Anatomy Trains

AN

AT

OM

IST

SC

OR

NER

B y T h o m a s M y e r s

Figure 1 IQ measures theintelligence of the nervoussystem (Figure 1A), EQmeasures the intelligenceof the bodys fluid system(Figure 1B), and KQmeasures the intelligenceinherent in the bodys fibrous(myofascial) system (Figure 1C).Photos 1A-1C used with kind permission of Dover Press.

80 M A S S A G E & B O DY WO R K J U N E / J U LY 2 0 0 4

Figure 1A

Figure 1B

Figure 1C

The Anatomists Corner is veering from its usualmessy paintbox of muscles to join with this issuestheme of Structural Integration (SI). This author hasbeen joyfully engaged with Ida Rolfs work and specifi-cally her 10-session recipe for nearly (gulp!) 30 years.

SI remains a genuine contribution to the larger endeavorwe could call SpatialMedicine the explo-ration of what canchange when we alter theclients experience ofinner space; in otherwords, actual structuralrelationships and theirkinesthetic propriocep-tion. The scope ofinquiry within the worldof Spatial Medicine isvery wide, consideringissues of evolution andmaturational develop-ment, authentic self-expression, the relation-ship between spatialarrangement and physi-ology, and, of course, thecomplex details of bio-mechanics (Rolf, I, 1977, Rolfing, Healing Arts Press,Rochester, VT). Osteopaths and chiropractors, yoga andAlexander teachers, Feldenkrais workers,Pilates and dance teachers, martial artists,somatically-oriented psychotherapists,athletic trainers and coaches, bodywork-ers of all stripes, and most especially theteachers of movement to children allthese and more labor in the vineyard ofSpatial Medicine.

All Spatial Medicine practitioners seekKQ increased Kinesthetic Intelligence.We are accustomed to measuring IQ, andwe are warming to the idea of EQ Emotional Intelligence. But KQ theintelligence of the moving body hasyet to be measured or mapped, with theresult that, especially in our body-alienat-ing culture, much of our KQ is wasted(see Figure 1A, 1B, 1C).

SI is one experiment in generating such body-centeredintelligence, with a method designed to balance and length-en the standing body around its gravitational line. This featis usually accomplished via a finite series of sessions ofdeep fascial and myofascial work undertaken over several

months. The goal is to progressively move the posturalarrangement from wherever the client begins toward adynamic and hopefully more functional state of balance.

Over the last five years, I experimented with, and thenbegan teaching, a new form of this recipe a 12-sessionseries that, I am convinced, brings increased clarity, logic,

accessibility, and creativityto SI practice. Have a look,and judge for yourself (seeFigures 2A and B).

Similar But Different

The AnatomyTrains Recipe(ATR) covers the

same territory the myofas-cia of theentire parietalbody asthe Rolf

Classic Recipe(RCR) and is

based on the sameprinciples. The

Anatomy Trains 12-sessionrecipe, however, bases itself

around coherent myofascially-linked complexes calledmyofascial meridians lines of tensile transmission

within the unitary and body-wide fascial net(Myers, T, 2001, Anatomy Trains, ChurchillLivingstone, Edinburgh).

This approach has the advantage of basingthe recipe on a logical unfolding of myofas-cial continuities rather than a protocol basedlargely on Ida said. To me, the new pro-tocol is easier to learn and retain, and makesthe journey from postural/movement assess-ment to treatment plan more accessible.

On the other hand, any change in some-thing as complex as Rolfs work runs therisk of throwing the baby out with thebathwater of making some essentialchange in the results obtained. The changesproposed here to the SI protocol seem, tothis author, to be minor, but telling,improvements, but I welcome critical think-

ing from my colleagues, publicly or back-channel.For those already familiar with Ida Rolfs recipe, let me

alert you to a few things before going any further: 1) Please remember that this version is offered in thecontext of the beginning student how the student

Figure 2 Ida Rolfs classic recipe is taught in variousStructural Integration (SI) schools, including the RolfInstitute (Figure 2A original 1958 logo for posturalrelease).The Anatomy Trains recipe is taught exclusively in theKinesis Myofascial Integration (KMI) program (Figure 2B).

Figure 3 Dr. Ida P. Rolf,Ph.D, 18961979, pioneer ofStructural Integration.

Figure 2A

Figure 2B

J U N E / J U LY 2 0 0 4 M A S S A G E & B O DY WO R K 81

BONY STATIONS MYOFASCIAL TRACKSScalp fascia

Mastoid process 12.11. Sternocleidomastoid

Sternal manubrium 10.9. Sternalis/sternochondral fascia

Fifth rib 8.7. Rectus abdominis

Pubic tubercle 6.Anterior inferior iliac spine 5.

4. Rectus femoris/quadricepsPatella

Subpatellar tendonTibial tuberosity 3.

2. Short and long toe extensors,tibialis anterior, anterior crural compartment

Dorsal surface of foot and toes 1.

practitioner can most easily attain a working understand-ing of the myofascial system as a whole and her intentwithin it; 2) the lower leg work that is concentrated inSession 2 of the RCR is spread throughout the first fiveATR sessions; and 3) look for the addition of a SpiralLine Session between RCR Sessions 3 and 4, plus a ses-sion devoted entirely to arms and shoulders near the end.

For those unfamiliar with the Rolf series, look at thefollowing as a map to unwinding the myofascial layersof the body.

The Anatomy Trains Recipe in General

The SI recipe based on the Anatomy Trains isdesigned to give the beginning student an accurateand inclusive map to the body and the progression of thesessions without stifling artistic or experimental inquiry.

The ATR defines a territory and a set of goals foreach session, leaving the specifics of application to theindividual practitioner interacting with the unique pat-tern of each client. Following is a skeleton of the ATR,

without the questions or palpatory assessments that areessential before developing an individual strategy forany given session. These assessments determine whereto start, what to emphasize, what are the specific goals,and how to know when you are done. Any recipe, inother words, is only a shell that needs to be filled withthe clients details before it comes alive.

Another general point is that these myofascial meridianscan be understood in three ways:

1) As a Line They can be portrayed as a simple geo-metric line (See Figure 4A) the most economicalline of pull, from one end of the line to the other,attachment to attachment.

2) As a Plane Each line especially the cardinal(front, back, and side) lines extends into the sur-rounding investing fascia blended into the specificmyofascia of the line. (See Figure 4B)

3) As a Volume The three-dimensional actuality ofthe muscles and fascia named within the line. (SeeFigure 4C)

Figure 4 Each Anatomy Trains line can be portrayed as a one-dimensional geometric line (Figure 4A), a two-dimen-sional plane (Figure 4B), or a three-dimensional volume of fascial and myofascial structures (Figure 4C). In the follow-ing summary of the recipe, the illustrations are drawn from various sources to show the variety in which the lines havebeen mapped. All pictures not otherwise attributed are drawn from Anatomy Trains, Elsevier 2001.

Figure 4A


a n a t o m i s t s c o r n e r

In other words, the Superficial Front Line (SFL) themain territory for the first session can be viewed 1) as ageometric pull from the top of the toes to the anterior hip,and from the pubic symphysis to the skull, and/or 2) as themuscles and associated fascia of the anterior compartmentof the leg (tibialis anterior, long toe extensors, tissue on theanterior surface of the tibia, and so on up the body), and/or3) as the superficial fascia (deep investing fascia cruralin the lower leg, fascia lata in the thigh, etc.) extendingaround the outer aspect of the structures listed in the tables,blending away from the lines myofascial specifics.

In practice, these three views of the line are combined,and the style and order for working with structures and tis-sues within the line vary enormously from client to client.In the first session, for instance, one person might require astrategy of working from the feet up, another might focuson the rib cage, with only minimal work being done else-where. One client might call for really deep movement oftissue, while another may need a sensitive introduction totheir own interior space. The method lies in unfolding thetissues as outlined below; the skill in the method involves

deeply sensing and understanding the client and theirimmediate, long-term, and even their unexpressed needs.

All bodywork is a conversation between two intelligentsystems. Any recipe ATR, RCR, or any other method-ological approach must defer in the end to the specificsof the conversation between practitioner and client.

Put in its most simple form, following is a summary ofthe Anatomy Trains.

Superficial sessions:Session 1: Open the SFL, differentiate Superficial andDeep Front Arm Lines from axial body. (See Figures 5Aand 5B)

Session 2: Open the Superficial Back Line (SBL), differenti-ate the Superficial Back and Deep Back Arm lines fromaxial body. (See Figures 6A and 6B)

Session 3: Open the Lateral Line, differentiate all four ArmLines from below, and open lateral aspects of the DeepFront Line at either end of the rib cage. (See Figure 7)

Figure 4C

Illustrationby Andrew Mannie

Figure 4B


Figure 5 The Superficial Front Line, plus the two FrontArm Lines, form the territoryfor the first ATR session.Computer graphic from Anatomy Trains video by Videograf.

Figure 6 The Superficial Back Line,plus the two Back Arm Lines, form theterritory for the second ATR session.

Figure 7 The Lateral Line, plus all the Arm Lines pictured above, form theterritory of the third session.This depiction of the Lateral Line structurescomes from a forthcoming collaboration between the author and PrimalPictures (www.PrimalPictures.com).

Figure 5B

Figure 5A

Figure 6B

Figure 6A



Session 4: Balance superficialmyofasciae for tonal balance ofboth right and left Spiral Line. (See Figure 8)

Core sessions:Session 5: Open the lower por-tion of the Deep Front Line(DFL), balance with Lateral Line.(See Figure 9)

Session 6: Open the trunk por-tion of the DFL, revisit FrontArm Lines, especially Deep FrontArm Line. (See Figures 10A, 10B,and 10C)

Session 7: Open the Deep BackLine (DBL), relate to DFL, atten-tion to inner bag (peri-articu-lar) issues of support from calca-neus to ischial tuberosities tosacrum to the mid-dorsal hinge(around T6 see Figure 11).

BONY STATIONS MYOFASCIAL TRACKSOccipital ridge/mastoid 1.

process/atlas/axis TPs2. Splenius capitis and cervicis

Lower cervical/upper thoracic SPs 3.

4. Rhomboids major and minorMedial border of scapula 5.

6. Serratus anteriorLateral ribs 7.

8. External oblique9. Abdominal aponeurosis, linea alba

10. Internal obliqueIliac crest/ASIS 11.

12. Tensor fasciae latae, iliotibialtract

Lateral tibial condyle 13.14. Tibialis anterior

1st metatarsal base 15.16. Peroneus longus

Fibular head 17.18. Biceps femoris

Ischial tuberosity 19.20. Sacrotuberous ligament

Sacrum 21.22. Sacrolumbar fascia, erector

spinaeOccipital ridge 23.

Figure 8 The complex loops of the left and right Spiral Line form the territory of the ATR Session 4, shownhere as a diagram and in list form.


Session 8: Open the neck and head portions of the DFLand DBL, relate to Arm Lines. (See Figure 12)

Integration sessions:Session 9: Promote tonal balance, complete movementand integration in the seven lines that run through thepelvis and legs, with an emphasis on stance and walk-ing. (See Figure 13)

Session 10: Promote tonal balance, complete movement andintegration in the nine lines that run through and aroundthe rib cage, with an emphasis on breathing. (See Figure 14)

Session 11: Promote tonal balance, complete movementand balanced integration in the four lines of the armsand shoulder girdle, with an emphasis on balancedshoulders. (See Figure 15)

Figure 10 The middle part of the Deep Front Line is the principal territory ofATR Session 6. Here we see A) a diagram showing the different tracks upthrough the torso, B) an interesting side (opposite) view of the relationship ofthe psoas and the diaphragm (developed by Rolfer Jeff Linn using the VisibleHuman Data Project data), and C) a view of the anterior longitudinal ligamentthrough a computerized translucent skeleton, drawn from the Anatomy Trainsvideo/DVD series.


Figure 10A

Figure 10B

Figure 10C


Figure 9 The lower part of the DeepFront Line (the myofascial core, consist-ing of the deep posterior compartment inthe lower leg, the adductors in the thigh,and the intrinsic muscles within thepelvis) is the territory for ATR Session 5.This depiction of the Deep Front Linestructures with a tracks and stationsoverlay comes from a forthcoming collab-oration between the author and PrimalPictures (www.PrimalPictures.com).

Session 12: Promote the balance ofthe deep muscles of the spine, andcomplete fascial tensegrity balanceacross the entire body, with anemphasis on deep adaptability in thespine (see Figure 16). Obviously, theATR is presented here only in skeletalform. In training, the details and thetechniques are filled in on many otherlevels.

Some QuestionsOK, I hear some of my SI colleagues

saying, if I look at the anatomy of thelines, this seems fairly similar to what Ilearned, but I have some questions.

1) Why add a Spiral Line session intothe series?

The Spiral Line loops aroundthrough the tissues of the Front, Back,and Lateral Lines, and therefore is asummary completion/integration ses-sion for the superficial myofasciaebefore heading into the core.

More importantly, Ida Rolfs recipestrongly emphasizes hinging (flex-ion/extension) actions in the body atthe expense of rotational patterns. Byloosening and resolving rotational/spi-ral patterns in the superficial myofas-ciae, the deeper patterns in the corebecome much easier to see andresolve. Without the Spiral Line ses-sion, the subsequent core sessions areless organized and more random.

2) Why spread the lower leg workthroughout the first five sessionsinstead of keeping the whole regionin one session?

The ATR is designed to deal with lon-gitudinal myofascial continuities. Eachcompartment of the lower leg is linkedwith its myofascial partners in the bodyabove. Thus, the anterior compartmentis linked to the quadriceps and FrontLine, the peroneals and the lateral com-partment to the entire lateral line, etc.

The lower part of the Spiral Lineaddresses the sling that runs from the

Mid-dorsalhinge

Sacroiliacjoints

IschialTuberosities

Heels

Figure 11 The concern of ATRsession 7 is the relation of the bonysupports up the back of the body,the heel, the back of the pelvis, themid-back, and the occiput.

Figure 12 Session 8 asks us toput the head on balancing theneurocranium (those bones sur-rounding the brain) with the visce-rocranium (the bones of the face,jaw, and voicebox).

Figure 13 Session 9 is about bal-ancing all the lines around the pelvisand legs.

Figure 14 Session 10 is about bal-ancing the lines around the torso insearch of an easy breath.

Figure 15 The ATR Session 11addresses all the Arm Lines (Figures5B & 6B) plus their functional exten-sions to the contralateral hips,pictured here.

Occipitalridge

Illustration byAndrew Mannie

Illustration byAndrew Mannie


pelvis under the arches, allowing forincreased support from the footarches before entering into manualdialogue with the bodys core tissues.

3) Why add an arm session into theintegrating sessions?

Why not? The arms have alwaysgotten short shrift in the Rolf series.This minor addition simply allowstime to give breathing integrationand the trunk its due, and the hand,arms and shoulders their righteoustime as well.

4) Whats this about fascialtensegrity in the final session?

Given that the ATR is basedaround these fascial continuities,and emphasizes helical spirals asmuch as hinges, the idea of going upthe body balancing only the hinges

(as in Rolfs classic recipe) seemedvery limited. We look instead foreven tonus along all these lines oftransmission, the Anatomy Trains(see Figure 17). You can explore theidea of fascial tensegrity atAnatomyTrains.net, and the idea is also very similar to what EdMaupin (in a forthcoming publica-tion) calls Expansional Balanceand Rolfer Jeffrey Maitland callsPalintonos (Maitland, J, 2004,IASI Yearbook 2004, TheInternational Association ofStructural Integrators; visitwww.theIASI.org for this new publication).

Some Final Notes

Whatever recipe is used,Structural Integration is a fab-ulous immersion course in the struc-tural body, in Spatial Medicine, indeveloping Kinesthetic Intelligence. Ican unhesitatingly recommend the SIprocess to anyone interested in thedeeper reaches of their bodys innerarrangement. SI is compatible withmost approaches to the body and

offers support to athletic training,performance-based arts, and

most forms of psychother-apeutic intervention, aswell as the more com-mon and global goal ofbiomechanical stressreduction.

Any prospective stu-dent of SI should scope

out the dozen or moreschools (see pages 1819),

as each has a different fla-vor. A fit between the stu-

dent and program is impor-tant for successful training.

I believe that the AnatomyTrains Recipe presents amore accessible and aca-demically acceptableapproach to the unfolding

of the SI process both

in training and in practice. Moreexperience and documentation willbe necessary to determine whatapproach works best. I look forwardto the ongoing process.

Thomas Myers has practiced integrativebodywork for nearly 30 years. He teaches work-shops internationally on anatomy, movement,and soft-tissue work. His book, AnatomyTrains, was published by Elsevier in 2001. Helives, writes, and sails on the coast of Maine.

M&B

Figure 17 Fascial Tensegrity seesthe bones as compression-resistantstruts, balanced and floating within acontinuous sea of restraining ten-sion from the myofasciae. Moreresearchers are working with model-ing the body in this way, and thesemodels have interesting propertiesthat mimic those of bodies.Althoughgeneral forays into tensegrity geome-try as the basis for living systemshave appeared in the scientific jour-nals (Ingber, D, The Architecture ofLife, Scientific American, Jan 1998),few have braved the challenge ofactually creating tensegrity modelsin our own image and likeness. Oneresearcher who has taken the plungeis the indomitable geometer ThomasFlemons, who lives on SaltspringIsland in Vancouver, and whose com-pany, Intension Designs, has beenworking with tensegrity applicationsfor more than 25 years.This is one ofmany models available via http://salt-spring.gulfislands.com/tflemons/inten-sion.html. Used with kind permission.


Figure 16 Taken as awhole, thesystem ofmyofascialmeridiansshows howthe combinedmuscles andfascia sur-round andsupport thebones like atensegritystructure.


Documents

Anatomy Trains