Upload
bill
View
29
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Exoplanet Exploration Program, Planet Detection Test-bed: Latest results of planet light detection in the presence of starlight. Andrew J. Booth, Stefan R. Martin, Frank Loya, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of technology. Summary. Test-bed goals - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
A.J.Booth et al., Planet Detection Testbed 1
Exoplanet Exploration Program, Planet Detection Test-bed: Latest results of planet light detection
in the presence of starlight
Andrew J. Booth, Stefan R. Martin, Frank Loya,
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of technology
A.J.Booth et al., Planet Detection Testbed 2
Summary
Test-bed goals Introduction to the Planet Detection test-bed (PDT) Additions to Test-bed since 2006 Nulling performance Planet detections Future plans
A.J.Booth et al., Planet Detection Testbed 3
Test-bed Goals Lab simulation for a near infrared terrestrial exoplanet
characterization mission 10um, dual nulling interferometer X-array “Emma”, formation flying Other testbeds deal with:
– formation flying– broadband nulling
PDT emulates 4 beam nulling and cross combining for:– Optical arrangements– Control systems– Planet signal extraction
A.J.Booth et al., Planet Detection Testbed 4
Test-bed Goals
Detect “planet” signal at 106:1 contrast ratio with star with SNR 3
Stable nulls of 105:1– Local zodiacal light at ~10-4 of star mean better nulls superfluous
Extra 100:1 contrast ratio below null depth obtained by:– Chopping planet signal - interferometrically
– Rotation of array through 360º and averaging
A.J.Booth et al., Planet Detection Testbed 5
Introduction to the PDT
Star laser source
Planet source
Star thermal source
Detector
pinholes
Cross-combiner
Nuller 1
Nuller 2π
π
A.J.Booth et al., Planet Detection Testbed 6
Introduction to the PDT
Null starlight Chop cross combiner optical path from fringe peak on one side of
star to fringe peak on other side of star (star at inflection point) Planet signal is difference in flux on two sides of chop
A.J.Booth et al., Planet Detection Testbed 7
Introduction to PDT
A.J.Booth et al., Planet Detection Testbed 8
Test-bed updates since 2006 Closed loop tip-tilt (few 10Hz) and shear (few Hz) servos
with detectors working at 850nm
Tip-tilt laser source
Star source
π
nuller
Tip-tilt detector
Tip-tilt detector
Shear detector
Shear detector
Shear mirror
Tip-tilt mirror
A.J.Booth et al., Planet Detection Testbed 9
Test-bed updates since 2006 Fringe tracking at ~2.5um, ~1Hz
– Star thermal source
– Control signal is difference of two beam combiner outputs
– One for each nuller and cross combiner
laser metrology tracking at ~1.5um, ~100Hz– Up stream and down stream from beam train mid point
Star laser source
Planet source
Star thermal source
Detector
pinholes
Cross-combiner
Nuller 1
Nuller 2π
π
A.J.Booth et al., Planet Detection Testbed 10
Test-bed updates since 2006
Phase plates – Path matching at nulling and fringe tracking
wavelengths
– Nullers:• Null at 10um
• Fringe signal inflection point at 2.5um
– Cross combiner• Chop 10um fringe peak to trough
• Chop from 2.5um inflection point to inflection point
A.J.Booth et al., Planet Detection Testbed 11
Test-bed updates since 2006
Planet input optics with optical path modulation to allow simulation of array rotations
Star laser source
Planet source
Star thermal source
Detector
pinholes
Cross-combiner
Nuller 1
Nuller 2π
π
A.J.Booth et al., Planet Detection Testbed 12
Nulling performance Short term (100s) null depth
– Max null depth 1.6×106:1
– Mean null depth 9×105:1 (goal: better than 105:1)
– Short term noise due to poor metrology tracking
0 50 100 150 200 25010
-8
10-7
10-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
101
Time (secs)
Flu
x
peak
shutter
A.J.Booth et al., Planet Detection Testbed 13
Nulling performance
Long term null stability– Drift of < few 106:1 over 104s (goal : better than <105:1)
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 1000010
-8
10-6
10-4
10-2
100
102
time(s)
log
null
shutter
peak
A.J.Booth et al., Planet Detection Testbed 14
Planet Detection
Linear dual Bracewell array configuration Planet at ~0.1urad from star (~1AU at ~50pc)
Time (sec)
A.J.Booth et al., Planet Detection Testbed 15
Planet Detection
Normalized cross correlation of data with templates
A.J.Booth et al., Planet Detection Testbed 16
Simulated Emma Array planet signal Simulated “Emma” array planet signal Array ratio 6:1, radius 60m, planet at 0.375urad
Array Rotation (degrees)Nor
mal
ized
pla
net c
hopp
ed s
igna
l
A.J.Booth et al., Planet Detection Testbed 17
Future Plans
Emma array simulations Broad band nulling from Ar-arc source with dispersed
dectection– Will allow further ~10x sensitivity improvement using wavelength
fitting of fringe rotation data, allowing planet detection at realistic 107 contrast ratios.