56
nimal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

Animal behaviour as a biomarker

of chemical stress

Ecotoxicology

Page 2: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

Implement quantitative behavioural responses in the assessment of chemical stress in animals

Development of computerized video tracking systems for automated measurements of animal locomotor behaviour

To establish mechanistic links between cellular responses, behavioural changes and higher level effects of pollutants

To propose specific measurable components of animal behaviour as non-invasive health biomarkers in ecotoxicological research and environmental management

Scientific objectives

Page 3: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

Impaired fitness

Disturbed population andecosystem stability- social behaviour- predator-prey interactions- reproduction- growth

Chemical pollution- speciation- bioavailable residues

Sensoryinterference

Absorption

Molecular responsesPhysiological responses

Structural damage

Exposure / effectbiomarkers

Effect / healthbiomarkers

Page 4: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

x1 , y1 , time1x2 , y2 , time2x3 , y3 , time3

xi , yi , time i

Page 5: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

Red

Green

Blue

Size

Shape

0 255

0 255

0 2550 0 1

Page 6: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology
Page 7: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology
Page 8: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology
Page 9: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

Path lengthVelocitiesTurning behaviourActivity/Rest periods

Page 10: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

Impaired fitness

Disturbed population andecosystem stability- social behaviour- predator-prey interactions- reproduction- growth

Chemical pollution- speciation- bioavailable residues

Sensoryinterference

Absorption

Molecular responsesPhysiological responses

Structural damage

Exposure / effectbiomarkers

Effect / healthbiomarkers

Page 11: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology
Page 12: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology
Page 13: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology
Page 14: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

Uptake of dimethoate in woodlice

Control activity (22 hrs) Exposure (22 hrs)

14 C-Dimethoate0, 140, 280, 560

g ha-1

14C

Page 15: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

ng

a.i.

/mg

wo

od

lou

se

Residual uptake of Dimethoate in woodlouse

at three application rates

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

meters

140 g / ha

240 g / ha

560 g / ha

Page 16: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

Impaired fitness

Disturbed population andecosystem stability- social behaviour- predator-prey interactions- reproduction- growth

Chemical pollution- speciation- bioavailable residues

Sensoryinterference

Absorption

Molecular responsesPhysiological responses

Structural damage

Exposure / effectbiomarkers

Effect / healthbiomarkers

Page 17: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

Prolonged effects of Dimethoate in woodlice

Night 1 Night 2 Night 3 Night 24

Control Exposure (140 g a.i./ha) Recovery

Control

140 g a.i./ha corresponds to 1/10 of the LD20 – 48 hours

Page 18: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

1 2 3 24

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

40

60

80

100

120

140

60

70

80

90

100

110

60708090

100110120130140

Time in activity

Turning rate

Path

Average velocity

Per

cen

tag

e ac

tivi

ty (

Nig

ht

n/N

igh

t 1)

Night number

Prolonged effect of Dimethoate on woodlouse locomotor parameters

Exposed

Controls

Page 19: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology
Page 20: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology
Page 21: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

Tim

e in

ve

loci

ty in

terv

als

Velocity intervals

Page 22: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

Prolonged effect of an organophosphate on woodlouse velocity frequency distribution

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

Sec

on

ds

in e

ach

vel

oci

ty in

terv

al

Velocity interval

Control

34 hrs exposure

21 days recovery

Controls

Exposed (140 g / ha)

Page 23: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

Exposure of a carabid beetle to copper during larval development

9 days10 days32 days

Cu

Cu

Page 24: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

Altered locomotor behaviour in adult female carabid beetlesexposed to copper during larval development

Walkeddistance

met

er

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Time inlocomotion

Sec

10

-3

0

5

10

15

20

Average velocity

mm

/ se

c

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

Movementdisruption

Sto

ps /

wal

ked

met

er60

80

100

120

Turningrate

Deg

rees

/ se

c

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

ControlsExposed

Page 25: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

24 hours

Dimethoate application:- 0% - 7% - 15% - 26% - 59%

of LD50 (48H)

AChE inhibition and locomotor behaviour

AChE

Page 26: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

Correlation between organophosphate application rate and acetylcholinesterase activity in a carabid beetle

Application rate (µg dimethoate / g fw beetle)

0 1 2 3

AC

hE

-akt

ivit

y(

µm

ol /

min

/ g

fw

bee

tle

)

0,0

0,1

0,2

0,3

0,4

0,5

Males Females

Page 27: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

Males

Pa

th l

en

gth

(m)

50100150200250300350

Tim

e in

act

ivit

y(

ho

urs

)

0

1

2

3

4

Ave

rag

e ve

loci

ty(m

m/s

ec)

05

1015202530

0,0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6

01234567

Females

50100150200250300350

0

1

2

3

4

5

10

15

20

25

30

AChE aktivity (µmole/min/g fw)

0,0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5

Tu

rnin

g r

ate

(deg

rees

/mm

)

01234567

Pat

h le

ng

th

(m)

Tim

e in

act

ivit

y

( h

ou

rs)

Ave

rag

e ve

loci

ty

(mm

/sec

)

Tu

rnin

g r

ate

(deg

rees

/mm

)

Relationship between AChE activity andlocomotor behaviour in a carabid beetle

Control, Mean ± SE 5% LD50 (48 h), Mean ± SE10% LD50 (48 h), Mean ± SE23% LD50 (48 h), Mean ± SE

Page 28: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

Impaired fitness

Disturbed population andecosystem stability- social behaviour- predator-prey interactions- reproduction- growth

Chemical pollution- speciation- bioavailable residues

Sensoryinterference

Absorption

Molecular responsesPhysiological responses

Structural damage

Exposure / effectbiomarkers

Effect / healthbiomarkers

Page 29: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology
Page 30: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology
Page 31: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology
Page 32: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology
Page 33: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology
Page 34: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology
Page 35: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

Time (sec)0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800

Dis

tan

ce (

mm

)

0

5

10

51

20

Pat

h l

en

gth

(m

m)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Collembola

Mite

Predator-prey interactions in a mite-collembola system

GROUP No. 1 2Number of contacts: 6 10Time to 1. contact: 526.5 136.9

Maximum duration: 524.6 666.6Minimum duration: 2.4 2.4

Total duration 559.8 826.5

Maximum distance: 14.7 15.3Minimum distance: 0.0 0.0Average distance: 4.6 4.6Time to max. meet.: 811.8 293.5Time to capture: 811.8 171.8Contacts until cap.: 4 2

ANIMAL No. 1 2 3 4Walked path 913 1034 419 275Walked path to cap. 830 1034 145 275Active time 1051.6 705.4 690.6 167.6Active time to cap.: 776.4 705.4 690.6 167.6

Page 36: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

Time (min)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Cu

mu

lati

ve s

urv

ival

of

Co

llem

bo

la

0,3

0,4

0,5

0,6

0,7

0,8

0,9

1,0

Females

Males

Kaplan-Meier analysis of collembolan survival- females are more efficient hunters than males

Page 37: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

What is decisive for capture ?Size experiment

Sizes of mite and collembola: randomly paired (totally 81 cases)

Parameters considered in Cox Regression Model:Sex of miteSize of mite and collembolaSize ratioAverage velocities of mite and collembola, respectivelyFrequency of contactsTime to first contact

Parameters of importance for capture:Sex of miteSize ratioAverage velocity of miteFrequency of contacts

Page 38: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

What is decisive for capture ?Starvation experiment

- mite starvation: 0, 4, 7, 22, 60 days (totally 131 cases)

Parameters considered in Cox Regression Model:Mite hungerAge of mite and collembolaTime in locomotor activity (mite and collembola)Mite and collembolan average velocitiesFrequency of contactsTime to first contact

Parameters of importance for capture:Time in locomotor activity of miteAverage velocity of miteFrequency of contacts

Page 39: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

0 500 1000 1500 2000

Time (sec)

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0C

um

ula

tive

su

rviv

al

Effect of dimethoate on the survival of collembola in a Mite-Collembola predator-prey system

0.75 mg dimethoate / kg soil Controls

Kaplan-Meier analysis

Page 40: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

Conclusions

Unbiased measurements of changes in animal behaviour:

● Displays dose-response relationships

● Is decisive for residual uptake of xenobiotics

● Reveals long-term effects of chemical stress

● Is mechanistically linked to altered biochemical and physiological processeswithin the animal

● Provides a functional and measurable interface between individual andpopulation disturbances

● Identifies pollutions with chemical impact on animal health

Page 41: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

perim

eter

fence

Edge

Reference

Plastics recycling factory

Plastic

N

Sampling of woodlice at the plastics recycling factory in Thetford, UK

100 m

October 1991

Page 42: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology
Page 43: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

June 1995

Page 44: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

Reference Edge Plastic

g m

etal

/g d

ry w

eigh

t

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

Pb

Cd

Zn

Cu

Body-burden of heavy metals in woodlicefrom the three sampling sites

Page 45: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

Time in activity

mm

/s

**

sec

on

ds

x 10

0

met

erd

egre

es/m

m

deg

rees

/mm

mo

ves/

m

Turning rateTurn bias Movement rate

Average velocityPath length

R E P

0

15

30

45

60

R E P

0

15

30

45

60

75

R E P

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

R E P

0,0

0,5

1,0

1,5

2,0

R E P

0,0

0,1

0,2

0,3

0,4

0,5

R E P

0

20

40

60

80

Locomotor behaviour of woodlice collected atPlastic layer, Edge of plastic layer and Reference site

Page 46: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

Mean glycogen and total protein contents for woodlice collected

at the Reference site, the Edge and the Plastic layer

R E PGlycogen 36.8 ± 9.9 8.1 ± 0.7 *** 8.3 ± 0.9 ***Total protein 32.9 ± 1.9 38.0 ± 0.9 28.3 ± 1.5

µg/mg fresh weight ± standard error (n=16)

Page 47: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

FoundryZn 400 - 2000 ppmPb 140 - 1500 ppmCr 10 - 100 ppmNi 11- 40 ppmSpots of tarturpentenebenzenexylenepetrol

100 Km

Background levelsZn 5.8 - 59.7 ppmPb 4.5 - 19.2 ppmCr 2.7 - 30.4 ppmNi 0.9 - 15.1 ppm

(5-95% Fractile)

Page 48: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology
Page 49: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

f Path AvVel AV Move TurnRate Max. Vel 001 1107. . . . .0.33 0.26 log( ) 5.55 0.04 .

Page 50: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology
Page 51: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

Woodlice collected at clean and polluted field sitesshow differences in locomotor behaviour

Discriminant value

-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3

Silkeborg

Als

Hadsten

Thy

Hg-sludge

Foundry

a

b

a

a

a

a

Page 52: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

Mean metal concentrations in woodlicehepatopancreas and carcass.

µg metal / g dry wt. tissue ± S.E.

Zn Pb

Pooled control group

Carcass 41.3 ± 1.2 (19) 2.12 ± 0.3 (17)

Hepatopancreas 542 ± 114 (19) 243 ± 53 (16)

Foundry group

Carcass 70.7 ± 5.6 (19) 13.1 ± 3.8 (19)

Hepatopancreas 15770 ± 1093 (19) 205 ± 19 (19)

Page 53: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

Rubbish dump

Gas works

2500 ppm Zn2 ppm Cd250 ppm Pb

Cyanide 25 pptTar 120 ppt

Phenol 190 ppmBenzene 200 ppmToluene 150 ppm

Phenanthrene 8400 ppmBenzo(A)pyrene 1300 ppm

Page 54: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology
Page 55: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

Discriminant value

-0,6 -0,4 -0,2 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0

Control 1

Control 2

Control 3

Control 4

Coal-gas

Rubbish dump

Tar-asphalt

Altered locomotor behaviour in woodlice from polluted sites

a

a

a

a

a

b

b

Page 56: Animal behaviour as a biomarker of chemical stress Ecotoxicology

Applicability of the behavioural biomarker

● Can be run by technical personnel with only little training

● Provide a measurement of animal health at presumed polluted sites

● Identifies pollutions with chemical impact on animal fitness

● Includes long-term effects of chemical stress

● Fully automated data sampling and statistical calculations

● Fast (hours) and cheap (< 5.000 DK per site) screening method