry out Respirometry testing

on a sample of trade effluent arising from their manufacturing operation in Tullagreen,

Carrigtwohill, Co. Cork. The company have been issued with an Integrated Pollution Prevention &

Control Licence (Register No. P0571-03) by the Environmental Protection Agency which permits

the discharge of their trade effluent to the Local Authority foul sewer. The sewer is connected to

the nearby municipal waste water treatment plant in Carrigtwohill which provides full biological

treatment of the trade effluent in admixture with domestic sewage using an activated sludge

process. Schedule C.3.2 of the Licence requires an annual Respirometry test to be carried out on

the emissions to the sewer at SE1.

A representative sample of trade effluent was collected by Enterprise Environmental on the 10th of

August 2010 and tested using a Respirometry test based on an International Organisation for

Standardisation test method (EN ISO 8192:2007). This ISO test specifies a method for assessing

the inhibitory effect of a test material or wastewater on the oxygen consumption (respiration rate) of

activated sludge micro-organisms. It provides information on inhibitory or stimulatory effects after

short term exposure (up to 180 minutes) of the test sample on the activated sludge micro-organisms.

The test is intended to represent conditions in a biological wastewater treatment plant and was

carried out on the sample using activated sludge from Carrigtwohill municipal wastewater treatment

plant.

Test Principle In the presence of easily biodegradable substances, activated sludge consumes oxygen at a higher

rate than in their absence, depending on, among other factors, the concentration of micro-organisms

present. The addition of a toxic concentration of a test material will result in a decrease in the

oxygen consumption rate. The test uses a volumetric Respirometer to continually measure and

record the oxygen consumption rate (respiration rate) of the activated sludge at a fixed mixed liquor

suspended solids concentration. The sludge is fed with a non toxic, biodegradable substrate

(control) and the oxygen consumption rate is compared to sludge fed with the control substrate plus

the test sample. In the event that the oxygen consumption rate of the test is lower than the control

this indicates biological inhibition/toxicity. The percent inhibition of the oxygen consumption is

calculated after a stipulated time (180 minutes) by comparing the oxygen consumption rate of the

control sample (OECD synthetic sewage)(1) with the oxygen consumption rate of the sample

containing test material. This test is repeated for a range of test sample concentrations to enable an

inhibition curve to be calculated.

The sensitivity of the activated sludge can be checked using a reference substance,

3,5-dichlorophenol. This substance has an EC50 toxicity value in the range of 2 to 25 mg/l when

tested against a nitrifying municipal activated sludge and a value of 5 to 40 mg/l when tested

against a non nitrifying sludge. When the same sludge source is regularly used its sensitivity only

needs to be checked intermittently and when a different source is used its sensitivity should be

checked for each series of tests where possible.

(1) OECD synthetic sewage Standard synthetic sewage as defined by the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation

and Development made up at 100 fold strength. Its composition is:

Peptone 16g

Meat extract 11 g

Urea 3 g

Sodium chloride 0.7 g

Calcium chloride dihydrate 0.4 g

Magnesium sulphate heptahydrate 0.2 g

Dipotassium hydrogen phosphate 2.8 g

Water to 1000 ml



Test Method The test was carried out in accordance with EN ISO 8192:2007. The only deviation from the test

method involved the use of an automatic volumetric respirometer to continually measure and record

the oxygen consumption rate instead of a one off reading using a dissolved oxygen meter. A state of

the art Arthur Bench Respirometer was used. This utilises a 1 litre sample chamber and an air uplift

column to provide aeration and mixing which simulates the aeration basin of a full scale activated

sludge treatment plant.

Test Conditions

Test Sample: Millipore Ireland Ltd, Trade effluent, 24 h composite sample

at SE1, 9th to 10

th of August 2010.

Activated Sludge Source: Carrigtwohill (upper basin) sludge collected on the 10/08/10

Pre-treatment of sludge: Allowed settle for approx 30 minutes and the supernatant

decanted to increase the MLSS concentration. Aerated at 22 oC until used in the test. The sludge was screened for

nitrification and found to be nitrifying.

pH of Sludge: 7.1

pH of test sample: 7.0

Suspended Solids concentration of

Activated Sludge in test chamber: 1,500 mg/l

Test Duration: 180 minutes

Test Temperature: 22 oC

Test Date: 11th August 2010

Definitions

EC50 The effective concentration (0 to 100 % v/v or mg/l) of the test sample giving a calculated or

interpolated inhibition of oxygen consumption of 50 % as compared to a blank control.

Toxic Unit. An alternative means of expressing effluent toxicity (0 to 100 % v/v only) as a function of the

undiluted sample. This is known as the Toxic Unit and is defined as 100/ EC50.

Inhibition Threshold. The effective concentration (0 to 100 % v/v or mg/l) of the test sample giving a

calculated or interpolated inhibition of oxygen consumption of zero as compared to a blank control.



Results

Sludge Sensitivity Reference Test (Carrigtwohill activated sludge of the 10th August 2010)

This test assesses the suitability of the activated sludge for the ISO8192:2007 test. The 180 min

EC50 toxicity value of 3,5-dichlorophenol should be within the range of 2 to 25 mg/l (nitrifying

sludge).

Reference Substance Used: 3,5-dichlorophenol.

Date tested: 11th August 2010

Result of Sludge Sensitivity Test:

180 min EC50 toxicity value: 20 to 30 mg/l (see inhibition Chart No. 1)

As this value was within the normal range (2 to 25 mg/l) for nitrifying municipal activated

sludge the sludge was suitable for testing purposes

R² = 0.956

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

0.1 1 10 100

Inhibition %

3,5-Dichlorophenol concentration mg/l

Test for Inhibition of Oxygen Consumption by Activated Sludge. 1Chart .minute test180 , 2007: 8192 ISO Test Method Reference: EN

10/08/10Sludge Sensitivity Test: Carrigtwohill A/S of

Inhibition Threshold

1 to 2 mg/l

EC50 20 to30 mg/l



Sample Test

(Millipore Ireland Ltd, Trade effluent, 24 h composite sample at SE1, 9th to 10

th of August 2010).

The sample was tested in duplicate at a sample concentration of 50 % v/v (500 ml of test sample

made up to 1 litre with activated sludge). No inhibition was found after 180 minutes.

The results are presented in the table below and the Respiration chart for the control and the test

sample (in duplicate) is presented in Chart 2. The Chart shows the respiration rate of the test

sample to be a little higher than the control indicating biodegradation of the test sample by the

acclimated microbes in the activated sludge.

Result of Sample Test:

Summary. The results indicate that the Millipore Ireland Ltd, trade effluent sample at SE1 exhibited no acute

biological inhibition/toxicity to a mixed microbial population, including nitrifying organisms in

Carrigtwohill activated sludge at up to 50 % v/v concentration in the sludge.

EC50 toxicity value (180 minute) : Greater than 50 % concentration v/v

Toxic Unit value (180 minute) : Less than 2 TU

Inhibition Threshold (180 minute) : Greater than 50% concentration v/v

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180

Slu

dg

e R

esp

ira

tio

n R

ate

(ml

ox

yg

en

/l/

h)

Time (min)

Respirometry Chart, Millipore Ireland Ltd, 2Chart

Trade Effluent, Comp sample (SE1) 9th to 10th Aug 2010

Red line = Control, 32 ml synthetic sewage only, (100 fold strength) in 1000 ml of activated sludge

Blue line (duplicate) = Test, 500 ml of Millipore Ireland Ltd, trade effluent composite sample at SE1, 9th to 10th of Aug 2010 +

32 ml synthetic sewage (100 fold strength) in 1000 ml of activated sludge



Appendix II

Waste Management Record

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total

General Waste Offices,All production departments

Non-hazardous 20-03-07 Yes 18640 24240 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42880 Greenstar CK-WMC-323/05 Cork County Council Greenstar,Glanmire, Co. Cork 136-2 EPA Knockharley Landfill, Naven 146-1 EPA

General Waste Offices,All production departments

Non-hazardous 20-03-07 Yes 0 0 25080 32380 15760 25600 20840 15147 22275 18468 19760 17180 212490 Greenstar CK -WMC-323/05 Cork County Council Greenstar,Glanmire, Co. Cork 136-2 EPABallynagran Landfill, County

Wicklow 165-1 EPA

General Waste Canteen Non-hazardous 20-03-01 Yes 2440 2480 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4920 Greenstar CK-WMC-323/05 Cork County Council Greenstar,Glanmire, Co. Cork 136-2 EPA Knockharley Landfill, Naven 146-1 EPA

General Waste Canteen Non-hazardous 20-03-01 Yes 0 0 2620 3290 2680 2351 2612 1106 806 2067 1949 1329 20810 Greenstar CK-WMC-323/05 Cork County Council Greenstar,Glanmire, Co. Cork 136-2 EPABallynagran Landfill, County

Wicklow 165-1 EPA

Food Waste Canteen Non-hazardous 20-01-08 Yes 0 0 0 0 0 0 800 800 800 800 800 800 4800 Greenstar CK-WMC-323/05 Cork County Council Greenstar,Glanmire, Co. Cork 136-2 EPAMilltown Composting Systems

Ltd. County Tipperary.WP 019 02

South Tipperary County Council

Plastic Millex 25,Cleanroom 3 Non-hazardous 15-01-02 Yes 1790 8550 3340 10080 2470 3890 2195 3460 2880 3780 4100 3009 49544 Tarrants WCP-CK-08-0588-01 Cork County Council Glyntown, Glanmire.Co. Cork WFP-CK-10-0047-02 Cork County Council Asian Eagle,Little Island,Cork. CKS 552/08 Cork County Council

Cardboard Cleanroom3,Millex 25,Durapore

Non-hazardous 15-01-01 Yes 4900 11220 8620 8820 12780 10024 4900 7644 8560 9348 11172 9996 107984 Tarrants WCP-CK-08-0588-01 Cork County Council Glyntown, Glanmire.Co. Cork WFP-CK-10-0047-02 Cork County Council

Xiamen Industrial Trading Company,

Huli,Xiangiu Road,

Xiamen,China.

SEPA Licence China

Annealing Paper Durapore Non-hazardous 20-01-01 Yes 10700 12100 16050 12450 11400 13900 9050 7350 14250 11450 9400 14150 142250 Tarrants WCP-CK-08-0588-01 Cork County Council Glyntown, Glanmire.Co. Cork WFP-CK-10-0047-02 Cork County CouncilPeute Papier Recycling

BV,Baanhoekweg 4,3313 La Dordrecht.

Permit No IreG004/08 Holland

P.E.T. Rolls Durapore Non-hazardous 20-01-39 Yes 4200 7600 10800 8200 5200 7600 7400 4600 17850 1600 15700 10800 101550 Tarrants WCP-CK-08-0588-01 Cork County Council Glyntown, Glanmire.Co. Cork WFP-CK-10-0047-02 Cork County Council Asian Eagle,Little Island,Cork. CKS 552/08 Cork County Council

Plastic Regrind Moulding Non-hazardous 20-01-39 Yes 1960 4740 2560 4850 1550 5010 1960 3760 5300 4000 6860 6284 48834 Tarrants WCP-CK-08-0588-01 Cork County Council Glyntown, Glanmire.Co. Cork WFP-CK-10-0047-02 Cork County Council Asian Eagle,Little Island,Cork. CKS 552/08 Cork County Council

Pallets Warehouse Non-hazardous 15-01-03 Yes 4750 8020 6000 6000 5620 9375 4875 5625 7500 5475 9375 5250 77865 Tarrants WCP-CK-08-0588-01 Cork County Council Glyntown, Glanmire.Co. Cork WFP-CK-10-0047-02 Cork County Council ErasEco,Youghal,Co.Cork WO 211-01 EPA

Cardboard Drums Durapore Non-hazardous 15-01-01 Yes 0 1820 0 1650 0 1400 0 0 0 1900 0 0 6770 Tarrants WCP-CK-08-0588-01 Cork County Council CTO, Whitegate,Co Cork WFP-CK-09-0018-01 Cork County Council CTO, Whitegate,Co Cork WFP-CK-0018-01 Cork County Council

Metal OP 2 Workshop,Facilities Non-hazardous 20-01-40 Yes 0 2140 0 900 3860 900 0 1800 7420 0 5420 960 23400 Cork Metal WCP-LK-08-589-01 Cork County Council Cork Metal, Cork CK (S) 491/07 Cork County Council Spain N/A Various facilities on file

Office Paper Offices, All production departments

Non-hazardous 20-01-01 Yes 0 980 1040 1120 1350 0 960 1100 0 1080 1140 1180 9950 Rehab CK-WMC-146/03 Cork City Council Bailey Waste, Dublin WFP-FG-08-0002-01 Fingal County Council UK N/A Various facilities on file

Sludge WWTP Non-hazardous 07-02-12 Yes 38680 27240 41200 33900 46420 46140 39580 36280 40040 49000 56280 22440 477200 Greenstar CK-WMC-323/05 Cork County Council Eras Eco,Youghal,Co. Cork W0211-01 EPARemondis Production

GmbH,Brunnenstr,Germany21/Fo/Tho-G61/93 Germany

Glass Bottles Labs,Canteen Non-hazardous 15-01-07 Yes 710 0 0 330 0 0 0 380 0 0 0 0 1420 Irohaul WCP-CK-09-0641-01 Cork County Council Rehab.Cork 03/07 Cork City Council Quinn Glass, Fermanagh NR112005561Northern Ireland

Environmental Agency

Soil&Stone Waste Area 51 Non-hazardous 17 05 04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7780000 0 0 0 7780000

Concrete Waste Area 51 Non-hazardous 17 01 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 789000 0 0 789000

Source

NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT REGISTER 2010

Waste DescriptionQuantity (kg)

EWC Code Ultimate DestinationIssuing AuthorityClassificationGreen List

WasteWaste Licence/Permit Issuing Authority

WASTE MANAGEMENT REGISTER

Waste TransporterWaste Collection

Permit Waste Disposal/Recovery Facility Waste Licence/PermitIssuing Authority

D1 N

D1 N

D1 N

D1 N

R N

R5 N

R3 N

R3 N

R5 N

R5 N

R3 N

R3 N

R4 N

R3 N

D10 N

R5 N

N

N

Reject consign. (Y/N)

Method of Recovery/Disposal


Membrane with HPA / AMPS (hydroxypropylacrylate) 1 3261 8 II Durapore Hazardous 15 02 02* No 145 0 359 67 127 201 126 104 120 0 306 144 1699 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA, Brunsbuttel D10 N

HPA Gel 2 3265 8 II Durapore Hazardous 07 01 04* No 7509 0 8788 3215 5729 6738 3240 6797 5568 0 6970 0 54554 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA, Brunsbuttel D10 N

HV Filters 3 2926 4.1(6.1) II Durapore Hazardous 15 02 02* No 0 0 0 636 329 683 0 0 0 0 0 0 1648 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R1 N

GV Filters 4 3175 4.1 II Durapore Hazardous 15 02 02* No 1059 0 2060 0 81 112 641 412 693 440 646 0 6144 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R1 N

GV and HV Filters 5 2926 4.1 II Durapore Hazardous 15 02 02* No 65 0 454 354 80 0 0 0 340 0 363 606 2262 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R1 N

HV Lacquer 6 1992 3 (6.1) II Durapore Hazardous 07 01 04* No 0 0 1721 2747 412 1146 0 0 181 0 514 0 6721 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R12/R1 N

GV Lacquer 7 1993 3 II Durapore Hazardous 07 01 04* No 1442 0 2219 149 184 780 2138 420 183 603 575 521 9214 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R12/R1 N

GV and HV Lacquer 8 1992 3 (6.1) II Durapore Hazardous 07 01 04* No 0 0 273 1374 775 570 387 1141 1225 398 705 189 7037 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R12/R1 N

Methanol Feed Product 9 1992 3 II TBD Hazardous 07 01 04* No 1763 0 0 0 0 0 0 572 972 0 397 0 3704 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R12/R1 N

Acetone Feed Product 10 1993 3 II TBD Hazardous 07 01 04* No 0 0 2829 0 684 422 813 1099 0 0 1298 0 7145 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA FUEL R2 N

DMAC Waste 11 1992 3 (6.1) II TBD Hazardous 07 01 04* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA N/A R12/R1 N

GV Membrane Waste with acetone 12 1993 3 II Durapore Hazardous 07 01 04* No 0 0 0 0 72 275 231 393 311 467 159 203 2111 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R1 N

Waste COD Vials 13 2922 8 II WWTP Hazardous 16 05 07* No 0 0 8 0 18 0 0 0 15 0 0 22 63 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA, Brunsbuttel D10 N

Ink/Solvent Waste/ Sponges contaminated with MEK, THF 14 3175 4.1 II TBD Hazardous 15 02 02* No 0 0 529 139 252 359 218 149 503 104 291 0 2544 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R1 N

High Flow Final Lacquer- Butanol, Nitrocellulose 15 1993 3 II Aircast Hazardous 07 01 04* No 4944 0 8621 5263 3269 5242 3205 3282 7570 1655 7926 2904 53881 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R12/R1 N

High Flow Filters 16 3175 4.1 II Aircast Hazardous 15 02 02* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA N/A N/A N

High Flow Base Lacquer Mixture 17 1090 3 II Aircast Hazardous 07 01 04* No 0 0 182 230 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 412 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA FUEL R2 N

High Flow Ethanol 18 1170 3 II Aircast Hazardous 07 01 04* No 624 0 0 0 178 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 820 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R12/R1 N

High Flow Acetone 19 1090 3 II Aircast Hazardous 07 01 04* No 0 0 182 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 182 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA FUEL R2 N

High Flow Butanol 20 1120 3 II Aircast Hazardous 07 01 04* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA N/A N/A N

Nitrocellulose Membrane 21 3270 4.1 II Aircast Hazardous 15 02 02* No 5025 0 5513 3810 3654 6073 2688 4773 4814 3267 4739 4108 48464 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA, Brunsbuttel D10 N

High Flow Solids Waste (Butanol, Ethanol) 22 3175 4.1 II Aircast Hazardous 15 02 02* No 777 0 745 270 382 673 416 418 690 185 885 485 5926 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R1 N

High Flow Sodium Azide 24 1687 6.1 II Aircast Hazardous 15 01 10* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA N/A N/A N

Lab Glassware 25 3175 4.1 II TBD Hazardous 15 02 02* No 0 0 156 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 156 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R1 N

Moisture Meter Waste 26 1992 3,6.1 II TBD Hazardous 07 01 04* No 0 0 0 154 0 0 0 0 0 0 193 0 347 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R12/R1 N

Methanol/Water/Silvernitrate 27 1992 3,6.1 II TBD Hazardous 07 01 04* No 0 0 0 154 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 154 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R12/R1 N

Acetonitrile (Non Chlorinated Solvent) Waste 28 1648 3 II TBD Hazardous 07 01 04* No 0 0 0 228 0 224 0 0 0 0 193 0 645 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R12/R1 N

0 0 3228 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3228 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA R1 N

0 0 0 0 0 5248 0 0 5342 0 0 5889 16479 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA D10 N

Waste Ammonia Vials 30 2672 8 II WWTP Hazardous 16 05 06* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA N/A N/A NPrinting Ink 31 1210 3 II Site Hazardous 20 01 27* No 0 0 140 0 0 276 0 0 107 0 44 0 567 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R12/R1 N

Waste Fluorescent Tubes 32 NR - II Site Hazardous 20 01 21* No 0 0 0 180 0 0 367 0 0 0 0 0 547 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA WEEE RYC (KMK) R4 NWaste Electronic Equipment 33 NR - II Site Hazardous 16 02 13* No 0 0 308 0 327 128 0 0 0 0 0 0 763 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA WEEE RYC (KMK) R13 N

Waste Aerosols 34 1950 2.1 II Site Hazardous 15 01 10* No 0 0 24 0 18 0 0 0 18 0 0 15 75 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA D10 NBiohazard waste 35 II Labs Hazardous 18 01 03* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA N/A N/A NLaboratory smalls 36 2926 4.1 (6.1) II Labs Hazardous 07 05 13* No 0 0 179 612 73 122 0 303 73 397 151 0 1910 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R1/R4 NWaste cooking oil 37 NR II Canteen Hazardous 20 01 25* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA N/A N/A N

Pallet Waste 38 NR II SIte Hazardous 15 01 03* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA N/A N/A NWaste PET rolls 40 NR II Durapore Hazardous 20 01 39* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA N/A N/A N

Waste needles from Steritest 41 NR II TBD Hazardous 07 05 13* No 0 0 99 0 0 0 86 0 0 0 0 0 185 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA D10 NMultiscreen Waste 55 NR - II Cleanroom 3 Hazardous 07 05 13* No 0 0 293 68 0 0 75 60 72 0 316 78 962 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R1/R4 N

Waste PEI 57 NR-HM II TBD Hazardous 07 01 04* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 9 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R12/R1 NMEK/ CTMD STERITEST 60 1993 3 II TBD Hazardous 07 01 04* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA N/A N/A N

Rags cont with Hydraulic Oil 61 NR-HM II TBD Hazardous 15 02 02* No 0 0 65 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 98 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R1 NWaste Trichloroacetic acid soln 65 3265 8 II TBD Hazardous 20 01 14* No 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA, Brunsbuttel D10 N

GC Solvent Waste 70 1992 3.6.1 II Durapore Hazardous 07 01 04* No 0 0 0 154 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 154 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R12/R1 NWaste Cellfloc A-13 72 1760 II WWTP Hazardous 20 01 14* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA N/A N/A N

Sodium Hydroxide Waste 30% 73 1760 II WWTP Hazardous 20 01 14* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 384 0 0 0 384 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA D10 NNitrocellulose 74 2556 4.1. II Aircast Hazardous 16 05 08* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 1256 420 0 0 0 0 1676 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA D10 N

Waste lubrication oil 75 NR - II Facilities/Site Hazardous 13 02 08* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA N/A N/A NContaminated Multiscreen UF Plates 76 1759 8 II Cleanroom 3 Hazardous 20 01 14* No 0 0 24 0 45 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 129 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA D10 N

Liquid lab waste from Multiscreen 77 1719 8 II Cleanroom 3 Hazardous 06 02 05* No 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA D10 NMultiscreen EUDI plates 78 3175 4.1 II Cleanroom 3 Hazardous 07 05 13* No 0 0 327 139 153 216 156 173 151 0 241 0 1556 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R1/R4 N

Ponceau S Solution 79 NR - II Labs Hazardous 07 01 04* No 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R12/R1 NWaste from A2 Lab 80 1760 8 II A2 Lab Hazardous 20 01 14* No 0 0 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA D10 NWaste hydraulic oil 81 NR - II Site Hazardous 13 02 08* No 0 0 576 0 0 0 1056 0 388 848 0 0 2868 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ENVA D9 N

Waste Fumehood filters 82 3175 4.1 II Site Hazardous 15 02 02* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 60 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R1 NMicroactivator 83 1498 5.1 II TBD Hazardous 16 05 07* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA N/A N/A NTEGDA Waste 84 NR - II IC2 Hazardous 07 01 04* No 0 0 286 185 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 471 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R12/R1 NDMAc Waste 85 NR - II Durapore Hazardous 07 01 04* No 0 0 726 0 1547 401 180 0 0 0 1556 0 4410 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R12/R1 N

Electronic Equipment - Monitors 86 NR-HM - II Site Hazardous 20 01 35* No 0 0 196 0 0 169 0 0 0 0 252 0 617 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA WEEE RYC (KMK) R13 NCellfloc CE190 87 NR - II WWTP Hazardous 07 02 01* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA N/A N/A N

Total Nitrogen- Hydroxide Vials 88 1492 5.1 II WWTP Hazardous 16 05 07* No 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA D10 NTotal Nitrogen- Acid Vials 89 1830 8 II WWTP Hazardous 16 05 07* No 0 0 40 0 34 0 0 0 33 0 0 45 152 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA, Brunsbuttel D10 N

Waste Blue dye containing IPA 90 1993 3 II TBD Hazardous 07 01 04* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA N/A N/A NNO-TOX Liquid Ink 92 1993 II TBD Hazardous 07 05 04* No 0 0 140 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 140 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R12/R1 N

Waste Irgacure 93 NR - II TBD Hazardous 07 05 13* No 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA, Brunsbuttel D10 NKymene Waste 94 NR - II TBD Hazardous 07 01 04* No 0 0 0 0 0 603 0 0 0 0 0 0 603 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R12/R1 N

Waste MEK in bottles 95 1193 II TBD Hazardous 07 01 04* No 0 0 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R12/R1 NWaste Sodium Hypochlorite 96 1791 8 II TBD Hazardous 06 02 05* No 0 0 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA, Brunsbuttel D10 N

Ammonium Persulphate (AMPs) 97 1444 II TBD Hazardous 16 05 07* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 169 0 169 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA D10 NSpill Kit contaminated with Ethylene Glycol 101 NR - II TBD Hazardous 07 05 13* No 0 0 18 68 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 86 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R1/R4 NSpill kit contaminated with aqueous solvent 102 3175 4.1 II TBD Hazardous 15 02 02* No 0 0 0 68 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R1 N

HiFlow Lacquer with Savinyl Black Dye 103 1992 3.6.1 II Aircast Hazardous 07 05 04* No 0 0 340 394 178 0 0 0 0 0 682 0 1594 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R12/R1 NWaste Membrane with Savinyl Black Dye 104 2926 4.1 6.1 II Aircast Hazardous 15 02 02* No 0 0 0 545 0 0 0 0 0 0 334 0 879 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R1 N

0 0 614 168 180 658 0 0 451 0 1284 0 3355 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R1 N0 0 0 261 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 261 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA D10 N

Acetone, acetonitrile, DMSO (with plastic) 106 1993 II TBD Hazardous 07 01 04* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA N/A N/A NWaste Ethanol and Nitrocellulose 107 1993 3 II TBD Hazardous 07 01 04* No 187 0 664 376 198 197 324 540 365 0 392 0 3243 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R12/R1 N

Cellulose acetate 108 II TBD Hazardous 07 01 04* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA N/A N/A NEthanol and Ntrocellulose with Savinyl Black Dye 109 1992 3 II Aircast Hazardous 07 05 04* No 0 0 0 0 184 158 0 328 0 0 0 0 670 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R12/R1 N

PES, NMP, TEG Waste Lacquer 110 NR - II IC2 Hazardous 07 01 04* No 1504 0 1300 2500 118 570 0 2249 200 1530 2866 0 12837 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R12/R1 NEmpty Butane Gas Aerosols 111 1011 2.1 II Site Hazardous 16 05 04* No 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 37 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA D10 N

Sodium Persulfate 112 1505 5.1 II TBD Hazardous 16 05 07* No 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA D10 NNMP 113 NR - II IC2 Hazardous 07 01 04* No 0 0 0 2606 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2606 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R12/R1 N

Ethylene Glycol 114 NR - II TBD Hazardous 07 01 04* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA N/A N/A N

NoII Durapore Hazardous 15 02 02*HV Membrane Waste with methanol & DMAc 105 2926 4.1 (6.1)

Durapore Hazardous 07 01 04* NoCationic Monomer 29 NR -

Millipore WC

HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT REGISTER 2010 WASTE MANAGEMENT REGISTER

Waste Description Source Classification EWC CodeGreen List

Waste

Quantity (kg)Waste Transporter

Waste Collection Permit

Waste Disposal/Recovery Facility/ Ultimate Destination



Issuing Authority Waste Transfer Facility Waste Licence/Permit Issuing AuthorityUN No ClassPacking Group

II


Millipore WC



Waste







SDBS 115 NR - II Aircast Hazardous 07 05 13* No 0 0 0 168 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 168 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R1/R4 N

AER-O-LITE 3% COLD FOAM 116 NR - II Site Hazardous 07 01 01* No 0 0 0 0 296 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 296 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA FUEL R2 N

Absorbent contaminated with AER-O-LITE 3% FOAM 117 NR - II Site Hazardous 07 05 13* No 0 0 0 0 162 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 162 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R1/R4 N

0 0 5 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA Veolia Fermoy D15/D10 N

0 0 48 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA Veolia Fermoy R13/R4 N

Loctite adhesive in tubes 119 1133 - II Site Hazardous 20 01 27* No 0 0 37 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 48 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R12/R1 N

Biological 120 NR - II Labs Hazardous 18 01 07* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA N/A N/A N

Mercury from Chemistry lab 121 2809 8 II Chemistry Lab Hazardous 06 04 04* No 16 4 0 8 18 0 0 0 0 57 20 0 123 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA Irish Lamps D10 N

Waste PPE/empty bottles contaminated with Mercury 122 2811 II CPG Hazardous 16 05 07* No 15 0 0 0 35 0 0 0 38 0 15 0 103 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA D10 N

CPG Dust Waste 123 NR - II CPG Hazardous 07 05 13* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 129 0 0 0 129 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA D10 N

TEG Liquid Waste 124 NR - II IC2 Hazardous 07 01 04* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA N/A N/A NPES Filter Waste 125 NR - II IC2 Hazardous 15 02 02* No 2155 0 260 1035 191 719 0 641 0 686 359 0 6046 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R1 N

PES Waste Membrane with traces of NMP & TEG 126 NR - II IC2 Hazardous 15 02 02* No 3553 0 2787 2405 765 339 0 4045 755 1434 2233 0 18316 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R1 NAbsorbent material contaminated with HPA Waste 127 1759 8 II TBD Hazardous 06 02 05* No 0 0 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA, Brunsbuttel D10 NAbsorbent contaminated with Ammonium Chloride 128 3261 8 II TBD Hazardous 15 02 02* No 0 0 105 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 105 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA, Brunsbuttel D10 N

Absorbant contaminated with Triton X 129 3077 9 II TBD Hazardous 15 02 02* No 0 0 399 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 399 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA, Brunsbuttel D10 NFlasks contaminated with Tween and red dye 130 II TBD Hazardous 07 05 13* No 0 0 0 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA D10 N

Tween and red dye waste 131 NR - II TBD Hazardous 07 01 04* No 0 0 0 0 55 0 66 0 0 0 0 0 121 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA FUEL R2 NPPE contaminated with CPG Dust 132 NR - II CPG Hazardous 15 02 02* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 0 61 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA D10 N

Spill kit contaminated with Sodium Hydroxide 133 3260 8 II CPG Hazardous 06 02 05* No 0 0 46 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 109 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA D10 NPurple Dye Granules 134 NR - II TBD Hazardous 07 05 13* No 0 0 204 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 204 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA, Brunsbuttel D10 N

SRU STREAM 3 STEP 1 LIQUID WASTE 135 NR - II IC2 Hazardous 07 01 04* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6888 0 0 0 0 6888 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA D10 N0 0 0 2218 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2218 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA, Brunsbuttel R1 N0 0 0 0 4421 3182 0 2779 5264 0 0 0 15646 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA, Brunsbuttel D10 N

SRU STREAM 3 STEP 3 LIQUID WASTE 137 NR - II IC2 Hazardous 07 01 04* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2288 0 0 0 2288 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA D10 NWaste Sulphuric Acid 1.8N (0.9M) 138 1830 8 II WWTP Hazardous 20 01 14* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA N/A N/A N

SRU STREAM 3 STEP 2 LIQUID WASTE 136 NR - II IC2 Hazardous 07 01 04* No

Empty containers of No-Tox Liquid Ink 118 1993 3 II TBD Hazardous 15 01 10* No


Millipore WC



Waste







Sodium Hydroxide 1.2N 139 1823 - II WWTP Hazardous 06 02 05* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA N/A N/A NFilters contaminated with caustic and CPG dust 140 3260 8 II CPG Hazardous 15 02 02* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA N/A N/A N

Filters contaminated with HCl and CPG dust: 141 3260 8 II CPG Hazardous 15 02 02* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA N/A N/A NPPE contaminated with caustic 142 3260 8 II CPG Hazardous 15 02 02* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA N/A N/A N

PPE contaminated with HCl and caustic 143 3260 8 II CPG Hazardous 15 02 02* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 176 93 0 0 269 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA D10 NSpill waste Antichlor 144 NR - II WWTP Hazardous 15 02 02* No 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R1 N

3M-N-Heptane Solid Waste 145 3175 4.1 II TBD Hazardous 07 05 13* No 0 0 288 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 348 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R1/R4 NTins of paint waste 146 1263 3 II Site Hazardous 20 01 27* No 0 0 83 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 83 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R2/R1 N

Solid material contaminated with HF Final lacquer 147 3175 4.1 II Aircast Hazardous 15 02 02* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA N/A N/A NSpill waste-Poly CE190 148 NR - II WWTP Hazardous 07 05 13* No 0 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R1/R4 N

Solid waste with IPA and blue dye 149 3175 4.1 II TBD Hazardous 07 05 13* No 0 0 129 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 146 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R1/R4 NHostapur 93% Waste 150 NR - II TBD Hazardous 07 05 13* No 0 0 144 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 144 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R1/R4 N

Full winchesters of trichloromethylsilane 151 2924 II TBD Hazardous 16 05 08* No 0 0 0 0 140 51 80 0 52 0 0 61 384 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA D10 NWaste Ethanol wipes 152 3175 II Site Hazardous 15 02 02* No 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 14 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R1 N

Empty metal containers previously containing N-Methyl-Pyrolidone 153 NR - II TBD Hazardous 15 01 10* No 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA Veolia Fermoy R13/R4 N

Fixtures trace contaminated with Trichloromethylsilane and ammonia 154 2925 4.1.8 II TBD Hazardous 07 05 13* No 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA D10 N

Waste Empty Heptane Winchesters 155 1206 II TBD Hazardous 15 01 10* No 0 0 0 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA, Brunsbuttel D10 NEmpty Cationic Monomer Drum 156 NR II Durapore Hazardous 15 01 10* No 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA Veolia Fermoy D15/D10 N

Waste Myler and HPA 157 3261 8 II Durapore Hazardous 07 05 13* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 188 0 0 0 0 0 188 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA SAVA D10 NFull butane gas canisters 159 1011 2.1 II Site Hazardous 16 05 04* No 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA Tradebe D10 N

Lab waste contaminated with Acetone and Ink 160 3175 II Labs Hazardous 15 02 02* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 10 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA ATM R1 NSpill kit contaminated with 32% Ammonia 161 2672 II TBD Hazardous 15 02 02* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/01 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-02 EPA N/A N/A N

Glass slides contaminated with Ink 162 1210 II Cleanroom 3 Hazardous 20 01 27* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/02 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-03 EPA N/A N/A NCPG Slurry 163 NR - II CPG Hazardous 07 01 04* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 260 0 0 0 260 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/03 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-04 EPA SAVA D10 N

Elmatec A3 Cleaning Fluid 164 1760 II TBD Hazardous 06 02 05* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 12 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/04 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-05 EPA SAVA D10 NHoses contaminated with oil 166 II TBD Hazardous 07 05 13* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 129 0 0 0 129 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/05 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-06 EPA SAVA D10 N

Waste water with trace SDBS 167 NR - II TBD Hazardous 07 05 01* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1050 0 1050 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/06 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-07 EPA FUEL R2 NCPG Furnace Waste 168 NR - II CPG Hazardous 10 12 08* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/07 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-08 EPA N/A N/A N

Absorbent material contaminated with 5%Nitric Acid 169 1759 8 II TBD Hazardous 20 01 14* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 18 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/08 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-09 EPA SAVA D10 NWaste AMP's 170 NR - II IC2 Hazardous 07 05 01* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 210 13 223 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/09 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-10 EPA FUEL R2 N

Empty Paint/Ink Tins 171 1210 3 II Site Hazardous 15 01 10* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/10 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-11 EPA ATM D10 NMBAM MOD Liquid Waste 172 NR - II IC2 Hazardous 07 05 04* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/11 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-12 EPA N/A N/A N

MOD Mix Solids Waste 173 NR - II IC2 Hazardous 07 05 04* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/12 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-13 EPA N/A N/A NSartomer MOD Liquid Waste 174 NR - II IC2 Hazardous 07 05 04* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/13 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-14 EPA N/A N/A N

ONE OFF WASTE DISPOSALEmpty metal drums previously containing oil - TBD Hazardous 15 01 10* No 0 0 0 0 0 70 0 0 0 0 49 0 119 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/15 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-16 EPA Veolia Fermoy R13/R4 N

Nitric Acid Waste - 1760 8 TBD Hazardous 20 01 14* No 0 0 92 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 92 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/16 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-17 EPA SAVA D10 NWaste bottles of ammonia solution - 2672 8 TBD Hazardous 20 01 14* No 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 21 43 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/17 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-18 EPA SAVA D10 N

Acetic Acid Glacial or Acetic Acid Solution (>80%) - 2789 8 TBD Hazardous 20 01 14* No 0 0 250 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/18 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-19 EPA SAVA D10 NEmpty Drum Trace Antifreeze - NR - TBD Hazardous 15 01 10* No 0 0 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/19 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-20 EPA Veolia Fermoy R13/R4 N

Waste water drums - NR - - TBD Hazardous 07 05 01* No 0 0 0 891 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 906 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/20 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-21 EPA FUEL R2 NDrum containing traces of heptane and water - 1993 3 TBD Hazardous 07 01 04* No 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/21 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-22 EPA FUEL R2 NWaste Fire Extinguisher Powder and Water - NR - - TBD Hazardous 07 05 01* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 394 0 394 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/22 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-23 EPA FUEL R2 N

Waste Oil filters containing metal - NR - - TBD Hazardous 15 02 02* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 18 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/23 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-24 EPA SAVA D10 NIC2 Waste water trace solvent tanker - NR - - IC2 Hazardous 07 05 01* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26560 0 0 0 26560 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/24 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-25 EPA Blending Facility Fermoy D13/D10 N

Contaminated Soil - TBD Hazardous 17 05 03* No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20000 20000 Rilta D15 NWaste Methanol and Water - 1992 3 TBD Hazardous 07 05 04* No 35620 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35620 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/24 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-25 EPA FUEL R13 N

LAB SMALLS COLLECTIONLaboratory Waste- Organic Labs Hazardous 16 05 08* No 0 82 0 54 83 0 0 0 0 477 0 0 696 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/24 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-25 EPA SAVA D10 N

Laboratory Waste- Inorganic Labs Hazardous 16 05 07* No 0 115 0 185 129 0 0 0 0 60 0 0 489 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/24 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-25 EPA SAVA D10 NWaste Mercury Thermomether 2809 Labs Hazardous 06 04 04* No 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 South Coast Transport CK WMC 07/24 Cork County Council AVR, Safeway W0050-25 EPA Irish Lamps D15 N

BIOHAZARDOUS WASTE

Clinical Waste N.O.S. subject to special requirements in order to prevent infection

N/A 3291 6.2 II Labs Hazardous18 01 03* (liquid

waste)No 10.8 65.3 185.4 126.2 139.2 146.8 95.2 117.3 174.8 122 148.9 42.6 1374.3

Healthcare Waste Management, Co.

Carlow

Initial Medical Services

Eco Safe Systems 54-2 AGR D15N


N/A 3291 6.2 II Labs Hazardous 16 05 08* (liquid waste) No 65.9 0 36.6 10.8 15.3 0 47.7 27.4 0 51 49.6 92.7 397.3Healthcare Waste Management, Co.

Carlow


Eco Safe Systems 54-2Recyfuel D15 N


N/A 3291 6.2 II Labs Hazardous18 01 03* (clinical

bags)No 298.9 338.3 462.8 310.8 387.3 483.1 362.8 370.7 445.2 366.1 391.8 402.9 4620.7

Healthcare Waste Management, Co.

Carlow


Eco Safe Systems 54-2Ballynagran Landfill D15 N

428.8153

SOLVENT RECOVERED ONSITE (Litres) Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec TOTALAcetone N/A IC1 Hazardous N/A No 29316 24384 32888 2707 0 39366 10371 0 58668 0 41894 10169 249763Methanol N/A IC1 Hazardous N/A No 53682 51972 23998 139571 178097 89226 40599 133009 0 130005 16758 31985 888902

DMAc N/A IC1 Hazardous N/A No 9092 16627 3982 23332 27489 13442 5385 19826 0 21584 1833 5630 1482221286.887

TOTAL 2010



Appendix III

PRTR

| PRTR# : P0571 | Facility Name : Millipore Ireland Limited | Filename : P0571_2010.xls | Return

Year : 2010 | 2322 1/6/2011 09:56

Guidance to completing the PRTR workbook

Version 1.1.11

REFERENCE YEAR 2010

1. FACILITY IDENTIFICATION

Parent Company Name Millipore Ireland Limited

Facility Name Millipore Ireland Limited

PRTR Identification Number P0571

Licence Number P0571-03

Waste or IPPC Classes of Activity

No. class_name

12.2.1 ##############################################################

11.1 ##############################################################

Address 1 Tullagreen

Address 2 Carrigtwohill

Address 3 County Cork

Address 4

Country Ireland

Coordinates of Location -8.27911 51.9049

River Basin District IESW

NACE Code 2221

Main Economic Activity Manufacture of plastic plates, sheets, tubes and profiles

AER Returns Contact Name Sheila Duggan

AER Returns Contact Email Address [email protected]

AER Returns Contact Position Health Safety & Environmental

AER Returns Contact Telephone Number 021-4883666

AER Returns Contact Mobile Phone Number

AER Returns Contact Fax Number 021-4883048

Production Volume 0.0

Production Volume Units

Number of Installations 0

Number of Operating Hours in Year 0

Number of Employees 0

User Feedback/Comments

Web Address

2. PRTR CLASS ACTIVITIES

Activity Number Activity Name

9(c)

Installations for surface treatment of substances,objects or products using

organic solvents,in particular

dressing,printing,coating,degreasing,waterproofing,sizing,painting,cleaning or

impregnating

50.1 General

3. SOLVENTS REGULATIONS (S.I. No. 543 of 2002)

Is it applicable? Yes

Have you been granted an exemption ? No

If applicable which activity class applies (as per

Schedule 2 of the regulations) ? Other coating including metal, plastic, textile, fabric, film and paper coating

Is the reduction scheme compliance route being

used ? No

AER Returns Workbook

http://www.epa.ie/downloads/advice/aerprtr/completinguploadingtheprtrworkbook/

4.1 RELEASES TO AIR Link to previous years emissions data | PRTR# : P0571 | Facility Name : Millipore Ireland Limited | Filename : P0571_2010.xls | Return Year : 2010 | 1/6/2011 09:56

8 8 16 16 24 24 6 7 6 6 6 7 24

SECTION A : SECTOR SPECIFIC PRTR POLLUTANTS

Please enter all quantities in this section in KGs

QUANTITY

No. Annex II Name M/C/E Method Code Designation or Description Emission Point 1 Emission Point 2 T (Total) KG/Year

A (Accidental)

KG/Year

F (Fugitive)

KG/Year

08 Nitrogen oxides (NOx/NO2) M EN 14792:2005 44.64 20.88 44.64 0.0 0.0

* Select a row by double-clicking on the Pollutant Name (Column B) then click the delete button

SECTION B : REMAINING PRTR POLLUTANTS


QUANTITY

No. Annex II Name M/C/E Method Code Designation or Description Emission Point 1 T (Total) KG/Year A (Accidental) KG/Year F (Fugitive) KG/Year

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0


SECTION C : REMAINING POLLUTANT EMISSIONS (As required in your Licence)


QUANTITY

Pollutant No. Name M/C/E Method Code Designation or Description Emission Point 1 Emission Point 2 T (Total) KG/Year

A (Accidental)

KG/Year

F (Fugitive)

KG/Year

351 Total Organic Carbon (as C) M ALT EN 12619 2747.0 1667.0 4414.0 0.0 0.0


Additional Data Requested from Landfill operators

Landfill: Millipore Ireland LimitedPlease enter summary data on the

quantities of methane flared and / or

utilised

additional_pollutant_no T (Total) kg/Year M/C/E Method Code

Designation or

Description

Facility Total Capacity

m3 per hour

Total estimated methane generation (as per

site model) 0.0 N/A

Methane flared 0.0 0.0 (Total Flaring Capacity)

Methane utilised in engine/s 0.0 0.0 (Total Utilising Capacity)

Net methane emission (as reported in Section

A above) 0.0 N/A

POLLUTANT METHOD

Method Used

For the purposes of the National Inventory on Greenhouse Gases, landfill operators are requested to provide summary data on landfill gas (Methane)

flared or utilised on their facilities to accompany the figures for total methane generated. Operators should only report their Net methane (CH4) emission

to the environment under T(total) KG/yr for Section A: Sector specific PRTR pollutants above. Please complete the table below:

Method Used

Method Used

RELEASES TO AIR

POLLUTANT METHOD

Method Used

POLLUTANT

RELEASES TO AIR

RELEASES TO AIR

METHOD

4.2 RELEASES TO WATERS Link to previous years emissions data | PRTR# : P0571 | Facility Name : Millipore Ireland Limited | Filename : P0571_2010.xls | Return Year : 2010 | 1/6/2011 09:56

8 8 16 16 24 24 6 6 6 6 6 6

SECTION A : SECTOR SPECIFIC PRTR POLLUTANTS Data on ambient monitoring of storm/surface water or groundwater, conducted as part of your licence requirements, should NOT be submitted under AER / PRTR Reporting as this only concerns Releases from your facility


QUANTITY


0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0


SECTION B : REMAINING PRTR POLLUTANTS


QUANTITY


0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0


SECTION C : REMAINING POLLUTANT EMISSIONS (as required in your Licence)


QUANTITY

Pollutant No. Name M/C/E Method Code Designation or Description Emission Point 1 T (Total) KG/Year A (Accidental) KG/Year F (Fugitive) KG/Year

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0


RELEASES TO WATERS

RELEASES TO WATERS

Method Used

POLLUTANT

Method Used

POLLUTANT

POLLUTANT

RELEASES TO WATERS

Method Used

4.3 RELEASES TO WASTEWATER OR SEWER Link to previous years emissions data | PRTR# : P0571 | Facility Name : Millipore Ireland Limited | Filename : P0571_2010.xls | Return Year : 2010 |1/6/2011 09:56

8 10 18 25 6 10 6 10 21

SECTION A : PRTR POLLUTANTS


QUANTITY

No. Annex II Name M/C/E Method Code Designation or Description Emission Point 1 Emission Point 2 Emission Point 3 Emission Point 4

Emission

Point 5

T (Total)

KG/Year

A

(Accident

al)

KG/Year

F

(Fugitive)

KG/Year

79 Chlorides (as Cl) M EN ISO 15682:2001 0.0 4982.0 1125.0 22.7 28.0 6157.7 0.0 0.0

12 Total nitrogen M EN ISO 11905-1:1998 2006.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2006.0 0.0 0.0

76 Total organic carbon (TOC) (as total C or COD/3) M EN 1484:1997 6290.0 168.0 68.0 0.066 3.33 6529.396 0.0 0.0


SECTION B : REMAINING POLLUTANT EMISSIONS (as required in your Licence)


QUANTITY

Pollutant No. Name M/C/E Method Code Designation or Description Emission Point 1 Emission Point 2 Emission Point 3 Emission Point 4

Emission

Point 5

T (Total)

KG/Year

A

(Accident

al)

KG/Year

F

(Fugitive)

KG/Year

361 Acrylates M CRM HPLC Method 13.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.0 0.0 0.0

303 BOD M ALT IS EN 1899-1-1998 9770.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9770.0 0.0 0.0

306 COD M ALT ISO 15705 18870.0 503.0 203.0 0.07 10.0 19586.07 0.0 0.0

314 Fats, Oils and Greases M CRM

Method ET0832 Based on

APHA98 5520 D 259.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 259.0 0.0 0.0

330 Organic solvents M EN ISO 9562:2004 28.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.0 0.0 0.0

343 Sulphate M CRM BS EN ISO 10304-2 616.0 4368.0 1326.0 0.52 38.0 6348.52 0.0 0.0

240 Suspended Solids M CRM BS EN 872 2005 4783.0 71.0 28.0 0.06 4.0 4886.06 0.0 0.0

347 Total heavy metals M CRM BS EN ISO 11885 3.0 12.0 0.7 0.01 0.0 15.71 0.0 0.0


OFFSITE TRANSFER OF POLLUTANTS DESTINED FOR WASTE-WATER TREATMENT OR SEWER

OFFSITE TRANSFER OF POLLUTANTS DESTINED FOR WASTE-WATER TREATMENT OR SEWER

Method Used

Method Used

POLLUTANT METHOD

POLLUTANT METHOD

4.4 RELEASES TO LAND Link to previous years emissions data | PRTR# : P0571 | Facility Name : Millipore Ireland Limited | Filename : P0571_2010.xls | Return Year : 2010 | 1/6/2011 09:56

8 8 16 16 6 6 6 6

SECTION A : PRTR POLLUTANTS


QUANTITY

No. Annex II Name M/C/E Method Code Designation or Description Emission Point 1 T (Total) KG/Year A (Accidental) KG/Year

0.0 0.0 0.0


SECTION B : REMAINING POLLUTANT EMISSIONS (as required in your Licence)


QUANTITY

Pollutant No. Name M/C/E Method Code Designation or Description Emission Point 1 T (Total) KG/Year A (Accidental) KG/Year

0.0 0.0 0.0


POLLUTANT METHOD

Method Used

RELEASES TO LAND

RELEASES TO LAND

POLLUTANT METHOD

Method Used

5. ONSITE TREATMENT & OFFSITE TRANSFERS OF WASTE | PRTR# : P0571 | Facility Name : Millipore Ireland Limited | Filename : P0571_2010.xls | Return Year : 2010 | 1/6/2011 09:56

5 151 Please enter all quantities on this sheet in Tonnes 150

Quantity

(Tonnes per

Year)

Haz Waste : Name and

Licence/Permit No of Next

Destination Facility Non

Haz Waste: Name and

Licence/Permit No of

Recover/Disposer

Haz Waste : Address of Next

Destination Facility

Non Haz Waste: Address of

Recover/Disposer

Name and License / Permit No. and

Address of Final Recoverer /

Disposer (HAZARDOUS WASTE

ONLY)

Actual Address of Final Destination

i.e. Final Recovery / Disposal Site

(HAZARDOUS WASTE ONLY)

Transfer Destination

European Waste

Code Hazardous Quantity T/Year Description of Waste

Waste

Treatment

Operation M/C/E Method Used

Location of

Treatment Name and Licence / Permit No. of Recoverer / Disposer / Broker Address of Recoverer / Disposer / Broker Name and Address of Final Destination i.e. Final Recovery / Disposal Site (HAZARDOUS WASTE ONLY) Licence / Permit No. of Final Destination i.e. Final Recovery / Disposal Site (HAZARDOUS WASTE ONLY)

To Other Countries 15 02 02 Yes 1.699

Membrane with HPA / AMPS

(hydroxypropylacrylate) D10 M Weighed Abroad

Veolia Environmental

Services Technical Solutions

Ltd,W0050-02

Corrin,.,Fermoy,Co.Cork,Irel

and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel

D,.,.,.,Germany Brunsbuttel D,.,.,.,Germany

To Other Countries 07 01 04 Yes 55.554 HPA Gel D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


To Other Countries 15 02 02 Yes 1.648 HV Filters R1 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and ATM,1538449,.,.,.,.,Belgium .,.,.,.,Belgium

To Other Countries 15 02 02 Yes 6.144 GV Filters R1 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



To Other Countries 15 02 02 Yes 2.262 GV and HV Filters R1 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



To Other Countries 07 01 04 Yes 6.721 HV Lacquer R12 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



To Other Countries 07 01 04 Yes 7.037 GV and HV Lacquer R12 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



To Other Countries 07 01 04 Yes 3.704 Methanol Feed Product R12 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



Within the Country 07 01 04 Yes 7.145 Acetone Feed Product R2 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Fuel Blending Veolia,W0050-

02,Fermoy,.,Co.Cork,.,Irelan

d Fermoy,.,Co.Cork,.,Ireland

To Other Countries 07 01 04 Yes 2.111 GV Membrane Waste with acetone R1 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



To Other Countries 16 05 07 Yes 0.063 Waste COD Vials D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel



Ink/Solvent Waste/ Sponges contaminated

with MEK, THF R1 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02




High Flow Final Lacquer- Butanol,

Nitrocellulose R12 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



Within the Country 07 01 04 Yes 0.412 High Flow Base Lacquer Mixture R2 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland



Ltd,W0050-02


and




To Other Countries 07 01 04 Yes 0.82 High Flow Ethanol R12 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



Within the Country 07 01 04 Yes 0.182 High Flow Acetone R2 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland



Ltd,W0050-02


and




To Other Countries 15 02 02 Yes 48.464 Nitrocellulose Membrane D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


Method Used

To Other Countries 15 02 02 Yes 5.926 High Flow Solids Waste (Butanol, Ethanol) R1 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



To Other Countries 15 02 02 Yes 0.156 Lab Glassware R1 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



To Other Countries 07 01 04 Yes 0.347 Moisture Meter Waste R12 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



To Other Countries 07 01 04 Yes 0.154 Methanol/Water/Silvernitrate R12 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02




Acetonitrile (Non Chlorinated Solvent)

Waste R12 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



To Other Countries 07 01 04 Yes 3.228 Cationic Monomer Waste R1 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


To Other Countries 07 01 04 Yes 16.479 Cationic Monomer Waste D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


To Other Countries 20 01 27 Yes 0.567 Printing Ink R12 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



To Other Countries 20 01 21 Yes 0.547 Waste Fluorescent Tubes R4 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

KMK Metals Recycling

Limited,W0113-

03,Cappincur Industrial

Estate,Daingean

Road,Tullamore,County

Offaly,Ireland

Cappincur Industrial

Estate,Daingean


Offaly,Ireland

To Other Countries 16 02 13 Yes 0.763 Waste Electronic Equipment R13 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and


Limited,W0113-


Estate,Daingean


Offaly,Ireland


Estate,Daingean


Offaly,Ireland

To Other Countries 15 01 10 Yes 0.075 Waste Aerosols D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


To Other Countries 07 05 13 Yes 1.91 Laboratory Smalls R1 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



To Other Countries 07 05 13 Yes 0.962 Multiscreen Waste R1 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



To Other Countries 07 05 13 Yes 0.185 Waste needles from Steritest D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



To Other Countries 07 01 04 Yes 0.009 Waste PEI R12 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



To Other Countries 15 02 02 Yes 0.098 Rags cont with Hydraulic Oil R1 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



To Other Countries 20 01 14 Yes 0.01 Waste Trichloroacetic acid soln D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


To Other Countries 07 01 04 Yes 0.154 GC Solvent Waste R12 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

ATM,NB

930607.002/4,.,.,.,.,Belgium .,.,.,.,Belgium

To Other Countries 20 01 14 Yes 0.384 Sodium Hydroxide Waste 30% D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


To Other Countries 16 05 08 Yes 1.676 Nitrocellulose D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


To Other Countries 20 01 14 Yes 0.129 Contaminated Multiscreen UF Plates D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


To Other Countries 06 02 05 Yes 0.011 Liquid lab waste from Multiscreen D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


To Other Countries 07 05 13 Yes 1.556 Multiscreen EUDI plates R1 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



To Other Countries 07 01 04 Yes 0.018 Ponceau S Solution R12 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



To Other Countries 20 01 14 Yes 0.12 Waste from A2 Lab D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


Within the Country 13 02 08 Yes 2.868 Waste hydraulic oil D9 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Enva,W0196-01,John F

Kennedy Road

,Naas Road,Dublin

12,.,Ireland

John F Kennedy Road

,Naas Road,Dublin

12,.,Ireland

To Other Countries 15 02 02 Yes 0.06 Waste Fumehood Filters R1 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



To Other Countries 07 01 04 Yes 0.471 TEGDA Waste R12 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



To Other Countries 07 01 04 Yes 4.41 DMAc Waste R12 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



To Other Countries 20 01 35 Yes 0.617 Electronic Equipment - Monitors R13 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and


Limited,W0113-


Estate,Daingean


Offaly,Ireland


Estate,Daingean


Offaly,Ireland

To Other Countries 16 05 07 Yes 0.02 Total Nitrogen- Hydroxide Vials D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


To Other Countries 16 05 07 Yes 0.152 Total Nitrogen- Acid Vials D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


To Other Countries 07 05 04 Yes 0.014 NO-TOX Liquid Ink R12 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



To Other Countries 07 05 13 Yes 0.03 Waste Irgacure D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


To Other Countries 07 01 04 Yes 0.603 Kymene Waste R12 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



To Other Countries 07 01 04 Yes 0.055 Waste MEK in bottles R12 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



To Other Countries 06 02 05 Yes 0.063 Waste Sodium Hypochlorite D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


To Other Countries 16 05 07 Yes 0.169 Ammonium Persulphate (AMPs) D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


To Other Countries 07 05 13 Yes 0.086 Spill Kit contaminated with Ethylene Glycol R1 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



To Other Countries 15 02 02 Yes 0.068 Spill kit contaminated with aqueous solvent R1 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



To Other Countries 07 05 04 Yes 1.594 HiFlow Lacquer with Savinyl Black Dye R12 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



To Other Countries 15 02 02 Yes 0.879 Waste Membrane with Savinyl Black Dye R1 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02




HV Membrane Waste with methanol &

DMAc R1 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02




HV Membrane Waste with methanol &

DMAc D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


To Other Countries 07 01 04 Yes 3.243 Waste Ethanol and Nitrocellulose R12 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02




Ethanol and Ntrocellulose with Savinyl

Black Dye R12 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



To Other Countries 07 01 04 Yes 12.837 PES, NMP, TEG Waste Lacquer R12 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



To Other Countries 16 05 04 Yes 0.037 Empty Butane Gas Aerosols D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


To Other Countries 16 05 07 Yes 0.016 Sodium Persulfate Waste D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


To Other Countries 07 01 04 Yes 2.606 NMP Waste R12 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



To Other Countries 07 05 13 Yes 0.168 SDBS Waste R1 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



Within the Country 07 01 01 Yes 0.296 AER-O-LITE 3% COLD FOAM R2 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland



Ltd,W0050-02


and





Absorbent contaminated with AER-O-LITE

3% FOAM R1 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



To Other Countries 15 01 10 Yes 0.024 Empty containers of No-Tox Liquid Ink D15 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and




To Other Countries 15 01 10 Yes 0.066 Empty containers of No-Tox Liquid Ink R13 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and




To Other Countries 20 01 27 Yes 0.048 Loctite adhesive in tubes R12 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



Within the Country 06 04 04 Yes 0.123 Mercury from Chemistry lab D10 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Irish Lamp Recycling

Ltd,02/2000B,Woodstock

Industrial Estate,Kilkenny

Road,Athy,Co.

Kildare,Ireland

Woodstock Industrial

Estate,Kilkenny

Road,Athy,Co.

Kildare,Ireland

To Other Countries 07 05 13 Yes 0.129 CPG Dust Waste D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


To Other Countries 15 02 02 Yes 6.046 PES Filter Waste R1 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02




PES Waste Membrane with traces of NMP

& TEG R1 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02




Absorbent material contaminated with HPA

Waste D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel



Absorbent contaminated with Ammonium

Chloride D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


To Other Countries 15 02 02 Yes 0.399 Absorbant contaminated with Triton X D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel



Flasks contaminated with Tween and red

dye D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


Within the Country 07 01 04 Yes 0.121 Tween and red dye waste R2 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland



Ltd,W0050-02


and




To Other Countries 15 02 02 Yes 0.061 PPE contaminated with CPG Dust D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel



Spill kit contaminated with Sodium

Hydroxide D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


To Other Countries 07 05 13 Yes 0.204 Purple Dye Granules D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


To Other Countries 07 01 04 Yes 6.888 SRU STREAM 3 STEP 1 LIQUID WASTE D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


To Other Countries 07 01 04 Yes 2.218 SRU STREAM 3 STEP 2 LIQUID WASTE R1 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel





Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel





Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


To Other Countries 15 02 02 Yes 0.269 PPE contaminated with HCl and caustic D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


To Other Countries 15 02 02 Yes 0.019 Spill waste Antichlor R1 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



To Other Countries 07 05 13 Yes 0.348 3M-N-Heptane Solid Waste R1 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



To Other Countries 20 01 27 Yes 0.083 Tins of paint waste R2 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



To Other Countries 07 05 13 Yes 0.07 Spill waste-Poly CE190 R1 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



To Other Countries 07 05 13 Yes 0.146 Solid waste with IPA and blue dye R1 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



To Other Countries 07 05 13 Yes 0.144 Hostapur 93% Waste R1 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



To Other Countries 16 05 08 Yes 0.384 Full winchesters of trichloromethylsilane D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


To Other Countries 15 02 02 Yes 0.014 Waste Ethanol wipes R1 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



Within the Country 15 01 10 Yes 0.004

Empty metal containers previously

containing N-Methyl-Pyrolidone R13 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland



Ltd,W0050-02


and





Fixtures trace contaminated with

Trichloromethylsilane and ammonia D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


To Other Countries 15 01 10 Yes 0.034 Waste Empty Heptane Winchesters D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


Within the Country 15 01 10 Yes 0.013 Empty Cationic Monomer Drum D15 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland



Ltd,W0050-02


and




To Other Countries 07 05 13 Yes 0.188 Waste Myler and HPA D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


To Other Countries 16 05 04 Yes 0.005 Full butane gas canisters D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Tradebe Fawley

Limited,EPR/FP3935KL,.,.,.,.

,United Kingdom .,.,.,.,United Kingdom


Lab waste contaminated with Acetone and

Ink R1 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



To Other Countries 07 01 04 Yes 0.26 CPG Slurry Waste D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


To Other Countries 06 02 05 Yes 0.012 Elmatec A3 Cleaning Fluid D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


To Other Countries 07 05 13 Yes 0.129 Hoses contaminated with oil D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


Within the Country 07 05 01 Yes 1.05 Waste water with trace SDBS R2 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland



Ltd,W0050-02


and





Absorbent material contaminated with

5%Nitric Acid D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


Within the Country 07 05 01 Yes 0.223 Waste AMP's R2 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland



Ltd,W0050-02


and




To Other Countries 15 01 10 Yes 0.007 Empty Paint/Ink Tins D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02



Within the Country 15 01 10 Yes 0.119 Empty metal drums previously containing oil R13 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland



Ltd,W0050-02


and




To Other Countries 20 01 14 Yes 0.092 Nitric Acid Waste D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


To Other Countries 20 01 14 Yes 0.043 Waste bottles of ammonia solution D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel



Acetic Acid Glacial or Acetic Acid Solution

(>80%) D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


Within the Country 15 01 10 Yes 0.052 Empty Drum Trace Antifreeze R13 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland



Ltd,W0050-02


and




Within the Country 07 05 01 Yes 0.906 Waste water drums R2 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland



Ltd,W0050-02


and




Within the Country 07 01 04 Yes 0.1

Drum containing traces of heptane and

water R2 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland



Ltd,W0050-02


and




Within the Country 07 05 01 Yes 0.394 Waste Fire Extinguisher Powder and Water R2 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland



Ltd,W0050-02


and




To Other Countries 15 02 02 Yes 0.018 Waste Oil filters containing metal D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


Within the Country 07 05 01 Yes 26.56 IC2 Waste water trace solvent tanker D13 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland



Ltd,W0050-02


and




Within the Country 07 05 04 Yes 35.62 Waste Methanol and Water R13 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland



Ltd,W0050-02


and




Within the Country 17 05 03 Yes 20.0 Contaminated Soil Waste D15 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland

Rilta Environmental

Ltd,W0192-3

Block 402 ,Greenogue.

Business

Park,Rathcoole,Co.

Dublin,Ireland

Rilta Environmental Ltd

,W0192-3, Block

402,Greenogue. Business

Park,Rathcoole,Co.

Dublin,Ireland

Block 402,Greenogue.

Business

Park,Rathcoole,Co.

Dublin,Ireland

To Other Countries 16 05 08 Yes 0.696 Laboratory Waste- Organic D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


To Other Countries 16 05 07 Yes 0.489 Laboratory Waste- Inorganic D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


Within the Country 06 04 04 Yes 0.012 Waste Mercury Thermomether D15 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Irish Lamp Recycling

Ltd,02/2000B,Woodstock

Industrial Estate,Kilkenny

Road,Athy,Co.

Kildare,Ireland

Woodstock Industrial

Estate,Kilkenny

Road,Athy,Co.

Kildare,Ireland

To Other Countries 18 01 03 Yes 1.3743 Biohazardous Waste- liquid waste D15 M Weighed Abroad Eco Safe Systems,54-2

1A Allied Industrial

Estate,Kylemore

Road,Dublin 10,Co.

Dublin,Ireland

AGR,642/050506,Im

Emseherbruch

11D,.,Herten,45699,German

y

Im Emseherbruch

11D,.,Herten,45699,German

y

To Other Countries 16 05 08 Yes 0.397 Biohazardous Waste- liquid waste D15 M Weighed Abroad Eco Safe Systems,54-2


Estate,Kylemore

Road,Dublin 10,Co.

Dublin,Ireland

Recyfuel,BE 459 735 458

,Zoning Industrial Estate

d'Ehein,B,Engis,4480,Belgiu

m

Zoning Industrial Estate

d'Ehein,B,Engis,4480,Belgiu

m

Within the Country 18 01 03 Yes 4.6207 Biohazardous Waste- Clinical Bags/Sharps D15 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland Eco Safe Systems,54-2


Estate,Kylemore

Road,Dublin 10,Co.

Dublin,Ireland

Greenstar Holding

Ltd,W0165-1,Ballynagran

Coolbeg and

Kilcandra,.,.,Co.

Wiclow,Ireland

Ballynagran Coolbeg and

Kilcandra,.,.,Co.

Wiclow,Ireland

Within the Country 20 01 39 No 48.834 Plastic Regrind R5 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland Asian Eagle,CKS 552/08 Little Island,.,Cork,.,Ireland

Within the Country 15 01 03 No 77.865 Pallets R3 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland Eras Eco Ltd,WO 211-01 .,.,Youghal ,Co.Cork,Ireland

Within the Country 15 01 01 No 6.77 Cardboard Drums R3 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland CTO,WFP-CK-0018-01

.,.,Whitegate Co.

Cork,.,Ireland

To Other Countries 20 01 40 No 23.4 Metals R4 M Weighed Abroad

Cork Metal Co Ltd,CK (S)

491/07 .,.,.,.,Spain

To Other Countries 20 01 01 No 9.95 Office Paper R3 M Weighed Abroad

Bailey Waste,WFP-FG-08-

0002-01 .,.,.,.,United Kingdom

To Other Countries 07 02 12 No 477.2 WWTP Sludge D10 M Weighed Abroad

Remondis Production

GmbH,21/Fo/Tho-G61/93 .,.,Brunnenstr,.,Germany

Within the Country 15 01 07 No 1.42 Glass Bottles R5 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland Rehab Recycle,"03/07"

Monahan Road,.,Cork City

Co. Cork,.,Ireland

Within the Country 20 03 07 No 42.88 General Waste D1 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland Knockharley Landfill,146-1 .,.,Naven,.,Ireland

Within the Country 20 03 07 No 212.49 General Waste D1 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland Ballynagran Landfill,165-1 .,.,County Wiclow,.,Ireland

Within the Country 20 03 01 No 4.92 General Waste- Canteen D1 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland Knockharley Landfill,146-1 .,.,Naven,.,Ireland

Within the Country 20 03 01 No 20.81 General Waste- Canteen D1 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland Ballynagran Landfill,165-1 .,.,County Wiclow,.,Ireland

Within the Country 20 01 08 No 4.8 Canteen Food Waste R13 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland

Milltown Composting

Systems Ltd,WP 019 02 .,.,County Tipperary,.,Ireland

Within the Country 15 01 02 No 49.544 Plastic Waste R5 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland Asian Eagle,CKS 552/08 Little Island,.,Cork,.,Ireland

To Other Countries 15 01 01 No 107.984 Cardboard Waste R3 M Weighed Abroad

Xiamen Industrial Trading

Company,SEPA Licence

Huli,Xiangiu

Roa,Xiamen,.,China


Waste PPE/empty bottles contaminated

with Mercury D10 M Weighed Abroad



Ltd,W0050-02


and

Sava,A51 G00

508,Brunsbuttel


To Other Countries 20 01 01 No 142.25 Annealing Paper R3 M Weighed Abroad

Peute Papier Recycling BV,

IreG004/08

Baanhoekweg 4,.,La

Dordrecht.,3313,Netherland

s

Within the Country 20 01 39 No 101.55 P.E.T. Rolls R5 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland Asian Eagle,CKS 552/08 Little Island,.,Cork,.,Ireland

* Select a row by double-clicking the Description of Waste then click the delete button

Link to previous years waste data

Link to previous years waste summary data & percentage change



Appendix IV

Environmental Objectives & Targets 2010

Millipore Ireland Ltd. Tullagreen, Carrigtwohill, Co. Cork

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME

REPORT

MILLIPORE IRELAND LTD Environmental Management Programme

End of Year Review 2010 March 2011

Page 2

Environmental Management Programme

Report 2011

Table of Contents

1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 3

2.0 SCOPE.................................................................................................................. 3

3.0 REFERENCE ....................................................................................................... 4

4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTIVES & TARGETS 2006 - 2010 ................... 5


4.0 2010 ENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTIVES & TARGETS – REPORT........ 10



Page 3

1.0 INTRODUCTION The following Environmental Management Programme (EMP) was prepared in fulfillment of Condition 2.2.2.2 & 2.2.2.3 of IPPC Licence Reg. No. P0571-03, concerning the activities of Millipore Ireland Limited, Carrigtwohill, Co. Cork. Millipore Ireland Limited hereafter referred to as Millipore, is licensed under IPPC Licence Reg. No. P0571-03, granted from the Environmental Protection Agency on March 09th 2010, and is located in Carrigtwohill, Co. Cork. This schedule of Environmental Objectives and Targets and associated Management Programme has been prepared for 2010, in fulfillment of Condition 2.2.2.2 & 2.2.2.3 and was submitted to the Agency for approval, as part of the Annual Environmental Report for 2010. 2.0 SCOPE In accordance with IPPC licence Condition 2.2.2 and other requirements, a schedule for Environmental Objectives and Targets was prepared for the site. The schedule details the Environmental Objectives the company has set itself for the next five year period, from 2010 – 2015. The targets demonstrate the company’s long term commitment to the protection of the environmental and reflect the site EHS policies. The company endeavors to maintain its policy of continuous improvement and ensure this environmental management programme is dynamic and effectual. The purpose of this end of year review of the Environmental Objectives and Targets is to review the status of the proposed environmental targets and objectives for 2010, assess progress against the agreed schedule, and ensure the objectives and targets are being appropriately supported by a realistic programme and appropriate resources. In addition, the purpose of this end of year review is to facilitate reporting to the EPA, as part of the Annual Environmental Report for 2010.

��

��



Page 4

3.0 REFERENCE IPPC Licence Register No. P0571-03 – Condition 2.2.2.2 & 2.2.2.3 “The licensee shall maintain a Schedule of Environmental Objectives & Targets. The schedule shall, as a minimum provide for a review of all operations and processes, including an evaluation of practicable options for energy and resource efficiency, the use of cleaner technology, cleaner production and the prevention, reduction and minimisation of waste and shall include waste reduction targets. The schedule shall address a five year period as a minimum. The schedule shall be reviewed annually and amendments thereto notified to the Agency for agreement as part of the Annual Environmental Report (AER).” “The licensee shall maintain an EMP including a time schedule for achieving the Environmental Objectives and Targets prepared under Condition 2.2.2.2. Once agreed the EMP shall be maintained by the licensee. It shall include:

- designation of responsibility for targets; - the means by which they may be achieved; - the time within which they may be achieve.

The EMP shall be reviewed annually and amendments thereto notified to the Agency for agreement as part of the Annual Environmental Report (AER).”



Page 5

4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTIVES & TARGETS 2006 - 2010

Site EHS Policy Environmental Objectives and Targets are based on identified significant environmental aspects and applicable laws and regulations as per Environmental Objectives and Targets Procedure 0030450 MP. The current EHS site policy contains the following commitments that are cross-referenced where applicable in the Site Environmental Objectives and Targets.



Page 6

5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTIVES & TARGETS 2010 - 2015 This Environmental Management Programme 2010 forms the EMP for the period January 01st 2010 to December 31st 2010. However the schedule of Environmental Objectives & Targets will address a five year period as a minimum. The targets aim to combine the priorities of the EPA and Millipore Cork and incorporate them into achievable goals.



Page 7


Targets Site Goals Objective Focus Areas

for 2010 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Actual Results for

2010

WWTP

Compliance

100% Compliance 100%

Compliance

100% Compliance 100% Compliance 100% Compliance 100% Compliance

for WWTP

New IPPC

Licence


Compliance

100% Compliance 100% Compliance 100% Compliance Only 3 Non-

compliances for TO

Bypasses

(73% reduction

from 2009), 100%

Compliance for

Normal Operations

Spill Prevention

Programme

0 Spills Impacting

on the

Environment

0 Spills

Impacting on

the

Environment

0 Spills Impacting

on the

Environment

0 Spills Impacting

on the

Environment

0 Spills Impacting

on the

Environment

0 Spills Impacting

on the Environment

Maintenance &

Calibration


Compliance


1. 100% IPPC

Licence

Compliance

Achieve 100%

Compliance with

all Licence

Parameters

Waste

Compliance


Compliance




Page 8


for 2010 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Actual Results for

2010

WWTP

Improvement


Compliance


for the WWTP

EHSIR for 2010 =

0.22

Air Emissions


Compliance

100% Compliance 100% Compliance 100% Compliance Only 3 Non-

compliances for TO

Bypasses

(73% reduction

from 2009), 100%

Compliance for

Normal Operations

Waste

Improvement

5% Reduction in

Waste Disposal

5% Reduction

in Waste

Disposal

5% Reduction in

Waste Generation

5% Reduction in

Waste Generation

5% Reduction in

Waste Generation

Estimated 45%

Reduction in Non-

Haz Waste

Generation

2. Reduce the site

EHSIR

(EHS Incident

Rate)

Achieve EHSIR

<0.3

Training &

Awareness

>75%

Engagement in

EHS Training &

Awareness

>75%

Engagement in

EHS Training

& Awareness

>75%

Engagement in

EHS Training &

Awareness

>75%

Engagement in

EHS Training &

Awareness

>75%

Engagement in

EHS Training &

Awareness

>75% personnel

participated in

offsite EHS

sessions for all

departments.

3. EHS Achieve a fully EHS 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%



Page 9


for 2010 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Actual Results for

2010

Management

Systems

functional

certified EHS

Management

System

Management

System

Implementation of

Management

System

Implementation

of

Management

System

Implementation of

Management

System

Implementation of

Management

System

Implementation of

Management

System

Implementation &

ISO14001

Certification

received.

Energy Efficiency 5% Improvement

on Previous Year

5%

Improvement

on Previous

Year

5% Improvement

on Previous Year

5% Improvement

on Previous Year

5% Improvement

on Previous Year

5% Improvement on

Previous Year 4. Sustainability Achieve an

effective

Sustainability

Programme Resource

Efficiency

5% Improvement

on Previous Year

5%

Improvement

on Previous

Year

5% Improvement

on Previous Year

5% Improvement

on Previous Year

5% Improvement

on Previous Year

5% Improvement on

Previous Year

�� !�Fran, can you estimate based on the energy & volume figures for 2010?

�� !�Fran, can you estimate based on the water & volume figures for 2010?



Page 10

6.0 2010 ENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTIVES & TARGETS – REPORT

Site Goal: 100% IPPC Licence Compliance

Objective: Achieve 100% Compliance with all Licence Parameters

Target: 100% Compliance

Ref: Env. Sig. Aspects: 001, 002, 003, 004, 005, 006, 010, 012, 013

Rationale: The operating IPPC licence is primary regulatory requirement for the site for the management and control of site

operations and associated environmental emissions. In addition, the site has reviewed its IPPC licence to

incorporate the CPG process onsite, therefore this requires to be fully incorporated into site systems

Reference No. Focus Area

Plan Status

Install TOC monitoring system at SW1 TOC and all support equipment fully installed.

Undergoing equipment commissioning. Serious

challenges with supplier have delayed schedule of

completion. To be fully completed in 2011.

Complete HAZOP/assessment of system Completed. Actions identified for followup. Actions fully

closed out.

1. WWTP WWTP Compliance

Programme

Complete associated Firewater System management

programme and SOP

Draft SOP in place for the management of the FW

ponds. The current Firewater Retention Assessment

was reviewed by external consultants ERM, to

determine basis for FW management programme. Draft



Page 11


Plan Status

report to agree TOC limits prepared, however need

insitu TOC levels to establish baseline levels, given

issues with instrument, this is also behind schedule. No

further work can progress until completion of the TOCs,

the system can go live.

WWTP Training

Programme

Complete programme of training for new WWTP

operators and Membrane Operators

This programme of training is fully completed, but will

be continued on an ongoing basis. The new WWTP

Operators commenced in Q1 2010, providing 7 day

supervision of the WWTP, and supervised by EHS

Technical Support. This organization increase has

resulted in huge benefits in the WWTP, including 100%

compliance with IPPCL, improvements in WWTP

controls, monitoring and reporting and general

housekeeping.

Environmental

Laboratory

Programme

Complete validation programme of environmental

procedures

Phase I of the laboratory validation programme is fully

completed. All actions associated with Phase I also fully

completed. Phase II ongoing, due for completion in

2011.

2. New IPPC Licence New Emissions Update monitoring programmes for new emissions (air,

wastewater, waste, etc)

All monitoring programmes have been updated and

completed for Emissions to Sewer and Emissions to Air



Page 12


Plan Status

for all new emissions under the IPPCL.

Air Abatement Test

Programme

Complete test programme on air abatement associated

with CPG operations

A proposal for air abatement for IPPCL emission point:

A2-30 is fully completed and submitted to the EPA. This

is the only valid air emission point at this time. The

abatement programme was subsequently completed

and submitted to the EPA. Additional actions are

ongoing and the programme will be repeated during

CPG Phase II in 2011.

Update Site Systems Update site SOPs, procedures and systems to

incorporate new IPPC licence requirements

Updates to site SOPs, procedures and systems to

incorporate new IPPC licence requirements are now

fully completed.

3. Spill Prevention

Programme

Spill Prevention

Programme

Progress Spill Prevention Programme, report to the

Agency as required.

This programme is ongoing and the site has retained

the services of the external Chartered Engineer to

continue to progress this programme. Updates to the

EPA as required were provided during 2010 and this

has been financially supported by the site Capital

Programme. This programme is due for full completion

in 2011 due to the complexity of programme.



Page 13


Plan Status

Develop long term programme for management of

bunds and structures onsite

See above.

Complete bunding of site Transformers There is a long term plan in place for bunding of site

transformers which is linked to the site Capital

Programme (financial). T1 & T2 Upgrades were

completed in 2009. T3 was upgraded in August 2010

and T6 was completed in December 2010. T4&T5 to be

upgraded as part of EMP in 2011/2012 and are

submitted to the site Capital Programme for 2011/2012.

Complete bunding of IC2 Foam Suppression System The bunding of the IC2 Foam Suppression was fully

completed in 2010 with full integrity testing completed.

Test Reports were reviewed and approved by

Chartered Engineer.

Implement colour coding of drains onsite This action is one of the final tasks of the Spill

Prevention Programme. As outlined above, this

programme is ongoing and this action is now due to

progress into 2011 for full completion.

4. Maintenance &

Calibration

Maintenance &

Calibration

Review M&C programmes for EHS critical equipment

and develop improvement plan for implementation

All EHS critical equipment identified on M&C

programme (focus on WWTP) as other areas

(TO&CPG) are incorporated into operational M&C



Page 14


Plan Status

programmes. Register and schedule for M&C is

completed and the programme is ongoing.

Formalise waste analysis programme and complete

analysis required in 2010

Programme completed. Gaps identified and

progressed. SOP finalized. Completed by end of year.

5. Waste Compliance Waste Compliance

Complete review of classification of waste sludge The classification of sludge commenced in Q3 & Q4

with testing of the WWTP sludge. An external

consultant then completed a draft waste classification,

which is currently been reviewed with our waste

contractors. Once approved, this will be submitted to

the EPA for approval. To progress into 2011 for fully

completion.



Page 15

Site Goal: Reduce the Site EHSIR

Objective: Achieve EHSIR <0.3

Target: 100% Compliance; 5% Reduction in Waste Disposal; 75% Engagement in EHS Training & Awareness

Ref: Env. Sig. Aspects: 001, 002, 003, 004

Rationale: The site EHSIR represents the EHS Incident Rate, which requires to be proactively targeted with improvement

programmes to reduce the rate of non-compliances, accidents, incidents, near misses etc. onsite.


Plan Status

Complete review of WWTP operations by external expert Completed.

The site commissioned external engineers Parsons to

complete a Front End Study of the WWTP to increase

treatment capabilities both short term and long term.

Full FES report subsequently received from Parsons.

The long terms actions will be progressed as full

WWTP project in 2011.

Develop Improvement Plan (based on findings of review) See above. The short term actions were commenced in

2010 and included the purchase of pumps and

redundancy equipment for the WWTP. Full installation

will form the basis of the WWTP Project, to be fully

detailed as part of the 2011 EMP.

1. WWTP Improvement Upgrade of

WWTP

Implementation of Improvement Plan See above. Short term actions implemented in 2010.



Page 16








Plan Status

Longer term actions to form part of 2011 EMP.

WWTP HAZOP

Actions

Progress priority HAZOP actions in WWTP As above.

WWTP Safety

Programme

Develop and implement a safety programme in the WWTP Excellent progress with this programme, with following

actions completed in 2010 as follows:

1. Installed platform for clarifier, sludge skips &

access platform in inlet/santisation tank.

2. Review of hoists completed. Housekeeping

exceptional. Hazards signed.

3. Developed register of task based risk

assessments. Assessments prioritised.

Training completed & assessments underway.

4. Improvements to WWTP security and signage.



Page 17








Plan Status

Developed training for visitors/contractors.

WWTP Metrics Develop WWTP metrics and integrate into site operations Metrics were developed for the WWTP, with daily &

weekly reports completed and issued on an ongoing

basis.

WWTP

Housekeeping

Review housekeeping in WWTP and develop programme

for improvement

Huge improvements completed in 2010. These include

the visuals and signage, as outlined above. Full

relocation of all SE1 continuous equipment from

emission point to dedicated building. Access control

implemented in WWTP and additional controls

implemented on WWTP activities.

2. Air Emissions Thermal Oxidiser

Programme

Review of TO Bypasses and implementation of identified

improvements

Numerous measures completed by team in 2010,

including additional controls through SCADA, suppliers

Megtech, training with personnel, completion of Air



Page 18








Plan Status

Dispersion Modelling. Work to continue into 2011.

Odour Monitoring Update Odour Monitoring Programme to incorporate EPA

Guidance

Programme fully completed. This programme included

a complete update of the site monitoring programme to

reflect EPA guidance on odour monitoring, specified

monitoring locations and documentation to support

odour emission characteristics.

ODS Programme Complete ODS management programme. A dedicated Ozone Depleting Substance management

report completed was completed, incorporating full

register of ODS onsite and a dedicated management

plan. An action plan was developed for the appropriate

management and removal (as required) of ODS. This

programme is progressing and will also be included in

the EMP for 2011.



Page 19








Plan Status

Develop programme for R22 replacement onsite A capital submission for upgrades was prepared in

2010 and commenced with the ongoing removal of the

site Chillers (contain R22). Full completion to be

addressed within 2011 EMP.

Review of Hazardous & Non-Hazardous Waste

Management Onsite

Ongoing:

Specific actions completed in 2010: including Mapping

of waste streams in each department & Initiated tender

process with contractors to ensure full engagement &

leverage waste management activities onsite.

3. Waste Waste

Improvement

Programme

Development of Improvement Programme for Waste

Prevention, Minimization & Recovery

Implementation of segregation at source in site

canteen, including introduction of compostable waste

streams. Infrastructure installed and training completed.

Programme in place.



Page 20

Site Goal: EHS Management Systems

Objective: Achieve a fully functional certified EHS Management System

Target: 100% Implementation of Management System

Ref: Env. Sig. Aspects: -

Rationale: The site is committed to the implementation of a fully functional site-wide EHS Management System, which will add value

to the business by providing a resource to our site customers for EHS requirements, systems and programmes.

Reference No. Focus

Plan Status

Complete EHS Management System

Policies

In 2010 the site completed a full review of the site EHS

Management system. As part of this, the site developed

guidance (known as policies) for the EHS programmes

onsite. This is to provide guidance on key EHS

programmes for the site. The policies are available on a

dedicated internal website, accessible for all personnel.

Develop Action Plan & Implement Action plan in place and fully completed. As outlined above.

1. EHS Management System

Complete EHS Management System

Manual

As part of the EHS Management system improvement, a

new EHS Manual was developed to provide guidance on

the systems. This is also available onsite through dedicated

website.



Page 21

Reference No. Focus

Plan Status

Complete Certification of EHS Management

Systems to ISO14001/18001

In Q4, the site completed external certification audit with

external certifiers and received certification of the site EHS

Management System to ISO14001 in December 2010.



Page 22

Site Goal: Sustainability

Objective: Achieve an effective Sustainability Programme

Target: 5% Improvement Year on Year

Ref: Env. Sig.

Aspects:

007

Rationale: The site is committed to the implementation of an effective Sustainability Programme, focusing on improving energy and

resource efficiencies at the facility.

Reference No. Focus

Plan Status

1. Energy Efficiency Programme Develop and implement programme for

refrigerant replacement and utilities upgrade

onsite

Ongoing. See previous items.

2. Resource Efficiency Programme Investigate feasibility of reuse of Reverse

Osmosis Reject Water in Site Operation

Ongoing.

3. Overall Equipment Effectiveness Identify, agree and track OEE Targets for

Ops 1 and Ops2, incorporating PE projects

into plans for improvement.

Completed. OEE tracked as part of weekly metrics for each

operational area. Reviewed by senior management team

on monthly basis. Ongoing programme.



Appendix V

Proposed Objectives and Targets 2011

Millipore Ireland Ltd. Tullagreen, Carrigtwohill, Co. Cork

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME

PROPOSAL FOR 2011


Proposal for 2011 March 2011

Page 2

Environmental Management Programme

Proposal for 2011

Table of Contents

1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 3

2.0 SCOPE.................................................................................................................. 3

3.0 REFERENCE ....................................................................................................... 4



6.0 REPORTING & REVIEW................................................................................. 6

4.0 PROPOSED 2011 ENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTIVES & TARGETS..... 10



Page 3

1.0 INTRODUCTION The following Environmental Management Programme (EMP) was prepared in fulfillment of Condition 2.2.2.2 & 2.2.2.3 of IPPC Licence Reg. No. P0571-03, concerning the activities of Millipore Ireland Limited, Carrigtwohill, Co. Cork. Millipore Ireland Limited hereafter referred to as Millipore, is licensed under IPPC Licence Reg. No. P0571-03, granted from the Environmental Protection Agency on March 09th 2010, and is located in Carrigtwohill, Co. Cork. This schedule of Environmental Objectives and Targets and associated Management Programme has been prepared for 2011, in fulfillment of Condition 2.2.2.2 & 2.2.2.3 and will be submitted to the Agency for approval, as part of the Annual Environmental Report for 2010. 2.0 SCOPE In accordance with IPPC licence Condition 2.2.2 and other requirements, a schedule for Environmental Objectives and Targets was prepared for the site. The schedule details the Environmental Objectives the company has set itself for the current five year period, from 2010 – 2015. The targets demonstrate the company’s long term commitment to the protection of the environmental and reflect the site EHS policies. The company endeavors to maintain its policy of continuous improvement and ensure this environmental management programme is dynamic and effectual. The purpose of this environmental management programme is to ensure that a realistic environmental programme, which is implemented throughout the company, supports the schedule of environmental objectives and targets. Therefore, this environmental management programme relates to all areas of company environmental performance incorporated into the operating IPPC licence, regulatory and other requirements.

��

��



Page 4

3.0 REFERENCE IPPC Licence Register No. P0571-03 – Condition 2.2.2.2 & 2.2.2.3 “The licensee shall maintain a Schedule of Environmental Objectives & Targets. The schedule shall, as a minimum provide for a review of all operations and processes, including an evaluation of practicable options for energy and resource efficiency, the use of cleaner technology, cleaner production and the prevention, reduction and minimisation of waste and shall include waste reduction targets. The schedule shall address a five year period as a minimum. The schedule shall be reviewed annually and amendments thereto notified to the Agency for agreement as part of the Annual Environmental Report (AER).” “The licensee shall maintain an EMP including a time schedule for achieving the Environmental Objectives and Targets prepared under Condition 2.2.2.2. Once agreed the EMP shall be maintained by the licensee. It shall include:

- designation of responsibility for targets; - the means by which they may be achieved; - the time within which they may be achieve.

The EMP shall be reviewed annually and amendments thereto notified to the Agency for agreement as part of the Annual Environmental Report (AER).”



Page 5

4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTIVES & TARGETS 2010 - 2015

Site EHS Policy Environmental Objectives and Targets are based on identified significant environmental aspects and applicable laws and regulations as per Environmental Objectives and Targets Procedure 0030450 MP. The current site EHS policy contains the following commitments that are cross-referenced where applicable in the Site Environmental Objectives and Targets.



Page 6

5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTIVES & TARGETS 2010 - 2015 This Environmental Management Programme 2011 will form the EMP proposal for the period January 01st 2011 to December 31st 2011. However the schedule of Environmental Objectives & Targets will address a five year period as a minimum. The targets aim to combine the priorities of the EPA and Millipore Cork and incorporate them into achievable goals. The Objectives & Targets will review all operations and activities and specifically revaluate practicable options for the following:

- Energy & Resource Efficiency; - Use of Cleaner Technology; - Cleaner Production; and - Prevention, Minimization & Reduction of Waste.

In addition, the Environmental Objectives and Targets will specifically review site operations to ensure new projects and/or potential future production developments, will be suitably included within the Objectives and Targets, as appropriate. The schedule is being reported as part of this environmental management programme, however for each project the following items will be addressed and reporting in the Annual Environmental Report:

- Rationale for undertaking the project; - Target to be achieved; - Programme for achieving the target; - Personnel responsible; - Timeframe for completed.

An individual project may have several different stages of action required to realize the project endpoint. Different personnel may have responsibility for coordinating separate stages of a project, therefore these are individually outlined. In addition, efforts have been made to maximize inputs from all levels of the organistion. The personnel outlined are only those with overall responsibility for coordinating the programme and additional personnel may assist in project realization.

6.0 REPORTING & REVIEW The Environmental Management Programme will be reviewed on an annual basis or when any significant obstacle or business need arise, in order to keep the programme functional and dynamic. The review will assess the following:

- The programme of date of project implementation; - The effective to date of any projects completed, or nearing completion and

other recommendations from key technical staff; - An obstacles of additional benefits encountered in implementing specific

projects;



Page 7

- The relevance and cost effectiveness of the various projects within the programme;

- Any future projects which may be incorporated into the programme. An Annual Environmental Report (AER) will be prepared to document the items outlined above, present amendments to the Objectives & Targets schedule, and other information as specified in the IPPC licence and Agency Guidance Notes on Preparation of AERs. The AER will be submitted to the Agency as required under the terms of the operating IPPC licence.



Page 8


Targets Site Goals Objective Focus Areas for

2011 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

WWTP Compliance

100% Compliance 100% Compliance 100% Compliance 100% Compliance 100% Compliance

New IPPC Licence


Spill Prevention

Programme

0 Spills Impacting

on the Environment

0 Spills Impacting

on the Environment

0 Spills Impacting

on the Environment

0 Spills Impacting

on the Environment

0 Spills Impacting

on the Environment

Maintenance &

Calibration


1. 100% IPPC

Licence

Compliance

Achieve 100%

Compliance with all

Licence Parameters

Waste Compliance


WWTP Improvement


Air Emissions


Waste Improvement 5% Reduction in

Waste Disposal

5% Reduction in

Waste Disposal

5% Reduction in

Waste Generation

5% Reduction in

Waste Generation

5% Reduction in

Waste Generation

2. Reduce the site

EHSIR

(EHS Incident Rate)

Achieve EHSIR

<0.3

Training &

Awareness

>75% Engagement

in EHS Training &

Awareness

>75% Engagement

in EHS Training &

Awareness

>75% Engagement

in EHS Training &

Awareness

>75% Engagement

in EHS Training &

Awareness

>75% Engagement

in EHS Training &

Awareness

3. EHS Management Achieve a fully EHS Management

System

100%

Implementation of

100%

Implementation of

100%

Implementation of

100%

Implementation of

100%

Implementation of



Page 9


Targets Site Goals Objective Focus Areas for

2011 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Systems functional certified

EHS Management

System

Management

System

Management

System

Management

System

Management

System

Management

System

Energy Efficiency 5% Improvement on

Previous Year

5% Improvement on

Previous Year

5% Improvement on

Previous Year

5% Improvement on

Previous Year

5% Improvement on

Previous Year

4. Sustainability Achieve an effective

Sustainability

Programme Resource Efficiency 5% Improvement on

Previous Year

5% Improvement on

Previous Year

5% Improvement on

Previous Year

5% Improvement on

Previous Year

5% Improvement on

Previous Year



Page 10

4.0 PROPOSED 2011 ENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTIVES & TARGETS




Rationale: The operating IPPC licence is primary regulatory requirement for the site for the management and control of site operations and associated

environmental emissions.


Plan Timeframes Responsibility

Review options for the management of the surface water at

SW1 (i) Option 1 – TOC System (ii) Option 2 – Alternative

System for Management & Monitoring

Q2, 2011 F. Studdert, EHS

Complete next step of preferred option (i) Commissioning of

the TOC monitoring system at SW1 (ii) Agreement with EPA &

installation of alternative management & monitoring system.


Complete associated Firewater System management

programme and SOP


WWTP Compliance Programme

Complete associated TOC Warning & Action Levels

Programme and Submission to the EPA


1. WWTP

WWTP Training Programme Continuation of training & engagement programme for WWTP

operators

Q1-Q4, 2011 L. Gordillo, EHS



Page 11








Environmental Laboratory

Programme

Complete validation programme of environmental procedures

& Complete installation of MES software programme.

Q1-Q3, 2011 L. Gordillo, EHS

CPG Emissions Strategy (I )Review and agree options for CPG emissions management

(II) Agree strategy with EPA

(III) Implement required monitoring programme for same.

Q3, 2011 S.Duggan (EHS),

CPG Project

Team

2. IPPC Licence

Air Abatement Test Programme Complete second test programme on air abatement

associated with CPG operations Phase II

Q3, 2011 Ross Daly (EHS),

CPG Project

Team

Complete Spill Prevention Programme, report to the Agency

as required.

Q1–Q3, 2011 F.Studdert (EHS)

& Chartered

Engineer

3. Spill Prevention

Programme

Spill Prevention Programme

Develop long term programme for management of bunds and

structures onsite

Q3, 2011 F. Studdert

(EHS) &

Chartered



Page 12








Engineer

Complete bunding of site Transformers – T4/T5 included in

Capital 2011 – to be implemented in 2011 subject to fund

available for 2012.

Q4, 2011 B. McGrath

(Facilities)

Implement colour coding of drains onsite Q4, 2011 F.Studdert (EHS)

& Chartered

Engineer

4. Maintenance &

Calibration

Maintenance & Calibration Implementation of M&C Programme Q1-Q4, 2011 J.Coleman &

P.Barry (WWTP)

Formalise waste analysis programme and complete analysis

required in 2011

Q1-Q4, 2011 L. Gordillo, EHS 5. Waste

Compliance

Waste Compliance

Complete review of classification of waste sludge & submit to

the Agency for agreement.

Q2, 2011 R.Daly, EHS



Page 13








Complete additional monitoring of waste sludge to verify

classification of waste sludge & submit to the Agency for

agreement.

Q4, 2011 R.Daly, EHS



Page 14




Rationale: The site EHSIR represents the EHS Incident Rate, which requires to be proactively targeted with improvement programmes to reduce the rate

of non-compliances, accidents, incidents, near misses etc. onsite.



Appointment of dedicated WWTP Project Engineer to manage

WWTP Project

Q1, 2011 S.Duggan, EHS

Develop & implement short term WWTP Improvement &

Optimisation Plan (based on findings of FES & Works

completed in 2010)

Q2, 2011 Project Engineer

& EHS Team

Develop long term WWTP Capacity Plan for 2011 – 2015

Q2-Q4, 2011 Project Engineer

& EHS Team

Upgrade of WWTP

Develop plan for replacement of the WWTP Underground

Pipeline & commence implementation of plan.

Full completion in 2012.

Q3-Q4, 2011 Project Engineer

& EHS Team

1. WWTP

Improvement

WWTP Safety Programme Ongoing implementation of safety programme in the WWTP Q1-Q4, 2011 L. Gordillo, EHS

2. Air Emissions Thermal Oxidiser Programme Review of TO Bypasses and implementation of identified

improvements

Q1-Q4, 2011 Project Team



Page 15




Rationale: The site EHSIR represents the EHS Incident Rate, which requires to be proactively targeted with improvement programmes to reduce the rate

of non-compliances, accidents, incidents, near misses etc. onsite.



Incident Notification Update Incident Reporting SOP to incorporate EPA Guidance Q2, 2011 R.Daly, EHS

Complete ODS management programme Q1, 2011 F.Studdert, EHS ODS Programme

Complete programme for R22 replacement onsite (including

completion of Chiller Project Replacement)

Q1-Q4, 2011 B.McGrath

(Facilities)

Complete Waste Tendering Process for Waste Contractors

onsite

Q1-Q2, 2011 F.Studdert &

L.Gordillo, EHS

Implementation of new waste management system onsite,

based on the Waste Tendering Process.

Q2 – Q4, 2011 F.Studdert &

L.Gordillo, EHS

3. Waste Waste Improvement Programme

Development of Waste Auditing Programme Q3-Q4, 2011 F.Studdert &

L.Gordillo, EHS



Page 16

Site Goal: EHS Management Systems

Objective: Achieve a fully functional certified EHS Management System & Integrate with Merck Corporate Requirements

Target: 100% Implementation of Management System

Rationale: The site is committed to the implementation of a fully functional site-wide EHS Management System, which will add value to the business by

providing a resource to our site customers for EHS requirements, systems and programmes.

In addition, integration of Merck Corporate Requirements into site systems.

Reference No. Focus


1. EHS Management System Complete re-certification of EHS Management Systems to

ISO14001/18001

Q4, 2011 F.Studdert &

EHS Team 2. Merck Integration Programme Complete gap analysis, develop and implement programme of

integration

Q1-Q4, 2011 R.Daly & EHS

Team



Page 17

r Site Goal: Sustainability

Objective: Achieve an effective Sustainability Programme

Target: 5% Improvement Year on Year

Rationale: The site is committed to the implementation of an effective Sustainability Programme, focusing on improving energy and resource efficiencies at

the facility.

Reference No. Focus


1. Energy Efficiency Programme Develop and implement programme for refrigerant

replacement and utilities upgrade onsite

Q1-Q4, 2011 F. Studdert, EHS

& B.McGrath

(Facilities)

2. Resource Efficiency Programme Investigate feasibility of reuse of Reverse Osmosis Reject

Water in Site Operation

Q1-Q4, 2011 B.McGrath

(Facilities)

3. Overall Equipment Effectiveness Identify, agree and track OEE Targets for Ops 1 and Ops2,

incorporating PE projects into plans for improvement/

Q1-Q4, 2011 Production

MILLIPORE IRELAND LTD Objectives & Targets


Page 18



Appendix VI

Solvent Managment Plan

Millipore Ireland BV

SOLVENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR 2010

Millipore Ireland BV Solvent Management Plan for 2010

CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................................3 2. SOLVENTS DIRECTIVE ........................................................................................................................3 3. SOLVENT DIRECTIVE TERMS .............................................................................................................4 4. ENVIRONMENTAL INCIDENTS.............................................................................................................7 5. SOLVENT DIRECTIVE RESULTS .........................................................................................................8

APPENDICES

Appendix A Overall Solvent Mass Balance

Appendix B Solvents Directive Terminology


Page 3 of 16

1. INTRODUCTION A mass balance for the period January 2010 - December 2010 was carried out at Millipore Ireland BV. This report examines six solvents on site: Dimethylacetamide (DMAc), methanol, acetone, ethanol, butanol and N Methyl-2-Pyrrolidinone (NMP). This Solvent Management Plan has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of IPPC Licence No.P0571-03, Condition 6.9.4: “The Licensee shall prepare a Solvents Management Plan. Guidelines on the completion of the solvent management plan given in the Emission of Volatile Organic Compounds from Organic Solvents Regulations (S.I. No. 543 of 2002) shall be followed. This Plan shall be submitted to the Agency, as part of the AER annually.”

2. SOLVENTS DIRECTIVE1 The summary of the mass balance results in accordance with the Solvents Directive is presented in Appendix A. The following paragraphs describe the main terms used in the mass balance. These have been modified to reflect the Solvents Directive. The Solvents Directive terminology used for the site is given in Appendix B. The relevant solvents under the Directive are listed below since their vapour pressure is greater than 0.01 kPa at 293.15K.

Solvent Vapour Pressure at 293.15K (kPa)

N,N-Dimethylacetamide (DMAc) 0.2

Methanol 13.0

Acetone 24.5

Ethanol 5.85

Butanol 0.56

N Methyl-2-Pyrrolidinone (NMP) 0.06

During 2011, there will be no new solvents introduced on site with a vapour pressure greater than 0.001 kPa.

1 Council Directive 1999/13/EC on the limitation of emissions of volatile organic compounds due to the use of organic solvents in certain activities and installations as implemented via Emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds from Organic Solvents Regulations 2002, SI 543 of 2002.


Page 4 of 16

3. SOLVENT DIRECTIVE2 TERMS

Fresh Solvent Input (I1) The input stream consists of the purchases for each solvent and the virgin solvent change of inventory (COI). The purchase of material is determined from delivery records on the computer system.

Recovered & Reused Solvent (I2) Previously, recovered solvent was not considered in the solvent mass balance, as it is an internal loop. This remains the case for the Solvents Directive. In any case the volumes of solvent recovered on-site are still included in the solvent mass balance spreadsheets for completeness. On-site recovery refers to DMAC, acetone and methanol which is recovered from the Durapore process and NMP and Methanol from the IC2 process. The on site recovery figure is determined from Production Records. It was anticipated that NMP would be recovered for reuse on site in 2010. However NMP was not recovered in 2010 as the SRU was unable to handle Sumitomo PES. This Waste stream was sent to WWTP.

Inputs (I = I1 + I2) corresponds to gross usage For the Solvents Directive the input term (I) refers to the sum of fresh solvent and recovered solvent used as input into the process.

The inputs (I) of each solvent for the 2010 PRTR year were calculated from on site databases and engineering estimates. DMAC, methanol, acetone and NMP are recovered on-site. Reuse and recovery are classified as the same for this mass balance.

Accumulation Accumulation incorporates the storage or removal of a substance from the site during the time period in question. The various materials are divided into virgin material, recovered material and waste material. Accumulation is not dealt with as an explicit term in the Solvents Directive. The term accumulation will be individually incorporated into the appropriate terms.

Accumulation of virgin materials have been incorporated into the term I1 (input of fresh solvent)

Accumulation of on-site recovered materials have been incorporated into the term I2 (Solvent recovered and re-used on site)

Accumulation of waste have been incorporated into the term O6 (waste collected to send off-site)

2 Council Directive 1999/13/EC on the limitation of emissions of volatile organic compounds due to the use of organic solvents in certain activities and installations as implemented via Emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds from Organic Solvents Regulations 2002, SI 543 of 2002.


Page 5 of 16

Output Terms The output element of the solvent mass balance is made up of:

solvent emitted to air through licensed emission points and as fugitive emissions

solvent sent to sewer,

solvent present in products,

solvent treated in thermal oxidizer and wastewater treatment plant,

solvent waste sent off-site,

solvent sent off-site for recovery and reuse,

solvent released in other ways. These terms are discussed below.

Solvent Emissions to Air from Licensed Sources (O1) This term includes solvent emissions lost through:

A1/7: from thermal oxidizer TO1 and TO2

A1/8: from thermal oxidizer TO3. These emissions are continuously monitored.

Solvent Emissions to Air from Fugitive Sources (O4) Outputs to air also arise from fugitive emission sources. The figures for fugitive emissions arise from:

Building Ventilation

Minor Emission Points

Solvent Storage Tanks

Wastewater Treatment Tank losses

Process Components

Hose Decoupling losses

Incidents/uncontrolled releases

Liquid Effluent (O2) In terms of the Solvents Directive, O2 refers to ‘organic solvents lost in water, if appropriate taking into account waste water treatment when calculating O5’. This figure for liquid effluent was calculated based on quarterly effluent analysis results for individual solvent compounds.

Solvent as a Residue in Product (O3) This term does not apply to the Millipore site.


Page 6 of 16

Lost Due to Chemical or Physical Reaction (O5) Under the Solvents Directive, the term O5 encompasses any solvent which is lost due to chemical or physical reactions including incineration, adsorption, waste water treatment, process reaction etc. This term includes losses due to treatment in the:

On-Site Wastewater Treatment Plant

Thermal Oxidisers (TO1, TO2 & TO3)

Waste Off-Site (O6) A number of solvent waste streams from Millipore Ireland BV are sent off-site for incineration. Waste sent off site for disposal is classed as Solvent Directive term O6 – organic solvents contained in collected waste. It should be noted that any solvent which is sent for reuse/recovery is classed under O8 (organic solvents contained in preparations recovered for reuse but not as input into the process, as long as not counted under O7). It should be noted that the definition of recovery for reuse under the legislation is ‘the use of organic solvents recovered from an installation for any technical or commercial purpose and including use as a fuel but excluding the final disposal of such recovered organic solvent as waste’. Therefore for the Solvents Directive it is important to distinguish between solvent that is sent off-site as waste and solvent that is sent off-site for reuse, including use as a fuel. Accumulation figures for waste drums have been included in the term O6 (waste collected).

Solvent which is Sold as Commercially Valuable Product (O7) This term does not apply to the Millipore site.

Solvent Reused/Recovered Off-Site (O8) The Solvents Directive term O8 (solvents contained in preparations recovered for reuse but not as input into the process) includes waste from Millipore which is sent off-site for recovery.

Organic Solvents released in Other Ways (O9) This term does not apply to the Millipore site.


Page 7 of 16

4. ENVIRONMENTAL INCIDENTS There was one reported incident involving solvents during 2010:

In June 2010, there was an uncontrolled release of acetone from VMF1 (Durapore) to the WWTP.

This incident is detailed further in the 2010 Annual Environmental Report (AER).


Page 8 of 16

5. SOLVENT DIRECTIVE RESULTS

Unaccounted Unaccounted is not dealt with in the Solvents Directive. However it has been kept in the Solvent Mass Balance table to give an indication as to the accuracy of the solvent mass balance. The quantity of unaccounted solvent in the mass balance is calculated using the following equation: Unaccounted = Input - Accumulation - Output For the Solvents Directive, the purpose of the solvent mass balance (or solvent management plan as it is known in the Directive) is to calculate fugitive emissions. Fugitive emissions is a broader term than that used in IPPC licensing terms to date – it encompasses emissions to water and residues in product in addition to the usual non-licensed emissions to air.

Solvent Consumption (C) Under the Solvents Directive the term ‘consumed’ is the quantity of organic solvent which is input into the process minus any that is recovered for reuse but not as input into the process. It is expressed as C = I1 – O8. Solvent consumption determines whether an installation comes under the Solvents Regulations or not. For ‘Other Coating, including Metal, Plastic, Textile, Fabric, Film and Paper Coating’ the solvent consumption threshold is > 5 tonnes per year. As can be seen from the calculation for consumption, the more solvent that is recovered for reuse elsewhere (O8), the lower will be the consumption term for the installation. Therefore for the Solvents Directive it is important to distinguish between solvent that is sent off-site as waste and solvent that is sent off-site for reuse, including use as a fuel. For the 2010 solvent mass balance, solvent consumption is as follows:

Table 5.1: Solvent Consumption

Solvents Consumption (kg)

C = I1 - O8

DMAC 43,131

Methanol 172,947

Acetone 324,893

Ethanol 125,308

Butanol 68,504

NMP 11,732

Total 746,515 The solvent consumption figure of 746,515 tonnes for 2010 is above the threshold of > 5 tonnes per year for ‘Other Coating, including Metal, Plastic, Textile, Fabric, Film and Paper Coating’ and therefore the Directive does apply to the site.


Page 9 of 16

Fugitive Emissions (as calculated by the Solvents Directive Solvent Management Plan) The term ‘fugitive emissions’ as calculated by the Solvent Directive solvent management plan has a broader meaning than in previous solvent mass balances. Under the solvent emissions Directive, the term “fugitive emissions”, as well as including emissions to air other than in waste gases, actually includes solvent emissions to water and solvent residues in product. Previously, in accordance with the site’s IPPC licence, fugitive emissions were just those emissions to air, other media were not included. The Solvents Directive allows for fugitive emissions to be calculated either directly through measurement /estimates or by difference in the solvent mass balance: F = I1 – O1 – O5 – O6 - O7 - O8 (unaccounted figure treated as fugitive emission) or F = O2 + O3 + O4 + O9 (calculated directly through measurement /estimate) Ensuring all fugitive emissions to air are directly quantified will eliminate the need to calculate fugitive emissions by solvent mass balance difference. Hence the uncertainty that is inherent in the quantification of all figures, which would lead to the unaccounted figure being included as part of fugitive emissions, can be avoided.

The Solvents Directive sets a fugitive emission value of 20% of input (I) for the ‘Other Coating, including Metal, Plastic, Textile, Fabric, Film and Paper Coating’ sector (> 15 tonnes solvent consumption threshold per year). Fugitive emissions are outlined in Table 5.2.

Table 5.2: Fugitive Emissions

Solvents Fugitive Emission (kg)

F = O2 + O3 + O4 + O9

DMAC 21

Methanol 8,451

Acetone 9,833

Ethanol 2,230

Butanol 1,247

NMP 7

Total 21,790 (1.21% of Input (I))

It should be noted that Condition 6.9.1 of the sites IPPC license states that ‘Fugitive emission values shall not exceed 5% of solvent input. This fugitive emission limit does not include solvent sold as part of products or preparations in a sealed container’. Therefore, the figure of 1.21% is well below the Solvents Directive limit and the limit set by the site’s IPPC license.


Page 10 of 16

Other Issues in relation to the Solvents Directive - Specific Risk Phrase Solvents Apart from requirements to meet emission limit values (waste gas and fugitive) and compile solvent management plans, there will also be requirements under the Solvents Directive in relation to specific risk phrase solvents. There are specific requirements under the legislation for solvents which have been assigned one or more of the following risk phrases:

Risk Phrase R45 (may cause cancer)

R46 (may cause heritable genetic damage)

R49 (may cause cancer by inhalation)

R60 (may impair fertility)

R61 (may cause harm to the unborn child)

R40 (limited evidence of a carcinogenic effect) and halogenated

Of the solvents used at Millipore Ireland BV, the following has been assigned one of these risk phrases:

DMAc has been assigned risk phrase R61 (may cause harm to the unborn child). Hence the requirements for specified risk phrase solvents will have to be looked at in relation to the use of DMAc:

Replacing the chemical as far as possible by a less harmful substance or preparation

For discharges where the mass flow is greater than, or equal to, 10 g/h, an emission limit value of 2 mg/Nm3 shall be complied with.

The discharge of these chemicals shall be controlled as emissions from an installation under contained conditions, as far as technically and economically feasible, to safeguard public health and the environment.

In relation to the usage of DMAc on site – this is a base solvent for the membrane manufacturing process and is core to the Millipore site. At this stage there has been no programme in place to replace its usage as this change would require a whole new reformulation of the membrane product as well as total revalidation and customer notification. DMAc is used on site having regard to all applicable Health and Safety legislation to ensure there is no health risk to employees.


Page 11 of 16

APPENDIX A

OVERALL SOLVENT MASS BALANCE

Mass Balance January - December 2010

CONSUMPTION FUGITIVE

Purchased COI Purchased + COI

Recovered & Reused

Air Licensed Air Fugitive

Liquid Eff sent to sewer

Lost to Product

Lost by reaction

Waste Collected Sold

Sent for Reuse off-

site

Released in Other Ways Unacc % Unacc

threshold for this sector is > 5

tonnes

threshold for this sector is > 20% of

'I'*Solvents Directive Term I1 I2 I O1 O4 O2 O3 O5 O6 O7 O8 O9 C = I1- O8DMAc 78,580 -23,393 55,187 139,353 180,400 0 20 2 0 16,557 -1,240 0 12,056 0 13,653 7.6% 43,131 21Methanol 226,030 -31,070 194,960 687,737 838,682 0 8,443 8 0 109,870 0 0 22,013 0 10,612 1.3% 172,947 8,451Acetone 406,040 -42,521 363,519 204,403 557,142 4,414 9,830 3 0 296,392 3,523 0 38,626 0 -49 0.0% 324,893 9,833Ethanol 129,540 6,275 135,815 0 125,887 0 2,230 0 0 113,150 741 0 10,507 0 -741 -0.6% 125,308 2,230Butanol 80,000 -5,338 74,662 0 73,709 0 1,247 0 0 66,303 0 0 6,159 0 0 0.0% 68,504 1,247NMP 20,040 -619 19,421 -849 19,659 0 7 0 0 1,850 889 0 7,689 0 10,073 51.2% 11,732 7Total 940,230 -96,666 843,564 1,030,644 1,795,479 4,414 21,777 13 0 604,122 3,913 0 97,048 0 33,548 1.9% 746,515 21,790

1.21%

UNACCOUNTED

Kg

FRESH SOLVENT INPUT or USAGE

OUTPUT


Page 13 of 16

APPENDIX B

SOLVENTS DIRECTIVE TERMINOLOGY


Page 14 of 16

Solvents Directive Mass Balance Term

Description from the solvents Directive

Relevance of the term to Millipore Ireland BV and previous mass balance term used

Shorthand used in solvent balance

I1 The quantity of organic solvents or their quantity in preparations purchased which are used as input into the process in the time frame over which the mass balance is being calculated

Annual fresh solvent purchases plus the change in inventory (COI) of fresh solvent between the start and end of the year. Was termed ‘input’ in previous solvent mass balances.

Fresh solvent (Purchased + COI)

I2 The quantity of organic solvents or their quantity in preparations recovered and reused as solvent input into the process. (The recycled solvent is counted every time it is used to carry out the activity)

Solvent recovered and reused on-site. Consists of actual recovered amounts and the change in inventory of recovered solvent. Differentiates between solvent recovered and actually reused. Was termed ‘recovered’ in previous solvent mass balances.

Recovered & Reused

I Inputs of organic solvents (I = I1 + I2) Throughput or usage of solvent in production. Was termed ‘gross usage’ in previous solvent mass balances.

Input or Usage

C Consumption (C = I1 – O8). Corresponds to the quantity of organic solvent which in input into the process minus any that is recovered for reuse but not as input into the process.

Consists of fresh solvent purchases and change in inventory minus any solvent sent for reuse elsewhere. This term was not included in previous solvent mass balances.

Consumption

Outputs of organic solvents (O): O1 Emissions in waste gases Solvent lost to air through licensed emission points. Air - Licensed O2 Organic solvents lost in water, if

appropriate taking into account waste water treatment when calculating O5

The quantity of solvent discharged to sewer. Liq. Eff. sent to Sewer

O3 The quantity of organic solvents which remains as contamination or residue in products output from the process

The quantity of solvent present as a contaminant in the finished product. Was termed ‘product’ in previous solvent mass balances.

Lost to Product


Page 15 of 16





O4 Uncaptured emissions of organic solvents to air. This includes the general ventilation of rooms, where air is released to the outside environment via windows, doors, vents and similar openings.

Solvent lost to air other than through unlicensed emission points. Includes building vents, process vents and any relevant incidents. Was termed ‘air - fugitive’ in previous solvent mass balances.

Air - Fugitive

O5 Organic solvents and/or organic compounds lost due to chemical or physical reactions (including for example those which are destroyed, e.g. by incineration or other waste gas or waste water treatments, or captured, e.g. by adsorption, as long as they are not counted under O6, O7 or O8).

Organic solvents and/or organic compounds lost due to chemical or physical reactions

Lost by chem./ phys. Reaction

O6 Organic solvents contained in collected waste.

The quantity of waste solvent generated at the site. Consists of waste sent off-site for disposal and the change in inventory of the waste. In previous solvent mass balances, the change in inventory wasn’t included and the term ‘waste off-site’ was used.

Waste collected

O7 Organic solvents, or organic solvents contained in preparations, which are sold or are intended to be sold as a commercially valuable product.

Not relevant to the site. Any solvent present in products will be as a contaminant only.

-

O8 Organic solvents contained in preparations recovered for reuse but not as input into the process, as long as not counted under O7.

Solvent sent off-site for recovery and reuse in other applications (including use as a fuel). Was termed ‘solvent reused off-site’ in previous solvent mass balances.

Sent for reuse off-site

O9 Organic solvents released in other ways.

Not relevant to the site. -


Page 16 of 16





- - Unaccounted is the difference between fresh solvent input and solvent output and accumulation. Illustrates the accuracy of the solvent mass balance. Unaccounted is not included as a term in the Solvents Directive.

Unaccounted



Appendix VII

Environmental Noise Survey 2010

PM Dublin Ireland T +353 1 404 0700 PM Cork Ireland T +353 21 435 8922 F +353 1 459 9785, E [email protected] www.pmg.ie F +353 21 435 8933, E [email protected]

Coversheet and Document Template Template:162.TP.020, Issue 6, 11/12/062008

Millipore Ireland

Project No.: Environmental Noise Survey

Project No.: IE0310403

Environmental Noise Survey 2010 File No: IE0310403.22.140 Document Number: IE0310403-22-RP-0001

CURRENT ISSUE

Issue No: B Date: 23/02/11 Reason for Issue: Final

Sign-Off Originator Checker Reviewer Approver Customer Approval

(if required)

Print Name Ross Daly Tim O’Shea Ross Daly

Signature

Date 23/02/11 23/02/11 23/02/11

PREVIOUS ISSUES (Type Names)

Issue No. Date Originator Checker Reviewer Approver Customer Reason for Issue

A 04/01/11 R. Daly T. O’Shea R. Daly For Client Review

Millipore Ireland IE0310403-22-RP-0001 Environmental Noise Assessment 2010 – FINAL 23 February 2011

i

CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1

2 NOISE REGULATIONS AND NOISE ASSESSMENT 2

2.1 Noise Regulations 2 2.2 Survey Equipment 2 2.3 Terminology 3 2.4 One-Third Octave Analysis 3

3 MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS 5

3.1 Noise Sensitive Locations 5 3.2 On-site Boundary Locations 5

4 SURVEY DETAILS AND RESULTS 6

4.1 Noise Sensitive Location and On-site Boundary Results 6

5 NOISE ENVIRONMENT DISCUSSION 9

5.1 Noise Sensitive Location 9 5.2 Onsite/Boundary Locations 10 5.2 Comparison with Previous Noise Surveys 11

6 CONCLUSIONS 13


ii

Appendices APPENDIX A - SURVEY DETAILS APPENDIX B – SITE MAP APPENDIX C – ONE THIRD OCTAVE TONAL TRENDS


1

1. INTRODUCTION PM Group was commissioned by Millipore Ireland to carry out an environmental noise survey at Millipore’s Cork facility located at Tullagreine, Carrigtwohill, Co. Cork. The survey was carried out to satisfy Conditions 4.2 and 6.12 of Millipore’s IPPC Licence Registration No. P0571-03. The survey was carried out by PM acoustic personnel within the Millipore site boundary and at one offsite noise sensitive location over a weekday period of normal operation. The noise survey was carried out on Thursday December 9th and Friday December 10th, 2010. The survey was carried out during normal plant operation. The survey was conducted in accordance with the Environmental Noise Survey Guidance Document (2003) published by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and other relevant guidelines and standards. The IPPC licence conditions sets out that noise emissions from the site should not exceed 55 dB(A) during daytime and 45 dB(A) during night-time hours at noise sensitive locations, and similarly that there should be no clearly audible tonal or impulsive components in such noise emissions at noise sensitive locations. The results and technical analysis of the survey are detailed hereunder.


2

2 NOISE REGULATIONS AND NOISE ASSESSMENT

2.1 Noise Regulations

In Ireland the only existing statutory noise limits are imposed by the EPA, which apply to facilities that require an environmental Waste License or an Integrated Pollution and Prevention Control (IPPC) Licence. The EPA has published guidelines relating to control of noise from premises under control of Waste Licences and IPPC Licences, i.e. the EPA Guidance Note for Noise in Relation to Scheduled Activities. These guidelines set out noise limits for facilities operating under the control of EPA licenses. If a site has an EPA Licence, then the licence conditions may impose noise limits of 55dB(A) during the day (08.00-22.00) and 45dB(A) during the night (22.00 – 08.00). In addition, audible tones and impulsive noise should also be avoided at all noise sensitive locations (local residential property) especially at night-time. [A penalty of 5dB(A) is added for tonal and/or impulsive noise.] Table 2.1: EPA Noise Limits Summary

Daytime Time 08.00-22.00

Noise Limit: 55dB (A) at nearest noise sensitive receptors (30-min)

Night-time Time 22.00-08.00


Additional conditions: No site operations should give rise to tonal or impulsive noise at anytime.

As per Schedule B.4 – P0571-03 In addition to the foregoing criteria, noise from a facility should not be of such a nature or occur at such a time that it gives grounds for annoyance. An assessment of the noise emissions from Millipore was undertaken in accordance with the following Standards and Guidance documents.

• Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) “Guidance note for noise in relation to scheduled activities” (2006),

• World Health Organisation (WHO) “Guidelines for Community Noise 1999”.

• BS4142 “Method for Rating industrial noise affecting mixed Residential and Industrial areas”,

2.2 Survey Equipment

Measurements were made using a Brüel & Kjær Type 2250 Sound Meter calibrated with a Brüel & Kjær Type 4231 Sound Level Calibrator. The instruments were checked and calibrated before and after the survey period to ensure no drift in the instrument’s sensitivity had occurred. Measurements at all locations were made at a height of 1.5m above ground level and measurements were free field, taken 1-2m from reflecting surfaces. [The weather conditions were in accordance with the requirements of ISO 1996: Acoustics – Description and Measurement of Environment Noise.] Some very light breezes were present otherwise weather conditions during each measurement period can be considered dry and calm.


3

2.3 Terminology

In order to understand the terms used, appropriate definitions are outlined as follows: -

LAeq Is the A-weighted equivalent continuous sound level during a sample time period and effectively represents an average value i.e. the average level recorded over the sampling period and includes all noise events. The closer the LAeq value is to either the LAF10 or LAF90 value indicates the relative impact of the intermittent sources and their contribution. The relative spread between the values determines the impact of noise on the background. The LAeq value has been found to correlate well with human tolerance of noise, and is the value normally used in setting and monitoring industrial noise limits.

LAF10 Refers to those levels in the top 10 percentile of the sampling interval; it is the

level that is exceeded for 10% of the measurement period. It is used to determine the intermittent high noise level features of locally generated noise, i.e. the higher noise levels present in the ambient noise.

LAF90 Refers to those levels in the lower 90 percentile of the sampling interval; it is

the level that is exceeded for 90% of the measurement period. It is used to estimate a background level. It tends to exclude short events such as occasional cars passing (but less so for regular passing traffic), dogs barking, aircraft flyovers etc.

LAMax The LAMax is the maximum reading measured at the sound level meter. It gives

an indication of the highest noise produced by a varying noise source. LAMin The LAMin is the minimum reading measured at the sound level meter. It gives

an indication of the lowest noise produced by a varying noise source. A-weighting is the process by which noise levels are corrected to account for the non-

linearity of human hearing. dB(A) A logarithmic noise scale (decibel). The “A” indicates that a frequency weighting

has been applied to take account of the variation in the sensitivity of the human ear as a function of frequency.

All quoted noise levels are relative pressure of to 2x10-5 Pa. It should be noted that the night-time measurement period of 15-minutes duration is in accordance with the reference time interval as per ISO 1996 “Description and Measurement of Environmental Noise” and BS 4142:1997 “Rating industrial noise affecting mixed residential and industrial areas”.

2.4 One-Third Octave Analysis

One-third (1/3) Octave Band analysis is a method of analysing the structure of a noise, i.e. the frequency spectrum of a noise. The centre frequencies of the one-third octave bands are 12.5Hz, 25Hz, 31.5Hz, 40Hz, 50Hz, 63Hz, 80Hz, 100Hz, 125Hz, 160Hz, 250Hz, 500Hz, 1kHz, 1.25kHz, 1.6kHz, 2kHz, 2.5kHz, 3.15kHz, 4kHz, 5kHz, 6.3kHz, 8kHz, 10kHz, 12.5kHz, 16kHz and 20kHz. The frequency profile of the noise was measured in the 1/3-octave band to assess the potential tonal components, which may be used to identify specific sources of nuisance noise


4

at the sensitive receptors. In accordance with ISO 1996 – Description and Measurement of Environment Noise, a source is described as having a tonal element at a particular frequency when it is clearly audible or exceeds the level of the adjacent bands by 5dB or more. For example, a fan or generator running inefficiently can exhibit a tonal noise as a hum or drone. In order to understand how human hearing responds to the 1/3-octave frequency band, Figure 2.1 outlines where the threshold of hearing lies with respect to each range of frequency.

Figure 2.1 - Human Hearing Response (threshold of hearing) Across 1/3-Octave Frequency Data Spectrum

Source: Acoustics and Noise Control; Smith, B.J., Peters, R.J. and Owen, S., 1996.

From Figure 2.1, it can be seen that a noise source of 40Hz would need to be at a level of approximately 40dB(A) in order to be audible. Likewise, a noise source of 50Hz would need to be at a level of approximately 35dB(A) in order to be audible. Similarly, a noise source of 125Hz would need to be at a level of approximately 20dB(A) in order to be audible. It should be noted that the human threshold of hearing is less responsive at low and high frequency extremes of the spectrum, i.e. a sound at a frequency of 16Hz would need to be at a level of approximately 80dB(A) to be heard by humans, and a sound at a frequency of 8kHz would need to be at a level of approximately 15dB(A) to be within the audible range of the human ear.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

16 20 25 31.5 40 5 0 63 80 100 125 1 60 200 250 315 400 500 630 800 1k 1.25k 1.6k 2k 2.5k 3.15k 4k 5k 6.3k

Frequency (Hz )

dB(

Thresho


5

3 MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS

The survey included ambient environmental noise measurements at both onsite locations and a noise sensitive location within the immediate proximity to the Millipore site.

3.1 Noise Sensitive Locations Given the rural and estuarine setting of Tullagreine, noise measurements were carried out at a single noise sensitive location in the vicinity of Millipore. This location is described in Table 3.1 below and is approved by the EPA as the nearest sensitive receptor. Table 3.1: Description of Noise Sensitive Locations.

Noise Sensitive Locations Description

NSL 1 Tullagreine House, Tullagreine, Cobh Road, Carrigtwohill, Co. Cork.

3.2 On-site Boundary Locations

Measurements were made at 7 locations within the Millipore site boundary. A description of these locations is included in Table 3.2 below. These locations are concurrent with survey locations used in previous surveys. [See Appendix B – IPPC Site Map.] Table 3.2: Description of Boundary Locations

On-site Locations Description AN 1 (A) Western Site Boundary – 60m from Tullagreine House AN 2 (B) Western Site Boundary – Adjacent to IC1 Tank Farm AN 3 (C) Southern Site Boundary – Site entrance AN 4 (D) Southern Site Boundary – Sports field AN 5 (E) Northern Site Boundary – WWTP AN 6 (F) Northern Site Boundary - rear of Durapore Casting AN 7 (G) Eastern Site Boundary – rear of contractor compound/yard


6

4 SURVEY DETAILS AND RESULTS

Measurements were made on a cyclic basis at a noise sensitive location and the Millipore site boundaries over both day and night-time periods. 1/3rd octave band analysis was measured at all locations during the survey period to assess the presence of tonal components in the noise environment.

4.1 Noise Sensitive Location and On-site Boundary Results

Having undertaken day and night-time measurements, the results of the noise monitoring completed and associated observations are included in Table 4.1 and 4.2 Table 4.1 – Levels Detected at Noise Sensitive Locations (nightime and daytime periods)

Location Date Time LAeq LAmax LAmin LA10 LA90 Comments/Observations Tonal or Impulsive Noise

00.25-00.40 50.3 55.3 47.1 52.9 48.0

Traffic on N25 and Cobh Rd dominated the noise environment. Plant operations barely audible – steady state noise pattern.

No tones or impulsive noise audible or detected

Dec 9th

00.40-00.55 50.7 54.2 47.3 52.8 48.6 Same as previous


13.01-13.16 60.5 65.1 54.5 62.2 58.0

Road traffic continues to be the dominant noise source – numerous HGV’s. Plant barely audible during lulls in traffic only (onsite crane audible only).


NSL 1

Dec 10th

14.23-14.38 55.8 57.9 53.9 56.7 54.9

Road traffic continues to be the dominant noise source, less traffic than previous measurement. Plant operations inaudible.


Note: All values in dB (A) re 2x10-5 Pa. Night-time and daytime measurements split over a 30-minute duration Table 4.2 – Noise Levels Detected at Boundary Locations (nightime and daytime periods)


Dec 9th

23.23 – 23.38 52.3 63.5 49.3 53.5 50.6

Road traffic audible from Cobh Rd interchange and N25. Plant noise audible from roof of Durapore – chillers, compressors, AHU and flues audible. Dog barking in Tullagreine house.

No tones or impulsive noise audible or detected AN 1 (A)

Dec 10th 12.45 – 13.00 54.3 61.6 52.0 55.1 53.3

Road traffic dominant noise source from Cobh Rd interchange and N25. Plant noise audible from roof of



7

Durapore – chillers, compressors, AHU and flues audible. Birdsong

Location Date Time LAeq LAmax LAmin LA10 LA90 Comments/Observations Tonal or

Impulsive Noise

Dec 9th

23.05 – 23.20 52.5 57.3 48.3 54.2 50.3

Road traffic dominant noise source. Compressors or pumps audible from tank farm.


AN2 (B)

Dec 10th 12.31-12.46 55.4 58.1 53.4 56.8 54.2

Road traffic dominant noise source. Onsite noise audible primarily from tank farm pumps. No onsite traffic audible at times.



Dec 9th

22.07 -22.22 51.1 60.5 46.2 52.8 48.8

Road traffic on Cobh Road and N25 dominant noise source – HGV’s and modified cars particularly distinguished. Steady state plant noise audible during lulls in traffic. Birdlife audible from estuary. Hiss from gas supply plant also audible at times.


AN3 (C)

Dec 10th 12.10 – 12.25 55.7 69.7 50.5 56.7 52.5

Road traffic on Cobh Road and N25 dominant noise source. Frequent traffic movements onsite and on local access road. Plant operations inaudible



Dec 9th

22.25 - 22.40 51.1 59.8 47.5 52.7 49.1

Road traffic dominant noise source – monitoring location was in direct line of sight of Cobh Rd interchange. Steady state plant noise observed. Birdsong audible from estuary. Dog barking in Tullagreine House.


AN4 (D) Dec 10th 11.18 – 11.33 54.9 65.8 49.0 56.7 50.9

Road traffic dominant noise source – monitoring location was in direction line of sight of Cobh Rd interchange. Also onsite and local traffic audible. Steady state plant noise observed.



Dec 9th

00.08 – 00.23 60.0 62.4 58.9 60.7 59.4

Thermal oxidiser and adjacent plant audible over WW plant operations. N25 also clearly audible behind foliage.

No tones or impulsive noise audible or detected AN5 (E)

13.57 – 14.10 62.5 68.6 59.9 63.8 61.0 Thermal oxidiser and

adjacent plant audible. No tones or impulsive noise


8

Dec 10th

Squealing-type noise from clarifier audible. N25 clearly audible behind foliage.

audible or detected


Dec 9th

23.45 – 00.00 56.7 70.1 50.3 59.8 51.7

N25 road noise clearly influential over noise environment. Steady state plant noise audible.


AN6 (F) Dec 10th

13.38 – 13.53 66.0 81.8 59.4 66.7 60.9

N25 road noise clearly dominates over plant noise. Boiler and flue systems audible at times of low traffic.



Dec 9th

22.45 – 23.00 53.0 59.7 45.4 55.5 49.1 N25 dominant noise source. Steady state plant noise audible.


AN7 (G) Dec 10th 11.51 – 12.06 54.7 59.3 51.0 56.7 52.5

N25 dominant noise source including numerous HGV’s. Steady state plant noise audible. HGV delivering to site. Also HGV’s audible on local access road.


Note: all values in dB (A) re 2x10-5 Pa.


9

5 NOISE ENVIRONMENT DISCUSSION

Millipore is currently licensed by the EPA. The Conditions and Schedule of Limits set by the Agency to assess noise levels are as follows: Condition 4.2 Noise from the installation shall not give rise to sound pressure levels

(Leq, T) measured at NSL of the installation which exceed the limit value(s). (Schedule B.2)

Condition 6.12 The licensee shall carry out a noise survey of the site operations annually. The survey programme shall be undertaken in accordance with the methodology specified in the ‘Environmental Noise Survey Guidance Document’ as published by the Agency.

Schedule B.4 Daytime Time 08.00-

22.00 Noise Limit: 55dB (A) at nearest noise sensitive receptors (30-min)

Night-time Time 22.00-08.00


Additional conditions: No site operations should give rise to tonal or impulsive noise at anytime.

In terms of satisfying the conditions and schedule of limits, the following has been deduced from each noise measurement and associated observation.

5.1 Noise Sensitive Location

5.1.1 NSL1 – Tullagriene House Nighttime

Night-time noise levels ranged from LAeq 50.3 - 50.7dB(A). While Millipore operations were only barely audible, the noise environment was mostly influenced by the N25 dual carriageway and Cobh Road interchange. Night-time noise levels were above the EPA scheduled limit of LAeq 45dB (A) on both occasions. It was observed that elevated the LAeq noise levels (which takes account of all noise sources and then deduces an averages level) was dominated by two constant traffic sources within an immediate proximity to Tullagreine House. However, if the LA10 values are assessed against the LAeq values; a difference of only ~2dB is observed. Therefore LA10, which is a measure of locally generated noise i.e. the higher noise levels present in the ambient noise, seems to greatly effect the average noise environment (LAeq). LA10 can be used as a measure of traffic, as traffic is the generated locally. This indicates that Millipore’s nighttime operations (which can be considered background noise) can be considered low in terms of its influence over the average ambient noise environment (LAeq) at the noise sensitive receptor. No tonal or impulsive noise was detected during any of the nighttime measurements. No noise penalties shall be applied.


10

Daytime Daytime noise levels ranged from LAeq 60.5 - 55.8dB (A). The noise environment was again primarily influenced by the N25 and Cobh Road. Plant noise was periodically audible during lulls in traffic. Plant noise when audible was considered steady state. Daytime noise levels were above the EPA scheduled limit of 55dB (A) on both occasions. Again both the LAeq and LA10 values show similar values with a variation of ~2dB. Therefore traffic was concluded to be the dominant noise source in the ambient noise environment. No tonal or impulsive noise was detected during the daytime measurements at this location.

5.2 Onsite/Boundary Locations

5.2.1 AN1 - Western Site Boundary – 60m from Tullagreine House Onsite noise levels at the western site boundary ranged from LAeq 52.3dB(A) during the nighttime period to LAeq 54.3 dB(A) during the daytime measurement. The most influential noise sources were predominately located offsite ranging from the N25 during night and daytime periods. There were some onsite operations audible namely vents, chillers, compressors and pumps from the roof area of the Durapore building. However onsite noise was considered low level. No tonal or impulsive noise was detected during the nighttime or daytime measurements at this location.

5.2.2 AN2 - Western Site Boundary – Adjacent to IC1 Tank Farm Onsite noise levels adjacent to the IC1 tank farm ranged from LAeq 52.5dB(A) during the nighttime period to LAeq 55.4 dB(A) during the daytime measurement. The most influential noise source at this location was traffic from the nearby Cobh Road during night and daytime periods. Onsite noise sources were limited to a compressor and pumps within the tank farm. No tonal or impulsive noise was detected during the daytime or nighttime measurements at this location.

5.2.3 AN3 - Southern Site Boundary – Site entrance Onsite noise levels on the southern site boundary ranged from LAeq 51.1dB (A) during the night-time period to LAeq 55.7dB (A) during the daytime measurement. The single dominant noise source during all measurements was road traffic from the Cobh Road and distant N25. Daytime measurements were also influenced by local traffic enter/exiting the Millipore site and using the local access road. No tonal or impulsive noise was detected during the nighttime or daytime measurements at this location. 5.2.4 AN4 – Southern Site Boundary – Sports field Onsite noise levels on the southern site boundary ranged from LAeq 51.1dB(A) during the night-time period and LAeq 54.9dB(A) during the daytime measurement. The dominant noise source during all measurements was road traffic from the Cobh Road and distant N25. Daytime measurements were also influenced by onsite traffic and HGV’s


11

using the local access road. Steady-state plant noise was also audible particularly during nighttime periods but was not considered excessive or influential over the noise environment. No tonal or impulsive noise was detected during the daytime or night-time measurements at this location. 5.1.5 AN5 – Northern Site Boundary – WWTP Onsite noise levels on the northern site boundary ranged from LAeq 60.0dB(A) during the night-time period to LAeq 62.5dB(A) during the daytime measurement. While steady state operations of the wastewater treatment plant were audible, the thermal oxidiser (TO3) also contributed to the noise environment. A squealing-type noise was also audible from the movement of the clarifier during the daytime periods. The N25 was also clearly audible throughout both onsite measurements. No tonal or impulsive noise was detected during the daytime or night-time measurements at this location. 5.2.5 AN6 - Northern Site Boundary - rear of Durapore Casting Onsite noise levels on the northern site boundary ranged from LAeq 56.7dB (A) during the night-time period to LAeq 66.0dB (A) during the daytime measurement. Road traffic from the N25 was clearly influential during both nighttime and daytime periods. However steady state plant noise from nearby pumps, flues, vents and boilers were also audible. No tonal or impulsive noise was detected during the daytime or night-time measurements at this location. 5.2.6 AN7 - Eastern Site Boundary – rear of contractor compound/yard Onsite noise levels on the northern site boundary ranged from LAeq 53.0dB (A) during the night-time period to LAeq 54.7dB (A) during the daytime measurement. Road traffic on the N25 was the dominant noise source over the noise environment which included numerous HGV’s. A steady state plant hum was audible at times during the nighttime measurements but was not apparent during the daytime measurement. Traffic movements onsite, including the delivery of a digger and trailer, did however marginally effect the ambient noise environment. No tonal or impulsive noise was detected during the daytime or night-time measurements at this location.

5.2 Comparison with Previous Noise Surveys

[It should be noted that previous noise surveys were not carried out by PM Group, therefore onsite observations can only be compared with previous technical reports.]


12

Nighttime noise levels were comparable with the 2009 survey; however LAeq levels at AN1, AN3, AN4, AN5 and AN7 showed an increase by 1-3dB. It is possible that such an increase was due to the speed limit on the N25 being increased from 100km/hr to 120 km/hr hence all vehicles can potentially create elevated noise levels. Also the 2009 survey was carried out on October 27th 2009, when more foliage-cover was present on the trees and hedgerows; hence noise levels retention was reduced. Variations in weather conditions may also have contributed to varying noise levels. Daytime levels are also comparable with 2009 survey levels, where the majority of locations (AN1-5) showed a marked decreased of 1-3dB. The 2009 survey was carried out during the school run period of 14.30-16.30, therefore greater traffic volumes were envisaged. The 2010 survey was carried out during the morning and afternoon periods, where less traffic was likely (particularly on the Cobh Road and interchange). Daytime levels at AN6 & AN7 were noticeably higher in 2010 (+ 3dB) compared to 2009 survey results. Given both locations proximity to the N25, ambient noise was subject to an increased speed limit by road users.


13

6 CONCLUSIONS

A daytime and night-time environmental noise survey was successfully carried out at Millipore, Tullagreine, Carrigtwohill, Cork to comply with the IPPC licence conditions and limit schedule of P0571-03. The noise environment at the noise sensitive location was observed to be greatly influenced by traffic on the nearby N25 dual carriageway and Cobh Road Interchange. Both daytime and night-time noise levels were observed to be above the limits set out by the IPPC Licence. However, the noise environment was not subject to excessive or influential noise produced by Millipore operations. Onsite measurements taken at each site location (AN1-7 inclusive) showed that plant processes were audible at each location but considered low-level, steady state and non-tonal in character. All noise levels did show some variation from noise levels in 2009, but the source of such variation can be derived from an increase in speed limit on the N25 (2010 limit 120km/hr, 2009 limit 100km/hr) and seasonal factors (weather and foliage). This was particularly apparent during night-time periods. In terms of satisfying the Conditions/Limit Schedule of Millipore Ireland’s IPPC licence, the noise survey has shown that site operations do not impose a significant impact on the noise environment despite an exceedance of the noise limits at the noise sensitive receptor. It was observed that the noise environment at the noise sensitive receptor is dominated by road traffic from the nearby national and regional road networks.

A14

APPENDIX A

Survey Details

A15

A.1 Instrumentation

• Brüel & Kjaer Type 2260 Investigator Sound Level Meter

• Brüel & Kjaer Type 4231Sound Level Calibrator

The Brüel & Kjaer Type 2250 Investigator Sound Level Meter was calibrated by the Brüel & Kjaer Type 4231 Sound Level Calibrator prior to carrying out the survey. It was subsequently checked, after the survey, to ensure that there was no difference in the instrument’s readings. The meter was mounted on a tripod and stood 1.5m above ground level. Measurements were free field and recorded 1-2m away from any reflecting surfaces. All measurements were made in accordance with ISO 1996 Acoustics – Description and Measurement of Environment Noise. A.2 Weather Conditions The noise survey was carried out from Thursday December 9th and Friday, December 10th, 2010. Weather conditions were in accordance with ISO 1996: Acoustics – Description and Measurement of Environment Noise. Conditions during the survey are highlighted in Table E.1. Table A.1 – Weather Details Observed During the Survey

Max. Windspeed Date Rainfall (mm)

Max. Temp

Min. Temp knots m/s

9/12/2010 0 6.3 -0.1 6.5 3.3

10/12/2010 0.2 6.8 3.8 4.9 2.5

A.3 Survey Personnel

Ross Daly

Senior EHS Consultant

PM Group

A16

APPENDIX B

Site Map

A17

NS

L1

AN

1

AN

2

AN

3

AN

4

AN

7

AN

5

AN

6

A18

APPENDIX C

1/3 Octave Tonal Trends

A19

1/3 Octave Trend -NSL 1 (night)

0102030405060

12.5 25 50 10

020

040

080

01.6

k3.1

5 6.3 12.5

Frequency (Hz)

Sou

nd P

ress

ure

(dB

)

0.250.45

1/3 Octave Trend - NSL 1 (day)

010203040506070

12.5 25 50 10

020

040

080

01.6

k3.1

5 6.3 12.5

Frequency (Hz)

Sou

nd P

ress

ure

(dB

)

13.0414.17

A20

1/3 Octave Trend - AN1

010203040506070

12.5 25 50 10

020

040

080

01.6

k3.1

5 6.3 12.5

Frequency (Hz)

Soun

d P

ress

ure

(dB)

23.2312.45


010203040506070

12.5 25 50 10

020

040

080

01.6

k3.1

5 6.3 12.5

Frequency (Hz)

Soun

d P

ress

ure

(dB)

23.0512.31

A21


010203040506070

12.5 25 50 10

020

040

080

01.6

k3.1

5 6.3 12.5

Frequency (Hz)

Sou

nd P

ress

ure

(dB

)

22.0712.10


010203040506070

12.5 25 50 10

020

040

080

01.6

k3.1

5 6.3 12.5

Frequency (Hz)

Soun

d P

ress

ure

(dB)

22.2511.18

A22


010203040506070

12.5 25 50 10

020

040

080

01.6

k3.1

5 6.3 12.5

Frequency (Hz)

Soun

d P

ress

ure

(dB)

0.0813.57


010203040506070

12.5 25 50 10

020

040

080

01.6

k3.1

5 6.3 12.5

Frequency (Hz)

Sou

nd P

ress

ure

(dB

)

23.4513.38

A23


010203040506070

12.5 25 50 10

020

040

080

01.6

k3.1

5 6.3 12.5

Frequency (Hz)

Sou

nd P

ress

ure

(dB

)

22.4511.51



Appendix VIII

Groundwater Monitoring Report 2010

Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world

IPPC Groundwater Monitoring Report, 2010

Client: Millipore Ireland Limited

October 2010

www.erm.com

Millipore Ireland Limited

IPPC Groundwater

Monitoring Report, 2010

October 2010

0114243

Prepared by: Brian Rouse and Simon Tillotson

For and on behalf of Environmental Resources Management Approved by: Simon Tillotson

Signed: Position: Partner

Date: 19th October 2010

This report has been prepared by Environmental Resources Management the trading name of Environmental Resources Management Limited, with all reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of the Contract with the client, incorporating our General Terms and Conditions of Business and taking account of the resources devoted to it by agreement with the client. We disclaim any responsibility to the client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of the above. This report is confidential to the client and we accept no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report, or any part thereof, is made known. Any such party relies on the report at their own risk.

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT MILLIPORE IRELAND LIMITED

10

CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION 1

1.1 PREAMBLE 1 1.2 REPORT FORMAT 1

2 SITE SETTING 2

2.1 SITE DESCRIPTION 2 2.2 SURROUNDING LAND USE 2 2.3 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 2

3 FIELDWORK METHODOLOGIES ADOPTED 4

3.1 SAMPLING LOCATIONS 4 3.2 FIELD OBSERVATIONS 4

4 ANALYTICAL RESULTS 5

4.1 SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS 5 4.2 ASSESSMENT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS 5

5 CONCLUSIONS 8

6 RECOMMENDATIONS 9

Figures Site Location Plan

Borehole Location Plan

Groundwater Flow Diagram

Annex A Laboratory Certificates

Annex B Generic Quantitative Risk Assessment Tables

Annex C Certificates of Laboratory Chemical Analysis


1

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 PREAMBLE

Environmental Resources Management Limited (ERM) was commissioned by

Millipore Ireland Ltd. (Millipore), to undertake annual monitoring works at

the Carrigtohill Facility (‘the Site’), located at Carrigtohill, County Cork,

Republic of Ireland, identified on Figure 1. The purpose of the annual

monitoring is to satisfy the Environment Protection Agency (EPA) Integration

Pollution Prevention Control (IPPC) Licence (Register No. P0571-02) at the

facility.

This report provides the results of the 2010 monitoring round undertaken on

9th and 10th August 2010.

1.2 REPORT FORMAT

The remainder of this report has been structured as follows:

• Section 2 summarises the environmental setting of the Site;

• Section 3 presents the history of the incidents which have led to this

groundwater monitoring;

• Section 4 describes the field methodologies employed during the fieldwork

programme, the Site-specific ground conditions encountered, observations

and measurements made during the investigation;

• Section 5 details the findings of the assessment and presents the conclusions

of the assessment.

• Section 6 presents the recommendations based on the conclusions of this

monitoring event.

In addition, the following Annexes are attached to the report:

Figures Site Location Plan

Borehole Location Plan

Groundwater Flow Direction

Annex A Detailed Field Methodologies

Annex B Generic Quantitative Risk Assessment Tables

Annex C Certificates of Laboratory Chemical Analysis


2

2 SITE SETTING

2.1 SITE DESCRIPTION

The Site is located within a predominantly rural setting in County Cork

approximately 1km west of Carrigtwohill and 10 km east of Cork city centre.

A site location plan is provided as Figure 1.

The Site occupies an area of approximately 38 hectares. The Site topography

generally falls from the north east to south west with a maximum elevation of

6.038 m Above Ordinance Datum (AOB) to north east and a minimum

elevation of 0.765 m AOD in the south west. The majority of the Site is

occupied by a single large building in the northern and central areas of the

site. The area in the south west of the Site is used for fire water retention

ponds, and the area in the south east is used as playing fields.

In the north east corner of the Site is the on-site wastewater treatment facility.

The remaining areas of the Site are landscaped, apart from the two car parking

areas, to the east and west, which are covered with tarmac and gravel.

The Site is currently occupied by the Millipore facility which was purpose

built for Millipore in 1987, for the production of filtration devices and

membrane films; prior to this the Site was undeveloped agricultural land.

2.2 SURROUNDING LAND USE

The surrounding land use is predominantly agricultural, with the closest farm

located adjacent to the southern boundary of the site.

2.3 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING

2.3.1 Superficial & Solid Geology

Published information identifies that the Site is underlain by superficial

deposits consisting of Glacial Till, comprising of light brown soft sandy gritty

clay, which are further underlain by alluvial deposits compromising of sands

and gravels.

The underlying solid geology comprises of the Dinantian pure unbedded

limestone.

Recent site investigation work identified slightly gravelly silt to clay. The clay

and silt were dry, friable, yet firm, gravels within the clay was well rounded

fine to coarse and included cobbles. The sand content also varied between

boreholes.


3

The clay was underlain by a series of sand and gravel drift deposits, ranging

from sandy silty gravels to clayey sands. The sands and gravels were

encountered between 4.2 and 5m bgl in the middle of the site, to the west the

gravels were encountered around 2.5m bgl and to the north eastern boundary

the gravels were similarly encountered at 2.5m bgl. The sands and gravels

were generally brown in colour, with gravels being well rounded.

2.3.2 Hydrogeology

The underlying alluvium has been classified as a Locally Important

Sand/Gravel Aquifer. Groundwater flow direction has been calculated to be

in a south west direction.

The underlying bedrock has been classified by the GSI online mapping tool as

a regionally important karstified aquifer.

There are no known groundwater abstractions down gradient of the site,

however, there is potential for there to be unregistered private supply

abstractions.

2.3.3 Hydrology

The closest surface water feature is Slatty Water, which is located 200 m west

of the Site. Slatty water represents the upper reaches of estuarine waters of

Cork harbour.

There are no known recorded surface water abstractions within 1 km of the

Site.


4

3 FIELDWORK METHODOLOGIES ADOPTED

The site works were undertaken by ERM between 9th and 10th August 2010.

3.1 SAMPLING LOCATIONS

The five monitoring wells designated as the IPPC wells are identified on

Figure 2. Details of the field methodologies used at the Site, the environmental

samples collected and the schedule of samples for laboratory chemical

analysis are included in Annex A.

3.2 FIELD OBSERVATIONS

Each of the five boreholes contained water, and none of the locations

displayed visual or olfactory evidence of hydrocarbon or VOC contamination.

Groundwater Quality

The results of field screening, using a hand-held YSI multiparameter handheld

direct reading field instrument, are summarised in Table 4.3a.

Table 4.3a YSI Testing

Borehole Screening

Criteria

AGW1 AGW2 AGW3 AGW5 AGW6

Parameter (Units)

Temperature (oC) 25 13.98 13.98 12.83 16.91 13.09

Conductivity (µs/cm) 1,000 545 511 654 4,027 408

Dissolved Oxygen (DO

%)

No

abnormal

change

10.4 65.0 35.0 15.5 11.2

pH >6.5 to <9.5 6.74 6.74 6.87 6.67 6.68

pH (pH mv) Not

applicable

14.2 13.9 6.2 17.8 16.9

Redox Potential (ORP) Not

applicable

-58.2 90.1 71.3 993 -35.3

Note: XXX – exceeds screening criteria

The groundwater was sampled using a “low flow” technique with purged

water screened using a YSI multimeter until the readings stabilised.

Groundwater flow at the site has been inferred from measurement of

groundwater elevations to be in a south westerly direction, see Figure 3.


5

4 ANALYTICAL RESULTS

4.1 SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Following concerns over the laboratory previously used to undertake

groundwater sample analysis, Millipore and ERM decided to switch

laboratory provider. Jones Environmental Forensics, a UKAS accredited

laboratory, were utilised to undertake the analysis.

Groundwater samples were submitted for the following analytical suite:

• Metals Suite (arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, selenium,

boron, copper, nickel, zinc;

• Total Ammonia;

• Nitrate (as N);

• Orthophosphate;

• Chloride;

• Fluoride;

• Sodium;

• Magnesium;

• Potassium;

• Calcium;

• Mineral Oil; and

• Organic solvents.

The analytical results are reproduced in Annex B.

The laboratory analytical certificates are included in Annex C.

4.2 ASSESSMENT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS

4.2.1 Rationale

The assessment of the analytical results has been carried out with reference to

the guidance and methods specified by the Irish Environmental Protection

Agency in their Technical Advice to Third Parties on the Protection of

Groundwater in Ireland, Interim Report. In assessing whether pollution of

groundwater has, or is likely to occur, it is common practice to compare

against Interim Guideline Values (IGVs) defined within this guidance.

4.2.2 Results

The groundwater analytical results were assessed against the relevant IGVs

and are reproduced in Annex B.


6

The only exceedances of these IGVs are summarised in Table 4.5a below.

Table 4.5a Exceedances of IGVs

Compound IGV Criteria mg/l AGW1 AGW2 AG3 AGW5 AGW6

Orthophosphate 0.03 0.07 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.08

Chloride 30 37.9 31.4 30.2 1369.3 37.8

Potassium 5 10.3 5.2 - 5.2 16.6

Sodium 150 - - - 672.3 -

hexamethyldisiloxane No IGV available - - - - 0.101

hexamethylcyclotrisiloxane No IGV available - - - - 0.125

Note: IGV Criteria – Interim Guideline Value

- = did not exceed IGV

Orthophosphate

Orthophosphate concentrations are consistent across the Site with one of the

highest concentrations noted in AGW3 which represents background

groundwater quality as it is up hydraulic gradient of the Site. This suggests

the orthophosphate concentrations are either typical for background

groundwater in the area or are being impacted by an off site source up

hydraulic gradient of the site.

Chloride

Chloride concentrations are consistent across the Site ranging between

30.2mg/l and 37.9mg/l with the exception of AGW5 which had a

concentration of 1369.3 mg/l. This indicates in general the chloride

concentrations are either typical of groundwater in the area or are being

impacted by an off site source up hydraulic gradient of the site.

The chloride concentration detected in AGW5 has been historically elevated

since it was first installed in 2003. The reported on the installation of the

boreholes on site indicates clean beach sands were encountered at the base

of this borehole and that this may signify an ancient raised beach at this

location. This may result in sea water contributing to the groundwater

regime at this location.

In addition, due to the extreme weather conditions in Q4 2009 and Q1

2010, the site used salt as a de-icing agent to ensure safety of site

personnel and vehicles. AGW5 is adjacent to the main access roadway

into the site and therefore this activity may have resulted in an impact.

However there was no storage of salt in this location.


7

These factors would explain the elevated chloride readings at this

location.

Potassium

The background monitoring well, AGW3, is below the IGV but all other wells

are above the IGV indicating this may be a result of site activities. The

potassium may be as a result of localised geological conditions or the use of

fertilisers in the area.

Sodium

The sodium concentration in AWG5 has been historically elevated since it was

first installed in 2003. The reported related to the installation of the boreholes

on site indicates clean beach sands were encountered at the base of this

borehole which may signify an ancient raised beach at this location.

This may result in sea water contributing to the groundwater regime at

this location.

In addition, due to the extreme weather conditions in Q4 2009 and Q1

2010, the site used salt as a de-icing agent to ensure safety of site

personnel and vehicles. AGW5 is adjacent to the main access roadway

into the site and therefore this activity may have resulted in an impact.

However there was no storage of salt in this location.

These factors would explain the elevated sodium readings at this

location.

Hexamethyldisiloxane and hexamethylcyclotrisiloxane

There are no IGV values available for these substances. These substances are

currently not used on site and are detected in AGW6 only. AGW1 which is up

gradient of AGW6 but still down gradient of site buildings did not contain

these substances. This would indicate this is a localised occurrence but this

requires further assessment to establish the source of these exceedences and

any risks associated with these exceedences.


8

5 CONCLUSIONS

Orthophosphate, sodium, chloride and potassium were detected at

concentrations above the IGV criteria.

The orthophosphate results are consistent across the site and are believed to

be representative of the aquifer in this area.

Potassium is elevated in the site monitoring wells but not the background

monitoring wells. The potassium may be as a result of localised geological

conditions or the use of fertilisers in the area. Elevated levels have previously

been recorded on site but as potassium is not used on site this is believed to be

from an external source.

AGW5 has historically shown elevated sodium and chloride levels since it was

first installed in 2003. The reported related to the installation of the boreholes

on site indicates clean beach sands were encountered at the base of this

borehole which may signify an ancient raised beach at this location and

may result in sea water contributing to the groundwater regime at this

location. This would explain the elevated sodium, chloride and

conductivity readings at this location. In addition, due to the extreme

weather conditions in Q4 2009 and Q1 2010, the site used salt as a de-

icing agent to ensure safety of site personnel and vehicles. AGW5 is

adjacent to the main access roadway into the site and therefore this

activity may have resulted in an impact. However there was no storage

of salt in this location. These factors would explain the elevated chloride

readings at this location.

It should also be noted that the receptor of concern, the Slatty Water, will be

saline. It is therefore considered the groundwater from the site is unlikely to

represent a significant risk to the Slatty water.


9

6 RECOMMENDATIONS

The potassium elevated concentrations will be monitored during the next

IPPC monitoring events to allow comparison over time.

The detection of hexamethyldisiloxane and hexamethylcyclotrisiloxane in

AGW6 also needs further assessment. This borehole should be resampled or

potential sources of these substances identified.

The results obtained from AGW5 will be further assessed to determine the

sodium, chloride and conductivity readings over time and the monitoring

well will be further assessed over low and high tide times to determine if a

trend exists.

Figures

CLIENT: SIZE: TITLE:

DATE: 21/05/2010

DRAWN: MTC

CHECKED: BR

APPROVED:

PROJECT: 0114243

SCALE: As Scale BarDRAWING: REV:

Millipore Ireland BV A4 Figure 1: Site Location Plan Carrigtwohill, Co Cork, Ireland

CorkLocationPlan.mxd 0SOURCE: Reproduced from Ordnance Survey digital map data. © Crowncopyright, All rights reserved. 2007 License number 0100031673.PROJECTION: TM65 Irish Grid

File:

0114

243M

illipore

GIS_

MTC_

BR\C

orkLo

catio

nPlan

.mxd

ERM11th Floor5 Exchange QuayManchester, M5 3EFTel: 0161 958 8800Fax: 0161 958 88880 25

Kilometres

© ERM This print is confidential and is supplied on the understanding that it will be used only as a record to identify or inspect parts, concepts or designs and that it is not disclosed to other persons or to be used for construction purposes without permission.

SITE LOCATION

Carrigtwohill

BH04BH04

BH01BH01

BH05BH05BH03BH03

BH02BH02

AGW2AGW2

BH02BH02

BH05BH05

BH03BH03

BH01BH01

Pit 1RPit 1R

Pit 1bPit 1b

Pit 1LPit 1L

SumpSump

Enlarged View of Sump AreaEnlarged View of Sump Area

Please See Enlarged View of Sump Area

Please See Enlarged View of Sump Area

SB15SB15

SB11SB11SB21SB21

SB2SB2

SB5SB5

SB14SB14

SB4SB4

SB7SB7SB8SB8

SB18SB18

AGW1AGW1

AGW6AGW6

AGW2AGW2

AGW3AGW3

AGW5AGW5

ERM Installed Borehole

BH04BH04

BH02BH02

BH05BH05 BH03BH03

BH01BH01

Fire Retention Pond

Fire Retention Pond

Fire Retention Pond

Fire Retention Pond

Car ParkCar Park

Durapore CastingDurapore Casting

OfficesOffices

OfficesOffices

WarehouseWarehouse

Existing Car ParkExisting Car Park

Contractors CompoundContractors Compound

Wastewater Treatment PlantWastewater Treatment Plant

Proposed Solvent Tank Farm


Proposed Thermal Oxidiser


Hi FlowHi Flow

Manchester Office11th Floor5 Exchange QuayManchester, M5 3EFTelephone: +44 (0) 161 958 8800Facsimile: +44 (0) 161 958 8888


SOURCE:

CHECKED: BR

APPROVED:

PROJECT: 0114243

SCALE: Not to Scale

REV:

0114243_1 - 04.02.10 0

DATE: 04.02.10

DRAWN: MTC

DRAWING:

SIZE:

A3

CLIENT:


TITLE:

Figure 2: Site Layout, Monitoring Well & Sample Location Plan

Carrigtwohill, Co Cork, Ireland

KEY:

Site boundary

ERM installed monitoring wells

IPPC monitoring wells

Remaining monitoring / remediation boreholes

Additional soil sample location

Text to be place here

Text to be place here

Reproduced from Ordnance Survey digital map data. © Crown copyright, All rights reserved. 2009 License number 0100031673

0 6

Metres

N

S

W E

BH04BH04

BH01BH01

BH05BH05BH03BH03

BH02BH02

AGW1AGW1

AGW6AGW6

AGW2AGW2

AGW3AGW3

AGW5AGW5

ERM Installed Borehole

BH04BH04

BH02BH02

BH05BH05 BH03BH03

BH01BH01

2mAOD2mAOD

1mAOD1mAOD

0mAOD0mAOD

SB15SB15

SB11SB11SB21SB21

SB2SB2

SB5SB5

SB18SB18

SB14SB14

SB4SB4

SB7SB7SB8SB8

Fire Retention Pond

Fire Retention Pond

Fire Retention Pond

Fire Retention Pond

Car ParkCar Park

Durapore CastingDurapore Casting

OfficesOffices

OfficesOffices

WarehouseWarehouse

Existing Car ParkExisting Car Park

Contractors CompoundContractors Compound

Wastewater Treatment PlantWastewater Treatment Plant





Hi FlowHi Flow

Manchester Office11th Floor5 Exchange QuayManchester, M5 3EFTelephone: +44 (0) 161 958 8800Facsimile: +44 (0) 161 958 8888


SOURCE:

CHECKED: BR

APPROVED:

PROJECT: 0114243

SCALE: Not to Scale

REV:

0114243_2 - 04.02.10 0

DATE: 21.05.10

DRAWN: MTC

DRAWING:

SIZE:

A3

CLIENT:


TITLE:

Figure 3: Inferred Groundwater Flow Direction

Carrigtwohill, Co Cork, Ireland

KEY:

Site boundary

ERM installed monitoring wells

IPPC monitoring wells

Remaining monitoring / remediation boreholes

Groundwater contour mAOD (metres above ordnance Datum

Inferred direction of flow

Reproduced from Ordnance Survey digital map data. © Crown copyright, All rights reserved. 2009 License number 0100031673

0 6

Metres

N

S

W E

Annex A

Detailed Field

Methodologies

A1 DETAILED FIELD METHODOLOGIE

A1.1 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING

The groundwater encountered within each of the boreholes was purged

and sampled using peristaltic pumps low flow sampling techniques. The

groundwater samples were submitted to Jones Environmental Forensics

laboratories, for analysis of the following parameters, as per the IPPC

licence:

• Conductivity;

• Total Ammonia;

• Nitrate (as N);

• Orthophosphate;

• Chloride;

• Fluoride;

• Sodium;

• Magnesium;

• Potassium;

• Calcium;

• Organic Solvents specifically targeting dimethyl acetamide, methanol and acetone;

• Mineral Oil; and

• Heavy metals.

Sample bottles, once filled and labelled, were transferred to insulated

sample safes, freezer blocks were added to the sample containers to reduce

the loss of volatile materials. Details of decontamination and quality

assurance procedures used in the course of the site investigation are

described in Sections A2.1.

The analytical schedule for groundwater samples is presented in Table

A1.1a.

A2.1 DECONTAMINATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL

General sampling and decontamination procedures used in the course of

the site investigations were designed to allow the collection of

representative samples and to minimise the potential for cross-

contamination between samples. In addition, a rigorous programme of field

QA/QC was implemented including sample labelling and chain-of-custody

documentation.

A2.2 SAMPLE ACQUISITION AND PREPARATION

During sample collection, relevant information such as field observations

was logged in the field book before transferring the samples to laboratory-

prepared sample bottles. In the course of sampling, especially for samples

destined for volatile analysis, care was taken to fill groundwater sample

bottles completely to minimise remaining headspace. Care was also taken

to minimise the aeration of samples during transfer to the bottles.

As part of the overall sampling QA/QC package, sample tags and 'Chain-

of-Custody' travel documents were filled out for each sample. This allowed

tracking of the samples from acquisition through to analysis. These forms

were enclosed in the sample coolers shipped to the laboratory.

During sampling and decontamination activities, disposable nitrile gloves

were worn to prevent transfer of contaminants from other sources.

Annex B

Generic Quantitative Risk

Assessment Tables

Groundwater Analytical Results

Screening Criteria

Metals

Arsenic mg/l 0.01 <0.0009 <0.0009 0.0029 <0.0009 <0.0009

Boron mg/l 1.00 0.027 0.025 0.014 0.015 0.244

Cadmium mg/l 0.005 0.0001 <0.00003 0.0001 0.001 <0.00003

Chromium mg/l 0.03 <0.0002 <0.0002 0.0005 <0.0002 <0.0002

Copper mg/l 0.030 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003

Lead mg/l 0.01 <0.0004 <0.0004 0.001 <0.0004 <0.0004

Mercury mg/l 0.001 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005

Nickel mg/l 0.02 0.001 <0.0002 <0.0002 0.001 <0.0002

Selenium mg/l n.v. <0.0012 <0.0012 <0.0012 0.002 <0.0012

Zinc mg/l 0.10 <0.0015 <0.0015 0.002 0.003 <0.0015

Inorganics

pH >6.5-<9.5 8.05 8.12 8.06 7.95 8.04

Ammonia (as ammonium) mg/l 0.15 0.64 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

Nitrate as N# mg/l 25.00 0.35 8.98 7.00 4.14 0.31

Ortho phosphate as PO4# mg/l 0.03 0.07 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.08

Sulphate# mg/l 200.00 18.83 15.85 15.88 18.89 8.10

Chloride# mg/l 30.00 37.9 31.4 30.2 1369.3 37.8

Fluoride mg/l 1.00 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3

Calcium - dissolved# mg/l 200.00 74.2 77.9 121.7 127.6 10.1

Magnesium - dissolved# mg/l 50.00 8.1 9.2 7.2 18.1 17.2

Potassium - dissolved# mg/l 5.00 10.3 5.2 1.2 5.2 16.6

Sodium - dissolved# mg/l 150.00 19.3 19.6 17.8 672.3 42.0

VOCs

Disiloxane, hexamethyl- mg/l n.a. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. 0.101

Cyclotrisiloxane, hexamethyl- mg/l n.a. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. 0.125

Mineral Oil mg/l 0.10 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01

No Phenols Detected

No PAHs Detected

No Phthalates Detected

No other SVOCs Detected

Note:

n.d - not detected above detection limit

n.a. - not available

EPA IGV - Environmental Protection Agency Interim Guidline Values

exceeds screening criteria

Analyte

Concentration

EPA IGVUnits

AGW1 AGW2 AGW3 AGW5 AGW6

Annex C

Certificates of Laboratory

Chemical Analysis.

Unit 3 Deeside Point

Zone 3

Deeside Industrial Park

Deeside

No.4225

Attention :

Date :

Your reference :

Our reference :

Location :

Date samples received :

Status :

Issue :

J W Farrell- Jones CChem FRSC

Chartered Chemist

3

Thirteen samples were received for analysis on 11th August 2010 which was completed on 24th August 2010. Please find attached our Test

Report which should be read with notes at the end of the report and should include all sections if reproduced.

All interpretations and opinions are outside the scope of any accreditation, and all results relate only to samples supplied.

All analysis is reported on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. Results are not surrogate corrected.

Millipore

11th August 2010

Final Report

Brian Rouse

24th August 2010

114243

Test Report 10/3769

Jones Environmental Laboratory

CH5 2UA

Tel: +44 (0) 1244 833780

Fax: +44 (0) 1244 833781

ERM

The Capel Building

Mary's Abbey

Dublin 7

QF-PM 3.1 v3Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced

All solid results are expressed on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. 1 of 11


Client Name: Report : Liquids

Reference:

Location:

Contact: Liquids/products: V=40ml vial, G=glass bottle, P=plastic bottle

JE Job No.: 10/3769 H=H2SO4, Z=ZnAc, N=NaOH, HN=HN03

J E Sample No. 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 41-45 46-50

Sample ID SB2 SB4 SB5 SB8 SB14 SB15 SB18 SB21 AGW1 AGW2

Depth - - - - - - - - - -

COC No / misc

Containers V,V,H,P,G V,V,H,P,G V,V,H,P,G V,V,H,P,G V,V,H,P,G V,V,H,P,G V,V,H,P,G V,V,H,P,G V,V,H,P,G V,V,H,P,G

Sample Date 10/08/10 10/08/10 10/08/10 10/08/10 10/08/10 10/08/10 10/08/10 10/08/10 10/08/10 10/08/10

Sample Type Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water

Batch Number 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Date of Receipt 11/08/10 11/08/10 11/08/10 11/08/10 11/08/10 11/08/10 11/08/10 11/08/10 11/08/10 11/08/10

pH# ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8.05 8.12 <0.01 pH units TM073

Electrical Conductivity# @25°C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 510 452 <100 µS/cm TM28/PM11

Amm N2/Tot Ammonia as NH3# ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0.6 <0.2 <0.2 mg/l TM038W

Nitrate as N# ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0.08 2.04 <0.05 mg/l TM038W

Ortho phosphate as PO4# ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0.07 0.12 <0.06 mg/l TM038W

Sulphate# ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 18.83 15.85 <0.05 mg/l TM038W

Chloride# ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 37.9 31.4 <0.3 mg/l TM038W

Fluoride ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 mg/l TM027W

Calcium - dissolved# ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 74.2 77.9 <0.2 mg/l TM 030W

Magnesium - dissolved# ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8.1 9.2 <0.1 mg/l TM 030W

Potassium - dissolved# ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 10.3 5.2 <0.1 mg/l TM 030W

Sodium - dissolved# ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 19.3 19.6 <0.1 mg/l TM 030W

VOCs TICs ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ND ND <100 μg/l TM15/PM10

VOCs # ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ see tab see tab <1-5 μg/l TM15/PM10

SVOCs (dissolved) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ see tab see tab <10 μg/l TM16/PM9

SVOC TICs ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ND ND <100 μg/l TM16/PM9

Mineral Oil ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM5/PM9

Arsenic - dissolved # ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <0.9 <0.9 <0.9 µg/l TM 030W

Boron - dissolved ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 27.0 25.0 <2.0 µg/l TM 030W

Cadmium - dissolved # ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0.10 <0.03 <0.03 µg/l TM 030W

Chromium - dissolved # ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 µg/l TM 030W

Copper - dissolved # ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <3 <3 <3.0 µg/l TM 030W

Mercury - dissolved # ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 µg/l TM 030W

Nickel - dissolved # ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1.0 <0.2 <0.2 µg/l TM 030W

Lead - dissolved # ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 µg/l TM 030W

Selenium - dissolved # ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 µg/l TM 030W

Zinc - dissolved # ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 µg/l TM 030W

Dissolved Methane ~ 3980 ~ 14879 ~ 10803 ~ 7265 ~ ~ <1 µg/l TM25

Dissovled CO2 ~ 59961 ~ 90161 ~ 29726 ~ 44729 ~ ~ <1 µg/l TM25

LOD UnitsMethod

No.

Please see attached notes for all

abbreviations and acronyms

ERM

Brian Rouse

Millipore

114243



Jones Environmental LaboratoryClient Name: Report : Liquids

Reference:

Location:



J E Sample No. 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 41-45 46-50

Sample ID SB2 SB4 SB5 SB8 SB14 SB15 SB18 SB21 AGW1 AGW2

Depth - - - - - - - - - -

COC No / misc

Containers V,V,H,P,G V,V,H,P,G V,V,H,P,G V,V,H,P,G V,V,H,P,G V,V,H,P,G V,V,H,P,G V,V,H,P,G V,V,H,P,G V,V,H,P,G

Sample Date 10/08/10 10/08/10 10/08/10 10/08/10 10/08/10 10/08/10 10/08/10 10/08/10 10/08/10 10/08/10

Sample Type Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water

Batch Number 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Date of Receipt 11/08/10 11/08/10 11/08/10 11/08/10 11/08/10 11/08/10 11/08/10 11/08/10 11/08/10 11/08/10

COD 17 <7 20 2343 13 12 <7 <7 ~ ~ <7 mg/l TM057W

Alcohols and acetates

Methyl Alcohol <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 ~ ~ <500 μg/l TM083

Ethyl Alcohol <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 ~ ~ <500 μg/l TM083

i-Propyl Alcohol <500 <500 <500 5816 <500 <500 <500 <500 ~ ~ <500 μg/l TM083

n-Propyl Alcohol <500 <500 <500 2750 <500 <500 <500 <500 ~ ~ <500 μg/l TM083

n-Butyl Alcohol <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 ~ ~ <500 μg/l TM083

n-Pentyl Alcohol <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 ~ ~ <500 μg/l TM083

n-Hexyl Alcohol <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 ~ ~ <500 μg/l TM083

n-Heptyl Alcohol <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 ~ ~ <500 μg/l TM083

Methyl Acetate <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 ~ ~ <500 μg/l TM083

Ethyl Acetate <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 ~ ~ <500 μg/l TM083

i-Propyl Acetate <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 ~ ~ <500 μg/l TM083

n-Propyl Acetate <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 ~ ~ <500 μg/l TM083

n-Butyl Acetate <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 ~ ~ <500 μg/l TM083

THF <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 ~ ~ <500 μg/l TM083

Cyclohexane <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 ~ ~ <500 μg/l TM083

Acetone <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 ~ ~ <500 μg/l TM083

N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 ~ ~ <500 μg/l TM083

Alcohols and acetates tics ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ~ ~ <500 μg/l TM083

LOD UnitsMethod

No.

ERM

114243

Millipore

Brian Rouse






Reference:

Location:



J E Sample No. 51-55 56-60 61-65

Sample ID AGW3 AGW5 AGW6

Depth - - -

COC No / misc

Containers V,V,H,P,G V,V,H,P,G V,V,H,P,G

Sample Date 10/08/10 10/08/10 10/08/10

Sample Type Water Water Water

Batch Number 1 1 1

Date of Receipt 11/08/10 11/08/10 11/08/10

pH# 8.06 7.95 8.04 <0.01 pH units TM073

Electrical Conductivity# @25°C 566 3937 372 <100 µS/cm TM28/PM11

Amm N2/Tot Ammonia as NH3# <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 mg/l TM038W

Nitrate as N# 1.59 0.94 0.07 <0.05 mg/l TM038W

Ortho phosphate as PO4# 0.10 0.08 0.08 <0.06 mg/l TM038W

Sulphate# 15.88 18.89 8.10 <0.05 mg/l TM038W

Chloride# 30.2 1369.3 37.8 <0.3 mg/l TM038W

Fluoride <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 mg/l TM027W

Calcium - dissolved# 121.7 127.6 10.1 <0.2 mg/l TM 030W

Magnesium - dissolved# 7.2 18.1 17.2 <0.1 mg/l TM 030W

Potassium - dissolved# 1.2 5.2 16.6 <0.1 mg/l TM 030W

Sodium - dissolved# 17.8 672.3 42.0 <0.1 mg/l TM 030W

VOCs TICs ND ND see tab <100 μg/l TM15/PM10

VOCs # see tab see tab see tab <1-5 μg/l TM15/PM10

SVOCs (dissolved) see tab see tab see tab <10 μg/l TM16/PM9

SVOC TICs ND ND ND <100 μg/l TM16/PM9

Mineral Oil <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM5/PM9

Arsenic - dissolved # 2.9 <0.9 1.8 <0.9 µg/l TM 030W

Boron - dissolved 14.0 15.0 244.0 <2.0 µg/l TM 030W

Cadmium - dissolved # 0.10 1.00 <0.03 <0.03 µg/l TM 030W

Chromium - dissolved # 0.5 <0.2 0.3 <0.2 µg/l TM 030W

Copper - dissolved # <3 <3 <3 <3.0 µg/l TM 030W

Mercury - dissolved # <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 µg/l TM 030W

Nickel - dissolved # <0.2 1.0 <0.2 <0.2 µg/l TM 030W

Lead - dissolved # 1.0 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 µg/l TM 030W

Selenium - dissolved # <1.2 2.0 <1.2 <1.2 µg/l TM 030W

Zinc - dissolved # 2.0 3.0 <1.5 <1.5 µg/l TM 030W

114243

Millipore

ERM

Brian Rouse



LOD UnitsMethod

No.




Reference:

Location:



J E Sample No. 51-55 56-60 61-65

Sample ID AGW3 AGW5 AGW6

Depth - - -

COC No / misc

Containers V,V,H,P,G V,V,H,P,G V,V,H,P,G

Sample Date 10/08/10 10/08/10 10/08/10

Sample Type Water Water Water

Batch Number 1 1 1

Date of Receipt 11/08/10 11/08/10 11/08/10

COD <7 ~ ~ <7 mg/l TM057W

Alcohols and acetates

Methyl Alcohol <500 ~ ~ <500 μg/l TM083

Ethyl Alcohol <500 ~ ~ <500 μg/l TM083

i-Propyl Alcohol <500 ~ ~ <500 μg/l TM083

n-Propyl Alcohol <500 ~ ~ <500 μg/l TM083

n-Butyl Alcohol <500 ~ ~ <500 μg/l TM083

n-Pentyl Alcohol <500 ~ ~ <500 μg/l TM083

n-Hexyl Alcohol <500 ~ ~ <500 μg/l TM083

n-Heptyl Alcohol <500 ~ ~ <500 μg/l TM083

Methyl Acetate <500 ~ ~ <500 μg/l TM083

Ethyl Acetate <500 ~ ~ <500 μg/l TM083

i-Propyl Acetate <500 ~ ~ <500 μg/l TM083

n-Propyl Acetate <500 ~ ~ <500 μg/l TM083

n-Butyl Acetate <500 ~ ~ <500 μg/l TM083

THF <500 ~ ~ <500 μg/l TM083

Cyclohexane <500 ~ ~ <500 μg/l TM083

Acetone <500 ~ ~ <500 μg/l TM083

N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) <500 ~ ~ <500 μg/l TM083

Alcohols and acetates tics ND ~ ~ <500 μg/l TM083



LOD UnitsMethod

No.

114243

Millipore

ERM

Brian Rouse




Client Name: SVOC Report : LIQUID

Reference:

Location:

Contact:

JE Job No.: 10/3769

J E Sample No. 41-45 46-50 51-55 56-60 61-65

Sample ID AGW1 AGW2 AGW3 AGW5 AGW6

Depth - - - - -

COC No / misc

Containers V,V,H,P,G V,V,H,P,G V,V,H,P,G V,V,H,P,G V,V,H,P,G

Sample Date 10/08/10 10/08/10 10/08/10 10/08/10 10/08/10

Sample Type Water Water Water Water Water

Batch Number 1 1 1 1 1

Date of Receipt 11/08/10 11/08/10 11/08/10 11/08/10 11/08/10

Phenols

2-Chlorophenol <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

2-Methylphenol <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

2-Nitrophenol <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

2,4-Dichlorophenol <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

2,4-Dimethylphenol <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

2,4,5-Trichlorophenol <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

2,4,6-Trichlorophenol <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

4-Chloro-3-methylphenol <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

4-Methylphenol <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

4-Nitrophenol <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

Pentachlorophenol <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

Phenol <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

PAHs

2-Chloronaphthalene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

2-Methylnaphthalene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

Naphthalene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

Acenaphthylene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

Acenaphthene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

Fluorene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

Phenanthrene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

Anthracene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

Fluoranthene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

Pyrene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

Benz(a)anthracene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

Chrysene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

Benzo(bk)fluoranthene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

Benzo(a)pyrene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

Indeno(123cd)pyrene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

Dibenzo(ah)anthracene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

Benzo(ghi)perylene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

Phthalates

Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

Butylbenzyl phthalate <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

Di-n-butyl phthalate <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

Di-n-Octyl phthalate <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

Diethyl phthalate <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

Dimethyl phthalate <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

Other SVOCs

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9



2-Nitroaniline <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

2,4-Dinitrotoluene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

2,6-Dinitrotoluene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9


4-Bromophenylphenylether <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

4-Chloroaniline <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

4-Chlorophenylphenylether <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9


Azobenzene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

Carbazole <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

Dibenzofuran <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

Hexachlorobenzene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

Hexachlorobutadiene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

Hexachloroethane <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

Isophorone <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9

Nitrobenzene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 μg/ l TM16/PM9



LOD UnitsMethod

No.

ERM

114243

Millipore

Brian Rouse




Client Name: VOC Report : LIQUID

Reference:

Location:

Contact:

JE Job No.: 10/3769

J E Sample No. 41-45 46-50 51-55 56-60 61-65

Sample ID AGW1 AGW2 AGW3 AGW5 AGW6

Depth - - - - -

COC No / misc

Containers V,V,H,P,G V,V,H,P,G V,V,H,P,G V,V,H,P,G V,V,H,P,G

Sample Date 10/08/10 10/08/10 10/08/10 10/08/10 10/08/10

Sample Type Water Water Water Water Water

Batch Number 1 1 1 1 1

Date of Receipt 11/08/10 11/08/10 11/08/10 11/08/10 11/08/10

Dichlorodifluoromethane <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 μg/l TM15/PM10

Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 μg/l TM15/PM10

Chloromethane # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 μg/l TM15/PM10

Vinyl Chloride <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 μg/l TM15/PM10

Bromomethane <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 μg/l TM15/PM10

Chloroethane # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 μg/l TM15/PM10

Trichlorofluoromethane # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 μg/l TM15/PM10

1,1-Dichloroethene # <6 <6 <6 <6 <6 <6 μg/l TM15/PM10

Carbon Disulphide # NA NA NA NA NA <3 μg/l TM15/PM10

Dichloromethane # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 μg/l TM15/PM10

trans-1-2-Dichloroethene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 μg/l TM15/PM10

1,1-Dichloroethane # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 μg/l TM15/PM10

cis-1-2-Dichloroethene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 μg/l TM15/PM10

2,2-Dichloropropane <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 μg/l TM15/PM10

Bromochloromethane # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 μg/l TM15/PM10

Chloroform # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 μg/l TM15/PM10

1,1,1-Trichloroethane # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 μg/l TM15/PM10

1,1-Dichloropropene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 μg/l TM15/PM10

Carbon tetrachloride # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 μg/l TM15/PM10

1,2-Dichloroethane # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 μg/l TM15/PM10

Benzene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 μg/l TM15/PM10

Trichloroethene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 μg/l TM15/PM10

1,2-Dichloropropane # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 μg/l TM15/PM10

Dibromomethane # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 μg/l TM15/PM10

Bromodichloromethane # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 μg/l TM15/PM10

cis-1-3-Dichloropropene # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 μg/l TM15/PM10

Toluene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 μg/l TM15/PM10

trans-1-3-Dichloropropene # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 μg/l TM15/PM10

1,1,2-Trichloroethane # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 μg/l TM15/PM10

Tetrachloroethene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 μg/l TM15/PM10

1,3-Dichloropropane # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 μg/l TM15/PM10

Dibromochloromethane # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 μg/l TM15/PM10

1,2-Dibromoethane # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 μg/l TM15/PM10

Chlorobenzene # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 μg/l TM15/PM10

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 μg/l TM15/PM10

Ethylbenzene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 μg/l TM15/PM10

p/m-Xylene # <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 μg/l TM15/PM10

o-Xylene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 μg/l TM15/PM10

Styrene # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 μg/l TM15/PM10

Bromoform # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 μg/l TM15/PM10

Isopropylbenzene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 μg/l TM15/PM10

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 μg/l TM15/PM10

Bromobenzene # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 μg/l TM15/PM10

1,2,3-Trichloropropane # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 μg/l TM15/PM10

Propylbenzene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 μg/l TM15/PM10

2-Chlorotoluene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 μg/l TM15/PM10

1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 μg/l TM15/PM10

4-Chlorotoluene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 μg/l TM15/PM10

tert-Butylbenzene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 μg/l TM15/PM10

1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 μg/l TM15/PM10

sec-Butylbenzene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 μg/l TM15/PM10

4-Isopropyltoluene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 μg/l TM15/PM10

1,3-Dichlorobenzene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 μg/l TM15/PM10


n-Butylbenzene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 μg/l TM15/PM10


1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 μg/l TM15/PM10

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 μg/l TM15/PM10

Hexachlorobutadiene #

<3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 μg/l TM15/PM10

Naphthalene <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 μg/l TM15/PM10

1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 μg/l TM15/PM10



LOD UnitsMethod

No.

ERM

114243

Millipore

Brian Rouse




VOCs - Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs)

Job number: 10/3769 Method TM15/PM10

Sample number: 61

Sample identity: AGW6

Sample depth: -

Sample Type: Water

Units: ug/l

Retention Time

(minutes)

Disiloxane, hexamethyl- 3.95 101

Cyclotrisiloxane, hexamethyl- 4.96 125

note: Only samples with TICs (if requested) are reported. If TICs were requested but no compounds found they are

not reported.

Tentative Compound Identification Concentration

QF-PM 3.1 v3

Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced


Job number:

Sample number:

Sample identity:

Sample depth:

Sample Type:

Units:

2.42 300

2.53 5816

3.29 2750

5.18 3856

5.41 35874

5.78 9338

6.42 10650Cyclotetrasiloxane, octamethyl-

1-Pentanol, 2-methyl-

SB8

~

water

ug/lnote: Only samples with TICs (if requested) are reported. If TICs were requested but no compounds found they are not

reported.

Tentative Compound Identification Retention Time

(minutes)Concentration

Acetone

Isopropyl Alcohol

1-Propanol

1,3-Dioxolane, 2-ethyl-4-methyl-

Propanoic acid, propyl ester

16

Jones Environmental LaboratoryVOCs - Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs)

3769

QF-PM 3.1 v5


All solid results are expressed on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. Page 9 of 11

Alcohol and Acetate Standard

2 . 0 0 2 . 5 0 3 . 0 0 3 . 5 0 4 . 0 0 4 . 5 0 5 . 0 0 5 . 5 0 6 . 0 0

1 0 0 0 0

2 0 0 0 0

3 0 0 0 0

4 0 0 0 0

5 0 0 0 0

6 0 0 0 0

7 0 0 0 0

8 0 0 0 0

9 0 0 0 0

1 0 0 0 0 0

1 1 0 0 0 0

1 2 0 0 0 0

T i m e - - >

A b u n d a n c e

T I C : A lc 0 1 8 . D \ D A T A S I M . M S

He

xa

no

l

Bu

ty

l

ac

et

at

e

Pe

nt

an

ol

Pr

op

yl

a

ce

ta

te

Bu

ta

no

l

Et

hy

l

ac

et

at

e

Pr

op

an

ol

Me

th

yl

a

ce

ta

te

Is

oP

ro

pa

no

l

Ac

et

on

e

Et

ha

no

l

10/3769-16

2 . 0 0 2 . 5 0 3 . 0 0 3 . 5 0 4 . 0 0 4 . 5 0 5 . 0 0 5 . 5 0 6 . 0 0 6 . 5 0 7 . 0 0 7 . 5 0

2 0 0 0 0

4 0 0 0 0

6 0 0 0 0

8 0 0 0 0

1 0 0 0 0 0

1 2 0 0 0 0

1 4 0 0 0 0

1 6 0 0 0 0

1 8 0 0 0 0

2 0 0 0 0 0

2 2 0 0 0 0

2 4 0 0 0 0

2 6 0 0 0 0

2 8 0 0 0 0

3 0 0 0 0 0

3 2 0 0 0 0

T i m e - - >

A b u n d a n c e

T IC : A lc 0 0 8 .D \ D A T A .M S

Pe

nt

an

ol

Pr

op

an

ol

Is

oP

ro

pa

no

l

Ac

et

on

e

QF-PM 3.1 v5


All solid results are expressed on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. Page 10 of 11

SOILS

DEVIATING SAMPLES

$ sample temperature on receipt considered inappropriate for analysis requested

^ samples exceeding recomended holding times

& samples received in inappropriate containers (e.g. volatile samples not submitted in VOC jars/vials)

~ no sampling date given, unable to confirm if samples are with acceptable holding times

# - UKAS accredited

M - MCERTS accredited

NAD - No Asbestos Detected

ND - None Detected (usually refers to VOC and/SVOC TICs)

SS - Calibrated against a single substance

* - analysis subcontracted to a Jones Environmental approved laboratory.

W - Results expressed on as received basis

If you have not already done so, please send us a purchase order if this is required by your company.

NOTES TO ACCOMPANY ALL SCHEDULES AND REPORTS

Please note we are only MCERTS accredited for sand, loam and clay and any other matrix is outside our

scope of accreditation.

Where an MCERTS report has been requested, you will be notified within 48 hours of any samples

that have been identified as being outside our MCERTS scope. As validation has been performed on

clay, sand and loam, only samples that are predominantly these matrices, or combinations of them will

be within our MCERTS scope. Your final report will reflect this, with non-MCERTS results on separate

pages.

It is assumed that you have taken representative samples on site and require analysis on a

representative subsample. Stones will generally be included unless we are requested to remove

them.

All samples will be discarded one month after the date of reporting, unless we are instructed to the

contrary. If we are instructed to keep samples, a storage charge of £1 (1.5 Euros) per sample per

month will be applied until we are asked to dispose of them.

++ Result outside calibration range, may be possible to re-run with higher detection limits

Where appropriate please make sure that our detection limits are suitable for your needs, if they are

not, please notify us immediately.

All analysis is reported on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. Results are not surrogate

corrected.

Asbestos screens where requested will be undertaken by a UKAS accredited laboratory.

WATERS

Please note we are not a Drinking Water Inspectorate (DWI) Approved Laboratory . It is important that

detection limits are carefully considered when requesting water analysis.

UKAS accreditation applies to surface water and groundwater and one other matrix which is analysis

specific, any other liquids are outside our scope of accreditation

As surface waters require different sample preparation to groundwaters the laboratory must be informed of

the water type when submitting samples. All samples are treated as groundwaters and analysis performed on

settled samples unless we are instructed otherwise.

Samples must be received in a condition appropriate to the requested analyses. All samples should be

submitted to the laboratory in suitable containers with sufficient ice packs to sustain an appropriate

temperature for the requested analysis. If this is not the case you will be informed and any analysis that may

be compromised highlighted on your schedule/ report by the use of a symbol.

The use of any of the following symbols indicates that the sample was deviating and the test result may be

unreliable:

ABBREVIATIONS and ACRONYMS USED

+ Failed AQC results should be considered as indicative only and are not accredited.



ERM consulting services worldwide www.erm.com

ERM has over 100 offices

Across the following

countries worldwide

Argentina Netherlands

Australia Peru

Belgium Poland

Brazil Portugal

China Puerto Rico

France Singapore

Germany Spain

Hong Kong Sweden

Hungary Taiwan

India Thailand

Indonesia UK

Ireland USA

Italy Venezuela

Japan Vietnam

Korea

Malaysia

Mexico

ERM’s Dublin Office

Suite 508

The Capel Building

Mary’s Abbey

Dublin 7

Tel: 01 814 7700

Fax: 01 814 7777



Appendix IX

Energy Audit Report 2010

Energy Audit Report

Prepared for: Millipore Corporation Cork, Ireland

Prepared by: Chris Famolare, Millipore Corporation April 2010

2

1 Introduction................................................................................................................................. 4

2 Overview of Activities and Findings........................................................................................... 4

2.1 Executive Summary.......................................................................................................................... 4

2.2 Goals and Objectives ........................................................................................................................ 5

2.3 Audit Activities ................................................................................................................................. 5 2.3.1 Energy Use Assessment.............................................................................................................................5 2.3.2 Site Inspection ...........................................................................................................................................5

3 Cork Ireland, Existing Building............................................................................................... 6

3.1 Description of Existing Building Conditions.................................................................................. 6 3.1.1 Walkthrough Information ........................................................................................................................6

3.2 Metering information ....................................................................................................................... 9

3.3 Building Envelope............................................................................................................................. 9

3.4 Electricity Usage ............................................................................................................................. 10

3.5 Natural Gas Consumption ............................................................................................................. 12

3.6 Energy Consumption...................................................................................................................... 15

3.7 Existing Energy Efficiency Measures ........................................................................................... 16

3.8 Proposed Energy Efficiency Measures ......................................................................................... 17 3.8.1 Summary of Proposed EEMs .................................................................................................................25

3.9 Greenhouse Gas Emission Savings................................................................................................ 26

3.10 EUI Evaluation ............................................................................................................................. 26

3.11 Utility Cost Savings Analysis ....................................................................................................... 27 3.11.1 Additional Cost Saving Opportunities ................................................................................................27

3.12 Future Work ................................................................................................................................. 28

APPENDIX A (Lighting)............................................................................................................. 29

APPENDIX B (Motor Replacement) .......................................................................................... 33

APPENDIX C (Steam and Boilers)............................................................................................. 38

APPENDIX D (Chillers).............................................................................................................. 42

APPENDIX E (thermal Images) ................................................................................................. 44

Thermal Image Summary.................................................................................................................... 45

3

List of Tables Table 1: Utility Rate Schedule ___________________________________________________________________5 Table 2: Total Electric Consumption (from the CHP and Grid) ________________________________________10 Table 3: Electricity Imported from the Grid________________________________________________________11 Table 4: Natural Gas Consumption (CHP + Millipore)_______________________________________________12 Table 5: Millipore Boilers Gas Consumption_______________________________________________________14 Table 6: Millipore Natural Gas Consumption _______________________________ Error! Bookmark not defined. Table 7: Cork Motor EEM Summary _____________________________________________________________17 Table 8: Lighting Control EEM Summary _________________________________________________________17 Table 9: Re-Commissioning Lighting Controls EEM_________________________________________________18 Table 10: Compressed Air EEM Summary_________________________________________________________18 Table 11: Screw Chiller Savings over a Reciprocating Chiller _________________________________________19 Table 12: Boiler Burner Efficiency Upgrades ______________________________________________________19 Table 13: Boiler Burner Efficiency Quote _________________________________________________________20 Table 14: Cochran Boiler Back Door Insulation EEM _______________________________________________22 Table 15: Lower the Steam Pressure EEM Summary_________________________________________________22 Table 16: Steam Leak Remediation Summary ______________________________________________________23 Table 17: Isolé Plug Load Control Summary_______________________________________________________23 Table 18: Summary of EEMs ___________________________________________________________________25 Table 19: Energy Reduction Summary by Utility ____________________________________________________25 Table 20: Greenhouse Gas Reduction ____________________________________________________________26 Table 21: EUI evaluation ______________________________________________________________________26 Table 22: Utility cost savings analysis ____________________________________________________________27

4

1 Introduction The following study was completed by Chris Famolare and Paul Lukitsch of Millipore Corporation, for Millipore Corporation in order to assess potential energy saving solutions for the Cork, Ireland facility. All energy and cost savings reported herein are based off historical utility data and historical equipment use patterns, Actual savings may vary depending on future equipment use and maintenance practices. 2 Overview of Activities and Findings

2.1 Executive Summary In the first quarter of 2010, a detailed energy audit of the Cork, Ireland facility was

performed. An investigation of the building systems revealed several potential energy efficiency measures which are detailed within this report. A cumulative savings of � 259,269 per year can be realized with an implementation cost of approximately � 333,596. The described savings lead to a combined simple payback of approximately 1.29 years. The Net Present Value discounted at 12% for variable terms dependant upon the life expectancy of each project (an average of 7.2 years) is very favorable at � 935,498. This savings results in a 4,864,896 kWh (11%) energy reduction when compared to the energy consumption in 2009, which in turn results in an 8% decrease in energy cost.

Cork, Ireland EEM Summary

EEM kWh

Savings Cost

Savings Implementation

Cost SPB NPV

NPV Term (yrs)

Motor Upgrades 101,103 � 13,851 � 36,700 2.65 � 41,561 10 Lighting Upgrades 232,730 � 31,884 � 81,550 2.56 � 50,199 5 Existing Lighting Re-commissioning (non IC2) 16,174 � 2,216 � 0 0.00 � 7,650 5 Steam traps, valves, etc. 707,008 � 20,228 � 3,200 0.16 � 31,684 2 Isolé Plug Load Controls 15,000 � 2,055 � 8,182 3.98 � 3,430 10 2 Chillers, Replace with Screw 563,827 � 77,244 � 45,180 0.58 � 391,265 10 Boiler Burner Efficiency Upgrades 2,546,053 � 72,843 � 131,784 1.81 � 279,795 10 Insulate back of Cochran Boiler 55,002 � 1,574 � 3,000 1.91 � 8,887 10 Lower Steam Pressure to 9 Bar for 50% of time 454,750 � 13,639 � 0 0.00 � 62,468 5 Compressed Air Leak Audit 173,250 � 23,735 � 24,000 1.01 � 61,559 5 SUM 4,846,896 � 259,269 � 333,596 1.29 � 935,498 7.2

Energy Reduction Summary by Type of Utility

Natural Gas (kWh) Electric (kWh) CHP Heat (kWh) kWh Overall Cost 2009 Energy Consumption 21,811,302 17,204,800 3,377,906 42,394,008 � 3,108,831 Potential EEM Reduction 3,762,812 1,102,084 0 4,864,896 � 259,268 Percentage Reduction 17% 6% 0% 11% 8%

5

2.2 Goals and Objectives The goal of this Energy Audit was to identify 3,000,000 kWh of energy efficiency

measures (EEMs) at the Cork, Ireland facility in order to propose an energy action plan specific to the Cork facility and ultimately reduce the consumption of non-renewable resources. With a reduction in consumption of energy resources comes a significant yearly energy cost savings. The Energy Efficiency Measures were defined through a detailed survey of facility motors, HVAC equipment, steam systems, historic utility data, lighting, employee habits, and BMS controls.

2.3 Audit Activities

2.3.1 Energy Use Assessment

Historical electrical and Natural Gas usage data was collected from the utility provider (Dalkia) in order to set a baseline for utility use at the Cork facility. This data was used in order to identify energy usage trends, and to establish a baseline energy cost per fuel unit. Electrical and natural gas usage data spans from January 2006 to March 2010.

2.3.2 Site Inspection

A detailed site survey was conducted of the facility in order to gather vital building systems information from sources including: - HVAC/air handler data - Electric motor data - Compressed air survey - Vacuum pump information - Lighting - Building envelope/construction - Building Management System configuration - Steam use - Boiler controls - CHP operation

Methodology for Estimating Savings and Cost

In order to estimate the cost savings associated with the building systems, historical utility data was analyzed. The billing schedule from Dalkia is complex due to the fact that there are night and day time as well as overage charges and minimum take pays. For this reason, the total cost per unit of fuel was used and was regarded as a 24/7 flat rate in order to simplify the analysis. Table 1 shows the utility rates used.

2008 Utility Rates Used in Calculations

Cost/Unit Unit Electric (Including Min Take Pay) �.137 kWh Heat Delivered from CHP (Incl. Min Take Pay) �.0421 kWh Natural Gas (delivered to Millipore) �.02861 kWh

Table 1: Utility Rate Schedule All equipment operational costs and resulting cost savings were based off the

per unit fuel cost found in Table 1 for the appropriate utility.

6

Operational hours per year for all equipment were calculated and estimated based on building occupancy and BMS set points. Lighting hours of operation were estimated conservatively. It is very difficult to accurately identify the number of hours lighting is used in areas that are not on a fixed schedule, data loggers that will accurately identify the number of hours an area is unoccupied while the lights are on can be used in some areas of interest (non-Ex areas). This will provide concise data for calculating lighting savings.

3 Cork Ireland, Existing Building

The following details the existing conditions found at Millipore’s Cork Ireland facility

during the two site walkthroughs, one in February 2010 and one in March 2010. Some energy efficiency measures are beginning to show a significant savings such as the new compressed air system. The compressed air system not only shows an energy savings, but it has resulted in less production down time, clean oil-free air for production, and less maintenance time devoted to compressed air problems. Currently all compressed air has been switched over to the new stainless steel piping.

3.1 Description of Existing Building Conditions

The Ireland facility is primarily a manufacturing facility which measures 188,000 square feet. Cork operates as a two and three shift facility depending on the production volume.

3.1.1 Walkthrough Information The inspection started with a general walkthrough of the interior of the building

and collection of motor nameplate data as well as lighting data. Over 200 motors were identified, of which 61 can be changed to a premium efficiency motor with favorable financial results.

The building envelope consists mainly of corrugated steel panels followed by

insulation, and an inner wall constructed of concrete blocks and a finished sheetrock wall.

The roof is non-ballasted and is covered by a grey rubber membrane. The roof is insulated with 2-4” of insulation which is sufficient for the climate in Ireland. Some older sections of the roof were observed to have some missing or deteriorated insulation which could lead to punctures in the membrane. It was also observed that various decommissioned pieces of equipment exist on the roof. These should be removed and the materials recycled if there is no longer a use for the equipment.

Windows throughout the Cork Facility include single and double pane windows.

The number of single pane windows is few and since the climate of Ireland is relatively mild, the return on investment for replacing these single pane windows with double pane windows would not be reasonable at the current utility rates.

7

Electricity is provided to the Cork plant via an on-site Combined Heat and Power plant as well as from the electrical grid. All electricity is purchased from Dalkia (the CHP owner) regardless of whether it comes from the grid or is produced using the CHP. There are numerous agreements within the CHP contract that are unfavorable towards Millipore, These will be discussed later.

Cooling is provided throughout the facility by reciprocating chillers, air cooled

screw chillers, and package DX rooftop units. Generally the most cost effective and least energy intensive way of providing cooling to a large facility is through water cooled glycol chillers. The air cooled screw chillers (Carrier) are a relatively energy efficient solution, offering good performance with an energy consumption of approximately 1 kW/ton of cooling. After speaking with the team from Cork (Brendan Mcgrath in particular) I learned that the 24 year old Carrier reciprocating chillers that are located in the compressed air room as well as the pump stands that go with them are being replaced this year. These Carrier reciprocating chillers have slowly deteriorated to the point where they are no longer usable. If they are not replaced immediately then production could be compromised once the warmer weather arrives. This is due to the fact that the chillers no longer possess the capacity to provide the cooling the building will soon demand. A 900kW variable speed screw chiller has been selected and ordered by Brendan Mcgrath as a replacement for these two units.

Heating is provided by a variety of methods including hot water from the CHP,

steam from the CHP as well as steam to hot water heat exchangers (calorifiers). The steam that is delivered to the steam to hot water heat exchangers comes from the 487kW Danstoker CHP boiler as well as two 4000kW Millipore owned boilers (one Cochran, one Byworthy) the Byworthy boiler was manufactured in 1989 and is equipped with linkage controls in order to modulate between high and low fire ranges. The Cochran boiler is equipped with controls that are a little more sophisticated due to the fact the burner can modulate the air inflow using a butterfly valve. These controls are considered fairly good compared to the Byworthy controls which in comparison are very rudimentary. The back door of the Cochran boiler is un-insulated and very hot. A sign has been hung from the back of the boiler that reads “WARNING VERY HOT SURFACE” as seen in Figure 1. There is an opportunity for energy savings here by insulating the back door.

Figure 1: Boiler Back Door "WARNING"

8

Ventilation is provided by numerous exhaust fans. Found above and below the roof. Conditioned air is delivered to all areas of the facility through air handling units located on the roof as well as below the roof in multiple mechanical rooms.

The compressed sir system at the Cork facility is one of the best designed and

constructed compressed air systems out of all the Millipore facilities. Recent upgrades included re-piping with stainless steel, decommissioning of oil flooded compressors, decommissioning of oil flooded air lines, installation of two Atlas Copco oil-free screw compressors (one full load, one variable speed, both posses heat of compression air dryers). The implementation of this new equipment has resulted in clean, dry, oil free air being delivered to production equipment, zero air leaks in the 4” stainless steel ring main, allowed the pressure to be reduced from 10 bar down to 7.2 bar, and overall has resulted in energy and cost savings.

Lighting at the Cork facility has seen some changes over the years, but could

benefit from a lighting upgrade. IC2 was designed and built with energy efficient lighting and controls in mind. All fixtures posses electronic ballasts and T8 lamps and are controlled by occupancy sensors (PIR). The rest of the plant is fitted with a mix of electronic and magnetic ballasts, as well as scattered occupancy sensors. Ideally, we would like to bring all the lighting in the plant up to the standard that IC2 was designed to; this includes occupancy sensors in all areas including the hallways as well as upgrading all ballasts to electronic models.

Three vacuum pumps are positioned outside the compressor room and operate

on a rotating schedule. These vacuum pumps are located adjacent to the new oil-free air compressors. Because we do not want oil contamination in the new air compressors, we must blank off the louver between the compressor room and the vacuum pump shed. In addition the vacuum pumps are not on VSDs and could benefit from these types of controls as seen in our Jaffrey facility.

Steam is distributed throughout the Cork facility for process, space heating, and

solvent recovery. As previously stated, the steam is provided by the Dalkia CHP as well as the Millipore Ops-2 boilers. While walking through the plant, many steam leaks were observed, these will be detailed later. As for the condition of the steam and condensate lines, it is apparent that the IC1 side of the plant is in worse condition that the IC2 side of the plant. While visiting in February, a condensate pipe leak was observed which caused quite a mess. The cause of the leak was rotted threads on one of the condensate pipe connections which can be seen in Figure 2. If this leak had occurred on the steam side of the pipe the leak could have posed serious safety concerns. We believe the root cause of the steam problems including steam trap failure has to do with the past boiler water chemistry. Highly acidic and highly basic boiler water can cause corrosion problems not only in the steam lines but also in the condensate pumps, steam traps, feed water tanks, and the boilers themselves.

9

Figure 2: Rotted threads on condensate pipe

Also observed was that the CHP boiler steam was at a lower pressure (12.5 bar)

than the Millipore boiler pressure (14 bar) during the March 2010 visit. If this is the case, then steam from the CHP is not being used to its full capacity. The steam mains from the three boilers feed into a common header. Without the CHP steam being at a higher pressure than the steam for the ops2 boilers, the Millipore boilers are doing the majority of the work.

3.2 Metering information Electrical- Electricity is purchased from Dalkia for both the grid electricity and the CHP generated electricity.

Natural Gas- Natural gas is purchased from Dalkia for use in the ops2 Millipore boilers as well as the thermal oxidizer and various smaller uses such as cooking. Natural gas is billed as a “heat” delivery with a combustion efficiency of 75% applied to the cost of heat Steam and hot water from CHP – Billed as a heat value in kWh. This utility is delivered from the CHP plant.

Water and Sewer- Water is provided to the Cork facility from the city. Waste water is treated at the on-site treatment plant owned and operated by Millipore.

3.3 Building Envelope The Cork, Ireland facility is constructed mainly of corrugated steel panels

insulated from the inside. Windows are both single and double pane. Replacement of the single pane windows is not financially favorable due to the fact that the climate is relatively mild year round so the resulting payback will be very lengthy.

As for building “tightness”, Cork could use some improvements. As seen in Appendix E which shows thermal images taken of the exterior of the building, it is clear that a heavy draft is present at the inner corners of the building as well as some of the seams between steel panels and contributes to a significant thermal loss, both heating and cooling.

10

3.4 Electricity Usage

Total kWh Electric Consumption (including CHP electric)

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 January 1,165,578 1,226,135 1,323,400 1,300,200 1,403,740 February 1,074,900 1,106,925 1,285,200 1,195,300 1,294,460 March 1,202,500 1,370,140 1,393,100 1,447,341 1,491,131 April 1,146,100 1,163,790 1,337,500 1,372,042 May 832,900 1,163,786 1,416,064 1,446,873 June 1,229,300 1,430,026 1,385,936 1,524,277 July 1,195,000 1,396,848 1,416,000 1,581,149 August 1,216,700 1,453,060 1,413,100 1,483,206 September 1,426,300 1,496,990 1,377,900 1,524,670 October 1,203,300 1,374,900 1,267,900 1,501,716 November 1,268,080 1,367,600 1,419,000 1,427,533 December 1,062,020 1,265,200 1,195,200 1,400,494 SUM 14,022,678 15,815,400 16,230,300 17,204,800

Table 2: Total Electric Consumption (from the CHP and Grid)

Total Electric Consumption (fron the CHP and Grid)

0200,000400,000600,000800,000

1,000,0001,200,0001,400,0001,600,0001,800,000

Janu

ary

February

March

April

MayJu

ne July

Augus

t

Septem

ber

Octobe

r

Novem

ber

Decem

ber

kWh

20062007200820092010

Figure 3: Total Plant Electric Consumption (CHP + Grid) As seen in Table 2 and Figure 3, the site electrical consumption continues to rise each year when comparing like months. There are very few occasions when the electrical consumption decreased year to year.

11

Total Cork Electrical Consumption by Source

0

200,000

400,000

600,000

800,000

1,000,000

1,200,000

1,400,000

1,600,000

1,800,000

Jan-0

6

Apr-06

Jul-0

6

Oct-06

Jan-0

7

Apr-07

Jul-0

7

Oct-07

Jan-0

8

Apr-08

Jul-0

8

Oct-08

Jan-0

9

Apr-09

Jul-0

9

Oct-09

Jan-1

0

kWh

CHP Electric Imported Electric from Grid

Figure 4: Total Plant Electric Consumption by Source (CHP or Grid) Figure 4 shows the total site electrical consumption by source (from the CHP or the Grid) over 4.25 year period. Again it is very apparent that the site electrical consumption has continued to increase over time.

Electric kWh Imported from the Grid 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 January 479,400 626,040 838,800 790,800 767,540 February 450,600 504,420 639,600 639,000 643,660 March 686,400 724,140 695,400 813,841 805,531 April 565,800 544,620 714,000 750,892 0 May 164,400 605,136 800,364 833,923 0 June 657,000 1,130,868 1,012,236 876,210 0 July 548,400 1,396,848 748,800 973,015 0 August 638,640 1,193,928 826,200 1,483,206 0 September 839,760 827,400 848,400 1,415,110 0 October 575,400 784,200 906,000 851,676 0 November 630,480 800,400 726,600 783,033 0 December 453,120 642,000 777,000 795,094 0 SUM 6,689,400 9,780,000 9,533,400 11,005,800

Table 3: Electricity Imported from the Grid

12

Electricity Imported from the Grid

0200,000400,000600,000800,000

1,000,0001,200,0001,400,0001,600,000

Janu

ary

Febru

ary

March

April

MayJu

ne July

Augus

t

Septe

mber

Octobe

r

Novem

ber

Decem

ber

kWh

20062007200820092010

Figure 5: Electricity Imported from the Grid

3.5 Natural Gas Consumption

Total kWh Gas Consumption (Including gas for CHP) 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 January 3,387,806 3,185,090 3,396,417 3,580,740 4,139,185 February 3,129,388 2,944,528 3,630,091 3,296,291 3,661,992 March 3,108,758 3,357,810 3,965,926 3,687,407 4,204,027 April 3,078,285 3,221,478 3,613,195 3,303,884 May 3,361,608 2,779,164 3,430,609 3,416,963 June 2,984,434 2,722,325 3,056,093 3,513,307 July 2,679,409 1,517,753 3,517,259 3,222,500 August 3,154,641 2,227,212 2,912,081 1,967,791 September 2,799,671 3,188,041 3,057,592 2,582,651 October 3,084,307 3,363,418 3,021,501 3,826,945 November 3,206,274 3,313,881 3,538,027 3,781,428 December 3,009,290 3,401,500 3,357,487 3,895,295 SUM 36,983,871 35,222,200 40,496,278 40,075,202

Table 4: Natural Gas Consumption (CHP + Millipore)

13

Total Gas Consumption CHP and Millipore

0500,000

1,000,0001,500,0002,000,0002,500,0003,000,0003,500,0004,000,0004,500,000

Janu

ary

Febru

ary

March

April

MayJu

ne July

Augus

t

Septem

ber

Octobe

r

Novem

ber

Decem

ber

kWh

20062007200820092010

Figure 6: Total Plant Gas Consumption (CHP and Millipore)

Cork Total Natural Gas Usage by User

0

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

2,000,000

2,500,000

3,000,000

3,500,000

4,000,000

4,500,000

Jan-

06

Apr-06

Jul-0

6

Oct-06

Jan-

07

Apr-07

Jul-0

7

Oct-07

Jan-

08

Apr-08

Jul-0

8

Oct-08

Jan-

09

Apr-09

Jul-0

9

Oct-09

Jan-

10

kWh

CHP Gas Millipore Gas

Figure 7: Natural Gas Consumption by User (CHP or Millipore) Figure 7 shows the natural gas consumption broken out by user (either CHP or Millipore). As seen in the summers of 2007 and 2009 the CHP was out of service and the plant was being supported solely by Millipore steam and grid electricity.

14

Gas kWh Consumed by Millipore 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 January 1,433,217 1,333,887 1,905,821 2,010,481 2,254,307 February 1,234,808 1,141,013 1,803,823 1,705,582 1,770,989 March 1,598,674 1,467,129 1,914,207 1,823,924 2,226,298 April 1,393,540 1,346,038 1,769,137 1,493,948 0 May 1,451,644 1,346,038 1,600,079 1,611,611 0 June 1,280,514 1,793,977 1,945,888 1,617,740 0 July 733,724 2,307,101 1,523,540 1,426,775 0 August 1,462,754 1,693,499 1,130,830 1,967,791 0 September 999,571 1,360,045 1,330,578 2,249,882 0 October 1,206,485 1,617,854 2,078,792 1,856,350 0 November 1,284,071 1,505,402 1,486,331 1,908,182 0 December 1,157,229 1,867,296 2,114,709 2,139,037 0 SUM 15,236,231 18,779,279 20,603,737 21,811,302

Table 5: Millipore Boilers Gas Consumption

Natural Gas Consumption by Millipore

0

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

2,000,000

2,500,000

Janu

ary

Febru

ary

March

April

MayJu

ne July

Augus

t

Septe

mber

Octobe

r

Novem

ber

Decem

ber

kWh

20062007200820092010

Figure 8: Millipore Natural Gas Consumption (excluding CHP)

15

3.6 Energy Consumption

Millipore Energy Usage

01,000,0002,000,0003,000,0004,000,0005,000,0006,000,000

Jan-0

6

Apr-06

Jul-0

6

Oct-06

Jan-0

7

Apr-07

Jul-0

7

Oct-07

Jan-0

8

Apr-08

Jul-0

8

Oct-08

Jan-0

9

Apr-09

Jul-0

9

Oct-09

Jan-1

0

kWh

Natural Gas (CHP and Millipore) Electricity (Imported from Grid)

Figure 9: Raw Utility Usage (gas for Millipore Boilers and CHP and Electricity from Grid)

Utility Summary

0

1,000,000

2,000,000

3,000,000

4,000,000

5,000,000

Jan-0

6

Apr-06

Jul-0

6

Oct-06

Jan-0

7

Apr-07

Jul-0

7

Oct-07

Jan-0

8

Apr-08

Jul-0

8

Oct-08

Jan-0

9

Apr-09

Jul-0

9

Oct-09

Jan-1

0

kWh

Gas Use in Plant (Including steam delivered from CHP) Electric Use in Plant (CHP + Grid)

Figure 10: Utility End Use Summary

16

Total Energy Consumption (CHP and Millipore Gas Plus Grid Electric)

38,000,000

40,000,000

42,000,000

44,000,000

46,000,000

48,000,000

50,000,000

52,000,000

kWh

2006200720082009

Figure 11: Year over Year Total Energy Consumption

Figure 11 shows a summary of the total energy consumption (CHP Gas + Millipore Gas + Grid Electricity) for the years 2006 to 2009. As seen from the chart, Millipore’s energy consumption has increased by 17% from our 2006 baseline.

3.7 Existing Energy Efficiency Measures

HVAC- Cooling and heating set points and control requirements vary with location. Clean rooms require temperature and humidity controls to remain within tight margins. Office areas are on night time setbacks

Motors- Some motors are high efficiency or premium efficiency. High and premium efficiency motors provide a significant savings over a standard efficiency motor. All new motors purchased must be premium efficiency.

Lighting- All indoor lighting in the facility is fluorescent. IC2 lighting is fitted with high efficiency T8 bulbs with high efficiency electronic ballasts. IC2 lighting is also on occupancy sensors. Rooftop lighting was found on during the day, the problem could be remedied by installing a turn dial timer that an employee can set while they are working on the roof. Warehouse lighting, filter cutting, Snap ID, Stericup, the chemistry lab, the microbiology lab, and CPG are all on occupancy sensors as well.

Water- Boiler feed water comes from RO water. Compressed Air- The compressed air system at the Cork facility is one of the best compressed air systems at Millipore. The new 4” stainless steel ring main was installed with surgical precision and provides restriction-less flow to all parts of the facility. The Atlas Copco compressors work in harmony to precisely adjust their sequencing and loading based on the building’s demand for compressed air.

17%

17

3.8 Proposed Energy Efficiency Measures Two hundred (200) motors were identified at the facility and were analyzed for

energy saving opportunities. Of the 200 motors identified, 61 motors were chosen as good candidates for replacement due to the fact that they will yield a favorable financial return on investment. Some motors did not display efficiency data on the nameplates, and some nameplates were painted over. For this reason, the efficiency was estimated for some motors. Table 7 shows a summary of the motor replacement EEM while Appendix B goes into greater detail. Efficiencies highlighted in red in Appendix B indicate that the efficiency was estimated/assumed. Efficiency assumptions were carefully chosen based on motor size, location, age, and what the surrounding motors with similar asset nomenclature showed for efficiency.

61 Motors - Upgrade to Premium Efficiency

kWh Savings 101,103.01 Cost Savings � 13,851.11 Implementation Cost � 36,700.00 SPB (Years) 2.65 NPV 10 yrs @12% � 41,561 Table 6: Cork Motor EEM Summary

Lighting at the Cork facility accounts for approximately 3% of the building’s

energy load (7.5% of the electric load). This does not sound like much, but in reality the current lighting load is approximately 1,250,000 kWh per year (including IC2). As previously noted, there is opportunity for lighting savings which includes changing all magnetic ballasts to high efficiency magnetic ballasts, as well as installing and properly commissioning occupancy sensors (PIRs) in all locations.

Some areas where daylight harvesting may be an option include the canteen area as well as the office space below the canteen. Daylight harvesting opportunities are something that can be discussed further with a local lighting efficiency specialist.

Table 8 shows the total lighting savings for the facility while Appendix A details the potential lighting savings if magnetic ballasts and lighting controls such as occupancy sensors and day light harvesting are implemented.

Cork, Ireland Lighting EEM Summary

Quantity Individual Cost installed Total Cost High Efficiency Electronic Ballasts 554 � 75 � 41,550 Occupancy Sensors (approx quantity) 200 � 200 � 40,000 Bundled Project � 81,550 Energy Savings (kWh per year) 232,730 Cost Savings per ear � 31,884 Simple Payback (years) 2.56 NPV after 5 years discounted @ 12% � 50,199

Table 7: Lighting Control EEM Summary

In addition to replacing the magnetic ballasts and installing occupancy sensors throughout the facility, a no-cost energy efficiency measure is the re-commissioning of the existing occupancy sensors throughout the building. Reducing the occupancy timer

18

by just 5 minutes in each area will yield a savings of �2,216 per year with no cost to Millipore other than one day of labor for an in house electrician. Table 9 shows a summary of the potential savings for re-commissioning sensors in IC2, Stericup, Snap ID, Filter Cutting, Inner Process Test Area, Maintenance shop, and the IC1 Casting Hall.

7% savings by re-commissioning (5 minutes less) kWh Savings 16,174 Cost Savings � 2,216 Implementation Cost 0 SPB 0 NPV 5 yrs � 7,988 Table 8: Re-Commissioning Lighting Controls EEM

Compressed air upgrades at the Cork facility continue to yield excellent results, yet there is still opportunity for savings. A thorough compressed air leak detection should be performed which will most definitely yield a significant CFM demand reduction which in turn saves energy. Also, the VSD compressor needs to be taken offline in order for the air leak to be taken care of (a significant amount of air can be heard leaking from inside the VSD air compressor). Table 10 shows a summary of the potential savings to be realized by simply fixing leaks and replacing the pneumatic valve on the roof that is in-line with the RTO pipe with an electronic valve. This valve can be seen in Figure 12.

Figure 12: Blue pneumatic RTO valve on roof

Compressed Air EEM Summary

CFM kWh Blue valve on roof for RTO air (continuous purge) 15 23625 General air leak detection 75 118125 VFD Compressor Air leak 20 31500 Sum of kWh Savings 110 173,250 Cost Savings � 23,735.25 Implementation Cost � 24,000.00 SPB 1.01 NPV � 61,559.00

Table 9: Compressed Air EEM Summary

19

Two 24-year old chillers that reside in the compressed air room are being replaced this year due to insufficient capacity from failing components. Combined, the current chillers used to offer 236 Tons of cooling capacity at full load with a power input of 405kW, but now only offer approximately 60 Tons of cooling. Replacing the current chillers with a new reciprocating chiller is the least expensive way to regain the needed cooling capacity, but is also the least energy efficient way of producing chilled water. A screw chiller will be used instead of a reciprocating chiller, which will offer higher efficiencies, but at a higher cost. The cost difference and energy savings between the new reciprocating chiller and the new screw chiller were used in the financial analysis in Table 11. Below, Table 11 shows a summary of the additional costs for the chiller replacement with an air cooled, VSD, screw chiller as opposed to a standard reciprocating unit. For a more detailed look at the analysis behind the chiller selection please refer to Appendix D

Screw Vs Reciprocating kWh Savings 563,827 Cost Savings � 77,244 Implementation Cost over a Recip � 45,180 SPB 0.58 NPV 10 yrs @ 12% � 391,265

Table 10: Screw Chiller Savings over a Reciprocating Chiller Limpsfield low O2 burners coupled with Autoflame controls should be installed on the Cochran and Byworthy boiler. These boilers are 4000kW each and are Millipore’s largest boiler. Limpsfield burners in combination with Autoflame controls have proven to burn more efficiently and cleaner than a traditional burner at our Bedford and Danvers Facilities. This cleaner and more efficient burn has resulted in a significant fuel savings averaging 29% at out Danvers and Bedford locations. This savings is in part, the result of implementing boiler water temperature setbacks based on outside air temperature. Due to the fact that Cork’s boilers will not benefit from outside temperature setbacks at this time (due to process requirements) a conservative fuel savings estimate of 15% was used in the calculations. A 15% fuel reduction in the boilers is equal to 2,546,053 kWh of natural gas, which in turn yields a cost savings per year of � 72,843. The 10 year net present value for this project discounted at 12% is equal to � 279,795.00. Table 12 show the expected savings from implementing the Autoflame controls on a Limpsfield low O2 burner.

Boiler Burner Efficiency Upgrades kWh Savings with 15% burner efficiency upgrades 2,546,053 Cost Savings � 72,843

Implementation Cost � 131,784 Simple Payback 1.81 10 year Net Present Value at 12% discounted rate � 279,795.00

Table 11: Boiler Burner Efficiency Upgrades

20

A quote has been obtained for the complete installation and commissioning of the burner upgrades and is summarized below in Table 13.

Boiler Burner Upgrade Costs

1.38 USD = 1 Euro

At time of quote (Feb 2010) Task Total Euro Total USD Burner Install (2) � 17,000 $23,460 Brickwork Modification � 4,850 $6,693 Gas Pipe Modifications � 9,800 $13,524 Subtotal � 31,650 $43,677 Burner for Cochran � 29,762 $41,072 Burner for Byworthy � 33,414 $46,112 Autoflame & EGA � 7,597 $10,484 Autoflame & EGA � 7,597 $10,484 Subtotal � 78,371 $108,152 Computer � 2,174 $3,000 Computer Stand � 362 $500 Data Transfer Interface � 3,623 $5,000 US Burner Expert (supervisor) � 3,623 $5,000 10% Contingency � 11,980 $16,533 Subtotal � 21,763 $30,033

Grand Total � 131,784 $181,862 Table 12: Boiler Burner Efficiency Quote

This project is by far the one of the most rewarding energy efficiency measure the

Cork facility can invest in at this time. Not only will the combustion efficiency be increased by 15%, but the boilers will be outfitted with controls that communicate with each other, have the capability to add sophisticated controls to the system, and will reduce the maintenance required on the boilers by burning cleaner, leaving little soot in the boiler to be cleaned during inspection. Another reason to implement this project is because of the rise in fuel usage Cork has experienced over the years. Table 14 and Figure 13 show the historical boiler gas consumption per year. If Millipore continues to grow at this rate, the boiler gas consumption will reach upwards of 20,000,000 kWh by the year 2012.

21

Yearly Actual Gas Consumption in Millipore Boilers

Year Usage (M^3) Cubic Feet BTU kWh % increase from previous Yr

2003 1,035,941 36,584,256 36,584,256,415 10,719,091 2004 1,079,451 38,120,812 38,120,812,065 11,169,297 4% 2005 1,052,819 37,180,303 37,180,302,985 10,893,731 -2% 2006 1,189,474 42,006,274 42,006,274,310 12,307,728 13% 2007 1,368,058 48,312,968 48,312,968,270 14,155,572 15% 2008 1,532,836 54,132,103 54,132,103,340 15,860,564 12% 2009 1,640,413 57,931,185 57,931,185,095 16,973,684 7%

Table 13: Millipore Boiler Yearly Natural as Consumption 2003-2009

Millipore Boiler Natural Gas Usage and Projected Usage

0

5,000,000

10,000,000

15,000,000

20,000,000

25,000,000

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Year

kWh

of G

as

kWh of gas to Millipore Boilers Projected kWh of Gas

Figure 13: Plot of Millipore Boiler Natural Gas Consumption 2003-2009

In addition to performing the boiler burner upgrades, the back door of the Cochran boiler needs to be insulated properly. Currently there is a sign that states “CAUTION HOT SURFACE” hanging from the rear of the boiler as seen in Figure 1. After performing an infrared scan of the boiler, it was found that the back of the boiler is between 330 and 375 degrees Fahrenheit as seen in Appendix E. Insulating the back of just the Cochran boiler will yield a 55,002 kWh savings which equates to � 1,573 as seen in Table 14. The energy savings only includes the radiant heat loss off the back of the boiler. It does not include the convective heat loss so the savings will be even greater if this was accounted for.

22

Insulate Back of Cochran Boiler kWh Savings 55,002 Cost Savings � 1,573.61 Implementation Cost � 3,000.00 SPB 1.91

NPV � 5,887.00 Table 14: Cochran Boiler Back Door Insulation EEM

Another fuel saving opportunity involves lowering the steam pressure from 14 bar

to 9 bar when the high pressure is not needed. This pressure reduction is essentially the same as performing a boiler temperature setback for the fact that as steam pressure decreases, so does the steam temperature. At 14 bar, the steam temperature is 198 degrees Celsius, at 9 bar the steam temperature is 179 degrees Celsius.

The national average percentage of stem lost due to steam leaks in a system is 19%. To be conservative we will assume a 10% steam loss at the Cork facility. We will also assume that the steam pressure can be reduced to 9 bar for 75% of the operating hours (whenever the solvent recovery system is not purging). Table 15 shows a summary of the resulting steam loss reduction savings by lowering the pressure to 9 bar for 75% of the operating hours. This savings does not include the savings from the reduced temperature of the steam (which would take some more in depth calculations). This project would have an instantaneous payback because the controls for this operation could be integrated into the Autoflame controls package for a minimal cost. The only expense would be tying in an output from the solvent recovery stations telling the boilers to ramp up to high pressure for their purge cycle to take place.

Lower the Steam Pressure

kWh Savings 454,750 Cost Savings � 11,056.46 Implementation Cost 0 Simple Payback 0 NPV 10 yrs @ 12% � 62,468

Table 15: Lower the Steam Pressure EEM Summary

In addition to performing pressure setbacks, a valve could be placed on lines that have intermittent service (such as the solvent recovery farms) to further reduce steam loss.

Steam leaks have been an ongoing issue at the Cork facility. We believe the root cause of the steam leak problems to be the boiler water chemistry from years past. Typically if the boiler water chemistry is maintained correctly then there will be far fewer problems with steam trap failures, fitting failures and valve failures. Incorrect boiler chemistry can also lead to fouling of the boiler tubes which can be costly to replace.

Dave Bodwell, the licensed boiler operator for Massachusetts has developed a very robust way of treating the boiler chemistry. Separate chemical pumps should be installed in the boiler feed water lines (to each boiler), the as well as the feed water tank. This will allow for the water in the feed water tank to be treated properly. The feed water to each boiler varies based on the boiler loading. For this reason, each line should be injected with chemical treatment separately (and controlled based on feed water flow). This will allow the boiler feed water to be chemically adjusted based on the feed water

23

demand of the boiler. Once the boiler chemistry is in order, replacement of the boiler feed water tank should be considered since it is deteriorated.

Repair of existing steam leaks such as steam traps, valves, and calorifier seals should be performed. Table 16 shows a summary of the saving that may be realized by repairing leaking traps, valves, and seals. Appendix C details the areas of interest.

Steam Leak Remediation

kWh Savings 707,008 Cost Savings � 20,227.50 Implementation Cost � 3,200.00 Simple Payback 0.16 NPV 2 yrs @ 12% � 31,684 Table 16: Steam Leak Remediation Summary

Installation of Isolé plug load controllers should take place at all workstations

(especially cubicles). An estimated 150 desks could be fitted with Isolé plug load controllers. They way they work is, once a person leaves their desk, 5 minutes later the non-critical equipment in the cubicle is shut down. 1,100 Isolé plug load controllers have been installed in the Massachusetts offices and Jaffrey plans to do the same. We have measured an average yearly savings of 100kWh per workstation. Table 17 summarizes the savings attainable through the installation of plug load controllers.

The plug load controllers also add value to employee awareness with regards to the Millipore sustainability efforts. Employees see that we are taking steps to reduce consumption at the workstation level and begin to change their attitudes towards energy conservation. Cost per unit is approximately 55 Euro.

Isolé Plug Load Controllers

# of desks 150 kWh savings/year/desk 100 Energy Savings 15,000 Cost Savings � 2,055.00 Implementation Cost � 8,181.82 SPB (Years) 3.98 NPV 10 years discounted at 12% � 3,430.00 Table 17: Isolé Plug Load Control Summary

As previously stated, the building envelope could benefit from sealing of drafts, in

particular where the corrugated steel forms an inner or outer corner on the building. Thermal images of these problem areas can be seen in Appendix E.

Particle counters should be installed and properly comissioned in all applicable

clean rooms. Particle counters will measure the number of particles in the return air side of the HVAC system and when tied to a VFD, will allow the air handler fan to slow down when the particle count is low enough while still meeting the clean room specifications. This has been implemented in Danvers, MA at a cost to purchase of approximately $3,000 for each particle counter; total installation cost with commissioning will vary based on the number of particle counters installed. Since the clean rooms are the most energy intensive rooms in the facility, the particle counters offer a great way to save

24

energy on heating, cooling, dehumidifying, and fan electricity. At the Danvers facility Millipore realized a 70% savings on the air handler fans due to the particle counter controls. Figure 14 shows the results from metering the Danvers air handlers with particle counters (maroon, jagged line) and without particle counters (red, horizontal line).

Three Week, Mobius Particle CounterAnnual Savings of 141,332 kWh (69% reduction)

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00

4.50

11/4

/09

12:0

0 A

M

11/5

/09

12:0

0 A

M

11/6

/09

12:0

0 A

M

11/7

/09

12:0

0 A

M

11/8

/09

12:0

0 A

M

11/9

/09

12:0

0 A

M

11/1

0/09

12:

00 A

M

11/1

1/09

12:

00 A

M

11/1

2/09

12:

00 A

M

11/1

3/09

12:

00 A

M

11/1

4/09

12:

00 A

M

11/1

5/09

12:

00 A

M

11/1

6/09

12:

00 A

M

11/1

7/09

12:

00 A

M

11/1

8/09

12:

00 A

M

11/1

9/09

12:

00 A

M

11/2

0/09

12:

00 A

M

11/2

1/09

12:

00 A

M

11/2

2/09

12:

00 A

M

11/2

3/09

12:

00 A

M

11/2

4/09

12:

00 A

M

11/2

5/09

12:

00 A

M

kWh

kWh of RTU 6&7 No Controls kWh of RTU 6&7 With Controls Figure 14: Danvers Air Handler Particle Counters

Deteriorating insulation on the pipes in the boiler room and on Air handlers should be repaired or replaced. Some tempered pipes and valves possess torn, wet, or missing insulation which results in thermal losses as the heating or cooling fluid travels through the pipe. This has a direct effect on the cooling and heating load of a building. This EEM will show savings but is difficult to quantify and would require a further study. In addition, the insulation on the chilled water tank located in the compressed air room should be re-insulated as well. Deteriorating insulation leads to unnecessary heating of the chilled water in this tank. A thermal image of the tank can be seen in appendix E

Retired or unnecessary equipment should be removed, and the building

penetrations sealed and insulated. Unnecessary penetrations allow heat to escape in the winter and cool air to escape in the summer as well as compete with the HVAC system and can cause static pressure balancing issues. Also, excess equipment on the roof makes it difficult to navigate an already cluttered and slippery rooftop. Bathroom exhaust fans can be put on occupancy sensors. Doing so will allow the exhaust fan to come on when someone enters the restroom and will remain on for a set amount of time (10-15 minutes) and then shut off until the next person walks in This

25

EEM will be most effective during second and third shift when some restrooms are not in use.

Vacuum pumps service various areas of the building. Installing a VSD on the vacuum pumps will yield a favorable energy savings by is difficult to quantify due to the fact that the Vacuum load varies with production volume.

A no cost, low cost EEM that will most likely benefit the Cork facility is the re-

commissioning of the building management set points once the BMS upgrades have been completed. Adjusting set points based on occupancy, time of day, and outside temperature among other variables can yield generous energy savings which could be upwards of 5% of the buildings energy load. Commissioning of the building should be contracted out to a Building Commissioning Professional.

3.8.1 Summary of Proposed EEMs Table 18 summarizes the proposed EEMs, their energy savings, cost savings, and simple paybacks that can be realized, Table 19 summarizes the savings when compared against 2009 usage data. Overall, the simple payback for the ten EEMs is approximately 1.29 years with a net present value of �935,498 for varying terms discounted at 12%.

Cork, Ireland EEM Summary

EEM kWh

Savings Cost

Savings Implementation

Cost SPB NPV

NPV Term (yrs)

Motor Upgrades 101,103 � 13,851 � 36,700 2.65 � 41,561 10 Lighting Upgrades 232,730 � 31,884 � 81,550 2.56 � 50,199 5 Existing Lighting Re-commissioning (non IC2) 16,174 � 2,216 � 0 0.00 � 7,650 5 Steam traps, valves, etc. 707,008 � 20,228 � 3,200 0.16 � 31,684 2 Isolé Plug Load Controls 15,000 � 2,055 � 8,182 3.98 � 3,430 10 2 Chillers, Replace with Screw 563,827 � 77,244 � 45,180 0.58 � 391,265 10 Boiler Burner Efficiency Upgrades 2,546,053 � 72,843 � 131,784 1.81 � 279,795 10 Insulate back of Cochran Boiler 55,002 � 1,574 � 3,000 1.91 � 8,887 10 Lower Steam Pressure to 9 Bar for 50% of time 454,750 � 13,639 � 0 0.00 � 62,468 5 Compressed Air Leak Audit 173,250 � 23,735 � 24,000 1.01 � 61,559 5 SUM 4,846,896 � 259,269 � 333,596 1.29 � 935,498 7.2

Table 18: Summary of EEMs

Energy Reduction Summary by Type of Utility Natural Gas (kWh) Electric (kWh) CHP Heat (kWh) kWh Overall Cost 2009 Energy Consumption 21,811,302 17,204,800 3,377,906 42,394,008 � 3,108,831 Potential EEM Reduction 3,762,812 1,102,084 0 4,864,896 � 259,268 Percentage Reduction 17% 6% 0% 11% 8%

Table 19: Energy Reduction Summary by Utility

26

3.9 Greenhouse Gas Emission Savings Table 20 details the CO2 emission reduction per year for the proposed EEMs. A 6 % reduction in kWh of electricity and a 17% reduction in kWh of natural gas will result in an 8% reduction in carbon dioxide emissions. The CO2 reduction potential has been calculated against 2009 utility usage data.

Greenhouse Gas Reduction resulting from proposed EEMs

EEM Natural Gas

(kWh) Electric (kWh)

CO2 (lbs)

Motor Upgrades 0 101,103 127,390 Lighting Upgrades and Controls 0 232,730 293,239 Existing Lighting Control Changes (non IC2) 0 16,174 20,380 Steam traps, valves, and Calorifiers 707,008 0 117,600 Isolé Plug Load Controls 0 15,000 18,900 2 Chiller Replacements with Screw 0 563,827 710,421 Boiler Burner Efficiency Upgrades 2,546,053 0 423,497 Insulate back of Cochran Boiler 55,002 0 9,149 Lower Steam Pressure to 9 Bar for 50% of time 454,750 0 75,641 Compressed Air Leak Audit 0 173,250 218,295 SUM of reductions from EEMs 3,762,812 1,102,084 2,014,512 Current Operations 21,811,302 17,204,800 25,306,025 % Reduction 17% 6% 8%

Table 20: Greenhouse Gas Reduction

3.10 EUI Evaluation Table 21details the Energy Utilization Index for the Cork and Jaffrey facilities.

According to the 2009 utility data the EUI was calculated to be approximately 226 kWh/ft2/year. After the EEMs are completed, the EUI will be reduced by 26 kWh/ft2/year to equal 200 kWh/ft2/year. When compared to Jaffrey, the 2009 EUI for Cork was 105% higher than Jaffrey. After the EEMs are implemented, the Cork facility will be about 90% greater than Jaffrey’s post-EEM EUI.

Cork EUI Evaluation (compared to Jaffrey)

Building Square Footage kWh per year

EUI (kWh/ft2/yr)

Cork Reduction

Jaffrey EUI (kWh/ft2/yr)

% greater than Jaffrey

2009 Conditions 188,000 42,394,008 226 110 105% Post EEMs 188,000 37,529,112 200 11% 105 90%

Table 21: EUI evaluation

27

3.11 Utility Cost Savings Analysis Table 22 details the expected utility cost savings that may be realized through the

implementation of the Energy Efficiency Measures detailed in this report. Through implementing the described EEMs Millipore will reduce their utility cost by approximately �259,268 per year which equates to an 8% reduction when compared against 2009 utility costs.

Energy Reduction Summary by Type of Utility Natural Gas (kWh) Electric (kWh) CHP Heat (kWh) kWh Overall Cost 2009 Energy Consumption 21,811,302 17,204,800 3,377,906 42,394,008 � 3,108,831 Potential EEM Reduction 3,762,812 1,102,084 0 4,864,896 � 259,268 Percentage Reduction 17% 6% 0% 11% 8%

Table 22: Utility cost savings analysis

3.11.1 Additional Cost Saving Opportunities As noted in the audit performed by EirData in December 2009, there are many faults

within the current CHP contract with Dalkia as well as mutual faults regarding the operation of the CHP. Currently the CHP is operating at 900 kW while it is capable of 1000 kW. The reason for the reduced power output is the fact that Millipore currently can not use all the available low temperature hot water from the CHP. Increasing the sites hot water demand through removing as many steam coils as possible and switching to hot water coils will allow the CHP to operate at higher RPMs which will result in higher electrical efficiency. This increased electrical efficiency will allow for lower electricity prices and will decrease or eliminate the electrical minimum take pay charged for not using the waste heat from the CHP. In addition to increasing the electrical output, raising the efficiency of the CHP will allow Millipore to take more steam from the CHP, thus reducing the amount of natural gas used in Millipore Ops-2 boilers.

Contract negotiations should eliminate the minimum take pays charges which are issued due to the fact that Millipore is not using all the available heat from the CHP. Millipore should demand that Dalkia installs a properly sized cooling tower for the necessary heat rejection from the CHP rather than surcharging Millipore for being unable to operate the CHP at full capacity and efficiency. Additional contract negotiations should include renegotiating the heat rate Millipore pays to Dalkia for hot water and steam. A good method for negotiating this deal would be to use the Autoflame controls on the Millipore boilers to determine the efficiency of the Millipore boilers. Millipore then uses that efficiency value and applies it to the price paid for gas from the CHP. Currently Dalkia has set a generic value of 75% efficiency for combustion efficiency of gas users, and actually charges Millipore on the gas as “heat” consumption. If we enter negotiations and first eliminate minimum and maximum take pays, then we can leverage our boiler efficiency (which will be approximately 80%) in order to reduce the gas cost.

28

3.12 Future Work Future work on the Cork facility could include the following:

- Boiler economizers - Pure Cycle power system (operated from hot water heated by boiler and CHP

exhaust gas) http://www.pw.utc.com/vgn-ext-templating/v/index.jsp?vgnextoid=7400b924618b0210VgnVCM1000004f62529fRCRD

- Re-negotiating the CHP contract - Finding solutions to use the excess hot water from the CHP in order to help

increase the efficiency of the CHP and take load off the Millipore Ops=2 boilers.

29

APPENDIX A (Lighting)

Detailed Lighting EEM

Location Fix Type Bulbs/Fix length # fix ballast occ W/bulb #ballasts/fix W/ballast W/fixture kW/room

kW/room with new ballasts Hours of Op

Hours w/sensors

kWh Currently

kWh w/Electric Ballasts

kWh w/elec. Ballasts and occ sensors

Current Cost

Cost with electric ballasts

Cost w/elec. Ballasts and Occ sensors

WIP 3 T8 4 4 10 mag n 36 2 15 174 1.74 1.44 24 19.2 15,242 12,614 10,092 � 2,088 � 1,728 � 1,383 Durapore Casting T12 2 5 31 mag n 40 1 15 95 2.945 2.48 24 19.2 25,798 21,725 17,380 � 3,534 � 2,976 � 2,381 Durapore Control Room T8 3 4 4 mag n 36 1 15 123 0.492 0.432 24 19.2 4,310 3,784 3,027 � 590 � 518 � 415 MCC Room Durapore T8 2 5 9 mag n 58 1 15 131 1.179 1.044 24 19.2 10,328 9,145 7,316 � 1,415 � 1,253 � 1,002 Durapore Equipment Room T8 2 5 6 mag n 58 1 15 131 0.786 0.696 24 19.2 6,885 6,097 4,878 � 943 � 835 � 668 Durapore Annealing T8 3 4 8 Electric n 36 1 0 108 0.864 0.864 24 19.2 7,569 7,569 6,055 � 1,037 � 1,037 � 830 VMF4 T8 4 4 16 Electric n 36 2 0 144 2.304 2.304 24 19.2 20,183 20,183 16,146 � 2,765 � 2,765 � 2,212 Hydrophiln Room T8 4 4 6 Electric n 36 2 0 144 0.864 0.864 24 19.2 7,569 7,569 6,055 � 1,037 � 1,037 � 830 Inspector (Durapore) T8 4 4 6 mag n 36 2 15 174 1.044 0.864 18 12.6 6,859 5,676 3,974 � 940 � 778 � 544 WIP 5 T8 4 4 6 mag n 36 2 15 174 1.044 0.864 24 19.2 9,145 7,569 6,055 � 1,253 � 1,037 � 830 Durapore Mixing Room T12 2 5 26 mag n 40 1 15 95 2.47 2.08 24 19.2 21,637 18,221 14,577 � 2,964 � 2,496 � 1,997 Durapore Staging Area T8 4 4 6 mag n 36 2 15 174 1.044 0.864 24 19.2 9,145 7,569 6,055 � 1,253 � 1,037 � 830 Durapore Maintenance Office T8 4 2 11 mag y 18 2 15 102 1.122 0.792 19.2 19.2 7,863 5,550 5,550 � 1,077 � 760 � 760 Durapore Lab T8 4 4 2 mag n 36 2 15 174 0.348 0.288 24 16.8 3,048 2,523 1,766 � 418 � 346 � 242 Maintenance Workshop 4 T8 2 5 8 mag n 58 1 15 131 1.048 0.928 18 12.6 6,885 6,097 4,268 � 943 � 835 � 585 Office at top of ramp T8 3 4 14 mag n 36 1 15 123 1.722 1.512 18 14.4 11,314 9,934 7,947 � 1,550 � 1,361 � 1,089 Switch Room T8 3 4 2 mag n 36 1 15 123 0.246 0.216 12 6 1,077 946 473 � 148 � 130 � 65 Boiler House T8 2 5 14 mag n 58 1 15 131 1.834 1.624 24 2.4 16,066 14,226 1,423 � 2,201 � 1,949 � 195 Ramp corridor T8 2 5 12 mag n 58 1 15 131 1.572 1.392 24 19.2 13,771 12,194 9,755 � 1,887 � 1,671 � 1,336 Mixing Room T8 2 5 13 Electric n 58 1 0 116 1.508 1.508 24 19.2 13,210 13,210 10,568 � 1,810 � 1,810 � 1,448 Mixing Room T8 2 5 25 Electric n 58 1 0 116 2.9 2.9 24 19.2 25,404 25,404 20,323 � 3,480 � 3,480 � 2,784 MCC Hi-Flow T8 2 5 9 Electric n 58 1 0 116 1.044 1.044 24 19.2 9,145 9,145 7,316 � 1,253 � 1,253 � 1,002 Casting IC1 T8 2 5 37 Electric n 58 1 0 116 4.292 4.292 24 19.2 37,598 37,598 30,078 � 5,151 � 5,151 � 4,121 Casting IC1 T8 2 5 18 Electric y 58 1 0 116 2.088 2.088 19.2 19.2 14,633 14,633 14,633 � 2,005 � 2,005 � 2,005 End of Casting hall IC1 T8 4 4 20 Electric n 36 2 0 144 2.88 2.88 24 19.2 25,229 25,229 20,183 � 3,456 � 3,456 � 2,765 IC1 Water Room T8 2 5 17 Electric n 58 1 0 116 1.972 1.972 24 9.6 17,275 17,275 6,910 � 2,367 � 2,367 � 947 Roll Storage and packing IC1 T8 4 4 17 mag n 36 2 15 174 2.958 2.448 24 12 25,912 21,444 10,722 � 3,550 � 2,938 � 1,469 Inner Process Test Area T8 4 4 4 mag y 36 2 15 174 0.696 0.576 16.8 16.8 4,268 3,532 3,532 � 585 � 484 � 484 Clean Rm 2 Ladies Room T8 4 2 2 mag n 18 2 15 102 0.204 0.144 24 16.8 1,787 1,261 883 � 245 � 173 � 121 Clean Room 2 (millex33) T8 3 4 59 ? n 36 1 0 108 6.372 6.372 24 19.2 55,819 55,819 44,655 � 7,647 � 7,647 � 6,118 Clean Rm 2 Gowning T8 3 4 4 mag n 36 1 15 123 0.492 0.432 24 19.2 4,310 3,784 3,027 � 590 � 518 � 415 Clean Rm 2 Raw Materials T8 4 4 2 mag n 36 2 15 174 0.348 0.288 24 19.2 3,048 2,523 2,018 � 418 � 346 � 277 Clean Room 2 corridor (gowning entrance) T8 2 5 5 mag n 58 1 15 131 0.655 0.58 � 0 � 0 � 0 HR office T8 4 4 2 mag n 36 2 15 174 0.348 0.288 12 7.2 1,524 1,261 757 � 209 � 173 � 104 HR office T8 4 4 1 mag n 36 2 15 174 0.174 0.144 12 7.2 762 631 378 � 104 � 86 � 52 HR office T8 4 4 2 mag n 36 2 15 174 0.348 0.288 12 7.2 1,524 1,261 757 � 209 � 173 � 104 HR office T8 4 4 3 mag n 36 2 15 174 0.522 0.432 12 7.2 2,286 1,892 1,135 � 313 � 259 � 156 Corridor outside HR T8 4 4 6 mag n 36 2 15 174 1.044 0.864 24 19.2 9,145 7,569 6,055 � 1,253 � 1,037 � 830 corridor outside engineering workshop T8 2 5 5 mag n 58 1 15 131 0.655 0.58 24 19.2 5,738 5,081 4,065 � 786 � 696 � 557 Zip Tip area T8 4 4 5 Electric n 36 2 0 144 0.72 0.72 18 12.6 4,730 4,730 3,311 � 648 � 648 � 454 Filter Cutting T8 3 4 19 Electric y 36 1 0 108 2.052 2.052 19.2 19.2 14,380 14,380 14,380 � 1,970 � 1,970 � 1,970 Filter Cutting 2 T8 4 4 30 Electric y 36 2 0 144 4.32 4.32 19.2 19.2 30,275 30,275 30,275 � 4,148 � 4,148 � 4,148

31

Packaging T8 4 4 8 Electric n 36 2 0 144 1.152 1.152 24 19.2 10,092 10,092 8,073 � 1,383 � 1,383 � 1,106 Stericup T8 4 4 16 Electric y 36 2 0 144 2.304 2.304 19.2 19.2 16,146 16,146 16,146 � 2,212 � 2,212 � 2,212 Molding Gowning T8 4 2 4 Electric n 18 2 0 72 0.288 0.288 24 19.2 2,523 2,523 2,018 � 346 � 346 � 277 Molding T12 3 5 46 mag n 40 1 15 135 6.21 5.52 24 19.2 54,400 48,355 38,684 � 7,453 � 6,625 � 5,300 Molding Services T8 2 5 14 mag n 58 1 15 131 1.834 1.624 24 19.2 16,066 14,226 11,381 � 2,201 � 1,949 � 1,559 Compressor Room T8 2 5 14 mag n 58 1 15 131 1.834 1.624 18 1.8 12,049 10,670 1,067 � 1,651 � 1,462 � 146 Corridor by Compressor Room T8 2 5 10 mag n 58 1 15 131 1.31 1.16 24 19.2 11,476 10,162 8,129 � 1,572 � 1,392 � 1,114 Med Devices Gowning T8 3 4 4 Electric n 36 1 0 108 0.432 0.432 24 19.2 3,784 3,784 3,027 � 518 � 518 � 415 Medical Devices T8 3 4 36 mag n 36 1 15 123 4.428 3.888 24 19.2 38,789 34,059 27,247 � 5,314 � 4,666 � 3,733 Med Devices Office T8 3 4 3 mag n 36 1 15 123 0.369 0.324 12 8.4 1,616 1,419 993 � 221 � 194 � 136 Med Devices Office T8 3 4 6 mag n 36 1 15 123 0.738 0.648 12 8.4 3,232 2,838 1,987 � 443 � 389 � 272 Molding Workshop T8 3 4 14 mag n 36 1 15 123 1.722 1.512 12 9.6 7,542 6,623 5,298 � 1,033 � 907 � 726 Molding Office T8 3 4 1 mag n 36 1 15 123 0.123 0.108 12 9.6 539 473 378 � 74 � 65 � 52 Molding Office T8 3 4 1 mag n 36 1 15 123 0.123 0.108 12 9.6 539 473 378 � 74 � 65 � 52 Molding Office T8 3 4 4 mag n 36 1 15 123 0.492 0.432 12 9.6 2,155 1,892 1,514 � 295 � 259 � 207 Molding Office T8 3 4 2 mag n 36 1 15 123 0.246 0.216 12 9.6 1,077 946 757 � 148 � 130 � 104 Millex Packaging Raw Materials T8 4 4 17 mag n 36 2 15 174 2.958 2.448 24 19.2 25,912 21,444 17,156 � 3,550 � 2,938 � 2,350 Millex Packaging Raw Materials T8 4 4 6 mag n 36 2 15 174 1.044 0.864 24 19.2 9,145 7,569 6,055 � 1,253 � 1,037 � 830 Snap ID T8 4 4 13 Electric y 36 2 0 144 1.872 1.872 19.2 19.2 13,119 13,119 13,119 � 1,797 � 1,797 � 1,797 Snap ID Packing Room T8 4 4 4 Electric n 36 2 0 144 0.576 0.576 24 19.2 5,046 5,046 4,037 � 691 � 691 � 553 Snap ID Gowning T8 4 4 2 Electric n 36 2 0 144 0.288 0.288 24 19.2 2,523 2,523 2,018 � 346 � 346 � 277 corridor Snap ID Gowning T8 2 5 8 mag n 58 1 15 131 1.048 0.928 24 19.2 9,180 8,129 6,503 � 1,258 � 1,114 � 891 Validation and QA dept T8 1 2 20 mag n 18 1 15 33 0.66 0.36 12 9.6 2,891 1,577 1,261 � 396 � 216 � 173 Warehouse T8 2 5 9 mag n 58 1 15 131 1.179 1.044 24 14.4 10,328 9,145 5,487 � 1,415 � 1,253 � 752 Warehouse T8 3 4 11 mag n 36 1 15 123 1.353 1.188 24 14.4 11,852 10,407 6,244 � 1,624 � 1,426 � 855 Stability Study Warehouse T12 3 5 4 mag n 40 1 15 135 0.54 0.48 12 4.8 2,365 2,102 841 � 324 � 288 � 115 Second Floor Mechanical Rm (Micro Lab) T8 2 5 5 mag n 58 1 15 131 0.655 0.58 8 2 1,913 1,694 423 � 262 � 232 � 58 Micro Lab Main Rm T8 2 5 13 Electric n 58 1 0 116 1.508 1.508 12 9.6 6,605 6,605 5,284 � 905 � 905 � 724 Microbio Back rm T8 4 2 3 Electric n 18 2 0 72 0.216 0.216 12 9.6 946 946 757 � 130 � 130 � 104 Microbio Biohaz Rm T8 4 2 2 Electric n 18 2 0 72 0.144 0.144 12 9.6 631 631 505 � 86 � 86 � 69 Microbio Biohaz Rm T8 4 4 1 Electric n 36 2 0 144 0.144 0.144 12 9.6 631 631 505 � 86 � 86 � 69 Microbio Biohaz Rm T8 3 4 1 Electric n 36 1 0 108 0.108 0.108 12 9.6 473 473 378 � 65 � 65 � 52 Microbio Priorclave Rm T8 4 2 3 Electric n 18 2 0 72 0.216 0.216 12 9.6 946 946 757 � 130 � 130 � 104 Microbio Hood Rm 1 T8 3 4 3 Electric n 36 1 0 108 0.324 0.324 12 9.6 1,419 1,419 1,135 � 194 � 194 � 156 Microbio Hood Rm 2 T8 4 4 3 Electric n 36 2 0 144 0.432 0.432 12 9.6 1,892 1,892 1,514 � 259 � 259 � 207

32

Commission existing occupancy sensors (go from 15 minute delay to 10 minute delay) 7% savings

Area Fix Type Bulbs/Fix length

# fix ballast occ W/bulb #ballasts/fix W/ballast W/fixture kW/area

kW/area with new ballasts Hours of Op

Hours w/commissioning

kWh Currently

kWh w/Electric Ballasts

kWh w/elec. Ballasts and occ sensors

Current Cost

Cost with electric ballasts

Cost w/elec. Ballasts and Occ sensors

Snap ID T8 4 4 13 Electric y 36 2 0 144 1.872 1.872 19.2 17.856 13,119 13,119 12,201 � 1,797 � 1,797 � 1,671 Stericup T8 4 4 16 Electric y 36 2 0 144 2.304 2.304 19.2 17.856 16,146 16,146 15,016 � 2,212 � 2,212 � 2,057 Filter Cutting T8 3 4 19 Electric y 36 1 0 108 2.052 2.052 19.2 17.856 14,380 14,380 13,374 � 1,970 � 1,970 � 1,832 Filter Cutting 2 T8 4 4 30 Electric y 36 2 0 144 4.32 4.32 19.2 17.856 30,275 30,275 28,155 � 4,148 � 4,148 � 3,857 Inner Process Test Area T8 4 4 4 mag y 36 2 15 174 0.696 0.576 16.8 15.624 4,268 3,532 3,285 � 585 � 484 � 450 Casting IC1 T8 2 5 18 Electric y 58 1 0 116 2.088 2.088 19.2 17.856 14,633 14,633 13,608 � 2,005 � 2,005 � 1,864 Durapore Maintenance Office T8 4 2 11 mag y 18 2 15 102 1.122 0.792 19.2 17.856 7,863 5,550 5,162 � 1,077 � 760 � 707 IC2 T8 3 4 190 Electric y 36 1 0 108 20.52 20.52 12 11.16 89,878 89,878 83,586 � 12,313 � 12,313 � 11,451

***NOTE: All values in RED were estimated based on square footage.

APPENDIX B (Motor Replacement)

Process Motors

Location and Manufacturer Asset Number kW Hp RPM Efficiency Premium Efficiency

VSD/DOL/STAR/DELTA (indicate operating frequency (Hz))

Run Time (Hours/year) Current kW Proposed kW Current kWh

Proposed kWh

Is it EX?

Cost Savings per year

Replacement Price SPB SPB < 5 yrs SPB < 7 yrs

IC2 F.I.M.M - Pump pp-1501 0.12 0.2 1350 71 71 4380 0.1183 0.1183 518.1972 518.1972 y � 0.00

IC2 F.I.M.M - Pump pp-1502 0.18 0.2 1350 65 65 4380 0.1938 0.1938 849.0462 849.0462 y � 0.00

ABB - Pump pp-1503 1.5 2.0 2830 87 87 4380 1.2069 1.2069 5286.2069 5286.2069 y � 0.00 � 300.00

CEMP - Pump pp-1504 7.5 10.1 1450 77 90.4 4380 6.8182 5.8075 29863.6364 25436.9469 y � 606.46 � 800.00 1.3 replace replace






ABB - Pump pp-1510 4 5.4 2870 88 88 4380 3.1818 3.1818 13936.3636 13936.3636 y � 0.00 � 600.00

ABB - Pump pp-1511 4 5.4 2870 88 88 4380 3.1818 3.1818 13936.3636 13936.3636 y � 0.00 � 600.00

ABB - Pump pp-1514 3 4.0 2820 88 88 4380 2.3864 2.3864 10452.2727 10452.2727 y � 0.00 � 600.00

ABB - Pump pp-1516 3 4.0 2870 88 88 VSD 4380 2.3864 2.3864 10452.2727 10452.2727 y � 0.00 � 600.00

pp-1517 4380

pp-1518 0.0 4380

NORD - Pump pp-1519 1.1 1.5 1400 74 84.1 4380 1.0405 0.9156 4557.5676 4010.2259 y � 74.99 � 300.00 4.0 replace replace

CEMP - Pump pp-1520 0.75 1.0 1400 70 82.5 4380 0.7500 0.6364 3285.0000 2787.2727 n � 68.19 � 300.00 4.4 replace replace

ABB - Pump pp-1521 1.1 1.5 1400 84 84 4380 0.9167 0.9167 4015.0000 4015.0000 y � 0.00 � 300.00

CEMP - Pump pp-1522 1.5 2.0 1420 79 85.3 4380 1.3291 1.2309 5821.5190 5391.5592 y � 58.90 � 300.00 5.1 replace


Pump pp-1402 0.75 1.0 1400 70 82.5 4380 0.7500 0.6364 3285.0000 2787.2727 y � 68.19 � 300.00 4.4 replace replace






ABB - Pump pp-1408 2.2 2.9 2850 86 86 4380 1.7907 1.7907 7843.2558 7843.2558 y � 0.00 � 400.00


ABB - Pump pp-1411 2.2 2.9 2850 88 88 4380 1.7500 1.7500 7665.0000 7665.0000 y � 0.00 � 400.00


ABB - Pump pp-1414 7.5 10.1 2910 90 90.1 4380 5.8333 5.8269 25550.0000 25521.6426 y � 3.88 � 800.00 205.9



CEMP - Pump pp-1417 3 4.0 1450 77 87.7 4380 2.7273 2.3945 11945.4545 10488.0274 y � 199.67 � 600.00 3.0 replace replace


pp-1419 0.0 4380

ABB - Pump pp-1420 0.75 1.0 2790 82.5 82.5 4380 0.6364 0.6364 2787.2727 2787.2727 y � 0.00 � 300.00

CEMP - Pump pp-1421 0.75 1.0 1400 70 82.5 4380 0.7500 0.6364 3285.0000 2787.2727 y � 68.19 � 300.00 replace replace

WEG - Pump pp-1103 1.85 2.5 2940 89 89 4380 1.4551 1.4551 6373.1461 6373.1461 y � 0.00 � 300.00

WEG - Pump pp-1104 1.85 2.5 2940 89 89 4380 1.4551 1.4551 6373.1461 6373.1461 y � 0.00 � 300.00

GRUNDFOS - Pump pu-102 4 5.4 2917 89 89 4380 3.1461 3.1461 13779.7753 13779.7753 � 0.00 � 600.00

GRUNDFOS - Pump pu-102A 4 5.4 2917 89 89 4380 3.1461 3.1461 13779.7753 13779.7753 � 0.00 � 600.00 #DIV/

0!

GRUNDFOS - Pump pu-103 1.1 1.5 2853 82.5 82.7 DOL 4380 0.9333 0.9311 4088.0000 4078.1137 � 1.35 � 300.00 221.5

35





GRUNDFOS - Pump pu-108 1.1 1.5 2853 82.8 82.8 DOL 4380 0.9300 0.9300 4073.1884 4073.1884 � 0.00 � 300.00









GRUNDFOS - Pump pu-301A 7.5 10.1 2900 89.5 90.1 DOL 4380 5.8659 5.8269 25692.7374 25521.6426 � 23.44 � 800.00 34.1

ABB - Agitator ag-1101 37 49.6 1777 93.9 93.9 VSD 2190 27.5825 27.5825 60405.7508 60405.7508 y � 0.00 � 2,000.00





ABB - Agitator ag-1106 7.5 10.1 1773 90.1 90.1 VSD 2190 5.8269 5.8269 12760.8213 12760.8213 y � 0.00 � 800.00

ABB - Agitator ag-1107 1.1 1.5 1435 81 81 VSD 2190 0.9506 0.9506 2081.8519 2081.8519 y � 0.00 � 300.00

ag-1108 0.0 2190

ABB - Agitator ag-1109 18.5 24.8 984 91.7 91.7 VSD 2190 14.1221 14.1221 30927.4809 30927.4809 y � 0.00 � 1,500.00

ABB - Agitator ag-1110 1.1 1.5 1435 81 84.1 n 2190 0.9506 0.9156 2081.8519 2005.1130 y � 10.51 � 300.00 28.5

ABB - Agitator ACT-1507-PES Monometer AG1 0.75 1.0 942 69 78.9 VSD 2920 0.7609 0.6654 2221.7391 1942.9658 y � 38.19 � 300.00 7.9

ABB - Agitator ACT-1508-PES Monometer AG1 0.75 1.0 942 69 78.9 VSD 2920 0.7609 0.6654 2221.7391 1942.9658 y � 38.19 � 300.00 7.9

ABB - Agitator ACT-1509-PES Monometer AG1 0.75 1.0 942 64 78.9 VSD 2920 0.8203 0.6654 2395.3125 1942.9658 y � 61.97 � 300.00 4.8 replace replace

ABB - Agitator vp-101 3 4.0 2896 87.1 87.1 n 4380 2.4110 2.4110 10560.2755 10560.2755 y � 0.00 � 600.00 Reliance (water services room)- Fan M1-3030 150.0 1485 95.8 VSD 8760 0.0000 n

Reliance M-3031 30.0 1465 94.1 VSD 8760 0.0000 n #DIV/0! � 1,500.00

ADDA - Pump M-4203 2.2 2.9 1430 77 86.7 DOL 8760 2.0000 1.7762 17520.0000 15559.8616 � 268.54 � 400.00 1.5 replace replace

Elektrim - Fan MTR-1500 7.5 10.1 2895 88.4 90.1 DOL 8760 5.9389 5.8269 52024.8869 51043.2852 � 134.48 � 800.00 5.9 replace

Siemens - Supply Fan M-4400B 0.0 VSD 8760

US Motors - Pump M-3019-Curing Zone #5 3.73 5.0 2925 87.5 88.5 DOL 8760 2.9840 2.9503 26139.8400 25844.4746 � 40.47 � 300.00 7.4

US Motors - Pump M-3018-Curing Zone #4 1.492 2.0 2915 81.5 85.5 DOL 8760 1.2815 1.2215 11225.6982 10700.5193 � 71.95 � 300.00 4.2 replace replace

US Motors - Pump M-3021-Drying Zone #1 3.73 5.0 2925 87.5 88.5 DOL 8760 2.9840 2.9503 26139.8400 25844.4746 � 40.47 � 600.00 14.8

US Motors - Pump M-3020-Curing Zone #6 3.73 5.0 2925 87.5 88.5 DOL 8760 2.9840 2.9503 26139.8400 25844.4746 � 40.47 � 600.00 14.8



US Motors - Pump M1-M3025-Heating Hood #2 Kmachine 7.46 10.0 2915 90.2 90.2 DOL 8760 5.7894 5.7894 50714.7672 50714.7672 � 0.00 � 800.00

US Motors - Pump 3024-Heating Hood #1 Kmachine 7.46 10.0 2915 90.2 90.2 DOL 8760 5.7894 5.7894 50714.7672 50714.7672 � 0.00 � 800.00

US Motors - Pump M-3017- Curing Zone #3 1.492 2.0 2915 81.5 85.5 DOL 8760 1.2815 1.2215 11225.6982 10700.5193 � 71.95 � 300.00 4.2 replace replace



US Motors - Pump M-3014 5.595 7.5 2905 88.5 89.5 DOL 8760 4.4254 4.3760 38766.7119 38333.5642 � 59.34 � 800.00 13.5

ABB - Agitator ag-1026 1.76 2.4 1500 79 85.3 VSD 500 1.5595 1.4443 779.7468 722.1571 � 7.89 � 300.00 38.0

Brook - Pump p-1006 2.2 2.9 2860 85.9 85.9 DOL 8760 1.7928 1.7928 15704.7730 15704.7730 � 0.00 � 400.00

Brook - Agitator a-1006 2.2 2.9 1716 77 86.7 DOL 500 2.0000 1.7762 1000.0000 888.1200 � 15.33 � 400.00 26.1

ABB - Pump p-1015 2.2 2.9 2845 85.9 85.9 VSD 8760 1.7928 1.7928 15704.7730 15704.7730 � 0.00 � 400.00

Siemens - Agitator a-1014 2.2 2.9 1420 77 86.7 VSD 500 2.0000 1.7762 1000.0000 888.1200 � 15.33 � 400.00 26.1

Siemens - Agitator a-1013 2.2 2.9 1420 77 86.7 VSD 500 2.0000 1.7762 1000.0000 888.1200 � 15.33 � 400.00 26.1

36

Brook - Agitator a-1004 1.5 2.0 940 79 82.5 DOL 500 1.3291 1.2727 664.5570 636.3636 � 3.86 � 300.00 77.7

Brook - Agitator a-1009 1.2 1.6 710 74 81 DOL 500 1.1351 1.0370 567.5676 518.5185 � 6.72 � 300.00 44.6

ABB - Agitator M1-1010 T-1010 1500 VSD 500

ABB - Agitator M1-1011 T-1011 0.0 500

CEMP - Pump p-1013A 2.2 2.9 1420 77 86.7 VSD 4380 2.0000 1.7762 8760.0000 7779.9308 � 134.27 � 400.00 3.0 replace replace

CEMP - Pump p-1014A 2.2 2.9 1420 77 86.7 VSD 4380 2.0000 1.7762 8760.0000 7779.9308 � 134.27 � 400.00 3.0 replace replace

CEMP - Pump p-1011 1.8 2.4 1500 77 85.3 VSD 500 1.6364 1.4771 818.1818 738.5698 � 10.91 � 300.00 27.5

Brook - Pump p-1003 3 4.0 1430 81 87.7 VSD 500 2.5926 2.3945 1296.2963 1197.2634 � 13.57 � 600.00 44.2

Brook - Pump p-1002 2.2 2.9 1425 77 86.7 VSD 500 2.0000 1.7762 1000.0000 888.1200 � 15.33 � 400.00 26.1

MP - Pump p-1010 2.2 2.9 1500 77 86.7 VSD 500 2.0000 1.7762 1000.0000 888.1200 � 15.33 � 400.00 26.1

Brook - Pump p-1001 1.5 2.0 2865 79 85.3 VSD 500 1.3291 1.2309 664.5570 615.4748 � 6.72 � 300.00 44.6

Brooks Crompton - Fan VMF4 Dryer Supply Motor 45 60.3 1465 91 94.2 VSD 8760 34.6154 33.4395 303230.7692 292929.9363 � 1,411 � 3,000.00 2.1 replace replace

US Motors - Fan VMF4 Air Knife 11.19 15.0 3525 88.5 91 VSD 4380 8.8508 8.6077 38766.7119 37701.6923 � 145.91 � 700.00 4.8 replace replace

Baldor - Fan UV Extract Fan 5 6.7 1425 84 89.6 DOL 4380 4.1667 3.9063 18250.0000 17109.3750 � 156.27 � 600.00 3.8 replace replace

Baldor - Fan UV Cooling Fan 10 13.4 2850 85.5 91.4 DOL 4380 8.1871 7.6586 35859.6491 33544.8578 � 317.13 � 700.00 2.2 replace replace

VEM - Fan c-103-Intermitent Ext. Fan VMF4 3 4.0 1440 81 87.7 DOL 1500 2.5926 2.3945 3888.8889 3591.7902 � 40.70 � 600.00 14.7

Brook Crompton - Pump E181- OP2 Condensate Recovery #1 1.5 2.0 2870 79 84.2 DOL 4380 1.3291 1.2470 5821.5190 5461.9952 � 49.25 � 300.00 6.1 replace

Brook Crompton - Pump E181- OP2 Condensate Recovery #2 1.5 2.0 2870 79 84.2 DOL 4380 1.3291 1.2470 5821.5190 5461.9952 � 49.25 � 300.00 6.1 replace

WEG - Fan VMF1 D dryer Supply 90 120.6 1480 92 95.2 VSD 4380 68.4783 66.1765 299934.7826 289852.9412 � 1,381 � 5,000.00 3.6 replace replace

Brook Crompton - Fan VMF1 Dryer Exhaust 30 40.2 1470 89 93.6 VSD 4380 23.5955 22.4359 103348.3146 98269.2308 � 695.83 � 2,000.00 2.9 replace replace

Reliance Electric - Fan pp-401 VMF1 air knife 11.19 15.0 2920 91.7 91.7 DOL 4380 8.5420 8.5420 37413.8931 37413.8931 � 0.00 � 700.00

Brook motors - Pump pp-409 VMF1 Formation Bath 5.5 7.4 2900 89.2 89.2 2920 4.3161 4.3161 12603.1390 12603.1390 EEXD � 0.00 � 600.00

Brook Motors - Agitator Durapore Mix Vessel 1 11 14.7 1475 86 91.4 VSD 2920 8.9535 8.4245 26144.1860 24599.5624 old ex � 211.61 � 700.00 3.3 replace replace

Brook Motors - Agitator MTR-ag-103 11 14.7 1475 86 91.4 VSD 2920 8.9535 8.4245 26144.1860 24599.5624 old ex � 211.61 � 700.00 3.3 replace replace

Brook Motors - Agitator MTR-ag-105 Durapore Mix Vessel 3 11 14.7 1475 86 91.4 VSD 2920 8.9535 8.4245 26144.1860 24599.5624

old ex � 211.61 � 700.00 3.3 replace replace

Brook Motors - Pump MTR-pp-107 1.5 2.0 2870 79 84.2 8760 1.3291 1.2470 11643.0380 10923.9905 EEXD � 98.51 � 300.00 3.0 replace replace

Brook Motors - Pump MTR-102 1.75 2.3 2850 79 84.2 DOL 8760 1.5506 1.4549 13583.5443 12744.6556 EEXD � 114.93 � 300.00 2.6 replace replace

Brook Motors - Pump MTR-100 Vessel 1 Heat Tracing 1.5 2.0 2870 79 84.2 DOL 8760 1.3291 1.2470 11643.0380 10923.9905 EEXD � 98.51 � 300.00 3.0 replace replace

Brook Motors - Pump MTR-109 4 5.4 1440 88 88.6 VSD 8760 3.1818 3.1603 27872.7273 27683.9729 � 25.86 � 500.00 19.3

Brook Motors - Pump MTR-114 1.5 2.0 2850 79 84.2 DOL 8760 1.3291 1.2470 11643.0380 10923.9905 � 98.51 � 300.00 3.0 replace replace

Brook Motors - Pump MTR-416 Sump Pump 402 1.5 2.0 2870 79 84.2 DOL 8760 1.3291 1.2470 11643.0380 10923.9905 � 98.51 � 300.00 3.0 replace replace

Brook Motors - Pump MTR-518 Sump Pump 502 1.5 2.0 2870 79 84.2 DOL 8760 1.3291 1.2470 11643.0380 10923.9905 � 98.51 � 300.00 3.0 replace replace

Brook Motors - Pump p-2003-A 11 14.7 2935 86 91.2 DOL 8760 8.9535 8.4430 78432.5581 73960.5263 � 612.67 � 700.00 1.1 replace replace

Argus - Pump P-2003-B 1.5 2.0 2865 79 84.2 DOL 1000 1.3291 1.2470 1329.1139 1247.0309 � 11.25 � 300.00 26.7

Brook Motors - Pump p-2002-A 11 14.7 2940 88.5 91.2 DOL 4380 8.7006 8.4430 38108.4746 36980.2632 � 154.56 � 700.00 4.5 replace replace

Brook Motors - Pump P-2002-B 1.5 2.0 2865 79 94.2 DOL 4380 1.3291 1.1146 5821.5190 4882.1656 � 128.69 � 300.00 2.3 replace replace

Brook Motors - Pump p-2001-A 11 14.7 2935 86 91.2 DOL 4380 8.9535 8.4430 39216.2791 36980.2632 � 306.33 � 700.00 2.3 replace replace

Brook Motors - Pump P-2001-B 1.5 2.0 2865 79 94.2 DOL 4380 1.3291 1.1146 5821.5190 4882.1656 � 128.69 � 300.00 2.3 replace replace

Brook Motors - Pump pp-219-B 3.9 5.2 2890 88 88.5 DOL 4380 3.1023 3.0847 13587.9545 13511.1864 � 10.52 � 300.00 28.5

Brook Motors - Pump pp-219-A 3.9 5.2 2890 88 88.5 DOL 4380 3.1023 3.0847 13587.9545 13511.1864 � 10.52 � 400.00 38.0

Brook Motors - Pump pp-210 3 4.0 2880 81 87.1 DOL 4380 2.5926 2.4110 11355.5556 10560.2755 � 108.95 � 600.00 5.5 replace

Brook Motors - Pump pp-211 2.2 2.9 2850 85.9 85.9 DOL 4380 1.7928 1.7928 7852.3865 7852.3865 � 0.00 � 400.00

Brook Motors - Pump pp-209 3 4.0 2880 81 87.1 DOL 4380 2.5926 2.4110 11355.5556 10560.2755 � 108.95 � 600.00 5.5 replace

Brook Motors - Pump p-304 1.1 1.5 2850 74 82.7 DOL 4380 1.0405 0.9311 4557.5676 4078.1137 old ex � 65.69 � 300.00 4.6 replace replace

Brook Motors - Pump p-302 1.5 2.0 2870 79 84.2 DOL 4380 1.3291 1.2470 5821.5190 5461.9952 old ex � 49.25 � 300.00 6.1 replace

ATB - Pump pp-301 1.5 2.0 3000 79 84.2 DOL 4380 1.3291 1.2470 5821.5190 5461.9952 old ex � 49.25 � 300.00 6.1 replace

Brook Motors - Pump pp-220 T-215 1.5 2.0 2820 79 84.2 DOL 1500 1.3291 1.2470 1993.6709 1870.5463 � 16.87 � 300.00 17.8

37

Brook Motors - Pump MTR-pp-221 T-216 1.5 2.0 2820 79 84.2 DOL 1500 1.3291 1.2470 1993.6709 1870.5463 � 16.87 � 300.00 17.8

Brook Motors - Pump MTR-223 T-213 1.1 1.5 2850 74 82.7 DOL 1500 1.0405 0.9311 1560.8108 1396.6143 � 22.49 � 300.00 13.3

Brook Motors - Pump MTR-pp-222 T217 1.1 1.5 2850 74 82.7 DOL 1500 1.0405 0.9311 1560.8108 1396.6143 � 22.49 � 300.00 13.3

Brook Motors - Pump MTR-pp-219 T214 1.5 2.0 2820 79 84.2 DOL 1500 1.3291 1.2470 1993.6709 1870.5463 � 16.87 � 300.00 17.8

Brook Motors - Pump MTR-pp-218 1.5 2.0 2820 79 84.2 DOL 1500 1.3291 1.2470 1993.6709 1870.5463 � 16.87 � 300.00 17.8

Brook Motors - Pump MTR-203A T-201 5.5 7.4 2900 84 89.2 VSD 1500 4.5833 4.3161 6875.0000 6474.2152 � 54.91 � 600.00 10.9

Brook Motors - Pump MTR-pp-206 2.2 2.9 2850 85.9 85.9 DOL 1500 1.7928 1.7928 2689.1735 2689.1735 � 0.00 � 400.00



Brook Motors - Pump pp-201 DMAC 5.5 7.4 2900 84 89.2 DOL 1500 4.5833 4.3161 6875.0000 6474.2152 � 54.91 � 600.00 10.9

Alpak - Pump p-309 15 20.1 2900 89 91.9 DOL 1500 11.7978 11.4255 17696.6292 17138.1937 � 76.51 � 800.00 10.5

Alpak - Pump p-310 15 20.1 2900 89 91.9 DOL 1500 11.7978 11.4255 17696.6292 17138.1937 � 76.51 � 800.00 10.5

Siemens (wastewater bubbler) 30 40.2 2950

GRUNDFOS - Pump RO1 5.5 7.4 3500 84 89.2 DOL 2920 4.5833 4.3161 13383.3333 12603.1390 � 106.89 � 600.00 5.6 replace

GRUNDFOS - Pump RO2 5.5 7.4 3500 84 89.2 DOL 2920 4.5833 4.3161 13383.3333 12603.1390 � 106.89 � 600.00 5.6 replace

GRUNDFOS - Pump Pre-Softner Pump 1 4 5.4 2900 89 89 DOL 2920 3.1461 3.1461 9186.5169 9186.5169 � 0.00 � 500.00

Pre-Softner Pump 2 4 5.4 2900 89 89 DOL 2920 3.1461 3.1461 9186.5169 9186.5169 � 0.00 � 500.00

GRUNDFOS - Pump Cochran Boiler 1 7.5 10.1 2900 89 90.1 DOL 2920 5.8989 5.8269 17224.7191 17014.4284 � 28.81 � 800.00 27.8

GRUNDFOS - Pump Cochran Boiler 2 7.5 10.1 2900 89 90.1 DOL 2920 5.8989 5.8269 17224.7191 17014.4284 � 28.81 � 800.00 27.8

GRUNDFOS - Pump Byworth PU1 7.5 10.1 2920 89.5 90.1 DOL 2920 5.8659 5.8269 17128.4916 17014.4284 � 15.63 � 800.00 51.2

GRUNDFOS - Pump Byworth PU2 7.5 10.1 2920 89.5 90.1 DOL 2920 5.8659 5.8269 17128.4916 17014.4284 � 15.63 � 800.00 51.2

GRUNDFOS - Pump UF Water P5 4 5.4 2930 89 89 DOL 2920 3.1461 3.1461 9186.5169 9186.5169 � 0.00 � 500.00

GRUNDFOS - Pump UF Water P6 4 5.4 2930 89 89 DOL 2920 3.1461 3.1461 9186.5169 9186.5169 � 0.00 � 500.00 ***NOTE: All values in RED were estimated due to the fact that information was not available but needed for calculations. The methodology for estimations can be seen in the motors section of the report.

APPENDIX C (Steam and Boilers)

Lower Steam Pressure

kWh Savings

Millipore Steam Cost After Burner Upgrades CHP Steam Cost Total Steam Cost

Current operation � 412,775 � 96,429 � 509,204

Assuming 10% continuous steam lost to leaks in 14 bar lines � 41,277.45 � 9,642.94 � 50,920.39

Steam Loss at 9 bar � 26,535.51 � 6,199.03 � 32,734.54

Savings � 14,741.95 � 3,443.91 � 18,185.85

Saving by lowering steam pressure to 9 bar 75% of the time 454,750 � 11,056.46 � 2,582.93 � 13,639.39

Insulate Back of Cochran Boiler

kWh Savings 55,002 Cost Savings � 1,573.61 Implementation Cost � 3,000.00 SPB 1.91

NPV � 5,887.00

40

Boiler Burner Efficiency Upgrades

kWh Savings with 15% burner efficiency upgrades 2,546,053 Cost Savings � 72,843

Implementation Cost � 131,784 Simple Payback 1.81

10 year Net Present Value at 12% discounted rate � 279,795

Boiler Burner Upgrade Costs 1.38 USD = 1 Euro Task Total Euro Total USD Burner Install (2) � 17,000 $23,460 Brickwork Modification � 4,850 $6,693 Gas Pipe Modifications � 9,800 $13,524 Subtotal � 31,650 $43,677 Burner for Cochran � 29,762 $41,072 Burner for Byworthy � 33,414 $46,112 Autoflame & EGA � 7,597 $10,484 Autoflame & EGA � 7,597 $10,484 Subtotal � 78,371 � 108,152 Computer � 2,174 $3,000 Computer Stand � 362 $500 Data Transfer Interface � 3,623 $5,000 US Burner Expert (supervisor) � 3,623 $5,000 10% Contingency � 11,980 $16,533 Subtotal � 21,763 $30,033

Grand Total � 131,784 $181,862

Steam Leak Remediation

Steam leak location Leak size (in)Steam Pressure Cost (per 1000lbs of

steam) Cost/year Imp. Cost SPB Steam valve in water room 0.0313 14 � 10.54 � 1,405.00 � 600.00 0.42705 IC2 Tank Farm Condensate pump tank 0.0625 14 � 10.54 � 5,625.00 � 400.00 0.07111 AHU28 Calorifier on roof 0.0625 5 � 10.54 � 1,400.00 � 200.00 0.14286 bottom inspection plate of Byworthy Boiler 0.0313 14 � 10.54 � 2,812.50 � 400.00 0.14222 Microweb Condensate Pump (failed trap upstream) 0.0625 7 � 10.54 � 1,960.00 � 400.00 0.20408 Steam pouring out of pipe on side of building 0.0625 14 � 10.54 � 5,625.00 � 600.00 0.10667 Steam pouring out of pipe on side of building 0.0625 5 � 10.54 � 1,400.00 � 600.00 0.42857

APPENDIX D (Chillers)

Chiller Selection and operational Costs kWh per year for various loadings

Chiller Type Cooling Tonnage EER COP

Input kW kW/ton Full Load 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20%

Currently Installed 236 7 2.050982 404.6 1.71 3,544,046 3,189,641 2,835,237 2,480,832 2,126,427 1,772,023 1,417,618 1,063,214 708,809 Reciprocating 260 10 2.929974 312.0 1.20 2,733,120 2,459,808 2,186,496 1,913,184 1,639,872 1,366,560 1,093,248 819,936 546,624 Screw 260 17 4.980955 183.5 0.71 1,607,718 1,446,946 1,286,174 1,125,402 964,631 803,859 643,087 482,315 321,544 Centrifugal 260 21 6.152945 148.6 0.57 1,301,486 1,171,337 1,041,189 911,040 780,891 650,743 520,594 390,446 260,297 Energy Cost of operation per year at various loadings Full Load 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% Currently Installed Recip. �485,534 �436,981 �388,427 �339,874 �291,321 �242,767 �194,214 �145,660 �97,107 Reciprocating �374,437 �336,994 �299,550 �262,106 �224,662 �187,219 �149,775 �112,331 �74,887 Screw �220,257 �198,232 �176,206 �154,180 �132,154 �110,129 �88,103 �66,077 �44,051 Centrifugal �178,304 �160,473 �142,643 �124,812 �106,982 �89,152 �71,321 �53,491 �35,661 Estimated Building Load Profile Full Load 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% % of time at each loading 1% 1% 5% 12% 22% 22% 15% 12% 10% Energy Cost of Operation Based on Building Load Profile Yearly Total Currently Installed Recip. �4,855 �4,370 �19,421 �40,785 �64,091 �53,409 �29,132 �17,479 �9,711 �243,253 Reciprocating �3,744 �3,370 �14,977 �31,453 �49,426 �41,188 �22,466 �13,480 �7,489 �187,593 Screw �2,203 �1,982 �8,810 �18,502 �29,074 �24,228 �13,215 �7,929 �4,405 �110,349 Centrifugal �1,783 �1,605 �7,132 �14,977 �23,536 �19,613 �10,698 �6,419 �3,566 �89,330

Yearly energy savings based on percentage of time loaded at 20-100% Yearly Total Savings

Screw vs. Recip �1,541.80 �1,387.62 �6,167.20 �12,951.13 �20,351.78 �16,959.81 �9,250.81 �5,550.48 �3,083.60 � 77,244.24 Centrifugal vs. Recip �1,961.34 �1,765.21 �7,845.36 �16,475.25 �25,889.67 �21,574.73 �11,768.03 �7,060.82 �3,922.68 � 98,263.08 Centrifugal vs. Screw �419.54 �377.58 �1,678.15 �3,524.12 �5,537.90 �4,614.92 �2,517.23 �1,510.34 �839.08 � 21,018.84 Equipment Cost Recip Cost � 100,000 Estimated Screw Cost � 145,180 Quoted Centrifugal Cost � 245,972 Quoted Screw Vs Reciprocating kWh Savings 563,827 Cost Savings � 77,244 Implementation Cost over a Recip. � 45,180 SPB 0.58 NPV 10 yrs @ 12% � 391,265

APPENDIX E (Thermal Images)

45

Thermal Image Summary Image 1: Shows un-insulated steam pipe and valves that could benefit from insulation Image 2: Shows heat loss through an inside corner located on the exterior of the building. This can be repaired by simply sealing between the corrugated steel panels. Image 3: Shows another inside corner that is leaking a significant amount of heat. This seam could also benefit from sealing. Image 4: Shows a third inside corner that is in need of some sealing. Heat loss is evident in this area. Image 5: Shows a pipe pouring steam out the building and heating the surrounding area to nearly 100 degrees Celsius. This steam leak should be stopped (it is most likely coming from a failed steam trap) or if it is process steam then maybe it is possible to reclaim the heat and use it to heat a room or other space nearby. Image 6: Shows a plume of steam coming off the roof. This heat los should be stopped or contained and reused for other purposes. Image 7: Shows the heat loss through the ridge of the roof as well as the corners of the building where insulation may be lacking Image 8: Shows heat loss through the seams of the corrugated steel panels, sealing of these seams can decrease the drafts in the building resulting in a higher efficiency building envelope Image 9: Again shows a seam that is leaking hot air into the cold atmosphere. Sealing of this leak will help to reduce the heating load of the building. Image 10: Shows a section of un-insulated steam line. Image 11: Shows a properly operating steam trap. Image 12: Shows a significant steam leak outside the building. This leak needs to be repaired but if it is process steam the possibly the steam can be recaptured and put through a second use. Image 13: Again shows an un-insulated steam valve that is emitting a great deal of heat. Insulating jackets must be added to all steam lines and valves. Image 14: Shows the boiler stack temperature at 191 on the outside of the stack. This is pretty typical of a steam boiler but the thought behind this is that the boiler exhaust can be used in conjunction with a Pure Cycle system to generate electricity from the waste heat. Image 15: Shows the temperature of the back door of the Cochran boiler. This is the boiler that is in need of an insulating jacket. Image 16: Shows the back door of the Cochran boiler up near the exhaust stack where a significant amount of heat is being lots. Image 17: Shows the front of the Cochran boiler the front of the boiler is shielded and insulated with plates mounted over the body of the boiler. Image 18: Again shows the front of the Cochran boiler. Heat coming out from between the insulating plates is tremendously hot. Image 19: Shows a section of un-insulated pipe. Sections like this exist all throughout the plant and should be buttoned up to conserve energy. Image 20: Shows calorifier 1 and its missing insulation. This calorifier can be removed since it is no longer used. Image 21: Shows the chilled water tank in the compressor room that is lacking insulation beneath the aluminum sheathing. The room this tank is in if full of un-insulated steam pipes and other heat sources that drastically warm up the tank and causes a decrease in building systems efficiency.

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66



Appendix X

Environmental Liabilities Risk Assessment &

DMP

DMP & ELRA Review for Millipore Ireland Limited Final 31st March 2011

ii

Document Control Status Draft Final Draft Final Date 24/3/2011 29/3/2011 31/3/2011

Version # 1 2 3

Approved

This report has been prepared by Environet Consulting Ireland Ltd, with all appropriate care and diligence within the terms of the Contract with the client. This Contract incorporates our Terms and Conditions and takes account of the resources devoted to it by agreement with the client. We disclaim any responsibility to the client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of works. This report is confidential to the client and we accept no responsibility to third parties to whom this report, or any part thereof, is made known. Such parties rely on the report at their own risk.

Dungarvan Business Centre Fairlane Shandon Dungarvan Co. Waterford Ireland Tel: 058-51155 Fax: 058-51231 Email: [email protected] www.environet.ie

iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................4

1.1 Decommissioning Management Plan........................................................................4

1.2 Environmental Liability Risk Assessment ................................................................5

1.3 Site Audit and Documentation Review......................................................................5

1.4 Assumptions ................................................................................................................6

2 DMP REVIEW...........................................................................................7

2.1 Methodology ................................................................................................................7

3 ELRA REVIEW.......................................................................................10

3.1 Methodology ..............................................................................................................10

3.2 Item 39 Addition.........................................................................................................13

3.3 Updated Risk Matrix ..................................................................................................14

3.4 Additional Item for Risk Mitigation Form ................................................................15

4 CLOSURE ..............................................................................................15


4

1 Introduction Millipore Ireland Limited (Millipore) is an IPPC licensed facility based in Tullagreen, Carrigtwohill, Co. Cork. Millipore has requested Environet to carry out a review of the Decommissioning Management Plan (DMP) and Environmental Liabilities Risk Assessment (ELRA) submitted to the EPA with the 2010 AER. The results of the review are contained in this report. The original IPC licence (register no. 571 or P0571-01) was issued to Millipore on 19th September 2002. This licence was superseded by IPPC licence Reg. No. P0571-02 issued by the EPA on 28th March 2007 and the current licence Reg. No. P0571-03 issued by the EPA on 9th March 2010. The licence was transferred to Millipore Ireland Limited from Millipore Ireland BV on 3rd August 2010. The principal class of activity on site is:

‘The manufacture or use of coating materials in processes with a capacity to make or use at least 10 tonnes per year of organic solvents, and powder coating manufacture with a capacity to produce at least 50 tonnes per year.’

The site is also licensed to be carried out the following activity:

‘The recovery or disposal of waste in a facility, within the meaning of the Act of 1996, which facility is connected or associated with another activity specified in this Schedule in respect of which a licence or revised licence under Part IV is in force or in respect of which a licence under the said part is or will be required’.

1.1 Decommissioning Management Plan

The preparation of a Decommissioning Management Plan (DMP) is a requirement under Condition 10 of the current IPPC licence Reg. No. P0571-03, which states as follows: 10.2.1 The licensee shall prepare, to the satisfaction of the Agency, a fully

detailed and costed plan for the decommissioning or closure of the site

or part thereof. This plan shall be submitted to the Agency for

agreement within nine months of the date of grant of the licence.

10.2.2 The plan shall be reviewed annually and proposed amendments

thereto notified to the Agency for agreement as part of the AER. No


5

amendments may be implemented without the agreement of the

Agency.

10.2.3 The Decommissioning Management Plan shall include as a minimum,

the following:-

i) A scope statement for the plan; ii) The criteria which defines the successful decommissioning of the

activity or part thereof, which ensure the minimum impact on the environment;

iii) A programme to achieve the stated criteria; iv) Where relevant, a test programme to demonstrate the successful

implementation of the decommissioning plan; v) Details of the costings for the plan and the financial provisions to

underwrite those costs.

1.2 Environmental Liability Risk Assessment

The preparation of an ELRA is a requirement under Condition 12 of the current IPPC licence, which states as follows: Condition 12.3 Environmental Liabilities

12.3.2 The licensee shall arrange for the completion, by an independent and appropriately qualified consultant, of a comprehensive and fully costed Environmental Liabilities Risk Assessment (ELRA), which addresses the liabilities from past and present activities. The assessment shall include those liabilities and costs identified in Condition 10 for execution of the DMP. A report on this assessment shall be submitted to the Agency for agreement within twelve months of date of grant of this licence. The ELRA shall be reviewed as necessary to reflect any significant change on site, and in any case every three years following initial agreement: review results are to be notified as part of the AER.

1.3 Site Audit and Documentation Review

Mr. Gerard Kelly of Environet visited the site on 10th March 2011 for the purpose of carrying out a site audit and to review documentation that might result in a change to the current documents. Table 1 below contains a list of some of the documentation reviewed as part of the audit;


6

Documentation Reviewed Decommissioning Management Plan Update, ERM, 2010. Environmental Liabilities Risk Assessment, ERM, 2010. Draft Site Major Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Study (Seveso), Denis Curtin Ltd., 12th March 2010. Application to the EPA for a licence transfer, 26th March 2010. EPA Audit Report for audit carried out on 2nd December 2010. Incident Reports – 2010. Groundwater Monitoring Reports – 2010. Site Hazardous Waste Management Register – 2010. Site Non-Hazardous Waste Management Register – 2010. EPA Correspondence File. Firewater Risk Assessment Review, ERM, 2010

Table 1: Documentation Reviewed

1.4 Assumptions

The following assumptions have been made in order to facilitate the production of this report:

• That all relevant information has been made available to Environet in order to complete an effective review of the DMP and ELRA.

• This report is based on the operations that have been carried out at the site to date. The report does not consider potential liabilities associated with significant changes in the use of the site e.g. extension or redevelopment. Any such changes to the operation should be assessed as part of a separate risk assessment and the results of this assessment taken into account when reviewing and updating any aspect of the report; and

• For the purpose of the report, Environet assumes that Millipore operates its site in general accordance with the conditions of the IPPC Licence. No provisions have been made for any potential costs associated with any criminal proceedings that could arise. Such costs are not covered by insurance and therefore cannot be underwritten by any third party or insurance organisation.


7

2 DMP Review

2.1 Methodology

Table 2 below details the review of the various sections of the current DMP report, comments and, where appropriate, makes changes;

Section Comment Change

1 Introduction Millipore Ireland BV has now changed to Millipore Ireland Limited as detailed in the Transfer Application to the Agency dated 26th March 2010

‘Millipore Ireland BV’ to ‘Millipore Ireland Limited’ throughout the report

1.1 Overall Methodology

The guidance document from the EPA used in the preparation of the report is still current

None

1.2 Key Assumptions Assumptions remain valid

None

2 Step 1: Initial Screening and Operational Risk Assessment

2.1 Methodology Methodology remains valid

None

2.2 Screening and Assessment

Overall activities at the site remain the same therefore screening and assessment has not changed

None

3 Step 2: Preparation of a Closure, Restoration and Aftercare Management Plan

3.1 Closure Plan 3.1.1 Introduction The licence details,

facility location and boundary remain the same. However Millipore corporation was purchased by

Add the following; ‘Millipore Corporation was purchased by Merck KGaA in 2010 and is now part of the Merck Millipore division of Merck KGaA.’


8

Section Comment Change Merck KGaA in 2010.

3.1.2 Facility closure scenarios covered in the plan

Closure scenario remains the same.

None

3.1.3 Site Evaluation Environmental sensitivity and site history remain the same. Some additions to compliance history (note improvement in IPPCL compliance in 2010 Vs 2009) and groundwater monitoring results are required. Products and processes remain the same. Quantities of raw materials and products remain the same. Quantity of waste produced in 2010 has changed therefore total quantities need to be updated in Table 3.12

Add the following to Table 3.4 Year: 2010 No. of non-compliances: 3 Source of non-compliances: 3 TO bypasses. Also 1 pipeline integrity issue Corrective Action: TO – various mechanical/ electrical faults now rectified Pipeline integrity – investigation followed by pipeline rerouting & decommissioning and soil removal & disposal. Hazardous waste total changes from 294 t to 429 t. Hon-hazardous waste changes from 1608 t to 1333 t.

3.1.4 Closure considerations

Clean/non-clean closure assumptions have not changes. While costs for decommissioning plant and equipment would have reduced since 2010 it is considered prudent to keep these costs at the same level as before. While hazardous waste quantities have increased in 2010, non-hazardous waste quantities have decreased and the cost change is not material.

None In Table 3.15 change hazardous waste quantity from 29.4 t to 42.9 t. Change non-hazardous waste quantity from 160.8 t to 133.3 t. This results in a change to the overall waste disposal cost from €93,920 to €93, 820, which is not significant and will not be carried on to


9

Section Comment Change The register of ODS materials has not changed.

the rest of the report. None

4 Criteria for successful closure, restoration and aftercare management

These criteria have not changed.

None

5 Programme for successful closure, restoration and aftercare management

Table 5.1 refers to Mayo County Council

Replace ‘Mayo County Council’ with ‘Cork County Council’

5.1 Closure Plan Implementation

The closure plan implementation process has not changed

None

5.2 Surrender of the Licence

The surrender process has not changed

None

6 Financial Provisions

The estimated costs associated with site closure have not changed. The company has prepared a financial statement to underwrite the costs associated with the CRAMP.

None

7 Cramp Update and Review

The update and review process has not changed

None

Table 2: Review of DMP


10

3 ELRA Review

3.1 Methodology

Table 3 below details the review of the various sections of the current ELRA report, comments and, where appropriate, makes changes;

Section Comment Change

1 Introduction Millipore Ireland BV has now changed to Millipore Ireland Limited as detailed in the Transfer Application to the Agency dated 26th March 2010

‘Millipore Ireland BV’ to ‘Millipore Ireland Limited’ throughout the report

1.1 Approach The guidance document from the EPA used in the preparation of the report is still current

None

1.1.1 Objectives The objectives have not changed

None

1.1.2 Scope The scope has not changed

1.1.3 Key Assumptions

The assumptions have not changed

None

1.1.4 Sources of Information

The sources of information remain valid but there are additional sources of information

Add the following to the sources of information; - site audit by Environet on 10th March 2011. - Draft 2010 AER - Additional Groundwater Monitoring Reports

2 Description of the Site

2.1 Facility Location Facility location details have not changed.

None

2.2 Site Ownership The licence details, facility location and boundary remain the same. However Millipore corporation was purchased by Merck KGaA in 2010.

Add the following; ‘Millipore Corporation was purchased by Merck KGaA in 2010 and is now part of the Merck Millipore division of Merck KGaA.’

2.3 On Site Plant and Site plant and None


11

Section Comment Change Equipment equipment have not

changed

2.4 Site Drainage Site Drainage has not changed

None

2.5 Air Abatement Air abatement systems have not changed

None

3 Identification and Evaluation of Environmental Hazards

3.1 Potential Historical Liability

Environmental sensitivity and site history remain the same. Some additions to compliance history and groundwater monitoring results are required. Products and processes remain the same.

The blow should be added to Table 3.2 which lists noteworthy groundwater monitoring. ‘This incident occurred on August 13th 2010, whereby as part of an EPA agreed proactive underground structure review programme, the site was completing integrity assessments in the IC1 area. The site excavated the ground local to the IC1 sink pipeline connection point to remove any potentially contaminated material. Also verification soil sampling following excavation was completed to confirm all potentially contaminated material was removed.

3.2 On-site Workshop and Consultation

A site visit and additional consultation was undertaken by Environet on 10th March 2011.

Insert the following in Section 3.2. ‘Environet visited the site on 10th March 2011 and had consultations with site EHS management around additional potential liabilities.’

3.3 Risk Register The risk register remains unchanged (with the exception of items 37 & 39) as the


12

Section Comment Change mitigation measures are not yet in place, in particular the TOC meter on surface water discharge. Item 37 has been given an adjusted score of 12 due to the amount of work that has been completed on above ground and underground spill containment at the site. Item 39 is added from the site audit carried out by Environet.

Change score for item 37 to 12 (Occurrence 3, Severity 4) Add item 39 to Table as detailed in Section 3.2

3.4 Preparation of the Risk Matrix

An updated Risk Matrix needs to be prepared.

Updated Risk Matrix presented in Section 3.3 below.

4 Risk Prevention/Mitigation

Table 4.1 Risk Mitigation needs an additional row to include item 39

Additional item for Table 4.1 Risk Mitigation presented in Section 3.4 below.

5 Identification of Financial Provision and Instruments

Due to the change in scoring of item 37 and the addition of item 39 the financial provision Table 5.2 must be recalculated. We concur with the findings of the current ELRA that worst case scenario costs are likely to be in the order of €1,000,000 and this is the minimum sum most appropriate to insure for. The company has prepared a financial statement to underwrite the costs associated with the ELRA, in support of the Merck Millipore insurance

The updated most likely scenario cost figure is €897,500.


13

Section Comment Change policy.

6 Review of ELRA The update and review process has not changed

None

Table 3: Review of ELRA

3.2 Item 39 Addition

Risk ID

Source of Info

Potential Hazards

Environmental Effect

Sev. Basis for Severity Rating

Occ. Basis for Occurrence

Rating

Risk Score (Sev. x Occ.)

39 Site Audit Internal spillage of liquid materials on site while firewater tank is being pumped directly to sewer. As TOC meter is not operational all surface waters are being diverted to the firewater holding tanks.

Discharge of hazardous liquids directly to sewer impacting Carrigtwohill WWTP and potentially surface waters

4 Impact on municipal WWTP and surface waters could be major

3 Spills to surface water systems are a possibility and due to the amount of time required to pump the firewater holding tanks.

12

Table 4: Item 39


14

3.3 Updated Risk Matrix

The below table updated the current risk matrix for the change in scoring of item 37 and the addition of item 39.

Very High 5

07, 08, 38

High 4

32, 33

Medium 3

05 09 02, 14, 18, 22, 36

03, 04, 28, 37, 39

Low 2

11, 12, 13, 16, 20, 24, 26

01,10,15,17,19,21,23,25,29,30,31

27, 34, 35

Occurrence

Very Low 1

06

Trivial

Minor Moderate Major Massive

1 2 3 4 5 Severity

Table 5: Updated Risk Matrix


15

3.4 Additional Item for Risk Mitigation Form

Ref ID Description Risk Score Before Mitigation

Possible Mitigation Measures

Revised S Rating

Revised O Rating

Revised Risk Score

Measure Agreed

Risk Mgr

Deadline to complete measure

Medium Level Risks (Yellow) from EPA Matrix 38 Internal

spillage of liquid materials on site while firewater tank is being pumped diretly to sewer. As TOC meter is not operational all surface waters are being diverted to the firewater holding tanks.

16 1. Ensure that TOC meter is operational 2. Ensure that there is a well developed procedure for emptying the firewater holding tanks.

4 2 8 Yes SD 6 mths

Table 6: Additional Item for Risk Mitigation Form

4 Closure Once the recommendations in this report are implemented we consider that both the DMP and ELRA will be updated to cover the changes identified at the site. Environet would like to thank Millipore for the opportunity to work on this project.

Documents

Annual Environmental Report · This report fulfils the requirement for an Annual Environmental Report (AER) in accordance with Condition 11.8 of Integrated Pollution Prevention and