Analysis of Multi-Storey Steel Buildings - IJOAR Journals · Analysis of Multi-Storey Steel Buildings ... Even though a multi storey building is three ... analysis of globally stable

International Journal of Advance Research, IJOAR .org ISSN нонлπфмлл

IJOAR© 2013 http://www.ijoar.org

International Journal of Advance Research, IJOAR .org Volume 1, Issue 1, January 2013, Online: ISSN нонлπфмлл

Analysis of Multi-Storey Steel Buildings R.M.Shotorbani, Dr.S.Lavanya Devi

ABSTRACT

The paper presents world stability of two distinctive structural systems for a twenty five - storey high steel building. The systems will be with rigid and the systems which are hinged joint connections between beams and columns in the steel structure. The discussion focuses on the fundamental structure which was designed only to hold vertical masses, and on the corresponding structure which was stable with vertical bracings in the façade walls. This paper also shows couple of steps of executions

KeyWords

steel structure, global stability, vertical bracings, multi-storey building, space frame belt truss.

1



INTRODUCTION

One of the most characteristics of multi-storey buildings in steel, which incorporates a great influence

on the global stability of the building, may be a low stiffness of the most load bearing structure, which may be a consequence of the small

cross-sections of the support components of steel, the small base of the building compared to its height, principally massive free spaces with-

in the building of lightweight walls and façades. The large values of horizontal forces, especially the seismal forces, in cases of the buildings

with larger heights, could disturb their global stability and safety of people staying in them. There upon in mind, the worldwide stability of

the building which becomes a priority for the design and the construction those buildings are notably in seismal active areas. Planning the

appropriate form of structural systems, those have an adequate bracing system, is very important not just for structural safety, but additionally

its efficiency and speed of construction and mounting of its elements. the selection of the proper method of bracing is of civil authority im-

portance to the structural style and should even govern the whole style conception of a high-rise building.

Bracing system provides the required rigidity and international stability of the building, and is thus associate integral part of most structural

systems in steel. In several cases it represents the whole structural system. Stiffening system plays an important role of reception of horizontal

forces functioning on associate object and their transmission to the foundation and soil. It prevents excessive of horizontal deflection and also

limits vibrations of the tall buildings. This system undoubtedly incorporates a sizeable influence on the global stability of the building and is

additionally one in all the few factors that can be influenced so as to increase global rigidity and in this means improve the soundness of the

building. For achieving the world stability of the analyzed three-dimensional procedure models of the building, in the sensible a part of this

work, the stiffening system with vertical bracings and belt trusses was applied.

PROBLEM DISCUSSION

The multi storey building usually accommodates beams and columns, either rigidly connected or having straightforward end connections

besides diagonal bracing to produce stability. Even though a multi storey building is three-dimensional, it always is intended to be much stiff-

er in one direction than in the other; so it should fairly be treated as a series of plane frames. However, if the framing is specified the behavior

of the members in one plane well influences the behavior in another plane, the frame should be treated as a three-dimensional house frame

[3].

This paper is associate example of world stability for twenty five - structure high steel building, with 2 distinctive structural systems - the

system with rigid and also the system with the hinged joint of connections between beams and columns within the steel structure (in further

the text rigid systems and the hinged systems).

In each case there have been rigid connections between columns and foundation. The analysis was performed on the three-dimensional com-

putational models of the building, using Finite component methodology. The aim of the paper was to broaden the information and to realize a

deeper understanding of the behavior of those structural systems in house during the seismic load and eventually to grant advantage for prac-

tical use of one treated system.

First, the fundamental structural systems are analyzed. The systems are designed for receiving only the vertical hundreds. After that, style and

analysis of globally stable structural systems was started, in several steps, by laying the vertical bracings within the façade walls. Bracings

are disposed only within the façade walls for branch of knowledge reasons, to not disturb the utilization of the interior area. Often, it is more

advantageous to install the bracing within the external walls, as elimination structural restrictions on the liberty of internal layout [4].

The maximimum work is horizontal deflections of the building attributable to seismic forces in 2 orthogonal directions (X and Y) are tested,

moreover as the natural periods of vibrations of the building within the same directions (T1x and T1y). The analysis of the systems are con-

2



sidered to be stable when the maximum horizontal deflections are within the limits given by The Serbian Rules for the Technical Standards in

Construction of Buildings in seismic Active Areas, H/600 (H-building height), this case is 15,17 cm, and when the state of strain and stress in

all elements of the structure was among tolerable limits.

BUILDING STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION

The analyzed building has rectangular formed base with dimensions 40x45m. The height of the building is ninety one m. There are two

basement floors, the ground floor and twenty five floors above. construction height is three,5 m. Axial distance between columns in both or-

thogonal directions is 5,0 m. in the central part there's a strengthened - concrete core with dimensions in the base 5x10 m and 25 cm thickness

in walls. Between the main columns on the façade there are the façade columns that extend through all storeys above bottom floor. All beams

in the floor structure have a similar rank and that they are connected on to main columns. The cross-sections of beams are classic I profiles

and therefore the cross-section of columns are 2 connected IPB profile. each floor has monolithic, sixteen cm thick strengthened - concrete

block. the foundation structure was sculpturesque as a full foundation block on elastic base, thickness of 1 m. Foundation depth is seven m.

The basement floors have strengthened concrete walls 0, 5 m thick, which extend around the base. The concrete classes are MB30, and steel

is S235.

BASIC SYSTEMS

During the look of the essential structural systems the minimum needed dimensions of steel and concrete elements are adopted, in order to

receive solely vertical masses, both for the system with hinged, and therefore the system with rigid joint connections. Later, the modal analy-

sis was done and therefore the natural periods of vibrations for each orthogonal directions of the building are calculated (T1x and T1y). Then

the unstable design was done. unstable forces are calculated for 2 orthogonal directions, X and Y, in line with the tactic of Equivalent Static

masses for the level of seismic intensity VIII. The building structure was classified in construction with flexible ground floor (Kp = 2), as a

result of the larger rigidity of the structure higher than ground floor, with existence of façade columns in other floors.

The discusion of the basic structural systems was performed to found what are their dynamic characteristics and sizes of horizontal displace-

ments because of earthquakes and also to see the state of stress within the structure when the seismal load. Table below presents the results of

this analysis.

In the following, bracings which will offer the worldwide stability of the essential structural systems are designed up to the amount that was

set in the introduction.

3



STABILIZED SYSTEMS

Bearing in mind that the analyzed basic structural systems are terribly versatile, having high values natural periods for vibrations and signifi-

cantly the higher horizontal displacements than allowable ones, it absolutely was set to make bracings entirely of crossed diagonals which

will be stiffly connected to the bracing nodes. The stiffness of lattice girder will be accumulated by constructing it with rigid joints, so that a

mixture of lattice and rigid framework is obtained [4].

This decision is predicated on the previous experience and data concerning the problems of high-rise steel building the stability. The kind of

bracings represents the stiffening system combined of a truss and rigid frame, in several times a statical indeterminate structure and much

more efficient in stiffening the multistory steel buildings [1]. The bracings are placed only in façade walls. The crosssection of diagonal brac-

ings it is 2U profiles connected as a box. In the following, the three-dimensional models with bracings are designed, for both the rigid and the

hinged system. it absolutely was worn out many steps with an equivalent arrangement of bracings in both systems. during this work results of

modal analysis and the values of maximum horizontal deflection designed in seismic forces are examined because it was done for the fun-

damental structural systems.

STEP – 1

In the beginning the class of the concrete components was exaggerated to MB40, as well as the thickness of strengthened - concrete core

walls to 30 cm. Bracings are placed as in Figure one in all façade walls and cross-sections of diagonal bracings are 2U200. Then the analysis

of the free oscillations and the seismic design would be done.

Vertical bracings experience the ground floor, therefore ground floor was no longer thought of to be flexible, and plasticity and damping con-

stant Kp for seismic forces are Kp=1,6, since the natural period of vibrations was bigger than a pair of,0 seconds. This value for Kp was kept

until the end of the analysis. The analysis, as already mentioned, included each style of structural systems, hinged and rigid. The Table a pair

of presents the results of this analysis.

4



Fig. Vertical bracings for Step – 1

STEP – 2

In the second step vertical bracings of an equivalent sort and size are supplementary in the middle

of the façade walls, as Figure a pair of shows. an equivalent analysis was performed and therefore the results are shown in Table


5



Step – 3

Since the vertical bracings accessorial to the façade walls within the Step 2 failed to have a greater effect, it absolutely was set to line belt

trusses around sure storeys, as in Figure.


6



Step – 4

Bearing in mind that belt trusses more within the previous step are very efficient, the following systems are shaped by placing further belt

trusses around every third floor, as in Figure. Cross-section of diagonal bracings was multiplied to 2U300. During this means the maximum

horizontal deflections in building in each treated structural systems are taken to the limit allowed. the state of the stress in some steel ele-

ments was not in tolerable limits, cross-sections of those elements are multiplied. Analysis results square measure presented in Table.


7



The following Table half dozen shows the size of the columns for both treated structural systems that are adopted at the beginning of the

analysis for the basic structural systems and at the top of the analysis for stabilized structural systems.

In the Table we see that adopted cross-sections of the columns are identical for both systems examined at the beginning of the analysis, still

as for stiffened structural systems obtained at the tip of the analysis. During the work, until the tip of research when spatially stable structural

systems are formed in category of the concrete core was accrued from MB30 to MB40 still as the wall thickness from 25 cm to 30 cm. Also

increased the cross-sections of façade columns from 2U200 to 2U300. The adopted cross-sections of diagonal bracings area unit 2U300. Di-

mensions of beams within the system with hinged joint connections are retained on I260, whereas within the rigid system the cross-sections

of beams are increased to I320 and I340.

CONCLUSION

The structural systems designed in the iterations satisfy the wants for global stability, they're still thought-about quite flexible, thanks to the

tiny sizes of the adopted structural elements, which will show the values of obtained most horizontal displacements.

8



REFERENCES

[1] Milisav Damnjanovic, et al (Vol. 10, No 1, 2012, pp. 85 - 96) COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF GLOBAL STABILITY OFTHE TYPI-

CAL STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS OF MULTI-STOREY STEEL BUILDINGS, Architecture and Civil Engineering.

[2] Cilic, et al,(2011 pg 55-60) POSITIVE EFFECTS OF OUTRIGGER TRUSSES, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, NIS Uni-

versity, International Conference "Innovation as a Function of Engineering Development".

[3] C.G. Salmon, et al (1996) STEEL STRUCTURES, DESIGN AND BEHAVIOR, By Prentice Hall.

[4] F. Hart, et al (1978) MULTI - STOREY BUILDINGS IN STEEL, Publishing by Granada .

9

Documents

Analysis of Multi-Storey Steel Buildings - IJOAR Journals · Analysis of Multi-Storey Steel Buildings ... Even though a multi storey building is three ... analysis of globally stable