Upload
nani
View
35
Download
4
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
The Cosmic Microwave Background:. New Challenges. Angelica de Oliveira-Costa. University of Pennsylvania. XI Advanced School of Astrophysics. Campos do Jordao, September 2002. The Importance of CMB Polarization:. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Angelica de Oliveira-CostaUniversity of Pennsylvania
The Cosmic Microwave Background:
New Challenges.
XI Advanced School of Astrophysics Campos do Jordao, September
2002
The Importance of CMB Polarization:
1. Polarization measurements can substantially improve accuracy with which parameters are measured by breaking the degeneracy between certain parameter combinations.2. It also offers an independent test of the basic assumptions that underly the standard cosmological model.
Where does CMB Polarization comes from (Hu & White 1997)?
CMB polarization is induced via Thomson scattering, either at decoupling or during a later epoch of reonization.
The level of polarization induced is linked to the local quadrupole anisotropy of radiation incident on the scattering eletrons. The level of polarization is expected to be 1%-10% of the amplitude of the temperature anisotropies.
Under coordinate transformations, the Q and U maps transform into a “vector” field on the celestial sphere described by the quantities E and B.E and B can correlate with each other, and with the temperature T. By parity, <EB> and <TB> are zero, <TE> has the largest signal, <EE> is smaller, and <BB> should be zero (except for the cases of gravity-waves present in the last scattering or the existence of polarized foregrounds).
Important things to know (Kamionkowski et al. 1997,
Zaldarriaga 1998):
TT TE TB
TE EE EBTB EB BB
Matter Buget
1. g = Photons
2. b = Baryons (H,He,…)
3. d = CDM
4. fu = Neutrinos
5. L = Lambda (Dark Energy)
6. k = Curvature
Input Fluctuations
7. As = Scalar Normalization
8. At = Tensor Normalization
9. ns = Scalar Tilt
10. nt = Tensor Tilt
Gastrophysics
11. = Reonization Optical Depth
From Combinations of Parameters
12. h = Hubble Constant
Others
Foregrounds, Topology, Defects, etc.
Our Cosmological Model: Polarization Movies:
www.hep.upenn.edu/~angelica/polarization.html
Matter Buget
1. g = Photons
2. b = Baryons (H,He,…)
3. d = CDM
4. fu = Neutrinos
5. L = Lambda (Dark Energy)
6. k = Curvature
Input Fluctuations
7. As = Scalar Normalization
8. At = Tensor Normalization
9. ns = Scalar Tilt
10. nt = Tensor Tilt
Gastrophysics
11. = Reonization Optical Depth
From Combinations of Parameters
12. h = Hubble Constant
Others
Foregrounds, Topology, Defects, etc.
Our Cosmological Model: Polarization Movies:
www.hep.upenn.edu/~angelica/polarization.html
Matter Buget
1. g = Photons
2. b = Baryons (H,He,…)
3. d = CDM (d = d h2)
4. fu = Neutrinos
5. L = Lambda (Dark Energy)
6. k = Curvature
Input Fluctuations
7. As = Scalar Normalization
8. At = Tensor Normalization
9. ns = Scalar Tilt
10. nt = Tensor Tilt
Gastrophysics
11. = Reonization Optical Depth
From Combinations of Parameters
12. h = Hubble Constant
Others
Foregrounds, Topology, Defects, etc.
Our Cosmological Model: Polarization Movies:
www.hep.upenn.edu/~angelica/polarization.html
Matter Buget
1. g = Photons
2. b = Baryons (H,He,…)
3. d = CDM
4. fu = Neutrinos (fn =HDM/T)
5. L = Lambda (Dark Energy)
6. k = Curvature
Input Fluctuations
7. As = Scalar Normalization
8. At = Tensor Normalization
9. ns = Scalar Tilt
10. nt = Tensor Tilt
Gastrophysics
11. = Reonization Optical Depth
From Combinations of Parameters
12. h = Hubble Constant
Others
Foregrounds, Topology, Defects, etc.
Our Cosmological Model: Polarization Movies:
www.hep.upenn.edu/~angelica/polarization.html
Matter Buget
1. g = Photons
2. b = Baryons (H,He,…)
3. d = CDM
4. fu = Neutrinos
5. L = Lambda (Dark Energy)
6. k = Curvature
Input Fluctuations
7. As = Scalar Normalization
8. At = Tensor Normalization
9. ns = Scalar Tilt
10. nt = Tensor Tilt
Gastrophysics
11. = Reonization Optical Depth
From Combinations of Parameters
12. h = Hubble Constant
Others
Foregrounds, Topology, Defects, etc.
Our Cosmological Model: Polarization Movies:
www.hep.upenn.edu/~angelica/polarization.html
Matter Buget
1. g = Photons
2. b = Baryons (H,He,…)
3. d = CDM
4. fu = Neutrinos
5. L = Lambda (Dark Energy)
6. k = Curvature
Input Fluctuations
7. As = Scalar Normalization
8. At = Tensor Normalization
9. ns = Scalar Tilt
10. nt = Tensor Tilt
Gastrophysics
11. = Reonization Optical Depth
From Combinations of Parameters
12. h = Hubble Constant
Others
Foregrounds, Topology, Defects, etc.
Our Cosmological Model: Polarization Movies:
www.hep.upenn.edu/~angelica/polarization.html
Matter Buget
1. g = Photons
2. b = Baryons (H,He,…)
3. d = CDM
4. fu = Neutrinos
5. L = Lambda (Dark Energy)
6. k = Curvature
Input Fluctuations
7. As = Scalar Normalization
8. At = Tensor Normalization
9. ns = Scalar Tilt
10. nt = Tensor Tilt
Gastrophysics
11. = Reonization Optical Depth
From Combinations of Parameters
12. h = Hubble Constant
Others
Foregrounds, Topology, Defects, etc.
Our Cosmological Model: Polarization Movies:
www.hep.upenn.edu/~angelica/polarization.html
Matter Buget
1. g = Photons
2. b = Baryons (H,He,…)
3. d = CDM
4. fu = Neutrinos
5. L = Lambda (Dark Energy)
6. k = Curvature
Input Fluctuations
7. As = Scalar Normalization
8. At = Tensor Normalization
9. ns = Scalar Tilt
10. nt = Tensor Tilt
Gastrophysics
11. = Reonization Optical Depth
From Combinations of Parameters
12. h = Hubble Constant
Others
Foregrounds, Topology, Defects, etc.
Our Cosmological Model: Polarization Movies:
www.hep.upenn.edu/~angelica/polarization.html
Matter Buget
1. g = Photons
2. b = Baryons (H,He,…)
3. d = CDM
4. fu = Neutrinos
5. L = Lambda (Dark Energy)
6. k = Curvature
Input Fluctuations
7. As = Scalar Normalization
8. At = Tensor Normalization
9. ns = Scalar Tilt
10. nt = Tensor Tilt
Gastrophysics
11. = Reonization Optical Depth
From Combinations of Parameters
12. h = Hubble Constant
Others
Foregrounds, Topology, Defects, etc.
Our Cosmological Model: Polarization Movies:
www.hep.upenn.edu/~angelica/polarization.html
Matter Buget
1. g = Photons
2. b = Baryons (H,He,…)
3. d = CDM
4. fu = Neutrinos
5. L = Lambda (Dark Energy)
6. k = Curvature
Input Fluctuations
7. As = Scalar Normalization
8. At = Tensor Normalization
9. ns = Scalar Tilt
10. nt = Tensor Tilt
Gastrophysics
11. = Reonization Optical Depth
From Combinations of Parameters
12. h = Hubble Constant
Others
Foregrounds, Topology, Defects, etc.
Our Cosmological Model: Polarization Movies:
www.hep.upenn.edu/~angelica/polarization.html
Princeton IQU Experiment (PIQUE):
Ground based experiment (roof of Jadwin Hall).FWHM = 0.235o (100<l<600).Operates at 90 (and 40) GHz.Scans a ring of radius 1o around the NCP (144 pixels).
Hedman et al. (2001)
Sensitivity ~ 3KHEMT correlation receiver.
Team:
M. Hedman
D. BarkatsJ. Gundersen
S. StaggsB. Winstein
A. de Oliveira-CostaM. TegmarkM. Zaldarriaga
Part of analysis effort:
Expected foregrounds < 0.5K.
PIQUE Analysis:
Headman et al. (2001):TE <14K 211 (+294,-146)TB <13K 212 (+229,-135)TE(TB=0) <10K
de Oliveira-Costa et al (2002):TTE <17K
TTB <20K
We compute 5 power spectra T,E,B,TE & TB with a QE method, and later complement it with the Likelihood analysis.
TSK =50K
Netterfield et al. (1997):
TEB ???
50 bands w/ dl=20 till l=1000
To do better we need reduce PIQUE pixel noise.
Polarization Observations of the Large Angular Regions (POLAR):
Ground based experiment (Madison, WI).FWHM=7o (2<l<20).Operates at 30 GHzScans at fixed =43o (300 pixels).
O’Dell (2002)
Keating et al. (2001)
Expected sensitivity ~ 1-5K.HEMT correlation receiver.
Team:B. KeatingC. O’Dell
P. Timbie
A. PolnarevJ. Steinberger
Part of analysis effort:A. de Oliveira-
CostaM. Tegmark
POLAR Results:
O’Dell, Ph.D Thesis (2002)
Keating et al. (2001):
TE <10K
TB <10K
TE(TB=0) < 8K
de Oliveira-Costa et al (2002):
TTE <13K
TTB <11K
TDMR =20K
Smoot et al. (1992):
TEB < 4K
3 bands w/ dl=10 till l=30
(Normalized Likelihood Contours)
(Band power estimates - same results when average the bands)
“Leakage”: Tegmark & de Oliveira-Costa et al. (2001).
1. E and B are symmetric:
2. Leakage drops with l (E/B
3. Map-shape is important:
4. Sensitivity is negligible
variance is dominant, this
There are equal leakage from
E to B and vise-versa.
separation works well for
l>>dl).
The narrowest dimension of
the map is the limiting factor.
compared with sky coverage:In a situation where sample
tends to make windowns
slightly lobsided.
B2002, l=20: B2002, l=70:
Circle, l=70:
B2002, l=20 (disentangle):
5. There is no leakage between T & TE and E & TE.
6. There is no leakage between TE & TB, E & EB and B & EB: de Oliveira-Costa et al. (2002). 7. Leakage between E & B can be completed removed: Bunn et al. (2002).
Balloon Observations Of Millimetric Extragalactic Radiation
ANd Geophysics (BOOMERanG):
Ballon experiment (two 10 day flight).Operates between 150 to 450 GHz.
FWHM=10’ (50<l<1000).
Bolometers. Sensitivity ~ 7K (“small regions”) and ~22K otherwise.
2nd flight: 80 & 800(o)2.
de Bernardis et al. (2000)
1st flight: 80 & 800(o)2.
Team:UCSB: J. Ruhl, K. Coble, T. Montroy, E. TorbetCaltech: A. Lange, B. Crill, V. Hristov, B. Jones, K. Ganga, P. MansonJPL: J. BockU.Mass: P. MauskopfU.Penn: A. de Oliveira-Costa, M. TegmarkU.Toronto: B. NetterfieldU.La Sapienza: P. de Bernardis, S. Masi, F. Piacentini, F. Scaramuzzi, N. VittorioIROE: A. BoscareliQueen Mary: P. Ade
Microwave Anisotropy Probe (MAP):
Frequencies(GHz): 22 30 40 60 90
FWHM(): 0.93 0.68 0.53 0.35 0.23
Sensitivity: ~35K (all channels & 0.3 x 0.3 pixels)Detector: Differential Radiometer (with polarization)
More info at: http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov
Data release: Jan 2003! Data from 1st full sky scan
Other CMB Polarization Experiments:
Experiment FWHM n(GHz) Receiver Sensitivity Area Site
Polatron 2.5’ 100 Bolometer 11K 5313(’)2 OVRO
†RoPE 2o 9 HEMT 5K 560(o)2 LBNL Compass 15’ 30,40&90 HEMT 8K U.Wisc.
MAP 13-41’ 30,40,60&90 HEMT 19K All sky Space L2
Planck-LFI 14’&10’ 70&100 HEMT 6K All sky Space L2
Planck-HFI 8’&5’ 143&217 Bolometer 6K All sky Space L2SPOrt 7o 22,32,60&90 HEMT 80% sky Space Station
(300<l<2000)
(2<l<50)
(l<650)
(l<600)
(l<1500)
(2<l<20)
BOOMERanG 10’ 150,250&450 Bolometer 7K,22K 80-800(o)2 SP (50<l<1000)
Maxipol 10’ 140&420 Bolometer 1.4K NM
DASI 10-15’ 30 HEMT 10(o)2 SP(100<l<900)
CBI 3’-6o 30 Interferometer 3 of 100(o)2 Atacama (2<l<2000)
CapMap 3’ 30,90 HEMT 0.2K 3(o)2 Princeton (300<l<2000)
Small Scale CMB Experiments:
We propose a Center for High Resolution CMB studies (CfHRC). This center will develop a Millimeter Bolometer Camera (MBC) which will be implemented in the Atacama Cosmology Teslescopy (ACT).
Operates at frequencies 145, 225 & 265 GHz.Ground based experiment at Atacama desert, Chile.
Sensitivity/pixel ~ 2, 8 & 16K (64 nights of quality data).
FWHM=1.7, 1.1 & 0.93’.Scans only in azimuth with the ability to cross-link elevations.
Team:
Haverford: S. Boughn, B. Partridge
U.Penn: A. de Oliveira-Costa, M. Devlin, B. Jain, M. Tegmark
Princeton: N. Jarosik, R. Lupton, L. Page, U. Seljak, D. Spergel, S. Staggs, D. Wilkinson
Rutgers: A. Kosowsky
U.Toronto: B. Netterfield
NASA/GSFC: H. Moseley
NIST: K. Irwin
CfHRC Goals:
Measure the primary anisotropy beyond the MAP & Planck resolution limits.
Measure the amplitude of the CMB gravitational lensing, and therefore probe the mass power spectrum at 1Mpc scales at z~1-2.
Find galaxy clusters at z<1 through SZ effect.
Detect signature of reonization at z~10 through Vishniac effect.
Find all extragalactic mm-wave point sources in 200(o)2 to a sensitivity of 1mJy.
Galactic Microwave Emission:
Objectives
1. Accurate modeling and subtraction of Galactic foreground contamination in order to correct measure the CMB power spectrum.
2. Unique opportunity to understand the Galactic emission processes between 10 to 103 GHz.
Smoot et al. (1992)
Galactic Microwave Emission:
Objectives
1. Accurate modeling and subtraction of Galactic foreground contamination in order to correct measure the CMB power spectrum.
2. Unique opportunity to understand the Galactic emission processes between 10 to 103 GHz.
Smoot et al. (1992)
Synchrotron Emission:
Dust Emission:
Free-Free Emission:
Reynolds et al. (2001)
COBE/DMR
At 31GHz we expect DIRBE traces free-free.
Smoot et al. (1992)
Saskatoon
OVRO result (Leitch et al. 1997) is much higher than expected for a free-free component.
19 GHz
Spinning dust grains predicts a turn-over at lower frequencies (Draine & Lazarian 1998).
QMAP
Tenerife
Smoking gun: evidence for a turn-over and WHAM correlations only at b<15o.
Jones (1999)
Galactic Microwave Emission:
Objectives
1. Accurate modeling and subtraction of Galactic foreground contamination in order to correct measure the CMB power spectrum.
2. Unique opportunity to understand the Galactic emission processes between 10 to 103 GHz.
Smoot et al. (1992)
Galactic Microwave Emission:
Objectives
1. Accurate modeling and subtraction of Galactic foreground contamination in order to correct measure the CMB power spectrum.
2. Unique opportunity to understand the Galactic emission processes between 10 to 103 GHz.
Smoot et al. (1992)
QMAP Foregrounds:
QMAP Power Spectrum:
Polarized Foregrounds:
Residual foregrounds after cleaning 5 MAP channels:
Conclusions:
CMB Polarization is likely to be a goldmine of cosmological information, allowing improved measurements of many cosmological parameters and numerous important cross-checks and tests of the underlying theory.
CMB Small Angular Scale maps enables new fundamental cosmological tests.
Our ability to measure cosmological parameters using the CMB will only be as good as our understanding of the microwave foregrounds.