42
Andrea Iffland Andrea Iffland Preparing a Design and Monitoring Framework P P roject roject P P erformance erformance M M anagement anagement S S ystem ystem Results-focused Project Design and Management

Andrea Iffland

  • Upload
    lefty

  • View
    43

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Andrea Iffland. P roject P erformance M anagement S ystem. Preparing a Design and Monitoring Framework. Results-focused Project Design and Management. Activities. Outputs. Outcomes. Impacts. Inputs. MfDR. (1) Planning (Defining desired results). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Andrea Iffland

Andrea IfflandAndrea Iffland

Preparing a Design and Monitoring Framework

PProject roject PPerformanceerformanceMManagement anagement SSystem ystem

Results-focused Project Design

and Management

Page 2: Andrea Iffland

MfDR

Inputs Activities OutcomesOutputs Impacts

(1) Planning(Defining desired

results)

(2) Measure performance

(Monitoring and evaluation)

(3) Use performance information (Feedback-loop)

Page 3: Andrea Iffland

Project Performance Project Performance Management System - Management System - PPMSPPMS

•DesignDesign

outlines a systematic approach outlines a systematic approach totoProject and Program Project and Program

•Implementation Implementation

•EvaluationEvaluation

Page 4: Andrea Iffland

Components of PPMSComponents of PPMS

Design and Monitoring Framework

Development

Outcome

Programs, Projects, TAs

EvaluationManage-

mentDesign

RRPTA

paper

PAM PPR/TPR

PCR/TCR

PPER/TPER

Post Evaluatio

n

Reporting

Page 5: Andrea Iffland

• Design and Monitoring Design and Monitoring Framework is a tool only! Framework is a tool only!

• The The ProcessProcess improves improves prospects for results. prospects for results.

Page 6: Andrea Iffland

The Process The Process Situation Assessment

• Problem Analysis

• Stakeholder Analysis

Solution Development

• Results Chain Analysis

• Project Strategy

• Objectives Analysis

Page 7: Andrea Iffland

The ResultDesign and Monitoring Framework

Problem analysis

Objectives

Results Chains

Design Assumptions

& Risks

Performance

Targets

Data Sources

Design Summary

A & RIMPACT

ACTIVITIES & MILESTONES INPUTS

OUTPUT A & R

OUTCOME A & R

Assumptions

& Risks

Performance

Targets

Data Sources

Design Summary

A & RIMPACT

ACTIVITIES & MILESTONES INPUTS

OUTPUT A & R

OUTCOME A & R

Assumptions

& Risks

PerformanceTarget/

Indicator

Data Sources Monitoring Mechanism

Design Summary

A & RIMPACT

ACTIVITIES & MILESTONES INPUTS

OUTPUT A & R

OUTCOME A & R

Page 8: Andrea Iffland

Projects are defined….Projects are defined….

as interventions to create as interventions to create positive change in an existing positive change in an existing situationsituation

Page 9: Andrea Iffland

Think about this…..Think about this…..

• All projects and All projects and programs bring about programs bring about CHANGECHANGE

• People and institutions People and institutions make change succeed make change succeed or failor fail

• Who are the persons behind the achievements and difficulties in your project?

Page 10: Andrea Iffland

Stakeholder AnalysisStakeholder AnalysisA diagnostic tool toA diagnostic tool to

• identify key stakeholdersidentify key stakeholders

• clarify their interests clarify their interests

• comprehend their perception of the comprehend their perception of the problem problem

• specify their resources (supportive specify their resources (supportive and destructive)and destructive)

• outline their mandate outline their mandate

Stakeholder analysis is a continuous process

Page 11: Andrea Iffland

Helpful Stakeholders to Helpful Stakeholders to enlist….enlist….

• Advocates – – Idea creators, designersIdea creators, designers

• Champions - to lead the change- to lead the change

• Supporters - “critical mass- “critical mass”

• Decision Makers - to approve the activation of - to approve the activation of critical critical change enablers – change enablers – policies, funds, policies, funds, people people

• Opinion Leaders - decision-swayers, special - decision-swayers, special interest interest groups that groups that sustain people’s sustain people’s awareness of the need for change awareness of the need for change

(lobby groups, media)(lobby groups, media)

Page 12: Andrea Iffland

GroupsGroups InterestsInterests Problem Problem PerceptionPerception

ResourcesResources MandateMandate

1.1.

2.2.

3.3.

4.4.

Stakeholder Table Stakeholder Table

Page 13: Andrea Iffland

The Process The Process Situation Assessment

• Problem Analysis

• Stakeholder Analysis

Solution Development

• Results Chain Analysis

• Project Strategy

• Objectives Analysis

Page 14: Andrea Iffland

““Doctor, doctor!”Doctor, doctor!”I’ve been bitten by a mosquito and

exposed to malaria so I need

chloroquine urgently

Limited information

Diagnosis without

participation

Jumping to conclusions

Instant prescriptions and solutions

Page 15: Andrea Iffland

Problem TreeProblem TreeA diagnostic tool to A diagnostic tool to

• analyse the existing analyse the existing situation surrounding a situation surrounding a given problem context given problem context

• identify major problems identify major problems associated with the associated with the stated negative stated negative conditioncondition

• visualize cause-effect visualize cause-effect relationships and relationships and interrelationships interrelationships

Page 16: Andrea Iffland

How to state How to state problems….problems….

• Negative conditionNegative condition

• Owned by a stakeholder/group (whose Owned by a stakeholder/group (whose problem is it?)problem is it?)

• Specific and clearSpecific and clear

Example:Example:

Wrong – “Poor quality of public services”

Better – “Urban poor do not have access to safe drinking water

Page 17: Andrea Iffland

Statements to avoid….Statements to avoid….

Lack of funds Lack of funds

PovertyPoverty

CorruptionCorruption

Solutions phrased as problemsSolutions phrased as problems

Page 18: Andrea Iffland

Debt Service is crowding out Public

Spending

Problem Analysis

Public Infrastructure is in poor condition

Quality Social Services provided by government

agencies is below standard

Government sees itself as

main provider of public services

Private Sector

activities declining

Income Tax Collection

is weak and inefficient

SOEs run operating

losses

Tax evasion is not prosecuted

Government regulations and

red tape excessive

CEOs are political appointees with no

business background

Legislation provides loop holes for tax evaders

MoF operates an excessive budget

deficit

Starter Problem

SOE receive subsidies

Public Sector Wages and Salaries absorb 70% of recurrent budget

Tax Revenues fall short of estimates

Causes

Effects

WHY?

Page 19: Andrea Iffland

Case Study Case Study TasksTasks

• Read the backgroundRead the background

• Construct a problem Construct a problem treetree

• Use the cards and pin Use the cards and pin boards boards

• Can use your own Can use your own experience experience

to go beyond available to go beyond available information information

• Present back to the Present back to the Group Group

30 minutes

Page 20: Andrea Iffland

Tips for using Meta CardsTips for using Meta Cards• Write your own statement on a card.Write your own statement on a card.

• Write only one idea on a card.Write only one idea on a card.

• Express your statement in a concise Express your statement in a concise sentence using no more then 3 lines. sentence using no more then 3 lines.

• Make your sentence specific.Make your sentence specific.

• Stick to the facts and avoid abstractions Stick to the facts and avoid abstractions and generalizations.and generalizations.

• Write your cards before you begin Write your cards before you begin discussion.discussion.

Page 21: Andrea Iffland

Doesn’t matter what form it takes as long as it helps us

understand the problem

Page 22: Andrea Iffland

The Process The Process Situation Assessment

• Problem Analysis

• Stakeholder Analysis

Solution Development

• Results Chain Analysis

• Project Strategy

• Objectives Analysis

Page 23: Andrea Iffland

Objectives TreeObjectives Tree

• Gives a picture of the “changed situation”

• Helps stakeholders imagine what will be required to achieve the change and maintain more control over planning the change

• Facilitates the formulation of success indicators that are realistic, acceptable, and owned by the stakeholders

Page 24: Andrea Iffland

Objectives Tree – How?Objectives Tree – How?Process involves converting problem into a Process involves converting problem into a ‘positive condition’ then checking – ‘positive condition’ then checking –

• Does the objective statement make sense as an Does the objective statement make sense as an “improved condition?” [realistic? possible?]“improved condition?” [realistic? possible?]

• Have we left out anything in our problem analysis that Have we left out anything in our problem analysis that will need to be addressed to achieve this desired will need to be addressed to achieve this desired “improved condition?” “improved condition?”

• What do stakeholders think or how might they react? What do stakeholders think or how might they react?

• What might be possible risks and assumptions? What might be possible risks and assumptions?

Page 25: Andrea Iffland

Objectives Analysis

MoF operates a balanced budget

Development Objective

SOE generate profits

Public service employment is efficient and cost effective

Tax Revenues exceeds

estimates

Ends

Means

HOW?

Private sector employment and profits increase

Inland Revenue operates efficient

tax collection

SOE operations are

commercialized

SOE operations are privatized

Public service is right-sized

Selected public services are

privatized

Government concentrates on basic functions

Legislation stipulates tax

evasion as criminal offence

Legislation eliminates tax

loop holes

Government deregulates private sector investments

Government provides investment incentives

Government agencies

provide a well maintained

public infrastructure

Population has access to Social

Services of international

standard

Page 26: Andrea Iffland

Case StudyCase Study

• Break into the same groups as Break into the same groups as beforebefore

• Refer to your Problem Tree Refer to your Problem Tree

• Develop an Objective statement Develop an Objective statement for each problem (don’t skip any!) for each problem (don’t skip any!)

• Remember to include the Remember to include the stakeholder in the statement of stakeholder in the statement of objectiveobjective 15 minutes 15 minutes

Page 27: Andrea Iffland
Page 28: Andrea Iffland

The Process The Process Situation Assessment

• Problem Analysis

• Stakeholder Analysis

Solution Development

• Results Chain Analysis

• Project Strategy

• Objectives Analysis

Page 29: Andrea Iffland

Results Chains

• Helps in assisting stakeholders “own” Helps in assisting stakeholders “own” the project by analyzing their “part” in the project by analyzing their “part” in the Objectives Treethe Objectives Tree

• Clarifies the changes that stakeholders Clarifies the changes that stakeholders aspire to have and checks on their aspire to have and checks on their willingness and readiness to carry these willingness and readiness to carry these outout

Page 30: Andrea Iffland

How to do a Results Chain

•Identify the owners of means-end chains in Identify the owners of means-end chains in the Objectives Treethe Objectives Tree

•Have each stakeholder-owner assess the Have each stakeholder-owner assess the feasibility of achieving their means-end chain feasibility of achieving their means-end chain before deciding whether this should be before deciding whether this should be included in the project designincluded in the project design

External Consultants and Experts should share their experiences to encourage stakeholders to consider the change

Page 31: Andrea Iffland

Preparatory Steps forPreparatory Steps forScoping the Scoping the

Project/Program Project/Program

Ask “WHAT”

Validate the Validate the positive conditions in the Objectives Tree in the Objectives Tree with those knowledgeablewith those knowledgeable (stakeholders themselves) and (stakeholders themselves) and other projects (development experts)other projects (development experts)

Ask “HOW”

Clarify means to achieve these changes then check whether Clarify means to achieve these changes then check whether these are these are attainable and and wanted by those who need to by those who need to make these changes. (Conduct stakeholder workshops with make these changes. (Conduct stakeholder workshops with those who are directly involved in the changes)those who are directly involved in the changes)

Ask “WHO”

Motivate Stakeholders to consider the change. Showing Stakeholders to consider the change. Showing models and testimonials could be helpful.models and testimonials could be helpful.

Page 32: Andrea Iffland

Helpful criteria Helpful criteria in deciding on Results Chains in deciding on Results Chains

AVOIDBias in solutions

• Desirable?• Less risk?• Faster or slower

implementation?• Less or more cost?• Greater or lesser chance of

sustainability? • Acceptability of the change

to members of the group? to

• the institutions’ culture?

Page 33: Andrea Iffland

From Objectives Tree to From Objectives Tree to Design SummaryDesign Summary

• Each stakeholder group declares what Each stakeholder group declares what change (results chains) they can work on. change (results chains) they can work on.

• By consolidating their different results chains, By consolidating their different results chains, stakeholders agree on a common statement stakeholders agree on a common statement of of Outcome, Outputs, indicators and targets Outcome, Outputs, indicators and targets

Page 34: Andrea Iffland

Linkage between the Linkage between the Objectives Tree and the Objectives Tree and the

DMFDMF

Inputs

Impact

Outcome

Outputs

Activities

Selected Results Chains

DMF

Page 35: Andrea Iffland

1st Step1st Step - - OutcomeOutcome Design Summary

OUTCOME

IMPACT

OUTPUTS

ACTIVITIES

Why do you want to implement this project/program?

What is the problem or constraint you hope to resolve ?

What IMMEDIATE OUTCOME do you expect to achieve from using the completed outputs?

Style of Outcome Statement

‘MoF operates a Balanced Budget’

[change statement, not an action statement, that will either involve beneficiaries using the project outputs to achieve an outcome, or performance

changes of systems or institutions]

Page 36: Andrea Iffland

2nd Step - 2nd Step - IMPACTIMPACTDesign Summary

OUTCOME

IMPACT

OUTPUTS

ACTIVITIES

What is the high level, long range ‘VISION’ to which this project will contribute? Should be the same as or support sector and thematic impacts as stated in the CSP and roadmaps

Style of Impact Statement

The Population has assess to high quality social services and well maintained public

infrastructure

Page 37: Andrea Iffland

3rd Step - 3rd Step - OutputsOutputsDesign Summary

OUTCOME

IMPACT

OUTPUTS

ACTIVITIES

What, specifically, will the project produce, provide or leave behind?

What are the “DELIVERABLES”?

e.g. Infrastructure, New Policies & Procedures, Strengthened Institutions, Skilled Personnel

Examples Output Statement

1. Inland Revenue operates an efficient tax collection system.

2. Private sector investments are deregulated. 3. SOE operations are commercialized.

Page 38: Andrea Iffland

4th Step4th Step - - ActivitiesActivitiesDesign

Summary

OUTCOME

IMPACT

OUTPUTS

ACTIVITIES

What, specifically, is the project GOING TO DO?

For example: ‘Build…’, ‘Train…’, ‘Equip…’, ‘Develop Policy….’, ‘Draft Legislation…’, ‘Conduct Surveys…’ all action statements

Sample Activities

Output 1. Inland Revenue operates an efficient tax collection system.1.1 Revise tax legislation closing loop holes (10/2008)1.2 Prosecute tax evaders. (8/2008)1.3 Install IT-based tax system (5/2008) 1.4 Training tax officers. (2/2008)Output 2. Private sector investments are deregulated. 2.1 Review current legislation and red tape.2.2 Consult private sector representatives on their concerns. 2.3 Draft legislative amendments. 2.4 Advise private sector on legislative changes.

Page 39: Andrea Iffland

55thth Step - Inputs Step - InputsDesign Summary

OUTCOME

IMPACT

OUTPUTS

ACTIVITIES INPUTS

What RESOURCES does the project need to do its work? e.g. Consultants, Equipment, Civil Works, Training, Funding, including counterparts

Government – $5 million Personnel 150 PM – $2 million Transport and logistics – $1.5 millionOperating Expenses – $1.5 million Donor Agency– $20 millionConsulting services 50 PM – $1.25 millionTraining, study tours – $2.75 million Contingencies – $1 millionBeneficiaries/Private Sector Personnel 200 PM – participation in planning, monitoring and evaluation

Page 40: Andrea Iffland

The ResultThe ResultDesign and Monitoring Framework

Problem analysis

Objectives

Results Chains

Design Assumptions

& Risks

Performance

Targets

Data Sources

Design Summary

A & RIMPACT

ACTIVITIES & MILESTONES INPUTS

OUTPUT A & R

OUTCOME A & R

Assumptions

& Risks

Performance

Targets

Data Sources

Design Summary

A & RIMPACT

ACTIVITIES & MILESTONES INPUTS

OUTPUT A & R

OUTCOME A & R

Assumptions

& Risks

PerformanceTargets/

Indicators

Data Sources

/Reporting Mechanism

Design Summary

A & RIMPACT

ACTIVITIES & MILESTONES INPUTS

OUTPUT A & R

OUTCOME A & R

Page 41: Andrea Iffland

Recommendations:Recommendations:Improve development Improve development

performance performance

• Involve they stakeholders in all stages • Let stakeholder determine what change they aspire and are committed to implement • Hold them responsible for their commitment • Jointly monitor progress and adjust design when necessary.

Page 42: Andrea Iffland

Thank you. Thank you.