7
Society for the Study of Early China ANCIENT CHINA IN NEW CHINA Author(s): Doris Dohrenwend Source: Early China, Vol. 2 (FALL 1976), pp. 89-94 Published by: Society for the Study of Early China Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23351289 . Accessed: 06/09/2013 09:14 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. . Society for the Study of Early China is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Early China. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.119.168.112 on Fri, 6 Sep 2013 09:14:12 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

ANCIENT CHINA IN NEW CHINA

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ANCIENT CHINA IN NEW CHINA

Society for the Study of Early China

ANCIENT CHINA IN NEW CHINAAuthor(s): Doris DohrenwendSource: Early China, Vol. 2 (FALL 1976), pp. 89-94Published by: Society for the Study of Early ChinaStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23351289 .

Accessed: 06/09/2013 09:14

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

.

Society for the Study of Early China is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access toEarly China.

http://www.jstor.org

This content downloaded from 128.119.168.112 on Fri, 6 Sep 2013 09:14:12 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Page 2: ANCIENT CHINA IN NEW CHINA

two major exhibits, ancient bronzes and pottery from ancient to modern times. A collection of Kwang tung regional pottery of all periods was shown us in the Canton historical museum.

These displays and others which we saw, such as the one in a Suchow silk factory contrasting the horrors of pre-liberation life with the joys of

present-day working conditions, were put together to form excellent learning centers. Ancient pottery, for example, was exhibited together with models, pictures and maps showing manufacturing techniques and sites, distribution areas and so forth. Bronze tools were not merely museum pieces, but were given functional meaning by being mounted on reconstructed wood handles. Any visitor to a museum would receive a clear impression of the quality of traditional Chinese life and the skills of the Chinese people.

We, who traveled rapidly from place to place, also obtained a striking view of the regional diver sity of past and present Chinese life. The isola tion of the Canton area until after the end of the

Han dynasty showed up well in the poor quality of

early pottery found in the area and displayed in

the regional museum. Such an insight is lost in the typical national collection featuring the best

products of an age.

The museums were not without problems, however.

Collections were generally inadequately housed and

displayed. Large numbers of pieces in rooms dis

tracted one's attention from the quality of each.

In Shanghai, recently excavated bronzes were mixed

in with older unauthenticated pieces from formerly private collections and with replicas of pieces kept elsewhere. Heat and humidity were usually not controlled. In Peking, we were told that paintings earlier than M1ng would not be shown until the

weather moderated. Where controls existed, they were

less than perfect. In Changsha, the Han lacquer ware was kept well moisturized in sealed glass cases, but water droplets on the inside of the glass obscured

most of the view of the pieces.

The trip described above which, besides

museums, also included visits to a factory, commune, middle school and residential area, was an ideal

introduction to China for someone like me who must

present the entire range of Chinese history to his

students and to the community in which he lives. It was obviously not a trip designed for the special ized interests of the historian of early China. I would urge the Early China Society to make every effort to organize a trip for its members to meet

their particular needs.

Perhaps because we were regarded as a group of

tourists, the museum officials who acted as our guides were administrators rather than scholars. None whom

we met had an extensive acquaintance with their

collections or even with Chinese history in general. We received running commentaries which summarized

the labels in the cases. Deeper questioning elicited no response. There was little, if any, knowledge of

research literature. One of our Shanghai museum

guides even was vague about basic Marxism, continual

ly referring to the feudal landlords of Shang slave

society.

The only real brush with Chinese scholarship we

had came at Peking's National Minorities Institute. Here we met the director of research, Professor

Fei Hsiao-t'ung. Fe1 bubbled over with enthusiasm during a brief tour of the facilities. He told us of the enormous library collection, the work of

developing new scripts and publishing newspapers in

minority languages and, most thrilling to him of all, the study of small minority groups and their classifi cation as different types of slave or feudal societies. This experience brought home to me, as no amount of

reading had done, the excitement to be found in

China's scholarly circles when totally untapped areas of research emerge as a consequence of accept

ing the Marxist approach to history and society.

ANCIENT CHINA IN NEW CHINA

Doris Dohreriwend

(Royal Ontario Museum)

The Art and Archaeological Delegation which visited the People's Republic of China 1n November

of 1973 was jointly sponsored by the National Academy of Sciences of the United States and the Scientific and Technical Association of the PRC. Originally Intended to be chiefly archaeological, the delegation ultimately Included specialists in Chinese painting, a historian and a conservationist as well as those of us more immediately concerned with "underground art" or recent archaeological finds (see List 1).

Starting at Kuangchou (Canton) we flew to Peking, and five days later to S1an. From S1an we travelled by (excellent) train through the historic Eastern Pass to Loyang. Then to Chengchou, Nanking, Suchou, Shanghai, Hangchou and back to Canton. We parted where,we had met as a group at the start of this

trip, in Hong Kong.'

Supplied with lists of places we wanted to visit and specific works of art we hoped to see, the Chinese

authorities enabledus to make good use of our time

in their country even though they were unable to

grant all our wishes. On the go seven days a week

from roughly 8:30 A.M. to 6 P.M.—and with many a banquet, film or theatrical performance in the even ing'—we saw, I think, all that could be seen in one month at that time of art and archaeology in New China. We were permitted to photograph freely at all Museums and sites visited, the only restriction being photography from the air. As to other practical matters: we could have used, in that winter month, more warm clothing designed for indoor use, more

ordinary cold remedies (hospital care in China proved excellent and was freely given in more than one case),

and more film.

89

This content downloaded from 128.119.168.112 on Fri, 6 Sep 2013 09:14:12 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Page 3: ANCIENT CHINA IN NEW CHINA

To see material from controlled excavations with provenance data, we visited such important provincial museums as those at Si an, Chengchou and Nanking. Other provincial museums, unfortun

ately, were closed or inaccessible to us. This was

true of the Szechuan and Yunnan institutions which we had not dared hope to visit, but true also of the Hunan Provincial Museum at Changsha which we had requested.

In the museums we did visit, only a fraction of what must be vast holdings was on view. Storage was all but impenetrable. Artifacts on display were chosen to represent major historical develop ments rather than full runs of visual types or art historical trends. Labels (in Chinese) were clear but brief. In many cases only the site was mentioned. Information as to whether an object came from a closed find or undisturbed burial or from elsewhere about the site was not given. When one asked for detail of this-kind "on the spot" it was not always given, nor was it usually looked up in the museum records. The use of graphics to explain the context, function and meaning of objects on display was, however, rich and Impressive. Reproductions filling major gaps in local collections were often effective and usually labelled.3 An occasional wealth of

material, as of neolithic jade in Nanking, allowed fuller display and acted as a stimulant.

Except for objects in the Shanghai and Chengchou Museums and in the Study collections of the archaeo

logical institutes, it was difficult to see things "in hand" or to study details at close range. In

Shanghai objects were removed from cases for study and photographing. At Chengchou, thanks to persistent questioning by Virginia Kane about the contents and

relationship of the various Shang levels and sites in the area, the Honan Provincial Museum staff

brought forth from storage a large number of pots and sherds believed Neolithic, transitional, middle and late Shang. They also brought out and hung rubbings from stones and tiles with early pictorial designs for study by the painting specialists among us. These were among the notable instances of kind ness to us on the Chinese side,,4

Due to the presence of Tom Chase, Chief Con servator of the Freer Gallery of Art in Washington, we saw several important and famous bronzes and

paintings in Conservation, the latter being a

primary concern in the PRC. Through Tom's initiative we also saw testing equipment for radiocarbon analysis in Peking and learned that such testing was done also at Nanking University. Thermoluminescence was less well known or utilized as a possibly useful technique in determining, for example, the relative dates of Neolithic sites whose temporal relationship is uncer tain and disputed. Most of our Chinese hosts seemed interested above all in exchanges of technical infor mation about such matters as conservation and testing.

Archaeologists of the People's Republic of China regularly visit the field to learn as well as to instruct. Objects also travel back and forth for

study and testing. Comparative studies and perhaps most theoretical writing on a particular subject or site may take place at key archaeological institutes with study collections. We were able to look at important ceramics and bronzes with some of China's

leading archaeologists at the Archaeological Institute of Peking, for example. In November 1973, many known

pieces from Erh-li-t'ou (an early Shang site, possibly

the capital known in traditional texts as Po or

Western Po Ife ) were on view not in the Loyang municipal museum, not in the Honan Provincial Museum at Chengchou, but in the study room of the

Loyang Archaeological Institute. Here also were

many of the Loyang finds known from publications of the Chung-chou-lu excavations.

Archaeological sites have themselves become museums in New China, or have museums connected with them. Such is the situation at Chou-k'ou-tien out side Peking, visited by Richard Rudolph and others of our group (I was unfortunately hospitalized that

day). Among the best known of these site Museums is the early Yang-shao complex at Pan-p'o-ts'un outside Sian. Here a hangar-like building was con structed over a fraction of the ancient village site including part of its protective ditch, while a selection of Pan-p'o artifacts was on display with much explanatory material in an adjacent showroom. Two Han chambered tombs with painted tiles excavated in the '50s were moved from the cemetaries and reconstructed in a park at Loyang where one could

enter them and see Han painting in situ.5 (There was concern about the preservation of these early paintings underground, as they were not removed to a museum as had been done in the case of the Princess

Yung-t'ai's tomb paintings, replaced in the T'ang grave by copies.)

We were surprised and fortunate to be able to see archaeological work in progress at the new Neolithic site of Ta-ho-ts'un near Chengchou. This is important for its double layer of Lung-shan over

Yang-shao stratigraphy. It was taken then to be

possibly transitional between Yang-shao and Lung shan (see Kaoqu 1973: 6). An "armchair archaeologist" like me with chiefly art historical training can scarcely judge the quality of the fieldwork we saw in China. The gathering and recording of material would seem to be as careful as possible, however, even in salvage archaeology, which much of it is in China today where higher priorities exist necessarily in other areas of endeavor and where archaeological excavation waits upon dam construction, road building and agriculture.

There is relatively little official interest in China today in Buddhist art of in Chinese paint ing for its own sake. The Buddhist caves at Lung men near Loyang (we were unable to visit the Yun

kang caves in northern Shansi) are being preserved, and they are visited by Chinese as well as foreign visitors. Two of our greatest surprises, further, were the amount and quality of painting preserved in Peking, Nanking and Shanghai, and a delegation of experts in Chinese painting has been scheduled to visit the PRC in the Spring of 1977. The foreign religion of Buddhism and the painted expressions of a past elite are not, however, primary concerns at the moment. Questions about early China, on the other hand, are far more central in the current

Chinese reinterpretation of history, and it is in the study of the Neolithic through Han periods that current theorizing most eagerly awaits the work of the spade. Thus, further exchanges in the precise area covered in this journal might realistically be

hoped for.

High points of our trip for me were undoubtedly

seeing firsthand the urban and rural landscapes of

the Huangho and Yangtze regions of China and our

90

This content downloaded from 128.119.168.112 on Fri, 6 Sep 2013 09:14:12 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Page 4: ANCIENT CHINA IN NEW CHINA

meetings with leading archaeologists of the People's Republic (though there was never enough time, or in

rny case language facility, to get deeply into specific questions about the recent finds and their inter

pretation). Equally important was the early material

newly come to light. Of this we saw at least a selec tion "in the flesh." This experience will, I think,

require us in many instances to review or revise our still narrow conceptions of the variety of types and

styles possible within so large an area as China at

any given time. My notion of neolithic jade, for

example, as being undecorated and low or incomplete in polish was given a jolt by the sight in Nanking and elsewhere of highly polished (not to say glassy)

axeheads and a number of long tsung fif, "earth"

jades with geometric surface decoration - all from neolithic sites.

A major disappointment, no doubt unavoidable since we were treated most kindly as a whole, was

missing Changsha in the area of which so many

spectacular finds have been made since 1950. Anyang was also requested but not written into our schedule. Most of all we missed seeing the enormous Peking Historical Museum, still closed (since the Cultural

Revolution) for revision of displays and labels, for

there, in the capital must be housed most of the

unique and important pieces from the length and

breadth of China. The Historical Museum was apparent ly not open until October, 1975, when a group from

Toronto's Royal Ontario Museum was perhaps the first

foreign one to enter. Judging from more recent visits the Museum is now at least partially open.

Photography was not allowed in 1975.

One of the things we had hoped would result

from our trip was a slide archive to be housed, it

was thought, at the University of Michigan at Ann

Arbor, and ordered, selected and catalogued under

such headings as Bronzes (Robert Poor), Jades and

Lacquer (Dorie Dohrenwend), Architecture and Gardens

(Laurence Sickman), Sculpture (Sherman Lee), Painting (James Cahill), Museums (Thomas Lawton), Conservation

(Tom Chase), etc. We have exchanged slides and

photos among ourselves and with others on an informal

basis, and we have naturally used these in teaching and lecturing. Completion of the larger formal

archive is still, however, so far as I know, in

abeyance. It was suggested that such a thing would

be a form of publication. On this topic the last

word forwarded to us by Dr. Sherman Lee of the Cleveland Museum (our trip Chairman) was from Chu

Yung-hang, Deputy Director of the Bureau of Foreign Affairs of the Chinese Scientific and Technical

Association, who wrote: "It will be unsuitable for

others to publish photographs of Museums'collections before the owners' publication...it is advisable that in case you still have a few photographs in

question in choosing them for publication..., you

might send them to me and I would inquire the relevant

Museums on your behalf."

FOOTNOTES

1. Other groups have been able to hold meetings in the U.S. prior to departure. This is not essential, but it is desirable--for the division of tasks, collating lists, deciding who is to photograph what and with what film and camera, etc.

2. It is well when visiting the PRC to attend, in so far as it is possible, performances or other occasions to which the group is invited. At

Sian, after a particularly long day, only five of the twelve of us emerged for an evening of

revolutionary song and dance. When we arrived at the local theater we discovered that the twelve seats reserved for us in a row near the front had been kept empty, our three Chinese

guides with four others they had rounded up were

prepared to fill in our depleted ranks, and

that the whole performance had been held up

pending our (conspicuous) arrival, resulting in

the omission of a much needed intermission. We subsequently attended everything.

3. An interesting problem arose at Sian in the

bronze section of the Shensi Provincial Museum.

Questions as to whether the Fu-feng kuanq shown there and also a superb rhinoceros tsun

were originals or reproductions (the labels did

not say "Reproduction") elicited different

answers from two of our hosts. The Fu-feng kuanq must have been in Europe in 1973, on

tour with one of the two great exhibitions sent

abroad, and the rhinoceros tsun one would have

thought was in Peking. This was probably an

oversight in the labelling.

4. The question of how to repay kindnesses received

in China was often on our minds. We gave two

banquets (small return for the nine or ten

given for us), and some of us gave or later sent

articles or books we had written. The question of editing published works to be given as gifts to scholars and friends of the People's Republic

by deleting or obscuring possibly "objectionable" terms (such as Chinese Turkestan or, worse, Central Asia when Hsinchiang Province is meant) or references (as to the National Palace Museum

Collection of Taiwan) was apparently occasionally

discussed. Whether such adjustments have ever

been requested by the receiving side or not I

do not know.

5. See Jonathan Chaves, "A Han Painted Tomb at

Loyang," Artibus Asiae XXX, no. 1 (1968), pp. 5-27.

LIST 1 - Our Hosts in:

CHENGCHOU (Honan)

Tu Hsi-t'ang ^>-± , Head of Honan Cultural Bureau

^ flj \ Fu Yueh-hua ^ , Staff of Honan Provincial

Museum

Han Shao-shih \fjij Staff of Honan Provincial

Museum ft (ft\ HANGCHOU (Chekiang)

Chang lieh Jj, , Responsible Person, Chekiang

Provincial Cultural Bureau yffr

91

This content downloaded from 128.119.168.112 on Fri, 6 Sep 2013 09:14:12 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Page 5: ANCIENT CHINA IN NEW CHINA

Chleh Chih-yUan RPf , Responsible Person, Chekiang Provincial Museum >1 lf|

Li Tzu-yao^ 4" $i\ , Professor of History, Hangchou

University ^ H/ A <£. ^ 4* •

Chou Chung-hsia )£} 'f J| , Staff Member, Chekiang Provincial Museum :/tlj >1 |j} iL'f'P3

Chu Te-pan Staff Member Chekiang Provincial Museum. -/ffj jjf 4$ £%) 1 .

WangChi-ying >£ yfy , Staff Member, Chekiang Pro vincial Museum.

KUANGCHOU (Canton. Kwangtung)

Han Chien 3* , Deputy Director, Scientific and

Technical Association of Kwangtung Province /|| ^

h UK Vp f ®\ i . Hsu Shang-ch'ien ) , Deputy Director, Bureau

of Culture, Kwangtung ^ ft fa #j fa & •

Shang Ch'eng-tso]^| , Archaeologist and Professor, Dept. of Chinese Literature, Chungshan University

Li Sung-sheng ^ fa i , Instructor, Dept. of History,

Chungshan University 'f ^

Liang Ming-hsing If; ^ , Archaeologist, Kwangtung

Provincial Museum t$j- ^ ^ 4 •

Su Keng-ch'un ^ ^ ^ , Archaeologist, Kwangtung Provincial Museum.

Mai Ying-hao ^

, Archaeologist, Museum of

Canton^ <H| fl£ •

LOYANG (Honan)

Chiang Jo-shihi)-| tl , Assistant Director, Loyang

Municipal Cultural Bureau Vkr jx)

fa £ .

Hsu Ching-yuan1 Hi , Head of Loyang Station, Archaeological Institute, Chinese Academy of

Sciences if ft % t Vt\ $L \%

Chang Shu-hua Head Loyang Munjcipal Foreign Affairs yfc ^ i •

NANKING (Kianqsu)

T'ang Ch'ih , Responsible Person from Kiangsu Provincial Cultural Bureau 'jT~ /* Ji

/%)

Yao Ch'ien Head of Nanking Museum -7

Sung Po-yin p ^0 , Professor, Nanking Museum "if) ̂

Chao Ch'ing-fang^J "^j , Professor, Nanking Museum.

PEKING

Wang Yeh-ch'iu 3- Director, State Bureau for

Preservation of Cultural Relics ifi "at £ <K? ̂

Hsia Nai jl , Director, Institute of Archaeology, Academia Sinica (9, Wang Fu Ta Chieh), Peking

aft * Hi ft-1 • Chu Yung-hang ij< ^ , Deputy Director, Foreign

Relations Bureau, Scientific and Technical Assoc- of the PRC, Peking, People's Republic

of China (Erh li kou, Peking)1^

Wt Niu Chao-hsun ^ , Leading Member, Institute

of Archaeology, Acad. Sinica, Peking

f %rn fj |i a_ • Kuo Lao-weityJh , Deputy Director, Foreign

Relations Division, State Bureau for Preserva

tion of Cultural Relics, Peking 1^] %t %

x % if £) * f £-$)&£■■ Lu Chao-yin ^ fa , Archaeologist, Institute of

Archaeology, Academia Sinica ^ l§]i

if-% .

Yu Tsu-yuan X*, Staff Member, Ministry of

Foreign Affairs Pj- "A i] J- jji /\ \ .

Yu Hui-chun ^^ , Staff member, Foreign Relations

Division, State Bureau for Preservation of

Cul tural Rel i cs l£) % <L ^ *$1% /a) b\

■JatJ-'ffc A_|j . Hu Hou-hsuan"$/3/^ J[_ , Oracle Bone Scholar, Institute

of History, Academia Sinica vf tfi]^)j^ P1L> /#

Chou Yi-liang/^1 ~*

|c , Director, Department of

History, Peking University 3-t-^1\'jjrfi> [$L

Lu Tsun-e.'ft 5^. , Archaeologist (Paleolithic period)

Department of History Peking University 10 %3

i&vcjffc

92

This content downloaded from 128.119.168.112 on Fri, 6 Sep 2013 09:14:12 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Page 6: ANCIENT CHINA IN NEW CHINA

Li Yang-sung ^, Archaeologist (Neolithic period) Department of History, Peking Univer

sity ^ 7? ^ ^ "fe .

Tsou Heng Archaeologist (Yin and Chou), Dept. of History, Peking University^'i)-j£] iz .

Kao Ming , Archaeologist (Yin and Chou), Peking Dept. of History, Peking University.

Su Pai 15 , Archaeologist (Ch'in through T'ang),

Dept. of History, Peking University

^ tz .

Ni Meng-hsiung , Head of Foreign Relations

Section, Peking University .

Wu Chung-ch'ao , Director, Palace Museum,

Peking 3^ J, fif

Hsu Chih-ch'ao^ $s%if , Director, Restoration

Factory, Palace Museum, Peking 1'^ \\ .

T'ang Lan/^f. , Advisor on Bronzes, Palace Museum

Shan Shih-yiian -i 5L» , Advisor on Architecture,

Palace Museum ^ fttj .

T'ien Hsiu , Head, Painting Division, Palace

Museum «

Li Hui-ping . Advisor on Ceramics, Palace

Museum ^ /||| tf/j .

Liu Chiu-an fj hfe , Expert on Painting, Palace

Museum °

SHANGHAI (Kianqsu)

Pai Hsu (3 hSi , Shanghai Municipal Cultural Office

Jl 'fa -i-'ft/l 1 A_ . Wen Yuan-yu ;5Cj » Responsible Person, Shanghai

Museum jl f ^ ^ A, .

Huang Hsuan-p'ei ^ ^1/^, Archaeological Person,

Shanghai Museum Jl 7^ -^7$ ^ u ■

Li Chuan-ch1 lin \ , Conservation Department,

Shanghai Museum jl ^ f\

SIAN (Shensi)

Yii Che-chi "3" M Ta , Head, Shensi Provincial Cultur

al Bureau j ^ .

Ma Te-chih > , Member of Si an Station Archaeo

logical Institute, Academia Sinica l^j "32j-^

;jfc . ^

Yuan Chung-i /n , Archaeologist, Shensi

Provincial Cultural Bureau ^ ■£.%7 Tj Vt

Chang Po-1 ing Xfc. /*- , Shensi Provincial Museum, Exhibition Department

*)%%.

SUCHOU (Kiangsu)

Chou Liang jl] %- , Responsible Person, Suchou Mini

cipal Cultural Bureau 47-^'j SL1fc-/SJ ̂ •

Ch'ien Hsueh-an 'gT, Responsible Person, ^ Suchou Minicipal Museum >''! 'rp £}

\ A,.

Hsieh Hsiao-ssu'i^^ , Worker in Suchou Cultural

Research X 9L 3- 1T- ̂3 •

LIST 2: Members of the November 1973 Delegation,

Professor James F. Cahill, Department of Art,

University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720

W. Tom Chase, Chief Conservator, Freer Gallery of

Art, Smithsonian Institute, Washington, DC

20560

Dr. Dorie Dohrenwend, Far Eastern Department, Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S

2C6

Professor Virginia C. Kane, History of Art, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48104

Dr. Thomas Lawton (Liason and chief translator), Freer Gallery of Art, Smithsonian Institute,

Washington, DC 20560

Dr. Sherman E. Lee, Director (Chairman of the group), The Cleveland Museum of Art, Cleveland, OH 44106

Professor Robert J. Meada, History of Art, Brandeis

University, Waltham, MA 02154

Professor Robert Poor, History of Art, University of

Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455

Professor Richard C. Rudolf, Far Eastern Languages, University of California at Los Angeles, Los

Angeles, CA 90024

Dr. Laurence Sickman, Director, Nelson Gallery-Atkins Museum of Art, Kansas City, M0 64111

Professor Charles Weber, Dept. of Fine Arts, Univer sity of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90007

Professor Arthur F. Wright, Hall of Graduate Studies,

Yale University, New Haven CT

93

This content downloaded from 128.119.168.112 on Fri, 6 Sep 2013 09:14:12 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Page 7: ANCIENT CHINA IN NEW CHINA

LIST 3: More Early China Scholars believed to have

visited the PRC recently.

Lester J. Bilsky, Department of History, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little Rock, AR

Dr. Anneliese G. Bulling, 1903 B Humphrey Merry Way, Lynnewood Gardesn, El kins Park, Philadelphia, PA 19117

Professor Kwang-chih Chang, Department of Anthropology, Yale University, New Haven, CT

Mrs. Wilma Falrbank, 41 Winthrop Street, Cambridge, MA 02138

Dr. James (Chin-hsiung) Hsu, Far Eastern Department Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 2C6

Professor David N. Keightley, Department of History, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720

Dr. Max Loehr, The Fogg Art Museum, Harvard Univer

sity, Cambridge, MA 02138

Dr. Joseph Needham, F.R.S,, F.B.A., Master, Gonville and Caius College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England

Mrs. Jessica Rawson, Department of Oriental Antiquities, The British Museum, London WC1, England

Dr. Hsio-yen Sh1h, Curator, Far Eastern Department, Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 2C6

Mrs. Barbara Stephen, Associate Director Curatorial

Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, Ontario Canada, M5S 2C6

Professor William Watson, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, London,

England.

Liason Office of the People's Republic of China, 2300 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20008 (will accept applications, but direct

application to Chinese Academy of Sciences, Peking, PRC)

Guozi Shudian, China Publications Centre, P.O. Box 399, Peking, PRC

Natural and Social Sciences Section, Chinese Acaderny of Sciences, Peking, PRC

LIST 4: People and agencies for assistance in

contacting or visiting the PRC

China Exchange Newsletter, Committee for Scholarly Communication with the People's Republic of China (CSCPRC), National Academy of Sciences (ACLS, SSRC), Washington, DC 20418

Professor Chou Pei-yuan, Head, Scientific and Technical Association of the People's Republic of China, (also Head of Peking University), Peking, PRC

Chu Yung-hang, Deputy Director (Director: Pan Chun), Bureau of Foreign Affairs, Scientific and Technical Association of the People's Republic of China, Peking, PRC

Archie R. Crouch, Director, China Information Library, Newsbank, Inc., P.O. Box 645, Greenwich, CT 06830

Anne Keatley, Staff Director, Committee for Scholarly Communication with the People's Republic of China, National Academy of Sciences, 2101 Consti tution Avenue, Washington, DC 20418

COMPUTER RESEARCH IN ASIAN LANGUAGES

The computer research in Asian languages by Eric Grinstead is described in the Annual Newsletter of the Scandinavian Institute of Asian Studies 9 (1975). He has prepared an occurrence list of characters in 20 Chinese classics for a computer program, which has been written and run on a pre liminary basis. Four-corner numbers are added to all characters, together with Morohashi numbers and the modern pronunciation. Extra information for a polyglot dictionary, based first on Chinese characters, with all relevant codes, has been

compiled and now totals approximately 12,000 separate

characters. Cooperation with Dr. Ludwig Geier on his radical-stroke index to Lin Yu-t'ang's Chinese English Dictionary has provided new information that can be fed into the polyglot dictionary project. The following print-outs are available: English Index to the Classics, Karlgren-Morohashi Index,and Research Register for Asian Studies in Scandinavia. The computer research also includes a program on

magnetic tape that will draw maps and other shapes, to be excuted either on an oscilloscope (GT 40) or a Calcomp plotter.

94

This content downloaded from 128.119.168.112 on Fri, 6 Sep 2013 09:14:12 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions