Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
59
Annexes
60
Annex A
61
Annex B
62
Annex C
63
Approved and Endorsed by the Administrative Council for BOR Action.
Administrative Council Resolution No. 377 Series 2015
Approving the updated Strategic Development Plan of Ifugao State University 2014-2017 and subsequently endors-ing to the BOR for consideration and approval.
Administrative Council
Presiding Chairperson: Dr. Serafin L. Ngohayon, University President Members: Dr. Nancy Ann P. Gonzales Vice-President for Academic Affairs Dr. Napoleon K. Taguiling Vice-President for Research & Dev’t, Extension & Training Dr. Diosdado M. Aquino Campus Director, Lamut Campus Dr. Ricardo L. Ildefonso Campus Director, Potia Campus Dr. Camilo A. Pimentel Campus Director, Lagawe Campus Dr. Jose G. Daniels Campus Director, Tinoc Campus Mr. Joseph L. Ngohayon Campus Director, Aguinaldo Campus Mr. Vicente L. Kalaw Campus Director, Hapao Campus Dr. Mary C. Caclini Dean, College of Advanced Education (CAE) Dr. Alice Y. Brawner Dean, College of Education and Arts (CEA) Dr. Freddie B. Caday Dean, College of Criminology, Computing & Health Sciences (CCCHS) Dr. Marissa P. Bulong Dean, College of Tourism, Home Science & Agriculture (CTHSA) Dr. Rosita T. Guinaat Dean, College of Agriculture and Forestry (CAF) Dr. Patricia A. Aliguyon Dean, College of Industry, Technology and Criminology (CITC) Dr. Adoracion N. Albano Dean, College of Education, Administration & Health Sciences (CEAH) Dr. Fanie G. Pinkihan Dean, College of Business and Management (CBM) Dr. Marcelino B. Lunag Dean, College of Engineering, Industrial Technology, & Education (CEITE) Engr. Jose P. Binwag Director, Infra & Site Development Ms. Christine N. Dinagtuan Director, Student Affairs & Services Dr. Alicia M. Binwag Director, Registrar Services Dr. Wedy J. Lanaon Director, NSTP Mrs. Lilian Tumapang Director, Library Services Dr. Fernando G. Hernando Director, PE & Sports Dr. Vivian D. Dumelod Director, Quality Assurance Dr. Juliet C. Daniels Director, Finance Services Engr. Loinaz D. Dulawan Chief Administrative Officer/Director for Administration Dr. Teresita D. Allig Director, Research & Development Dr. Eva Marie C. Dugyon Director, Extension & Training Mr. Nathaniel F. Dimog Director, Income Generating Project Dr. Joyce A. Bodah Director, Planning & Information Management Engr. Stradivary D. Caro Director, General Services & Facilities Mrs. Generose S. Ognayon Director, NBC Zonal Center Dr. Vicky C. Madangeng Director, Socio-Cultural & Museum Dr. Rommel B. Sumeg-ang Director, Gender and Development
Annex D
64
Annex E
65
RESULTS-BASED PRIORITY FRAMEWORK OF THE PHILIPPINES Annex F
66
Proceedings of the Mid-Plan Review and Strategic Planning
Date : December 10-11, 2015 Venue : JME Garden, Bolog, Kiangan, Ifugao Participants: Administrative Council members Chairpersons and Coordinators Heads of Administrative Units Background The 2014-2017 Four-Year Development Plan was put into place for sets of actions needed to attain the Universi-ty’s vision, mission, and goals and national development goals. These goals and objectives, the performance indica-tors and its targets were the major basis in cascading targets used in evaluating performances of delivery units and individuals in accordance to SPMS provisions. The 2014-2017 Four-Year Development Plan at its mid-term had its assessment through a series of planning-workshop activities and consultation from October to December 2015 to evaluate accomplishments in the past two years of implementation. This is to guide the management with proper courses of actions for the next two more years of the plan. A re-planning was undertaken and included where reforms and current trends such as the Gender and Development per CMO No. 1, s. 2015, RA 9710), Performance-Informed Budgeting (NBC 552, s.2014), Good Governance Conditions requirements to qualify for PBB, PRIME-HRM evaluation, K+12, and others. The series of activities aimed to update the Four-Year Development Plan 2014-2017 to accommodate reforms and current trends in the government. Specifically; (a.) it assessed the University’s performance in its two-year imple-mentation of programs and projects, (b.) ensured the recognition of gender issues and gender equality concerns in development programs and projects of the University, (c.) inclusion of resources in target-setting where the HR Plan, Procurement Management Plan, Site Development Plan, ICT Plan and Budget are anchored, (d.) ensured that these gender-responsive PPAs are aligned to the expected outputs and outcomes that the national government ex-pects from state universities and colleges, (e.) ensured that performance indicators and targets are easily cascaded to the delivery units and individuals for a more efficient evaluation of performances, (f.) had an updated version of the 2014-2017 Development Plan. Methodology Opening Program In the opening program, Dr. Rommel Sumeg-ang, GAD Director, who gave an opening talk discussing a brief background about GAD and the need to integrate it in the strategic planning process. It was followed by an over-view of the activities by the Director for Planning and Information Management, Dr. Joyce A. Bodah emphasizing the rationale of updating the Plan, the chronological order of the activities to be done in the two-day seminar-workshop, and the expected outputs. The University President Dr. Serafin L. Ngohayon gave a message that in-spires the participants with updates in the University and encouraged the participants to actively participate as plan-ning is a very crucial factor in the University. Seminar-Workshop Proper 1. Vision-Mission Review. Presided by the University President, the IFSU vision, mission and goals were presented.
After lengthy discussions, the body agreed to retain the vision, mission and goals. 2. Objectives and the PPAs. The participants were grouped according to the University thrusts—that is by instruc-
tion, research, extension, income generation, and administration. The President, Dr. Ngohayon led the admin-istration group consisting of heads of administrative units; the Vice President for Academic Affairs, Dr. Nancy Ann Gonzales and Dr. Alice Brawner (during the second day), Dean of College of Education and Arts facilitat-ed the instruction group consisting of deans and program chairpersons; the Vice President for Research and Extension and Training, Dr. Napoleon K. Taguiling, facilitated the RDET group together with RD Director Dr. Teresita Allig and ET Director Dr. Eva Marie Dugyon in separate sessions; and Mr. Nathaniel Dimog led the group of IGP.
In summary, the following are addition/revision in the Strategic Planning Workshop as to objectives by goal and the programs, projects and activities (PPA) from the workshop conducted which are based on the result of the SWOT analysis facilitated by the Development Planning Task Force, together with the secretariat:
Annex G
67
Rationalization of program offerings
Curricular revision
Outcomes-based VMO of the programs
■ Curricular development
■ Formulation of Operations Manual for Colleges
2. To upgrade the quality of instruction
Application for ISA and ISO evaluation
Accreditation of programs
Performance in Examinations
■ Licensure Examinations
■ Trade Skills Certification
Compliance to COE/COD requirements
Faculty Development & Awards ■ Seminars, Workshops and Trainings
Re-echo of seminars attended
Retooling and advanced studies
Faculty awards ■ Evaluation of Faculty Classroom Performance ■ Outcomes-based syllabi ■ Instructional Materials Preparation
3. To enhance access to quality higher education a. Admission and Registration Service
■ Automation of enrolment services ■ Online Grade
Information drive and campaign ■ Increase of Graduates
b. NSTP Service ■ Regular ROTC practice and involvement of alumni
Varied community services C. PE and Sports Service
■ Intensified practices of the various varsity teams
Formulation of PE & Sports Operations Manuald d. Library Services ■ Upgrading and improvement of library services
e. Student Services and Development
Enhancement of Guidance and counseling services
Improvement of Medical-Dental service
Improvement of Student Housing service
Improvement of Student Publication
Improvement of Student Organizations
Increase of student beneficiaries for Student Scholarship/ Financial assistance e. Linkage with Alumni
■ Conduct of Tracer study
Involvement of alumni in development f. Assessment of Student Services g. Socio-cultural and the arts
Annual calendar of activities for socio-cultural and the arts program
Organization of performing arts and literary groups
Participation in competitions and PASUC nationals
Database system for collections in the museum
68
Goal 2. Pursue excellence in research & development
Programs Projects and Activities (PPA)
1. To intensify conduct of research in line with specialization and mandate
of the university
■ Conduct of approved focused researches
Conduct of GAD related researches ■ Regular monitoring and evaluation of conduct of researches ■ Packaging and submission of proposals to external funding agencies
Establishment of research centers 2. To increase visibility of research outputs in the local, national and international arena
Publication of research outputs in CHED accredited, international and Thomson Reuters/Scopus indexed journals
■ Presentation of research outputs in international, national and local fora
Strengthening of extension of research outputs to community 3. To generate, package and patent relevant technologies
■ Conduct of patentable researches ■ Conduct of IPR training
Submission of all researches for copyright/patent before presentation and publication 4. To capacitate human resources in research
Conduct of related seminars and trainings for faculty and staff
Attendance of faculty and staff to external research related seminars and trainings
Re-echo of SWTs and submission of travel reports
Goal 3. Pursue excellence in extension & training
Objectives
Current Revision
1. To intensify the conduct of research 1. To intensify the conduct of research in line with specialization and mandate of the Univer-sity
2. To increase visibility of research out-puts in the international, national and local arena.
2. To increase visibility of research outputs in the local, national, and international arena.
4. To increase capacity of human re-sources.
4. To capacitate human resources in research.
Objectives
Current Revision
1. To package and transfer technologies respon-sive to the needs of target communities for stakeholders’ empowerment and self-reliance.
1. To package and transfer knowledge and technologies responsive to the needs of target communities.
3.To level-up functional linkages and network-ing with other institutions at the local, regional, national and international levels for source shar-ing, fund sourcing and for greater impact.
3. To intensify linkages and networking with other institutions at the local, regional and in-ternational levels.
Legend: ■ Current
Revision
69
Programs Projects and Activities (PPA) 1. To package and transfer knowledge and technologies responsive to the needs of target communities -Packaging and transfer of information and technologies (developed by the university research and other institutions) thru trainings and demo projects 2. To intensify monitoring, evaluation and impact assessment of extension programs/activities conducted for technical advisory and strategic planning -Monitoring, evaluation and impact assessment
Goal 4. Pursue excellence in resource generation
Programs Projects and Activities (PPA)
1. To enhance income generating projects -Preparation of Feasibility Study/Project Proposal -Project assessment
2. To maximize the utilization of land for income generation -Advertisement of PPP Projects in IFSU website and strategic locations -Conduct of bidding procedures -Preparation and signing of MOA documents
3. To enhance and improve operation and administration of income generating projects -Enhancement of knowledge and skills of IGP personnel -Attendance to SWT and consultations -Installation of feedback mechanisms -Enhancement of IGP operation systems -Regular updating of project status -Realization of target income on all IGPs
4. To provide employment opportunities to students, graduate of IFSU and the community -Provision of financial assistance to poor but deserving students -Provision of empAloyment opportunities to IFSU graduates and community people
5. To utilize the projects for the conduct of employees’ and students’ researches -Accommodation of student researches/OIPs/OJTs in IGPs -Accommodation of faculty researches in IGPs
6. To utilize IGP projects for the conduct of extension services of the university -Coordination with the Extension Department for data and development focus -Conduct of extension services
Objectives
Current Revision
3. To intensify resource generation from external funding agencies/benefactors.
3. To enhance and improve operation and ad-ministration of income generating project
4. To enhance and improve operation and admin-istration of IGP
4. To provide employment opportunities to students, graduate of IFSU and the communi-ty.
5. To utilize the projects for conduct of em-ployees’ and students’ researches.
6. To utilize IGP projects for the conduct of extension services of the University.
70
Goal 5. Pursue excellence in administration and governance
Programs Projects and Activities (PPA)
1. To continue modernizing the university ■ Establishment and upgrading of laboratories
Enhancement of office procedures
Improvement of mobility of personnel and students/stakeholders for official business ■ Construction and repairs/improvements of infrastructure and facilities
Mainstreaming of GAD in the University’s Development Plan 2. To continue improving administrative proficiency and financial management
■ Capacitation of non-teaching personnel
Improvement of internet connectivity
On time payment of claims 3. To adopt good governance by heart and action
■ On time submission of accurate reports
Availability of reliable information ■ Conducive and environment friendly work place ■ Securing and protection of land assets ■ On time procurement and delivery of supplies and materials
Implementation of policies 4. To improve quality and administrative services
Improvement of administrative services ■ Quality assessment of administrative services
- Internal assessment through feedback mechanism - Accreditation for PRIME-HR
5. To implement NBC 461 efficiently and effectively
Promotion of faculty members in CARSUCs
Personnel development The two-day workshop ended with a presentation of updates/revisions in the plan by area. The
outputs were further processed and enhanced in the succeeding operational planning workshops with the end-goal of setting the performance indicators for monitoring and evaluation and the targets for the years 2016 and 2017. Proceedings of the operational planning workshops are filed separately at the Department of Planning and Information Management. The workshops were facilitated by the Development Planning Task Force and Secretariat.
Task Force Secretariat Chairperson : Dr. Joyce A. Bodah Chairperson : Jill B. Saquing Vice Chair : Dr. Jovel Francis Ananayo Vice Chair : Michelle T. Bannawol Members : Desiree A. Ballitoc Members : Honeylette Baloc Elpidio Basilio, Jr. Menard Bongayon Cherry Ann H. Bumidang Katrina Buhang Michelle J. Dulay Renie Chang-a Generose S. Ognayon Blezel Grace dela Cuesta Julio Pugong, Jr. Rochelle Pahalon Roger Tamargo Technical Support: Michael Pinkihan Aristorenas Gano Renie Chang-a
Objectives
Current Revision/Addition
5. To implement NBC 461 efficiently and effectively.
71
Annex H SWOT ANALYSIS
I. Instruction (MFO 1-Higher Education Services, MFO 4 – Advanced Education Services, Support to Operations and other Related Affairs)
A. Strengths
1. Majority of the faculty members are master’s degree holders. 2. There is an increased and speedy promotion of faculty members. 3. Faculty members are empowered and capacitated. 4. The passing rate in national examinations is above the national cut-off
score. 5. Majority of the curricular programs are accredited. 6. Graduate programs were revised. 7. Presence of Transnational Education and distance education programs. 8. Very good instructional leadership and management. 9. Library resources at the Main Campus, Potia and Lagawe campuses are
improved. 10. Strong and established data-base system in the Main Campus. 11. There is existing Faculty Development Plans and programs for the univer-
sity. 12. Strategic Plans (University, college and departments) are regularly re-
viewed, revised and innovated.
B. Weaknesses
1. Learning from seminars, workshops, and trainings (SWTs) are not well-disseminated.
2. There are the same programs being offered at the campuses of the university which, in some way cause competition among the campuses.
3. Instructional materials/resources are inadequate (Educational Technology, multimedia and internet access, books, ventilation of classrooms).
4. Laboratories need to be separated for Chemistry and Biology. Purchase of la-boratory equipment and materials, LCD and white boards for classrooms is necessary.
5. Syllabi are not outcomes-based.
C. Opportunities
1. International activities brought about by ASEAN2015 integration. 2. OJT opportunities for students in local, national and international agencies/
organizations. 3. Increasing donors/benefactors for scholarships to faculty and students. 4. PTCA and stakeholders are very supportive to the University’s endeavors. 5. There are exchange programs of the university with other universities abroad. 6. Reforms in the government that provides opportunities for the University to
improve quality education (i.e. K+12, Results-Based Performance Manage-ment System, Outcomes-Based Education, etc.).
72
D. Threats
1. No enrollment in the first year for 2016 & 2017
2. Income from fees is reduced due to decreased enrolment.
3. Power failure/interruption which disturbs or affects quality service and instructional quality for students.
4. Students’ attitude towards spending for school requirements. Most students belong to underprivileged families as evidenced by the very high percentage of grantees/scholars.
5. Unemployment and underemployment of graduates. 6. Existence of business establishments offering services that support or spur vices of stu-
dents (i.e. computer shops, bars, etc.).
II. Research and Development (MFO 2 – Research Services)
A. Strengths
1. Faculty members have varied specialization with varied research interests. 2. There are designated research coordinators in each campus and college. 3. There are existing collaborative researches among faculty members, students and
staff. 4. Researchers actively participate in local and international fora, seminars, workshops
and trainings. 5. The University has policies for incentives and faculty workloads for researchers.
Published research outputs are credited for faculty promotion through the NBC 461 Evaluation.
6. The research services are being manned by competent middle managers and person-nel.
7. Research aides are being hired to assist faculty researchers. There is fund for re-search assistants for externally funded researches.
8. There are regular internal capability building activities for researchers. 9. Regular evaluation of researches (in-house reviews) is conducted. 10. Presence of policy on IPR and Research Ethics. 11. The number of researches conducted and completed is consistently increasing. 12. Research Journal of the University is accredited/recognized by CHED. 13. Publication and presentation of research outputs continuously increase. Also, vari-
ous external scientific researches published and presented. 14. There is increasing number of approved utility models and copyrights. 15. Presence of other agencies for collaboration/ linkage. LGUs have existing research
programs for IFSU to collaborate with. 16. Students actively participate in the conduct of research and in scientific conferences.
There are programs for mentoring of students on research. 17. Funds for research activities and resources are augmented by STF-research fee,
GAD, and external funding for externally-funded researches by partner-agencies. STF funds are available for purchase of ICT equipment needs of the R&D Office.
18. There are existing laboratories for Research; a Banana Tissue Culture Laboratory and Winery. IFSU R&D has a Research Product Marketing and an Experimental area.
19. The IFSU Printing Service is very accessible for the printing needs of the R&D.
73
B. Weaknesses 1. Some faculty members are not involved in research. 2. Researches of some faculty researchers have no focused commodity, not aligned to spe-
cialization as observed during accreditation. 3. There are only a few faculty researchers having track records (ex. awards). 4. Some seminars, workshops, and trainings attended by personnel/faculty researchers are
not re-echoed. 5. Limited collaboration with other institutions. 6. There are only few faculty researchers with published outputs. 7. Transfer/ non-rehiring of non-permanent faculty researchers causing delays or non-
completion of researches. Also, most R&D personnel are contractual. 8. Lack of external seminars, workshops and trainings and benchmarking attended by R &
D personnel and researchers. 9. Colleges have no college R&D Office and staff, no college journal and no student jour-
nal. 10. Salary of Research Aides is low (as compared to DOST rate). 11. Research services have insufficient budget. Funds for each student’s research are limited.
Faculty members have limited capability to access external funding. 12. Attitude of community people (i.e. strong adherence to culture) towards specific re-
search topics/areas. 13. Few publication in ISI indexed/ Scopus/ CHED accredited journals; 14. Few citations, researchers with awards, national and local publications and printed inter-
national publication; 15. Colleges have no college journals (institutional journal). 16. There is no invention patented. Only a few research outputs were submitted for patent-
ing and majority of researches conducted are not patentable. 17. Copyrights are very few and these copyrighted works are not from research outputs. 18. There is very few commercialized research outputs. 19. No reports on students’ researchers being submitted to the R and D Office. 20. Inadequate laboratory facilities & equipment (vehicle, etc.); RD-related software
(statistics, plagiarism, etc) not available; Intermittent internet connection; Inadequate computer units & printers for researchers; Insufficient technical capability to operate laboratory; and Low quality of purchased equipment due to limited funds.
21. Limited services of the IFSU Printing Office for the publication and printing needs of R&D.
22. Inadequate information on GAD research priorities and thrusts resulting to limited GAD-related researches conducted.
C. Opportunities
1. There are local and international fora and journals available for presentation and publica-tion of research outputs.
2. Opportunities for local and international research capability building activities are availa-ble. There are also offerings for trainings and scholarships from partner-agencies/organizations.
3. There are diverse researchable areas/topics/commodities within the province and re-gion.
4. Experts from partner-agencies are available for support collaboration. 5. CHED-DBM policies on research performing schools as determined through the Nor-
mative Financing Scheme.
74
1. There are existing companies to fund/adopt technologies. 2. The “One Town One Product” policy set by the MLGU’s and DTI in Ifugao prov-
ince gives opportunities for many researchable aspects. 3. There are various external scientific for a, scholarship opportunities and funding
agencies for research activities. 4. Competition among proponents from different SUCs result to better and improved
quality of research outputs. 5. The LGUs are very supportive and communities are very cooperative to research
projects. 6. The research thrusts of funding agencies are aligned to the specialization of research-
ers. 7. External funding agencies are available. There are externally funded projects with ap-
proved budget allocation for ICTs. 8. Existence of laboratory facilities in other agencies for resource-sharing. 9. Presence of other printing services within the province and in nearby provinces. 10. Benchmarking opportunities are provided for GAD-related activities in other GAD
centers.
D. Threats 1. Permanent positions/ high paying jobs in other agencies where trained staffs transfer
to these agencies. 2. There is no activity for search for best researchers in spite of existing policy. 3. Slow procurement of supplies for the conduct of research. 4. Poor linkage between research and extension services.) 5. Inconsistencies of research evaluation results from the different reviewers. 6. No Intellectual Property Office in the university. 7. Possibility of non-observance by faculty researchers of IPCR policies and research
ethics. 8. Fast-paced technology shifting that may devaluate the research outputs.
9. Policies on IPR ownership ( Waiver when submitting to other journals).
10. Natural and manmade disasters affecting research activities/services and facilities. 11. Indifference of community people and stakeholders towards certain research activi-
ties/topics and government projects. 12. Competition with other agencies in availing external funds for research. 13. Competition among SUCs (SUC Leveling and for Normative Funding). 14. Strict COA regulations (i.e. for honoraria, etc.) which affects efficiency of implemen-
tation of projects.
III. Extension & Training (MFO 3 – Extension Services)
A. Strengths
1. The University Extension and Training Department has very competent middle man-agers and personnel with strong administrative support.
2. Faculty members actively participate in extension and training activities. 3. There is sufficient pool of experts for extension services. 4. Funds for extension activities are augmented by the Fiduciary & GAD funds. There
are also externally-funded projects. 5. There are established policies on faculty workload ensuring the contribution and in-
volvement of faculty members in extension activities.
75
6. Presence of workable extension packages (i.e. Planning to evaluation; thrusts/direction).
7. Active participation of students in extension/training activities. Mentoring of stu-dents on extension activities is conducted by faculty members.
8. Active partnership with other agencies and continuous collaboration with them. 9. Adoption of technologies and information are extended to partner agencies. 10. There are existing facilities for extension services such as the RDET building, Inte-
grated Model Farm and Training Center (ICT, laboratories).
B. Weaknesses 1. The Extension and Training department has limited permanent items for office staff.
There is also inadequate number of full time extension personnel in each college and campus.
2. There is lack of attendance to capability building or enhancement activities by exten-sion personnel.
3. There is no activity for search for best extensionists, etc.. in spite of existing policy. 4. Lesser incentive or reward (workload equivalence) for extension personnel is allocated
compared to those in research and instruction. 5. Poor disbursement system of extension and training supplies and materials which
cause delays in the procurement that also affect the extension activities. 6. Weak linkage between research and extension activities (Insufficient matured technol-
ogies generated from research, packaging of research for dissemination). 7. Extension activities are not regularly monitored and evaluated. 8. Exposure or involvement of students in extension programs is limited. 9. Few (same) faculty members are the ones involved in externally-funded extension pro-
jects. 10. Limited linkages for resource sharing with existing linkages 11. Fund for extension and training is very limited. 12. No vehicle for extension & training 13. Data bank needs improvement. 14. Few GAD-related extension programs being approved.
C. Opportunities
1. Extension projects/programs of faculty members are credited for promotion through the NBC 461 Evaluation.
2. Opportunities for seminars, workshops and trainings (local and international) are available.
3. The university has strong collaboration with other government and non-government agencies. Many funding agencies finance or share resources for extension services of the university. (External funding for extension projects - National and International).
4. There is strong demand of extension services. 5. The communities are very cooperative with the university’s extension programs. Also,
there are many willing farmer cooperators. 6. The university has existing facilities for extension services such as the community
model farms and the RDET building. STF funds are available as fund source for ICT equipment needs for extension services.
7. The university has Printing Services for IEC materials of the extension department; the IFSU website and other social media and other venues of information dissemina-tion (radio).
76
D. Threats 1. Contractual personnel who are trained in extension works tend to transfer to other agen-
cies that offer higher salary or permanent position. 2. Change of political leadership and designations within the University that may affect im-
plementation extension services in the communities. 3. Attitude of stakeholders towards government projects where some community people are
non-responsive to extension programs. Some stakeholders do not adopt technologies/ information being extended to them and some farmer-cooperators has forsaken the demo/model farms.
4. Strict COA regulations (incentives) for resources from other agencies. 5. Man-made and natural disasters that impede implementation of extension programs/
services. 6. Equipment for extension services are limited (laptop computers, LCD projector and cam-
era, equipment for printing of IEC materials and others). 7. Inflation rate that cause needed ICT equipments very expensive. Also, ICT equipments
deteriorate too quickly that they need to be upgraded very often.
IV. Income Generating Projects
A. Strengths
1. The University IGP is managed by a competent Director, together with capable and com-
mitted project managers.
2. Policies governing IGPs are established and in place.
3. There are established systems for monitoring and evaluation of projects such as regular
reporting and site visits.
4. A policy on income retention is in place where 20% of the net income is retained to sus-
tain the operations of the projects.
5. As business enterprises, the IGPs maintain some social responsibility activities such as
use of IGPs and personnel for extension services. Also, IGPs showcase best practices to
stakeholders or visitors.
6. Collaboration activities with stakeholders are maintained to improve the services of the
IGPs.
7. The IGP Office has adequate ICT equipment needed for the services.
8. Existing lands of the University are available and could be leased for income generation.
9. University IGPs are GAD-sensitive/ responsive.
B. Weaknesses
1. Some IGP managers who are faculty members are not full-time managing the project/s.
2. Needed equipments which are appropriate for certain IGPs are limited.
3. There is a need to improve the collection management system of IGPs.
4. Marketing of products/services of IGPs needs improvement to boost their sales and pro-
mote their brand in the market.
5. There is a need to improve the communication and information dissemination in IGPs
and among its personnel.
6. For certain IGP – on Loans, very limited number of employees are served due to lack of
ceiling on the loanable amount.
7. IGP personnel or workers in some projects are hired without contract of service.
77
C. Opportunities
1. Partnership and collaboration with partner-agencies of the University are available for pos-sible expansion and/or other business opportunities.
2. The university has available market for its IGPs which are mostly its students and person-nel.
3. The province, as a tourism site, could open opportunities for the University for IGP ex-pansion or other business opportunities.
4. Ordinances of LGUs help in improving the services of IGPs (i.e. sanitation, pro-environment ordinances).
D. Threats
1. There are competitors within the vicinity and in nearby places. 2. Trends in the market such as changing prices, unhealthy competition, changing customer
behavior and others affect the performance of IGPs. 3. Current trends in the government such as implementation of the K+12 affecting enrol-
ment and eventually the incomes of certain IGPs.
V. Administration and Governance A. Strengths
1. The administration is very supportive of personnel professional growth and development (i.e. trainings and seminars). Scholarship opportunities in the University are also provided.
2. Heads of administrative offices and personnel (both permanent and contractual) are quali-fied and competent.
3. The University organizational structure is in place and is regularly updated. Flowcharts in offices are prepared and posted in conspicuous areas. The University has manuals of oper-ation in place.
4. Systems are in place: Student Information and Accounting System – in the Main and Potia Campuses; and Performance Monitoring system.
5. The Board of Regents is very supportive of the University’s programs and projects. 6. The university adheres to policies from line agencies such as the CSC (on No Noon Break,
Citizens’ Charter); COA, DBM and NGA rules and regulations. 7. Administrative offices strictly adhere to deadlines (i.e. submission of reports), process
claims the soonest possible time, among others. 8. The university maintains a client feedback mechanism to assess and improve service quali-
ty. 9. Students are represented/involved in the planning and budgeting processes of the Univer-
sity and in the Board of Regents. 10. Students’ services are managed by a competent and capable Director, together with quali-
fied heads of units and personnel. 11. Policies, programs and services for students are in place and are implemented. 12. University facilities are being utilized/resource-shared with stakeholders. 13. GAA budget increases annually.
a. 2013 – P138 M b. 2014- P219M c. 2015 – P242 M
14. Collections from internally generated income increases annually: a. 2013 – P51,199M b. 2014 –P61,213M c. 2015 – P67,137M
78
15. New buildings and facilities are continuously increasing. Repairs and improvements are done regularly. Basic amenities in buildings (toilets with sink) are provided.
16. Budget for Capital Outlay increases annually: a. >2014 – P8.3M b. >2015 – P28.3M c. >2016 – P41.6M
15. Internet connectivity is available in most campuses. All administrative units have ade-quate ICT equipments with personnel who are equipped with basic ICT skills.
16. The university has a GAD focal point system with Plans and budget in place.
B. Weaknesses 1. Staff development program in all campuses is not efficient. There is unequal distribution of
training and seminar opportunities for administrative personnel. 2. Flowcharts of some offices and organizational structure are not posted in conspicuous areas.
Some units do not have flowcharts. 3. HR and Supply systems are no yet systemized electronically. Some systems are not efficiently
implemented (i.e. profile system, car policy system, etc.) 4. HR and frames specified in some citizens’ charter are not fully implemented by some offic-
es/units. 5. Implementation of programs and projects are now properly and regularly monitored. 6. Budget allocated for administrative units/offices is insufficient to finance operation. 7. Operations manual for each office is not in place. 8. Student Information and Accounting System (SIAS) is not installed in other campuses. 9. Some administrative offices are not assessed by clients. 10. Some campuses have no feedback mechanism to evaluate the frontline services. 11. Satellite campuses (especially smaller ones) have insufficient allotment of budget. 12. The university has insufficient housing services, laboratories, internet hub and facilities such
as multi-purpose/ conference halls. 13. Budget for students’ services is very limited. 14. Alumni support is weak. Alumni members are not cooperative; and there is no alumni office
in place. 15. The policy against “No Permit, No Test” affects collections from fees. Allowing employees
as guarantors to students with balances also pose some problems in collecting students’ fees. 16. Facilities for administrative services in most campuses are inadequate. Some campuses have
no Administration buildings. Basic amenities in administrative buildings/offices have no washing/brushing areas, kitchen, drinking fountains, mirrors in toilets, and others. A number of administrative facilities need repair.
17. Sports facilities (i.e. covered gym to accommodate activities during rainy season) are not in place in most campuses.
18. The university lacks personnel for maintenance of ICT and for car pooling system. 19. Not all campuses have access to internet connectivity. 20. Gender-related PAPs are limited. There is difficulty among personnel in understanding GAD
mainstreaming due to inadequate information dissemination.
79
C. Opportunities 1. Partner-agencies offer training and scholarship opportunities for administrative personnel. 2. There are alumni who are willing to fund or sponsor projects/programs of the University.
The Alumni Association is also funding programs/activities of the university. 3. Current trends in the government and policies help improve services such as the Results-
based Performance Management System (RBPMS), Normative Financing Formula (NFF), and SUC Leveling, among others.
4. Partner-agencies and linkages exist to help boost the funding leverage of the university for infrastructure projects.
5. Laws and policies (Building Code and related laws, GAD policies) compel the university to improve the quality of infrastructure projects and to provide the needed basic amenities for people in the buildings being constructed.
6. LGU ordinances (“Walang Plastikan sa Lamut”, No Smoking, Curfew Hours, No Spitting of Moma) facilitate implementation of university policies and/or help improve quality of ser-vices.
7. Establishments of TESDA assessment centers provided quick access for skills assessment. 8. Online processing systems of other agencies (i.e. DBM, CHED) eases transactions. 9. International/National GAD mandates that promote gender sensitivity in programs and pro-
jects.
D. Threats 1. Reforms in Higher Education that affect implementation of existing programs and
projects. 2. Government laws, policies and standards for higher education (NFF, PBB, SUC Lev-
eling, etc. ) challenge the university to be flexible and adjust to new trends. 3. Delay of payment by sponsors of the tuition fees of scholars as well as reports (i.e.
list of scholars) which delay proper planning and reporting. 4. Poor security of student housing services. 5. There are neighboring public and private colleges/universities with better facilities. 6. Natural and man-made calamities and disasters affecting implementation of projects
and programs. 7. Laws and policies (Building Code and related laws, GAD policies) which cost the
university in its adherence to these laws and policies and make reforms to adjust to them.
8. There are existing issues/ problems on land grabbing/squatting on University’s lots. 9. Indifferent attitude of personnel and community people (clientele) towards GAD due
to differences in culture and beliefs.
80
Mid-Term Plan Assessment: Development Plan 2014-2017
Annex I
1. Organizational Outcomes (OO) Note: Accomplishments as of Third Quarter 2015.
Legend:
Accomplished at least70% of target. Accomplished below 70% of target but could catch up until 4th quarter. No/Lack official report; Needs verification; Incomplete Data; Could catch up
until 4th quarter.
OO 1 - Relevant and quality tertiary education ensured to achieve inclusive growth
Performance Indicators Baseline 2015
Target
Actual (As of Sept. 30,
2015)
Remarks/ Status of Accomplish-
ment
PI 1. Average percentage passing in licensure exam by the SUC graduates over national average percentage passing in board programs covered by the SUC
1.83 (75/40.98)
1.85 (75/40.54)
1.51 or 150.75%
PI 2. Percentage change in number of graduates tracked who are employed in jobs related to their undergraduate programs
No data available
25% Survey on
going
PI 3. Percentage change in number of graduates in priority programs
61 36.07% (83) 0.59% (6)
OO 2 - Access of deserving but poor students to quality tertiary education
Performance Indicators Baseline 2015 Target
Actual (As of Sept.
30, 2015)
Remarks/ Status of Accomplish-
ment
PI 1. Percentage change in number of students in priority programs awarded financial aid
6675 1.99 (6808) 0
PI 2. Percentage change in number of students of students awarded finan-cial aid who completed their degrees
3919 3.01 (4107) 1.02
81
OO 3 - Higher education research improved to promote economic productivity and innovation
Performance Indicators Baseline 2015
Target
Actual (As of
Sept. 30, 2015)
Remarks/ Status of
Accomplishment
PI 1. Number of R&D outputs patented/ commercialized/ used by the industry or by other benefi-ciaries
(a) Applied for patenting 2 3
(9) 7 pa-tented; 2
copyrighted
(b) Patented or commercialized
(c ) Adopted by industry/small and medium enterprises / LGU/ Community-based organization
PI 2. Number of research and de-velopment outputs in the fields of agro-industrial* technology pub-lished in CHED recognized refer-eed journals.
2 4 24
PI 3. Percentage in number of fac-ulty engaged in research work ap-plied in any of the following:
(a) Pursuing advanced research degree programs (Ph.D.)
17 41.18 (24) 47% (25)
(b) Publishing (investigative, or basic and applied scientific re-search or
(c ) Producing technologies for commercialization or livelihood improvement
82
OO 4 - Community engagement increased
Performance Indicators Baseline 2015
Target
Actual (As of
Sept. 30, 2015)
Remarks/ Sta-tus of Accom-
plishment
PI 1. Percentage change in number of partnerships with LGUs, indus-try, small and medium enterprises, and local entrepreneurs and other national agency in developing, im-plementing or using new technolo-gies relevant to agro-industrial* development
2 100% (4) 200% (6)
PI 2. Percentage change in number of poor beneficiaries** of technol-ogy transfer/ extension programs and activities leading to livelihood improvement
1,073 36%
(1,460) 122% (2387)
2. Major Final Outputs (MFO) Note: Accomplishments for FY 2014 and FY 2015 (as of September 30, 2015)
Legend:
Accomplished at least70% of target. Accomplished below 70% of target but could catch up until 4th quarter. No/Lack official report; Needs verification; Incomplete Data; could catch up until
4th quarter.
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
2014 ACTUAL
2015 TARGET
2015 ACTUAL
Remarks/ STATUS
PI 1. Total Number of Graduates
1016 715 1367
PI 2. Percentage of Total Graduates that are in Priority Courses
68% 68%
74.76%
(1022/ 1367)
83
PI 3. Average of Passing Per-centage of Licensure Exams by the SUC Graduates/ Na-tional Average Percentage Passing Across all Disciplines covered by the SUC
201% 57.50%
150.75%
PI 4. Percentage of Programs Accredited (cumulative)
68% 60% 72%(28/39)
PI 5. Percentage of Gradu-ates who Finished Academic Program According to the Prescribed Timeframe
74% 71%
73% (1207/1639)
MFO 2 – Research Services
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
2014 ACTUAL
2015 TARGET
2015 ACTUAL
REMARKS/ STATUS
PI 1. Number of Research Stud-ies Completed in the last three years
69 45
75
FY 2013 - 25
FY 2014 - 30
FY 2015 (as of Oct. 31) - 20
PI 2. Percentage of Research Outputs Published in Recog-nized Journal in the Last 3 Years
58% 40/69)
50%
85% (64/75)
FY 2013 - 16
FY 2014 - 24
FY 2015 (as of Oct. 31) - 24
PI 3. Percentage of Research Projects Completed within the Original Project Timeframe. (current year only)
100% (30/30)
75%
100% (20/20)
84
MFO 3 – Extension Services
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
2014 ACTUAL
2015 TARGET
2015 ACTUAL
REMARKS/ STATUS
PI 1. Number of Persons Trained Weighted by the Length of Training
6431.25 3,800
4657.25
PI 2. Number of Persons Pro-vided with Technical Advice
881 800
724
PI 3. Percentage of Trainees who Rate the Training Course as Good or Better
88.62% 75%
94%
(3029/3207)
PI 4. Percentage of Clients who rate the Advisory Services as Good or Better
85.53% 75%
97%
(701/724)
PI 5. Percentage of Requests for Training Responded to within 3 days of Request
87.64% 65%
96% (51/53)
PI 6. Percentage of Requests for Technical Advice that are Responded to within 3 Days
70% 45%
99.72%
(717/719)
PI 7. Percentage of Persons who Receive Training or Advi-sory who Rate Timeliness of service delivery as Good or Bet-ter
88.18% 60%
96%
(3021/3147)
STO– Support to Operation
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
2014 ACTUAL
2015 TARGET
2015 ACTUAL
REMARKS/ STATUS
PI 1. Submission of Opera-tions Manual on or before Jan. 15, 2015
New 100% (submit on
due date)
Submitted on due date
PI 2. % of students who rate student services as good or better
92% 92% 90%
85
GASS – General Administration and Support Services
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
2014 ACTUAL
2015 TARGET
2015 ACTUAL
REMARKS/ STATUS
A. BUR
PI 1. % of total obligations to total releases
99%
90% (72,287/8031
9)
73% (175,161/ 240,200)
PI 2. % of total disbursements to total obligations (excluding PS)
87%
87% (62,890/72,2
87)
94% (47,929/ 51,146)
B. Submission of PFM to COA and DBM
PI 1. BFAR (No. of quarterly re-ports submitted)
100% (4/4) 100% 75% (3/4)
PI 2. Report on Ageing of Cash Advance
100% (1/1) 100%
Submitted report be-fore due
date (Nov. 25, 2015).
PI 3. COA Financial Reports
100% (5/5) 100%
100% (5/5) Submitted to COA on
Feb. 13, 2015.
C. APCPI
New 100%
Uploaded on due date
(Dec. 1, 2015).
D. Submission of APP (2015 APP)
100% 100%
Submitted/Uploaded Nov. 29,
2014.
3. Programs, Projects, and Activities Note: Accomplishments for FY 2014 and FY 2015 (As of September 30, 2015) Legend:
Accomplished at least 90% of target for 2014 and at least 70% of target for 2015. Accomplished below 90% of target for 2014; below 70% of target for 2015 No/Lack official report; For verification; Incomplete Data
86
Goal 1. Pursue Excellence in Instruction Objective 1. To rationalize Instruction
PPAs 2014
Target
2015 Target
2014 Actual
2015 Actual
Status of Accomplish-
ment
No. of programs amalgamated 10 0 10 -
No. of programs reviewed and revised
0 4 0 3
No. of curricular programs pro-posed
2 0 - -
Objective 2. To upgrade the quality of instruction
PPAs 2014
Target
2015 Target
2014 Actual
2015 Actual
Status of Accomplish-
ment
% compliance to COD/COE re-quirements
No. of faculty members who at-tended SWT
95 105 96 121
No. of faculty on scholarship for Ph.D.
19 21 - 6
% of faculty who are engaged in any of the ff: (a) Pursuing research degree
25% 25% - 40%
(b) Publishing (pedagogical, instructional materials)
8% 10% - 3.37%
(c ) conducting research work 25 25 - 13
% of faculty rated by their students as excellent
15% 15% 12.99% 23.39%
Objective 3. To enhance access to quality higher education
PPAs 2014
Target
2015 Target
2014 Actual
2015 Actual
Status of Accomplish-
ment
No. of automated enrolment ser-vices
2 3 1 1
% of students who get their grades online
40 50 0 0
No. of enrollees 6972 7450 7352 7334
87
Goal 2. Pursue Excellence in Research and Development Objective 1. To intensify conduct of research
No. of graduates in priority cours-es
763 822 837 1081
% of graduates who finished their course on the prescribed timeframe
73% 74% 74% 73%
Rank in RAATI Competition
1st 1st 1st
(Main); 4th (Potia)
1st
Rank in regional competitions – PE & Sports
2nd 2nd 4
Rating of students on library services VG VG VG VG
No. of career placement conducted 11 15 9 21
% of students served (Medical-Dental) 75% 80% 36% 1.88%
% of students served (student housing) 15% 17% 20%
Award in regional competition (student publication)
5th 4th 3rd
% of students availing scholarship 70% 70% - 71.52%
No. of programs with internation-al OJT
1 1
No of programs with inbound and outbound students
1 1
PPAs 2014
Target
2015 Target
2014 Actual
2015 Actual
Status of Accom-plishment
No. of research conducted/ongoing
35 35 55 47
No. of researchers with track record
10 11 12 13
No. of externally-funded research 10 11 10 9
Objective 2. To increase visibility of research outputs in the international, national and local arena
PPAs 2014
Target
2015 Target
2014 Actual
2015 Actual
Status of Accom-plishment
No. of researches published 16 18 48 21
No. of research presented 28 30 39 55
No. of citations 15 20 16 15
No. of researchers awarded 3 4 17 7
88
Goal 3. Pursue Excellence in Extension and Training Objective 1. To package and transfer technologies responsive to the needs of target
communities for stakeholders empowerment and self-reliance
Objective 3. To generate, package and patent relevant technologies
PPAs 2014
Target
2015 Target
2014 Actual
2015 Actual
Status of Accom-plishment
No. of inventions patented/copyrighted
0 1 8 20
No. of copyrights submission 2 5 3 2
No. of inventions not patented but utilized
0 1 0 3
PPAs 2014
Target
2015 Target
2014 Actual
2015 Actual
Status of Ac-complishment
No. of communities assessed 4 5 7 19
No. of packaged technologies 12 14 33 26
No. of trainings, seminars con-ducted
55 59 91 53
No. of viable demonstration pro-jects implemented
3 3 4 7
No. of persons trained 2770 2795 5295 2387
No. of persons-days utilized for trainings
5000 5200 6431 4657
Objective 2. To intensify monitoring, evaluation and impact assessment of extension programs/activities conducted for technical advisory and strategic planning
% of clients who rate training as good or better
91% 91% 88.62% 94.44%
No. of clients benefited (advisory services)
140 800 881 724
% of clients who rate the advisory services as good or better
75% 80% 85.53% 96.46%
% of persons who receive training or advisory services as good or better
92.3% 92.50% 88.18% 93%
89
% of requests for Training Re-sponded to within 3 days of Re-quest
45% 50% 70% 99.5%
% of requests for Technical Ad-vice that are Responded to within 3 Days
65% 70% 87.64% 94%
% of Persons who Receive Train-ing or Advisory who Rate Timeli-ness of service delivery as Good or Better
60% 88.18% 60% 96%
No. of adopters 278 281 304 150
No. of adopters engaged in viable enterprises
30 33 46 43
Objective 3. To level up functional linkages and networking with other institutions at local, regional, national and international levels for resource sharing, fund
PPAs 2014
Target
2015 Target
2014 Actual
2015 Actual
Status of Accom-plishment
No. of LGUs assisted in planning 10 12 21 31
No. of active linkages/partnership 2 - 11 45
No. of externally funded extension projects
2 3 3 4
Goal 4. Pursue Excellence in Resource Generation
Objective 1. To enhance income generating projects
PPAs 2014
Target
2015 Target
2014 Actual
2015 Actual
Status of Accom-plishment
No. of new IGP established 1 2 11
No. of building and facilities re-paired
1 1 9
No. of stocks procured 2 2 24
No. of research technology com-mercialized
1
90
Objective 2. To maximize the utilization of land for income generation
PPAs 2014
Target
2015 Target
2014 Actual
2015 Actual
Status of Accom-plishment
No. of land use plans prepared 2 2
No. of business partners with MOA
2 2 19
No. of project proposals prepared and submitted
10 10 16
Objective 3. To enhance and improve operation and administration of IGP
PPAs 2014
Target
2015 Target
2014 Actual
2015 Actual
Status of Accom-plishment
% of clients who rated IGP ser-vices as good or better
85% 85%
No. of market outlets consulted 3 4 7
No. of policy formulated or re-vised
1
Goal 5. Pursue Excellence in Administration and Governance Objective 1. To continue modernize the university
PPAs 2014
Target
2015 Target
2014 Actual
2015 Actual
Status of Ac-complishment
No. of projects ongoing (infra) 4 5 10 17
No. of repaired /improved facili-ties
21 23 9 26
No. of new laboratories 4 4 3 6
Objective 2. To continue improving administrative proficiency and financial management
PPAs 2014
Target
2015 Target
2014 Actual
2015 Actual
Status of Accom-plishment
No. of SWT attended by admin. staff
5 7 1 31
No. of internet connections 12 13 14 30
No. of online services 1 1
91
Objective 3. To adopt good governance by heart and action
PPAs 2014
Target
2015 Target
2014 Actual
2015 Actual
Status of Accom-plishment
% of reports submitted on time 100% 100%
% of information available and accessible
100% 100% 90%
% of sustained sanitation and cleanliness
70% 80%
% of land assets protected and secured
60% 70% 30%
Objective 4. To improve quality and administrative services
PPAs 2014
Target
2015 Target
2014 Actual
2015 Actual
Status of Accom-plishment
Average rating of employees/client on non-academic services
>3.5 >3.5
Accreditation of IFSU as prime HR
Level 2 Level 2 Level 2
No as-sessment by CSC
