Upload
marc-chien
View
14
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
| 1
Analyze the 2013 China market, interview issues
and suggestions
Research and analyse by Marc Chien
| 2
Aim:
To achieve strategic telephone interview research, make a new view and strategy of China
market.
Purpose:
A whole picture of the China market from the interviews has been achieved in 2013. The
China team needs more support and seek good ideas for 2014. By analysing different
responses form firms’ owner type background, also have evidence to help the team to
understand the issues and solve them.
Analysing respond samples of ‘owner type’ can help the team better understand what kind
of business culture we are dealing with. China has it own unique economic structure; what
can the team do? What kinds of new samples do we need? What can we do to create a
better situation?
This analysis report takes business owner types as main centre focus to investigate how this
impacts on our interviews. In the future, how much and how far we can approach the legal
GC/manager/decision maker, because of the unique market structure.
Analysis
The analysis points from samples:
The firms’ owner types
Owner types vs. phone call result
Owner types vs. success interview
Owner types vs. refused interview
Owner types vs. unfinished- appointment interview
Compare the response in different type firms
Analyze the China top25 research firms
| 3
WIPO HC&HW Mix PO SO
91
32 31
189
492
The China samples - owner types
Category Quantities
WIPO( west investment - privately owned) 91
HC&HW(half state & half west investment ) 32
Mix (State + other Asia countries ) 31
PO(Privately owned) 189
SO(state-owned) 492
Figure 1 The China sample owner types over view
| 4
8 5 5
22
42
15 7 10
43
108
53
12 10
65
141
WIPO HC&HW Mix PO SO
Compare the response in different types firms
I R UF
Category stats
I (interviewed) R (refused) UF(unfinished -Appointment)
WIPO( west investment - privately owned) 8 15 53
HC&HW(half state & half west investment ) 5 7 12
Mix (State + other Asia countries ) 5 10 10
PO(Privately owned) 22 43 65
SO(state-owned) 42 108 141
Figure2 The response status in different types firms
| 5
WIPO HC&HW Mix PO SO
Success % 10% 20% 20% 16% 14%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
Success %
Category stats total Success %
I (interviewed) R (refused) UF(unfinished -appointment)
WIPO 8 15 53 76 8/76 - 0.1 10%
HC&HW 5 7 12 24 5/24 - 0.2 20%
Mix 5 10 10 25 5/25 - 0.2 20%
PO 22 43 65 130 22/130 - 0.16 16%
SO 42 108 141 291 42/291 - 0.14 14%
Success %
WIPO( west investment - privately owned) 10%
HC&HW(half state & half west investment ) 20%
Mix (State + other Asia countries ) 20%
PO(Privately owned) 16%
SO(state-owned) 14%
Figure 4 The successful interview firms' type in China
Figure 2 The response status in different types firms
| 6
WIPO HC&HW Mix PO SO
Refused % 19% 29% 40% 33% 37%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
Refused %
Category stats total Refused %
I (interviewed) R (refused) UF(unfinished -appointment)
WIPO 8 15 53 76 15/76 - 0.19 19%
HC&HW 5 7 12 24 7/24 - 0.29 29%
Mix 5 10 10 25 10/25 - 0.4 40%
PO 22 43 65 130 43/130 - 0.33 33%
SO 42 108 141 291 108/291 - 0.37 37%
Refused %
WIPO( west investment - privately owned) 19%
HC&HW(half state & half west investment ) 29%
Mix (State + other Asia countries ) 40%
PO(Privately owned) 33%
SO(state-owned) 37%
Figure 5 The refused interview firms' type in China
Figure 2 The response status in different types firms
| 7
WIPO HC&HW Mix PO SO
UF(unfinished -appointment) % 70% 50% 40% 50% 48%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
UF(unfinished -appointment) %
Category stats total UF(unfinished -appointment) %
I (interviewed) R (refused) UF(unfinished -appointment)
WIPO 8 15 53 76 53/76 - 0.70 70%
HC&HW 5 7 12 24 12/24 - 0.5 50%
Mix 5 10 10 25 10/25 - 0.4 40%
PO 22 43 65 130 65/130 - 0.5 50%
SO 42 108 141 291 141/291 - 0.48 48%
UF(unfinished -appointment) %
WIPO( west investment - privately owned) 70%
HC&HW(half state & half west investment ) 50%
Mix (State + other Asia countries ) 40%
PO(Privately owned) 50%
SO(state-owned) 48%
Figure 6 The unfinished appointment in China
Figure 2 The response status in different types firms
| 8
State-own firms
Figure1 is an overview about the business firms’ ownership structure in China. The Chinese market
has a very special economy type. The biggest of domestic business Shareholder is the government,
especially on transportation, banking, financial service, medicine, natural resources, telecoms, and
car manufacturing. State-owned business have 59% in the Chinese sample, however we only got a
14% interview success rate (Figure 4), 37% of the refused category is the second highest figure in the
China sample (Figure 5), the second lowest position on 48% (Figure 6) unfinished appointment,
which also means it is the second highest chance to approach state-owned legal department .
Of The top 500 firms in China, a large percentage are owned by the government (local /centre), and
a lot of these companies have a one $billion revenue on “Sharplegal” target. There are two main
types of business focus in state-own firms, focus 1, China/ local only; focus 2, attempt to become
an international and global firm, the reason for this is because the ownership type has an affect on
our interview results.
What is the impact? The focus 1(China/local only), most of them only use an In-house legal
department, the legal matters have to be done by very high level security, because they are state-
own business, and also the government has the highest legal authority; they can deal with legal
matters by department to department; sometimes they do not need any legal counsels. There are
some cases our interview has been refused, because they do not hire an external legal firm or do not
have a legal department.
Are there any other reasons why the Chinese interview team did not get more interviews from
states-owned firms? Yes, there is one more main reason, also shared with focus 2 (international and
global); it is about Acritas’s reputation, they did not know who Acritas is, many of them only have
limited English ability, and also do not have the time to read all the information from Acritas website.
The Chinese government has very powerful authority to make state-owned firms’ staff to be very
careful about opinions on company matters. They ask us to send a traditional mail or fax to
introduce Acritas and Sharplegal project. They do not usually fully understand who we are and what
we want for them, just by reading the Email or fax we send to them. When we present Acritas by
talking on the phone, they can get better understanding of us, better than Email or fax; however we
only can get a short window time talk to them, sometimes having to call back do it again and again.
There is also an issue, some of the firms do not use company’s personal Email or only provide a
general Email. They did not know about Acritas, they can’t trust us; because of the freedom of
speech is still very limited in these types of firms. If this project can be approved by any government
department/legal organization/ government owned organization, it will be a great bridge to our
project.
The focus 2 (international and global); these companies hire external legal firms; we also got a good
number to agree to our interviews. However, some of them already had been interviewed in the
past two years; they did not want to do it again. In the past the free report was only in English, we
did not receive too much positive feedback. When we had conversation with them, some of them
did not get free report Email, or some of them are too busy to read it or click the link and the
| 9
content of report did not fully satisfy. A few responders mentioned, they would be willing to buy the
report when they need it.
Privately-owned firms
Figure1, Privately-owned firms is the second largest number in the China sample, it has 23%. These
samples only achieved a 16% as second lowest success interview, 33% refused (Figure 5), and 50%
(Figure 6) as second highest unfinished appointment in 2013. This category still has a high number
of refused and unfinished appointments; successful interview figures are located in the middle of
figure1. In general over view of privately-owned firms, there is a 49% (16% success +33% refused)
chance of talking to the legal department, this is very close to the state-owned firms at 51% (14%
success +37% refused), the reach responders percentage was around 50% ,however successful
interviews (State-own / Privately-owned )was only 15% each. In this case, can any similar issues be
improved by combining them together?
According to the conversations with responses, about 50% of them were not really sure if it will be a
safe interview or not and would not make a decision immediately; they will say “call me back when I
get free time, then I will do it”, this could take months to get the final answer from them. Some of
them are curious about an overseas interview and free report and not fully convinced by who Acritas
is. The interview team deliver all the information and show the resource which we can get from
Acritas to responders, it still is not enough for them to trust us; it will then become a chasing game
without guarantee of an interview.
On the other hand, there is additional support information available online for the responder about
Acritas; there are some websites still not legal in China; for example: LinkedIn, Facebook, and Google.
They can’t use these sites legally; they can only use a backdoor program to go on them sometimes.
The freedom of media is still very limited when related to news, social media groups and external
internet channels.
In China, when the legal matters decisions relate to money and authority In China, when the legal
matters decisions relate to money and authority, the final answer will come from a very high level of
authority (owner/ big shareholder). Sometimes even legal GC/manager can’t make a final decision; if
you can have a relationship with the high authority then you will get a better chance to win the deals.
“The relationship” is a very important weapon which can make a business deal become much easier
and get better results. If there was a relationship between Acritas and government/ association/
academia, it will become much easier to convince and good support points to get ‘a foot in the door’,
to approach the decision maker.
| 10
8 5 5
22
42
15 7 10
43
108
53
12 10
65
141
WIPO HC&HW Mix PO SO
Compare the response in different types firms
I R UF
Category stats
I (interviewed) R (refused) UF(unfinished - Figure 2 The response status in different types firms
| 11
Analyze the China top 25 research firms
Top 25 main research companies in China, 2013
1. Ipsos (益普索) , location: Beijing http://www.ipsos.com.cn/en
2. TNS ,location: Beijing (Kantar group 北京特恩斯) http://www.tns-global.com.cn/
3. CVSC-TNSRESEARCH , location: Beijing (央视市场研究股份有限公司 CTR) http://www.tns-
global.com.cn/
4. AC-Nielsen ,location: Shanghai (AC 尼尔森中国) http://cn.en.nielsen.com/site/index.shtml
5. Horizon Research Consultancy Group ,location: Beijing (零点研究咨询集团) http://www.horizon-
china.com/?l=us-en
6. iResearch ,location: Shanghai (艾瑞咨询集团) http://www.iresearchchina.com/
7. HuiCong Research, location: Beijing (慧聪研究) http://www.hcr.com.cn/english/index.html
8. Dmworld ,location: Guangzhou (达闻通用市场研究有限公司)
http://www.dmworld.com.cn/eng/index.asp
9. GfK Group ,location: Beijing (捷孚凯市场咨询(中国)有限公司)
http://www.gfk.com/us/Industries/Pages/default.aspx
10. Intage China Inc ,location: Shanghai (INTAGE Group 英德知聯恒市场咨询(上海)有限公司) http://www.intage-china.com/yingwenban/
11. Sinomonitor International ,location: Beijing (北京新生代市场监测机构有限公司) http://www.sinomonitor.com/sinomonitor_en/
Appointment)
WIPO( west investment - privately owned) 8 15 53
HC&HW(half state & half west investment ) 5 7 12
Mix (State + other Asia countries ) 5 10 10
PO(Privately owned) 22 43 65
SO(state-owned) 42 108 141
| 12
12. Sino market research Ltd. ,location: Beijing ( 赛诺市场研究公司) http://www.sino-mr.com/cn/
13. Beijing Pan- Asia Market Research Institute (PAMRI) ,location: Beijing (北京环亚市场研究社)
http://www.pamri.com/English/index.asp
14. United Research China ( URC), location: Guangzhou (广州市致联市场研究有限公司) http://www.china-urc.com/en/
15. Diagaid marketing research , ,location: Shanghai ( 上海大正市场研究有限公司) http://www.diagaid.com/emain.php
16. DATA100 ,location: Beijing (北京数字 100 市场咨询有限公司) http://en.data100.com.cn/
17. Selection market research group (SMR) ,location: Guangzhou (赛立信研究集团) http://www.smr.com.cn/enindex.asp
18. All China Marketing Research Co. Ltd. ,location: Beijing (ACMR) (北京华通人商用信息有限公司)
http://www.acmr.com.cn/en/Advantages/About_us.html
19. Chear Mirror marketing research & consulting company Ltd. ,location: Guangzhou (广州明镜市场
研究咨询有限公司)http://www.cmmrchina.com/
20. OpenBook , location: Beijing (北京开卷信息技术有限公司) http://www.openbook.com.cn/EN/
21. Consumer behaviour research (CBR) , location: Shanghai (简博市场研究有限公司) http://www.cbr.com.cn/english/
22. Loya international, location: Guangzhou (诚予国际市场研究有限公司)http://www.dgchina.com/
23. Ims consulting group ,location: Shanghai (艾美仕市场调研咨询(上海)有限公司)
http://www.imshealth.com/portal/site/ims/
24. Datasea marketing research ,location: Beijing (北京勺海市场调查有限责任公司)
http://www.datasea.com.cn
| 13
In this analysis, it’s clear to see, there is a big space for professional legal research ,however some
media and legal associations have been doing small projects in the industry. (More detail can see
from “Sharplegal Project in the Chinese Market-It is time to make another move” by Ivy - Jing Qu)
| 14
Suggestion A
Acritas legal market service study co-seminar (China)
Aim: Support sharplegal interview team and build up company reputation within the
Chinese legal industry.
Purpose (Acritas):
In the Chinese sample, it is getting harder and harder to find the legal contact’s name and
phone number in order to reach them and do the interview. The companies’ switchboards
always ask us for the legal managers full name before they will transfer our call, or they
can’t transfer the call because their legal department have own direct phone-line and can’t
be transferred by the switchboard, we have to talk them directly. Most of time, we can’t
find any direct line from our online resources, some of the companies phone numbers are
incorrect on their own official website. Team China needs more accurate data. Team China
is seeking a new solution to improve the situation.
In general, In Chinese business culture and if the firm has a strong brand image, it will help
to open the door for future business. Because of the political culture, the state-owned
business or half western investment, the decision makers usually come from high level of
government management, it is very hard to approach them; the communication channel
usually is closed. If Acritas could build up a relationship with local Chinese
organization/media/ university, it could have some positive benefit to the shaplegal project.
The purpose of the seminar (enterprise & education sectors):
There are an increased number of Chinese companies expanding their business
internationally. At same time, they are also involved in wider legal matters which are related
to “Stock Listing”, “M&A”, “abroad law and norm”, “Intellectual property” and “commercial
contracts”. It starts from local to national then expands to International. To face the fast
moving business needs, how an in-house legal Department leader leads the team to become
stronger and improve efficiency.
There are more and more Chinese firms moving towards internationalization, whether it is a
domestic cooperation or overseas local matters; there is one main key point, which is the
cross culture communication, in-house legal counsels need some help to face overseas legal
matters and understand the legal cultural difference.
| 15
How about external law firms? What can they do to improve themselves to provide a better
Chinese legal market service? Such as satisfaction of expectations, a reasonable fee,
accuracy of the legal message, to have good knowledge related to clients’ industry matters
and provide high quality service. The legal department decision makers are looking forward
to having a good quality service from those law firms.
The purpose of this seminar can benefit legal sectors experience exchange. Whether the
legal cases are in China or worldwide, it could really help those firms’ needs in the future.
On the other side, international law firms can have a better understanding of the Chinese
legal market; the education sector can also take it into a study which is the future legal
market service, to help law students increase competitiveness.
Benefit (Acritas):
1) This co-seminar can hopefully help the interview team to get more accurate data,
also have a better project finishing time for 2014 shaplegal project (China).
2) Start to build up reputation and relationship with local firms in China.
3) To open potential new markets and clients in China.
4) New project for legal firms (international).
5) Take a market position(China)
| 16
Seminar (online conference video meeting)
Topic: The legal service market future trends and needs in future five years in China.
(Suggestion)
Hosting: Acritas, organization/media/ university in China
Location: UK. Acritas & China
Invited guests: Legal Dept. GC/ manager/decision maker
Consultants:
Legal service: International law firm/ senior legal consult
Education sector: university (UK/China)
Legal Dept. (firms): international firms’ GC
Process:
First stage: one to one telephone interview
Purpose: collect new data (shaplegal 2014+ seminar focus area) and analyze
centre questions
Interviewer: Acritas
Support partner: education sectors (send traditional invitation mails to the
enterprises)
Invited responder: The legal department decision maker (100 people)
Second stage: seminar meeting
Option one: Twenty (responders) as one group
The groups can divide by
“State-owned enterprises”,
“State-owned + western investment enterprises”
“Western investment enterprises”
Option two: One hundred (responders)
Location: UK vs. China or China
Meeting style: Video conferencing or face to face conferencing
| 17
Acritas
1. Accurate contact data
2. Reputation in China
3. Build up local relationship in China
4. Approach potential clients
5. Take a market position
1. Exchange experience with other
GC/manager
2. Exchange knowledge on
international legal matters
3. A across culture communication
in the international business
sectors.
There is an exclusive depth special
report on the media channel.
1. Study international and
national legal market needs.
2. Study a across culture legal
communication.
3. Support China legal industry, it
has good knowledge and global
connection to the market.
1. They could meet up with
potential clients.
2. Better understand what the
China legal market needs.
3. Build up local relationship in
China
Semina
University Media
International law firms Enterprises’ GC/ manager
Receive
Receive
Receive Receive
Receive
Telephone interview
Shaplegal interview
Co- host Co- host
Acritas
Education sectors International legal firms
Host
1. Mail Invitation (local)
2. Provide/ search more
local contacts
Sponsor
Co-partnership
| 18
Project role:
Acritas:
1. main host for the project
2. Propose the project to potential sponsor
3. Coordinate project
4. Telephone interview
International law firm:
1. Consultant in the seminar 2. Sponsor
Education sector:
1. Co-host project
2. Sending tradition mail, help to invite legal GC /decision maker
3. Local main host for the seminar (seminar location )
Media:
1. Support local commutation
2. Exclusive report
.