Upload
ngonguyet
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Analysis of statistics 2017
January 2018
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
2/60
Table of Contents Overview of the Court’s statistics in 2017 .............................................................................................. 4
A. New applications ........................................................................................................................ 4 B. Applications disposed of judicially and pending applications .................................................... 4 C. Processing of applications .......................................................................................................... 4
1. Pre-allocation .......................................................................................................................... 4 2. Inadmissibility or strike out decisions .................................................................................... 4 3. Communicated applications ................................................................................................... 4 4. Judgments ............................................................................................................................... 4 5. Requests for interim measures (Rule 39 of the Rules of Court) ............................................. 5
D. Priority policy ............................................................................................................................. 5 E. Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................... 5
General information ............................................................................................................................... 6 Number of applications allocated to a judicial formation ................................................................ 7 Processing of applications ................................................................................................................ 9
Country-specific information ................................................................................................................ 14 Albania ............................................................................................................................................ 14 Andorra ........................................................................................................................................... 15 Armenia .......................................................................................................................................... 16 Austria ............................................................................................................................................. 17 Azerbaijan ....................................................................................................................................... 18 Belgium ........................................................................................................................................... 19 Bosnia and Herzegovina.................................................................................................................. 20 Bulgaria ........................................................................................................................................... 21 Croatia ............................................................................................................................................. 22 Cyprus ............................................................................................................................................. 23 Czech Republic ................................................................................................................................ 24 Denmark ......................................................................................................................................... 25 Estonia ............................................................................................................................................ 26 Finland ............................................................................................................................................ 27 France ............................................................................................................................................. 28 Georgia ............................................................................................................................................ 29 Germany ......................................................................................................................................... 30 Greece ............................................................................................................................................. 31 Hungary ........................................................................................................................................... 32 Iceland ............................................................................................................................................. 33 Ireland ............................................................................................................................................. 34 Italy ................................................................................................................................................. 35 Latvia ............................................................................................................................................... 36 Liechtenstein ................................................................................................................................... 37 Lithuania ......................................................................................................................................... 38 Luxembourg .................................................................................................................................... 39
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
3/60
Malta ............................................................................................................................................... 40 Republic of Moldova ....................................................................................................................... 41 Monaco ........................................................................................................................................... 42 Montenegro .................................................................................................................................... 43 Netherlands .................................................................................................................................... 44 Norway ............................................................................................................................................ 45 Poland ............................................................................................................................................. 46 Portugal ........................................................................................................................................... 47 Romania .......................................................................................................................................... 48 Russian Federation ......................................................................................................................... 49 San Marino ...................................................................................................................................... 50 Serbia .............................................................................................................................................. 51 Slovakia ........................................................................................................................................... 52 Slovenia ........................................................................................................................................... 53 Spain ............................................................................................................................................... 54 Sweden ........................................................................................................................................... 55 Switzerland ..................................................................................................................................... 56 “The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” .............................................................................. 57 Turkey ............................................................................................................................................. 58 Ukraine ............................................................................................................................................ 59 United Kingdom .............................................................................................................................. 60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
4/60
Overview of the Court’s statistics in 2017 As was the case last year the Court’s statistics for 2017 disclose a higher number of incoming applications allocated to a judicial formation. This can be explained principally by an increase in the number of applications allocated coming from Turkey.
At the same time productivity increased spectacularly mainly due to large groups of applications that were adjudicated in particular concerning a few countries. As a result the Court was able to reduce the number of pending applications.
A. New applications In 2017 63,350 applications were allocated to a judicial formation, an overall increase of 19% compared with 2016 (53,400). 49,400 of these were identified as Single-Judge cases likely to be declared inadmissible (an increase of 36% in relation to 2016). Single judge applications continue to be processed as soon as they are identified as qualifying for such a procedure. 13,950 applications were identified as probable Chamber or Committee cases (a decrease of 18%).
B. Applications disposed of judicially and pending applications 85,951 applications were disposed of judicially, an increase of 123% in relation to 2016 (38,506). The number of cases disposed of exceeded those allocated by more than 22,500. As a result, the stock of allocated applications pending before the Court decreased over the year, by 29% from 79,750 to 56,250.
C. Processing of applications
1. Pre-allocation
As at 31 December 2017 the number of applications pending at this pre-judicial stage stood at 12,600, a decrease of 9% in relation to the same date the previous year (13,800). The number of applications disposed of administratively in 2017 was 22,650, a decrease of 8%. 61% of these files were disposed of for failure to comply with the requirements of Rule 47 of the Rules of Court (contents of an individual application).
2. Inadmissibility or strike out decisions
In 2017 70,356 applications were declared inadmissible or struck out of the list of cases by a Single Judge, a Committee, a Chamber or a Grand Chamber, a 92% increase compared with 2016 (36,579).
The Single-Judge formation decided 66,156 applications in 2017, an increase of 113% compared with 2016 (30,996).
In 2017, 2,282 applications were struck out by a Chamber or a Committee, in a decision, following a friendly settlement or a unilateral declaration, a decrease of 40% (3,772 in 2016). Friendly settlements (1,528) decreased by 24% (2,006 in 2016) and unilateral declarations decreased by 57% (754 compared to 1,766 in 2016). The remainder of the applications were declared inadmissible by a Grand Chamber, Chamber or a Committee or struck out by these formations on other grounds.
3. Communicated applications
In 2017 7,225 applications were communicated (a decrease of 24% compared to 2016 when 9,533 applications were communicated).
4. Judgments
Judgments were delivered in respect of 15,595 applications (compared with 1,927 in 2016 – an increase of 709%). A large proportion of these applications were joined, but the number of
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
5/60
judgments actually delivered was 1,068, an increase of 8%. 523 judgments (in respect of 2,664 applications) were adopted by a three-judge Committee formation (+ 69% compared to 2016). Committee judgments accounted for 17% of the applications decided by a judgment (50% in 2016). This difference in percentage is explained by the fact that in 2017 the Grand Chamber struck out 12,148 applications in a single judgment.
5. Requests for interim measures (Rule 39 of the Rules of Court)
The total number of decisions on interim measures (1,669) decreased by 28% compared with 2016 (2,313). The Court granted requests for interim measures in 117 cases (a decrease of 10% compared to 130 in 2016) and dismissed them in 533 cases (52% less than the 1,103 in 2016). The remainder fell outside the scope of Rule 39 of the Rules of Court. 70% of the requests granted concern expulsion or immigration cases.
D. Priority policy 1 The essence of this policy is to concentrate more resources on the most important cases, namely the cases falling within the top three categories (“priority applications”). At 31 December 2017 there were 17,860 applications in these categories (a decrease of 10% compared to the beginning of the year).
The number of priority applications dealt with at different stages of the procedure in 2017 decreased by 23% compared to 2016 (5,937 in 2016 and 4,594 in 2017). There are two main reasons for this:
• The first is that more than 6,000 Hungarian conditions of detention applications previously allocated to a priority category were sent to Single Judge after the Court found that Hungary had established a national remedy. These applications were declared inadmissible by a Single Judge and are therefore not counted in the priority productivity.
• The second reason is that the Romanian conditions of detention applications have been processed at a slower pace because of the pending pilot procedure.
36% fewer priority applications were communicated to the respondent Governments in comparison with 2016 (3,972 in 2016 and 2,555 in 2017). The number of priority applications declared inadmissible or struck out of the list of cases by a Chamber or Committee decreased by 15% (1,067 in 2016 and 905 in 2017). The number of priority applications struck out following a friendly settlement or a unilateral declaration decreased from 715 in 2016 to 479 in 2017. Despite the two reasons given above the number of priority applications giving rise to a judgment increased by 26% in 2017 (898 in 2016 and 1,134 in 2017).
E. Conclusion 2017 saw unusual fluctuation in the case-load as a result of a high volume of incoming cases in the first part of the year and a large number of cases disposed of over the last six months. The stock of pending cases which started the year at 79,750 rose to 93,200 in June and then was down to 56,250 by the end of the year. The difference between the figure in January and that at the end of the year is essentially the effect of cases being repatriated to the national system in one form or another (non-exhaustion of a new domestic remedy or strike out in the context of an on-going pilot procedure). The challenge of reducing the backlog of non-repetitive Chamber cases/priority cases remains. In this context the Court and its Registry have introduced new working methods and procedures intended to streamline processing and adjudication of this part of its case-load and will continue to review their approach to these cases in the coming year.
1 An explanation of the Court’s priority policy can be found on the Court’s internet site http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Priority_policy_ENG.pdf
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
6/60
General information
Table 1 General statistical information
63350 53400 19%
2017 2016 +/-
7225 9533 -24%
2017 2016 +/-
85951 38506 123%
15595 1927 709%
70356 36579 92%
31/12/2017 1/1/2017 +/-
56250 79750 -29%
26250 28450 -8%
25700 47500 -46%
4300 3800 13%
31/12/2017 1/1/2017 +/-
12600 13800 -9%
2017 2016 +/-
22650 20950 8%
5. Pre-judicial applications [round figures (50)]
Applications at a pre-judicial stage
Applications disposed of administratively
- by decision (inadmissible or struck out)
4. Pending applications [round figures (50)]
Applications pending before a judicial formation
- Chamber and Grand Chamber
- Committee
- Single-Judge formation
- by judgment delivered
1. Applications allocated to a judicial formation 2017 2016 +/-[round figures (50)]
Applications allocated
2. Interim procedural events
Applications communicated to respondent Government
3. Applications decided
By decision or judgment
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
7/60
Number of applications allocated to a judicial formation2
Chart 1 Applications allocated to a judicial formation per year
Chart 2 Applications pending before a judicial formation
2 Figures represent the total number of applications, including joined applications. The document generally gives round figures. The upsurge in applications allocated in 2002 was due to a change in working methods, transferring much of the screening of inadmissible applications from the administrative, pre-judicial phase to the judicial stage.
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
8/60
Chart 3 High case-count States
Chart 4 The Court’s total caseload by stage of proceedings and judicial formation3
3 The “Pending Government action” category was created to monitor applications following a judgment applying the pilot procedure.
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
9/60
Chart 5 The Court’s total caseload by priority category
Processing of applications
Chart 6 Major procedural steps in processing of applications
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
10/60
Chart 7 Number of judgments since 2002
Chart 8 Applications in categories I, II and III processed from 2014 to 2017
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
11/60
Table 2 Applications allocated per Contracting State and population
The Council of Europe member States had a combined population of about 831 million inhabitants on 1 January 2017. The average number of applications allocated per 10,000 inhabitants was 0.76 in 2017.
State
2014 2015 2016 2017 1.1.2014 1.1.2015 1.1.2016 1.1.2017 2014 2015 2016 2017
Albania 82 147 146 95 2896 2892 2886 2886 0,28 0,51 0,51 0,33Andorra 5 6 4 2 76 76 72 73 0,66 0,79 0,56 0,27Armenia 156 122 753 356 3017 3017 2999 2986 0,52 0,40 2,51 1,19Austria 315 261 236 228 8507 8576 8690 8773 0,37 0,30 0,27 0,26Azerbaijan 402 268 331 679 9477 9593 9706 9810 0,42 0,28 0,34 0,69Belgium 159 202 184 153 11204 11209 11311 11366 0,14 0,18 0,16 0,13Bosnia and Herzegovina 667 908 1030 866 3831 3825 3516 3510 1,74 2,37 2,93 2,47
Bulgaria 928 1031 882 582 7246 7202 7154 7102 1,28 1,43 1,23 0,82Croatia 1096 812 764 723 4247 4225 4191 4154 2,58 1,92 1,82 1,74Cyprus 55 32 33 31 858 847 848 855 0,64 0,38 0,39 0,36Czech Republic 370 340 338 385 10512 10538 10554 10579 0,35 0,32 0,32 0,36Denmark 66 44 47 58 5617 5660 5707 5749 0,12 0,08 0,08 0,10Estonia 187 190 206 156 1316 1313 1316 1316 1,42 1,45 1,57 1,19Finland 185 177 196 181 5451 5472 5487 5503 0,34 0,32 0,36 0,33France 1142 1087 916 887 65835 66415 66760 67024 0,17 0,16 0,14 0,13Georgia 102 80 74 89 4490 4490 3720 3718 0,23 0,18 0,20 0,24Germany 1026 789 676 586 80767 81198 82176 82800 0,13 0,10 0,08 0,07Greece 585 457 337 422 10927 10858 10784 10757 0,54 0,42 0,31 0,39Hungary 2403 4234 5568 1952 9877 9856 9830 9798 2,43 4,30 5,66 1,99Iceland 28 10 24 27 326 329 333 338 0,86 0,30 0,72 0,80Ireland 33 18 26 54 4605 4629 4725 4775 0,07 0,04 0,06 0,11Italy 5490 1885 1409 1374 60783 60796 60666 60589 0,90 0,31 0,23 0,23Latvia 298 244 255 275 2001 1986 1969 1950 1,49 1,23 1,30 1,41Liechtenstein 12 13 10 9 37 37 38 38 3,24 3,51 2,63 2,37Lithuania 387 376 405 401 2943 2921 2889 2848 1,31 1,29 1,40 1,41Luxemburg 23 22 38 38 550 563 576 591 0,42 0,39 0,66 0,64Malta 39 24 25 22 425 429 434 440 0,92 0,56 0,58 0,50Republic of Moldova 1101 1011 834 758 3559 3555 3553 3553 3,09 2,84 2,35 2,13Monaco 4 9 6 7 36 38 38 38 1,11 2,37 1,58 1,84Montenegro 158 129 165 138 622 622 622 622 2,54 2,07 2,65 2,22Netherlands 674 495 494 532 16829 16901 16979 17082 0,40 0,29 0,29 0,31Norway 141 73 90 123 5108 5166 5214 5258 0,28 0,14 0,17 0,23Poland 2747 2178 2422 2066 38018 38006 37967 37973 0,72 0,57 0,64 0,54Portugal 252 233 152 197 10427 10375 10341 10310 0,24 0,22 0,15 0,19Romania 4425 4604 8192 6509 19947 19871 19760 19638 2,22 2,32 4,15 3,31Russia 8913 6003 5587 7957 143667 143667 143667 143667 0,62 0,42 0,39 0,55San Marino 5 4 13 11 34 33 33 33 1,47 1,21 3,94 3,33Serbia 2786 1235 1330 1431 7147 7114 7076 7040 3,90 1,74 1,88 2,03Slovak Republic 324 353 309 425 5416 5421 5426 5435 0,60 0,65 0,57 0,78Slovenia 352 213 239 374 2061 2063 2064 2066 1,71 1,03 1,16 1,81Spain 642 552 627 669 46512 46450 46440 46529 0,14 0,12 0,14 0,14Sweden 272 212 138 150 9645 9747 9851 9995 0,28 0,22 0,14 0,15Switzerland 304 318 258 266 8140 8238 8327 8418 0,37 0,39 0,31 0,32"The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia" 382 362 339 345 2066 2069 2071 2074 1,85 1,75 1,64 1,66
Turkey 1584 2212 8303 25978 76668 77696 78741 79815 0,21 0,28 1,05 3,25Ukraine 14181 6007 8644 4387 45246 45246 45246 45246 3,13 1,33 1,91 0,97United Kingdom 720 575 372 415 64351 64875 65383 65809 0,11 0,09 0,06 0,06Total 56208 40557 53427 63369 823320 826105 828136 830929 0,68 0,49 0,65 0,76
SOURCES 2014 and 2017: Internet sites of the Eurostat service (“Population and social conditions” ).
Applications allocated to a judicial formation
Population (1000)
Allocated/population(10000)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
12/60
Table 3 The Court’s total caseload by stage of proceedings and judicial formation
State
Single Judge or
Committee (cat. VI - VII)
Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)
CommunicatedPending
Government action
Admissible TOTAL
Albania 4 308 213 0 1 526Andorra 0 0 1 0 0 1Armenia 36 1636 140 0 7 1819Austria 20 11 29 0 4 64Azerbaijan 4 1588 431 0 4 2027Belgium 14 263 42 0 2 321Bosnia and Herzegovina 77 467 93 6 34 677Bulgaria 70 429 108 0 16 623Croatia 34 211 250 0 7 502Cyprus 9 24 16 0 3 52Czech Republic 20 25 52 0 1 98Denmark 3 8 8 0 1 20Estonia 30 14 22 0 2 68Finland 9 2 3 0 0 14France 58 135 160 0 6 359Georgia 8 1753 161 0 2 1924Germany 64 36 56 0 11 167Greece 19 458 208 0 10 695Hungary 194 2305 1026 0 10 3535Iceland 3 30 9 0 2 44Ireland 1 15 2 0 1 19Italy 139 2203 2290 13 20 4665Latvia 64 60 34 0 4 162Liechtenstein 1 0 0 0 0 1Lithuania 34 54 106 0 8 202Luxembourg 1 3 3 0 1 8Malta 0 27 27 0 5 59Republic of Moldova 143 833 365 1 6 1348Monaco 0 2 0 0 0 2Montenegro 22 12 43 0 3 80Netherlands 77 99 36 0 0 212Norway 18 25 9 0 2 54Poland 141 654 603 0 5 1403Portugal 13 85 46 0 8 152Romania 266 983 3172 5481 18 9920Russia 697 3055 3763 61 171 7747San Marino 0 8 6 0 0 14Serbia 159 601 176 0 4 940Slovakia 83 66 42 0 11 202Slovenia 56 38 26 1 6 127Spain 62 24 76 0 6 168Sweden 16 7 2 0 2 27Switzerland 49 45 42 0 5 141"The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia" 16 184 109 0 4 313
Turkey 1214 4310 1920 0 74 7518Ukraine 301 5576 1193 0 42 7112United Kingdom 43 52 33 0 2 130
ALL STATES 4292 28724 17152 5563 531 56262
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
13/60
Table 4 Unilateral declarations and friendly settlements from 2015 to 2017
State
2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017Albania 1 2 14 10 2AndorraArmeniaAustria 2 7 2Azerbaijan 6 19 9 4Belgium 1 1 2Bosnia and Herzegovina 1 3 5 4 5Bulgaria 5 4 1 4 11 5 %Croatia 9 2 2 36 11 5Cyprus 1Czech Republic 5 2DenmarkEstonia 1 2 1Finland 1France 3 2 1 2 6Georgia 14 1 7 12 4 1Germany 2 2 1 4 1Greece 24 15 20 129 146 115Hungary 2 61 98 83Iceland Ireland 1Italy 1853 811 17 9 279 36Latvia 2 4 4 1 2Liechtenstein 1Lithuania 4 1 2 4LuxembourgMalta 1 1 2 1Republic of Moldova 4 3 2 5 1Monaco 1Montenegro 8 2 1 23 7Netherlands 1 1 2 8 2NorwayPoland 33 12 171 113 27 346Portugal 7 5 31 36 6Romania 116 110 46 168 353 221Russia 194 215 202 43 354 305San MarinoSerbia 9 3 1 291 5 32Slovakia 4 5 4 20 18 18Slovenia 1 1 1 1Spain 1 1Sweden 2SwitzerlandThe former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia' 5 10 2 19 26 5Turkey 18 65 52 139 103 65Ukraine 658 482 210 520 456 237United Kingdom 2 1 6Grand Total 2970 1766 754 1660 2006 1528
Unilateral declaration Friendly settlement
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
14/60
Country-specific information
Albania
Chart 9 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 10 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)4
0,8%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)308
58,5%
Communicated213
40,5%
Admissible1
0,2%
Total applications526
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
2015 2016 2017
147 146
95
79
44
56
99
25
11
22 22
0
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
15/60
Andorra
Chart 11 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 12 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Communicated1
100%
Total applications1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
2015 2016 2017
6
4
2
6
4
3
1 1
00
2
0
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
16/60
Armenia
Chart 13 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 14 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)36
2,0%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)163689,9%
Communicated140
7,7%
Admissible7
0,4%
Total applications1,819
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2015 2016 2017
122
753
356
178133
109
25 41 449 16 12
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
17/60
Austria
Chart 15 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 16 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)20
31%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)11
17%
Communicated29
46%
Admissible4
6%
Total applications64
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
2015 2016 2017
261
236 228
241 239 260
3316
257 11
27
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
18/60
Azerbaijan
Chart 17 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 18 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)4
0,2%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)158878,3%
Communicated431
21,3%
Admissible4
0,2%
Total applications2,027
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
2015 2016 2017
268331
679
124 136
210
106
164 168
30 5097
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
19/60
Belgium
Chart 19 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 20 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)144%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)26382%
Communicated42
13%
Admissible2
1%
Total applications321
0
50
100
150
200
250
2015 2016 2017
202
184
153
198
158
177
268
35
19 11 16
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
20/60
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Chart 21 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 22 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)77
11%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)46769%
Communicated93
14%
Pending Government action
61%
Admissible345%
Total applications677
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
2015 2016 2017
908
1030
866790
596
1449
52 881810 2 43
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
21/60
Bulgaria
Chart 23 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 24 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)70
11%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)42969%
Communicated10817%
Admissible163%
Total applications623
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
2015 2016 2017
1031
882
582
1176
907
622
10247 73
37 42 62
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
22/60
Croatia
Chart 25 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 26 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)347%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)21142%
Communicated25050%
Admissible7
1%
Total applications502
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
2015 2016 2017
812
764723
832
639
786
144 83 93
25 39 28
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
23/60
Cyprus
Chart 27 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 28 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)9
17%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)24
46%
Communicated16
31%
Admissible3
6%
Total applications52
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2015 2016 2017
32 3331
24
34
30
76
3
20
4 3
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
24/60
Czech Republic
Chart 29 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 30 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)20
20%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)25
26%
Communicated52
53%
Admissible1
1%
Total applications98
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
2015 2016 2017
340 338385
403
339
423
45
8 144 7 8
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
25/60
Denmark
Chart 31 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 32 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)3
15%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)8
40%
Communicated8
40%
Admissible1
5%
Total applications20
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2015 2016 2017
4447
58
4851
60
02
4
03 2
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
26/60
Estonia
Chart 33 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 34 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)30
44,1%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)14
20,6%
Communicated22
32,4%
Admissible2
2,9%
Total applications68
0
50
100
150
200
250
2015 2016 2017
190206
156
181
210
150
4 8 155 5 2
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
27/60
Finland
Chart 35 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 36 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)9
64%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)2
14%
Communicated3
22%
Total applications14
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
2015 2016 2017
177
196
181
256
157
217
6 2 07 1 2
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
28/60
France
Chart 37 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 38 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)58
16%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)13538%
Communicated16044%
Admissible6
2%
Total applications359
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
2015 2016 2017
1087
916887
1156
874 909
10358 63
33 27 17
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
29/60
Georgia
Chart 39 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 40 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)8
0,4%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)175391,1%
Communicated161
8,4%
Admissible2
0,1%
Total applications1,924
0
50
100
150
200
250
2015 2016 2017
8074
89
197
148
232
47
76
25
4 412
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
30/60
Germany
Chart 41 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 42 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)64
38%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)36
22%
Communicated56
33%
Admissible117%
Total applications167
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
2015 2016 2017
789
676
586
901
658 621
23 48 1912 19 19
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
31/60
Greece
Chart 43 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 44 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)193%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)45866%
Communicated20830%
Admissible101%
Total applications695
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
2015 2016 2017
457
337
422
670
455388
118
275
186
9465 43
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
32/60
Hungary
Chart 45 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 46 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)194
5,5%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)230565,2%
Communicated102629%
Admissible10
0,3%
Total applications3,535
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
2015 2016 2017
4234
5568
1952
13631125
7353
478 498330
88 100 26
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
33/60
Iceland
Chart 47 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 48 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)3
7%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)30
68%
Communicated9
20%
Admissible2
5%
Total applications44
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2015 2016 2017
10
2427
11
15
64
7
3
10
7
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
34/60
Ireland
Chart 49 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 50 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)1
5%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)15
79%
Communicated2
11%
Admissible1
5%
Total applications19
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2015 2016 2017
18
26
54
16
19
45
05
10 02
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
35/60
Italy
Chart 51 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 52 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)1393%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)220347,2%
Communicated229049,1%
Pending Government action
130,3%
Admissible20
0,4%
Total applications4,665
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
2015 2016 2017
1885
1409 1374
4438
2695
19731848
763
1441
25 35 133
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
36/60
Latvia
Chart 53 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 54 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)64
40%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)60
37%
Communicated34
21%
Admissible4
2%
Total applications162
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
2015 2016 2017
244 255275
406
228
261
21 2067
17 20
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
37/60
Liechtenstein
Chart 55 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 56 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)1
100%
Total applications1
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
2015 2016 2017
13
109
16
14
8
10 0
2
10
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
38/60
Lithuania
Chart 57 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 58 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)34
17%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)54
27%
Communicated10652%
Admissible8
4%
Total applications202
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
2015 2016 2017
376
405 401
278
453 451
10
5576
21 22 33
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
39/60
Luxembourg
Chart 59 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 60 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committeecat. VI - VII
112%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
cat. I - V3
37%
Communicated3
38%
Admissible1
13%
Total applications8
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2015 2016 2017
22
38 38
2422
52
2
6
11
0 1
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
40/60
Malta
Chart 61 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 62 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)27
46%
Communicated27
46%
Admissible5
8%
Total applications59
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2015 2016 2017
24 25
22
30
141516
19
9
7
10
5
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
41/60
Republic of Moldova
Chart 63 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 64 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)143
10,6%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)833
61,8%
Communicated365
27,1%
Pending Government action
10,1%
Admissible6
0,4%
Total applications1,348
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
2015 2016 2017
1011
834758
926
750
633
121
41 6720 27 17
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
42/60
Monaco
Chart 65 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 66 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)2
100%
Total applications2
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2015 2016 2017
9
6
7
8
5
8
1
0 00 0
1
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
43/60
Montenegro
Chart 67 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 68 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)22
27%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)12
15%
Communicated43
54%
Admissible3
4%
Total applications80
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
2015 2016 2017
129 165 138
452
220
154
47
23137 4 16
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
44/60
Netherlands
Chart 69 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 70 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)77
36%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)99
47%
Communicated36
17%
Total applications212
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
2015 2016 2017
495 494532552
500
573
19 12 240 11 3
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
45/60
Norway
Chart 71 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 72 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)18
33%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)25
46%
Communicated9
17%
Admissible2
4%
Total applications54
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
2015 2016 2017
73
90
123
7887
129
2 721 3 3
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
46/60
Poland
Chart 73 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 74 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)14110%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)654
46,6%
Communicated60343%
Admissible5
0,4%
Total applications1,403
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
2015 2016 2017
2178
2422
2066
2253 2246
2446
760
68
404
31 29 20
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
47/60
Portugal
Chart 75 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 76 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)139%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)85
56%
Communicated46
30%
Admissible8
5%
Total applications152
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
2015 2016 2017
233
152
197
169
269
209
91
14 2520 3314
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
48/60
Romania
Chart 77 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 78 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)266
2,7%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)983
9,9%
Communicated317232%
Pending Government action548155,3%
Admissible18
0,2%
Total applications9,920
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
2015 2016 2017
4604
8192
6509
4180 4089 3767
880
2195
495260 259 214
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
49/60
Russian Federation
Chart 79 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 80 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)6979%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)305539%
Communicated376349%
Pending Government action
610,8%
Admissible171
2,2%
Total applications7,747
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
2015 2016 2017
60035587
7957
65526365
6889
1331
1765 1953
160645
1156
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
50/60
San Marino
Chart 81 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 82 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)8
57%
Communicated6
43%
Total applications14
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
2015 2016 2017
4
13
11
6
5
10
10
6
10
1
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
51/60
Serbia
Chart 83 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 84 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)159
16,9%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)601
63,9%
Communicated176
18,7%
Admissible4
0,4%
Total applications940
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
2015 2016 2017
1235 13301431
2491
1220
1594
180 7692121 66 37
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
52/60
Slovakia
Chart 85 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 86 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)83
41%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)66
33%
Communicated42
21%
Admissible115%
Total applications202
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
2015 2016 2017
353
309
425
344318
377
2942 47
15 10 18
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
53/60
Slovenia
Chart 87 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 88 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)56
44,1%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)38
29,9%
Communicated26
20,5%
Pending Government action
10,8%
Admissible6
4,7%
Total applications127
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
2015 2016 2017
213 239
374
248
299
1818
16 18 715 4 13
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
54/60
Spain
Chart 89 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 90 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)62
37%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)24
14%
Communicated76
45%
Admissible6
4%
Total applications168
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
2015 2016 2017
552
627
669
668
557
635
25 1652
418 7
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
55/60
Sweden
Chart 91 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 92 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)16
59%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)7
26%
Communicated2
8%
Admissible2
7%
Total applications27
0
50
100
150
200
250
2015 2016 2017
212
138 150
211
141
154
4 8 16 4 1
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
56/60
Switzerland
Chart 93 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 94 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)49
35%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)45
32%
Communicated42
30%
Admissible5
3,5%
Total applications141
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
2015 2016 2017
318
258266
321
230
263
19 15 1811 10 10
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
57/60
“The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”
Chart 95 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 96 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)16
5,1%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)184
58,8%
Communicated109
34,8%
Admissible4
1,3%
Total applications313
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
2015 2016 2017
362 339 345
328 321286
38
65 59
12 16 10
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
58/60
Turkey
Chart 97 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 98 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)121416%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)431057%
Communicated192026%
Admissible741%
Total applications7,518
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
2015 2016 2017
2212
8303
25978
30604042
30063
2141499 1005
158 118991
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
59/60
Ukraine
Chart 99 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 100 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)3014%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)557678%
Communicated119317%
Admissible421%
Total applications7,112
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
2015 2016 2017
6007
8644
43875712
4188 2975
8828
1326288
81 116
12438Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2017
60/60
United Kingdom
Chart 101 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 102 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)43
33%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)52
40%
Communicated33
25%
Admissible2
2%
Total applications130
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
2015 2016 2017
575
372 415
533
360
507
3814 4
1028
395
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered